DOCSLIB.ORG

Gap Analysis and Priorities for Filling Identified Gaps in Data Coverage and Quality M22

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gap Analysis and Priorities for Filling Identified Gaps in Data Coverage and Quality M22 Deliverable 1.1 (D1.1) Gap analysis and priorities for filling identified gaps in data coverage and quality M22 Project acronym: EU BON Project name: EU BON: Building the European Biodiversity Observation Network Call: ENV.2012.6.2-2 Grant agreement: 308454 Project duration: 01/12/2012 – 31/05/2017 (54 months) Co-ordinator: MfN, Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Germany Delivery date from AnnexI: M22 Actual delivery date: M22 Lead beneficiary: MfN Authors: Dr. Florian Wetzel (Task Lead), Dr. Anke Hoffmann, Alexander Kroupa, Günther Korb, Dr. Christoph Häuser (MfN, Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity, Germany); Prof. Urmas Köljalg, Dr. Kessy Abarenkov (UTARTU, University of Tartu, Estonia); Tim Robertson, Mélianie Raymond PhD, Dipl. Biol. Andrea Hahn, Dr. Donald Hobern (GBIF, Secretariat of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility); Dr. Isabel Calabuig, Lotte Endsleff (UCPH, University of Copenhagen: Natural History Museum of Denmark, Denmark); Dr. Michael Kuhlmann (NHM, The Natural History Museum, London); Prof. Karol Marhold, Matúš Kempa (IBSAS, Botanicky Ustav Slovenskej Akademie Vied, Slovakia); Dr. Lyubomir Penev, Dr. Pavel Stoev (Pensoft Publishers Ltd., Bulgaria); Dr. Nicolas Bailly, Kathleen Reyes FIN, Fishbase 1 Information & Research Group, Inc., Philippines); Dr. Fredrik Ronquist (NRM, Naturhistoriska Riksmuseet, Stockholm, Sweden) Dr. Sarah Faulwetter, Dr. Christos Arvanitidis, Dr. Eva Chatzinikolaou (HCMR, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Greece); Dr. Corinne Martin (WCMC, World Conservation Monitoring Centre, UK); Dr. Dirk Schmeller, Dr. Jean-Baptiste Mihoub, Dr. Guy Peer, Prof. Klaus Henle (UFZ, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Germany); Dr. Lluis Brotons, Dr. Sergi Herrando (EBCC–CTFC, Centre Tecnologic Forestal de Catalunya, Spain); Anton Güntsch, Dr. Eckhard von Raab-Straube, Andreas Kohlbecker (FUB-BGBM, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany); Dr. Stefan Stoll, Prof. Peter Haase, Dr. Jonathan Tonkin (SGN, Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung, Germany); Nils Valland, Wouter Koch (NBIC, Norwegian Biodiversity Information Centre, Norway) Dr. Aaike de Wever (RBINS, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Belgium) Dr. Quentin Groom (Botanic Garden Meise; Belgium) Dr. Donat Agosti, Terry Catapano, Jeremy Miller, Guido Sautter (PLAZI, Plazi Inc., Switzerland); Furthermore: Dr. Alexander Sennikov and Dr. Pertti Uotila (Finnish Museum of Natural History, Finland), Dr. Yde de Jong (Netherlands), Dr. Christian Schmid-Egger (Germany). 2 This project is supported by funding from the specific programme 'Cooperation', theme 'Environment (including Climate Change)' under the 7th Research Framework Programme of the European Union Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) This project has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreement No 308454. All intellectual property rights are owned by the EU BON consortium members and protected by the applicable laws. Except where otherwise specified, all document contents are: “© EU BON project“. This document is published in open access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 3.0 (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 3 Content 1 Overview Deliverable D1.1........................................................................................... 6 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 Progress towards objectives ........................................................................................ 6 1.3 Achievements and current status ................................................................................ 7 1.4 Future developments ................................................................................................... 8 2 Overall overview of gaps and limitations of Biodiversity datasets ........................... 9 2.1 High level questions on biodiversity in Europe and biodiversity data ....................... 9 2.2 European Datasets, Essential Biodiversity Variables and gaps ................................ 14 2.3 A first overview of GBIF, PESI, INSD and DataOne data ....................................... 15 3 Key findings - Overview of main gaps of the specific analysis of global and European datasets and recommendations ................................................................ 19 3.1 Spatial gaps ............................................................................................................... 20 3.2 Temporal gaps ........................................................................................................... 23 3.3 Taxonomic Gaps ....................................................................................................... 24 3.4 Other gaps ................................................................................................................. 25 3.5 Data availability ........................................................................................................ 26 3.6 General recommendations for closing existing biodiversity data gaps .................... 29 3.7 Literature ................................................................................................................... 32 4 Specific Gap Analysis of European and global Databases ...................................... 33 4.1 Criteria for assessing the gaps ................................................................................... 33 4.2 General review of gaps in biodiversity data: Monitoring trends in GBIF mobilized content to help address gaps .................................................................... 35 4.3 Focused-review of gaps in specific databases: Analysis of distribution data of vascular plants in Europe ......................................................................................... 50 4.4 Focused-review of gaps in specific databases: Gap Analysis about Marine Species Distribution and Traits ................................................................................ 63 4.5 Focused-review of gaps in specific databases - Marine and coastal data holdings of UNEP-WCMC ..................................................................................................... 90 4.6 Availability of freshwater biodiversity data ............................................................. 95 4.7 Focused-review of gaps in specific databases: Gap analysis on pollinator species (Hymenoptera: Apoidea: Anthophila) ......................................................... 99 4.8 General review of gaps in European monitoring schemes - Assessment of the EuMon database ..................................................................................................... 114 4 4.9 Focused-review of gaps in a specific monitoring scheme: Atlas of European Breeding Birds (version 1&2) and the Pan European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme ..................................................................................................................... 118 4.10 General review of gaps in Nucleotide Sequence Databases ..................................... 123 4.11 General review of gaps in European taxonomic databases: Fauna (Database Fauna Europaea)....................................................................................................... 130 4.12 General review of gaps in European taxonomic databases: Flora - vascular plant species (Euro+Med) ................................................................................................. 137 4.13 General review of gaps in European environmental test site data: LTER Data ...... 141 5 ANNEXES ................................................................................................................ 157 5.1 Annex 1: High level questions on biodiversity and, as a subset, the target high-level questions for the EU BON gap analysis ................................................................. 157 5.2 Annex 2: Chapters and Authors .............................................................................. 162 5 1 OVERVIEW DELIVERABLE D1.1 1.1 INTRODUCTION This report aims to assess the relevant data sources on biodiversity on a European and global scale. The assessment particularly evaluates the gaps of available biodiversity information sources and, after outlining the most important gaps, to identify priorities for improving the data availability and to give recommendations of how the gaps can be closed. The gap analysis has a focus on biodiversity information on a European scale and is based on an assessment of current marine, terrestrial and freshwater biodiversity data sources. The gaps are evaluated against the needs of the different stakeholders; this includes the demands from European policy (like the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020), international relevant processes (like the Convention on Biodiversity and the Aichi biodiversity targets) and the scientific community. There are various requirements for biodiversity data, and the gap analysis aims
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UNIVERSITY of READING Delivering Biodiversity and Pollination Services on Farmland
    UNIVERSITY OF READING Delivering biodiversity and pollination services on farmland: a comparison of three wildlife- friendly farming schemes Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Agri-Environmental Research School of Agriculture, Policy and Development Chloe J. Hardman June 2016 Declaration I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. Chloe Hardman i Abstract Gains in food production through agricultural intensification have come at an environmental cost, including reductions in habitat diversity, species diversity and some ecosystem services. Wildlife- friendly farming schemes aim to mitigate the negative impacts of agricultural intensification. In this study, we compared the effectiveness of three schemes using four matched triplets of farms in southern England. The schemes were: i) a baseline of Entry Level Stewardship (ELS: a flexible widespread government scheme, ii) organic agriculture and iii) Conservation Grade (CG: a prescriptive, non-organic, biodiversity-focused scheme). We examined how effective the schemes were in supporting habitat diversity, species diversity, floral resources, pollinators and pollination services. Farms in CG and organic schemes supported higher habitat diversity than farms only in ELS. Plant and butterfly species richness were significantly higher on organic farms and butterfly species richness was marginally higher on CG farms compared to farms in ELS. The species richness of plants, butterflies, solitary bees and birds in winter was significantly correlated with local habitat diversity. Organic farms supported more evenly distributed floral resources and higher nectar densities compared to farms in CG or ELS. Compared to maximum estimates of pollen demand from six bee species, only organic farms supplied sufficient pollen in late summer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemical Ecology and Evolution of Bee–Flower Interactions: a Review and Perspectives1
    668 REVIEW / SYNTHE` SE The chemical ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions: a review and perspectives1 S. Do¨ tterl and N.J. Vereecken Abstract: Bees and angiosperms have shared a long and intertwined evolutionary history and their interactions have re- sulted in remarkable adaptations. Yet, at a time when the ‘‘pollination crisis’’ is of major concern as natural populations of both wild and honey bees (Apis mellifera L., 1758) face alarming decline rates at a worldwide scale, there are important gaps in our understanding of the ecology and evolution of bee–flower interactions. In this review, we summarize and dis- cuss the current knowledge about the role of floral chemistry versus other communication channels in bee-pollinated flow- ering plants, both at the macro- and micro-evolutionary levels, and across the specialization–generalization gradient. The available data illustrate that floral scents and floral chemistry have been largely overlooked in bee–flower interactions, and that pollination studies integrating these components along with pollinator behaviour in a phylogenetic context will help gain considerable insights into the sensory ecology and the evolution of bees and their associated flowering plants. Re´sume´ : Les abeilles et les angiospermes partagent une grande partie de leur histoire e´volutive, et leurs interactions ont produit de remarquables exemples d’adaptations mutuelles. Cependant, a` une e´poque ou` la « crise de la pollinisation » de- vient une pre´occupation majeure et ou` les populations d’abeilles sauvages et mellife`res (Apis mellifera L., 1758) font face a` des de´clins massifs a` l’e´chelle mondiale, notre compre´hension de l’e´cologie et de l’e´volution des relations abeilles- plantes demeure fragmentaire.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comprehensive Guide to Insects of Britain & Ireland
    a comprehensive guide to insects of Britain & ireland To be launched Spring 2014. order your copy now and save over £7.50! Offer endS 31 March 2014 Special expected list price: £27.50 Pre-Publication special price: £19.95 offer you save: £7.50 A comprehensive guide to Insects of Britain & irelAnd by Paul D. Brock Special expected list price: £27.50 * Scientific Associate of the Pre-Publication special price: £19.95 Natural History Museum, offer you save: £7.50 London, and author of the acclaimed ‘Insects of the New Forest’ full colour photographs throughout, with fully comprehensive sections on all insect 2 Ants, bees and wasps Subfamily Andreninae Ants, bees and wasps 3 Andrena species form the majority of this large subfamily of small to large, mining (soil-nesting) bees; very few groups, including flies, bees and wasps nest communally. There are sometimes several species with similar appearance, thus care is needed in identification. Many have a single brood, but identification of others with two broods is so by seasonal variation. In a few species, giant males occur, with large heads and mandibles. metimes complicated species and a few Sphecodes species are cleptoparasites and parasitic flies are often seen around Colourful nests where it is fascinating to watch their behaviour. A selection of species in this popular genus is include Nomada widespread, some are very local. ISBN 978-1-874357-58-2 d; although Andrena angustior Body length: 8–11 mm. Small, distinguished by the long marginal area on 2nd tergite. Cleptoparasite probably Nomada fabriciana Flexibound, 195 × 135mm, around 500pp woodlands, meadows and sometimes heaths.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of the Diet and Micro-Habitat Values for Wildlife and the Agronomic Potential of Selected Grassland Plant Species
    Report Number 697 Review of the diet and micro-habitat values for wildlifeand the agronomic potential of selected grassland plant species English Nature Research Reports working today for nature tomorrow English Nature Research Reports Number 697 Review of the diet and micro-habitat values for wildlife and the agronomic potential of selected grassland plant species S.R. Mortimer, R. Kessock-Philip, S.G. Potts, A.J. Ramsay, S.P.M. Roberts & B.A. Woodcock Centre for Agri-Environmental Research University of Reading, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR A. Hopkins, A. Gundrey, R. Dunn & J. Tallowin Institute for Grassland and Environmental Research North Wyke Research Station, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB J. Vickery & S. Gough British Trust for Ornithology The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU You may reproduce as many additional copies of this report as you like for non-commercial purposes, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains with English Nature, Northminster House, Peterborough PE1 1UA. However, if you wish to use all or part of this report for commercial purposes, including publishing, you will need to apply for a licence by contacting the Enquiry Service at the above address. Please note this report may also contain third party copyright material. ISSN 0967-876X © Copyright English Nature 2006 Project officer Heather Robertson, Terrestrial Wildlife Team [email protected] Contractor(s) (where appropriate) S.R. Mortimer, R. Kessock-Philip, S.G. Potts, A.J. Ramsay, S.P.M. Roberts & B.A. Woodcock Centre for Agri-Environmental Research, University of Reading, PO Box 237, Earley Gate, Reading RG6 6AR A.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera; Andrenidae) Manuela Giovanetti, Eloisa Lasso
    Body size, loading capacity and rate of reproduction in the communal bee Andrena agilissima (Hymenoptera; Andrenidae) Manuela Giovanetti, Eloisa Lasso To cite this version: Manuela Giovanetti, Eloisa Lasso. Body size, loading capacity and rate of reproduction in the com- munal bee Andrena agilissima (Hymenoptera; Andrenidae). Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2005, 36 (3), pp.439-447. hal-00892151 HAL Id: hal-00892151 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00892151 Submitted on 1 Jan 2005 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie 36 (2005) 439–447 © INRA/DIB-AGIB/ EDP Sciences, 2005 439 DOI: 10.1051/apido:2005028 Original article Body size, loading capacity and rate of reproduction in the communal bee Andrena agilissima (Hymenoptera; Andrenidae)1 Manuela GIOVANETTIa*, Eloisa LASSOb** a Dip. Biologia, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 26, 20133 Milano, Italy b Dep. Plant Biology, University of Illinois, 505 S. Goodwin Av., 265 Morrill Hall, Urbana, IL 61801, USA Received 12 February 2004 – revised 3 November 2004 – accepted 12 November 2004 Published online 9 August 2005 Abstract – In bees, body size may be particularly important in determining the loading capacity, and consequently the rate of reproduction.
    [Show full text]
  • Ejt-719 Williams Altanchimeg Byvaltsev.Indd
    European Journal of Taxonomy 719: 1–120 ISSN 2118-9773 https://doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2020.719.1107 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2020 · Williams P.H. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0). Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A4500016-C219-4353-B81C-5E0BB520547F Widespread polytypic species or complexes of local species? Revising bumblebees of the subgenus Melanobombus world-wide (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus) Paul H. WILLIAMS 1,*, Dorjsuren ALTANCHIMEG 2, Alexandr BYVALTSEV 3, Roland DE JONGHE 4, Saleem JAFFAR 5, George JAPOSHVILI 6, Sih KAHONO 7, Huan LIANG 8, Maurizio MEI 9, Alireza MONFARED 10, Tshering NIDUP 11, Rifat RAINA 12, Zongxin REN 13, Chawatat THANOOSING 14, Yanhui ZHAO 15 & Michael C. ORR 16 1,14 Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. 2 Institute of General and Experimental Biology, Peace Avenue 54b, Ulaanbaatar 13330, Mongolia. 3 Novosibirsk State University, ul. Pirogova 2, Novosibirsk, 630090 Russia. 4 Langstraat 105, B-2260 Westerlo, Belgium. 5 South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. 6 Agricultural University of Georgia, 240 Agmashenebli Alley, Tbilisi, Georgia. 7 Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Jakarta, Indonesia. 8,13,15 Kunming Institute of Botany (Chinese Academy of Sciences), 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming, Yunnan 650201, China. 9 Università di Roma ‘Sapienza’, Piazzale Valerio Massimo 6, Roma 00162, Italy. 10 Yasouj University, Zirtol, Yasouj, Iran. 11 Sherubtse College, Royal University of Bhutan, Trashigang, Bhutan. 12 Zoological Survey of India, Pali Road, Jodhpur 342005, Rajasthan, India. 16 Institute of Zoology (Chinese Academy of Sciences), 1 Beichen West Road, Chaoyang, Beijing 100101, China.
    [Show full text]
  • Competition Between Honeybees and Wild Danish Bees in an Urban Area
    Competition between honeybees and wild Danish bees in an urban area Thomas Blindbæk 20072975 Master thesis MSc Aarhus University Department of bioscience Supervised by Yoko Luise Dupont 60 ECTS Master thesis English title: Competition between honeybees and wild Danish bees in an urban area Danish title: Konkurrence mellem honningbier og vilde danske bier i et bymiljø Author: Thomas Blindbæk Project supervisor: Yoko Luise Dupont, institute for bioscience, Silkeborg department Date: 16/06/17 Front page: Andrena fulva, photo by Thomas Blindbæk 2 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................ 5 Resumé ........................................................................................................ 6 Introduction .................................................................................................. 7 Honeybees .............................................................................................. 7 Pollen specialization and nesting preferences of wild bees .............................. 7 Competition ............................................................................................. 8 The urban environment ........................................................................... 10 Study aims ............................................................................................ 11 Methods ...................................................................................................... 12 Pan traps ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Trait-Based Approach Laura Roquer Beni Phd Thesis 2020
    ADVERTIMENT. Lʼaccés als continguts dʼaquesta tesi queda condicionat a lʼacceptació de les condicions dʼús establertes per la següent llicència Creative Commons: http://cat.creativecommons.org/?page_id=184 ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis queda condicionado a la aceptación de las condiciones de uso establecidas por la siguiente licencia Creative Commons: http://es.creativecommons.org/blog/licencias/ WARNING. The access to the contents of this doctoral thesis it is limited to the acceptance of the use conditions set by the following Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en Pollinator communities and pollination services in apple orchards: a trait-based approach Laura Roquer Beni PhD Thesis 2020 Pollinator communities and pollination services in apple orchards: a trait-based approach Tesi doctoral Laura Roquer Beni per optar al grau de doctora Directors: Dr. Jordi Bosch i Dr. Anselm Rodrigo Programa de Doctorat en Ecologia Terrestre Centre de Recerca Ecològica i Aplicacions Forestals (CREAF) Universitat de Autònoma de Barcelona Juliol 2020 Il·lustració de la portada: Gala Pont @gala_pont Al meu pare, a la meva mare, a la meva germana i al meu germà Acknowledgements Se’m fa impossible resumir tot el que han significat per mi aquests anys de doctorat. Les qui em coneixeu més sabeu que han sigut anys de transformació, de reptes, d’aprendre a prioritzar sense deixar de cuidar allò que és important. Han sigut anys d’equilibris no sempre fàcils però molt gratificants. Heu sigut moltes les persones que m’heu acompanyat, d’una manera o altra, en el transcurs d’aquest projecte de creixement vital i acadèmic, i totes i cadascuna de vosaltres, formeu part del resultat final.
    [Show full text]
  • Entertainment-Education in Science Education Available on Mobile Devices Interactive Tasks Allow You to Quickly Verify the Acquired Knowledge
    Entertainment-education in science education the monograph edited by Grzegorz Karwasz & Małgorzata Nodzyńska 1 2 Entertainment-education in science education the monograph edited by Grzegorz Karwasz & Małgorzata Nodzyńska TORUŃ 2017 3 The monograph edited by: Grzegorz Karwasz & Małgorzata Nodzyńska Rewievers: Cover: Ewelina Kobylańska ISBN .......... 4 Introduction Jan Amos Komensky in „Great Didactics” (Amsterdam, 1657) defined didactics not as a mere process of teaching, but as teaching efficient, lasting and pleasant. He wrote (p. 131) “The school itself should be a pleasant place, and attractive to the eye both within and without. […] If this is done, boys will, in all probability, go to school with as much pleasure as to fairs, where they always hope to see and hear something new.” Further (p. 167) Komensky added: “The desire to know and to learn should be excited in boys in every possible manner.” The idea of linking the fun with didactics finds many followers, expressed also in tittles of activities like “Science is Fun” or “Physics is Fun”. In (Karwasz, Kruk, 2012) we defined three complementary aspects of any bit of information (an exhibition object, a film, a lecture): entertainment (“ludico” in Italian), didactics, and science. The first aspect gives an impression to a student/ visitor/ listener: “how funny it is!”. The didactical aspect induces: “How simple it is!” And the aspect of scientific curiosity induces in best students a question: “How complex it is!” These three functions add-up like three basic colors to give a full spectrum of enlightenment. The entertainment function can be performed in different forms – school, extra-school, complementary to school.
    [Show full text]
  • Bumble Bees of the Susa Valley (Hymenoptera Apidae)
    Bulletin of Insectology 63 (1): 137-152, 2010 ISSN 1721-8861 Bumble bees of the Susa Valley (Hymenoptera Apidae) Aulo MANINO, Augusto PATETTA, Giulia BOGLIETTI, Marco PORPORATO Di.Va.P.R.A. - Entomologia e Zoologia applicate all’Ambiente “Carlo Vidano”, Università di Torino, Grugliasco, Italy Abstract A survey of bumble bees (Bombus Latreille) of the Susa Valley was conducted at 124 locations between 340 and 3,130 m a.s.l. representative of the whole territory, which lies within the Cottian Central Alps, the Northern Cottian Alps, and the South-eastern Graian Alps. Altogether 1,102 specimens were collected and determined (180 queens, 227 males, and 695 workers) belonging to 30 species - two of which are represented by two subspecies - which account for 70% of those known in Italy, demonstrating the particular value of the area examined with regard to environmental quality and biodiversity. Bombus soroeensis (F.), Bombus me- somelas Gerstaecker, Bombus ruderarius (Mueller), Bombus monticola Smith, Bombus pratorum (L.), Bombus lucorum (L.), Bombus terrestris (L.), and Bombus lapidarius (L.) can be considered predominant, each one representing more than 5% of the collected specimens, 12 species are rather common (1-5% of specimens) and the remaining nine rare (less than 1%). A list of col- lected specimens with collection localities and dates is provided. To illustrate more clearly the altitudinal distribution of the dif- ferent species, the capture locations were grouped by altitude. 83.5% of the samples is also provided with data on the plant on which they were collected, comprising a total of 52 plant genera within 20 plant families.
    [Show full text]
  • South West Bees Project Andrena Hattorfiana 2016
    Cornwall – June/July/August 2016 September 2016 Will Hawkes – Volunteer Saving the small things that run the planet Contents 1. Summary--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3 2. Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4 3. Species description-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------5 4. Field surveys---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 5. Survey Sites ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7-16 5.1 Overview of Sites---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------7 Map 1 Bee and Scabious records of Cornwall---------------------------------------------------7 5.2 Gwithian Towans-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-10 5.2.1 Overview----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------8-9 5.2.2 Areas to improve--------------------------------------------------------------------------------9 5.2.3 Scabious locations and bee sightings table----------------------------------------------10 Map 2 Bee and Scabious records of Gwithian Towans--------------------------------------10 5.3 Kelsey Head and West Pentire----------------------------------------------------------------------11-15
    [Show full text]
  • Bees and Wasps of the East Sussex South Downs
    A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 A SURVEY OF THE BEES AND WASPS OF FIFTEEN CHALK GRASSLAND AND CHALK HEATH SITES WITHIN THE EAST SUSSEX SOUTH DOWNS Steven Falk, 2011 Abstract For six years between 2003 and 2008, over 100 site visits were made to fifteen chalk grassland and chalk heath sites within the South Downs of Vice-county 14 (East Sussex). This produced a list of 227 bee and wasp species and revealed the comparative frequency of different species, the comparative richness of different sites and provided a basic insight into how many of the species interact with the South Downs at a site and landscape level. The study revealed that, in addition to the character of the semi-natural grasslands present, the bee and wasp fauna is also influenced by the more intensively-managed agricultural landscapes of the Downs, with many species taking advantage of blossoming hedge shrubs, flowery fallow fields, flowery arable field margins, flowering crops such as Rape, plus plants such as buttercups, thistles and dandelions within relatively improved pasture. Some very rare species were encountered, notably the bee Halictus eurygnathus Blüthgen which had not been seen in Britain since 1946. This was eventually recorded at seven sites and was associated with an abundance of Greater Knapweed. The very rare bees Anthophora retusa (Linnaeus) and Andrena niveata Friese were also observed foraging on several dates during their flight periods, providing a better insight into their ecology and conservation requirements.
    [Show full text]