DOCSLIB.ORG

Recommendations 35

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Recommendations 35 Joanna Bennett Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah Zoë Ware The Royal Commonwealth Society March 2010 ABOUT THIS REPORT ……………………………………………………………… This report presents the full findings of the Commonwealth Conversation, a public consultation about the future of the Commonwealth run by the Royal Commonwealth Society (RCS) from July 2009 to March 2010. It has been written by an RCS team comprising Joanna Bennett (Communications Manager), Dhananjayan Sriskandarajah (Director) and Zoë Ware (Commonwealth Affairs Manager). Project assistance was provided by Anushya Devendra and Alex Try. The RCS is grateful to the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) for their financial support and to countless people around the Commonwealth who have devoted considerable amounts of time, often on a voluntary basis, to making this undertaking a success. The views expressed in this report are those of its authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the Trustees or Members of the RCS, or of the FCO. Defining the Commonwealth Given its long history and changing nature, ‘the Commonwealth’ is not always easy to define. In this report and throughout the Commonwealth Conversation, we have tried to be clear which aspect of the Commonwealth is being referred to, including: Member States: All 54 countries that are members of the Commonwealth Intergovernmental Commonwealth: The Commonwealth’s official organs funded by and serving member states (Commonwealth Secretariat, Commonwealth Foundation and Commonwealth of Learning) Commonwealth Civil Society organisations: The non-governmental organisations that work to promote the Commonwealth, often accredited to the inter-governmental Commonwealth. For a comprehensive list see: www.thecommonwealth.org Commonwealth ‘family’: All organisations, member governments and peoples who work on Commonwealth issues 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ………………………………………………………………. The Commonwealth Conversation would not have been possible without the help of numerous people who have given their time selflessly to this project, including, but by no means limited to, those listed below. Organisations Association of Commonwealth Universities BBC World British Council British Council Kenya British Council Tanzania British Council Zimbabwe British Youth Council Chancellor College, Malawi CM Insight Commonwealth Broadcasting Association Commonwealth Business Council Commonwealth Foundation Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative Commonwealth Journalists Association India Commonwealth Parliamentary Association Canada Commonwealth Parliamentary Association UK Commonwealth People’s Association of Uganda Commonwealth Policy Studies Unit Commonwealth Scholarships Commission Commonwealth Secretariat Commonwealth Student Welfare Group of India Commonwealth Trust, Wellington (RCS Branch) Commonwealth Youth Exchange Council Commonwealth Youth Organisation of Nigeria Commonwealth Youth Programme Dept of Political Studies, University of Cape Town Foreign and Commonwealth Office, UK Global Rights Institute of Commonwealth Studies Hope Enterprises Ltd, Jamaica Luvei Viti Community Group, New Zealand Institute of Security Studies, South Africa I-TECH Namibia Institute of International Relations, UWI, Trinidad Institute of International Studies, New Zealand Media Initiative for Public Policy, Bangladesh Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Maldives ModComms Ltd Obafemi Awolowo University, Nigeria One Tree Hill College, Auckland Otjozondjupa Regional Education Authority, Namibia Phat Reaction RCS Auckland Branch RCS Bath Branch RCS Cambridge Branch RCS Cameroon Branch 3 RCS Canberra Branch RCS Honorary Representative, Cayman Islands RCS Ottawa Branch RCS Queensland Branch RCS Saskatchewan Branch RCS Toronto Branch Redactive Print Management Routledge Journals, Taylor and Francis Group Royal Agricultural Society of the Commonwealth Shaaban Robert Secondary School The Round Table University of Engineering and Technology, Pakistan Westminster School, UK YouGov Individuals Abigail Trow, Adam Hassan, Ahmed Shiaan, Alastair Rabagliati, Alex Nuwagaba, Andrew Firmin, Andrew Tuggey, Andy Killen, Ann Hodkinson, Asad Mirza, Blackson Olaseni Bayewumi, Catherine Millican, Celia Watts, Charles Quin, Cheryl Dorall, Chris Harrington, Chris Nelson, Claire Anholt, Claire Hastings, Clare Mansfield, Conrad Bird, Cornelia Ndifon, Courtney Battistone, Daisy Cooper, Danny Andrews, Darryl Stevens, Datuk Feisol, David Howell, Derek Smail, Ed Matthews, Eduardo Del Buey, Ejazur Rahman, Elisapeci Samanunu Waqanivalu, Emily Fitzgerald, Frederick Kiapi, Gary Davis, Gavin Tench, Gordon Ross, Hari Om Dahiya, Hatty Cooper, Hugh Craft, Ian O’Reilly, James Ballantyne, Jason Rheinberg, Jean Philippe L’Eveque, Joany Grima, John Bradshaw, John Phillips, Joy Okech, Kareem Folajaiye, Kate Davies, Kevin Nellies, Laura Webb, Mandi Manga Obase, Marcie Shaoul, Margaret Russell, Mark Collins, Matt O’Neill, Matthew Albert, Michael McWilliam, Mmasekgoa Masire-Mwamba, Mong Marma, Nadia Hashmi, Neal Dalgleish, Nicky Baughen, Olalekan Oshunkoya, Patricia Alston, Patrick Wintour, Patsy Robertson, Paul Easton, Peter Kellner, Peter Marshall, Peter Williams, Petra Cooke, Philip Bolam, Philippa Norton, Purna Sen, Rajiv Bendre, Richard Bourne, Richard King, Richard Luce, Rita Payne, Rob Jordan, Robert Schrire, Ruth Dix, Sarah Barton, Sarah Lee, Sean Leno, Seth Lartey, Simon Atkinson, Simon Lever, Stefano Fabeni, Steve Cutts, Suzanne Livingston, Terry Barringer, Tim Shaw, Tom Baird, Vic Craggs, Victoria Bower, Wajahat Nassar, and Will Henley. 4 CONTENTS ……………………………………………………………… 1. Introduction 6 2. Methodology 8 1. Surveys 9 2. Online Activities 13 3. Offline Activities 18 4. Competition 28 5. Media 29 3. Recommendations 35 1. Live out principles 35 2. Lead from the front 38 3. Innovate and be bold 40 4. Prove worth 42 5. Exploit unique strengths 43 6. Invest 45 7. Communicate clearly 47 8. Short is sweet 49 9. Interact 50 10. Reach more people 51 4. Conclusion 52 Annex 1 Poll Results Annex 2 Online Discussion Group Summary Report Annex 3 Winning Commonwealth Chat Report Annex 4 My Commonwealth Competition Winners Annex 5 Opinion Pieces 5 1. INTRODUCTION ……………………………………………………………… In March 2009, to coincide with Commonwealth Day, the Royal Commonwealth Society conducted a nationally representative opinion poll in the UK to gauge the Commonwealth’s profile and reputation. Its results were alarming, but many people at the time told us the outlook was far bleaker in the UK than elsewhere. To put this oft cited theory to the test, we set about conducting six more opinion polls in Australia, Canada, India, Jamaica, Malaysia and South Africa. The results, published as part of the launch of the Commonwealth Conversation on 20 July 2009, did little to assuage our fears. Across these countries, we unearthed indifference and ignorance. The misperceptions and scepticism surrounding the Commonwealth seemed to point towards some deep-seated challenges and, in the association’s 60th anniversary year, we wanted to determine what they were. It was with this in mind that we embarked upon our consultation. The main aims of the Conversation were: • To gather views about the Commonwealth and its future • To identify key issues on which the Commonwealth should focus • To develop recommendations to present to Commonwealth leaders and policymakers • To help revitalise the Commonwealth and reconnect it to a new generation • To raise awareness about the Commonwealth In the pursuit of these aims, we adopted a wide range of online and offline consultation methods (for full details see Section 2 on Methodology) and deliberately set out to engage with the broadest cross section of participants, including members of the public, government officials, opinion leaders and Commonwealth experts. After four months, in November 2009, we published our emerging findings ahead of the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) in Trinidad and Tobago. We called our report ‘Common What?’ (available to download from our website). The title echoed a phrase used by two participants in the Conversation: a journalist in South Africa and a Jamaican businesswoman in the UK. Both told us that, if they were to ask their friends and colleagues how relevant the Commonwealth was to them, this is the response they would get. The phrase also seemed to capture much of what we had found by that stage, including a widespread lack of awareness about what the modern Commonwealth is and an uncertainty about what exactly its member states have in common that sets the association apart from other international groupings. In trying to understand the reasons for the Commonwealth’s low profile, in our emerging findings, we identified several key challenges. We characterised these as the 3 Ps: principles, priorities and people. If the Commonwealth were to renew its focus on these three areas, we argued, it would rebuild its profile and become a stronger, healthier association, better equipped to prosper in the 21st century. We emphasised that the whole Commonwealth family, from member states to inter- governmental institutions, to civil society, shared a responsibility for this revitalisation. Our emerging findings were provocative and unashamedly so. We deliberately did not tone down what we had heard (nor did we pick the most sensationalist or critical comments as some people suggested at the time). We felt that we had a duty to accurately record what we had been told, even if it made for uncomfortable reading. But we also chose not to tone down
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Gender, Generation and Memory: Remembering a Future Caribbean
    Alissa Trotz: Gender, Generation and Memory: Remembering a Future Caribbean Gender, Generation and Memory: Remembering a Future Caribbean CGDS, The UWI, Cave Hill Campus Working Paper No. 14, March 2008 Alissa Trotz Associate Professor, New College, University of Toronto, Now Associate Professor in Women and Gender Studies and Director of the Undergraduate Caribbean Studies Program New College, University of Toronto ISBN: 978-976-621-157-4 Centre for Gender and Development Studies (CGDS) The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus Working Paper Series Editorial Committee Prof. Eudine Barriteau, Head, CGDS, NBU, UWI, Cave Hill Campus; Editor, CRGS Prof. Patricia Mohammed, CGDS, The UWI, St. Augustine Dr. Letnie Rock, Head and Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Government, Sociology and Social Work, The UWI, Cave Hill Campus Ms Sheila Stuart, Social Affairs Officer – Gender, ECLAC Dr. Keith Nurse, Director, Shridath Ramphal Centre for International Trade, Law, Policy and Services, The UWI, Cave Hill Campus Dr. Jessica Byron, Senior Lecturer, Dept. of Government, Sociology and Social Work, UWI, Mona Editorial Assistant Ms Carmen Hutchinson, CGDS, NBU, UWI, Cave Hill Campus 327 www.sta.uwi.edu/crgs/index.asp UWI IGDS CRGS Issue 9 ISSN 1995-1108 Keywords: Caribbean gender relations, migration, Caribbean development, globalisation, regional integration, Caribbean diaspora How to cite Trotz, Alissa. 2015. “Gender, Generation and Memory: Remembering a Future Caribbean.” Caribbean Review of Gender Studies issue 9, 327- 372 328 Alissa Trotz: Gender, Generation and Memory: Remembering a Future Caribbean Editor's Note Working Paper No.14 is based on a lecture delivered by Dr. Alissa Trotz, Associate Professor, New College University of Toronto, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulatory Consultation: a MENA-OECD Practitioners' Guide
    Regulatory Consultation A MENA-OECD PRACTITIONERS’ GUIDE FOR ENGAGING STAKEHOLDERS IN THE RULE-MAKING PROCESS Regulatory Consultation.indd 1 09-Nov-2012 5:45:09 PM ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Acknowledgements. This guide is based on the work of the regional initiative of the MENA-OECD Governance Programme and the 2011 OECD publication: “Regulatory Consultation in the Palestinian Authority” which has been prepared in cooperation with the Palestinian Authority within the framework of the MENA-OECD Initiative. In addition, this guide refers to the upcoming OECD progress report on the implementation of regulatory reform in MENA countries and summarises the outcomes of the policy dialogue organised by the MENA-OECD Working Group IV on Regulatory Reform. The OECD Secretariat owes special thanks to the Palestinian Authority in completing the above-mentioned 2011 OECD publication: Minister Ali Jarbawi; Deputy Minister of Justice, Khalil Karaja Al-Rifai; Mousa Abu Zeid, President of General Personnel Council; Head of the Secretariat of the Council of Ministers, Naim Abu Al Hommos; Acting Head of the Diwan al-Fatwa wa’ Tashri’, Ali Abu Diak; he Legal Adviser of the President, Office of the President, Hasan Al-Ori and the Special Advisor to the Minister and Head of Aid Management and Coordination Directorate of the Ministry of Planning and Administrative Development, Mr. Estephan Salameh. The OECD is grateful to the delegates of the regional working groups of the MENA-OECD Governance Programme for their active engagement in completing the work and discussing the Guide’s key findings: the Working Group IV on Regulatory Reform, chaired by Tunisia and co- chaired by Canada, France and Italy, the Working Group II, chaired by the United Arab Emirates and co-chaired by Italy and South Korea as well as of the MENA-OECD Governance Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Resolving Intra-National Conflicts: a Strengthened Role for Non- Governmental Actors
    Resolving Intra-National Conflicts: A Strengthened Role for Non- Governmental Actors The Carter Center January 1992 Table of Contents 1. Foreword 2. Introduction to the International Negotiation Network 3. Opening Plenary Address-Human Rights: The Real Cost of War Jimmy Carter 4. Opening Plenary Session-Issues of National Sovereignty and their Impact on NGOs Involved in Conflict Resolution 5. Working Sessions Afghanistan Angola Burma/Myanmar Cambodia Cyprus Korean Peninsula Liberia Sudan Psychological Dimensions of Conflict Sustaining the Peace 6. Conversation with Eduard Shevardnadze 7. Closing Plenary Address-Globalism and Meaningful Peace: A New World Order Rooted in International Community Shridath Ramphal 8. Appendix Consultation Program Consultation Participants Foreword This report is a summary of the inaugural consultation of the International Negotiation Network (INN), held at The Carter Center of Emory University CCEU), in Atlanta, Georgia, January 14-17, 1992. The consultation brought together over 200 invited guests from 40 countries and more than 150 organizations or governments. It was made possible through the generous support of the Carnegie Corporation of New York, and shaped in part by that foundation's president, David Hamburg, who has served as one of the INN's advisors. The INN is first and perhaps foremost a network linking individuals, organizations, resources, and parties in conflict throughout the world. One of its most important functions is the ability to convene persons involved in common pursuits who seldom have the opportunity to meet one another. The participants in the consultation, whose names are listed in the appendix, represent a mix of parties engaged in conflicts, as well as a broad cross-section of diplomats, scholars, practitioners of "track-two" diplomacy and representatives of inter- governmental, regional and non-governmental organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Freedom of Information: a Comparative Legal Survey
    JeXo C[dZ[b ^h i]Z AVl J^[_cfehjWdY[e\j^[h_]^jje Egd\gVbbZ9^gZXidgl^i]6GI>8A:&.!<adWVa 8VbeV^\c [dg ;gZZ :megZhh^dc! V aZVY^c\ _d\ehcWj_edehj^[h_]^jjeadem_iWd ^ciZgcVi^dcVa ]jbVc g^\]ih C<D WVhZY ^c _dYh[Wi_d]boYedijWdjh[\hW_d_dj^[ AdcYdc! V edh^i^dc ]Z ]Vh ]ZaY [dg hdbZ iZc nZVgh# >c i]Vi XVeVX^in! ]Z ]Vh ldg`ZY cekj^ie\Z[l[befc[djfhWYj_j_ed[hi" ZmiZch^kZan dc [gZZYdb d[ ZmegZhh^dc VcY g^\]i id ^c[dgbVi^dc ^hhjZh ^c 6h^V! 6[g^XV! Y_l_bieY_[jo"WYWZ[c_Yi"j^[c[Z_WWdZ :jgdeZ! i]Z B^YYaZ :Vhi VcY AVi^c 6bZg^XV! ]el[hdc[dji$M^Wj_ij^_ih_]^j"_i_j gjcc^c\ igV^c^c\ hZb^cVgh! Xg^i^fj^c\ aVlh! iV`^c\XVhZhidWdi]cVi^dcVaVcY^ciZgcVi^dcVa h[WbboWh_]^jWdZ^em^Wl[]el[hdc[dji WdY^Zh! VYk^h^c\ C<Dh VcY \dkZgcbZcih! VcY ZkZc ldg`^c\ l^i] d[ÒX^Vah id egZeVgZ iek]^jje]_l[[\\[Yjje_j5J^[i[Wh[ YgV[ig^\]iid^c[dgbVi^dcaVlh#>cVYY^i^dcid iec[e\j^[gk[ij_edij^_iXeeai[[ai ]^h ldg` l^i] 6GI>8A:&.! ]Z ]Vh egdk^YZY ZmeZgi^hZ dc i]ZhZ ^hhjZh id V l^YZ gVc\Z jeWZZh[ii"fhel_Z_d]WdWYY[ii_Xb[ d[ VXidgh ^cXajY^c\ i]Z LdgaY 7Vc`! kVg^djh JCVcYdi]Zg^ciZg\dkZgcbZciVaWdY^Zh!VcY WYYekdje\j^[bWmWdZfhWYj_Y[h[]WhZ_d] cjbZgdjh C<Dh# Eg^dg id _d^c^c\ 6GI>8A: \h[[Zece\_d\ehcWj_ed"WdZWdWdWboi_i &.!IdWnBZcYZaldg`ZY^c]jbVcg^\]ihVcY ^ciZgcVi^dcVa YZkZadebZci! ^cXajY^c\ Vh V e\m^Wj_imeha_d]WdZm^o$ hZc^dg ]jbVc g^\]ih XdchjaiVci l^i] Dm[Vb 8VcVYVVcYVhV]jbVcg^\]iheda^XnVcVanhi 68dbeVgVi^kZAZ\VaHjgkZn Vi i]Z 8VcVY^Vc >ciZgcVi^dcVa 9ZkZadebZci ;gZZYdbd[>c[dgbVi^dc/ 6\ZcXn8>96# ÆJ^[\h[[Ôeme\_d\ehcWj_edWdZ_Z[Wi IdWn BZcYZa ]Vh ejWa^h]ZY l^YZan! b_[iWjj^[^[Whje\j^[l[hodej_ede\ 6 8dbeVgVi^kZ AZ\Va HjgkZn Xdcig^Wji^c\ id cjbZgdjh 6GI>8A: &.
    [Show full text]
  • The Commonwealth of Nations Today: Historical Anachronism Or Focus for Universal Values?
    2462 THE COMMONWEALTH OF NATIONS TODAY: HISTORICAL ANACHRONISM OR FOCUS FOR UNIVERSAL VALUES? Doughty Street Lecture 2010. Doughty Street Chambers, London The Royal Commonwealth Society, London 1 June 2010 The Hon. Michael Kirby AC CMG DOUGHTY STREET CHAMBERS, LONDON DOUGHTY STREET LECTURE 2010 THE ROYAL COMMONWEALTH SOCIETY LONDON, 1 JUNE 2010 THE COMMONWEALTH OF NATIONS TODAY: HISTORICAL ANACHRONISM OR FOCUS FOR UNIVERSAL VALUES? The Hon. Michael Kirby AC CMG INTRODUCTION The British Empire, precursor to the Commonwealth of Nations, grew out of decisions, most of them made in London. It is a city that never ceases to surprise the visitor. Walking yesterday through Leicester Square, I came upon a landmark that I had never previously noticed. In the centre of that public space, circling a statue, is a series of indicators, pointing in the directions of the countries of the Commonwealth. The pointers occupy every segment of the circle, indicating that members of this unique family of nations, and their people, can be found in every corner of our world. I am a member of the last generation that grew up in the era of the British Empire. In my school days in Australia, every 24 May was celebrated as Empire Day. In 1954, at my high school in Sydney, I Justice of the High Court of Australia (1996-2009); President of the Court of Appeal of Solomon Islands (1995-6); Independent Co-chairman of the Malawi Constitutional Conference (1994); member of the ILO Mission to South Africa (1991-2). After this lecture was given, it was announced that Michael Kirby was appointed to the Eminent Persons Group on the future organisation of the Commonwealth of Nations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Learning Guide to Public Involvement in Canada
    A Learning Guide to Public Involvement in Canada Mary Pat MacKinnon Sonia Pitre Judy Watling February 2007 Canadian Policy Research Networks is a not-for-profit organization. Our mission is to help make Canada a more just, prosperous and caring society. We seek to do this through excellent and timely research, effective networking and dissemination, and by providing a valued neutral space within which an open dialogue among all interested parties can take place. You can obtain further information about CPRN and its work in public involvement and other policy areas at www.cprn.org The Parliamentary Centre is an independent, not-for-profit organization whose mission is to strengthen legislatures in Canada and around the world. The Centre's guiding principle is that legislatures should play an important role in ensuring that state institutions are accountable, open and participatory. The Parliamentary Centre specializes in assisting legislatures internationally through assessment missions, capacity development and confidence building programs, research and publications as well as exposure to the experience of the Canadian Parliament. More information about the Parliamentary Centre and its work in parliamentary strengthening and democratic governance is available at www.parlcent.ca Canadian Policy Research Networks Inc. 600-250 Albert Street Ottawa, ON K1P 6M1 Tel: (613) 567-7500 Fax: (613) 567-7640 Web Site: www.cprn.org 1 Preface This document provides the reader with a self-managed learning guide to public involvement in Canada. An earlier version of the document was prepared for two researchers from the National People’s Congress of China who completed a three month study attachment to learn about public involvement practice and theory in Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Consultation on the Proposed Charter of the Commonwealth
    STANDING SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND INTERNATIONAL TRADE A Charter “Fit for Purpose”: Parliamentary Consultation on the Proposed Charter of the Commonwealth April 2012 1 Ce rapport est aussi disponible en français. Des renseignements sur le comité sont donnés sur le site : www.senate-senat.ca/foraffetrang.asp. Information regarding the committee can be obtained through its web site: www.senate-senat.ca/foraffetrang.asp. 2 A Charter “Fit for Purpose”: Parliamentary Consultation on the Proposed Charter of the Commonwealth 3 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .............................................................................................................. 7 THE COMMITTEE ........................................................................................................................ 9 ORDER OF REFERENCE ........................................................................................................... 13 I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 15 A. Background to the Committee’s study .............................................................................. 15 B. The Committee’s Consultation Process ............................................................................ 15 II. THE COMMONWEALTH AND THE PROPOSED CHARTER ....................................... 16 A. The Commonwealth
    [Show full text]
  • 1993 Annual Report
    PARLIAMENTARIANS FOR GLOB AL A CT ION ANNUAL REPORT 1 9 9 3 211 East 43rd Street, Suite 1604 New York, New York 10017 (212) 687-7755 Fax: 687-8409 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1993: Global Governance for a Planet Under Stress . ..... 1 Building A Global Security System for the 21st Century . .. ... 3 A Submission to the UN Secretary-General . 5 PROGRAMME ACTIVITIES "Global Dialogue on the New World Order" ........................ .. 7 DEMOCRACY AND DEVELOPMENT Sustainable Development and Population .. .... 8 Parliamentary Initiative for Democracy. 11 Special Project on Africa . .. 14 PEAC E AND SECURITY UN Collective Security . .. .... .. 16 International Law: International Criminal Court .... .. .18 Nuclear Test Ban and Non-Proliferation . .21 Chemical Weapons Convention .. 24 MEMB E RSHIP ... .... .. ... .26 ORGANISATION AND PUBLICITY .......... .28 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE . .... .29 INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL. .... .32 STAFF .... .33 FINANCES. .34 OUTLOOK '94. 35 GLOBAL ACTION 1993 CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS .... .................. .......... 36 A P P E N D Ix - Audited Accounts 1993 Parliamentarians for Global Action is a non-profit organisation under section 501 (c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States. 1993 GLOBAL GOVERNANCE FOR A PLANET UNDER STRESS Two events of personal significance to me symbolise the year of 1993. One morning in May, an eight-year old girl sat beside me in an august hall of the United Nations as I delivered a submission, developed at Global Action's own Workshop, to the Preparatory Committee for the UN Population and Development Conference. "The Earth," I said to the gathering of diplomats, "cannot sustain the increase in population numbers and the continued excessive consumption pattern of some societies that we are witnessing today.
    [Show full text]
  • Small States and the Challenge of Sovereignty
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by OpenGrey Repository Small States and the Challenge of Sovereignty: Commonwealth Caribbean Offshore Financial Centers and Tax Competition William B. Vlcek Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in International Relations The London School of Economics and Political Science University of London 2006 ABSTRACT The dynamics of inter-state relations and state sovereignty have been disturbed by late-20th century globalisation. Yet the literature on the international system, globalisation and international political economy gives scant attention to the most vulnerable sovereign entities, the small and micro states. One significant exception has been the Commonwealth, with its many small state members. Another is the area of financial crime, and the role of the offshore financial centre (OFC) within global finance. This thesis analyses the efforts of several small Commonwealth states from the Caribbean to maintain their OFCs in the face of an OECD-directed campaign against tax competition. It demonstrates both the contribution made to economic development by an OFC and the successful assertion of sovereignty achieved by these small states. The case study focuses on Caribbean OFCs and the OECD campaign against harmful tax competition during 1998 - 2003. First, the argument that tax competition is a global problem is deconstructed. Three main points from the small states’ response to the OECD position are explored, along with the OECD’s rebuttal. Because the small states are individually at a disadvantage, the thesis provides an exposition of the collective response facilitated by the Commonwealth.
    [Show full text]
  • Subaltern Geopolitics and the Post-Colonial Commonwealth, 1965-1990
    King’s Research Portal DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.04.003 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Craggs, R. (2018). Subaltern geopolitics and the post-colonial Commonwealth, 1965-1990. POLITICAL GEOGRAPHY , 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2018.04.003 Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Federal Government Online Public Consultation Trials: Local Learnings in E-Democracy
    ANZCA09 Communication, Creativity and Global Citizenship. Brisbane, July 2009 Australian federal government online public consultation trials: local learnings in e-democracy Jim Macnamara PhD University of Technology Sydney [email protected] Jim Macnamara PhD is Professor of Public Communication and Director of the Australian Centre for Public Communication at the University of Technology Sydney, posts he took up in 2007 after a 30-year career working in professional communication practice spanning journalism, public relations, advertising andmedia research. After co-founding and heading a leading communication agency for13 years, he founded the Asia Pacific office of a leading media research firm, CARMA International, and headed the firm for a decade before selling the company to Media Monitors in 2006. Jim holds a BA in journalism, media studies and literary studies and an MA by research in media studies from Deakin University and gained his PhD in media research from the University of Western Sydney. Abstract After its landslide victory in the 2007 Australian Federal election which was widely described as “the YouTube election”, the Rudd Labor government launched a series of trial public consultation blogs in 2008 as part of a commitment to e-democracy through the use of interactive Web 2.0 communication applications. At the same time, Barack Obama swept into power in the United States aided by Web 2.0 media including text messaging, blogs, YouTube, Twitter, and social networks such as Facebook which gained unprecedented levels of online political engagement. While e-democracy and e-government have been emerging concepts in many countries over more than a decade, these two experiences provide new information on the successes and challenges of online citizenship.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Consultation on the English Language Requirement and the New Sponsorship Framework for the Partner Visa Program
    Public consultation on the English language requirement and the new sponsorship framework for the Partner visa program Australia is a successful and cohesive multicultural nation. Over one quarter of Australia's residents were born overseas, from over 200 countries. The diversity of the population provides Australia with a variety of languages. The English language provides an important unifying element of Australian society. Integration is critical to Australia’s success, building cohesive and more resilient communities. Within the Family stream of the Migration Program, the Partner visa program facilitates unification of partners of Australian citizens, Australian permanent residents or eligible New Zealand citizens.1 The Partner program is the largest component within the Family migration stream. As part of the 2020-21 Federal Budget, the Government announced that it will implement reforms to strengthen the integration outcomes of the Partner program by the end of 2021. These include: Introducing an English language requirement for permanent resident sponsors and Partner visa applicants; and Applying the sponsorship framework set out in the Migration Amendment (Family Violence and Other Measures) Act 2018 to the Partner visa program. The Department of Home Affairs (the Department) is seeking community views to inform the development of settings and the implementation of the new English language requirement and the sponsorship framework for the Partner visa program. Part A. English Language Requirement Introduction The new English language requirement for Partner visa applicants and permanent resident sponsors will encourage and support English acquisition. English language skills assist partners to gain employment, independently access government services and seek help in emergency situations, such as when facing family violence at home or during medical emergencies.
    [Show full text]