Balance Due After Deducting from Proceeds of Auctioned Items

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Balance Due After Deducting from Proceeds of Auctioned Items BALANCE DUE AFTER DEDUCTING FROM PROCEEDS OF AUCTIONED ITEMS Payee Name Category Year Paid Remarks DAVANDRAN A/L BULOGANATHAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0110/ 0621 SIVAKUMAR A/L SUPPIAH UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00633 R SANGARI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 1366 NG CHIN WOON UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 00885 NG CHIN WOON UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 00886 NG CHIN WOON UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 00887 SALIHA BT ADNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 01018 LAAVAN A/L GOPALARISHNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 01967 MUNIANDY A/L MARIAMUTHU UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 02195 GNANAPRAKASAM A/L KANNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 02493 N G KUMAR A/L GOVINDASAMY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 02658 NARIS A/L KUPPAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 02834 RAJANDRAN A/L PALANIAPPAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 02872 MANI A/L MANIYANDI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 02941 MURALI A/L RENGARAO UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 03043 CHAN CHUN MUN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 03164 SOLIHIN BIN MOHAMED DAUD UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/ 03201 SHUHUNESWARAN A/L SAMMUGAM UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/ 0286 KARTHIKESU A/L VELLASAMY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/ 1411 YOGESMARTHA A/P SATHIASEELA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/ 00448 MOHD KHARIL BIN MOHAMMAD UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/ 0550 GAN CHIN HIN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00115 RAJENDRAN A/L PERUMAL UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00869 MALA A/P SAHADEVAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00080 MALA A/P SAHADEVAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00240 GEMMA DELA CRUZ CINDE UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 47 LEE CHIN CHUAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/676 TENG JUNG HAW UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/1009/494 KALA DEVI D/O M KRISHNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0110/573 LEONG SEET FONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/1788 DONATO MESINA PONCE UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/842 SATHISHKUMAR S/O MOHAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 629 WONG SOON YONG DAREEL UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 41189819 CHAU YOKE FONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/1414 JESSICA LGNACIO VINOYA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/181 LEE SUI CHI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0310/869 MARIA VICTONIA VILLAGOMEZ UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/1355 TING KONG ER UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 41189529 WANG HUA SHENG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 738 ROSMAWATI BINTE ASHAR UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/1109/1222 GOVINDAN KUMARESAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 165 LLANA MELIZA RONQUILLO UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/140 NISHANTHA KUMARA DASANAYAKA DA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 154 SRIWAHYUNI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/1769 PANEERCHALVAN KARTHIK UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/126 GAO HONGCONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/257 MALARVILLI D/O JESURAJU UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/1109/940 JOHN VIMALA VIMAL UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/522 ORPILLA PRINCELOU RAMOS UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 197 SEJO JOHNY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0709/98 ELANGO MOHANA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 809 SHOBAN SUPARAMANIAM UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0110/1362 RAMAPRIYA D/O TAMILSELVAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/1498 KOH CHEE CHONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0509/588 DE SILVA WILLIAM GEORGE UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 65 MARIMA AHMAD HOSSAIN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 04/10B4 CARMELITA DE JESUS MIGUEL UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 74 PAIDI BIN TOSARI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 44 WOON SWEE KAI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/1009/640 LIM CHIEW ENG (LIN QIUYING) UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 38 JONNAVARAPU SIVA PRASAD UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 1021 PHYO THANDAR HTAY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 249 THINES KUMAR A/L ARMUGAM UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 957 ELANGO MOHANA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 8071 JOVELYN ALEGRIA MERIDA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/805 CHANTHIRAKASAN BALAMURUGAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 88 IWAN KUSMANDA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0709/390 GAFFAR BIN YUSOFF UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/674 SHERYL TUMAMAO BAITIONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 471 PUNITHAVATHY SIVA PAKMAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/1109/340 WOON SWEE KAI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/1009/591 SOOSAIMANICKAM ALEXANDER UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 37 SINNATHAMBY SIVASHANTHAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 393 RIZABUDDIN BIN JOHARI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 11 LEE BOON KIAT UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/924 CARMELITA DE JESUS MIGUEL UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 386 XU QIAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 9 WONG SOON YONG DAREEL UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 41189818 ABDUL MANAN BIN MOHD NASIR UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/1008 SUTINI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0410/525 WONG HOY CHAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 295 SIVAKUMAR S/O RAMASAMY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 923 SEE BOON KWEE UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 501 JAYSON JOHNREY ROBLE UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 25 TAN SHWU FENG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/580 HO HWEE ENG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 218 LIM CHIEW ENG (LIN QIUYING) UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 39 SULAIMAN BIN OSMAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0310/349 GUNASEGARAN ANNAMALAI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 375 PANYASEN NATTHAKAMON UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0110/1010 CHAN SAI CHOONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0310/578 ANUJA A/P MOOTHI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0310/361 WYNN KO KO UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 87 USHADHAVY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 539 CHONG YEOW HOONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 411891255 CHEN TECK HWA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 04/10B1921 MD FARIZAN B JOHARI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0310/ 2781 SURESNA A/P SOMASUNDARAM UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00873 GAN CHIN HIN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00252 RAYMOND TAN POH CHUAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00733 RAYMOND TAN POH CHUAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00735 WONG TONG FOONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00204 LETCHUMANAN A/L APPAVOO UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00662 RANI A/P RAJANGAM UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 01168 TAM SIEW LAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00485 YEK NAI LEE UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 01970 YEK NAI LEE UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 02108 ONG LAY ENG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00463 TAN LEE HUA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00317 TAN LEE HUA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00318 TEEBAH A/P KARUPAIAH UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 01059 AMALUDDIN BIN MD DARUS UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 01188 KANAGESWARY A/P SKANDIAH UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 01532 JAGATHAMBHAL A/P MUNIANDY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00478 ANJALADEVI MRS JOHN PETER PARANJOTHI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 0435 YE YIBIN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 1080 TAN LI YIN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 00248 JAMES SARAVANAN A/L SINAPPAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 00691 LIM ZHI ZHONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 00835 SUGUNAN A/L RAMU UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 00897 FUN KOK KIANG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 01044 MAHESVARAN A/L SIPPIA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00257 MAHESVARAN A/L SIPPIA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00258 FOO SET YEOW UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00259 RAMKUMAR A/L KUMARAN BALAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00531 RAMKUMAR A/L KUMARAN BALAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00532 YEAP LEONG CHYE UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 01068 TONY YONG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 02257 SHASITHARAM A/L RAMAL UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 02467 RAJAETHARAN A/L IYAN KUTTY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 03418 DORIS RAGA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 01078 S SHANMUGAM A/L SUBRAMANIAM UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00212 TEO KAI SIANG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00276 TAN LAI PENG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00030 PALMA RUEL UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00612 VADIVELAN A/L RAMASAMY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00104 PALLEWATHTHE GEDARA THUSITHA S UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00272 SUNG NAM UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00303 SOO LEY HWA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 072010/B/10812 KANAN A/L RAMASAMY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 072010/B/12961 SITI AMINAH BINTI SARMIJAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 072010/B/13730 SUGANTHI A/P SUPREMANIAM UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/ 0483 NORAINI BINTE MOHAMED HADI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/ 01400 NORAINI BINTE MOHAMED HADI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/ 01401 BALA MURUGAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 07/10 00852 THEIVENDRAM A/L MUTHUKEPAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 07/10 02841 SUN SAM MOI @ SOON SAM MOI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 0338 LEE PENG YEW UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00145 WONG SIN HUAT UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 00469 JAYALAKSHMI A/P PACHIYAPPAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 092010/B/11118 MANIMARAN A/L BALAKRISHNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 092010/B/11180 RAVINTHARAN A/L KRISHNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 092010/B/13673 RAVINTHARAN A/L KRISHNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 092010/B/13674 VEERAN A/L KRISHNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 092010/B/13675 LEE AH PHENG UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/1010/ 0040 SAMUGAM A/L ANNASAMY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0210/ 00826 LIM CHEN LING UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 06/10 00280 RATNAMALAR A/P K RATNAM UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 00698 NAGALINGAM A/L KUPPUSAMY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 01275 R GAYATHRI A/P RAMACHANDRAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 08/10 02277 LETCHIMY A/P KUPUSAMY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 00909 INDIRANI A/P S KRISHNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 01057 YESUDOSS A/L PONNUSAMY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 02893 SARASPATHI A/P AVADAYAR UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 03114 SURESH KUMA A/L BALAKRISHNAN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10 03169 YAP CHEE ONN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 0208 SUCILA A/P SAITHU UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/ 2384 CHANDRAN SRIDHAR UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10943 ALI BIN MINGOO UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/10324 WANG MING CAI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 46 SOH CHYE TECK UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0710/1560 SITI NORBAYAH BINTE AHMAD UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/73 CUBALLES KAHLIL LLORIN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 325 JASILA BINTE BADARDIN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/1355 DENG CINDY UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/276 MOHAMMED NASIR BIN AWI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 09/102172 MARGARITA BOMITIV UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/453 SOH BEE KIEN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 B/0910/1240 CHEN KUI UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 94 MOHD ALFARAD B WAHYUDIN UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 07/10948 SEMBUTHANTHIRIGE DONA MANJULA UNCLAIMED SURPLUS 2011 08/101085
Recommended publications
  • OPENING of the LEGAL YEAR 2019 Speech by Attorney-General
    OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2019 Speech by Attorney-General, Mr Lucien Wong, S.C. Monday, 7 January 2019 Supreme Court Building, Level Basement 2, Auditorium May it please Your Honours, Chief Justice, Judges of Appeal, Judges and Judicial Commissioners of the Supreme Court, Introduction: AGC in Support of the Government, for the People 1 2018 was a fast-paced year for the Government and for the Attorney-General’s Chambers. The issues occupying the thoughts of Singapore’s leaders were complex and varied, with several key themes coming to the fore. These themes shaped our work over the past year, as we strove to be a strategic partner in support of the Government’s plans and initiatives, for the benefit of our country and its citizens. I will touch on three of these themes. 2 The first theme was our Smart Nation. This initiative aims to tap on the ongoing digital revolution in order to transform Singapore through technology. The Smart Nation vision is for Singapore to be a world-class leader in the field of digital innovation, resting on the triple pillars of a digital economy, digital government, and digital society. The Smart Nation revolution will play a critical part in ensuring our continued competitiveness on the world stage, powered by digital innovation. 1 3 Data sharing was and continues to be a critical aspect of this initiative. To this end, a new law was passed in 2018 which introduced a data sharing regime among different agencies in the Singapore Government. The Public Sector (Governance) Act 2018, which was drafted by our Chambers in support of this initiative, underpins and formalises a data sharing framework for the Singapore public sector.
    [Show full text]
  • SAL Annual Report 2017
    An nu al R ep or t 2017/18 ears of Sharing and Creating Value The SAL Story 03 An interview with The President 06 SAL 30th Anniversary Celebration 08 SAL Senate 10 SAL Executive Board 12 SAL Key Executives 14 Organisational Structure 15 Key Statistics 16 Setting new precedents for Singapore Law 17 Financial Statements 35 SAL ANNUAL THE 02 REPORT 2017/18 SAL STORY 03 THE SAL STORY The Singapore Academy of Law Bill was Our Vision passed in 1988. It was said to be a giant step forward; lawyers will have a forum Singapore — for sharing ideas, SAL will not only help to promote a sense of belonging amongst The Legal hub of Asia members of the legal profession, but also raise the standard of legal services in Singapore. At least 1,700 people were Our Mission expected to be members, including judges, practising lawyers, legal service officers, Driving legal excellence lecturers in the university’s law faculty and law students. through thought leadership, Modelled after the Inns of Court in London, SAL provided dining facilities world-class infrastructure in City Hall to enable the Chief Justice and judges to get together over lunches and solutions and dinners with members of the legal fraternity for closer rapport. At the first Senate meeting held on 19 January 1989, with the late CJ Wee Chong Jin as President, eight Committees were appointed to carry out the functions of SAL. None had full-time staff. It was nevertheless a promising start. The first issue of the Singapore Academy of Law Journal was published in December 1989 and in the following year, SAL organised its first major conference to discuss “Legal Services in the 1990s”.
    [Show full text]
  • Singapore Judgments
    This judgment is subject to final editorial corrections approved by the court and/or redaction pursuant to the publisher’s duty in compliance with the law, for publication in LawNet and/or the Singapore Law Reports. Guy Neale and others v Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 28 Court of Appeal — Civil Appeal No 171 of 2013 Sundaresh Menon CJ, Chao Hick Tin JA and Andrew Phang Boon Leong JA 26 May 2014; 11 March 2015 Trade marks and trade names — Licensing 26 May 2015 Judgment reserved. Sundaresh Menon CJ (delivering the judgment of the court): Introduction 1 The parties in this appeal are operators of popular dining and nightlife establishments. Their dispute concerns the use of the name “Ku De Ta”. The parties on both sides use this name for their respective businesses. All of the appellants are current members of a partnership (“the Partnership”) that owns and operates a restaurant, bar and club in Bali, Indonesia. The Partnership is also the beneficial owner of two registered trade marks in Singapore relating to the “Ku De Ta” name (“the Singapore Marks”). The registrations for the Singapore Marks were until recently held by Nine Squares Pty Ltd (“Nine Squares”) on trust for the Partnership. The respondent is Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd (“the Respondent”), a company that operates the restaurant, bar, lounge and club which bear the “Ku De Ta” name at the Skypark at the Marina Bay Sands Guy Neale v Ku De Ta SG Pte Ltd [2015] SGCA 28 development (“MBS”) in Singapore. For convenience, we will refer to the Partnership’s business as “Ku De Ta Bali” and the Respondent’s business as “Ku De Ta Singapore”.
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Law in Singapore
    Singapore: An Overview of Shipping Law Photograph courtesy of the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore “This is a most valuable judgment, both for its depth of analysis and the width of its comparative law survey.” - The English Court of Appeal in The Alkyon [2018] EWCA Civ 2760 commenting on the judgment of the Singapore Court of Appeal delivered by Rajah JA in The Vasiliy Golovnin [2008] SGCA 39 Supporting organisations: Printed in March 2021 Table of Contents I. Introduction 1 II. Application of English Law Act, International 3 Conventions & Treaties III. Singapore Legal System 5 IV. Contract 7 V. Tort of Negligence 11 VI. Collisions 13 VII. Arrest 15 VIII. Arbitration 19 IX. Enforcement 23 X. Conclusion 27 Schedule I: Singapore Registry of Ships 28 Schedule II: List of International Conventions 29 ratified by Singapore Useful Links 30 Acknowledgements 31 I. INTRODUCTION Singapore - A Maritime and Trading Hub Singapore is today one of the busiest ports in the world. With more than 130,000 vessels calling at the port of Singapore annually, it acts as a maritime gateway to Asia. Backed by good infrastructure and governmental support, it is also home to more than 150 of the world’s top international shipping groups. The Singapore Registry of Ships has also grown over the years and today it boasts more than 4,000 vessel registrations. See Schedule I for a more detailed discussion on the registration of ships in Singapore. The importance of the maritime industry to Singapore, and to the rest of the world, has led to a modern, sophisticated and constantly evolving legal framework.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinner Hosted by the Judiciary for the Forum of Senior Counsel
    DINNER HOSTED BY THE JUDICIARY FOR THE FORUM OF SENIOR COUNSEL FRIDAY, 14 MAY 2010 REMARKS BY CHIEF JUSTICE CHAN SEK KEONG Ladies and Gentlemen: My colleagues and I warmly welcome you to tonight’s dinner, the second that the Judiciary is hosting for the Forum of Senior Counsel. In particular, I would welcome my predecessor as AG, Mr Tan Boon Teik who, instead of relaxing at home, has taken the trouble to join us tonight. The presence of so many Judges of the Supreme Court and Senior Counsel augurs well for this annual series of dinners evolving into a tradition that will continue to strengthen the bonds between the Bar and the Judiciary. 2. This dinner is not meant to be an occasion for long boring speeches, so I will keep my remarks short and make only three points. First, the Institute of Legal Education is in the process of developing a framework for Continuing Professional Development (CPD) in Singapore. Justice V K Rajah and his committee have been working very hard to set up a CPD programme that will be effective and meaningful to the Bar. It will be a serious programme, under which we will drag unwilling horses to the trough to drink. But we hope that the CPD programme will provide a true learning experience and not be a wasteful imposition on the Bar. It will be a great achievement if members of the Bar welcome this programme and not dismiss it as being a PR exercise. 2 3. When the CPD programme is finalised, we will need Senior Counsel and leading members of the corporate Bar to become lecturers, instructors and mentors.
    [Show full text]
  • Rules of Court (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2017
    1 S 322/2017 First published in the Government Gazette, Electronic Edition, on 21 June 2017 at 5 pm. No. S 322 SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE ACT (CHAPTER 322) RULES OF COURT (AMENDMENT NO. 2) RULES 2017 In exercise of the powers conferred on us by section 80 of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act and all other powers enabling us under any written law, we, the Rules Committee, make the following Rules: Citation and commencement 1. These Rules are the Rules of Court (Amendment No. 2) Rules 2017 and come into operation on 1 August 2017. Amendment of Order 91 2. Order 91 of the Rules of Court (R 5) (called in these Rules the principal Rules) is amended by deleting Rule 5 and substituting the following Rule: “Powers of Registrar concerning court fees (O. 91, r. 5) 5.—(1) Subject to these Rules, the Registrar may, in any case, and on such terms and conditions as the Registrar deems fit — (a) waive or defer the payment of the whole or any part of any court fees; (b) refund the whole or any part of any court fees paid; or (c) direct that the whole or any part of any court fees be paid by any party or be apportioned among all or any of the parties. (2) Any party requesting a refund under paragraph (1)(b) must make a written request to the Registrar within one month after the date on which the reason for the refund arose.”. S 322/2017 2 Amendment of Appendix B 3. Appendix B of the principal Rules is amended — (a) by deleting paragraph (2) of item 63; and (b) by inserting, immediately after item 64, the following sub‑heading and item: Document to be No.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Response by Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon Opening
    RESPONSE BY CHIEF JUSTICE SUNDARESH MENON OPENING OF THE LEGAL YEAR 2020 Monday, 6 January 2020 Mr Attorney, Mr Vijayendran, Honoured Guests, Members of the Bar, Ladies and Gentlemen: I. INTRODUCTION 1. It gives me great pleasure, on behalf of the Judiciary, to welcome you to this morning’s proceedings. I am especially grateful to the Honourable Prof Dr M Hatta Ali, Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia, the Right Honourable Tan Sri Tengku Maimun binti Tuan Mat, Chief Justice of Malaysia, the Honourable Slaikate Wattanapan, President of the Supreme Court of Thailand, and our other guests from abroad for being with us this morning. 2. Over the past year, the Judiciary has been involved in a number of significant reforms in both its domestic and international fields of work. This morning, I will provide a broad overview of our progress and outline some anticipated 1 changes, before turning to some broader issues concerning the future of our profession. Let me begin by briefly reviewing the changes within the Judiciary. II. FELICITATIONS 3. Justices Pang Khang Chau, Audrey Lim, Ang Cheng Hock and Vincent Hoong were appointed as Judges of the High Court following their terms as Judicial Commissioners. We have also just welcomed Judicial Commissioner Mohan S/O Ramamirtha Subbaraman, who brings years of experience in admiralty practice as one of our first Senior Accredited Specialists in Maritime and Shipping law. These appointments will enhance the quality and the diversity of the Bench. 4. In addition to the extensions I foreshadowed in my Response last year, we retained the deep experience of Justices Woo Bih Li and Tan Siong Thye, each of whom has been re-appointed for a term of two years.
    [Show full text]
  • Suppressing Fake News Or Chilling Free Speech 25
    47 (1) JMCL SUPPRESSING FAKE NEWS OR CHILLING FREE SPEECH 25 SUPPRESSING FAKE NEWS OR CHILLING FREE SPEECH: ARE THE REGULATORY REGIMES OF MALAYSIA AND SINGAPORE COMPATIBLE WITH INTERNATIONAL LAW? Raphael Kok Chi Ren* Abstract In this modern digital era, information can go viral across all corners of the world in the blink of an eye. Since 2018, Malaysia and Singapore have taken great leaps to combat the proliferation of misinformation or disinformation – colloquially known as ‘fake news’. In Malaysia, the short-lived Anti-Fake News Act 2018 lasted barely over a year and a half between April 2018 and December 2019. Nevertheless, despite its repeal, authorities remain vigilant in cracking down fake news through existing laws, particularly the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998. In Singapore, the Protection from Online Falsehoods and Manipulation Act 2019 was passed in October 2019. Since then, under this regime, regulators have swiftly issued ‘take down’ and ‘correction’ notices to authors and intermediaries (e.g. Facebook). This article aims to examine the compatibility of the enforcement measures taken by both neighbouring governments with international norms on human rights. Does fake news have any intrinsic value worth protecting under the umbrella of free speech? To what extent do such measures meet the international standards of legality, necessity and proportionality? Is there a risk of extraterritorial overreach? Should intermediaries assume the role as the ‘arbiter of truth’ and filter user content? Ultimately, the war against fake news is a delicate balancing act to protect society from dangerous lies without ‘chilling’ people into silence. Keywords: Fake news, freedom of expression, proportionality, POFMA.
    [Show full text]
  • The One Judiciary Annual Report 2018
    CHIEF JUSTICE’S FOREWORD As I have said on previous occasions, the Judiciary The Courts have also launched several initiatives is the custodian of the sacred trust to uphold to help members of the public better navigate our the rule of law. To this end, it must not only hand judicial system. In October 2018, the State Courts, down judgments which are fair and well-reasoned, together with community partners, launched the but also ensure that justice is accessible to all, first part of a Witness Orientation Toolkit to help for it is only by so doing that it can command the prepare vulnerable witnesses for their attendance trust, respect and confidence of the public. This in court. Similarly, the Family Justice Courts worked is indispensable to the proper administration of closely with the Family Bar to publish, earlier this justice. January, the second edition of The Art of Family Lawyering, which is an e-book that hopes to This One Judiciary Annual Report will provide an encourage family lawyers to conduct proceedings overview of the work done by the Supreme Court, in a manner that reduces acrimony between the the State Courts and the Family Justice Courts in parties, focuses on the best interests of the child, 2018 to enhance our justice system to ensure that it and conduces towards the search for meaningful continues to serve the needs of our people. long-term solutions for families. On the international front, we continued to expand our international networks. Regionally, we Strengthening Our Justice System Both the international legal infrastructure to promote law schools and to expand the opportunities that deepened our engagement with ASEAN by playing Within and Without cross-border investment and trade.
    [Show full text]
  • SAL Annual Report 2018/19
    ANNUAL REPORT 2018/2019 CONTENTS Our Vision & Mission 02 A Partnership for the Ages 04 The Senate 06 SAL Executive Board 08 Management Team 10 The Secretariat 12 Key Statistics 14 Keeping the Conversation Going 16 Catalysing Innovation 18 Crystallising Thought Leadership 22 Championing Singapore Abroad 26 Reaching Beyond the Legal Community 30 Financial Statements 34 OUR VISION Singapore: The legal hub of Asia OUR MISSION Driving legal excellence through thought leadership, world-class infrastructure and solutions SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL REPORT 2018/19 A PARTNERSHIP FOR THE AGES The legal community that the Academy was set up to support more than 30 years ago is vastly different from the one that it serves today. No longer are the stakeholders simply members of the local Bench, the Bar, and academia. Today’s innovation-fuelled profession also includes several allied legal professions, among them technopreneurs, angel investors and alternative legal service providers. As the profession lies on the cusp legal innovation and technology. CRYSTALISING THOUGHT of significant transformation, it is Another significant milestone was LEADERSHIP the Academy’s urgent task to bring the inaugural TechLaw.Fest, held in The Academy has had a long history together these disparate groups April 2018. The event comprised of supporting the profession in to facilitate dialogue, harness conferences, exhibitions, the creation, organisation, and synergies, and to unite them master-classes, hackathons, and dissemination of legal knowledge around our shared purpose. opportunities for networking and and material. In 2019, Academy With this in mind, the Academy the sharing of ideas. More than 500 Publishing released eight new has focused its efforts over the lawyers, technologists, regulators, titles in areas such as the law and past year on two main strategic and leading thinkers in the field practice of tribunals, environmental objectives: to prepare the legal from around the world attended law and restitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Text (PDF)1063KB***Contempt of Court
    jU l 2011 Jul 2011 | S i n g a p o r e a c a d e m y o f L aw In Focus 03 The Honourable Chief Justice Chan Sek Keong shares his views on contempt of court issues. 06 Harry Elias SC examines the ambit of acts of contempt in relation to lawyers’ conduct. 12 Ang Cheng Hock SC and Tay Yong Seng provide an overview 03 of the law of civil and criminal contempt. 18 Jeth lee speaks to members of the legal fraternity to find out Cover what contempt of court means to rules of court them. 27 A look at the recent decision on the law on contempt of court for scandalising the judiciary. InsIghts 27 34 Yap Teong liang gives guidance on how to deal with challenges in family law practice. Side Bar 44 Adrian Tan brings us true-life examples of contempt of court around the world. 34 44 July 2011 In Focus Inter Se is a everythIng must come to an end and after publishing Inter Se publication of: (and its predecessor) for 22 years, we are sad to announce that this July 2011 issue will be its swansong. It has been quite an experience. Inter Se began as a simple way of disseminating information and reaching out to our members. It started as a four-page SAL Newsletter, which only narrated past events and announced forthcoming activities, that soon morphed into something bigger to include case and legislation updates and thought-provoking articles. Chief Executive With progress came change, bringing about other effective Serene wee avenues for SAl to further its objectives: e-alerts to members; a tier-1 Editors journal for articles; and online services in the form of lawNet and eileen Khoo Singapore law Watch for legislation and case updates.
    [Show full text]
  • Affidavit of Written Initial Uniformed Commercial Code Financing Statement Fixture Filing, Land and Commercial Lien
    Moorish National Republic Federal Government ❧ ~ Societas Republicae Ea Al Maurikanos ~ ❧ Moorish Divine and National Movement of the World Northwest Amexem / Northwest Africa / North America / 'The North Gate' Affidavit of Written Initial Uniformed Commercial Code Financing Statement Fixture Filing, Land and Commercial Lien National Safe Harbor Program UCC § 9-521 whereby Nationals who file written UCC1 claims can file UCCs in any state. 11 Dhul Hijjah 1440 [12 August, 2019 CCY] To: [GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] and all derivatives thereof [GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [HALIMAH YACOB d/b/a PRESIDENT OF GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [TAN CHUAN-JIN d/b/a SPEAKER OF THE PARLIAMENT OF SINGAPORE OF GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [GRACE FUMS GRACE FU HAI YIEN d/b/a LEADER OF THE HOUSE, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [LEE HSIEN LOONG d/b/a PRIME MINISTER, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [TEO CHEE HEAN d/b/a SENIOR MINISTER & COORDINATING MINISTER FOR NATIONAL SECURITY, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [THARMAN SHANMUGARATNAM d/b/a SENIOR MINISTER & COORDINATING MINISTER FOR SOCIAL POLICIES, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [HENG SWEE KEAT d/b/a DEPUTY PRIME MINISTER & MINISTER OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [KHAW BOON WAN d/b/a COORDINATING MINISTER FOR INFRASTRUCTURE & MINISTER FOR TRANSPORT, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [NG ENG HEN d/b/a MINISTER FOR DEFENCE, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [VIVIAN BALAKRISHMAN d/b/a MINISTER OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [K SHANMUGAM d/b/a MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS & MINISTER FOR LAW, GOVERNMENT OF SINGAPORE] [GAN KIM YONG d/b/a MINISTER FOR
    [Show full text]