II CITY OF LAS VEGAS AREAS
MAP OF AREAS OF THE CITY
Residents and stakeholders identified a lack of community type framework in the context of Chapter 1’s Case for cohesion and pride as an obstacle to a strong quality of Change PlaceBuild analysis. As part of implementation, life during the planning process. Some areas of the city the City may create area plans and dedicate individual have a strong sense of identity, such as Summerlin, that staff members from multiple disciplines or departments was carefully cultivated during its development. Other to address planning issues within the district itself. Nu Wav Kaiv parts of the city have strong homeowners’ associations or neighborhood identity, but others lack a sense of Some areas already have this framework – either new plans “place”. As “Las Vegas” is generalized to mean the greater or older plans that may be updated to drill down into greater detail the implementation of place types and possible metropolitan area, more can be done to formalize the city’s 95 neighborhoods into places that residents can identify, zoning changes and overall planning direction (Recent Kyle Canyon Kyle Canyon Tule Springs celebrate, protect, preserve, and establish connections plans include Downtown Las Vegas, Summerlin North/ West, and Centennial Hills “Town Center”). The recent with their neighbors. This section sets the stage for Grand Teton
Downtown Plan is a good model in establishing a collection Buffalo future implementation, including subarea planning and Aliante Centennial Hills of smaller neighborhoods (Medical District, Arts District, La Madre Foothills Elkhorn
departmental shifts so the City can help harness the Jones Decatur energy and enthusiasm of neighbors and translate that Fremont East, Historic Westside) into a larger whole to think into meaningful, equitable implementation across the city. strategically about branding, character, and collaboration. 95 Ann To build a framework for future subarea planning, the City of Las Vegas was divided into 16 “Areas.” These
Fort Apache Fort areas are intended to allow for more detailed planning Craig Rancho Lone Mountain with greater analysis in evaluating each area’s place Buffalo Rancho
Cheyenne Durango
Rainbow 5th
Twin Lakes 15 Civic Center Summerlin North Losee Lake Mead Simmons Lake Mead
KEY ACTIONS West Las Vegas Pecos
Lamb Summerlin West Nellis Far Hills Washington • Working with community members, develop special Summerlin East Las Vegas
Bonanza Rampart
Town Center
area plans for each area. King L Martin Decatur
Durango Downtown Las Vegas Charleston 2-62 • Establish priorities across city departments for 215 Fremont 2-63 Angel Park Charleston Downtown South implementing planning area recommendations. 159 Sahara Sahara 15
Boulder Jones
• Identify catalytic redevelopment sites in each planning Eastern
McLeod
Maryland Valley View Valley 215 Desert Inn Las Vegas
Paradise Hualapai area to spur redevelopment. Apache Fort Spring Mountain
• Establish partnerships to identify deficiencies in community centers, schools, and open space and plan
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS for equitable implementation of new facilities. These areas were identified by existing development agreement boundaries, character analysis, and Census
geography boundaries to facilitate better data analysis and track implementation progress. 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT
DRAFT: 09/13/20 AREA METRICS
This section summarizes opportunities in each area. Each Planning Area was analyzed to determine how well it RELATION TO GUIDING PRINCIPLES currently meets the Guiding Principles according a set of metrics focused on the following topics. The following pages Each Area of the City will: provides an overview of the district level metrics.
• Consist of place types For more recommendations specific to these topics, please LAND USE PLACE TYPE MAPS AVERAGE WATER CONSUMPTION see the following sections: • Conserve resources and water Each district section contains a map showing existing land As land areas change in the City and new housing is built use patterns and potential areas of change, where existing to accommodate future population growth, the form of • Preserve historic buildings and neighborhoods land uses could overtime change into one of the new housing can have a significant impact on household water Land Use and Development - See Section I of proposed place types. Below each map, a diagram shows consumption. The Place Build model uses historic data • Have affordable and market rate housing this chapter how potential changes were modeled. The hatched area of associated with specific residential housing types to assess • Be served by City services, utilities, and public the circle chart represents areas of existing land use that average daily gallons of water used per housing unit across infrastructure Services - See Chapter 4, Section III could potentially change, and to the right of that it shows the district, based on the specific mix of housing types in the future place types it might change into. It is important that district. This same value is calculated for the proposed • Have parks, community centers to note that diagrams and map do not match one-to-one. condition, which in many cases shows the average water Parks and Open Space - See Section III of this The map indicates general patterns of potential change, consumption per housing unit decreasing in the future as • Have schools (new/existing) of different levels and chapter places for workforce training whereas the diagram is based on assumptions of certain % more water efficient forms of housing are constructed. of existing land areas changing from one pattern to another. • Have jobs and employment opportunities of Workforce - See Chapter 3 These values are compared against city-wide averages for all types for all skill sets, including in primary comparative purposes. industries and those that are developing Transportation - See Chapter 4, Section I • Be safe and be protected from hazards, and within ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district close proximity to LVFR and LVMPD FUTURE PLACE TYPES (IN ACRES) WATER USAGE For each of the 16 planning areas, a series of metrics • Be connected by highways, streets, trails, bike Land Use Change in City of 0.9Las Vegas Average water consumption of residents in the City of Las Vegas were assembled that relate existing conditions to city- ar et t era e lanes, and transit o a 307.5 wide averages, future targets, and/or projected conditions • Have convenient access to food and community based on the PlaceBuild analysis tools. Critical assumptions 2-64 294.7 2-65 for each of these analyses are described on the next few services 4.4 pages. Overall, these metrics connect back to the plan’s t era e ….all in a manner that’s equitable, innovative, health- guiding principles and how we can begin to measure o a minded, livable, resilient; whether existing, in the progress towards desired outcomes and understanding the 22.4% 27.7 months and years ahead, or by 2050. t a era e magnitude of change needed within each planning district. t a era e to a to a LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS
02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t era e ater ro ose era e Education, Institution, Public and Open Space place types are not se o a ater se 80% included in changes a ons a n t a ons a n t t era e
ro ose ar DRAFT: res 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 85.8 516.4 ota ar et res 35% 37% t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res ACCESS AND PROXIMITY
Mapping accessibility and proximity to foundational assets within each planning area helps demonstrate prior decision- making and future changes that may be needed. These points are detailed in other goals throughout the plan.
PROXIMITY TO SERVICES City of Las Vegas U.S. 95 Nu Wav Kaiv
TENAYA WY. RAINBOW BLVD.TORREY PINESJONES DR. BLVD.BRADLEY RD. DECATURMOCCASIN BLVD. RD. Masterplan Dwelling Units Total Dwelling % Ease of access to daily needs is essential for residents and is an Planning Area Within 1/2 mile Units Coverage LOG CABIN WY. Angel Park 5,392 22,957 23% KYLE CANYON RD. 1/2 Mile Walkable indicator of areas that are well-served, as well as an indicator of ¹½ Centennial Hills 4,908 23,686 21% IRON MOUNTAIN RD. Kyle Canyon¹½ ¹½ Charleston 10,457 29,115 36% Distance to Public School Downtown Las Vegas 6,983 13,981 50% areas that have higher rates of auto-dependency. Unfortunately, HORSE DR. Tule Springs¹½ Downtown South 3,542 5,897 60% ¹½ GRAND TETON DR. East Las Vegas 14,170 22,366 63% Legend much of Las Vegas’s services are designed for, and accessible ¹½ ¹½ Historic West Side 5,137 6,544 78% ¹½ FARM RD. City of Las Vegas ¹½ Kyle Canyon 209 4,274 5% ¹½ ¹½ La Madre Foothills 1,863 10,451 18% to, the car. ELKHORN RD. ¹½ Lone Mountain 4,287 20,483 21%
DEER SPRINGS WY. Tw¹½in Lakes ¹½ 12,134 37,275 33% 1/2 Mile walk distance ¹½ ¹½ ¹½¹½ ¹½ ¹½ Rancho 2,765 16,103 17% ¹½ Centennial Hills I - 215 Summerlin North 4,681 27,610 17% Because the City doesn’t have many community centers, each La Madre Foothills ¹½ ¹½ Summerlin West 1,234 6,705 18% ¹½ TROPICAL PKWY. ¹½ ¹½ ¹½Tule Springs¹½ ¹½ 1,608 9,400 17% serve a wider population that’s accessible by walking, biking, or ¹½ ¹½ ¹½¹½ ¹½ U.S. 95 ANN RD. ¹½ ¹½ Totals 79,370 256,847 31% ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ a short drive. The lack of these places indicates a need for more ¹½ WASHBURN RD. ¹½
LONE MOUNTAIN RD. ¹½ publicly facing neighborhood facilities. ¹½ Rancho ¹½ Public Schools PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES CRAIG RD. ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ^_ Alternative Lone Mountain ALEXANDER RD. ¹½ Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ Safe routes to school are important for every student within Las ¹½ ¹½ ^_ ¹½¹½ GOWAN RD. ¹½ Elementary ¹½ ¹½ Not in City¹½ Limits CHEYENNE AVE. ^_ CHEYENNE AVE. High Vegas. The ability to walk to school in older areas, which have ¹½¹½ ¹½ ¹½ RANCHO DR. ¹½ ^_ ¹½ Middle LAKE MEAD BLVD. Parks 56% higher densities, walkable urban form, and more schools, is far ¹½ ¹½ MARTIN L.KING BLVD. ¹½ ¹½ CAREY AVE. ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ^_ ¹½¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ Special ¹½ LAKE MEAD BLVD. easier, while auto-oriented suburban planning areas have fewer Twin Lakes ¹½ ¹½ ¹½
SUMMERLIN PRKWY ¹½ ¹½ ¹½¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½¹½ ¹½ SANDHILL RD. ¹½ RD. MOJAVE ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ I - 15 ¹½ Historic¹½ West Side ¹½ OWENS AVE. walkable routes. Summerlin West Summerlin North ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ WASHINGTON AVE. ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ Schools 31% ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½¹½ ¹½¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½¹½ BONANZA RD. ¹½ East Las ¹½Vegas ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ Downtown Las Vegas ¹½ STEWART¹½ AVE. ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½¹½ ¹½ ¹½ CHARLESTON BLVD. CHARLESTON¹½ BLVD. ¹½¹½Charleston ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ Grocery and retail services 19% ¹½ ¹½ US 95
DR. ¹½ ¹½ Angel Park PECOS RD.
$ ¹½ LAMB BLVD. NELLIS BLVD. ¹½ ¹½ Downtown South¹½ MARION DR. ¹½ ¹½ TOWN CENTER ¹½ SAHARA AVE. ¹½ SAHARA AVE. ¹½ BOULDER HWY. ¹½ Miles
¹½ ¹½ 0 0.5 1 2 WY. AYA ¹½
I - I215 - ¹½
¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ LINDELL RD.
Not in City Limits ¹½ TEN JONES BLVD.
EASTERN AVE. ¹½ BUFFALO BUFFALO DR.
CIMARRON RD. LAS VEGAS BLVD. RAINBOW BLVD. Not in City Limits GIS maps are normally produced
MARYLAND PKWY. ¹½ DESERT INN RD. TORREY PINES DR. ¹½ ¹½ only to meet the needs of the City. ¹½ Due to continuous development activity ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ this map is for reference only. ¹½ DECATUR BLVD. ¹½ ¹½ Geographic Information System ¹½ ¹½ Planning & Development Dept.
HUALAPAI HUALAPAI WY. ¹½
Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: · DURANGO DR. ¹½ ¹½ 702-229-6301
FORT APACHE RD. FORT ALLEY VIEW BLVD. V ¹½ ¹½ Printed: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½ ¹½
Community Centers 45%
City of Las Vegas City of Las Vegas U.S. 95 Nu Wav Kaiv U.S. 95 Nu Wav Kaiv Masterplan Dwelling Units Total Dwelling % TENAYA WY. RAINBOW BLVD.TORREY PINESJONES DR. BLVD.BRADLEY RD.DECATUR BLVD. TENAYA WY. RAINBOW BLVD.TORREY PINESJONES DR. BLVD.BRADLEY RD.DECATUR BLVD. Masterplan Dwelling Units Total Dwelling % MOCCASIN RD. MOCCASIN RD. Planning Area Within 2 miles Units Coverage Planning Area Within 1/2 mile Units Coverage LOG CABIN WY. Angel Park 1,220 22,957 5% LOG CABIN WY. Angel Park 2,725 22,957 12% KYLE CANYON RD. KYLE CANYON RD. Centennial Hills 12,827 23,686 54% 1/2 Mile Walkable & 2 Mile Drive Centennial Hills 2,661 23,686 11% 1/2 Mile Walkable IRON MOUNTAIN RD. Charleston 14,750 29,115 51% Kyle Canyon IRON MOUNTAIN RD. Charleston 6,704 29,115 23% Distance to Grocery Store Kyle Canyon Distance to Community Center Downtown Las Vegas 13,981 13,981 100% _ Downtown Las Vegas 6,611 13,981 47% ^ HORSE DR. HORSE DR. Downtown South 5,870 5,897 100% Downtown South 1,400 5,897 24% Tule Springs Tule Springs East Las Vegas 14,783 22,366 66% East Las Vegas 6,956 22,366 31% GRAND TETON DR. Legend GRAND TETON DR. Legend Historic West Side 1,088 6,544 17% Historic West Side 5,929 6,544 91% ^_ FARM RD. Kyle Canyon - 4,274 0% City of Las Vegas ^_ FARM RD. Kyle Canyon 236 4,274 6% City of Las Vegas La Madre Foothills 158 10,451 2% La Madre Foothills 44 10,451 0% ELKHORN RD. ^_ Community Center ^_ ELKHORN RD. Lone Mountain 2,643 20,483 13% ^_ Grocery Store Lone Mountain 10,690 20,483 52% Twin Lakes 9,624 37,275 26% Twin Lakes 14,911 37,275 40% DEER SPRINGS WY. 1/2 Mile walk distance ^_ DEER SPRINGS WY. 1/2 Mile walk distance ^_ Rancho 514 16,103 3% ^__ Rancho 3,300 16,103 20% ^ ^_ Summerlin North 2,879 27,610 10% Centennial Hills I - 215 Summerlin North 17,521 27,610 63% Centennial Hills ^_I - 215 2 Mile drive distance La Madre Foothills ^_ ^_ Summerlin West 2 49 6,705 4% La Madre Foothills Summerlin West 3,155 6,705 47% ^_ TROPICAL PKWY. ^_TROPICAL PKWY. Tule Springs 312 9,400 3% Tule Springs 40 9,400 0%
^_ ^_ U.S. 95 ANN RD. U.S. 95 ^_ ^_ ANN RD. Totals 47,546 256,847 19% Totals 116,235 256,847 45%
WASHBURN RD. WASHBURN RD.
LONE MOUNTAIN RD. LONE MOUNTAIN RD. Rancho Rancho^_ ^_ ^_ CRAIG RD. ^_ CRAIG RD.
Lone Mountain ALEXANDER RD. 2-66 Lone Mountain ALEXANDER RD. 2-67
^_ GOWAN RD. GOWAN RD. Not in City Limits Not in City Limits CHEYENNE AVE. CHEYENNE AVE. ^_ ^_ ^_ CHEYENNE AVE. ^_^_ ^_ ^_ CHEYENNE AVE. RANCHO DR. RANCHO DR.
LAKE MEAD BL VD.
MARTIN L.KING BLVD. LAKE MEAD BLVD. MARTIN L.KING BLVD. CAREY AVE. ^_^_ ^_ ^_ CAREY AVE. ^_ ^_ LAKE MEAD BLVD. ^_^_ ^_ LAKE MEAD BLVD. ^_^_ Twin Lakes ^_ Twin Lakes^_ ^_ ^_^_ ^_ SUMMERLIN PRKWY
SUMMERLIN PRKWY ^_ SANDHILL RD.
I - 15 RD. MOJAVE OWENS AVE. SANDHILL RD. ^_ Historic West Side I - 15 RD. MOJAVE ^_ OWENS AVE. Historic West Side Summerlin North ^_ ^_ Summerlin West Summerlin North^_ Summerlin West WASHINGTON AVE. ^_^_ ^_ WASHINGTON AVE. ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ BONANZA RD. ^_ ^_ BONANZA RD. ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_^_ East Las Vegas^_ ^_ East Las Vegas Downtown Las Vegas STEWART AVE. ^_ ^_STEWART AVE. ^_ ^_ Downtown Las Vegas^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ CHARLESTON BLVD. ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ CHARLESTON BLVD. CHARLESTON BLVD. LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS ^_ CHARLESTON BLVD. ^_ ^_ ^_^_^_ ^_ ^_^_ Charleston
Charleston US 95
US 95 DR.
Angel Park PECOS RD.
LAMB BLVD.
DR.
PECOS RD. MARION DR.
Angel Park Downtown South NELLIS BLVD.
LAMB BLVD.
NELLIS BLVD. MARION DR. ^_ Downtown South TOWN CENTER ^_
TOWN CENTER SAHARA AVE. ^_ SAHARA AVE. BOULDER HWY.
_ SAHARA AVE. 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT ^_ ^ BOULDER HWY. SAHARA AVE. ^_ ^_^_ ^_^_^_ ^_ ^_ Miles
Miles 0 0.5 1 2 LL RD.
0 0.5 1 2 I215 -
I - I215 - LINDELL RD.
Not in City Limits WY. TENAYA
JONES BLVD.
EASTERN AVE.
BUFFALO BUFFALO DR. TENAYA WY. TENAYA
Not in City Limits LINDE
JONES BLVD.
EASTERN AVE. CIMARRON RD.
BUFFALO BUFFALO DR. LAS VEGAS BLVD.
RAINBOW BLVD. Not in City Limits GIS maps are normally produced
MARYLAND PKWY.
CIMARRON RD. TORREY PINES DR.
LVD. LAS VEGAS BLVD. DESERT INN RD.
^_ RAINBOW BLVD. Not in City Limits GIS maps are normally produced only to meet the needs of the City. MARYLAND PKWY. DESERT INN RD. ^_ TORREY PINES DR. only to meet the needs of the City. Due to continuous development activity Due to continuous development activity this map is for reference only. this map is for reference only.
DECATUR BLVD. Geographic Information System
DECATUR B Geographic Information System
Planning & Development Dept. HUALAPAI HUALAPAI WY.
Planning & Development Dept. · DURANGO DR. 702-229-6301
HUALAPAI HUALAPAI WY.
FORT APACHE RD. FORT ALLEY VIEW BLVD. DURANGO DR. 702-229-6301
· LLEY VIEW BLVD.
V FORT APACHE RD. FORT
VA Printed: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 Printed: Thursday, May 28, 2020
DRAFT: 09/13/20 ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district PARKS AND OPEN SPACE ACCESS JOB-TO-HOUSING AND JOB PROXIMITY ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district 0.9 ar et t era e Access to parks and open space is important for the quality of life of residents. Access to employment opportunity is a critical quality of life and economic 0.9 o a ar et t era e 307.5 While overall quantity of open space is important, the proximity and quantity within o a 307.5 consideration for the City of Las Vegas. Two metrics are considered on a district- short, walking distances of residences is most essential. by-district basis: 294.7 294.7 4.4 The parks and open space access metrics look at publicly4.4 owned t era e and/or maintained (1) Existing t ratio era e of jobs to housing units within the overall district and in comparison open space and considers two key data points: (1) how many o a acres of park space, to the city-wide o a average. This can help identify whether a district tends to be a jobs per 1,000 residents, are within a 1/4 mile walk distance on average; and (2) given “importer” (with more jobs than housing units,22.4% thus pulling people into the district 27.7 t a era e 27.7 t a era e 22.4% the projected population of the district, how many total acres of park space are for employment) or a jobs “exporter” with relatively more people leaving the district to a t a era e to a t a era e to a needed to achieve a target of 7.0 acres per person. for employment. The City will strive for a citywide job-housing balance of 1.0 to 1.25. to a
City-wide averages are shown for comparison purposes. (2) The second metric provides a measure of how o res ents many njobs ann n are areawithin th n a 1/2-mile e o e a t PARK ACCESS PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET era e ater ro ose or 1-mile era e radius on average from any point in the district. This analysis considers ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district se o a ater se 80% o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t Acres of accessible park space per 1,000 a ons a n t a ons a n t proximity of jobs outside of the district itself but still within the 1/2-mile or 1-mile t era e residents within 1/4 mile of the City distance. era e ater ro ose era e 0.9 JOB PROXIMITY ar et ro ose ar t res era e JOB SUPPLY IN DISTRICT se o a ater se 80% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o o a 307.5 Average job opportunity in proximity to the City a ons a n t a ons a n t Average job opportunity per residential trans t sto ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district t era e 85.8 516.4 294.7 unit in the City today 35% 37% ota ar et res 1.0 Target* 4.4 0.9 ro ose ar res t era e ar et t era e t era e t era e o res ents n ann n area th n or e o o a o a 307.5 th n e th n e t era e t era e trans t sto th n e th n e Park access and proximity is convenient 27.7 st n 22.4% 85.8294.7 516.4 t a era e in areas with new subdivisions, where ar res t a era e 4.4 ota ar et res to a 35% 37% t era e to a planning standards have required o a amenities, whether public or private. t era e t era e 22.4% 27.7 th n e th n e Suburban areas tend to have fewer t a era e Distance to parks, open space, and green t era e t era e t a era e *equivalent of one to a jobs and an abundance of housing, o res ents n ann n th narea th n e e o e th n a t e to a space as a place of refuge and respite is full-time employee per era ethus necessitating ater ro ose a commute era e st n to residential unit lacking in the areas surrounding Downtown ar res employment se o a locations. ater se 80% Las Vegas. a ons a n t a ons a n t o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t t era e INSET MAP Å era e ater ro ose era e City of Las Vegas see inset map se o a ater se 80% U.S. 95 Nu Wav Kaiv ro ose ar res 95 a ons a n t a ons a n t TENAYA WY. RAINBOW BLVD.TORREY PINESJONES DR. BLVD.BRADLEY RD. Masterplan Dwelling Units Total Dwelling % DECATURMOCCASIN BLVD. RD. Nu Wav Kaiv o res ents n ann n area th n or e o Planning Area Within 1/2 mile Units Coverage City of Las Vegas t era e LOG CABIN WY. Angel Park 15,820 22,957 69% trans t sto KYLE CANYON RD. Centennial Hills 16,260 23,686 69% 1/2 Mile Walkable Nu Wav Kaiv Job-Housing Balance Kyle Canyon IRON MOUNTAIN RD. Charleston 5,678 29,115 20% Distance to Public85.8 Park/ 516.4 ro ose ar res Downtown Las Vegas 9,214 13,981 66% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o HORSE DR. Greenspace Downtown South 2,702 5,897 46% Tule Springs 35% 37% Tule Springs ota ar et res No Housing or Jobs trans t sto East Las Vegas 6,046 22,366 27% GRAND TETON DR. Kyle Canyon Historic West Side 2,662 6,544 41% Legend More Housing - Fewer Jobs FARM RD. Kyle Canyon 4,211 4,274 99% 85.8GRAND TETON 516.4 t era e t era e La Madre Foothills 7,800 10,451 75% City of Las Vegas ota ar et res th n e th n e 35% 37% ELKHORN RD. Lone Mountain 15,730 20,483 77% t era e t era e
Twin Lakes 16,365 37,275 44% BUFFALO DEER SPRINGS WY. CLV Public Park Rancho 7,751 16,103 48% th n e th n e t era e t era e Greenspace or Private Park Centennial Hills I - 215 Summerlin North 20,205 27,610 73% Centennial Hills th n e th n e La Madre Foothills st n t era e t era e Summerlin West 6,363 6,705 95% 1/2 Mile walk distance ar TROPICAL res PKWY. Tule Springs 6,854 9,400 73% th n e th nDECATUR e Balanced La Madre Foothills 95 U.S. 95 ANN RD. Totals 143,661 256,847 56% st n ANN WASHBURN RD. ar res More Jobs - Less Housing Rancho LONE MOUNTAIN RD.
JONES
CRAIG RD. GIS maps are normally produced only to meet the needs of the City. Rancho Due to continuous development activity 2-68 this map is for reference only. 2-69 Lone Mountain ALEXANDER RD. Lone Mountain Miles Geographic Information System Planning & Development Dept. 0 0.5 1 2 702-229-6301 GOWAN RD. Not in City Limits
CHEYENNE AVE. RAINBOW
CHEYENNE AVE. APACHE FORT
RANCHO DR.
RANCHO LAKE MEAD BLVD.
MARTIN L.KING BLVD. CAREY AVE.
LAKE MEAD DURANGO Twin Lakes LAKE MEAD BLVD.
SUMMERLIN PRKWY SANDHILL RD. Historic West Side I - 15 RD. MOJAVE OWENS AVE. Summerlin West Summerlin North Summerlin North Summerlin West Historic WASHINGTON AVE. West FAR HILLS BONANZA RD. Twin Lakes Side WASHINGTON East Las Vegas SUMMERLIN BONANZA Downtown Las Vegas STEWART AVE.
RAMPART FREMONT East Las Vegas LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS CHARLESTON BLVD.
BUFFALO Downtown CHARLESTON BLVD. Charleston Las Vegas
US 95 CHARLESTON Charleston DR.
Angel Park PECOS RD.
LAMB BLVD. NELLIS BLVD.
Downtown South MARION DR. TOWN CENTER 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT SAHARA AVE. SAHARA AVE. BOULDER HWY. Miles Downtown South
159 JONES
LL RD. 0 0.5 1 2 Angel Park SAHARA
I - I215 - TENAYA WY. TENAYA
Not in City Limits LINDE
JONES BLVD.
EASTERN AVE.
BUFFALO BUFFALO DR.
VALLEY VIEW VALLEY CIMARRON RD.
LVD. LAS VEGAS BLVD.
RAINBOW BLVD. Not in City Limits GIS maps are normally produced MARYLAND PKWY. DESERT INN RD. TORREY PINES DR. only to meet the needs of the City. Due to continuous development activity
this map is for reference only. DESERT INN EASTERN MARYLAND
DECATUR B Geographic Information System
Planning & Development Dept. HUALAPAI HUALAPAI WY.
· DURANGO DR. 702-229-6301
FORT APACHE RD. FORT ALLEY VIEW BLVD.
V · Printed: Thursday, May 28, 2020 Printed: Tuesday, September 1, 2020
DRAFT: 09/13/20 TRANSPORTATION & MOBILITY Access to Public Transportation for Public Transit. Both existing conditions and future conditions are displayed to indicate a short walk to alternative transportation. Existing RTC Transit routes provide a minimum level of accessibility to older The final set of metrics pertains to transportation and responds to an essential planning areas. Development of RTC’s OnBoard high capacity transit system will improve coverage as well as provide equity question: how easily are people able to access transportation services. Four access to suburban areas. different metrics are considered:
.
(1) Percentage of households without cars, relative to the VEHICLE OWNERSHIP ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district city-wide average. Households without access to a motor Percentage of households without cars within the City vehicle must rely on other transportation options. 0.9 ar et t era e o a 307.5
294.7
4.4 t era e o a
22.4% 27.7 t a era e t a era e to a to a
o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t (2) Average time era e length ater of commute, ro ose relative era e to the COMMUTE TIME TO WORK city-wide average. se Longer o a commute ater times se may be Average commute time (in 80% a ons a n t a ons a n t minutes) within the City ACRESACRES of PARK space space per per 1,000 1,000 within within 1/4 miles 1/4 miles Job per Jobhousing per unithousing within unit district within district an opportunity for providing more jobs or improving t era e transportation options. ro ose ar res 0.9 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o ar et 0.9 t era e trans t sto ar et o a t era e 307.5 o a 85.8307.5 516.4 ota ar et res 35% 37% 294.7 294.7 t era e t era e 4.4 t era e th n e th n e o a t era e t era e 4.4 t era e th n e th n e o a st n 22.4% 27.7 ar res t a era e t a era e to a 27.7 to a 22.4% t a era e t a era e to a to a (3)Percentage of the area of the City within 1/4 mile of TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t dedicated bicycle facilities. Bike trails are considered more era e ater ro ose 2-70 era e desirable for all user groups, but much of the City only has 2-71 se o a ater se o 80% res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t a ons a n t a ons a n t bike lanes or no bike facilities at all. t era e era e ater ro ose era e ro ose ar res se o a ater se 80% a ons a n t a ons a n t o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto t era e 85.8 516.4 ro ose ar res 35% 37% ota ar et res (4) Percentage of residents within 1/4 mile or 1/2 mile of o res ents n ann n area th n or e o LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS a transit stop. 1/2 mile distance is typically t used era e in transit t era e trans t sto th n e th n e t era e t era e planning, although from a convenience and attraction 85.8 516.4 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT th n e th n e ota ar et res standpoint transit stops closer to home can provide better 35% 37% st n ar res access. t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n DRAFT: 09/13/20 ar res DEMOGRAPHICS
95 Nu Wav Kaiv A number of demographic indicators for each area helps explain the composition of the residents that live in the Tule Springs City of Las Vegas neighborhoods. Compiled from Census, American Community Survey, and Planning Department data, each tell a story Kyle Canyon City Population Density about the area’s socio-economic characteristics, the types of houses, and who lives there.
GRAND TETON Population per Sq. Mile
0 - 530.4 6,896 - 7,691
BUFFALO 530.5 - 1,538 7,692 - 8,434 Centennial Hills KEY 1,539 - 2,493 8,435 - 9,176
2,494 - 3,448 9,177 - 10,020 DECATUR TOTAL CITY DEMOGRAPHICS 3,449 - 4,349 10,030 - 11,030 (1) The current population of the area 95 4,350 - 5,198 11,040 - 12,090 ANN 5,199 - 6,047 12,100 - 13,530 La Madre Foothills 1. Current population: 675,971 6,048 - 6,895
(2) The largest age group indicates variations in age JONES 2. Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (avg age 34.5) cohorts Rancho 3. Persons per household: 2.83 GIS maps are normally produced only to meet the needs of the City. Due to continuous development activity Lone Mountain this map is for reference only. Miles Geographic Information System 0 0.5 1 2 Planning & Development Dept. 4. Single Family Dwellings: 10,724 (avg/area) RAINBOW 702-229-6301
(3) Persons per household explains household APACHE FORT composition, children, or multi-generational homes 5. Multi-Family Dwellings: 6,399 (avg/area) RANCHO
6. Median Household income: $60,917 LAKE MEAD DURANGO (4) and (5) indicated the current number of dwellings 7. Median rent / mortgage: $1,159 / $1,468 Summerlin West Summerlin North Historic within an area, whether single-family residential or multi- Twin Lakes 8. Housing tenure: 45.86% rent / 54.14% own West FAR HILLS Side Downtown WASHINGTON family dwelling unit types, such as duplex, triplex, four-plex, 9. Attained High School Diploma: 84.85% SUMMERLIN Las Vegas BONANZA Howard Wasden RAMPART East Las Vegas apartments, townhomes, condominiums, or mobile homes. 10. Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 24.89% FREMONT BUFFALO 11. Unemployment rate: 8.62% CHARLESTON Charleston (6) Median household income measures the overall
12. Housing Density: 5.14 dwelling units / acre JONES Downtown South economic prosperity of the area 159 Angel Park SAHARA
13. Population Density: 8,146 residents / square mile VIEW VALLEY
DESERT INN EASTERN (7) Median rent and mortgage payments represent a 14. Racial/ethnic composition MARYLAND snapshot of the housing costs and affordability · Printed: Tuesday, September 1, 2020
95 Nu Wav Kaiv (8) Housing tenure indicate the percentage of people who City of Las Vegas rent their dwelling or own it outright Kyle Canyon Tule Springs Citywide Dwelling Units Density (9) and (10) show the levels and rates of educational GRAND TETON attainment: those that have attained a high school Dwelling Units per Sq. Mile 0 - 338.2 2,707 - 3,044 BUFFALO 338.3 - 676.5 3,045 - 3,382 diploma and those that have received a Bachelor’s degree Centennial Hills 676.6 - 1,015 3,383 - 3,721 (11) The area’s unemployment rate DECATUR 1,016 - 1,353 3,722 - 4,059 95 1,354 - 1,691 4,060 - 4,397
ANN 1,692 - 2,029 4,398 - 4,735 La Madre Foothills (12) and (13) Housing and population density 2,030 - 2,368 4,736 - 5,074
JONES 2,369 - 2,706 White Black/African American 2-72 Rancho 2-73 (14) The racial and ethnic composition of the area GIS maps are normally produced only to meet the needs of the City. American Indian/Native American Asian Due to continuous development activity this map is for reference only. Miles Geographic Information System Lone Mountain 0 0.5 1 2 Planning & Development Dept.
702-229-6301 RAINBOW
Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other APACHE FORT
More than one race Latino/Hispanic RANCHO
LAKE MEAD DURANGO
Summerlin West Summerlin North Historic Twin Lakes West FAR HILLS Side WASHINGTON SUMMERLIN BONANZA
RAMPART East Las Vegas LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS FREMONT
BUFFALO Downtown Las Vegas CHARLESTON Charleston 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT Downtown South
159 Angel Park JONES SAHARA VALLEY VIEW VALLEY
DESERT INN EASTERN · MARYLAND
Printed: Tuesday, September 1, 2020 DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.A DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS
4 LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DOWNTOWN FUTURE LAND USE FROM 2045 MASTER PLAN 4 LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
4 LAND USE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Downtown Las Vegas is the City’s civic, commercial, and cultural hub. Located in the center of the Las Vegas Valley, encompassing the original 1905 town site, it functions as a primary regional center of Southern Nevada together with the Las Vegas Strip. Centered along Fremont Street, Downtown is the original home to local gaming and tourism. It continues to attract visitors looking for a historic and authentic Las Vegas experience. The Downtown of tomorrow is envisioned as a vibrant and livable urban environment and will continue to “Reinvent the Legend” through complete implementation of the Vision 2035 Downtown Las Vegas Master Plan. DEMOGRAPHICS
• Current population: 28,115 Race & Ethnicity • Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (4,600)
2-74 • Persons per household: 2.28 2-75 • Single Family Dwellings: 1,755 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 12,226 FIG 4.1: PROPOSED GENERALIZED LAND USE CONCEPT • Median Household income: $22,471 (* DRAWINGS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND NOT INTENDED TO BE INTERPRETED AS DEFINITIVE PROPOSALS.) • Median rent / mortgage: $746 / $1,219 FIG 4.1: PROPOSED GENERALIZED LAND USE CONCEPT VISION 2045 DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS MASTERPLAN | 83 • Housing tenure: 84.8% rent / 15.2% own (* DRAWINGS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND NOT INTENDED TO BE INTERPRETED AS DEFINITIVE PROPOSALS.) • Attained High School Diploma: 71.6% SEE ALSO: VISION 2045 DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS MASTERPLAN | 83 • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 11.7%
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS White Black/African American • Unemployment rate: 15.3% Vision 2045: Downtown Las Vegas Masterplan Downtown Civic Space and Trails Plan • Housing Density: 6.56 dwelling units / acre American Indian/Native American Asian 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT • Population Density: 8,439 residents / square mile Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other Title 19.09 Form-Based Code Hundred Plan More than one race Latino/Hispanic Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20
FIG 4.1: PROPOSED GENERALIZED LAND USE CONCEPT (* DRAWINGS ARE CONCEPTUAL AND NOT INTENDED TO BE INTERPRETED AS DEFINITIVE PROPOSALS.) VISION 2045 DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS MASTERPLAN | 83 II.A DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
Downtown is characterized by a traditional urban fabric centered on Fremont Street. The Downtown is divided into several Corridor of Hope: unique and culturally rich neighborhoods. The core districts include the Civic and Business District, Resort and Casino 1 Homeless Services District, Fremont East Entertainment District, and Symphony Park District. Downtown also encompasses the Historic New convention and CLV Courtyard Westside and Cashman neighborhoods, the Las Vegas Medical District, and the gateway to the Strip. Downtown is bisected space by US-95 and I-15, creating connectivity issues between the core and the downtown periphery. Innovation and Tech 3 IN THE FUTURE
Downtown will achieve a compact, vibrant urban 2050 PROJECTIONS environment, focusing on higher density mixed-use, transit- • Population: 51,539 Replacement of oriented development. Downtown is governed by the special • Total New Housing Units: 10,274 (83 Single family / 10,121 I-515 viaduct as area plan and regulated by the City’s Form-Based Code (Title Multi-family) part of Downtown • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 12,320,270 2 19.09). The Form-Based Code establishes Transect Zones Civic developments Access Project with • Housing Density: 11.38 dwelling units / acre and Building Types, Frontage Types, Open Space Types, and around City Hall, 4 additional HOV • Population Density: 15,471 residents / square mile Thoroughfare Standards that apply within the 12 districts of including around access the Downtown Las Vegas Overlay District. Bonneville Transit KEY LAND USE TOOLS Center, the hub for • Mixed-use RTC’s future high University PLANNED PLACE TYPES • Transit-oriented development capacity transit Medical Center 5 • Placemaking through arts and culture Concurrent Maryland • Regional Center system • Diverse housing options Scotch 80 Pkwy TOD station area Mixed-Use Center Complete Click each tool to read more. neigborhood planning throughout development of Corridor Mixed-Use corridor, including the UNLV School of Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use 6 Founders and Civic Medicine Mixed Residential and Business Districts ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 milesTraditional Neighborhoods WATER USAGE New Subdivision Water consumption of residents in the planning area will 39.3% 4.51 ar et Subdivision Retrofit str t o a be increase slightly with the planned buildout. ann n City Average str t o a In order to capture the above projected land uses and 307.5 City Average DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK densities, the following place types are planned for future 294.7 KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES change: 211.8 t era e2-76 205.6 1. Implement the “Hundred Plan” to revitalize the F CLV Fire Station 2-77 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) Historic Westside LVMPD Substation t era e t era e 2. Sympony Park mixed-use development Hospital t era e 25.9 ann n 3. Cashman Center redevelopment opportunity str t o a CCSD School (elementary/middle/ high/alternative or special) 4. FremontPercent East District area of theredevelopment planning district and within complete 1/4 mile of bike facilities Library .8 PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS street improvements oth e e ra e ane str t o a ane ra n n City or other public facility 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater otent a era e 5. Arts District cultural improvements, investments, se o a ater se and redevelopment23% 38% 30% Community Center a ons a n t a ons a n t Downtown Las Vegas area: 2,132.1 acres City-wide Average District Total Area with- Transportation improvement 6. Gateway District revitalization and improvements(61%) (70%) out access along Las Vegas Blvd otent a ar res Planned High Capacity Transit DRAFT: 09/13/20Percent of residents in the planning district within 1/4 and 1/2 mile of a transit stop 605 4,313 97% 100% ota ar et res t era e t era e th n e th n e th n e th n e t era e t era e st n ar res II.A DOWNTOWN LAS VEGAS
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Downtown has the greatest concentration of public Downtown has several notable and memorable places, Downtown encompasses a variety of industry clusters. Located near the intersection of I-15, I-515, and US-95 facilities and services in the region. Federal, state, and including the Fremont Street Experience, Container Park, The Casino Center and the Fremont East District remain (future I-11), Downtown is also the central hub of the RTC local government civic buildings are located throughout Symphony Park, and 3rd Street, but is notably lacking major economic drivers of Las Vegas and the region. In Transit system and future high capacity transit network. In Downtown, including the Clark County Government Center, traditional parks, civic, and green spaces. In the past decade, order to maintain that standing and address historic terms of access and mobility, Downtown has the region’s Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Headquarters, and regional Downtown witnessed the birth of a variety of museums blighting conditions, the City has introduced downtown best complete street grid. The Union Pacific Railroad court and judicial facilities. Other private and non-profit and cultural amenities, including the Mob Museum, Neon redevelopment areas and new economic development parallels I-15 which may allow Downtown to potentially be services serve the City and Southern Nevada as a whole; Museum, and Smith Center for the Performing Arts. The initiatives. Adaptive reuse has brought new life to the central hub for high-speed rail connecting to Southern most notably, homeless service providers are concentrated Downtown Parks and Civic Spaces sub-plan provides an underutilized industrial areas, creating vibrant places like California. However, as the oldest part of the ity, Downtown within Downtown and its periphery along the “Corridor of implementation framework for increased public and private the Arts District. The UNLV School of Medicine and several also has aging infrastructure of all types. Hope.” parks, plazas, and other civic spaces, including a Civic major hospitals located in the Medical District allow for Plaza and central park. The Title 19.09 form-based zoning growth in the health care and education sectors. Finally, PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES code also similarly requires open space and specifies civic major mixed-use and special purpose areas, including the VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Cashman Center and Symphony Park, allow for unique Percentage of households Average commute time (in space standards.ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles economic development and redevelopment opportunities. without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRESCity of PARKACRES space of per PARK 1,000 space within per 1/41,000 miles within 1/4 miles PARK ACCESS 39.3% Parks 66% 56% The Downtown residents are served by neighborhood CCSD 39.3% ACRES of PARK space ar et per 1,000 within 1/4 miles 4.51 str t o a ann n ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Acres of accessible park space per 1,000 residents within 1/4 4.51schools and charter schools. 39.3% 39.3% ann n ar et4.51 4.51 str t o a str t o a mile ar et ar et str t o a str t o a ann n ann n str t o a ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 milesJOB SUPPLY IN DISTRICT str t o a str t o a Schools 50% 31% 39.3% 39.3% 4.51 4.51 ann n ar et str t o a ar et Average job opportunity str t per residential o a unit in the ann n planning district str t o a str t o a 39.3% 4.51 ann n Grocery and retail services 47% 19% t era e t era e t t era e era e ar et 211.8 str t211.8 o a 211.8 211.8 $ 205.6 205.6 205.6 205.6 str t o a
211.8 t era e t era e 211.8 t era e t era e t era e t era e 205.6 t era e 205.6 t era e t era e 25.9 t era e Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: t era e t era e 25.9 25.9 t era e 211.8 ann n t ann n era e 25.9 205.6 str t o a str t o a t era e ann n t era e t era e str t o a t era e ann n t era e Percent area of thePercent planning area district of the withinplanning 1/4 district mile of within bike facilities1/4 mile of bike facilities str t o a Community Centers 100% 45% 1.0 Target* 25.9 t era e 25.9 t era e Percent area of the planning district within 1/4 mile of bike facilities ann n .8 .8 t era e oth e e oth ra e e ane ra ann n e ane t era e str t o a str t o a Percent area of the planning district within 1/4 mile of bike facilities ane ra ane n ra n str t o a n str t o a .8 oth e t e era e ra e ane 25.9 str t o a era e ater era e otent a ater era e otent a era e ane ra n n ann n .8 se o a se o a ater se ater se Percent area of the planning district within23% 1/4 mile of38% bike facilities30% Percent area of the planning oth e district within e 1/4 ra mile of bike e facilities ane str t o a 23% 38% 30% str t o a a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t era e ater TRANSPORTATION otent a era e ACCESS & EQUITY ane ra n n .8 se o a ater se City-wide Average DistrictCity-wide Total Average AreaDistrict with- Total Area with- oth e 38% e ra e ane .8 oth e e ra e ane (61%) (70%) 23% Percent area of the planning30% district within 1/4 mile of bike facilities str t o a str t o a era e ater otent a era e (61%) (70%) out access a ons a n t a ons a n t ane ra n n out access ane ra n n se o a ater se City-wide Average District Total otent a ar res otent a ar res era e ater otent a era e 23% Area38% with- 30% .8 era e ater otent a era e Percent of residents in the planning district within 1/4 and 1/2 (61%) oth (70%) e e ra e ane str t o a a ons a n t se o a Percent a ons a n t ater of residents se in the planning district within 1/4 and 1/2 out access se o a ater se 23%mile of a transit stopmile of38% a transit stop 30% 23% ane ra 38% n 30% n 2-78 a ons a n t a ons a n t 2-79 City-wide Average District Total Area with- otent a ar res a ons a n t a ons a n t *equivalent of one full-time worker per unit era e ater otent a era e (61%) (70%) 605605 4,313 4,313 City-wide Average District Total Percent of residents in the planning City-widedistrict Average within 1/4District and Total 1/2 Area with- out access se o a ater se Area with- 23% (61%) (70%) 38% 30% PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET (61%) (70%) 97% 100%97% 100%mile of a transit stop out access otent a ar res JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t out access Downtown ota ar et res ota ar et res Percent of residents in theCity-wide planning Average districtDistrict withinTotal 1/4Area and with- 1/2 otent a ar res otent a ar res Average job opportunity in proximity605 to the planning 4,313 district t era e t t era e era e t era e has more Percent of residents in the planning district within 1/4 and 1/2 Percent of residents in the planning district within(61%) 1/4 and(70%) 1/2 th n e th n th n e e th n e mile of a transit stop97% 100% out access than enough th n e th n e th n e th n e mile of a transit stop mile of a transit stop otent a ar res vacant land t era e t ota era e ar et res t era e t era e 605 4,313 Percent of residents in the planning district within 1/4 and 1/2 605 4,313 t era e t era e st n st n in the future 605 4,313 mile of a transit stop 97% 100% ar res ar res 97% th n e th n e 97% 100% place type th n e th n e 100% ota ar et ota res ar et res ota ar et res model to t era e t era e 605 4,313 LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS t era e t era e t era e t t era e era e t era e 97% 100% convert to st n th n e th n th n e e th n e ota ar et res th n e th n e ar res th n th n e e th n th n e e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT parks th n or open e th n e t era e t era e space t to era e meet t era e t era e t era e t t era e era e th n e th n e st n the target. st n st n th n e th n e ar res ar res t era e t era e ar res st n ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.B EAST LAS VEGAS
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Redevelop substandard housing and incentivize infill housing
• Reduce food swamps
• Embrace Latinx culture through creative placemaking and design SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Consider locating additional facilities in the north/ northeast PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Develop more accessible parks and open space
• Increased tree canopy target area - highest levels of ozone in City WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
East Las Vegas is comprised of a network of higher density traditional neighborhoods, a thriving and growing Latinx • Focus on workforce training and job creation community, and a well-connected street system; it does, however, face a number of challenges, including high poverty rates, higher rates of crime, and an overall lack of investment or under-investment in infrastructure and services to • Address school overcrowding accommodate a rapidly changing population. The addition of high capacity transit along the edges wil enable East Las TRANSPORTATION Vegas to transform itself into a diverse and cohesive sector of Las Vegas.
• Complete sidewalk network DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity • Develop high capacity transit along Charleston Blvd • Current population: 75,146 and Eastern Ave and rapid bus along Nellis Blvd • Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (11,177) 2-80 • Persons per household: 3.40 2-81 • Single Family Dwellings: 9,428 Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic • Multi-Family Dwellings: 12,938 are highlighted on the following pages • Median Household income: $32,224 • Median rent / mortgage: $828 / $1,039 • Housing tenure: 63.2% rent / 36.8% own • Attained High School Diploma: 57.6% White Black/African American • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 4.8% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Unemployment rate: 10.3% American Indian/Native American Asian • Housing Density: 7.95 dwelling units / acre Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT SEE ALSO: • Population Density: 16,095 residents / square mile More than one race Latino/Hispanic Spectrum Industrial Park Area Plan Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.B EAST LAS VEGAS
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
East Las Vegas is generally characterized by higher density development with a mix of residential housing types. There are existing auto-oriented commercial nodes and retail strips along Bonanza at Eastern Ave and Nellis Blvd.
IN THE FUTURE
There are several opportunities to redevelop substandard 2050 PROJECTIONS housing stock with affordable high-quality housing and • Population: 84,936 Freedom Park introduce higher density mixed-use development particularly • Total New Housing Units: 4,173 (326 Single-family / 3,848 along Bonanza Rd, Eastern Ave, and Nellis Blvd while Multi-family) remaining affordable. The construction of high capacity • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 10,248,995 3 transit along Charleston Blvd along the area’s southern • Housing Density: 9.43 dwelling units / acre edge will also help facilitate transit-oriented development at • Population Density: 19,322 residents / square mile 1 2 US-95, Lamb Blvd, and Nellis Blvd.
PLANNED PLACE TYPES KEY LAND USE TOOLS
Regional Center • Traditional Neighborhood Design • Neighborhood Character • Mixed-Use Center • Transit-Oriented Development Corridor Mixed-Use • • Placemaking through arts and culture • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use Click each tool to read more. Downtown Access Project (reconstruction • Mixed Residential of US-95 East Charleston • Traditional Neighborhoods High Capacity New Subdivision ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district Transit • Subdivision Retrofit WATER USAGE Click each Place Type to read more. Water consumption of residents in the planning area will ar et t era e be reduced with the new planned place types. In order to capture the above projected land uses and City Average densities, the following place types are planned for future 307.5 290.0 City Average 294.7 EAST LAS VEGAS PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK change: 270.1 KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES t era e2-82 2-83 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) 17% ann n area to a 0.29 1. Mixed Residential Potential t a era eF CLV Fire Station 2.3 str t o a 27.7 str t o a 2. Desert t Pines era e Golf Course (city owned) - consider ann n area CCSD School (elementary/middle/ to a neighborhood mixed-use at Pecos intersection and high/alternative or special) retain greenspace Library
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS 3. Mixed-use o redevelopment res ents n ann n priority area th n e o e a t City or other public facility 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater ro ose era e Transportation improvement East Las Vegas Community Center se o a ater se 78% a ons a n t a ons a n t Planned High Capacity Transit East Las Vegas total area: 2,183.3 acres t era e th n e ota ar et res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 59 302 56% 76% ro ose ar res t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.B EAST LAS VEGAS
SERVICES + FACILITIES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE + EDUCATION TRANSPORTATION
East Las Vegas has several major city and regional facilities, Several large traditional parks have historically anchored Over time, blighting conditions have led to the As an older part of town, East Las Vegas has aging including East Las Vegas Community Center, and Clark East Las Vegas, including Freedom Park. A few new parks establishment of expanded redevelopment areas and infrastructure of all types and needs substantial upgrades County Family Services, as well as several city operational are under construction, including smaller neighborhood new economic development initiatives. Many union and complete street improvements in many neighborhoods. facilities, including the City’s East Service Yard, Fire training parks that will help provide green space to underserved halls and training centers are located throughout the The Interstate 515 viaduct (future I-11) runs through the center, and Detention Center. The area lacks city facilities areas, but more will still be needed, and of different types district, as is the Spectrum Industrial Center. Many CCSD southern portion and could be reconstructed and replaced, in the north and northeastern portions, and is plagued by and varieties. Desert Pines Golf Course is also located elementary schools are overcrowded and are in disrepair, which could impact surrounding neighborhoods. Charleston higher overall crime rates throughout the district. within this area; while a major asset, it could be repurposed despite a high concentration. Desert Pines High School Blvd, Eastern Ave, and Nellis Blvd will continue to transition to another use while still incorporating much needed civic is also over capacity. from auto-oriented arterials toward transit-based complete green space. User safety of parks, trails, and open space streets. Opportunities exist along bicycle-friendly corridors within the area has been noted as well. to connect and complement the Las Vegas Wash regional trail. PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESS of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job perJOB housing SUPPLY IN unit DISTRICT within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: ACRES of PARKACRES space of per PARK 1,000 space within per 1/4 1,000 miles within 1/4 miles Job per housing Job unit per withinhousing district unit within district Acres of accessible park space per 1,000 residents within 1/4 Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in City mile ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 milesplanning district Job per housing unit within district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES of PARK spaceACRES per of 1,000 PARK within space 1/4 per miles 1,000 within 1/4 Jobmiles per housing unit Job withinper housing district unit within district ar et t era e Parks 27% 56% ar et ar et t era e t era e ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district 1.0 Target* ar et t era e ar et ar et t era e t era e 290.0 290.0290.0 Schools 63% 31% 290.0 270.1290.0 270.1270.1 ar et t era e 290.0 t era e 270.1 270.1 270.1 t era e t era e Grocery and retail services 31% 19% t era e 290.0 17% 17% $ t era e t era e 17% 17% 17% ann n ann n 270.1 ann n area to a ann n 17% 0.29 ann n area to a t a era e t a era e str t0.29 o a area to a area ann n to a t a era e 2.3 2.3 0.29 0.29 str t o a area to a t a era e t a era e 27.7 27.7 t era e 2.3 0.29 str t o a str t o a str t o a str t o a 27.7 area to a t a era e 2.3 2.3 str t o a 0.29 27.7 t era e t era e ann n area ann n area27.7 Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: str t o a str t o a str t o a 2.3 str t o a 17% t era e ann n area 27.7 t era e ann n area t era e to a to a ann n area str t o a ann n to a t era e ann n area to a to a area to a t a era e to a 0.29 str t o a Community Centers2.3 66% 45% 27.7 str t o a t era e ann n area o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t TRANSPORTATION o res ents ACCESS n ann n & EQUITY area th nto a e o e a t o res ents n ann n o res ents area n th n ann n area e th n o e a t e o e a t era e ater ro ose era e o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t era e ater ro ose era e era e ater era e ro ose ater era e ro ose era e o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t se o a se ater o a se ater se 78% 78% se o a se o a ater se ater se 78% 78% a ons a n t *equivalent of one a ons a n t a ons a n t full-time worker per a ons a n t unit era e ater ro ose era e a ons a n t era e a ons a n t ater a ons a n t ro ose a ons a n t era e o res ents se o a n ann n area ater t th n era e se e o t e era e a t 78% PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a ater se th n e t era e 78% JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e t era e a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e ota ar et res ota ar et res era e ater ro ose era e t era e Even with Average job opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n or area e th n o or e o ota ar et res ota ar et se o a res ater se 78% th n t era e e trans t sto trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n or e o 2-84 the place a ons a n t a ons a n t 2-85 o res ents n ann n area th n th n or e e o 59 ota 302 ar et res trans t sto type model 59 302 t era e trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n or e o ota ar et res 56% 76% 56% 76% assumption 59 59 302 302 th n e o trans t res ents sto n ann n area th n or e o of additional ro ose ar res ro ose ar res 56% 76% ota ar et res t era e t era e t era e t era e trans t sto 56% 76% 59 302 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o potential park ro ose ar res th n e th n e th n e t era e t t ro ose era e era e ar res t era e 56% 76% acres, East 59 302 trans t sto t era e t t era e era e t era e th n e th n th n e e th n e Las Vegas still ro ose ar res th n e th n th n e e th n56% e 76% st n st n 59 302 t era e t era e t era e t era e t era e t era e falls short ar res of ar res ro ose ar res th n e th n th n e e th n e 56% 76% th n e th n e the target. t era e t era e t era e t era e ro ose ar res st n st n LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e ar res ar res st n t era e t era e th n e th n e
02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e ar res th n e th n e th n e th n e st n See Chapter 3, Section st n I.B School Facilities and ar res ar res Chapter 4, Section III.A Public Facilities See Chapter 2, Section III Environment See Chapter 3, Economy & Workforce See Chapter 4, Section I Transportation
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.C WEST LAS VEGAS
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Balance historic neighborhood preservation with housing infill
• Expansion of redevelopment areas to enable infill SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Increase equitable access to services PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Develop more accessible parks and open space WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Consider a Westside High School
• Strengthen performance of schools TRANSPORTATION
West Las Vegas is comprised of the neighborhoods immediately surrounding the Historic Westside district of Downtown • Upgrade aging infrastructure Las Vegas, a culturally significant and diverse area including the Berkley Square Neighborhood, Bonanza Village, Vegas Heights, and Eastland Village neighborhoods. For many decades, West Las Vegas and its residents, predominantly African • Complete streets improvements American, were physically and economically segregated from the rest of the community. West Las Vegas is comparatively poorer, homogeneous, and faces greater socio-economic challenges than other districts. By 2050, this area will gain new • Develop Rapid Bus alogn Martin Luther King Blvd and life and development that preserves the community’s identity and heritage. Rancho Dr DEMOGRAPHICS
• Current population: 17,343 Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic • Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (2,794) Race & Ethnicity are highlighted on the following pages. • Persons per household: 2.93 2-86 • Single Family Dwellings: 3,698 2-87 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 2,846 • Median Household income: $32,937 • Median rent / mortgage: $867 / $1,174 • Housing tenure: 67.2% rent / 32.8% own • Attained High School Diploma: 71.2% • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 7.6%
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Unemployment rate: 11.3% White Black/African American • Housing Density: 6.60 dwelling units / acre 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT • Population Density: 11,190 residents / square mile American Indian/Native American Asian SEE ALSO: Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other West Las Vegas Area Plan Above / Below citywide average More than one race Latino/Hispanic
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.C WEST LAS VEGAS
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
The Martin Luther King Blvd corridor links the core neighborhoods of West Las Vegas. Many of these neighborhoods remain stable and offer a range of affordable single-family and multi-family housing types. Other neighborhoods have lost significant housing stock, leaving behind vacant or empty lots, providing an opportunity for infill mixed residential Vegas Heights redevelopment. Places of worship are spread throughout the community and serve as an anchor for many neighborhoods. Las Vegas 2 Business Park IN THE FUTURE
2050 PROJECTIONS Transit-Oriented Development corridors and neighborhood 1 • Population: 83,898 centers are located throughout the district and offer • Total New Housing Units: 2,987 (229 Single family / 2,758 prime areas for higher density development. The western Multi-family) half of West Las Vegas is typified by mature single-family 1 2 • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 2,778,885 residential neighborhoods and apartment complexes, with • Housing Density: 9.61 dwelling units / acre pockets of large estates. The southern end of the district • Population Density: 16,837 residents / square mile contains substantial industrial land along the freeway. Comstock Historic West Side KEY LAND USE TOOLS Estates Berkley Square PLANNED PLACE TYPES (Rural Pres.) • Diverse Housing Options Regional Center • Infill housing • Mixed-Use Center • Traditional Neighborhood Design • Neighborhood Character 3 Corridor Mixed-Use • • Transit-Oriented Development • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Placemaking through arts and culture • Mixed Residential • Adaptive Reuse • Traditional Neighborhoods • Historic Preservation Click each tool to read more. ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 milesNew Subdivision Job per housing unit within district WATER USAGE Subdivision Retrofit • Water consumption of residents in the planning area will Click each Place Type to read more. ar et t era e be reduced with the new planned place types. In order to capture the above projected land uses and densities, the following place types are planned for future City Average 294.9 change: 307.5 City Average 257.9 WEST LAS VEGAS PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK t 2-88 era e 294.7 22.4% 2-89 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) KEY REDEVELOPMENT ann n OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES area to a 0.45 str t o a F CLV Fire Station t a era e 1. Key Redevelopment Sites 1.7 t a era e 27.7 LVMPD Substation str t o a ann n area 2. Historic Neighborhoods - balance preservation withto a CCSD School (elementary/middle/ infill high/alternative or special) LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t Library 3. Ahern Properties Redevelopment Opportunity 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater ro ose era e City or other public facility se o a ater se 100% a ons a n t a ons a n t Doolittle Community/Senior Center West Las Vegas area: 991.1 acres t era e th n e ota ar et res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 75 346 ro ose ar res 96% 100% t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.C WEST LAS VEGAS
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
West Las Vegas has a major need for upgraded There is a significant lack of parks and open space in West Historically West Las Vegas’s commercial uses were Rancho Dr, US-95 (future I-11), and I-15 make up the infrastructure and additional public facilities and services. Las Vegas; Existing facilities are limited to a scattering of dominated by small, local businesses. A few national fast primary western, southern, and eastern edges of the The area is served by two community centers: Pearson and small neighborhood and pocket parks exist and a major food and fast casual chains have opened near Lake Mead district, while the northern edge is bounded by the City Doolittle. However, the western half of West Las Vegas lacks park (Kianga Isoke Palacio Park) at the Doolittle Community and Martin Luther King Blvd. Through the efforts of the of North Las Vegas. West Las Vegas will be served by significant investment and community services. West Las Center. An additional major park or open space should be City’s Redevelopment Agency, several major employment rapid bus service along Rancho and Martin Luther King. Vegas is served by the LVMPD’s Bolden Area Command; constructed with quality amenities that will be safe and well centers are now located within West Las Vegas, including Infrastructure throughout the district is older, deteriorating, however, higher crime rates, homelessness, drug use, and utilized. the West Las Vegas Business Park and the Bonanza Rd and in need of maintenance. While CDBG funds and FRI chronic illnesses and conditions continue to plague the corridor. Many CCSD and private schools are located funding have helped to pay for select improvements, capital area. throughout the district, but a major high school is lacking, funding is needed to support complete streets and public and many schools routinely underperform, despite being transportation projects. Efforts that further connect West in designated Opportunity or Achievement zones and Las Vegas and the Historic Westside to Downtown Las receiving additional funding and resources. Also located in Vegas should continue to be encouraged. West Las Vegas is the Advanced Technologies Academy and the Veterans Tribute Career and Technical Academy. PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESSACRES of PARK of PARK space space per per 1,000 1,000 within within 1/4 milesmiles Job Job per per housingJOB housing SUPPLY unit IN within unitDISTRICT within district district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessible park spaceACRES per 1,000of PARK residents space within per 1,000 1/4 within 1/4 milesAverage Jobjob opportunityper housing per unit residential within unit district in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in ACRES ofCity PARK spaceACRES per of PARK1,000mile space ofwithin the perplanning 1/4 1,000 miles districtwithin 1/4 milesACRES Job per ofhousing PARK Job unitspace per within housing per district 1,000 unit within within district1/4 milesplanning district Job per housing unit within district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ar et t era e ar et t era e Parks 41% 56% ar et t era e 1.0 Target* ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles ar et Job per ar et housing unit within district t era e t era e 294.9 ar et t era e 294.9294.9 294.9 294.9 Schools 78% 31% 294.9 257.9 ar et t era e t era e 22.4% t era e 257.9 257.9257.9 ann n 22.4% t era e t era e t era e 257.9 22.4% 22.4% 22.4% area to a $ Grocery and retail services 17% 19% 294.9 0.45 ann n ann n 257.9 ann n ann n t era e str t o a 22.4% 0.45 0.45 area to a area to a area to a area to a 0.45 str t o a str t o a str t o a ann n 0.45 str t o a t a era e area to a 257.9 0.45 str t o a t a era e t a era e t a era e 27.7 t a era e t era e 1.7 22.4% 27.7 Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: 1.7 1.7 str t o a t a era e t a era e 27.7 t a era e ann n area 27.7 t a era e str t o a str t o a 1.7 ann n ann n area t a era e str t o a ann n area t a era e to a ann n area27.7 1.7 str t o a area to a to a to a t a era e 27.7 0.45 str t o a 1.7 to a ann n area str t o a ann n area Community Centers 91% 45% to a t a era e to a o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n e area o th n e a t e o e a t o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 1.7 t a era e 27.7 str t o a TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY ann n area o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t era e ater era e ro ose ater era e ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e se o a ater se to a 100% se o a ater se se o a era e ater ater se ro ose era e 100% o o res ents res ents n100% n ann n ann n area area th n th n e e o e o a t e a t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t se a ons a n t o a ater se 100% *equivalent of one full-time employee per residential unit era e ater ro ose t era e era e t era e 2-90 era e a ons a n t ater ro ose a ons a n t era e 2-91 t era e se o a th n ater se e th n e 100% PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a o res ents n ann n ater searea th n e o e a t th n e t era e 100% ota ar et res ota ar et res JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t Even with a ons a n t o res ents a ons a n t n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n or area th n e o or e o th n e ota ar et res era e ater ro ose era e t era e Average job opportunity in proximity to the planning district trans t sto trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n or e t o era e the place ota se ar et o a res ater se 100% th n e type model 75 75 346 346 trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n th n or e e o a ons a n t ota ar et res a ons a n t assumption 96% 100% 96% 100% trans t sto ro ose ar res ro ose ar res ota ar et res 75 346 t era e o res ents n ann n area th n or e o of additional th n e trans t o res ents sto 96% n ann n area th n or e o ro ose ar res 75 346 t era e t era e t era e t era e 100% potential park th n e th n e 96% ota ar et res ro ose ar res 75 346 th n e th n e trans t sto 100% acres, West t era e t t era e era e t era e o res ents n ann n area th n or e o t era e t era e th n e th n th n e e th n e 96% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS Las Vegas still ro ose ar res 75 346 trans t sto th n e t th n era e e t era e 100% st n st n t era e t era e th n e th n e ar res falls short of 96% 100% ar res 75 346 ro ose ar res th n e t th n era e e t era e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e the target. th n e th n e 96% 100% th n e th n e ro ose ar res st n t era e t era e t era e t era e ar res st n th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e ar res t era e t era e st n th n e th n e t era e ar res t era e th n e th n e st n th n e th n e st n ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 ar res II.D DOWNTOWN SOUTH
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Balance historic neighborhood preservation with development pressures along corridors SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Consider locating additional facilities to complete service offerings PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Develop more accessible parks and open space WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Build a new specialized school at the former Bishop Gorman High School site along Maryland Pkwy to alleviate overcrowding TRANSPORTATION
• Upgrade aging infrastructure over time Downtown South is comprised of the City’s earliest inner-ring traditional neighborhoods, including John S. Park, Huntridge, • Construct Spencer Greenway trail for additional multi- Beverly Green, Southridge, Mayfair, Hillside Heights, and Crestwood. Given its close proximity to Downtown Las Vegas and modal access to regional desinations several major transportation corridors on its periphery, including Charleston Blvd, Maryland Pkwy, Sahara Ave, and Las Vegas Blvd, these historic areas are in flux and must be carefully balanced with preservation efforts with the increasing • Develop Maryland Pkwy, Eastern Ave, Charleston Blvd, pressure and demand for transit-oriented development. and Las Vegas Blvd high capacity transit, and upgrade service along Sahara Ave DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity • Current population: 16,883 Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic • Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (2,345) are highlighted on the following pages. 2-92 2-93 • Persons per household: 3.06 • Single Family Dwellings: 4,083 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 1,814 • Median Household income: $38,561 • Median rent / mortgage: $936 / $1,189 • Housing tenure: 50.7% rent / 49.3% own • Attained High School Diploma: 70.4%
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS White Black/African American • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 16.2% SEE ALSO:
• Unemployment rate: 10.5% American Indian/Native American Asian 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT Beverly Green/Southridge Neighborhood Plan • Housing Density: 5.70 dwelling units / acre Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other • Population Density: 10,451 residents / square mile John S. Park Neighborhood Plan More than one race Latino/Hispanic Above / Below citywide average Maryland Parkway TOD
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.D DOWNTOWN SOUTH PLANNING AREA
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
Comprised of traditional historic neighborhoods, Downtown South will focus on preservation of existing housing. However, as opportunities present themselves, higher density transit-oriented development and developing new place and housing types along the periphery will be thoughtfully done to ensure housing remains affordable and gentrification is John S. Park historic minimized. neighborhood Construct Spencer Greenway to IN THE FUTURE connect regional destinations
While the neighborhoods around Downtown South are well 2050 PROJECTIONS established, some areas along the edges of the planning • Population: 27,434 area may require enhancements and transformations in an • Total New Housing Units: 3,448 (136 Single family / 3,312 1 effort to redevelop and remove blighting conditions. Historic Multi family shopping centers and mixed-use corridors may potentially • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 3,705,302 need to be redeveloped over time, especially at key nodes. • Housing Density: 9.04 dwelling units / acre • Population Density: 16,983 residents / square mile
PLANNED PLACE TYPES KEY LAND USE TOOLS • Regional Center • Diverse Housing Options • Mixed-Use Center • Infill housing New CCSD School • Corridor Mixed-Use • Neighborhood Character Beverly Green historic • Mixed-Use • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use neighborhood • Transit-Oriented Development Mixed Residential • • Placemaking through arts and culture • Traditional Neighborhoods • Historic Preservation New Subdivision Click each tool to read more.
• Subdivision Retrofit WATER USAGE ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4Click miles each Place Type Job to perread housing more. unit within district Water consumption of residents in the planning area will be reduced with the new planned place types. In order to capture the above projected land uses and ar et t era e densities, the following place types are planned for future City Average 320.2 307.5 DOWNTOWN SOUTH PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK change: 0.79 City Average str t o a KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 2-94 272.1 294.7 2-95 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) t era e 18.1% ann n 23.5 1. Key redevelopmentarea to a site (former Castaways site) ann n LVMPD Substation area to a t a era e Hospital t a era e 1.3 CCSD School (elementary/middle/ str t o a high/alternative or special) LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS Planned High Capacity Transit City or other public facility o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater ro ose era e Downtown South area: 1,033.9 acres se o a ater se 100% a ons a n t a ons a n t t era e th n e DRAFT: 09/13/20 ota ar et res o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 114 673 78.1% 100%
t era e t era e ro ose ar res th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.D DOWNTOWN SOUTH
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Because Downtown South’s close proximity to Downtown Downtown South has several historic parks with mature Some CCSD schools, especially high schools, are Downtown South is bordered by major transit corridors that Las Vegas, major city and regional facilities located there trees and denser tree canopy, but more open space overcrowded, but an opportunity exists to build a new will continue to transition from auto-oriented arterials toward serve this area, or may be located in Clark County; however, amenities are needed throughout the area. Several parks, specialized school at the former Bishop Gorman High transit-based complete streets. A number of important bike- Downtown South does lack some facilities and services that including Leavitt Park and Baker Park are small, but well- School site along Maryland Pkwy to serve the community. friendly corridors, including St Louis Ave and the proposed would provide more complete offerings and public safety used neighborhood parks that have recently been upgraded. Spencer Greenway, provide multi-modal options. As an older protections. An opportunity for a unique civic space exists at Huntridge part of town, aging infrastructure will need to be upgraded Circle Park, as well as constructing a multi-use trail along over time. the Spencer Greenway.
PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESS of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job perJOB housingSUPPLY IN DISTRICTunit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRES of PARKACRES space of per PARK 1,000 space within per 1/4 1,000 miles within 1/4 miles Job per housing Job unit per withinhousing district unit within district Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessible park space per 1,000 residents within 1/4 Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district City mile of the planning district planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES of PARKACRES space of PARK per space1,000 withinper 1,000 1/4 within miles 1/4 miles Job per housing Job per unit housing within unit district within district Parks 46% 56% ar et ar et ar et t era e t era e t era e 320.2 320.2 1.0 Target* 320.2 ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district ar et t era e 320.2 ar et t era e 0.79 ar et t era e 0.79 320.2 str t0.79 str t o a 320.2 o a str t o a Schools 60% 31% 0.79 272.1 0.79 0.79 str t o a 272.1272.1 ar et t era e str t o a str t320.2 o a 18.1% 18.1% t era e t era e 272.1 272.1 18.1% t era e 272.1 ann n ann n 23.5 23.5 Grocery and retail services 24% 19% 18.1% ann n 18.1% 23.5 $ t era e t era e t era e 18.1% area to a area to a ann n 0.79 ann n 23.5 area to a ann n str t o a ann n 23.5 ann n area to a 23.5 ann n area to a ann n area to a area to a ann n area to a ann n area to a 272.1 t areaa era e to a t a era e area to a t a era e area to a 18.1% t a era e t a era e t a era e t era e t a era e Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: ann n t a era e t a era e t a era e t a era e 1.3 1.3 23.5 t a era e str t o a str t o a area to a 1.3 1.3 str t o a ann n str t o a 1.3 str t o a 1.3 str t o a area to a Community Centers 100% 45% t a era e t a era e TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY o res ents n ann n o res ents area n th n ann n area e th no e a t e o e a t 1.3 o res ents o n res ents ann n narea ann n th n area e th n o e e a t o e a t str t o a era e ater ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e o o res ents res ents n ann n area area th n th n e e o e o e a t a t era e ater ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se se o a se o a ater se ater se 100% 100% 100% 100% *equivalent of one full-time worker per unit 2-96 a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t era e a ons a n t ater a ons a n t era e ater ro ose a ons a n t era e ro ose era e 2-97 se o a ater se t era e 100% PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a o res ents n ater ann n se area th n t era e e o e a t t era e t era e 100% JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e Even with a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e ota ar et res ota ar et res t era e the place ota ar et res ota ar et era e res ater Average ro ose job opportunity era e in proximity to the planning district o res ents n ann n area th n or e o t era e o res ents n ann n area th n or e o o res ents n ann n area th n or th n e o e type model se o a ater se trans t sto trans t sto 100% o res ents n ann n area th n eor e o a ons a n t ota ar et res a ons a n t trans t sto trans t sto assumption ota 114 ar et114 res 673 673 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o of additional 114 673 t era e 78.1% 78.1% 100% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o 114 673 th n e 100% trans t sto potential 78.1% 78.1%100% ota ar et res t era e t era e trans t sto 100% park acres, ro ose ar res 114 673 t era e t era e ro ose ar res o res ents n th n ann n e th n area th n th n e e or th n e e o 78.1% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS Downtown t era e t era e t era e t era e 114 673 t era e t t era e era e t era e 100% ro ose ar res trans t sto South still th n e th n ro ose e th n ar e res th n e th n e th n th n e e th n e78.1% 100% st n t era e t era e t era e t era e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e st n falls short of 114 673 ro ose ar res ar res ar res th n e th n th n e e th n e th n e th n e the target. t era e t era e 78.1% 100% t era e t era e st n st n ro ose ar res th n e th n e th n e th n e ar res ar res t era e t era e st n t era e t era e ro ose ar res th n e th n e th n e th n e t era e t era e ar res th n st n e th n e DRAFT: 09/13/20 st n ar res ar res II.E CHARLESTON
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Balance historic neighborhood preservation with development pressures along corridors
• Support transit-oriented development along corridors SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Explore additional city facilities in the southern area PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• More civic and green spaces are needed district-wide WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Address school overcrowding, expected to increase with the addition of high capacity transit TRANSPORTATION
• Improve aging infrastructure and make complete streets improvements. The Charleston Blvd corridor is the City’s major east-west link and commercial corridor between Downtown Las Vegas and its western suburbs. Comprised of both the City’s earliest inner-ring suburbs and new suburban neighborhoods, this area • Develop high capacity transit along Charleston and has high potential for transit-oriented development and new place types along multiple corridors with the introduction of Decatur Boulevard corridors, as well as Rapid bus high capacity transit over the next thirty years. along Jones Boulevard and Sahara Ave corridors
• Construct improvements along I-15 corridor DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity • Current population: 75,146 Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic • Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (10,326) are highlighted on the following pages. • Persons per household: 2.74 2-98 2-99 • Single Family Dwellings: 14,693 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 14,422 • Median Household income: $41,172 • Median rent / mortgage: $864 / $1,298 • Housing tenure: 59.7% rent / 40.3% own • Attained High School Diploma: 78.7% • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 16.8% White Black/African American LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Unemployment rate: 9.0% American Indian/Native American Asian
• Housing Density: 5.65 dwelling units / acre 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT • Population Density: 9,340 residents / square mile Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other SEE ALSO: More than one race Latino/Hispanic Meadows Neighborhood Plan Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.E CHARLESTON
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
Comprised of traditional historic neighborhoods on its eastern end, Charleston must balance the preservation of its existing housing and businesses with new development. The transition from older neighborhoods to newer suburbs can will be carefully done to ensure housing remains affordable and gentrification is minimized. Areas with traditional shopping centers may have opportunities for future infill development. Las Vegas 1 IN THE FUTURE Springs Preserve The Charleston area will focus on more intense, higher 2050 PROJECTIONS density transit-oriented development and developing new • Population: 103,384 place and housing types at specific locations and strips • Total New Housing Units: 10,306 (877 Single family / 9,429 along Charleston Blvd, Sahara Ave, and Decatur Blvd with Multi family the redevelopment of select opportunity sites. • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 4,082,409 • Housing Density: 7.66 dwelling units / acre CSN • Population Density: 12,850 residents / square mile
PLANNED PLACE TYPES
Regional Center KEY LAND USE TOOLS • Mixed-Use Center • Diverse Housing Options • Neighborhood Character Corridor Mixed-Use • • Mixed-Use • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Transit-Oriented Development Charleston and • Mixed Residential • Placemaking through arts and culture Decatur High 2 Capacity Transit • Traditional Neighborhoods • Adaptive reuse Click each tool to read more. New SubdivisionJob per housing unit within district • Subdivision Retrofit ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Click each Place Type to read2.77 more. str t o a WATER USAGE Water consumption of residents in the planning area will ar et be reduced with the new planned place types. In order to capture the above projected land uses and densities, the following place types are planned for future City Average 287.2 CHARLESTON PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK change: 307.5 City Average KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES t era e2-100 259.6 2-101 4.3 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) 294.7 str t o a 17.5% 22.0 ann n 1. Meadows Mall Redevelopment Opportunity ann n area to a F CLV Fire Station t era e area to a 2. Business t a era ePark Redevelopment Opportunity t a era e Hospital CCSD School (elementary/middle/ high/alternative or special) LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS Transportation o res ents nimprovement ann n area th n e o e a t Library
02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater ro ose era e Planned High Capacity Rapid Transit City or other public facility se o a ater se 100% a ons a n t a ons a n t Upgraded Bus Rapid Transit Mirabelli Community Center Charleston area: 5,149.3 acres t era e th n e
ota ar et res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 184 956 77.5% 99.5% ro ose ar res t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.E CHARLESTON
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
The Charleston planning area has several major city and The Charleston area’s most notable open space asset is the Over time, blighting conditions have led to the establishment The Charleston planning area is bordered on the east and regional facilities, including Mirabelli Community Center, and Las Vegas Springs Preserve, a central park signifying the of expanded redevelopment areas and new economic north by I-15 and US-95 (Future I-11). Each of the corridors the Las Vegas Valley Water District. It lacks city facilities in historical development of resilience of this Mojave Desert development initiatives. Several large neighborhood will continue to transition from auto-oriented arterials the southern area and has higher crime rates in the central metropolis. Several large traditional parks have been casinos are located within the district. The large regional toward transit-based complete streets. Similarly, the area and eastern portion of the district. With the addition of high constructed, including Rainbow Family Park and Firefighters mall and shopping center currently serve as the major also contains important bicycle-friendly corridors, including capacity transit, already overcrowded school facilities will Memorial Park. While other smaller neighborhood parks commercial anchor; however, the area is prime for future the Downtown to Red Rock Trail along Alta Dr. However, face increased pressure have been recently upgraded, more civic and green spaces redevelopment. The College of Southern Nevada serves as as an older part of town, it also has aging infrastructure are needed throughout the area. a major institutional and employment anchor. Many CCSD of all types and needs upgrades and complete street schools are overcrowded and at least one new high school improvements in several neighborhoods. and middle school are needed.
Job per housing unit within district Job per housingJob unit per within housing district unit within district JOB SUPPLY IN DISTRICT PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESS of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Job per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRES of PARK space perJob 1,000 per housing withinJob unit 1/4per withinhousingmiles district unit within district Average2.77 job opportunity per residential unit in the planning Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles 2.77 2.77 str t o a Acres of accessible park space per 1,000 residents within 1/4 district str t o a str t o a Percentage of households Average commute time (in ACRESCity of PARKACRES space of per PARKmile 1,000 ofspace the within planningper 1/41,000 miles district within 1/4ACRES miles of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles 2.77 without cars within the district minutes) within the City Job per housing unit within district2.77 str t2.77 o a str t o a str t o a Parks 20% 56% ar et ar et ar et ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles 2.77 ar et ar et str t o a ar et 287.2 287.2287.2 Schools 36% 31% 287.2 287.2 ar et 287.2 t era e 259.6 259.6 4.3 t era e4.3 t era e 259.6 259.6 259.6 4.3 t 4.3 era e t era e4.3 str t o a str t o a 17.5% $ Grocery and retail services 23% 19% str t o a str t o a str t o a 259.6 17.5% 22.0 4.3 t era e287.2 17.5% 17.5% 22.0 ann n 22.0 17.5% 22.0 ann n ann n ann n 22.0 str t o a ann n ann n ann n ann n 17.5% ann n area to a area to a area to a 22.0 ann n t era e t era e area to a area to a area to a area to a area to a t era e t era e area ann n to a t era e 259.61.0 t era e Target* ann n area to a 4.3 t a era e t a era e t a era e t a era e area to a t a era e area to a str t o a t era e t a era e t a era e t a era e Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: 17.5% t a era e 22.0 t a era e t a era e ann n ann n t a era e area to a t era e area to a Community Centers 51% 45% t a era e o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t o res ents n ann n area t th n a era e e o e a t o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t era e ater era e ro ose ater era e ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se era e ater ro ose era e 100% 100% o o res ents res ents n n ann n ann n area area th n th n e e o e o a t e a t era e ater ro ose era e a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t se o a se o a ater se ater se 100% 100% *equivalent of one full-time worker per unit 2-102 a ons a n t era e a ons a n t ater a ons a n t era e ater ro ose a ons a n t ro ose era e era e t era e t era e 2-103 se o a ater th n se e th n e PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a o res ents n ann n ater area se th n e o e a t t era e t era e 100%100% ota ar et res ota ar et res JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t Even with a ons a n t o res ents a ons a n t n ann n o res ents area n th n ann n area or th n e o or e o th n e th n e era e ater ro ose Average era ejob opportunity in proximity to the planning district t era e the place ota ar et res ota ar et res trans t sto trans t sto t era e se o a ater se 100% o res ents n ann n o res ents area n th n ann n orarea th n th n e o e or e o type model a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e 184 184 956 ota ar et956 res trans t sto assumption 77.5% 77.5%99.5% trans t sto ota ar et res t era e 99.5% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o of additional ro ose ar res ro ose ar res 184 184 956 956 th n e trans t o res ents sto n ann n area th n or e o potential t era e t t era e era e t era e 77.5% 99.5% ota ar et res th n e th n th n e e th n e trans t sto 77.5% 99.5% park acres, t ro ose era e ar t res era e t era e t era e 184 956 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o ro ose ar res 77.5% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS th n e th n e 99.5% Charleston th n e th n e184 956 trans t sto t era e t t era e era e t era e st n still falls st n short ro ose ar res th n e th n th n e e th n e77.5% 99.5% 184 956 t era e t era e t era e t era e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e ar res of the ar target. res ro ose ar res th n e th n th n e e th n e 77.5% 99.5% th n e th n e t era e t era e t era e t era e ro ose ar res st n st n th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e ar res ar res t era e t era e st n th n e th n e t era e t era e ar res th n e th n e th n e th n e st n st n ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 ar res II.F TWIN LAKES
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Balance historic neighborhood preservation with development pressures along corridors
• Add visual improvements throughout planning area SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Increase services, especially near county islands PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Develop more accessible parks and open space WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Increase employment opportunities
• Improve school performance
• Build upon Tech Center as economic engine TRANSPORTATION Twin Lakes contains a collection of inner-ring traditional suburban neighborhoods, including Golf Ridge, Charleston Heights, and Pittman, as well as some small and large traditional planned communities, like Desert Shores. So named • Improve walkability for the springs of Lorenzi Park and waters at Desert Shores, the Las Vegas Tech Center serves as a regional employment center with medical offices and business park. The Decatur Blvd corridor will serve as a new spine for redevelopment and • Improve aging infrastructure affordable housing choices. • Develop high capacity transit along Decatur Blvd and rapid bus along Jones Blvd and Rancho Dr DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity
• Current population: 105,220 • Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (16,254) Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic are highlighted on the following pages 2-104 • Persons per household: 2.93 2-105 • Single Family Dwellings: 19,932 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 17,343 • Median Household income: $46,152 • Median rent / mortgage: $957 / $1,241 • Housing tenure: 57.1% rent / 42.9% own • Attained High School Diploma: 80.8% • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 16.7% White Black/African American LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Unemployment rate: 10.4% American Indian/Native American Asian • Housing Density: 7.59 dwelling units / acre 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other • Population Density: 13,712 residents / square mile: SEE ALSO: More than one race Latino/Hispanic Desert Shores Planned Unit Development Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.F TWIN LAKES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
The traditional neighborhoods of Twin Lakes include a range of mid-century housing, as well as a variety of multi-family housing types. Numerous apartment complexes and other multi-family housing types exist, although the quality varies. CLV Several unincorporated county islands containing single-family residential and ranch estates present opportunities for West annexation. Yard
IN THE FUTURE 1 1 Desert Shores Redevelopment opportunities for transit-oriented 2050 PROJECTIONS Las Vegas development at older, vacant shopping centers exist along • Population: 103,384 Tech Center 1 many of the major north-south arterial corridors including • Total New Housing Units: 8,506 (266 Single family / 8,241 Rancho Drive, Decatur Blvd, Jones Blvd, and Rainbow Blvd. Multi family • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 4,995,693 • Housing Density: 9.32 dwelling units / acre 1 1 • Population Density: 16,961 residents / square mile
PLANNED PLACE TYPES 1 Golf Course, Ed KEY LAND USE TOOLS Regional Center 1 Fountain Park, • Diverse Housing Options Lorenzi Park • Mixed-Use Center • Neighborhood Character 1 • Corridor Mixed-Use • Mixed-Use • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Walkable Site Design • Transit-Oriented Development • Mixed Residential • Placemaking through arts and culture Decatur High Traditional Neighborhoods • Adaptive reuse Capacity Transit New SubdivisionJob per housing unit within district Click each tool to read more. Subdivision Retrofit ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles• WATER USAGE Click each Place Type to read more. Water consumption of residents in the planning area will be reduced with the new planned place types. ar et In order to capture the above projected t era e land uses and 6.8 str t o a densities, the following place types are planned for future change: City Average 283.9 307.5 City Average 2-106 265.8 TWIN LAKES PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK 2-107 t era e 0.60 294.7 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) str t o a KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 24.3 t a era e ann n F CLV Fire Station 8.8% area to a t a era e 1. Redevelopment ann n Opportunities Hospital area to a CCSD School (elementary/middle/ high/alternative or special) LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS Library o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT City or other public facility era e ater ro ose era e se o a ater se 100% Planned High Capacity Transit Mirabelli Community Center Twin Lakes area: 4,910.9 acres a ons a n t a ons a n t t era e th n e ota ar et res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 64 310 ro ose ar res 86.2% 99.8% t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.F TWIN LAKES
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Twin Lakes has a number of city services, including the Several major regional parks are in Twin Lakes including Twin Lakes includes a mix of business and economic Rancho Dr and US-95 (future I-11), as it transitions from City’s West Service Center; Mirabelli Community Center Lorenzi Park, Kellogg Zaher Park, Ed Fountain Park, and Doc development opportunities. Older arterial corridors contain east-west to north-south around the Rainbow Curve, make is also located in this area, but pockets of Twin Lakes are Romeo Park; these are connected by the Lone Mountain strip retail and neighborhood shopping centers; the ones up the primary western, southern and eastern edges of underserved, especially around the unincorporated county and Bonanza Trails. Las Vegas Municipal Golf Course, the east and north of US-95 have higher rates of tenant the district. Twin Lakes will be served by several RTC’s high islands. The addition of a new community center would City’s first golf course, can also be found within the. While vacancies. The Las Vegas Tech Center is a major planned capacity transit services; BRT and Rapid bus service will help connect residents with City services in an area that is there are several smaller neighborhood parks, a few notable business park containing the Mountain View Hospital. In service most north-south arterial corridors. Infrastructure underserved. areas lack an accessible park or green space. newer suburban areas abutting Summerlin along the US-95 throughout the district varies; newer developed areas corridor, many shopping centers are stable and contain a provide adequate capacity, while older areas will require wide range of national retail chains catering to an upscale new infrastructure investment. market. There is a good distribution of public schools in Twin Lakes; however, the middle and high schools tend to suffer in academic performance. Western High School is located in Twin Lakes along with the College of Southern Nevada: Western Center. Job per housing unit within district Job per housingJob unit per within housing district unit within district PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESS of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRES of PARK spaceACRES per of PARK1,000 space within per 1/4 1,000 miles within 1/4 miles Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessible park space per 1,000Job residents per housingJob withinper housing unit 1/4 within unit district within district Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles City mile ofJob the per planning housing district unit within district planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES ofACRES PARK ofspace PARK per space 1,000 per within 1,000 1/4 within miles 1/4 miles Parks 44% 56% ar et ar et ar et t era e t era e t era e ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles 6.86.8 6.8 1.0 Target* str t str t o a o a str t ar et o a t era e ar et ar et 6.8 t era e t era e 6.8 6.8 str t o a 283.9 283.9283.9 Schools 33% 31% str t o a str t o a ar et t era e 265.8283.9 265.8 0.60 283.9 0.60283.9 265.8 6.8 t era e t era e 0.60 str t o a str t o a str t o a t era e str t o a 265.8 265.8 Grocery and retail services 26% 19% 0.60265.8 $ t era e t era e 0.60 0.60 t era e 24.3 24.3 str t o a str t283.9 o a str t o a t a era e t a era e ann n ann n 24.3 24.3 24.3 265.8 t a era e area to a area to a 24.3 ann n 0.60 t a era e t a era e ann n ann n 8.8% 8.8% t a era e t era e t a era e t a era e ann n area to a str t o a 8.8% 8.8% area to a area to a ann n ann n 8.8% t a era e t a era e 8.8% t a era earea to a Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: ann n ann n area to a area ann n to a t a era e 24.3 ann n t a era e area to a area to a area to a ann n area to a 8.8% area to a t a era e Community Centers 40% 45% ann n area to a TRANSPORTATION o res entsACCESS o res ents n& ann n EQUITY n ann n area th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n e area o th n e a t e o e a t era e ater ro ose era e o o res ents res ents n n ann n ann n area th n th n e e o o e e a t a t era e ater era e ater ro ose era e ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se se o a se o a ater se ater se 100% 100% 100% 100% *equivalent of one full-time worker per unit 2-108 a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t era e a ons a n t ater a ons a n t era e ater ro ose a ons a n t era e ro ose era e 2-109 o res ents se o a n ann n area ater th n se e t o era e e a t PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a ater se t era e t era e t era e 100%100% JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t th n th n e e Even with a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e ota ar et ota res ar et res era e ater ro ose era e t era e the place ota ar et res ota ar et res Average job opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents o res ents n ann n n ann n area th n area th n or e or o e o t era e se o a ater se 100% o res ents n ann n area th n or th n e o e type model a ons a n t a ons a n t trans t sto trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n th n e or e o ota ar et res trans t sto assumption 64 64 310 310 t era e trans t sto ro ose ar ro ose res ar res ota ar et res o res ents n ann n area th n or e o of additional 64 310 th n e 86.2% 86.2%99.8% 99.8% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o ro ose ar res ro ose ar res 64 310 trans t sto ota ar et res potential park 86.2% 86.2% t era e t era e trans t sto 99.8% 99.8% acres, Twin 64 310 o res ents n ann n t era e area th n t era e or e o ro ose ar res th n th n e e th n th n e e 86.2% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS 99.8% Lakes still ro ose t era e ar t era e res t era e t era e 64 310 trans t sto t era e t era e t era e t era e falls short of th n th n e e th n e th n e th n e th n th n e e th n e86.2% 99.8% 64 310 t era e t t era e era e t era e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e ro ose ar res st n the target. st n ar res ar res th n e th n th n e e th n e 86.2% 99.8% th n e th n e t era e t era e t era e t era e st n st n th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e ar res ar res t era e t era e st n th n e th n e t era e t era e ar res th n e th n e th n e st n th n e st n ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 ar res II.G ANGEL PARK
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Ensure transition of high quality mixed-use development that’s compatible with established residential neighborhoods SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Add city facilities and services PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Maintain and strengthen open space and connections between developments WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Recruit employers and professional offices
• Address school overcrowding - consider a high school for the area TRANSPORTATION Located along the West Charleston Blvd corridor, the Angel Park neighborhoods serve as a transition from the older established areas to the east to the gateway of Summerlin development and Red Rock Canyon. With a mix of large lot • Transition corridors from auto-oriented to complete homes, new residential and commercial subdivisions, and master planned communities, including Canyon Gate, The streets Lakes, Peccole Ranch, and Queensridge, the Angel Park area serves both existing residences with new development occuring to the west. •
• Make improvements to Summerlin Pkwy DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity • Current population: 53,320 Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic • Largest Age Group: 35 - 44 years (7,469) are highlighted on the following pages 2-110 2-111 • Persons per household: 2.41 • Single Family Dwellings: 12,772 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 10,185 • Median Household income: $59,029 • Median rent / mortgage: $1,184 / $1,481 • Housing tenure: 48.2% rent / 51.8% own • Attained High School Diploma: 91.8%
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 30.9% White Black/African American • Unemployment rate: 6.2%
American Indian/Native American Asian 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT • Housing Density: 6.85 dwelling units / acre Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other • Population Density: 10,187 residents / square mile More than one race Latino/Hispanic Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.G ANGEL PARK
City-owned golf course and open LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Tivoli Village Mixed- space TODAY Use Center
Angel Park is characterized by significant open space amenities and master planned communities with an overall higher potential for transit-oriented development. There are several well-established shopping centers such as Boca Park, Tivoli Westcliff Transit Village, and Village Square along the major corridors. Existing large-lot estates and master planned communities, such as Center (park and The Lakes, Queensridge, Canyon Gate, and Peccole Ranch are stable. ride) IN THE FUTURE
2050 PROJECTIONS Along Charleston Blvd and Sahara Ave, the Angel Park Queensridge • Population: 62,529 district will focus corridor directed higher density transit- • Total New Housing Units: 3,821 (531 Single family / 3,290 oriented development to support existing commercial 2 Multi family nodes. Existing large-lot estates and master planned • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 1,389,882 communities will remain. • Housing Density: 7.99 dwelling units / acre • Population Density: 11,946 residents / square mile Peccole Ranch
PLANNED PLACE TYPES KEY LAND USE TOOLS Regional Center • Neighborhood Character Canyon Gate • Mixed-Use Center • Mixed-Use 1 • Corridor Mixed-Use • Walkable Site Design • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Placemaking through arts and culture Click each tool to read more. • Mixed Residential Traditional Neighborhoods Job per housing unit within district New Subdivision ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 •milesSubdivision Retrofit The Lakes WATER USAGE The Lakes business Click each Place Type to read more. park Water consumption of residents in the planning area will ar et t era e be reduced with the new planned place types. In order to capture the above projected land uses and densities, the following place types are planned for future City Average 292.8 307.5 change: 282.8 City Average 294.7 t era e2-112 0.52 ANGEL PARK PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK 2-113 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) str t o a 3.9 KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES str t o a 23.1 t a era e LVMPD Substation ann n 1. Village6.4% Square Mixed-Use Center Infill Potential t a era e area to a CCSD School (elementary/middle/ ann n high/alternative or special) 2. Boca Parkarea to a Mixed-Use Center Infill Potential Library LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t City or other public facility
02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater ro ose era e Planned High Capacity Transit se o a ater se 100% a ons a n t a ons a n t Upgraded Bus Rapid Transit Angel Park area: 3,349.0 acres t era e th n e ota ar et res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto
ro ose ar res 84 339 79.9% 98.9%
t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.G ANGEL PARK
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Aside from parks and open spaces and the West Sahara Angel Park’s most notable open spaces include the park The shopping centers within Angel Park are generally auto- Angel Park is bordered on the north by Summerlin Parkway Library branch, Angel Park generally lacks major city and and golf course for which the district is named. Other parks oriented and contain large general commercial uses. Long and is bisected by Charleston Blvd and Sahara Ave. Each regional facilities. Because the built environment transitions and open spaces, including those within the master planned term, opportunities exist to improve their character and corridors will continue to transition from suburban auto- from urban to suburban, there is a need for a greater balance communities, are well connected by trails and greenbelts. make them more walkable. One major employer (Sutherland oriented arterials toward transit-based complete streets. and presence of city services and community resources. The area is served by several large parks, including All Global) anchors Angel Park. No major high schools or Express transit service from Downtown Las Vegas and the American Park and the Badlands development, a defunct higher education sites exist within Angel Park; to alleviate Strip serves Angel Park and Summerlin. Angel Park contains golf course, provides an opportunity for new open space. overcrowding additional space may be required. the transition point of bicycle-friendly corridors, including the Bonanza Trail and Downtown to Red Rock Trail along Alta Dr. Because of the relatively new infrastructure of all types, upgrades may eventually be needed long-term.
Job per housing unit within district Job per housingJob unit per within housing district unit within district PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESS of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRES of PARK spaceACRES per of PARK 1,000Job per space within housingJob perper 1/4 housingunit1,000 miles within within unit district within 1/4 miles district Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessible park space per 1,000 residents within 1/4 Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in Job per housing unit withinACRES district of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles ACRESCity ofACRES PARK spaceof PARK mileper space 1,000of the per withinplanning 1,000 1/4 within district miles 1/4 miles planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES Parksof PARK space per 1,000 within69% 1/456% miles ar et ar et ar et t era e t era e t era e 1.0 Target* ar et ar et t era e t era e ar et t era e 292.8 292.8292.8 292.8 292.8 282.8 Schools ar et 23% 31% t era e 292.8 282.8282.8 282.8 282.8 282.8 t era e 0.52 t era e 292.8 str t0.52 o a str t o a t era e t era e t era e0.52 0.52 0.52 $ Grocery and retail services 12% 19% 3.9 3.9 str t o a str t o a 282.8 str t o a 3.9 3.9 str t o a str t t o a era e 0.52 str t o a str t o a str t o a 3.9 str t o a 23.1 3.9 23.1 23.1 t a era e 23.1 t era e 0.52 str t o a t a era e t a era e t a era e ann n 23.1 str t o a ann n ann n t a era e ann n 23.1 3.9 6.4% 6.4% t a era e t a era earea to a area6.4% to a 6.4% t a era e t a era e area t to a a era e area to a ann n Percentage of total units within 2 str t mile drive: o a ann n ann n ann n ann n 6.4% t a era e ann n area to a area to a 6.4% t a era e area to a area to a 23.1 area to a area ann n to a t a era e ann n ann n area to a Community Centers 5% 45% 6.4% t a era e area to a area to a ann n o res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t area to a o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t era e ater era e ater ro ose era e ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se era e ater ro ose era e 100% 100% o res entso res ents n n ann n ann n area th n th n e e o o e e a t a t era e ater ro ose era e a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t se o a se o a ater se ater se 100% 100% *equivalent of one full-time worker per unit 2-114 a ons a n t era e a ons a n t o ater res ents a ons a n t era e n ater ann n ro ose a ons a n t area era e ro ose th n era e t era e e t o e era e a t 2-115 se o a ater se th n e th n e PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a ater se t era e t era e 100%100% ota ar et ota res ar et res era e ater ro ose JOB PROXIMITY era e a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e Even with a ons a n t o a ons a n t res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n th n area th n or e or o e o th n e se o a ater se 100% t era e the place ota ar et res ota ar et res Average job opportunity in proximity to the planning district trans t sto trans t sto t era e a ons a n t a ons a n t o res ents n ann n area th n or th n e o e type model o res ents n ann n area th n e or e o ro ose ar ro ose res ar res 84 84 339 339 t era e ota ar et res 79.9% trans t sto trans t sto assumption ota ar et res th n e 79.9% 98.9% 98.9% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o of additional 84 339 ota ar et res ro ose ar res ro ose ar res 84 339 o trans t res ents sto n ann n area th n or e o potential park t era e t era e t era e t era e 79.9% 98.9% o res ents n ann n th n area e th n th n e th n or e th n e e o trans t sto 79.9% 98.9% t era e ro ose t era e ar res 84 339 acres, Angel t era e t era e trans t sto 79.9% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS Park still falls th n ro ose e th n ar res e th n e th n e 84 339 t era e t era e t era e t era e 98.9% ro ose ar res st n short st n of the84 339 th n e th n th n e e th n 79.9% e 98.9% ar res ar res t era e t t era e era e t era e 79.9% 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e target. 98.9% th n e th n th n e e th n e th n e th n e t era e t era e t era e t era e st n t era e t era e st n th n e th n e th n e th n e ar res ar res t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e st n th n e th n e ar res th n e th n e st n st n ar res ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.H SUMMERLIN NORTH
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Consider mixed-use infill long-term SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Add city facilities and services PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Regional trail connections WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Alleviate school overcrowding TRANSPORTATION
• As the area ages, improve infrastructure
• Construct high capacity transit along Charleston Blvd, Originally intended for aerospace development, the development of the 25,000-acre master planned community of linking to Summerlin Transit Center Summerlin began in the 1990s through a Planned Community development agreement. The first developments began • Complete Summerlin Pkwy improvements in Summerlin North and included an age-restricted Sun City Summerlin. Today, Summerlin Corporation retains control of the area’s open space and residential land through a master community association, divided into individual villages with additional HOAs. This northern portion of the community is now fully developed and mature with numerous neighborhood and village parks, more than 150 miles of trails, nine golf courses, shopping centers, medical and cultural facilities, Red Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic Rock Resort, the Suncoast, and JW Marriott hotels-casinos, business parks and more than 30 public and private schools. are highlighted on the following pages
DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity • Current population: 60,748 • Largest Age Group: 65 - 74 years (9,276) 2-116 2-117 • Persons per household: 2.27 • Single Family Dwellings: 18,873 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 8,737 • Median Household income: $68,329 • Median rent / mortgage: $1,360 / $1,558 • Housing tenure: 31.8% rent / 68.2% own • Attained High School Diploma: 94.2%
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 40.3% White Black/African American
• Unemployment rate: 8.6% American Indian/Native American Asian 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT • Housing Density: 5.79 dwelling units / acre Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other SEE ALSO: • Population Density: 8,148 residents / square mile More than one race Latino/Hispanic Summerlin North Development Agreement Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.H SUMMERLIN NORTH
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
Summerlin North is characterized by a range of stable, upscale single-family detached and multi-family developments, many of which are auto-oriented, gated, and exclusive.
IN THE FUTURE 2050 PROJECTIONS Much of the land within Summerlin North will remain in place • Population: 63,903 as-is pursuant to the development agreement; however, • Total New Housing Units: 1,390 (0 Single family / 1,390 there may be opportunities to replace aging development Multi family with higher intensity uses. • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 600,203 • Housing Density: 6.08 dwelling units / acre • Population Density: 8,572 residents / square mile
1
PLANNED PLACE TYPES 1 • Regional Center • Mixed-Use Center KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES & TOOLS Corridor Mixed-Use • • Traditional Neighborhood Design • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Neighborhood Character • Mixed Residential • Mixed-use Traditional Neighborhoods • Walkable site design • Placemaking through arts and culture • New Subdivision • Subdivision RetrofitJob per housing unit within district Click each Place Type to read more. 1 1 ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles WATER USAGE Water consumption of residents in the planning area will be reduced with the new planned place types. ar et In order to capture the above projected t land era e uses and 325.5 densities, the following place types are planned for future City Average 319.9 5.7 change: 307.5 City Average SUMMERLIN NORTH PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK str t o a 0.65 2-118 str t o a 294.7 2-119 t era e PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 23.2 t a era e ann n F CLV Fire Station area to a 1. Should4.4% the opportunity for infill be desired in t a era e ann n Hospital Summerlinarea to a North, these areas are appropriate CCSD School (elementary/middle/ high/alternative or special) LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS Library o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT Transportation improvement City or other public facility era e ater ro ose era e se o a ater se 100% Planned High Capacity Rapid Transit Veteran’s Memorial Community Center Summerlin North area: 4,771.3 acres a ons a n t a ons a n t ro ose ar res t era e th n e ota ar et res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 92 551 40.1% 61.2%
t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.H SUMMERLIN NORTH
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Many City of Las Vegas services are supplemental in this The area contains abundant parks, open spaces, and well- Summerlin North is served by upscale retail and business Summerlin North is bisected by Summerlin Parkway and area to those amenities provided through the Summerlin preserved washes and arroyos. Several public and private establishments, primarily along the Charleston Blvd is bounded on the west by the 215 Beltway. Generally, the Association; Veteran’s-Memorial Community Center anchors golf courses and county clubs, including Angel Park, TPC corridor near Summerlin Centre and along Town Center. infrastructure is newer and well-maintained, but as the area a portion of Summerlin North, and many medical services Summerlin, TPC Canyons, Palm Valley, Highland Falls, and Major office and professional service-oriented jobs are in continues to age, infrastructure should be programmed for are easily accessed at Summerlin Hospital. Police and fire Eagle Crest courses wind through Summerlin North and are business parks near the hospital; two major casino-resorts upgrades and/or replacement. Summerlin North also has protection in this area are adequate. well utilized amenities of the area. mark the entryway to Summerlin. Many high-quality public an extensive trail, bicycle, and shared-use path system. and private schools are found throughout Summerlin North. Improvements to Summerlin Parkway will help improve traffic flow and safety, especially as neighborhoods are developed in Summerlin West.
Job per housing unit within district Job per housing unit within district Job per housing unit within district PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESS of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessibleACRES of parkPARK space space per per 1,000 1,000Job residents per within housingJob withinper 1/4 housingunit 1/4miles within unit district within district Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles City mile Jobof the per planning housing district unit within district planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES ofACRES PARK spaceof PARK per space 1,000 per within 1,000 1/4 within miles 1/4 miles Parks 73% 56% ar et ar et t era e t era e ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles 1.0 Target* 325.5 325.5 ar et t era e 325.5 ar et t era e 325.5 319.9 319.9 ar et ar et t era e t era e 319.9 5.7 5.7 325.5 325.5 319.9 Schools 17% 31% str t o a 319.9 319.9 ar et t 5.7 era e str t o a 0.65 0.65 5.7 5.7 str t o a 5.7 325.5 0.65 str t o a str t o a str t o a str t o a t str t era e o a str t o a t era e0.65 0.65 319.9 0.65 str t o a Grocery and retail services 10% 19% t era e str t o a str t o a $ 5.7 t era e t era e t era e 23.2 str t o a 23.2 23.2 t a era e 23.2 ann n 0.65 str t o a 23.2 23.2 ann n ann n t a era e t a era e ann n area to a t a era e t a era e ann n 4.4% t a era e ann n area to a t era e area to a area to a t a era e area to a 4.4% 4.4% t a era e t a era e 4.4% 4.4% ann n t a era e t a era e area to a 4.4% t a era e Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: ann n ann n 23.2 ann n ann n area to a area to a ann n area to a ann n area to a area to a t a era e area to a 4.4% t a era e area to a Community Centers 63% 45% ann n area to a TRANSPORTATION o res ents ACCESS o res ents n& ann n EQUITY n area ann n th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t era e ater o res entso res ents n n ann n ann n areaarea th n e e o o e e a t a t era e ater ro ose era e ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se era e ater ro ose se o a era e ater se 100% 100% 100% *equivalent of a ons a n t one full-time worker per unit era e ater ro ose era e 2-120 a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t se o a era e ater a ons a n t ater se ro ose a ons a n t era e 2-121 100% o res ents se o a n ann n area ater th n se t era e e t o era e e a t 100% PARK ACRES ro ose NEEDED ar ro ose res TO ar ACHIEVE res TARGET a ons a n t se o a a ons a n t ater se t era e 100% ro ose ar res JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e Summerlin ro ose ar res a ons a n t a ons a n t t era e th n e ota ar et ota res ar et res era e ater ro ose era e t era e ro ose ota ar ar et res res Average job opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents n ann n area th n or e o th n e North meets ro ose ar res se o a ater se o res ents n ann n area100% th n or e o th n t era e e the target ota ar et res a ons a n t a ons a n t trans t sto trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n th n e or e o ota ar et res o res ents n ann n area th n or e o acreage at full ota 92 ar et res 551 t era e trans t sto ro ose ar res 92 551 trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n or e o build out. 92 551 th n40.1% 40.1% e 61.2% 61.2% o trans t res ents sto n ann n area th n or e o ota ar et res 92 551 trans t sto 40.1% 61.2% 92 551 o res ents n ann n t era e area t th n era e t era e t or era e e o 40.1% 61.2% th n e th n e th n e th n e 40.1% 61.2% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS t era e t era e t era e t era e 92 551 trans t sto t era e t era e th n e th n e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n 40.1% e th n 61.2% e
92 551 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT st n st n t era e t era e th n e th n t era e e t era e ar res ar res t era e th n t era e e th n e 40.1% 61.2% th n e th n e th n e th n t era e e t era e t era e t era e st n th n 85.8 e th n516.4 e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res t era e t era e st n th n e th n e t era e ar res t era e ar res th n e th n e th n e th n e st n st n ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 ar res II.I SUMMERLIN WEST
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Creation of new mixed-use center
• Affordable housing options SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Continue expansion of facilities as development occurs. PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Preserve natural features WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Support new schools as development occurs. TRANSPORTATION
• Ensure non-motorized connections between neighborhoods. As a part of the Summerlin master planned community, Summerlin West is the gateway to Red Rock Canyon and will be • Complete Summerlin Pkwy interchange home to approximately one third of Summerlin’s 250,000 residents upon full build-out. As a part of the master development agreement, development will gradually progress west as more neighborhoods and villages are built out. The addition of a new neighborhood mixed use village center and new resorts will bring new commercial activities that are currently lacking in the area. Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic are highlighted on the following pages DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity
• Current population: 18,748 • Largest Age Group: 35 - 44 years (3,587) 2-122 • Persons per household: 2.88 2-123 • Single Family Dwellings: 6,167 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 538 • Median Household income: $112,605 • Median rent / mortgage: $1,754 / $2,295 • Housing tenure: 33.6% rent / 66.4% own • Attained High School Diploma: 97.3% • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 55.8% White Black/African American LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Unemployment rate: 5.7% American Indian/Native American Asian • Housing Density: 0.83 dwelling units / acre 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other • Population Density: 1,490 residents / square mile More than one race Latino/Hispanic Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.I SUMMERLIN WEST PLANNING AREA
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
Summerlin West is mostly undeveloped at present, with only the Vistas, Paseos, Reverance, and Crossbridge villages under development.
IN THE FUTURE Open Space preservation for hillside and foothill 2050 PROJECTIONS preservation, as well as to Summerlin West will continue to develop a range of upscale • Population: 74,788 protect “Little Red Rock” auto-oriented, gated, and exclusive single-family and multi- • Total New Housing Units: 20,231 (13,255 Single family / family developments. At build out, Summerlin West will 6,976 Multi family 1 have approximately six more villages with 20,250 homes, • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 5,317,228 Gaming Enterprise including a new mixed-use town and employment center • Housing Density: 3.35 dwelling units / acre areas allowing for Completion / Complete system-to- near Summerlin Pkwy and I-215. As new subdivisions are • Population Density: 5,945 residents / square mile resort Implementation of system interchange built, nearly all the land west of the beltway will remain in Summerlin West place as-is pursuant to the Summerlin West Development Development Agreement Agreement.
PLANNED PLACE TYPES Preservation of arroyos for open space and trails, as well Regional Center KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES & TOOLS as connections to Red Rock Mixed-Use Center • Traditional Neighborhood Design Canyon NCA Corridor Mixed-Use • Neighborhood Character • Mixed-use • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Walkable site design Mixed Residential • • Placemaking through arts and culture Traditional Neighborhoods • New SubdivisionJob per housing unit within district Subdivision Retrofit ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles• WATER USAGE Click each Place Type to read more. Water consumption of residents in the planning area will In order to capture the above projected land uses and 21.2 be reduced with the new planned place types. str t o a densities, the following place types are t planned era e for future change: 363.8 SUMMERLIN WEST PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) 306.9 2-124 City Average City Average 2-125 307.5 294.7 KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 25.1 t a era e ann n F CLV Fire Station 1.3% t a era e 1. Future higher density mixed-use center area to a ar et ann n LVMPD Substation area to a CCSD School (elementary/middle/ t era e high/alternative or special)
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS 0.07 str t o a o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t Library 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater ro ose era e City or other public facility se o a ater se 97.7% a ons a n t a ons a n t Veteran’s Memorial Community Center t era e Summerlin West area: 8,050.5 acres th n e ro ose ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 7 43 1.8% 79.9%
t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e ar et res th n e th n e st n ar res II.I SUMMERLIN WEST
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
As with Summerlin North, while many City of Las Vegas Red Rock Canyon’s natural beauty and proximity to Currently, Summerlin West has only one area with limited Summerlin West is bounded to the east by the 215 services are likely supplemental in this area to those Summerlin West provide excellent opportunities for neighborhood commercial at Summerlin Centre and Beltway. Much of the roads and infrastructure will be new. amenities provided through the Summerlin Association; additional open spaces. The district contains abundant along Town Center. Future plans include a new village and Summerlin West is adding to its extensive trail, bicycle, and Veteran’s-Memorial Community Center is close, and many open spaces, and well-preserved washes and arroyos; employment center and up to 5.85 million square feet of shared-use path system with several opportunities for linear medical services are easily accessed at Summerlin Hospital. adjacent foothills and Little Red Rock will continue to be commercial, along with office and professional service parks and trails along natural arroyos, as well as along the A new LVMPD substation will be complete in 2020 and fire protected. While up to 90 holes of golf are permitted, such uses, as well as a possible resort area with up to two resort regional Beltway Trail. No transit service is available, but protection in this is adequate, with two new stations to be courses may only be developed if conditions allow for their casinos adjacent to Red Rock Canyon. Several new public opportunities exist for micro transit and several transit added as development progresses. construction. and private schools have recently been constructed with centers with direct connections for express service to more to be built over time as demand warrants and to avoid Downtown Las Vegas, the Strip, and the airport. overcrowding at current elementary schools, Rogich MS, and Palo Verde HS.
Job per housing unit within district Job per housingJob unit per within housing district unit within district PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESS of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRES of PARK ACRESspace perof PARK 1,000 space within per 1/4 1,000 miles within 1/4 miles Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessible park space per 1,000Job residents per housingJob withinper housingunit 1/4 within unit district within district Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles City mile of Jobthe planningper housing district unit within district planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES ofACRES PARK spaceof PARK per space 1,000 per within 1,000 1/4 within miles21.2 1/421.2 miles Parks 95% 56% str t str t 21.2 o a o a t era e t era e t era e ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles str t o a 1.0 Target* 21.2 t era e 21.2 21.2 str t t era e o a 363.8 363.8363.8 str t o a str t o a t era e Schools 18% 31% 306.9363.8 21.2 363.8 363.8 306.9306.9 str t o a t era e 306.9 306.9 306.9 Grocery and retail services 4% 19% 363.8 $ 25.1 25.1 t a era e t a era e ann n 25.1 306.9 25.1 25.1 ann n 1.3% t a era e t a era e area to a 25.1 ann n t a era e t a era e ann n 1.3% t a era e area to a ann n ann n t a era e ann n ar et ar et 1.3% 1.3% t a era e t a era earea to a area to a ann n 1.3% t a era e area to a 1.3% t a era e Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: ar et ann n ann n area to a area ann n to a area to a ar et ar et ar et area to a area to a 25.1 area ann n to a t era e t era e t a era e ann n area to a t era e t era e 1.3% t a era e Community Centers 47% 45% t era e area to a t era e 0.07 ann n ar et 0.07 0.07 str t0.07 o a str t o a str t o a str t o a area to a TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n e area o th n e a t e o e a t o res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t 0.07 str t0.07 o a str t o a t era e era e ater ro ose era e o res entso res ents n n ann n ann n areaarea th n th n e e o o e e a t a t era e ater era e ater ro ose era e ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se se o a se o a ater se ater se 97.7% 97.7% 97.7% 97.7% 2-126 *equivalent a ons a n t of a ons a n t one full-time a ons a n t worker a ons a n t per unit a ons a n t a ons a n t era e ater ro ose era e 2-127 0.07 str t o a era e a ons a n t ater ro ose a ons a n t era e se o a ater se t era e t era e PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a o res ents n ann n ater se area th n e o e a t t era e t era e 97.7%97.7% JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e Because a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e ro ose ar ro ose res ar res era e ater ro ose era e t era e ro ose ar res ro ose ar res Average job opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n th n area th n or e or o e o Summerlin se o a ater se 97.7% th n t era e e trans t sto o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n or area th n e o or e o West has so a ons a n t a ons a n t trans t sto th n e ro ose ar res trans t sto trans t sto few residents 7 ro ose 7 ar res 43 43 t era e o res ents n ann n area th n or e o today, it’s 7 7 43 43 1.8% th n1.8% e79.9% 79.9% o trans t res ents sto n ann n area th n or e o ro ose ar res meeting it’s 1.8% trans t sto 1.8%79.9% 79.9% 7 43 o res ents n ann n t era e area t era e t th n era e t era e or e o target and th n e th n e th n e th n e LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS is on track t era e t era e t era e t era e 7 43 trans t sto t era e t t era e era e 1.8% t era e 79.9% to meet the ar et res ar et res th n e th n e th n e th n e th n e th n th n 1.8% e e th n 79.9% e st n 7 43 t era e t era e t era e t era e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e st n target at full ar res ar res ar et res ar et res th n e th n th n e e th n e 1.8% 79.9% th n e th n e buildout. t era e t era e t era e t era e st n st n ar res ar et res th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e ar res t era e t era e st n th n e th n e t era e ar t res era e ar et res th n e th n e ar et res st n th n e th n e st n ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 ar res II.J LONE MOUNTAIN
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• New neighborhoods west of the beltway should consider traditional neighborhood design for highest efficiency of services
• Mixed-use opportunities along Cheyenne SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Consider fire station in western sector PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Improve open space connections WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Ensure jobs-housing balance TRANSPORTATION
• Reduce barriers to walkability
• Look for opportunities to improve connectivity
Lone Mountain, so named for the isolated mountain standing apart from the La Madre Mountains at the districts western edge, represents a transitional area between established and new suburban neighborhoods to lower-density areas. Due Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic to its lower densities and array of neighborhood types, most of Lone Mountain has potential for subdivision retrofits and are highlighted on the following pages preservation of ranch-style neighborhoods. DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity
• Current population: 56,848 • Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (7,071) 2-128 2-129 • Persons per household: 2.86 • Single Family Dwellings: 15,924 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 4,559 • Median Household income: $68,989 • Median rent / mortgage: $1,264 / $1,465 • Housing tenure: 35.7% rent / 64.3% own • Attained High School Diploma: 92.7% White Black/African American LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 29.5% American Indian/Native American Asian
• Unemployment rate: 6.4% 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT • Housing Density: 6.01 dwelling units / acre Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other SEE ALSO: • Population Density: 10,682 residents / square mile More than one race Latino/Hispanic Cliff Shadows Special Area Plan Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.J LONE MOUNTAIN
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
Lone Mountain has an established low-density suburban character. The Lone Mountain, Lone Mountain West, and Cliffs Edge master planned communities have diverse but separated neighborhoods. Lone Mountain IN THE FUTURE Regional Park 2050 PROJECTIONS Increased density will take the form of several neighborhood • Population: 71,136 mixed-use centers along the Cheyenne corridor and near • Total New Housing Units: 4,996 (4,851 Single family / 6,067 freeway interchanges. The areas around Mountain View Multi family gravel pit Hospital north of the Las Vegas Technology Center and • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 832,619 at Craig Rd-US-95 (future I-11) have potential to further • Housing Density: 7.48 dwelling units / acre Rural Preservation 1 develop as a transit-oriented development. Some areas • Population Density: 13,367 residents / square mile New subdivisions of unincorporated Clark County may be annexed into the City. New neighborhoods may be developed in undeveloped areas within the district, as well as west of the 215 Beltway. KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES & TOOLS • Traditional Neighborhood Design • Neighborhood Character PLANNED PLACE TYPES 1 1 • Mixed-use Regional Center • Walkable site design Mixed-Use Center • Placemaking through arts and culture Corridor Mixed-Use
• Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use WATER USAGE • Mixed Residential The average water consumption of residents in Traditional NeighborhoodsJob per housing unit within district the planning area will increase with projected new • New Subdivision subdivisions. If the area develops with denser, more ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles traditional neighborhood design, that will help lower the Subdivision Retrofit • average. Click each Place Type to read more. 337.5 ar et In order to capture the above projected land t era e uses and 327.2 densities, the following place types are planned for future City Average City Average 5.8 change: 307.5 str t o a 294.7 LONE MOUNTAIN PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK 2-130 2-131 t era e PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 25.2 t a era e ann n F CLV Fire Station t a era e 1. Mixed-use3.3% centers area to a ann n LVMPD Substation area to a Hospital 0.22 str t o a CCSD School (elementary/middle/ LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS high/alternative or special) o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT City or other public facility era e ater ro ose era e se o a ater se 100% Durango Hills Community Center and a ons a n t a ons a n t golf course t era e Lone Mountain area: 3,406.1 acres th n e ro ose ar DRAFT: 09/13/20 res o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto
st n 15 69 ar res 36.5% 60.6% t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e ota ar et res II.J LONE MOUNTAIN
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Lone Mountain has several major city and regional public Lone Mountain has several large regional open spaces and Employment areas are congregated along Cheyenne Avenue Cheyenne Avenue and Lone Mountain Rd define the edges community facilities, including Durango Hills Community parks, including Lone Mountain Regional Park, Majestic adjacent to the residential neighborhoods, and generally of the Lone Mountain district and serve as primary east-west Center and Golf Course. However, it lacks fire stations in Park, Durango Hills Park and Community Center and parks take the form of professional offices, services, and general corridors. Lone Mountain is disconnected from Summerlin the western quarter of the district and near unincorporated and sports fields built within detention basins near the retail located in strip malls and office parks. The closest North, and that lack of any form of connection has created areas. Lone Mountain is home to the LVMPD’s Northwestern eastern edge of the district. The area would benefit from major employment center is the Las Vegas Tech Center a hard edge spanning 2.5 miles. Except for the area serving Area Command and training center and has low crime rates. smaller neighborhood park along the Cheyenne corridor. in Twin Lakes. A general increase in jobs and services Mountain View Hospital, Lone Mountain’s low-density limits Existing trails and bike lanes, including the Lone Mountain will improve the jobs-housing balance. CCSD schools are fixed-route transit; however, this area may be a candidate for Trail, 215 Trail, and the Alexander Rd corridor provide interspersed throughout Lone Mountain. The area would both fixed-route express transit and microtransit circulators. connections to other areas. The adjacent mountains and benefit from a new high school and middle school on the Lone Mountain’s existing infrastructure of all types is fairly foothills provide additional opportunities for new open western edge of the district. adequate, but system capacity and capital improvements spaces, but require increased connectivity between urban must be considered in planning future development. A trails and natural areas. wastewater treatment facility was shut down to reduce operational costs. Job per housing unit within district Job per housingJob unit per within housing district unit within district PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARK ACCESS JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRES of PARK spaceACRES per of 1,000 PARK within space per 1/4 1,000 miles within 1/4 miles Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessibleACRES ofpark PARK space space per 1,000 perJob 1,000 residents per housing Jobwithin withinper housing1/4unit 1/4 mileswithin unit district within district Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in Job per housing unit withinACRES district of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles City mile of the planning district planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES ofACRES PARK spaceof PARK per space 1,000 per within 1,000 1/4 within miles 1/4 miles 337.5337.5 ACRES Parksof PARK space per 1,000 within77% 1/456% miles ar et ar et t era e t era e 337.5 ar et 1.0 t era e Target* 327.2327.2 327.2 337.5 ar et 337.5 337.5 t era e 327.2 ar et ar et t era e t era e 5.8 337.5327.2 327.2 Schools ar et 21% 31% t 5.8 era e5.8 str t o a str t str t o a o a 5.8 327.2 5.8 5.8 str t o a str t o a str t o a t era e t t era e era e Grocery and5.8 retail services 13% 19% $ t era e t era e t era e str t o a 25.2 25.2 t a era e 25.2 25.2 t a era e ann n ann n 25.2 t a era e t a era e ann n 25.2 t era e t a era e t a era e ann n 3.3% t a era e area to a ann n 3.3% t a era e area to a t a era e ann n 3.3% 3.3% t a era e t area a era e to a area to a 3.3% ann n area to a ann n 3.3% t a era e area to a Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: ann n ann n 25.2 ann n area to a t a era e ann n area to a ann n 0.22 area to a area to a area to a 0.22 0.22 str t o a 3.3% t a era e area to a area to a 0.22 str t o a str t o a str t o a 0.22 ann n Community Centers 52% 45% str t0.22 o a str t o a area to a TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 0.22 o res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t str t o a era e ater ro ose era e o res ents o res ents n ann n n ann n area area th n th n e e o e a t a t era e ater ro ose era e era e ater era e ro ose ater era e ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se se o a ater se 100% 100% 100% *equivalent of one full-time worker per unit se o a era e ater ater se 100% 2-132 a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t era e a ons a n t atero res ents n ro ose ann n a ons a n t era e area ro ose th n era e e o e a t 2-133 a ons a n t a ons a n t se o a ater se t era e 100% PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a ater se t era e t era e 100% JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t th n e th n e t era e ro ose ar era e ater ro ose era e a ons a n t ro ose ar a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e res se ro ose o a ar ater se t era e Should Lone res ro ose ar Average job opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n 100% th n area th n or e or o e o t era e a ons a n t res a ons a n t th n e Mountain res ro ose ar trans t sto trans t sto o res ents n ann n o res ents area n th n ann n areaor th n th n e eo or e o ro ose ar t era e develop as 15 69 res trans t sto trans t sto st n st n 15 res69 th n e o res ents n ann n area th n or e o ro ose ar planned, it ar res 36.5% 36.5%60.6% 60.6% ar res st n 15 69 o trans tres ents sto n ann n area th n or e o res will exceed st n 15 69 ar res o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 36.5% 60.6% the target ar res st n 15 69 t era e t era e t era e t era e 36.5% 60.6% trans t sto th n e th n e th n e th n e 36.5% 60.6% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS park acres. t era e st n t era e t era e t ar era e res15 69 t era e t t era e era e t era e st n 15 69 th n e th n e th n e th n e 36.5% 60.6% ar res th n e th n th n e e th n e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e ar res ota ar et ota res ar et res t era e t era e t era e t era e 36.5% 60.6% th n e th n e th n e th n e th n e th n t era e e t era e t era e t era e t era e t era e ota ar et res ota ar et res th n e th n e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e ota ar et res th n e th n e th n e th n e ota ar et res ota ar et res DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.K RANCHO
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Balance rural preservation with increased services and access to transportation options SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Consider locating additional facilities in this area PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Develop more accessible parks and open space WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Redevelop strip centers with more diverse employment opportunities
• Consider middle and high schools in this area to alleviate overcrowding elsewhere TRANSPORTATION
• Emphasize complete streets to support transit The suburbs and neighborhoods along the Rancho Dr corridor transition from older inner-ring suburbs to new subdivisions and “ranchos” moving northwest toward Centennial Hills. The area currently lacks cohesion, largely because of the lack of • Upgrade infrastructure, particularly in annexed areas major city and community services. However, with a reimagination of Rancho Dr, and the addition of high capacity transit routes along it, Decatur Blvd, and Craig Rd, the area can develop a new identity that balances transit-oriented mixed-use • Develop high capacity transit along Decatur Blvd and and existing developments. Craig Rd corridors, as well as rapid bus along Rancho Dr and North Rainbow Blvd DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity • Current population: 44,362 Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic • Largest Age Group: 45 - 54 years (6,469) are highlighted on the following pages 2-134 2-135 • Persons per household: 2.85 • Single Family Dwellings: 12,868 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 3,235 • Median Household income: $63,766 • Median rent / mortgage: $1,183 / $1,374 • Housing tenure: 31.1% rent / 68.9% own • Attained High School Diploma: 88.9%
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 20.2% White Black/African American
• Unemployment rate: 9.4% American Indian/Native American Asian 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT • Housing Density: 4.63 dwelling units / acre Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other • Population Density: 8,155 residents / square mile More than one race Latino/Hispanic Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.K RANCHO
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY Rural While this district is predominantly residential in character, several major commercial corridors extend north-south or east- Preservation west, providing a major node along Rancho Dr. A variety of rural preservation areas are intermixed throughout the area.
IN THE FUTURE 2050 PROJECTIONS Along Rancho Dr, the Rancho area will see directed medium- • Population: 56,468 to higher-density, suburban-oriented transit-oriented • Total New Housing Units: 4,248 (376 Single family / 3,872 Los Prados development to support existing well-established, yet Multi family older, shopping centers at key nodes that have potential to • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 2,103,429 become neighborhood mixed-use centers. Existing large-lot • Housing Density: 5.85 dwelling units / acre “rancho” estates and older master planned communities, • Population Density: 10,380 residents / square mile such as Los Prados and Rancho Alta Mira are stable.
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES & TOOLS PLANNED PLACE TYPES 2 • Diverse Housing Options 2 Regional Center • Infill housing • Mixed-Use Center • Traditional Neighborhood Design 1 • Corridor Mixed-Use • Neighborhood Character • Mixed-use Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • • Walkable site design Decatur • Mixed Residential • Transit-oriented Development High Traditional Neighborhoods • Placemaking through arts and culture NARA (rural Capacity New Subdivision preservation) Job per housing unit within district Transit • Subdivision Retrofit WATER USAGE ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4Click miles each Place Type to read more. Water consumption of residents in the planning area will be reduced with the new planned place types. Rural 344.3 Preservation ar et In order to capture the above projected t land era e uses and 316.7 Childrens City Average densities, the following place types are planned for future City Average Memorial Park 307.5 change: 294.7
2-136 RANCHO PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK 2-137 t era e PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 0.44 str t o a t a era e F CLV Fire Station 25.8 t a era e 1. Rancho3.9% Dr corridor improvements and ann n upgrades area to a ann n CCSD School (elementary/middle/ 1.8 from arealinear to a suburban strip malls to mixed-use high/alternative or special) str t o a corridor scaled for rapid bus Overall lack of schools, LVMPD,
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS 2. Redevelopment opportunities community centers o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater ro ose era e se o a ater se Planned High Capacity Rapid Transit100% Rancho area: 3,481.7 acres a ons a n t a ons a n t t era e th n e ota ar et res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 31 149 ro ose ar res 57.3% 79.7% t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.K RANCHO
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Aside from the need for more parks and open spaces, The Rancho area lacks significant amounts of parks and Economic centers consist predominantly of auto-oriented Rancho is bounded by Cheyenne Avenue the 215 Beltway Rancho similarly lacks major city and regional facilities. open space; while some neighborhood parks, such as commercial corridors. Santa Fe Station Hotel-Casino is one and US-95 (future I-11) freeways, while the City of North Las No City or community facilities exist, The low-density Children’s Memorial Park and a few smaller parks can be of the few major or significant employers in the area. Most Vegas is bordered on the east at Decatur Blvd. Rancho Dr environment of the district highlights a need for a greater found, there are noticeable voids and parks that are not jobs and commercial activity consist of both small and large itself serves as main street through the area; each of the presence of city services and community resources. easily accessible. Los Prados Golf Course can also be found general retail; several shopping centers can actively be corridors will continue to transition from suburban auto- within the northern edge of the district. redeveloped now or in the near-term, with a number of other oriented arterials toward transit-based complete streets, opportunities to improve their character and make them while rapid bus service and BRT will eventually serve Rancho more walkable could exist long-term. Rancho also lacks Dr and Decatur Blvd respectively. While a few bicycle-friendly public middle and high schools. While school overcrowding corridors exist, improvements are needed to help connect to is not a major issue in this area, home-to-school distance areas to the north and northwest and with North Las Vegas. and the ability to alleviate school overcrowding at other Because many areas were annexed, sewer improvements locations could benefit the area overall. may be needed, and while the northern half of the district has relatively new infrastructure of all types, upgrades will eventually be needed long-term. Job per housing unit within district Job per housingJob unit per within housing district unit within district PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESS of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRES of PARK spaceACRES per of 1,000PARK spacewithin per 1/4 1,000 miles within 1/4 miles Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessible park space per 1,000Job residentsper housingJob withinper unit housing 1/4 within unit district within district Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in Job per housing unit withinACRES district of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles City mile of the planning district planning district 344.3without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES of PARKACRES space of PARK per space1,000 perwithin 1,000 1/4 within miles 1/4 miles 344.3 344.3 Parks 48% 56% ar et ar et ar et t era e t era e t era e 316.7 316.7316.7 ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles 1.0 Target* 344.3 ar et 344.3 344.3 t era e 316.7 ar et ar et t era e t 344.3 era e 316.7 316.7 Schools 17% 31% ar et t era e 316.7 t era e t era e t era e $ Grocery and retail services 20% 19% t era e t era e t era e 0.44 0.44 0.44 str t o a str t o a t a era e t a era e 0.44 str t o a 25.8 t a era e 0.44 str t o a 0.44 t a era e 25.8 t a era e t era e str t o a str t o a t a era e t a era e 3.9% 3.9% 25.8 t 25.8a era e t a era e t a era e ann n area to a ann n area to a 25.8 t a era e 3.9% ann n 3.9% 25.8 t a era e 3.9% ann n area ann n to a area to a ann n ann n area to a Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: ann n area to a 3.9% ann n area to a 0.44 1.8 1.8 ann n ann n area to a 1.8 1.8 str t o a str t o a str t o a t a era earea to a area to a ann n str t o a str t o a 1.8 25.8 t a era e area to a str t o a 1.8 area to a str t o a 3.9% ann n area to a Community Centers 3% 45% ann n 1.8 area to a TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t str t o a o res ents o n res ents ann n n area ann n th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t o res ents o res ents n n ann n ann n area area th n th n e e o o e e a t a t era e ater era e ater ro ose era e ro ose era e era e ater era e ro ose ater era e ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se se o a se o a ater se ater se 100% 100% 100% 100% *equivalent of a ons a n t one full-time worker a ons a n t per unit era e ater ro ose era e 2-138 a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t era e a ons a n t atero res ents a ons a n t n ro ose ann n a ons a n t era earea th n e o e a t 2-139 se o a ater se t era e PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a ater se t era e t era e t era e 100% JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e era e ater ro ose era e a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e ota ar et res ota ar et res t era e Even with ota ar et res se ota o a ar et res Average ater se job opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents o n res ents ann n n area ann n 100% th n area th nor e or o e o t era e the place th n e a ons a n t a ons a n t trans t sto trans t sto o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n or area th n th n e o e or e o type model ota ar et res t era e trans t sto 31 ota 31 ar et 149 res 149 trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n or e o assumption ro ose ar ro ose res ar res th n e 31 149 57.3% 79.7%57.3% 79.7% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o of additional ro ose ar res 31 149 trans t sto ota ar et res ro ose ar res trans t57.3% sto 79.7%57.3% 79.7% potential park o res ents n ann n t era e area t th n t era e era e t or era e e o ro ose ar res 31 149 acres, Rancho trans t sto th n e th n th n e e th n e 57.3% 79.7% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS ro ose t era e ar t era e res t era e t era e31 149 t era e t era e t era e t era e still falls31 short 149 th n e th n e th n e th n e th n e th n th n e e 57.3% th n 79.7% e ro ose ar res st n st n of the target. t era e t t era e era e t era e 57.3% 79.7% 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e ar res ar res th n e th n th n e e th n e th n e th n e t era e t era e t era e t era e st n st n th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e ar res ar res st n t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e th n e th n ar e res st n st n ar res ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.L CENTENNIAL HILLS
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Embrace original vision to be a suburban town center SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Consider new LVMPD command station at town center PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Celebrate natural settings of the area and access to places like Mount Charleston WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Additional schools to alleviate overcrowding TRANSPORTATION
• Strengthen multi-modal and microtransit opportunities at the Centennial Hills Transit Center and rapid bus connection from Rancho Dr
Centennial Hills is the major regional center for northwest Las Vegas. Centered at the Centennial Spaghetti Bowl (the • Complete Centennial Bowl system-to-system intersection of the US-95 (future I-11) and I-215 Beltway), brings together northwestern neighborhoods. Previously interchange and I-11 improvements envisioned as a northwestern “Town Center,” it has developed a commercial core, but largely as conventional suburban- Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic style development, with some unique higher density neighborhoods and urban form. Because Centennial Hills has are highlighted on the following pages previously been identified as a location for more intense uses, this planning area will re-establish itself as a true regional center that’s adapted to existing development, while transforming key areas around its core.
DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity
• Current population: 62,126 • Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (9,246) 2-140 2-141 • Persons per household: 2.77 • Single Family Dwellings: 18,903 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 4,783 • Median Household income: $71,074 • Median rent / mortgage: $1,257 / $1,528 • Housing tenure: 36.6% rent / 63.4% own • Attained High School Diploma: 93.0% White Black/African American LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 27.9% • Unemployment rate: 7.6% American Indian/Native American Asian 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT • Housing Density: 6.21 dwelling units / acre Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other SEE ALSO: • Population Density: 10,422 residents / square mile More than one race Latino/Hispanic Centennial Hills Town Center Special Area Plan Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.L CENTENNIAL HILLS
Centennial Hills Transit LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT Center and future CSN- Northwest Campus - TODAY future activity center
Centennial Hills, and Town Center itself, is comprised of a large mix of higher density new subdivisions; however, major Silverstone land uses are still auto-oriented, with several large surface parking lots and few major multi-story buildings. Peripheral Ranch areas also contain large-lot residential ranch estates surrounded by unincorporated county pockets that may eventually be annexed. Village of Centennial Springs - enhance activity center IN THE FUTURE 2050 PROJECTIONS 1 Centennial Hills will maintain its mix of traditional and • Population: 82,915 suburban single-family development combined with large- • Total New Housing Units: 7,505 (438 Single family / 7,067 lot residential estates. Unincorporated county pockets Multi family may eventually be annexed. Over time, the core part of the • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 5,240,455 2 regional center will become more dense and intense as a • Housing Density: 8.18 dwelling units / acre suburban “Town Center.” 3 • Population Density: 13,909 residents / square mile Complete Northern Beltway regional trail PLANNED PLACE TYPES Centennial Hills Hospital - LAND USE TOOLS future activity center • Regional Center Mixed-Use Center • Traditional Neighborhood Design 3 • Neighborhood Character Corridor Mixed-Use • Mixed-use Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • • Walkable site design • Mixed Residential • Placemaking through arts and culture Traditional Neighborhoods • Diverse housing options • New Subdivision Job per housing unit within district WATER USAGE ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4• milesSubdivision Retrofit Water consumption of residents in the planning area will Click each Place Type to read more. be reduced with the new planned place types. 337.1 ar et In order to capture the above projected t land era e uses and 302.1 6.1 densities, the following place types are planned for future City Average str t o a 307.5 City Average change: 294.7 2-142 CENTENNIAL HILLS PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK 2-143 t era e PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 0.41 str t o a t a era e t a era eF CLV Fire Station 1. Retrofit3.0% existing subdivisions to improve 27.0 ann n Hospital connectivity, ensure future subdivisions follow ann n area to a area to a Centenial Hills Town Center design standards for CCSD School (elementary/middle/ high/alternative or special) better Traditional Neighborhood Design LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS City or other public facility o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 2. New mixed-use node 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT Centennial Hills Community Center, era e ater ro ose era e se o a ater se 3. Long-term transformation of suburban-style 100% Library, Senior Center Centennial Hills area: 3,815.2 acres a ons a n t a ons a n t commercial to mixed-use activity center t era e Transportation improvement ota ar et res th n e DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto ro ose ar res 28 148 37.9% 63.2%
t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.L CENTENNIAL HILLS
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Centennial Hills is the major regional hub for northwestern Centennial Hills has a wide variety of new parks, equestrian As a regional center, Town Center has a vast amount of new Town Center makes up most of the area, but several other districts and contains several city and regional facilities. space, and other open spaces, much in the form of private suburban commercial located around the major freeway small master planned communities are located throughout Centennial Hills Park complex provides a number of or HOA pocket and neighborhood parks. Several major parks interchanges between Ann Rd and Durango Dr. Major retail the district. Over time, the Centennial Spaghetti Bowl and community services and the area is anchored by Centennial are located within the district including Thunderbird Park centers, auto-oriented uses, car dealerships, professional the surrounding road network will be completed, as well as Hills hospital. Although the area has low crime, it would be and the Centennial Hills Park complex, which also has a offices, and commercial activities located here. Centennial full-build out of the beltway. Centennial Hills Transit Center an ideal location for a new LVMPD area command. New fire YMCA community center, senior center, pools, and library; a Hills has several public schools in close proximity to the and park ‘n’ ride at the Elkhorn HOV interchange allows stations may also be needed near the edges of the district, smaller community center, Cimmaron Rose, provides some new subdivisions; however, more new schools are needed for express transit service to Downtown Las Vegas and the especially near low-density annexed areas. recreational space. Desert Rose Golf course is located at to alleviate school overcrowding, specifically Arbor View Strip, while it can be a base for local routes, circulators, the southern edge of the district and Shadow Ridge high schools. Centennial Hills will also carpoolers, microtransit or demand response service for be home to a branch campus of the College of Southern the district. The 215 trail parallels the beltway and several Nevada. other trails and bicycle-friendly complete streets can be found within the district. Most other infrastructure within Centennial Hills is relatively new.
JobJob per per housing housing Jobunit unitper within housing within district districtunit within district PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARK ACCESS JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRESACRES of PARKof PARK space spaceACRES per per of 1,000 1,000 PARK within withinspace per1/4 1,000 milesmiles within 1/4 miles Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessible park space per 1,000Job residents per housingJob withinper housingunit 1/4 within unit district within district Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in Job per housing unit withinACRES district of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles City mile of the planning district planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES ofACRES PARK spaceof PARK per space 1,000 per within 1,000 1/4 within miles 1/4 miles 337.1 337.1 337.1 Parks 69% 56% ar et ar et ar et t era e t era e t era e 302.1 302.1302.1 ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles 1.0 Target* 6.1 6.1 337.1 6.1 str t o a ar et 337.1 337.1 t era e 302.1 ar et ar et str t o a t str t era e o a t era e 302.1 302.1 6.1 Schools 21% 31% 6.1 6.1 str t337.1 o a ar et str t o a str t o a t era e 302.1 6.1 t era e str t o a t era e Grocery and retail services 11% 19% t era e $ t era e t era e t era e 0.41 str t0.41 o a t a era e t a era e str t o a t a era e t a era e 0.41 0.41 0.41 str t o a t a era e t era e str t o a str t o a 0.41 t a era e t a era e t 3.0% a era e 3.0% 27.0 t a era e str t o a t a era e t a era e 27.0 t a era e 3.0% 3.0% 27.0 27.0 ann n 3.0% ann n ann n ann n 27.0 Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: ann n area to a 3.0% 27.0 0.41 ann n ann n ann n ann n area to a area to a area ann n to a str t o a t a era e area to a area to a t a era e area to a ann n ann n area to a area to a area to a 3.0% 27.0 area to a area to a Community Centers 54% 45% ann n ann n area to a TRANSPORTATION o res ents ACCESS o res ents n& ann n EQUITY n area ann n th narea area to a th n e o e e a t o e a t o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n e area o e th n a t e o e a t era e ater ro ose era e o res ents o res ents n ann n n ann n area area th n th n e e o o e e a t a t era e ater era e ater ro ose era e ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se se o a se ater o a se ater se 100% 100% 100% 100% *equivalent of one full-time worker per unit 2-144 a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t era e ater a ons a n t o res ents a ons a n t era e n ater ro ose ann n a ons a n t era e area ro ose th n era e e o e a t 2-145 se o a ater se t era e PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a ater se t era e t era e t era e 100%100% ota ar et ota res ar et res JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e ota ar et res era e ota ater ar et res ro ose era e a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e t era e Even with se o a Average ater se job opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents o res ents n ann n n area100% ann n th n area th n or e or o e o t era e ota ar et res th n e the place ota ar et res a ons a n t a ons a n t trans t sto trans t sto o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n or th narea e th n o e or e o type model ro ose ar ro ose res ar res t era e trans t sto 28 28 148 148 trans t sto ota ar et res assumption ro ose ar res ro ose ar res th n e o res ents n ann n area th n or e o 28 28 148 148 37.9% 37.9% 63.2% 63.2% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o of additional trans t sto ro ose ar res o res ents n ann n area th n or e o 37.9%trans t sto 37.9%63.2% 63.2% potential ro ose ar res 28 148 t era e t era e t era e t era e park acres, trans t sto th n e th n e th n e th n e 37.9% 63.2% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS ro ose ar res t era e t era e t era e t era e28 148 t era e t era e t era e t era e Centennial28 148 th n e th n e th n e th n e th n e th n th n 37.9% e e th n 63.2% e st n Hills st n still falls t era e t t era e era e t era e 37.9% 63.2% 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e ar res ar short res of the th n e th n th n e e th n e th n e th n e t era e t era e t era e t era e st n target. st n th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e ar res ar res t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e st n th n e th n e th n e th n e ar res st n st n ar res ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.M LA MADRE FOOTHILLS
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Need for planned mixed-use/commercial centers SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Many additional services needed in this area PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Develop more park space west of the beltway to connect to natural features WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Increase employment opportunities
• Consider new schools to alleviate overcrowding nearby TRANSPORTATION
• Complete area-wide complete streets network
• Construct Nah Gah Kaiv (Sheep Mountain) Pkwy Along the northwestern edge of the valley is La Madre Foothills, an area comprised of a unique mix of master-planned communities, large-lot residential estates, and traditional suburban single-family development. Potential opportunities • Implement microtransit and develop park and ride exist to develop further along the foothills and create new recreational opportunities along Box Canyon. Given its adjacency facilities to facilitate express transit. to Centennial Hills Town Center, rapid growth, and opportunity for future development, by 2050, La Madre Foothills will emerge as a cohesive suburban community.
Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity are highlighted on the following pages
• Current population: 25,401 • Largest Age Group: 25 - 34 years (4,901) 2-146 • Persons per household: 2.77 2-147 • Single Family Dwellings: 8,967 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 1,484 • Median Household income: $78,359 • Median rent / mortgage: $1,259 / $1,646 • Housing tenure: 37.8% rent / 62.2% own • Attained High School Diploma: 94.6% • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 33.9% White Black/African American LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Unemployment rate: 4.7% American Indian/Native American Asian • Housing Density: 3.96 dwelling units / acre 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other • Population Density: 6,541 residents / square mile More than one race Latino/Hispanic Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.M LA MADRE FOOTHILLS
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
Linked together by the northwestern leg of the I-215 beltway, La Madre Foothills contains several new subdivisions developed over the last fifteen years, the largest being the Cliff Shadows and Providence master planned communities. Peripheral areas also contain large-lot residential ranch estates surrounded by county pockets that may eventually be detention annexed. basin / potential IN THE FUTURE park Providence
For areas west of the beltway, new subdivisions can be 2050 PROJECTIONS developed, but as there are few major neighborhood centers • Population: 48,227 and an overall lack of a commercial areas, an opportunity • Total New Housing Units: 8,240 (5,995 Single family / 2,246 potential new exists for the development of a new suburban neighborhood Multi family subdivisions center for the entire district. • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 1,970,803 • Housing Density: 3.96 dwelling units / acre • Population Density: 6,541 residents / square mile PLANNED PLACE TYPES
Regional Center BLM land Mixed-Use Center LAND USE TOOLS Proposed detention basin Corridor Mixed-Use • Traditional Neighborhood Design 1 / potential park • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Neighborhood Character potential new • Mixed-use • Mixed Residential subdivisions • Walkable site design Traditional Neighborhoods • Placemaking through arts and culture • New Subdivision • Diverse housing options gravel pit Job per housing unit within district • Subdivision Retrofit ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within Click1/4 miles each Place Type to read more. WATER USAGE In order to capture the above projected land uses and Water consumption of residents in the planning area will ar et densities, the following place types are planned for future t era e be reduced with the new planned place types. change: 353.2 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) 332.8 City Average LA MADRE FOOTHILLS PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK t 2-148 era e 307.5 2-149 City Average KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 294.7 t a era e t a era eF CLV Fire Station 2.4% 27.3 1. Future ann n Neighborhood Mixed-Use Opportunity ann n CCSD School (elementary/middle/ area to a area to a high/alternative or special)
0.8 Overall lack of schools, LVMPD, str t o a PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS 0.06 community centers str t o a o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t
02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater ro ose era e se o a ater se Transportation improvement 99.7% a ons a n t a ons a n t La madre footHills area: 4,718.7 acres t era e th n e ro ose ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 5 19 0.0% 79.9%
t era e t era e th n e th n e t era e t era e ota ar et res th n e th n e st n ar res II.M LA MADRE FOOTHILLS
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
La Madre Foothills lacks major city and regional facilities, Several turnkey parks have been constructed in conjunction La Madre Foothills currently lacks commercial activity While most infrastructure is relatively new, development including community centers and other civic services. With with the development of Providence, including the and job centers. Residents rely on businesses located in been somewhat haphazard, leaving some areas lacking respect to public safety, at least one new fire station will be Promenade and Huckleberry, Knickerbocker, and Gilcrease Centennial Hills Town Center. Several new public schools from complete streets, flood control, and trails. A major needed, and while crime is low in this area, a new LVMPD Brothers parks. A wide variety of new parks, equestrian have been constructed near the new subdivisions; regional flood control facility helps prevent flooding from substations may be needed to serve much of the growing space, and other open space could be developed in new however, more new schools are needed to alleviate school stormwater coming from Kyle Canyon and Mount Charleston; northwest. subdivisions west of the beltway, with connections to Lone overcrowding, especially for Centennial and Arbor View High other facilities have been constructed for Box Canyon. While Mountain Regional Park and other parks along foothills. Schools. A major gravel pit and mining operation exists at Centennial Hills Transit Center and park and ride allows for the southern edge of the district, and a new regional public express transit service to Downtown Las Vegas and the Strip, safety facility has been planned for the area. no transit service is available for local routes, circulators, carpoolers, micro transit or demand response service. Several equestrian trails link the foothills and mountains with parks, while the 215 trail parallels the beltway providing a major connection between the northern and western valley. Eventually, Nah Gah Kaiv Pkwy will be constructed to link the Job per housing unit within district Beltway with future I-11 to the north. Job per housingJob unit per within housing district unit within district PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARK ACCESS JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRES of PARK spaceACRES per of 1,000 PARK within space 1/4 per miles 1,000 within 1/4 miles Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: AcresACRES of accessible of PARK park space space per 1,000 1,000Job residents withinper housingJob within 1/4per housingunitmiles 1/4 within unit district within district Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles City mile of theJob planning per housing district unit within district planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES ofACRES PARK spaceof PARK per space 1,000 per within 1,000 1/4 within miles 1/4 miles ar et ar et ACRESParks of PARK space per 1,00075% within56% 1/4 miles ar et t era e t era e ar et 1.0 t era e Target* ar et ar et t era e 353.2 t era e t era e 353.2 353.2 Schools ar et18% 31% 353.2 t era e 353.2 353.2 332.8 332.8 t era e 332.8 t era e 332.8 332.8 332.8 t era e 353.2 Grocery and retail services 2% 19% t era e t era e $ t era e 332.8 t a era e t a era e t a era e 27.3 t a era e t era e t a era e t a era e 2.4% t a era e2.4% 27.3 t 27.3 a era e t a era e t a era e ann n t a era e 2.4% 2.4% 27.3 ann n ann n 27.3 ann n t a era e ann n 2.4% area to a 27.3 Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: ann n ann n ann n area to a 2.4% area to a area to a ann n area to a ann n ann n t a era earea to a area to a area to a ann n t a era e area to a area to a area to a 2.4% 27.3 area to a 0.8 ann n Community Centers 0% 45% 0.8 0.8 str t o a 0.8 ann n str t o a str t o a 0.06 str t 0.06 o a str t o a 0.06 0.06 str t o a str t o a area to a area to a 0.8 0.8 str t o a TRANSPORTATION o res entsACCESS o res ents n& ann n EQUITY n area ann n th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n e area o e th n a t e o e a t str t o a str t o a 0.06 0.06 str t o a str t o a era e ater ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e o res ents n ann n o res ents area n th n ann n area e th n o e a t e o e a t era e ater ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e 0.8 se o a se o a ater se ater se se o a se ater o a se ater se 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% str t o a 0.06 *equivalent a ons a n t of a ons a n t one full-time worker a ons a n t per unit era e ater ro ose era e 2-150 str t o a a ons a n t a ons a n t era e ater a ons a n t a ons a n t o res ents ro ose era e n ann n a ons a n t area th n e o e a t 2-151 PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a se ater o a se ater se t era e t era e t era e 99.7% 99.7% JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t th n th n e e t era e ro ose ar ro ose res ar res era e ater ro ose era e a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e While Lone ro ose ar res t era e ro ose se o a ar res Average ater job se opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n 99.7% th n area th n or e or o e o t era e Mountain o res ents n ann n area th n th n or e e th n o e a ons a n t ro ose ar res a ons a n t trans t sto trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n or e o doesn’t meet ro ose ar res trans t sto 5 5 19 19 t era e trans t sto its target o res ents n ann n o res ents area n th n ann n area or th n e o or e o 5 19 0.0% th n0.0% e79.9% 79.9% ro ose ar res today, it is on 5 19 trans t sto trans t0.0% sto 79.9% 79.9% track to meet 5 19 o res ents n ann n t era e area t era e t th n era e t era e or e o 0.0% the target at 5 19 trans t sto th n th n e e th n th n e e 79.9% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS t era e t era e t era e t era e t era e t era e t era e 0.0% t era e full buildout. 0.0% 79.9% ota 5 ar et ota res ar et res 19 th n th n e e th n e th n e th n e th n e th n e st n st n t era e t t era e era e t era e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT t era e t era e 0.0% 79.9% t era e t era e ar res ar res ota ar et res th n e th n th n e e th n e th n e th n e ota ar et res t era e t era e th n e th n e st n st n t era e th n t era e e th n e t era e t era e ar res ota ar et res ar res ota ar et res th n e th n e th n e th n e t era e st n t era e st n ar res ota ar et res th n e th n e ar res st n DRAFT: 09/13/20 ar res II.N KYLE CANYON
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Build out subdivisions as traditional neighborhood development
• Create mixed-use nodes at interchanges SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• Provide array of city services and facilities as population increases PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Continue to connect parks and open space as new development occurs WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Create employment centers
• Build new schools TRANSPORTATION
US-95 (future I-11) and Kyle Canyon Rd (NV-157) create major rural-urban transition point within the Kyle Canyon district. • Strengthen multi-modal transportation options at park This is an area that is both the current northwestern gateway to the Las Vegas Valley from Northern Nevada and the Spring and rides to support future express bus service to Mountains and is the home the city’s newest subdivisions. The district character is predominantly detached single-family Downtown and the Strip residential and has several areas under development agreements, open desert, and large-lot estates. • Construct Nah Gah Kaiv (Sheep Mountain) Pkwy DEMOGRAPHICS Race & Ethnicity • Current population: 13,291 Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic • Largest Age Group: 35 - 44 years (2,420) are highlighted on the following pages 2-152 • Persons per household: 3.33 2-153 • Single Family Dwellings: 3,894 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 380 • Median Household income: $82,137 • Median rent / mortgage: $1,368 / $1,648 • Housing tenure: 29.3% rent / 70.7% own • Attained High School Diploma: 95.7% • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 29.1% White Black/African American LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Unemployment rate: 7.5% American Indian/Native American Asian • Housing Density: 1.24 dwelling units / acre 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other • Population Density: 2,471 residents / square mile More than one race Latino/Hispanic Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.N KYLE CANYON
Paiute Reservation LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY Construction and Kyle Canyon is a rapidly developing area. Existing large-lot estates that are rural preservation areas and new subdivisions completion of Nah New park in the Skye Canyon and Sunstone master planned communities dot the area’s eastern and northwestern edges, as well Gah Kaiv Pkwy (Sheep and ride and as along Kyle Canyon Rd extending west toward Mt Charleston. Mountain) transit center
IN THE FUTURE New regional park and Much of Kyle Canyon will see the eventual build- 2050 PROJECTIONS high school out of medium-low density suburbs currently under • Population: 47,063 1 Sunstone 2 development agreements utilizing traditional neighborhood • Total New Housing Units: 10,142 (8,238 Single family / development. New shopping centers will continue to be 1,904 Multi family constructed at major interchanges and have potential to • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 639,992 become neighborhood mixed-use centers, especially at the • Housing Density: 4.19 dwelling units / acre Kyle Canyon and Skye Canyon Park interchanges. • Population Density: 8,748 residents / square mile
PLANNED PLACE TYPES LAND USE TOOLS Regional Center Skye Canyon • Traditional Neighborhood Design Mixed-Use Center • Neighborhood Character Corridor Mixed-Use • Mixed-use • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Walkable site design • Mixed Residential • Placemaking through arts and culture • Diverse housing options Traditional Neighborhoods New Subdivision • WATER USAGE Subdivision RetrofitJob per housing unit within district • The average water consumption of residents in the ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4Click miles each Place Type to read more. planning area will increase with the currently approved In order to capture the above projected land uses and developments. If the area develops with denser, more densities, the following place types are planned for future traditional neighborhood design, that will help lower the 11.4 t era e str t o a change: average. 380.1
PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) KYLE CANYON PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK 358.9 ar et2-154 2-155 City Average KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES City Average 307.5 294.7 F CLV Fire Station t a era e t a era e 1. Future1.1% subdivisions 29.7 ann n ann n CCSD School (elementary/middle/ t era e area to a high/alternative or special) 2. Newarea Mixed-Use to a node Overall lack of schools, LVMPD, LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS 0.04 community centers str t o a
o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT Transportation improvement era e ater ro ose era e se o a ater se 99.7% Kyle Canyon area: 3,442.9 acres a ons a n t a ons a n t t era e th n e ro ose ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 5 23 79.9%
t era e t era e th n e th n e ota ar et res t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res II.N KYLE CANYON
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Kyle Canyon lacks major city and regional facilities; those Despite being still mostly undeveloped, Kyle Canyon has Few major or significant employers or commercial centers With the existing US-95 (future I-11) freeway and Kyle may be required as the development agreements are a variety of mostly new parks and open spaces, including exist within Kyle Canyon. Limited new suburban commercial Canyon Rd (NV-157) as major corridors, as well as future executed, and population thresholds are met. While some Skye Canyon Park; much of the park space is in the form will be constructed at the Kyle Canyon and Skye Canyon development of the new Nah Gah Kaiv Pkwy, Kyle Canyon private services are currently or will be provided, the low- of private or HOA pocket and neighborhood parks, but new Park interchanges, but major jobs and commercial activity is configured for suburban auto-oriented development. density environment of the district highlights a need for a parks, including Igor Soldo Park and a new regional park will are needed. At least one new major resort-casino will be Bicycle friendly-layered complete streets and separate non- greater presence of city services and community resources. be constructed near-term. As Skye Canyon and Sunstone constructed as part of Skye Canyon’s Gaming Enterprise motorized trails line most arterials. No transit service is develop, new parks, arroyo trails, and linear open spaces will District. Kyle Canyon severely lacks public schools of all available to Kyle Canyon, but a park and ride at each major be constructed as required by the respective agreements. forms; new schools will be constructed over time and interchange may allow for future express transit service to several will be under construction near-term to alleviate Downtown Las Vegas and the Strip, while microtransit or school overcrowding. demand response service could be made available to other low-density portions of the district or feed rural preservation areas along Kyle Canyon Rd. Nearly all of Kyle Canyon has new infrastructure of all types, but the extension infrastructure is dependent upon future new subdivisions being planned and Job per housing unit within district Job per housing Jobunit per within housing district unit within district existing ones being completed. PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARK ACCESS JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK ACRESACRES of PARKof PARK space spaceACRES per per of 1,000 1,000PARK withinwithinspace per1/41/4 1,000miles miles within 1/4 miles Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: Acres of accessible park space per 1,000Job residents per housingJob withinper housingunit 1/4 within unit district within district Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles City mileJob of the per planning housing district unit within district planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES ofACRES PARK spaceof PARK per space 1,000 per within 1,000 1/4 within miles 1/4 miles 11.411.4 11.4 t era e ACRES Parksof PARK space per 1,000 within99% 1/456% miles str t str t o a o a str t o a t era e t era e 380.1 11.4 1.0 Target* 380.1380.1 11.4 11.4 str t o a t era e str t o a t era e t era e 380.1 str t o a 380.1 380.1 Schools 11.4 5% 31% 358.9 t era e ar et ar et 358.9 358.9 str t o a ar et 380.1 358.9 358.9 ar et ar et ar et 358.9 Grocery and retail services 6% 19% $ 358.9 t a era e ar et t a era e t a era e 29.7 t a era e t a era e 1.1% 1.1% t a era e 29.7 t a era e t a era e t a era e ann n t a era e 1.1% 1.1% 29.7 29.7 ann n 1.1% ann n t a era e ann n 29.7 t a era e t era e area to a 29.7 Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: t era e ann n ann n ann n ann n area to a ann n area to a 1.1% area ann n to a t era e ann n t era e t era e area to a area to a area to a area to a area to a ann n area to a t era e t a era e area to a area to a 1.1% 29.7 t a era e Community Centers 0% 45% 0.04 ann n ann n t era e 0.04 0.04 str t0.04 o a area to a area to a str t o a str t o a str t o a o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n e area o th n e a t e o e a t 0.04 0.04 TRANSPORTATION o res ents ACCESS o res ents n& ann n EQUITY n area ann n th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t str t o a str t o a era e ater ro ose era e o res ents o res ents n ann n n ann n area area th n th n e e o o e a t a t era e ater era e ater ro ose era e ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e se o a se o a ater se ater se se o a se ater o a se ater se 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 99.7% 0.04 *equivalent of one full-time worker per unit 2-156 str t o a a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t era e a ons a n t ater a ons a n t era e ater ro ose a ons a n t era e ro ose era e 2-157 o res ents se o a n ann n area ater th n se t era e e t o era e e a t 99.7% PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a ater se t era e t era e 99.7% JOB PROXIMITY a ons a n t a ons a n t th n th n e e ro ose ar ro ose res ar res era e ater ro ose era e a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e ro ose ar res ro ose ar res t era e Even with se o a Average job opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n th n area th n or e or o e o t era e ater se 99.7% th n e the place a ons a n t ro ose ar res a ons a n t trans t sto trans t sto o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n or area th n e th n o e or e o type model ro ose ar res trans t sto 5 5 23 23 t era e trans t o sto res ents n ann n area th n or e o assumption th n e79.9% 79.9% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o ro ose ar res 5 5 23 23 trans t sto of additional trans t sto 79.9% 79.9% potential park 5 23 o res ents n ann n t era e area t th n era e t era e t or era e e o acres, Kyle th n th n e e th n th n e e
LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS 79.9% ota ar et ota res ar et res t era e t era e t era e t era e 5 23 trans t sto t era e t era e t era e t era e Canyon still th n e th n e 5 23 th n e th n e th n e th n th n e e th n 79.9% e ota ar et res t era e t era e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT st n st n falls short of ota ar et res t era e t era e 79.9% t era e t era e ar res ar resthe target. th n e th n th n e e th n e th n e th n e ota ar et res t era e t era e t era e t era e st n st n th n e th n e t era e t era e th n e th n e ar res ar res ota ar et res t era e t era e st n th n e th n e ota ar et res t era e t era e th n e th n e th n e th n ar e res st n st n ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 ar res II.O TULE SPRINGS
KEY IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT
• Opportunities for large-lot estates and rural preservation
• Create more local-serving business and employment opportunities SERVICES AND FACILITIES
• New Fire / LVMPD area command; new CLV facilities, community centers, and infrastructure needed in the area PARKS AND OPEN SPACE
• Increase park space in areas near county islands
• Convert Silverstone Ranch to accesible open space WORKFORCE AND EDUCATION
• Create employment centers Tule Springs is bounded by the National Monument to the north and the I-215 beltway to the south, while county islands and scattered parcels make up the remaining edges. The City of North Las Vegas on the east at Decatur Blvd is the • Build new schools eastern boundary. North of the 215 Beltway is Tule Springs, an area bordering the Monument and with a mix of traditional TRANSPORTATION and suburban single-family development and large-lot residential estates, many containing ranch or small agricultural functions. Tule Springs continues to develop, but it lacks major commercial and retail services, despite the accessibility to • Upgrade aging infrastructure impressive open space and recreational amenities. • Strengthen the trail network to improve access to DEMOGRAPHICS significant natural resources
• Current population: 27,672 • Implement microtransit and develop park’n’ride • Largest Age Group: 35 - 44 years (3,587) Race & Ethnicity facilities. 2-158 • Persons per household: 3.03 2-159 • Single Family Dwellings: 8,908 • Multi-Family Dwellings: 492 • Median Household income: $95,954 Click each strategy to read more. Metrics for each topic • Median rent / mortgage: $1,565 / $1,858 are highlighted on the following pages • Housing tenure: 20.9% rent / 79.1% own • Attained High School Diploma: 94.2% • Attained Bachelor’s Degree: 32.1% LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS • Unemployment rate: 6.4%: White Black/African American
• Housing density: 3.24 dwelling units / acre American Indian/Native American Asian 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT • Population density: 6,110 residents / sq. mile Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Other More than one race Latino/Hispanic Above / Below citywide average
DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.O TULE SPRINGS
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
Tule Springs is comprised of a mix of new subdivisions and large-lot residential ranch estates surrounded by unincorporated county pockets that may eventually be annexed. Tule Springs IN THE FUTURE National Monument Floyd Lamb Significant land is available for medium-low density 2050 PROJECTIONS Park suburban development, while certain rural preservation • Population: 36,097 areas should remain protected. Existing large-lot estates • Total New Housing Units: 2,797 (2,290 Single family / 507 and newly master planned communities line Decatur Blvd Multi family Silverstone on the district’s eastern edge, as well as northwestern • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 581,630 Ranch edges. • Housing Density: 4.21 dwelling units / acre • Population Density: 7,981 residents / square mile
PLANNED PLACE TYPES LAND USE TOOLS Regional Center • Traditional Neighborhood Design Rural Mixed-Use Center • Neighborhood Character preservation Corridor Mixed-Use • Mixed-use • Walkable site design • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Placemaking through arts and culture Mixed Residential • • Diverse housing options Traditional Neighborhoods • New Subdivision WATER USAGE • Subdivision RetrofitJob per housing unit within district The average water consumption of residents in the Click each Place Type to read more. planning area will increase with the currently approved 1 ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles developments. If the area develops with denser, more traditional neighborhood design, that will help lower the Complete Northern 22.6 average. 423.6 str t o a In order to capture the above projected t land era e uses and Beltway regional trail densities, the following place types are planned for future change: 376.8
2-160 TULE SPRINGS AREA PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK 2-161 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) City Average City Average KEY REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 307.5 294.7 t a era e CCSD School (elementary/middle/ 29.7 t a era e 1. Neighborhood1.8% mixed-Use node high/alternative or special) ann n ann n area to a ar et area to a Overall lack of schools, city t era e LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS services 0.09 Transportation improvement str t o a o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT era e ater ro ose era e se o a ater se 100% Tule Springs area: 2,898.7 acres a ons a n t a ons a n t t era e th n e ro ose ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 6 20 4%
1.4% t era e t era e th n e t era e t era e ota ar et res th n e th n e th n e st n ar res II.O TULE SPRINGS
SERVICES PARKS AND OPEN SPACE WORKFORCE TRANSPORTATION
Tule Springs lacks major city and regional facilities, although Tule Springs encompasses the historic Floyd Lamb Park Few major or significant employers or commercial centers No transit service is provided in the area but a park and some do exist along Decatur Blvd and within the City of North at Tule Springs and the Tule Springs National Monument, exist within Tule Springs. Limited new suburban commercial ride at the Decatur-215 interchange may allow for future Las Vegas as part of the Aliante Master Planned Community. which provide large expanses of open space and is located along Decatur Blvd, especially at its interchange express transit service to Downtown Las Vegas and the The low-density environment and annexed territory within recreational opportunities. This area also has a wide variety with the beltway, but major jobs and commercial activity Strip, while microtransit or demand response service the district highlight a need for a greater presence of city of new parks, equestrian space, and other open spaces, are needed. Tule Springs lack public schools near the new could be made available to other low-density portions of services and community resources of all types. including Teton Trails and Bradley Bridle Parks; much of the subdivisions; new schools will be constructed over time and the district. A few bicycle-friendly corridors and trails do other park space is in the form of private or HOA pocket and several will be under construction near-term to alleviate exist but could be greatly improved to help connect to the neighborhood parks. Still, areas around unincorporated school overcrowding, especially to alleviate the overcapacity national monument and Floyd Lamb Park, as well as with county islands lack parks and open space where noticeable at Arbor View and Shadow Ridge high schools. North Las Vegas. Because many areas were annexed, some voids exist and parks that are not easily accessible. The capital improvements may be needed over time, and while Silverstone Ranch development, a defunct golf course, may the northern and eastern half of the district has relatively also be an opportunity for new open space. new infrastructure of all types, upgrades may eventually be needed long-term.
Job per housing unit within district Job per housingJob unit per within housing district unit within district PROXIMITY OF DWELLING UNITS TO SERVICES PARKACRES ACCESSACRES of PARKof PARK space space per per 1,000 1,000 within within 1/4 milesmiles JOB SUPPLY INJob DISTRICT per housing unit within district VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK Percentage of total units within 1/2 mile walk: ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles AcresJob of accessibleper housing park unit space within per 1,000 districtJob residents per housingJob withinper housingunit 1/4 within unit district within district Average job opportunity per residential unit in the Percentage of households Average commute time (in City mile of the planning district ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles planning district without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 withinACRES 1/4 miles ofACRES PARK spaceof PARK per space 1,000 per within 1,000 1/4 within miles22.6 22.61/4 miles 22.6 423.6 423.6423.6 Parks 73% 56% str t str t o a o a str t o a t era e t era e t era e 1.0 Target* 22.6 t era e 423.6 22.6 22.6 str t o a 423.6 423.6 22.6 str t o a str t o a t era e t era e 423.6 376.8 Schools str t 17% o a 31% t era e 376.8 376.8 376.8 376.8 376.8 376.8 Grocery and retail services 3% 19% $ t a era e t a era e 29.7 t a era e 1.8% t a era e 29.7 t a era e t a era e t a era e 1.8% ann n t a era e 29.7 29.7 t a era e ann n t a era e 1.8% t a era e ann n 29.7 1.8% 1.8% ann n area to a 29.7 t a era e ann n ann n area to a 1.8% area ann n to a Percentage of total units within 2 mile drive: ar et ar et t a era e ann n ann n ann n area to a ann n area to a area to a t area a era e to a ann n area to a ar et ar et ar et 1.8% area to a 29.7 area to a area to a ar et ann n area to a t era e ann n t era e area to a Community Centers ar et 0% 45% t era e t era e area to a t era e t era e 0.09 0.09 TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY 0.09 0.09 str t o a str t o a o res ents n ann n o res ents area th n n ann n e area o th n e a t e o e a t str t o a str t o a o res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t t era e 0.09 0.09 str t o a str t o a era e ater ro ose era e o res ents o res ents n ann n n ann n area area th n th n e e o o e e a t a t era e ater era e ater ro ose era e ro ose era e era e ater ro ose era e 0.09 se o a se o a ater se ater se se o a se ater o a se ater se 100% 100% 100% 100% str t o a *equivalent of one full-time worker per unit o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t 2-162 a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t era e ater a ons a n t a ons a n t era e ater ro ose a ons a n t era e ro ose era e 2-163 se o a ater se t era e PARK ACRES NEEDED TO ACHIEVE TARGET se o a ater se t era e t era e t era e 100%100% era e ater ro ose JOB PROXIMITY era e a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e se o a ater se a ons a n t a ons a n t th n e th n e Tule Springs ro ose ar ro ose res ar res 100% t era e ro ose ar res a ons a n t ro ose ar res a ons a n t Average job opportunity in proximity to the planning district o res ents o res ents n ann n n area ann n th n area th n or e or o e o t era e exceeds its o res ents n ann n area th n or th n e o e trans t sto trans t t sto era e o res ents n ann n area th n th n e or e o target park ro ose ar res trans t sto ro ose ar res th n e trans t sto areas, thanks 6 6 20 20 4% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o ro ose ar res 4% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o to Floyd Lamb 6 6 20 20 4% trans t sto o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto 4% Park and 1.4% t era e t era e 6 20 trans t sto 1.4% 4% the National t era e t era e th n e th n e LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS ota ar et res t era e t era e t era e t era e 6 20 1.4% t era e ota 6 ar et res 20 th n e th n e 1.4%4% t era e Monument th n e th n e th n e th n e 4% th n e t era e t era e th n e ota ar et res t era e t t era e era e t era e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT 1.4% t era e st n st n ota ar et res th n e th n e ar res ar res th n e th n th n e e th n e 1.4% t era e t era e th n e ota ar et res t era e t era e 1.4% t era e st n st n th n e th n e th n e th n e t era e th n e t era e t era e ar res t era e ar ota res ar et res t era e t era e ota ar et res th n e th n e th n e th n e st n th n e th n e ar res st n st n ar res ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.P SNOW MOUNTAIN - NU WAV KAIV
SERVICES TRANSPORTATION
As no existing community resources or services exist, US-95 (future I-11) travels through Nu Wav Kaiv and extends facilities and services will eventually be required and northwest to Tonopah, Reno, and Carson City. While mostly developed to serve this area; the closest such services are upgraded for service to the Air Force bases and Nevada Test located to the southeast in the Kyle Canyon and Centennial Site, it will eventually need to be upgraded to full interstate Hills districts. standards. A new north-south corridor, Nah Gah Kaiv Pkwy (Sheep Mountain) will connect the area with the 215 Beltway. For any development to occur, new infrastructure, PARKS AND OPEN SPACE especially new roads, water, sewer and utility service, must be extended into the area, and only along appropriate Much of the open space in this area surrounds the corridors or easements, at a time for which service can be Monument along the wash; other arroyos and washes will be extended cost-effectively. protected from development and appropriate connections will be extended to the surrounding Federal lands and into the City, including along the former historic Las Vegas- Tonopah Railroad railbed. The Las Vegas Paiute Golf Resort is also located on the adjacent tribal land. VEHICLE OWNERSHIP COMMUTE TIME TO WORK Job per housing unit within districtJob per housingJob per housingunit within unit district within district Percentage of households Average commute time (in without cars within the district minutes) within the City ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 withinACRES 1/4 miles ofACRES PARK ofspace PARK per space 1,000 per within 1,000 1/4 within miles 1/4 miles WORKFORCE
No current commercial or economic activity exists in Nu ar et ar et t era e t era e ar et t era e Wav Kaiv; however, the Tule Springs National Monument Act 46.1 46.1 designates a job creation zone exclusively for commercial 46.1 ann n ann n area to a or light-industrial development.276.8 276.8 This area could develop ann n area to a area to a t era e 276.8 t era e as research and supportive business space for defense t era e activities located at Creech Air Force Base and the Nevada t a era e t a era e National Security Site. Further opportunities also exist 0.9% 0.9% t a era e t a era e The northern gateway to the City of Las Vegas spanning the future I-11 corridor is Nu Wav Kaiv, (“New Way a Ky”), a to work with the Las Vegas Paiute Tribe on economic t a era e ann n ann n 0.9% area to a area to a t a era e Southern Paiute name meaning “Snow Mountain” and reference to the snowcapped Mount Charleston (Nivaganti) in the development activities on their land. New schools will be ann n Spring Mountains to the west. This area is currently undeveloped and characterized by several major features: the Upper required within this area as it develops. area to a Las Vegas Wash, which flows through this portion of the0.20 Upper0.20 Las Vegas Valley (Tsoariuwav); the Tule Springs National str t o a str t o a 0.00 0.00 N/A o res ents o res ents n ann n n ann n area th n area th n e o e e a t o e a t Monument (Titsivasi), a vast linear open space extending 15 miles northwest-southeast from Corn Creek (Pakonapant); N/A mountains, foothills,0.20 and alluvial fans of the Spring Mountains, Sheep Range (Tuhuti), Gass Peak (Kaiwiyiv), Kyle Canyon era e ater era e ater ro ose era e ro ose era e TRANSPORTATION ACCESS & EQUITY se o a se o a ater se 86.8% (Kunabi), Lee Canyon (Tinainab str t) and o a Mount Charleston; and finally, the 0.00Snow Mountain Reservation, a unique tribal area ater se o res ents n ann n area th n 86.8% e o e a t 2-164 N/A a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t a ons a n t 2-165 t era e t era e of the Las Vegas Paiute Tribe. Because of these attributes, place names and locations within this gateway area will reflect era e ater ro ose era e th n th n e e se o a the Southern Paiute tongue and heritage. ro ose ar ro ose res ar res ater se 86.8% a ons a n t a ons a n t o res ents o res ents n ann n n ann n area th n area th n or e or o e o trans t sto trans t sto t era e 0 0 0 0 th n e ro ose ar res 79.9% 79.9% o res ents n ann n area th n or e o trans t sto t era e t era e t era e t era e th n th n e e th n th n e e LAS VEGAS MASTER PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS 0 ota ar et ota res ar et0 res t era e t era e t era e t era e th n th n e e th n e th n e 79.9% st n st n 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT ar res ar res t era e t era e th n e th n e ota ar et res t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res DRAFT: 09/13/20 II.P SNOW MOUNTAIN
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT TODAY
This area is currently undeveloped and characterized by several major natural features, including desert alluvial fans and Complete I-11 the Upper Las Vegas Wash. interchanges IN THE FUTURE 1 2050 PROJECTIONS Extend utilities Large areas of Nu Wav Kaiv will remain protected, leaving • Population: 18,032 only a few areas of focused development: The Upper Las • Total New Housing Units: 6,510 (3,616 Single family / 2,893 Vegas Wash Plan area on the southeastern portion of the Multi family district, the job creation zone north of the tribal land, and a • New Commercial (1,000 GSF): 15,323,164 new gateway area along I-11. • Housing Density: 0.69 dwelling units / acre Tule Springs National Future area planning • Population Density: 1,217 residents / square mile Monument needed to develop Job PLANNED PLACE TYPES Creation Zone (see Chapter 3: Workforce + Economic Regional Center Development section) Mixed-Use Center LAND USE TOOLS Upper Las Vegas Wash Special Area Plan Corridor Mixed-Use • Traditional Neighborhood Design Adopted, Development • Neighborhood Center Mixed-Use • Neighborhood Character Agreement Pending • Mixed Residential • Mixed-use • Walkable site design Traditional Neighborhoods • Placemaking through arts and culture New Subdivision • • Diverse housing options Subdivision Retrofit 2 Job per housing unit within district Click each Place Type to read more. ACRES of PARK space per 1,000 within 1/4 miles WATER USAGE Projected water consumption of residents in the planning ar et t era e area with the new planned place types. In order to capture the above projected land uses and 46.1 densities, the following place types are planned for future ann n City Average City Average area to a change: 276.8 307.5 294.7 NU WAV KAIV PLACE TYPE FRAMEWORK t era e 2-166 2-167 PROPOSED AREAS OF CHANGE (IN ACRES) KEY REDEVELOPMENT t a era e OPPORTUNITIES COMMUNITY FACILITIES 0.9% t a era e ann n CCSD School (elementary/middle/ area to a 1. Future area planning needed to develop high/alternative or special) Neighborhood Mixed-Use Center
0.20 2. Planned Nah Gah Kaiv Pkwy connection to future Overall lack of schools, city str t PLAN VEGAS MASTER LAS o a 0.00 N/A o res ents n ann n area th n e o e a t I-11 services, and infrastructure
era e ater ro ose era e 02. LAND USE + ENVIRONMENT se o a ater se 86.8% a ons a n t a ons a n t t era e Nu Wav Kaiv area: 9,485.5 acres th n e ro ose ar res o res ents n ann n area th n or e o DRAFT: 09/13/20 trans t sto 0 0 79.9%
t era e t era e th n e th n e ota ar et res t era e t era e th n e th n e st n ar res