Nicola Cabibbo (1935–2010) CERN to Italy, Where He Taught Theoretical Pioneer in Understanding the Weak Force of Particle Physics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Nicola Cabibbo (1935–2010) CERN to Italy, Where He Taught Theoretical Pioneer in Understanding the Weak Force of Particle Physics NEWS & VIEWS NATURE|Vol 467|16 September 2010 OBITUARY talent as a teacher and conference speaker made Cabibbo an internationally known and influential figure. In 1966, he returned from Nicola Cabibbo (1935–2010) CERN to Italy, where he taught theoretical Pioneer in understanding the weak force of particle physics. physics at the universities of L’Aquila and Sapienza, moving in 1981 to the University of Rome Tor Vergata and returning to In his 1961 book The Theory of Fundamental Sapienza in 1993. In Rome, he created Processes, Richard Feynman vividly a school of outstanding young particle described the satisfaction that he and Murray physicists. Gell-Mann felt at finding an explanation Inspired by Cabibbo’s intuition for physics, for the close similarity between the Fermi mathematical skill and personal charisma, CONTRASTO/EYEVINE constants describing the β decays of neutrons the Rome school contributed significantly and muons. Feynman and Gell-Mann to establishing what is today known as the had discovered the ‘universality’ of standard theory of particle physics — an weak interactions. This is similar to the elaborate framework describing the weak, the universality of electromagnetic interactions strong and the electromagnetic interactions. and thus provided a tantalizing hint of a Among Cabibbo’s many achievements are common origin for the two forces. But the describing electron–positron annihilation book also recorded Feynman’s disquiet that into hadrons in terms of point-like the Fermi constant of ‘strange’ particles entities termed partons; calculation (nuclear particles such as the lambda, of the contribution of the combined comprising an up, a down and a strange electromagnetic and weak interactions to the quark) turned out to be smaller by a factor of anomalous magnetic moment of the muon; 4 to 5. It was Nicola Cabibbo who reconciled and the prediction of a phase transition these strange-particle decays with the of nuclear matter to a plasma of quarks universality of weak interactions. In doing and gluons in quantum chromodynamics so, he paved the way to the modern unified (QCD) — the particle-physics theory that theory of the electromagnetic and weak Cabibbo later reformulated the weak- today describes strong interactions. With forces that is central to the standard model interaction universality in terms of quarks — Giorgio Parisi, Cabibbo proposed and built of particle physics. the elementary particles that constitute a parallel supercomputer, termed the array Cabibbo died in Rome on 16 August hadronic particles such as protons, neutrons processor experiment (APE), for calculations following a severe respiratory illness. The and lambdas. Only three types of quark in QCD. APE and its subsequent evolutions son of a Sicilian lawyer, he was born in the (up, down and strange) were then known, have proved useful in elucidating basic QCD same city on 10 April 1935. He graduated and Cabibbo showed that β decays could be phenomena in a regime where the usual in theoretical physics at the Sapienza explained by a coupling between the types mathematical approach of perturbation University of Rome under the supervision of quark encoded in the Cabibbo angle. (Put theory cannot be applied. of Bruno Touschek, whom he would always more technically, the weak interaction couples From 1983 to 1992, Cabibbo served consider his mentor. In the early 1960s, in the up quark to an orthogonal combination as president of the National Institute of Frascati just outside Rome, Touschek and his of the down and strange quarks, determined Nuclear Physics in Frascati, making the collaborators were building the first collider by the Cabibbo angle.) This concept of the transition (unexpected to most) to science of electrons and their antiparticles, positrons. mixing of the different types of quark had administration. He was president of the With Raoul Gatto, who was also to become major implications for particle physics, and Italian energy agency ENEA from 1993 to a leading figure in particle theory, the young in 1970, Sheldon Glashow, John Iliopoulos 1998, and from 1993 was president of the Cabibbo wrote an exploratory paper on the and I extended it to include a fourth type of Pontifical Academy of Sciences, based in the physics that could be studied using electron– quark, charm, whose existence was confirmed Vatican. He brought to these positions vision, positron collisions, a paper that soon became experimentally in 1974. managerial skill and a universally appreciated a standard reference in the field. Cabibbo universality and the charm integrity. In 1991, he became one of the first In 1962, while working at CERN, quark made it possible to extend the recipients of the European Physical Society’s Europe’s particle-physics laboratory near unified electroweak theory, which had been prize in high-energy and particle physics. He Geneva, Switzerland, Cabibbo found the proposed by Steve Weinberg and Abdus was awarded the American Physical Society’s solution to the puzzle of the weak decays of Salam, to the interactions of hadrons, ironing Sakurai prize in 1989 and the Dirac medal strange particles. Formulating what came out the difficulties that had plagued the in 2010. to be known as Cabibbo universality, he three-quark scheme. But the phenomenon of Nicola liked teaching, and was still doing assumed that all β decays, whether they CP violation, observed in the decay of certain so until the last months of his life. Like all involved strange particles or not, had to be elementary particles, also had to be included. great thinkers, he could find simple ways described in terms of a weak current that To account for it, Makoto Kobayashi and to explain the most difficult concepts. His was determined by a single parameter — Toshihide Maskawa extended the theory students were captivated by his simplicity, the Cabibbo angle. Using this angle, now further, introducing two more quarks, the gentleness and sense of humour. So were determined to be about 12°, and exploiting bottom and top. In this six-quark model, all of us who had the privilege to be his the particle symmetries that had been Cabibbo’s quark-mixing scheme is embedded collaborators and friends. discovered by Gell-Mann and Yuval Ne’eman, in what is known as the Cabibbo–Kobayashi– Luciano Maiani Cabibbo could not only explain the Maskawa matrix. Luciano Maiani is in the Department of Physics, β decays of strange particles, but could also The success of Cabibbo’s theory — now Sapienza University of Rome, and president of the account for the small discrepancy between supported by decades of data, including the Italian National Research Council, Rome 00185, the Fermi constants of neutron and muon most recent data from CERN and Fermilab Italy. β decays. in Batavia, Illinois — and his exceptional e-mail: [email protected] 284 © 2010 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved.
Recommended publications
  • DPF Newsletter - December 1999
    DPF Newsletter - December 1999 In This Issue... DPF Elections DPF Symposia Stanley Wojcicki was elected Vice-Chair of DPF in this year's election. Peter Meyers was elected DOE & HEPAP News Divisional Councillor. The new Executive Committee members are Janet Conrad and Bill NSF News Carithers. APS Prize Winners The members of the 2000 DPF Executive Committee and the final years of their terms are New APS Fellows Chair: Eugene Beier (2000). ICFA Statement Chair-Elect: Chris Quigg (2000). Vice-Chair: Stanley Wojcicki (2000). DPF Committees Past Chair: Howard Gordon (2000). Secretary-Treasurer: Catherine Newman- Holmes (2000). Proceedings of DPF 99 Now Division Councilor: Sally Dawson (2002), Available on the Web Peter Meyers(2003). Executive Committee Members: Vernon Barger (2001), Bill Carithers (2002), Janet Proceedings of the 1999 DPF Conrad (2002), Glennys Farrar (2001), meeting held in January, 1999 at Nicholas Hadley (2000) and Donna Naples UCLA are now available on the (2000). Web at http://www.dpf99.library.ucla.edu/. We would like to take this opportunity to thank These proceedings were published DPF Executive Committee members whose terms only electronically. are expiring in 1999: Howard Georgi (Past Chair), Robert Cahn (Divisional Councillor) and Pat Burchat and Kay Kinoshita (Executive Committee members). We also express our appreciation to all DPF - 2000 who agreed to run for DPF office this year. We were fortunate to have an excellent slate of DPF 2000 will be held August 9 - candidates. 12, 2000, at Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio. The program This was DPF's first experience with electronic is being developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Prizes, Fellowships and Scholarships
    ESEARCH OPPORTUNITIES ALERT Issue 26: Volume 2 R SCHOLARSHIPS, PRIZES AND FELLOWSHIPS (Quarter: July - September, 2016) A Compilation by the Scholarships & Prizes RESEARCH SERVICES UNIT Early/ Mid Career Fellowships OFFICE OF RESEARCH, INNOVATION AND DEVELOPMENT (ORID), UNIVERSITY OF GHANA Pre/ Post-Doctoral Fellowships Thesis/ Dissertation Funding JUNE 2016 Issue 26: Volume 2: Scholarships, Prizes and Fellowships (July – September, 2016) TABLE OF CONTENT OPPORTUNITIES FOR JULY 2016 DAVID ADLER LECTURESHIP AWARD ............................................................................................................ 15 HAYMAN PRIZE FOR PUBLISHED WORK PERTAINING TO TRAUMATISED CHILDREN AND ADULTS ..................................................................................................................................................................... 15 HANS A BETHE PRIZE ........................................................................................................................................... 16 TOM W BONNER PRIZE IN NUCLEAR PHYSICS ............................................................................................ 17 HERBERT P BROIDA PRIZE .................................................................................................................................. 18 OLIVER E BUCKLEY PRIZE IN CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS ............................................................... 18 DANNIE HEINEMAN PRIZE FOR MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 APS Prize and Award Recipients
    APS Announces 2018 Prize and Award Recipients The APS would like to congratulate the recipients of these APS prizes and awards. They will be presented during APS award ceremonies throughout the year. Both March and April meeting award ceremonies are open to all APS members and their guests. At the March Meeting, the APS Prizes and Awards Ceremony will be held Monday, March 5, 5:45 - 6:45 p.m. at the Los Angeles Convention Center (LACC) in Los Angeles, CA. At the April Meeting, the APS Prizes and Awards Ceremony will be held Sunday, April 15, 5:30 - 6:30 p.m. at the Greater Columbus Convention Center in Columbus, OH. In addition to the award ceremonies, most prize and award recipients will give invited talks during the meeting. Some recipients of prizes, awards are recognized at APS unit meetings. For the schedule of APS meetings, please visit http://www.aps.org/meetings/calendar.cfm. Nominations are open for most 2019 prizes and awards. We encourage members to nominate their highly-qualified peers, and to consider broadening the diversity and depth of the nomination pool from which honorees are selected. For nomination submission instructions, please visit the APS web site (http://www.aps.org/programs/honors/index.cfm). Prizes 2018 APS MEDAL FOR EXCELLENCE IN PHYSICS 2018 PRIZE FOR A FACULTY MEMBER FOR RESEARCH IN AN UNDERGRADUATE INSTITUTION Eugene N. Parker University of Chicago Warren F. Rogers In recognition of many fundamental contributions to space physics, Indiana Wesleyan University plasma physics, solar physics and astrophysics for over 60 years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of the Standard Theory
    August 11, 2016 9:28 The Standard Theory of Particle Physics - 9.61in x 6.69in b2471-ch02 page 29 Chapter 2 The Making of the Standard Theory John Iliopoulos Laboratoire de Physique Th´eorique, Ecole´ Normale Sup´erieure, 24 rue Lhomond, 75005 Paris, France 1. Introduction The construction of the Standard Model, which became gradually the Standard Theory of elementary particle physics, is, probably, the most remarkable achieve- ment of modern theoretical physics. In this Chapter we shall deal mostly with the weak interactions. It may sound strange that a revolution in particle physics was initiated by the study of the weakest among them (the effects of the gravitational interactions are not measurable in high energy physics), but we shall see that the weak interactions triggered many such revolutions and we shall have the occasion to meditate on the fundamental significance of “tiny” effects. We shall outline the various steps, from the early days of the Fermi theory to the recent experimental discoveries, which confirmed all the fundamental predictions of the Theory. We shall follow a phenomenological approach, in which the introduction of every new concept is motivated by the search of a consistent theory which agrees with experiment. As we shall explain, this is only part of the story, the other part being the requirement of mathematical consistency. Both went in parallel and the real history requires the understanding of both. In fact, as we intend to show, the initial motivation was not really phenomenological. It is one of these rare cases in which a revolution in physics came from theorists trying to go beyond a simple phenomenological model, The Standard Theory of Particle Physics Downloaded from www.worldscientific.com not from an experimental result which forced them to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • DPF NEWSLETTER - April 15, 1996
    DPF NEWSLETTER - April 15, 1996 To: Members of the Division of Particles and Fields From: Jonathan Bagger, Secretary-Treasurer, [email protected] 1995 DPF Elections Howard Georgi was elected Vice-Chair of the DPF. Tom Devlin and Heidi Schellman were elected to the Executive Committee. George Trilling was elected as a Division Councillor. The current members of the DPF Executive Committee and the final years of their terms are Chair: Frank Sciulli (1996) Chair-Elect: Paul Grannis (1996) Vice-Chair: Howard Georgi (1996) Past Chair: David Cassel (1996) Secretary-Treasurer: Jonathan Bagger (1997) Division Councillor: Henry Frisch (1997), George Trilling (1998) Executive Board: Sally Dawson (1996), Tom Devlin (1998), Martin Einhorn (1997), John Rutherfoord (1997), Heidi Schellman (1998), Michael Shaevitz (1996) Call for Nominations: 1996 DPF Elections The 1996 Nominating Committee is hard at work. Please send suggestions for candidates to the Chair, Abe Seiden of Santa Cruz ([email protected]). The other members of the Nominating Committee are Melissa Franklin, Robert Jaffe, Michael Murtagh, Helen Quinn, and Bill Reay. DPF Members are also entitled to nominate candidates by petition. Twenty signatures from DPF members are required. Nominations will be accepted by Jonathan Bagger until May 15, 1996. Snowmass 1996: New Directions for High Energy Physics The 1996 Snowmass Workshop on New Directions in High Energy Physics will be held in Snowmass, Colorado, from June 24 to July 12, 1996. Arrival, registration, and a reception will be on June 24. Full-day plenary sessions will be held on June 25-26 and July 11-12. This workshop will provide an opportunity to begin to develop a coherent plan for the longer term future for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisor Input Part 2
    Paul O’Connor Dear Ian and Marcel, Here is the input you requested on the Instrumentation Task Force topics. I have confined my comments to the instrumentation needs of High Energy Physics, although at a multipurpose lab like BNL we see quite significant overlap with other disciplines, particularly photon science and medical imaging. 1. National Instrumentation Board It's unclear what authority this body could have. Perhaps a better model would be an advisory panel to the DOE and NSF or a sub-panel of HEPAP. Coordination with NP and BES programs may be more effective. 2. Targeted Resources at National Labs I support the idea of dedicating a fraction of each labs' LDRD funding to leading-edge instrumentation development. In addition, Increased support for dedicated detector instrumentation groups at the labs is also needed. The more common model, engineering support organizations whose funding comes from charge-back to programs, makes it difficult to develop and sustain the talent and equipment resources needed to respond to next-generation instrumentation needs. 3. National Instrumentation fellowships Few university physics departments promote talented students to follow instrumentation-related courses of study. There are some instances in which a MS in Instrumentation is offered to grad students who fail Ph.D. qualifying exams. The sense that instrumentation is a path for less-qualified students certainly does not promote the development of the next generation of talented instrumentalists. A suitably prestigious fellowship program could help reverse this trend, in conjunction with the Instrumentation schools. 4. Instrumentation schools Of the topics listed for the task force this is one that I most strongly support.
    [Show full text]
  • SHELDON LEE GLASHOW Lyman Laboratory of Physics Harvard University Cambridge, Mass., USA
    TOWARDS A UNIFIED THEORY - THREADS IN A TAPESTRY Nobel Lecture, 8 December, 1979 by SHELDON LEE GLASHOW Lyman Laboratory of Physics Harvard University Cambridge, Mass., USA INTRODUCTION In 1956, when I began doing theoretical physics, the study of elementary particles was like a patchwork quilt. Electrodynamics, weak interactions, and strong interactions were clearly separate disciplines, separately taught and separately studied. There was no coherent theory that described them all. Developments such as the observation of parity violation, the successes of quantum electrodynamics, the discovery of hadron resonances and the appearance of strangeness were well-defined parts of the picture, but they could not be easily fitted together. Things have changed. Today we have what has been called a “standard theory” of elementary particle physics in which strong, weak, and electro- magnetic interactions all arise from a local symmetry principle. It is, in a sense, a complete and apparently correct theory, offering a qualitative description of all particle phenomena and precise quantitative predictions in many instances. There is no experimental data that contradicts the theory. In principle, if not yet in practice, all experimental data can be expressed in terms of a small number of “fundamental” masses and cou- pling constants. The theory we now have is an integral work of art: the patchwork quilt has become a tapestry. Tapestries are made by many artisans working together. The contribu- tions of separate workers cannot be discerned in the completed work, and the loose and false threads have been covered over. So it is in our picture of particle physics. Part of the picture is the unification of weak and electromagnetic interactions and the prediction of neutral currents, now being celebrated by the award of the Nobel Prize.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae Del Prof. LUCIANO MAIANI
    Curriculum vitae del Prof. LUCIANO MAIANI Nato a Roma, il 16 Luglio 1941. Professore ordinario di Fisica Teorica, Università di Roma “La Sapienza” Curriculum Vitae 1964 Laurea in Fisica (110 e lode) presso l'Università di Roma. 1964 Ricercatore presso l’Istituto Superiore di Sanità. Nello stesso anno inizia la sua attività di fisico teorico collaborando con il gruppo dell'Università di Firenze guidato dal Prof. R.Gatto. 1969 Post-doctor per un semestre presso il Lyman Laboratory of Physics dell'Università di Harvard (USA). 1976/84 Professore Ordinario di Istituzioni di Fisica Teorica presso l'Università di Roma “La Sapienza” 1977 Professore visitatore presso l'Ecole Normale Superieure di Parigi. 1979/80 Professore visitatore, per un semestre, al CERN di Ginevra. 1984 Professore di Fisica Teorica presso l'Università di Roma “La Sapienza”. 1985/86 Professore visitatore per un anno al CERN di Ginevra. 1993/98 Presidente dell'Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare 1993/96 Delegato italiano presso il Council del CERN 1995/97 Presidente del Comitato Tecnico Scientifico, Fondo Ricerca Applicata, MURST 1998 Presidente del Council del CERN 1999/2003 Direttore Generale del CERN 2005 Socio Nazionale dell’Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Roma 2005-2008 Coordinatore Progetto HELEN-EuropeAid 2008 Presidente del Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Laurea honoris causa Université de la Méditerranée, Aix-Marseille Università di San Pietroburgo Università di Bratislava Università di Varsavia Affiliazioni Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei, Socio Nazionale Fellow, American Physical Society Socio dell’Accademia Nazionale delle Scienze detta “dei XL” Socio dell’Accademia delle Scienze Russe Membro, Academia Europaea di Scienze ed Arti Premi 1980 Medaglia Matteucci, conferita dall'Accademia Nazionale dei XL.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    CURRICULUM VITAE Howard E. Haber Distinguished Professor of Physics Department of Physics University of California, Santa Cruz EMPLOYMENT 2020-present Research Professor of Physics, Department of Physics, UC Santa Cruz 1990–2020 Professor of Physics, Department of Physics, UC Santa Cruz 1989–1990 Associate Professor of Physics, Department of Physics, UC Santa Cruz 1988–1989 Assistant Professor of Physics, Department of Physics, UC Santa Cruz 1984–1988 Adjunct Assistant Professor of Physics, Department of Physics, UC Santa Cruz 1982–1984 Assistant Research Physicist/Visiting Assistant Professor, UC Santa Cruz 1980–1982 Postdoctoral Research Associate, University of Pennsylvania 1978–1980 Postdoctoral Research Associate, Theoretical Physics Group, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory 1975–1978 Research Assistant, University of Michigan 1973–1978 Teaching Assistant, University of Michigan EDUCATION Ph.D., Physics University of Michigan, 1978 S.M., Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1973 S.B., Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1973 S.B., Math Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1973 ACADEMIC WEB PAGE OF HOWARD E. HABER http://scipp.ucsc.edu/˜haber/ HONORS AND AWARDS 2018 Simons GGI Visiting Scientist Fellowship, The Galileo Galilei Institute for Theoretical Physics, Arcetri, Florence, Italy 2017 Co-recipient of the American Physical Society J.J. Sakurai Prize for The- oretical Particle Physics ($10,000, shared among the four recipi- ents) 2015 Received the honorary designation of Distinguished Professor of Physics 1 2013
    [Show full text]
  • PDF) Submittals Are Preferred) and Information Particle and Astroparticle Physics As Well As Accelerator Physics
    CERNNovember/December 2019 cerncourier.com COURIERReporting on international high-energy physics WELCOME CERN Courier – digital edition Welcome to the digital edition of the November/December 2019 issue of CERN Courier. The Extremely Large Telescope, adorning the cover of this issue, is due to EXTREMELY record first light in 2025 and will outperform existing telescopes by orders of magnitude. It is one of several large instruments to look forward to in the decade ahead, which will also see the start of high-luminosity LHC operations. LARGE TELESCOPE As the 2020s gets under way, the Courier will be reviewing the LHC’s 10-year physics programme so far, as well as charting progress in other domains. In the meantime, enjoy news of KATRIN’s first limit on the neutrino mass (p7), a summary of the recently published European strategy briefing book (p8), the genesis of a hadron-therapy centre in Southeast Europe (p9), and dispatches from the most interesting recent conferences (pp19—23). CLIC’s status and future (p41), the abstract world of gauge–gravity duality (p44), France’s particle-physics origins (p37) and CERN’s open days (p32) are other highlights from this last issue of the decade. Enjoy! To sign up to the new-issue alert, please visit: http://comms.iop.org/k/iop/cerncourier To subscribe to the magazine, please visit: https://cerncourier.com/p/about-cern-courier KATRIN weighs in on neutrinos Maldacena on the gauge–gravity dual FPGAs that speak your language EDITOR: MATTHEW CHALMERS, CERN DIGITAL EDITION CREATED BY IOP PUBLISHING CCNovDec19_Cover_v1.indd 1 29/10/2019 15:41 CERNCOURIER www.
    [Show full text]
  • 1991 HEPP Conference: LEP Precision Is Main Feature
    1991 HEPP Conference ments of heavy quarks and τ leptons [τb = (1.33 ± 0.05 ± 0.06).10 -12 s, ττ = (302.5 ± 5.9).10-12 s] from various experiments LEP Precision is Main Feature now agree. Furthermore, the new data have improved the knowledge of the Cabbibo- Kobayashi-Maskawa matrix elements. The The Divisional Conference of the High J. Carter summarized precision tests of way CP violation is achieved in nature still Energy and Particle Physics Division takes the standard model and the following set of remains an open question. Two experiments place every two years. As the IUPAP Lepton- measurements serves as an example of the at CERN and at Fermilab, employing neutral Photon Symposium was due to be held in high level of accuracy with which the funda­ kaon beams, do not yet allow a conclusive Europe, it was felt that one should accom­ mental parameters for electroweak inter­ answer to the size of the CP violating para­ modate the large overlap in physics topics actions have been determined : meter Re (ε'/ε), but new experiments with a with the EPS High Energy Physics Confe­ higher accuracy are planned (J.M Gerard). rence by organizing only one meeting in The four LEP experiments have also Geneva. The 1991 Conference was thus searched for new phenomena beyond the organized jointly by EPS, IUPAP and CERN, standard model and, In particular, have and took place in the Geneva Conference The electroweak Z parameters have been looked for the appearance of new particles. Centre with over 1000 participants from used to evaluate the number of light neu­ M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Charm of Theoretical Physics (1958– 1993)?
    Eur. Phys. J. H 42, 611{661 (2017) DOI: 10.1140/epjh/e2017-80040-9 THE EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL H Oral history interview The Charm of Theoretical Physics (1958{ 1993)? Luciano Maiani1 and Luisa Bonolis2,a 1 Dipartimento di Fisica and INFN, Piazzale A. Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy 2 Max Planck Institute for the History of Science, Boltzmannstraße 22, 14195 Berlin, Germany Received 10 July 2017 / Received in final form 7 August 2017 Published online 4 December 2017 c The Author(s) 2017. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract. Personal recollections on theoretical particle physics in the years when the Standard Theory was formed. In the background, the remarkable development of Italian theoretical physics in the second part of the last century, with great personalities like Bruno Touschek, Raoul Gatto, Nicola Cabibbo and their schools. 1 Apprenticeship L. B. How did your interest in physics arise? You enrolled in the late 1950s, when the period of post-war reconstruction of physics in Europe was coming to an end, and Italy was entering into a phase of great expansion. Those were very exciting years. It was the beginning of the space era. L. M. The beginning of the space era certainly had a strong influence on many people, absolutely. The landing on the moon in 1969 was for sure unforgettable, but at that time I was already working in Physics and about to get married. My interest in physics started well before. The real beginning was around 1955. Most important for me was astronomy. It is not surprising that astronomy marked for many people the beginning of their interest in science.
    [Show full text]