Peter Berger and the Study of Religion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peter Berger and the Study of Religion Peter Berger and the Study of Religion Peter Berger is the most influential and the most cited contemporary sociologist of religion, who has been writing on this subject for over forty years. Yet until now there has been no in-depth study of Berger’s contribution to the study of religion. A collection of essays by leading scholars in the study of religion and theology, Peter Berger and the Study of Religion is a comprehensive introduction to both the work of Peter Berger and to current thought on the central issues and ideas in the study of religion. The themes and subjects addressed in this volume include: • Berger on religion and theology • Religion, spirituality and the discontents of modernity • Secularization and sacralization • Signals of transcendence. A postscript by Peter Berger himself, responding to the essays, completes this definitive overview of a major figure’s work in a diverse and complex discipline. Linda Woodhead is Senior Lecturer in Religious Studies at Lancaster University. She is the editor of Routledge’s forthcoming Religion in the Modern World and editor (with Paul Heelas) of Religion in Modern Times: An Interpretive Anthology (2000). Paul Heelas is Professor in Religion and Modernity at Lancaster University. David Martin is a Visiting Professor at Lancaster University and Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the London School of Economics. Peter Berger and the Study of Religion Edited by Linda Woodhead with Paul Heelas and David Martin London and New York First published 2001 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 29 West 35th Street, New York, NY 10001 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2002. © 2001 Linda Woodhead, Paul Heelas and David Martin All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data ISBN 0–415–21532–3 (pbk) ISBN 0–415–21531–5 (hbk) ISBN 0-203-20680-0 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-20683-5 (Glassbook Format) Contents Notes on contributors vii Introduction 1 LINDA WOODHEAD PART I Berger on religion and theology 9 1 Berger: an appreciation 11 DAVID MARTIN 2 Berger and his collaborator(s) 17 THOMAS LUCKMANN 3 Berger: theology and sociology 26 GARY DORRIEN PART II Religion, spirituality and the discontents of modernity 41 4 Homeless minds today? 43 PAUL HEELAS AND LINDA WOODHEAD 5 A New Age theodicy for a new age 73 COLIN CAMPBELL vi Contents PART III Secularization and sacralization 85 6 The curious case of the unnecessary recantation: Berger and secularization 87 STEVE BRUCE 7 The persistence of institutional religion in modern Europe 101 GRACE DAVIE 8 The twofold limit of the notion of secularization 112 DANIÈLE HERVIEU-LÉGER PART IV Signals of transcendence 127 9 Berger’s vision in retrospect 129 RICHARD K. FENN 10 Berger and New Testament Studies 142 DAVID G. HORRELL 11 Berger’s anthropological theology 154 BERNICE MARTIN Postscript 189 PETER BERGER References 199 Index 209 Notes on contributors Steve Bruce is Professor of Sociology at the University of Aberdeen. He was previously lecturer, reader and professor at The Queen’s University of Belfast. His works include Conservative Protestant Politics (1998), Choice and Religion: A Critique of Rational Choice Theory (1999), and Fundamentalism (2001). Colin Campbell is Professor of Sociology at the University of York. He has written on irreligion, the cult and the cultic milieu, and superstition, while his books include The Romantic Ethic and the Spirit of Modern Consumerism (1987) and The Myth of Social Action (1996). Grace Davie is Reader in the Sociology of Religion, University of Exeter. Recent publications include Religion in Britain since 1945: Believing without Belonging (1994) and Religion in Modern Europe: A Memory Mutates (2000). Gary Dorrien is Ann V. and Donald R. Parfet Distinguished Professor at Kalamazoo College, Michigan. His most recent book is The Barthian Revolt in Modern Theology: Theology without Weapons (1999). Parts of his essay in this volume are adapted from Dorrien (1993), with permission. Richard K. Fenn is Maxwell Upson Professor of Christianity and Society at Princeton Theological Seminary. Recent publications include The Persistence of Purgatory (1996), The Blackwell Companion to the Study of Religion (edited, 2000) and Time Exposure: The Personal Experience of Time in Secular Societies (2001). Paul Heelas is Professor in Religion and Modernity at the Department of Religious Studies, Lancaster University. Recent publications include The New Age Movement (1996) and, with Linda Woodhead, Religion in Modern Times: An Interpretive Anthology (2000). viii Notes on contributors Danièle Hervieu-Léger is Professor at the École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales (Paris), and director of the Centre d’Études Interdisciplinaires des Faits Religieux (CEIFR, EHESS/CNRS). Recent publications include La Religion pour Mémoire (1993) (translated in English as Religion as a Chain of Memory, 1999), Identités religieuses en Europe (edited with G. Davie) (1996), and Le Pèlerin et le Converti. La Religion en Mouvement (1999). David G. Horrell is Senior Lecturer in New Testament Studies in the Department of Theology, University of Exeter. Recent publications include The Social Ethos of the Corinthian Correspondence (1996), An Introduction to the Study of Paul (2000) and an edited collection entitled Social-Scientific Approaches to New Testament Interpretation (1999). Thomas Luckmann is Professor Emeritus at the University of Constance, Honorary Professor at the University of Salzburg, formerly Visiting Professor at Harvard Divinity School and the Universities of Wollongong and Vienna. Recent publications include Modernity, Pluralism and the Crisis of Meaning (1995) (with Peter Berger) Morals in Everyday Life (1980) and The Communicative Construction of Morals (1999) (with Jörg Bergmann and others) (in German). Bernice Martin is Reader Emeritus in Sociology at the University of London (Royal Holloway College). Her best known publication is A Sociology of Contemporary Cultural Change (1981). David Martin is Professor Emeritus of Sociology at the London School of Economics, University of London, and Honorary Professor in the Department of Religious Studies at Lancaster University. Recent publications include Does Christianity Cause War? (1997) and Reflections on Theology and Sociology (1997). Linda Woodhead is Senior Lecturer in Christian Studies in the Department of Religious Studies, Lancaster University. Recent publications include Diana: The Making of a Media Saint (edited with Jeffrey Richards and Scott Wilson, 1999), Reinventing Christianity: Nineteenth-century Contexts (edited, 2001) and, with Paul Heelas, Religion in Modern Times: An Interpretative Anthology (2000). Introduction Linda Woodhead Here I want to see those men of hard voice. Those that break horses and dominate rivers; those men of sonorous skeleton who sing with a mouth full of sun and flint Federico Garcia Lorca Used as the epigraph of The Homeless Mind (Berger and Kellner, 1973) When Paul Heelas and I recently put together a reader on Religion in Modern Times there were a handful of authors whose work we found ourselves using again and again. Try as we might to find alternatives, there was no getting away from the fact that these were the writers responsible for a disproportionate number of the key formulations in the study of religion. If we take the Second World War as a watershed, the prewar authors we used the most were Weber, Troeltsch, Durkheim, Marx and Simmel. No big surprises there – our work merely confirmed an informal canon which is already widely accepted. But a canon in the postwar study of religion is not yet as clearly defined, and it was therefore with genuine interest that we discovered that the authors from whom we had extracted the most were David Martin, Robert Bellah, Robert Wuthnow – and Peter Berger. In varying degrees and in different ways, all four of these authors combine high-level theorizing with close attention to empirical evidence. Arguably, it is Berger who has contributed the most to the study of religion at the level of what might be called ‘meta-theory’. The essentials of Berger’s theoretical framework were laid down early in his career, particularly through his collaboration with Thomas Luckmann on The Social Construction of Reality (1966). This foundational text in the sociology of knowledge explored and exposed the linkages between conviction, commitment, and social reality. Berger applied the arguments of this book to the religious realm in The Sacred Canopy (1967). His unique insight – 2 Linda Woodhead which he now modestly refers to as his one truly original idea – was that pluralism undermines stable belief. Under the pressure of the pluralizing forces of modernity the ‘sacred canopy’ becomes the ‘precarious vision’. A central conclusion was that pluralism leads inevitably to secularization. Berger’s version of secularization theory endorsed the view that there is an intrinsic link between modernization and secularization, but found in pluralism the missing link which made the connection clear. The power of this early theoretical framework is proven by the way in which it yielded rich insights in the many different spheres to which Peter Berger applied it in subsequent work. To ‘the modern condition’ in The Homeless Mind (1973) and Facing up to Modernity (1979); to the family in The War over the Family (1983); to economic cultures and development in books such as Pyramids of Sacrifice (1974a) and The Capitalist Revolution (1987). The history of its continuing application to religion is particularly interesting and revealing. Berger’s interest in religion has continued throughout his career.
Recommended publications
  • (Dis)Believing and Belonging: Investigating the Narratives of Young British Atheists1
    (Dis)Believing and Belonging: Investigating the Narratives of Young British Atheists1 REBECCA CATTO Coventry University JANET ECCLES Independent Researcher Abstract The development and public prominence of the ‘New Atheism’ in the West, particularly the UK and USA, since the millennium has occasioned considerable growth in the study of ‘non-religion and secularity’. Such work is uncovering the variety and complexity of associated categories, different public figures, arguments and organi- zations involved. There has been a concomitant increase in research on youth and religion. As yet, however, little is known about young people who self-identify as atheist, though the statistics indicate that in Britain they are the cohort most likely to select ‘No religion’ in surveys. This article addresses this gap with presentation of data gathered with young British people who describe themselves as atheists. Atheism is a multifaceted identity for these young people developed over time and through experience. Disbelief in God and other non-empirical propositions such as in an afterlife and the efficacy of homeopathy and belief in progress through science, equality and freedom are central to their narratives. Hence belief is taken as central to the sociological study of atheism, but understood as formed and performed in relationships in which emotions play a key role. In the late modern context of contemporary Britain, these young people are far from amoral individualists. We employ current theorizing about the sacred to help understand respondents’ belief and value-oriented non-religious identities in context. Keywords: Atheism, Youth, UK, Belief, Sacred Phil Zuckerman (2010b, vii) notes that for decades British sociologist Colin Campbell’s call for a widespread analysis of irreligion went largely un- heeded (Campbell 1971).
    [Show full text]
  • Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. the University of Sheffield. Phd Thesis
    Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. The University of Sheffield. PhD Thesis. March 2017. “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff: A Contextual Bible Study Experiment.” 1 Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. The University of Sheffield. PhD Thesis. March 2017. “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff: A Contextual Bible Study Experiment.” 2 Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. The University of Sheffield. PhD Thesis. March 2017. “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff: A Contextual Bible Study Experiment.” THE SHEFFIELD INSTITUTE FOR INTERDISCIPLINARY BIBLICAL STUDIES (SIIBS) THE FACULTY OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES THE UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD “WHEN THE BIBLE MEETS THE BLACK STUFF: A CONTEXTUAL BIBLE STUDY EXPERIMENT” A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY TIFFANY WEBSTER 120213511 06 March, 2017 3 Tiffany Webster. 120213511. SIIBS. The University of Sheffield. PhD Thesis. March 2017. “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff: A Contextual Bible Study Experiment.” CONTENTS ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………………………………….7 CHAPTER ONE. INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………8 Research Aims. …………………………………………………………………………………………..8 The Why of “When the Bible Meets the Black Stuff” or Why this Research is Important…………………………………………………………………………………………………9 How this Research Took Shape………………………………………………………………….20 Participant Consent……………………………………………………………………………………28 Terminological Clarification……………………………………………………………………….29 CHAPTER TWO. WORKING REFLEXIVELY………………………………………………………………..31 Defining Reflexivity……………………………………………………………………………………33
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Review 2015-16 Nurturing Wisdom ST GEORGE’S HOUSE
    ST GEORGE’S HOUSE Annual Review 2015-16 nurturing wisdom ST GEORGE’S HOUSE contents 1 Foreword 2 The Warden’s Report 4 ‘Reflections on Shakespeare’ - 2016 Annual Lecture given by Dr Rowan Williams 10 Programme Report 2015-16 13 Trustees Report 14 Financial Statement 16 Council Membership 17 Corporate Associates nurturing wisdom Foreword by The Right Reverend David Conner KCVO Dean of Windsor Once again, it is my pleasure to write a brief Foreword to the St George’s House Annual Review, to note that the House continues to flourish, and to try to convey something of the respect I have for those whose hard work and enthusiasm contribute to its being valued by many people. Clare Four times each year, at our quarterly ‘Obit’ services in St David George’s Chapel, we commemorate and give thanks for the Founder and Benefactors of the College of St George. As we do Photographs: so, we remember all those “who helped to create and establish St George’s House as a centre of learning and study”. We are reminded at each ‘Obit’ observation of the significant part that St George’s House has played in the history of the College. During 2016, as you will see from what follows in this Review, we were delighted to mark the 50th anniversary of the founding of the House by HRH The Duke of Edinburgh and Dean Robin Woods. During the past year, we have been especially mindful of the vision, imagination, and profound concern to help build a better world that were at the beginning, and have remained through the years, the inspiration of the architects of the St George’s House wide-ranging programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Religion and the Individual
    RELIGION AND THE INDIVIDUAL This volume brings together a significant set of reflections on the meaning of religion for the individual as well as society. In doing so it makes a timely and valuable contribution to our understanding both of individualizing tendencies within religion, and of appropriate theoretical and methodological responses to that shift. Professor Linda Woodhead, Director AHRC/ESRC Religion and Society Programme, Lancaster University, UK What does religion mean to the individual? How are people religious and what do their beliefs, practices and identities mean to them? The individual’s place within studies of religion has tended to be overlooked recently in favour of macro analyses. Religion and the Individual draws together authors from around the world to explore belief, practice and identity. Using original case studies and other work firmly placed in the empirical, contributors discuss what religious belief means to the individual. They examine how people embody what religion means to them through practice, considering the different meanings that people attach to religion and the social expressions of their personal understandings and the ways in which religion shapes how people see themselves in relation to others. This work is cross-cultural, with contributions from Asia, Europe and North America. THEOLOGY AND RELIGION IN INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVE SERIES IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE BSA SOCIOLOGY OF RELIGION STUDY GROUP BSA Sociology of Religion Study Group Series editor: Pink Dandelion and the publications committee Theology and Religion in Interdisciplinary Perspective Series editors: Douglas Davies and Richard Fenn The British Sociological Association Sociology of Religion Study Group began in 1975 and provides the primary forum in Britain for scholarship in the sociology of religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Putting Science and Engineering at the Heart of Government Policy
    House of Commons Innovation, Universities, Science and Skills Committee Putting Science and Engineering at the Heart of Government Policy Eighth Report of Session 2008–09 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 8 July 2009 HC 168-II Published on 23 July 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Innovation, Universities, Science & Skills Committee The Innovation, Universities, Science & Skills Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Department for Innovation, Universities and Skills. Current membership Mr Phil Willis (Liberal Democrat, Harrogate and Knaresborough)(Chairman) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods (Labour, City of Durham) Mr Tim Boswell (Conservative, Daventry) Mr Ian Cawsey (Labour, Brigg & Goole) Mrs Nadine Dorries (Conservative, Mid Bedfordshire) Dr Evan Harris (Liberal Democrat, Oxford West & Abingdon) Dr Brian Iddon (Labour, Bolton South East) Mr Gordon Marsden (Labour, Blackpool South) Dr Bob Spink (UK Independence Party, Castle Point) Ian Stewart (Labour, Eccles) Graham Stringer (Labour, Manchester, Blackley) Dr Desmond Turner (Labour, Brighton Kemptown) Mr Rob Wilson (Conservative, Reading East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental Select Committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No.152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk Publications The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House. All publications of the Committee (including press notices) are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/ius A list of reports from the Committee in this Parliament is included at the back of this volume.
    [Show full text]
  • 'No Religion' in Britain
    Journal of the British Academy, 4, 245–61. DOI 10.5871/jba/004.245 Posted 8 December 2016. © The British Academy 2016 The rise of ‘no religion’ in Britain: The emergence of a new cultural majority The British Academy Lecture read 19 January 2016 LINDA WOODHEAD Abstract: This paper reviews new and existing evidence which shows that ‘no religion’ has risen steadily to rival ‘Christian’ as the preferred self-designation of British people. Drawing on recent survey research by the author, it probes the category of ‘no religion’ and offers a characterisation of the ‘nones’ which reveals, amongst other things, that most are not straightforwardly secular. It compares the British situation with that of comparable countries, asking why Britain has become one of the few no-religion countries in the world today. An explanation is offered that highlights the importance not only of cultural pluralisation and ethical liberalisation in Britain, but of the churches’ opposite direction of travel. The paper ends by reflecting on the extent to which ‘no religion’ has become the new cultural norm, showing why Britain is most accurately described as between Christian and ‘no religion’. Keywords: religion, no religion, identity, secular, culture, ethics, liberalism, pluralism, Christianity The ‘nones’ are rising in Britain—in a slow, unplanned and almost unnoticed revolu- tion. It has been happening for a long time, but the tipping point came only very recently, the point at which a majority of UK adults described their affiliation as ‘no religion’ rather than ‘Christian’. This article explores the significance of this change. It starts by reviewing exactly what has happened, considers who the nones are, and suggests why the shift has occurred.
    [Show full text]
  • What Counts As Religion in Sociology?
    What Counts as Religion in Sociology? What Counts as Religion in Sociology? The problem of religiosity in sociological methodology Erika Willander Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in University Main Buildning, hall IX, Biskopsgatan 3, Uppsala, Friday, 26 September 2014 at 14:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Professor James A Beckford (University of Warwick ). Abstract Willander, E. 2014. What Counts as Religion in Sociology? The Problem of Religiosity in Sociological Methodology. 271 pp. Uppsala: Sociologiska institutionen. ISBN 978-91-506-2409-0. This thesis aims to contribute to the ongoing critical discussion within the sociology of reli- gion by focusing on the seldom considered perspective of methodology. As such, it consists of a theoretical part that problematizes the ways in which religion has been analyzed, and an empirical part that develops how religiosity can be approached in sociological studies. The thesis seeks, in other words, to contribute to how sociologists analyze religion, and addresses a research problem that has gained new relevance in the aftermath of criticism of the seculari- zation paradigm. In the theoretical part, the assumptions underlying the ways in which reli- gion is studied are revisited, as is the impact that these have had as faras the empirical study of religion is concerned in one of the countries often assumed to be secularized – i.e. Sweden. The empirical part of the thesis is comprised of three studies based on the latest European Value Survey, qualitative interviews and the Blogosphere on religion-related content (n=220000 blog posts).
    [Show full text]
  • NEW AGE to POSTMODERN AGE the Cultural Location of Metaphysical Belief Submitted for the Award of Master of Arts in Communicatio
    NEW AGE TO POSTMODERN AGE the cultural location of metaphysical belief Submitted for the award of Master of Arts in Communication Studies (Research) to the School of Communications, Dublin City University. Fiona Smyth July, 2001 I hereby certify that this material, which I now submit for assessment on the programme of study leading to the award of Master of Arts in Communication Studies (Research) is entirely m y own work and has not been taken from the work of others save and to the extent that such work has been cited and acknowledged within the text of my work. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS With sincere thanks to my supervisor Dr. Bill Dorris for valued input and total support throughout this project. Thanks also to Dr. Bill Campbell for extending the co-operation of Manchester Metropolitan University and for helpful suggestions and recommendations made. Finally, thanks to all others who assisted in any way in the production of this thesis. TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION CHAPTER ONE - THE NE W AGE 1.1 INTRODUCTION 1.1.1 2 1.1. 2.................................................. 4 1.2 ROOTS OF THE NE W AGE - THE OCCULT METAPHYSICAL TRADITION 1.2.1 6 1.2. 2 8 1.2. 3.................................................. 8 1.2.4 .................................................. 9 1.3 THE MODERN NEW AGE 1.3. 1.................................................. 12 1.3. 2.................................................. 14 1.3. 3.................................................. 15 1.3. 4.................................................. 16 1.4 COMMON BELIEFS OF THE MOVEMENT 20 1.5 THE EMERGING CULTURE OF THE NE W AGE 1.5. 1.................................................. 24 1.5. 2.................................................. 25 1.5.3 .................................................. 26 1.5.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001-2
    Faculty of Social and Political Sciences Address: Free School Lane Cambridge CB2 3RQ Telephone: 01223 334520 Fax: 01223 334550 E-mail: General Enquiries: sps-enquiries@lists.cam.ac.uk Postgraduate Admissions: sps-graduates@lists.cam.ac.uk www: www.sps.cam.ac.uk Report by the Head of Department of Social and Political Sciences • ♦ • The Faculty was successful in achieving 23 out of 24 in the Quality Assurance Agency Teaching Review undertaken in October 2001. The positive outcome was the result of the collective effort of academic, administrative staff and students. The result was particularly gratifying, given the problems faced by staff as a result of the complaint from students which was investigated over the Long Vacation of 2001. The Faculty had recovered remarkably well from the trials of the Lent and Easter term in order to put in a sustained effort in the QAA exercise. The Faculty was very grateful for the support of members of the University who helped to prepare the Faculty for the assessment especially Duncan McCallum, Education Section. The Faculty was also gratified by the success achieved in the Research Assessment Exercise where the Faculty received a four for the Politics’ submission with the Centre for International Studies and Sociology and Social Psychology were pleased to receive a five. Although there is much controversy surrounding both forms of assessment in teaching and research, the Faculty emerged from the QAA and RAE with considerable success. The results of the RAE had a profound effect on the following second and third term of the academic year. The Politics Group considered that their result reflected the difficult conditions of formulating a research policy with good results when the two groups did not work more closely together.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Grief: Minority Populations Mourn Diana’, in Steinberg, D
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/50750 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. Mourning Identities: Hillsborough, Diana and the Production of Meaning by Michael J. Brennan A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Warwick Department of Sociology September 2003 Contents Introduction 1 Shifting Focus, Shifting Orientation 1 Biography of the Project 2 The Hillsborough Disaster and the Death of Princess Diana 7 The Inter-Disciplinary and Multi-Method Approach of the Project 10 Outline of the Chapters 16 Chapter 1: Approaches to Death, Dying and Bereavement 22 The Denial and Revival of death 26 Death and Contemporary Social Theory 33 Death Studies: Academic Specialism or Thanatological Ghetto 47 Towards the ‘Sociological Private’ 54 Chapter 2: Mourning, Identity and the Work of the Unconscious 60 The Scandal of Reason: Freud’s Copernican Revolution 65 Misogyny and Medical Discourse: Feminist Critiques of Freud 71 Mortido Destrudo: Freud’s Detour of Theory From Eros to Thanatos 74 Mourning, Loss and the Work of Mourning 82 Kleinian Object-Relations and the Internalisation of ‘Things’ 94 Kristeva and
    [Show full text]
  • Women on the Path of the Goddess: Sacred Technologies of the Everyday
    Women on the Path of the Goddess: Sacred Technologies of the Everyday By Åsa Trulsson Abstract Contemporary spiritualties are often portrayed as a turn to a subjective and individualized form of religion, consisting of individually held truth claims or private peak experiences that are generated sporadically at retreats and workshops. The portrayal is ultimately related to a perception of everyday life in contemporary Euro-America as mundane, rationalized, and secular, but also the exclusion of practices centered on the body, the home and the everyday from what is deemed properly religious. This article explores the sacred technologies of the everyday among women in England who identify as Goddess worshippers. The purpose is to further the understanding of religion and the everyday, as well as the conceptualization of contemporary Goddess-worship as lived religion. Through examining narratives on the intersection between religion and everyday activities, the technologies of imbuing everyday life with a sacred dimension become visible. The sacred technologies imply skills that enable both imagining and relating to the sacred. The women consciously and diligently work to cultivate skills that would allow them to sense and make sense of the sacred, in other words, to foster a sense of withness through the means of a host of practices. I argue that the women actively endeavor to establish an everyday world that is experienced as inherently different from the secular and religious fields in their surroundings; hence it is not from disenchantment or an endeavor with no social consequences. The women’s everyday is indeed infused with different strategies where the body, different practices, and material objects are central in cultivating a specific religious disposition that ultimately will change the way the women engage with and orient themselves in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sociology of Prayer: Dimensions and Mechanisms
    social sciences $€ £ ¥ Article The Sociology of Prayer: Dimensions and Mechanisms Paul Froese * and Rory Jones Department of Sociology, Baylor University, One Bear Place #97326, Waco, TX 76798, USA; rory_jones@baylor.edu * Correspondence: Paul_Froese@baylor.edu Abstract: The sociology of prayer has a long history and routinely stresses the centrality of prayer to religious belief and ritual solidarity. Still, we have struggled to clearly define the parameters of prayer and the various components of this ubiquitous practice. Drawing from a comprehensive literature review of prayer research, we propose that there are four conceptually distinct dimensions of the private prayer experience which vary across religious cultures and traditions; they are (1) the quantity of prayer, (2) the style of prayer, (3) the purpose of prayer, and (4) prayer targets. Our proposed measures of these dimensions offer researchers a framework to better theorize and investigate the social mechanisms which produce variation in prayer as well as the individual and social outcomes of prayer. In particular, we discuss how each prayer dimension fits within specific theoretical framings to better test the extent to which the emotional, rational, and behavioral elements matter to prayer outcomes. Keywords: prayer; mechanisms; framework; ritual; belief; religion 1. Introduction A vast majority of humans pray daily. From folk to high church religions, prayer is a constant across religious history (Levin and Taylor 1997; Bellah 2011). In general, we know that prayer is a source of social solidarity and conflict (Layman 2001; O’Reilly 1995), an individual and collective ritual which creates an ongoing symbolic interaction with the Citation: Froese, Paul, and Rory divine realm (Collins 2004; Draper 2019), and a mechanism which enhances confidence in Jones.
    [Show full text]