DOCSLIB.ORG

Waimakariri Tributary Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Waimakariri Tributary Report Waimakariri tributary report Report No. R09/11 ISBN 978-1-86937-927-8 Taryn Wilks Adrian Meredith February 2009 Report R09/11 ISBN 978-1-86937-927-8 58 Kilmore Street PO Box 345 Christchurch 8140 Phone (03) 365 3828 Fax (03) 365 3194 75 Church Street PO Box 550 Timaru 7940 Phone (03) 687 7800 Fax (03) 687 7808 Website: www.ecan.govt.nz Customer Services Phone 0800 324 636 Waimakariri tributary report 2008 Executive summary Water quality in the lower Waimakariri catchment, including Cam, Cust, Ohoka, Kaiapoi, Courtenay, South Branch/Otukaikino and the Styx Rivers have been monitored since 2000 by Environment Canterbury. Cessation of waste water discharge in 2005 and the initiatives to improve discharge methods of both Waimakariri District Council and Christchurch City Council have yielded significant water quality improvements in the Cam River and South Branch/Otukaikino. Water quality in the Ohoka, Cust and Styx Rivers has remained in a steady state, while water quality in the Kaiapoi River has shown signs of degradation. Concentrations of faecal indicator bacteria in Waimakariri tributary streams regularly exceed the contact recreation guideline of 550 MPN/100ml, resulting in very poor contact recreational grades. The sources are likely to be a mixture of natural (wildlife), agricultural (livestock), and discharges, but exclusion of livestock from stream banks and springheads hold most promise for reduced concentrations. High nitrogen concentrations are also an ongoing issue, and it is therefore recommended that monitoring of these tributaries (both water quality and ecosystem health) is continued. Additionally an investigation into declining water quality in the Kaiapoi River is recommended. Environment Canterbury Technical Report i Waimakariri tributary report 2008 ii Environment Canterbury Technical Report Waimakariri tributary report 2008 Table of contents Executive summary .................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 1 2 Methods ........................................................................................................... 1 2.1 Data analysis .................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Trend analysis ................................................................................................................. 4 3 Results ............................................................................................................. 5 3.1 Water physico-chemistry ................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Nutrients .......................................................................................................................... 6 3.2.1 Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen ............................................................................. 6 3.2.2 Ammonia Nitrogen ............................................................................................. 7 3.3 Microbial contamination - Escherichia coli ...................................................................... 9 3.4 Dissolved Organic Carbon ............................................................................................10 3.5 Turbidity ........................................................................................................................11 3.6 Trend analysis ...............................................................................................................12 3.7 Ecosystem health..........................................................................................................13 3.8 Contact recreation.........................................................................................................16 4 Discussion ..................................................................................................... 18 5 Acknowledgements ...................................................................................... 20 6 References ..................................................................................................... 20 Appendix 1: Summary of Waimakariri Tributaries water quality 2000-2008 ....... 23 Appendix 2: South Branch before and after the ocean outfall ............................ 24 Appendix 3: Cam River before and after the ocean outfall .................................. 25 Appendix 4: Photos of Waimakariri Tributaries .................................................... 26 Appendix 5: Guideline values for water quality determinands used in this study .................................................................................................... 27 Environment Canterbury Technical Report iii Waimakariri tributary report 2008 List of figures Figure 2-1: Map of Waimakariri tributary sampling site ....................................................................... 3 Figure 3-1: Distribution of Dissolved Oxygen Saturation (DOSAT%) 2000-2008, note outer edges of box are 20th and 80th percentiles. ..................................................................... 5 Figure 3-2: Distribution of Dissolved Inorganic Nitrogen concentrations 2000-2008. ....................... 6 Figure 3-3: Distribution of Ammonia Nitrogen (mg/L) concentrations 2000-2008 ............................... 7 Figure 3-4: Distribution of Dissolved Reactive Phosphorus concentrations 2000-2008. .................. 8 Figure 3-5: Distribution of Escherichia coli (E. coli) concentrations in the Waimakariri Tributaries 2000-2008.. ....................................................................................................................... 9 Figure 3-6: Distribution of Dissolved Organic Carbon (mg/L) concentrations in tributaries of the Waimakariri River 2002 -2008. ........................................................................................10 Figure 3-7: Distributions of Turbidity concentrations (NTU) in the Waimakariri Tributaries 2000- 2008. ..............................................................................................................................11 Figure 3-8: Invertebrate community diversity (%) of six tributaries of the Waimakariri River over summer 2008/09. ............................................................................................................14 List of tables Table 2-1: Waimakariri River tributary monitoring sites ...................................................................... 2 Table 3-1: Water quality trend analysis 2000-2008; showing Relative Sen Slope Estimator (expressed as % of data median yr)................................................................................13 Table 3-2: QMCI and Invertebrate Grade over summer 2008/09 ....................................................13 Table 3-3: Contact recreational monitoring sites in the Waimakariri catchment ..............................17 iv Environment Canterbury Technical Report Waimakariri tributary report 2008 1 Introduction The Waimakariri River has a number of lowland tributaries that enter the river near the sea. These tributaries drain extensive areas of both the Waimakariri District in the north and Christchurch City in the south. Some of the tributaries have historically received a number of industrial and municipal discharges that compromised the water quality of both the tributaries themselves and the lower reaches of the Waimakariri River. Most of these discharges have ceased in recent years through closure of major industries, alternative treatment, or alternative (ocean outfall) disposal options. However, urbanisation of Christchurch suburbs (Belfast, Northwood) and Waimakariri townships (Kaiapoi, Rangiora, and outlying settlements) has the potential to further compromise water quality through the infiltration of contaminants arising from initial land developments and stormwater discharges. Agricultural land use intensification (often associated with irrigation such as the Waimakariri Irrigation Scheme) has also developed rapidly in recent years, and has the potential to further compromise water quality. The Waimakariri River Regional Plan (WRRP) became operative in 2004 and contains controls on the use and discharge of water, and regimes for monitoring of the Waimakariri River and tributaries. The resulting quarterly monitoring of Waimakariri River tributaries over the past eight years (<32 samples per site) provides a useful data set to summarise the current state, trends, and changes following modification of major discharge activities. This reports main focus is on reporting the current state, trends and changes in water quality for seven major lowland tributaries of the Waimakariri River; Cam, Cust, Ohoka, Kaiapoi, Courtenay, South Branch/Otukaikino and Styx Rivers. A brief summary on invertebrate health and microbial quality related to contact recreation is also included in this report 2 Methods As part of Environment Canterbury’s (ECan) routine water quality monitoring programme, quarterly water quality data was collected from six rivers in the lower Waimakariri catchment over 2000 to 2008, with an additional site monitored monthly in 2007-2008 (Table 2-1; Figure 3-1). The microbial quality of six tributaries are monitored as part of Environment Canterbury’s contact recreational programme and results are discussed briefly (Table 2-1; Figure 3-1). Standard water quality guidelines where available were used in this report
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kaiapoi Street Map
    Kaiapoi Street Map www.northcanterbury.co.nz www.visitwaimakariri.co.nz 5 19 To Woodend, Kaikoura and Picton North To Rangiora T S S M A I L L I W 2 D R E 62 D I S M A C 29 54 E V A 64 E To Pines, O H and Kairaki 52 U T 39 45 4 57 44 10 7 63 46 47 30 8 32 59 9 38 33 24 65 11 37 66 48 18 16 23 61 26 20 17 27 25 49 13 58 14 12 28 21 51 15 22 31 41 56 50 55 3 1 35 Sponsored by 36 JIM BRYDEN RESERVE LICENSED AGENT REAA 2008 To Christchurch Harcourts Twiss-Keir Realty Ltd. 6 MREINZ Licensed Agent REAA 2008. Phone: 03 327 5379 Email: [email protected] Web: www.twisskeir.co.nz 40 60 © Copyright Enterprise North Canterbury 2016 For information and bookings contact Kaiapoi i-SITE Visitor Centre Kaiapoi Street and Information Index Phone 03 327 3134 Adams Street C5 Cressy Ave F3 Lees Rd A5 Sneyd St F2 Accommodation Attractions Adderley Tce E2 Cridland St E4 Lower Camside Rd B4 Sovereign Bvd C5 1 H3 Blue Skies Holiday & Conference Park 32 F4 Kaiapoi Historic Railway Station Akaroa St G3 Cumberland Pl H2 Magnate Dr C5 Stark Pl D5 2 C4 Grenmora B & B 55 Old North Rd 33 F4 Kaiapoi Museum And Art Gallery Aldersgate St G2 Dale St D4 Magnolia Bvd D5 Sterling Cres C5 3 H3 Kaiapoi on Williams Motel 35 H3 National Scout Museum Alexander Ln F3 Davie St F4 Main Drain Rd D1 Stone St H4 64 F6 Kairaki Beach Cottage 36 H5 Woodford Glen Speedway Allison Cres D5 Dawson Douglas Pl G4 Main North Rd I3 Storer St F1 4 F3 Morichele B & B Alpine Ln F3 Day Pl F5 Mansfield Dr G3 Sutherland Dr C6 5 A5 Pine Acres Holiday Park & Motels Recreation Ansel Pl D5 Doubledays
    [Show full text]
  • Two Into One – Compiled by Jean D.Turvey
    Two Into One – compiled by Jean D.Turvey Page 1 Two Into One – compiled by Jean D.Turvey Page 2 Two Into One – compiled by Jean D.Turvey Published by Kaiapoi Co-operating Parish 53 Fuller Street Kaiapoi Email - [email protected] ISBN 0-476-00222-2 ©Copyright Kaiapoi Co-operating Parish, February 2004 Printed by Wickliffe Print 482 Moorhouse Avenue Christchurch PREFACE This is a story of three parishes - one Methodist, one Presbyterian, and one Co- operating - worshiping and witnessing in Kaiapoi in three different centuries. It starts with pioneer settlers in a small village half a world away from their homes. It ends - at least this part of the story does - in a burgeoning satellite town. Letters and news originally took months to arrive. Now they are as instant as emails and television. However, through the dramatic changes of the last 150 years runs the common thread of faith. This is a story which needs to be read twice. The first time, read what Jean Turvey has written. In any history there are those people who stand out because of their leadership, strong personalities, or eccentricities. Ministers loom large, simply because they are involved in most aspects of parish life. Buildings feature, because they provide a focal point for congregational life. The second reading of this history is more difficult. You need to read between the lines, to focus on what is not written. The unrecorded history of these three parishes is just as vital as the narration of obvious events and personalities. It consists of people whose names are unknown, but who worshipped faithfully and gave life to these local churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklands Residential Red Zone: Summary of Technical Information As at October Area ID: 18A, 2016 18B, 18C
    Brooklands residential red zone: Summary of Technical Information as at October Area ID: 18A, 2016 18B, 18C Purpose of this document: The following information provides a summary of the local environmental values, conditions and potential hazards. The information has been gathered using the best available technical data held by a number of agencies and organisations. It does not identify or assess land use options or the feasibility of land uses. The information in this document is not, and should not be interpreted as, a pre-determination, recommendation or decision about future use. No decisions regarding the future use of this land have been made. Overview of Brooklands residential red zone (Area 18): Area 18 is approximately 78 hectares in area and is surrounded by the Brooklands Lagoon to the east and the Styx River to the north and west. To the south-east Area 18 adjoins Seafield Park and an area of rural land. The surrounding area is noted in the proposed Christchurch Replacement District Plan to have high existing environmental values. There is forestry and pastoral land use in the area to the south and east and a relative absence of built features. This area falls within an expansive flood ponding area located between the Styx River and the Te Tai o Mahaanui/the Christchurch Coast. Consequently coastal processes dominate the geographic context and there are large areas of adjoining and proximate reserves. Stopbanks to the north of Brooklands provide protection to this locality from flooding from the Waimakariri River. There are also tidegates within the stopbank at the outlet of the Styx River providing protection from tidal water flowing up the Styx River.
    [Show full text]
  • RACE RESULTS Group 1 (Year 1 and 2) Girls Results
    2015 Canterbury Primary and Intermediate School Championships Sunday 23 August 2015 RACE RESULTS Group 1 (Year 1 and 2) Girls Results BIB NAME SCHOOL RED BLUE AGG TIME PLACE NUMBER 15 Katie Chinn Somerfield School 31.22 28.74 59.96 1 7 Poppy Freeman Hororata School 31.66 31.21 62.87 2 16 Stella Valantine St Albans Primary School 45.47 42.39 87.86 3 14 Chlara Wieberneit Selwyn House School 47.50 41.98 89.48 4 9 Jasmine Ginnever Ohoka School 39.72 40.03 - DQ / OK 10 Gracie Haigh Ohoka School 39.88 36.84 - DQ / OK 19 Joy Chiles Springfield School 28.32 26.93 - DQ / OK Group 1 (Year 1 and 2) Boys Results BIB NAME SCHOOL RED BLUE AGG TIME PLACE NUMBER 40 Sam Moffatt Ohoka School 28.81 27.16 55.97 1 2 Gus Spillane Elmwood Normal School 34.84 31.26 66.10 2 12 Max Downes Redcliffs School 36.91 31.92 68.83 3 8 Baxter Olson North Loburn School 36.81 36.47 73.28 4 4 James Hunter Elmwood Normal School 62.44 55.05 117.49 5 3 Toby-withdrawn Brown Elmwood Normal School 0.00 0.00 - DQ / DQ 5 Jackson Douglas Fendalton School 37.47 33.88 - OK / DQ 6 Sam Hardy Glentunnel School 0.00 48.74 - DNF / OK 11 Ollie Tinkler Redcliffs School 46.41 47.31 - OK / DQ 13 Luca Cable Redcliffs School 38.00 35.31 - OK / DQ 17 Hayden Reed The Cathedral Grammar School 0.00 52.82 - FALL / OK 18 Baxter Bretherton West Eyreton School 0.00 47.72 - DQ / OK Well Done Everyone! Page | 1 2015 Canterbury Primary and Intermediate School Championships Sunday 23 August 2015 RACE RESULTS Group 2 (Year 3 and 4) Girls Results BIB NAME SCHOOL RED BLUE AGG TIME PLACE NUMBER 66 Henrietta Evatt
    [Show full text]
  • 3 a CONSERVATION BLUEPRINT for CHRISTCHURCH Colin D
    3 A CONSERVATION BLUEPRINT FOR CHRISTCHURCH Colin D. Meurk1 and David A. Norton2 Introduction To be 'living in changing times* is nothing new. But each new technological revolution brings an increasingly frantic pace of change. There has been a growing separation of decision-makers from the environmental consequences of their actions; there is a general alienation of people from the land, and there has been a corresponding quantum leap in environmental and social impacts. The sad and simple truth is that the huge advances in power and sophistication of our technology have not been matched by an equivalent advance in understanding and wise use of its immense power. From a natural history perspective the colonies of the European empires suffered their most dramatic changes compressed into just a few short centuries. In New Zealand over the past millenium, the Polynesians certainly left their mark on the avifauna in addition to burning the drier forests and shrublands. But this hardly compares with the biological convuolsions of the last century or so as European technology transformed just about all arable, grazable, burnable and millable land into exotic or degraded communities, regardless of their suitability for the new uses. Even today, 2 000 ha of scrub is burnt annually in North Canterbury alone. It is equally tragic, since the lessons from past mistakes are all too obvious, that there has persisted an ongoing, but barely discernible, attrition of those natural areas that survived the initial onslaught. Inevitably the greatest pressures have occurred in and around the major urban centres. The European settlers were primarily concerned with survival, development, and attempts to tame the unfamiliar countryside.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Getting There Places to Fish Methods Regulations
    3 .Cam River 10. Okana River (Little River) The Cam supports reasonable populations of brown trout in The Okana River contains populations of brown trout and can the one to four pound size range. Access is available at the provide good fishing, especially in spring. Public access is available Tuahiwi end of Bramleys Road, from Youngs Road which leads off to the lower reaches of the Okana through the gate on the right Introduction Lineside Road between Kaiapoi and Rangiora and from the Lower hand side of the road opposite the Little River Hotel. Christchurch City and its surrounds are blessed with a wealth of Camside Road bridge on the north-western side of Kaiapoi. places to fish for trout and salmon. While these may not always have the same catch rates as high country waters, they offer a 11. Lake Forsyth quick and convenient break from the stress of city life. These 4. Styx River Lake Forsyth fishes best in spring, especially if the lake has recently waters are also popular with visitors to Christchurch who do not Another small stream which fishes best in spring and autumn, been opened to the sea. One of the best places is where the Akaroa have the time to fish further afield. especially at dusk. The best access sites are off Spencerville Road, Highway first comes close to the lake just after the Birdlings Flat Lower Styx Road and Kainga Road. turn-off. Getting There 5. Kaiapoi River 12. Kaituna River All of the places described in this brochure lie within a forty The Kaiapoi River experiences good runs of salmon and is one of The area just above the confluence with Lake Ellesmere offers the five minute drive of Christchurch City.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of September 4, 2010 Canterbury Earthquake
    Presentation of September 4, 2010 Canterbury Earthquake William Godwin, PG, CEG AEG Vice President, 2019-20 Webinar – May 6, 2020 Introduction ► This presentation is on the 2010 Mw 7.1 Canterbury Earthquake. The earthquake occurred as I was traveling from San Francisco to Auckland, New Zealand to attend the IAEG Congress. Upon arrival I was asked to join the Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance (GEER) team to document damage from the event in the Christchurch area of the South Island. Little did I know that another smaller (Mw 6.2), yet deadlier earthquake would strike 5 months later in close to the same area. Introduction ► The purpose of the GEER is to observe and record earthquake induced phenomena and impacts to infrastructure before evidence is removed or altered as part of cleanup efforts. ► The reconnaissance was conducted by a joint USA-NZ-Japan team with the main funding for the USA contingent coming from GEER and partial support from PEER and EERI. ► This presentation includes my photographs from Sept. 8-10 supplemented with a few photos and observations noted in the GEER report, Nov. 2010. I also describe other seismic events from 2011-16. Sept 4th Darfield Earthquake ► At 4:35 am on September 4th NZ Standard Time (16:35 Sept 3rd UTC) the rupture of a previously unrecognized strike-slip fault (Greendale Fault) beneath the Canterbury Plains of New Zealand’s South Island produced a Mw 7.1 earthquake that caused widespread damage throughout the region. Surprisingly only two people were seriously injured, with approximately 100 total injuries. This compares with 185 deaths in the 2011 event Canterbury Earthquake Sequence Greendale Fault Rupture Characteristics Epicenter (focal) depth: 10.8km Tectonic Setting Ground Motion (pga) Geographical Setting Preliminary Observations ► Rock Avalanche, Castle Rock Reserve, Littleton, Christchurch ► Fault Offset, Telegraph Rd at Grange Rd.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kaiapoi River Has Historically Been Valued As a Freshwater Tidal Waterway and Port That Provided for Many Unique Values and Activities
    Assessment of the state of a tidal waterway - the Lower Kaiapoi River Report No. R18/7 ISBN 978-1-98-852079-7 (print) 978-1-98-852080-3 (web) Assessment of the state of a tidal waterway - the Lower Kaiapoi River Report No. R18/7 ISBN 978-1-98-852079-7 (print) 978-1-98-852080-3 (web) Adrian Meredith March 2018 Name Date Prepared by: Adrian Meredith March 2018 Principal Scientist Reviewed by: Helen Shaw, Surface Water June 2018 Science Manager Suzanne Gabites, Team Leader June 2018 Hydrological Science Approved by: Tim Davie July 2018 Chief Scientist Report No. R18/7 ISBN 978-1-98-852079-7 (print) 978-1-98-852080-3 (web) 200 Tuam Street PO Box 345 Christchurch 8140 Phone (03) 365 3828 Fax (03) 365 3194 75 Church Street PO Box 550 Timaru 7940 Phone (03) 687 7800 Fax (03) 687 7808 Website: www.ecan.govt.nz Customer Services Phone 0800 324 636 Assessment of the state of a tidal waterway - the Lower Kaiapoi River Executive summary The lower Kaiapoi River is a large river channel that traverses Kaiapoi township and drains to the large alpine fed braided Waimakariri River less than two kilometres from the sea. It is unique in being a previous channel of the Waimakariri River (the North Branch), receiving drainage from several major plains tributaries, and being strongly tidal over several kilometres of its length. It is a highly valued river, a culturally important waterway, a designated port and navigational waterway, and an important recreational and fishery resource. However, in recent years there have been complaints of degradation of its water quality and ecology.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford-Ohoka Community Board
    From: Thea Kunkel To: Mailroom Mailbox Subject: Plan Change 7 to the LWRP Submission Date: Thursday, 12 September 2019 11:58:28 AM Good Day Please find attached the submission of the Oxford-Ohoka Community Board on the proposed Plan Change 7 to the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan and proposed Plan Change 2 to the Waimakariri River Regional Plan. Thea Kunkel | Governance Team Leader Governance Phone: 0800 965 468 (0800 WMK GOV) .~ WA I MA K AR I R I 0 ts,i waimakariri.govtnz . CUSl~ICT COUNCIL 6 September 2019 To: Environment Canterbury Subject: Plan Change 7 to the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan From: Oxford-Ohoka Community Board Doug Nicholl, Chairperson Contact: Thea Kunkel, Governance Team Leader [email protected] C/- Waimakariri District Council, Private Bag 1005, Rangiora 7440. ______________________________________________________________________________ The Oxford-Ohoka Community Board (the Board) welcomes the opportunity to comment on the proposed Plan Change 7 to the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan. Summary The Oxford-Ohoka Community Board endorses the Waimakariri District Council’s submission (attached) in the matter of the proposed Plan Change 7 to the Canterbury Land and Water Regional Plan and proposed Plan Change 2 to the Waimakariri River Regional Plan. The Board however wishes to add the following: 8 Policies Nutrient management The Board is concerned about the reduction threshold for winter grazing from 10ha to 5ha. As Board members are of the opinion that farmers are not going to put their stock into a 5ha property or a number of 5ha properties, as this may jeopardise the health and welfare of their stock.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Assessment Report | October Waimakariri District Council
    Waimakariri District Council Independent assessment report | October * An independent assessment report issued by the Independent Assessment Board for the CouncilMARK™ local government excellence programme. For more information visit www.councilmark.co.nz 1 MBIE 2016 2 Stats NZ Census 2013 3 DIA 2013 4 Ministry of Transport 2013/14 *Period of assessment March 2017 Waimakariri District Council assessment report 1 Assessment Summary AT A GLANCE The Waimakariri district is expecting continued rapid growth yet retains its rural/small town character. The current situation Waimakariri District Council is a medium-sized, high-growth council emerging from the rebuild that has followed the Canterbury earthquakes. In addition, approximately 10,000 people have moved into the district since the earthquakes, with a further 8,000 forecast to move there over the next seven years. As a result, some substantial issues have emerged. Competition over resources and priorities for development has built up between Rangiora, Kaiapoi and Woodend. Period of assessment The assessment was conducted on 13 and 14 March 2017. Notwithstanding the significant capital investment which has occurred post-earthquakes, particularly in infrastructure, there continues to be strong demand for further investment in local facilities. Transport solutions are needed to ensure the district remains a viable commuter suburb, with 42 per cent of the workforce now commuting to Christchurch. 2 CouncilMARK™ $1,100m GROSS DOMESTIC 1 PRODUCT SERVES RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKES UP 1,546km 57,800 % ROADS4 2 0.841 PEOPLE , A MIX OF 3 91% EUROPEAN/PAKEHA OF NEW ZEALAND’S TOTAL LAND AREA 7% MĀORI REPRESENTING WAIMAKARIRI 2% ASIAN DISTRICT, FROM PEGASUS BAY THROUGH TO PUKETERAKI RANGE, AN AREA OF: 2 2,255 km POPULATION TREND HIGH GROWTH Key learnings The Council needs to be responsive to the pace and timing of change expected by its community relative to its own plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Values and Management Recommendations for the Styx River Mouth Reserve, Lower Waimakariri Regional Park
    Biodiversity values and management recommendations for the Styx River mouth reserve, Lower Waimakariri Regional Park P Grove July 2009 Biodiversity values and management recommendations for the Styx River mouth reserve, Lower Waimakariri Regional Park Executive summary Council policies and objectives for management of Environment Canterbury lands include safeguarding of significant natural values, and to protect and maintain the health and diversity of indigenous species and habitats. The Styx River mouth reserve, part of the Lower Waimakariri Regional Park, contains regionally- significant saltmarsh and freshwater wetland habitats. It has high native wildlife value, supporting populations of threatened swamp birds and waders, and is a potential site for reintroduction of some locally extinct bird species. This report describes the indigenous biodiversity and habitat values of the Styx River mouth reserve and recommends that the area be primarily managed to protect and enhance these values. Recommendations include a list of invasive weeds to be controlled throughout the area, site-led control of willows and shrub weeds, and managing access to avoid disturbance of sensitive wildlife. Environment Canterbury Unpublished Report i Biodiversity values and management recommendations for the Styx River mouth reserve, Lower Waimakariri Regional Park Table of contents Executive summary ................................................................................................... i 1 Introduction....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Styx River Issues and Options Report
    STYX RIVER ISSUES AND OPTIONS REPORT CHRISTCHURCH CITY COUNCIL DRAINAGE AND WASTE MANAGEMENT UNIT OCTOBER 1990 FOREWORD In 1988 a Styx River Catchment Advisory Group was set up by the Christchurch Drainage Board to advise it on the preparation of a flood mitigation plan for the Styx River catchment. The Advisory Group comprised Councillors, Board members and staff of the following local authorities: Christchurch Drainage Board North Canterbury Catchment Board Canterbury United Council Christchurch City Council Waimairi District Council Two Government Departments and various interest groups were also represented: Department of Conservation Ministry for the Environment (observer) Waimairi Federated Farmers North Canterbury Acclimatisation Society Royal Forest and Bird Society Ngai Tahu Maori Trust Brooklands Community Centre Spencerville Residents Association Redwood Action Committee Gabites Porter and Partners were engaged to advise on Town Planning matters. The first meeting of the Advisory Group was held in November 1988. At this meeting it was decided to prepare a draft Issues and Options document to assist the Advisory Group in the formulation of a plan. The preparation of this document was undertaken by Gabites Porter and Partners in consultation with staff of the Christchurch Drainage Board. The draft with additions and changes was adopted by the Advisory Group at its meeting the following May, after which it was released as an Issues and Options Report for public comment. Four submissions were received to this report. The purpose of the Issues and Options document was to assist in the formulation of a Draft flood mitigation plan for the Styx River. The Issues and Options Report is available as a resource document for further floodplain and catchment studies of the Styx River.
    [Show full text]