Sugarbush Resort Vegetation Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sugarbush Resort Vegetation Management Plan Sugarbush Resort Vegetation Management Plan November 2008 Prepared for: Sugarbush Resort Prepared by: Images courtesy of Sugarbush Resort, Sandy Macys and SE GROUP . Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of Report ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Area ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Goals and Objectives ............................................................................................................................ 1 2.1 Preservation of Existing Thrush Habitat ....................................................................................... 1 2.2 Restoration and Maintenance of Native Plant Communities ..................................................... 2 2.3 Wildlife Habitat Management .......................................................................................................... 2 3.0 Regulatory Framework ......................................................................................................................... 2 3.1 Consistency with Green Mountain Forest Plan and USFS Policy and Guidelines ..................... 2 3.2 Consistency with Sugarbush MDP ..................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Private Land Management ................................................................................................................... 3 4.0 Site Characterization ............................................................................................................................. 3 4.1 Site History ......................................................................................................................................... 3 4.2 Description of Existing Vegetation Communities ....................................................................... 4 4.3 Bicknell’s Thrush Habitat Assessment ........................................................................................... 7 4.4 Species and Habitats of Interest ...................................................................................................... 9 5.0 Assessment of Previous Revegetation Efforts ................................................................................ 10 6.0 Identification of areas for Regeneration and For Preservation of Bicknell’s thrush Habitat .. 11 7.0 Vegetation Management Guidelines ................................................................................................. 12 7.1 Prescription Selection ..................................................................................................................... 12 7.2 General Forest Zone Management ............................................................................................... 15 7.2.1 Zone A – Bicknell’s Thrush Habitat .................................................................................... 15 7.2.2 Zone B – Non-Bicknell Thrush Habitat ............................................................................. 15 7.2.3 Prescription Definitions (Zone A and Zone B) ................................................................. 15 7.2.4 Prescriptions for Vegetation Management Zone A (Bicknell’s Thrush Habitat) .......... 17 7.2.5 Prescriptions for Vegetation Management Zone B (Non-Bicknell’s Thrush Habitat) . 25 7.3 Rotational Management of Tree Skiing Terrain ......................................................................... 32 7.4 Revegetation Guidelines ................................................................................................................. 32 7.5 Non-native Invasive Species Management .................................................................................. 33 7.6 Discussion of Preservation and Enhancement Methodologies and Expected Plant Community Succession .............................................................................................................................. 33 7.6.1 Regeneration Methodologies ................................................................................................. 33 7.6.2 Plant and Seed Suppliers ........................................................................................................ 33 8.0 Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................................ 34 8.1 Methods ............................................................................................................................................ 35 8.1.1 Protocol .................................................................................................................................... 35 8.1.1.1 Stem Density ....................................................................................................................... 35 8.1.1.2 Aerial Coverage ................................................................................................................... 35 8.1.2 Performance Standards .......................................................................................................... 35 8.2 Contingency Measures .................................................................................................................... 36 8.3 Monitoring Term .............................................................................................................................37 9.0 References ............................................................................................................................................ 38 Sugarbush Resort page i Vegetation Management Plan November 2008 Figures Figure 1 – Vicinity Map Figure 2 – Existing Landcover Figure 3 – Proposed Facilities Figure 4 – Bicknell’s Thrush Habitat Assessment Figure 5 – Vegetation Management Zones Figure 6 – Vegetation Management Prescriptions – Zone A Figure 7 – Vegetation Management Prescriptions – Zone B Sugarbush Resort page ii Vegetation Management Plan November 2008 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Report Portions of Sugarbush Resort are located on National Forest System (NFS) lands and are operated under a Special Use Permit (SUP) issued by the Green Mountain National Forest (GMNF) and administered by the Eastern Region Winter Sports Team. The intent of this Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) is to guide the maintenance of existing winter and summer recreation trails (e.g., ski, mountain bike, hiking), the development of new trails, and management of all vegetation within all the SUP boundary. The management direction outlined in this VMP is intended to allow Sugarbush Resorts to maintain ski terrain and facilities while ensuring that maintenance activities are consistent with the objectives contained in Green Mountain National Forest 2006 Land and Resource Management Plan, hereafter referred to as the "Forest Plan". The VMP also includes direction for the management of vegetation during construction of new projects (e.g., new chairlifts, ski trails, and facilities) contained in the 1998 Final Environmental Impact Statement Proposed Improvement and Development at Sugarbush (USDA 1998), 2005 Amendments to the Master Development Plan (MDP) (SE GROUP 2005), any future NEPA decisions and Biological Assessment/Biological Evaluation updates. The VMP also includes guidance for managing vegetation around existing facilities and infrastructure, as well as on existing ski trails and tree skiing terrain. 1.2 Project Area Sugarbush Resort encompasses approximately 5,113.5 acres. On the Lincoln Peak side, there are 1,825 acres of NFS lands. On the Mt. Ellen side, there are 58 acres of NFS lands. Additionally, there is a 32-acre parcel of NFS land in the Slide Brook drainage area. The remaining 3,320.5 acres is comprised of private lands. This VMP provides direction for the management of vegetation within the entire Sugarbush Resort area, as identified in Figure 1 – Vicinity Map, regardless of ownership. Within the project area, developed facilities, ski, hiking and mountain bike trails support the winter and summer operations. 2.0 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The Forest Plan (USDA 2006) establishes goals and objectives for each land allocation and management area (MA). This VMP acknowledges the goals and objectives of the Forest Plan and has adapted the following overall goal: to balance the recreational needs of Sugarbush Resort with habitat management. This VMP intends to achieve this overall goal by incorporating the following objectives: 1) Preservation of existing Bicknell’s thrush habitat within the ski area boundary; 2) Restoration and maintenance of native plant communities; and 3) Overall habitat management for multiple species. 2.1 Preservation of Existing Thrush Habitat Consistent with the GMNF Bicknell’s Thrush Conservation Strategy, in instances where habitat removal or alteration (e.g., ski trail establishment or expansion) is proposed, a “no-net loss” mitigation process is Sugarbush Resort page 1 Vegetation Management Plan November 2008 warranted. Few timber harvesting operations occur in the montane fir-dominated forests preferred by Bicknell’s thrush, therefore the most promising opportunities on the GMNF for active management exist in areas of habitat that are currently developed for recreation, telecommunications,
Recommended publications
  • Download Bbmr/Ikon Waiver
    RELEASE OF LIABILITY, WAIVER OF CLAIMS, WARNING, ASSUMPTION OF RISK AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT BY SIGNING THIS AGREEMENT, YOU WILL WAIVE CERTAIN LEGAL RIGHTS, INCLUDING THE RIGHT TO SUE. THE EFFECT OF THIS AGREEMENT MAY VARY FROM JURISDICTION TO JURISDICTION. PLEASE READ CAREFULLY! “Activity” or “Activities” means skiing, snowboarding, ski/ride racing/competition, ski/ride school classes/clinics/lessons, guided tours, participation in special events, hiking, uphilling and any other use of Resort property or facilities, including, but not limited to, the use of terrain parks and features, chairlifts and other conveyances, buildings and premises, food and beverage and retail locations, use of Rental Equipment, ski/snowboard tuning and repair, vehicles, sidewalks, stairways, trails, parking lots, mountain coaster, alpine slide, ice skating, zip lines, climbing walls, trampolines and other amusement events or features, and Resort tubing areas. “Agreement” means this “Release of Liability, Waiver of Claims, Warning, Assumption of Risk and Indemnity Agreement.” “Equipment” means all equipment offered for use by Resorts including, but not limited to, rental skis or snowboard, boots, bindings, helmets, ski bikes, ice skates, tubing or exercise equipment or any other equipment. “Minor” or “Minor Participant” means the minor(s) participant(s) named below. “Releasors” means all participants signing this Agreement, as well as all participants on behalf of whom any signatory below is signing this Agreement, including without limitation Minor Participants.
    [Show full text]
  • Warren, Vermont
    VERMONT BI-CENrENNIAI. COMMEMORATIVE. s a special tribute to the Vermont State Bi-Centennial Celebration, the A Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Company has compiled a commemorative historical section for the 1991 telephone directory. Many hours of preparation went into this special edition and we hope that you will find it informative and entertaining. In 1979, we published a similar telephone book to honor the 75th year of business for the Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Company. Through the years, folks have hung onto these books and requests for additional copies continued long after our supply was drpleted. Should you desire additional copies of the 1991 edition, we invite you to pick them up at our Business Office, Waitstield Cable, or our nunierous directory racks in business and store locations throughout the Valley. Special thanks go out to the many people who authored the histories in this section and loaned us their treasured pictures. As you read these histories, please be sure to notice the credits after each section. Without the help of these generous people, this project would not have been possible. In the course of reading this historical section, other events and recollections may come to mind. likewise,, you may be able to provide further detail on the people and locations pictured in this collection. The Waitsfield-Fayston Telephone Company, through our interest in the Valley’s heritage, wishes to continue compiling historical documentation. We encourage you to share your thoughts, ideas and comments with us. @ HAPPY20oTH BIRTHDAYVERMONT!! VERMONT BICENTENNIAL, 1 VERMONYBI-CENTENNLAL CUMMEMORATWE @ IN THE BEGINNING@ f the Valley towns - Fayston, Moretown, Waitsfield and Warren - 0Moretown was the only one not chartered during the period between 1777 and 1791 when Vermont was an Independent Republic.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter 2020 Grant Proposals
    ** CONFIDENTIAL - PLEASE DO NOT FORWARD ** WINTER 2020 GRANT PROPOSALS Following are two-page summaries for each proposal on The Conservation Alliance Winter 2020 Ballot. Please review the grant proposals and project slideshow, and complete your online ballot by Friday, March 13, 2020. If you would like to learn more about the projects on the ballot, please join us for our Winter 2020 Ballot Education Webinar, Wednesday, February 26 at 11:00 AM PST. Click Here to Register Thank you for your help in making the grant decisions for this round of Conservation Alliance funding. If you have any questions, please contact Josie Norris at 541-389-2424. Below are the organizations included on the Winter 2020 ballot: 1. Adirondack Council - Campaign for the Follensby Pond Preserve 2. Alaska Wilderness League - Arctic National Wildlife Refuge Campaign 3. American Rivers - Protecting Western Montana's Last Best Wild Rivers 4. American Whitewater - Wild Olympics Campaign 5. Backcountry Hunters and Anglers - Advancing Collaborative Conservation Solutions for Montana's Blackfoot Clearwater Valleys 6. California Wilderness Coalition - Northwest California Mountains and Rivers, Central Cost Wild Heritage 7. Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society - British Columbia - Establishing the Dene K'eh Kusan Provincial Conservancy in Northern BC 8. Columbia Land Trust - Mount Hood Oaks Acquisition 9. Dolores River Boating Advocates - Delores River Canyon National Conservation Area Campaign Education and Outreach 10. Downeast Lakes Land Trust - Lakeville Forest Project 11. Habitat Acquisition Trust - Sc'ianew Indigenous Protected and Conserved Area: A Reconciliation Based Path to Conservation 12. Northeastern Minnesotan's for Wilderness - Campaign to Save the Boundary Waters 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Winooski River Watershed Fletcher 14 122
    Belvidere Albany Junction East Center 16 Albany Albany West Glover 118 Land Use/Land Cover East Eden 100 Fletcher Mills 91 West Eden Merrill UppFletcher r Winooski Watershed Planning Basin Glover Corner Huntsville 109 108 South North Waterville Albany VVeerrmmoonntt AAggeennccyy ooff NNCaambtrtidugue rraall RReessoouurrcceess Winooski River Watershed Fletcher 14 122 Department of Environmental Conservation North89 SandeDrson epartmBeinghnamvtille of Environmental Conservation Lake Hyde Corner Champlain Park 7 ORLEANS Mill COUNTY Village The Upper Winooski Watershed Planning Basin includes all waters contributing to the Winooski 16 mainstem above Bolton Falls Dam. The Winnoski Subbasin (02010003) has been divided LAMOILLE Craftsbury into Upper and Lower Basins for ANR planning purposes. COUNTY Common Cambridge Ithiel CHITTENDEN Junction Falls COUNTY The accuracy of the data layers shown on this map are limited byC tahme barcidcgueracy of the source mat1e0ri8als. Although every effort has been made to assure the accuracy 100C East 15 100 2 of features and their attributes, the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources is not responsible for errors in or misuse of the data. The information used in preparing East 2 89 Craftsbury the data layer repre10se4nts the best data possessed by the Vermont Agency of Natural Resources aJte tfhfeer stiomnev iollfe production. No warranty as to the accuracy or the 15 Johnson usefulness of the data is expressed or implied. Craftsbury Johnson Gebbie 89 Corner 2 Cartographer: Ryan Knox, 27th of February 2009 2
    [Show full text]
  • SURF ICILL GEOIJJGY of the LINCOLN MOUNTAIN Quadrangth, VERMONT by Parker E
    OPEN-FILE REPORT NO. X-2. SURF ICILL GEOIJJGY OF THE LINCOLN MOUNTAIN QUADRANGTh, VERMONT by Parker E. Calkin and Paul MacClint ock (A Report to the State Geologist of Vermont) INTRODUCTION Location The Lincoln Mountain quadrangle, covering an area of approximately 215 square miles, is defined by latitudes wt 00' and )41i 15' north and longitudes 72' bS' and 73° 00' west in central Vermont (fig. 1) • The area lies within parts of Addison, Washington, and Chittenden Counties. In this areaare the principal villages of Lincoln, Moretown, Irasvifle, Waitsfield, and Warren, as well as the lavish ski resorts of Sugarbush Valley. Pbysiographic and Geologic Setting The Lincoln Mountain quadrangle lies at the eastern edge of the Green Mountain physiographic province. In addition to the north-south oriented Green Mountain range proper, the quadrangle includes the Northfield Mountain ridge along the eastern edge, which is considered part of the Vermont Piedmont province. Peaks of the latter average between 2,400 and 3,000 feet while along the Green Mountains, the elevation reaches up to 14,013 feet above sea level at Lincoln Peak (fig. 2). Although the whole area has been covered by the continental ice sheet during the Pleistocene, the principal and most interesting glacial features - ol "- - IS H bO 2 / I; o c fl cJ•) •d d 0 Wa4 Li 1-fl W o 0 o d In ir ., rcj D 0 9/ fr6r4 I 00 w 4) ho 1'd 4 DD co 0 (1) c(1) hO CRE r-C3 -- 2 Li boo1 >1 d U A IV 'i 0 10 * Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sugar Mountain Sugar Mountain Ski School
    Sugar Mountain Ski School Banner Elk NC Sugar Mountain www.skisugar.com Phone # (828) 898-4521 Director: Len Bauer PSIA Event Registration Location (in most cases): Lift Opens: 9:00am Region 07 Main Base Lodge Snowsports School Staff Title Phone Email: Len Bauer Snowsports School Director (828) 898-4521 X200 [email protected] Witold Kosmala Trainer [email protected] Lifts Open: 9:00-4:30 & 6:00-10:00 Wkends 9:00-4:30 & 6:00-10:00 Park Kids Beginner Intermediate Advanced Skiing Season Nov-April Dec-March ________ Pipe Half Quarter Super Kids Estimated Estimated Other 1200 Snowmaking 100 % Vertical Trail Count 20 Group Packages Youth Senior's Closed these Children's Women's Full Season Programs Days Closed these Christmas Eve Nights PSIA-E / AASI offers this listing as a service to our members. We are not affiliated with any of these lodging locations, nor are we making any recommendations or endorsements Lodging Property Location Phone Website Email Best Western Plus Mountain Lodge Banner Elk 877-877-4553 www.bestwesternbannerelk.com [email protected] Sugar Ski & Country Club Banner ElkNC 800-634-1320 www.sugarmountain.com [email protected] Sugar Mountain Resort Banner ElkNC 800-438-4555 www.staysugarmountain.com [email protected] Sugar Mountain Lodging Banner ElkNC 800-858-9663 www.sugarmountainlodging.com [email protected] Valle Cruscis Bed & Breakfast Banner ElkNC 828-963-2525 www.vallecrucisbandb.com [email protected] Pineola Inn & Ski Shop PineolaNC 828-733-4979 www.pineolainn.com Hidden Valley Motel BooneNC 828-963-4372 www.hiddenvalleymotel.com [email protected] In addition to complimentary lift tickets, this resort offers PSIA-E / AASI Members the following discount while attending events.
    [Show full text]
  • Earned Media Report
    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MARKETING EARNED MEDIA RESULTS January 5, 2018 One National Life Dr, Davis Bldg, 6th Floor Montpelier, VT 05620 (802) 272-2399 | [email protected] When Phil Scott barrels his No. 14 stock car around Thunder Road outside his hometown of Barre, Vermont, it’s easy to assume the 59-year-old has a need for speed. After all, he’s raced motorcycles and snowmobiles everywhere from America’s Midwest to Ontario, Canada, amassing dozens of wins across a three-decade career. Ask Scott, though, and he’ll dig into the psychology, not the adrenaline rush: “There are some good drivers, and some not so good; some who are very emotional, some who are more patient than others. And then there are some who are driving over their head.” Soft- spoken and silver-haired, Scott couldn’t be more at home speaking from his crew’s garage: “It’s all about strategy. And trying to not over-drive the car.” Good advice for the racetrack, and a fitting allegory for Scott. In November, the driver won another race — this one to become the Republican governor of Vermont, in the backyard of Bernie, no less. Having served as lieutenant governor and a state senator, Scott advertised himself as a cautious driver, replacing Pete Shumlin, the Democrat governor who promised the moon with the nation’s first single-payer health care system and then failed to deliver. Scott’s campaign message was simple: Elect me, and I will make Vermont more affordable. Facing a revenue downgrade and a deficit upon taking office in January, his priorities have remained similarly mild-mannered while trying to reverse what he called the state’s “6-3-1” problem: six fewer workers, three fewer students and nearly one baby born into opioid- related addiction each day.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Brook and Clay Brook Water Quality Remediation Plan
    SUMMIT VENTURES NE, LLC SUGARBUSH RESORT Warren, Vermont WATER QUALITY REMEDIATION PLAN CLAY BROOK AND RICE BROOK WATERSHEDS October 15, 2008 SUMMIT VENTURES NE, LLC SUGARBUSH RESORT WATER QUALITY REMEDIATION PLAN CLAY BROOK AND RICE BROOK WATERSHEDS October 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................ I 1.0 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Water Quality Remediation Plan Overview ........................................................ 2 1.2.1 Watershed Delineation ...................................................................................... 4 1.2.2 Wash‐off Sediment Load Analysis .................................................................. 5 1.2.3 Hydrologic Modeling ........................................................................................ 5 1.2.4 Instream Survey and Reconnaissance ............................................................. 6 1.3 Water Quality Remediation Plan Components ................................................... 7 2.0 CLAY BROOK AND RICE BROOK WATERSHEDS .............................................. 8 2.1 Regional Setting ........................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Land Use / Land Cover ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Download It FREE Today! the SKI LIFE
    SKI WEEKEND CLASSIC CANNON November 2017 From Sugarbush to peaks across New England, skiers and riders are ready to rock WELCOME TO SNOWTOPIA A experience has arrived in New Hampshire’s White Mountains. grand new LINCOLN, NH | RIVERWALKRESORTATLOON.COM Arriving is your escape. Access snow, terrain and hospitality – as reliable as you’ve heard and as convenient as you deserve. SLOPESIDE THIS IS YOUR DESTINATION. SKI & STAY Kids Eat Free $ * from 119 pp/pn with Full Breakfast for Two EXIT LoonMtn.com/Stay HERE Featuring indoor pool, health club & spa, Loon Mountain Resort slopeside hot tub, two restaurants and more! * Quad occupancy with a minimum two-night Exit 32 off I-93 | Lincoln, NH stay. Plus tax & resort fee. One child (12 & under) eats free with each paying adult. May not be combined with any other offer or discount. Early- Save on Lift Tickets only at and late-season specials available. LoonMtn.com/Tickets A grand new experience has arrived in New Hampshire’s White Mountains. Arriving is your escape. Access snow, terrain and hospitality – as reliable as you’ve heard and as convenient as you deserve. SLOPESIDE THIS IS YOUR DESTINATION. SKI & STAY Kids Eat Free $ * from 119 pp/pn with Full Breakfast for Two EXIT LoonMtn.com/Stay HERE Featuring indoor pool, health club & spa, Loon Mountain Resort slopeside hot tub, two restaurants and more! We believe that every vacation should be truly extraordinary. Our goal Exit 32 off I-93 | Lincoln, NH * Quad occupancy with a minimum two-night stay. Plus tax & resort fee. One child (12 & under) is to provide an unparalleled level of service in a spectacular mountain setting.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying the Public Trust Doctrine to Snowmaking Alethea O'donnell
    Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review Volume 24 | Issue 1 Article 5 9-1-1996 Something Old, Something New: Applying the Public Trust Doctrine to Snowmaking Alethea O'Donnell Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Alethea O'Donnell, Something Old, Something New: Applying the Public Trust Doctrine to Snowmaking, 24 B.C. Envtl. Aff. L. Rev. 159 (1996), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/ealr/vol24/iss1/5 This Comments is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOMETHING OLD, SOMETHING NEW: APPLYING THE PUBLIC TRUST DOCTRINE TO SNOWMAKING Alethea O'DonneU* "By the law of nature these things are common to mankind-the air, running water, the sea and consequently the shores of the sea."! I. INTRODUCTION Skiing in America is big business.2 Many ski resorts are finding that because of tough competition from neighboring operations, they must expand their resorts with more trails, more lifts, and consequently, more snow.3 This increased competition, coupled with a decreased natural snowfall, has made ski resorts extremely dependent on snow­ making for their surviva1.4 Ski resorts have become so dependent on snowmaking, in fact, that without snowmaking, a ski resort in today's market probably would go out of business.5 Environmental groups allege that harmful environmental conse­ quences accompany the making of snow.6 In order to create a sufficient amount of snow to cover the ski slopes, a resort must draw water from some water source, such as a stream, pond, or lake.7 Environmental- * Managing Editor, 1996-1997, BOSTON COLLEGE ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS LAW REVIEW.
    [Show full text]
  • Spirit Mountain Task Force
    SPIRIT MOUNTAIN TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATIONS MARCH 2021 0 SPIRIT MOUNTAIN TASK FORCE MEMBERS Co-Chairs: City Councilor Arik Forsman, Parks, Libraries and Authorities Chair City Councilor Janet Kennedy, Fifth District Task Force Members: Matt Baumgartner Amy Brooks Barbara Carr Michele Dressel Mark Emmel Daniel Hartman Hansi Johnson Noah Kramer Dale Lewis Sam Luoma Chris Rubesch Scott Youngdahl Aaron Stolp, Spirit Mountain Recreation Area Authority Board Chair Wayne DuPuis, an Indigenous representative with expertise in Indigenous cultural resources Ex officio members: Gretchen Ransom, Dave Wadsworth and Jane Kaiser (retired), directors at Spirit Mountain Anna Tanski, executive director of Visit Duluth Tim Miller and Bjorn Reed, representatives of the Spirit Mountain workforce selected in consultation with the AFSCME collective bargaining unit 1 CONTENTS Spirit Mountain Task Force Members ........................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Fulfilling the Charge ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Business
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Development
    2| Historic Development 2.A GEOLOGICAL HISTORY 2.B PRE-COLONIAL HISTORY Two of Vermont’s highest peaks lay six to ten miles Little evidence of Native American activity has been west, their rounded foothills forming the town’s west- discovered in Waitsfield though it is known that Al- ern border. Above the hills to the east, the land flat- gonquians, roaming on the western fringe of their tened into a broad, mile-wide plateau that spanned tribal territory, periodically lived or passed through the length of the township beneath the low ridges of the area. Fine campsites would have been found the Northfield Mountain Range. Originally, Waits- along the Mad River, but the river’s periodic flood- field included lands east of those mountains, but geo- ing may have destroyed, buried or carried away any graphical proximity later resulted in their annexation evidence of use. A recent archaeological study of the to Northfield in 1822 and 1846. Today, Waitsfield en- town-owned Munn property, however, turned up a compasses about 15,540 acres. chert projectile point and a quartz biface knife, both of which date from the Middle to Late Archaic period The summits surrounding Waitsfield belong to the (ca. 5500—900 B.C.). Green Mountains, a backbone of double mountain ranges that longitudinally bisect Vermont. In turn, Archaeologists believe other sites may be found with- these grey ledge summits represent the northern in Waitsfield in the future; a map of the Mad River extension of a much longer continental cordillera Valley showing areas of high archaeological sensitivi- stretching in eastern America from Alabama all the ty was prepared by the state archaeologist in 1988.
    [Show full text]