DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Pest Management Plan Proposal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Pest Management Plan Proposal Regional Pest Management Plan – Proposal (November 2017) _____________________________________________ Hearing Panel Recommendations on Submissions _____________________________________________ Prepared June 2018 Submitter List Submitter Submitter Name Contact Page Number 569 South Marlborough Landscape Restoration Trust Ian Mitchell 1 571 Rod Littlefield 3 572 Walter Hilhorst 4 573 Picton Dawn Chorus Siobain Browning 5 574 Nine Scott 6 575 The Westervelt Company Steve Smith 7 576 Aquaculture New Zealand Gary Hooper 9 577 Chilean Needle Grass National Steering Group, Warwick Lissaman 11 CNG Action Group 578 Gillian Durham 15 579 Mirza Downs Rick Stolwerk 16 580 Don Miller 17 581 Federated Farmers of New Zealand Kim Reilly 18 582 Weed Solutions Limited Benjamin James Minehan 33 583 Joan Winifred Dodson 36 584 New Zealand Defence Force Rebecca Davies 37 585 Nelson Forests Limited Heather Arnold 49 586 Pat Williams 51 587 Royal Forest and Bird Protection Society of NZ Inc. Debs Martin 54 588 Geoff Evans 70 589 Kiwifruit Vine Health Inc. and New Zealand Kiwifruit John Maher 73 Growers Inc. 590 Department of Conservation Lionel Solly 75 591 Land Information New Zealand Marcus Girvan 99 592 KiwiRail Rebecca Beals 112 593 Marlborough Environment Centre Beverley Ruth Doole 117 594 Phillip Pratt 123 595 Harry Lampe 124 596 Leah Gibson 126 597 Marlborough Sounds Restoration Trust Andrew Macalister 127 598 NZ Transport Agency Carol Bannock 131 599 Ministry for Primary Industries Mike Harre 136 600 Fish & Game NZ Rhys Barrier 166 601 Tony Orman 168 602 William Wallace Scholefield 171 Introduction The following recommendations have been made by the hearing panel (Councillor Cynthia Brooks, Councillor Nadine Taylor and Rural Representative Ross Beech) for the submissions received on the Regional Pest Management Plan – Proposal (November 2017). These recommendations have been entered into a database with the submissions. This report from the database contains the submission, staff comments and the recommendations of the hearing panel. The recommendations can be viewed by the submitters directly from the database on the Council website. Alternatively, this report is available as a PDF on the Council website or available as a hard copy on request. 569 Ian Mitchell 145 Giffords Road, RD 3, Blenheim 7273 South Marlborough Landscape Restoration Trust Category: All In Section 6 we wish that the following pinus species be made subject to sections 52 and 53 of the act. Pinus contorta, nigra, mugo, sylvestris and monticola. These species have no commercial value and are known to spread into Marlborough's hinterland. Plants and seed of such should not be available. Decision Requested As above Staff Comment Staff Recommendation: Note Reason: Staff wish to make aware the fact that if a species is within a programme within the Regional Pest Management Plan (RPMP), it is declared a pest under the Biosecurity Act 1993 (the Act). This triggers the statutory obligations of section 52 and 53 of the Act. Hearing Panel Recommendation Accept in part The hearing panel thanks you for your submission. In response to your submission and others, the hearing panel recommends that the proposed programmes for: contorta pine, Corsican pine, European larch, mountain pine, Scots pine, western white pine and wilding conifers not be included in the Regional Pest Management Plan at this time. A clear message from submitters is that relying on collaborative programmes as proposed is not seen as Council providing enough leadership or providing enough certainty to stakeholders and the community for these high-risk conifer species and wilding conifers. Therefore the hearing panel has concluded that further work is required to develop a Proposal specifically for high-risk conifer species and wilding conifers that seeks to: • Provide certainty about the roles of Council and other stakeholders. • Support the current collaborative programmes. • Provide a clearer framework for handover from collaborative programmes to a regulatory programme for Marlborough in the Regional Pest Management Plan. • Integrate management of the high risk conifers and other wilding species under a single programme within the Regional Pest Management Plan. • Consider the management of the existing containment zones in the 2012 Regional Pest Management Plan. • Consider other species such as sycamore and European larch hybrids. • Have a focus of protecting current non infested areas in Marlborough. • Provide certainty of obligations and benefits for stakeholders and ratepayers and aligns with the intention of the National Wilding Conifer Programme including funding elements. • Incorporate a Good Neighbour Rule. • Better align with MPI National Guidelines and also other region’s approaches where appropriate. The work undertaken as part of this process will include identifying reporting mechanisms, setting out a clear funding framework and benefits and costs for a new programme including addressing the option for a progressive containment objective. The hearing panel recommends that a stakeholder reference group is established to support the development of the Proposal and that this work is completed to align with the 2019/2020 Annual Plan process. While this work is being undertaken, Council will continue to support the current collaborative programmes including existing LTP budget allocations. Council’s involvement in wilding conifer management will continue to be guided by our Biosecurity Strategy. Category: Part Two - Proposed Programmes 7 - Programmes 7.39 - Wilding conifers All Section 7.39 is supported Decision Requested Retain section 7.39 1 Staff Comment Staff Recommendation: Note Reason: Hearing Panel Recommendation Accept in part The hearing panel thanks you for your support of the proposed wilding conifer programme. 2 571 Rod Littlefield 51A Brooklyn Drive, Redwoodtown, Blenheim 7201 Category: All I most strongly object to the use of 1080 in the use of pest control, especially using rate money to which l contribute. 1080 is exceptionally cruel, and no animal should die this way, especially deer ,pigs and occasionally farm animals which is know to happen. The Graff brothers have plenty of film footage to prove this. (Out of sight, out of mind is not acceptable ) The long term benefits of 1080 is very dubious, as many preditors breed back up to pre 1080 levels. In the case of saving the birds, it's probably killing more than it saves. ( While not in Marlborough ,the kea is sadly now endangered). Finally,the risks to human health is still not fully known, but clearly a large amount ends up in our waterways..Also the recent case of a family in the Waikato poisoned after eating wild pig which is suspected of eating 1080 , should be a warning to all. Decision Requested Not provided. Staff Comment Staff Recommendation: Note Reason: Staff comment that 1080 is a registered vertebrate toxic agent available to those who may need to undertake vertebrate pest control. Hearing Panel Recommendation Reject The hearing panel thanks you for your submission and your comments on the use of 1080. Your comments are noted by the hearing panel. The use of 1080 is outside the scope of this review process. 3 572 Walter Hilhorst 77 Hutcheson Street, Mayfield, Blenheim 7201 Category: All Trout are an introduced, noxious organism which, having caused the extinction of native fishes, should be classed as a pest. Their favoured position as a 'fishery' is due to a very effective, historical propaganda campaign waged by Fish & Game for decades, duping an indifferent public for whom, as opposed to birds and plants, native fish are 'out of sight, out of mind' and therefore have suffered from having no advocate. Decision Requested Designate some appropriate water-ways as exclusive habitat for native fishes, mainly white-bait which require low-land, tidal waters to lay eggs. The Taylor and Opawa Rivers are ideal, trout could be eliminated over time by netting and there-after enjoying semi-permanent nets strung across both the lower and higher reaches. Para Swamp is also suitable habitat, nets could be strung across Tuamarina Stream. These measures should be funded by imposing an additional fee on the sale of F&G licenses, a suggestion which may interest councils throughout NZ. That F&G, a private organisation, has jurisdiction over public assets such as water-ways is a travesty and councils throughout NZ should lobby for a change in legislation in order to bring full control within their ambit, F&G reduced to a pressure group like any other private concern. Staff Comment 1. With respect to the classification of trout Staff Recommendation: Reject Reason: Staff comment that trout are currently a sports fish as designated by the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1983. In addition, as a species, a programme under a RPMP would not be a feasible intervention to address such a widespread aquatic species. Staff Comment 2. With respect to managing specific waterways Staff Recommendations: Note Reason: Initiatives that may manage a specific waterway are not driven by the Regional Pest Management Plan (RPMP). If Council were to be involved in such an initiative, it would likely be a project to protect biodiversity and/or improve water quality. Staff Comment 3. With respect regard the points raised about Fish & Game Staff Recommendation: Note Reason: Staff comment that not all requests are within the scope of Council's mandate. Hearing Panel Recommendation Reject The hearing panel thanks you for your submission and note that trout are currently designated by the Freshwater Fisheries Regulations 1983 as a sport fish and as such cannot be considered for a programme in the Regional Pest Management Plan. 4 573 Siobain Browning 29 Glentui Place, Waikawa, Picton 7220 (Speaking) Picton Dawn Chorus Category: All Decision Requested to include a wider range of introduced, pest mammals in the Pest Management Strategy Staff Comment 1. To request greater support and/or recognition for a number of introduced mammalian predators. Staff Recommendation: Reject Reason: A Regional Pest Management Plan (RPMP) is a specific tool available to Councils under the Biosecurity Act 1993 (the Act).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • WAIRAU RIVER ACCESS POINTS ᵴ = Swimming Spot ۩ = Toilet Ᵽ = Picnic Area ۩ Wairau Bar 1 Vehicle Access to the Northern Side of the Wairau River Mouth
    NELSON / MARLBOROUGH REGION MARLBOROUGH / NELSON such as a Humpy, Irresistible or Royal Wulf. If the trout are are trout the If Wulf. Royal or Irresistible Humpy, a as such NEW ZEALAND NEW first choice. If the fish are rising try a size 12 to 16 dry fly fly dry 16 to 12 size a try rising are fish the If choice. first with a red and gold veltic or articulated trout being a good good a being trout articulated or veltic gold and red a with productive method. The trout will take any type of spinner spinner of type any take will trout The method. productive TM before the wind gets up. Spinning is a popular and and popular a is Spinning up. gets wind the before wind conditions. The best fishing is often in the morning morning the in often is fishing best The conditions. wind Supported by: Supported All fishing methods work well but can be depend upon upon depend be can but well work methods fishing All size and the occasional larger fish up to 3kg. to up fish larger occasional the and size Telephone (03) 544 6382 www.fishandgame.org.nz 6382 544 (03) Telephone fishery with good numbers of brown trout around the 1kg 1kg the around trout brown of numbers good with fishery P O Box 2173, Stoke, Nelson. Stoke, 2173, Box O P 66 Champion Rd, Richmond, Rd, Champion 66 available at the south eastern end of the pond. It is a reliable reliable a is It pond. the of end eastern south the at available the shoreline.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 March 2021 – Page 1 Network Outcomes Contract Report (Provided by Lee Hautler - Interim Contract Manager)
    Contents Marlborough Roads ...................................................................................................................... 1 Local Road Asset Management Report – January 2021 ................................................................................ 1 Marlborough Roads Activity ............................................................................................................................ 3 Project Status .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Road Safety Incidents ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Marlborough Roads Team .............................................................................................................................. 5 Rivers and Drainage Section – Activity Report ........................................................................... 7 Wairau River ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Wairau Floodplain and Tributaries .................................................................................................................. 9 Drainage ........................................................................................................................................................ 11 Floodway Reserves ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 11 October 2018
    MARLBOROUGH DISTRICT COUNCIL TELEPHONE (0064) 3 520 7400 15 SEYMOUR STREET FACSIMILE (0064) 3 520 7496 PO BOX 443, BLENHEIM 7240 EMAIL [email protected] NEW ZEALAND WEB www.marlborough.govt.nz 5 October 2018 Record No: 18223360 File Ref: D050-001-E01 Ask For: Nicole Chauval Notice of Committee Meeting – Thursday, 11 October 2018 A meeting of the Environment Committee will be held in the Council Chambers, District Council Administration Building, 15 Seymour Street, Blenheim on Thursday, 11 October 2018 commencing at 9.00 am. BUSINESS As per Agenda attached. MARK WHEELER CHIEF EXECUTIVE Meeting of the ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE to be held in the Council Chambers, 15 Seymour Street, on THURSDAY, 11 OCTOBER 2018 commencing at 9.00 am Committee Clr D D Oddie (Chairperson) Clr G A Hope (Deputy) Clr J A Arbuckle Clr T E Hook Clr C J Brooks Clr L M Shenfield Clr N P Taylor Mayor J C Leggett Mr E R Beech (Rural representative) Departmental Head Mr H Versteegh (Manager, Regulatory Department) Staff N Chauval (Committee Secretary) In Public Page 1. Apologies ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2. Declaration of Interests .................................................................................................................. 1 3. Resource Hearing Commissioner Decision .................................................................................. 2 4. Wairau Plain Liquefaction Risk Assessment .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • WAIRAU RIVER ACCESS POINTS ᵴ = Swimming Spot ۩ = Toilet Ᵽ = Picnic Area
    Hamill’s Killer can also work well. work also can Killer Hamill’s Telephone (03) 544 6382 www.fishandgame.org.nz 6382 544 (03) Telephone NELSON / MARLBOROUGH REGION MARLBOROUGH / NELSON such as a Mrs Simpson, Woolly Bugger (black or olive) or or olive) or (black Bugger Woolly Simpson, Mrs a as such P O Box 2173, Stoke, Nelson. Stoke, 2173, Box O P NEW ZEALAND NEW Hares Ear, Snail or Water Boatman. Larger wet fly lures lures fly wet Larger Boatman. Water or Snail Ear, Hares 66 Champion Rd, Richmond, Rd, Champion 66 18 nymph such as a Pheasant Tail, Tail, Pheasant a as such nymph 18 – 14 size a try rising Nelson Marlborough Region Marlborough Nelson as a Humpy, Irresistible or Royal Wulf. If the trout are not not are trout the If Wulf. Royal or Irresistible Humpy, a as NEW ZEALAND NEW TM choice. If the fish are rising try a size 12 to 16 dry fly such such fly dry 16 to 12 size a try rising are fish the If choice. with a red and gold veltic or pink enticer being a good first first good a being enticer pink or veltic gold and red a with TM productive method. The trout will take any type of spinner spinner of type any take will trout The method. productive before the wind gets up. Spinning is a popular and and popular a is Spinning up. gets wind the before wind conditions. The best fishing is often in the morning morning the in often is fishing best The conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Marlborough Rivers and Their Margins
    The Natural Character of selected Marlborough Rivers and their margins May 2014 C10003 Prepared for Marlborough District Council (MDC) Updated Report May 2014 Boffa Miskell Limited: James Bentley, Sally Bishop, Alistair Marshall, Brian McAuslan, Marlborough District Council: Pere Hawes, Peter Hamill This report draws on the findings of the following report: ‘Natural Character: Application of the River Significance Assessment Method to Marlborough District’, past of the River Values Assessment System: Volume 2: Application to cultural, production and environment values. LEaP Report No. 24B, Lincoln University, New Zealand: Neil Deans (Nelson - Marlborough Fish and Game) Val Wadsworth (Marlborough District Council) Brin Williman (Marlborough District Council) Allan Rackham (Boffa Miskell) James Bentley (Boffa Miskell) The Natural Character of selected Marlborough Rivers and their margins The winding nature of the Wairau River channel and its The ox-bow lake of Grove Arm in the Wairau Plain broad semi-braided river bed. Much of the lower banks of the river are lined by willows and gorse. Contents A Section A: INTRODUCTION AND STUDY PROCESS 5 Introduction 6 Study Process 7 B Section B: APPLICATION OF THE METHODOLOGY 9 Definition of Natural Character 10 Naturalness 10 Natural Character Values of Rivers and their margins 14 The River Environment Classification System (REC) 14 Assessment Criteria 16 C Section C SELECTED RIVERS & THEIR MARGINS IN THE MARLBOROUGH REGION 23 Marlborough’s Rivers 24 Wairau River 26 Awatere River 28 Rai and Pelorus Rivers 29 Clarence River 30 Other Rivers within Marlborough 30 D Section D: EVALUATION OF SELECTED RIVERS AND THEIR MARGINS 33 Inventory of Selected Marlborough Rivers 34 E Section E REFERENCES 47 References 48 Websites 48 Section A: INTRODUCTION AND STUDY PROCESS 6 Introduction Marlborough District Council (MDC) engaged Boffa and Mapping the Marlborough Coastal Environment, Miskell Ltd (BML) to assess selected rivers and their (2014), Boffa Miskell et al’.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Properties in the Wairau Valley
    Soil Properties in the Wairau Valley 3 Technical Report No: 16-005 August 2016 Soil Properties in the Wairau Valley MDC Technical Report No: 16-005 ISSN 1179-819X (Online) ISBN 978-1-927159-70-5 (Online) File Reference/Record No: E355-004-008-08/16210911 August 2016 Report Prepared by: Iain Campbell Land and Soil Consultancy Services, Matt Oliver Biologic Soils and Rachel Rait MDC Environmental Science & Monitoring Group Marlborough District Council Seymour Square PO Box 443 Blenheim 7240 Phone: 520 7400 Website: www.marlborough.govt.nz Acknowledgements: The Marlborough District Council wish to thank the landowners for providing access to their properties to allow soils to be sampled and Dr Iain Campbell for help in location of sampling sites, soil profile descriptions and comments on geomorphology of the catchments. Soil Properties in the Wairau Valley Executive Summary Currently Council has detailed information for soils mapped on the Wairau Plain and the lower Awatere Valley. For the rest of Marlborough, we have little, or more often, no soils information available. An example is the Wairau Valley where there is no available information on important soil parameters such as water holding capacity, drainage, soil depth and permeability. This information is useful if we want to help landowners manage their soils for activities such as irrigation scheduling, effluent application, stock management. Furthermore, a range of models such as OVERSEER, SPASMO and the Dairy Pond Calculator require accurate soils information to help predict things like nutrient losses from soils, water availability and the suitability of soils for effluent application. Because soils act as buffers to capture and store nutrients and microbes, treat a range of waste products and store and filter water, accurate soils information is critical.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the Braided Riverbeds of Southern Marlborough, New Zealand
    Birds of the braided riverbeds of southern Marlborough, New Zealand DOC SCIENCE INTERNAL SERIES 95 S.E.A. Hallas Published by Department of Conservation P.O. Box 10-420 Wellington, New Zealand DOC Science Internal Series is a published record of scientific research carried out, or advice given, by Department of Conservation staff, or external contractors funded by DOC. It comprises progress reports and short communications that are generally peer-reviewed within DOC, but not always externally refereed. Fully refereed contract reports funded from the Conservation Services Levy are also included. Individual contributions to the series are first released on the departmental intranet in pdf form. Hardcopy is printed, bound, and distributed at regular intervals. Titles are listed in the DOC Science Publishing catalogue on the departmental website http://www.doc.govt.nz and electronic copies of CSL papers can be downloaded from http://www.csl.org.nz © January 2003, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1175–6519 ISBN 0–478–22362–5 This is a client report commissioned by Nelson/Marlborough Conservancy and funded from the Unprogrammed Science Advice fund. It was prepared for publication by DOC Science Publishing, Science & Research Unit; editing and layout by Geoff Gregory. Publication was approved by the Manager, Science & Research Unit, Science Technology and Information Services, Department of Conservation, Wellington. CONTENTS Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 2. Data collection 6 3. Results 8 3.1 Wairau River 9 3.2 Awatere River 11 3.3 Waima River 15 3.4 Clarence River 15 3.5 Hapuku River 16 3.6 Kowhai River 16 3.7 Kahutara River 16 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Picturesque Atlas of Australasia Maps
    A-Signal Battery. I-Workshops. B-Observatory . K-Government House. C-Hospital. L-Palmer's Farm. .__4 S URVEY D-Prison. M-Officers ' Quarters. of E-Barracks . N-Magazine. F-Store Houses. 0-Gallows. THE SET TLEMENT ;n i Vh u/ ,S OUTN ALES G-Marine Barracks . P-Brick-kilns. H-Prisoners ' Huts. Q-Brickfields. LW OLLANI) iz /` 5Mile t4 2 d2 36 Engraved by A.Dulon 4 L.Poates • 1FTTh T i1111Tm»iTIT1 149 .Bogga 1 a 151 Bengalla • . l v' r-- Cootamundra Coola i r A aloe a 11lichellago 4 I A.J. SCALLY DEL. , it 153 'Greggreg ll tai III IJL. INDEX TO GENERAL MAP OF NE W SOUTH W ALES . NOTE -The letters after the names correspond with those in the borders of the map, and indicate the square in which the name will be found. Abercrombie River . Billagoe Mountain Bundella . J d Conjurong Lake . Dromedary Mountain. Aberdeen . Binalong . Bunda Lake C d Coogee . Drummond Mountain. Aberfoyle River . Binda . Bundarra . L c Cook (county) . Dry Bogan (creek) Acacia Creek . Bingera . Bunganbil Hill G g Coolabah . Dry Lake . Acres Billabong . Binyah . Bungarry Lake . E g Coolaburrag u ndy River Dry Lake Adelong Bird Island Bungendore J h Coolac Dry Lake Beds . Adelong Middle . Birie River Bungle Gully I c Coolah . Dry River . Ailsa . Bishop 's Bridge . Bungonia . J g Coolaman . Dubbo Creek Albemarle Black Head Bunker 's Creek . D d Coolbaggie Creek Dubbo Albert Lake . Blackheath Bunna Bunna Creek J b Cooleba Creek Duck Creek Albury . Black Point Bunyan J i Cooma Dudanman Hill . Alice Black Swamp Burbar Creek G b Coomba Lake Dudley (county) .
    [Show full text]
  • Macroinvertebrates of the Wairau River and the Likely Consequences of Proposed Hydroelectric Development
    Macroinvertebrates of the Wairau River and the likely consequences of proposed hydroelectric development Dean A. Olsen DOC RESEArcH & DEVELOPMENT SERIES 256 Published by Science & Technical Publishing Department of Conservation PO Box 10420, The Terrace Wellington 6143, New Zealand DOC Research & Development Series is a published record of scientific research carried out, or advice given, by Department of Conservation staff or external contractors funded by DOC. It comprises reports and short communications that are peer-reviewed. Individual contributions to the series are first released on the departmental website in pdf form. Hardcopy is printed, bound, and distributed at regular intervals. Titles are also listed in our catalogue on the website, refer www.doc.govt.nz under Publications, then Science and Research. © Copyright November 2006, New Zealand Department of Conservation ISSN 1176–8886 ISBN 0–478–14129–7 This is a client report commissioned by Nelson–Marlborough Conservancy and funded from the Science Advice Fund. It was prepared for publication by Science & Technical Publishing; editing and layout by Geoff Gregory. Publication was approved by the Chief Scientist (Research, Development & Improvement Division), Department of Conservation, Wellington, New Zealand. In the interest of forest conservation, we support paperless electronic publishing. When printing, recycled paper is used wherever possible. ContEnts Abstract 5 1. Introduction 6 1.1 Objectives 6 2. Macroinvertebrate community of the Wairau 7 2.1 Species composition 7 2.2 Macroinvertebrates of potential conservation interest 9 2.3 Comparison with other South Island braided rivers 9 2.3.1 Taxon richness 9 2.3.2 Invertebrate abundance 9 2.3.3 Community composition 12 2.4 Significance to fish and birds 13 3.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Rivers of New Zealand
    Sl. No River Name 1 Aan River 2 Acheron River (Canterbury) 3 Acheron River (Marlborough) 4 Ada River 5 Adams River 6 Ahaura River 7 Ahuriri River 8 Ahuroa River 9 Akatarawa River 10 Akitio River 11 Alexander River 12 Alfred River 13 Allen River 14 Alma River 15 Alph River (Ross Dependency) 16 Anatoki River 17 Anatori River 18 Anaweka River 19 Anne River 20 Anti Crow River 21 Aongatete River 22 Aorangiwai River 23 Aorere River 24 Aparima River 25 Arahura River 26 Arapaoa River 27 Araparera River 28 Arawhata River 29 Arnold River 30 Arnst River 31 Aropaoanui River 32 Arrow River 33 Arthur River 34 Ashburton River / Hakatere 35 Ashley River / Rakahuri 36 Avoca River (Canterbury) 37 Avoca River (Hawke's Bay) 38 Avon River (Canterbury) 39 Avon River (Marlborough) 40 Awakari River 41 Awakino River 42 Awanui River 43 Awarau River 44 Awaroa River 45 Awarua River (Northland) 46 Awarua River (Southland) 47 Awatere River 48 Awatere River (Gisborne) 49 Awhea River 50 Balfour River www.downloadexcelfiles.com 51 Barlow River 52 Barn River 53 Barrier River 54 Baton River 55 Bealey River 56 Beaumont River 57 Beautiful River 58 Bettne River 59 Big Hohonu River 60 Big River (Southland) 61 Big River (Tasman) 62 Big River (West Coast, New Zealand) 63 Big Wainihinihi River 64 Blackwater River 65 Blairich River 66 Blind River 67 Blind River 68 Blue Duck River 69 Blue Grey River 70 Blue River 71 Bluff River 72 Blythe River 73 Bonar River 74 Boulder River 75 Bowen River 76 Boyle River 77 Branch River 78 Broken River 79 Brown Grey River 80 Brown River 81 Buller
    [Show full text]
  • Renwick Area, Marlborough District
    Marlborough District Seismic Hazard Investigation Programme – Phase 2 Paleoseismic trench investigation of the active trace of the Wairau section of the Alpine Fault, Renwick Area, Marlborough District December 2003 (amended 2005) Report prepared by Dr Mark Yetton GEOTECH CONSULTING LTD Reference: 1490 Prepared for: Marlborough District Council 2 of 24 Refer to this report as: Marlborough District Seismic Hazard Investigation Programme - Phase 2: Paleoseismic trench investigation of the active trace of the Wairau section of the Alpine Fault, Renwick area, Marlborough District. Yetton, M. D. December 2003 (further amended 2005). The information collected and presented in this report and accompanying maps and documents by the Consultant and supplied to Marlborough District Council is accurate to the best of the knowledge and belief of the Consultant acting on behalf of Marlborough District Council. While the Consultant has exercised all reasonable skill and care in the preparation of information in this material, neither the Consultant nor Marlborough District Councils accept any liability in contract, tort or otherwise for any loss, damage, injury or expense, whether direct, indirect or consequential, arising out of the conclusions reached or the provision of information in this report and associated maps. IMPORTANT NOTES Accuracy of Active Fault Maps The maps contained in this report are either regional in scope and detail (Figure 1 and the inset in Figure 2), or are based on hand held GPS and aerial photograph interpretation. While every effort has been made to accurately locate the active fault features there may be location errors. The maps should not be viewed as a substitute for site-specific investigations and/or geotechnical engineering assessment wherever this is required.
    [Show full text]
  • Proposed Marlborough Environment Plan Topic 9: Natural Hazards
    Proposed Marlborough Environment Plan Topic 9: Natural Hazards Hearing dates: 28 – 29 and 31 May 2018 S42A Report Writer: Paul Whyte, Gavin Cooper and Laddie Kuta Conflicts of Interest: None Interim decision: Yes (Note: A list of conflicts of interest which arose during the process are available to view on the Marlborough District Council Website) Topic 9: Natural Hazards Structure of Decisions ............................................................................................................................. 4 Natural Hazards ...................................................................................................................................... 6 Statutory setting ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Summary of principal PMEP Policies the subject of submissions ........................................................... 7 Objective 11.1 ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Submissions Summary .......................................................................................................................... 11 Section 42A Report ............................................................................................................................... 12 Interim decision .................................................................................................................................... 13
    [Show full text]