DOCSLIB.ORG

Hill III JR. Nest-Depth Preference in Pipe-Nesting Northern Rough

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hill III JR. Nest-Depth Preference in Pipe-Nesting Northern Rough j. Field Ornithol., 59(4):334-336 NEST-DEPTH PREFERENCE IN PIPE-NESTING NORTHERN ROUGH-WINGED SWALLOWS JAMESR. HILL, III Purple Martin ConservationAssociation Institutefor Researchand CommunityServices EdinboroUniversity of Pennsylvania Edinboro,Pennsylvania 16ddd USA Abstract.--The placementdepths of 44 Northern Rough-wingedSwallow (Stelgidopteryx serripennis)nests built insideidentical drainage pipes at a dam in northwesternPennsylvania were determinedusing a "ripariascope."The averageplacement depth was 82.4 cm (32.45•') with an observedrange of 53-117 cm (21"-46"). PROFUNDIDAD DE NIDO PREFERIDA POR STELGIDOPTERYX RUFICOLLIS Rcsumcn.--La profundidada la cual individuosdc Stelgidopteryxruficollis construycron 44 nidos dcntro dc tubcrias dc drcnajc cnun rcprcsa cn cl norocstcdc Pcnsilvania, fuc dctcr- minada utilizando un "raparioscopio"(rapariascopc). La profundidad promcdio dcl nido fuc dc 82.4 cm (32.45 pulgadas)con un alcanccdc 53-117 cm (21-46 pulgadas). The Northern Rough-wingedSwallow (Stelgidopteryxserripennis) is a burrow-nesting,nest-site opportunist that rarely, if ever, excavatesits own nest burrow (Coues 1878, Gaunt 1963, Lunk 1962). Little detailed information has been publishedon the placementdepths of nestsin this species.The literature on the subjectis either of a very general nature, lists only burrow depthsand not actual nest depths,or representssingle observations.For instance, Macoun and Macoun (1909:584) said that nestsof the roughwing "have been found at all depths," Howe (1900) statedthat roughwingnests are "dug into the bank aboutan arm'slength," and Bailey (1913:262) statedthat the nest of the roughwingis in the "end of a burrow or hole in a bank, from two to five feet from the entrance." Referencesthat give only burrow depths and not the actual nest depthsinclude Headstrom(1970:60) who listed the length of the burrow "from 9 inchesto 6 feet," Blake (1953:107) who gavethe depths of two burrows used for nesting as "20 inches deep" and "28 inches deep," Eynon (1936:84) who said the tunnel "was aboutthree feet long," and Graber et al. (1972:15) who statedthat the burrows"varied in depth from 10 inchesto 3 feet, 18-20 inchesbeing most common." Burrow measurements,such as thosecited above,are relatively mean- inglessin relation to the actual depth of nestplacemement in the Northern Rough-wingedSwallow, sinceit doesnot typically build its nest at the innermostends of burrows(see Skutch 1960, this study)unless they are relativelyshallow. Some exact depths of nestplacement by the roughwing have been given in the literature, but theseare basedon singleobserva- tions. For example, Best (1977) reporteda nest "at the end of a burrow 68 cm deep," Blake (1907:104) describedfinding a nestat the end of a 334 Vo•.59, •o. ,• Rough-wingedSwallow Nest-depth Preference [3 3 5 tunnel "20 inchesin length," and Sargent(1893) discovereda nest "27 inchesdeep." Today, roughwingscommonly nest in man-madecavities such as those providedby drainage pipes (Harrison 1975). In order to quantify nest- depth preferencein this species,I measuredthe placementdepths of 44 nestsbuilt inside metal seeptilepipes at the Union City Dam in Erie County, Pennsylvania.The study was conductedduring the summer of 1981, but the nestswere the productof severalyears of activity at the siteby roughwings.The pipeswhere the nestswere built were embedded in a nearly-vertical,cement retaining wall 1.9 m, 4.9 m, and 7.9 m above the groundand functionedto facilitatewater seepagefrom the cut sand- stone/shalerock layersbehind the wall. They were flushwith the cement wall on their outer end and abuttedthe cut rock layersinternally. The amountof water observedseeping from thesepipes, even after prolonged, heavyrains, was insufficientto dislodgethe roughwings'nests; therefore, the observednest depths were assumedto accuratelyrepresent the species' preferencein nest-placementdepth. The pipeswere straight,122 cm long, had inner diameters of 102 mm, and were embedded in the wall at a four-degreegrade. Becauseall of the pipeswere identical,they provided a uniform burrow type, ideal for testingnest-depth preference in rough- wings. By eliminating differencesin tunnel topography,any observed variation in depth of nest-placementcan be attributedto preference. To determinenest depth, a calibrated"ripariascope" was insertedinto eachof the pipes (Demong and Emlen 1975). Nest depthwas definedas the distancefrom a pipe's outer edgeto the center of the nest cup. The averageplacement depth of the 44 nestsmeasured was 82.4 cm (32.45") with a range of 53-117 cm (21"-46"); SD was 16.1 cm. Both the modal andmedian nest depth was 79 cm (3 !"). Only threeof the 44 nests(6.8%) were built againstthe rock walls at the extreme inner endsof the pipes. These findingsare in agreementwith Skutch (1960) who observedthat, when roughwingsused completed kingfisher burrows as nest sites,they did not build their nest in the expandeddistal nest chamber,but instead used the center of the tunnel. What evolutionaryforces might have shapednest-depth preference in the Northern Rough-wingedSwallow? Probablythe factor which acted to setthe minimum nest-placementdepth was the arm reachof its mam- malian predatorsplus the distancethese predators typically dig into mud or sandbanks while attemptingto raid suchnests. Alternatively, at least two factorsmight have actedto reducemaximum nest-placementdepths. One might be a need to keep tunnel distancesshort enough that the entrancehole remains visible to the nestlingsin the nest. This would allow the backgroundlight to be blockedwhen the parentsentered the burrow to feed the young,causing an abrupt changein light intensityas perceivedby the nestlings.Abrupt changesin light intensityhave been shownto be the stimulusfor elicitingthe food-gapingresponse in nestlings of otherbird speciesraised in dimly lit places,including the Bank Swallow Riparia riparia (Fulk 1967) and the Barn SwallowHirundo rustica (Jack- 336] J.R. Hill, III J.Field Ornithol. Autumn 1988 sonand Burchfield1975, pers.obs.). The samestimulus/response system probably operatesin the Northern Rough-wingedSwallow. The other factorprobably acting to reducemaximum nest-placementdepths, is the needto minimize tunnel exit/entry timeswhen feedingnestlings. If the parentswere feedingat the maximum possiblerate, then youngin deeply placed nestswould be fed less frequently than young in more shallow nestsdue to the time required to negotiatethe extra tunnel length between feedings. The findingsof this studyhave management implications for the North- ern Rough-wingedSwallow. When artificial nestingtubes (after Lunk 1962) are designedand placedfor useby roughwings,their lengthsshould fall within the preferrednest-depth range of the speciesin orderto increase their attractiveness. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I thank the Army Corps of Engineersfor permissionto study thesebirds at the Union City Dam and alsoK. E. Waterstripefor his tirelessfield assistancethroughout this project. A. F. Skutch,W. A. Lunk, A. J. Erskine, R. A. Wolinski, and E. H. Burtt, Jr. were kind enoughto commenton earlier drafts of this manuscript. LITERATURE CITED BAILEY,H.H. 1913. The Birds of Virginia. J.P. Bell Co., Inc., Lynchburg,Virginia. BEST,L. B. 1977. Bull snakepreys on Rough-wingedSwallow nest. Condor 79:509. BLA•E, C. H. 1953. Notes on the Rough-wingedSwallow. Bird-Banding 24:107-108. BLA•E, F. G. 1907. The nestingof Stelgidopteryxserripennis in Norwich, Vt. Auk 24: 103-104. Coup.s, E. 1878. Birds of the ColoradoValley. U.S. Geol. Surv. Misc. Publ. No. 11. DEMONG,N.J., AND S. T. EMLEN. 1975. An optical scopefor examining nest contents of tunnel-nesting birds. Wilson Bull. 87:550-551. EYNON,A. E. 1936. Rough-winged Swallow breeding in Rhode Island. Auk 53:83-84. FULK, G. W. 1967. The gaping responseof nestlingBank Swallows. Wilson Bull. 79: 344-345. GAUNT,A.S. 1963. Fossorialadaptations in the Bank Swallow, Riparia riparia (Linnaeus). Univ. of Kansas, Ph.D. diss. GRABER,R. R., J. w. GRABER,AND E. L. KIRK. 1972. Illinois birds: Hirundinidae. Ill. Nat. Hist. Surv. Biol. Notes No. 80:1-36. HARRISON,H. H. 1975. A field guide to birds' nests in the United States east of the Mississippi River. Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston. HEADSTROM,R. 1970. A completefield guideto nestsin the United States.Ives Washburn, Inc., New York. HOWE,JR., R.H. 1900. The Rough-wingedSwallow breedingin Connecticut,and other notes. Auk 17:389. JACKSON,J. A., AND P. G. BURCHFIELD. 1975. Nest-site selectionof Barn Swallows in East-centralMississippi. Am. Midi. Nat. 94:503-509. LUN•, W.A. 1962. The Rough-wingedSwallow: a studybased on its breedingbiology in Michigan. Publ. Nuttall Ornithol. Club, No. 4. MACOUN,J., AND J. M. MACOUN. 1909. Catalogue of Canadian birds. Government Printing Bureau, Ottawa. SARGENT,H. B. 1893. Breedingof the Rough-wingedSwallow at Shelter Island, New York. Auk 10:369. S•UTCH, A. F. 1960. Life Histories of Central American birds. Part II. Pacific Coast Avif. No. 34. Received13 Feb. 1987; accepted4 Mar. 1988. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Costa Rica 2020
    Sunrise Birding LLC COSTA RICA TRIP REPORT January 30 – February 5, 2020 Photos: Talamanca Hummingbird, Sunbittern, Resplendent Quetzal, Congenial Group! Sunrise Birding LLC COSTA RICA TRIP REPORT January 30 – February 5, 2020 Leaders: Frank Mantlik & Vernon Campos Report and photos by Frank Mantlik Highlights and top sightings of the trip as voted by participants Resplendent Quetzals, multi 20 species of hummingbirds Spectacled Owl 2 CR & 32 Regional Endemics Bare-shanked Screech Owl 4 species Owls seen in 70 Black-and-white Owl minutes Suzy the “owling” dog Russet-naped Wood-Rail Keel-billed Toucan Great Potoo Tayra!!! Long-tailed Silky-Flycatcher Black-faced Solitaire (& song) Rufous-browed Peppershrike Amazing flora, fauna, & trails American Pygmy Kingfisher Sunbittern Orange-billed Sparrow Wayne’s insect show-and-tell Volcano Hummingbird Spangle-cheeked Tanager Purple-crowned Fairy, bathing Rancho Naturalista Turquoise-browed Motmot Golden-hooded Tanager White-nosed Coati Vernon as guide and driver January 29 - Arrival San Jose All participants arrived a day early, staying at Hotel Bougainvillea. Those who arrived in daylight had time to explore the phenomenal gardens, despite a rain storm. Day 1 - January 30 Optional day-trip to Carara National Park Guides Vernon and Frank offered an optional day trip to Carara National Park before the tour officially began and all tour participants took advantage of this special opportunity. As such, we are including the sightings from this day trip in the overall tour report. We departed the Hotel at 05:40 for the drive to the National Park. En route we stopped along the road to view a beautiful Turquoise-browed Motmot.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Shifts in Migration Phenology and Breeding Distribution of Declining North American Avian Aerial Insectivores
    EXPLORING SHIFTS IN MIGRATION PHENOLOGY AND BREEDING DISTRIBUTION OF DECLINING NORTH AMERICAN AVIAN AERIAL INSECTIVORES A thesis submitted to the Kent State University Honors College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for University Honors by Nora Honkomp May, 2021 Thesis written by Nora Honkomp Approved by ________________________________________________________________, Advisor ______________________________________,Chair, Department of Biological Sciences Accepted by ___________________________________________________, Dean, Honors College ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES…..……………………………………………….………………….iv LIST OF TABLES………..…………………………………………….………………....v ACKNOWLEDGMENT…………………….…………….……………………………..vi CHAPTERS I. INTRODUCTION……………….………………….…………….………1 II. METHODS……………………….………………………………….…..16 Migration Timing Analysis……………….…………………………..….16 Breeding Distribution Analysis………………………………………..…27 III. RESULTS……………………………………………………………..…30 Migration Timing Analysis………………………………………………30 Breeding Distribution Analysis………………………………………….40 IV. DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………47 LITERATURE CITED…………………………………………………………………..56 APPENDIX........................................................................................................................61 iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Number of checklists by day of year ………………………......………..……....21 Figure 2. Latitude of sighting by day of year .…………………………………………......22 Figure 3. Start and end dates for spring and fall migration..................................................24 Figure 4. Change
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Martin Monitoring After a Wildfire in the Lincoln
    PURPLE MARTIN MONITORING AFTER A WILDFIRE IN THE LINCOLN NATIONAL FOREST, NEW MEXICO – 2007 RESULTS Submitted To: Prepared By: USDA Forest Service Hawks Aloft, Inc. Danney Salas P.O. Box 10028 Sacramento Ranger District Albuquerque, New Mexico 87184 1101 New York Avenue (505) 828-9455 Alamogordo, New Mexico 87571 Website: www.hawksaloft.org E-mail Contact: [email protected] Purple Martin Conservation Association John Tautin 301 Peninsula Dr., Suite 6 Erie, Pennsylvania 16505 15 February 2008 Purple Martins in the Lincoln National Forest TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................2 STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................3 METHODS ..........................................................................................................................4 RESULTS ............................................................................................................................7 DISCUSSION......................................................................................................................9 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .................................................................................................13 LITERATURE CITED ......................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Aves: Hirundinidae)
    1 2 Received Date : 19-Jun-2016 3 Revised Date : 14-Oct-2016 4 Accepted Date : 19-Oct-2016 5 Article type : Original Research 6 7 8 Convergent evolution in social swallows (Aves: Hirundinidae) 9 Running Title: Social swallows are morphologically convergent 10 Authors: Allison E. Johnson1*, Jonathan S. Mitchell2, Mary Bomberger Brown3 11 Affiliations: 12 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago 13 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan 14 3 School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska 15 Contact: 16 Allison E. Johnson*, Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Chicago, 1101 E 57th Street, 17 Chicago, IL 60637, phone: 773-702-3070, email: [email protected] 18 Jonathan S. Mitchell, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, 19 Ruthven Museums Building, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, email: [email protected] 20 Mary Bomberger Brown, School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska, Hardin Hall, 3310 21 Holdrege Street, Lincoln, NE 68583, phone: 402-472-8878, email: [email protected] 22 23 *Corresponding author. 24 Data archiving: Social and morphological data and R code utilized for data analysis have been 25 submitted as supplementary material associated with this manuscript. 26 27 Abstract: BehavioralAuthor Manuscript shifts can initiate morphological evolution by pushing lineages into new adaptive 28 zones. This has primarily been examined in ecological behaviors, such as foraging, but social behaviors 29 may also alter morphology. Swallows and martins (Hirundinidae) are aerial insectivores that exhibit a This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Dynamics and Migration Routes of Tree Swallows, Tachycineta Bicolor, in North America
    J. Field Ornithol., 59(4):395-402 POPULATION DYNAMICS AND MIGRATION ROUTES OF TREE SWALLOWS, TACHYCINETA BICOLOR, IN NORTH AMERICA ROBERT W. BUTLER Canadian Wildlife Service Box $dO Delta, British Columbia, VdK $Y$, Canada and EcologyGroup Departmentof Zoology Universityof British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia V6T ?W5, Canada Abstract.--Band recoveriesand published accountsindicate that 79.1% of Tree Swallows (Tachycinetabicolor) die in their first year and 60.3% in eachsubsequent year. Tree Swallows live an averageof 2.7 yr. The net reproductiverate (R0) is 0.701 females/yr.At that rate a femalethat raisesan average-sizedbrood in eachbreeding year more than replacesherself in an averagelife span.However, a secondyear (SY) femalethat fails to breedmust raise an average-sizedbrood in each of the next three years to replace herself, but few females live that long. Tree Swallowsuse three migration routeseast of the Rockies:(1) eastcoast and Great Lake populationsmigrate along the easternseaboard to Florida, the Caribbean and Central America; (2) Canadian prairie and mid-west USA populationsfollow the Mississippidrainage basin to the Gulf Coast statesand Central America;(3) populations alongthe eastside of the Rockiesmigrate due southinto Mexico. Migration routesof western populationsare unknown,but a residentpopulation may exist in southernCalifornia. DINJ•MICA DE POBLACIONES Y RUTAS DE MIGRACI6N DE TACHYCINETA BICOLOR EN NORTE AMERICA Rcsumcn.--Tanto la litcratura como cl rccobrodc anillas indican quc cl 79.1% dc los individuosdc Tachycinetabicolor mucrcn durante cl primer afio y cl 60.3% cn aftossubsi- guicntcs.En promcdiocstas aves duran 2.7 aftos.La taza ncta rcproductivadc la cspccic (R0) cs dc 0.71 hcmbras/afio.A csta taza rcproductiva,una hcmbra quc cric una camada dc tamafio promcdiodurante susaftos dc vida, producirauna pcqucfiamayor cantidaddc individuosquc su rcmplazo.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Nest Construction in Swallows (Hirundinidae) Is Associated with the Decrease of Clutch Size
    © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 38/1 711-716 21.7.2006 The evolution of nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is associated with the decrease of clutch size P. HENEBERG A b s t r a c t : Variability of the nest construction in swallows (Hirundinidae) is more diverse than in other families of oscine birds. I compared the nest-building behaviour with pooled data of clutch size and overall hatching success for 20 species of swallows. The clutch size was significantly higher in temperate cavity-adopting swallow species than in species using other nesting modes including species breeding in evolutionarily advanced mud nests (P<0.05) except of the burrow-excavating Bank Swallow. Decrease of the clutch size during the evolution of nest construction is not compensated by the increase of the overall hatching success. K e y w o r d s : Hirundinidae, nest construction, clutch size, evolution Birds use distinct methods to avoid nest-predation: active nest defence, nest camouflage and concealment or sheltered nesting. While large and powerful species prefer active nest-defence, swallows and martins usually prefer construction of sheltered nests (LLOYD 2004). The nests of swallows vary from natural cavities in trees and rocks, to self-exca- vated burrows to mud retorts and cups attached to vertical faces. Much attention has been devoted to the importance of controlling for phylogeny in com- parative tests (HARVEY & PAGEL 1991), including molecular phylogenetic studies of swallows (WINKLER & SHELDON 1993). Interactions between the nest-construction va- riability and the clutch size, however, had been ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • Head-Scratching Method in Swallows Depends on Behavioral Context
    SHORT COMMUNICATIONS 679 shoulder-spot display during their observations of behavior in partridges. In all cases that I observed, the shoulder spot appeared to be a fear or flight intention display as described by Lumsden (1970). However, the display seemed secondary in importance compared to vocalizations and “tail flicking” during periods of extreme alarm. Examination of the shoul- der spot of a partridge confirmed the realignment of white underwing coverts to the top of the wing in the patagial region. The manipulation by the bird of underwing feathers appeared to be identical to that of Ruffed Grouse (Bonusa umbellus)(Garbutt 198 1). Since “display” implies actual communication between individuals further investigation is needed to de- termine if, in fact, the shoulder spot actually is serving a communication function in Gray Partridge. The shoulder spot in Gray Partridges and the display seen in grouse are morphologically similar. Lumsden (1970) concluded that the widespread occurrence of this display among grouse indicated it appeared relatively early in evolution. The morphological and behavioral similarities between the display in grouse and partridges suggest that the shoulder spot may have evolved even earlier. Since this is an escape behavior, and since many species of partridges and pheasants are difficult to observe in the wild, it may have been overlooked. Acknowledgments.-Theseobservations were made while the author was supported by funds from the North Dakota Game and Fish Department through Pittman-Robertson Project W-67-R. Additional support was provided by the Biology Department and Institute for Ecological Studies at the University of North Dakota. Helpful editorial comments were provided by R.
    [Show full text]
  • Top 10 Reasons Why People Fail to Attract Purple Martins
    Ten Reasons Why People Fail to Attract Purple Martins Over one million North Americans maintain housing for way out in open fields, or next to isolated ponds, rarely lished sites, martins will not recognize, as potential Purple Martins. Unfortunately, only a small percentage of results in successful martin attraction. Martin housing breeding sites, any martin housing with closed holes. these folks successfully attract breeding martins. Below is should be placed in the center of the most open spot A few compartments should be left open on each side a list of the top ten reasons why so many people fail. Your available, about 30’-100’ from human housing. If your of the house. chances of attracting martins will greatly increase if you martin housing hasn’t attracted nesting martins and In contrast, landlords that had breeding martins avoid making these common mistakes. isn’t placed within 100 feet of your house, try moving the previous year can leave their housing completely it closer. closed up, if they choose, until the martins return and 1. Housing placed too close to tall trees or in land on the housing. They can do this because Purple yards that are too enclosed. The main reason people 4. Housing not painted white. Although martins Martins exhibit a very high level of site fidelity — once fail to attract martins is that they place their martin have been known to nest in houses and gourds painted they have bred successfully at a specific location, the housing incorrectly within their yards, or their yards are other colors, white housing seems to attract them best.
    [Show full text]
  • The Best of Costa Rica March 19–31, 2019
    THE BEST OF COSTA RICA MARCH 19–31, 2019 Buffy-crowned Wood-Partridge © David Ascanio LEADERS: DAVID ASCANIO & MAURICIO CHINCHILLA LIST COMPILED BY: DAVID ASCANIO VICTOR EMANUEL NATURE TOURS, INC. 2525 WALLINGWOOD DRIVE, SUITE 1003 AUSTIN, TEXAS 78746 WWW.VENTBIRD.COM THE BEST OF COSTA RICA March 19–31, 2019 By David Ascanio Photo album: https://www.flickr.com/photos/davidascanio/albums/72157706650233041 It’s about 02:00 AM in San José, and we are listening to the widespread and ubiquitous Clay-colored Robin singing outside our hotel windows. Yet, it was still too early to experience the real explosion of bird song, which usually happens after dawn. Then, after 05:30 AM, the chorus started when a vocal Great Kiskadee broke the morning silence, followed by the scratchy notes of two Hoffmann´s Woodpeckers, a nesting pair of Inca Doves, the ascending and monotonous song of the Yellow-bellied Elaenia, and the cacophony of an (apparently!) engaged pair of Rufous-naped Wrens. This was indeed a warm welcome to magical Costa Rica! To complement the first morning of birding, two boreal migrants, Baltimore Orioles and a Tennessee Warbler, joined the bird feast just outside the hotel area. Broad-billed Motmot . Photo: D. Ascanio © Victor Emanuel Nature Tours 2 The Best of Costa Rica, 2019 After breakfast, we drove towards the volcanic ring of Costa Rica. Circling the slope of Poas volcano, we eventually reached the inspiring Bosque de Paz. With its hummingbird feeders and trails transecting a beautiful moss-covered forest, this lodge offered us the opportunity to see one of Costa Rica´s most difficult-to-see Grallaridae, the Scaled Antpitta.
    [Show full text]
  • The First Mangrove Swallow Recorded in the United States
    The First Mangrove Swallow recorded in the United States INTRODUCTION tem with a one-lane unsurfaced road on top, Paul W. Sykes, Jr. The Space Coast Birding and Wildlife Festival make up the wetland part of the facility (Fig- USGS Patuxent Wildlife Research Center was held at Titusville, Brevard County, ures 1 and 2). The impoundments comprise a Florida on 13–17 November 2002. During total of 57 hectares (140 acres), are kept Warnell School of Forest Resources the birding competition on the last day of the flooded much of the time, and present an festival, the Canadian Team reported seeing open expanse of shallow water in an other- The University of Georgia several distant swallows at Brevard County’s wise xeric landscape. Patches of emergent South Central Regional Wastewater Treat- freshwater vegetation form mosaics across Athens, Georgia 30602-2152 ment Facility known as Viera Wetlands. open water within each impoundment and in They thought these were either Cliff the shallows along the dikes. A few trees and (email: [email protected]) (Petrochelidon pyrrhonota) or Cave (P. fulva) aquatic shrubs are scattered across these wet- Swallows. lands. Following his participation at the festival, At about 0830 EST on the 18th, Gardler Gardler looked for the swallows on 18 stopped on the southmost dike of Cell 1 Lyn S. Atherton November. The man-made Viera Wetlands (Figure 2) to observe swallows foraging low are well known for waders, waterfowl, rap- over the water and flying into the strong 1100 Pinellas Bayway, I-3 tors, shorebirds, and open-country passer- north-to-northwest wind.
    [Show full text]
  • ILLINOIS BIRDS: Hirundinidae
    LIBRARY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN Y\o. GG - €)3 SURVEY ILLINOIS BIRDS: Hirundinidae RICHARD R. GRABER J^' JEAN W. GRABER ETHELYN L. KIRK ^^^ Biological Notes No. 80 ILLINOIS NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY Urbana, Illinois — August, 1972 State of Illinois Department of Registration and Education NATURAL HISTORY SURVEY DIVISION 1969 -1967 Fig. 1.—Routes travelled in summer (1957-1970) to study breed- ing distribution of the birds of Illinois. The encircled areas were spe- cial study areas where daily censuses of migrants and nesting popula- tions of birds were carried out, 1967-1970. , ILLINOIS BIRDS: Hirundinidae Richard R. Graber, Jean W. Graber, and Ethelyn L. Kirk THIS REPORT, the third in a series of pa- particularly interesting group for distribution studies, pers on the birds of Illinois, deals with the and to determine their population trends we should swallows. The introductions to the first two papers, know the location of every major colony or popula- on the mimids and thrushes (Graber et al. 1970, tion in the state. We therefore appeal to all students 1971) also serve as a general introduction to the of Illinois birds to examine the maps showing breed- series, and the procedures and policies outlined in ing distributions, and publish any additional infor- those papers also apply to this one. mation they may have. By this procedure we will One point that warrants emphasis and clarifica- ultimately learn the true distribution of all the Illi- tion is the geographic scope of the papers. Unless nois species. otherwise indicated, the data presented and the In bringing together the available information statements made refer to the state of Illinois (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Martin Project Our Vision
    New York PurPle Martin Purple Martin P r o j e c t Project New York PHOTO JIM WILLIAMS Female and male parents share in building the nest to raise their young Adult female on the left shown with two of its young IN NEW YORK STATE, PURPLE MARTINS Check out these websites HAVE DECLINED BY 39% since 1985. for more information on purple martins: Help Reverse the Trend! www.friendsofiroquoisnwr.org/ The National Audubon Society suggests the purplemartins/media.html following ways that you can help to conserve newyorkwild.org/martin/martin_video.htm Purple Martins: purplemartin.org ■ Purchase or construct and install appropriate birds.audubon.org/species/purmar martin housing, including predator proofing. Project Partners Housing standards can be found at New York State Ornithological Association www.purplemartin.org Buffalo Audubon Society ■ Protect martin colonies from European Buffalo Ornithological Society Starlings and House Sparrows by trapping or Purple Martin Conservation Association otherwise removing these non-native nest Friends of Iroquois NWR site competitors. New York State Bluebird Society ■ Plant native trees, shrubs, flowers and Orleans Bluebird Society grasses which attract more insects than non- If you have questions about caring for a natives. In fact, they support almost 30 times Purple Martin colony, please contact: more insect diversity than introduced plants. FINWR c/o Carl Zenger ■ Avoid applying pesticides that kill or poison 1101 Casey Road flying insects that martins eat. Basom, NY 14013 Carl Zenger: [email protected] 716-434-7568 ■ Create a dragonfly pond to attract and breed these and other insects preferred by martins. Celeste Morien : [email protected] 585-721-8202 ■ Maintain a pile of small gravel or sand in an Pat Lynch: [email protected] open area for grit.
    [Show full text]