DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix E. Alternatives Analysis Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix E. Alternatives Analysis Report Integrated Vector Management Program APPENDIX E ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT Appendix E: Alternatives Analysis Report Integrated Vector Management Program Document Information Prepared by Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District Project Name Integrated Vector Management Program Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Date July 2014 SCREENCHECK DOCUMENT Prepared by: Marin/Sonoma Mosquito & Vector Control District 595 Helman Lane, Cotati, CA 94931 USA www.msmosquito.com With assistance from Cardno ENTRIX 2300 Clayton Road, Suite 200, Concord, CA 94520 USA www.cardno.com July 2014 MSMVCD i MSMVCD_APP E Alternatives_JAN2015.docx Appendix E: Alternatives Analysis Report Integrated Vector Management Program This Page Intentionally Left Blank ii MSMVCD July 2014 MSMVCD_APP E Alternatives_JAN2015.docx Appendix E: Alternatives Analysis Report Integrated Vector Management Program Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................1-1 1 Program Background ....................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Program Location ............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Program History ................................................................................................................ 1-1 2 Potential Tools...............................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Integrated Pest Management ........................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Description ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.2 Examples of Tool Use ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.3 Applicable to District IVMP ................................................................................ 2-1 2.2 Vector Surveillance........................................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.1 Description ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.2.2 Examples of Tool Use ....................................................................................... 2-1 2.2.3 Applicable to District IVMP ................................................................................ 2-2 2.3 Physical Control ................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.3.1 Description ........................................................................................................ 2-2 2.3.2 Examples of Tool Use ....................................................................................... 2-2 2.3.3 Applicable to District IVMP ................................................................................ 2-2 2.4 Vegetation Management .................................................................................................. 2-2 2.4.1 Description ........................................................................................................ 2-2 2.4.2 Examples of Tool Use ....................................................................................... 2-2 2.4.3 Applicable to District IVMP ................................................................................ 2-2 2.5 Biological Control Pathogens (Viruses) ............................................................................ 2-3 2.5.1 Description ........................................................................................................ 2-3 2.5.2 Examples of Tool Use ....................................................................................... 2-3 2.5.3 Applicable to District IVMP ................................................................................ 2-3 2.6 Biological Control Pathogens (Bacteria)........................................................................... 2-3 2.6.1 Description ........................................................................................................ 2-3 2.6.2 Examples of Tool Use ....................................................................................... 2-3 2.6.3 Applicable to District IVMP ................................................................................ 2-4 2.7 Biological Control Parasites ............................................................................................. 2-5 2.7.1 Description ........................................................................................................ 2-5 2.7.2 Examples of Tool Use ....................................................................................... 2-5 2.7.3 Applicable to District IVMP ................................................................................ 2-6 2.8 Biological Control Predators ............................................................................................. 2-6 2.8.1 Description ........................................................................................................ 2-6 2.8.2 Examples of Tool Use ....................................................................................... 2-7 2.8.3 Applicable to District IVMP .............................................................................. 2-18 2.9 Biological Control Plants ................................................................................................ 2-19 2.9.1 Description ...................................................................................................... 2-19 2.9.2 Examples of Tool Use ..................................................................................... 2-20 2.9.3 Applicable to District IVMP .............................................................................. 2-20 2.10 Synthetic Insecticides ..................................................................................................... 2-21 July 2014 MSMVCD Table of Contents iii MSMVCD_APP E Alternatives_JAN2015.docx Appendix E: Alternatives Analysis Report Mosquito and Vector Management Programs 2.10.1 Description ...................................................................................................... 2-21 2.10.2 Examples of Tool Use ..................................................................................... 2-21 2.10.3 Applicable to District IVMP .............................................................................. 2-21 2.11 Botanical Insecticides ..................................................................................................... 2-21 2.11.1 Description ...................................................................................................... 2-21 2.11.2 Examples of Tool Use ..................................................................................... 2-22 2.11.3 Applicable to District IVMP .............................................................................. 2-22 2.12 Insect Growth Regulators ............................................................................................... 2-22 2.12.1 Description ...................................................................................................... 2-22 2.12.2 Examples of Tool Use ..................................................................................... 2-23 2.12.3 Applicable to District IVMP .............................................................................. 2-24 2.13 Mineral Oils ..................................................................................................................... 2-24 2.13.1 Description ...................................................................................................... 2-24 2.13.2 Examples of Tool Use ..................................................................................... 2-25 2.13.3 Applicable To District IVMP ............................................................................ 2-25 2.14 Mass Trapping ................................................................................................................ 2-25 2.14.1 Description ...................................................................................................... 2-25 2.14.2 Examples of Tool Use ..................................................................................... 2-28 2.14.3 Applicable to IVMP .......................................................................................... 2-28 2.15 Attract and Kill ................................................................................................................ 2-28 2.15.1 Description ...................................................................................................... 2-28 2.15.2 Examples of Tool Use ..................................................................................... 2-31 2.15.3 Applicable to District IVMP .............................................................................. 2-32 2.16 Inundative Releases ....................................................................................................... 2-32 2.16.1 Description ...................................................................................................... 2-32 2.16.2 Examples of Tool Use ..................................................................................... 2-33 2.16.3 Applicable
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Emily Coluccio, PA-S OUCH!
    BUG BITES & STINGS Emily Coluccio, PA-S OUCH! ● Insect bites & stings can be mild, but they also have the ability to transmit insect-borne illnesses and cause severe allergic reactions ● Bites vs. Stings ○ Bites consist of punctures made by the mouthparts of the organism ○ Stings involve the injection of venom and may cause reactions ranging from local irritation to life-threatening allergic reactions ● Lesions from arthropod bites (mosquitoes, ticks, kissing bugs, bed bugs, black flies, etc.) usually result from the host's immune reactions to the insect’s salivary secretions or venom TYPES OF REACTIONS LOCAL REACTIONS ● Normal reaction to an insect bite is an inflammatory reaction at the site, appearing within minutes, and usually involves pruritic erythema and edema ● Treatment ○ Wash with soap and water ○ Ice or cold packs may help with swelling ○ Topical creams, gels, and lotions (Calamine or Pramoxine) may help with itching ○ Oral antihistamines (Cetirizine or Fexofenadine) preferred in small children to help with troublesome itching PAPULAR URTICARIA ● Hypersensitivity disorder in which insect bites (most commonly fleas, mosquitoes, or bed bugs) lead to recurrent and sometimes chrony itchy papules on exposed areas of skin ● Reported predominantly in young children (typically 2-10 years old) ○ Diaper area, genital, perianal, and axillary areas are spared PAPULAR URTICARIA ● There may be a delay between the inciting bite and the onset of lesions, and new lesions may appear sporadically ● Renewed itching may reactivate older lesions,
    [Show full text]
  • 2015C10 Lesson1 Presentation.Pdf
    Invasive Mosquito Network Lesson 1 An introduction to mosquitoes and mosquito transmitted diseases -Introduction to Mosquitoes Mosquito • Small, flying, blood- sucking insects • Family: Culicidae • Can be a threat and a nuisance • Found on every continent except Antarctica Image #9187 from the CDC Public Health Image Library Types of Mosquitoes • 41 genera • >3,000 species • 176 species in the United States • Not all species transmit disease causing pathogens • Some rarely interact with humans Invasive Mosquitoes • Mosquitoes that are not native and spread rapidly in new location • Can be very detrimental to native species and overall ecosystem • Bring diseases that native species have no immunity Example: Hawaii’s invasive mosquitoes Aedes •Throughout the United States•Prefers mammals •Spreading quickly •Fly short distances •Container-breeders and •Transmits encephalitis, accumulated water Chikungunya, yellow •Feeds during the day fever, dengue, and more http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/25/Aedes_aegypti_resting_position_E-A-Goeldi_1905.jpg Mosquito species Diseases they transmit Known Location in the U.S. Aedes albopictus Yellow fever, dengue, and Southern and eastern United Asian tiger mosquito Chikungunya States Aedes aegypti Yellow fever, dengue, and Throughout the southern Yellow fever mosquito Chikungunya United States Aedes triseriatus La Crosse encephalitis, yellow Eastern United States Eastern tree hole mosquito fever, Eastern equine encephalitis, Venezuelan encephalitis, Western equine encephalitis, and canine
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) Are Specialist Predators of Snails
    Eur. J. Entomol. 112(1): 145–150, 2015 doi: 10.14411/eje.2015.016 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Larvae of the water scavenger beetle, Hydrophilus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae) are specialist predators of snails TOSHIO INODA1, YUTA INODA1 and JUNE KATHYLEEN RULLAN 2 1 Shibamata 5-17-10, Katsushika, Tokyo 125-0052, Japan; e-mail: [email protected] 2 University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae, Hydrophilus acuminatus, feeding preferences, snail specialist Abstract. Hydrophilus acuminatus larvae are known to feed on aquatic prey. However, there is no quantitative study of their feeding habits. In order to determine the feeding preferences and essential prey of larvae of H. acuminatus, both field and laboratory experi- ments were carried out. Among the five potential species of prey,Austropeplea ollula (Mollusca: Lymnaeidae), Physa acuta (Mollusca: Physidae), Asellus hilgendorfi (Crustacea: Asellidae), Palaemon paucidens (Crustacea: Palaemonidae) and larvae of Propsilocerus akamusi (Insecta: Chironomidae), the first instar larvae of H. acuminatus strongly prefered the Austropeplea and Physa snails in both cafeteria and single-prey species experiments. Larvae that were provided with only snails also successfully developed into second instar larvae, while larvae fed Palaemon, Propsilocerus larvae or Asellus died during the first instar. In addition, the size of adult H. acuminatus reared from first-instar larvae and fed only snails during their entire development was not different from that of adult H. acuminatus collected in the field. This indicates that even though the larvae ofH. acuminatus can feed on several kinds of invertebrates, they strongly prefer snails and without them cannot complete their development.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 16 –Number 3 National Park Service • U.S
    PARKARK P CIENCECIENCE SS Integrating Research and Resource Management Volume 16 –Number 3 National Park Service • U.S. Department of the Interior Summer 1996 THE NATURAL RESOURCE TRAINEE PROGRAM: PROFESSIONALIZATION TRIUMPH OF THE 1980S AND EARLY 1990S Who are they and where are they now? See the key on page 17 to identify these participants of the first Natural Resource Trainee Program and learn what they are up to now. BY THE EDITOR imparting the skills. Regional office funding allowed parks to HE NEED TO ESTABLISH AND PROFES- send staff to the training and backfill behind them to take care sionalize science and resource management func- of unfinished park work. Other superintendents soon heard tions and apply them in the management of na- about the training opportunity and wanted to be a part of it. tional parks was recognized as early as the 1930s. Wauer then prioritized individual park needs, opting for placing Then, biologist George Wright published several resource management trainees at parks that formerly didn’t have Tpapers on wildlife management and made the clear connection any resource management expertise. between science and informed park resource management ac- The program went national in the early 1980s following pub- tivities. Yet, for the next 5 decades, resource management work lication of two different conservation organization reports on continued to be done mostly by park rangers who were trained threats to national parks and a response by the National Park primarily in law enforcement and other operational areas, not Service in the form of a state-of-the-parks report.
    [Show full text]
  • Series I. Correspondence, 1871-1894 Box 1 Folder 1 Darwin to Riley
    Special Collections at the National Agricultural Library: Charles Valentine Riley Collection Series I. Correspondence, 1871-1894 Box 1 Folder 1 Darwin to Riley. June 1, 1871. Letter from Charles Darwin to Riley thanking him for report and instructions on noxious insects. Downs, Beckerham, Kent (England). (handwritten copy of original). Box 1 Folder 2 Koble to Riley. June 30, 1874. Letter from John C. Koble giving physical description of chinch bugs and explaining how the bugs are destroying corn crops in western Kentucky. John C. Koble of L. S. Trimble and Co., Bankers. Box 1 Folder 3 Saunders to Riley. Nov. 12, 1874. William Saunders receipt to C. V. Riley for a copy of descriptions of two insects that baffle the vegetable carnivora. William Saunders, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Box 1 Folder 4 Young to Riley. Dec. 13, 1874. William Young describes the flat-headed borer and its effects on orchards during summer and winter seasons. From Palmyra Gate Co., Nebraska. Box 1 Folder 5 Saunders to Riley. Dec. 22, 1874. William Saunders receipt of notes of investigation on the insects associated with Sarracenia. William Saunders, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Box 1 Folder 6 Bonhaw to Riley. Jan. 19, 1875. L. N. Bonhaw requesting a copy of his Missouri report, for him to establish a manual or handbook on entomology, and to find out about an insect that deposits eggs. Subject: tomato worm, hawk moth. 1 http://www.nal.usda.gov/speccoll/ Special Collections at the National Agricultural Library: Charles Valentine Riley Collection Box 1 Folder 7 Holliday to Riley.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E: Alternatives Analysis Report Integrated Mosquito and Vector Management Program
    Integrated Mosquito and Vector Management Program APPENDIX E ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS REPORT Appendix E: Alternatives Analysis Report Integrated Mosquito and Vector Management Program Document Information Prepared by Napa County Mosquito Abatement District Project Name Integrated Mosquito and Vector Management Program Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Report Date July 2014 Prepared by: Napa County Mosquito Abatement District 15 Melvin Road, American Canyon, CA 94503 USA www.napamosquito.org With assistance from Cardno ENTRIX 2300 Clayton Road, Suite 200, Concord, CA 94520 USA www.cardno.com July 2014 NCMAD Document Information i MVCAC DPEIR_APP E_NCMAD AltRpt_MAR2016_R2.docx Appendix E: Alternatives Analysis Report Integrated Mosquito and Vector Management Program This Page Intentionally Left Blank ii Document Information NCMAD July 2014 MVCAC DPEIR_APP E_NCMAD AltRpt_MAR2016_R2.docx Appendix E: Alternatives Analysis Report Integrated Mosquito and Vector Management Program Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................1-1 1 Program Background ....................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Program Location ............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Program History ................................................................................................................ 1-1 2 Potential Tools...............................................................................................................2-1
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitoes Are Small Flies That Are Known for Drinking Blood. Some Species Are Both a Nuisance and a Public Threat to People but Others Do Not Bother Humans at All
    Introduction to mosquitoes and mosquito-borne pathogens Mosquito: Mosquitoes are small flies that are known for drinking blood. Some species are both a nuisance and a public threat to people but others do not bother humans at all. Types: There are dozens of different kinds of mosquitoes in the U.S. alone. Many of them do not bite people and pose little to no threat to us in any way. Others will feed off of humans and in doing so can transmit various pathogens that can make people very sick. Invasive mosquitoes: Invasive mosquitoes are not native to a region and, when introduced, spread rapidly. They can be extremely detrimental to native species--one example being Hawaii’s invasive mosquitoes. Hawaii had no native species of mosquitoes and they were not introduced until Europeans brought them in the 1800s. After the introduction of mosquitoes, several native birds started to perish and went extinct because of mosquito-borne avian malaria. Some species survived simply because they lived too high on the mountains and mosquitoes could not survive the cooler temperatures. When mosquitoes are introduced to an area, they may be carriers of parasites or viruses not transmitted in the area which may result in a decline in native animal populations. Aedes: This egg collection project is focusing on Aedes mosquitoes. Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus are of particular interest since they are vectors of chikungunya, dengue fever, and yellow fever viruses and are two of the most invasive mosquito species in the United States. Originally from Africa and Asia, these mosquitoes are used to warm weather but are slowly acclimating themselves to more moderate and cool regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Frank G. Zalom
    Award Category: Lifetime Achievement The Lifetime Achievement in IPM Award goes to an individual who has devoted his or her career to implementing IPM in a specific environment. The awardee must have devoted their career to enhancing integrated pest management in implementation, team building, and integration across pests, commodities, systems, and disciplines. New for the 9th International IPM Symposium The Lifetime Achievement winner will be invited to present his or other invited to present his or her own success story as the closing plenary speaker. At the same time, the winner will also be invited to publish one article on their success of their program in the Journal of IPM, with no fee for submission. Nominator Name: Steve Nadler Nominator Company/Affiliation: Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis Nominator Title: Professor and Chair Nominator Phone: 530-752-2121 Nominator Email: [email protected] Nominee Name of Individual: Frank Zalom Nominee Affiliation (if applicable): University of California, Davis Nominee Title (if applicable): Distinguished Professor and IPM specialist, Department of Entomology and Nematology, University of California, Davis Nominee Phone: 530-752-3687 Nominee Email: [email protected] Attachments: Please include the Nominee's Vita (Nominator you can either provide a direct link to nominee's Vita or send email to Janet Hurley at [email protected] with subject line "IPM Lifetime Achievement Award Vita include nominee name".) Summary of nominee’s accomplishments (500 words or less): Describe the goals of the nominee’s program being nominated; why was the program conducted? What condition does this activity address? (250 words or less): Describe the level of integration across pests, commodities, systems and/or disciplines that were involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Biotic Resources of Indio Mountains Research Station
    BIOTIC RESOURCES OF INDIO MOUNTAINS RESEARCH STATION Southeastern Hudspeth County, Texas A HANDBOOK FOR STUDENTS AND RESEARCHERS Compiled by: Richard D. Worthington Carl Lieb Wynn Anderson Pp. 1 - 85 El Paso, Texas Fall, 2004 (Continually Reviewed and Updated) by Jerry D. Johnson (Last Update) 16 September 2010 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION - Pg. 3 COLLECTING IMRS RESOURCES – Pg. 4 POLICIES FOR THE PROTECTION OF RESOURCES – Pg. 4 PHYSICAL SETTING – Pg. 5 CHIHUAHUAN DESERT – Pg. 6 CLIMATE – Pg. 6 GEOLOGY – Pg. 8 SOILS – Pg. 12 CULTURAL RESOURCES – Pg. 13 PLANT COMMUNITIES – Pg. 14 LICHENS – Pg. 15 NONVASCULAR PLANTS – Pg. 18 VASCULAR PLANTS – Pg. 19 PROTOZOANS – Pg. 34 FLATWORMS – Pg. 34 ROUNDWORMS – Pg. 34 ROTIFERS – Pg. 35 ANNELIDS – Pg. 36 MOLLUSKS – Pg. 36 ARTHROPODS – Pg. 37 VERTEBRATES – Pg. 64 IMRS GAZETTEER – Pg. 80 2 INTRODUCTION It is our pleasure to welcome students and visitors to the Indio Mountains Research Station (IMRS). A key mission of this facility is to provide a research and learning experience in the Chihuahuan Desert. We hope that this manual will assist you in planning your research and learning activities. You will probably be given a short lecture by the station Director upon entering the station. Please pay attention as IMRS is not without potential hazards and some long-term research projects are underway that could be disturbed if one is careless. Indio Mountains Research Station came into being as a result of the generosity of a benefactor and the far-sighted vision of former UTEP President Haskell Monroe. Upon his death in 1907, the will of Boston industrialist Frank B.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Water Bug (Arctocorixa Interrupta) (Lethocerus Americanus )
    Water Boatman Giant Water Bug (Arctocorixa interrupta) (Lethocerus americanus ) Size: Baxter Conservation Conservation Baxter ID Area Cards Size: 25 to 100 mm in length 3 to 11 mm in length (~actual size of fully grown adult) Predaceous Diving Beetle Water Scavenger Beetle (Dytiscus marginalis) (Hydrophilus triangularis ) Size: Size: 2 to 70 mm 3 to 25 mm In length In length Larvae: Size: Water Tiger Adult 1 to 40 mm in length Giant Water Bug ( Lethocerus americanus ) Water Boatman (Arctocorixa interrupta) • Belong to a large group of insects called heteroptera, • Belong to a large group of insects called heteroptera, or “true” bugs. or “true” bugs. • They range in size from 2-11cm in length. One of •Somewhat flattened and elongate d in shape. Canada’s largest insect. • Hind legs are oar-shaped which allows them to swim. • They live in lakes and ponds. Are very fast swimmers. • Small insect: Adults range in length from 3mm - 1.5cm • They prefer habitats with aquatic vegetation where • Are usually dull colored and often mottled. they can grab hold of a plant near the surface, and • Often confused with backswimmers because they stick their short breathing tube out of the water to have the same general shape. The best way to tell allow them to breath while waiting for prey. them apart is by watching them swim: Backswimmers • They are good fliers. This enables them to fly from swim upside down in the water. pond to pond to look for better habitats (You may have • Lack gills and breath air when at the surface of the even found them in your schoolyard!) water or they carry an air bubble with them and • They hunt small fish, tadpoles, snails, insects and breath oxygen from the bubble while swimming.
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Insects
    Aquatic Insects (Ephemeroptera, Odonata, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera, Diptera) of Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site on the Great Plains of Colorado Author(s): Boris C. Kondratieff and Richard S. Durfee Source: Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 83(4):322-331. 2010. Published By: Kansas Entomological Society DOI: 10.2317/JKES1002.15.1 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.2317/JKES1002.15.1 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is an electronic aggregator of bioscience research content, and the online home to over 160 journals and books published by not-for-profit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. JOURNAL OF THE KANSAS ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 83(4), 2010, pp. 322–331 Aquatic Insects (Ephemeroptera, Odonata, Hemiptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera, Diptera) of Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site on the Great Plains of Colorado 1,2 3 BORIS C. KONDRATIEFF AND RICHARD S. DURFEE ABSTRACT: The Great Plains of Colorado occupies over two-fifths of the state, yet very little is known about the aquatic insects of this area. This paper reports on the aquatic insects found in temporary and permanent pools of Big Sandy Creek within the Sand Creek Massacre National Historic Site, on the Great Plains of Colorado.
    [Show full text]