DOCSLIB.ORG

Hereford HOPVINE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hereford HOPVINE HereforHerefordd H OPVINE The Magazine of the Herefordshire Branch of CAMRA Issue No 69 Spring 2018 Free CAMRA GOES TO COLLEGE YE OLDE SPRING PUB OF THE SEASON GOING, GOING...TO BE DEMOLISHED SECRET PUB RE-OPENING LAMB SURVIVES CLOSE SHAVE NEW COMMUNITY-OWNED PUB? THREE NEW MICRO-PUBS LIVES FONDLY REMEMBERED Have you used the UK’s BUSINESS RATES CAMPAIGN best pub website yet? DINMORE HILL WALK LATEST BEER,1 CIDER & PUB NEWS Advertisement The Boot Inn, Orleton Help us save this beautiful village pub The Boot Inn in Orleton is under threat of This is an opportunity for you to own (part development. It was closed in July 2017 of) a pub by buying shares - which will pay against the wishes of the community. interest. A real living investment to enjoy! For more information and the full The good news is that there is a Community prospectus please go to the website. Bid to buy The Boot and return it to the heart of the community, where it has The Boot has always been a thriving always been a busy and popular village pub business and will be again with your with restaurant. support. If you would like to invest please make your Help us by joining our campaign, like our pledge as soon as possible and before the Facebook page, and if you would like to end of March, investment will be available invest then pledge your support. after this date. Contact The Boot Inn community bid Facebook - The Community Boot Inn Email - [email protected] - [email protected] - [email protected] www.thecommunitybootinn.co.uk 2 PUB CAMPAIGN: VOLUNTEER INN THE VOLUNTEER’S DARKEST HOUR Herefordshire Council Planning Committee vote to demolish pub in the face of strong opposition The Volunteer Inn is the last and only pub in Marden. Yet, despite this fact, back on the 17th January, Herefordshire Council Planning Com- mittee voted in favour of an application that will see the ACV-listed village inn closed and de- molished - something that might happen as soon as this summer. Unsurprisingly, the locals aren’t at all pleased. It was in the autumn of 2016 that the commu- nity of Marden first became aware of a suite of four related planning applications submitted to Herefordshire Council planners by local firm, S & A Produce. Three of the applications related to a development of housing, agricultural and Destined for the wrecking ball office buildings in the village, whilst one focused - inside the doomed Volunteer Inn solely on the village’s pub – the Volunteer Inn, single letter of support for what was being pro- which was temporarily closed at that time (it has posed. It appeared that everyone except S & A since successfully re-opened). The plan was to Produce was quite happy to stick with the Volun- demolish the pub and replace it with a new- teer Inn. Why was this? build “family pub” on an alternative site nearby. This created quite a stir, and it wasn’t long be- Dining on the Ceiling fore the phones at Herefordshire CAMRA’s HQ There’s an old saying about the devil being in bunker were ringing. the detail, and doesn’t that ever apply in this Bigger and Better case. It was a crucial absence of detail on some fundamental aspects of the proposed replace- On first inspection the plans submitted seemed ment pub’s design and function that gave seri- to be a spiffing idea: a case of out with the old ous cause for concern. The new so-called and in with the new. Whilst the Volunteer Inn “family pub” is to focus on dining. Fair enough, would be left to the wrecking ball, on the sur- many village pubs do, but the plans for the lay- face of it, the new pub appeared to be more out of the interior public area showed 35 tables, than a worthy replacement. Its interior is bigger about which were set a total of 140 chairs. The and better configured; it would have a larger tables and chairs were so crammed in, that it garden; more parking; better catering provision, would have come as little surprise to discover and eight letting rooms upstairs. It even looks to they were also planning to nail tables and be an attractive building, judging from the exte- chairs onto the walls and ceiling as well! There rior design visuals provided with the application. wasn’t an inch of space remaining that could However, the pièce de résistance is undoubt- reasonably accommodate any of the trappings edly the planned provision of a brewhouse. and activities one might normally expect to find What’s not to like? in a typical village pub: such as for games, so- One might think CAMRA would be completely cial gatherings, meetings - or just standing at bonkers to object to such a proposition, but that the bar having a drink with friends. This place is was precisely what we did. And we were not going to be a gastro-pub - full stop - and noth- alone. There were over fifty written objections to ing else. As designed, it isn’t fit-for-purpose as a the proposal, and Herefordshire Council’s own replacement village pub. That is if it ever gets Historic Buildings and Economic Development built, of course. Officers each objected to the proposals too. In a spirit of seeking co-operation, CAMRA Moreover, it spoke volumes that there wasn’t a promptly sought clarity via the planners on a 3 PUB CAMPAIGN: VOLUNTEER INN number of matters regarding the interior design and co-operation. This vacuum of information and function and, specifically, as to the new then provides room for unhelpful rumour and pub’s ability to be able to accommodate the speculation to circulate, with one less charita- reasonable needs of the local community - as ble comment suggesting the new pub, if ever the Volunteer Inn does today. However, no built, would be no more than a social club for S such assurances were forthcoming. All that & A Produce staff. came back was a curt statement that the run- ning and management of the pub was not a In a very detailed and thorough 38-page report planning matter (that’s telling ‘em!), then later to the planning committee, the planning officer the 35 tables and 140 chairs magically disap- set out the issues. Despite Herefordshire Coun- peared from the plans that would ultimately be cil’s own Economic Development Officer stating put in front of the planning committee! that there was no evidence presented that the replacement pub could meet the needs of the Revolting Peasants community, and the council’s Historic Buildings In later correspondence to the planners, S & A Officer adding that the Volunteer Inn was a sig- Produce stated their surprise and disappoint- nificant heritage asset (for which he believed ment with the reaction to their plans from so- retention and sympathetic extension should be called “third parties” (a euphemism they seem to a priority instead) the planning officer’s recom- apply to the local community). You can almost mendation to the planning committee was for feel the self-righteous indignation leaping out approval. from the page, when one reads how the new These matters were briefly discussed by the pub project is being promoted by Mr John Da- planning committee ahead of the vote, as too vies of S & A Produce himself as, quote: “a per- was the fact there was to be absolutely no re- sonal philanthropic gesture for the benefit of the quirement placed on S & A Produce to ever community.” It accuses those same “third par- build the replacement pub. However, a majority ties” of being “critical” and “unappreciative”, and of councillors were content to take it at face of raising “trivial” and “frivolous” objections. One value that it would appear at some point in the can imagine the rage…perhaps only Marie An- future unknown, and the application was ap- toinette could have put it better: How dare the proved by 7 votes to 4, with one abstention. peasants revolt! I’m giving them a brand new Thus the Volunteer Inn was condemned to be- village pub! But is this really the case? If some- come no more than rubble and memories. one was really going to build a community a new pub, wouldn’t they speak to them about it? Snatching Defeat from the Victory Why the stonewalling? What is there to be afraid This is a very disappointing outcome. But what of? What is it that they have to hide? is more disappointing was that one of the votes It has been this persistent unwillingness of S & in favour was from Councillor J L V Kenyon, A Produce to discuss the application with any- who will be better known to many Hopvine one in the local community that has created ill- readers as Jim Kenyon - the erstwhile Mayor of felling and mistrust. There has been absolutely Hereford and owner-operator of both the Here- no effort at all to consult with residents, the ford Brewery and the city’s Victory pub. Jim objectors or the parish council on the plans at clearly believes this new pub will be built, and any point. Moreover, on the 26th November that it will work. We genuinely hope that we are 2016, there was a well-attended public meet- wrong and that he has made the right call, as ing at Marden Village Hall, organised by the doubtless will the residents of Marden - who are parish council, to discuss the planning applica- shortly to bear witness to the closure and tions (including that for the Volunteer Inn).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Land at Oak Tree Farm, Dinmore, Herefordshire HR1
    Land at Oak Tree Farm, Dinmore, Herefordshire HR1 3JP Situation: easements, quasi easements, covenants, restriction orders, etc., as may exist or for the The subject land is located approximately 8 same whether mentioned in the sale miles north of Hereford and 6.5 miles south of particulars or not. Leominster. Located in close proximity to the A49, with an eastern border along the River Fishing Rights: Lugg. Single bank fishing rights are held under a Description: separate Deed extending to the full length of the River frontage and also encompassing the Approximately 31.25 acres of pasture land frontage onto Burghope Farm land with river frontage to the east and vehicular immediately next door. Full details available access to the west. The land is south facing on request. and slopes from the western boundary with Land at Oak Tree Farm, the road to the eastern boundary with the Tenure: Dinmore, River Lugg. Herefordshire Directions: Freehold, with vacant possession upon completion. HR1 3JP Leave Hereford north along the A49 for approximately 7 miles. As one starts to Vendor’s Solicitors: ascends Dinmore Hill there is a turning on the Harrison Clark Rickerbys, 29 Broad Street, right hand side (signposted Dinmore). Hereford HR4 9AR Continue for approximately 400 metres along FAO J. Mayglothling Tel; 01432 349703 the narrow road and the subject land wil be Summary of features located on the right hand side as denoted by Email [email protected] the Agent’s For Sale board. 31.25 acres of permanent pasture Boundaries: River frontage At present, the boundaries comprise thick Viewing: hedgerows with sporadic fencing.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Quality Annual Status Report (ASR)
    Herefordshire Council 2019 Air Quality Annual Status Report (ASR) In fulfilment of Part IV of the Environment Act 1995 Local Air Quality Management January 2020 LAQM Annual Status Report 2019 Herefordshire Council Local Authority Abbie O’Sullivan Officer Department Environmental Health & Trading Standards Address 8 St Owens Street, Hereford HR1 2ZB Telephone 01432 260918 E-mail [email protected] Report Reference ASR 2019 V0.4 number Date January 2020 LAQM Annual Status Report 2019 Herefordshire Council Executive Summary: Air Quality in Our Area Air Quality in Herefordshire Council Air pollution is associated with a number of adverse health impacts. It is recognised as a contributing factor in the onset of heart disease and cancer. Additionally, air pollution particularly affects the most vulnerable in society: children and older people, and those with heart and lung conditions. Further, there is often a strong correlation with equalities issues, because areas with poor air quality are also often the less affluent areas1,2. The annual health cost to society of the impacts of particulate matter alone in the UK is estimated to be around £16 billion3. Herefordshire is located in the West Midlands of England. It is bordered by five counties; Shropshire, Worcestershire, Gloucestershire, Powys and Monmouthshire. As of mid-2018, Herefordshire's resident population was estimated to be 192,100, which has increased by 1,600 since 2016. Herefordshire is one of the least densely populated areas of the United Kingdom, with residents scattered across 842 square miles. The main pollutant of concern within Herefordshire is nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The major source of air pollutants in Herefordshire is vehicle emissions, specifically the emissions from the A49 Road through Hereford and Bargates Road junction in Leominster have been identified as significant.
    [Show full text]
  • Pyons Group Environment and Ecology
    Pyons Group Environment and Ecology 0 Document Control Issue 1.0 Date: 10 November 2020 Prepared by: Jonathan Lee BEM. CSMP, NDP Review Steering Group Member CBCI, RISC, MSyI Reviewed by: NDP Review Steering Group Approved by: Pyons Group Parish Council Copyright Statement This document has been prepared to support the review of the Pyons Group Neighbourhood Development Plan. It is for the sole benefit, use and information of the people who live and work in the group’s parishes. Where mapping is used, use has been made of the Parish Council’s Ordnance Survey Public Sector Mapping Agreement Licence number (01000548100), OpenStreetmap.com, and DEFRA’s MAGiC open data sets. 1 Contents Document Control...................................................................................................................... 1 Copyright Statement .................................................................................................................. 1 Aim ............................................................................................................................................. 4 Scope and Methodology ............................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 6 Sustainable Development .......................................................................................................... 6 Climate Change .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Accident A49 Spurstow Crossroads
    Petition Ref: Petition 86 to Cheshire East Council Proposed Speed Limit A49 Spurstow Submission – 20/10/16 Sandbach Town Hall ( Mrs Griffiths) Accident A49 Spurstow Crossroads Department for Transport Circular on Setting Speed Limits – January 2013 7.3 131 Fear of traffic can affect people's quality of life in villages and it is self evident that villages should have comparable speed limits to similar roads in urban areas. It is therefore government policy that a 30 mph speed limit should be the norm through villages. 7.3. 134.. Where the character of a village falls outside this definition, local authorities are encouraged to use their discretion in deciding whether a lower speed limit is appropriate “Local residents may also express their concerns or desire for a lower speed limit and these comments should be considered.” Extract Taken form Minutes of Spurstow Parish Council Meeting March 2013 Cheshire East Council Propose a 30 MPH speed limit for A49 Spurstow. The Current Petition therefore represents a position originally proposed by Cheshire East Council Re: – Petition Ref: Petition 86 to Cheshire East Council A49 Spurstow Speed Limit 30 MPH Summary Points To be read in conjunction with Correspondence with Mr Frank Jordon (Executive Director –Place) Further points in support of a 30 MPH limit and with reference to: Department for Transport Circular on Setting Speed Limits – January 2013 Cheshire East Council’s “Speed Management Strategy – September 2016 Guidance states that 30mph is generally the norm in villages; The road geometry demands a 30 mph limit. ( Photographs 1 – 3) Residential properties drives that access directly onto the main A49 suffer from poor visibility due to the road geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Research on Weather Conditions and Their Relationship to Crashes December 31, 2020 6
    INVESTIGATION OF WEATHER CONDITIONS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO CRASHES 1 Dr. Mark Anderson 2 Dr. Aemal J. Khattak 2 Muhammad Umer Farooq 1 John Cecava 3 Curtis Walker 1. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences 2. Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering University of Nebraska-Lincoln Lincoln, NE 68583-0851 3. National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO Sponsored by Nebraska Department of Transportation and U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration December 31, 2020 TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. SPR-21 (20) M097 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Research on Weather conditions and their relationship to crashes December 31, 2020 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. Dr. Mark Anderson, Dr. Aemal J. Khattak, Muhammad Umer Farooq, John 26-0514-0202-001 Cecava, Dr. Curtis Walker 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. University of Nebraska-Lincoln 2200 Vine Street, PO Box 830851 11. Contract or Grant No. Lincoln, NE 68583-0851 SPR-21 (20) M097 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Nebraska Department of Transportation NDOT Final Report 1500 Nebraska 2 Lincoln, NE 68502 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes Conducted in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. 16. Abstract The objectives of the research were to conduct a seasonal investigation of when winter weather conditions are a factor in crashes reported in Nebraska, to perform statistical analyses on Nebraska crash and meteorological data and identify weather conditions causing the significant safety concerns, and to investigate whether knowing the snowfall amount and/or storm intensity/severity could be a precursor to the number and severity of crashes.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Stretton: Submission Stage 1 Assessment Summary Sheet
    Church Stretton: Submission Stage 1 Assessment Summary Sheet Housing sites Church Stretton Site Ref Site Name Progressed to Comments Stage 2 CSTR001 Windsor Place, Churchill Road No Committed site - housing development has already commenced CSTR002 Land at the rear of Church Stretton No Committed site - housing development has already commenced. School CSTR003 Land between A49 north and railway No Not well related to current development boundary. Also promoted for line employment as ELR050 CSTR004 Land at Rabbit Burrow, Trevor Hill Yes CSTR005 Land off Burway Road Yes CSTR006 Land at the edge of Rectory Field off No Less than 0.2 ha in size. However, site is within development boundary so Burway Road is a potential windfall site. CSTR007 Land at Tiger Hall Yes Site contains Ancient Woodland. That part of the site outside the Ancient Woodland is progressed for further assessment. CSTR008 Long Mynd Hotel golf course, Cunnery Yes Lane CSTR009 Land fronting Ludlow Road Yes CSTR010 Adj. Ringing Stones, Cunnery Road No Less than 0.2 ha in size. CSTR011 Fire Station BT Police Sandford Avenue No Within development boundary so is a potential windfall site. CSTR012 The Wetlands No A significant part of the site and part of the access road are in Flood Zone 3 CSTR013 Land south of Continental Fires Yes Promoted for employment use only as ELR051 CSTR014 Land adjacent to the school Yes Part of site also known as ELR078 (Springbank Farm) CSTR015 Land at Brockhurst No The site does not adjoin the development boundary and is not well related to Church Stretton CSTR016 Crown Carpets, Burway Road No Less than 0.2 ha in size and not promoted.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    INTRODUCTION Bodenham, either homestead or enclosure of a man called BOTA or BODA, or Old English for “place where the Beadle lived”, is an attractive village which lies just east of the A49 on the eastern edge of Dinmore Hill mid way between Hereford and Leominster. It falls entirely in an Area of Great Landscape Value and is a Conservation Area. The River Lugg on which it stands is one of the few rivers in the country to be designated throughout its length as a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI). Lugg is a Celtic word for “bright stream”. There are interesting old houses and timbered cottages, and the interesting church of St Michael and All Angels is well worth a visit. The village has strong associations with the Devereux and Arkwright families and ample evidence of their influence on the area is to be seen on the walks. Based on the footpaths of Bodenham (BM) the walks include some connecting footpaths in Hope under Dinmore (HD) and Marden (MR) in order to create circular walks. The series of notes draw attention to the points of interest on the walks and their historical background. In 1990 a group of retired residents, organised by Bodenham Ramblers, joined, in cooperation with Hereford and Worcester County Council, a project to open up public rights of way by the year 2000. Work in Bodenham was completed in 1991 and the group went on to restore, in total, some 35 miles (56 km) of paths in 7 further parishes. The work was carried out with enthusiasm, much humour and a sense of achievement.
    [Show full text]
  • Land at Rocks Green Ludlow Shropshire SY8 2DS
    Committee and date Southern Planning Committee 22 September 2020 Development Management Report Responsible Officer: Tim Rogers email: [email protected] Tel: 01743 258773 Fax: 01743 252619 Summary of Application Application Number: 20/00840/REM Parish: Ludford Proposal: Approval of reserved matters (appearance, landscaping, layout, scale) pursuant of 14/05573/OUT (access approved) for the erection of foodstore (Use Class A1) and petrol filling station; all ancillary works Site Address: Land At Rocks Green Ludlow Shropshire SY8 2DS Applicant: Blackfriars Property Group Ltd Case Officer: Richard Fortune email : [email protected] Grid Ref 352276 - 275636 © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Shropshire Council 100049049. 2019 For reference purposes only. No further copies may be made. Recommendation:- Permit, subject to receipt of ecology comments and agreement on appropriate ecological mitigation measures, withdraw of the holding objection by Highways England and the conditions set out in Appendix 1. The delegated authority being given to the Area Planning Manager to adjust/add conditions as necessary following receipt of comments from those consultees. Planning Committee – 22 September 2020 Land At Rocks Green Ludlow Shropshire SY8 2DS REPORT 1.0 THE PROPOSAL 1.1 At the February 2017 South Planning Committee meeting it was resolved to grant outline planning permission for the erection of a new food store, associated petrol filling station, and associated car parking (to include access) at Dun Cow Farm, Rocks Green, Ludlow, subject to consultation with the Secretary of State (Ref. 14/05573/OUT). The Secretary of State decided not to call in the application and was content for the application to be determined by the local planning authority.
    [Show full text]
  • River Lugg SSSI Restoration Technical Report Draft for Comment and Consultation
    River Lugg SSSI Restoration Technical Report Draft for Comment and Consultation January 2015 Revision 2 Document Control Sheet BPP 04 F8 Version 16; October 2013 Project: Wye and Lugg SSSI Restoration Client: Environment Agency Project No: B228B001 Document title: River Lugg SSSI Restoration – Technical Report Ref. No: Originated by Checked by Reviewed by NAME NAME NAME ORIGINAL Katy Kemble Helena Parsons Helena Parsons NAME As Project Manager I confirm that the INITIALS Approved by above document(s) have been subjected to Andy Lee Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE 1/09/14 Document status: First draft REVISION NAME NAME NAME 1 Katy Kemble Alison Flynn Alison Flynn NAME INITIALS Approved by As Project Manager I confirm that the Helena Parsons above document(s) have been subjected to Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE Nov 2014 Document status: First revision for client comment REVISION NAME NAME NAME 2 Katy Kemble Sera Roberts Helena Parsons NAME INITIALS Approved by As Project Manager I confirm that the above document(s) have been subjected to Helena Parsons Jacobs’ Check and Review procedure and that I approve them for issue DATE Jan 2015 Document status: Draft for consultation Jacobs U.K. Limited This document has been prepared by a division, subsidiary or affiliate of Jacobs U.K. Limited (“Jacobs”) in its professional capacity as consultants in accordance with the terms and conditions of Jacobs’ contract with the commissioning party (the “Client”). Regard should be had to those terms and conditions when considering and/or placing any reliance on this document.
    [Show full text]
  • Monkmoor Meadows Masterplan and Final Proposals (RIBA 3) Red Kite Network Limited Monkmoor Meadows
    Monkmoor Meadows Masterplan and Final Proposals (RIBA 3) Red Kite Network Limited Monkmoor Meadows Masterplan and Final Proposals (RIBA Stage 3) February 2018 Monkmoor Meadows Masterplan and Final Proposals (RIBA 3) Red Kite Network Limited Contents Introduction 3 1.0 Site Analysis 4 1.1 Site Assessment 5 1.2 Ecology 6 1.3 Flood Risk 7 1.4 History 8 2.0 Community and Stakeholder Engagement 9 2.1 Online Survey 10 2.2 Drop-in Sessions 12 2.3 Stakeholder Engagement 14 Report Title: Monkmoor Meadows Masterplan and Final Proposals 278.17 3.0 Concept Design 15 Project Ref: Client: Shropshire Wildlife Trust 3.1 Design Concept 16 3.2 Sketch Plans 17 Report Status: Final 3.3 Sketch Views 18 Date of Issue: 22/02/2018 3.4 Case Study 19 Report Author: Red Kite Network Limited 4.0 Final Design 20 4.1 Masterplan 21 Copyright © Red Kite Network Limited 2018 4.2 Sections 22 4.3 Views 23 4.3 Material Palette 25 5.0 Implementation 27 5.1 Habitat Creation 28 5.2 Outline Bill of Quantities 29 RED KITE NETWORK LIMITED 5.3 Management and Maintenance 31 The John Rose Building, High Street, Coalport, Shropshire TF8 7HT 5.4 Action Plan 32 t 01952 582111 e [email protected] www.redkitenetwork.co.uk Registered in England & Wales No: 8169295 2 Monkmoor Meadows Masterplan and Final Proposals (RIBA 3) Red Kite Network Limited Introduction Red Kite Network Limited, a Shropshire-based landscape architecture, ecology and greenspace consultancy, were appointed by Shropshire Wildlife Trust to carry out a feasibility study and site design of Monkmoor Meadows, Shrewsbury (the Site).
    [Show full text]
  • Hope Under Dinmore Neighbourhood Development Plan
    Neighbourhood Development Plan Submission draft May 2016 Hope-under-Dinmore Group Parish Council Prepared by DJN Planning Ltd. for Hope under Dinmore Group Parish Council INTRODUCTION This is the submission draft of the Hope-under-Dinmore Neighbourhood Development Plan. The Plan has been prepared by a Project Group of Parish Councillors and local volunteers, with professional planning help. It looks ahead to 2031, and tackles such topics as a village boundary for Hope-under-Dinmore, new housing, the local economy, design, and protecting open spaces. We started work in 2014, carrying out a household survey and looking in detail at possible land for new housing in and around the village. We then drew up a draft Plan, which was published and circulated throughout the parishes in November last year for comment. The responses received have been carefully considered in preparing this next version of the Plan. You can find details of all the comments made and our response in the accompanying Consultation Statement. We have made a number of changes to the draft Plan as a result of the consultation. This version of the Plan has been prepared for the next stage of the process – submission to Herefordshire Council. The Plan then has to go through a number of checks, including an independent Examination, before it can be approved for adoption. The final stage is a parish referendum – a majority of those who vote need to agree with the Plan for it to be finalised and come into use. It will then become the formal starting point for decisions on planning applications in the parishes, together with the complementary policies in Herefordshire Council’s Local Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Vebraalto.Com
    Wye Lea Bridstow, Ross On Wye, HR9 6PZ £595 Per Calendar Month 2 2 1 E Wye Lea Bridstow, Ross On Wye, HR9 6PZ Finch Cottage is a delightful mid terrace property on the Wye Lea complex, which is located on the outskirts of Bridstow, approximately 3 miles from the centre of Ross. The property enjoys an idylic setting and has views to the rear over the communal grounds and beyond to Much Marcle and Ledbury and offers a rural location, whilst being conveniently placed for access to the M50/A40/A49 road networks. The accommodation comprises Entrance Hall, Kitchen with oven, hob, dishwasher and space for a washing machine, Lounge/Dining Room, two double Bedrooms, one with ensuite bathroom and a further shower room. The property benefits from LPG central heating, two parking spaces and a lawned rear garden. Please call us on 01989 768666 or email us at [email protected] SPECIAL CONDITIONS No children. Tenants must be aged 50+. No Housing Benefit COUNCIL TAX Council Tax Band B LOCAL AUTHORITY Herefordshire Council. Tel: 01432 260000. RESERVATION FEE & DEPOSIT A holding fee of £100.00 is required upon application of this property. Subject to satisfactory references the £100.00 is deducted off the first months rent. The deposit of this property is £685.00 TO VIEW Viewings are strictly by arrangement with the Letting Agents TrivettHicks, 53 Broad Street, Ross-on-Wye. Tel: (01989) 768666. 18 King Street Hereford Tel: 01432 274300 DIRECTIONS From the town centre, proceed along High Street in the direction of Hereford, crossing over Wilton Bridge and at Wilton Roundabout, take the A49 Hereford Road.
    [Show full text]