Bienvenue! We Are So Glad to Have You!
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
" We Are Family?": the Struggle for Same-Sex Spousal Recognition In
INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be fmrn any type of computer printer, The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reprodudion. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e-g., maps, drawings, &arb) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to tight in equal sections with small overlaps. Photographs included in the original manuscript have been reproduced xerographically in this copy. Higher quality 6' x 9" black and Mite photographic prints are available for any photographs or illustratims appearing in this copy for an additional charge. Contact UMI directly to order. Bell 8 Howell Information and Leaning 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 USA 800-521-0600 "WE ARE FAMILY'?": THE STRUGGLE FOR SAME-SEX SPOUSAL RECOGNITION IN ONTARIO AND THE CONUNDRUM OF "FAMILY" lMichelIe Kelly Owen A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Sociology and Equity Studies in Education Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto Copyright by Michelle Kelly Owen 1999 National Library Bibliothiique nationale l*B of Canada du Canada Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliographic Services sewices bibliographiques 395 Wellington Street 395. -
City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average Price by Percentage Increase: January to June 2016
City of Toronto — Detached Homes Average price by percentage increase: January to June 2016 C06 – $1,282,135 C14 – $2,018,060 1,624,017 C15 698,807 $1,649,510 972,204 869,656 754,043 630,542 672,659 1,968,769 1,821,777 781,811 816,344 3,412,579 763,874 $691,205 668,229 1,758,205 $1,698,897 812,608 *C02 $2,122,558 1,229,047 $890,879 1,149,451 1,408,198 *C01 1,085,243 1,262,133 1,116,339 $1,423,843 E06 788,941 803,251 Less than 10% 10% - 19.9% 20% & Above * 1,716,792 * 2,869,584 * 1,775,091 *W01 13.0% *C01 17.9% E01 12.9% W02 13.1% *C02 15.2% E02 20.0% W03 18.7% C03 13.6% E03 15.2% W04 19.9% C04 13.8% E04 13.5% W05 18.3% C06 26.9% E05 18.7% W06 11.1% C07 29.2% E06 8.9% W07 18.0% *C08 29.2% E07 10.4% W08 10.9% *C09 11.4% E08 7.7% W09 6.1% *C10 25.9% E09 16.2% W10 18.2% *C11 7.9% E10 20.1% C12 18.2% E11 12.4% C13 36.4% C14 26.4% C15 31.8% Compared to January to June 2015 Source: RE/MAX Hallmark, Toronto Real Estate Board Market Watch *Districts that recorded less than 100 sales were discounted to prevent the reporting of statistical anomalies R City of Toronto — Neighbourhoods by TREB District WEST W01 High Park, South Parkdale, Swansea, Roncesvalles Village W02 Bloor West Village, Baby Point, The Junction, High Park North W05 W03 Keelesdale, Eglinton West, Rockcliffe-Smythe, Weston-Pellam Park, Corso Italia W10 W04 York, Glen Park, Amesbury (Brookhaven), Pelmo Park – Humberlea, Weston, Fairbank (Briar Hill-Belgravia), Maple Leaf, Mount Dennis W05 Downsview, Humber Summit, Humbermede (Emery), Jane and Finch W09 W04 (Black Creek/Glenfield-Jane -
This Election Was Very Much for Someone Else
ELECTION 2018 WHAT HAPPENED WHAT’S NEXT Sponsored by: 76 40 7 1 Welcome to our Look Inside Election 2018 Friends, colleagues and partners, Our in-depth research report breaks down the findings of exclusive We are going to have a new Premier, quantitative post-election research a new government and lots of change conducted by Pollara Strategic Insights. coming to Ontario. On behalf of Pollara, With a comprehensive analysis from Enterprise and Maclean’s, we are Enterprise, this provides an unmatched, delighted to share with you our post- thorough look inside the 2018 Ontario election research report, Election 2018: Election and what it means for the future. What Happened, What’s Next. We recognize and thank our sponsors The 2018 Ontario Election has been Labatt, Bruce Power and CN for their one of the most anticipated and closely support and for making this important followed in recent history. It was an research possible as well as Maclean’s, election about change. our media sponsor for its participation in The results will undoubtedly change the and coverage of this initiative. face of Ontario for the next four years, We trust you find this report informative and Premier Designate Doug Ford will and insightful and encourage you to have a lot of work ahead to roll out the share it with your colleagues. Progressive Conservative platform. We wanted to dig deeper into the key issues Thank you for taking the time to read our that motivated voters, answer some of report. the questions about what happened and explore what’s next for Ontarians. -
The TTC Belongs to Toronto
TAKE ACTION! The TTC belongs to Call Premier Ford and the Minister of Transportation and tell them that the TTC belongs to Toronto! Urge them to oppose the plan to upload the TTC subway. It only Toronto. takes a few minutes and it makes a huge difference. We pay for it at the fare box and through our Hello, my name is ____ and my postal code is property taxes. But Premier Doug Ford wants ____. I strongly oppose your plan to upload the TTC because it will mean higher fares, break apart the TTC to break apart the TTC and take over the reduced service, and less say for riders. The subway. Transit riders will pay the price with TTC belongs to Toronto. We pay for it through higher fares, less say, and reduced service. our property taxes and our TTC fares. Consituency MPP Phone Etobicoke North Hon. Doug Ford 416-325-1941 higher fares Say no to higher fares Renfrew-Nipissing-Pembroke Hon. John Yakabuski 416-327-9200 Minister of Transportation A single TTC fare lets us transfer between bus, subway, and Etobicoke Centre Kinga Surma 416-325-1823 Parliamentary Assistant to Minister of Transportation streetcar. But the provincial transit agency Metrolinx is considering Beaches East York Rima Berns-McGown 416-325-2881 raising fares on the subway, charging more to ride longer Davenport Marit Stiles 416-535-3158 distances, and charging separate fares for the subways and buses. Don Valley East Michael Coteau 416-325-4544 If the province takes over the TTC subways, Metrolinx can carry Don Valley North Vincent Ke 416-325-3715 out its plan to charge us more. -
I Was Here Episode 1: Church Street with Brian Sambourne and Richard
I Was Here Episode 1: Church Street with Brian Sambourne and Richard Isaac Please Note: These transcripts reflect a taped conversation and as such might not read as grammatically correct in every instance. Introduction Catherine: I Was Here was created with generous financial support from the Accessibility Project at the G. Raymond Chang School of Continuing Education, Ryerson University. The views and opinions expressed in this podcast are those of the storytellers and are in no way endorsed by, or representative of, the G. Raymond Chang School of Continuing Education. Disclaimer Catherine: A warning to those of you who may be listening with small children, this episode features frank discussion of sexual practices. Cold Open Brian: And he was still full of tears, and he said to me, Brian, why me and not you? You were randy in your day. You had sexual partners. Now this sears you, when you hear, and you think to yourself, why me and not you. And I just said to him, Wayne, just luck, that’s all it was. [music] Interview 1 Catherine: You are listening to I Was Here, a podcast featuring older adults who have interesting stories about, or long histories with, spaces and places in Toronto. I am your host, Catherine Dunphy. [music] Catherine: In this episode, I am talking to: Brian: Brian Sambourne. I am age 66. I came out in the 1970s in the gay and lesbian community through MCC. I continued to be involved in my community and I thrive because of it. Richard: Richard Isaac. I am 73. -
Graffiti Management Plan – Streetartoronto (Start) Partnership Programs 2013 Grant Allocation Recommendations
STAFF REPORT ACTION REQUIRED Graffiti Management Plan – StreetARToronto (StART) Partnership Programs 2013 Grant Allocation Recommendations Date: May 9, 2013 To: Licensing and Standards Committee From: General Manager, Transportation Services Wards: All Reference p:\2013\ClusterB\tra\pr\ls13005pr Number: SUMMARY StreetARToronto (StART) was launched in 2012 as a public/private partnership program and a central feature of Council's new Graffiti Management Plan, a proactive approach to eliminating graffiti vandalism while supporting street art that adds character and visual interest to city streets. StART is funded as a Community Partnership and Investment Program (CPIP) grant of $375,890.00 from the former Graffiti Transformation Program and is administered by the Public Realm Section in Transportation Services, which also has carriage of coordination and implementation of many parts of the Graffiti Management Plan. StART is part of the City's Clean Toronto Together Campaign, which links citizens with city government to keep Toronto streets clean and free of posters and graffiti vandalism. In 2012, StART provided funding to 20 organizations resulting in the installation of 48 pieces of mural art. Two programs have been developed under the StART umbrella. The StART Partnership program provides up to $30,000.00 per application for non-profit arts organizations to create street art. The StART Diversion and Education program provides up to $20,000.00 per application for programs that engage at-risk youth who have been arrested for graffiti vandalism and diverted through the court system. The parameters for these programs were established by Council in the Graffiti Management Plan. This report recommends funding for 26 community-based groups in the above-noted categories. -
Master's Research Paper Officers of the Assembly and the Ontario
Master's Research Paper Officers of the Assembly and the Ontario Legislature: Reconsidering the Relationship Jocelyn McCauley Student Number: 216280703 Dr. Peter P. Constantinou A Master's Research Paper submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Public Policy, Administration and Law York University Toronto, Ontario, Canada July 2020 Abstract Officers of Parliament, or as they are referred to in Ontario, “officers of the Assembly”, have emerged within Westminster systems as a recognized tool for enhancing parliamentary oversight and increasing transparency in government. However, in Ontario, the absence of a clearly defined relationship with the provincial legislature has meant that certain officers of the Assembly have felt it necessary to “lobby” individual members and committees, as well as the media, in order to carry out their accountability and oversight functions. This lack of clarity places unnecessary stress on the relationship between independent officers, the Ontario Legislature, and the public sector, and can also negatively impact the public’s perception of government overall. This paper looks specifically at the relationship between the Ontario Legislature and officers of the Assembly, in terms of their governance structures, their appearances in legislative committees, and references to their work in House and committee proceedings. It finds that reforms are needed in order to strengthen officers’ relationships with the Legislature. Independent officers possess few powers of enforcement and as such, strong ties to the Assembly are necessary to ensure that recommended action is taken by legislators defend public trust and dollars. 2 Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. -
Standing Committee on Public Accounts
STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ACCOUNTS DARLINGTON NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION REFURBISHMENT PROJECT (SECTION 3.02, 2018 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL OF ONTARIO) 1st Session, 42nd Parliament 68 Elizabeth II ISBN 978-1-4868-3911-7 (Print) ISBN 978-1-4868-3913-1 [English] (PDF) ISBN 978-1-4868-3915-5 [French] (PDF) ISBN 978-1-4868-3912-4 [English] (HTML) ISBN 978-1-4868-3914-8 [French] (HTML) The Honourable Ted Arnott, MPP Speaker of the Legislative Assembly Sir, Your Standing Committee on Public Accounts has the honour to present its Report and commends it to the House. Catherine Fife, MPP Chair of the Committee Queen's Park December 2019 STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMITÉ PERMANENT DES COMPTES PUBLICS Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2 STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ACCOUNTS MEMBERSHIP LIST 1st Session, 42nd Parliament (as of October 28, 2019) CATHERINE FIFE Chair FRANCE GÉLINAS Vice-Chair JILL ANDREW GOLDIE GHAMARI TOBY BARRETT NORMAN MILLER Parry Sound–Muskoka STAN CHO Willowdale MICHAEL PARSA STEPHEN CRAWFORD NINA TANGRI *JOHN FRASER * MICHAEL GRAVELLE was replaced by JOHN FRASER on October 31, 2019. PETER TABUNS regularly served as a substitute member of the Committee. CHRISTOPHER TYRELL Clerk of the Committee IAN MORRIS Research Officer STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMITÉ PERMANENT DES COMPTES PUBLICS Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2 STANDING COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC ACCOUNTS MEMBERSHIP LIST 1st Session, 42nd Parliament (November 28, 2018 - October 28, 2019) CATHERINE FIFE Chair PEGGY SATTLER Vice-Chair TOBY BARRETT -
Online Voting in Ontario's Municipal Elections a Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology?
Online Voting in Ontario's Municipal Elections A Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology? Authored by Anthony Cardillo Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Aleksander Essex, PhD., P.Eng. Western University, Canada Associate Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Western University, Canada Nicholas Akinyokun School of Computing and Information Systems The University of Melbourne, Australia PUBLICATION NOTE An extended abstract of this report was presented at the Fourth International Joint Conference on Elec‐ tronic Voting (E‐Vote‐ID) in Bregenz, Austria, October, 2019. It won the Best Paper Award in the Trackon Security, Usability and Technical Issues. Cite the extended abstract as: Anthony Cardillo, Nicholas Akinyokun, and Aleksander Essex. Online Voting in Ontario Municipal Elections: A Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology?. In: Krimmer R. et al. (eds) Electronic Voting. E‐Vote‐ID 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11759, pp. 67‐82, 2019. Cite this full report as: Anthony Cardillo, Nicholas Akinyokun, and Aleksander Essex. Online Voting in Ontario Municipal Elections: A Conflict of Legal Principles and Technology? Whisper Lab Research Report, Western University, 2020. Available online: https://whisperlab.org/ontario-online.pdf Acknowledgments We are grateful to a many individuals in Ontario and beyond for helpful conversations and important in‐ sights. Special thanks to Jane Buchanan for her tireless effort searching municipal documents. Thanks to Joe Abley, Richard Ackerman, Tony Adams, Matt Bernhard, Kevin Creechan, Faye and Ron Ego, Josh Franklin, Nicole Goodman, Jared Marcotte, Beata Martin‐Rozumiłowicz, John Meraglia, Scott Richie, Matt Saunders, Cameron Shelley, Ken Strauss, Dave Suffling, Vanessa Teague, Anne Walkinshaw, Susan Watson, Uli Watkiss. -
Committee Agenda Erick
COMMITTEE AGENDA TO Municipal Election Compliance Audit Committee DATE Wednesday May 6 , 2015 LOCATION City Hall, Council Chambers TIME 5 p.m. ________________________________________________________________________________________________________ DISCLOSURE OF PECUNIARY INTEREST Municipal Election Compliance Audit Committee meeting to hear an application requesting a compliance audit submitted by Ian Flett on behalf of Susan Watson, under Section 81 of the Municipal Elections Act , with respect to the financial statements filed by Glen Tolhurst. Attachments: Application Notice of Hearing Page 1 of 1 CITY OF GUELPH COMMITTEE AGENDA ERICK. GILLESPIE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BARRISTERS & SOLICITORS IAN FLETT, J.D. Telephone: +1 (41 6) 703-5400 Direct: +1 ( 416) 703-7034 Fax: +1 (416) 703-9111 Ema il: iflett@gillespielaw .ca AprillO, 2015 {gilr«:;/,':fl~~lr :fa) Delivered by email APR ln 2015 Mr. Stephen O'Brien City Clerk CITY CLERKS OFFICE City of Guelph 1 Carden Street Guelph, ON NlH 3Al Dear Mr. O'Brien: Re: Application for Compliance Audit of the Financial Statements of Councillor Glen Tolhurst We are the lawyers for Ms. Susan Watson, an elector in the City of Guelph, who makes application for a compliance audit of the statements provided to t he City by Mr. Glen Tolhurst in relation to his 2014 election campaign finances. Ms. Watson details the groundsforherbeliefthe candidate has contravened provisions of the Municipal Elections Act in the enclosed Application for Compliance Audit. We would be obliged for your confirmation of receipt of this application. In addition, we ask that you provide notice to both our office and Ms. Watson directly of all upcoming hearing dates and other important matters as they relate to this application. -
TO360 Year One Round Two Consultation Report
Consultation Report TO360 Wayfinding Strategy (Phase III) – Year One, Round Two Consultation, March 2018 Table of Contents BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................1 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREAS 1 & 2 .....................................................................................................6 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREA 3 ........................................................................................................... 12 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREA 4 ........................................................................................................... 20 DETAILED FEEDBACK: AREAS 5 & 6 ................................................................................................... 28 This Consultation Report documents feedback shared in the March 2018 Local Mapping Open Houses for TO360 — Phase III. It was shared with participants for review before being finalized. Background Toronto 360 (TO360) is an effort to help people find their way by making streets, neighbourhoods, and the city more legible. Following the successful completion of a pilot project in the Financial District in 2015, the City began a five-year city-wide rollout in 2017. This rollout is focused on developing a map database that will support the future production of wayfinding maps. In Year One of the rollout, the TO360 team is developing the map database in an area bounded roughly by Lake Ontario, Royal York Road, St. Clair Avenue, and Warden Avenue. In -
Community Action Policing Activities for 1999/2000
Community Action Policing Activities for 1999/2000 (City Council at its regular meeting held on October 3, 4 and 5, 2000, and its Special Meetings held on October 6, 2000, October 10 and 11, 2000, and October 12, 2000, adopted this Clause, without amendment.) The Policy and Finance Committee recommends the adoption of the Recommendation of the Task Force on Community Safety, embodied in the following communication (September 18, 2000) from the City Clerk: Recommendation: The Task Force on Community Safety, at its meeting on September 12, 2000, recommended to the Policy and Finance Committee the adoption of the report (July 31, 2000) from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services summarizing the Community Action Policing (CAP) activities undertaken by Community and Neighbourhood Services in 1999/2000. _________ (Report dated July 31, 2000, addressed to the Task Force o n Community Safety from the Commissioner of Community and Neighbourhood Services Department) Purpose: This report summarizes the Community Action Policing (CAP) activities undertaken by Community and Neighbourhood Services (CNS) in 1999 - 2000. Financial Implications and Impact Statement: There are no financial implications with respect to this report Recommendations: It is recommended that: (1) the report on the Perceptions of Safety amongst Homeless People in Toronto as contained in Appendix 2 of this report, be referred to Police Services and to the relevant City of Toronto Departments for appropriate action; and (2) the appropriate City officials be authorized and directed to take the necessary steps to give effect thereto. Background: At its July 1999 meeting, Toronto Council adopted Policy and Finance report no.