DOCSLIB.ORG

Rise in Microsurgical Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction in Academic Medical Practices Chanukya R

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rise in Microsurgical Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction in Academic Medical Practices Chanukya R RESEARCH ARTICLE Rise in Microsurgical Free-Flap Breast Reconstruction in Academic Medical Practices Chanukya R. Dasari, MD,* Sven Gunther, MS,* David H. Wisner, MD,* David T. Cooke, MD,* Christopher K. Gold, MD,† and Michael S. Wong, MD* annually from 1998 to 2008, whereas autologous reconstructions de- Background: Previous studies have examined national trends in breast recon- creased by 5% per year.1 Immediate reconstructions, mostly implant struction, using various data sets demonstrating increases in implant-based recon- based, also increased by 5% yearly, with a near-doubling reported in a struction and decreases in autologous reconstruction. However, academic breast Surveillance, Epidemiology, End-Results database analysis.2 Associ- reconstruction practices have never been specifically characterized. The University — ated with this trend, a growing incidence of elective mastectomy and Health Consortium Association of American Medical Colleges Faculty contralateral prophylactic surgery in lieu of breast conservation has Practice Solutions Center database contains comprehensive, factual billing been described in several large studies.3,4 and coding data from 90 academic medical centers in the United States, Implant-based reconstructions are often an attractive option for and has been used to characterize practice patterns of various academic patients and practitioners. Primary implant reconstructions are gener- surgical specialties. ally less technically challenging, requiring less intraoperative time, with Objective: To describe breast reconstruction trends unique to academic surgical more favorable insurance reimbursement when compared to autologous practices, using the Faculty Practice Solutions Center database. reconstructions.1 More rapid postoperative recovery and avoidance of Methods: Annual data for defined breast reconstruction procedures (current donor site morbidity are also reasons that may help explain the greater procedural terminology codes: 19340, 19342, 19357, 19361, 19364, 19366, number of practices offering only implant-based reconstruction versus 19367, 19369, and 19380) performed by university plastic surgeons during the full spectrum of autologous reconstructions and microvascular calendar years 2007 to 2013 were included in the study. free flaps.5 Results: From 2007 to 2013, a 2-fold increase in the number of breast reconstruc- However, breast implants have negative implications. Over time, tion procedures was observed (from a mean of 45.3 to 94.2 procedures per implant-based reconstructions can develop capsular contracture, rip- surgeon). During this period, implant-based reconstructions and autologous 6 – – pling, implant migration, asymmetry, and implant rupture. In contrast, reconstructions rose in tandem (28.9 44.6 and 11.4 19.3, respectively), with a autologous reconstructions age more naturally with the patient and may preserved 2.5:1 ratio between the 2 categories each year. When compared to even look better over time. Recent investigations into patient education reconstructions overall, the proportion of both implant reconstruction and protocols have demonstrated a greater proportion of patients with a autologous reconstruction procedures declined, since revision and other types stated preference for autologous repairs in clinical settings.7 of reconstructions increased (11% of all reconstructions in 2007 vs 32% in For revision reconstructions of previous implant-based repairs, 2013). With regard to autologous reconstruction, microsurgical free flaps (mostly various modalities are used including autologous tissue transfer, fat comprised of deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps) have supplanted grafting, implant exchange, and placement of acellular dermal matrix. latissimus flaps as the favored modality and comprised 13% to 14% of breast The use of microvascular techniques and specifically, deep inferior reconstruction cases overall from 2011 to 2013. epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flaps for revision reconstruction is Conclusion: In contrast to national trends, university-based plastic surgeons are also well documented.8,9 In various contexts, microsurgical free flaps performing a growing number of microsurgical free flaps as the preferred method are associated with high patient satisfaction and favorable aesthetic for autologous breast reconstruction. Whereas implant-based reconstructions outcomes.10–12 The effect has been that practices offering free flap still predominate in academic practices, the trend of increasing preference expertise have evolved into referral hubs for all types of breast toward implant-based reconstructions has slowed in recent years and revision therapy.13 Characterizing these practices can help us understand the reconstructions are on the rise. recent impact of changing patients' preferences for primary reconstruc- Key Words: microsurgery, free flap, DIEP, perforator, autologous, breast tion and emerging strategies for revision reconstruction. reconstruction, academic surgery (Ann Plast Surg 2015;74: S62–S65) OBJECTIVE The objective of this paper was to analyze breast reconstruction BACKGROUND practices of academic plastic surgeons using the Faculty Practice Solu- tions Center (FPSC) database. The University Health Consortium— Recent papers on breast reconstruction practices highlight the Association of American Medical Colleges maintains the FPSC database, national trend toward implant-based reconstructions. In the Nationwide which contains comprehensive coding and billing data from 90 aca- Inpatient Sample (NIS), implant-based reconstructions rose by 11% demic medical centers (comprising more than two thirds of qualifying institutions), encompassing all procedures performed at these facilities for all payer types in both inpatient and outpatient settings by individual specialty. Roughly 300 plastic surgeons (full-time, part-time, and ad- junct faculty) are represented. Previously, the FPSC database has been Received July 24, 2014, and accepted for publication, after revision, December 31, 2014. 14,15 From the *Division of Plastic Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, used to characterize practice patterns of other surgical specialties. CA; and †Division of Plastic Surgery, Travis Air Force Base, Fairfield, CA. Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared. Reprints: Michael S. Wong, MD, Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, MATERIALS AND METHODS University of California Davis Medical Center, 2221 Stockton Blvd, Suite 2123, Annual data for defined breast procedures [current procedural Sacramento, CA 95817. E-mail: [email protected]. Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. terminology codes: 19316, 19318, 19324, 19325, 19328, 19330, ISSN: 0148-7043/15/7401–S062 19340, 19342, 19350, 19355, 19357, 19361, 19364, 19366, 19367, DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000483 19369, 19370, 19371, 19380, and 19399] performed by university S62 www.annalsplasticsurgery.com Annals of Plastic Surgery • Volume 74, Supplement 1, May 2015 Copyright © 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. Annals of Plastic Surgery • Volume 74, Supplement 1, May 2015 Rise in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction TABLE 1. Breast Reconstruction Procedures by CPT Code (FPSC) Mean Annual Procedures Per Surgeon Breast Reconstruction Type 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Implant 28.9 30.8 28.0 41.9 42.7 42.8 44.6 19340—Immediate breast prosthesis 15.4 17.8 16.2 5.7 6.0 7.4 9.1 19342—Delayed breast prosthesis 10.5 10.2 9.1 10.9 11.8 9.2 8.4 19357—Tissue expander, immediate or delayed 2.9 2.8 2.8 25.3 24.9 26.1 27.1 Autologous 11.4 15.7 15.1 12.9 16.9 17.0 19.3 19361—Latissimus flap 9.4 12.9 12.6 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.9 19364—Free flap, microvascular 0.2 0.2 0.3 7.1 10.9 11.6 12.5 19367—TRAM flap, single pedicle 0.2 0.3 0.2 2.6 2.5 1.9 1.9 19369—TRAM flap, double pedicle 1.7 2.2 2.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 1.0 Miscellaneous 5.0 3.9 3.8 16.5 22.7 20.8 30.3 19380—Revision reconstruction 0.0 0.0 0.0 14.9 21.0 19.8 22.1 19366—Reconstruction, other technique 5.0 3.9 3.8 1.6 1.7 1.0 8.2 Total 45.3 50.4 47.0 71.3 82.4 80.6 94.2 plastic surgeons during calendar years 2007 to 2013 were included in the previously dominated by latissimus flaps, was more recently comprised study. Both average frequency numbers and average annual work relative primarily of microvascular free flap repairs with the highest reported value units (wRVUs) from the FPSC are presented here. mean of 12.5 procedures per surgeon in 2013. The miscellaneous cate- More recent data from the NIS from 2008 to 2011 are also cross- gory in Table 1 includes revision reconstructions and reconstructions referenced to examine the proportional makeup of microvascular using other techniques without specific designation of implant-based or free-flap breast reconstruction subtypes such as free transverse rectus autologous methods in each. In more recent years, from 2010 to 2013, abdominis myocutaneous flap (TRAM), DIEP, superficial inferior the number of revision reconstructions increased from 14.9 to 22.1 proce- epigastric artery, gluteal artery perforator, and other perforator free dures per surgeon and comprised 20% to 25% of the total breast recon- flaps. No individual CPT codes exist for these procedures; all are struction procedures overall. Supercharged TRAM with microvascular included under the general CPT code of 19364 for microsurgical anastomosis (CPT 19368) failed to reach a notable threshold (at least free tissue reconstruction of the breast. The NIS, from 2008
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Options a Guide to Reconstruction for Breast Cancer
    Your Options A Guide to Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Options In this booklet Introduction to Breast Reconstruction ................................................................ 3 How to Make a Decision .............................................................................. 4 UMHS Team .......................................................................................... 6 Reconstruction Options Implants ........................................................................................... 7 Natural Tissue and Implants ....................................................................... 10 Lat Dorsi (Latissimus Dorsi) Flap Natural Tissue Reconstruction .................................................................... 11 Abdomen • Pedicled TRAM (Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous) Flap • Free TRAM (Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous) Flap • Free Muscle-Sparing TRAM (Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous) Flap • Free DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator) Flap • Free SIEA (Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery) Flap Alternative Donor Sites ........................................................................... 15 SGAP (Superior Gluteal Artery Perforator) Flap TUG (Transverse Upper Gracilis) Flap Additional Surgeries After Reconstruction ........................................................ 17 • Nipple Reconstruction • Breast Lift, Augmentation, Reduction Terms to Know .................................................................................... 19 “I’m a wife and mother and I
    [Show full text]
  • Autologous Breast Reconstruction Performance Measurement Set
    AMERICAN SOCIETY OF PLASTIC SURGEONS (ASPS) Autologous Breast Reconstruction Performance Measurement Set ASPS Approved : October, 2017 ©2017 American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer: These Performance Measures and related data specifications were developed by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS) through a multi-disciplinary physician workgroup and are based on a systematic review of published literature and/or relevant clinical practice guidelines to facilitate quality improvement activities by physicians. These Performance Measures are not clinical guidelines and do not establish a standard of medical care, and have not been tested for all potential applications. They are not intended to establish fixed protocols, but rather to serve as metrics by which a health care provider’s or facility’s performance may be compared with national benchmarks. Patient care and treatment should always be based on the clinician’s independent medical judgment, given the individual patient’s clinical circumstances. The Performance Measures, while copyrighted, can be reproduced and distributed, without modification, for noncommercial purposes, for example, use by health care providers in connection with their practices. Commercial use is defined as the sale, license, or distribution of the Measures for commercial gain, or incorporation of the Measures into a product or service that is sold, licensed or distributed for commercial gain. Commercial uses of the Performance Measures require a license agreement between the user and the ASPS. The ASPS nor its members shall be responsible for any use of the Performance Measures. CPT copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. CPT is a registered trademark of the American Medical Association.
    [Show full text]
  • IN-NETWORK EXCEPTIONS for BREAST RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY FOLLOWING MASTECTOMY Policy Number: ADMINISTRATIVE 202.14 T2 Effective Date: April 1, 2018
    UnitedHealthcare® Oxford Administrative Policy IN-NETWORK EXCEPTIONS FOR BREAST RECONSTRUCTION SURGERY FOLLOWING MASTECTOMY Policy Number: ADMINISTRATIVE 202.14 T2 Effective Date: April 1, 2018 Table of Contents Page Related Policies INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE .......................................... 1 Breast Reconstruction Post Mastectomy CONDITIONS OF COVERAGE ...................................... 1 Requests for In-Network Exceptions PURPOSE ................................................................ 2 Timeframe Standards for Utilization Management BENEFIT CONSIDERATIONS ...................................... 2 (UM) Initial Decisions DEFINITIONS .......................................................... 2 POLICY ................................................................... 3 APPLICABLE CODES ................................................. 5 ATTACHMENTS ........................................................ 7 REFERENCES ........................................................... 7 POLICY HISTORY/REVISION INFORMATION ................. 7 INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE This Clinical Policy provides assistance in interpreting Oxford benefit plans. Unless otherwise stated, Oxford policies do not apply to Medicare Advantage members. Oxford reserves the right, in its sole discretion, to modify its policies as necessary. This Clinical Policy is provided for informational purposes. It does not constitute medical advice. The term Oxford includes Oxford Health Plans, LLC and all of its subsidiaries as appropriate for these policies. When deciding
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Reconstruction Post Mastectomy and Poland Syndrome – Commercial Coverage Determination Guideline
    UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Coverage Determination Guideline Breast Reconstruction Post Mastectomy and Poland Syndrome Guideline Number: CDG.003.17 Effective Date: July 1, 2021 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Related Commercial Policies Coverage Rationale ........................................................................... 1 • Breast Reduction Surgery Documentation Requirements......................................................... 3 • Breast Repair/Reconstruction Not Following Definitions ........................................................................................... 4 Mastectomy Applicable Codes .............................................................................. 5 • Cosmetic and Reconstructive Procedures References ......................................................................................... 9 • Durable Medical Equipment, Orthotics, Medical Guideline History/Revision Information ......................................... 9 Supplies and Repairs/ Replacements Instructions for Use .........................................................................10 • Gender Dysphoria Treatment • Pneumatic Compression Devices • Prosthetic Devices, Wigs, Specialized, Microprocessor or Myoelectric Limbs • Skin and Soft Tissue Substitutes Community Plan Policy • Breast Reconstruction Post Mastectomy and Poland Syndrome Coverage Rationale Indications for Coverage The following are eligible for coverage as reconstructive and medically necessary: In accordance with Women’s Health and Cancer Rights
    [Show full text]
  • Using Your Own Tissue to Rebuild Your Breast
    WEBINAR TRANSCRIPT Breast Reconstruction Series, Part 2: Using Your Own Tissue to Rebuild Your Breast Karen M. Horton, MD, MSc, FACS, FRCSC February 25, 2015 OPERATOR programs and strategic initiatives at LBBC. I’m very privileged to Greetings, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Living serve as your moderator. Beyond Breast Cancer webinar. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will At LBBC, we know that for some women, breast reconstruction follow the formal presentation. plays a very important role in your emotional recovery from breast cancer treatment. We also know that many If anyone should require operator or technical assistance during women have a hard time getting timely, useful and practical the conference, please press “star, 0” on your telephone keypad. information about making what can be very complicated As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. decisions about rebuilding your breast or breasts, whether you’re choosing to do that at the time of your breast cancer It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Ms. Janine surgery or in the months and years afterward. Our goal today Guglielmino. Thank you. You may begin. is to give you some background to help inform these important and complicated decisions. JANINE E. GUGLIELMINO, MA Thanks, Diego, and hi, everyone. Welcome to part 2 of Living Just to give you a sense of what we’re hoping to cover today, Beyond Breast Cancer’s February webinar series focusing on we’ll talk about rebuilding the breast using your own body breast reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Reconstruction
    Understanding Breast Reconstruction Preparing for Your Options Operation and Managing Your Post-Surgical Recovery Understanding Breast Reconstruction Options: Preparing for Your Operation and Managing Your Post-Surgical Recovery Although you may be going through a difficult time right now, with a new diagnosis of breast cancer, or a strong family history of breast cancer, many decisions have to be made regarding your treatment plan and surgical options. Successful surgery requires a partnership between the patient and the surgeon. Your surgeon will discuss with you and your family, if you so desire, the options available to you for breast reconstruction. The goal of this book is to help you make decisions about what type of surgery you and your doctor choose, anticipate what will occur with each surgery and help manage the post-operative care required. There are multiple options regarding breast reconstruction and with each of these come unique issues and questions. This book will help answer those questions and act as a reference manual for you. What questions aren’t answered here can be answered by our professional team of nurses, doctors, and staff. This book will be continually updated to encompass all frequently asked questions and concerns. We will also use web based mate - Thank you to the following contributors: rials to continually enhance the education and resources available Dunya Atisha, MD to our patients. Deniz Dayicioglu, MD Gerard C. Mosiello, MD This guide will be useful to you throughout your reconstruc - Paul Smith, MD tion process. The Plastic Surgery Team at Moffitt Cancer Center is Karen Wells, MD dedicated to restoring a healthy body image through the most Lisa Fox, RN, CPSN, OCN ® advanced techniques in breast reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • UNC Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Breast Reconstruction Facts and Patient Information
    UNC Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Breast Reconstruction Facts and Patient Information What is Breast Reconstruction? Breast reconstruction is achieved through several plastic surgery techniques that attempt to restore a breast to near normal shape, appearance and size following mastectomy. Although breast reconstruction can rebuild your breast, the results are highly variable: A reconstructed breast will not have the same sensation and feel as the breast it replaces. Visible incision lines will always be present on the breast, whether from reconstruction or mastectomy. Certain surgical techniques will leave incision lines at the donor site, commonly located in less exposed areas of the body such as the back, abdomen or buttocks. A note about symmetry: If only one breast is affected, it alone may be reconstructed. In addition, a breast lift, breast reduction or breast augmentation may be recommended for the opposite breast to improve symmetry of the size and position of both breasts. Breast Reconstruction Risks and Safety The decision to have breast reconstruction surgery is extremely personal. Breast reconstruction is not required. You may choose to wear a prosthesis in your bra for symmetry. Insurance commonly pays for prosthetics. You’ll have to decide if the benefits will achieve your goals and if the risks and potential complications are acceptable. Your plastic surgeon and/or staff will explain in detail the risks associated with surgery. You will be asked to sign consent forms to ensure that you fully understand the procedures you will undergo and any risks or potential complications. The possible risks of breast reconstruction include, but are not limited to, bleeding, infection, poor healing of incisions, possible need for revision(s), and anesthesia risks.
    [Show full text]
  • DIEP Flap Reconstruction for Breast Cancer Patients
    DIEP flap reconstruction for breast cancer patients Information for patients This sheet answers common questions about breast reconstruction with DIEP flap surgery. If you would like further information, or have any particular worries, please do not hesitate to ask your specialist nurse or consultant plastic surgeon. In all cases, a doctor will explain the procedure to you and answer any questions you may have. In most cases it will be possible for a friend or relative to accompany you for all or part of the procedure. Please ask your nurse or doctor. What types of reconstruction can be performed after breast cancer? There are two main types of breast reconstruction. Surgeons can use a ‘flap’ of your own tissues from elsewhere on your body, known as an autologous reconstruction, or use a breast implant to recreate the volume of the missing breast. This leaflet explains the procedure for breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap. What is the DIEP flap? DIEP stands for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. DIEP flap surgery involves taking tissue from the abdomen with its blood supply to reconstruct the breast. This is a long microsurgical procedure that can take up to six to eight hours. Its advantages include replacing like with like tissues that have the same consistency and feel as your own breast tissue. Furthermore, the tissues will change as your body gains or loses weight. In contrast, a breast implant reconstruction may eventually need replacing as it is a foreign body. 1 How is a DIEP flap procedure performed? This procedure usually involves two surgeons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Patient Journey in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
    FEATURE The patient journey in DIEP flap breast reconstruction BY OLIVIER ALEXANDRE BRANFORD AND PAUL ANTHONY HARRIS n the UK approximately 40,000 transverse rectus abdominis muscle pathway and results in a flap success women are diagnosed with (TRAM) free flap and the deep inferior rate of 99.5%. We describe the breast cancer every year. About epigastric perforator (DIEP) free flap, protocol here. 40% of these need, or choose, named after the vascular pedicle that I Immediate versus delayed to undergo mastectomy, where all perfuses it. These procedures harvest of the breast tissue is removed. an ellipse of lower abdominal tissue reconstruction Currently around a third of these and the flap is then transferred to the For most women the whole process of patients choose to undergo breast chest. Unlike the TRAM flap, where diagnosis, mastectomy, reconstruction, reconstruction, two thirds of these at one rectus abdominis muscle is taken, recovery and other treatments such the time of mastectomy (immediate the DIEP procedure spares the rectus as chemotherapy or radiotherapy can reconstruction) and the rest later abdominis muscle which helps to be a very daunting rollercoaster. It is (delayed reconstruction). All patients preserve abdominal strength, halving difficult to make big decisions during undergoing mastectomy should be the likelihood of a bulge or hernia, and this time, such as whether to have offered breast reconstruction as this shortens recovery time. Because of reconstruction at all, or whether to has been shown to increase patient this, the DIEP flap is now considered have reconstruction immediately or satisfaction [1]. the gold standard for free flap breast at a later time.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Anesthetic Blocks in Plastic Surgery Using Portable Ultrasound a Simplified Approach Christopher Homsy, MD, and John T
    CLINICAL PAPER Regional Anesthetic Blocks in Plastic Surgery Using Portable Ultrasound A Simplified Approach Christopher Homsy, MD, and John T. Lindsey, MD cesarean section, and among other procedures.1,8–11 In breast surgery, Background: With the introduction of latest generation ultrasound technology the introduction of PEC-1 block offered a promising and attractive alter- and its easy availability and portability, regional anesthetic blocks, which were native to the widely used paravertebral block.12–14 Regional blocks are formally in the domain of anesthesiologists, have now become available to prac- widely used in other specialties and have become a component of many ticing plastic surgeons. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for other Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols.15–23 PEC-1 specialties such as orthopedics and colorectal surgery have incorporated regional blocks were introduced in 2012 by Blanco.24 This has been followed anesthetic blocks. These regional blocks have been shown to be effective in im- by other regional thoracic blocks including the serratus anterior plane proving the patient comfort and experience and decreasing reliance on (SAP) block.25–28 opioid medications. In contrast to the previously mentioned specialties, regional Methods: Patients scheduled for elective plastic surgery received PEC-1, serratus blocks have not been routinely used in plastic and reconstructive sur- anterior plane, or transversus abdominis plane blocks as indicated for the proposed gery; however, a recent report by Temple-Oberle et al21 demonstrated procedure. All blocks were performed under ultrasound guidance using the Philips the efficacy of TAP blocks in reducing length of stay in patients under- Lumify system with the linear array 12-4 probe by the operating surgeon.
    [Show full text]
  • Contralateral Breast Symmetrisation in Unilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction
    This is a repository copy of Contralateral breast symmetrisation in unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/105539/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Wade, RG orcid.org/0000-0001-8365-6547, Marongiu, F, Sassoon, EM et al. (3 more authors) (2016) Contralateral breast symmetrisation in unilateral DIEP flap breast reconstruction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, 69 (10). pp. 1363-1373. ISSN 1748-6815 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2016.06.009 © 2016 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Reuse Unless indicated otherwise, fulltext items are protected by copyright with all rights reserved. The copyright exception in section 29 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 allows the making of a single copy solely for the purpose of non-commercial research or private study within the limits of fair dealing. The publisher or other rights-holder may allow further reproduction and re-use of this version - refer to the White Rose Research Online record for this item. Where records identify the publisher as the copyright holder, users can verify any specific terms of use on the publisher’s website. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Title Contralateral Breast Symmetrisation in Unilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Running Head Contralateral Symmetrisation in Unilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction Authors Ryckie G Wade MBBS MClinEd MRCS FHEA 1, 2 Francesco Marongiu MD 1 Elaine Sassoon AB FRCS(Plast) 1 Richard Haywood MBBS FRCS(Plast) 1 Rozina Ali BSc MBBS MD FRCS(Plast) 1 Andrea Figus MD PhD FEBOPRAS 1, 3 Institutions 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Breast Reconstruction Program
    www.myreconstruction.ca facebook.com/UHN.BRP twitter.com/UHN_BRP youtube.com/user/UHNBRP mission statement Our mission is to provide excellence in state of the art reconstructive procedures and comprehensive surgical and nursing care to women confronted with breast cancer. Please visit our website: www.myreconstruction.ca Please recycle this booklet. Once you are finished reading it, give it to someone else who you think may read it. Otherwise, please return to the offices of Dr.’s Zhong, Hofer, O’Neill and Haykal so another patient can benefit. dear patient... This booklet was made for women who are thinking about breast reconstruction, either after a mastectomy as part of the surgical treatment of breast cancer or removal of all or some of the breast tissue and nipple as a preventative measure (prophylactic mastectomy) for women who carry a BRCA gene mutation. Breast reconstruction is a personal choice, and there are several options available. This booklet is made to give you information to help in your decision-making, and to be used with information you will get at your consultation with a plastic surgeon. This is a service that is covered under Provincial Health Insurance for all Canadians. If you would like to make an appointment with a plastic and reconstructive surgeon at Toronto General Hospital, please ask your oncologist or breast surgeon to call us at 416-340-3449, 416-340-3858, 416-340-3143 or 416 340 4327 or fax a referral to 416-340-4403. Sincerely UHN Breast Reconstruction Program a personal choice Breast reconstruction is an option available to most women faced with the physical changes after a mastectomy.
    [Show full text]