UNIVERSITY of LONDON THESIS This Thesis Comes Within Category D
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
REFERENCE ONLY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON THESIS Degree ^V\v& Year Name of Author \0~i4* COPYRIGHT This is a thesis accepted for a Higher Degree of the University of London. It is an unpublished typescript and the copyright is held by the author. All persons consulting the thesis must read and abide bythe Copyright Declaration below. COPYRIGHT DECLARATION I recognise that the copyright of the above-described thesis rests with the author and that no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without the prior written consent of the author. LOANS Theses may not be lent to individuals, but the Senate House Library may lend a copy to approved libraries within the United Kingdom, for consultation solely on the premises of those libraries. Application should be made to; Inter-Library Loans, Senate House Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. REPRODUCTION University of London theses may not be reproduced without explicit written permission from the Senate House Library. Enquiries should be addressed to the Theses Section of the Library. Regulations concerning reproduction vary according to the date of acceptance of the thesis and are listed below as guidelines. A. Before 1962. Permission granted only upon the prior written consent of the author. (The Senate House Library will provide addresses where possible). B. 1962 -1974. In many cases the author has agreed to permit copying upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. C. 1975 - 1988. Most theses may be copied upon completion of a Copyright Declaration. D. 1989 onwards. Most theses may be copied. This thesis comes within category D. FT This copy has been deposited in the Library of — This copy has been deposited in the Senate House Library, Senate House, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HU. C:\Documentsand Settings\lproctor\I_Gcat SettingsYTemporary Internet Fiies\OLKS\Copyright- thesis (2).doc Canine oral biofilms: cultural, molecular, and in vitro studies David Richard Elliott September 2005 Eastman Dental Institute (University College London) Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Microbiology (clinical dentistry) UMI Number: U592012 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U592012 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Abstract The canine oral microbiota is poorly understood compared to that of humans. The aim of this work was to improve understanding of the canine oral microbiota. This was achieved by surveying the canine oral microbiota, determining coaggregation interactions between its mem bers, and developing a laboratory microcosm. Bacteria were isolated from the dental plaque and saliva of dogs, and isolates were identified by comparative 16S rRNA gene sequenc ing. From 339 isolates, 84 phylotypes belonging to 37 genera were identified. Approximately half were identified to species level, and 28 % of these were also members of the human oral microbiota. Thirty eight phylotypes were tentatively identified as candidate new species. The genera most frequently isolated from saliva were Actinomyces, Streptococcus, and Granulicatella. Porphyromonas, Actinomyces, and Neisseria were most frequently isolated from plaque. On average, se quences from this study differed by almost 7 % in the 16S rRNA gene compared to similar organisms from humans. Targeted PCR was used to detect culture resistant bacteria from ca nine plaque. Successful amplification indicated that Spirochaetes and candidate division TM7 bacteria were present, however the identities of the originating organisms were not determined. The entire cultivable plaque microbiota from a single dog was as sessed for coaggregation reactions. Eight (6.7 %) unique interactions were detected from 120 crosses, indicating that the prevalence of coag gregation is similar in the canine and human oral microbiotas. Genera common to both hosts generally exhibited similar coaggregation reac tions, however autoaggregation was more common among bacteria iso lated from dogs. The constant depth film fermenter was used to grow microcosms from canine plaque and saliva using a mucin containing artificial saliva supplemented with horse serum as the growth medium. The model produced biofilms similar to natural dental plaque, which could be used to investigate the canine oral microbiota further. 2 Acknowledgements Many people have contributed to this work by encouraging and sup porting me both academically and personally. I dedicate this thesis to my wife Pamela, whose continual love and support has been invaluable. Thank you for tolerating my indulgence so happily, and for the sacrifices you have made on my behalf. I thank my parents and extended family for providing a loving en vironment in which my childhood interest in science and nature was encouraged. I also wish to thank my parents for their generous finan cial assitance throughout my education. Thanks to my colleagues and friends at the Eastman Dental Institute for your technical assistance, discussion, and fun times. I also acknowledge assistance with DNA sequencing given by Prof William Wade at Guys and St Thomas’s, and thank Dr Marilou Ciantar and Lisa Milella for their kind assistance with sampling. Financial sup port for this project was generously provided by the BBSRC and the Waltham Centre for Pet Nutrition. Finally, special thanks go to my academic and industrial supervi sors. Dr Neil Culham, Dr Catherine Buckley, and Dr Marie-Louise Baillon were all involved in my supervision at the Waltham Centre. At the Eastman, Prof Mike Wilson and Dr Dave Spratt were my academic supervisors. Between them they inspired and motivated me, enabled me to work productively, and allowed me to develop as an independent researcher. 3 Abbreviations General abbreviations AA anaerobe agar AS artificial saliva BHI brain heart infusion bp base pairs BPA black pigmented anaerobic bacteria CAS canine artificial saliva CBA Columbia agar base CFAT cadmium fluoride acriflavin tellurite cfu colony forming units CP canine plaque CPP canine pooled plaque CPS canine pooled saliva DGGE denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis DNA deoxyribonucleic acid FISH fluorescent in situ hybridisation GCF gingival crevicular fluid h hour PBS phosphate buffered saline PCR polymerase chain reaction ptype phylotype RCF relative centrifugal force (multiples of g) RNA ribonucleic acid rRNA ribosomal RNA S Svedberg unit (measure of density) sp. species (singular) spp. species (plural) Tm melting temperature tvc total viable count UPGMA unweighted pair group method with arithmetic means V volt (electric potential difference) Units m metre min minute M moles litre-1 (molarity) MY million year MYA million years ago y m year month Unit prefixes m milli- (xlO-3) /.i micro- (xlO-6) n nano- (xlO-9) 4 Contents A bstract.......................................................................................................... 2 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................... 3 Abbreviations ................................................................................................. 4 List of Figures 10 List of Tables 12 1 Introduction 14 1.1 Microbially-mediated oral diseases ...................................................... 15 1.1.1 Periodontal d ise a se s ............................................................... 16 1.1.2 Diseases of the to o th ............................................................... 16 1.2 Oral disease in the d o g ......................................................................... 18 1.3 Oral microbiota of humans and d o g s ................................................... 19 1.3.1 Firmicutes ............................................................................... 20 1.3.2 Fusobacteria........................................................................... 26 1.3.3 Actinobacteria ........................................................................ 27 1.3.4 Spirochaetes ............................................................................ 30 1.3.5 Proteobacteria........................................................................ 30 1.3.6 Bacteroidetes........................................................................... 35 1.3.7 Deferribacteres........................................................................ 37 1.3.8 Candidate divisions TM7 and OP11 ...................................... 37 1.4 Modelling the oral m icro b io ta............................................................. 38 1.4.1 In vivo system s........................................................................ 39 1.4.2 Planktonic in vitro system s...................................................... 40 1.4.3 Biofilm in vitro sy ste m s......................................................... 40 5 CONTENTS 1.5 Methods of community a n a ly sis ....................................................... 43 1.5.1 Microscopic.............................................................................