DOCSLIB.ORG

Lyttelton Road Tunnel Administration Building

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

New Zealand Historic Places Trust Pouhere Taonga Registration Report for a Historic Place Lyttelton Road Tunnel Administration Building Wilson, P, Lyttelton Road Tunnel Administration Building, Heathcote Valley, Christchurch, August 2005, NZHPT Southern Region Pamela Wilson Draft: last amended 20 March 2008 New Zealand Historic Places Trust © TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 1. IDENTIFICATION 4 1.1. Name of Place 4 1.2. Location Information 4 1.3. Current Legal Description 4 1.4. Physical Extent of Place Assessed for Registration 4 1.5. Identification Eligibility 4 1.6. Physical Eligibility as an Historic Place 4 2. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 5 2.1. Historical Description and Analysis 5 2.2. Physical Description and Analysis 8 2.3. Chattels 9 2.4. Key Physical Dates 9 2.5. Construction Professionals 10 2.6. Construction Materials 10 2.7. Former Uses 10 2.8. Current Uses 10 2.9. Discussion of Sources 11 3. SIGNIFICANCE ASSESSMENT 13 3.1. Section 23 (1) Assessment 13 3.2. Section 23 (2) Assessment 14 4. OTHER INFORMATION 17 4.1. Associated NZHPT Registrations 17 4.2. Heritage Protection Measures 17 5. APPENDICES 18 5.1. Appendix 1: Visual Identification Aids 18 5.2. Appendix 2: Visual Aids to Historical Information 23 5.3. Appendix 3: Visual Aids to Physical Information 25 5.4. Appendix 4: Significance Assessment Information 28 Registration Report For A Historic Place 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Lyttelton Road Tunnel Administration Building, built in 1963-4 at 1 Bridle Path Road in Christchurch, is a significant work in the development of New Zealand architecture. The building was located at the western end of the newly constructed road tunnel linking Christchurch to the port of Lyttelton. It was built to house the staff who controlled all aspects of the tunnel’s operations, including the toll booths across the motorway. By 1979 the collection of tolls ceased and the booths were removed. The Christchurch-Lyttelton Road Tunnel Authority commissioned the building and considered the tunnel as a prime point of entry to Canterbury. The Authority wanted a grand, impressive building which would reflect this status and also include some symbolic references to its location at the Christchurch end of the Bridle Path, the route the early settlers took from Lyttelton after their arrival from England in 1850.1 Canterbury’s founding settlers had initially arrived in four ships and this building’s design was conceived as a symbol of a ‘fifth ship’ that was ‘moored’ alongside the road. The architect Peter Beaven created a monumental structure which provides a vertical accent alongside the horizontal motorway. The structure, formed to suggest the tub shape of a ship, is built on bulb pile foundations inserted deeply into the rock beneath the fill added to form the new roadway into the tunnel. These foundations are left exposed, to form a large undercroft to the structure around which the low planting of the immediate environs is indicative of a small metaphorical lake in which the ship is moored. It has a frame of columns and double beams which support the cantilevered top section of two floors and a penthouse. Fairfaced concrete and glass enclose the building, with glass partitions frequently used to divide the interior. The open main staircase rising through the centre of the building has a monumental open form, providing a vertical element which contrasts with the overall horizontal emphasis of the structure. Beaven’s design reflects the Modern Movement’s principle of form following function and also illustrates Beaven’s idiosyncratic and innovative approach to design through the inclusion of symbolism and regional references. It is an important example of Beaven’s contribution to the distinctive character of New Zealand architecture. 1 The Bridle Path is registered Historic Area by the NZHPT. Registration Report For A Historic Place 3 1. IDENTIFICATION2 1.1. Name of Place Name: Lyttelton Road Tunnel Administration Building Other Names: Lyttelton Tunnel Control Building Christchurch-Lyttelton Road Tunnel Authority Building 1.2. Location Information Address 1 Bridle Path Road Heathcote Valley Christchurch Canterbury Additional Location Information Corner of Bridle Path Road and Tunnel Road (State Highway 74) Local Authority: Christchurch City Council 1.3. Current Legal Description Pt Lot 3 DP 2907 (NZ Gazette 1963, p.665), Canterbury Land District 1.4. Physical Extent of Place Assessed for Registration Extent includes part of the land described as Pt Lot 3 DP 2907, Canterbury Land District, and the building known as the Lyttelton Road Tunnel Administration Building thereon, and its fittings and fixtures. It is bounded by enclosing roads on three sides and on the fourth, southern side the access bridge and an extension of the line from it to the motorway forms the final boundary line. Other items within this boundary, including the Lyttelton- Woolston pipeline and block valve, telemetry data communication pole and associated cabling, are excluded from the registration. Also excluded from the registration is the canopy which extends across the road and formerly covered the toll booths, as this is planned for removal in 2008. (Refer to map in Appendix 1 for further information). 1.5. Identification Eligibility There is sufficient information included in this report to identify this place. 1.6. Physical Eligibility as an Historic Place This place consists of a building that is affixed to land that lies within the territorial limits of New Zealand. This place is therefore physically eligible for consideration as a historic place. 2 This section is supplemented by visual aids in Appendix 1 of the report. Registration Report For A Historic Place 4 2. SUPPORTING INFORMATION 2.1. Historical Description and Analysis The Lyttelton Road Tunnel Administration Building was completed in May 1964. The distinctive Modernist structure was built to provide toll booths and accommodation for the service and administration staff for the recently completed tunnel. The tunnel (completed in February, 1964) was constructed to provide shorter road access between the Port Lyttelton and the Canterbury Plains. The building’s unique architectural form and styling have been acknowledged since it was constructed, earning its status as one of Christchurch’s most iconic buildings. Christchurch’s links to the port of Lyttelton were problematic from the earliest days of the province’s settlement, with the Port Hills a significant barrier to access. When the issue of providing direct access to the port was discussed in 1851 the possibility of a road tunnel was considered and rejected, in part because of fear that horses would catch cold coming into a cold tunnel from the hot plains.3 Development of the road over Evans Pass was the first solution, greatly improved when the rail link via a tunnel was completed in 1867. Although better roads had been constructed and were well used, the growth of road transport increased the need for a road tunnel. As early as 1919 an Australian firm prepared plans for a road tunnel at an estimated cost of £700,000, but was unable to convince authorities that this was a necessity.4 However, by 1956 it was agreed that the need was now urgent and it was time for action. The Christchurch-Lyttelton Road Tunnel Authority was set up by an Act of Parliament to construct a tunnel and organize the collection of tolls to cover the costs. Work on the 1.9 kilometre tunnel began in 1961 and it was completed and formally opened on 27 February, 1964. At the Christchurch portal of the tunnel an administration building with adjoining toll plaza was required to serve as the nerve centre for the whole operation. The Authority wanted the administrative building and toll booths to not only serve this essential function but also to have a ‘monumental appearance and some symbolism to underline the historic access used by the pioneers to give access to the Plains at this point in the hills’.5 The end of the Bridle Path, the most direct route historically taken by newly arrived settlers journeying from the port, is the site of the tunnel’s entrance at the head of the Heathcote Valley. The Authority also recognised the Christchurch tunnel end as an important point of entry to the city, like Christchurch Airport, and wished it to reflect this status by the grandeur of its form and design. Architect Peter Beaven, who was commissioned in 1961 to plan the building, was chosen because of his already established reputation as a skilled designer with strong regional affinities. 3 Christchurch –Lyttelton Road Tunnel, p.1 4 Ibid 5 Home and Building. June 1st, 1965, p.71 Registration Report For A Historic Place 5 Beaven’s design fulfilled the Authority’s wishes with a building that met all the requirements of the brief and the building was immediately acclaimed for its dramatic, evocative appearance. He interpreted the symbolism the Authority had suggested by an imaginative building in a ship-like form which he used to represent a ‘fifth ship’ as an addition to the ‘First Four Ships’ which had brought the initial group of Canterbury settlers to the province in December, 1850. ‘Moored’ in this hilly setting beside a ‘wharf’, the motorway approaching the tunnel portal, with the tollbooths under their canopy providing the linkage between the two as a symbolic ‘mooring line’. The building embodied the concept of the journey undertaken by the founding settlers and also referred to the adjoining Bridle Path. Covering 117,500 square feet and costing £115,000 to build, the administration building was intended to be grand in scale, bold in appearance and constructed of ‘good materials’.6 When there was some criticism of the possible costs compared with the original estimate by the Ministry of Works, Beaven responded that the Ministry had ‘no idea of what was wanted and at the time a tin shed might have been considered appropriate’.7 Apart from the essential purpose of collecting tolls, the administration building had wide ranging functions.
Recommended publications
  • How the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence Led to a Departure from Concrete Technologies

    How the Canterbury Earthquake Sequence Led to a Departure from Concrete Technologies

    A CHANGE OF SCENE: HOW THE CANTERBURY EARTHQUAKE SEQUENCE LED TO A DEPARTURE FROM CONCRETE TECHNOLOGIES Morten Gjerde 1 School of Architecture, Victoria University of Wellington, P.O. Box 600, Wellington, 6140, New Zealand Over time, nature can expose even the slightest weakness. This became very clear following a sequence of unexpected earthquakes that struck in Christchurch, New Zealand earlier this decade. At the time the quakes struck, research and development with concrete building technology Canterbury had gained an international reputation and contributed significantly to the region's development. Structural and architectural innovation helped make concrete the material of choice for new commercial buildings. The paper outlines some of the key architectural and structural innovations evident in the buildings of the city. The earthquake sequence exposed several shortcomings in the design, construction and maintenance of buildings, including to several buildings that represent key moments along the innovation pathway. Now that the rebuild is well under way it is becoming clear with every building that is completed that the city’s visual character will be significantly different. The emerging character appears to be developing around the global materials of steel and glass, with concrete no longer featuring in the ways it had. The paper discusses the background to this departure and how it signals the end of a productive period of innovation with this local material. Keywords: Christchurch earthquakes, performance, concrete, disaster, innovation INTRODUCTION Throughout its brief history of post-colonial settlement, and prior to the widespread losses arising from the 2010-12 seismic sequence, Christchurch had gained a well-deserved reputation for the quality of its built environment.
  • Bays Area Community Directory 2020

    Bays Area Community Directory 2020

    BAYS AREA COMMUNITY DIRECTORY 2020 1 | P a g e Proudly supported by Contents Welcome to the 2020 edition of the Bays Area Community Directory ............... 3 Emergency Information .............................................................................................. 4 Local Emergency Services ...................................................................................... 4 Community Response Teams.................................................................................. 5 Christchurch Hospital ............................................................................................... 5 After Hours Medical Care ........................................................................................ 5 Natural disasters ........................................................................................................ 5 Defibrillator Locations............................................................................................... 9 How to Stay Informed - Radio ............................................................................... 10 Notes about this directory ........................................................................................ 11 Key local organisations .......................................................................................... 11 Charitable Status .................................................................................................... 11 Public interest/good ..............................................................................................
  • 402 Montreal Street, Christchurch

    402 Montreal Street, Christchurch

    DISTRICT PLAN –LISTED HERITAGE PLACE HERITAGE ASSESSMENT – STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE HERITAGE ITEM NUMBER 391 DWELLING AND SETTING– 402 MONTREAL STREET, CHRISTCHURCH PHOTOGRAPH: M. VAIR-PIOVA, 2014 HISTORICAL AND SOCIAL SIGNIFICANCE Historical and social values that demonstrate or are associated with: a particular person, group, organisation, institution, event, phase or activity; the continuity and/or change of a phase or activity; social, historical, traditional, economic, political or other patterns. The dwelling at 402 Montreal Street has historical and social significance for its connection to Reverend John Aldred and Joseph Colborne Veel. The dwelling was built in 1878 when builder Henry Haggerty leased the property from the Rev. John Aldred and raised a mortgage to build on the site. Rev. Aldred, after whom Beveridge Street was once named, was an ordained Wesleyan minister, had arrived in New Zealand in 1840. He settled in Christchurch in 1854 as one of the first Wesleyan clergyman in the town and was granted land in Durham Street North by the Superintendent in 1856. Aldred was sent to Dunedin in 1864 but he later returned to live in St Albans. Haggerty encountered financial difficulties and sold the property to Dan Griffiths in 1882. Griffiths owned it for 10 years before Joseph Colborne Veel purchased part of the property in a mortgagee sale. Oxford-educated, Veel arrived in New Zealand in 1857, where he joined Page 1 the staff of The Press and subsequently became editor, a position he held until 1878. Veel also served on the Canterbury College Board of Governors and was secretary to the North Canterbury Education Board.
  • Peter Beaven 1

    Peter Beaven 1

    ITINERARY n.24 NOT ON MAP 2 3 5 6 9 13 10 4 11 8 7 12 1 : Stephen Goodenough Photo This itinerary looks at Peter Beaven’s architecture before his hiatus in London in the late 1970s and early 1980s. A forthcoming itinerary will look at the work he has completed since his return to NZ. Biography: Peter Beaven 1: The 60s & 70s Peter Jamieson Beaven was In 1972 an exhibition entitled “The New Romantics in Building” was held at the Dowse Gallery in Lower born in Christchurch on 13 Hutt, including work by Ian Athfield, Roger Walker, Peter Beavan, Claude Megson and John Scott. The August 1925. He attended show celebrated one of the high points of 20th century Kiwi architecture, as a cohort of designers spliced Christ’s College, deciding local and international influences with such audacity that it seemed, if only briefly, that the nation could to become an architect after host a globally significant stream of architectural development. Peter Beaven was one of the senior a conversation with Paul members of this group (he’s seventeen years older than Walker), but he had rapidly made the transition Pascoe. He studied at the from a more orthodox modernism to the adventurous, hippy-fied approach of the youngsters. Such School of Architecture at the slipping in and out of both the Kiwi and international mainstreams has been the hallmark of Beaven’s University of Auckland, his career. studies being interrupted by Beaven established his office in the mid-1950s and his early work sits comfortably within the restrained, war service in the NZ Navy.
  • JULIA GATLEY Architects Contents

    JULIA GATLEY Architects Contents

    Athfield Architects JULIA GATLEY Contents Preface Encounters with Athfield vii // Formative Years Christchurch and Beyond 1 From Student Projects to the Athfield House 10 // Happenings Early Athfield Architects 35 From Imrie to Eureka 48 // Boom Corporates, Developers and Risk 117 From Crown House to Landmark Tower 128 // Public Works Architecture and the City 187 From Civic Square to Rebuilding Christchurch 204 Past and Present Staff 294 Glossary 296 References 297 Select Bibliography 301 Index 302 uck and timing are often important in the development of observation about one so young and Athfield barely gave a thought architects’ careers.1 Ian Athfield was fortunate to spend time to any other possible career paths. Ashby also saw in Tony a potential in New Zealand’s three biggest cities at crucial periods in career in music.5 Ella took particular heed and prompted both her sons his formative years. Born in Christchurch in 1940, he grew to follow the teacher’s suggestions. Athfield soon took the initiative, Lup there and became interested in architecture just as that city’s convincing Tony that they should build a garage at the family home,6 young Brutalists – the so-called Christchurch School – were having surely an eye-opener for any young person interested in architecture. an impact on the urban fabric. He studied in Auckland in the early Len and Ella also encouraged both boys to learn music. They played in 1960s, when influential nationalist and regionalist protagonists a band together in their early teens. The collaboration did not last, but were teaching in the School of Architecture and the Dutch architect Tony progressed through a series of musical groups – Max Merritt and 1 Andrew Barrie, ‘Luck and Timing in Post-War Japanese Aldo van Eyck visited New Zealand to deliver inspirational lectures.
  • A Quick Reconnaissance Report

    A Quick Reconnaissance Report

    A RECONNAISSANCE REPORT ON THE DARFIELD (NEW ZEALAND) EARTHQUAKE OF SEPTEMBER 4, 2010 Ömer AYDAN Tokai University, Shizuoka, Japan Reşat ULUSAY Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey On the behalf of JSCE Earthquake Disaster Investigation Committee 2010 September 12 1 CONTENT 1 Introduction 3 2 Geography 4 3 Geology 5 4 Tectonics and Crustal Straining 7 5 Seismicity 10 6 Characteristics of the Earthquake 14 7 Strong Ground Motions 16 8 Building Damage 19 9 Geotechnical Damage 21 10 Transportation Facilities 29 11 Lifelines 38 12 Fires 41 13 Industrial Facilities 42 14 Damage to Structures by Faulting 42 15 Conclusions and Lessons 43 References 44 2 1 Introduction An earthquake with a magnitude of 7.0 occurred near Darfield in Canterbury region in the South Island of New Zealand at 4:36 AM on New Zealand Standard Time on September 4, 2010. The city of Christchurch, New Zealand, and surrounding areas were heavily shaken. It is the most damaging earthquake in New Zealand since the Hawke's Bay earthquake in 1931, but there has been no loss of life. The earthquake occurred on an unknown fault. Although the earthquake was quite strong and happened in a populated region, two people were only injured. However, extensive ground liquefaction was observed in the city of Christchurch and Kaiapoi, causing extensive damage to buried lifelines and residential houses. Figure 1: Location of the earthquake epicenter 3 2 Geography The epicenter of the earthquake was near Darfield in the Canterbury Region of the South Island of New Zealand. The Canterbury Plains are flatlands between the Southern Alps and the Pacific Ocean.
  • Roger Walker

    Roger Walker

    Roger Walker New Zealand Institute of Architects Gold Medal 2016 Roger Walker New Zealand Institute of Architects Gold Medal 2016 B Published by the New Zealand Contents Institute of Architects 2017 Introduction 2 Editor: John Walsh Gold Medal Citation 4 In Conversation: Roger Walker with John Walsh 6 Contributors: Andrew Barrie, Terry Boon, Pip Cheshire, Comments Patrick Clifford, Tommy Honey, Gordon Andrew Barrie Let a Thousand Flowers Bloom 40 Moller and Gus Watt. Tommy Honey Who Dares Wins 42 Gordon Moller Fun, Roger-style 46 All plans and sketches © Roger Walker. Patrick Clifford Critical Architecture 50 Portrait of Roger Walker on page 3 by Gus Watt Reggie Perrin on Willis Street 52 Simon Wilson. Cartoon on page 62 Terry Boon A Radical Response 54 by Malcolm Walker. Pip Cheshire Ground Control to Roger Walker 58 Design: www.inhouse.nz Cartoon by Malcolm Walker 62 Printer: Everbest Printing Co. China © New Zealand Institute of Architects 2017 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced or transmitted in any form by any means without written permission from the publisher. ISBN 978-0-473-38089-2 1 The Gold Medal is the highest honour awarded by the New Zealand Institute of Architects (NZIA). It is given to an architect who, over the course of a career (thus far!), has designed a substantial body of outstanding work that is recognised as such by the architect’s peers. Gold Medals Introduction for career achievement have been awarded since 1999 and, collectively, the recipients constitute a group of the finest architects to have practised in New Zealand over the past half century.
  • Agenda of Te Pātaka O Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula

    Agenda of Te Pātaka O Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula

    Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū Banks Peninsula Community Board AGENDA Notice of Meeting: An ordinary meeting of the Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board will be held on: Date: Monday 22 June 2020 Time: 10am Venue: Little River Boardroom 4238 Christchurch-Akaroa Road, Little River Membership Chairperson Tori Peden Deputy Chairperson Tyrone Fields Members Reuben Davidson Nigel Harrison Howard Needham Jamie Stewart Andrew Turner Scott Winter 15 June 2020 Joan Blatchford Manager Community Governance, Banks Peninsula/Lyttelton 941 5643 [email protected] Penelope Goldstone Manager Community Governance, Banks Peninsula/Akaroa 941 5689 [email protected] www.ccc.govt.nz Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policy unless and until adopted. If you require further information relating to any reports, please contact the person named on the report. To view copies of Agendas and Minutes, visit: https://www.ccc.govt.nz/the-council/meetings-agendas-and-minutes/ Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board 22 June 2020 Page 2 Te Pātaka o Rākaihautū/Banks Peninsula Community Board 22 June 2020 Article I. Table of C onte nts Part A Matters Requiring a Council Decision Part B Reports for Information Part C Decisions Under Delegation TABLE OF CONTENTS Karakia Timatanga ....................................................................................................... 4 C 1. Apologies / Ngā Whakapāha........................................................................... 4 B 2. Declarations of Interest / Ngā Whakapuaki Aronga .......................................... 4 C 3. Confirmation of Previous Minutes / Te Whakaāe o te hui o mua ........................ 4 B 4. Public Forum / Te Huinga Whānui................................................................... 4 B 5. Deputations by Appointment / Ngā Huinga Whakaritenga ...............................
  • Lytteltonreview

    Lytteltonreview

    Allandale E129 Camp Bay Cass Bay Charteris Bay Church Bay Corsair Bay Diamond Harbour Godley Head Governors Bay community news from port lyttelton to port cooper Lyttelton Port Cooper Port Levy Purau Bay Rapaki lyttelton review Teddington joint effort between professionals real estate and the lyttelton harbour information centre www.lytteltonharbour.info Weekly Read: Lyttelton's Community Emergency Response Local Bus Service Launched Celebrations for Lyttelton Road Tunnel Can Cruise Ships Return to Lyttelton Albion Square on Target to Complete Stark Bros Come to the Rescue, Again Te Ahikaaroa Kapahaka Live at Rapaki review creators Lyttelton Harbour Review is a 100% voluntary community newsletter initiative developed after the February 2011 earthquake by local Professionals Real Estate Agent Lynnette Baird, and Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre Chairperson Wendy Everingham. The objective of the Lyttelton Harbour Review is to help keep local residents informed with what is going on in the wider Lyttelton Harbour community. Of course the success of the Lyttelton Harbour Review could not be possible Lyttelton’s Community Emergency without the ongoing support and Response Plan enthusiasm from the wider community. Being Prepared for a Crisis A big thank you goes out to everyone who sends information; is willing to be Back in November 2012 a small group of residents got together and interviewed by a couple of amateurs; or started to articulate what Lyttelton’s community response to any crisis lets us know what might be might be. happening in the neighbourhood. The At the core of the thinking was any response would be better if our community was Lyttelton Harbour Review project would well connected.
  • TOWN and HILLS WALKS LYTTELTON Explore Lyttelton Township and Nearby Hills and Coastline on This Mix of Walks and Tramps

    TOWN and HILLS WALKS LYTTELTON Explore Lyttelton Township and Nearby Hills and Coastline on This Mix of Walks and Tramps

    TOWN AND HILLS WALKS LYTTELTON Explore Lyttelton township and nearby hills and coastline on this mix of walks and tramps Crater Rim Choose Your Lyttelton Walk walkway is on city side of Mt. Pleasant Mt. Pleasant Mt. Cavendish, The Tors Castle Rock/ Gondola Gun Emplacements Witch Hill/ Te Tihi o Kahukura Te Upoko o Kuri- 2 Crater Rim Pioneer Women’s 4 walkway Memorial 2 4 2 2 Major Hornbrook Somes Reserve Entrance 4 Road 3 Urumau Reserve Entrance 4 5 Whakaraupo¯ 3 2 Governors Bay Road Reserve Entrance Bridle Path Tunnel Entrance 5 to Lyttelton 4 3 3 5 Rapaki 5 4 4 2 1 1 5 3 1 1 Cass Bay / 1 Motu-kauati-rahi - Corsair Bay / Pony Point / Otuherekio Motu-kauati-iti Lyttelton / O¯ hinehou Inner Harbour Magazine Bay / Lyttelton Information Centre Ta¯poa Key to walks Walking on formed track, Dogs permitted under Please look after Lyttelton’s environment some up and down hill, may effective control be muddy Toilets: Most routes do not have toilets. Public toilets next to 1 Coastal Walk To Pony Point Reserve Meander along the coast visiting swimming beaches. Excellent for Tramping on unformed track Lyttelton Harbour Information Centre, in Albion Square, Corsair Bay, Dogs on leads only children. Forms part of Head to Head walkway. with prolonged up and down hill Cass Bay and at the Gondola. Rubbish: Bins are generally not provided. Carry all your rubbish out 2 Urumau Loop For the nimble-footed who like scrambling up Mountain bikes not permitted Dogs prohibited with you. Check after picnicking to ensure you have not left litter, and rocks and narrow cliff paths, with magnificent vistas.
  • Michael Findlay "Peter Beaven: the Return of History to Architecture in the 1960S"

    Michael Findlay "Peter Beaven: the Return of History to Architecture in the 1960S"

    Michael Findlay "Peter Beaven: The Return of History to Architecture in the 1960s" Christchurch architect Peter Beaven's long career has been marked by his opposition to modernist philosophies during which time his practice has been animated by a strong sense of history and place. Beaven's diverse body of work is incorporated into New Zealand modernism as though his strongly expressed beliefs about the role of the architect under modernism were immaterial. Critic Kenneth Frampton's influential chapter on critical regionalism in Modern Architecture: A Critical History sets up a framework for interpreting Beaven's contentious statement that he was never a modernist. This paper specifically explores Beaven's position with relation to the design of the Canterbury Building Society building in High St, Auckland (1967). Kerry Francis "Wrapping the Present (the hard man comes to town): Slight adjustments in Whangarei during the 1960s" In 1964 The New Zealand Refining Company opened the country’s only oil Refinery at the entrance to the Whangarei Harbour. This Refinery placed a provincial town at a pivotal location in the modern New Zealand. During the same decade two Whangarei buildings that had been designed by architect A. P. Morgan received new facades courtesy of a “new” architect M.J. Stiffe. In 1963 the Whangarei Womens’ Club in Rust Avenue received a wrap of red brick and mill finish aluminium windows around the original 1924 weatherboard bungalow and in 1967 the then Head Office for the North Auckland Electric Power Board an asymmetric entry location and a skin of selected mosaic tiles across the original (1950) symmetrical plaster façade.
  • Rockfall in the Port Hills of Christchurch: Seismic and Non-Seismic Fatality Risk on Roads.: Rockfall Fatality Risks in the Port

    Rockfall in the Port Hills of Christchurch: Seismic and Non-Seismic Fatality Risk on Roads.: Rockfall Fatality Risks in the Port

    New Zealand Geographer (2018) 74,3–14 doi:10.1111/nzg.12170 Research Article Rockfall in the Port Hills of Christchurch: Seismic and non-seismic fatality risk on roads Stefan Unterrader,1,2 Peter Almond,2 and Sven Fuchs1 1Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria, 2Lincoln University, Private Bag 85084, Lincoln, New Zealand Abstract: Numerous rockfalls released during the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence affected vital road sections for local commuters. We quantified rockfall fatality risk on two main routes by adapting a risk approach for roads originally developed for snow avalanche risk. We present results of the collective and individual fatality risks for traffic flow and waiting traffic. Waiting traffic scenarios particularly address the critical spatial-temporal dynamics of risk, which should be acknowledged in operational risk management. Comparing our results with other risks commonly experienced in New Zealand indicates that local rockfall risk is close to tolerability thresholds and likely exceeds acceptable risk. Key words: fatalities, natural hazard, quantitative risk analysis, road infrastructure, rockfall. Introduction was quantified for residential homes exposed on a suburb scale following the landslide risk management framework The 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence triggered widespread mass movements in the Port Hills area of introduced by Fell et al. (2005) and revisited by the Christchurch, the largest metropolitan centre of Australian Geomechanics Society (2007). As a result, rock- fall risk levels were identified being considerably higher New Zealand’s South Island. Most significantly, the magni- than it was understood before the 2010/2011 events. tude 6.2 M Christchurch earthquake on 22 February 2011 W However, geomorphological and photographic evi- generated previously inexperienced large ground motions, dence derived during post-event field assessments particularly with respect to vertical ground accelerations (Hancox et al.