DOCSLIB.ORG

Mountain City, Ruby Mountains, and Jarbidge Ranger Districts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mountain City, Ruby Mountains, and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Mountain City, Ruby Mountains and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Combined Travel Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement References A & A Research. 1995. Humboldt National Forest Communications Planning Workbook – Summary of findings by Dr. E. B. Eiselein. Abbott, I. and D. Le Maitre. 2010. Monitoring the impact of climate change on biodiversity: The challenge of megadiverse Mediterranean climate ecosystems. Austral Ecology, Vol. 35, pp. 406 - 422. Ecological Society of Australia. Anderson, M.G. and C.E. Ferree. 2010. Conserving the Stage: Climate Change and the Geophysical Underpinnings of Species Diversity. PLoS One Diversity, Ecology Climate, Vol. 5, issue 7. http://www.plosone.org . Anderson, S. 1996. Memo to Scott Bell and Dave Archer concerning Leiberg’s clover and Lewis’ buckwheat. Humboldt National Forest. Dated October 17, 1996. Anderson, S., M. White, and D. Atwood. 1991. Humboldt National Forest sensitive plant field guide. Ogden, Utah: U.S.D.A., Forest Service, Intermountain Region.Autenrieth, R. E. 1981. Sage Grouse Management in Idaho. Wildlife Research Section, Idaho Department of Fish and Game. Wildlife Bulletin No. 9. Atwood, D. 1997. Final report for challenge cost share project inventory for least phacelia (Phacelia minutissima): a Bureau of Land Management special status plant. Boise, Idaho. Bureau of Land Management, Idaho State Office, 24 [54] pgs. (Technical bulletin (United States. Bureau of Land Management. Idaho State Office. 97-6) Ayala, R. D.; Srivastava, P.; Brodbeck, C. J.; Carter, E. A.; McDonald, T. P.,2005 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Paper Number 052017: 1-10 R.D. Ayala, Modeling Sediment Transport from an Off-Road Vehicle Trail Stream Crossing Using WEPP. Barneby, R. C. 1989. Fabales. In A. Cronquist, A. H. Holmgren, N. H. Holmgren, J. L. Reveal, and P. K. Holmgren. Intermountain Flora, Vol. 3B. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 279 pgs. Beck, J. and Peek, J. 2004. Herbage productivity and ungulate use of northeastern Nevada Bayer, R.J. 1992. Allozyme variation, genecology, and phytogeography of Antennaria arcuata (Asteraceae), rare species from the Great Basin and Red Desert with small disjunct populations. American Journal of Botany 79: 872-881.mountain meadows. Journal of Range Management 57:376-383. Behnke, R.J. 2002. Trout and Salmon of North America. The Free Press, New York, NY. 359 p. Berchard, M. 2011. Personal communication with Kyra Walton, Northeast Zone Wildlife Biologist, on road closures for goshawk. February 16. Bilby, R.E., K. Sullivan, and S.H. Duncan. 1989. The generation and fate of road-surface sediment in forested watersheds in southwestern Washington. Forest Science 35: 453-468. Bowers, W., B. Hosford, A. Oakley and C. Bond. 1979. Wildlife habitats in managed rangelands – the Great Basin of southeastern Oregon: native trout. General Technical Report PNW-84. Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Portland, Oregon. 16 p. Bozek, M.A., and W.A. Hubert. 1992. Segregation of resident trout in streams as predicted by three habitat dimensions. Canadian Journal of Zoology 70: 886-890. Bradley, P. 2009. Personal communication at Elko, Nevada NDOW office on January 30, 2009. 221 Mountain City, Ruby Mountains and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Combined Travel Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Breckel, J. and J. Keehn. 2009. End of Season Report, May to August 2009. Unpublished, 3 pp. Bull, E.L. 2005. Ecology of the Columbia spotted frog in Northeastern Oregon. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-640. Pacific Northwest Research Station, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Portland, Oregon. 45 p. Brooks, M.L., and B. Lair. 2005. Ecological effects of vehicular routes in a desert ecosystem. Report prepared for the United States Geological Survey, Recoverability and Vulnerability of Desert Ecosystems Program. Western Ecological Research Center, US Geological Survey, Henderson, NV. 23 pp. Burford, D.D., Jr. 2005. An assessment of culverts as fish passage barriers in a Montana drainage using a multi-tiered approach. Masters thesis. Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana. 50 pp. Carroll, M.B. 2008. The effects of stream crossings and associated road approaches on water quality in the Virginia Piedmont. Masters thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia. 144 p. Center for Plant Conservation (CPC). 2004. CPC National Collection Plant Profile: Trifolium leibergii. http://www.ridgwaydb.mobot.org/ cpcweb/CPC_ViewProfile/.asp?CPCNum=4325. Accessed March 3, 2004. Christensen, Alan G.; Lyon, L. Jack; Unsworth, James W. 1993. Elk management in the Northern Region: considerations in forest plan updates or revisions. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-303. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. 10 p. Christensen J H, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R, Kolli R K, Kwon W- T, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Menéndez C G, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A and Whetton P. 2007. Regional Climate Projections. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K B, Tignor M and Miller H L (eds)]. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge, UnitedKingdom and New York, NY, USA. Clinton, B.D., and J.M. Vose. 2003. Differences in surface water quality draining four road surface types in the southern Appalachians. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 24: 100-106. Coates, K.P. and S.D. Schemnitz. 1994. Habitat use and behavior of male mountain sheep in foraging associations with wild horses. Great Basin Naturalist 54(1) pp. 86-90. Coe, D.B.R. 2006. Sediment production and delivery from forest roads in the Sierra Nevada, California. Masters thesis. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado. 110 p. Connelly, J., M. Schroeder, A. Sands, and C. Braun. 2000. Guidelines to manage sage grouse populations and their habitats. Wildlife Society Buletin 28(4): 967-985. Connelly, J. W., and O. D. Markham. 1983. Movements and radionuclide concentrationsof sage grouse in southeastern Idaho. Journal of Wildlife Management 47:169-177 Connelly, J. W., S. T. Knick, M. A. Schroeder, and S. J. Stiver. 2004. Conservation Assessment of Greater Sage-grouse and Sagebrush Habitats. Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies. Unpublished Report. Cheyenne, Wyoming. 222 Mountain City, Ruby Mountains and Jarbidge Ranger Districts Combined Travel Management Project Final Environmental Impact Statement Copstead, R.L., P.E., 1998, Water/Road Interaction: Introduction to Surface Cross Drains, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. http://www.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/html/wr_p/98771806/98771806.htm Cordone, A.J., and D.W. Kelley. 1961. The influences of inorganic sediment on the aquatic life of streams. California Fish and Game 47: 189-228. Corn, P.S., and R.B. Bury. 1989. Logging in western Oregon: responses of headwater habitats and stream amphibians. Forest Ecology and Management 29: 39-57. Crockett, D.H. 1967. Reconnaissance Soil Survey of Ruby Mountain Division, Humboldt National Forest. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Croke, J., and S. Mockler. 2001. Gully initiation and road-to-stream linkage in a forested catchment, southeastern Australia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 26: 205-217. Cronquist, A. 1994. Asterales. In A. Cronquist, A. H. Holmgren, N. H. Holmgren, J. L. Reveal, and P. K. Holmgren. Intermountain Flora, Vol. 5. New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 496 pgs. Crum, S. J. 1994. The Road on Which We Came: A History of the Western Shoshone. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. Delong, Anita K., J.A. Crawford, and D.C. Delong, Jr. 1995. Relationships between vegetational structure and predation of artificial sage grouse nests. Journal of Wildlife Management 59(1): 88- 92. DeGraaf, Richard M.; Scott, Virgil E.; Hamre, R. H.; [and others]. 1991. Forest and rangeland birds of the United States: Natural history and habitat use. Agric. Handb. 688. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 625 p. deVos. J.C., M.R. Conover, and N.E. Headrick, editors. 2003. Mule deer conservation: Issues and management strategies. Jack H. Berryman, Utah State University. Logan, UT. DiTomaso, Joseph M. 2000. Invasive Weeds in Rangelands: Species, Impacts and Management. Weed Science, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 255-265. Duncan et al. 2004. Assessing the Economic, Environmental, and Societal Losses from Invasive Plants on Rangeland and Wildlands. Weed Technology, Vol. 18. Invasive Weed Symposium. Pp. 1411-1416. Duncan, C.L. and Clark, J.K. 2005. Invasive Plants of Range and Wildlands and their Environmental, Economic, and Societal Impacts. Dunfee, S.E. 2008. Evolution of ORV trails in the Little Sahara Recreation Area, Utah, 1952- 1997. Masters thesis. Ohio University, Athens, Ohio. 92 pp. Durrant, S.D. 1935. A survey of the waters of the Humboldt National Forest. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Fisheries, Washington. 42 p. Elko County. 2007. Elko County Open Space Plan. Elko County Board of Commissioners. Elko County. 2009. Elko County Code Title 12 Natural Resource Management Elko County. 2010. Elko County Public Land Use and Natural Resource management Plan. Elko County Board of Commissioners, Charlie Meyers, Chairmen. Elliot, J. W. 2000. Roads and Corridors. In: Dissmeyer, G.E. (Editor). 2000. Forest and Grasslands: A Synthesis of Scientific Literature. General Technical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • U86MAR03.Pdf (1.586Mb)
    STATUS REPORT Scientific Name of Taxon: ANTENNARIA ARCUATA Cronq, Common Name{a) of Taxon: Meadow Pussytoes Family: Asteraceae State{s) Where Taxon Occurs: USA: Wyoming, Idaho, Nevada Recommended Federal Status: dategory 2 (additional inventory and monitoring needed) Author(s) of Report: Hollis Merriott Rocky Mountain Heritage Task Force 3165 University Station Laramie, WY 82071 Original Date of Report: 30 November 1985 Date of Most Recent Revision: TABLE OF CONTENTS I. SPECIES INFORMATION 1. Classification and Nomenclature 1 2. Present Legal or Other Formal Status 2 3. Description 4 4. Significance of the Taxon. 7 5. Geographical Distribution 7 6. Environment and Habitat 23 7. Population Biology/Ecology 25 8 •. Current Land Ownership and Management Responsibility 27 9. Management Practices and Expeiience 28 10. Evidence of Threats to Survival 29 II. ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11. General Assessment of Vigor, Trends and Status 30 12. Priority of Listing or Status Change 30 13. Recommended Critical Habitat 31 14. Conservation/Recovery Recommendations 33 15. Interested Parties 33 III. INFORMATION SOURCES 16. Sources of Information 35 17. Summary of Materials on File 41 IV. AUTHORSHIP 18. Initial Authorship 42 19. Maintenance of Status Report 42 V. NEW INFORMATION 20. Record of Revisions i LIST OF FIGURES AND PHOTOGRAPHS Figure Page 1. Geographic range 0£ Antennaria arcuata in Wyoming 10 2. Precise occurrences 11 Photographs of Antennaria arcuata and habitat 5 ii LIST OF APPENDICES I. Allotment summary for Antennaria arcuata sites II. Element Occurrence Records III, 1986 field survey routes IV. Slides 0£ Antennaria arcuata and habitat iii I. SPECIES INFORMATION 1. Classification and Nomenclature A.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Associations. and Plant Species of Special Concern in the Jack Morro:W Hills Ecosystem
    .~ .· Plant Associations. and Plant Species of Special Concern in the Jack Morro:w Hills Ecosystem Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management Rock Springs District By (_) George.Jon~s and Walter Fertig. Wyoming Natural Diversity Databas·~ ·1604. Grand Ave.. · Laramie, Wyoming 82070 February 29, 1.996. - ·".! Agreement # K9lO-A4-0011 ·' Task Order # 6 .,,, ~ ' 1 ' TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . 2 LIST OF FIGURES • . 2 INTRODUCTION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • a • • 4 ~THODS • • • • • • • • • • • ~ • • • • • • • • • o· • 4 -PLANT COMMUNITIES • • • • • • • • • • • • ••• '4 PLANT SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN • .• • • • • • • . • • • 8 RESULTS • . • • • • • 9 PLANT COMMUNITIES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • I 9 PLANT SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN . • . • • '41 Antennaria arcuata • • • • • • • • • 46 Astragalus nelsonianus . • • • • • • ··49. Carex parryana • • • . • • • • • • • • • • 52 Cryptantha scoparia • • • • • • • • • • • • 55 Eriastrum wilcoxii . • • • . • . • . $7 Erigeron uintahensis • • • • • • • • • • . 59 Eriogonum divaricatum • • • • • • • • • . • • . 62 Ipomopsis crebrifolia • • • • • • • • • . • • . 64 Lesauerella macrocarpa • • . o • o 66 Monolepis pusilla • • • • • • • • • . • . • • • 71 Oryzopsis contracta • o • • o • • o o o • o 73 oxytheca dendroidea • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • o 76 Penstemon paysoniorum • • • • • • • • • • • . • . • 78 Phacelia demissa • • • • • • • • • • • o • o • 80 Phacelia salina • • • • • • • • • • • . •. • . • • • 82 Phacelia scopulina . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • 84 DISCUSSION AND
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Antennaria Arcuata (Meadow Pussytoes) in Sublette County, Wyoming
    Status of Antennaria arcuata (Meadow pussytoes) in Sublette County, Wyoming Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management - Pinedale and Rock Springs Field Offices By Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database Dept. 3381, University of Wyoming 1000 E. University Ave. Laramie, WY 82071 February 2013 Cooperative Agreement No. L12AC20036 ABSTRACT Surveys were conducted for Antennaria arcuata (Meadow pussytoes) in Sublette County, southwestern Wyoming. Potential habitat was surveyed throughout the Upper Green River Basin and the nearest potential habitat at the head of the Sweetwater River watershed. This report presents the results of the first systematic surveys in the Upper Green River Basin, documenting nine populations on all three sides of the basin, and building on all prior work. Antennaria arcuata was previously characterized as having a two-part distribution in Fremont and Sublette counties whereas results of the current survey suggest a more contiguous distribution pattern and expand information on habitat requirements. Incidental to surveying Antennaria arcuata, five other wetland species of concern were documented that are not otherwise known from BLM lands in Wyoming. One is a recently-recognized addition to the state flora. They do not occupy the same wetland vegetation zone but their confluent habitat provides context for understanding the habitat of Antennaria arcuata. Results for each of the five species are presented in a report chapter on additional survey results. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Michael Kirkpatrick (WYNDD) helped conduct Antennaria arcuata field surveys and provided review of the report. Victoria Pennington (WYNDD) contributed many of the preparations needed for 2012 field surveys of A. arcuata using Geographic Information System software and layers for photointerpretation and assembling maps, digitized survey routes after the field season, provided help in preparing tables and climate data that appear in this report, and provided review.
    [Show full text]
  • Sensitive Species Lists in Some Adjacent States As Well As Lists from Other Federal and State Agencies in Wyoming Were Reviewed for This Effort
    BLM Wyoming Sensitive Species Policy and List March 31, 2010 Introduction The USDI Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Wyoming has prepared this list of sensitive species to focus species management efforts towards maintaining habitats under a multiple use mandate. Many species are not on this list due to the lack of status, distribution and habitat requirement information which prohibits any management attention. The goals of this sensitive species policy are to: • Maintain vulnerable species and habitat components in functional BLM ecosystems. • Ensure sensitive species are considered in land management decisions. • Prevent a need for species listing under the Endangered Species Act. • Prioritize needed conservation work with an emphasis on habitat. Authority The authority for this policy and guidance comes from the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA), as amended; Title II of the Sikes Act, as amended; the Federal Land Policy and Management Act (FLPMA) of 1976; and the Department Manual 235.1.1A., General Program Delegation, Director, Bureau of Land Management. Special Status Species include those species listed or proposed for listing under the ESA together with species designated internally as BLM sensitive in accordance with BLM Manual 6840. Actions authorized by the BLM shall further the conservation and/or recovery of federally listed species and conservation of Bureau sensitive species. Bureau sensitive species will be managed consistent with species and habitat management objectives in land use and implementation plans to promote their conservation and to minimize the likelihood and need for listing under the ESA. Criteria set forth in the 0.2A section of the 6840 Manual for designating sensitive species are: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • A Publication of the Wyoming Native Plant Society
    Castilleja A Publication of the Wyoming Native Plant Society May 2005, Volume 24, No. 2 Posted at www.uwyo.edu/wyndd/wnps/wnps_home.htm In this issue: What good is a sterile staminode?. 1 Announcement – annual fieldtrip, in May! . 2 Monitoring sensitive plant species (BHNF) 3 Plant monitoring in Wyoming . 6 Additions to the flora of Wyoming . 6 Proposed By-Laws amendments. 8 WHAT GOOD IS A STERILE STAMINODE? By Peter Lesica [Reprinted with permission, from Kelseya, Newsletter of Montana Native Plant Society, 2002. 15(4):1,5]. Penstemons are one of our favorite and most familiar groups of native plants. That’s understandable because there are lots of them and most have colorful, showy flowers. In fact, Penstemon is the largest genus of plants among those found only in North America. Of the 250 species, the majority occur in the western U.S. The great diversity of penstemons makes them a great group for gardening, but it also allows us to study how flowers evolve without having to go too far from home. Beardtongue is the common name applied Above: Penstemon haydenii is among the few Penstemon to many members of the genus Penstemon. It species with both glabrous and hairy staminodes, found in refers to the fact that all penstemons have a mixed populations (Heidel 2005). Drawings by B. Heidel. sterile stamen called a “staminode” that is hairy Evolutionary biologists believe that the to some extent in the majority of species. pollen-bearing function of the staminode was lost Penstemon flowers are pretty simple, so the during the evolution of penstemon’s two-sided, staminode is easy to see.
    [Show full text]
  • THE IDAHO NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY RARE PLANT LIST – FEB. 2007 the Idaho Rare Plant List Has Three Main Divisions: GLOBALL
    THE IDAHO NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY RARE PLANT LIST – FEB. 2007 The Idaho Rare Plant List has three main divisions: GLOBALLY RARE = Species and varieties or subspecies rare throughout their range. STATE RARE = Taxa rare within the political boundaries of Idaho, but more common elsewhere. REVIEW = Taxa that may be of conservation concern in Idaho, but which lack sufficient information to base a recommendation regarding their appropriate classification on the Idaho Rare Plant List. Global conservation ranks used to assign taxa to the first two groups are based on a system developed by The Nature Conservancy and used by the Natural Heritage and Conservation Data Center network (NatureServe). Using this one- through-five ranking system, taxa ranked G1-G3 are assigned to one of the INPS GLOBALLY RARE categories. Taxa ranked G4 or G5 are assigned to one of the INPS STATE RARE categories. There are four INPS GLOBALLY RARE categories: Globally Extinct (GX), Global Priority 1 (GP1), Global Priority 2 (GP2), and Global Priority 3 (GP3). In addition, each globally rare species that is not currently listed as Endangered or Threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act receives a Threat Priority rank. This one-through-twelve rank is based on the old U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Listing Priority criteria. In the past, these rankings have helped the INPS make and prioritize recommendations to the USFWS for the federal Candidate list, as well as other conservation efforts. INPS STATE RARE species are assigned to one of five categories: Taxa believed to be extirpated from Idaho (SX), State Priority 1 (SP1), State Priority 2 (SP2), Sensitive (S), or Monitor (M).
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Conservation Status of Antennaria Arcuata in Idaho
    REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF ANTENNARIA ARCUATA IN IDAHO by Christine C. Lorain Natural Heritage Section Nongame/Endangered Wildlife Program Bureau of Wildlife March 1990 Idaho Department of Fish and Game 600 South Walnut, P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 Jerry M. Conley, Director Status Survey Report prepared for Idaho Department of parks and Recreation through Section 6 funding from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1 REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION STATUS OF ANTENNARIA ARCUATA IN IDAHO Taxon name: Antennaria arcuata Cronq. Common name: arching pussy-toes Family: Asteraceae (Compositae) States where taxon occurs: U.S.A.; Idaho, Nevada, and Wyoming Current Federal Status: Category 2 Recommended Federal Status: Category 2 Author of report: Christine C. Lorain Original date of report: 19 March 1990 Date of most recent revision: N/A Institution to Whom Further Information and Comments Should be Sent: Idaho Natural Heritage Program Idaho Depart. of Fish and Game 600 S. Walnut St. P.O. Box 25 Boise, Idaho 83707 i ABSTRACT Arching pussy-toes (Antennaria arcuata) is a dioecious, white-woolly perennial from disjunct locations in three western states. As of 1989, 23 populations of arching pussy-toes are known throughout its range. A single population of arching pussy- toes occurs in Blaine County, Idaho, two populations occur in Elko County, Nevada, and 20 populations are documented for Fremont County, Wyoming. The taxon occurs in moist, natural grass-sedge meadows and near seeps or springs within sagebrush grasslands. The single Idaho population of arching pussy-toes occurs in a privately-owned portion of Huff Creek Meadows, 9 miles east of Carey, Blaine County.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomics Resolves the Relationships Within Antennaria
    Phylogenomics Resolves the Relationships within Antennaria (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae) and Yields New Insights into Its Morphological Character Evolution and Biogeography Authors: Thapa, Ramhari, Bayer, Randall J., and Mandel, Jennifer R. Source: Systematic Botany, 45(2) : 387-402 Published By: The American Society of Plant Taxonomists URL: https://doi.org/10.1600/036364420X15862837791221 BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use. Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/Systematic-Botany on 21 May 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-useAccess provided by Mississippi State University Systematic Botany (2020), 45(2): pp. 387–402 © Copyright 2020 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364420X15862837791221 Date of publication May 13, 2020 Phylogenomics Resolves the Relationships within Antennaria (Asteraceae, Gnaphalieae) and Yields New Insights into its Morphological Character Evolution and Biogeography Ramhari Thapa,1 Randall J. Bayer, and Jennifer R.
    [Show full text]
  • A Publication of the Wyoming Native Plant Society
    Castilleja A Publication of the Wyoming Native Plant Society www.uwyo.edu/wyndd/wnps/wnps_home.htm May 2001 Wyoming Locoweed (Oxytropis Volume 20, No. 2 nana) served as the mascot of the Wyoming Native Plant Society from 1982-1994. Bob Dorn th discussed this Wyoming endemic in the October Gala 20 Anniversary Issue 1985 issue of the newsletter: “this is another spring-flowering legume with a tight raceme of In this issue: pink-purple flowers. The plants normally are about WNPS News . 2 8 inches high and grow on rocky slopes and ridges. In Quotes . 2 [Wyoming] locoweed was first collected by Thomas Pie (and Lichvar’s Mid-Section) Are Round – the Nuttall in 1834 on the “plains of the Platte in the Early Years of WNPS . 3 Rocky Mountain range” probably in either Converse Twenty Years of Wyoming Botany and WNPS . 4 or Natrona county. It was described by him in Botany Briefs Torrey and Gray’s Flora of North America in 1838. BLM Sensitive Species List Approved . 11 It is now known from Converse, Natrona, Carbon, and Fremont counties”. Illustration by Jane Dorn. Creek, and other summer wildflowers. If you wish to WNPS NEWS RSVP for the trip (not required), contact Walt Fertig at 307-766-3020 or by e-mail ([email protected]). Membership Renewal/WNPS Elections: Enclosed with this issue is a renewal notice and ballot for Society New Members: Please welcome the following new officers. Members with a 99, 00, or 01 on their mailing members of WNPS: Philip Kenney (Littleton, MA). label need to renew to remain in good standing, while those with a 02 are paid through the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Antennaria Arcuata (Meadow Pussytoes), Astragalus Diversifolius
    Inventory of Alkaline Meadows for BLM Sensitive Plant Species: Antennaria arcuata (Meadow pussytoes), Astragalus diversifolius (Meadow milkvetch) and Cleome multicaulis (Many-stemmed Spiderflower) with Field-Testing of Potential Distribution Models; Fremont and Sweetwater Counties, Wyoming Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management – Lander, Rawlins, Rock Springs Field Offices and BLM Wyoming Office By Bonnie Heidel Wyoming Natural Diversity Database Dept. 3381, University of Wyoming 1000 E. University Ave. Laramie, WY 82071 May 2015 Cooperative Agreement No. L10AC20123, Mod. 5 ABSTRACT Surveys were conducted for two species designated Sensitive by the Bureau of Land Management in Wyoming: Antennaria arcuata (Meadow pussytoes) and Astragalus diversifolius (Meadow milkvetch). The project was originally proposed to fill survey gaps. The objective was greatly expanded to test potential distribution models. Both of the two species occupy alkaline meadows and had suspected survey coverage gaps in the BLM Lander Field Office. A third species, Cleome multicaulis (Many-stemmed spiderflower) is also known from alkaline meadows and was discovered in the study area for the first time during the course of surveys. In total, one new population of A. arcuata, two new populations of A. diversifolius and two new populations of C. multicaulis were documented by use of photointerpretation. Eighty-two negative survey points were produced and will be used to revise the three species’ potential distribution models. This report represents the most current and complete information on the three species as present in Wyoming, drawing from all earlier studies. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report reflects the work of Wyoming botanists past and present, including Walter Fertig (Wyoming Natural Diversity Database; WYNDD), Hollis Marriott (WYNDD) and Robert Dorn.
    [Show full text]
  • Sagebrush-Associated Species of Conservation Concern Mary M
    Sagebrush Ecosystem Conservation and Management: 46–68, 2011 Chapter 2: Sagebrush-Associated Species of Conservation Concern Mary M. Rowland, Lowell H. Suring, Matthias Leu, Steven T. Knick, Michael J. Wisdom Abstract. Selection of species of con- Key words: ecoregional assessment, cern is a critical early step in conducting sagebrush ecosystem, species of conserva- broad-scale ecological assessments for tion concern, species selection, terrestrial conservation planning and management. vertebrates, vascular plants, Wyoming Ba- Many criteria can be used to guide this sins. selection, such as conservation status, ex- Ecoregional assessments may rely on isting knowledge base, and association coarse- or fine-filter approaches or both, with plant communities of interest. In depending on specific objectives of the conducting the Wyoming Basins Ecore- assessment. Coarse-filter approaches, gional Assessment (WBEA), we followed which are typically based on conserving a step-wise process to select vascular plant ecological communities, are often easier and vertebrate species of concern. Based to implement but may not capture occur- on our selection process, we identified 65 rences of rare or locally common species taxa of sagebrush-associated (Artemisia or other key habitat elements (Scott et al. spp.) vascular plants of conservation con- 1993, Noss and Cooperrider 1994, Haufler cern. The vast majority were forbs, and 1999b, Marcot and Flather 2007). More- nearly all are found in Wyoming (n = 59; over, coarse filters such as plant associa- 91%), reflecting its central location and tions and ecological processes are often spatial dominance (51%) of the study area. less tangible concepts for the public to un- Forty-eight plants (74%) were ranked ei- derstand.
    [Show full text]