DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Report 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Report 2 Regional Action Plan for the Protected Areas of East Asia 2006–2010 World Commission on Protected Areas Regional Protected Areas Programme Asia Government of Japan The designation of geographical Published by: Photos by: entities in this report, and the IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and John MacKinnon and Xie Yan presentation of the material, do not Bangkok, Thailand imply the expression of any opinion Layout by: whatsoever on the part of IUCN Copyright: Prachya Choompoo concerning the legal status of any © 2008 IUCN, International Union for Keen Media (Thailand) Co.,Ltd country, territory, or area, or of its Conservation of Nature and Natural authorities, or concerning the Resources Produced by: delimitation of its frontiers or Keen Media (Thailand) Co.,Ltd boundaries. The views expressed Resources: in this publication do not necessarily Reproduction of this publication for Available from: reflect those of IUCN. educational or other non-commercial IUCN Asia Regional Office purposes is authorized without 63, Soi Prompong, Sukhumvit 39 This publication has been made prior written permission from the Wattana, Bangkok 10110 possible by funding from the Ministry copyright holder provided the source Thailand of the Environment, Government of is fully acknowledged. Reproduction Tel: +662 662 4029 Japan. of this publication for resale or other Fax: +662 662 4388 commercial purposes is prohibited The East Asian region of the World without prior written permission of the Email: [email protected] Commission on Protected Areas copyright holder. www.iucn.org of IUCN includes: Mainland of the People’s Republic of China (hereafter Citation: abbreviated to China), Hong Kong J. MacKinnon and Xie Yan (2008). (a Special Administrative Region of Regional Action Plan for the China, hereafter abbreviated to Hong Protected Areas of East Asia. Kong), Macau (a Special Bangkok, Thailand. 82pp. Administrative Region of China, hereafter abbreviated to Macau), ISBN: Taiwan (province of China, hereafter 978-2-8317-1074-7 abbreviated to Taiwan), Japan, 2-8317-1074-x Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (hereafter abbreviated to DPRK), Republic of Korea (hereafter abbreviated to ROK) and Mongolia. Regional Action Plan for the Protected Areas of East Asia 2006–2010 Compiled and edited by J. MacKinnon (IUCN Consultant) and Xie Yan (WCPA Vice-chair for East Asia) IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA) Regional Protected Areas Programme Asia Contents 1. Introduction to the Plan 1 Part One – Assessment of the PA System of East Asia 2. Overview of the East Asian region 3 2.1 Extent and areas of the region ...........................................................................................................................3 2.2 Landform and geography ....................................................................................................................................3 2.3 Population and economic indicators ...................................................................................................................4 2.4 Major ecosystems ...............................................................................................................................................4 2.5 Biological richness ..............................................................................................................................................6 2.6 Features of special interest ................................................................................................................................7 2.7 Zoogeographic divisions .....................................................................................................................................7 2.8 Summary of PA development .............................................................................................................................8 3. Country/area summaries 10 3.1 Mainland, People’s Republic of China ..............................................................................................................10 3.2 Hong Kong ........................................................................................................................................................16 3.3 Japan ................................................................................................................................................................18 3.4 Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) ..............................................................................................21 3.5 Republic of Korea (ROK) ..................................................................................................................................23 3.6 Macau ...............................................................................................................................................................25 3.7 Mongolia ...........................................................................................................................................................25 3.8 Taiwan ...............................................................................................................................................................27 4. Conclusions on PA coverage in the East Asian region 30 Part Two – The Action Plan 2006–2010 5. Evaluation of 1996 Action Plan 33 6. Filling gaps in the Protected Areas network 35 6.1 National Systems planning ...............................................................................................................................36 6.2 Marine Protected Areas ....................................................................................................................................37 6.3 Transfrontier initiatives ......................................................................................................................................37 7. Strengthening the legal framework 39 7.1 Improving PA-related national law ....................................................................................................................39 7.2 Implementing global conventions .....................................................................................................................39 8. Improving PA management 40 8.1 Management planning ......................................................................................................................................40 8.2 Adoption of competence standards ..................................................................................................................40 8.3 Making better use of global programmes .........................................................................................................40 8.4 Monitoring, information management and sharing of information ....................................................................41 8.5 Species conservation needs.............................................................................................................................42 8.6 Adoption of best practices ................................................................................................................................43 8.7 Development of ecotourism ..............................................................................................................................44 9. Integration with other sectors 45 9.1 Alliances for conservation .................................................................................................................................45 9.2 Co-management and involvement of local communities ..................................................................................46 10. Training for PA management 47 10.1 At national level ..............................................................................................................................................47 10.2 At regional level ..............................................................................................................................................47 11. Funding mechanisms 48 12. Working together to implement the Plan 48 12.1 At national level ..............................................................................................................................................48 12.2 At regional level ..............................................................................................................................................48 Appendices Appendix I: List of priority projects ...........................................................................................................................51 Appendix II: Activities identified in 1996 Action Plan ...............................................................................................53 Appendix III: The Fragrant Hill Declaration, Beijing 1993. ........................................................................................57 Appendix IV: The Kushiro Declaration, Kushiro 1996. .............................................................................................58 Appendix V: The Yangmingshan Declaration, Taiwan 2002 .....................................................................................59 Appendix VI: Tolo Harbour Declaration, Hong Kong 2005 .......................................................................................61 Appendix VII Draft Jeju Declaration, Republic of Korea 2006 .................................................................................63 Appendix VIII: GIS analysis of gaps in East Asian PA system .................................................................................64
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lake Baikal Russian Federation
    LAKE BAIKAL RUSSIAN FEDERATION Lake Baikal is in south central Siberia close to the Mongolian border. It is the largest, oldest by 20 million years, and deepest, at 1,638m, of the world's lakes. It is 3.15 million hectares in size and contains a fifth of the world's unfrozen surface freshwater. Its age and isolation and unusually fertile depths have given it the world's richest and most unusual lacustrine fauna which, like the Galapagos islands’, is of outstanding value to evolutionary science. The exceptional variety of endemic animals and plants make the lake one of the most biologically diverse on earth. Threats to the site: Present threats are the untreated wastes from the river Selenga, potential oil and gas exploration in the Selenga delta, widespread lake-edge pollution and over-hunting of the Baikal seals. However, the threat of an oil pipeline along the lake’s north shore was averted in 2006 by Presidential decree and the pulp and cellulose mill on the southern shore which polluted 200 sq. km of the lake, caused some of the worst air pollution in Russia and genetic mutations in some of the lake’s endemic species, was closed in 2009 as no longer profitable to run. COUNTRY Russian Federation NAME Lake Baikal NATURAL WORLD HERITAGE SERIAL SITE 1996: Inscribed on the World Heritage List under Natural Criteria vii, viii, ix and x. STATEMENT OF OUTSTANDING UNIVERSAL VALUE The UNESCO World Heritage Committee issued the following statement at the time of inscription. Justification for Inscription The Committee inscribed Lake Baikal the most outstanding example of a freshwater ecosystem on the basis of: Criteria (vii), (viii), (ix) and (x).
    [Show full text]
  • The Cartographic Steppe: Mapping Environment and Ethnicity in Japan's Imperial Borderlands
    The Cartographic Steppe: Mapping Environment and Ethnicity in Japan's Imperial Borderlands The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Christmas, Sakura. 2016. The Cartographic Steppe: Mapping Environment and Ethnicity in Japan's Imperial Borderlands. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, Graduate School of Arts & Sciences. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:33840708 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA The Cartographic Steppe: Mapping Environment and Ethnicity in Japan’s Imperial Borderlands A dissertation presented by Sakura Marcelle Christmas to The Department of History in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts August 2016 © 2016 Sakura Marcelle Christmas All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Ian Jared Miller Sakura Marcelle Christmas The Cartographic Steppe: Mapping Environment and Ethnicity in Japan’s Imperial Borderlands ABSTRACT This dissertation traces one of the origins of the autonomous region system in the People’s Republic of China to the Japanese imperial project by focusing on Inner Mongolia in the 1930s. Here, Japanese technocrats demarcated the borderlands through categories of ethnicity and livelihood. At the center of this endeavor was the perceived problem of nomadic decline: the loss of the region’s deep history of transhumance to Chinese agricultural expansion and capitalist extraction.
    [Show full text]
  • Gap Analysis in Support of Cpan: the Russian Arctic
    CAFF Habitat Conservation Report No. 9 GAP ANALYSIS IN SUPPORT OF CPAN: THE RUSSIAN ARCTIC Igor Lysenko and David Henry CAFF INTERNATIONAL SECRETRARIAT 2000 This report, prepared by Igor Lysenko, World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC) and David Henry, United Nations Environment Program (UNEP) Global Resource Information Database (GRID)-Arendal, is a technical account of a Gap Analysis Project conducted for the Russian Arctic in 1997-1999 in support of the Circumpolar Protected Areas Network (CPAN) of CAFF. It updates the status and spatial distribution of protected areas within the CAFF area of the Russian Federation and provides, in 22 GIs based maps and several data sets, a wealth of information relevant for present and future management decisions related to habitat conservation in the Russian Arctic. The present Gap Analysis for the Russian Arctic was undertaken in response to the CPAN Strategy and Action Plan requirement for countries to identify gaps in protected area coverage of ecosystems and species and to select sites for further action. Another important objective was to update the Russian data base. The Analysis used a system of twelve landscape units instead of the previously used vegetation zone system as the basis to classify Russia's ecosystems. A comparison of the terrestrial landscape systems against protected area coverage indicates that 27% of the glacier ecosystem is protected, 9.3% of the tundra (treeless portion) and 4.7% of the forest systems within the Arctic boundaries are under protection, but the most important Arctic forested areas have only 0.1% protection. In general, the analysis indicates a negative relationship between ecosystem productivity and protection, which is consistent with findings in 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis
    United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) 2nd revised edition, January 2009 Global Ecological Forest Classification and Forest Protected Area Gap Analysis Analyses and recommendations in view of the 10% target for forest protection under the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Report prepared by: United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Network World Resources Institute (WRI) Institute of Forest and Environmental Policy (IFP) University of Freiburg Freiburg University Press 2nd revised edition, January 2009 The United Nations Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP- WCMC) is the biodiversity assessment and policy implementation arm of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the world's foremost intergovernmental environmental organization. The Centre has been in operation since 1989, combining scientific research with practical policy advice. UNEP-WCMC provides objective, scientifically rigorous products and services to help decision makers recognize the value of biodiversity and apply this knowledge to all that they do. Its core business is managing data about ecosystems and biodiversity, interpreting and analysing that data to provide assessments and policy analysis, and making the results
    [Show full text]
  • Mongolian Forest Ecosystems
    MONGOLIAN FOREST ECOSYSTEMS Batsukh N. WWF Mongolia Programme Office E-mail: [email protected] Mongolia has relatively low forest cover (FAO) with just over 8 percent of the country covered by closed forests. The forests are mainly located in the north-central parts of the country, forming a transition zone between the Great Siberian boreal forest and the Central Asian steppe desert. In Khentii and Khovsgol , the mountain slopes are clothed with boreal taiga forest. Due to a brief warm period, the growing season is not long enough for many plant species. It forms the most southern extension of the east Siberian taiga and consists mainly from Siberian Larch (Larix sibirica) and Siberian Pine (Pinus sibirica) and rich in mosses and lichens . Here are found a number of ungulates typical of Eurasian forests, among them Musk Deer (Moschus moschiferus), Elk (Alces alces), Roe Deer (Capreolus pugargus), and Reindeer (Rangifer tarandus). In northern Mongolia, a small number of families still herd reindeer in the traditional manner reminiscent of the Lapps of northern Europe. Forest predators include the grey wolf (Canis lupus), brown bear (Ursus arctos), wolverine (Gulo gulo), and Eurasiona lynx (Felis lynx). Typical birds of these forests include great grey owl (Strix nebulosa), boreal owl (Aegolius funereus), black-billed capercaillie (Tetrao parvirostris) and pine grosbeak (Pinicola enucleator). At yet lower altitudes, a high degree of biodiversity occurs in areas where taiga forest meets the steppes. Here mixed conifer and broadleaf forests intermingle with lush grasslands, and it is in this zone that the most heavily populated areas are found. The fauna includes species characteristic of both taiga and steppe.
    [Show full text]
  • NATIONAL PROTECTED AREAS of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: of the RUSSIAN FEDERATION: AREAS PROTECTED NATIONAL Vladimir Krever, Mikhail Stishov, Irina Onufrenya
    WWF WWF is one of the world’s largest and most experienced independent conservation WWF-Russia organizations, with almost 5 million supporters and a global network active in more than 19, bld.3 Nikoloyamskaya St., 100 countries. 109240 Moscow WWF’s mission is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a Russia future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: Tel.: +7 495 727 09 39 • conserving the world’s biological diversity Fax: +7 495 727 09 38 • ensuring that the use of renewable natural resources is sustainable [email protected] • promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. http://www.wwf.ru The Nature Conservancy The Nature Conservancy - the leading conservation organization working around the world to The Nature Conservancy protect ecologically important lands and waters for nature and people. Worldwide Office The mission of The Nature Conservancy is to preserve the plants, animals and natural 4245 North Fairfax Drive, Suite 100 NNATIONALATIONAL PPROTECTEDROTECTED AAREASREAS communities that represent the diversity of life on Earth by protecting the lands and waters Arlington, VA 22203-1606 they need to survive. Tel: +1 (703) 841-5300 http://www.nature.org OOFF TTHEHE RRUSSIANUSSIAN FFEDERATION:EDERATION: MAVA The mission of the Foundation is to contribute to maintaining terrestrial and aquatic Fondation pour la ecosystems, both qualitatively and quantitatively, with a view to preserving their biodiversity. Protection de la Nature GGAPAP AANALYSISNALYSIS To this end, it promotes scientific research, training and integrated management practices Le Petit Essert whose effectiveness has been proved, while securing a future for local populations in cultural, 1147 Montricher, Suisse economic and ecological terms.
    [Show full text]
  • GIS Assessment of the Status of Protected Areas in East Asia
    CIS Assessment of the Status of Protected Areas in East Asia Compiled and edited by J. MacKinnon, Xie Yan, 1. Lysenko, S. Chape, I. May and C. Brown March 2005 IUCN V 9> m The World Conservation Union UNEP WCMC Digitized by the Internet Archive in 20/10 with funding from UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge http://www.archive.org/details/gisassessmentofs05mack GIS Assessment of the Status of Protected Areas in East Asia Compiled and edited by J. MacKinnon, Xie Yan, I. Lysenko, S. Chape, I. May and C. Brown March 2005 UNEP-WCMC IUCN - The World Conservation Union The designation of geographical entities in this book, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNEP, UNEP-WCMC, and IUCN concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. UNEP-WCMC or its collaborators have obtained base data from documented sources believed to be reliable and made all reasonable efforts to ensure the accuracy of the data. UNEP-WCMC does not warrant the accuracy or reliability of the base data and excludes all conditions, warranties, undertakings and terms express or implied whether by statute, common law, trade usage, course of dealings or otherwise (including the fitness of the data for its intended use) to the fullest extent permitted by law. The views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of UNEP, UNEP-WCMC, and IUCN. Produced by: UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre and IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK Cffti IUCN UNEP WCMC The World Conservation Union Copyright: © 2005 UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • R Graphics Output
    China China LEGEND Previously sampled Malaise trap site Ecoregion Alashan Plateau semi−desert North Tibetan Plateau−Kunlun Mountains alpine desert Altai alpine meadow and tundra Northeast China Plain deciduous forests Altai montane forest and forest steppe Northeast Himalayan subalpine conifer forests Altai steppe and semi−desert Northern Indochina subtropical forests Amur meadow steppe Northern Triangle subtropical forests Bohai Sea saline meadow Northwestern Himalayan alpine shrub and meadows Central China Loess Plateau mixed forests Nujiang Langcang Gorge alpine conifer and mixed forests Central Tibetan Plateau alpine steppe Ordos Plateau steppe Changbai Mountains mixed forests Pamir alpine desert and tundra Changjiang Plain evergreen forests Qaidam Basin semi−desert Da Hinggan−Dzhagdy Mountains conifer forests Qilian Mountains conifer forests Daba Mountains evergreen forests Qilian Mountains subalpine meadows Daurian forest steppe Qin Ling Mountains deciduous forests East Siberian taiga Qionglai−Minshan conifer forests Eastern Gobi desert steppe Rock and Ice Eastern Himalayan alpine shrub and meadows Sichuan Basin evergreen broadleaf forests Eastern Himalayan broadleaf forests South China−Vietnam subtropical evergreen forests Eastern Himalayan subalpine conifer forests Southeast Tibet shrublands and meadows Emin Valley steppe Southern Annamites montane rain forests Guizhou Plateau broadleaf and mixed forests Suiphun−Khanka meadows and forest meadows Hainan Island monsoon rain forests Taklimakan desert Helanshan montane conifer forests
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution Mapping of World Grassland Types A
    Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2014) SYNTHESIS Distribution mapping of world grassland types A. P. Dixon1*, D. Faber-Langendoen2, C. Josse2, J. Morrison1 and C. J. Loucks1 1World Wildlife Fund – United States, 1250 ABSTRACT 24th Street NW, Washington, DC 20037, Aim National and international policy frameworks, such as the European USA, 2NatureServe, 4600 N. Fairfax Drive, Union’s Renewable Energy Directive, increasingly seek to conserve and refer- 7th Floor, Arlington, VA 22203, USA ence ‘highly biodiverse grasslands’. However, to date there is no systematic glo- bal characterization and distribution map for grassland types. To address this gap, we first propose a systematic definition of grassland. We then integrate International Vegetation Classification (IVC) grassland types with the map of Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World (TEOW). Location Global. Methods We developed a broad definition of grassland as a distinct biotic and ecological unit, noting its similarity to savanna and distinguishing it from woodland and wetland. A grassland is defined as a non-wetland type with at least 10% vegetation cover, dominated or co-dominated by graminoid and forb growth forms, and where the trees form a single-layer canopy with either less than 10% cover and 5 m height (temperate) or less than 40% cover and 8 m height (tropical). We used the IVC division level to classify grasslands into major regional types. We developed an ecologically meaningful spatial cata- logue of IVC grassland types by listing IVC grassland formations and divisions where grassland currently occupies, or historically occupied, at least 10% of an ecoregion in the TEOW framework. Results We created a global biogeographical characterization of the Earth’s grassland types, describing approximately 75% of IVC grassland divisions with ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • Russian Federation
    2020 Report of the FABLE Consortium Pathways to Sustainable Land-Use and Food Systems Published by International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) 2020 The full report is available at www.foodandlandusecoalition.org/fable. For questions please write to [email protected] Copyright © IIASA & SDSN 2020 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0; https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Disclaimer The 2020 FABLE Report was written by a group of independent experts acting in their personal capacities. Any views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of any government or organization, agency, or programme of the United Nations (UN). The country chapters use maps prepared solely by the national teams. The boundaries, colors, denominations, and other information shown on any map in this work do not imply any judgment on the part of SDSN or IIASA concerning the legal status of any territory or the endorsement or acceptance of such boundaries. Recommended citation: Strokov A., Potashnikov V. and Lugovoy O. (2020), “Pathways to Sustainable Land- Use and Food Systems in Russia by 2050” In: FABLE 2020, Pathways to Sustainable Land-Use and Food Systems, 2020 Report of the FABLE Consortium. Laxenburg and Paris: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) and Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN), pp. 511-539. https://doi.org/10.22022/ESM/12-2020.16896 Recommended Creative Commons (CC) License: CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 (Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International).
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Decline Caused by High Soil Water Conditions
    Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss., 6, 6087–6105, 2009 Hydrology and www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci-discuss.net/6/6087/2009/ Earth System HESSD © Author(s) 2009. This work is distributed under Sciences 6, 6087–6105, 2009 the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Discussions Papers published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions are under Forest decline open-access review for the journal Hydrology and Earth System Sciences caused by high soil water conditions H. Iwasaki et al. Forest decline caused by high soil water Title Page conditions in a permafrost region Abstract Introduction Conclusions References 1 1 1 2 1 H. Iwasaki , H. Saito , K. Kuwao , T. C. Maximov , and S. Hasegawa Tables Figures 1Graduate School of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, North 9, West 9, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8589, Japan J I 2Institute for Biological Problems of Cryolithozone, Siberian Division of Russian Academy of J I Sciences, 41, Lenin ave. Yakutsk, 678891, Russia Back Close Received: 28 August 2009 – Accepted: 7 September 2009 – Published: 23 September 2009 Correspondence to: H. Iwasaki ([email protected]) Full Screen / Esc Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. Printer-friendly Version Interactive Discussion 6087 Abstract HESSD In the permafrost region near Yakutsk, eastern Siberia, Russia, annual precipitation (June–May) in 2005–2006 and 2006–2007 exceeded the 26-year (1982–2008) mean of 6, 6087–6105, 2009 222±68 mm by 185 mm and 128 mm, respectively, whereas in 2007–2008 the excedent 5 was only 48 mm, well within the range of variability. Yellowing and browning of larch Forest decline (Larix cajanderi Mayr.) trees occurred in an undisturbed forest near Yakutsk in the 2007 caused by high soil summer growing season.
    [Show full text]
  • CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN for the RUSSIAN FAR EAST ECOREGION COMPLEX Part 1
    CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN FOR THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST ECOREGION COMPLEX Part 1. Biodiversity and socio-economic assessment Editors: Yuri Darman, WWF Russia Far Eastern Branch Vladimir Karakin, WWF Russia Far Eastern Branch Andrew Martynenko, Far Eastern National University Laura Williams, Environmental Consultant Prepared with funding from the WWF-Netherlands Action Network Program Vladivostok, Khabarovsk, Blagoveshensk, Birobidzhan 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN. Part 1. 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1. The Russian Far East Ecoregion Complex 4 1.2. Purpose and Methods of the Biodiversity and Socio-Economic 6 Assessment 1.3. The Ecoregion-Based Approach in the Russian Far East 8 2. THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST ECOREGION COMPLEX: 11 A BRIEF BIOLOGICAL OVERVIEW 2.1. Landscape Diversity 12 2.2. Hydrological Network 15 2.3. Climate 17 2.4. Flora 19 2.5. Fauna 23 3. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION IN THE RUSSIAN FAR EAST 29 ECOREGION COMPLEX: FOCAL SPECIES AND PROCESSES 3.1. Focal Species 30 3.2. Species of Special Concern 47 3.3 .Focal Processes and Phenomena 55 4. DETERMINING PRIORITY AREAS FOR CONSERVATION 59 4.1. Natural Zoning of the RFE Ecoregion Complex 59 4.2. Methods of Territorial Biodiversity Analysis 62 4.3. Conclusions of Territorial Analysis 69 4.4. Landscape Integrity and Representation Analysis of Priority Areas 71 5. OVERVIEW OF CURRENT PRACTICES IN BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION 77 5.1. Legislative Basis for Biodiversity Conservation in the RFE 77 5.2. The System of Protected Areas in the RFE 81 5.3. Conventions and Agreements Related to Biodiversity Conservation 88 in the RFE 6. SOCIO-ECONOMIC INFLUENCES 90 6.1.
    [Show full text]