Conference Program

Building the knowledge base 2016 for effective team science

May 16-19, 2016 Hyatt Regency Hotel Phoenix, AZ www.scienceofteamscience.org

Science of Team Science (SciTS) 2016 Conference

Day 1: Monday, May 16 1 Ellis East Ellis East A New Dimension Science: Team for Individual and in Elements System Collaboration Workshop 3: Workshop Immunity Change to Academic for (ITC) Scientists 6: Workshop Ellis West Ellis West The Difference - How - How Difference The Reap the Benefitsto of Interdisciplinary Teams Workshop 2: Workshop Network Using Evaluate to Analysis Science Team 5: Workshop (Regency Ballroom CD) Conference Schedule At-a-Glance Conference Regency AB Regency AB Welcome and Keynote Introduction and Keynote Welcome Regency Ballroom AB Opening Keynote: the University: at Expanding Science the Isomorphic Model Defeating Benefit the of Humanity for Regency Ballroom AB Networking - Evening Event of Arizona Taste Regency Ballroom CD Integration and Integration Implementation Sciences Specialist, Research Development or... Professional, Break Lunch Buffet Buffet Lunch 4: Workshop Establishing a Professional Community: Interdisciplinary Scientist, Executive Registration & Continental Breakfast & Continental Registration Foyer Entrance in front of Regency Ballroom 1: Workshop SciTS 101: of Fundamentals Team of the Science Science Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Day 1: Monday, May 16, 2016 May Monday, 1: Day 7:15-9:00 pm 6:15-7:15 pm 6:00-6:15 pm 4:30-6:00 pm Afternoon Workshop Afternoon Workshop Sessions 1:00–4:30 pm 12:00–1:00 pm Sessions 8:30–12:00 pm Morning Workshop 8:00–8:30 am SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 2 6:00-8:00 pm 5:15 pm (submitted) Thematic Paper Sessions 3:45–5:15 pm 3:30–3:45 pm and Panels (submitted) Thematic Paper Sessions 2:00–3:30 pm 12:30–2:00 pm 11:45–12:30 pm 11:30–11:45 am 9:30–11:30 am 9:00–9:30 am 8:00–9:00 am Day 2: Tuesday, May 17,2016 Conference At-a-Glance Schedule ASU Decision Theater, Tempe, AZ Tempe, Theater, Decision ASU Special Evening Event Adjourn in TeamScience Communication Papers: Break PerspectiveCTSA Performance: The Research Team Translational to Enhance Strategies Panel: New Buffet Lunch & Table EventTopic Networking AB Ballroom Regency LessonsGroup from Creativity: Synthesis Centers Featured Speaker: Break AB Ballroom Regency Advance TeamScience Teams and : Augmenting Cognition andExternalizing to Featured Panel: AB Ballroom Regency Ballroom Welcome &Introduction Regency of front in Entrance Foyer Registration &Continental Breakfast SciTS 2016Conference: Regency AB AB Regency Sundance Sundance (Regency Ballroom CD) Ballroom (Regency CD) Ballroom (Regency & Education Science Training Papers: Team Team Science Recognition for & Support Institutional Papers: (Advance registration required) registration (Advance Sundance Ellis West Ellis Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. to Stimulate Approaches Papers: New Development Research & Translational Teams for Papers: Biotech Ellis West Ellis Ellis East Ellis (Regency Ballroom CD) Ballroom (Regency Opportunities Challenges & Team Science: Publishing Papers: Ellis East Ellis Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 3 Ellis East Ellis East Ellis East Collaboration: Collaboration: & Data, Events, Documents Perspectives & Perspectives Considerations Lessons Papers: Learned Multi- from Disciplinary Organizations From & Fields: to Design Ecology Shared Papers: & Resources Papers: Papers: International Ellis West Ellis West Ellis West Trenches Visualizations Papers: & Collaboration NIH Supported Initiatives Center Team Papers: in the Training Papers: Network Papers: & Data Analyses Sundance Sundance Sundance Models & Theory Team Science Science Team Workforce: Learned Lessons in Tennessee Biotech Papers: & Healthcare Teams Papers: Conceptual Panel: Creating Creating Panel: the Next Gen (Regency Ballroom CD) Conference Schedule At-a-Glance Conference (Regency Ballroom CD) (Regency Ballroom CD) Regency AB Regency AB Regency AB Adjourn Break Break Panel: Communicating a Value Proposition... Buffet Lunch Buffet A Feminist Panel: to Approach Facilitating Interdisciplinary Collaboration Intersections of Team Science & Science Team Intersections of Regency Ballroom AB Break Papers: Evidence-Based for Strategies Success Registration & Continental Breakfast & Continental Registration Foyer Entrance in front Back Welcome of Regency BallroomRegency Ballroom AB of MultidisciplinaryWorkhorse as the Speaker: Analogies Featured Solving & Problem Creativity Regency Ballroom AB Visions: & Milestones, Threads, Award: Recognition 2016 SciTS Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Day 3: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 18, May Wednesday, 3: Day 5:15 pm 3:45-5:15 pm 3:30-3:45 pm 2:00–3:30 pm Sessions Paper Thematic (submitted) and Panels 12:30-2:00 pm 11:00-12:30 pm Sessions Paper Thematic (submitted) and Panels 10:45 –11:00 am 9:45–10:45 am 9:00–9:45 am 9:00 am 8:00–9:00 am SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 4: Thursday, May 19 4 12:00 pm 11:15-12:00 pm 10:00–11:15 am 9:15 –10:00am 8:30–9:15 am 8:30 am 8:00–8:30 am Day 4: Thursday, May 19,2016 Conference At-a-Glance Schedule Adjourn AB Ballroom Regency Future Panel Directions Closing Session: CD Ballroom Regency & Scientific Collaborative PosterSession &Brunch AB Ballroom Regency ofa15-year Research ProgramSummary Research Collaboration EffectivenessScience &the of Science:Team A Featured Speaker: AB Ballroom Regency Stewardship Teams &the Transformation ofHealth Partnership Approaches to BigProblems: Solving The Promise of Featured Speaker: AB Ballroom Regency Ballroom Welcome Back Regency of front in Entrance Foyer Registration SciTS 2016Conference: Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Natcher Conference Center Table of Contents

Special Thanks to this Year’s Sponsors! Conference Schedule At-a-Glance 1-4

Table of Contents 5

Hyatt Regency Phoenix - Confrence Locations 6-7

SciTS 2016 Conference Planning Committee and Support 8

Welcome Letter 9–10 Diamond Sponsor

Moderators and Recognition Award 11 Table of Contents Featured Speakers 12-15

Detailed Guide to the Conference 17-38

Reviewer Acknowledgement 40

Submitted Abstracts 41-123

Gold Sponsors

Enhanced Silver Sponsor

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 5 Hyatt Regency Phoenix - Conference Locations

The opening and closing sessions, along with all featured speaker talks, will be held in Regency Ballroom AB. Concurrent sessions will be held in Regency Ballroom AB. Ellis West, Ellis East, and Sundance rooms. The Thursday morning poster session will be held in Regency Ballroom CD. All food and the exhibitor tables will be located in Regency Ballroom CD throughout the conference.

Conference rooms are indicated on the following maps of the Hyatt Regency Phoenix by the dark gray boxes.

6 SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Hyatt Regency Phoenix - Conference Locations

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 7 SciTS 2016 Conference Planning Committee and Support

Conference Co-Chairs Conference Planning Committee Maritza Salazar, PhD Assistant Professor Kara L. Hall, PhD Gabriele Bammer, PhD Director, Science of Team Professor. National Centre for Division of Behavioral & Science Team Epidemiology & Population Health Organizational Sciences Behavioral Research Program Australian National University Claremont Graduate University National Cancer Institute Heather Billings, PhD Bonnie J. Spring, PhD Scott J. Leischow, PhD Director, Faculty Development Professor of Preventive Medicine, Professor of Health Services Research Center for Clinical & Translational Psychology, Psychiatry, & Behavioral Office of Health Disparities Research Sciences (CCaTS) Sciences Mayo Clinic Mayo Clinic Northwestern University

Program Chair Noshir Contractor, PhD Daniel Stokols, PhD Professor Research Professor and Chancellor’s Janet Okamoto, PhD Industrial Engineering & Management Professor Emeritus Assistant Professor Sciences, University of California, Irvine Health Services Research Communication Studies, Mayo Clinic Management & Organizations Amanda Vogel, PhD Northwestern University Senior Behavioral Scientist Conference Manager National Cancer Institute Stephen Crowley, PhD Chara Chamie, MPH Associate Professor Conference Planning & Registration Department of Program Manager Support Office of Health Disparities Research Boise State University Mayo Clinic Farhia Omar, MPH Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, PhD Communications Specialist Vice President Research Coordinator Global Academics & Mayo Clinic Research Relations Elsevier Amy Woof, MPH Research Analyst Stephen M. Fiore, PhD Mayo Clinic Associate Professor and Director, Cognitive Sciences Laboratory Danielle Wright, MSW University of Central Florida Administrative Assistant Mayo Clinic Julie Thompson Klein, PhD Professor of Humanities Emerita, Conference Communications

Faculty Fellow for Interdisciplinary and Committee Planning Development in Division of Research Julie Janovsky-Mason Wayne State University Communications Specialist Mayo Clinic Michael O’Rourke, PhD Professor of Philosophy, AgBioResearch Michigan State University

8 SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Welcome Letter

On behalf of the SciTS 2016 Conference Planning Committee, welcome to Phoenix, AZ and the Science of Team Science (SciTS) 2016 Conference!Welcome Letter

The SciTS 2016 Conference maintains the theme of “Building the Knowledge Base for Effective Team Science.” During the conference, a rich set of invited panels, oral presentations, and scientific posters will support this theme, highlighting the latest conceptual and empirical advances in our understanding of key topics related to advancing team-based science. Furthermore, this year we have a robust offering of practical workshops and presentations aimed at translating evidence into practice; for instance, highlighting strategies for educating and training our scientific workforce as well as implementing institutional supports for team-based research.

To kick off the week’s events, we offer a broad array of workshops on Monday which aim to: provide greater understanding of key SciTS topics, enhance methodological strategies for conducting SciTS studies, promote culture change and professional development, support the development and advancement of new roles in science, and provide guidance for increasing collaborative success.

New this year, attendees will come together for an exciting Monday evening networking session, “Taste of Arizona,” with appetizers and refreshments! Arizona State University President, Michael Crow will share his leading-edge views on re-envisioning the academic enterprise to kick off the networking event.

We’ve organized the conference so that mornings feature sessions that give a broad overview of SciTS topics relevant to all attendees, while afternoons allow attendees to focus more deeply on topics of particular interest to them.

Highlights from the morning sessions include:

• Tuesday’s featured panel focuses on strategies to enhance team cognition to advance team science. Cutting edge uses of technology, as well as high accessible techniques, will be shared by speakers, including: Jeremy Lasky, Perception; John Miller, Arizona State University; Deana Pennington, University of Texas at El Paso; Reiko Yajima, Stanford University; and Steve Fiore, University of Central Florida. Additionally, former ASU professor Ed Hackett (now at Brandeis University), will share insights on group creativity from studying National Science Foundation Synthesis Centers.

• Wednesday’s featured speaker, Christian Schunn, from the University of Pittsburgh, will discuss the role of analogies for multidisciplinary creativity and problem solving. The second annual SciTS Recognition Award will be presented to Dr. Julie Thompson-Klein, Wayne State University. Her talk will focus on conceptual, historical, and practical aspects of the intersection of team science and interdisciplinarity.

• Thursday’s featured Speaker, Ruth Wageman from Harvard University, will highlight approaches to assess challenges and improve effectiveness in partnerships assembled to solve big problems. Our final featured speaker, Barry Bozeman from Arizona State University, will provide his perspective on research collaboration effectiveness and the SciTS across a 15 year program of research.

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 9 Welcome Letter

This year, attendees will be well nourished throughout the conference! Come early each day for a light breakfast, join colleagues each day for lunch, and enjoy our opening evening appetizers. Tuesday lunch will include round table discussions and our Thursday Poster session will be paired with brunch! Each year the SciTS conference has leveraged a unique partnership with the host institution, providing new collaborators and new perspectives. This year our host organization, the Mayo Clinic, brings a strong practice perspective and rich connections with clinical and research institutions around the country. We anticipate that the dialogue fostered by this year’s conference—among administrators Letter Welcome who influence policies in academia, researchers who engage in team-based research, and scholars who study team science—will enrich the quality of the . After your exciting days with colleagues at the SciTS 2016 Conference, we hope you have the opportunity to enjoy the wonderful cuisine in Phoenix, join fellow sports fans at a Diamondbacks vs. Yankees game, or experience the city’s , arts, and culture.

Enjoy the SciTS 2016 Conference!

Kara L. Hall, PhD National Cancer Institute SciTS 2016 Conference Co-Chair

Scott J. Leischow, PhD Mayo Clinic SciTS 2016 Conference Co-chair

Janet Okamoto, PhD Mayo Clinic SciTS 2016 Conference Program Chair

10 SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Moderators and Recognition Award

Moderators

We would like to extend special thanks to our moderators for facilitating discussion at the SciTS Recognition Award conference: 2016 Recipient: Dr. Julie Thompson Klein, PhD Arsev Aydinoglu To recognize her vision, dedication, and leadership in Gabriele Bammer helping to establish and continue to advance the Science Heather Billings NIH of Team Science field. Stephen Crowley Dr. Julie Thompson Klein Holly Falk-Krzesinski is Professor of Humanities Sarah Hohl Emerita at Wayne State Julie Thompson Klein University. She has also been a Visiting Foreign Professor Sharon Ku at Shimane University in Gaetano Lotrecchiano Japan, a Fulbright professor Alina Lungeanu in Nepal, Foundation Visitor at the University of Michael O’Rourke Auckland in New Zealand, Marshall Scott Poole and Mellon Fellow in Digital Humanities at the University Dayan Ranwala of Michigan. She is the holder of a Ph.D. in English from the University of Oregon. Dr. Klein is the past president of the Maritza Salazar Association for Interdisciplinary Studies, former editor of Daniel Stokols its journal and a recipient of the Kenneth Boulding Award Amanda Vogel for outstanding scholarship on interdisciplinarity. Her books include Interdisciplinarity (1990), Interdisciplinary Studies Today (1994), Crossing Boundaries (1996), Transdisciplinarity (2001), Interdisciplinary Education in K-12 and College (2002), Humanities, Culture, and Interdisciplinarity (2005), Creating Interdisciplinary Campus Cultures (2010), and Interdisciplining Digital Humanities (2015). She was also Associate Editor of the Oxford Handbook on Interdisciplinarity (2010) and co-editor of the University of Michigan Press series Digital Humanities@ digitalculturebooks.

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 11 Featured Speakers

Michael M. Crow, PhD President Arizona State University

Michael M. Crow became the 16th president of Arizona State University on July 1, 2002. He is guiding the transformation of ASU into one of the nation’s leading public metropolitan research universities, an institution that combines the highest levels of academic excellence, inclusiveness to a broad demographic, and maximum societal impact—a model he terms the “New American University.” Under his direction the university pursues teaching, research, and creative excellence focused on the major challenges of our time, as well as those central to the quality of life, sustainable development, and economic competitiveness of Arizona and the nation. He has committed the university to sustainability, social embeddedness, and global engagement, and championed initiatives leading to record levels of diversity in the student body.

Ed Hackett, PhD Vice Provost for Research & Professor, Heller School of Social Policy & Management Brandeis University Professor Emeritus Arizona State University Senior Sustainability Scientist, Julie Ann Wrigley Global Institute of Sustainability

Dr. Hackett’s research focuses on how the social organization and conduct of science influence the knowledge that is produced. He has written about collaboration, leadership, peer review, environmental justice, and other topics. At the National Science Foundation he has directed the Division of Social and Economic Sciences (2006-08) and the Science and Technology Studies Program (1996-98). Dr. Hackett teaches courses on inequality and sustainability (from a global perspective), , social dimensions of science (grad) and research design and methodology (grad).

Stay Connected: Twitter and More

Stay involved during and after the SciTS Conference…

On Twitter at: #SciTS2016

On the conference website at: www.scienceofteamscience.org

12 SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Featured Speakers

Christian Schunn, PhD Professor, Psychology, Learning Science & Policy, & Intelligent Systems Senior Scientist, Learning Research & Development Center University of Pittsburgh

Christian Schunn is a Senior Scientist at the Learning Research and Development Center and a Professor of Psychology, Learning Sciences and Policy, and Intelligent Systems at the University of Pittsburgh. He directs a number of research projects studying engineering and science teams from cognitive and perspectives to produce to new tools that increase innovation. He also leads research projects that apply this knowledge to building innovative technology-supported STEM curricula, and studying factors that influence student and teacher STEM learning. He is a Fellow of AAAS, APA, and APS.

Ruth Wageman, PhD Associate Faculty in Psychology Harvard University

Dr. Wageman is Associate Faculty in Psychology at Harvard University and Director of Stewardship with ReThink Health. She specializes in the field of Organizational Behavior, studying and teaching the design and leadership of task performing teams—especiallyFeatured Speakers the particular challenges faced by leadership teams. Professor Wageman the conditions under which people are able to accomplish great things, especially in collaboration with one another. She studies and works with groups of leaders who work together across organizations to lead the transformation of health and health care in the US.

Barry Bozeman, PhD Center Director (ACD) & Professor, School of Public Affairs Arizona State University

Barry Bozeman is Arizona Centennial Professor of Public Management and and Director of the Center of Organizational Research and Design. Previous positions include Regents’ Professor and Ander Crenshaw Endowed Chair of Public Policy, University of Georgia; Regents Professor of Public Policy at Georgia Tech and Professor of Public Administration, Law and Affiliate Professor of Engineering at Syracuse University where he was founding director of the Maxwell School’s founding director of the Center for Technology and Information Policy. Bozeman’s research focuses on science and technology policy, organization theory, design of research institutions, and innovation.

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 13 Featured Panel

Panel Chair: Stephen M. Fiore, PhD Associate Professor of Cognitive Sciences Department of Philosophy University of Central Florida

Dr. Fiore is Director of the Cognitive Sciences Laboratory and faculty in the University of Central Florida’s Cognitive Sciences Program in the Department of Philosophy and Institute for Simulation & Training. He is President of the Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research and a founding Program Committee member for the annual Science of Team Science Conference. He maintains a multidisciplinary research interest that incorporates aspects of the cognitive, social, organizational, and computational sciences in the investigation of learning and performance in individuals and teams. His primary area of research is the interdisciplinary study of complex collaborative cognition and the understanding of how humans interact socially and with technology.

Jeremy Lasky Co Founder/Partner Perception

Jeremy was hired right out of school as Art Director at the acclaimed design- house-turned-interactive-agency R/GA (R/Greenberg Associates), where he designed and animated hundreds of commercial graphics and feature film titles In 2001, Lasky teamed with his former colleague, Danny Gonzalez, to found Perception. Lasky’s work has been featured in dozens of design and industry publications and he has garnered many of the most prestigious awards in the design world. Lasky has lectured on design and has been a guest speaker at OTIS, SCAD, Carnegie Mellon’s ETC and NYU ITP. Featured Speakers Featured Jon Miller, PhD Director Decision Theater Arizona State University

As Director, Decision Theater, Jon leads efforts to model, simulate, and visualize complex problems leading to informed policy discussions through better understanding and the ability to forecast the outcomes of policy decisions. He leverages the skills and experiences of a 34 year military career, executive leadership positions in private sector aerospace firms, and responsibilities as a Senior Executive Service member of the Department of Homeland Security. MG(ret) Miller is a graduate of the United States Military Academy and holds graduate degrees from Central Michigan University (Business), and the US Army War College (Strategic Studies).

14 SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Featured Panel

Deana Pennington, PhD Associate Professor, Department of Geological Sciences University of Texas at El Paso

Dr. Deana Pennington, Associate Professor in Geological Sciences at the University of Texas at El Paso, is a physical geographer with cross training in learning sciences. Her research focuses on how changes in climate and land structure impact natural processes, especially focused on geospatial approaches to analyzing land change and socio-environmental systems. These studies have dictated that she also gain expertise in knowledge integration and synthesis in interdisciplinary teamwork, and emerging for science, including cyberinfrastructure and informatics approaches. Hence, most of her work is at the boundaries between socio-environmental science, interdisciplinary teamwork, and emerging technologies.

Rieko Yajima, PhD Center for Design Research Stanford University

Rieko Yajima is a biochemist with interests that lie at the intersection of science and society-which include design and policy. She is currently a Visiting Research Scholar at the Center for Design Research at Stanford University to investigate how Design Thinking Paradigms can catalyze scientific research and innovation. Featured Speakers Previously, she worked for the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), in Washington, DC, where she advised the on research strategy and capacity building, and in the use of informed decision-making for funding research. She holds a doctorate degree in integrative biosciences from The Pennsylvania State University and served as a fellow at the National Academy of Sciences.

Contribute to a unique Science of Team Science Visioning Exercise:

Throughout the conference we invite conference participants to contribute to an online Visioning Exercise aimed at imagining what SciTS should look like in the future. Instructions for this exercise will be given during the Welcome & Introductions on both Monday evening and Tuesday morning. You will also find instructions in your conference bag and handouts at the Registration desk.

Join your colleagues in envisioning the future of SciTS!

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 15 16 SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Day 1: Monday, May 16 17

Associate Director, Center for Science, Technology, & Technology, Science, for Center Director, Associate Studies Policy Environmental University State Arizona Mary K. Feeney, PhD Mary K. Feeney, of Ethics Professor & Lincoln Professor Associate Affairs School of Public Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide

Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

Using Network Analysis to Evaluate Team Science Team Evaluate to Network Analysis Using

Monday, May 16, 2016 May Monday, Eliis West Regency AB Ballroom Foyer Entrance in front of Regency in front Ballroom Entrance Foyer SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: School of Public Affairs School of Public University State Arizona Center for Science, Technology, & Environmental Policy Policy & Environmental Technology, Science, for Center Studies Eric W. Welch, PhD PhD Welch, W. Eric & Director, Professor Workshop 2: Workshop from internationally recognized leaders in the SciTS field. This is an ideal opportunity for those interested in This is an ideal opportunity for those interested field. leaders in the SciTS recognized internationally from with leaders in the SciTS field. interacting and to science about team learning more Sciences Laboratory at UCF’s Institute for Simulation & Training, and President of the Interdisciplinary Network for and President Training, & Simulation Institute for Sciences Laboratory UCF’s at with presentations sessions break-out will include didactic, Q&A, and interactive workshop The Research. Group This half-day workshop is being organized and facilitated by Stephen M. Fiore, PhD, Associate Professor of Professor Associate PhD, M. Fiore, Stephen by and facilitated half-day is being organized This workshop of the Cognitive Director Florida, of Central University in the Department Sciences of Philosophy, Cognitive including commonly used terminology and conceptual frameworks, a review of the state of the science and key and key of the science of the state a review frameworks, and conceptual used terminology including commonly support, to and conduct effective available manage, and resources tools to and an introduction issues, emerging research. collaborative enter the conference with a deeper understanding, or as a refresher in team science fundamentals for those for fundamentals science in team or as a refresher with a deeper understanding, the conference enter participants knowledge of the SciTS field, will provide with foundational workshop The with prior exposure. University of Central Florida of Central University to want the field and new to are those who serve to for is designed science as a primer workshop in team This Stephen M. Fiore, PhD M. Fiore, Stephen Sciences of Cognitive Professor Associate Department of Philosophy 8:30–12:00 pm Science Team of of the Science 101 - Fundamentals 1: SciTS Workshop 8:00–8:30 am Breakfast and Continental Registration Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide

Immunity to Change (ITC) for Academic Scientists Academic Immunity for Change (ITC) to Ellis East 18 and professional goals. This workshop will explain the ITC process, provide examples of how it is being used by it is being used by of how examples provide process, the ITC explain will workshop This goals. and professional and maps, lead participants ITC their own their teams, through and for themselves global business leaders for community. research the scientific for tool as a developmental ITC implement can best we discuss how requirements for academic promotion). The Immunity to Change method is designed to help adults identify and Immunity help adults identify to The Change method is designed to academic promotion). for requirements new personal toward progress can prevent in one environment, being essential despite that, change behaviors Successful teamwork in all professions depends upon behaviors that promote team building and collaborative building and collaborative team promote that depends upon behaviors in all professions teamwork Successful approach a team science to are fundamental that new behaviors acquire to find it difficult thinking. Scientists may or traditional during early stages of training, developed behaviors personality, (e.g. a variety of reasons for Catalyst Harvard Science Center Translational HarvardThe Clinical & Erica Lawlor, PhD Erica Lawlor, Programming oF Education Director PhD Vaughan, D. Cheryl Skills Center Development Managing Director, (NCAI) Innovation Accelerated for Center an NIH Center, Biomedical Innovation Boston Workshop 3: Workshop University of IllinoisUniversity Chicago. at network data and analyzing networks as both a driver and consequence of team science. The workshop will workshop The science. of team and consequence and analyzing networksnetwork as both a driver data and Director CSTEPS Associate Mary K.Welch; Feeney, W. Eric and Professor CSTEPS Director by be facilitated at the Professor Assistant and Affairs; Michael Siciliano, in Public of Ethics Professor and Lincoln Professor Associate This half-day workshop is being organized and sponsored by the ASU Center for Science, Technology and Technology Science, for the ASU Center by and sponsored half-day is being organized This workshop collect to instruments designing experience extensive have whose researchers Studies Policy Environmental participants through the technical aspects of using network analysis to evaluate team science including: research including: research science team participants aspects evaluate the technical to network of using analysis through results. network analysis and presenting collection, techniques, data network analysis design, instrument design, team science (e.g. NIH CTSA; NSF EPSCoR), and research looking at how scientists use collaborative networks to networks to looking use collaborative scientists NIH CTSA; how at research and NSF EPSCoR), (e.g. science team understand to network used analysis have we that ways the will illustrate regulatory we restrictions, navigate guide sessions to break-out will then facilitate We science. of team the outcomes and investigate science team relationships. Drawing on a variety of studies including evaluations of small scale funding for encouraging encouraging on a variety small scale funding for of of studies including evaluations Drawing relationships. advancing scale funding for NIH MARC), of large evaluations NSF IGERT; (e.g. and training interdisciplinary research enable us to investigate the structure, antecedents, and consequences of these networks. Through the use of the use of Through networks. of these and consequences antecedents, the structure, investigate enable us to and describe networks represent and organizational individual how can explore we , organizational individual and or reshape expand, can create, science team and also how science collaborative While individual and organizational networks are recognized as critical components of Team Science they are are Science they Team of as critical components recognized networks are individual and organizational While technics that tools and analytic of a set provides Social network analysis empirically. to measure often difficult Public Policy & Public Administration Public & Policy Public of IllinoisUniversity Chicago at Professor PhD Siciliano, Michael D. Assistant

Day 1: Monday, May 16 Day 1: Monday, May 16 19

Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, PhD Falk-Krzesinski, Holly J. President Vice & Global Academics Relations Research Elsevier

Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

Establishing a Professional Community - Interdisciplinary Executive Scientist, Integration and and Integration Scientist, - Interdisciplinary Community Executive Establishing a Professional Regency AB Ballroom Regency CD Ballroom SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: goals and group objectives, and working toward defining ourselves to the extent this is useful in advancing those extentto the this is useful in advancing defining ourselves and working objectives, toward goals and group goals and objectives. have signed up to join an “IES community of interest”. This half-day will serveThis workshop as a first opportunityto “IES community of interest”. join an up to signed have common brainstorming groups, among the similarities and differences identifying this fertile ground, explore institutional supporters alike, with this concept being introduced by a variety of different names, including: names, a variety by of different being introduced institutional supporters with this concept alike, and Research and Implementation Sciences (I2S) specialist, Scientist (IES), Integration Interdisciplinary Executive than 30 people established and more already are I2S and RDP communities The (RDP). Professional Development To address complex problems and effectively engage diverse knowledge bases, it has been proposed that a that been proposed it has bases, engage diverse knowledge and effectively problems complex address To facilitate, new type of expertise translate, the interfaces to at work disciplines in order between is needed to and researchers, practitioners, science team by is shared active interest This outcomes. research and optimize Population Health Population University National Australian Gabriele Bammer, PhD Gabriele Bammer, & Epidemiology for Centre National Professor, NanoTechnology Duke University PhD Christine Hendren, Ogilvie Director, Executive Implications of the Environmental for Center 1:00-4:30 pm 4: Workshop or... Professional Development Research Implementation Sciences Specialist, Complimentary Lunch Buffet Complimentary Lunch 12:00-1:00 pm will benefit personally from the ITC experience by completing their own ITC maps. In addition, attendees will take attendees In addition, maps. own ITC their completing by experience the ITC from will benefit personally institutions. their home method back to necessary bring ITC the to and literature handouts, all slides, away We strongly believe the ITC method, with buy-in from academic leaders, could become the centerpiece of the centerpiece become could leaders, academic from buy-in with method, the ITC believe strongly We attendees Conference is done. science change in how a cultural faculty and promote for development professional Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide

A New Dimension for Team Science - Individual and System Elements in Collaboration Elements - Individual Science and System Team A New Dimension for The Difference - How to Reap the Benefits of Interdisciplinary Research Teams to Reap the ofBenefits - How Interdisciplinary Research Difference The

Share approaches that encourage thinking level. encourage a system that at approaches Share emotional and participants is cognitive, that give information to designed experience Be an interactive actionable. Introduce techniques which help at the individual level and prepare individuals to engage more effectively effectively engage more individuals to and prepare the individual level which help at techniques Introduce efforts. in collaborative Identify and address potential sources of conflicts and thus increase productivity of conflicts and thus increase sources potential and address Identify members opportunities equal all team Consider perspectives for and career Deal with the various facets of team diversity in different phases of research projects research phases of in different diversity of team Deal facets with the various • • • • • • Ellis East Ellis West This workshop will workshop This Executive Director Executive Institute Educopia PhD Skinner, Institute Cancer National Katherine The Green Zone Culture Group Culture Zone Green The PhD Ian Fore, Celeste Blackman, LHEP Blackman, Celeste Co-Founder Workshop 6: Workshop definitions of research quality, and equal opportunities and career perspectives for all team members. Participants team members. and equal opportunitiesfor all perspectives and career quality, research definitions of and will learn to: and examples, experiences their own contribute to invited are will introduce and apply practical tools and guidelines that help to deal effectively with the challenges of deal effectively help to and apply practical and guidelines that tools will introduce different selected aspects: on three strategies, publication will focus We teams. interdisciplinary research Interdisciplinary research teams combine various perspectives and heuristics and are capable of creating capable of creating perspectives various and heuristics combine are and teams Interdisciplinary research we conflict. of workshop, In this source also a potential are differences However, solutions. innovative Renate Handler Renate StaffScientific Member Knowledge Design Cooperative Convelop Managing Partner Knowledge Design Cooperative Convelop PhD Grasenick, Karin Workshop 5: 5: Workshop 20

Day 1: Monday, May 16 Day 1: Monday, May 16 21

trust relationships that are developed developed are that ­trust relationships Scott J. Leischow, PhD PhD Leischow, Scott J. of Health Services Research Professor Office Disparities of Health Research Clinic Mayo Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide

Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

Uncover the gains to be realized by reaching beyond institutional or personal benefit. institutional or beyond reaching by be realized the gains to Uncover • Behavioral Research Program Research Behavioral Institute Cancer National Director, Science of Team Team of Science Director, Science Team Kara PhD L. Hall, Regency CD Ballroom Regency AB Ballroom Regency AB Ballroom SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: 7:15-8:30 pm Networking - Evening Event of Arizona Taste President University State Arizona Michael M. Crow, PhD Michael M. Crow, Humanity 6:15-7:15 pm the Benefit the Isomorphic of Model for - Defeating the University at Expanding Science Opening Keynote: 6:00-6:15 pm Introduction and Keynote Welcome Break 4:30-6:00 pm to embrace all personalities, shifting the focus to systems, and freeing the individuals within them to be flexible in be flexible to the individuals within them and freeing systems, to shifting the focus all personalities, embrace to which brings a diversity wholly unexpected results. options creates their behavioral outwardly to others; the team, the organization, the system. the organization, others; the team, to outwardly working on particular is sometimes placed and personality problems of team However, behaviors types. focus The at their own discretion. When that element is allowed to flourish the high to is allowed element that When discretion. their own at activity is a human and expands inside the individual collaboration begins that True new level. a to bring the team Teams for large scale science projects are most often formed from those intellectually equipped in relevant intellectually those equipped in relevant from often most formed projects are science scale large for Teams because potential their full achieve never teams many However, expertise, and technologies. technical tools the work to brings member energy their emotional dimension. Each team fully engage the human they fail to Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 Featured Panel: Teams and Technology - 9:30–11:30 am National Cancer Institute Behavioral Research Program Science Team Director, Science of Team L.Hall, PhDKara Welcome andIntroduction 9:00–9:30 am Registration andContinental Breakfast 8:00–9:00 am processing. technologies designed to ‘externalize cognition’ andhelpteam scientists better manage complex information in science teams. Towards thisend, thispanelprovides aforum for discussingcutting edgeapproaches and Science mustwork to identify andexpand research ontechnology that canaugment cognition andcollaboration become more interdisciplinary, andasthenature oftheproblems getmore complicated, theScienceof Team Collaborative ofscientific problem cognition solvingisanincreasingly inservice complex endeavor. As teams 22 Arizona State University TheaterDecision Director Jon Miller, PhD Perception Co Founder/Partner Jeremy Lasky University ofCentral Florida ofPhilosophy Department Associate Professor ofCognitive Sciences Panel Stephen Chair: M.Fiore, PhD Regency Ballroom AB Regency Foyer Entrance Ballroom infront ofRegency Regency Ballroom AB Regency Tuesday, May 17,2016

Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference

SciTS 2016Conference: Augmenting Cognition andExternalizing to Advance Team Science Mayo Clinic ofResearchDean Diane F. PhD Jelinek, Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Stanford University Center for Design Research Yajima,Rieko PhD University of Texas at ElPaso Associate Pennington,Deana PhD Professor, ofGeological Sciences Department

Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 23 Paper 2: Ensuring Institutional of Recognition Paper Research Interdisciplinary Team-Based KathrynAuthors: & Robert Plaisance Gorbet Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide

Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

Ellis West Ellis West Sundance Regency CD Ballroom Regency AB Ballroom Regency CD Ballroom SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Authors: Timothy Timothy Authors: Beebe Paper 1: Incenting & Rewarding Team Science in the Science Team & Rewarding 1: Incenting Paper Clinic Mayo at Process & Promotion Appointment Thematic Paper Session: Institutional Support and Recognition for Team Science Team Session: Institutional Support Paper for Thematic and Recognition Session Sponsored by Authors: Cathleen T. Kane, Damayanthi (Dayan) Ranwala, Karen B. Demby, Beth B. Tigges, Kevin C. Wooten, Allan R. Allan Wooten, Kevin C. Tigges, Beth B. Demby, Karen Ranwala, B. (Dayan) Kane, Damayanthi T. Cathleen Authors: Brasier Thematic Paper Sessions and Panels (submitted) Sessions and Panels Paper Thematic CTSAThe Perspective - Performance Team Research Translational Enhance to New Strategies Panel: 2:00-3:30 pm 12:30-2:00 pm Topic NetworkingEvent Table Lunch & Buffet Arizona State University State Arizona Global Institute of SustainabilityWrigley Senior Sustainability Julie Ann Scientist, Vice Provost for Research & Professor, Heller School & Management of Social Policy & Professor, Research for Provost Vice University Brandeis Emeritus Professor Ed Hackett, PhD Hackett, Ed Featured Speaker: Group Creativity - Lessons Learned from Synthesis Centers Synthesis from Learned - Lessons Creativity Speaker: Group Featured 11:45-12:30 pm Break 11:30-11:45 am 11:30-11:45 Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 24 Robinson &Brian O’Rourke, Authors: Stephen Crowley, Michael ChadGonnerman, Communication Integration Drives Interdisciplinary Paper inDialogue- How 2:Micro-Integration Stephanie VaskoAuthors: Dialogue andCollaboration withSTEAM Researchers Paper 1:EnablingInnovation Across Fields -Facilitating Thematic Paper Communication Session: in Team Science by Sponsored Session Thematic Paper andPanels Sessions (submitted) 3:45-5:15 pm Break 3:30-3:45 pm Anderson Authors: Thomas Chung, Andrew Bradley, &Jeff Team-Based Science at theMayo Clinic for Translation into Practice through Multidisciplinary Paper 2:OpenInnovation andCollaborative Models Authors: David J. Mcbee R&D Scientific Teams Paper 1:Research ObstaclesandProblem in Solving Moderator: Sarah Hohl Thematic Paper Biotech Session: Teams for Translational Research andDevelopment Tsinoremas Authors: Stefan Sawsan Khuri, Wuchty, &Nicholas Paper 3:Inspiring Teams inComputational Science Regency Ballroom AB Regency Ballroom CD Regency Ellis East Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2016Conference: Paper 4:An Ethnography of Team Science Authors: Andrew Ritcheson PerspectiveManagement onInterdisciplinarity Paper 3: Working at theBioinformatics Crossroads -A Authors: & Andrew KevinKniffin Hanks Team? Paper Awesome 4:IsEverything When You’re Part ofa Authors: Tobais Buser&Silvia Tobias in TransdisciplinaryTarget Teams Knowledge Paper 4: Testing for Methods the Co-Production of Robinson &Brian Gonnerman, Cwik, Chad Bryan Authors: O’Rourke, Michael Planning Climate Resiliency Paper 3:Facilitating in Collective Decision-Making Authors: Anna Jabloner&Sandra Lee Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 25 Scientific Collaboration Scientific Greene & Sarah Warner Emily Authors: Publishing Research to Science Team 3: Bringing Paper Communities and Science Eric Olson Authors: Paper 3: Evidence-Based Organizational Change to 3: Evidence-Based Change to Organizational Paper in Research Careers Women’s Support Vaness McKean Authors: Paper 3: A Model for Team-Based Interdisciplinary Team-Based 3: A Model for Paper Doctoral Education Lisette Nilsa Force, Jo Ellen Bosque-Perez, Authors: Kate Cleary, Wulfhorst, JD Eigenbrode, Sanford Waits, Joseph Holbrook, Bentley Galbraith, Sara Amanda Michael Rhoades, O’Rourke, Paul Klos, Zion Brymer, & Nicole Sibelet Bryan Finegan, Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Lotrecchiano, Yianna Yovides, Trudy Trudy Yovides, Yianna Lotrecchiano, Sundance Sundance Ellis East Ellis West Ellis West Moderator: GaetanoModerator: Lotrecchiano Thematic Paper Session: Team Science Training and Education Training Science Team Session: Paper Thematic the Publishing Process Can Be Used to Foster Effective Effective Foster to Be Used Can Process the Publishing SciTS 2016 Conference: Kevin Elliot, Georgina Montgomery, & Patricia Soranno & Patricia Montgomery, Georgina Kevin Elliot, - How Team Science Publishing and 2: Scientific Paper Authorship Practices in Interdisciplinary Teams in Interdisciplinary Practices Authorship Cheruvelil, Kendra Brassel, Sheila Isis Settles, Authors: Moderator: Holly Falk-Krzesinski Moderator: - Problematizing “Inclusivity” Dark Side of The 1: Paper Thematic Paper Session: Publishing Team Science - Challenges & Opportunities Science Team Session: Publishing Paper Thematic Innovation & Devin Markovits Tavel MortonAuthors: Authors: Hannah & Jennifer Cross Hannah & Jennifer Authors: Team-Driven Epigenetic Model 2: An of Paper Paper 1: Increasing the Performance of Interdisciplinary the Performance 1: Increasing Paper Teams Research Thematic Paper Session: New Approaches to Stimulate Innovation Stimulate to Session: New Approaches Paper Thematic Session Sponsored by Pedagogy Akanksha Kathryn Lamarre, Authors: Georgia Plaisance, Madan, & Shane Morganstein Paper 2: Teaching Teamwork to Undergraduate Undergraduate to Teamwork Teaching 2: Paper Collaborative in Applied Study - A Case Students Authors: Gaetano Authors: Ma, Laurie Lyons Mallinson, Falk-Krzesinski, Holly & Jesse Pines Roche, Colleen Success in Collaborative Teaming through Reflective through Teaming in Collaborative Success Sensemaking Paper 1: Learning Interventions for Collaborative Team Team Collaborative Interventions 1: Learning for Paper for Workers Health and Biomedical Science - Preparing Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 26 Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2016Conference: Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 27

Scott J. Leischow, PhD PhD Leischow, Scott J. of Health Services Research Professor Office Disparities of Health Research Clinic Mayo

Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide

Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

Wednesday, May 18, 2016 May Wednesday, Regency CD Ballroom Regency AB Ballroom Regency AB Ballroom Regency AB Ballroom Foyer Entrance in front of Regency in front Ballroom Entrance Foyer SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: 10:45-11:00 am Break Wayne State University State Wayne Julie Thompson Klein,Thompson PhD Julie of Humanities Emerita Professor Interdisciplinarity 9:45-10:45 am and Science Team - Intersections of Visions and Milestones, Threads, Award: Recognition 2016 SciTS Senior Scientist, Learning Research & Development Center & Development Research Senior Learning Scientist, of Pittsburgh University Christian Schunn, PhD Systems & Intelligent & Policy, Science Learning Psychology, Professor, 9:00-9:45 am Solving of MultidisciplinaryWorkhorse and Problem Creativity as the Speaker: Analogies Featured Behavioral Research Program Research Behavioral Institute Cancer National Kara PhD L. Hall, Team of Science Director, Science Team 9:00 am Back Welcome 8:00–9:00 am Breakfast and Continental Registration Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 28 Collaborative Analysis Science-ABibliometric of Paper 3:Integration ofPeripheral Regions in Crespi Anderson, EleanorSayre,Authors: Katharine &Matthew Behavior Stage Academic inEarly CommunitiesLinking Paper 2: What Us Brings Together and -Institutions Ioannis Pavlidis Authors: Kyeongan Kwon, Uzzi, Brian & DineshMajeti, Visualization for Method Academic Careers Paper Plot andScalable -ACompact 1:Scholar Moderator: TBA Thematic Paper Analyses Network Session: andData Visualization Waldrupe Authors: SuzieAllard, Amy Dorsett, JanetNelson,DaniellePollock, Kristina Forrester, Partee, & Robert Thomas Panel: Creating Gen theNext Team Science Workforce -Lessons Learned from Tennessee Paper 3:Learning to aScience Be Team Steiner,Cynthia Michael Bulik, &ElianaPerrin Howard, Levine, Cary JaneBrown, Anna Bardone-Cone, Authors: Asheley Skinner, Andrew Perrin, Janna Building Principles to Develop a Transdisciplinary Team Paper 2:Radical Transdisciplinarity -Using Group Model L.Dianis& Authors: Nancy Tracy Wolbach Paper 1: Team ScienceChallengeBusters Thematic Paper Strategies Evidence-Based Session: for Success by Sponsored Session Thematic Paper andPanels Sessions (submitted) 11:00-12:30 pm Ellis West Sundance Ballroom AB Regency Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2016Conference: Boundary Objects Boundary DifferencesNegotiation ofDisciplinary through DevelopmentResearch ofScientific Proposals - Paper andCollaborative 4:Interdisciplinary Chini Authors: Stephen Catherine Gabelica, Fiore, &Jacquelyn Sebastian, &PabloSebastian, Jensen Lund,Authors: Kristin Heisawn Jeong, Grauwin the Challengesthat Face Multi-Expertise Teams with Analyses inOrder ofInterdisciplinarity to Detect Paper ofMultidisciplinarity 4:Linking Authors: Gregoire Cote &David Campbell County Level and Co-AuthorshipScientific at American Activity Authors: Laura Paganucci &Louise Wetherbee Phelps Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 29 Paper 3: The Effect of Pubic Research Funding in China’s in China’s Funding Pubic Research of Effect The 3: Paper Context Dongbo Shi Authors: Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Ellis East SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: American Partnership Levesque Lucie Erica Soltero, Lee, Rebecca Authors: Simpson, & Natalie LambertSimpson, & Natalie to Collaborations Multinational 2: Developing Paper a North from Learned Knowledge - Lessons Translate Action Oriented Team Science Team Action Oriented Elizabeth IftekharAuthors: Marshall Poole, Ahmed, Moderator: Arsev Aydinoglu Arsev Moderator: of Low-Overhead, Understanding Toward 1: Paper Thematic Paper Session: International Perspectives and Considerations and Session: Perspectives International Paper Thematic Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 30 BreenAuthors: &Deborah Duran Nancy Cross-Disciplinary Health Disparity Team Paper 1:Developing andMeasurement aMethods Moderator: Heather Billings Thematic Paper Collaboration Center Session: andNIHSupported Initiatives McAllister, Eric J. Konstantinos Clark, N.Lazaridis, Karl W. R. Oliver, Naresh Prodduturi, D. Eric Wieben, Tammy M. Hogenson, Paola Iguchi,Gavin Eriko Durin, A.Romecin Safgren, Hesles, ElisaEnriquez Luciana L.Almada, Tara L. Ashley N. Sigafoos, Ezequiel J. Tolosa, Stephanie L. Authors: JanB. Egan, David L.Marks, Anne M. Vrabel, Translational Team ScienceApproach Mutations to New Define Therapeutic Strategies -A Paper 2:Functional ofNovel Characterizations Somatic Kaehler, Tucker Lebien, &Sandra Wells Authors: Gwenyth Fischer, JodiFenlonKaren Rebuffoni, Accelerating Pediatric Device Development Paper 1:Novel Collaborative Approaches for Amanda VogelModerator: Thematic Paper Biotech Session: andHealthcare Teams by Sponsored Session Plaisance, Stephanie Kathryn Authors: O’Rourke, Michael Vasko, &Stephen Crowley Panel: AFeminist Approach to Facilitating Collaboration Interdisciplinary Thematic Paper andPanels Sessions (submitted) 2:00-3:30 pm Buffet Lunch 12:30-2:00 pm Ellis West Sundance Ballroom AB Regency Ballroom CD Regency Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2016Conference: Authors: Kristianna PettiboneAuthors: Kristianna &Jennifer Collins Program - NIEHSChildren’s HealthExposure Analysis Resource Paper 2:CHEARPlanning for a Team ScienceEvaluation Nyquist, Amy Gentry, &Brian Tomlinson Sara Nandita Khera, Wordingham, NoelArring, Sharon Cooke,Authors: Ayan, Nancy Sen Nathan McNeese, Team Science Paper 4:Improving Cancer Care Coordination through Palmon Dawn Venema, JosephAllen, JohnCrowe, Reiter- &Roni Jones,Authors: Katherine Victoria Kennel, Anne Skinner, Reduce Falls Paper 3:Collaboration andProactive Teamwork Used to E. Fernandez-ZapicoKlee, &Martin Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 31 Paper 4: Modeling the Dynamics of Collaboration 4: Modeling the Dynamics of Collaboration Paper Case of Clinical and The - Workforce in the Scientific Program Grant Pilot Awards Science Translational Noshir Lei, Kun Denis Agniel, Lungeanu, Alina Authors: Weber & Griffin Contractor, Authors: Zhiya Zuo, Xi Wang, Kang Zhao, & David & David Kang Zhao, Wang, Xi Zuo, Zhiya Authors: Eichmann and Experiences - Applications Them on 3: Focus Paper Promote to Business-Based Assessments Using and Leadership Teamwork, Collaboration, Gosselin & Ron David Bonnstetter Authors: Detailed Guide to the Conference the Detailed to Guide Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for

Regency AB Ballroom Regency CD Ballroom Ellis East Beti Thompson Disparities & Meagan Brown, Health Noble, Hohl, Sarah Authors: Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer and Cancer Energetics on Research Transdisciplinary Health Health and Population for and the Centers Paper 3: Transdisciplinary Outcomes in Two NIH-Funded NIH-Funded Two in Outcomes Transdisciplinary 3: Paper of the Study - A Qualitative Initiatives Grant Center SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Authors: Sharon Ku & Christine Hendren Ku Sharon Authors: Panel: Communicating a Value Proposition for Integrating Social Scientists and Natural Scientists/Engineers - A Scientists/Engineers Social Scientists and Natural Integrating for Proposition Value a Communicating Panel: Studies Case Integration through Sales Pitch 3:45-5:15 pm (submitted) Sessions and Panels Paper Thematic Break Study of iSchoolsStudy 3:30-3:45 pm Paper 2: The Prevalence and Interdisciplinarity of Prevalence The 2: Paper in MultidisciplinaryCollaborations Institutions - A Case in an Educational Setting - The InterdisciplinaryThe Design Setting - in an Educational Studio Kaygan & Pinar Aydinoglu Arsev Authors: Moderator: Daniel Stokols Moderator: Process Design 1: Interdisciplinary Collaborative Paper Thematic Paper Session: Lessons Learned from Multi-Disciplinary Organizations and Fields - From Design to to Design - From Multi-Disciplinary from and Fields Learned Organizations Session: Lessons Paper Thematic Ecology Session Sponsored by Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 32 Scott Poole Authors: Ashley Trudeau, Ahmed, &Marshall Iftekhar Perspective Research Environments Events-Based -ACritical Paper 2: Tracing theEvolution ofCollaborative Virtual Authors: Federica Fusi, Eric Welch, Louafi &Selim Science -An Event-Based Capital Social Perspective Paper 1:Communities andCommon Pool Resources in Moderator: M.ScottPoole Thematic Paper Shared Session: Resources andCollaboration -Events, Data, andDocuments Authors: Theresa Salazar Lant &Maritza Science Effectiveness - Role ofThe Team Training Paper 2:EnhancingIntegrative and Capacity Team Authors: WayneMcCormack PhD Scientists LevelNext - Team Training for Clinical and Translational Paper 1: Taking Interdisciplinary Team Science to the Salazar Moderator: Maritza Thematic Paper Session: Team Training inthe Trenches Authors: Pennington Deana BasedReasoning Model Paper Negotiation 2:Knowledge across Disciplineswith LawlessAuthors: William Science, Scientists, andScientific Teams Paper 1:A Thermodynamics ofInterdependence - Moderator: Stephen Crowley Thematic Paper Conceptual Session: and Models Theory Ellis East Ellis West Sundance Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2016Conference: O’Rourke Authors: Graham Hubbs, Ian Werkheiser, &Michael forIntentionality Interdisciplinary Teams Paper 4:JoiningForces IssuesinCollective -Some Deborah TollefsenAuthors: Science Paper 3:Collective andScience of Intentionality Team Carsten Osterlund Matt Sharma, Authors: Sarika Willis, Steve Sawyer, & Collaborations Academics andDocument Stewardship in Virtual Paper 4: Chaos,Virtual Face-to-Face Confusion - Authors: Leahey, Erin Attila Varga, Jacobs &Jerry Sciences Datasets intheSocial Large-Scale Paper Exchange Site of Interdisciplinary - 3:ANeglected Authors: Amy Moore Development Paper 4:A Team ScienceApproach to Leadership Shults Mackenzie Authors: Salazar, GiaDemichele, Maritza Theresa Lant, & Paper 3:Simulations for Team Science Training Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Detailed Guide to the Conference

Thursday, May 19, 2016

8:00–8:30 am Registration (no refreshments until Brunch)

Foyer Entrance in front of Regency Ballroom

8:30 am Welcome Back

Regency Ballroom AB

Kara L. Hall, PhD Scott J. Leischow, PhD Director, Science of Team Professor of Health Services Research Science Team Office of Health Disparities Research Behavioral Research Program Mayo Clinic National Cancer Institute

8:30-9:15 am Featured Speaker: Partnership Approaches to Solving Big Problems - The Promise of Stewardship Teams and the Transformation of Health

Regency Ballroom AB

Ruth Wageman, PhD Associate Faculty in Psychology Harvard University

9:15-10:00 am Featured Speaker: Research Collaboration Effectiveness and the Science of Team Science - A Summary of a 15-Year Research Program

Regency Ballroom AB Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Barry Bozeman, PhD Center Director (ACD) & Professor, School of Public Affairs Arizona State University

10:00-11:15 am

Scientific and Collaborative Poster Session and Brunch

Regency Ballroom CD

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 33 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 34 Poster 14-Project Aquilá: engaged Acommunity Authors: Aras Eftekhari the Classical Outperforming Team Norms Poster 13-Building Trust in aDistributed Federal Team: Thematic Poster Group #3:Collaborative Engagement Grant Authors: Amanda Vogel, Hall, David Kara Garner, &Elliot Success in Team Science Poster 10- The Team Science Toolkit: Practical Tools for Gillanders Authors: Katrina Theisz, Jennifer Couch, &Elizabeth Hub Poster 9-CitSciBio.org- The BiomedicalCitizen Science Thematic Poster Group #2: Collaboration,Virtual Technology, &/Crowdsourcing Lerner,Rachel Thomas Egan, &David Peden Authors: Demby, Karen Mary White, Richard Davis, and Lessons Learned Poster 4-Case Studies in Team Science:Observations Authors: HalaAzzam Transdisciplinary Teams Poster AGame-Like 3-Questae: Training Tool to Build Corcoran &Mary Kenneth Harwood, Authors: R.Lotrecchiano, Gaetano Paige McDonald, ResearchDoctoral Collaborative, Translational andImplementable and ChallengesinDeveloping aFramework for Poster 2-Learning Theory, Operative Model, Susan Carlson Authors: SusanCarter, Barbara Walker, JohnCrockett, & Science Furthering Research, Excellence andDiversity in Team Poster 1-UC Team Science Retreats: Promoting and Thematic Poster Group #1:Practical Resources, Tools, and Training Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2016Conference: Enhance TeamFunction Poater 7-Community Engagement Software Works To Wooten, &Fruma Yehiely B. Tigges, William M. Trochim, Lori Wiseman, KevinC. B. Peden, Angela F. Pfammatter, Spring, Bonnie Beth Diazgranados Diazgranados, Cathleen T. David Kane, Allen R.Brasier, JuanJ. Cordero, B. Karen Demby, Authors: Damayanthi Ranwala, Gwen Baillargeron, PilotIntervention Study Poster 6-Multi-CTSA Team Science Training PettiboneAuthors: Kristi Poster 5- Team Science Workbook for NIHProgram Staff Cristina AraujoCristina Brinkerhoff, & Eduardo Siqueira Negron, Rosalyn Authors: LindaSprague Martinez, transnational communities inMassachusetts process totransdisciplinary studyculture in Scott TousleyAuthors: Science & Technology Challenge Poster 12-Cybersecurity R&DasaHomeland Team Joshua YoungAuthors: Poster andtheScience of 11-EarthCube Team Science O’Rourke Authors: DilynCorner, Thomas Padilla, &Michael Find Them Poster and aboutInterdisciplinarity 8-Articles Where to Josefine Engel Authors: Mccord, Karen Laura Dress, David Proctor, & Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Detailed Guide to the Conference Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Day 4: Thursday, May 19

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 35 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 36 Arellano, &JessicaContreras Dominguez, Martin Edurne Bague,Bidegain, ClaudiaHernandez, Jessica Authors: Paras, Margarita Silvana Levi, Evangelina team Science experience ineducation of Mexico: atransdisciplinary Poster 24- landscapesin The studyofmultifunctional Authors: JeniCross &HannahLove researchinterdisciplinary Poster graduate 23-Including students in Bammer,Gabriele &Sharon Ku Authors: Hendren, Christine HollyJ. Falk-Krzesinski, Specialists of Practice &Research Science for Interdisciplinary Poster 22-EstablishingaProfessional Community Authors: Adams Robin & Richard Aleong Poster professional 21-Becoming across-disciplinary Authors: OlenaLeonchuk Evaluation Students:of Doctoral Testing aNewFramework ofSTI Poster 20-Assessment ofProfessional Capital Social Kennedy, &Alicja Foksinska Authors: Anthony Allman, Zakiyyah Hood, Crystal Approach Poster 19-Preparing for aPhD: A Transactivity Thematic Poster Group #4: Training, Education, andProfessional Development in Team Science Authors: Patrick Barlow, JosephZabner, Georgeanna Science Teams Training to of Improve andSkills theKnowledge Poster 16-Using aPilot Grant Program and Teamwork Vincent Authors: Pennington, David Deana Gosselin, &Shirley ProgramsSustainability EnvironmentalLeadership ofInterdisciplinary and Poster Effective 15-Negotiating Boundaries: Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2016Conference: Careers Poster into 25-Insights Computer Science Academic Enrlich, Yu-Ru Buchler Lin,&Norbou Authors: Liangyue Li,Hanghang Tong, NanCao, Kate ProblemNetworks: and Definitions Solutions Fast Poster 18 - Enhancing Team Composition in Professional Judith TavelAuthors: Thinking Poster andCollaborative Models 17-M&S,Mental Stewart Rosenthal, &Greg Gary Knudson, Beth Robinson, Birney Erica Authors: Molina, Michelle Watson-Currie, &Lauren Science (CCERS) Curriculum +Community Enterprise for Restoration Education andEnvironmental Restoration – The Poster 29- Transdisciplinary Collaboration for STEM-C Birney Authors: Erica Watson-Currie, & Lauren Molina, Michelle Curriculum inRestoration Science Teams Collaborate to Develop aNewSTEM-C Poster 28-Community Diverse Engagement Model: Wiseman Eugene Frazier, Faith Hellmich,&Lori Mark Robin, Authors: Kevin Wooten, Allan Brasier, Sukol, Marlon Team Science Leaders Poster 27-Development ofanAssessment Center for Wiseman Eugene Frazier, Faith Hellmich,&Lori Mark Robin, Authors: Kevin Wooten, Allan Brasier, Sukol, Barlon Science Contextualized Leadership Training Program for Team Poster 26-Developing a andImplementing &IoannisPavlidisAshik Khatri, Authors: Salah DineshMajeti, Taamneh, Ugur, Muhsin Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Detailed Guide to the Conference

Thematic Poster Group #5: Team Science to Address Health and Improve Healthcare

Poster 30 - Teaming-Up for Patient Safety: A Case Study Authors: Heidi McLeod, Katherine Carroll, Jessica of Social Interactions AmongTeam Members Mesman, Gary Keeney, & Judy C. Boughey Authors: Michelle Leak Poster 35 - Systematic evaluation of radiologist performance with reduced dose computed Poster 31 - The Academic Cartography of Sugar tomography protocols Sweetened Beverages: Interdisciplinarity in Research Between Scientific and Legal Fields Authors: Rickey E. Carter, David R. Iii Holmes, Adam C. Bartley, Phillip K. Edwards, Ronald A. Karwoski, Amy K. Authors: Lexi White Hara, Jeff L. Fidler, David Delone, David Levin, Gregory

Poster 32 - Ideal Hospital Discharge Process: A J. Michalak, Tammy A. Drees, Lifeng Yu, Shuai Leng, Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Systematic Review Cynthia H. McCollough, & Joel G. Fletcher Authors: Fares Alahdab, Shalak Gunjal, Zhen Wang, Poster 36 - The Effects of Organizational Commitment Jehad Almasri, Lindsey Lehman, Larry Prokop, & M. and Employee Empowerment on Patient Safety Culture Hassan Murad Using Physician Cohort Poster 33 - Data Analysis of Smoking Trends in New York Authors: Sujin Horwitz & Irwin Horwitz Authors: Shilpa Balan, Joseph Otto, & Pooja Sarang Poster 37 - Using Team Science to Demonstrate the Poster 34 - Identifying Successful Inter-Team Value of a Unique Clinical Practice in Breast Surgery Communication between the Frozen Section Authors: Elizabeth Habermann, Gary Keeney, & Judy Laboratory and Breast Surgery Team Boughey

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 37 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 38 Adjourn 12:00 pm FutureClosing Session: Panel Directions 11:15 -12:00pm to Confront GlobalChangeintheAmericas Practice: An Analysis ofInterdisciplinary Team Science Poster and between theRhetoric 41-ClosingtheGap Johnson, &DanRuss Ann Guadagno,Authors: Dumais, Charles Mary Calvin Content Responses Analysis ofCSRSurvey Poster 40-ANatural LanguageProcessing Approach to Hannah & Mark Authors: Margaret Hinrichs, Thomas Seager, Sarah Tracy, Emotional Intelligence andLeadership Poster 39-Addressing Challengeswith Interdisciplinary Authors: Sara Parks Documents Poster 38- Team Writing Science and Institutional Thematic Poster Group #6:Innovative Approaches to Team Science Regency Ballroom AB Regency Detailed GuidetoDetailed theConference SciTS 2016Conference: Motivation to Reduce or Stop Drinking BehaviorsMotivation to Reduce orStop Drinking Community-Based Intervention That Increases Poster through Risk CHOICES:A 44-Reducing Authors: Christina Ting &Jeff Tsao Processing HumanSystems andDecision-Making Poster 43-Signatures ofLearning by Information- William Schulze Authors: Jubo KevinKniffin, Brian Yan, & Wansink, on Influences CooperativeBehavior Poster 42- The ofCooperation: Sound Musical Farfan, &Ignacio Bonelli, Lorenzo Sebastian Michelle Jeremy Garcia-Cartagena, Pittman, Martin Authors: LilyHouse-Peters, Alonso-Yanez, Gabriela Authors: Konstance Cook-Withers Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

Submitted Abstracts

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 39 Reviewer Acknowledgement

We would like to extend special thanks to our abstract reviewers:

Gabriele Bammer Theresa Lant Christian Pohl

Michelle Bennett Scott Leischow Maritza Salazar

Heather Billings Wayne Lutters Dan Stokols

Kevin Crowston George Mensah Amanda Vogel

Kara Hall Janet Okamoto Stefan Wuchty

Grace Huang Michael O’Rourke

Julie Thompson Klein Deana Pennington

40 SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 41 2:00-3:30 pm Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Cathleen T. Kane, Cornell University CTSC; Damayanthi (Dayan) Ranwala, South Carolina Clinical & South Ranwala, Carolina CTSC; University Kane, (Dayan) Cornell Damayanthi T. Cathleen

: Impact & Area of Inquiry: We will overview some work showing how training improves outcomes of outcomes improves training how will overviewImpact showing some work of Inquiry: & Area We science. team translational for questions in training and unresolved teams, research settings, and examples of strategies used by CTSAs at UTMB, UNC-Chapel support CTSAs to used by UTMB, Hill, and Cornell at team of strategies and examples settings, science. in makingcompetencies translational team science will discuss the emphasis on defining We Focus: discipline. and rigorous formal a more research Overview: We will describe features of translational teams, challenges of their implementation in academic in academic challenges of their implementation teams, of translational will describe features Overview:We • • • Thematic Session 1 Thematic SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Part I: Panelists discuss translational teams, the CTSA program, and the Multi-CTSA Team Science Training Training Science Team the CTSA and the Multi-CTSA teams, program, discuss translational I: Panelists Part on the evaluation/data. with a special focus Study Intervention Pilot of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Medical University of South Carolina, Northwestern University, University of University University, Northwestern Medical of South University Galveston, Carolina, Medical at Branch Texas of Medical. Cornell Weill and University Commonwealth Virginia of North University Carolina, New Mexico, collaboration arose from a national CTSA Team Science Affinity Workgroup composed of team science facilitators, facilitators, team science composed of Workgroup Affinity Science Team CTSA a national from arose collaboration experts participating and implementation seven at evaluators CTSA-fundededucators, institutions: the University as well as our work within our respective centers. respective within our as our work as well This Study. Intervention Pilot Training Science Team all members of the the Multi-CTSA panelists are The examining a wider view of promising trends in the formal and informal dissemination of new strategies to enhance enhance to of new strategies dissemination and informal in the formal trends a wider view of promising examining the NIH and CTSA from performance, examples including various team leadership national research translational Translational Science Award (CTSA) program and its emphasis on team approaches to complex problems problems complex to approaches and its emphasis on team (CTSA) program Award Science Translational Science Affinity Team CTSA national of the will then describe the work We and health systems. spanning research by will conclude Our conversation Study. Intervention Pilot Training Science Team and the Multi-CTSA Workgroup The objective of this panel is to hold a facilitated discussion beginning broadly with an overview with of the Clinical broadly discussion beginning hold a facilitated objective is to of this panel The University of New Mexico College of Nursing; Kevin C. Wooten, University of Houston Clear Lake and Institute for Clear Lake and Institute for of Houston University Wooten, of Nursing; Kevin C. College of New Mexico University Sciences (ITS). Translational Institute for R. Brasier, Allan (ITS); Sciences Translational Translational Research Institute (SCTR), Medical University of South Carolina; Karen B. Demby, North Institute Carolina (SCTR), Research Demby, Karen B. Medical of South University Carolina; Translational of North University UNC School at of Medicine, Carolina TraCS), Institute and Clinical Sciences (NC Translational (UNM CTSC) Center Science and Translational Clinical and of New Mexico University Tigges, Chapel Hill; Beth B. Authors Performance Team Research Translational Enhance to Strategies New Panel: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 May Tuesday, Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 42 throughout bothlocallyandnationally, ourvarious networks includingbutnot exclusive to: group will give examples ofcurrent formal andinformal dissemination ofteam science practices”“best evident nationalof ways leadershiphave inwhichNIHandCTSA recently responded to thechanging nature ofteams. The Part III:Panelists team science, willdiscussofsomethenational trends supporting beginning withanoverview Part II: The panelistsshare theirexperiences offacilitating thistraining withnewteams. • • • • • • • • • Our own Our collaboration withtheCTSA Team Science Affinity Workgroup. teams andthegrowing fieldof team science. Various ways inwhichourown university andacademic cultures canadaptto thechanging nature of ofteam science.institutional support The growing shouldimplement common around metrics consensus collaboration that theCTSA and Workgroup: re “Developing Measures for Assessing andImproving Collaborations”. ofthecurrentAn overview goalsoftheCollaboration/Engagement Domain Task Force (CEDTF) competencies. nominalgroupstructured technique) definingtheirspecificgoals forimproving their own collaborative PilotOur –Objectives: We willshare thevarious “Top Five” eachteam objectives defined(viathe training. training; aswell asany unresolved questionsresulting from theprocess ofproviding theseteams withthis We &Area ofInquiry: Impact discusshow initialimprovements theteams reported asaresult ofthe the modules/pilotprocess). Focus: We discussboththeform (ourtechnique) andthecontent (thevariouscompetencies includedin WeOverview: thevarious features describe ofourrespective translational teams. diagnosis, planning. needsassessment, andaction sessionsinvolvingto-face experiential exercises aboutcollaboration andcommunication, aswell asteam pre andpost-test, two onlineteam science educational modules(www.TeamScience.net), andtwo face- Figure PilotOur –Objectives: 1below illustrates thedesign ofthetraining whichincludeda intervention, Figure ofthe 1:Overview Team Science Training Pilot Intervention Study SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 43 2:00-3:30 pm departments. In the process of setting up this structure, departments. of setting up this structure, In the process departmental guidelines and create had to have we research. our faculty evaluating members’ policies for given challenges has posed some interesting This sets of diverse most of our facultythat members have in line with some of which are programs, research the norms of the departments which they’re to addressing institutional barriers to the appropriate institutional barriers the appropriate to addressing particularly of interdisciplinary research, evaluation as it pertains pre-tenure faculty. to the Department from comes Our experience of (KI), which is housed in the Knowledge Integration Waterloo. of the University at of Environment Faculty department a philosopher The engineers, includes two change and a climate a sociologist, of science, to an interdisciplinary degree and offers researcher, to approach KI takes a novel students. undergraduate interdisciplinary faculty are appointments hiring in that held within a single interdisciplinary department, with one or to appointed each faculty member being cross departments traditional most relevant more are that appointments cross These of research. their area(s) to the departments to align that “access” facultyallow providing best with their disciplinary background, supervise courses, opportunities graduate teach to with their disciplinary and interact students, graduate those to obligations any but without conferring peers, discipline, from the academic institution, and less the academic institution, and less from discipline, which the other disciplines with from frequently of these barriers Examples include they collaborate. in disciplinaryvariations (journal publication norms for importance of authorship, order papers, conference vs. privileges structure that a reward etc.), of abstracts, of public communication over dissemination traditional collaborate to how as to a lack of training and science, the we will present talk In this with others. effectively for created we’ve and the tools leraned lessons we’ve Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 2 Thematic SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: faced by interdisciplinary researchers, even if they may if they may even interdisciplinary researchers, by faced interdisciplinary. their work consider not themselves within their implicit barriers face from may They to engage in and contribute to team-based research research team-based to engage in and contribute to of the same challenges many often face therefore in multi-disciplinary of levels with increasing teams, objectives and methodologies of research integration Faculty seeking those disciplines. across differ that Authors: KathrynAuthors: & Robert Plaisance Gorbet collaboration often involves science of team work The Paper 2: Ensuring Institutional of Recognition Paper Research Interdisciplinary Team-Based introduction in 2015 will also be discussed. in 2015 will also introduction for research staff – developed metrics for incenting for incenting metrics staff – developed research for the new metrics How science. team and rewarding their since been received and have deployed were advancement process. This presentation will describe presentation This process. advancement Subcommittee Personnel Clinic Research the Mayo how committee and promotion appointment – Mayo’s to acknowledgeto the efforts of the individual within the faculty into must be woven a team of the context and principal investigator status on extramural grants. grants. on extramural status and principal investigator faculty engage in team to research incent In to order mechanisms doing so, for them and reward science and tenure committees only reward individual only reward committees and tenure on lead or senior authorship focusing by achievement on a single research endeavor. However, there exist exist there However, endeavor. on a single research science, engage in team to individuals barriers for many promotion, appointment, including the fact many that Impactful science requires the bringing together of together the bringing Impactful requires science focus to and experiences experts training diverse from Appointment & Promotion Process at Mayo Clinic Mayo at Process & Promotion Appointment Timothy Authors: Beebe Paper 1: Incenting & Rewarding Team Science in the Science Team & Rewarding 1: Incenting Paper Institutional Support and Recognition for Team Science Team Institutional Support for and Recognition Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 44 Big orsmall, data needshandling, management, point ofcomputational scienceThe isdata. starting Tsinoremas Authors: Stefan Sawsan Khuri, Wuchty, &Nicholas Paper 3:Inspiring Teams inComputational Science endeavors.success intheseimportant at variouslevels and andencouraging participation team-based science, recognizing that exist thebarriers begin to create in for asetofbestpractices participants appointments. We hopethrough thisdiscussionto the needfor suchmechanismseven inmore traditional comparative discussion amongattendees, identifying within academia). We hopethiswillleadto anopen modelforcommon structural interdisciplinarity to units(another explicitly interdisciplinary for thosewithformal cross- orjoint-appointments within more traditional academicunits, aswell as researchdoing collaborative from cross-disciplinary We willexplain thebenefitsofoursolution to those tenure engaging research. ininterdisciplinary faculty we’ve putinplace to ensure theprotection ofpre- ourcircumstanceswill describe andthemechanisms assessment, reappointment, tenure, andpromotion. We challenges itcreates within atraditional system ofmerit model hasfor research, interdisciplinary aswell asthe we willoutlinethebenefitsthat thistalk, theKI In collaborative work. for appropriate evaluation andrecognition ofothers’ tools we’ve developed may provide arelevant template fromlearned theKIcontext are valuable, andthat the of theircollaborative research. We believe thelessons abovedescribed nature becauseoftheinterdisciplinary from outsidethat unit, theymay stillface thebarriers homeandcollaborating withothers their disciplinary based science may behousedinaunitaligned with Even thoughmany researchers engagedinteam- many intheScience of scholarsworking Team Science. different. We thinkthismodelwillbeofinterest to whereboundaries theresearch canbequite norms cross appointed whileotherscross disciplinary SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts innovation. and encourage boundaries that pushdisciplinary together before, are now coming together onprojects research disciplines, whohadpreviously notworked thecontext ofacademicresearch,In thismeansthat communities.humanities, communication andartistic physical, life andsocialsciences, andincreasingly inthe ofthe interface researchers at every skilled working the computational sciences, withcomputationally This makesteam work andteam science in thenorm new experiments that generate newdata, andsoon. usually iterative, withinterpretation feeding ideasfor and willeventually interpret, thedata. The process is hands ofresearchers otherthanthosewhocreated, These are computational increasingly skills inthe storage andanalysis sothat itcanbeinterpreted. today’s evolving academicstructures. phenomena, andhave given usnewinsights into allowed several usto observe keyteam science initiatives andcollaborations over theyears have Hazards, DrugDiscovery, Cities. Our andSmart broad themeareas, suchasClimate andEnvironmental andorganizedexpertise, ourresearch programs into data mining, engineering, software andvisualization installeddata management,cyberinfrastructure, research across alldisciplinesat UM. We builtalarge andtraining,service andgettinginvolved with (UM)hasbeenprovidingat theUniversity ofMiami years, theCenter for Computational Science (CCS) that housecomputational power. thelastnine Over Many institutionsare providing centralized cores Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. • • academia dictate thewayacademia dictate with whichwe engage Second, we note that thedifferent cultures within groups.traditionally non-computational the experimental approaches takeninthese havecomputational skills become intrinsicto approaching trans-disciplinarity, where collaborations, andtwo teams whoare researchers, multi-andinter- disciplinary 2012),withuni-disciplinary and Gadlin, Bennett team science collaboration continuum (per First, we seeexamples ofallstagesthe Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 45 2:00-3:30 pm waves of the SDR shows that average salary average growth that of the SDR shows waves those 7%, for just over at 2013 is greater, 2006 to from with compared in 2006 when teamwork who declared those who of 3.3% for salary rate the average growth In addition to in teamwork. not involved said they were we also find that higher salaries, earning significantly part significantly worked people who were of teams of the than the rest on average hours per week more with the significant 42.7). In contrast sample (47.1 vs. find salary we involving and hours-worked, patterns and job teamwork between no direct relationship satisfaction among the 2006 SDR respondents. field: the SciTS Our Advances the Research How team-related of on the only set attention focus findings the through been posed date, to has, questions that among STEM professionals teamwork SDR regarding a deeper understanding of the to and contributes labor markets and labor market outcomes. relevant whether or not teamwork is broadly rewarded across across rewarded is broadly or not teamwork whether of matched the benefit With markets. STEM labor the 2006, 2008, 2010, and 2013 waves to responses which to the degree investigate of the SDR, we compounding leads to participation in teamwork time. over – or negative effects – either positive important exists there While Summary Findings: of findings indicate our initial disciplines, across variation and engineers 40% of all scientists approximately that sampled in the 2006 SDR reported working as part of $22,700 were their incomes and on average a team While not part than those who were of a team. greater since in the SDR has not been measured teamwork subsequent to of matched-responses 2006, our analysis Scientific teams allow for the integration of individuals’ of individuals’ for the integration teams allow Scientific from depth effort, benefitting expertise a coherent into for of knowledge - a winning combination and breadth Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Finally, we experience the need for psychological psychological the need for experience we Finally, and coordination, leadership, motivating safety, of team known components all of which are success. these communities, in terms of due regard to to of due regard in terms these communities, procedures, experimental practices, publication body of each discipline. and the student • • Thematic Session 3 Thematic SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: background traits such as academic discipline and traits background as (2) the question of as well variables demographic Doctorates (SED), we focus on responses to a set of to on responses focus we (SED), Doctorates uniquely posed were questions that teamwork-related of (1) the relevance in the 2006 SDR and examine Methods: With data collected through the National the National collected through data With Methods: (NSF) Survey of Doctorate Science Foundation’s the Survey as (SDR) as well Recipients of Earned in the STEM fields are rewarded by the respective by the rewarded in the STEM fields are sector employment and hours worked to assess whether – and to what what assess whether – and to to and hours worked who participate – the individuals in teamwork degree focused on the differential impact of team-produced impactteam-produced of on the differential focused individual- will analyze we patents, and publications job satisfaction, variables such as salary, outcome level Authors: Kevin Kniffin & Andrew Hanks Kevin Kniffin Andrew & Authors: Objective: have prior Building upon studies that Paper 4: Is Everything Awesome When You’re Part of a Part You’re When 4: Is Everything Awesome Paper Team? our conclusions are useful in other cross-disciplinary useful in are our conclusions ventures. a computational science collaboration, regardless of regardless collaboration, science a computational hope We make up the team. disciplines that the precise Based on these observations, we propose several several propose Based on these observations, we of can predict the success with which we parameters Authors: David J. Mcbee J. David Authors: Paper 1: Research Obstacles and Problem Solving in Obstacles and Problem 1: Research Paper Teams Scientific R&D and Development Research Translational for Teams Biotech Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 46 to spontaneous interorganizational communication – their organization. Legal realities barriers pose serious occurs within expectations, thebulkofKSKI activity understanding ofwhat theissueis. to Contrary my and integrate what into they learned acommon advice, thisadvice buttheybring backto theirteam only doscientists reach outto otherscientists for (KSKI)process. knowledge-integration Not seeking/ problem-solving process asaknowledge- primarily As expected, thescientists the Ispokewith described scientists how describe theydealwithsuchuncertainty. any scientist withintheteam. Project leadersandcore background of ordisciplinary – fit to the expertise difficult for anyoneextension tounderstandand– by the fundamental nature ofsomeresearch obstaclesare research obstaclesassociated withchemistry. However, is understood that theteam’s chemistwilldealwith of individualscientists team, withintheproject e.g. it are matchedproblem-characteristics to theexpertise modified version of sovereignty’‘disciplinary where depth interviews. As expected, teams engageina and Organizational Learning to analyze thesein- ideas from recent research studiesoninterdisciplinary company intheGreater Boston area. Idraw primarily executives of “BioSimm”, asmallpharmaceutical scientists, leaders, project andseveral research in team-based problem-solving, allcore Iinterview To better understandhow scientific teams engage research obstaclescanbreak themdown. based problem-solving andhow theweight ofserious understanding ofthesocialprocesses team- underlying by providing experts themwithagreaterpolicy academics, managers, fundingagencies, andscience to scientific innovation. This paperseeks to inform but understudied, socialprocess that isfundamental that team-based problem-solving isanimportant, in order to fulfill research aims.In doingso, Iargue research obstacles–challengesthat mustbeovercome this paperfocuses onhow scientific teams dealwith that focuses onteam-based creativity andinnovation, its ultimate reception! As acomplement to research However, alotcangowrong between agoodideaand creativity andnovelty, two cornerstones ofinnovation. SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts disease advocacy groups,disease advocacy government andinvestment oftraditional R&Daspracticed, duration (10-15Y) With costs (NCE))and (>$1Bpernewchemicalentity Anderson Authors: Thomas Chung, Andrew Bradley, &Jeff Team-Based Science at theMayo Clinic for Translation into Practice through Multidisciplinary Paper 2:OpenInnovation andCollaborative Models senior (executive) scientists. –ofmore experiences –notnecessarily theexpertise obstacles by mapping research obstacles’ scopes to the I findthat scientists dealwith atypical research andexperience;work ontacitknowledge, expertise, but there are exceptions. Collin’sWith anodto Harry Management PerspectiveManagement onInterdisciplinarity Paper 3: Working at theBioinformatics Crossroads -A our strategy for future collaborations. we how willdescribe thesesuccesses have informed operational models andcurrent successes. Additionally, teams. thistalkwe ourcapabilities, In willdescribe ofourstrategicexpertise collaborators through virtual andmulti-domain leverages themultidisciplinary anddevelopmentin academicdrugdiscovery that We have establishednewmodelsof “open innovation” developmentproduct path, andinto clinicalpractice. of translating innovative biomedicalresearch onto a collaborators,internal and external toward thegoal topractices enhance team-based science amongst created keyresources andoperationalized best collaborators andMayo Clinicresearchers”. We have interactions between strategic academicandindustry intoproducts by clinicalpractice enablingbidirectional is “To facilitate andaccelerate thetranslation ofnovel for Clinicaland Translational Sciences whosemission new unitintheMayo ClinichousewithintheCenter ofThe Office Translation to Practice (OTP) isa relatively catalyze newinnovation andtranslational research. thebestofacademiato theparticipation particular models for anddevelopment, drugdiscovery in forcommunities are newinnovative looking business Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 47 that would not be attainable by individual efforts by and not be attainable would that and methodical, ongoing, is an important for target and optimization. adaptation, study, experiential Science Team of Ethnography 4: An Paper Lee Sandra Jabloner & Anna Authors: it has to be practiced. Success is a result of active is a result Success be practiced. it has to and communication, maintenance, factors like training, must be both leadership and and there development, and lasting value. successful deliver it to for buy-in crossroads the bioinformatics at Our assessment constantly is field that and emergent a complex reveals and rich with challenge and opportunity. changing, definition an interdisciplinary- is by Bioinformatics is in our effortsway discipline and arranging in this We of our environment. keeping with the requirements value complexity and delivering managing find that shifting away requires in this space and innovation specialty-driven, less dynamic, verticalfrom structures, out to pays in interdisciplinarity investing and that all parties Critically, an extended timeline. and across it is an approach is not a destination; interdisciplinarity field. SciTS fuels the team-based that and the oxygen Interdisciplinary supports management our how research to contribute communicate, organize, teams breakthroughs scientific achieve to and collaborate persistence in management and execution models that models that and execution in management persistence of known and the assumption processes, on rigid rely needed, is new approach A and milestones. deliverables an important and interdisciplinary offers management is fully complementary that and timely alternative objectives and key and supportive of overarching and sharing, standards data like open technology, science. and team interoperability, approach Interdisciplinarity as a management in a coordinated disciplines links between encourages whole and is an important alternative and coherent top-down, approaches. traditional, hierarchical to context within a team interdisciplinarity However, or used to existence, cannot simply be willed into and be done, modalities – it has to existing rename Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for than more done with less (multiplying-effect);than more and SciTS 2016 Conference: of time, cost, and scope; SME over-focus resulting in resulting SME over-focus and scope; cost, of time, (additive-effect),getting less done with more rather and discovery-based processes; vast and disparate and disparate vast processes; and discovery-based of basic project an absence stakeholder arrays; the triple constraints practices addressing management bioinformatics initiatives such as emergent and such as emergent initiatives bioinformatics and goals; iterative requirements changing rapidly to best effect. best effect. to hinder and even complicate realities Operational collaboration, development of novel approaches and approaches of novel development collaboration, and resources the precious that and ensure solutions, efforts spent are biomedical research to funds available deliver reliable task execution, but that also efficiently also efficiently but that task execution, reliable deliver and disciplinary technological facilitate juxtaposition, with fewer resources, while demonstrating accelerating accelerating while demonstrating resources, with fewer a places This on investment. and return innovation only not that approaches on management premium Public sector biomedical research organizations, organizations, sector biomedical research Public than 1/3 of U.S. more for which annually account productive be more expected to are biomedical R&D, bioinformatics initiatives benefits all levels and phases benefits all levels initiatives bioinformatics lifecycle. of the biomedical research the relationship of interdisciplinarity to management management to of interdisciplinarity the relationship and practically - in supporting- both conceptually conventional management models, and causes us to and causes us to models, management conventional and in particular approaches, new collaborative evolve understanding Better interdisciplinary. are those that intersection, offering an ever-expanding range of risk, an ever-expanding intersection, offering challenges crossroads This and reward. opportunity, Like any crossroads, there is complexity to be managed. be managed. to is complexity there crossroads, Like any with each new disciplinary increases complexity This biomedical research, data science and information and information science data biomedical research, the understanding of advance to combine technology and cure. disease prevention few places is this more the case than in bioinformatics. the case than in bioinformatics. is this more places few where a crossroads at is located Bioinformatics Today’s biomedical research challenges are rarely met met rarely are challenges research biomedical Today’s the or are a single discipline, from a solution owner by privileged domain of a lone subject expert. matter In Authors: Andrew Ritcheson Andrew Authors: Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 Communication in Team Science 48 to canbring STEMresearch setsthat thearts of theskill innovating.”4keep ourcountry Recognizing thevalue that will ofDesign areIsland School thesameskills day across that Iseeevery campus at theRhode skills solving, andmaking fearlessness, thinking and critical to STEMto turn STEAM? mean to addArt The problem the following thoughts onthematter: what doesit “So ofDesign andnotedSchool STEAM proponent, offered industry.3 former JohnMaeda, Island VP oftheRhode that focus onenhancinginnovation inresearch and STEAM events, collaborations, andresearch centers innovation asaselling point; we are beginning to see note thisasACD/STEM.2 Proponents ofSTEAM invoke identities at personalandprofessional levels andIwill “A” anddesign craft, (ACD) inSTEAM to includeart, operate from adefinition that expands theambiguous concept, for andbreadth, ofinclusivity Iwill purposes and argument aboutthebestacronym to represent this significant traction.1 While there hasbeen confusion mathematics (STEM)+ movement“art”) isgaining The STEAM (science, technology, engineering, and Stephanie VaskoAuthors: Dialogue andCollaboration withSTEAM Researchers Paper 1:EnablingInnovation Across Fields -Facilitating in team socialevents we andactivities, elucidate the interviews, andad-hocparticipation and unstructured ofteam repeat activities, observations semi-structured Through ethnographic methodssuchaslong-term concepts basedon solutionsfor clinicalneeds. them through aprocess to collaboratively innovate medicine, bioengineering andbusinessushers together teams offour withbackgrounds inclinical medical technologies. The fellowship program brings program at Stanford University, aimedat innovating a casestudyofyear training longinterdisciplinary methods to studytheculture ofteam science through This presentation theuseofethnographic describes Thematic 1 Session SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts team science withintheuniversity. institutional arrangements that enhance andimpede analysis ofprogram materials, we also identify andthecontent interviews, participant-observation, dynamics. triangulating data By from observations, contexts andteam anddisciplinary socio-economic intheir interpersonal conflicts relation to fellows’ and biographical andcontexts, junctures aswell as cultural pressures andchallenges, career trajectories and customs andexpectations, socio-economic educational cultures andtheirrespective disciplinary team dynamics. For instance, we diverging describe broader socialprocesses andplay roles that impact in and present example dialogueprompts andworkshop collaborations. Iwillalsoidentify potential future clients for Toolbox approaches to aidingACD/STEM I willlooktoward future andstrategies directions solutions to research questions. and methodsofpractice, and to develop collaborative as peopleto form common ground, to express views are at, allowing themto interact asresearchers and tailored approach where to meetingpractitioners they posit that the Toolbox Project offers a more flexible and aimed at dialoguebetween these communities,6 I collaborations. While there have beenprevious efforts points forwhich uncover andstarting similarities to discussions structure activities and co-creation by offering tailored modules, dialogueprompts, collaborations between STEMandACD researchers based Toolbox Project5 could beusedto enhance strategies. Iargue that philosophically- thistalk, In which theycanleverage for collaborative innovation core concepts suchasvalues andmethodologies, researchers indialogueto findsimilarities, through stepThe involves next puttingACD andSTEM is thefirststep onthepath to innovation. Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 3:45-5:15pm Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 49 and subsumption. The identified integrative relations relations integrative identified The and subsumption. organized and systematically explained, illustrated, are a taxonomy. into supplying a by science team advances research This understanding of dialogue as an integrative better but on interdisciplinary science, focus We mechanism. systematic way of thinking about integration to our our to of thinking way about integration systematic discuss, identify, we (b) of dialogue [7], and examination of specific integrative a number and systematize among modalities in actual exchanges dialogical scientists. as Project Toolbox the from data use transcript We dialogue record transcripts Toolbox [8]. our focus a from scientists among collaborating exchanges share, seeking of disciplines who are identify, range to about in their attitudes and understand dif-ferences the data analyze We practice. and scientific science using our transcripts Toolbox in six coded contained “integrative of the role framework, which highlights the type to of cor-respond that or relations relations”, on in a particular Focusing case. involved integration call we – what in the transcripts moments integrative or combine that or exchanges “micro-integrations”, the we identify together – bring something specific include These involved. relations specific integrative reconciliation, integration, such as sequential relations science teams effectively integrate the methods they the methods integrate effectively teams science problem? their common address use to mechanisms discuss integrative we In this presentation, We science. of interdisciplinary team in the context de-scribe as one important dialogue integrative inputs in a scientific integrating mechanism for is not a surprising This answer; context. collaborative (taken communication understand one might indeed, sharing or in its etymological sense as involving in character, making integrative as essentially common) of the co- in the ser-vice people together bringing construction not surprising, of meaning [6]. Although in detail in the has not been developed the answer (a) we ways: in two this answer develop We literature. a supply to designed apply an analytical framework Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: mechanisms of interdisciplinary integration are not are mechanisms of interdisciplinary integration is it that how instance, For often described in detail. biology and chemistry), disciplines, and fields, to the to biology and chemistry), and fields, disciplines, and data, of explanations, local combination more the the most local levels, at methods [5]. But even life sciences, including neuroscience [3] and systems [3] and systems including neuroscience sciences, life multiple at operate processes biology [4]. Integrative of domains (e.g., combination the global from levels, to health and the environment [2]. Research on [2]. Research health and the environment to has also blossomed in the interdisciplinary integration methodology of interdisciplinarity” [1], a fact that methodology of interdisciplinarity” makes it a critical part challenges grand of addressing such as those related human societies, confront that in the phenomenon of integration. “Integration,” “Integration,” in the phenomenon of integration. as the primary widely regarded “is Julie Klein us, tells As interest in collaborative, interdisciplinary research interdisciplinary research in collaborative, interest As so does interest grows, problems complex to responses Communication Drives Interdisciplinary Drives Integration Communication Chad Gonnerman, Michael Crowley, Stephen Authors: O’Rourke, & Brian Robinson Paper 2: Micro-Integration in Dialogue - How 2: Micro-Integration in Dialogue - How Paper well as with team creativity and innovation”9 through through and innovation”9 creativity as with team well (Likert analyzing quantitative scale) and qualitative and interviews)(dialogue transcripts data. “functional background variety“functional had a small diversity background performance team with general as relationship positive between of values of participants as compared to how how of participants to of values between as compared use ACD/STEM aim to we Finally, they self-identify.7 2011 finding that build on Bell et al.’s to collaborations to continue work on examining the differences the differences the on examining work continue to their academic to as compared of researchers values the differences comparing work begin and to branch8 and ultimately disrupt innovation. Working with ACD/ Working disrupt innovation. and ultimately Project Toolbox the will also allow STEM collaborations on identity development with respect to ACD and ACD with respect to on identity development if identity and investigate us to will allow This STEM.7 values influence about disciplines presuppositions include attention to issues of intersectionality issues to and include attention focused as of prompts as well epistemology, feminist structures for ACD/STEM collaborative teams. Recent Recent teams. collaborative ACD/STEM structures for Project Toolbox the to of improvements discussions Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 50 to discusstherange ofviews inaway that isrespectful groups aspossible(inclusive), peopletogether (c)bring ontheproblemperspectives from asmany stakeholder (b)information gather abouttheproblem widely; chose to pursuethisframework infive stages:(a)share and values.reflects consensus priorities The group focus that attention, decision-making andstructure problem (climate change)that helpsfilter information, conceptual framework aboutthe isaway ofthinking inclusive, resilient, andmeasurable. Acommon aclimate planthat isaccessible, resiliency to pro-duce conceptual framework that could enabletheregion First, though, theleadersneededto develop acommon government. energy, food andfarming, thebuiltenvironment, and involving many keystakeholdercommunities, including leaders initiated aclimate planningprocess resiliency and socialvia-bility. To respond to thisprospect, these could negatively affect Michigan’sWest economic andthesurrounding regionRapids that climate change climate change, thisflood convinced leadersinGrand ofadditionalseverethe prospect weather events dueto flood, resulting inwidespread damage. Combined with 2013,Grand April MIexperienced Rapids, arecordIn 2014[1]. Grand MI,inOctober Rapids, at the West Conference Climate Resiliency Michigan in resultspresent from preliminary theimplementation climate planningat theregion resiliency scale. We also research action approach to a complex, participatory We thedevelopment describe andimplementation of Robinson &Brian Gonnerman, Cwik, Chad Bryan Authors: O’Rourke, Michael Planning Climate Resiliency Paper 3:Facilitating in Collective Decision-Making designed to enhance theeffectiveness of team science. also informs (e.g., interventions the Toolbox approach) science, understandingoftheserelations aprincipled way. ofthescience ofteam additionto thetheory In contexts where inacoordinated teams mustfunction the integrative relations we identify are found inother SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts 1. We completed stage(b) by producing avalues- region scale. research approach to cli-mate planningat the resiliency action and implementing acomplex, participatory We assisted withstages(b), (c),and(d)by developing sectors, stakeholders. plusmunicipalandcommunity ofclimate changetoimpacts ninedifferent industry convey customized information aboutthepotential in-formational pre-meetings. These were designed to Forum –completed stage(a)by of10 hostingaseries –the partner Our West SustainableBusiness Michigan andcircumstancespriorities change(resilient). process (measurable); and(e)revisit thedialogueas ofthedialogueandresult-ingquality planning and buildscamaraderie (accessible); (d)assessthe on climate resiliency. and addition,analysis ofpre- In better conception members’ ofothercommunity views new thoughts aboutclimate and provided resiliency a revealed that mostbelieved theworkshop stimulated 3. Post-workshop questionnaires ofparticipants Conference.Resiliency parallel dialoguesessionsat the West Climate Michigan a Toolbox dialogueinstrument 12 and conducted Using themental modelsfrom stage(b), we developed share theirviews in onclimate impacts West Michigan. and to articulate tostructured enableparticipants one way stage(c), since to thedialogueis ad-dress with different worldviews [3]. Toolbox dialogueis communica-tion andcollaboration involving people process, adialoguemethoddesigned to enhance 2. We usedthemodelsasaninputto the Toolbox change. aboutclimate informed values andpriorities thinking attention to how ethicalandepistemic paid spe-cial ways ofadaptingto climate change[2]. These models models ofhow theythought aboutvulnerabilities and mental to construct andusedtheirinterviews sectors we representatives in-terviewed ofthevarious industry model ofthesocioeconomic effects ofclimate change, sector. atouchstone After constructing “expert” mental informed mental modelofakeyinformant from each Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 51 3:45-5:15 pm visualisation support. In the evaluation we focussed support.visualisation focussed In we the evaluation visualisation (1) Does real-time main points: on three (2) Does communication? basis for a common provide it support knowledge target the actors in developing and (3) does conditions landscape future regarding of the development stimulate visualisation real-time new ideas? that of survey analysis revealed data comparative The supports generally visualization real-time the different In knowledge. particular, target actors in creating basis for common a better provided visualization the inspired but it only marginally communication, main trade-offThe we new ideas. actors develop to the actors of that assessed the influence was found It focused strong. on the discussion as too visualisation on visual aspects. the discussion heavily transdisciplinary projects; however, they have rarely rarely have they transdisciplinary projects; however, ways. in systematic been tested a will present this paper this background, Against methods different tested which systematically study, methods The knowledge. the production of target for program research been applied in the Swiss have develop which aimed to and Nature”, People “Room for combining landscape development of future scenarios In visions. actors’ regional and visualizations scientific the methods in four applied and tested we this process, workshops. or scientific used different we In workshops, three artistic support methods to the visioning process in the fourth visualisation; workshop with real-time the participantstheir visions without any developed Mallinson, Holly Falk-Krzesinski, Laurie Lyons Ma, Laurie Lyons Mallinson, Holly Falk-Krzesinski, & Jesse Pines Roche, Colleen effort is the cooperative Collaboration Problem. a striving towards entities or more two between is key collaboration Optimizing team goal. common Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Lotrecchiano, Yianna Yovides, Trudy Trudy Yovides, Yianna Lotrecchiano, Thematic Session 2 Thematic http://transdisciplinarity.scnat.ch/toolbox). These These http://transdisciplinarity.scnat.ch/toolbox). been applied in many successfully methods have other societal actors’ perspectives. In recent years, a years, In perspectives. recent other societal actors’ number of methods has been developed growing toolbox the td-net’s example (for and made available Transcending existing boundaries between science boundaries science existing between Transcending and methods, approaches and practice requires and which enable the connection of researchers systems knowledge, but also target knowledge, i.e. i.e. knowledge, but also target knowledge, systems are. situations sustainable knowledge more what about be found. Moreover, there is increasing agreement that that agreement is increasing there Moreover, be found. should not only produce science in these situations research is considered to be a particularly to is considered useful form research solutions of knowledge where production in situations issues need to uncertain, complex, to contested and and practice in order to accommodate the complexity the complexity accommodate to and practice in order Transdisciplinary sustainability challenges. of current their understandings of transdisciplinarity vary, all their understandings of transdisciplinarity vary, boundaries existing transcending aim at approaches science disciplines and between scientific between based on transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge While actors. and other societal researchers between Scholars seeking sustainability challenges address to are that approaches research novel developed have Paper 4: Testing Methods for the Co-Production of the Co-Production Methods for Testing 4: Paper Knowledge Teams Target in Transdisciplinary Tobias & Silvia Buser Tobais Authors: responding “I don’t know” as a result of the dialogue. as a result know” don’t “I responding post-workshop responses to the instrument showed showed the instrument to responses post-workshop notice-able reductions number of participants in the Authors: Gaetano Authors: SciTS 2016 Conference: Success in Collaborative Teaming through Reflective through Teaming in Collaborative Success Sensemaking Paper 1: Learning Interventions for Collaborative Team Team Collaborative Interventions 1: Learning for Paper for Workers Health and Biomedical Science - Preparing and Education Training Science Team Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 52 could involve refinement orelaboration of existing study, changesto canoccur meaning structures which one’s matter own under aboutsubject perspective ofandreflecting-on the process ofmaking-sense who are charged withcollaborative tasks;that through as akeyoutcome process ofthelearning for adults decisions andactions. We emphasize transformation whichcouldin achangedperspective influence future to erroneous correct interpretations resulting over time triggers one a strong focus onself-reflection.Reflection Research. The are interventions learning designed with 6285: Collaboration and Team ScienceinPractice and research andoccupational therapy enrolled inHSci graduate students studyingfor degrees intranslational ofClinical InnovationOffice Practice (OCPI),andc) the national Urgent Matters Project through theGWU of medicinestakeholdersthat areemergency part sector, medicineresidents, namelya)emergency b) key audiences withinthehealthandbiomedical educational targeting interventions of high-impact psychometric analyses to design andpilotaseries and across thesector. We translate thesefindingsand workforcethe knowledge-producing onmultiplelevels spanning 125healthandbiomedicalparticipants nearly findingsbasedondata from collected and preliminary tool which to date hasyieldedamodel, scoping review, Readiness, Integration, andCollaboration (MATRICx) and validating theMotivation Assessment for Team ofalarger developing project this studyare part Method. The generated interventions learning for workforces. to collaboration for health,medical, andresearch develop to products assessmotivations andthreats producing objectives. The ofthisstudyisto purpose of teams to successfully achieve theirknowledge- to collaborateability andmay diminishtheability in motivations andthreats impedeindividuals’ to achieve commonpersonal skills goals. Variations complex problems requires ofintra- avariety andinter- perspectives, andleverage collective resources. Solving buildingthroughknowledge bringing together diverse teams (KPTs) that strive to engageincross-disciplinary for healthcare producing andbiomedicalknowledge SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts and results of impact on learners willbepresented onlearners and results ofimpact as analysis.through ofinterventions Rasch Descriptions Model), andcalculated Sensemaking (Reflective rubric results analysed willbetextually usingtheREFLECT narrative composed text andMATRICx by participants, as itrelates to collaboration. Polling ofparticipants, enabling individualsto adjusttheirmindsetsespecially through connections thus reflection meaningful judgment; itisaniterative sothat itcantrigger cycle processingidentification, andintegration, further and begins withexploration followedsense-making by process.a drafting The sequence learning ofreflective and judgment ofanemerging muchlike perspective thought ofasthecontinual exploration, integration, and perspectives. canbe This process ofsense-making meaning schemesand/orcreation ofnewschemes Madan, &Shane MorgansteinMadan, Plaisance, GeorgiaAuthors: Lamarre, Kathryn Akanksha Pedagogy Students -ACase Study inApplied Collaborative Paper 2: Teaching Teamwork to Undergraduate theory. offindings to learning,applicability andlearning interventions, ourinformed understandingofthe oftheMATRICxabout theusability itself, thelearning MATRICxknowledge findings.Outputs include disciplines. We professional bridge needwithempirical that ensure morepersonal skills integration across health andresearch problems, and exercise keyintra- and complexeffectiveness, clinical efficiency tackle who are required to work collaboratively to increase to health andbiomedicalscientists andpractitioners, targeted training inthisarea. response Our isspecific scientists andpractitioners. There isagrowing needfor new generation ofcollaborative healthand biomedical for data-informed that interventions willprepare a and accreditation agencies have theneed prioritized academic communities, national governing bodies, SciTS Advancement. Recent recommendations from findings. Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 53 Doctoral Education Lisette Nilsa Jo Ellen Force, Bosque-Perez, Authors: Kate Cleary, Wulfhorst, JD Eigenbrode, Sanford Waits, Joseph Holbrook, Bentley Galbraith, Sara Amanda Michael Rhoades, O’Rourke, Paul Zion Klos, Brymer, & Nicole Sibelet Bryan Finegan, abridged workshop for instructors regarding teaching teaching instructors regarding for abridged workshop skills in and supportingcollaborative teamwork not only workshops These courses. undergraduate but the knowledge directly gap, address us to allowed also acted the potential determine as a pilot project to course cross-faculty impact of an undergraduate, theory science on team and skills.focused do not students findings suggest that Preliminary and teamwork engage in effective to prepared feel teach or support effectively instructors to lack the tools indicate data The skills. the learning of collaborative impact series had a positive our workshop on the that and the high and competencies, attitudes students’ seems themselves in the workshops of interest level in collaborative interest of a campus-wide indicative Inskills this talk, will describe our project training. we that and its impact, ways suggesting some general disseminated be better might science in team research education. university as part of an undergraduate Interdisciplinary Team-Based 3: A Model for Paper relating to collaboration to students. Notably, our Notably, students. to collaboration to relating effort a collaborative of project itself is the result and a faculty students UW. between member at workshop an interactive and delivered designed We on with workshops “UW Collaborates”, series called conflict, and leveraging group communication, group to workshops these offered We in teams. diversity faculties different across students undergraduate an skilland promote encourage development to gathered We on campus. interdisciplinary culture the workshop surveys before through empirical data the attitudes regarding our hypotheses test series to collaborative towards of students and concerns as after the workshop as well practices in the classroom, the impact determine and interest to of the workshops an also offered in furtherWe learning opportunities. Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for education; 2) provide practical information and practical information 2) provide education; skills; teamwork opportunities develop to students for knowledge and relevant research and 3) disseminate was threefold: 1) survey and faculty students UW at threefold: was science team around gaps existed what determine to connections between programs on campus and on campus connections programs between (and in collaborative work to how students teaching aim of our project The often interdisciplinary) teams. education that is highly siloed at the undergraduate the undergraduate is highly siloed at that education making by this problem address wished to We level. to apply to a specific program, and are typically and are a specific program, apply to to outside courses taking from many too discouraged in university resulting of specialization, their area outside of KI. required are students university In incoming Canada, level. Our objective for this project was to close the gap to this project was Our objective for level. theorybetween science putting team and practice by Waterloo of the University at students actioninto for undergraduate classroom, resulting in a disconnect resulting classroom, undergraduate theorybetween the undergraduate and practice at collaborative efforts. Despite there being extensive extensive being there efforts. Despite collaborative knowledge this addressing science in team research the is applied to little of this research it seems that gap, employers frequently expect undergraduate students students expect undergraduate frequently employers skills, teamwork and utilize have to grads or recent engage in instruction to is little formal on how there an expression of frustration about this on the part of frustration an expression of and professors While the university. at other students on campus, and through their experiences in courses in courses their experiences and through on campus, a lack of noticed have KI students outside KI, many outside KI – and in teamwork training such explicit upon their experiences and improve their collaborative collaborative their and improve upon their experiences with other students skills In conversations as a result. a variety of teams, KI teaches students the theories and students teaches KI a variety of teams, effectively, collaborate to how best practices regarding with opportunities students reflect and provides to University of Waterloo. KI is an interdisciplinary program interdisciplinaryan is KI program Waterloo. of University In disciplines. across collaborate to students trains that an opportunity students giving addition to on work to (KI) and three undergraduate students completing their completing students undergraduate (KI) and three the at (BKI) degree Bachelor of Knowledge Integration In project this talk, report we on a collaborative Chair of Knowledge Integration the Associate between SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 New Approaches to Stimulate Innovation 54 Current teams has research oninter-disciplinary professional relationships? What of personaland structure istheidealnetwork teams develop into successful collaborative groups? scientific How discovery? scientific dointerdisciplinary innovation andmembership impact and structures study to how answer donetwork more specifically: We are into currently atwo-year longitudinal one-year topics ranging from polymersto Eco-districts. urban research teams. Teams have focused theirresearch on money andresources to fundseven interdisciplinary Program ofthisprogram, (CIP). As CSUhasinvested part program calledtheCatalyst for Innovative Partnerships Colorado State University (CSU) hasdeveloped a research ininterdisciplinary new knowledge teams? research teams? How dowe facilitate thecreation of How dowe besttransfer ininterdisciplinary knowledge Authors: Hannah&Jennifer Cross Research Teams Paper 1:Increasing thePerformance ofInterdisciplinary questions combining team members’ disciplines;2) model involves: 1)identification of integrated research address problem-based questions. The educational involving interdisciplinary, team-based research to model for educating students doctoral for careers problem-based research questions. We present a commitment to work withstakeholdersto address and boundaries, andtheability across disciplinary required to communicate andintegrate effectively of complex systems, breadth theinterdisciplinary needed to understandthespecialized components depth teams comprise individualswiththedisciplinary based research. Effective interdisciplinary research educate team- scientists ininterdisciplinary early-career problems faces. society There isanurgent needto for iscritical Interdisciplinarity addressing thecomplex Thematic 3 Session SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts graduate education. of team research aspart andproblem-solving skills interdisciplinary needto impart widely acknowledged integration amongstudents. This modeladdresses the they experienced. The modelachieved ahighlevel of by students ofeducational successes andchallenges literature, perspectives, andanassessment faculty is theoretically-based andevaluated inlight ofthe chapters andpublications. The educational model team research that yieldsjoint dissertation engagement withstakeholders;and5)interdisciplinary and workshops to enhance team cohesiveness; 4) proposals to address thequestions;3)meetings of interdisciplinarity and develop integrated research course work to review thetheoretical underpinnings code theconversations for evidence of the C-Factor. In meetings, we takefieldnotes on team dynamics, and Analysis Network Social (SNA). conducting During meetings for thedifferent research groups and researchOur methodsincluderegularly attending females inthegroup. members, of even andtheproportion turn-taking, These three measures are: ofgroup socialsensitivity based onthree measures ofcollective intelligence. et al(2010)proposed theC-Factor whichiscalculated creating innovative solutions. More specifically, Woolly information andcreating between membersand the effectiveness intransferring ofthenetwork ofthenetwork. social structure These influence factors social ground rulesandfacilitation tools influence the creation).(knowledge Research hasalsofound that the ofteams tothe ability create innovative solutions on bothcommunication transfer) (knowledge and ortrustingothers)hasanimpact (like beingfriends analysis)network aswell aspersonal relationships found (social that ofsocialconnections thestructure Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 3:45-5:15pm Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 55 clinical academia. The ICR has a strong team science science team ICR has a strong The clinical academia. was which research, translational on with a focus ethos, Cancer for the American Association by recognized 2012. in prize Science Team Research an evidence-based ICR took to The approach of academic experiences understanding women’s We undertook analysis a systematic careers. scientific entropy into a team. into entropy 3: Evidence-Based Change to Organizational Paper in Research Careers Women’s Support Vaness McKean Authors: in senior academic of women underrepresentation The a challenge remains and medicine in science roles examines presentation This et al 2013). (Sugimoto change can be which organizational the means by women retain undertaken institutions to in research that I argue in research. their careers and develop science team of the characteristics of successful many networksand diverse strong (including collaboration, and that in research, careers women’s also foster teams) barriers to of support can remove women programs for work. and team collaboration change project in I take the case of an organizational (ICR) which London Research, the Institute of Cancer and science from the loss of women address aimed to We suggest that a team also falls into differentiating differentiating also falls into a team that suggest We innovation constrain doing so may and that channels approaches novel finding from team the and prevent these channels with low associate We problems. to these low into movement suggest that and entropy the information by is promoted channels entropy networks specific of by provided entropy) (negative members including a network of team members, team social networks contributions, technical their linked by networks and cultural intelligence, collective foster that members and their activities link team that according content their information As predispositions. cultural to sustain be unable to these networks may is utilized, be needed may further and a revitalization innovation suggest a We of entropy. of new sources in the form possible use of game-play injecting as a method for Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: travel down a tilted, incised surface a tilted, down an he called travel increasingly guided by and are landscape” “epigenetic and stabilize. differentiate deeper channels as their cells variations may accumulate, yet remain unexpressed. unexpressed. remain yet accumulate, may variations organisms developing that suggested Waddington survival in a competitive space. Waddington noted noted Waddington survival space. in a competitive its genome development, during an organism’s that regulatoryby small networks so that is buffered Mendelian” evolutionary processes by which the team’s which the team’s by evolutionary processes Mendelian” for its fitness is then selected by concept developed concept. The epigenetic model distinguishes small epigenetic model distinguishes small The concept. activitiesscale spatio-temporal which a team by “Darwinian- scale larger from a new concept, develops development and network entropy is viewed as a is viewed and network entropy development as the here is defined innovation An driving force. adoption of a new and subsequent development innovating teams. The model focuses on interacting on interacting model focuses The teams. innovating networks of innovation as the basic mechanisms development, now being used to understand complex complex understand being used to now development, is presented and Alzheimer’s, diseases like diabetes describe the functioning as a model to herein of Authors: Morton Tavel & Devin Markovits Tavel MortonAuthors: model of cellular “epigenetic” Waddington’s Conrad Paper 2: An Epigenetic Model of Team-Driven Team-Driven Epigenetic Model 2: An of Paper Innovation discuss what might be the ideal network structure for be the ideal network structure might for discuss what interdisciplinary teams. of the study based on facilitation in each team, the in each team, of the study based on facilitation on SNA, and powerful of the C-Factor influence Some teams create and transfer knowledge better and transfer Some create teams in our presentation will demonstrate We than others. start the changed since social networks have how the C-factor. the C-factor. differently. has developed in our study Each team Through SNA, we have tracked how the social networks how tracked have SNA, we Through network compare We change overtime. of the teams and stylesteams, facilitation in the different changes to half-way through the research. It collected will be the research. through half-way concludes. after months the research two more once addition, SNA data has been collected at two different different two has been collected at SNA data addition, began and teams research the time intervals: before Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 help whenit devalues authorship andminimizes the to thosewe harm authorship may are actually trying science.in contemporary However, in inclusivity groups, and muchneededgoal isanimportant or marginalized (e.g., early-career, international) underrepresented (e.g., women, racial minorities) Inclusivity, ofindividualsfrom ortheparticipation Kevin Elliot, Georgina Montgomery, &Patricia Soranno Authors: IsisSettles, Sheila Brassel, Kendra Cheruvelil, Authorship Practices inInterdisciplinary Teams Paper 1: The Sideof Dark “Inclusivity” -Problematizing 56 and women’s groups alsoaccessible networking to development programs for women, mentoring, arenetworks encouraged through three leadership people andtheirroles –isvalued. Collaborations and contribute to aculture inwhichdiversity –inboth successfulThe initiatives all identified asparticularly postdoctoral researchers. and data onthecurrent destinations offormer ICR through three (2011,2014and2015) staffsurveys oftheseinitiativesspecific issues, andimpact measured Initiativesand staffsurveys. were developed to address in research, focus groups research for part-time staff, andenablerstowith team careers leadersonbarriers move to technical career paths. This includedinterviews understand why women choseto leave research or This research was supplemented by to further universities andagainstindividualpeerinstitutions. were inUK againstproportions benchmarked career path (scientific, clinicalacademicand technical) leave.maternity ofwomenThe ineach proportions committee membership, patterns and working promotions, andselected), applying, shortlisted career paths, recruitment data (genderratios ofthose of four years’ data ongenderofstaffinall research Publishing Team Science:ChallengesandOpportunities Thematic 4 Session SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts PI and one early-career team member(i.e.,PI andoneearly-career graduate sciencefunded interdisciplinary teams, oneproject science teams. Two members ofsixdifferent NSF- environmentalmentoring ininterdisciplinary practices toconducted studyauthorship, data sharing, and We present results from 12qualitative interviews team members. resultsscience teams innegative for andinfact impacts adequately consider thecomplex power dynamicsin mistakenly heldupas “inclusive,” whenreally it failsto publications. canbe scholarly Indeed, at timesapolicy contribution ofthosewhoprovide laboron intellectual I assess the factors whichcontributedI assessthefactors to theICR’s accreditation scheme. hasalsobeenrecognizedproject through anational scoresstaff survey from researchers. ofthe The impact comprehensive career development, andinhigher women insenioracademicroles, oncommittees, more ofthesemeasuresThe have impact resulted inmore in meetings, seminarsandthewiderlife oftheInstitute. These ledto more researchers beingableto participate careers ofleave periods ofextended (e.g. maternity). workforce on andminimizingtheimpact flexibility associations. Culture changesincludedenhancing development fortype andstrong eachstaff staff by dedicated programmesis supported ofcareer hospital. Diversity inteamsclinicians from thepartner institution andprovide mechanismsfor change. staff andfunding, bothsignal the commitment ofthe team science. Resources, includingdedicated project a seniormanagement team already committed to represented;life-stages andstrong leadershipfrom teamproject –diverse indisciplines, career paths and institutions. These includeoversight from adiverse successes whichcanbeappliedby otherresearch Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 3:45-5:15pm Day 2: Tuesday, May 17 57 the best research content on the open web, all from a all from on the open web, content the best research single dashboard. can be pulled into the open web from content Any to papers and blog posts white from PressForward, individual Then, feeds. Twitter Google Alerts and the can utilize of hundreds or teams researchers Paper 3: Bringing Team Science to Research Publishing Publishing Research to Science Team 3: Bringing Paper Communities and Science Eric Olson Authors: no shortageScientists face of challenges in the arena not to pressures are There of scholarly communication. but conversation, research into work own only get your up keep and institution your visibility for provide to also This dilemma field. own in your with the developments and the lack decentralization by is only compounded of strong, percentage of the large of discoverability and created impactfulpotentially scholarly content addressed have some tools While on the web. shared defunct like the now problem, “wicked” parts of this satisfactorily approached none have Google Reader, all of them, particularlya solution to in a research digital open-source is a free, PressForward context. these issues with to a response combines that tool platform a robust create to collaboration researcher and publishing curating, discussing, aggregating, for individual, primaryindividual, disconnect authors; (2) the between (3) and judgment; and reviewers’ science productive findings, research and update revise to disincentives in the published results non-reproducible leading to dialogue about is extensive there Though literature. shared where medicine, of precision the promises approach and a systems datasets genomic and clinical solutions, find precision to required are investigation to will continue if unaltered, publishing processes, current talk will This in this field. dampen achievements to collaborative discuss these structural to impediments publishing can be and describe how research scientific impede progress. than rather facilitate to reinvented on literature existing from Insights will be drawn interviewsextensive well as as collaboration scientific with scientists. Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: traditional publishing armamentarium underminestraditional through collaboration and investigation scientific to of credit misallocation mechanisms: (1) the several association with funder and administrator decisions with funder and administrator association is the primary careers, incentive research advance to The structures the conduct that of science. today Authors: Emily Warner & Sarah Greene & Sarah Warner Emily Authors: because of its papers, of scientific publication The the Publishing Process Can Be Used to Foster Effective Effective Foster to Be Used Can Process the Publishing Collaboration Scientific Paper 2: Scientific Publishing and Team Science - How - How Team Science Publishing and 2: Scientific Paper Based on our findings, we advance the science of team of the science we advance Based on our findings, ethical authorship suggestions for providing by science groups. marginalized truly empower practices that perspectives on authorship and highlight the impactperspectives and highlight on authorship practices. on authorship and status power, of gender, marginalized groups in fact in them. disadvantage groups marginalized new the interviews reveal to from excerpts provide We their papers, even though they did the majority though they did the even of the their papers, very minor roles. other authors played and many work assist inclusivityIn to designed policies these cases, practices on their careers. Half of the early career Half of the early career practices on their careers. was authorship participants for their credit noted included on authors were because so many diluted “inclusive” authorship practices, there was some was there authorship practices, “inclusive” of these the effects about expressed ambivalence side of including more, rather than fewer, authors than fewer, rather side of including more, research. the team’s from resulting on publications most early-careerAlthough also mentioned scholars their authorship practices as being “inclusive,” with “inclusive,” their authorship practices as being some emphasizing the importance of erring on the between the responses of the early-career and senior responses the between authorship team’s questions about their scholars to described uniformly senior scholars The practices. color, 1 White man, and 1 man of color. 1 man of color. man, and White 1 color, a contrast was emerged themes that One of the major hours. All six PIs were White men; of the early-career White PIs were six All hours. of woman 1 women, White 3 were participants, there student, post-doc, or assistant professor), took part took in a professor), post-doc, or assistant student, one-on-onerecorded 1 - 1.5 interview from lasted that Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 Howard, Levine, Cary Jane Brown, Anna Bardone-Cone, Authors: Asheley Skinner, Andrew Perrin, Janna Building Principles to Develop a Transdisciplinary Team Paper 2:Radical Transdisciplinarity -Using Group Model successful. and Westat developed templates project theteams are through theuseofScience of Team Science Tool Kit tight timeframes. The challengecanbedaunting, but accomplish deliverables project whichusually have will immediately coalesce andoperate seamlessly to are constituted bothteams withtheexpectation usually have together experience noprior working team and Westat/Client team project whosemembers contracts andgrants. Anewinternal Westat project both commercial andgovernment clients through drug, biologic,supports anddevice development for international for clinicaltrials almost30years. Westat design, management, andanalysis for domesticand in 1963. The Clinical Trials Area delivers excellence in company MDincorporated inRockville, headquartered Westat professional isanemployee-owned services L.Dianis & Authors: Nancy Tracy Wolbach Paper 1: Team ScienceChallenge Busters 58 StrategiesEvidence-Based for Success Wednesday, May 18,2016 for theAdvancement ofScience projects. With Association andAmerican Biological Laboratory Marine PLOS andPLOS Collections Blogsto theupcoming PressForward provides, from therecently launched collaboration andcommunity-focused features that organizations are already utilizingtheseunique with collaborators andthepublic. Several science thebest, mostvaluable contentand select to share integrated curation community system to discuss Thematic 1 Session SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Development. sessionrequiredThe introductory a Model andInitial Session The Introductory (5) revisiting theconceptual model. and study design; (4)implementation ofapilotstudy; to allow for intense application ofprevious work to a each discipline’s contributions to thearea; (3)aretreat toa seminarseries introductions provide to in-depth a common baselineunderstandingoftheproblem; (2) Steps included: (1)aninitialsessiondesigned to create and apilotstudyincorporating theentire team’s input. conceptual model atransdisciplinary planned products: The process includedteam buildingas well astwo R24 grant andincludedseveral plannedcomponents. teamOur development process was fundedby anNIH cognitive processing, and obesity-related behaviors. complex relationships amongchildren’s movie viewing, , publichealth,andpediatrics to explore the quantitative psychology, clinicalpsychology, cultural convened invisualculture, ateam bringing expertise the sumofwhat individualmembersbring. We team requires methodsofcreating beyond knowledge opportunity, development ofatruetransdisciplinary More thansimplycreating acommon communication Steiner,Cynthia Michael Bulik, &ElianaPerrin one source infocus. dozens oreven hundreds ofsources intheperiphery, to can interact withoneresource instead ofdozens. From represent theirfieldorinstitution,whileaudiences levels. Researchers orinformation officers caneasily to introduce newcontributors at multiplepermission tools inorder to collaborate anditiseasy ontheproject PressForward, scientists won’t have to jugglemultiple Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 11:00-12:30pm Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 59 other disciplines and therefore of learning about other disciplines and therefore their update constantly and with each other to their effortsto adapt or knowledge and coordinate 2007). In other Dillon, & Roloff, (Edmondson, improve diverse by being addressed are problems since words, with specialist knowledge and skills, professionals effectively work learn to to these specialists have team to develop a research strategy addressing the addressing strategy a research develop to team in children’s culture of health-related measurement such view and interpret children and how movies culture. Team Be a Science to 3: Learning Paper & Jacquelyn Fiore, Gabelica, Catherine Stephen Authors: Chini important is an increasingly area teamwork Scientific of inquiry collaboration of complex in the context benefits if the potential 2010). However, (Börner et al., the too are so promising, are teamwork of scientific Multi-disciplinarychallenges. some avoid workers of the pitfalls of experts working but are in isolation, of of the diversity advantage take able to not always expertise Sims, (Salas, and understanding in a team does not occur 2005). In& Burke, fact, true teamwork assigned just because individuals are automatically the challenge of members have Team a team. to and language of the understanding the concepts 2) inform the conceptual model; 3) assess key questions 3) assess key model; conceptual the 2) inform the and 4) provide of movies; viewing about children’s study of obesity a larger needed preliminary for data media use. and children’s would benefit challenges scientific Discussion. Many transdisciplinary broad different include input that from disciplinary and methodological paradigms, languages, of described process the have We approaches. a transdisciplinary developing which team successfully these and overcome problems solve to came together the to challenges by: team the whole 1) introducing 2) realizing each discipline; added from unique value of these integration the thorough through it is only that unique that of the interstices disciplines and privileging integrated will ensue; and 3) using this thoroughly work Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Pilot Study. The pilot study was designed to 1) provide 1) provide to designed pilot study was The Study. Pilot approaches; hands-on of multiple research application initial analysis of data from the pilot study, and will also the pilot study, from of data initial analysis continues. the model as our work revisit Using responses from each person, the most important from responses Using conceptual central and a identified were relationships direct our will use this model to We created. model was team development process. Individually, each team each team Individually, process. development team they thought relationships the ten member indicated the team. goal for most important the overall to were GMB leader created a conceptual diagram displaying displaying diagram a conceptual GMB leader created the throughout identified relationships the many reassess the structure. Our team, comprised of senior comprised Our team, the structure. reassess each of whom had many academics and scientists, The approach. a different required demands, competing Model Confirmation. Typically, GMB would use in- GMB Typically, Model Confirmation. the model and on feedback gather person sessions to disciplines as a common structure for developing developing structure for disciplines as a common work. future for questions and strategies research revisit the development of the conceptual model, model, of the conceptual the development revisit In a pilot study. designing and begin make revisions, of the applied the integration the group the retreat members how their fields were synergistic. synergistic. were their fields members how opportunityday-long a was to retreat The Retreat. and, 4) gaps in understanding. We also included also included We 4) gaps in understanding. and, team to transdisciplinary demonstrate seminars to Components of the seminars included: 1) how the of the seminars included: 1) how Components 2) prevailing obesity views and culture, paradigm approaches; 3) possible methodological theories, uses to conceptualize important and aspects conceptualize concepts uses to movies. in children’s to obesityspecific and culture to build outward, with sessions from each discipline. each discipline. sessions from with build outward, to of the general a presentation Each seminar included of the field and the particularapproach it insights ensure each aspect ensure is included. part second was The of the process Seminar Series. developing a transdisciplinarydeveloping because it brings team to works explicitly of view and points different together leader with some experience in Group Model Building in Group some experience leader with Model in building is useful dynamics. and system (GMB) Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 60 to T4). (T0 We tested ifteam ithadbeen reflexivity after rating tookperformance place at five points intime coordination)team andknowledge learning and week). (measuring by Data collection meansofsurveys improve problem-solving andcollaboration for next did, what theycould have done differently andhow to students to onwhat reflect they asking instructions from week 2,theyalsoreceived guidedreflexivity (i.e., were to team-level subjected feedback (week 1),while any form (week ofintervention 0/baseline),teams week whichteams during worked together without ideas to generate solution.Following thecorrect a that neededto beproperly interconnected to other These problems related to complex laws andtheories complex physics problem andsubmitateam solution. teamsmost lecture. week, hadto Every solve one coordinated exercises laboratory andwhichremoves which combines classroom work (inteams) with science and usingarelatively newway to teach physics computer science, biological science, andthephysical required for allstudents inengineering, majoring The physics ofasequence course was thesecond part inthefieldstudy. universityAmerican participated the course ‘’Physics for Engineers andScientists’’ at an Twenty-eight undergraduate intact teams following and effectively work together subsequently? howon how theyefficiently to anddoesitimpact learn continue theyhave to after learn beengiven guidance addressed questionssuchasdotheseteams and learn consequencesthe learning ofteam reflection. We undergraduateintact science teams andinvestigated the useofteam-level feedback andguidedreflexivity in designed andtested combining interventions learning scientific teams inpractice.In thepresent study, we andfast-learning highperforming develop andsupport teams. scarce Research sofarisvery ontheways to outline deliberate to interventions in buildlearning substandard group raises performance, theneedto not allteams andasaconsequence learn, may reach 2005; Sims, Salas, &Burke, 2005). The awareness that &Johnson,1992;RummelSpada, naturally (Johnson shown that team processes learning donotoccur and efficiently. However, research and practice have SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Boundary Objects Boundary DifferencesNegotiation ofDisciplinary through DevelopmentResearch ofScientific Proposals - Paper andCollaborative 4:Interdisciplinary time onteam processes. learning has beenstimulated, andeven stronger effects over thefirsttime butonlyafter reflexivity on performance team coordination, immediate andlonger-term effects team behaviours. learning We found delayed effects on coordination,team team performance, knowledge and guidance(after hasbeenpresented) andsubsequent examined therelations team between prior reflexivity and processes (at Times 3and4).More specifically, we induced predicted subsequent outcomes learning recognized across different scientific disciplines; and, and informational that isaccepted capacity and are itemsobjects that have arobust structure, function, Griesemer’s Boundary objects. concept ofboundary methodology by usingaframework basedonStar and This studyaddresses thisneedthrough anovel potentially improve components ofthesystem. understand thecomplexities ofthisprocess inorder to Additional research istherefore to better necessary and minimalreward asreflected by low funding rates. that requires significantfrom allpeople effort involved challenges canresult inan inefficient funding system review subsequent proposals. When combined, these to effectively solicitthese research solutionsand agencies alsoface challengesindetermining how a cohesive proposal andresearch design. Funding the integration differences ofdisciplinary to produce complicates thecollaborative process by requiring borders.teams that cross disciplinary This scenario issues, prompting inthenumberofcollaborative arise requesting solutionsto interdisciplinary scientific in thesciences. Funding agenciesare increasingly andcollaborativeinterdisciplinary research proposals process that isrequired for thedevelopment of The ofthisstudyisto purpose examine thecomplex Authors: Laura Paganucci &Louise Wetherbee Phelps Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 61 can improve the collaborative process by prompting prompting by process the collaborative can improve and resolution. negotiation communication, increased disciplinary can also assist Enhanced awareness funders in predicting necessary in composition team These solutions. scientific solicit appropriate to order as it interdisciplinarity established expectations for also help normalize may specific solicitations to relates process. review the proposal demonstrated as an effective method to analyze this this to analyze method an effective as demonstrated in the identification resulted analyses The process. between distinctof five characteristics differed that required These differences disciplines. scientific create to members in order team between negotiation also demonstrated analyses The proposal. a cohesive and the occurred process this negotiation how necessary for were that of consensus varied levels this study identified Additionally, productivity. review and solicitation federal the specific issues with These interdisciplinarity. to as they relate processes This ways. findings impact in multiple team science distinctto identify a structured method study offers is identification This disciplines. between differences disciplinary beneficial because increased awareness and composition optimal team can assist in developing Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Suzie Allard, Janet Nelson, Danielle Pollock, Kristina Dorsett, Amy Forrester, Robert Partee, & Thomas Thomas Robert & Partee, Forrester, Kristina Janet Nelson, Danielle Pollock, Dorsett, Amy Suzie Allard,

: Thematic Session 2 Thematic SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: sciences. First, the concept of boundary the concept objects was First, sciences. The findings from this study offered significant significant this study offered findings from The in the interdisciplinary collaborations into insight informational requirements of the proposal, and the of the proposal, requirements informational the through occurred that of the negotiations analysis proposal. proposal boundaryproposal object, the descriptionof the of the examination in this proposal, disciplines involved Changes protocols and textual analyses. These methods These and textual analyses. Changes protocols support to separate four uniquely integrated were research of the included the identification that analyses a federal research proposal. Multiple methods were Multiple methods were proposal. research a federal demographic interviewused including an protocol, Track- Word meeting observations, E-mail and analysis, this framework to examine a team of 13 scientists scientists of 13 a team examine to this framework of and their development 10 disciplines, representing activity. Analysis of the qualities of boundary of the qualities Analysis activity. the interdisciplinary and into insight objects offers study used This as it occurs. process collaborative objects between negotiation act to as modes for of collaborative a nexus therefore and are disciplines, in turn, these objects can be adapted according to to in turn, objects these according can be adapted boundary qualities allow These disciplinary need. include the need for changes in research culture and practices. Dr. Janet Nelson, Associate Vice Chancellor for for Chancellor Vice Janet Nelson, Associate Dr. and practices. culture changes in research include the need for Perspective One: Capacity Building. Universities are working to facilitate team science collaborations, but this can collaborations, science team working facilitate are to Universities One: Capacity Building. Perspective that can be facilitated by a team member with expertise in organizational communication, data management management data member with expertise a team communication, by in organizational can be facilitated that science perspectives on building and sustaining team interrelated three panel presents This and communication. members who can help support disciplinary of new knowledge across the creation boundaries. panelists. This exercise will be led by the panelists. will be led by exercise This panelists. puzzles and communication disciplinary information challenging Crossing presents boundaries teams within This is a panel proposal. This panel is unique because it is designed to spend approximately half the session spend approximately to panel is unique because it is designed This is a panel proposal. This the by perspectives represented the three around in a knowledge the audience building exercise engaging Authors Waldrupe Panel: Creating the Next Gen Team Science Workforce - Lessons Learned from Tennessee from Learned - Lessons Workforce Science Team the Next Gen Creating Panel: Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 microbiology, biology, marine andphilosophy. chemistry (student biosat http://scholar.cci.utk.edu/team-­ Centerthe UTMedical andtheuniversity library. backgrounds Students haveincluding ofdisciplinary avariety being embeddedwithteams at National sites Laboratory, includingOakRidge Complex, Y12 National Security Their experiences includeoperating asateam to develop atool Research for of andEngagement and theOffice canhelpthem aboutteamlearning science how andlearning theirskills “fit” into teams intheprofessional world. mentor ofthe from thefirst cohort ScienceTeam information professionals program will share their experience the meaningofaprofessional having “team science skills.” Four masters students student andtheirdoctoral Perspective Three: Catching Fire. Workforce development surrounding canbeachallengegiven theuncertainty is thefoundation oftheprogram. science oriented information professionals. There ofthecourses andexperience that willbeanoverview learning ofstudents intheUniversity offirst cohort Tennessee’sInformationSciencesSchool of program to develop team Communication andInformation) willshare from lessonslearned developing for curriculum andgraduating the andsolidcommunication Dr.Suziewith information skills. expertise Allard, Associate for Dean Research (College of Perspective Two: Curriculum Building. Teams are dealingwithdata intensive often issueswhichcanbefacilitated institutions. ateamchallenges andsolutionsto science encouraging environment andsupporting across campusandacross Research Development intheUniversity of Tennessee’s Research of andEngagement Office willdiscussthe full sessionandwe willendwithdiscussingaway forward for effective workforce development. professionals engaging withteam science? Top linecomments from backto the eachdiscussionwill bereported as thecore ofteam ? (Perspective 3:Catching Fire) What doesthefuture lookliketo new (Perspective 2:Curriculum Building) What dowe ofteam asacommunity science researchers/educators identify Building) How shouldinstitutionsapproach changing theculture ofresearcher team science? to practices support whereperspective thegroup willaddress acore question.Potential core questionsare: (Perspective 1:Capacity Approximately halfthesessionwillbe an interactive exercise into withtheaudience breaking groups for each science/people) 62 individual academic entities and theirrelative enabling the usertoframework, gain insight about visualization SPis a scalespace ofacademicmerit. thispaper,In we present Plot (SP),acompact Scholar Ioannis Pavlidis Authors: Kyeongan Kwon, Uzzi, Brian & DineshMajeti, Visualization for Method Academic Careers Paper Plot andScalable -ACompact 1:Scholar AnalysisNetwork andData Visualization Thematic 3 Session SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts feedback through afocus group study, andasurvey Factor Impact the Journal List, andOpenData. Initial data from open sources, Scholar, including Google publication, citation, andfunding profiles. SPdraws a figure multi-faceted information abouttheentity’s and itsthird level colleges. At eachlevel, SPpacksin level covers academics, itssecond level departments, contribution to aggregate academicentities. SP’s base Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 11:00-12:30pm ‐ Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 63 Over the past thirty years, the field of Physics Education Education Over the past thirtyPhysics of the field years, a handful from dramatically, (PER) has grown Research of authors publishing hundreds to of researchers, growth, this explosive With nearly 150 articlesa year. community has the structure of the collaborative islands of individual Initially, changed as well. naturally Paper 2: What Brings Us Together - Institutions and Together Brings Us What 2: Paper Linking Communities in Early Academic Stage Behavior & Matthew KatharineAuthors: Eleanor Sayre, Anderson, Crespi in interest long-term is considerable There networks: understanding the dynamics of collaboration Most time. over and evolve these networks form how on the dynamics of social networks done of the work Work on well-established communities. focuses simply social networks is rarer, emerging examining In this real time. to obtain in is difficult because data use thirty an emerging we from of data years paper, early crucial stage at that communityto look scientific use this We of a social network.in the development factors on the the effects of three explore to data changes network:structure growth, of the collaboration of institutions and the introduction in social norms, and journals. conferences such as field-specific academic records, supporting of evaluation the work records, academic of an the curious and academic in search committees it is that strengths advisor or department. One of SP’s This inclusive. are that open sources from data draws because Google problem a technical however, creates, SP - does not offer used by Scholar open source - a key the base interface. For programming an application- with sophisticated this problem solved of SP we level a simple one-time by assisted scraping data wiki function: the user is not by sought if the individual and copy user to then SP asks the SP, by recognized Google Scholar SP URL; individual’s the targeted paste the recovering automatically it thereafter, remembers For name. every data it by time a user requests scholar’s a wikithe department function levels, and college is in the works. Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Conclusion: The basic idea behind SP is to facilitate facilitate basic idea behind SP is to The Conclusion: of strengths different regarding insights instant indicator. For this reason, Department this reason, Plots and College For indicator. make heavy use of pie charts. College Plot). In these aggregate plots it is important In Plot). these aggregate College record entity’s much each constituent how show to the specific merit for score the aggregate to contributes cluster in colleges. The next two levels of Scholar next The levels two in colleges. cluster visualizing scholarship in levels, group are (SP) Plot departments (aka Department (aka and colleges Plot) research in vacuum. They live and work within within and work live They in vacuum. research academic departments and academic departments the two panel graphs facilitates such an association. facilitates panel graphs the two Scholars do not pursue Visualization: Level Group that may exist between funding and publishing, as and publishing, funding between exist may that research by production is oftenpublication powered of axes timeline in the horizontal common The dollars. visualizing the individual’s research funding record. This This funding record. research visualizing the individual’s causal relationship any the fore brings to arrangement decided to structure individual scholar plots as two-decided to visualizing the panel - the top panel arrangements panel while the bottom record, publication individual’s Furthermore, publication quality by publication is defined two Furthermore, of the journals and prestige factors: counts citation we Accordingly, appeared. the publications where and search committees; these are: a) publication a) publication these are: committees; and search funding. research and b) quality and quantity, design process for this level was to determine what what determine to was this level for process design looked at this question, we answer To visualize. to tenure, promotion, by the merit criteria considered Plot (SP) visualizes individual academic records. records. individual academic (SP) visualizes Plot as partto address we had of the first issue The back to the design cycle. the design back to of Scholar base level The Visualization: Base Level a wikiits department of population faster function for to study a longitudinal and b) levels; and college feeding in practice, usage patterns understand SP’s in search of an advisor or department.in search Next in steps with endowment a) SP’s include: this line of research having high potential in serving high potential having as a complementary aid an insightful and merit in reviews tool assessment SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 64 in scientific collaboration by usingtheinformation on Authors: Gregoire Cote &David Campbell County Level and Co-AuthorshipScientific at American Activity Collaborative Analysis Science- A Bibliometric of Paper 3:Integration ofPeripheral Regions in formation ofcollaboration more networks broadly. givesinteraction ofthese factors usinsight into the outsiders, towards collaborating witheachother. The established authorsaway from collaborating with coincident withthefirst conference, among andashift behavioral adiscrete shifts: increase inco authorship first field-specificjournals. Wealsoidentify two relevant institutions: thefirstfield-specific conference, andthe are theintroduction oftwo different ableto observe growth, behavioral shifts,andinstitutionalchange. We rest ofthispaper, we consider therole ofcommunity changes we seeinthisemerging the In community? This prompts afinalquestion:what isthesource ofthe identifiable as giants ofthefield. larger community, asmallnumberofindividualsare more thisnew, establishedsocialnetworks. In lookincreasingly thenetwork peers, like making accumulating thantheir linksmore quickly start networks. Butover time, asmallgroup ofresearchers way we have come inothercollaboration to expect thedegreeother: was distribution notskewed the there was littleto distinguishresearchers from each emergence ofthe “superstars” ofthefield.Initially, thesametimeperiod, the weDuring alsoobserve together into asinglewhole. themselves suddenlyknit when thosesmallerparts ofisolated individualsuntil themid-2000s,assortment take place gradually—the remained network aloose However,collaboration network. thischangedidnot collaborative community, boundtogether by arobust rather thanacluster ofindividuals, we findatrue isdisconnected.authorship network years later,Thirty researchers labored inrelative isolation, andtheco can beusedtoBibliometrics measure trends SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts concentration oftheir scientific output. However, large agglomerations, whichwould intensify the one handpopulations tend to migrate toward output, whetherthesituation isevolving. On about trends inthisconcentration ofscientific infrequent inperipheral regions, butlittleisknown is highlyconcentrated inlarge areas urban andis at present iswell that scientific activity known It inthesameplace.working the collaboration ofresearchers whoare notphysically trend that newcommunication technologies facilitate sectors, between countries, etc.), anditisanobservable studied at various levels (between institutions, between increase inscientific collaboration hasbeen extensively availableco-authorships inacademicpublications. The centers to basedonarandom thenumberexpected between agivenco-publications county andallurban centers (ameasure comparing thenumberofobserved the collaboration ofeach county affinity towardsurban between counties over thesame period. For instance, scientific collaboration data) (using co-authorship Analysis Network Social (SNA) isthenusedto analyze publications at thecounty level over thelast15years. the concentration ofpopulations andofscientific in theGINIcoefficient are used tomeasure trends in publication withone ormore UScounties. Changes This studyusesgeocoding to linkeachscientific effect ofpopulation migration. and therefore counterbalance, extent, the to acertain collaboration ofperipheral regions centers withurban the is that newmeansofcommunication support scientific output stable.remains fairly The hypothesis concentrated insomecounties, of thedistribution that althoughtheUSpopulation isincreasingly output at UScounty level. Preliminary findingsshow concentration ofpopulations andofscientific This presentation willexamine trends inthe in regional areas.scientific activity morein scientific teams, which support could inturn ofresearchersparticipation from regional organizations on theotherhand, newtechnologies facilitate the Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 65 11:00-12:30 pm to illustrate some of the challenges that face multi- face that some of the challenges illustrate to expertise experts Although teams. in a multidisciplinary for to analyze think they field may where know tracking changes in disciplinary interdisciplinarity, other time and in databases over of fields components for analyze to on where focus help to than Scopus may challenges of multi-expertise teams. use diverse frameworks and approaches. However, However, and approaches. frameworks use diverse also functioninterdisciplinary teams such within to extent by the work can be captured fields and their theoretical, (e.g. types of integration which different disciplines across occurs etc.) methodological, disciplinary 2011). Establishing et al. Wagner (e.g. but evaluating done quantitatively, can be composition new rise to give that interdisciplinary collaborations requires field new scientific or a coherent concepts papers (Jensen of individual analyses & qualitative Lund, 2012; Lund, Balacheff & 2013; Lutkouskaya, how illustrating 2013). After & Baker, Rosé, Suthers, longitudinally us to methods allow scientometric establish disciplinary of multidisciplinary content in research we use a case study of fields, research disciplinaryreflecting — that — education content 2004) and that research collaborations should be collaborations research 2004) and that and structured workflows planned and follow carefully processes. Extreme Lab for case study discusses the Joint This (JLESC),Scale Computing that an IVRO organization spans multiple projects, complex has generated organizational structures and processes provide provide structures and processes organizational the managers of IVROs as this decision challenges for decision success to making has a direct relation process (Dean & Sharfman, 1996). Because of of the complexity decisions should strategic that it seems obvious IVROs, such as structured approaches to be taken according & Meyer, (deWit analysis or SWOT chain analysis value Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 4 Thematic recognized as being multidisciplinary, and therefore and therefore as being multidisciplinary, recognized Sebastian, & Pablo Jensen Sebastian, & Pablo are in academia that research fields of many are There the Challenges that Face Multi-Expertise Teams Multi-Expertise Face the Challenges that Grauwin Jeong, Heisawn KristinAuthors: Lund, Paper 4: Linking of Multidisciplinarity Scientometrics Paper Detect to of Interdisciplinarity in Order with Analyses of the network. Trends towards more integration should integration more towards Trends of the network. network centralization. in overall decreases lead to basis, to test the hypothesis that the average centrality centrality average the that the hypothesis test to basis, The time. over increasing is county of the peripheral changes in the centralization also investigates analysis findings of this analysis, we compute the eigenvector eigenvector the compute we findings of this analysis, in the network on an annual of all counties centrality affinity towards urban centers increases in peripheral in peripheral increases centers urban towards affinity the periphery more becomes in other words, regions; further the validate To in the network. integrated showing the evolution in the affinity of each region region in the affinity of each the evolution showing the is that hypothesis The urban centers. towards network) are computed on an annual basis; the results the results on an annual basis; computed network) are map geographic using an animated will be displayed partner organizations. Decision making related to partner Decision to making related organizations. SciTS 2016 Conference: and other technologies to support to and other technologies scientific among and coordination activities, communication system of organizing, planning, and decision making and planning, of organizing, system combine IVRO initiatives research. scientific for instruments, scientific systems, data complex people, for multidisciplinary collaborative research that are are that research multidisciplinaryfor collaborative built upon cyberinfrastructure a complex provide Simpson, & Natalie LambertSimpson, & Natalie (IVRO) Virtual Organizations Research International Action Oriented Team Science Team Action Oriented Elizabeth IftekharAuthors: Marshall Poole, Ahmed, Paper 1: Toward Understanding of Low-Overhead, Understanding of Low-Overhead, Toward 1: Paper and Considerations International Perspectives Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 66 process involvingparticipatory a multidisciplinary collaboration that hasdeveloped through a fromand lessonslearned adecadeofmultinational public. This paperpresents theprocess, outcomes improves thestrength andhealthoftheAmerican for that translating is extremelyimportant knowledge International collaboration nations withneighboring Authors: Rebecca Lee, Soltero, Erica Lucie Levesque PartnershipAmerican Translate -Lessons Knowledge Learned from aNorth Paper 2:Developing Multinational Collaborations to lessons for Team Science. among sixsupercomputing centers, some andcarries JLESC hasproven adept at coordinating activities organizing that leadto coordination neglect” (p. 155). effectively becauseindividualshave lay about theories (2000) argue, “organizations failto often organize to Mintzberg’s (1978)idea.As Heath andStaudenmayer ahighnumberofreflects ‘emergent strategies’ similar that organizational planninganddecisionmaking JLESC represents animprovised approach of projects. system development processes to organize scientific general research areas, ofpersonnel, co-location and “go buildthings.” The casefocuses onhow JLESCuses flexible frameworks thatto encourage participants processes: rather thanplanningaheadtheysketch out systems development to and organizing itsactivities ofcomputerapplied theprinciples engineering and planning/management. The organizers ofJLESChave DOING rather thanadministrative and structures low-overheard, highlyimprovised process emphasizing specified processes.Instead itusesan exceptionally science withoutahighlevel projects or ofstructure significant numberof and valuable products team organizations that hasgeneratedand supporting a scientific amonginvestigators, network projects, represents acaseofdynamiccollaboration and specialties, andtechnological infrastructures. JLESC institutions, cultures, scientific andengineering SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts lessons learned such as learning from suchaslearning lessons learned eachother, channels.scientific, andpolicy community We present dissemination throughpublications andknowledge exchange andprofessional training, peerreviewed organizational research, intervention intercultural development and implementation, individualand and developing relevant includingpolicy products national andlocalfundingfrom allthree countries, multiple meetings, strategic sustaining networking, America. throughout North The process hasinvolved orLatinosincrease amongHispanics physical activity implementing strategies across multiplesettingsto the express ofdiscovering, objective enhancingand México andinfrastructure in scientific with capacity and México. hasaimedto increase The partnership team ofresearchers from Canada, theUnited States Coarsened Exact MatchingCoarsened methodto buildthecontrol Exact database. Further, thisresearch, employing thelatest citations database ofChinesescientists from Scopus thescientific publications and methods to extract all JieQingprojects. And italsoemploys data mining Qing Program sponsored scientists, and adatabase of anexhaustiveconstructs demographic database for Jie growth ofS&Ttalents inthepast20years. The project and evaluates theeffectsofJieQing Program to the outstanding young scientists. This research analyzes environment to facilitate the development of significant results increating aflexible and competitive Young QingProgram) (Jie Scholars hasgained China’s National ScienceFoundation for Distinguished Authors: Shi Dongbo Context Paper 3: The Effect of ResearchPubic Funding inChina’s enhanced scientific understandingand collaboration. contribute to by thehealthofallAmericans way of the healthofMexicans, andindirectly anddirectly Canadian scientists andMexican that benefit directly collaborative publications andgrants amongAmerican, enhancing fundability. haveThese efforts resulted in process, determining mutuallybeneficialoutcomes and emerging intheculture, implementing aparticipatory Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 67 2:00-3:30 pm supporting scientists at their early career, enhancing supporting early their career, at scientists take to scientists motivating of research, the freedom above Base on the risk talents. and attracting scientific dissects institutional issues the discussion, this research funding talent and the general Jie Qing Program for old”, “45 years of such as the phenomenon system, of heterogeneous management the homogeneous proportion scientists female of the over-low disciplines, explorative for budget management and the inflexible research. Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 1 Thematic the mechanism of Jie Qing Program into four groups: groups: four into Jie Qing Program the mechanism of result varies largely with disciplines. Combined with Combined with disciplines. largely varies result categorizes this research interviews, case studies and the creativity and the scientific impacts young and the scientific the creativity of among the is larger this effect Furthermore, scientists. the And old. funded under 40 years who were scientists count regression model. The results show that, Jie Qing that, show results The model. regression count productivity, research the enhanced effectively Program group, analyzes the causality analyzes the Jie Qing between group, a by talents S&T of high-level and the growth Program complex problems as members of interdisciplinary teams. problems complex experience injustice that differs from injustice experienced by those who belong only to one of the groups. groups. to one of the by those who belong only experienced injustice from differs that injustice experience and science about team conversations in or in the surrounding represented is well Neither of these literatures to respond both embody important those who seek to yet and lessons for insights interdisciplinary research, girls over abstract verities that purport abstract that practices verities of knowledge to everyone; over when it comes making,girls apply to to and value-laden of knowing and understanding. nature relational, embodied, the contextual, it highlights and groups disadvantaged Intersectionality several the fact belong to emphasizes a single individual may that Two important theoretical perspectives on issues related to equality and justice across lines of difference are are lines of difference equality across to and justice important perspectives on issues related theoretical Two and theory of women reality the lived emphasizes Feminist intersectionality. theory generally, feminist more and, to the extent possible, accommodate them. In accommodating them, these efforts them. In must be mindful of ethical and accommodating accommodate possible, the extent to think and make to one another and how treat to decisions about how since dimensions of collaboration, epistemic collaborators. among differences inequitable reinforce and potentially knowledge will exemplify together responses to complex problems. Diversity, though, can also complicate team process. Diversity along various lines along various Diversity process. team though, can also complicate Diversity, problems. complex to responses undermine trust and that differentials power ethnicity – can create gender, stage, career – disciplinary background, acknowledge should team science these factors of and, the effectiveness Effortsto enhance safety. psychological Among the topics discussed in the volume is the beneficial impact of diversity on team science – different points points is the beneficial impact – different team science discussed in the volume on of diversity the topics Among research can enrich condition the number of perspectives and ideas that skill and backgrounds sets, of view, Written by a committee of leaders in team science theory reports science of the art of leaders in team this volume on the state a committee and practice, by Written individual, of practice (e.g., all levels at science team enhance can be done to on what focusing science, in team institutional). team, efficiently and effectively as we can. This has motivated an interest in facilitating and enhancing approaches to and enhancing approaches in facilitating interest an This has motivated we can. effectively as and efficiently important An is the recent entry in this literature generally. more science and team interdisciplinary research team science. of on enhancing the effectiveness focuses that Academies the National published by monograph Complex, real-world problems are increasingly taken to motivate interdisciplinary, “team science” approaches, a approaches, science” “team interdisciplinary, motivate taken to increasingly are problems real-world Complex, fact efforts. in partBecause of the importance explains that in interdisciplinarycomplex research of the increase as respond on us to it is incumbent and poverty, security, and water food change, such as climate problems Overall Theme Overall Authors: Michael O’Rourke, Kathryn Plaisance, Stephanie Vasko, & Stephen Crowley & Stephen Vasko, Michael O’Rourke,Authors: Kathryn Stephanie Plaisance, Interdisciplinary Collaboration Facilitating to Approach A Feminist Panel: SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 the Toolbox instrument were notmadewithfeminist inmind. priorities theoriginal developmentdiscussed during of Toolbox dialogue method, thedecisionsthat ledto thecreation of its original form andfeminist themes. While feminist approaches to epistemology andphilosophy ofscience were mutual understandingand communicative capacity. Third, between the we detail departures Toolbox approach in communication andrelationally,characterizing transactionally therelationship and alsodescribing between ofmeaning.of theapproach interms of communication understood astheco-construction This willinvolve traditional analyticalepistemology andphilosophy ofscience. Second, objective theprincipal we articulate around theworld. discussion ofthephilosophy Our theapproach underpinning willreveal adependence on from theUSNational Science Foundation,with support and itsdeployment inover 170workshops to date andphilosophy behindtheapproach. recountinghistory In itshistory, we itsorigins, describe itsdevelopment the openingtalkofthispanel,In we introduce the Toolbox approach inthree stages. First, we the describe collaborators outsidetheworkshop. conversational patterns that differences reflect in commitment andimbalances tothe in project power amongthe in thedialoguesastheywould outsidetheworkshop setting. As aresult, theworkshop exhibit dialoguesoften workshops are onlylightly facilitated by Toolbox Project personnel, whichencourages collaborators to interact are generally grounded oftheirresearch inaspects activity, includingtheircommon project.Further, the in Toolbox workshops. While the Toolbox dialogue isframed philosophically, thedetailsofconversation relational that areCertain aspects potentially inimicalto robust andequitablecommunication are evident association. information transactions, andrelational,message-based involving that result actions inmutualidentification and related information. As we understandit, communication canbeunderstood bothasinformational, involving communication inthe Toolbox Project onethat beyond ofresearch- isarich includesbutextends transactions likely to avoid miscommunication iftheyunderstandoneanotherbetter asresearchers. The operative senseof of theircommunication withoneanother. The theapproach keyideaunderlying isthat collaborators are more and comparing theirdifferent approaches to ness research indialoguewiththeaimofenhancingeffective- a In Toolbox workshop, collaborators from different disciplines talkabouttheprompts inthe Toolbox, exploring how theworld isthat itcanbeinvestigated by us. associated withhow we are that we caninvestigate theworld, and themetaphysical dimension,associated with comprises prompts whichmapkeydimensionsofresearch worldviews, including theepistemic dimension, search worldviews.about theirre- instrument—theThis by dialogueisstructured asurvey Toolbox—that philosophy ofscience, we have developed aworkshop approach that centers ondialogueamong collaborators away difference from disciplinary toward collaborative common ground. Drawing onepistemology andthe providing concepts that frame common forms ofresearch abstraction engagement andmethodsthat support mustconfrontperspectives thereality ofdifferent languages, methods, andpriorities. Philosophy canhelphere, researchinter/transdisciplinary teams. Team-based research that aimsto integrate multipledisciplinary The Toolbox Project isaresearch that aims to understandandfacilitate effort communication within collaborative, Presentation 1: “Introducing theCase ofthe Toolbox Project” –Stephen Crowley O’Rourke &Michael can influence adjustments andimprovements designedto interventions to enhance team science. Project, asacasestudyinevaluating andabroader how concern willserve feminist withintersectionality theory communicative andcollaborative teams. ininterdisciplinary capacity This approach, developed by the Toolbox is the Toolbox approach, adialoguemethodthat employs philosophical concepts andmethodsto enhance designedspecific intervention to enhance theeffectiveness of teamscience. onwhich The intervention we focus teaminterdisciplinary science. We summarize andapplytheseapproaches through acasestudyinvolving a This panelisdevoted to bringing feminist to epistemological theories bearon andintersectionality 68 SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 69 Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Vasko across colleagues by methodologies Toolbox critiques of members to Project Toolbox of the experiences From Recent dynamics. questions of power and address must adapt to Project Toolbox the it is clear that disciplines, generally, and thus should be of interest to a broad audience. a broad to and thus should be of interest generally, E. – Stephanie and Intersectional Epistemological Issues” Feminist for Project Toolbox the “Adapting 3: Presentation research in social psychology, I demonstrate how the Toolbox Project could be substantially improved. be substantially could Project Toolbox the how I demonstrate in social psychology, research more science and team on collaboration research to applicable are discussed here the insights Furthermore, role where a team may be comprised mostly of male scientists and engineers and female social scientists, which social scientists, and female and engineers mostly of male scientists be comprised may a team where role By as the men. of credibility the same amount not being given researchers the likelihood of the female increases as recent as well epistemology feminist on lessons from and drawing factors, these various taking account into issue in interdisciplinary work, as fields in the sciences and engineering tend to be more male-dominatedto be more tend issue in interdisciplinary work, and engineering as fields in the sciences than by university respected (e.g., highly to be more tend former and the fields in the humanities and social sciences, being in a doubly marginalized of some researchers is a good chance there Thus, latter. than the administrators) In particular, research in social psychology demonstrates the significant role that power dynamics play in teams, teams, in dynamics play power role that the significant demonstrates in social psychology research In particular, is a particularlyThis salient minorities). and racial women positions (e.g., often silencing those in marginalized when those who bring diverse perspectives to the table are heard that their perspectives can enhance knowledge perspectives their can enhance that heard table are the perspectives to when those who bring diverse that illustrates threat) bias and stereotype on implicit (e.g., research temporary con- psychological Yet, production. weight. their proper given not always perspectives are those diverse not until individuals with different assumptions (typically arising from different characteristics experiences) and assumptions (typically different arising from with different individuals not until of those the diversity increase if we she argues, Thus, recognized. they are assumptions that out these point it is only However, assumptions. problematic potentially of identifying the chance will increase we communities, theorizing. Furthermore, she demonstrates how these background assumptions often go unnoticed, allowing allowing assumptions often go unnoticed, these background how she demonstrates Furthermore, theorizing. reasons they go One of the ways. in unknown research scientific affect to and political values social, moral, for often and it’s certain assumptions, communities often share members of scientific background is that unnoticed to understand the production of knowledge. Of most relevance to the Science of Team Science community is Team the Science of to the production understand Of of knowledge. to most relevance knowledge, theory of situated on the concept . of critical Drawing contextual Helen Longino’s probably scientific and biases can affect values assumptions that background individual’s it is through that argues Longino emphasized the need to pay attention to the role that personal characteristics and experiences play in generating generating in personal characteristics play that and experiences the role to attention pay the need to emphasized and of feminist tenet a fundamental knowledge is now idea that is situated This knowledge. and transmitting ought we how theories regarding It of epistemological a number spawned has since social epistemologists. collaborative efforts. collaborative have studies scholars, science as feminist as well epistemologists, feminist 1970s, least the late at Since to facilitate effective teamwork). Furthermore, I’ll show how different kinds of diversity can intersect in significant intersect can kinds of diversity in significant different how Furthermore, show I’ll teamwork). effective facilitate to of ensuring that well-known problems exacerbate that often in ways in interdisciplinary collaboration, ways fully to contribute to empowered minorities) are and racial positions (such as women marginalized those in more collaboration. In this talk, I turn to feminist and to demonstrate why we need to pay attention attention pay need to we why demonstrate In to epistemology and social this talk,collaboration. feminist I turn to I will talk about some key knowledge production. In and social factors particular, in collaborative psychological to efforts (and other Project Toolbox the enhancing can serve and theories for that concepts as useful frameworks reconcile their disciplinary differences before engaging in collaborative work. In other words, its focus has been its work. words, In other collaborative in engaging before their disciplinaryreconcile differences else- argued I’ve as However, disciplinary arise from that barriers differences. collaboration on the epistemic to in dynamics play factors interpersonal and group that the role overlooked has largely Project Toolbox the where, As discussed in the previous talk, the Toolbox Project has been quite successful using philosophical insights to to philosophical insights using successful been quite has Project Toolbox talk, in the previous discussed the As and cross-disciplinary recognize facilitate Its researchers has been in helping collaboration. main contribution articulate and their various disciplinary cross-disciplinary thus enabling problems anticipate worldviews, to teams Presentation 2: “Taking a Feminist Approach to the Toolbox Project” – KathrynPlaisance Project” Toolbox the to Approach Feminist a “Taking 2: Presentation SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 70 might useinsights to from improve feminist theory the Toolbox Project, aswell as team science more generally. the endofpresentation, we’ll openupthediscussionto theSciTSaudience to discussadditionalways we dialogue sessions, ofdeveloping andthepossibility specificprompts that makepower the focus ofdialogue. At adjustments to theprotocol, includingmovement from lightly-facilitated dialogue sessionsto quasi-facilitated research ininterdisciplinary concerns andintersectionality [3-5].Finally, we willdiscusspossiblefuture stageforabout thecorrect ourmixingqualitative andquantitative data to highlight feminist epistemological multivariate categorical quantitative data. From amixed methodsperspective, we willhighlight considerations strategiescollection andhow thesewillprovide future basisfor explorations identities ofintersectional using motivation for theminrelation to feminist theory. andintersectional addition,we’ll In discusschangesto data this presentationIn we thechangeswe willdescribe have madeto our Toolbox workshop protocol, explaining resulting inadjustments to the Toolbox workshop protocol inthree phases: with newclients. We are workshop experiences now withfeminist structuring concerns andintersectional inmind, We are intheinitialstagesofaddressing theseissues, andtheyhave hadashapinginfluence onourinteractions withinadialoguegroupof inequality remained unidentified andunmanaged. attention literature. to any particular For issuesassociated withpower themostpart, dynamicsandothersources group;experience for however, theparticipating thesemodifications were notsystematic anddidnot reflect theyears,Over theworkshop protocol was modified designedto includeinitial contact to inform the workshop which theinitial Toolbox instrument could enablethosegroups anddifferences. similarities to identify important shops were withoutmuchregard conducted for thedifferences among groups, focusing instead onthedegree to communication asignificant didnotexert influence development ontheearly ofthe Toolbox Early work-Project. As noted above, however, thesefeminist insights into power dynamicsandtherelational dimensionsof presentation, suggestsaneedfor attention to therole ofpower production. dynamicsinknowledge donotofferstructures safety.In addition, research in feminist andsocialepistemology, discussedintheprevious women, including(butnotlimited to) situations where collaborations canbedamaging andwhere program studies have alsopushedusto examine theroles andpower ofstructure dynamicsinacademicsettingsfor 3. 2. 1. presented to clients. inreports their specificsituation, we are pursuinga more prescriptive, follow-up approach inthe ofobservations form weBecause are now inaposition to evaluate thecommunication dynamicofagroup inaway that reflects centered approach that meetstheteam where theteam they are to instead meetuswhere ofasking we are. phases. The anew, information changesmadeto ourpre-workshop reflect gathering efforts organic, team- Third, adjustments have beenmadeto workshop follow-uptwo inlight oftheadjustments inthefirst identify native capacitiesandcreate acontext inwhichtheyteach themselves. of theworkshop. We adialoguethat allows instructuring themto hopethat thiswillaidparticipants ofgroupdistribution values, opinions, orresponses to prompts immediately to prior thedialogueportion process andR-baseddata processing strategies, we withasnapshotoftheinitial provide participants econd, thenature oftheworkshop experience itselfhasbeenmodified. Using anewonlinedata collection opinionsfromcollect theallparticipants. we supplement signed theinformation to we from collect de- theleadershipwithananonymous survey and desired outcomes. Recognizing that group power dynamicsmay notbenoticed by leadership, project leadership. These interactions withrepresentatives oftheclient group helpusidentify group needs, values, discussionswithgroup questionnaire leadersandapre-workshop completed orvirtual to-face by the First, client groups now gothrough amore robust and systematic on-boarding process consisting offace- SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 71 2:00-3:30 pm

further accelerate pediatric device development, development, device pediatric further accelerate of the continuum and the PDIC evaluated ODAT of Minnesota the University idea to at from innovation is the of our evaluation outcome The access. patient around coalesced of new programs implementation We solutions. team-based cross-disciplinary, creative, percent of the 1857 total invention disclosures to OTC OTC to disclosures invention of the 1857 total percent technologies. pediatric-specific medical for were partnered with the Minnesota Pediatric In 2014, ODAT Consortium Innovation Device (PDIC) pilot a to faculty to incentivize to intended funding program and creating on identifying pursue projects focused This health needs. pediatric to solutions innovative engages an advisoryprogram panel of academic and industry experts advisors parent and community-based with knowledge market clinical needs assessment, in regulatory, patenting, business planning, analysis, years In the first two and prototyping. engineering, an received launch, ODAT the program following projectadditional 18 pediatric-specific medical device this funding mechanism has Although applications. pediatric- novel more in identifying been successful total applicants the number of specific projects, other ODAT to in comparison low relatively remains population. on the pediatric not focused programs and funding program the existing augment To from faculty requesting funding and team support funding and team faculty requesting from and software, devices, therapeutics, advance to 5 (2%) of the 224 only Yet, approaches. treatment This child health needs. specific projects addressed technology is of pediatric-specific representation low disclosures, in the numbers of invention also reflected intellectual property agreements and licensing filings, for Office of Minnesota’s the University through review A data (OTC). Commercialization Technology less than 1 that the period of 2010-2015 revealed for Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 2 Thematic SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: and Translation (ODAT) provide funding and cross- provide (ODAT) Translation and disciplinary support team faculty. University to 224 applications received 2012-2014, ODAT From well-being by accelerating discoveries into practice. practice. into discoveries accelerating by well-being Office of Discovery the CTSI’s by developed Programs The University of Minnesota’s Clinical and Translational Translational Clinical and of Minnesota’s University The health and Science Institute (CTSI) improve aims to such as smaller market size and high development high development and such as smaller market size of devices barriers the development to remain costs health needs. pediatric address that medical device innovation and is home to many well- many and is home to innovation medical device known industry Jude St. including Medtronic, leaders factors and 3M. However, Scientific, Boston Medical, pediatric care providers often improvising or making often improvising providers pediatric care Minnesota products. is a leader in due with inadequate pediatric patient or end user. or end user. pediatric patient in gap results impact world of this innovation real The approved for pediatric use are scaled-down of use are pediatric versions for approved vary that adult devices in clinical functionality because for the specifically not been designed they have only 8 were labeled for use in a pediatric population population use in a pediatric labeled for only 8 were medical devices many Further, or subpopulation. approved for pediatric use remains low compared to to compared low use remains pediatric for approved of the 38 example, For adult use. for those approved in 2013, approvals Device Notification Premarket FDA development of devices for use in pediatric patients. patients. use in pediatric for of devices development and developed of devices availability However, pediatric population is estimated to lag the adult to estimated is pediatric population been made have Amendments a decade. market by the encourage Act to and Cosmetic Drug, Food, the to Kaehler, Tucker Lebien, & Sandra Wells & Sandra Lebien, Tucker Kaehler, the for development medical device Historically, Accelerating Pediatric Device Development Device Pediatric Accelerating Rebuffoni, Karen Jodi Fenlon Fischer, Gwenyth Authors: Paper 1: Novel Collaborative Approaches for for Approaches Collaborative 1: Novel Paper Teams and Healthcare Biotech Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 72 form. Expression levels and downstream pathway (WT) included comparison with thewildtype protocols. Functional assessment of eachmutant in cancer cell linesusing conventional transfection proteinsplasmids andexpressed asepitope-tagged were incorporated into mammalianexpression mutant counterparts sequences andtheir wild-type identified inclinicaloncology genomics tests. VUS (VUS) intherapeutically targetable genes significance andbiological value ofvariantsfunctional ofunknown for action. The aimofthisstudywas to investigate the targets are notcharacterized, thuslimiting theability number ofidentified variants inpotentially druggable based personalized medicinetests. However, alarge generate clinicallyrelevant results from genomics- Exome sequencinghasincreased to theability E. Fernandez-ZapicoKlee, &Martin McAllister, Eric J. Konstantinos Clark, N.Lazaridis, Karl W. R. Oliver, Naresh Prodduturi, D. Eric Wieben, Tammy M. Hogenson, Paola Iguchi,Gavin Eriko Durin, A.Romecin Safgren, Hesles, ElisaEnriquez Luciana L.Almada, Tara L. Ashley N. Sigafoos, Ezequiel J. Tolosa, Stephanie L. Authors: JanB. Egan, David L.Marks, Anne M. Vrabel, Translational Team ScienceApproach Mutations to New Define Therapeutic Strategies -A Paper 2:Functional ofNovel Characterizations Somatic childhealth. impact development ofnovel technologies that willdirectly team-based approaches, we to accelerate expect the resources for advancement. Through theseinnovative fordevelopment key that projects are services lacking academic research settingto expert provide hands-on, development assets bothwithinandoutsideofthe device incubator/accelerator, whichleverages device ledby OTC property intellectual andanovel pediatric industry. This includesunconventional approaches to programs, CTSA andthemedicaldevice consortia, withotherhealthcare systems,partnerships pediatric partners. and othercommunity We have formalized of patients, familymembers, healthcare providers have expanded ourcollaboration to includethevoices SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts and proteins wereWT expressed at similarlevels and their controls. MTOR,WT FGFR2andPDGFRBmutants did notexhibit changesinlocalization compared to mutant eachshowedRARA increased expression but localized andmembrane. to cytosol An FGFR4and mutant BCL2localized to themitochondria whileBTK BTK mutants showed reduced expression. and WT resultsInitial demonstrate that someBCL2and astheir counterpart. same cellular compartments WT expressed at significant levels anddelivered to the All mutant proteinsFGFR4, PDGFRBandRARA. were were evaluated MTOR, inBCL2,BTK, FGFR2, FBXW7, Potentially aberrant mutations indruggablegenes subcellular localization of andmutant proteins. WT stainingto determine and immunocytochemical was assessedwithwesternactivation blotting understanding ofatumor’s molecularbehavior. informed treatment decisionsbasedonathorough Cliniciansaredecision making. thenenabledto make but alsoproviding newinsights into patient care knowledge scientific body of regarding genefunctions, translational team science, thusadvancing not onlythe of Team Science field by demonstrating collaborative expression. This advances research theScience further results andcharacterize themechanismsofaltered focused studies significantto andsuggestfurther verify maymutants be suchasBCL2,FGFR2,FGFR4,andRARA mutation. Differences in expression levels seen for ofsignificantinactivation pathways due to somatic feasibility ofrapid identification or ofactivation great clinicalsignificance astheydemonstrate the these mutations isongoing. These findings are of Analysis ofthedownstream pathway by activation and expression are dependent onthecell context. mutants demonstrated that mutant FGFR2signaling when compared to controls. StudiesWT ofFGFR2 ofAKT mutants reducedFBXW7 phosphorylation AurKA andCyclin Eexpression levels differently, both completely understand. mutantsWhile altered FBXW7 analysis of downstream pathway to activation interesting findings;somethat have required ongoing Downstream target by activation mutants yielded localized to cellular theirexpected compartments. Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 73 Science to improve care coordination for critically ill for coordination care improve Science to patients. cancer of medical specialists and other allied groups These teams who as science staff can be viewed health care However, individual patients. caring for to apply science distinctions these between some interesting are there Team Science Team McNeese, Nathan Sen Nancy Ayan, Authors: Cooke, Sharon Noel Arring, Wordingham, Nandita Khera, Sara Tomlinson & Brian Gentry, Amy Nyquist, multiple typically patients have Critically ill cancer dysfunction support requiring system organ from Each specialty itself can specialists. different several In addition, each specialty multiple clinicians. involve the lens of issues through understands the patient’s with the patient specialtythat and often communicates cases the In many family individually. or the patient’s one by plan communicated or care prognosis, advice, specialty result conflicts of another and as a with that often leading messages, mixed the family receives when not care aggressive receiving the patient to and poor medical expenses, increasing warranted, is applying research team Our research quality of life. made in recommendations and effectiveness on team and Engineering of Science, Academies the National Team Medicine Report, of Enhancing the Effectiveness effectiveness in conducting 16 coordinating activities conducting in coordinating 16 effectiveness using a Likertto 4 Scale effective = not done/not (0 more the that = very Our findings indicate effective). the were team, the lower coordinating the effective 1). Effective Table (see and injurious fall rates total engaged members from included teams coordinating therapies, rehabilitation nursing, quality improvement, the structure and standardized They and pharmacy. level of fall risk the organizational reduction at process staff educating selectingby tool, a fall risk assessment risk interventions linked to choose appropriate to and accountability, conducting ensure factors, to audits actionsregarding taken as a with staff communicating of reported falls. result through Coordination Care Cancer 4: Improving Paper Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for intervention using a repeated measures ANOVA ANOVA measures intervention using a repeated scores effectiveness team Coordinating design. of assessment team coordinating from derived were calls and creating an internet-accessible toolkit. We We toolkit. an internet-accessible calls and creating team coordinating of the the effectiveness evaluated analyzed by the MTS component with a focus in with a focus component the MTS by analyzed – and then supported coordinating coordination conference webinars, conducting visits, site by teams reduction in each hospital using multiple assessments reduction in each hospital using multiple assessments – teamwork and change, to readiness of culture, and a shared mental model of how individual tasks model of how mental and a shared actions team achieve to with component coordinate of fall risk assessed the context We goals. organizational clarity around roles and responsibilities, predictability and responsibilities, clarity roles around the actions anticipating and needs of others, by (3) adjustment in real time (e.g. conducting post- time (e.g. in real (3) adjustment coordination these effective, When fall huddles). establishing by accountability ensure processes goal such as fall risk reduction. Coordination consists consists goal such as fall risk reduction. Coordination (e.g. (1) standardization basic processes: of three and and audit), (2) planning, policies/procedures is made up of two or more component teams that that teams component or more is made up of two organizational an overarching achieve to interact needs identified in the baseline assessment. From Aug. Aug. From baseline assessment. in the needs identified embedded these coordinating 2012 – July 2014, we MTS An structure. (MTS) system in a multiteam teams reduction coordinating teams in 16 CAHs to develop develop in 16 CAHs to teams reduction coordinating action address plan to a customized and implement level fall risk reduction processes in the CAHs. With With in the CAHs. fall riskreduction processes level and Research Healthcare the Agency for funding from fall risk with interprofessional collaborated we Quality, Nebraska’s 64 Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) than Hospitals (CAHs) 64 Critical Access Nebraska’s in its 18 non-CAHs of a structure an absence due to of organizational and coordination accountability for adverse event. A 2011 baseline assessment revealed revealed assessment A 2011 baseline event. adverse in greater significantly the risk of falls was that Palmon and serious costly, a common, Inpatient falls remain Authors: Katherine Jones, Victoria Kennel, Anne Skinner, Skinner, Anne Kennel, Victoria Katherine Authors: Jones, & Roni Reiter- John Crowe, Joseph Allen, Venema, Dawn Paper 3: Collaboration and Proactive Teamwork Used to to Used Teamwork and Proactive 3: Collaboration Paper Falls Reduce SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 74 methods and measurement science inhealth and consistent measures. The impetusfor addressing collaborations,disciplinary complex analysis methods, complex requires etiologyofhealthdisparities cross- to thesocial andphysicalfactors environments. The determinants range from geneticandbiological risk domains ofhealthdeterminants. ofhealth Domains complex. are Health disparities shapedby multiple Objective: The is etiologyofhealthdisparities BreenAuthors: &Deborah Duran Nancy Cross-Disciplinary Health Disparity Team Paper 1:Developing andMeasurement aMethods Collaboration Center andNIHSupported Initiatives needs to be fostered. Although multidisciplinary be littletimefor development. Instead, collaboration specialist teams are already composed andthere may the team, anddeveloping team leadership. However, incomposinginterventions theteam, developing The National recommends Academies report or remotely. never come together to collaborate eitherface-to-face specialists may notself-identify asateam andmay teams. Further,action-oriented thegroup ofmedical to beacross between academicscience teams and control, response emergency teams). These teams seem teams for which speedisoftheessence (NASAmission each oneinatimelymanner. There are otherscience problems (embodiedinapatient) andneedto address years at atime, medicalspecialistswork onmultiple science teams whomay work onasingleproblem for Research Council, 2015).However, unlikeacademic boundaries, andhightask interdependence (National integration,knowledge goalmisalignment, permeable of highdiversity ofmembership, needfor deep teams, themedicalspecialistscanface challenges groups andacademicscience teams. Likescience Thematic 3 Session SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts team white-board forteam white-board real timecollaborative decision collaborative andcleargoals, developing aninteractive workflow that includes team communication, setting communication andcoordination, developing a establishing ateam role (e.g., nurse)for facilitating improve care coordination amongspecialistsinclude Therefore someotherpotential to interventions focus oncommunication, coordination andinteraction. teams needtothat for interventions action-oriented teams. Cooke, Myers, Gorman, &Duran (2013) propose cross between traditional science teams andaction facilitate collaboration amongspecialistswhoare a We are therefore considering otherapproaches to implemented frequently dueto timeconstraints. specialiststogether,bring theyare notlikelyto be team conferences may way bethemostdirect of science approach isneeded. Ateam science approach methods required to understanddisparities, ateam nature ofthefieldand range of cross-disciplinary on standards andharmonized measures. Given the formake itcritical thefield to come to agreement more complex methodsfor analyzinghealthdisparities andthelikelihoodof etiology ofhealthdisparities the causesofhealthdisparities. Second, thecomplex the inconsistencies inhow different studiesperceive used. may Different perspectives explain disciplinary research, complex modelingmethods are notwidely of indicators andmethodsusedinhealthdisparities is two-fold.disparities First, despite thewiderange that traditional science teams. medical specialistswhooperate onfaster timescales work thescience will helpextend of team science to ofcare to illcancerof delivery critically patients. This intend to implement these andtest theminthecontext generation Records. Medical ofElectronic the next We collaboration through andthesupporting making Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science.

2:00-3:30pm Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 75 Create a public resource of children’s exposures exposures of children’s a public resource Create and the country, across the for standards and metadata data Develop community. health sciences environmental Expand the number of studies that include Expand the number of studies that in their studies, analysis exposure environmental in children’s Implement concept the exposome health studies, • • • • Authors: Kristianna Pettibone & Jennifer Collins & Jennifer KristiannaAuthors: Pettibone Objective: In Institute of 2015 the National funded the Children’s Health Sciences Environmental (CHEAR), program Resource Analysis Health Exposure for the tools provide to designed infrastructure a large of environmental assess the full array to researchers health affect children’s which may exposures will CHEAR resources (https://chearprogram.org/). conducting researchers health children’s be used by have currently or clinical studies that epidemiological or those of environment, very consideration limited but seek more data collected exposure who have analyses. extensive to: is intended CHEAR program The science approach with a cross-disciplinary with approach science set of necessarytool but a effective is not only an researchers build supportone to of NIH and in the field across the health disparities to moving health disparities for complex to assess the able of being next step scientific anticipate We of health disparities. causes contributing discussion and provide will conference the SciTS that more even will help us lead the process that guidance to create methods use of SciTS Successful effectively. and assessing determining for strategies harmonized and a high-profile health disparities will provide important the importance for case of SciTS. Science Evaluation Team a for 2: CHEAR Planning Paper Resource Analysis Health Exposure - NIEHS Children’s Program Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: optimum use of team science in assessing health science optimum use of team a team that indicate date Activities to disparities. addressed the system science approach for health for approach science the system addressed Discussion questions disparities will be presented. can promote that interactions foster will be posed to Statement of how the research advances the SciTS the SciTS advances research the of how Statement that process year long from the field: Initial findings to better understand the dynamic interactive causes of understand the dynamic interactive better to move to discussion of how Further health disparities. will be beneficial. the SciTS conference at this forward world relationships. Exploring use of complex systems systems Exploring use of complex relationships. world this limit and overcome to is recommended analyses disparities research. However, complex systems systems complex However, disparities research. and this not widely used in the field, are approaches characterizingis a limiting factor real in adequately and agents can be used to explore and evaluate the evaluate and explore to can be used and agents impact of both direct and indirect in health effects among health determinants are complex and cross- complex are among health determinants specify that approaches systems Complex disciplinary. multiple factors between interrelationships conditional causes of health disparities. These methods are methods are These causes of health disparities. However, important be used. to will continue and when relations limited are methods these statistical Currently used statistical methods are not adequate not adequate methods are used statistical Currently understand the multifactorial fully to and multilevel in the draft foundational paper. A wide range of A wide range paper. in the draft foundational health measure used to are approaches statistical health determinants. disparities and associated chemistry, biology, statistics, medicine and dentistry. medicine and statistics, biology, chemistry, reported working preliminary some The group results has been eliminated. Disciplines of working group of working Disciplines group has been eliminated. demography, , philosophy, members are to build a foundation that will lead to a scientific a scientific to will lead that build a foundation to the methods and measures includes This discipline. knowneeded to when disparities and when each exist a Trans-NIH Working Group on Methods and Group Working Trans-NIH a Health Disparities Research for Science Measurement disparities and help the field come to agreement. agreement. to come disparities and help the field NIMHD convened methods: Description of research will enable use of complex multifactorial use of complex will enable methods and reductions the causes determine in health to Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 76 hypothesis orresearch thisstudy, goal:In we explored ThompsonBeti Authors: Sarah Hohl, HealthNoble, Brown, Meagan & Disparities and theCenters for Population Healthand Transdisciplinary Research onEnergetics andCancer Center Grant Initiatives -AQualitative Study ofthe Paper 3: Transdisciplinary Outcomes in Two NIH-Funded and similarNCIfundedinitiatives. SciTSfield of andthe withthe work conducted TREC Ultimately, we intend for thiswork to contribute to the of thesuccess andchallengesoftheCHEARprogram. facilitate team science projects, aswell asadescription evidence ofwhat federal and funderscandoto support hope to strengthen theevaluation andprovide asolid to ofteam thecommunity science researchers, we Field: presenting By ourteam science evaluation plans Statement ofHow theResearch Advances theSciTS science. with aneye towards for establishingmetrics team science outcomes. willbepresentedThese activities have beenestablishedwith theaimoffacilitating team group discussions)specificgovernance structures (award meeting,activities terms, initialsteering kick-off ofFindings: oftheprogram Summary As start-up part Energetics andCancer (TREC). similar evaluations ofthe Transdisciplinary Research on evaluationOur goalsandquestionswillbeinformed by questions andmetrics, andideasfor additionalmetrics. seek feedback ontheappropriateness oftheevaluation and questionsplannedfor theprogram. The authors goals, aswell asteam science focused evaluation goals science approaches usedto facilitate theprogram essential for itssuccess. This poster team willdescribe to otherresearchers. Team science approaches are tools, analyses, conduct andpromote theresources groups ofresearchers to work together to develop the center, andadata center, theCHEARprogram requires With sixindependent laboratories, acoordinating Objective, problem underinvestigation, SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. on investigators, research centers, andthescientific collaborationperceived oftransdisciplinary impacts outcomes within TREC and CPHHD2)investigator- questions were designed to explore 1)transdisciplinary funding program stafffromInterview theNIH. and stafffrom the TRECandCPHHDprograms and with53investigators, interviews structured trainees, 2016, semi- and January We one-on-one conducted ofresearchDescription May 2015 methods:Between (CPHHD).Health Disparities andtheCenters for Population Healthand (TREC) Transdisciplinary Research onEnergetics andCancer ofHealth(NIH)-fundedcenterInstitute grant initiatives: towards outcomes oftwo National transdisciplinary and compared challenges, successes, andprogress Statement ofhow theresearch advances theSciTS initiative. inamulti-site, transdisciplinary participation attributedadvancement to their that theyinpart newdiscoveriesand CPHHDdescribed andcareer communities. Investigators ofalllevels across TREC buildingby engaging their academicconsortium provided ameansfor investigators to extend grantees to implement intervention acommunity exchange andpartnership. The requirement ofCPHHD buildingaswell as cross-center consortium intellectual in pilot projects TREC facilitated bothcross-center Coordination Center andongoingfundsfor one-year and training. ofacentral The support infrastructural changes, awareness anddissemination, translation, building, newmulti-level models, intervention policy research methodsandstatistical designs, consortium grants,new transdisciplinary disciplinarily-integrated research: authorship,transdisciplinary transdisciplinary ninebroadand CPHHDdescribed outcomes uniqueto Investigators offindings: fromSummary both TREC and across allqualitative data sources. emergent themesare identified and compared within comparison content analysis approach, inwhich coding and analysis. The team appliedaconstant checked for accuracy, anduploadedinto Atlas.ti for community. were .Interviews transcribed verbatim, Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 77 proposals with their co-authors and with those proposals However, papers. of cited a high number they share submit successful likely to more are researchers with their co-authors and with those they proposals Results also show papers. number of cited a lower share likely than men to more are researchers female that proposals on awarded collaborate proposals to a Clinical and Translational Science Science Translational a Clinical and to proposals in 2009. university a research at Program Awards of A total submitted. proposals grant 458 were There out of 37,266 possible applicants 1,469 researchers of whom 1,220 did not as PIs/Co-PIs, identified were and awarded 56 had both proposals, awarded have and 193 had only awarded proposals un-awarded and employment education Demographics, proposals. and school and departmentinformation, affiliation database. extracted internal the university from were Scopus from data used publication we Additionally, (including constructto bibliometric the information for co-authorship relations) and citation publications, of possible applicants. population the entire to Attribute ActorModel Autologistic first use We for to apply researchers predict the factors influencing Random use Exponential Graph and then we a grant assess factorsModels to influencing the assembly Preliminary teams. proposal of grant and success submit likely to more are researchers that show results knowledge and skills required for the science to to the science knowledge for and skills required an represents 2010), (Börneral., et be conducted” endeavor. important research but overlooked of the our understanding advance Our study seeks to discretion individuals have where assembly of teams and diverse requires and the team in their formation its expertise accomplish specialized successfully to social network bring theories together We goals. examine first to and teams groups on and research in scientific collaboration to the mechanism leading which among the assembly determine Next, we teams. team success. mechanisms also affect and questions using archival our research tested We submitting research about scientists data bibliographic Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for assemble and how can they be “optimized for the for “optimized can they be assemble and how SciTS 2016 Conference: impact on the scientific enterprise (Contractor, 2013). (Contractor, impact enterprise on the scientific teams scientific understanding how Therefore, Solomon, Kim, & Sonnenwald, 2003). Given these 2003). Given Solomon, Kim, & Sonnenwald, is sizable risk of assembling teams there challenges, negative with a resulting in a suboptimal manner, give the same level of priority work, the same level their joint and to give (Hara, “the right chemistry” have need to they even However, effective interaction and coordination is coordination and interaction effective However, compatible have Scientists need to achieve: to hard and writing they need to styles, science to approaches understood by all parties. Second, scientists also need all parties. scientists by Second, understood tasks. their collaborative coordinate know to to how daunting task, for intellectual as well as logistic and and as logistic task, intellectual as well daunting for have need to scientists one, For reasons. technical or hold knowledge mutually ground clear common in quality: with higher yield publications teams workingintellectual impact alone. than researchers is a such teams assembling consistently However, Recent research has shown that the results achieved achieved the results that has shown research Recent increased also have collaborations team through Over the last 50 years collaboration and teamwork have have and teamwork collaboration Over the last 50 years in virtually and volume in scope all scientific increased fields 2007;316(5827):1036-9). Science. et al., (Wuchty Authors: Alina Lungeanu, Denis Agniel, Kun Lei, Noshir Lei, Kun Denis Agniel, Lungeanu, Alina Authors: Weber & Griffin Contractor, in the Scientific Workforce - The Case of Clinical and The - Workforce in the Scientific Program Grant Pilot Awards Science Translational Paper 4: Modeling the Dynamics of Collaboration 4: Modeling the Dynamics of Collaboration Paper transdisciplinary research conduct, in effect, more conduct,transdisciplinary more in effect, research public health effectively generating and efficiently impact. can solve more complex public health problems. In public health problems. complex more can solve could help garnerturn, the appropriate our findings and departmentalacademic institutional support for elucidate the value of investing in transdisciplinary of investing the value elucidate that innovation foster to initiatives grant center that has explored the processes and facilitators and facilitators the processes explored has that of transdisciplinary identifying by science team of this type of work. such, our results outcomes As field: In this study, we built on previous research research previous we built on field: In this study, Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 78 as muchtheybenefited from in thecurriculum Findings. (1) The students benefited from peer-learning process. in regards to collaborative interdisciplinary design to narrate theexperiences ofstudents andfaculty analysis ofeachdataset, thefindings were integrated After the partners. a focus-group studywith industry questions);and(iv) (open-ended (iii) onlinesurveys graduate students spent four weeks withtheteams); (two (24); (ii)natural(50) andfaculty observation with studentsthrough interviews (i)semi-structured Methods. The data for thisstudywas generated educational tool. Design Studiopotential asan oftheInterdisciplinary collaborative design process better andevaluate the is to understand thedynamicsofinterdisciplinary Objective. The ofthisqualitative objective study departments). Student teams are diverse aswell (from 18different (engineering to design industrial to business). Faculty consists of20peoplefrom ninedepartments mentors for fouracademic andindustry to eight weeks. teams address adesign problem withguidance from Design student Studio (IDS)inwhichinterdisciplinary collaborative was calledInterdisciplinary design activity for collaborative DF’s design projects. METU first providing space andequipment infrastructure required is objective and education center whose primary research DF)isaninterdisciplinary Factory (METU Background. East Middle Technical University Design Authors: Arsev Aydinoglu &Pinar Kaygan Studio in anEducational - Setting Design The Interdisciplinary Paper Collaborative 1:Interdisciplinary Design Process Lessons Organizations Learned &Fields: from Multi-Disciplinary From Design to Ecology Thematic 4 Session SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts students performed fineinthe teams,students their performed roles in 3D printer, static calculation, etc.). (5)Although, the (coding, andknowledge using domain-based skills management,conflict etc.) as were asimportant (communication,but alsothefaculty. skills (4)Soft facilitate collaboration notonlyamongthestudents was to critical their learning. (3)Space (orlackthereof) andtheyconfused thestudents,faculty hampered values, andworkflows were quite different amongthe regards to collaborative research. (2) The perspectives, institution andtheprevalence andinterdisciplinarity ofan between multidisciplinarity the connection various domains. The goalofthisstudyisto examine institutionwithresearchers frommultidisciplinary in research institutions, oneway isto create a there are many ways to promote interdisciplinarity and science hasbecome more interdisciplinary. While researchinterdisciplinary hasbeenwidelyrecognized of thepastdecades,During theimportance Eichmann Authors: Zhiya Zuo, Xi Wang, Zhao, Kang &David Study ofiSchools -ACase Institutions Collaborations inMultidisciplinary Paper 2: The Prevalence of andInterdisciplinarity science of team science literature. through to mentoring newperspectives the brings research aswell. Moreover, theinclusionofindustry the IDS,findingsare applicable to collaborative addresses that gap. to Due theinnovative nature of engineers, designers andsocialscientists. This study collaborative work are among rare –especially however,important; educational settingsthat promote SciTS Relevance. Collaborative science hasbecome discussion. the teams andhow itchangedover timerequire more Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 79 taking a page from the business world to help students help students taking to the business world a page from effectively adapt more and understand themselves of analysis The world. others in the professional to improve to us about how informed have these data identified We have their use in debriefing the class. certain styles and motivational mixtures of behavioral ability to develop graduates who have relevant relevant who have graduates ability develop to work, team Collaboration, competencies. professional after sought are that competencies and leadership are difficult than it leadership more may We employers. by is leading recognizing is A critical first step be. needs to creation The lead. about whom you it is not about you, the to developing is critical collaboration of effective interdisciplinary linkages necessary are confront that to human by challenges posed environmental the many meet future to students prepare need to We activities. require demands that intellectual and workforce the challenge of address To leadership. collaborative and the development lead on whom you focusing Studies skills, the Environmental of collaboration of Nebraska-Lincoln the University at (ES) program TTI(UNL) in partnership Insights® used Success with curriculuma backward multiple modalities of design, actionresearch and a reflective learning, experiential and teamwork collaboration develop to approach the use of Through students. skills in undergraduate is program the UNL-ES TriMetrix®, the an instrument, Using social network analysis and text and network social mining analysis Using multidisciplinary a that found this research techniques, a more lead to not necessarily alone does environment interdisciplinary or more environment, collaborative and management, coordination, More collaborations. the benefits exploit fully needed to be may incentives of institutional multidisciplinarity stimulating in and interdisciplinarity. collaborations and Experiences - Applications Them on 3: Focus Paper Promote to Assessments Business-Based Using and Leadership Teamwork, Collaboration, Gosselin & Ron David Bonnstetter Authors: with a paradigm Higher is being confronted education their reexamine collectively it to shift is forcing that Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: significant negative effect. effect. negative significant confirmed our finding – educational multidisciplinarity our finding – educational confirmed of the interdisciplinarity predictor is a non-significant multidisciplinarity has while research of collaborations, collaborations that are more interdisciplinary. An An interdisciplinary. more are that collaborations variables further control with various OLS regression internal collaborations does not mean higher levels does not mean higher levels collaborations internal (2) a more of collaborations. of interdisciplinarity cannot guarantee multidisciplinary environment faculty members’ research interests derived from from derived interests research faculty members’ found We distributions of their publications. topic of (1) higher prevalence some surprising results: significant. We also conductedWe also assortativity analysis significant. networks using collaborating collaboration for not associated with a more collaborative institution, collaborative with a more not associated multidisciplinarity between and as the correlation networks is not the connectedness of collaboration each iSchool among its faculty members, we found found each iSchool we among its faculty members, of multidisciplinarity a higher level is having that measured by topic distributions from their publications. their publications. distributions from topic by measured network for collaboration building an internal After an iSchools’ faculty members’ educational background background educational faculty members’ an iSchools’ which is multidisciplinarity, distributions; research is interests, research of facultythe diversity members’ iSchool was measured with two metrics: educational metrics: with two educational iSchool measured was of multidisciplinarity is based on the Shannon Entropy disciplines. Our dataset includes 23,758 papers Our dataset disciplines. and their 675 faculty by members, authored multidisciplinarityThe of an background. educational We used 27 Information Schools (iSchools) in the U.S. Schools used 27 Information (iSchools) U.S. in the We multidisciplinary are because they as a case study, various institutions with faculty members from research institutions and funding agencies more and funding agencies more institutions research research. interdisciplinary promote effectively collaborations emerge in a multidisciplinary emerge collaborations questions can help these to Answers environment? techniques to address two research questions: questions: research two address to techniques breed does a multidisciplinary environment First, do interdisciplinary Second, collaborations? more of collaborations within the institution. Specifically, institution. Specifically, within the of collaborations text and social network mining analysis utilized we Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 Engineers Pitch -ASales through Integration Case Studies Panel: Communicating a Value Proposition for Integrating andNatural Scientists Social Scientists/ 80 into effective collaboration ortheyhave never been thatnot explicitly go hadto aboutthefactors learn students have experienced team projects, buthave drivers that may beproblematic to group Many work. solutions and opportunities offuture collaborations,solutions andopportunities through thefollowing exploring questions: We seekatwo-way dialoguebetween socialscientists andteam to science discusscurrent practitioners problems, integration. sustainable socio-technical individuals andorganizations candoto support weeliciting theirfeedback, willexamine whethercurrent methodsaddress theirconcerns ordemands, andwhat persuasive casethat team are science practitioners potential “clients” for thesocialscience methods. Through collaboration orsocietaloutreach barriers intheir jobduties. This panelwillhave beensuccessful if itmakesa managers,project team leadersandresearch development professionals whonavigate team dynamics, intendedOur audience beyond extends socialscientists to includeteam suchasresearchers, science practitioners inteam sciencebarriers planningandpractice. explore potentials for developing a “toolkit” whichcould systematically address thecognitive, socialandpolitical understanding oftheirnichesandlimitations interms ofscalesandgoalsintegration; we furthermore, will also anddifficultiesinthe barriers process of integration. thesedifferent Wejuxtapose approaches for a comparative dimensions inteam science to share theirmethods, research findingsas onwell as collaborationreflections social scientists/humanists whoare developing methods/casestudiesofimplementing socialandethical thispanel,In we planto onthecurrent reflect “demands andsupplies” integration, ofsocio-technical by inviting and natural sciences isto berealized. been adequately incentivized. This value proposition cross-pollination mustbemadeifmeaningful between social been made, norhastheallotment oftheirtimeandresources from withandlearning to socialsciences connecting scientists andengineers for socialscience harnessing wisdomto improve science outcomes hasnotadequately limited to what willsatisfy top down requirements from fundingagencies. The truevalue proposition to natural of interactions between thesecommunities overall currently remains innature, shallow andtransactional often hierarchies,disciplinary power dynamics, alongwithdifferent ongoals. expectations that thequality We assert between natural andsocialscientists remains confusing andcontroversial dueto thelackofintegration, collaboration relationshipinterdisciplinary communities, working isapplaudedby science theactual andpolicy (Ethical, Legal for Implications) and Societal humangenomeresearch ornanotechnology. However, whilesuch componentas anactive ofemerging science andtechnology development, asevidenced suchasELSI by efforts and implementation. Funding agenciesalsoencourage integration between natural science andsocialscience studies, buildingdeeplyresonate andinfrastructural withteam science design, management, humanresources recognized inteam science research andpractice. Classicsocialscience agendassuchas leadership, organizational ofsocialscience incomprehendingThe importance andfacilitating scientific collaboration hasbeen well andproblemsObjective underinvestigation Authors: Sharon Ku Hendren &Christine Thematic 1 Session SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. missing link: thescience ofself.missing link: to addthe for aproject. Education hadtheopportunity with regard to processes ofdeveloping ashared-vision explicitly explained to them. thecase This isparticularly 3:45-5:15pm Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 81 Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for What are their strengths and limitations? What are the benefits and the benefits and risks? are What and limitations? their strengths are What be interfaceat the social sciences and natural collaborations between beneficial can mutually How infrastructures? the required are What and incentivized? communicated designed, What are the common interests, goals and potential conflicts of socio-technical integration? Can social Can social conflicts of socio-technical goals and potential integration? interests, the common are What but also critical functions just instrumental than by scientists, defined more deliver to be utilized science team science? of practice and outcome reflections on the goal, and engineers? scientists with natural collaborating for available methodologies the social science are What Why would scientists benefit from spending their time/resources to enlist the expertiseto enlist the of social scientists? time/resources spending their from benefit scientists would Why social Are science? in team and social scientists natural between relationship the conceptualize to How scientists/engineers? natural of “intruders” or “guests”, “partners”, as perceived scientists/humanists • • • • • SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: (e.g., preferred methods, attitude toward application, importance of hypotheses) and makes them available for for importance application, and makes them available of hypotheses) toward attitude methods, preferred (e.g., and identify collectively to collaborators encourages the approach dialogue, By featuring consideration. collective worldviews. among their similaritiesexamine and differences dialogue among collaborators designed to reveal differences in research perspective and increase communicative communicative perspective and increase research in differences reveal to designed dialogue among collaborators By structuring the integration. with dialogical philosophical analysis it combines Methodologically, capacity. worldview research aspects fundamental of one’s foregrounds approach Toolbox the dialogue philosophically, 2. Toolbox Approach (Michael O’Rourke, Approach University) Michigan State Toolbox 2. philosophically structured producing involves is a method that approach Toolbox The Niche:Methodological Expected Outcomes: Through over three-dozen over studies performed Through laboratories and engineering in scientific Expected Outcomes: and value deliberation, learning, reflexive enhances North process the STIR and Asia, across America, Europe productivity integration. and stakeholder value it boosts creativity, Inpractical the process, adjustments. opportunities, considerations, alternatives and outcomes. During this time, collaborative description evolves into into description evolves collaborative During this time, and outcomes. alternatives opportunities, considerations, of action. courses socially robust alternative, new, which can identify inquiry, collaborative and engagement tools to map decision styles, elucidate stakeholder values and expand options. options. and expand stakeholder values elucidate decision styles, map to tools and engagement description of research collaborative real-time, facilitates protocol” “decision STIR The Mode: Collaboration Degree of Integration: STIR facilitates high-impact reflection on routine research decisions as they are made and decisions as they are research high-impactroutine STIR facilitates reflection on of Integration: Degree and humanist” “embedded an structured between interactions It ongoing, does this through in real-time. unfold use a variety Interdisciplinary of feedback collaborators a period of 12 weeks. for scientists/engineers collaborating innovation,” seeking to modulate research and innovation trajectories in desirable directions, after research and after research trajectories directions, in desirable and innovation seeking research modulate to innovation,” can be known. societal consequences but before been set, priorities have development anticipate and respond to societal dimensions of their technical work. Originally developed to assess researchers’ assess researchers’ to work. developed dimensions of their technical societal Originally to and respond anticipate activities, been recognized STIR has research during routine account into capacity ethical values take social and to “responsible It for an established mechanism has become the world. around funding organizations research by 1. Socio-technical Integration Research (STIR; Erik Fisher, Arizona State University) University) State Arizona (STIR; Erik Fisher, Research 1. Socio-technical Integration to and engineers scientists enabling for approach and proven Niche:Methodological is a globally tested STIR technical integration” will be showcased, with specific focus on the degree of integration, the collaboration model, model, collaboration the of integration, focus on the degree with specific will be showcased, integration” technical practitioner science to a team upon by will be commented Each presentation outcomes. research and collective “demand”. and “supply” between mutual understanding and communication facilitate Description of research methods and showcases methods and showcases Description of research “socio- and implementing distinct in conceptualizing panel discussion, three In methodologies the proposed Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 82 while socialscience theirjob, analyses enablesthe scientists to andcareer re-evaluate identity paths in afresh and ethnographic insight cancontribute to socialscience critical investigation inknowledge, power andorganization, ethnographic consciousness orcuriosity” epistemologically equivalent to theanthropologist’s. Actors’ para- collaborations practitioners, whoare withscience viewed andpolicy as “para-ethnographers” having “a preexisting ethnographic design, multi-sited anddata networks to engage communications andmutuallybeneficial partners” whowillinevitablyprovoke eachotherto thinktheirown research innewways. mobilizes It Collaboration MsEenvisions between natural Mode: affinity andsocialscientists acontemporary as “epistemic momentscritical ofcollaborations ofintegration. andspectrum integration,socio-technical usingethnographer’s multi-sited navigation to step-by-step andsensitivity buildthe power tool for inform concerns incremental practical inteam entry building, asapowerful enablingMsEto act spaces over multiplelocations. The sociological analyses oftheinterplay ofknowledge, people, organization and interests, aswell asuncovering therelational exchanges andsubtleinterconnectedness ofpeople, thingsand workof staying for inplace to thecreation identify boundary thecritical andharmonization ofmulti-sited Degree ofIntegration: MsEinvestigators move around andfollow horizontally withmultiplestakeholders instead linkedandrespondbe directly issues. to science andpolicy forums where thesocialscience research agendasuchaspower, hegemonies, values, ontology orgeopolitics can social science to arange ofepistemic spaces from rooms laboratories, to international policy factories,courts, unsettledpoliticalorderactivities, from and diplomatic sensitivity differentknowledge institutions. MsE connects involves multiplestakeholdersafieldfullofdiverse interests, technical indeterminacy, commercial proprietary MsEisananthropological scientificMethodological Niche: collaboration methodto which studylarge-scale 3. Multi-sited Ethnography (MsE, Sharon Ku, Drexel University) project. ofthe andthelocation inthelife-cycle oftheintervention ofparticipants factors, includingbuy-in onthepart within aproject. Achievement caseisdependent onanumberofcontextual oftheseoutcomes inaparticular among collaborators. More distally, theapproach aimsto enhance communicative andcollaborative capacity Outcomes:Expected Proximally, the Toolbox approach isdesigned to enhance self-andmutualunderstanding to takeupandusetheinsights itgenerates.participants communication ofthe ofthedialogueis dynamic.interest Akeydeterminant ofthecausalefficacy onthepart is ensured, andthisinforms asawindow aposthocevaluation ontheteam’s ofthedialoguewhichcanserve are central to thecollaborators. When delivered by outsiders, distance critical ontheprocess ofthecollaboration leadership, gatheringinformation usedto design aninstrument that beliefs, reflects values, that andpriorities relatively dialogueworkshop brief lightly facilitated by outsiders. The facilitators interact inadvance withproject Collaboration As Mode: delivered by the Toolbox Project, the Toolbox approach isinterventionist, centering ona coordinaterequired them,guidingthetrade-offs for collaborative decisionmaking. conscious anddifferences self-knowledge, and(2)dialogueaboutsimilarities in research worldviews can to integrateparticipants anew, reflexive appreciation for their own tacit commitments withthe rest oftheir Integration ofbeliefs andvalues takesplace canenable inthisdialoguealongtwo dimensions:(1)articulation the participants. collaboratorsThe dialogue, inidentifying then,supports native values andnative capacities. provide amodelofone’s andshared perspective, indialogueby whichisthenarticulated eachof disciplinary commitments thatcan beunderstood frame one’s asarticulating research approach. Together, theprompts perspective, andsotheresponses disciplinary these prompts, are askedto adopttheirprimary participants interactions ofitsindividualcomponents”, scientific research“Value-neutral ispossible”).In responding to (e.g., world underinvestigation from“The mustbeexplained intermsarising oftheemergent the properties prompts that are inthat theyfocus ofresearch abstract, onaspects that are nottiedto any specific context Degree ofIntegration: Toolbox instrument –the by dialogueisstructured asurvey “Toolbox” –constituted by SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 83 = 3:45-5:15 pm reduces degrees of freedom (dof), of freedom degrees reduces just as it does for 𝑆 1 gives: k to constant a crystal. Setting Boltzman’s log(dof) a collection 2). As of individual scientists (Eqn. its dof, reducing thereby unit, a single into is forged is produced. entropy zero deviation the standard give (1) to equation revise We competition for them generating limit cycles (Lawless cycles limit (Lawless them generating for competition 2016). et al., and Multitasking. Production Entropy Thermodynamics, overlooking the theory, information Shannon’s With human or of multitasking, three interdependence entropy; i.e., zero generate slaves scientist robotic an give scientists independent log 3/3 = 0; and three 2016). In et al., (Lawless of 3*1/3 log 1/3 = 1.584 entropy of a team that postulate we theory, with graph contrast, multitasking interdependently scientists independent by roles played perfectly different well-fitted is like the baseball team. members of a great the independent of tasks performed a set When the least number by multitasks that (graph) a team forms of scientists of a theorist, modeler perfectly a small team (e.g., a team into is converted a group and experimenter), (LEP). But like least entropy produces structure that interdependence level, the quantum at entanglement Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 2 Thematic both sides, like quantum entanglement, allow neutrals neutrals allow entanglement, like quantum both sides, not only Neutrals an issue. both sides of process to conflict, they can decide elections, the moderate individuals are committed to different sides, conflict sides, different to committed individuals are with interdependent neutrals claim that We ensues. Equation (1) captures social disagreement (e.g., (e.g., social disagreement (1) captures Equation if all For social dynamics, scientific). judicial, political, uncertainty in interpretations increase (i.e., poorer team team poorer (i.e., uncertainty increase in interpretations manager a team the need for motivating awareness), practice. and team interpretations (see Fig. 1): as uncertainty in a (see Fig. interpretations multitasking), improved skills (e.g., decrease team’s time, σB(interpretations) is the standard deviation deviation is the standard σB(interpretations) time, a Fourier forming the two transform, of its Fourier skill between pair of tradeoffs practices and social σA(skills)σB(interpretations) ≥ 1/2 (Eqn.1), where where ≥ 1/2 (Eqn.1), σA(skills)σB(interpretations) σA(skills) A over variable of deviation is the standard between interdependent and independent, each independent, and interdependent between its bistable with on tasks interferes focus team’s performance; i.e., improve to of how interpretations Authors: William William Authors: Lawless Introduction: multitasking As skills and wane wax Paper 1: A Thermodynamics of Interdependence - of Interdependence Thermodynamics 1: A Paper Teams and Scientific Scientists, Science, SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: at different stages of team building, inter/transdisciplinary team approaches for various stakeholders, and various stakeholders, for inter/transdisciplinaryteam approaches team building, stages of different at socio-technical in a complex space. science team and implementing designing for innovation methodological Implication for SciTS Implication for and team researchers among social science dialogues interactive and comparisons methodological Through communication and coordination to advance scope an integrative this panel offers practitioners, science will demonstrate how it works with multiple stakeholders from university, government, industry government, and non-profit university, from with multiple stakeholders it works how will demonstrate and intellectual goals products. collectively shared define to organizations Expected Outcomes: MsE helps dissolve the traditional hierarchy within the science-social collaboration, science hierarchy traditional the helps dissolve MsE Expected Outcomes: of the bigger awareness and assessment reflections, timely for enabling symmetric socio-technical integration MsE the as a case, nanotechnology and functions. Using is formulated science team socio-political where context reflexive angle. angle. reflexive Conceptual Models and Theory Models and Conceptual Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 84 outcomes. to produceand inability trulyinterdisciplinary mental model can leadto goalmisalignment, conflict, research intersections. Failure to generate ashared toperspectives findinteresting, potentially productive yet enoughabouteachothers’ theymustlearn undergraduatebeyond introductory science classes, to collaborate littletraining incommon having very team inparticular. These teams come often together team research ingeneral, andinsocio-environmental integration hasbeenidentified asa core challenge for or awickedproblem. The process ofdeepknowledge problem to besolved, whichinitially isill-structured, must beintegrated into shared mental modelsofthe teams, from deepknowledge different perspectives research socio-environmental interdisciplinary In Authors: Pennington Deana BasedReasoning Model Paper Negotiation 2:Knowledge across Disciplineswith in school. of young scientists ingang-controlled areas to flourish environmental problems inChina;andfor theinability in 1983(Lawless etal., 2016;seeFig. 2);for the of radwastes until thewhistlewas blown onDOE dispose scientific cardboard consensus to useordinary boxes to split- ups. Eqn. 4accounts ofEnergy’s for Department ceases; e.g., enforced cooperation, or authoritarianism, teamwork becomes dysfunctional, problem-solving Unexpectedly, oursecond novel findingisthat as Reversing thelimit:lim!!”#!!!σ!”#=∞(Eqn. 4). target problem (Cummings, 2015). members canmaximize itssearch for solutionsto its interdependentscientific team composed ofperfectly its science equalsMEP, ourfirstnovel finding. Thus, a team’s goesto structure zero, theentropy produced by ! σ!”#=∞(Eqn. 3);i.e., astheentropy produced by a entropy (MEP). production We findinthelimit:lim!!”#!! of LEPtimesthestandard deviation ofmaximum SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts each other’s research. background, training, to understand andvocabulary disciplines. Team memberssimplydonothave the by theother one understandstheideasputforth possible to buildoneachother’s ideasbecauseno researchsocio-environmental teams not itisoften each other’s contrast, ideaswithoutcritique. In in for example, callfor generating andbuildingon they viewtheproblem. Brainstorming activities, differ primarily inthe context fromparticipants which acrossknowledge diverse assumethat perspectives been developed for situations that callfor integrating highly heterogeneous. that Group have activities are andtheperspectives structured bothdeepand integrationknowledge whentheproblem isill- There islittleunderstandingofhow to facilitate to higher-level states (suchasgoals, commitments, have offered accounts that appeal ofshared agency Tuomela (1992,1993,1995,2007),among others, (1989,1994,1996,2003), andRaimo Margaret Gilbert Bratman (1993, 1999,2004,2006), 1995), Michael intentionalunderlying (1990, structure. JohnSearle have begunto investigate andits joint agency thepast fewOver decades, anumberofphilosophers Deborah TollefsenAuthors: Science Paper 3:Collective andScience of Intentionality Team Foundation (grant DBI-1052875). Center alsofundedby theNational (SESYNC), Science group at theNational Socio-Environmental Synthesis was conceived anddesigned through aworking (grant project (EMBeRS) DGE-1545404). The project inSocio-EnvironmentalBased Reasoning Synthesis Science Foundation-funded Employing Model developed andare soonto betested by theNational introduce newconceptual modelsthat have been on transformational learning. This presentation will one that ismediated by group processes anddepends isfundamentally problem, alearning but It intersection. each other’s disciplineswell enoughto findpoints of For progress to occur, team membersmustunderstand Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 85 al-ternatively, at the level of the individual engaging of the individual engaging the level at al-ternatively, entail actions it could in the joint with other members, or de- accentuates either interdisciplinarythat work socio-cultural of being, context a member’s accentuates a biologist. e.g., required intentionality extent is collective what To 3. actions that other members of the collective are going actions are other members of the collective that perform a high level. those goals at to achieve to however, interdisciplinaryIn collaborations, many radically of practice have members of the communities to used words the understanding of what different as count would what goals mean, describe the project’s We similar deep ambiguities. and achieving the goals, of an interdisciplinary intentions the collective examine and community of Bratman’s of practice in light accounts. Gilbert’s collective factors constrain do environmental 2. How thinking Lucy Suchman’s in interdisciplinary groups? particular suggests that cognition on situated work contexts and physical cultural, of social, arrangements does this What individuals think.can shape the way thinking collective suggest for in interdisciplinary entail it could of the community, the level At groups? disci- overcome the ability to of structured contexts a forge to of members in order plinary differences community is thinking of practice that collectively; of an interdisciplinary project. Integra-tive decisions are decisions are of an interdisciplinary Integra-tive project. and values the beliefs combine the need to marked by the evaluating jointly requires and this of collaborators, and thinking options about trade- collectively research can furtherthat offs project goals. describe and discuss we this background, Against questions about interdisciplinary research several their ability function concern to in that jointly teams pursuit of project goals: understanding be to must mutual extensive 1. How activity? intentional enable collectively Both Michael heavily rely accounts Gilbert’s and Margaret Bratman’s rea-sons) for different and ways (though in different or collective of a shared members on the idea that goals and the project both the project’s understand Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: integration is typically in the decision-making effected integration underwrite that cycle processes these stages in the life integrate their perspectives, both socially and their perspectives, integrate performing, of designing, the course in epistemically, This their research. and disseminating concluding, So understood, collective intentionality is an intentionality collective So understood, important part interdisciplinary research of successful must these groups be successful, To collaborations. in “we”-mode, rather than as a group of individuals as a group than rather “we”-mode, in functioning in “I”-mode. e.g., belief, acceptance, and intention. Roughly, a group a group Roughly, and intention. acceptance, belief, e.g., when they function intentionality collective exhibits of a particular goal (e.g., thinking through a problem, thinkingof a particular a problem, through goal (e.g., making abilityThis is a decision, performing an action). of psy-chologicaltypically in terms attitudes, analyzed teams, where this is under-stood as the ability of a this is under-stood where teams, function pursuit to in joint of agents together group questions about the collective activityquestions about the collective of we are Specifically, interdisciplinary re-search teams. of these intentionality in the collective interested O’Rourke number of theoretical ask a we In this presentation, Intentionality for Interdisciplinary Teams InterdisciplinaryIntentionality for & Michael Werkheiser, Ian Hubbs, Graham Authors: Paper 4: Joining Forces - Some Issues in Collective - Some Issues in Collective 4: Joining Forces Paper how theories of shared responsibility might help us might responsibility theories of shared how of team in the context responsibility understand to science. the ways in which “we-intentions” and “we-mode” “we-mode” and “we-intentions” in which the ways the mechanisms that theorize help us to might beliefs consider and I team science effective to contribute I consider how this literature might help to inform the inform help to might this literature how I consider I consider In (SciTi). particular, science of team science those working in this field explore a number of related related a number of those workingexplore this field in objectivity, group rationality, issues including group In this paper responsibility. and shared and collective growing field of collective intentionality. In addition collective intentionality. field of growing agency, of shared the nature questions regarding to and intentions) that are ‘‘shared’’ in some way. This This way. in some ‘‘shared’’ are that and intentions) of the rapidly foundation is the work theoretical Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 Team Training inthe Trenches 86 from theepistemic dimensions. Using thetheories to distinguishthesocialdimensionsofintegration iscollaborative, whentheproject project; itisdifficult ofasuccessfulis amark research interdisciplinary for integration? project As we have noted, integration (Dentistry, Medicine, Public Health& Professions, programs basedinallsixHealthScienceCenter colleges program PhD for students 40partner innearly programThe offers CTS and a certificate PhD co-major success. conceptual modeloftraining progression andcareer a range ofinnovative assessment basedona metrics evaluated assessment usingcompetency-based and of thisteam training modelfor PhD scientists isbeing mosaic modelofbasicandclinicalscientists. The impact collaborative research doctoral withamentoring PhD candidates from multipledisciplinesperform a team-based modelfor research training inwhich teaching method, andwe havea primary developed the core utilizes team-based curriculum as learning CTS coreeffective of competencies. learning Much of and career andprofessional development, for the mentored coursework, including didactic research, grant, we have expanded aninnovative curriculum, CTS pathways. by aCTSA inpart TL1 training Supported nonacademic translational research-related career that researchers mustbeprepared for academicand enhance the effectiveness of research teams, and and interprofessional training inteam science will program isbasedonthepremises that interdisciplinary The UFClinical& Translational PhD Science (CTS) Authors: WayneMcCormack PhD Scientists LevelNext - Team Training for Clinical and Translational Paper 1: Taking Interdisciplinary Team Science to the Thematic 3 Session SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts interdisciplinary researchinterdisciplinary projects. orsufficient –on integrationnecessary in collaborative, whether collective intentionality isacondition – ex-amined above, we willaddress thequestionof Human Performance, & andLiberal Journalism, Arts (Agriculture &Life Sciences, Engineering, Health& other colleges offering health-related PhD programs Nursing, Pharmacy, and Veterinary andfive Medicine) formation of TL1 Teams by using willbe driven inpart of collaborative research andteam mentoring. The research aim,andaddedelements one CTS-specific relatedproject to humanhealthordiseasewithat least dual mentors, research hasanoriginal dissertation each ofwhichidentifies basicandclinicalscience different degree programstwo in at least colleges, two ormore PhD students and/ordual-degree from training by implementing “TL1 Teams” comprised of core to isbeingextended research doctoral curriculum brought aboutby collaboration andteam science inthe The common themeoftransformational learning learning. viateam-based ethicaldecision-making practice Research”, student teams inwhichinterdisciplinary evaluation; and ofBiomedical Conduct “Responsible to team assembly, management, maintenance, and relatedscience of team science skills andpractice in whichstudents work inteams to aboutthe learn T0-T4 stagesoftranslational research; “Team Science”, an unmetmedicalneedanddevelop protocols for the Community, &Policy”, inwhichstudent teams identify “Translational Research & Therapeutics: Bedside, Bench, analysis, andpresentations. core Some courses include: work that requires team collaboration, discussion, strengthen research through experiential group skills Sciences). core was designedThe curriculum to CTS Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. 3:45-5:15pm Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 87 process. Preliminary findings suggest that team findings suggest that Preliminary process. as indicated effect positive had the intended training to compared behaviors social integrative enhanced by pre-training both typesReceiving F(1,47)=4.66, p<.05). be to also found only one was to compared of training (F (1,38)=5.43, effectiveness team to related positively p<.05). medical center ) can nurture team members’ trans- ) can nurture members’ team medical center disciplinary beliefs, the enduring values, orientation, support that skills, with and behaviors collaboration disciplinary diverse backgrounds, who have teammates of integrative the development which, in turn, fosters capacity. team training of these science effectiveness the test To conducted a large-scale we interventions, highly quasi-experiment in the field involving controlled 7 top across from teams 50 interdisciplinary science study uses a 3x1design, The schools. medical research one of three to assigned randomly are in which teams alone, mapping training team strategic conditions: or both alone, principles training communication the impact tracked on the of training We trainings. capacity ability and subsequent of integrative level knowledge and innovation. integrated generate to conducted in order collection and post data were Pre integrative of the team’s the development follow to capacity during their collaborative various points at Prior research suggests that interdisciplinary teams interdisciplinary suggests that teams research Prior a capability that capacity, an integrative must develop linking system an interactive is sustained through and processes and cognitive psychological, social, them can provide that in the team states emergent National This . succeed needed to with the resources investigates supported research Science Foundation capacity integrative of a team’s the development how impacted are knowledgeand subsequent outcomes team types two by of interventions: (1) strategic to team your assemble better mapping – learn to principles and (2) communication collaboration foster support– to cross-boundary knowledge sharing, to exposure that argue We and creation. integration our prior based on these interventions (developed study of sixty in one teams interdisciplinary research Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for a costly investment in scientific endeavors that do not that endeavors in scientific investment a costly the expected benefits. reap for managing collaborations, and team leaders who and team collaborations, managing for to lead experts not been trained scientific are but have can be consequence The of professionals. teams diverse diverse scientists is often elusive due to the make-up due to is often scientists elusive diverse of lack of understanding about best practices the teams, many cases these teams do not achieve the goal of do not achieve cases these teams many a joint knowledge solve to integrating successfully among goal of knowledgeThe integration problem. Although interdisciplinary scientific collaboration collaboration interdisciplinary Although scientific in suggests that evidence stories, success has many Science Effectiveness - The Role of Team Training Team The Role of - Science Effectiveness & Maritza Lant Salazar Theresa Authors: training model across institutions. model across training Team Capacity and 2: Enhancing Integrative Paper doctoral training for translational scientists, and scientists, translational for doctoral training opportunities the collaborative welcome expand to assist with data collection or analysis, etc. etc. collectionassist with data or analysis, transform to science of team using the science are We in which the research projects of individual team projects of individual team in which the research alternative provide each other, members will inform methods, analysis or data approaches experimental and/or at different parts of the T0-T4 continuum. continuum. T0-T4 parts of the different and/or at ways identifies plan that a team prepare Trainees such as a particular human disease being investigated such as a particular being investigated human disease organismal, cellular, (molecular, levels different at experimental approaches, different with population), but will be expected to meet established minimum meet but will be expected to research achievable expectations and anticipated interest, research a common have Teams TL1 outcomes. for TL1 funding. It should be emphasized that TL1 TL1 It that TL1 funding. be emphasized should for dissertations”, “team will not be workingtrainees on them to emerge on their own. Possible collaborators collaborators Possible own. on their emerge them to for their potential will be screened way in this identified students and eligibility of graduate TL1 mentors as optimal team-building where collaborators are picked picked are collaborators where optimal team-building for than waiting rather the network structure, from an alteration approach that uses social network analysis social network uses analysis that approach an alteration identify networksto of faculty analyze mentors to SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 88 operating procedure washed inhouse),3) for laundry about theoperations ofthehospital(e.g., astandard resources (e.g., when), 2)information whowas working four separate profiles: 1)information related to human profiles tasks). The hiddenprofile task was broken into best candidate, whichisacommon format for hidden members (rather thanataskfocused the onselecting be themostrelatable andunderstandableto allteam a problem around acommon hospitalinfection would program were medicalresearch teams, sowe felt that team inourinterdisciplinary training participating aureus) outbreak at ahospital. ofteamsThe majority task aboutaMRSA(Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus uniquely heldinformation, we created ahiddenprofiles ofclearcommunication focusedthe importance on orderIn to demonstrate to teams interdisciplinary communication training. for team withinterdisciplinary useinconjunction we felttask, that thismethodwas theoptimalmethod experiences onahiddenprofile ofteams working teams’between interdisciplinary experiences andthe would ofthesesimilarities suggest. Because expertise teams being lesseffective thantheir combined levels of problem at hand, whichresults ininterdisciplinary and/orc)adifferentexpertise, understandingofthe has a)adifferent background, b) adifferent level of researchinterdisciplinary team wherein eachmember This findingapproximates thedaily experience ofan to theproblem (Lu,pertaining Yuan, &McLeod, 2012). memberwas givenevery access to allinformation solution,comparedthe correct withteams inwhich withahiddenprofileteams taskwillfind working itlesslikelythatuniquely heldinformation, making more likelyto focus onshared information thanon that groups withahiddenprofile taskare working McLeod, from 2012).Results ametaanalysis reveal for many years (e.g., Stasser & Titus, 1985;Lu, Yuan, & profileHidden taskshave beenusedin team studies Shults Mackenzie Authors: Salazar, GiaDemichele, Maritza Theresa Lant, & Paper 3:Simulations for Team Science Training SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts positive withtheinformation that states that bleach about MRSAprofile would beable to counter thisfalse However, theindividualwhohasread theinformation the lackofhotwater hascausedthespread ofMRSA. the team comes memberoften to theconclusion that involvesfor laundry washing inhotwater withbleach, individual reads that thestandard operating procedure patient arrived at thehospital—when thissame aMRSAinfected thefirstnight after not functional would discoverparticipant that thewater heater was information. For example, inthe operations profile a happened at ahospital, aswell asfillerordistractor for solvingtheproblem ofhow aMRSAoutbreak Each profile contained keypieces ofinformation 4) information aboutMRSA(e.g., how itistransmitted). information aboutpatients (e.g., patient ), and and accelerate patientIn 2012theICR’s benefit. Cancer togetherbringing to diverse drive skill-sets discovery research teams, isfacilitated by multidisciplinary Europe. The to‘bench bedside’ modelfor translational comprehensive cancer centre, andthelargest in with theRoyal Hospitalisaworld Marsden leading The ofCancer Institute Research (ICR)inpartnership Authors: Amy Moore Development Paper 4:A Team ScienceApproach to Leadership Foundation grant. Group EffectivenessScience)Science in National (Building Resources for Integrating Disciplinesfor oftheBRIDGES student andmedicalteams aspart examples are basedonourwork withinterdisciplinary and development teams. withinterdisciplinary These canbeusedfor oftraining thepurposes this activity thispresentationIn we willprovide examples ofhow team interdisciplinary performance. impact ofcommunicationtypes (orlackthereof) an educational tool that demonstrates how different communication teams, as oninterdisciplinary serves withatraining focusedin conjunction onimproving theMRSAvirus.alone isenoughto kill This activity, Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 89 3:45-5:15 pm groups – with greater social capital are more likely to likely to more social capital are – with greater groups know little about how but we and collaborate, share as a community attribute, social capital is developed context. particularly global research in an increasingly on their personal networks to rely scientists While often to reluctant they are resources, and share access including data, knowledge, or IT assets. Research Research or IT assets. knowledge, including data, teams, – organizations, communities that has shown organisations..” and “it was particularly was have “it useful to and organisations..” leadership with people discussions about research industry also from they are publishing; after and in all, increased feeling Over90% cited key collaborators”. team and in in their abilityto lead a confidence team effective for required key relationships managing 50% of that revealed career-tracking year Three science. leader research the pilot cohort achieved successfully compared the majority in new organisations, roles, model This of less than 10%. UK sector the to average to approach of a collaborative the value demonstrates research. in scientific leadership development research funder (the Biotechnology and Biological Biological and funder (the Biotechnology research BBSRC), Council; Research Sciences the programme has seen 48 delegates launched in 2013 and so far was institutes. research UK different participate twelve from (building on US-developed resources) programme The supports a team to of transitioning the challenges deliver to key skills and explores required leader role e.g. in a multidisciplinaryscience environment skills. collaboration and negotiation, influencing, within perspectives multiple from provide Workshops research including current and outside academia, industry and journal funders, leaders, professionals 100% of delegates that indicated Feedback editors. of the nature the cross-organisational valued important “..really and variety of speakers: programme different perspectives arising from the different have to Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for Thematic Session 4 Thematic individuals and groups - gains importance individuals and groups in scientific sharing and using resources accessing, for communities As science becomes increasingly computational and computational increasingly becomes science As to social capital - the goodwill available data-intensive, Paper 1: Communities and Common Pool Resources in Resources Pool and Common 1: Communities Paper Perspective Social Capital Event-Based Science - An & Selim Louafi Welch, Eric Fusi, Federica Authors: SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Institute) in partnership with a major UK government namely “Pathway to Independence; Developing future future Independence; Developing to “Pathway namely world-leading by ICR and Organised leaders”. scientific Sanger Trust Wellcome the (e.g. institutes peer research science” approach to support to approach outstanding postdocs science” developing academic leadership by for prepare to programme, a cross-organisational and evaluating rationale for preparing scientists for leadership before leadership before for scientists preparing for rationale “team a ICR took The such roles. into they transition so in organisations they are new to. The value of value The new to. they are so in organisations has team science for leadership training effective is a strong , so there highlighted been previously Postdoc alumni data highlighted that most postdocs postdocs most that highlighted alumni data Postdoc do role leader an academic team who achieve postdocs demonstrates the global reach of our alumni, the global reach demonstrates postdocs in over represented with 30% of a sample of 232 alumni 20 non-UK countries. will move to a new organisation after a maximum of a new organisation to will move of destinations career into and research here 7 years and that the traditional boundaries of working the traditional and that within capacity limit collaborate. may to one organisation (postdocs) researchers Over 90% of ICR postdoctoral The ICR recognises that research career mobility seeds career research that ICR recognises The community expertise research the global cancer across Research Team Science Award, becoming the only non- becoming Award, Science Team Research date to of the award US recipient Therapeutics and Drug Development Units were Units were Drug Development and Therapeutics of Cancer the American Association by recognised and Documents Data, Events, and Collaboration: Resources Shared Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 90 scale scientific communities.Moreover, itwillenhance social capitalcanbecreated andsustainedinto large- those patterns willenhance ourunderstandingonhow communities might bechallenging, and mapping capital growth. Buildingcohesive andcooperative –determine thepatternsand boundaries ofsocial initial team, definingthe resource, designing rules developmentstages ofcommunity –setting-upthe and macro level behaviors anddecisions. Evolutionary built through acontinuous interplay between micro hypothesize that community-based socialcapital is across national borders, anddisciplines. sectors We communities that aimto promote resource sharing scientific anddevelopedconstructed withinlarge-scale This paperaimsat investigating how socialcapitalis larger andmore international. asresearchsocial capitalisimportant teams become Thus, understandingabout how communities develop engage inresource withinglobalcommunities. sharing access andshare resources, theyare reluctant to often While scientists rely to ontheirpersonalnetworks inanincreasingly global researchparticularly context. social capitalisdeveloped attribute, asacommunity share andcollaborate, butwe littleabouthow know groups –withgreater socialcapitalare more likelyto has shown that communities –organizations, teams, including data, knowledge, orITassets. Research communities for accessing, andusingresources sharing inscientificindividuals andgroups -gainsimportance data-intensive, socialcapital-thegoodwillavailable to As science becomes increasingly computational and Authors: Federica Fusi, Eric Welch, Louafi &Selim Science -An Event-Based Capital Social Perspective Paper 1:Communities andCommon Pool Resources in are buildingcommunities for resources across sharing studydrawsOur from theanalysis ofsixinitiatives that components are combined at thosedifferent scales. understandingofhowmissing critical socialcapital outcomes andvice versa. capitalliterature Social isstill decisions influence micro-level patterns andsocial and our understandingonhow macro-level actions SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. opportunities for interaction between themacroopportunities and process, by whichismarked events that create new of community-based socialcapitalisanon-linear show that thecreation andlong-term sustainability at different stagesofthecase. results Preliminary and identify sources andoutcomes ofsocialcapital been usedto develop anarrative for eachinitiative anddocuments for collected eachcasehaveInterviews - collaboration, cooperation, access to resources. trust, reciprocity andshared beliefs –andoutcomes as bothacombination ofsources -networks, resources, stage. maturity project We operationalized socialcapital considered heterogeneity inresources, and actors the uniquecontribution ofeachcase. We particularly samplingstrategya purposeful inorder to maximize different scientific fields. ourcasesusing Weselected an already functioning systeman already (Gaddis, functioning 2002;Gersick, processes inorder to maintain balance orimprove strategic to orredirect adjust structure decisionmaking eventsCritical are organizational situations that trigger incidents. system developers, andmanagersrespond to critical to understandhow teams ofscientists,is important to theconstantly evolving nature oftechnologies, it thus provide context arich to studyteam science. Due coordinated amongstdispersedscientists, activities that facilitates cyberinfrastructure Environments (VREs), (Cookework 2015). &Hilton, virtually Research Virtual research ortheir alarge teams whichconduct part large scale, complex investigations involve dispersed A significant numberofscientific pursuing projects Scott Poole Authors: Ashley Trudeau, Ahmed, & Marshall Iftekhar Perspective Research Environments Events-Based -ACritical Paper 2: Tracing theEvolution ofCollaborative Virtual distributed scientific communities are discussed. are shared. for Implications thebuildingoflarge-scale, are ofresources highlydependent onthetypes that the micro level. Moreover, patterns ofsocialcapital Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 91 provides “opportunities to increase knowledge in the increase to “opportunities provides theoretical and many sciences social and behavioral self- standard is because in addition to This traditions.” AddHealth items, reported and behavioral attitudinal also collects ego-centric as as well social network data The obtain bio-markers.blood and urine samples to studies dating back to the work of Price (1963). This This (1963). of Price the work back to studies dating ascertain of large-study seeks to whether the advent a represents the social sciences in scale panel datasets albeit on a smaller scale. similar development, embarking are this claim, we on a project investigate To panel large output of various the research examine to of Income Study Dynamics including Panel datasets, (NLSY), Youth of Study Longitudinal National (PSID), Health of Adolescent Study Longitudinal and National preliminary from present results we Here, (AddHealth). AddHealth. datasets: social science one of these large stated As investigate. is an ideal case to Health Add (http://www.cpc.unc.edu/projects/ on its website comprehensive “most addhealth/about), this undertaken” survey ever longitudinal of adolescents Institute National not only from funding from received but (NICHD), of Child Health and Human Development Co- agencies and foundations. also 23 other federal cross-disciplinary of broad, funding is a clear indicator AddHealth that also states website The interest. The expense of fielding such studies necessitates such studies necessitates of fielding expense The the to and thus leads of funding sources multiple and questions, of topics suite inclusion of a wide a broad to making of interest dataset the resulting and topics inclusion of many The of scholars. swath to scholars and perhaps prompts questions allows are that analyses sophisticated engage in nuanced, variables that for) control least (or at to attentive be critical. to found other disciplines have scholars from In short, of panel data depth and breadth the richness, investigations and integrative complex, make nuanced, possible. the growth in stimulating “big science” of role The in the teamwork projects and collaborative of large theme in science has been a prominent science natural Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for scholarship among social scientists. Panel studies are studies are Panel scholarship among social scientists. fields. across particularly collaboration foster likely to scholarship. We suspect that large, survey-based suspect large, that We scholarship. the scholarly community to available are that datasets interdisciplinary ‘bottom-up’ also servemay foster to down orchestration, prodding, or support. Jacobs prodding, orchestration, down are disciplines themselves (2013) makes clear that and serve of much interdisciplinary as a site porous, levels, and practiced in other places. It may even be It even and practiced may in other places. levels, or practiced without top- unintentionally, fostered A premise that guides the current study is that study is that guides the current that A premise other at be fostered well may interdisciplinary research focus on interstitial places like university research research like university places on interstitial focus and Dahlander 2014; (Biancani, McFarland, centers 2008). and Corley Boardman developing cross- disciplinary cross- developing research schools and/or date studies of IDR to (Sá many 2008). Indeed, centers and interdisciplinary research centers. Universities are are Universities centers. and interdisciplinary research funding cross-department and cross-college research IDR by facilitate to reorganizing and even endeavors and the National Institutes of Health are promoting promoting Institutes of Health are and the National supportingit by cross-cutting funding opportunities deal of interest on the part policymakers,deal of interest of science and academic researchers. administrators, university Science Foundation agencies like the National Federal Authors: Erin Leahey, Attila Varga, & Jerry & Jacobs Varga, Attila Erin Leahey, Authors: Interdisciplinary (IDR) is the subject Research of a great Paper 3: A Neglected - Interdisciplinary of Site Exchange Paper Large-Scale the Social in Datasets Sciences critical events involve a change in structure, policy, or policy, a change in structure, involve critical events practice. immediate action or a slow recognition of a problem of a problem action recognition immediate or a slow 1976). Decisionsof made because et al., (Mintzberg on organizational activities be on organizational (Gersick, 1991), may not temporally and are or unanticipated, anticipated be a sudden crisis requiring may Critical events bound. attention of organizational decision makers. Critical decision makers. of organizational attention impact 1976), in severity et al., (Mintzberg range events 1991; Mintzberg, Raisinghani, & Theoret, 1976; Poole, Poole, 1976; Theoret, Raisinghani, & 1991; Mintzberg, demand the that disruptions are 2004). Critical events SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 92 capture theextent to whichdiverse ideas are fully research,interdisciplinary because itdoesnotreally informative measure more modestlyasameasure of of research referenced inapaper. We refer to this ofthedisciplines. similarity This captures thebreadth the evenness aswell oftheirdistribution asthe(dis) ofdisciplines (i.e.,variety SCs)referenced, but also sophisticated measure that incorporates notonlythe what Alan Porter (2007:127)callsIntegration: a referenced Suchdata allowed articles. usto calculate references cited andtheSCsassociated withthose by these1686focal includingthenumberof articles, We information alsocollected abouttheworks cited scholarship. space the knowledge ‘covered’ by AddHealth based each constituent article. We rely ontheseSCsto define SCs are usedto classifyeachjournal, andby extension, management, andsocialpsychology. 1and 6 Between disciplines; examples includesociology, demography, SCs that roughly correspond to disciplinesorlarge sub- categories (SCs). subject There are approximately 250 institutional affiliations, name, journal abstract, and title, publication year, author names, we downloaded thefull WoS record, includingarticle notrepresentedjournals in WoS. For these1686 articles conference presentations, publishedin andarticles comments, replies, bookreviews, bookchapters, in Thomson Reuters’ Web omitting ofScience (Wos), that are indexedfocus articles onthe1686journal AddHealth ouranalysis data we (n=4806).In principally and presentations 2015)that utilize (asofOctober containing bibliographic information for all papers affiliated, weobtainedanupdated ENDNOTE library Principal Investigators oftheAddHealth are project From theCarolina Population Center, withwhich Data &Methods dataset.”this rich sciences andrelated fields to explore thepossibilitiesin of publichealth,humandevelopment, biomedical administrators “encourage researchers andstudents SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts whether and to what extent each article iscitingother whether andto what extent eacharticle also allowed these 1686focal usto ascertain articles Information obtainedfrom thebibliographies of scores closerto 1indicating greater interdisciplinarity. Perreault 2007). The IDRscore ranges from 0to 1,with relatively unrelated SCs(Porter, Cohen, Roessner, and a paper’s IDRscore increases asitreferences more, j(Rafols andMeyer 2010:267-8).Intuitively,category ofreferencedand pjistheproportion papersinsubject ofreferenced i, proportion category papersinsubject between SCsiandj,where piisthe sijisthesimilarity 1- 𝑆ijsijpipj parameterization Index: oftheStirling a particular integrated inthepaperquestion.Porter’s measure is published inmany different outlets(a total of386 AddHealth research, wewere findthat these articles As scope anotherindication oftheinterdisciplinary of articles. are onaverage more thanother interdisciplinary we analyze,articles allofwhichutilize from AddHealth, as 0.66(inBiotech Clearly, andMedicine). thesetof found IDRscores aslow andashigh as0.211 (inMath) Neuroscience, andPhysics), Porter andRafols (2009) Biotechnology,(Math, Engineering, Electrical Medicine, the meanIDRscore theirstudyof6fields to be0.62.In physics, Leahey, andStanko (2016)found Beckman, of disciplinesincludingengineering, life sciences, and fromtheir studyofover a broad range 25,000articles its level ofinterdisciplinarity iseven more apparent. In that otherscholarhave analyzed,samples ofarticles disciplines. When we compare AddHealth research to draw upononalarge,articles anddissimilargroup of median is0.8. This suggeststhat onaverage, AddHealth high: 0.78(recall thetheoretical range is0to 1),andthe The meanIDRscore isquite across all1686articles Results also utilize AddHealth data. initsbibliographythe percent articles that ofjournal ForAddHealth articles. eachfocal we calculated article, Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 93 We surmise the different ways people interact may may people interact ways surmise the different We about certain they think and feel do with how to have they interact and how technologies collaborative technologies. collaborative through of data an analysis from findings drawn present We discussed we where groups focus two at gathered results thus far clearly indicate the promise of studying the promise thus far clearly indicate results and cross-field of collaboration as a site panel datasets research. - Confusion Face-to-Face Virtual Chaos, 4: Paper Virtual in Stewardship and Document Academics Collaborations & Sawyer, Steve Willis, SarikaAuthors: Sharma, Matt Osterlund Carsten an ongoing study from findings drawn present We uses of practices, work on the shared focusing infrastructures on digital and reliance documents, Our findings of virtualcollaborations. scientific of teams collaborative driven organically suggest that with document grappling constantly academics are struggles The online. their work chaos when situating reflection of an inherent not of these academics are comes what Rather, or competence. disorganization people bring their personalities and mental clear is that and collide. intermingle that a collaboration models to grew, it become more specialized. Another measure of measure Another specialized. more it become grew, shows in two-modeclustering 4-ring closure, networks, preliminaryThese time. over increasing a similar trend, among scholars collaborations suggest that results over specialized more become have using Addhealth time. university will attach we In months, the coming assess or Shanghai) to rankings Leiden prestige (from taking is increasingly place whether collaboration as Jones et al. levels, prestige within (but not across) names authors’ will also disambiguate We (2008) found. professional on gender, data and collect individual-level and primaryage, department can analyze so we build plan to we While composition. in team trends the conference, the SciTS before on these analyses Abstracts Building the knowledge base for effective team science. effective Building the knowledge base for different institutions. Collaboration intensity is stable in intensity Collaboration institutions. different number of authors of a paper the period: the average network as the collaboration However did not change. AddHealth users. We know that roughly 75% of the know roughly that We users. AddHealth scholars from articles by authored are collaborative percentage is greater than for sociology articles than for more is greater percentage 2008; Moody 2004), and Leahey (Hunter generally practice among of collaborative suggesting a culture Collaborative research is also common among is also common research Collaborative articles 85% of AddHealth Overall, papers. AddHealth This scholars. or more two by co- authored are interdisciplinarity that meet or exceed that found in found that meet or exceed that interdisciplinarity other bodies of scholarship. that AddHealth scholarship has, in a short scholarship has, AddHealth periodthat of in witnessed increases 1997-2015) time (18 years: Mathematics (38% increase). Leahey, Beckman, and Leahey, (38% increase). Mathematics in mean IDR scores a 17% increase (2016) found Stanko suggest comparisons These 1979 and 2005. between 2005), and found upward shifts of 2.7%- range in the upward 2005), and found and (15% increase) Physics except all fields 6.5% for 2005) corresponds with other longitudinal analyses analyses with other longitudinal 2005) corresponds and Porter it. and likely exceeds of interdisciplinarity, (2009) studied a longer time periodRafols (1975- release (1997-1999) have a mean IDR score of 0.72; a mean IDR score (1997-1999) have release (2013-15). years three 0.80 in the last to this increases period (1997- the 18 year over 11% increase This author (Varga) has shown to be related to IDR. Articles to be related author (Varga) to has shown AddHealth’s years after published in the first three is 0.18. The positive correlation between publication publication between correlation positive The is 0.18. control when we even remains and IDR score year which one the number of articlesfor referenced, scholarship is becoming more interdisciplinary. The The interdisciplinary. more scholarship is becoming year with publication of IDR score correlation bivariate rehabilitation and urology. and urology. rehabilitation AddHealth time, over that also see evidence We represented, including biotechnology, computer computer including biotechnology, represented, gastroenterology, engineering, dentistry, science, oncology, microbiology, relations, international history, criminology, psychology, sociology, and many smaller many and sociology, psychology, criminology, WoS SCs are (160/250) of the half over total, In fields. journals are represented among the 1686 articles) among the represented journals are including of subject wide range a areas, across SciTS 2016 Conference: SciTS 2016 Conference: Day 3: Wednesday, May 18 94 Drive”use Google Isthetechnological equivalent of “I they have apreference to use. For example, “I refuse to personal opinionsonwhat collaborative technologies from eachother. Second, respondents their bring and teacher, mother, remain distinct andonlinesurfer four emailinboxes to ensure asaprofessor heridentity technologies. For example, one respondent maintains how theyare represented intheiruseofcertain thatlearned collaborators want to better understand Three findingsemerge from theanalysis. First, we data from participants. these vignettes, were elicit used asprobes to further questions, ofsemi-structured A series that builtfrom for review). The vignettes were read to participants. inthe previousconducted year CITEwithheld (See that hadbeen data interviews of23semi-structured in teamwork. These vignettes were developed from the vignette was aimedat data norms describing sharing to makesenseoftheorganization. trying The third several ICT’s, to anotherand moving from oneICT vignette ascenario aboutateam describes using teams share, store, andreuse documents. The second confluence ofdocuments inthe teamwork andhow given three vignettes. The firstvignette the describes and half. To frame theconversation were participants duration andthesecond focus group was anhour The first focus group was approximately onehourin collaborations. specifically inthearea distributed ofinterdisciplinary conversationspark aboutsuccessful collaboration, insight to existing ofattendees practices and analysis ofthefocus groups, we hopeto provide of thediscussionandto takenotes. From theinitial members were there to helpmanagethestructure members oftheresearch team. Research team informatics, andcommunications, metwiththree science andtechnology studies, anthropology, communitiesintellectual ofsociology, architecture, Across thetwo focus groups, 11scholarsfrom their own work indistributed teamwork environment. interested organize to abouthow learn participants distributed collaborative scientific practice. We were SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts This research isrelevant to theScienceof Team explicit practice. ontoand practices thecollaboration ifthere isnotan within agroup imposedifferent organizational schema collaborating through documents. That members document problems chaosandexperiencing with We seethisasaroot causeofgroups grappling with have to buildconsensus around use. those platforms andtherefore collaborative groups manager) collaborators different willbring schema to in use(for example: Dropbox, Drive, Google localfile example, that dependingontheplatform we observed it comes to organizing theirdocuments online. For mental modelsandorganizational schemawhen am avegan Irefuse to”. Third, have different participants technological platform. ofanyspecific characteristics standardized andshared models oforganizing documents, more thanto the we findthat people’s are practices tied to theirmental of software, platforms, tools, andtechnologies. And, work issustained through ofconfigurations avariety findings makeclearthat distributed collaborative to facilitate successful scientific collaboration.Our technologywhy orplatform there exists noperfect Science audience inthat ithelpsusto understand Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

Thematic Poster Group #1

Practical Resources, Tools, and Training

Poster 1 - UC Team Science Retreats: Promoting and team members, including males; this addition created a Furthering Research, Excellence and Diversity in Team climate of inclusion. It also gave all participants insights Science and training related to unconscious bias and the Authors: Susan Carter, Barbara Walker, John Crockett, & ways that men, women, and URMs navigate academic Susan Carlson careers differently. The activities will be expanded to the California State University System and additional Team Science (TS)-based research has become UC participants via the recently NSF funded Center for increasingly central in scientific discovery. Diversity on Research, Excellence and Diversity in Team Science. teams is known to have positive effects on creativity, innovation, and productivity. Having a strong network 4. Results. Institutions can combine components that of collaborators, mentors, and co-authors is critical support early-career scientists through a TS leadership to a successful academic career. However, women program within existing multi-disciplinary research and under-represented minority (URM) scientists are centers, including a component that values functional less likely to participate in TS collaborations and their diversity. These tools can support diverse scientific participation in these networks develops later in their teams to successfully compete for big opportunities. careers. Application and evaluation data from this program suggest that women and URM faculty perceive and 1. Relevance. Apart from its contribution to scientific experience different barriers to entering science breakthroughs and grand challenge problems TS has teams than their White male counterparts. Among beneficial impacts on individual research careers. the participants, confidence about TS competencies Giving women and URM scientists tools to engage in TS increased after the TS Retreat by an average of 29%. efforts earlier in their careers has numerous individual and institutional benefits. 5. Conclusions. The activities increase research and science capacity and impact, promoting the 2. Aims & Objectives. Institutional leadership can recruitment and retention of diverse faculty and a support TS efforts and increase the participation of stronger and more diverse STEM workforce. women and URM in leadership roles in science teams through specific early-stage interventions including faculty training approaches, Leadership and Team Poster 2 - Learning Theory, Operative Model, Formation Retreats, and asset-based concepts. and Challenges in Developing a Framework for Collaborative, Translational and Implementable 3. Methods. These methods are based on components Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Doctoral Research Day 4: of a pilot program “the UC Team Science Retreat” funded by an Elsevier New Scholars award and the Authors: Gaetano R. Lotrecchiano, Paige McDonald,

University of California Office of the President. The first Kenneth Harwood, & Mary Corcoran Thursday, May 19 Retreat took place at UC Santa Barbara in July 2014; a Doctoral dissertation research in many disciplines second was held in Pacific Grove, California in October utilizes a process of focused and specialized research 2015. These retreats included early to mid-career faculty to establish individual expertise through technical in the University of California (UC) system. The target knowledge discovery. This type of research purpose, audience was women (especially URM) researchers though arguably still dominant in many academic across STEM disciplines, including the social sciences. disciplines, is becoming challenged as more fields are While the retreats focused on issues facing women and confronted with recognizing the important roles of 1) URM scholars, we invited participation from multiple relevance and impact of research on social impact and

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 95 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 96 Authors: HalaAzzam Transdisciplinary Teams Poster AGame-Like 3-Questae: Training Tool to Build (Lotrecchiano, 2014). students of theirworkof doctoral andthepurpose that are theresult ofchanging attitudes andbehaviors highly relevant andimpact-focused research outputs anddevelopmentwill beusefulintheprioritization of preparation, dissertation doctoral single-researcher ofapproach,that thistype though seldomutilized in findings (Stokolsthat etal. impact 2008).We propose (Nash, 2008)cognizant oftheenvironmental factors of any onediscipline’s socialandscientific priorities Kosaraju etal., 2014)to work beyond theboundaries driven research (Trochim, andteaming 2011; priorities (Pohl, andimpact 2007),product Hadorn, andHirsch multilevel generation andtranslation knowledge proposed modelprovides aframework that encourages etal., 2008;Stokols,2008; Hirsch-Hadorn 2006).Our teamwork to inform ‘wicked’ socialproblems (Woolf, and thebenefitsofaccessing cross-disciplinary knowledge application of andefficiency of expediency need isanemerging tradition grounded inthepriorities social to impact to mechanisticbasicknowledge bring Stokols, 2013). The translational ofresearch capacity are intimately tiedgoals(Borrego &Newslander, 2010; discoveriesscholarly andprofessional problem-solving ever synergistic where networks socialandknowledge seemingly separate trajectories, are now more than for professional careers, and/orscholarly whileonce ofitsresearch goals.part student preparations Doctoral as experience withhighsocialimpact impact-driven research, thoughchallenging, canbeapedagogical and science research, we propose that dissertation doctoral economies, andatranslational approach to health collaboration knowledge science, cross-disciplinary model for research doctoral that of appliesprinciples Stokol, amulti-paradigm constructing 2005). By (Fuhrmann etal., 2011;Nash,2008;Mitrany and asrequisiteknowledge preparation ofgraduates integration andtechniques inthegeneration ofnew Seidl, 2010)and2)thebenefitsofcross-disciplinary implementation (Splitter & &Seidl, 2011;Nikolai SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts highly interactive tool that facilitates transprofessional Hypothesis: There isaneedto develop asystematic and adequately team training. focused ontransdisciplinary inthebusiness world haveteam buildingactivities not attention to therelationship whereas buildingaspect, training approaches inacademiahave paidlittle withdifferentparticipants mindsets. To date, existing a process whichcanfacilitate among connections relationships andtrust. This necessitates timeand ofanysolutions. teamwork At theheart isbuilding disciplines to work together innovative andbring a newgeneration ofprofessionals from disparate epidemics ofviolence, there isanurgent needto train overpopulation, diseasesand non-communicable problems suchasenvironmental degradation and aworld facingincreasingly In Objective: complex end theirtraining withaninterdisciplinary usesimulations forSome targeted interventions, others bringing teachers from various disciplinesto lecture. concepts orexposing students to different fields by methods,and lecture teaching abouttransdisciplinary training modalities, mostutilize thetraditional seminar begun experimenting withdifferent cross-disciplinary offindings:Summary While academic centers have transprofessionals. tools that would helptrain a newgeneration of grey literature to assessexisting interactive training outintowas carried PubMed, SciTSresources andthe Baltimore, 2013).FurtherMaryland, October research interprofessional inglobalhealth(University of skills and Coempower to discussbuildingdeveloping that convened academiciansfrom various universities inaroundtable meeting byconducted participating ofresearchDescription methods:Research was academic settingswillingto collaborate. refineImplement the andevaluatetool; 3) the tool in to evaluate interviews theprototype and and expert a prototype ofsuchatool; focus 2)Conduct groups Specificaims:1) work. researchConduct to develop in academiaandwillfacilitate project-based group needs. This tool would accompany traditional training team building, iseasyto adoptandcanbeadapted to Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

group project and journaling, but without much by at UNC, a Team Science Resource, a group of faculty way of preparing the students for their group activity. and staff, was formed within our CTSA to assemble These findings indicate a need for a tool that is highly multidisciplinary teams to apply for external grant experiential, interactive and removed from the support. Lessons learned can help others who assemble traditional didactic model of training. This tool would teams. borrow from the field of psychology, neuroscience Methods: Over two years, 21 teams were formed. Team and team science among others. It would need to members were selected by the Team Science Resource facilitate self-awareness, help participants understand which screened and selected funding opportunities the mindsets of others and embrace differences that specifically called for a multi-disciplinary approach using visuals to uncover mental constructs including and had sufficient funding to support multiple PIs. complex thoughts, emotions and attitudes that are Resource members nominated faculty investigators often unconscious or subconscious. While game-like from at least three disciplines to serve on teams. 18 interventions that seek to build teams using different teams were formed in this manner; the remaining 3 perspectives exist, none adopt a comprehensive teams were developed following a single workshop to and progressive approach towards building cross- develop proposals in response to research gaps related disciplinary teams. We report here the development to diabetes and obesity. Our measure of success was of Questae- latin for mindset -- a game-like training submission of proposals for funding. tool to build transdisciplinary teams. Questae is highly Summary of Findings/Results: 8 of 21 teams submitted interactive and takes the participants on a systematic a proposal and one team is planning to submit (43 %). journey of discovery and team work. It progressively For the teams that submitted at least one proposal, builds activities resulting in a transdisciplinary project 2 were funded and another two have the possibility activity based on real challenges. The tool uses of being funded. Successful teams were those where among other things visual cards, words, challenges a leader self-identified early in the process. Ten other and exercises focusing on interprofesssional groups did not submit proposals for various reasons, communication and professional mindsets, culture, which included: lack of leadership (no one stepped values, team composition, team roles and team forward); indecision on an approach or project; work activities to help participants understand their funding opportunity deadline was inconvenient; lack mindsets and that of others. of common logistics and time to meet; and waning Statement of how the research advances the SciTS enthusiasm due to extended timelines. field: To our knowledge this tool is unique in its focus Advancement for SciTS Field/Lessons Learned: The and comprehensive approach to professional mindsets process of selecting investigators and assimilating Day 4: and cross-disciplinary training. It will help advance teams to find an approach to funding opportunities Day 4: Thursday, May 19 the SciTS field by providing team members with was labor intensive. Coordinating meetings was time highly interactive and systematic approaches to build consuming, so interest in the project waned or other Thursday, May 19 cohesive transdisciplinary teams. activities took priority over team work. We have moved to assembling teams in a retreat setting, providing Poster 4 - Case Studies in Team Science: Observations sufficient time to develop a tangible product (such and Lessons Learned as draft of Specific Aims, or white paper) which we Authors: Karen Demby, Mary White, Richard Davis, surmise aids team cohesion. Feedback from teams Rachel Lerner, Thomas Egan, & David Peden led to various adjustments over time; most notably developing a team memorandum of agreement (MOA) Objective: To promote collaborative research funding and more structure around team facilitation and

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 97 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 98 Sources ofinformation for include: theworkbook of theareas listed below: planning theirteam science initiatives related to each questions for program staff onandanswerto in reflect we providesuccess. oftheworkbook, alistof As part ofkeytopics thatoverview facilitate team science a Team Science Workbook that provides staffwithan managing astandard portfolio. R01type We developed but managing thesegrants ismore complex than usefulwayscan bevery to move science forward, Recent experience withUgrants hasshown that these from 2006to 2016thanintheprevious 35years total. to fundteam science. We fundedmore Umechanisms mechanisms NIEHS isincreasingly usingconsortium PettiboneAuthors: Kristi Poster 5- Team Science Workbook for NIHProgram Staff content andmethodological expertise. some potential investigators principal andbalanced our latest endeavor, we endeavored that eachteam had balanced composition ofteams for iscritical success. In teams submitted proposals. This informed usthat of competent investigators. principal Noneofthese methodological experts. The final group was comprised andtheotherlacked one lackedcontent experts each would assume. Two groups lackedleadership; themwithoutcleardirectives interms ofwhichroleleft members were allowed into to groups. self-select This 3 teams that formed to respond to research gaps, the formation was helpfulandshouldbeapriority. For the • • • • • • • • • managing team science initiatives Feedback from program withexperience a TeamBuilding &CommunicationMeetings Preparing forResolution Conflict Governance Making RulesandDecision andResponsibilities Roles Structure &Goals ofa Understanding theBenefits Consortium Using aUMechanism SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts We willalsoincluderesources for evaluating team can consider inlaunchingateam science initiative. will provide examples questionsstaff ofthe reflection The and poster willhighlight eachofthesesections managing ateam science project. staff willhave created a concrete plan for effectively projects. Uponcompleting thediscussionquestions, and assesspast/current orto projects planfor future asa wayStaff canusethe to documentworkbook collaboration andcommunication, aswell asteam involving experiential exercises focusing upon science for sessions team scientists, two face-to-face online modules(TeamScience.net) involving team educational design, intervention whichincludestwo training interventions. Figure 1illustrates theoverall and educational process for future team science science training canbeimproved inbothcontent for existing translational science teams, andhow team effectiveness ofa team science educational program of thestudywere to determine thevalue and willbepresented. CTSC) The overall objectives ITS, NC Cornell CTSC, TraCS, NUCATS, UNM SCTR, institutions(CCTR, among sevenconducted CTSA Preliminary data for aneducational team pilotstudy Wooten, &Fruma Yehiely B. Tigges, William M. Trochim, Lori Wiseman, KevinC. B. Peden, Angela F. Pfammatter, Spring, Bonnie Beth Diazgranados Diazgranados, Cathleen T. David Kane, Allen R.Brasier, JuanJ. Cordero, B. Karen Demby, Authors: Damayanthi Ranwala, Gwen Baillargeron, PilotIntervention Study Poster 6-Multi-CTSA Team Science Training Environmental Public Health Evaluation Manual. Metrics science initiatives, suchasNIEHS’ Partnerships for Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. • • • • NIEHS Leadership Development Program literature team science andgroupOther dynamics NIH Field Guidefor Team Science team science initiatives withgrantees in Interviews whoparticipated Abstracts

diagnosis, needs assessment, and action planning. research is to fully define a human-centered design for collaboration software. Evaluative measures are being collected involves pre and post knowledge checks assessing effectiveness of Breezio, a software company that provides solutions online modules developed by Northwestern University, to enhance collaboration among teams, is launching a collaboration practices (Hall, et al., 2008), psychological user study to determine the qualitative enhancement safety (Edmonson, 1999), collective orientation (Driskell, of team functioning. A quantitative and qualitative Salas, & Hughes, 2010), and team member effectiveness web-based survey is distributed to research (Loughry, Ohland, & Moore, 2007). The results of these laboratories at the University of Maryland to assess the pre and post measures will be presented. Qualitative work processes of science teams. Users are working in data in terms of subject feedback for improvement in a variety of research fields from biology and chemistry the design and delivery of team science training, as to teaching and sociology. Survey questions are aimed well as observations from seven site coordinators who at identifying current collaboration tools used in these are responsible for the intervention will be depicted as settings to evaluate what capabilities researchers are lessons learned. The data collected from this training missing from current software tools. The survey is also intervention will be helpful in developing team science designed to capture work processes, policies, and training needs for the translational science teams which collaborative practices used by researchers. Results are is in line with one of the strategic goals of the NIH/ used to inform Breezio’s computer scientists as they NCATS. continue to improve upon the system design. Limitations exist with current software for virtual Poater 7 - Community Engagement Software Works To distributed teams. While social chatting features, Enhance Team Function file sharing, and email exist across a number of Authors: Karen Mccord, Laura Dress, David Proctor, & free services, none of these offerings provide the Josefine Engel opportunity to grow a sustainable knowledge network and accumulate bodies of work in one place. This The majority of research today is conducted in research research is advancing the science of team science by laboratories that consist of more than two individuals. understanding the needs of collaborative research In fact, most published research papers are written laboratories and virtual teams and translating them by two or more authors from multiple organizations. into technical requirements. Through this study, Breezio Wuchty et al. (2007) studied 22 million research articles can continue to build upon its human-centered design and found that the number of authors per team has for a new type of collaboration software. Since the user increased from 1.9 to 3.5 authors over the past 45 study is surveying laboratories in a range of research years. These collaborative efforts make it possible Day 4: fields, the software solution will be advantageous to Day 4: Thursday, May 19 for individuals with different expertise, ideas, and a large number of teams. In addition to developing resources to come together in the name of discovery additional features, integration with a variety of current Thursday, May 19 and innovation. At the same time, the shift towards software tools, virtual and distributed science teams team science has created new challenges around will be able to innovate and collaborate more efficiently coordination and communication. This work builds and safely, and as a result serve the global research on prior research conducted by Judith Olsen and community as a whole. Paul Mattessich on work processes in collaborative research by investigating what feature sets and corollary interventions are critical for virtual teams to be successful through a user study. The goal of this

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 99 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Hub Poster 9-CitSciBio.org- The BiomedicalCitizen Science Collaboration,Virtual Technology, &Citizen Science/Crowdsourcing 100 interdisciplinarity andtransdisciplinarity. We have recent publication patterns involving research about of aconceptual investigation andbibliometric of research beingpublished. We theresults report andtransdisciplinary aboutinterdisciplinary articles aboutinterdisciplinarity,articles and(B)where are questions: (A) how shouldwe thinkofthecategory, thisposter,In we provide answers to preliminary two literature andcontribute to it. difficulty forthose attempting tostay current withthe “fragmentation” inthisliterature presents significant to thefourand transdisciplinarity winds. The resulting scattering oftheliterature aboutinterdisciplinarity set ofobvious publication venues hasresulted inthe of different disciplines. The lackofacircumscribed that derive from avariety articles publish disciplinary butrather becausethey about multidisciplinarity not becausetheyconcentrate onpublishingarticles Nature; however, theycount asmultidisciplinary journals, suchasScience and are multidisciplinary as thepublication outletfor specificdisciplines. There or transdisciplinarity. Many serve academicjournals who wishto publishresearch aboutinterdisciplinarity results. This problem iseven more vexing for those tois determining thebestjournals disseminate their research andtransdisciplinary interdisciplinary conduct home. Acommon problemdisciplinary for thosewho cultures, andassuchyieldsoutputthat hasnoobvious combines ofmultipledisciplinary theperspectives research andtransdisciplinary typically Interdisciplinary O’Rourke Authors: DilynCorner, Thomas Padilla, &Michael Find Them Poster and aboutInterdisciplinarity 8-Articles Where to Thematic Poster Group #2 SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Gillanders Authors: Katrina Theisz, Jennifer Couch, &Elizabeth that articulate centralthat articulate dimensionsofthisliterature. (e.g., ‘interdisciplinarity’,terms ‘integration’, ‘complexity’) helps usfilter thekeyword lists, highlighting those collocation ofvarious terms. The philosophicalwork papers to generate keyword listsanddetermine the applied corpus analysis to software ourparadigmatic specification ofoursetparadigmatic articles. We techniquesbibliometric to provide additional We supplemented ourphilosophicalanalysis with featuresthe characteristic ofpublication. ofthistype analysis ofthecontent ofthesepapersto determine and transdisciplinarity. We aphilosophical conducted contributions to theliterature aboutinterdisciplinarity thatfields andjournals are paradigmatic examples of A. First, we publications collected from of avariety provided answers to asfollows: thesequestionsinturn transdisciplinarity. that publishresearch aboutinterdisciplinarity and concerns therange andnaturewill report ofjournals appear.in whichthearticles The main finding we publication onthejournals patterns based primarily or transdisciplinarity, we andanalyze willcollect that areeliminate notaboutinterdisciplinarity articles each publishedsince 2011.After winnowing thesetsto records from Web ofScience and PubMed --1,000from transdisciplinarity, we alarge willcollect setofarticle a highhitrate ofpapersaboutinterdisciplinarity and literature. Once we identify search that strings yield the nature andrange ofpublication venues for this as Web ofScience andPubMed, yieldinginsight into databases such tostrings beusedinsearching article willguideusindevelopingtransdisciplinarity search analyses of research aboutinterdisciplinarity and B. Second, thephilosophicalandbibliometric Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

In an effort to help connect the widely dispersed • Foster communication and interaction among practitioners and resources of biomedical citizen the geographically dispersed biomedical citizen science, NIH have teamed up with HUBzero to build science practitioners. the Biomedical Citizen Science Hub, CitSciBio.org. • Assess the infrastructure and computational The Hub (CitSciBio) is designed to be a collaborative demands associated with direct engagement of virtual environment, and to be complementary to the patients and the public in data collection, data existing citizen science and crowdsourcing websites donation, and data analysis. and project databases. The field of biomedical citizen • nvestigate and maintain informational resources science is ever expanding and changing, and resources on the ethical, legal, and social implications of can be difficult to find as they tend to be scattered research that uses citizen science methods. across different areas of the internet (scholarly publications, lay publications, recorded presentations, Impact on SciTS field: project portals, social media, etc.). Our intent is to Citizen science and crowdsourcing are emerging create an online collaboration space for this growing fields as methods of research. As more biomedical field, and to enable the gathering of references, researchers accept and adapt these methods (and methods, and communities to be discovered and as more citizen scientists partner with researchers), engaged by interested stakeholders. Users are able resources and infrastructure to support these to work on projects (anything from collaborating on endeavors become increasingly important. Over time, a blog series or a scholarly publication, to starting a much can be learned from those using CitSciBio to biomedical citizen science or crowdsourcing project), collaborate, learn, and engage each other in regards to store data and databases related to those projects, team formation, dynamics, and interdisciplinarity within upload different types of resources, such as fact sheets, the coordination and communication of distributed/ presentations, and collections of links to their favorite virtual teams. In the short term, the hub can help sources of information. HUBzero infrastructure also contribute knowledge, resources, and a collaborative allows for much more functionality which can be platform for researchers and citizen scientists to find unlocked or developed as needed. resources, methods, and team members. CitSciBio is designed to enable the community to: Poster 10 - The Team Science Toolkit: Practical Tools for • Promote the evaluation of citizen science Success in Team Science methods and assess which kinds of scientific questions are best-addressed using citizen Authors: Amanda Vogel, Kara Hall, David Garner, & Elliot science approaches. Grant Day 4: • Share knowledge, common practices, and Are you an investigator who works in teams or Day 4: Thursday, May 19 successful citizen science methodologies to the leads teams? Are you an academic administrator or

biomedical citizen science research community organizational leader who would like to create an Thursday, May 19 and other stakeholders. organizational climate that fosters success in team science? Are you a funder who would like to better • Build expertise and resources to support the support or facilitate team science? Do you need rapidly growing field of citizen science. measures or instruments for SciTS research, or to use • Advocate for and support open and citizen- in quality improvement oriented evaluation? The Team inclusive (empowered) data sharing and the Science Toolkit has practical resources to help you development of tools and platforms necessary to achieve your goals. do this effectively.

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 101 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 102 field, teaching team science, orstudying team science. whoare usingteam science experts inthe selected collaboration.and interdisciplinary Authors are hand- to enablemeta-analysis andintegrative data analysis, crowdsourcing harmonization ofmeasures to support and reuse, training undergraduates inteam science, issuesas:data sharing addressed suchwide-ranging blog feature onthe Toolkit. Recent blogpostshave The population poster alsohighlights thevery agencies, andSciTS scholars. generated by investigators, administrators, funding team science. The Toolkit’s tools have practical been oriented evaluation, andrecognition andrewards for team functioning, team training, improvement quality that are available onthe Toolkit, to helpwithformation, This poster tools highlights for practical team science (SciTSlist). listserv the success ofteam science, andavibrant linked relevant perspectives knowledgeable to maximizing Toolkit blogfeaturing alsoincludesapopularexpert scholarship relevant to success inteam science. The resources from thewiderange ofdisciplinesgenerating team science; and(3)abibliography that integrates team science; (2)measures to studyorevaluate tools topractical helpengagein,facilitate, orsupport The Toolkit offers threetypes of main resources: (1) currently includesover 2300resources. are continually beingadded.functionality The Toolkit Conference of2011.Newcontent inthespring and Institute, anddebuted at theAnnual International SciTS The Toolkit was created by theNational Cancer “state ofthescience” intheSciTS field. evolving store knowledge that represents thecurrent or download Toolkit resources, creating acontinuously members oftheSciTS community. Anyone canupload leverages andresources thecollective knowledge ofall baseofresourcesknowledge andinformation that or studyteam science. contains auser-generated It help you engagein,lead, facilitate, evaluate support, cancer.gov) for resources isanonlineone-stop-shop to The TeamScience Toolkit(www.teamsciencetoolkit. SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Foundation, isanevolving, community dynamicvirtual EarthCube, aninitiative oftheNational Science Joshua YoungAuthors: Poster andtheScience of 11-EarthCube Team Science produced by teams. ultimately helpto ofthescience maximize thequality fordirections team science andresearch, practice and team science aswell asSciTS research, stimulate new replicationreduce tools for ofpractical unnecessary interested inteam science. doingso, By the Toolkit can broadly available to thewiderange ofstakeholders forpractices team science, andto makethisknowledge diverse andgrowing abouteffective knowledge Overall, the Toolkit aimsto integrate andunifythe Framework tell usabout Cybersecurity asaHomeland leads usto our research question: What cantheSciTS as acontinuous challenge over thelongterm. This management andinvestment, risk, with cybersecurity and businesscommunities have wrestling started years inparticular, allareas ofthehomelandsecurity still evolving across academic communities. The last few field stilldefiningits nature Itisan and area practice. large scale;andyetits very thisremains arelatively new the Federal Cybersecurity R&DStrategic Plan illustrates withotherR&Ddomains;thenewversionconnected of Cybersecurity isastill-growing fieldgettingever more Scott TousleyAuthors: Science & Technology Challenge Poster 12-Cybersecurity R&DasaHomeland Team science ofteam science projects.transdisciplinary and theapplication ofconceptual modelsfor communications andcoordination, governance, the Science of Team Science conference regarding has valuable real-world lessonsandquestionsfor in2011,EarthCube community-led initiative started professionals. As aninherently transdisciplinary social scientists, educators, anddata andinformation polar, planetary, atmospheric, geospace, computer and of more ocean, than2,500contributors, includingearth, Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

Team Challenge of applied, cross-domain research and large and shifting field. Other team elements we development? expect to address include the linkage of R&D and Operations staff in Operations Research efforts; the The purpose of this study is to use SciTS thinking to teaming of Information Technology and Computer help homeland-focused Cybersecurity R&D managers Science expertise with Physical domain expertise; better develop and execute their work in this changing and the need to develop teams that can bring area. This effort will involve: together complex cyber-based systems safety and A) Literature review of both Cybersecurity R&D security. We also expect to leverage Dr. Gina Ligon’s planning and SciTS reference materials; work, “Strategic Planning for Collaborative Problem Solving: A Study of Public-Private Partnerships,” and B) Design of a flexible survey instrument (primarily her concept of Problem Complexity and Collaborative qualitative); Distance dimensions. Through CSD, we have access to 2000+ Cybersecurity R&D practitioners across the C) Survey of ~500 Cybersecurity R&D practitioners; academic, business and international communities, so D) Analysis of results, Conclusions and a White Paper we expect to generate a substantial number of survey responses at the core of this planned work. We can also E) Outcome discussions with the Federal Cybersecurity leverage informal assistance from Dr. Stephen Fiore, Dr. R&D community Reeshad Dalal (GMU) and Dr. Jared Freeman (Aptima) The primary focus of this study will be at the individual/ in conducting this work. We expect that this work will team level; we already see many cybersecurity R&D not only help the Cybersecurity R&D community, but efforts where a team proposed for the work involves will also contribute to the SciTS field, in areas such as individuals from several different academic domains, Coordination and Communication, Institutional Policies, or a combination of academic and business team Multi-level and multi-team systems, Leadership, members, etc. A secondary focus will be on the Organization/Management Factors, Research institutional/organizational level, as many academic Networking, Learning and Knowledge Networks, and business R&D organizations are looking at how Team Assembly/Composition/Dynamics, Technology to drive organizational change to better address this Transition, and Public Private Partnership.

Thematic Poster Group #3

Collaborative Engagement Day 4: Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Poster 13 - Building Trust in a Distributed Federal Team: the process of upgrading, is the cancer Data Standards

Outperforming the Classical Team Norms Registry and Repository (caDSR) at the National Cancer Thursday, May 19 Institute. caDSR falls under the Center for Biomedical Authors: Aras Eftekhari Informatics and Information Technology (CBIIT). Most, if A federally funded contract offers a unique teaming not all, teams within CBIIT are a case for interoperability dynamic that creates public-private partnerships, research in themselves, as IT professionals, data governed by strict rules and policies, yet demanding a scientists, and biomedical researchers collaborate to high level of collaboration and efficient use of public provide services and systems to the cancer research monies. More specifically, and for this case of a private community. company providing support of federal system that is in

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 103 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 104 experimentation to provefurther thiscase, andmake this case(alongwithafew otherexamples), setup efficiently and effectively. Thisposter intends to present more team performs that thisdistributed andvirtual where teams are concentrated inone physical place, that, compared to otherclassicteaming schemes team, Ibelieve experience withadistributed/virtual After approximately oneandhalf years ofcaDSRproject system extensibility. ensures success, project stronger collaboration, and technologies that canbe utilizedcutting-edge also efforts, alongwith researching emerging trends and inthe research.similar efforts Keepingtrack ofthese users,to better whilekeepingtrack serve ofallother ongoing withsystem requirements constantly evolving The planningprocess for eventual system upgrade is pages.updates andmilestones viapublicfacingwiki documentation usingcloudbasedsystems, andshares plan that is updated basis, on a weekly manages project viaweb weekly twice teleconferences, follows aproject effectively managetheproject. team meets This virtual communication methodsandmediumsare utilized to team anddifferent isdistributed across thecountry haveeffort beenspent indevelopment. The project more guarded inacasewhere years ofenergy and already somewhat guarded to contractors andeven to team success. However, afederal environment is building trustofthat team project would bevital If anewproject kick-off.contractor were to join, team members assigned to since thisproject project caDSR hasbeeninusefor over 10years, withsome teammates inthisenvironment? can afreshly newcontractor buildtrustoftheirfellow efficient collaboration wasn’t difficultenough, how and indifferent time zones? As ifthechallenge for technical managersare distributed across thecountry in theDCMetro area for example, yet and project side)? Additionally, what ifsuchanITsystem isbased federal contract are met(federal sidevs contracting ensure that terms andneedsfrom bothsidesofa professionals from suchdiverse career backgrounds and How canateam madeupoftechnical experts SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Institutes of Health – is working withinamultilevel ofHealth–isworking Institutes oftheNational Health andDisparities Minority Sciences Research (OBSSR) andtheNational of Institute Behavioral of by Social and theNIHOffice supported Lá) –adata driven team science planninggrant forImplications Health andHealthBehavior (Aqui Objective: Transnationalism, andCulture: Networks AraujoCristina Brinkerhoff, & Eduardo Siqueira Negron, Rosalyn Authors: LindaSprague Martinez, transnational communities inMassachusetts process totransdisciplinary studyculture in Poster 14-Project Aquilá: engaged Acommunity research. the appropriate contributions to expand Team Science discussions aboutshared experiences ofcultural of thecultures theybelongto, andengagedinlively pedagogy,in critical explored attributes participants ten cultural conversations steeped (n=90participants), by employing several methods. data collection During influenced by bothtransnational andlocalecologies the notionthat health behaviors andattitudes are is needed. Methods: We collaboratively explored influencing thehealthand wellbeing ofimmigrants contextualized understandingofthecultural factors culture operates at different levels, a more complex and declining healthamongimmigrants [6-8].Because determinantof acculturation, of asanimportant implicated culture, more specificallytheprocess immigrant healthworsens over time, research has we donotfullyunderstandthemechanismsby which over timeandacross generational status [5].Although however theseprotective benefitsfadedramatically [4]; outcomes [1-3]anddiseasemortality birthing found to present protective to withrespect factors between two nations. Immigrant status hasbeen emotionally, socially, andinsomecasesphysically transnationalDominican immigrants whoare living Here and There, ofmany Brazilian and isthestory and transnationalism onhealth.Aqui Lá,meaning framework to conceptualize ofculture theimpact Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

adaptation, transnational practices, and health basic research frameworks. concerns. Egocentric social network interviews (n=58) allowed us to visualize and explore socially grounded Poster 15 - Negotiating Boundaries: Effective practices which included transnational movement Leadership of Interdisciplinary Environmental & and activities, individual and group-level performance Sustainability Programs of cultural beliefs and behaviors, and interpersonal Authors: David Gosselin, Deana Pennington, & Shirley influences on health beliefs and behaviors. Finally, Vincent using Photovoice (n=9) we explored elements of A special issue of the Journal of Environmental Studies participants’ living and social environments that and Sciences explores challenges and opportunities influence cultural practices. Based on themes that confronting higher education related to leadership emerged from the preliminary data, a diverse group and teamwork. The creation of linkages between of six scholars and practitioners was identified and students, faculty, administration and community recruited to take part in the charrette planning stakeholders is necessary to address the many “wicked dialogues with the core planning team. Charrette problems” facing society. One common thread among sessions were structured so that the core planning team the 23 papers featured in issue that higher education presented themes, and participants provided feedback, is being challenged to collectively reexamine and in the context of their own research. We conducted change the paradigms under which they operate. a total of five charrette sessions, each informing the Each of the articles express explicitly or implicitly next. Sessions were taped and transcribed, and a that change happens through relationships and thematic analysis was completed between sessions, negotiating boundaries between individuals, groups, with data used to inform the next session. We identified and organizations. This issue explores the challenges key themes across discussions. Thus, the process was of leadership and program development at different iterative and helped to reinforce concepts that arose scales from student and faculty learning to institutional during data collection and helped narrow the scope initiatives that span across an entire campus. The for the following phase of the project. Summary: We leadership, relationship development, and boundary found that the most salient health concerns expressed crossing experiences presented in the papers in this by both Dominican and Brazilian immigrants were issue address four primary themes – Interdisciplinary related to mental health, particularly stress and distress. Team Building Strategies, Curriculum and Community Another important conclusion from the planning Connections, Institution-Level Leadership and process was that our project’s social network approach Perspectives, and Interdisciplinary Leadership and was a particularly promising way to collect data that Scholarship Support. Each of the individual papers illuminated cultural processes at multiple levels, namely address a pressing need in interdisciplinary and Day 4: Thursday, May 19 the individual and interpersonal relationship level. Day 4: transdisciplinary work for development of effective, Therefore, as a starting point for the design of the pilot situation-relevant methods for negotiating disciplinary study, we systematically assessed the distribution of Thursday, May 19 and professional boundaries. cultural knowledge within social networks to determine relationships between networked culture and health Poster 16 - Using a Pilot Grant Program & Teamwork outcomes, Networked Cultural Consonance. Innovation: Training to Improve the Knowledge and Skills of An important innovation of our work is that we brought Science Teams together elements of successful intervention and applied research modalities, such as community-based Authors: Patrick Barlow, Joseph Zabner, Georgeanna participatory research and popular education (Freire Robinson, Beth Knudson, Gary Rosenthal, & Greg 1973) and were able to integrate them in the context of Stewart

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 105 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 106 to 4.0(onascaleof1-5),or “Moderately Improved.” ofmeanratings rangingwith themajority from 3.0 related andknowledge to teamtheir skillsets science though theworkshop experience improved both feltEvaluation general, as In Results: participants over thecourseparticipants ofthefundingperiod? demonstrated theworkshop during or skills usedby what ways c)In future are cohorts? thetools and/ workshop, andinwhat ways canitbeimproved for the perceived usefulnessandoverall ofthe quality relatedand knowledge to team science? b) What is perceiveparticipants animprovement intheir skills evaluation questions:a) To what extentdidworkshop of thefundingcycle. We focused onthefollowing midway through and(3)at theend thefundingcycle; (2) (1) immediately theworkshop after (thisreport); over thecourse ofthepilotgrant fundingperiod: isoneofthree planned The data collections survey (total responsesto alltraining =87). participants Training Evaluation: was distributed Apapersurvey andsmallgrouplectures activities. influence team processes. Training consisted ofshort how ofteam characteristics memberscombine and (a) whoshouldbeincludedinaScience Team and(b) and 3)Identify aneffective approach to determining effective stages Science transition andaction for Teams, 2) Apply concepts oftemporal sequencingto plan benefits andobstaclesassociated with Science,Team 1) Understandthe ofhelpingparticipants objectives Training Description: Teamwork training hadthe Science (SciTS). 2-hour training sessionfocused ontheScience of Team proposal process, team membersagreed to attend a being invited to submitfullproposals. ofthe As part submitted LOIs, whichwere evaluated with25teams Letter ofIntent (LOI).one-page teams Eighty-one science teams andsubmitaninitial transdisciplinary the University ofIowa were encouraged to form new the development ofscience teams. Researchers at Pilot Grant Program goaloffacilitating withaprimary at theUniversity ofIowa institutedScience (ICTS) a Program Goal: The for Institute Clinical& Translational SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts including thepotential benefitoftraining team information for improving future training sessions, a 4or5.Qualitative data alsoprovided critical who responded to theiragreement thisitem ranking Team Science Pilot Grant Program with57outofthe70 workshop shouldcontinue to bearequirement for the Participants tended to agree orstrongly agree that the work (M=3.90,3.95,and4.03,respectively).day-to-day both thetopics andexamples were relevant to their content oftheworkshop itselfwas appropriate and = 4.17,SD1.0).Participants tended to agree that the was themost-improvedtaskwork area knowledge (M while thedifferentiation between teamwork and highest average improvement (M=4.17,SD0.90), felt theyhadthe withwhichparticipants as theskill onthe team science processReflecting was perceived in whichanoverarching understanding ofthenatural to Kuhn, philosophersofscience grappled withways seminal text TheRevolution. StructureofScientific Prior which Thomas Kuhn examined andsynthesized in his overarching mental constructs, suchasparadigm shifts, each ofusexperiences. Science hasbeenguidedby worldthat shapeourunderstandingoftheexternal mental modelsIamreferring to allmental constructs role that mental modelsplay inscientific research.By from andcolleagues. isthe friends It discussion apart but whichIhave notbeenableto finda venue for address atopic, whichIhave about beenthinking Narrative: This poster sessionhas prompted meto Judith TavelAuthors: Thinking Poster andCollaborative Models 17-M&S,Mental content andapplication. relatedincrease andskill to SciTS bothknowledge teamwork hands-on training helpedparticipants approachOur ofPilot Grant Funding that included teamwork for iscritical advancing skills Team Science. Advancement ofSciTS field:Helpingscientists develop areas to beincludedinthePilot Grant proposals. and closelyintegrating training content withtopical members together to facilitate shared mental models Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

world has evolved and changed through time. These and even lives. However, it is also perilous. The peril is overarching mental models are extremely important. often seen only in terms of whether the models and However, I have become increasingly interested in what the simulations have real world validity. This is crucial. I believe is a more powerful kind of mental modeling, However, the problems for which science seeks answers which is subtle, elusive and usually ignored. It is the and the frontiers which science wishes to explore are kind of mental modeling, which the neurobiologist, becoming more and more complicated, complex and Harry J. Jerisson, expressed in his statement: “The work even wicked. Moreover, various disciplines need to be of the brain is to create a model of a possible world combined in order to address the multifaceted nature. rather than to record and transmit to the mind a world Thus, teams are needed and it is essential to construct that is metaphysically true.” teams, which can rise to the challenges science is My interest in subtle mental models that shape what we facing. The Science of Team Science is important for do and think, how we act and react, interpret, express, addressing these challenges. conduct research, etc. is a result of a commitment My work with M&S in general has made me increasingly I made 9 years ago to writing a comprehensive, concerned that all of the mental models, which are introductory text on Modeling and Simulation, M&S. behind the scenes when research teams are constituted At the time I was a Dean at DeVry and part of the and the research is being designed, developed, launch of DeVry’s Game and Simulation Program. implemented and analyzed, may go unnoticed. Often There was simply no adequate introductory textbook mental models are only considered in terms of whether for the program. Right after the launch, I retired and or not team members are compatible, “getting along” took on the challenge of pulling together the entirety with one another and working efficiently to carry out of M&S and writing an introductory textbook. 2007 the necessary tasks to produce results. The importance marked not only the start of my research but coincided of this is indisputable and my interest in mental models with the first formal declaration of the importance in no way dismisses this importance. However, the of M&S. In July of 2007 the House of Representatives object of this poster presentation is to initiate a deeper passed House Resolution #487, establishing M&S as discussion of mental models. How can mental models a National Critical Technology, a technology which is be determined in order to enhance collaboration? How essential for the safety and prosperity of the U.S. This, can the various mental models of various disciplines be of course, will not come as a surprise to any scientist. combined to enhance collaboration? How is diversity Research that occurs in the virtual world of a computer of mental models important for success of a team’s is commonplace. Whether it is called in silico research, project? What role do mental models play in the computer-based science, cyber-enabled exploration design, development, implementation and analysis of a and experimentation, and so forth, most science is project? Day 4: Thursday, May 19 enabled and enhanced by working in the realm of Day 4: emulated reality. I have chosen to call this the realm of Poster 18 - Enhancing Team Composition in Professional emulated reality by reference to emulation, in which Networks: Problem Definitions and Fast Solutions Thursday, May 19 one electronic computer performs calculations in the Authors: Liangyue Li, Hanghang Tong, Nan Cao, Kate manner of another. M&S-based scientific research Enrlich, Yu-Ru Lin, & Norbou Buchler performs real world activities within cyberspace based on mathematical models that represent the object of In this work, we study ways to enhance the the research and mathematical manipulations that composition of teams based on new requirements in simulate real world activities. Being able to do this is a collaboration environment. A promising algorithmic extremely powerful: it saves money, resources, time approach to team composition treats a team as a subgraph embedded in a larger social network. We

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 107 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Training, Education, andProfessional Development in Team Science 108 shown that specific communication patterns among eachother.members know Furthermore, research has before better when andthat distributed teams perform members prefer to work withpeopletheyhave worked is backedby somerecent studieswhichshow that team aswell similarity. asstructural similarity The proposition original andthenewteams, whichincludesskill maintaining theteam-level between the similarity the disruptioninduced by theteam alteration by common technical solutions. We propose to reduce these problems canbeformulated inaway to share amongtheabovesimilarity four casesandpropose we carefulBy identify inspection, theproblem disruption shouldbeminimized. resource. alltheabove In four cases, theresulting oftheavailable to newchallenge suchasashortage the size ofateam needsto bereduced inresponse sets andcommunication structure. (4) Team Shrinkage, skill expand theteam by addingamemberwithcertain communication connections. (3) Team Expansion, to setsand member withanotherthedesired skill which considers refining a team by replacing one member becomes unavailable. (2) Team Refinement, best alternative from therest whenateam network team members. The central questionisto findthe Replacement,Member whichconcerns of thechurn the scope of Team Enhancement, namely, (1) Team Specifically, we address afamily ofproblems under up thecomputation. and(3)wekernel; design efficient algorithms toscale approachin aprincipled withthenotionofgraph based onnewrequirements; (2)we solve theproblem ways: (1)we alter thecomposition ofanexisting team differentiate our fromwork inthree previous efforts Armed withtheaboveArmed conjecture, we adoptthe team membersare for critical performance. Thematic Poster Group #4 SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. between theexisting andthenewteams. We perform for thesmoothnessandcorrespondence exploring designing thepruningstrategies analyses andmetric we propose by afamilyoffastalgorithms carefully of size 10. To address thecomputational challenges, would take6,338sto findone replacement for a team DBLP dataset withalmost1Musers, we found that it is computationally intractable. For example, for the one team refinement/replacement/expansion, which would require O(n)graph computations kernel for withnindividuals,network astraightforward method simultaneously. similarity structural However, for a andthe cannaturally similarity kernel capture theskill the lensoflabeledgraph for modelingteams, graph team-level for similarity Team Enhancement. Through tonotion ofgraph characterize the similarity/kernel team-net-work.org. proposed problems. website project Our is:http:// along withitsfastsolversalgorithms to address the of team science, andpropose graph based kernel to sciencedata mining, mininginparticular network onmultipleskills. carrying We in ourexpertise bring of ateam inthecontext ofnetworks, where nodes scope of team enhancement to alter thecomposition conclusion, weIn defineafamilyofproblems underthe multivariate data. network embedded inlarge-scale that enablesvisualanalysis ofteamscalled g-Miner sub-linearly. We alsodevelop aninteractive system arealgorithms orders ofmagnitude faster andscale average recall (2)ourfast andprecision, respectively; choices, we achieve 27%and24%netincrease in replacement result. Compared withthebestalternative matching, andstructural skill itleadsto amuchbetter Specifically, we findthat (1) byencoding boththe ofourmethods.the effectiveness andefficiency extensive evaluations empirical to demonstrate Abstracts

Poster 19 - Preparing for a PhD: A Transactivity industry-university partnership where industry pays Approach membership fees to support university-based research. Authors: Anthony Hood, Crystal Allman, Zakiyyah The NSF’s role is to reinforce consortium model of the Kennedy, & Alicja Foksinska partnership and provide a comprehensive evaluation The current manuscript adopts a novel approach to component for the program. This consortium model addressing the issue of faculty diversity by framing preserves the collaborative nature of the centers across it in part as a socio-cognitive problem. Integrating organizational, sector and disciplinary boundaries. theoretical insights from the domains of transactive Even though I/UCRCs’ evaluation component has been memory and transactive goal dynamics, we present a recognized by the National Academy of Sciences as one new framework referred to simply as transactivity. of the best examples of the improvement evaluation, We use this transactivity framework to advance it is still limited to methods that focus on long-term understanding of the doctoral admissions process. We outcomes (e.g. IP, publications) and microeconomic position transactivity as a socio-cognitive framework analysis. These metrics tend to omit the team science that describes the extent to which individuals aspect of scientific process and, particularly, the extent develop a cognitive and behavioral division of to which graduate training helps students acquire labor to mobilize the tasks, expertise and people professional social capital needed for their professional necessary to set and pursue goals—in the current growth. manuscript, gaining admission to a doctoral program. Current research project represents an application We posit that by establishing such a cooperative of the Scientific and Technical Human Capital (STHC) arrangement for learning and employing the nuances approach of Bozeman, Dietz and Gaughan (2001) of selecting, applying to and securing admission to to evaluation of graduate training of science & doctoral programs, prospective doctoral students can engineering students by measuring their professional minimize the likelihood of emotional overload, stress social capital and other outcomes. A quasi-experiment and fatigue that may delay or deter the admissions included a matched sample of doctoral students in process. We employ this transactivity framework engineering and computer sciences trained at the I/ to organize insights gained from the authors’ first UCRCs (N = 173) and doctorate students from the same person experiences with and observations of the universities who were not part of any research center Annual Conference of The Phd Project, a non-profit (N = 87). The groups were compatible in: gender (23% organization dedicated to increasing ethnic diversity female), age, immigration status (56% international, in academia and the workplace. Implications, consistent with national average), disciplines, GPA recommendations and directions for future research on and time spent in graduate school. The list of I/UCRC Day 4: Thursday, May 19 the diversity of science teams are offered. students was obtained from the I/UCRC directors and Day 4: the list of non-center students (control group) was Poster 20 - Assessment of Professional Social Capital obtained by data mining corresponding universities’ Thursday, May 19 of Doctoral Students: Testing a New Framework of STI websites. Evaluation The findings showed a significant I/UCRC training effect Authors: Olena Leonchuk on most components of professional social capital and The NSF Industry/University Cooperative Research other outcomes. Nevertheless, some of the I/UCRC Centers (I/UCRCs) represent one of the most well- effects were significantly mediated by immigration known long-term government investments in science, status (US vs. International) and dosage of the center technology and innovation (STI). The I/UCRCs are involvement. In addition, the study showed a pattern mostly self-sustained as they represent an example of where international students trained at I/UCRCs were

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 109 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 110 how the process ofbecoming professionals entails in asituated framework learning that characterizes acting,thinking, andbeing. This research isgrounded waysthese experiences asdistinct ofcross-disciplinary andtheways theymake senseof arts), and performing disciplines (engineering, scientice, business, liberal withothersfromexperience different working researchpublished empirical ontheways engineers This poster summarizes findingsfrom previously borrowing andtranslating ideasto newcontexts. of seeingtheworld, lossof “home” oridentity, and as languagedifferences, clashingparadigms or ways areboundaries by marked significant challengessuch movements andnon-disciplinary across disciplinary interdisciplinary, inquiry. andtransdisciplinary These involvedspanning practices inmultidisciplinary, used to broadly ofboundary characterize acollection problem settingandsolving. is Here, cross-disciplinary system, andcreating integrative frameworks for to andleveraging differences, seeingthebroader who canthinkandwork across -attuning perspectives professionalsThey needto become cross-disciplinary tolearning overcome ofwork. challengeswiththiskind work aswell asrecognize andself-managetheirown collaborativeconditions for successful cross-disciplinary sotheycancreate practices knowledge the disciplinary Professionals in cross- needto develop expertise Authors: Adams Robin &Richard Aleong Poster professional 21-Becoming across-disciplinary metrics. of scientific process largely ignored by the existing outcomes intheway that captures thesocialaspect applying theSTHCframework to evaluation ofscientific scale for graduate alsosetsthestagefor students. It in itsdevelopment oftheProfessional Capital Social of literature andSTHCapproach onsocialcapitaltheory Overall, thestudyrepresents acomprehensive review significantly more satisfied withtheir training. students, I/UCRC Both USandinternational, were more likelyto planto stay graduation. intheUSafter SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts stakeholders) 3)strategic leadershipto enablework and as intentional soallgain(me, learning my team, have different training to findabetter solution2) together withpeoplewho identified as1) working were practice and understandingcross-disciplinary from leastto mostcomprehensive ways ofexperiencing andhierarchicallydistinct related categories, going with astrategic samplingstrategy, four qualitatively Using adevelopmental phenomenography approach incorporating itself. anunderstandingofthepractice developed withinprofessional practice, whilealso being gives andskills meaningto theknowledge and beingintheworld. This embodiedunderstanding of professional that practice integrates knowing, acting, developing andrefining anembodiedunderstanding be advanced inthefollowing ways: critical Through may andpractice thisresearch, SciTStheory inquiry, collaboration,transdisciplinary andidentity. findings mapbroadly to existing onmulti/inter/work transforming to practice integrate systems. Research facilitate outcome aworthwhile and4)challenging and Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. • • • interapersonal, andepistemic difficulties professional (including interpersonal,disciplinary different ofbecoming trajectories across- providingBy aschemaandlanguage for professional.becoming across-disciplinary collaborative environments that facilitate framework offers applications direct for designing practice, the awareness ofcross-disciplinary identifying differencesBy critical and inlearning integration.support “boundaries” that seekto separate rather than onnotionsof reflecting critically “difference” and transformative that learning canoccur through of projects, andthekinds cross-disciplinary inorleading that motivate participating orientations thelearning work, cross-disciplinary thesocialandcollaborative of linking aspects perspective, theframework advances knowledge adevelopmental phenomenographic taking By Abstracts

• associated with the work), the framework offers at the past three SciTS meetings touching on the topic research-based tools to support individuals in self- have revealed an active interest shared by team science assessing and realizing learning goals in ways that practitioners, researchers, and institutional supporters support transfer of practice to new contexts. alike in acknowledging, defining and elevating this critical enabling role to a recognized career path. • By integrating the epistemological and ontological This concept has been introduced by a variety of dimensions of becoming a cross-disciplinary different names: Interdisciplinary Executive Scientist professional, the framework gives meaning not (IES), Integration and Implementation Sciences (I2S) only to our knowing and how we act but also who specialist, and Research Development Professionals we are as professionals. (RDP). A ½ day seminar held at this year’s SciTS meeting The poster will embody scholarship of integration and will serve as the inaugural meeting for interested user-centered principles to represent details of research practitioners and researchers alike to collectively define outcomes and implications as a guide for professionals challenges, needs and next steps toward establishing to recognize cross-disciplinary behavior and identify an active community of research and practice to build areas for professional growth. By presenting this work and advocate increased understanding and stature of at this conference, we hope to advance new research- this new role. This poster would serve as an additional to-practice applications beyond current applications opportunity to engage potential members, to educate (cancer prevention research, engineering education, the SciTS community about this proposed role, and interdisciplinary design, etc.). most importantly, to gather critical feedback from the community that may help shape the path forward. Poster 22 - Establishing a Professional Community of Practice & Research for Interdisciplinary Science Poster 23 - Including graduate students in Specialists interdisciplinary research Authors: Christine Hendren, Holly J. Falk-Krzesinski, Authors: Jeni Cross & Hannah Love Gabriele Bammer, & Sharon Ku Our poster will explore the role of graduate students in interdisciplinary research. It will develop a visual model There is a recognized, but thus far unaddressed need to answer: How do we integrate graduate students into for a new type of role to be defined, established, interdisciplinary research? institutionally supported and trained in order to optimize the success of interdisciplinary scientific Often graduate students oversee the ‘on-the ground endeavors. To address complex problems and research’ conducting experiments, analyzing data, and effectively engage diverse knowledge bases, a are fundamental in the research process. However, Day 4: specific expertise and skillset is needed to work at the Day 4: Thursday, May 19 graduate students are left out of the planning, process interfaces between disciplines to translate, facilitate, including PI meetings, leadership meetings, and other and optimize research outcomes. These connective, Thursday, May 19 arenas where faculty create and transfer knowledge. synthetic knowledge broker functions are needed to The social networks for interdisciplinary research teams cross the boundaries between otherwise separate often look like the following: groups in science teams in support of strengthened post-award science synthesis and advancement. The blue nodes are graduate students and red nodes Such functions may be currently carried out across a are faculty. The graduate students are often huddled number of roles or in an ad-hoc, organically developed together and are not well-connected to the network. manner; however, we propose that to date, this has So, we asked graduate students in the form of focus been suboptimal and fraught with challenges. Events

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 111 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 112 Poster into 25-Insights Computer Science Academic methods. consensus andscenario building encompassing spatial tools that encourage discussion,collaborative learning, landscapes. TS have access to resources, methodsand multi-scalar and management of multifunctional of approaches andmethods regarding thestudy seminar*dealswithareferredAn introductory review progress). representations.(Workpeople landscapeandsky in habitats; spatial andsemioticapproaches to indigenous inhouseholdsofurban healthandsickness conflicts; resources management andsocio-environmental water access, andspatial natural distribution; quality ofthethemesbeingaddressedSome are related to featured inourcultural landscapes. transformations systems ofcomplex socio-ecological of socialandnatural sciences in thestudyof The isto expectation contribute to theconvergence multi-scalarlandscapes.multi functional, question andthesisrelated to thestudyofcultural, phasingaresearch students- team science (TS)- educational approach designed for postgraduate The paperinforms theexperience ofatransdisciplinary Arellano, &JessicaContreras Dominguez, Martin Edurne Bague,Bidegain, ClaudiaHernandez, Jessica Authors: Paras, Margarita Silvana Levi, Evangelina team Science experience in education of Mexico: atransdisciplinary Poster 24- landscapesin The studyofmultifunctional existing academicsilosfor graduate students. with graduate students, andamodelfor bridging the visuals ofcommon research interdisciplinary teams research process. poster Our presentation willprovide integrating graduate students into theinterdisciplinary With ourdata, we have developed amodelfor would research. ideallybeincludedininterdisciplinary groups abouthow they andindividualinterviews SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Contextualized Leadership Training Program for Team Poster 26-Developing a andImplementing he advances through her/hisacademiccareer. professors’ ofwork andquantity improves quality ass/ professor. work Our willputto test thestatus quothat a (associate professor years), andonce theyreach full academic career stages:pre-tenure, post-tenure professors at various universities, through theirthree at universities. thispaper, In analysis we of report give promotions, raises andgrants to professors Career to quantification inacademiaisnecessary &IoannisPavlidisAshik Khatri, Authors: Salah DineshMajeti, Taamneh, Ugur, Muhsin Careers through mastery ofconceptsthrough from mastery Leadership “The understanding oftransformative andshared leadership Leaders and designated mentors; 3)to develop an Planner” withmentoring andcoaching from their Team Development“Individual Plan and Application to develop andimplement aleadership opportunity feedback process; 2)to provide managersthe project strengths through andweaknesses useofaformal 360° to diagnose theirown leadership the opportunity Team Leaders (PIs)and Team Project (PMs) Managers designed to accomplish five goals:1) to provide thedevelopmentand depict ofatraining program Leadership Challenge” by Kouzes andPosner (2012), leadershiptheory,widely usedcontemporary “The Hall,Misra, & Taylor, 2008). We builduponthemost et al., 2010;Falk-Krzesinski, etal., 2011;Stokols, for leaderdevelopment withinteam science (Börner, (McCall, 2010;Day, 2011)aswell astheuniqueneeds literature exists relative to general leaderdevelopment program developed for team scientists. Considerable the development ofacontextual leadershiptraining Objective: The ofthisposter purpose isto describe Wiseman Eugene Frazier, Faith Hellmich,&Lori Mark Robin, Authors: Kevin Wooten, Allan Brasier, Sukol, Barlon Science Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

Challenge” model; 4) to conceptualize and build a set Method: Table 1 illustrates the five broad assessment of practices applicable to translational team leadership dimensions to be used for the assessment center, as based on “The Leadership Challenge” model; and 5) to well as the four assessment methods proposed. apply and test leadership concepts and practices that Findings: Specific assessment criteria will be relate to translational team leadership, and reflect upon defined (e.g., learning capacity, empathy, etc.) for all further refinement and application. dimensions, and specific assessment methods (e.g., Method and Findings: Two pedagogical methods are Harvard cases, commercial 360° assessment inventories, illustrated in relation to leader training for team science. etc.) will be depicted in relation to the production of assessment center data to develop Individual First, the use of a “Flipped Classroom” is demonstrated Development Plans for team science leaders. (e.g., web-based platform to construct team science examples of leadership practices), and second, a Poster 28 - Community Engagement Model: Diverse constructivist leader development model is described Teams Collaborate to Develop a New STEM-C (Figure 1) by tying personal goals and assessment to Curriculum in Restoration Science contextual theory, and subsequently to application. Illustration of specific techniques (e.g., 360° assessment, Authors: Erica Watson-Currie, Michelle Molina, & Lauren individual development plans, and reflective exercises) Birney will also be shown. Demand for job skills in scientific and technological fields continues to rise; however, the number of Poster 27 - Development of an Assessment Center for students entering higher education STEM-C pathways Team Science Leaders is low. Thus, employment opportunities in Science, Authors: Kevin Wooten, Allan Brasier, Marlon Sukol, Technology, Engineering, Math, and Computer Eugene Frazier, Faith Robin, Mark Hellmich, & Lori Sciences (STEM-C) are swiftly outpacing supply of Wiseman qualified applicants. New models for increasing The purpose of this poster is to describe the application students’ interest, efficacy, and intentions to pursue of assessment center methods (Thornton & Rupp, STEM-C careers are being designed and tested. One 2006; Moses & Bynum, 2013) for the development of multi-faceted approach currently being developed scientific team leaders. Assessment center processes and refined is the Curriculum + Community Enterprise have been empirically shown as a valid methodology Model for Restoration Sciences, funded by a grant for leader prediction in industry and the military from the National Science Foundation (NSF). The (Gangler, Rosenthal, Thornton, & Bentson, 1987; partners are: Pace University, Columbia University Day 4: Arthur, Day, McNelly, & Edens, 2003), but relatively Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, New York Harbor Day 4: Thursday, May 19 little work has been done in the scientific or academic Foundation, New York Academy of Sciences, University environments. Rather than focus upon selection and of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Thursday, May 19 development of leaders involving traditional leader New York City Department of Education, New York traits, skills, and abilities, we describe the development Aquarium, The River Project, and Good Shepherd of an assessment center for team science leaders in an Services. Extensive collaboration efforts are underway academic medical center to provide actionable needs to develop and implement a sustainable project-based identification and development planning for team learning curriculum for urban middle school students. leaders as well as trainees (i.e., post-doctoral students Project-based science (PBS) emphasizes reforming and new assistant professors). pedagogy to motivate students to learn

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 113 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 114 and interactive computer programs for middle urban teams are developing lessonplans, exhibits, activities, concepts. cross-disciplinary Multiple Science (STEM-C) Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, andComputer restorationtying to core science activities Science, Science (CCERS) model offers anewpartnership The Curriculum +Community Enterprise for Restoration Birney Erica Authors: Molina, Michelle Watson-Currie, &Lauren Science (CCERS) Curriculum +Community Enterprise for Restoration Education andEnvironmental Restoration – The Poster 29- Transdisciplinary Collaboration for STEM-C collaborative are producing. efforts synergy inthelessons, andmaterials activities, their have expressed theyare already beginning to achieve teams enter theirsecond year ofpartnership, members development through engagement. community As produce anddisseminate anewmodelfor curriculum scientists witheducators inorder andpractitioners to This large scaletraining and teaching initiative teams lab education at science localmarine institutions. 5)Community exhibits withwet-science activities; environmentalmiddle schoolstudents usinghands-on Afterschool program students withdoctoral mentoring students’ 4) andcitizen science observations; data entry archiving lessonplanswithamobileapplication for authentic environmental 3)Digital fieldwork; platform lessonplansconducting ofSTEM-C Student curriculum 2) in implementing PBSlessonplansandactivities; 1) Teacher Training Continuing Education Program schools. The modelhasfive programmatic pillars: environmental conditions surrounding otherpublic model for otherrestoration assuited projects to local monitoring projects. Partners willdevelop areplicable in longterm restoration ecology andenvironmental education byto engaging enhance participants STEM-C understandings instead facts. ofmemorizing The goalis encourageModel students meaningful to construct problems. designed Activities around Bybee’s 5E andfindingsolutions to throughreal inquiry world SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts effective inchanging educator andstudent disposition interrelated content vehicles that are STEM-C delivery independently and/orcollectively asasystem of thefive2.Do programmatic pillarsfunction enterprise” localmodel? 1.What comprises the “curriculum pluscommunity following research questions: perspectives. The authors’ intent isto answer the andreplicationsustainability from leaders’ project vision; andfinallyprovide potential mechanisms for institutions) are collaborating towards oneshared institutions, organizations, community andcultural organizations (i.e., universities, foundations, K-12 from nineseparate thendiscusshowModel; partners school students. This the paperwillfirstdescribe CCERS the third set of interviews and survey responses.the third andsurvey setofinterviews These processes.making Researchers are currently analyzing defined goalsand(2)astreamlined(1) clearly decision into creating collaborations: effective transdisciplinary 1990). Furthermore, leadersshared project insights specific outcomesMeuse,De (Sundstorm, & Futrell, groups, inwhichorganizations share responsibility for pillars (Figure 2),whichcanbethought ofaswork collaboratethat through partners five programmatic Findings fromtwo thefirst show rounds ofinterviews Formative Assessment Rubric. organizations basedonGajda’s (2004)Strategic Alliance current andoptimallevels ofintegration withpartner also completed aCollaboration assessingtheir Survey organizations leadersfromproject theninepartnering across time(Hermanozicz, 2013, p. 189). Twenty-four interpret, andrespond to change” by examining themes andorganizations ontheproject partners “experience, Longitudinal (LQI) Qualitative Interviews to explore how To address thesequestionsresearchers employed 4.What core ofthemodelare replicable? aspects implementation?three-year andbeyond ofthemodellocallyduring its scalability 3.What are mechanismsfor creating and sustainability and stewardship? toward content STEM-C andenvironmental restoration Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

will further clarify how partners are collaborating; • New York Harbor Foundation as well as explore mechanisms for sustainability, • NYC Department of Education scalability, and replicability; and provide further Pillar 3: Digital Platform suggestions from partners on how to develop and strengthen effective partnerships. • University of Maryland – Center for Environmental Science Pillar 1: Teacher Fellowship Pillar 4: Afterschool/ Mentoring • Columbia University - Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory • Good Shepherd Services • Pace University • New York Academy of Science • New York Harbor Foundation Pillar 5: Community Exhibits

Pillar 2: Student Curriculum • New York Aquarium • Pace University • The River Project

Thematic Poster Group #5

Team Science to Address Health and Improve Healthcare

Poster 30 - Teaming-Up for Patient Safety: A Case Study with Orthopedic Surgery team members (including of Social Interactions AmongTeam Members two supervisors), and observations by the researcher Authors: Michelle Leak guided by the Observational Teamwork Assessment for Surgery (OTAS) instrument. This study finds that Despite increased awareness of the link between while mindfulness is a prerequisite to traditional teamwork and medical errors, and increased teamwork behaviors found among and between development of interventions aimed at improving team high performance surgical teams and team members, performance, the incidence of preventable errors in a dynamic interplay exists between processes of hospitals, and in the surgical environment particularly, collective mindfulness and teamwork safety behaviors remains high. Absent from interdisciplinary team wherein one continuously informs, shapes, and development efforts is empirical evidence informed reinforces the other (Figure1). Noting contributions by the voices of surgical team members specific to of this study to practice, education, research, the Day 4: Thursday, May 19 their day- to- day experiences of teamwork. For this Day 4: opportunity exists to expand the present inquiry reason, a case study of interdisciplinary teamwork to other surgical and non-surgical teams within the among Orthopedic Surgery team members was Thursday, May 19 hospital and clinic environments. conducted from June to December 2013 to: (a) discover how teamwork behaviors are enacted in the surgical Poster 31 - The Academic Cartography of Sugar environment to affect the incidence of preventable Sweetened Beverages: Interdisciplinarity in Research surgical errors; and (b) understand the experience Between Scientific and Legal Fields of teamwork from the perspective of surgical team members. Authors: Lexi White The case study data included 37 one-on-one interviews

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 115 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 116 experience during and after hospitaldischarge,experience andafter during that improve Interventions Objective: patient Hassan Murad Prokop, LindseyLehman,Jehad Almasri, Larry &M. Authors: Fares Alahdab, ShalakGunjal, Zhen Wang, Systematic Review Poster 32-IdealHospitalDischarge Process: A across bothisbeingtargeted at influencingpolicy. areas, theway theycommunicate, andhow information explore oftwo academicpublication theintersection scientometric techniques to newareas, butalsowe will only expand theapplications ofthesewell validated differences.By investigating these key issues we will not publishing, there are alsolanguageandcontextual of citations between legalacademicandscientific see whether, dividesinpatterns inaddition to structural ofthesearticles. structure This willallow researchers to (latent allocation) Dirichlet to examine thetextual research techniques willalsousemachinelearning across two keydatabases: SCOPUS andLexisNexis. This onsugarsweetened beveragesbetween articles analyses to examine ofcitation socialstructure patterns the researcher willusecitation analyses andnetwork one ofthisresearch, to bepresented inposter form, social groups: scientists andlegalscholars. phase In andinfluentialcommunication between two powerful anthropological approach to address academic reviewed research. This research usesanoverarching including thesystem for generating abodyofpeer- logics andprocesses law andscience, ofenacting science. Difference leads to different infunction differences ofthelaw and between thefunctions haslongbeennoted that thereIt are crucial including Medline In-Process Non-Indexedincluding Medline &Other comprehensive literature search ofsixdatabases, ofresearchDescription methods: We a conducted theiradoption. ofevidence supporting quality review to identify andappraise suchinterventions the complications are needed. We asystematic conducted reduce ofreadmission the risk andpostdischarge SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. the inclusion criteria. the inclusioncriteria. We developed ananalytic offindings:86out1173studiesmet Summary career research. scientists specialized inhealthservices statistician, anadministrator, and amedicaldoctor included aclinicalepidemiologist, alibrarian, a summarize evidence. The systematic review team approach anddeveloped ananalyticframework to relevant studies. We usedaqualitative meta-narrative Systematic reviews were usedto identify additional of patients’ characteristics, disease. orunderlying discharge planningprocess were included, regardless to Week studiesevaluating hospital 50,2015.Primary Reviews, andScopus, from eachdatabase’s inception of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database ofSystematic Citations, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register to beacontinuing concern withtherapid intheNew rate ofsmoking York state, seems smoking state inthisresearch. Despite significant declinesinthe trendswe intheNew specificallylook at smoking York Given thehighpopulation andthepoorairquality, intensity intheNew York state theyear after 2002. concern. This research identifies thetrends insmoking smokers. hasbeen a continuingThe issueofsmoking in theUnited States amongbothmaleandfemale The from diseaserisks have cigarette smoking increased Authors: ShilpaBalan,JosephOtto, &Pooja Sarang Poster 33-Data Analysis ofSmoking Trends inNew York discharge process. technology, for are anoptimized necessary hospital team, andadvanced informationa multidisciplinary patient monitoring andfollow-up, collaboration with Systematic approaches, includingcarefully planning, andengagedstakeholders. was multidisciplinary field: The thisstudy research team that performed Statement ofhow theresearch advances theSciTS discharge, discharge andafter (Table 1). hospitalization, at hospitalization, admission,during at appeared andwere summarized across 4stagesof framework (Figure 1).36hospitaldischarge processes Abstracts

rate of deaths and diseases caused due to smoking. and timely intraoperative evaluation of margins of Smoking can cause diseases such as lung cancer, breast cancer specimens. These successes are made heart disease, and type 2 diabetes among others. The possible through the social and communicational significance of this topic requires an immediate need practices of the personnel on both teams. The goal for data analysis on the current smoking trends. Big of this research was to identify the critical intra and Data has rapidly evolved and large sets of data are now inter-team communication that contributes to their available for free online. In this research, we use a data successful practice. To achieve this goal, members of analytics software named Tableau to analyze our data the Breast Surgery Team, Frozen Section Laboratory set. Tableau is a business intelligence software that and three health services researchers collaborated enables an individual to understand and visualize the to identify the complex web of communication that data easily. Using Tableau, interesting patterns and supports the technical and scientific collaboration of trends in smoking were found that may have otherwise these teams. been more difficult using manual methods. Manual Research Methods: Video Reflexive Ethnography, methods are time-consuming and can lead to errors a collaborative qualitative methodology that uses in data analysis. For example, from the New York data video ethnography and reflexivity as a tool for set we were able to analyze the percentage of current practice improvement was employed. Ten hours trends of male vs female smokers, the average age of of communication work associated with specimen smokers and the job status of smokers using Tableau. resections and diagnoses in a breast surgery team and Our analysis indicated that the percentage of female frozen section laboratory was video recorded over a smokers are more than the male smokers in the New two-week period at Mayo Clinic, Rochester Minnesota. York state. Most of the smokers in the New York state The video reflexivity phase of the study brought are found to be employed and the highest number of 57 staff from the breast surgery and frozen section smokers are above 40 years. A greater awareness of the laboratory teams together for four one-hour video negative effects of smoking will motivate smokers to reflexivity sessions to view one another’s practices quit smoking. This research will advance the SciTS field and to collaboratively analyze their communication. by illuminating the need for emphasis on research on These sessions were video recorded, transcribed, this topic, exploring the latest big data and business coded and thematically analyzed by three health intelligence technologies and its implementation service researchers. The identified themes were then for data analysis, and by improving the health of the further analyzed as practical implications for practice people. improvement.

Poster 34 - Identifying Successful Inter-Team Summary of Findings: Video reflexivity enabled staff to Communication between the Frozen Section see and articulate the complexity of their collaborative Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Laboratory and Breast Surgery Team communication practices that support the flow of

Authors: Heidi McLeod, Katherine Carroll, Jessica the specimen from surgical resection through to FSL Thursday, May 19 Mesman, Gary Keeney, & Judy C. Boughey pathological evaluation and reporting. Communication was characterized as flexible, inter-disciplinary, cross- Objective: The successful clinical and technical hierarchical and multi-functional. Flexibility in the collaboration between the Frozen Section Laboratory mode of communication (in-person, intercom, pager (FSL) and Breast Surgery Team at Mayo Clinic, Rochester or phone) supports team collaboration. Verbal and Minnesota has been described previously and follows visual cues aid prioritization, making the process more a linear flow of the specimen from the patient in the efficient. The close proximity of the teams facilitates operating room to FSL pathology to enable an accurate the physical flow of the specimen and the web of

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 117 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 118 developed anewstudy design for screening candidate testing ofaltered dose configurations.In particular, we innovative approaches instudydesign andrapid the development ofnewtechnologies to support and approaches performance to studyingobserver development required evaluation acritical ofexisting ofthesemulti-reader studies.aspects The workflow’s computerized systems to automate thedata collection built asophisticated workflow utilizingadvanced computed tomography protocols. This team has the development andevaluation oflower dose has beenassembledto address theneedto accelerate reconstruction, dosimetry, anddiagnostic radiology computer imageacquisition and science, CT inbiostatistics,A team of scientists withexpertise to routine useonpatients. to rigorously evaluate theseimaging approaches prior itisimperative performance, do notdegrade observer radiation exposure. To insure altered imaging protocols care to reduce concerns related to ofionizing risk and highresolution protocols are desired for patient thecontext ofcomputedIn tomography, lower-dose (e.g.,factors reader experience, fatigue andconfidence). locating andhuman andclassifyingabnormalities) (e.g.,of diagnostic performance detecting, correctly isacombination performance, denoted as observer within patients. simply often performance, Radiologist can review image(s)for ofdisease thedetection developed, researchers evaluate how well radiologists As newimaging modalitiesandprotocols are Cynthia H.McCollough, &JoelG.Fletcher J. Michalak, Tammy A.Drees, Lifeng Yu, ShuaiLeng, Hara, JeffL. Fidler, DavidDelone, David Levin, Gregory Amy K. Bartley, Edwards, Phillip K. A.Karwoski, Ronald Authors: E. Carter, Rickey Holmes, David R.Iii Adam C. tomography protocols withreducedperformance dosecomputed Poster 35-Systematic evaluation ofradiologist teams. non-linear andcross-hierarchical positionswithinboth communication allows team membersto engagein SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts Authors: Sujin Horwitz & Irwin Horwitz &Irwin Authors: SujinHorwitz Using Physician Cohort and Employee Empowerment onPatient Safety Culture Poster 36- The EffectsofOrganizational Commitment tomography imaging protocols. advance theavailability oftested, lower dosecomputed oftheteam havediverse skills worked collaboratively to fromlearned thesestudiesandillustrate how the utilized onover 10studies. We willhighlight lessons performance. This infrastructure hasbeensuccessfully pipeline that enabledrapid evaluation ofobserver data, anddeveloped adata performance of observer the presentation imaging dataset andthecollection created arobust computerized workstation to integrate studies,imaging protocols performance observer cancer. Through thisuniquepractice, surgeons and analysis for for patients undergoing breast surgery routinely utilize intraoperative frozen margin section is oneofonlytwo institutionsintheworld that Research Goal: The Mayo ClinicinRochester, Minnesota Boughey Keeney,Authors: Gary ElizabethHabermann, &Judy Value ofaUniqueClinicalPractice inBreast Surgery Poster 37-Using Team Science to Demonstrate the future work are alsodiscussed. The limitations andimplications ofourfindings for variables were notfound to ourexpectation. contrary culture. However,two theinteraction effectsofthe commitment andempowerment onpatient safety was found forSupport themaineffects ofaffective of patient ofphysicians. safety culture usingacohort commitment andempowerment ontheperception examined mainandinteraction effects ofaffective care organizations. More specifically, ourstudy means to promoting patient safety culture inhealth organizational commitment andempowerment, as attitudinal constructs, theaffective component of between patient safety culture andtwo employee studyinvestigatesOur acrucialyet understudiedlink Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

pathologists communicate extensively during the of this clinical practice was to occur to all institutions operation to ensure a margin negative resection is performing breast cancer surgery. achieved. The pathologist evaluates the margins of Summary of Findings: An analysis of ACS-NSQIP data the lumpectomy specimen and determines if there published in Surgery in 2014 showed lower 30-day is any tumor at the cut edge and at which margin(s). reoperation rates in breast cancer lumpectomy patients If so, the surgeon excises further tissue from that/ at our institution, which performs intraoperative those margin(s) during the same operation to achieve frozen section margin analysis, compared to other negative margins within one operation. At most other participating hospitals (3.6% vs 13.2%, p<0.001). Upon institutions, the cancer margin status remains unknown multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients in the until after the patient has left the operating room, and national ACS-NSQIP data set were over four times as the pathology report is available days to weeks later. likely to undergo reoperation as those at our institution When positive margins are detected, excision to obtain (odds ratio 4.19, 95% confidence interval 2.29-7.66, negative margins necessitates a second trip to the p<0.001). operating room. The goal of this team science initiative was to develop quantitative metrics to demonstrate the The Journal of Oncology Practice published our value of this clinical practice through the collaborations economic analysis in February 2016 which reported of a breast surgeon, frozen section pathologist, and that expanding this clinical practice to all US breast health services researcher. surgery practices would result in net annual cost savings of $90.9 million for Medicare, Medicaid and Research Methods: Initial discussions regarding the private payers, and $1.8 million for providers. value of this clinical practice were lengthy as the health services researcher aimed to better understand the Advancement of the Science of Team Science (SciTS) clinical language and the clinicians learned about Field: A team comprised of clinicians and researchers various data sources available for benchmarking. was built with the shared goal of demonstrating the Two team research projects have been completed to value of a unique institutional clinical practice using date. The first compared thirty-day reoperation rates quantitative data, resulting in two medical publications following breast surgery by utilizing the institutional to date. Our team work continues with the goal of and national American College of Surgeons National identifying best practices in the surgical care of breast Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) cancer patients. data. The second project involved economic modeling based on Medicare data to determine the economic impacts to payers and providers if full dissemination Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Thematic Poster Group #6 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Innovative Approaches to Team Science

Poster 38 - Team Writing and Institutional Science documents must navigate, this project suggests that Documents institutions co-construct these documents with teams. Authors: Sara Parks This project shows institutions may use guidelines as a proxy and persuasive, controlling member of teams. Rather than understanding institutional guidelines However, identifying institutional co-construction has as a framework that teams who write institutional

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 119 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 120 more creative, innovative solutions. On theother in constructive ways, andthinkoutsidethebox for prosocial behaviors withteammates, resolve conflict positive state ofaffectare more willing to engagein in regard to organizational outcomes. People ina Research ofaffect demonstrates theimportance Hannah & Mark Authors: Margaret Hinrichs, Thomas Seager, Sarah Tracy, Emotional Intelligence andLeadership Poster 39-Addressing Challengeswith Interdisciplinary negotiate requirements. institutionalwriting the hiddenmembersontheirteams andmore easily documents, theymight better beableto identify nature oftheir teams understand theco-constructed that buildsgroup recognition genres. ofdistinct If throughconstructed minorchangesandrepetition This scholarshipsuggeststhat alldocuments are co- pointand arhetorical ofviewfrom thehumanities. from thecommunication field’s on work team writing This study’s approach isnovel to SciTSbecauseitcomes anddata. knowledge accessible andpersuasive thantablesofspecialist that are reports more workobjectives to co-construct materials inanarrativeframe report form. Ideally, these potential safeguard ofinsistinginstitutionalobjectives administrators and understandthepoliticalrisk to theguidelines from 2012-2016show NSF narrative arcs to frame thegrant’s Changes impact. determined content andpre-determined styles guidelines require team science writers to usepre- to public, persuasive . The infusing theguidelineswithitsrenewed commitment Qualitative thematic analysis suggeststheNSFis to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR) grant. guidelinesfrom theExperimental Programreport years ofNational ScienceFoundation (NSF)annual studyanalyzes themostrecentThis preliminary five objectivity.assumed scientific and reporting this hiddeninstitutionalmemberraises questionsof implications fo team science writing. particular In SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts result from more efficient management ofscientists. most peopleassumescientific breakthroughs will like scientific research anddevelopment. And yet, for inhighlyinnovative teams working contexts andcreativity implications have productivity important component ofcollaboration anditseffect ona team’s productivity, andcreativity. The emotional, relational a group, shapingfuture communication, interactions, and subsequently incorporated into of thesocialfabric occuroften interpersonally, are expressed to others organizational, group, andteam settingsemotions and donotgobeyond individualexperience, in that peoplehave feelings whichoccur intrapersonally increases andabsenteeism. burnout While itistrue members’ newideasand willingness to entertain hand, negative emotionreduces organizational the tablebelow. These findings alsodraw upon from theNational Academies assummarized in report, presents recommendations to enhance thefindings thisposter communication, work, andknowledge Drawing uponliterature inemotions, leadership, situated, relational processes between group members. it analyze orrecommend afocus onunderstanding affective facets ofscientific collaboration, nordoes needs ofteams, didnotexplore emotional, thereport which recommend attention to socio-emotional from team from science. citingsources Apart inpassing and quantitative evaluation outputs ofbibliometric and organizational resources collaboration, to support diversity ofteam members, availability ofinstitutional collaboration. These dimensionsincludedtaskandrole which focused oncognitive primarily dimensions of titled EnhancingtheEffectiveness of ScienceTeam 2015,theNational April AcademiesIn released areport science.interdisciplinary been fullytranslated to, explored, orratified within organizational contexts, thesefindingshave not andsocialnature ofemotionin of theimportance diverse groups. Despite thewidespread understanding the emotionalfacets ofinnovating andcreating in However, attention viewneglects to thisefficiency Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

ethnographic and participant observation data CSR to evaluate thousands of records of stakeholder collected in the past 18 months on four different grant- sentiment with accuracy and speed on a broad range of funded projects. It is not enough to focus solely on issues. The model will also capture stakeholder needs cognitive aspects of interdisciplinary collaboration. and suggestions for further study, demonstrating the Future research in the areas of team creativity, potential use of computational linguistics in informing productivity, and innovation must also include the NIH leadership. emotional, relational components of collaboration and the ways in which communication creates these Poster 41 - Closing the Gap between the Rhetoric and realities for interdisciplinary team members. A key goal Practice: An Analysis of Interdisciplinary Team Science of this poster is to begin and encourage conversations to Confront Global Change in the Americas around these topics during SciTS 2016. Authors: Lily House-Peters, Gabriela Alonso-Yanez, Jeremy Pittman, Martin Garcia-Cartagena, Michelle Poster 40 - A Natural Language Processing Approach to Farfan, Sebastian Bonelli, & Ignacio Lorenzo Content Analysis of CSR Survey Responses The need to address rapid environmental change Authors: Charles Dumais, Mary Ann Guadagno, Calvin has created strong rhetorical support for increased Johnson, & Dan Russ interdisciplinary (ID) collaboration across the social, CSR has recently conducted pilot studies using natural, and engineering sciences. As collaborative short surveys with stakeholders. We are evaluating social-ecological research groups (1) increase in respondent sentiment on Peer Review related issues number, (2) become more interdisciplinary and using Likert type scales and an open text box for (3) more distributed across geographical regions, general comments. In the early stages of this effort, the additional research examining the difficulties, number of respondents providing general comments advantages, and shifting circumstances of ID teamwork was small enough to manually establish a taxonomy is needed. Our research demonstrates that in practice, of categories and evaluate the specific polarity of each ID teamwork often fails to produce desired policy shifts comment. In subsequent studies, as the respondent and environmental management outcomes. Rather, a population has increased, manual content analysis gap exists between rhetoric and practice. has become infeasible. In order to analyze thousands This research introduces a conceptual and of textual comments, CSR is collaborating with CIT to analytical framework to examine the dynamics of use innovative, computational linguistics to automate ID collaboration. We focus explicitly on how these the process of capturing and categorizing stakeholder dynamics influence the development and application responses as well as assessing the sentiment expressed of strategies aimed at producing outcomes for policy Day 4: Thursday, May 19 in these responses. We initially trained a set of and practice. Our research draws on the advances of Day 4: linguistic models using a set of manually annotated previously described SciTS scholarship. As a field, SciTS text fragments from the first pilot study. Then, we have has brought together various disciplinary approaches Thursday, May 19 refined the predictive accuracy and reliability of the and research frameworks to better understand and model using data from subsequent pilot studies. When enhance the processes and outcomes of scientific the comment text presents as a need or suggestion we collaboration. Of note, however, is the comparatively have trained the software to capture these important little work that has focused on researching teams issues as well. We are currently performing cluster- engaged in sustainability problems and environmental based analysis to understand the dominant needs management in social-ecological systems. These and suggestions identified by the respondents. This teams involve increasingly complex collaborative automated approach to content analysis will allow relationships, including non-academic stakeholders,

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 121 Day 4: Thursday, May 19 122 of cooperation withinteams, we focus ontheinfluence relevance for employee behavior. Given the importance behavior whilesparseattention hasbeengiven to its tohas beencloselystudiedwith respect consumer asanenvironmental Music Objective: influence William Schulze Authors: Jubo KevinKniffin, Brian Yan, & Wansink, on Influences CooperativeBehavior Poster 42- The ofCooperation: Sound Musical methods. integration ofqualitative andquantitative research team attributes to teamwork outcomes through the a modelthat explicitly linksindividualandcollective existing SciTS conceptual frameworks by presenting challenges;and2)advancessocio-environmental scholarship focused oncollaborative teams addressing of thework istwofold: 1) broadens thescope ofSciTS systems.change insocial-ecological The contribution teamwork andtheimplications for navigating rapid the existing inID andpractice gapbetween rhetoric findings ofthis research advance understandingof constraints: institutional, temporal, andfinancial. The management outcomes dueto three ofcommon types outcomes are andenvironmental over prioritized policy beneficial outcomes. Additionally, we findthat science for factors effective ID important teamwork that lead to language, epistemological openness, are andlearning) dimensions (e.g., communication viaacommon interaction, trust,to-face andempathy) andcognitive Findings suggestthat affective dimensions(e.g., face- across theAmericas. teaminterdisciplinary research undertaken projects impact). The framework isappliedto analyze 23 andenvironmental impact, management policy impact, to three categories ofIDteamwork outcomes (science collective team attributes andcomposition) (structure (cognitive,characteristics conative, andaffective) and proposed inthisstudyrelates individualteam member problems.wicked sustainability The framework management to confront andon-the-ground policy gapbyand aimto informing closetherhetoric-practice SciTS 2016Conference: Abstracts positively influences cooperative behavior when ofFindings:Summary Happy musicsignificantly and during, theexperiment. andafter rounds. We alsomeasured participants’ moodsbefore, contribute to eachofthe20 thepublicgoodduring compensation dependedontheirdecisionsto (not) were incentivized to makerealistic decisionssince their informed by experimental economics, participants 20-round publicgoodsgame. for As istypical research Control ina or theno-music (n=59)whileparticipating either Happy (n=60)orUnhappy Music (n=69) Music one ofthree conditions inwhichtheywere exposed to were 188participants randomly assignedMethods: into contexts.workplace of musicuponcooperative behavior innon-retail, these systems isnon-trivial, learn however, notjust processing Understandinghow anddecision-making. they are how alsolearning to improve oninformation- generating newknowledge. Perhaps asimportantly, processing decisions, information, and making domain. As thesesystems navigate, theyare constantly a battlefield to scientific teams navigating a research environments,rich ranging from soldiersnavigating Human systems are constantly navigating problem- Authors: Christina Ting &Jeff Tsao Processing HumanSystems andDecision-Making Poster 43-Signatures ofLearning by Information- among teammates across thesciences. adjustments involving musicto enhance cooperation highlight thepotential for environmental low-cost employees. The experimental findingsthat we present studied inrelation to the behavior ofprofessional relevance ofatmospheric variables hasnotbeenclosely How theResearch Advances theSciTS field: The relationship appearsrelatively limited. and cooperative behavior althoughthestrength ofthat find asignificant positive correlation between mood ControlUnhappy andno-music conditions. We also compared withpatterns found through boththe Building the knowledge baseforBuilding the knowledge effective team science. Abstracts

because the environment itself is a moving target, but utilizes motivational interviewing and Prochaska and because information-processing and decision-making DiClemente Stages of Change that tailors a women’s involve multiple time scales, heterogeneous implicit/ readiness for change; plus a birth control consultation explicit information, emotional factors, and complex for women who are at risk. It is designed to educate, feedback mechanisms. train and provide personal development for delivery in various disciplinary teams as well as providing We bring to this challenging problem unique effective counseling to their client through the perspectives from two distinct fields spanning our own training materials. Findings indicate that CHOICES is research team. First, we are developing a model of a a unique program that offers education, training, and learning system based on an emerging theory of the professional development of facilitators and counselors irreversible thermodynamics of self-organizing living that allows them to begin implementing CHOICES systems [JL England, Nature Nanotechnology 10, 919 into their existing practices. Translating CHOICES into (2015)]. In that theory, adaptation of a system is directly practice can advance the SciTS field by building a connected to entrainment with its environment, knowledge base for effective team science and increase defined here as resonances or synchronization with early diagnosis of those at risk for an AEP. input from external stimuli. Second, we are applying data-science algorithms to look for patterns and signatures of entrainment, which may involve any combination of the team restructuring, reforming goals or repositioning itself in its environment.

Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Company, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000.

Poster 44 - Reducing Risk through CHOICES: A Community-Based Intervention That Increases Motivation and Commitment to Reduce or Stop Drinking Behaviors

Authors: Konstance Cook-Withers Day 4: Thursday, May 19 Alcohol Exposed Pregnancy (AEP) is a major public Day 4: health problem that affects about 1% of the 4 million

annual live births in the U.S. and is a leading cause of Thursday, May 19 preventable birth defects. Most OB/GYNs in the U.S. screen their clients for alcohol use however, many women report that their provider condones moderate drinking during pregnancy. The Surgeon General warns that “any amount of alcohol can be harmful.” It is clear that education is needed for healthcare providers and clients. CHOICES is designed for the client and provider consisting of four sessions that

SciTS 2016 Conference: Building the knowledge base for effective team science. 123

of National HUMAN OF U.S.

Health

HEA

DE L P

TH ARTMENT ARTMENT

SERVICES Institutes

AND

National Cancer Institute T NIH... Y How • • • The and The What ou

A studying P A ublically

platform Discover up add Connect practice or uploading Contribute them science available T use T can conduct oolkit eam urning

comments to r

- use your

generated

Can

online. date

Is Science

team includes:

goals,

available

the or

Discovery team

to name resources

. documents, The on study .

connect - T Join

based Learn eam

Y

- on

news based . and

collection to Share ou T

expert resources oolkit of

resources

the

Science T into download

from

research,

to team with

and eam research. Use

your expert support

links, Health

discussions

is colleagues events.

colleagues science.

of

an that knowledge knowledge

such

T

resources

information, directo and oolkit The interactive them Science

It your your support

also as

recommended

Discove or on by practical team r

to: and y

T

provides ,

link

recommended exploring the by by

oolkit? or

the the

website stay

stay

to blog, blog,

T tools

up

oolkit? resources

readings to that

to

date

enhance by r provides .

www

experts on for Contribute.

resources research. evaluate, you The a news evaluating

research wide resources .

teamsciencetoolkit across

T conduct, and eam

variety events

collaboration, disciplines or

to Use

or that Science studying

help

study manage,

the

support of users

team

resources

T

T

Connect. team measures oolkit

oolkit manage,

science.

.cance

support, your goals. your -based

to includes

for for support, support,

to find find r .gov

help help