Laterallus Jamaicensis) on Long Island, New York

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Laterallus Jamaicensis) on Long Island, New York 1 Utilizing Vocalizations to Survey, Identify and Monitor Eastern Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis) on Long Island, New York By Andria L McMaugh Masters of Natural Resources, Oregon State University, 2019 2 Abstract The Eastern black rail (laterallus jamaicanesis) is the smallest of the rail species and facing catastrophic decline throughout its home range. According to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the black rail population has decreased as much as 90%, leading to its proposed Federal listing as threatened under the Endangered Species Act (2018). Due to its potential change in listing status, it is important to get accurate population estimates for the black rail and to establish survey methods to detect absence/presence of this mysterious species. To that end, this project documents my work initiated by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation on a pilot study to determine the presence of black rail at a historic breeding site at Gilgo State Park, Oak Beach, NY. Initiated in 2017, the first year of the study consisted of determining survey routes, ground truthing the survey route and working out the logistics of accessing the marsh. In 2018, the department launched and conducted its first call-response black rail survey, recording a positive detection for the species. This was the first detection of black rails on Long Island since the 2nd Breeding Bird Atlas was conducted between 2000-2005, during which time one bird was heard calling from the marsh (McGowan and Corwin, 2008). This call-response survey protocol was repeated in 2019 with the addition of an acoustic element and vegetation surveys to determine associations with vegetative habitats. The project has yielded positive detection of the black rail at Oak Beach, NY, which has subsequently been analyzed for variables of tide cycle and moon phase and factors that may limit presence of black rails at Oak Beach (availability of quality habitat, presence of predators, and natural range limitations.) By creating a working survey method, researchers can work together in determining where black rails are present and take the necessary steps to protect them and their habitats. 3 Submitted to the College of Forestry, Oregon State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Natural Resources ____________________________________________ Samuel S. Chan, Major Advisor ____________________________________________ Janean Creighton ____________________________________________ Badege Bishaw, Committee Members 4 Acknowledgements I would like to first thank Chip Hamilton for making me part of this exciting project and encouraging my love of marsh birds and professional growth. Without him, this idea would have remained just an idea. I would also like to thank Jessica Ermak and Adrianna Cappello for their work and dedication to this project and helping to make it come to life during its various stages. Without their hard work and positivity, this project would not have been possible. Thank you to my advisor, Dr. Samuel Chan who provided me guidance every step of the way in taking a few ideas and helping me turn them into this capstone project. His knowledge has been invaluable in this journey. I would also like to thank Dr. Janean Creighton and Dr. Badege Bishaw for the dedication of their time and knowledge as members of my graduate committee. Thank you to Ms. Julie Lundgren of New York Natural Heritage for sharing her love and knowledge of the marsh on our vegetation surveys which have provided so much insight on our marsh habitat. And finally, thank you to Celia Neumann, Maria Maragni and Timothy Sexton for their overwhelming support of my academic degree and patience during this project and journey. Thank you for always believing in me, and thinking of me during my nights out on the marsh. 5 Table Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction .............................................................................................................................................. 6 Threats to Marsh Birds ......................................................................................................................... 9 Survey Objectives ................................................................................................................................. 13 Methods ................................................................................................................................................... 14 Survey Site ......................................................................................................................................... 14 Call-Response Surveys .................................................................................................................. 16 Acoustic Surveys .............................................................................................................................. 20 Vegetation Surveys ......................................................................................................................... 23 Results ............................................................................................................................................ 24 Results & Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 27 Engagement and communication plan ........................................................................................ 33 Future Work Plan and Conclusion ................................................................................................ 36 Works Cited: .......................................................................................................................................... 39 6 Introduction The Eastern black rail (Laterallus jamaicensis) is a sparrow sized marsh bird measuring between 10-15 centimeters in length and weighing about 35 grams, making it the smallest rail in North America (Figure 1)(Eddleman et al. 1994). Historically it has a wide breeding range, including the coastal regions of North America from Texas in the southwest to Massachusetts in the northeast (Figure 2). Within its range, black rails primarily inhabit tidal and fresh water marshes, preferring to nest in the marsh-upland interface. They generally prefer shallower water compared to other rail species to feed and breed in, nesting in Spartina patens and Spartina alterniflora (Watkins 2007). Egg laying and incubation occur primarily between May and August but can be as early as March and April (Watts 2016). Adult females lay 1 egg per day, with an average clutch size of 7 (Legare and Eddleman 2001, cited in USFW 2019). Eggs are incubated for 17-20 days, with both birds helping with incubation and brood rearing. Figure 1: Adult black rail, photo taken by Sara Dzielski, Cornell Lab of Ornithology’s MacCaulay Library. 7 Black rails are nocturnal and highly secretive, preferring to walk or run rather than fly. They feed on aquatic invertebrates and seeds but are considered somewhat opportunistic (Eddelmen et. al 1994). Historically speaking, it is believed that black rails have always been rare in New York State, which is at the Northern edge of their breeding range (McGowan and Corwin 2008). Black rails were first documented in New York in 1870 in Yates County, and first on Long Island in 1884. In subsequent years, black rails were positively identified at various barrier islands of Long Island, with most discoveries located in Oak Beach. Prior to the present survey, the last positive identification for black rail on Long Island was a bird heard in Amagansett, NY in 2009, documented on the online database for bird observations, ebird1. 1 https://ebird.org/home 8 Figure 2: Range map, taken from eBird1 data. Overall, the Northern population of black rails has faced a catastrophic decline, estimated at 9.2% overall (Watts 2016). This is based on a study area of approximately 450km, ranging from Massachusetts to New Jersey, surveyed in the late 1980s and early 1990s, and again in between 2014 and 2016 (Watts 2016). The black rail has been listed as endangered in New York State and a proposal stands to list it as threatened under the Endangered Species Act as of September, 2018. It has a Natural Heritage ranking of S12(critically imperiled.) According to the United 2 A ranking of S1 according to New York Natural Heritage Foundation indicates a species that is” Critically imperiled in the nation or state/province because of extreme rarity (often 5 or fewer occurrences) or because of some factor(s) such as very steep declines making it especially vulnerable to extirpation from the state/province.” (New York Natural Heritage Foundation, https://guides.nynhp.org/definitions/) 9 States Fish and Wildlife Service, it is estimated that between only 355 and 815 breeding pairs of black rails exist along the Atlantic Coast, between New Jersey and the Gulf Coast of Florida (USFW 2018). Additionally, black rails are among the 139 focal species that U.S. Fish & Wildlife is focusing on as management priorities (Conway 2011). With the status of the black rail as it is, it is imperative to identify locations where they still breed in addition to developing sound survey protocol to help identify these secretive marsh birds. During the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation’s 2018 black rail survey, staff
Recommended publications
  • S T a T E O F N E W Y O R K 3695--A 2009-2010
    S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K ________________________________________________________________________ 3695--A 2009-2010 Regular Sessions I N A S S E M B L Y January 28, 2009 ___________ Introduced by M. of A. ENGLEBRIGHT -- Multi-Sponsored by -- M. of A. KOON, McENENY -- read once and referred to the Committee on Tourism, Arts and Sports Development -- recommitted to the Committee on Tour- ism, Arts and Sports Development in accordance with Assembly Rule 3, sec. 2 -- committee discharged, bill amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said committee AN ACT to amend the parks, recreation and historic preservation law, in relation to the protection and management of the state park system THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM- BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: 1 Section 1. Legislative findings and purpose. The legislature finds the 2 New York state parks, and natural and cultural lands under state manage- 3 ment which began with the Niagara Reservation in 1885 embrace unique, 4 superlative and significant resources. They constitute a major source of 5 pride, inspiration and enjoyment of the people of the state, and have 6 gained international recognition and acclaim. 7 Establishment of the State Council of Parks by the legislature in 1924 8 was an act that created the first unified state parks system in the 9 country. By this act and other means the legislature and the people of 10 the state have repeatedly expressed their desire that the natural and 11 cultural state park resources of the state be accorded the highest 12 degree of protection.
    [Show full text]
  • A Classification of the Rallidae
    A CLASSIFICATION OF THE RALLIDAE STARRY L. OLSON HE family Rallidae, containing over 150 living or recently extinct species T and having one of the widest distributions of any family of terrestrial vertebrates, has, in proportion to its size and interest, received less study than perhaps any other major group of birds. The only two attempts at a classifi- cation of all of the recent rallid genera are those of Sharpe (1894) and Peters (1934). Although each of these lists has some merit, neither is satisfactory in reflecting relationships between the genera and both often separate closely related groups. In the past, no attempt has been made to identify the more primitive members of the Rallidae or to illuminate evolutionary trends in the family. Lists almost invariably begin with the genus Rdus which is actually one of the most specialized genera of the family and does not represent an ancestral or primitive stock. One of the difficulties of rallid taxonomy arises from the relative homo- geneity of the family, rails for the most part being rather generalized birds with few groups having morphological modifications that clearly define them. As a consequence, particularly well-marked genera have been elevated to subfamily rank on the basis of characters that in more diverse families would not be considered as significant. Another weakness of former classifications of the family arose from what Mayr (194933) referred to as the “instability of the morphology of rails.” This “instability of morphology,” while seeming to belie what I have just said about homogeneity, refers only to the characteristics associated with flightlessness-a condition that appears with great regularity in island rails and which has evolved many times.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on New Or Unusual Birds from Trainidad, West Indies
    474 SHORT COMMUNICATIONS SUMMARY CLAUSEN, G., R. SANSON, AND A. STORESUND. 1971. The HbO, dissociation curve of the fulmar and Blood respiratory properties have been compared in the herring gull. Respir. Physiol. 12 :66-70. antarctic birds. Blood hemoglobin content, hemato- DANZER, L. A., AND J. E. COHN. 1967. The dis- crit, and mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration sociation curve of goose blood. Respir. Physiol. (MCHC) are higher in three species of penguins 3:302-306. than in the Giant Fulmar and the antarctic Skua. HOLMES, A. D., M. G. PIGGOT, AND P. A. CAhwmLL. Penguin chicks show lower hemoglobin values than 1933. The hemoglobin content of chicken blood. adults. HbO, dissociation curves show higher affin- J. Biol Chem. 103:657. ity in diving than nondiving birds. Among penguins, LENFANT, C., AND K. JOHANSEN. 1965. Gas trans- the Chinstrap Penguin, practicing longer and deeper port by the hemocyanin containing blood of the dives, has blood with higher O? affinity than the other cephalopod, Octopus dofleini. Amer. J. Physiol. species. The Bohr effect is similarly higher in diving 209:991-998. than nondiving birds. The adaptive value of the blood LENFANT, C., G. L. KOOYMAN, R. ELSNER, AND C. M. respiratory properties is discussed in the context of DRABEK. 1969. Respiratory function of blood behavior and mode of life of the species studied. of the adelie penguin, Pygoscelis adeliae. Amer. ACKNOWLEDGMENT J. Physiol. 216: 1598-1600. LUTZ, P. L., I. S. LoNchrmn, J. V. TUTTLE, AND K. This work was supported by the National Science SCHMIDT-NIELSEN. 1973. Dissociation curve of Foundation under grants GV-25401 and GB-24816 bird blood and effect of red cell oxygen consump- to the Scripps Institution of Oceanography for opera- tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendices Section
    APPENDIX 1. A Selection of Biodiversity Conservation Agencies & Programs A variety of state agencies and programs, in addition to the NY Natural Heritage Program, partner with OPRHP on biodiversity conservation and planning. This appendix also describes a variety of statewide and regional biodiversity conservation efforts that complement OPRHP’s work. NYS BIODIVERSITY RESEARCH INSTITUTE The New York State Biodiversity Research Institute is a state-chartered organization based in the New York State Museum who promotes the understanding and conservation of New York’s biological diversity. They administer a broad range of research, education, and information transfer programs, and oversee a competitive grants program for projects that further biodiversity stewardship and research. In 1996, the Biodiversity Research Institute approved funding for the Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation to undertake an ambitious inventory of its lands for rare species, rare natural communities, and the state’s best examples of common communities. The majority of inventory in state parks occurred over a five-year period, beginning in 1998 and concluding in the spring of 2003. Funding was also approved for a sixth year, which included all newly acquired state parks and several state parks that required additional attention beyond the initial inventory. Telephone: (518) 486-4845 Website: www.nysm.nysed.gov/bri/ NYS DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION The Department of Environmental Conservation’s (DEC) biodiversity conservation efforts are handled by a variety of offices with the department. Of particular note for this project are the NY Natural Heritage Program, Endangered Species Unit, and Nongame Unit (all of which are in the Division of Fish, Wildlife, & Marine Resources), and the Division of Lands & Forests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Kingbird Vol. 61 No. 2 – June 2011
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olume 61 No.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Communities of New York State
    Ecological Communities of New York State by Carol Reschke New York Natural Heritage Program N.Y.S. Department of Environmental Conservation 700 Troy-Schenectady Road Latham, NY 12110-2400 March 1990 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The New York Natural Heritage Program is supported by funds from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) and The Nature Conservancy. Within DEC, funding comes from the Division of Fish and Wildlife and the Division of Lands and Forests. The Heritage Program is partly supported by funds contributed by state taxpayers through the voluntary Return a Gift to Wildlife program. The Heritage Program has received funding for community inventory work from the Adirondack Council, the Hudson River Foundation, the Sussman Foundation, U.S. National Park Service, U.S. Forest Service (Finger Lakes National Forest), and each of the seven New York chapters of The Nature Conservancy (Adirondack Nature Conservancy, Eastern New York Chapter, Central New York Chapter, Long Island Chapter, Lower Hudson Chapter, South Fork/Shelter Island Chapter, and WesternNew YorJ< Chapter) This classification has been developed in part from data collected by numerous field biologists. Some of these contributors have worked under contract to the Natural Heritage Program, including Caryl DeVries, Brian Fitzgerald, Jerry Jenkins, Al Scholz, Edith Schrot, Paul Sherwood, Nancy Slack, Dan Smith, Gordon Tucker, and F. Robert Wesley. Present and former Heritage staff who have contributed a significant portion of field data include Peter Zika, Robert E. Zaremba, Lauren Lyons-Swift, Steven Clemants, and the author. Chris Nadareski helped compile long species lists for many communities by entering data from field survey forms into computer files.
    [Show full text]
  • Rufous-Faced Crake Laterallus Xenopterus
    COTINGA 9 Rufous-faced Crake: a new species for Bolivia Rufous-faced Crake Laterallus xenopterus. 18 August 1996. (Jon Hornbuckle) Rufous-faced Crake L. xenopterus. 18 August 1996. Rufous-sided Crake L. melanophaius. July/August 1997. (Jon Hornbuckle) (Jon Hornbuckle) Rufous-sided Crake L. melanophaius. July/August 1997. Area of savanna in which Rufous-faced Crake L. xenopterus (Jon Hornbuckle) and Speckled Rail Coturnicops notata were found in 1997. (Jon Hornbuckle) 7 6 COTINGA 9 Rufous-faced Crake Laterallus xenopterus: a new species for Bolivia, with notes on its identification, distribution, ecology and conservation Robin Brace, Jon Hornbuckle and Paul St Pierre Se describen los primeros registros de Laterallus xenopterus para Bolivia, en base a un individuo capturado el 18 agosto 1996 y tres observaciones obtenidas durante agosto 1997, todas en la Estación Biológica del Beni (EBB) (dpto. Beni). Anteriormente a nuestras observaciones, la distribución conocida de esta especie, considerada amenazada7, se extendía por sólo unos pocos sitios en Paraguay y un área del Brasil. Las aves fueron localizadas en la sabana semi-inundada caracterizada por la vegetación continua separada por angostos canales, los que claramente facilitan los desplazamientos a nivel del suelo. Si bien el registro de 1996 muestra que L. xenopterus puede vivir junto a L. melanophaius, nuestras observaciones en 1997 indican, concordando con informaciones anteriores, que L. xenopterus parece evitar áreas cubiertas por m ás que unos pocos centímetros de agua. Se resumen los detalles de identificación, enfatizando las diferencias con L. melanophaius. De particular im portancia son (i) el notable barrado blanco y negro en las cobertoras alares, terciarias y escapulares; (ii) la extensión del color rufo de la cabeza sobre la nuca y la espalda, y (iii) el pico corto y relativamente profundo, en parte de color gris-turquesa.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotted Rail, Brant, and Yellow-Breasted Crake-Records
    Spotted Rail. Brant. and Yellow-breasted Crake--records from the Yucatan Thomas Gatz, Peter Gent, Martin Jakle, Rebecca and William Otto, and Bruce Ellis (1973), with the exceptionof the back and Chatara in mid-June resembled the madeby the authorswhile bird- pattern,which was more spottedthan dark-phasejuvenile Spotted Rail takenin T HEingFOLLOWING on the YucatanSIGHTINGS Peninsula,WERE streaked.The white spotson the back November, in Veracruz, as describedby Mexico, in February1983. This second indicated that this was of the Central Dickerman and Haverschmidt (197 I). sightrecord of the SpottedRail (Pardi- American race, P.m. insolitus, dis- Thesedates indicate an extendednesting railus maculatus), near Coba, Quintana cussedby Parkeset al. (1978), rather seasonin Mexico for this species,possi- Roo, fills in anothergap in the known, than the more streak-backed South bly dependenton local weather condi- seeminglydisjunct, range of thisspecies. America race, P.rn. rnaculatus, por- tions. The rangeextends from the West Indies trayedin Petersonand Chalif (1973). The The SpottedRail was first recorded through Central and South America. cluckingvocalization described by Bond from Mexico in 1945 near Tuxtla, Gu- Also discussedare sightrecords of Brant (1979) washeard during the eveningob- tierrez,Chiapas (Friedman 1947). This (Branta bernicla), which was seen near servationFebruary 25. but not duringthe speciesis describedas "extremelyrare" Celestun,Yucatan, for the first recordfor mid-day observationthe following day. in Mexicoby Petersonand Chalif (1973). the east coastof Mexico, and of the Yel- Mark Kasprzykand Kelly Fleminglo- However, based on records from seven low-breasted Crake (Porzana fiavi- catedseveral Spotted Rails in this same Mexican states: Chiapas, Guerrero, renter), observedalso near Coba, Quin- lakeMarch 3 l-April 2, 1983, with a high Nayarit, Oaxaca, Puebla, Veracruz tana Roo.
    [Show full text]
  • Trail Map East
    72°6'0"W 41°6'0"N A 72°4'0"W B 72°2'0"W C 72°0'0"W 41°8'0"N 71°58'0"W D 71°56'0"W E 71°54'0"W TToowwnn ooff EEaasstt HHaammppttoonn TTRRAAIILL GGUUIIDDEE Gardiners Island Eastern Plains EEAASSTT Point 8 Inset: Amsterdam Beach Preserve Tobaccolot MONTAUK Pond 1 R 1 anch Ct NAPEAGUE Lake Montauk 0 0.5 1 2 P Miles e R g n a a Tobaccolot r n O c h F i Bay s l i h a R h r Para t T e di o se Ln a r P a s m s d k y e r a o c n w c n D a H A s W m " u INDEX: 0 a k ' e P u 6 ° k ta 2 a n 7 d o R Amsterdam Beach Preserve...........................D5 R L h M c Andy Warhol Preserve (TNC).........................D5 n il d a ra . T R s Benson Reserve............................................C5 E e s u e e l c it B c h Big Reed Pond County Park..........................D3 r A W N P cto Camp Hero State Park...................................E4 " e 0 Paum nok Conn ' a 8 Culloden Point Preserve.................................C3 ° 1 4 N Gin Beach......................................................D3 " 0 ' 4 e Goff Point.......................................................A4 ° z 1 a l 4 Hicks Island...................................................A4 B Hither Hills......................................................B4,B5 n w Hither Woods.................................................B4 o r Montauk County Park....................................D4 B Inset: Shadmoor State Park and Rheinstein Town Park il Montauk Downs State Park Golf Course.......C4,D4 a B r T Montauk Point State Park..............................E4 ri p s o b o Rheinstein Park..............................................D5 a L D n Shadmoor State Park.....................................D5 y e Hw it 2 St c South Flora Preserve......................................A5 2 t k h R Great re u d Stepping Stones Pond....................................D4 mo nta Pond en o P S F M Walking Dunes...............................................A4 l R S.
    [Show full text]
  • Where-To-Go Fifth Edition Buckskin Lodge #412 Order of the Arrow, WWW Theodore Roosevelt Council Boy Scouts of America 2002
    Where-to-Go Fifth Edition Buckskin Lodge #412 Order of the Arrow, WWW Theodore Roosevelt Council Boy Scouts of America 2002 0 The "Where to Go" is published by the Where-to-Go Committee of the Buckskin Lodge #412 Order of the Arrow, WWW, of the Theodore Roosevelt Council, #386, Boy Scouts of America. FIFTH EDITION September, 1991 Updated (2nd printing) September, 1993 Third printing December, 1998 Fourth printing July, 2002 Published under the 2001-2002 administration: Michael Gherlone, Lodge Chief John Gherlone, Lodge Adviser Marc Ryan, Lodge Staff Adviser Edward A. McLaughlin III, Scout Executive Where-to-Go Committee Adviser Stephen V. Sassi Chairman Thomas Liddy Original Word Processing Andrew Jennings Michael Nold Original Research Jeffrey Karz Stephen Sassi Text written by Stephen Sassi 1 This guide is dedicated to the Scouts and volunteers of the Theodore Roosevelt Council Boy Scouts of America And the people it is intended to serve. Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one less traveled by, And that made all the difference...... - R.Frost 2 To: All Scoutmasters From: Stephen V. Sassi Buckskin Lodge Where to Go Adviser Date: 27 June 2002 Re: Where to Go Updates Enclosed in this program packet are updates to the Order of Arrow Where to Go book. Only specific portions of the book were updated and the remainder is unchanged. The list of updated pages appears below. Simply remove the old pages from the book and discard them, replacing the old pages with the new pages provided. First two pages Table of Contents - pages 1,2 Chapter 3 - pages 12,14 Chapter 4 - pages 15-19,25,26 Chapter 5 - All except page 35 (pages 27-34,36) Chapter 6 - pages 37-39, 41,42 Chapter 8 - pages 44-47 Chapter 9 - pages 51,52,54 Chapter 10 - pages 58,59,60 Chapter 11 - pages 62,63 Appendix - pages 64,65,66 We hope that this book will provide you with many new places to hike and camp.
    [Show full text]
  • (Acuarioidea, Schistorophinae) Parasitizing Laterallus Viridis
    Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Vol. 94(6): 751-755, Nov./Dec. 1999 751 On Two Nematodes from Brazilian Birds and Description of a New Species (Acuarioidea, Schistorophinae) Parasitizing Laterallus viridis (Müller, 1776) (Gruiformes, Rallidae) Roberto Magalhães Pinto+/++, Joaquim Júlio Vicente++, Luís C Muniz-Pereira, Dely Noronha+++ Laboratório de Helmintos Parasitos de Vertebrados, Departamento de Helmintologia, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil 4365, 21045-900 Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brasil The present paper reports acuarioid nematodes recovered from avian hosts. A new species of the genus Schistorophus Railliet, 1916 is proposed based mainly on findings referring to ptilina, spicules and vagina. Ancyracanthopsis coronata (Molin, 1860) Chabaud & Petter, 1959 is referred again in Brazil since its proposition in 1860, from specimens recovered from a Brazilian bird. A revised key to the species of the genus Schistorophus is also presented. Key words: nematoda - Schistorophus - new species - Ancyracanthopsis - morphometrics - birds - Brazil Investigations related to avian nematodes have Helminthological Collection of the Oswaldo Cruz been our main interest for several years. The scope Institute (CHIOC). Processing of the helminths for of the present approach is to provide additional study, photomicrographs and illustrations were data on the knowledge of nematodes parazitizing obtained as described elsewhere (Pinto et al. 1993, Brazilian birds, since these parasites have recently Pinto & Vicente 1995). Measurements are in mi- been accounted in a complete and extensive re- crometers, unless otherwise indicated. Classifica- view from 1788 to 1995 (Vicente et al. 1995). The tion of the nematodes is in accord to Chabaud (1975) results presented herein refer to acuarioid nema- and host species to Schauensee (1970).
    [Show full text]
  • Raccoon Island Phase B 2009 Final EA FONSI
    PROPOSED MITIGATION MEASURES The following mitigation measures are proposed to reduce or eliminate environmental risks associated with the proposed action (herein referred to as the “Project”). Mitigation measures in the form of terms and conditions are added to the negotiated agreement and are shall be considered enforceable as part of the agreement. Application of terms and conditions will be individually considered by the Director or Associate Director of the MMS. Minor modifications to the proposed mitigation measures may be made during the noncompetitive negotiated leasing process if comments indicate changes are necessary or if conditions warrant. Plans and Performance Requirements The NRCS will provide the MMS with a copy of the Project’s “Construction Solicitation and Specifications Plan” (herein referred to as the “Plan”). No activity or operation, authorized by the negotiated agreement (herein referred to as the Memorandum of Agreement or MOA), at the Raccoon Island Borrow Area shall be carried out until the MMS has determined that each activity or operation described in the Plan will be conducted in a manner that is in compliance with the provisions and requirements of the MOA. The preferred method of conveying sediment from the Raccoon Island Borrow Area involves the use of a hydraulic cutterhead dredge and scows. Any modifications to the Plan that may affect the project area, including the use of submerged or floated pipelines to convey sediment, must be approved by the MMS prior to implementation of the modification. The NRCS will ensure that all operations at the Raccoon Island Borrow Area shall be conducted in accordance with the final approved Plan and all terms and conditions in this MOA, as well as all applicable regulations, orders, guidelines, and directives specified or referenced herein.
    [Show full text]