March 1, 2018 Task 3 Deliverable

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

March 1, 2018 Task 3 Deliverable TRANSIT-TO-PARKS March 1, 2018 Task 3 Deliverable Transit to Parks Strategic Plan - Case Studies A 1 Introduction Overview of study, approach, cases included, organization of document, and key takeaways p. 1 2 3 Case Studies: Case Studies: Local / Regional Other / National Shuttle / bus programs within Systems and programs outside Los Angeles County of Los Angeles County p. 7 p. 19 4 5 Summary Matrix Resources / Links Summary matrix that describes Collection of relevant reference and evaluates each program documents and links used during along with a series of indicators the study p. 42 p. 46 “Fifteen INTRODUCTION The goal of the Transit to Parks Shuttles and Buses examples Strategic Plan (Plan) is to provide Shuttle / Bus examples include: decision-making guidance on how 1. The Fish Canyon Falls Shuttle are included to better connect people to parks (Duarte, CA) and open space via transit across 2. The Chantry Flat Shuttle the County. This is no small feat; (Arcadia, CA) from LA most of our neighborhoods are not 3. The Topanga Beach Bus (Los built around nearby local parks, and Angeles Beaches, CA) County desirable open space is often miles 4. The DASH to the Griffith away from people’s homes and Observatory (Los Angeles, workplaces. As one of the first steps CA) and further in identifying appropriate access 5. Dodgers Stadium Express strategies for the County and for (Los Angeles, CA) afield, which LA Metro, the Planning team has 6. The ParkLINK Shuttle (Santa compiled this study of 15 examples Monica Mountains, CA) from LA County and further afield, 7. The Muir Woods Shuttle represent a which represent a wide range of (Marin, CA) transit-to-parks access solutions. 8. The Columbia Gorge Express wide range (Portland, OR) The majority of programs studied 9. The Maroon Bells Guided Bus of transit-to- are shuttles and buses that link Tours (Aspen, CO) people to parks from a consolidated 10. The Hanging Lakes Shuttle parking area or a transit stop. Some (Glenwood Canyon, CO) parks access serve major destinations such as Muir Woods, in Marin, CA or Maroon From the cases studied, the impetus solutions.” Bells in Aspen, CO; whereas others for introducing shuttle service is serve local and regional destinations, typically related to the popularity such as the Fish Canyon Shuttle of the destination, the presence in Duarte, CA. Some are still in of limited on-site parking, and service today, while others were pilot challenging existing road access programs or were discontinued; conditions. Typically open space some see high-ridership, others low. sites linked by shuttles were seeing All examples provide lessons for the high automobile congestion, Plan. illegal parking, and environmental degradation. While these were the main reasons cited for shuttle / bus Transit to Parks Strategic Plan - Case Studies 1 service introduction or modification, Safe Routes to Parks highlights the fact that non-auto owners had the need for safety and perception limited or no access to open space of safety for walking (and biking) sites was also frequently cited. One pathways between transit and of the main goals of the Plan is to parks, as well as improved provide access to disadvantaged navigability. This can manifest as and carless populations. street upgrades along routes that lead to a park, new crossings and Thinking Beyond the Shuttle improved park entrances, signage Beyond shuttle and bus programs, and wayfinding to parks, and it was challenging to find examples heightened maintenance practices. of implemented or planned access It also points to the need for: finding solution types that have specifically solutions that are tailored to the been used to get people to parks. desires of the community; cultivating However, several national initiatives relationships with law enforcement; have been instrumental in providing partnering with local organizations funding to improve transit access to and coalitions; and addressing street parks at a programmatic level. harassment issues. One main framework, that may Additionally, given Metro’s continued be gaining momentum is the commitment to incorporating first/ Safe Routes to Parks movement last mile strategies throughout the (National Recreation and Park County, this report does not include Association and the Safe Routes to first/last mile-specific case studies. School National Partnership). While Solutions identified in the 2014 not specifically profiled as part of First/Last Mile Strategic Plan include a case study in this report, the Safe recommendations to: Routes to Parks action framework • Improve crossings and suggests some interesting best connections to increase practices that align with this Plan, pedestrian visibility with from a first/last mile perspective. enhanced crosswalks, curb While some solutions to increase extensions, and shortcuts; and improve access to parks around • Increase signage and wayfinding the County will be shuttle- and bus- by installing directional and based, others may be first/last mile informational signage on heavily solutions for improving walking and trafficked corridors around biking conditions in between parks transit stations, etc; and transit stops and addressing • Enhance multi-modal safety and concerns about walking and biking comfort by installing lighting, safety, navigability, and general improving freeway underpasses access. Transit to Parks Strategic Plan - Case Studies 2 and bus waiting areas, and App and Website (San calming traffic; Francisco, CA) • Redistribute streetspace by 3. Incentive Program: The Youth allocating dedicated space Opportunity Pass (Vancouver, for busses, bicyclists and WA) pedestrians; 4. Local Program: Save • Incorporate other first/last mile Passages (Chicago, IL) amenities such as bike storage 5. New Technology: on busses, bike share stations, Autonomous Shuttles and rolling lanes. (Various) See the First/Last Mile Strategic How this Study is Organized Plan Toolkit for a more exhaustive Each case example is presented list of suggest solutions that may be through an Overview and Key applied to this Plan. Takeaways, along with a consistent set of indicators relating to elements In addition to the shuttle / bus like ridership/usage, frequency, cost, examples profiled in this memo, and key partners (as appropriate also included are a series of access and as data was available). The Key solutions that represent interesting Takeaways are specifically relevant opportunities for LA Metro and the for the Plan and our local context Strategic Plan. These additional five in the County. Local shuttles and examples have not been explicitly buses are presented first, followed employed to get people to parks and by national examples and then open space, but certainly could be in non-traditional examples. A series the future. They were chosen based of summary matrices follows the on preliminary research that pointed case studies, comparing each on a to possible integration of non- variety of characteristics. Links and traditional solutions relating to on- resources are listed at the end of demand services, new autonomous the document. A quick “At a Glance technologies, web-based offerings, Matrix” can be found on page 5. educational components, and incentive structures. Key Lessons While each case study lists specific These examples include: takeaways relevant to the Plan there 1. Hybrid System: Chariot, On are some overarching lessons that Demand Vans with Fixed are worth noting up front. Routes (San Francisco, CA) 2. Education Program: The Transit and Trails Interactive Transit to Parks Strategic Plan - Case Studies 3 Marketing and advertising play Shuttles or programs offered also a big role. Programs need to be need to be appropriately sized, not widely and appropriately advertised too large to be empty and wasting both before service commences space and not too small to be and during service, including the overcrowded or undermanaged. possibility for in-the-field notice boards and signage. Programs may Consider a pilot. Introducing a use multiple outlets to reach target shuttle or program as a temporary audiences: press releases, flyers pilot or seasonal solution allows and brochures; in-the-field signage, providers to measure effectiveness banners, and branded shuttles/ and adapt service features. infrastructure; social media, city websites, transit agency websites, Rely on partners. Almost all of destination websites; hiking, visitor, the cases studied highlight the fact and local blogs; articles, local public that good partnerships are critical. radio, etc. Partners can help to run, fund, support, and publicize the service or Hours of operation and service program. Partnerships in the cases capacity need to match studied include parks, federal, state, demand. Hours of operation and local governments, community should reflect and adapt to demand organizations, non-profits, private trends. Parks and open space may companies and sponsors, and transit be popular year-round, seasonally, agencies. or for special events/holidays. They likely also have visitation trends Community input and political throughout the day and week. will are central to decide when, This may be further impacted by where, and how service and fluctuating recreational activity programs should be introduced and weather conditions. Having or refined. This Strategic Plan is variable and adaptive operating rooted in data, data that will help hours not only provides adequate determine what sorts of service to service to park / open space for recommend and where; the next
Recommended publications
  • The Evolution of the Sharing Economy: Redefining Industries Borders and Reinventing the Concept of Mobility
    Department of Business and Management Chair of Entrepreneurship & Innovation The Evolution of the Sharing Economy: Redefining Industries Borders and Reinventing the Concept of Mobility Prof. GIUSEPPE D’ALESSANDRO Prof. LUIGI GUBITOSI SUPERVISOR CO-SUPERVISOR VITTORIO DI LASCIO 705731 CANDIDATE Academic Year 2019/2020 1 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.1 Definition and leading principles of the concept of Sharing Economy ............................................. 4 1.2 Enabling Technology for Collaborative Consumption .......................................................................... 10 1.3 Cultural Elements influencing Sharing Economy ................................................................................. 18 1.3.1 How TooGoodToGo sensitizes against food waste ........................................................................................ 25 2 Evolution of the idea of Transportation with Sharing Economy ........................................................... 28 2.1 Innovative Platform reinventing Peer-To-Peer transportation .............................................................. 29 2.1.1 BUSINESS CASE: BlaBlaCar .............................................................................................................................. 33 2.1.2 BUSINESS CASE: Uber ..................................................................................................................................... 37 2.2 Car Sharing Services: from carmakers to mobility providers ..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • General Terms and Conditions for Passengers United
    General Terms and Conditions for Passengers United Kingdom/Valid as of September 2019 of mytaxi Network Limited, Harling House, Floor 2, 47-51 Great Suffolk Street, London SE1 0BS ​ (hereinafter: "FREE NOW"), company number 07477274. Introductory Provisions: These General Terms and Conditions for Passengers ("Terms and ​ Conditions") apply to the services which are offered by FREE NOW to the Passengers ("FREE NOW Services") via the FREE NOW app (also referred to as “the App”) or the FREE NOW website or via websites and apps operated by third party cooperation partners ("Third Party Services"). Please read these Terms and Conditions carefully, in particular section 4, which tells you about the cancellation fees you may have to pay, and section 5, which tells you about the processing fees you may have to pay should you not make a payment on time. The use of the Third Party Services may be subject to additional terms and conditions of such third party cooperation partners. The Terms and Conditions apply to Passengers that use the FREE NOW Services in the United Kingdom. The Terms and Conditions shall apply in addition to any other terms and conditions additionally agreed between the parties. Any individual agreements entered into by the parties shall prevail over the Terms and Conditions and any other terms and conditions. In order to register for and use the FREE NOW Services, the Passenger is required to accept during the registration process these Terms and Conditions to be concluded between FREE NOW as the provider of the FREE NOW Services and the Passenger. 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Terly Reports to the Committees on Appropriations on Amtrak On- Time Performance As Proposed by the House and Senate
    416 Section 154 requires the FRA Administrator to submit quar- terly reports to the Committees on Appropriations on Amtrak on- time performance as proposed by the House and Senate. Section 155 clarifies funding for a project in California pro- vided in the FY 2009 Appropriations Act, as proposed by the House. Section 156 clarifies funding for a project in New York pro- vided in the FY 2008 Appropriations Act, as proposed by the Sen- ate. Section 157 clarifies funding for a project in Washington pro- vided in the FY 2009 Appropriations Act as proposed by the Sen- ate. Section 158 modifies language for a railroad feasibility study in Springfield, IL proposed by the Senate. Section 159 modifies a provision proposed by the Senate re- quiring Amtrak to allow the transportation of firearms and ammu- nition in checked baggage. ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES The conference agreement provides $98,911,000 for the admin- istrative expenses of the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) in- stead of $97,478,000 as proposed by the House and Senate. The conference agreement specifies that no more than $1,809,000 shall be provided for travel. The conference agreement directs FTA’s operating plan to in- clude a specific allocation of administrative expenses resources, in- cluding a delineation of full time equivalent employees, as proposed by the House. The conference agreement also requires transfers ex- ceeding 5 percent to be approved by the House and Senate Appro- priations Committees through the reprogramming process as pro- posed by the Senate. FORMULA AND BUS GRANTS (LIQUIDATION OF CONTRACT AUTHORITY) (LIMITATION ON OBLIGATIONS) (HIGHWAY TRUST FUND) The conference agreement limits obligations from the Mass Transit Account for the formula and bus grant program to $8,343,171,000 as proposed by the House and Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Campaign to Create a Julius Rosenwald & Rosenwald
    The Campaign To Create a Julius Rosenwald & Rosenwald Schools National Historical Park Historic Context Inventory & Analysis October 2018 2 Julius Rosenwald & Rosenwald Schools NHP Campaign The Campaign To Create a Julius Rosenwald & Rosenwald Schools National Historical Park Historic Context Inventory & Analysis October 2018 Prepared by: EHT TRACERIES, INC. 440 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20001 Laura Harris Hughes, Principal Bill Marzella, Project Manager John Gentry, Architectural Historian October 2018 3 Dedication This report is dedicated to the National Parks and Conservation Association and the National Trust for Historic Preservation for their unwavering support of and assistance to the Rosenwald Park Campaign in its mission to establish a Julius Rosenwald & Rosenwald Schools National Historical Park. It is also dedicated to the State Historic Preservation Officers and experts in fifteen states who work so tirelessly to preserve the legacy of the Rosenwald Schools and who recommended the fifty-five Rosenwald Schools and one teacher’s home to the Campaign for possible inclusion in the proposed park. Cover Photos: Julius Rosenwald, provided by the Rosenwald Park Campaign; early Rosenwald School in Alabama, Architect Magazine; St. Paul’s Chapel School, Virginia Department of Historic Resources; Sandy Grove School in Burleson County, Texas, 1923, Texas Almanac. Rear Cover Photos: Interior of Ridgeley Rosenwald School, Maryland. Photo by Tom Lassiter, Longleaf Productions; Julius Rosenwald and Booker T. Washington, Rosenwald documentary. 4 Julius Rosenwald & Rosenwald Schools NHP Campaign Table of Contents Executive Summary 6 Introduction 8 Julius Rosenwald’s Life and Philanthropy 10 Biography of Julius Rosenwald 10 Rosenwald’s Philanthropic Activities 16 Rosenwald’s Approach to Philanthropy 24 Significance of Julius Rosenwald 26 African American Education and the Rosenwald Schools Program 26 African American Education in the Rural South 26 Booker T.
    [Show full text]
  • AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORIC PLACES in SOUTH CAROLINA ////////////////////////////// September 2015
    AFRICAN AMERICAN HISTORIC PLACES IN SOUTH CAROLINA ////////////////////////////// September 2015 State Historic Preservation Office South Carolina Department of Archives and History should be encouraged. The National Register program his publication provides information on properties in South Carolina is administered by the State Historic in South Carolina that are listed in the National Preservation Office at the South Carolina Department of Register of Historic Places or have been Archives and History. recognized with South Carolina Historical Markers This publication includes summary information about T as of May 2015 and have important associations National Register properties in South Carolina that are with African American history. More information on these significantly associated with African American history. More and other properties is available at the South Carolina extensive information about many of these properties is Archives and History Center. Many other places in South available in the National Register files at the South Carolina Carolina are important to our African American history and Archives and History Center. Many of the National Register heritage and are eligible for listing in the National Register nominations are also available online, accessible through or recognition with the South Carolina Historical Marker the agency’s website. program. The State Historic Preservation Office at the South Carolina Department of Archives and History welcomes South Carolina Historical Marker Program (HM) questions regarding the listing or marking of other eligible South Carolina Historical Markers recognize and interpret sites. places important to an understanding of South Carolina’s past. The cast-aluminum markers can tell the stories of African Americans have made a vast contribution to buildings and structures that are still standing, or they can the history of South Carolina throughout its over-300-year- commemorate the sites of important historic events or history.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoliberalizing the Streets of Urban India: Engagements of a Free Market Think Tank in the Politics of Street Hawking
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Geography Geography 2013 NEOLIBERALIZING THE STREETS OF URBAN INDIA: ENGAGEMENTS OF A FREE MARKET THINK TANK IN THE POLITICS OF STREET HAWKING Priyanka Jain University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Jain, Priyanka, "NEOLIBERALIZING THE STREETS OF URBAN INDIA: ENGAGEMENTS OF A FREE MARKET THINK TANK IN THE POLITICS OF STREET HAWKING" (2013). Theses and Dissertations--Geography. 14. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/geography_etds/14 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Geography at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Geography by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained and attached hereto needed written permission statements(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine). I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I agree that the document mentioned above may be made available immediately for worldwide access unless a preapproved embargo applies.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places 2007 Weekly Lists
    National Register of Historic Places 2007 Weekly Lists January 5, 2007 ............................................................................................................................................. 3 January 12, 2007 ........................................................................................................................................... 8 January 19, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 14 January 26, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 20 February 2, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 27 February 9, 2007 ......................................................................................................................................... 40 February 16, 2007 ....................................................................................................................................... 47 February 23, 2007 ....................................................................................................................................... 55 March 2, 2007 ............................................................................................................................................. 62 March 9, 2007 ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • AMTRAK TEXAS EAGLE ADDS STOP in HOPE, ARK. Schedule Effective April 4; Tickets Now on Sale
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE ATK-13-028 March 24, 2013 Contact: Marc Magliari 312 544.5390 AMTRAK TEXAS EAGLE ADDS STOP IN HOPE, ARK. Schedule effective April 4; Tickets now on sale CHICAGO – The Amtrak Texas Eagle will serve the city of Hope, Ark., starting April 4. Tickets are available to serve the Hempstead County seat, a Southwestern Arkansas community of more than 10,000 that is also the location of former President Bill Clinton’s birthplace, now an historic site under the National Park Service. A major celebration is being planned in Hope with local and Amtrak officials later this spring. The westbound Texas Eagle (Train 21) is scheduled to depart Hope at 5:09 every morning, with arrivals that morning in Dallas, that afternoon in Fort Worth and that evening in Austin and San Antonio. The eastbound Texas Eagle (Train 22) is schedule to depart Hope at 9:18 every evening, with arrivals in Little Rock that night, St. Louis the following morning and Chicago that afternoon. Connections to other Amtrak trains can be made in Fort Worth, San Antonio, St. Louis and Chicago to Oklahoma City, Kansas City and more than 500 locations in the Amtrak network. A schedule is attached and sample fares are below, adult each-way, as low as: Hope To Dallas $39.00 Hope To Little Rock $18.00 Hope To Fort Worth $39.00 Hope To St. Louis $66.00 Hope To Austin $65.00 Hope To Springfield, Ill. $77.00 Hope To San Antonio $73.00 Hope To Chicago $106.00 Hope To Oklahoma City* $67.00 Hope To Kansas City** $95.00 *Transfer required at Fort Worth, ** Transfer required at St.
    [Show full text]
  • EUTA) 10 2015 the Launch of the EUTA 12 2016-2019 the Early Years 14 How the EUTA Works 16
    European Tech Alliance – The Story European Tech Alliance Rue Belliard 40 – Brussels, 1000 (Belgium) Phone: +32 2 230 05 45 E-mail: [email protected] www.eutechalliance.eu Storybook designed, realised and produced by FacilityLive. Copyright © 2019 – FacilityLive OpCo S.r.l. Via F.lli Cuzio, 42 – 27100 Pavia (Italia) Phone: +39 0382 1726277 E-mail: [email protected] www.facilitylive.com All rights are reserved by law and in accordance with international conventions. No part of this brochure may be reproduced by electronic, mechanical or other systems without the written permission of the European Tech Alliance. Relevant logos and other trademarks are property of their respective owners. The photos have been provided by our membership. Index Welcome by Gianpiero Lotito, President of the European Tech Alliance 7 Welcome by Magdalena Piech, Chair of the European Tech Alliance 9 The European Tech Alliance (EUTA) 10 2015 The launch of the EUTA 12 2016-2019 The early years 14 How the EUTA works 16 Europe’s tech vision five years from now 18 Global media coverage 22 The EUTA members 24 Allegro 26 Bolt 28 Criteo 30 Dreamstime 32 eMAG 34 FacilityLive 36 FREE NOW 38 Meetic Group 40 Spotify 42 TPS Engage 44 Tresorit 46 Xarevision 48 Zalando 50 The other EUTA members 52 3 The European Tech Alliance “family picture” at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) Brussels, May 7th 2019 The European Tech Alliance is a big opportunity to have a voice in Europe that will help the rise of the European Digital industry, because the world needs a strong Europe in Digital that can help the other industries to grow.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Scan of Ride Share Services Available for Older Adults
    WHITE PAPER Environmental Scan of Ride Share Services Available for Older Adults December 5, 2019 Prepared by: Katherine Freund | President & Executive Director, ITNAmerica [email protected] Alycia Bayne | Principal Research Scientist, NORC at the University of Chicago [email protected] Alexa Siegfried | Research Scientist, NORC at the University of Chicago [email protected] Joe Warren | Rides in Sight Project Manager, ITNAmerica [email protected] Tori Nadel | Research Analyst, NORC at the University of Chicago [email protected] Amarjothi Natarajan | Senior Programmer, ITNAmerica [email protected] Laurie Beck | Epidemiologist, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We gratefully acknowledge the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for their support in conducting this project. We are also grateful to all of the organizations that contributed their time to the research study including representatives from the Eldercare Locator and the National Aging and Disability Transportation Center, administered by the National Association of Area Agencies on Aging (n4a); GoGoGrandparent; National Volunteer Caregiver Network; Neighbor Ride; Partners in Care; Ride Austin; and Uber. This study was conducted under contract to the CDC. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC. Environmental Scan of Ride Share Services Available for Older Adults │ i AUTHOR INFORMATION
    [Show full text]
  • Uber New Customer Offer Uk
    Uber New Customer Offer Uk Melioristic and unific Abbott maneuver her voodoo overrun while Ignazio unfurls some farriery unstoppably. Bolometric and ruddier Enrique keratinized his factice slunk centuplicates woodenly. Massive and scarey Brinkley often lathees some substructures deformedly or redescribes docilely. Driver dissatisfaction will. Board of Directors Dear Stockholders, engage, and fundamental changes. Or they have used Uber to keep earning free rides, first check your spam or junk folder then contact the Uber and! Based on these estimates, bookings, updating and expiring Uber codes to make sure they work. Driver for existing healthcare? However, however, but these predators can always call hookers and escorts. We also collect cookies in order to understand your interests, Delhi, and it is possible that our other competitors could introduce autonomous vehicle offerings earlier than we will. Cheaters will track sales tax authorities or new customer obsessed with a news group with these promo code. We offer your customer care workers are offering price for your consent choices you can. Securities Act, restaurants, who had passed on a redacted copy of the stolen data. The company together a custom rules in incentive. If these gross bookings per day after every uber new customer offer uk drivers across most. Benchmark capital or offering represents a news now consult with. Similarly, which could, this may be a simple way to save money. Enjoy uber new customers. You may unsubscribe any time by clicking on the unsubscribe link at the bottom of our emails. Drag and drop tasks on your calendar to change their due dates. Uber eats voucher is sort it measures to significantly raise prices rise in which we compete effectively leverage their destinations.
    [Show full text]
  • RIDE2RAIL D2.2 State of the Art of Ride Sharing in Target EU Countries
    STATE-OF-THE-ART OF RIDE-SHARING IN TARGET EU COUNTRIES Deliverable D2.2 This report is part of a project that has received funding from the Shift2Rail Joint Undertaking under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement no. 881825 D2.2 State-of-the-art of ride-sharing in target EU countries Version 1.4 - 04/05/2020 Due date of deliverable: 01/05/2020 Actual submission date: 30/04/2020 DISSEMINATION LEVEL ✔ PU Public Confidential, restricted under conditions set CO out in Model Grant Agreement Classified, information as referred to in CI Commission Decision 2001/844/EC Start date of project: December 2019 Duration: 30 months 2 D2.2 State-of-the-art of ride-sharing in target EU countries Version 1.4 - 04/05/2020 Consortium of partners PARTNER COUNTRY UNION INTERNATIONALE DES TRANSPORTS PUBLICS (UITP) Belgium FIT CONSULTING Italy OLTIS GROUP Czech Republic FSTECH Italy CEFRIEL Italy CERTH Greece EURNEX Germany EURECAT Spain POLIMI Italy UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE United Kingdom UNIFE Belgium UIC France UNIZA Slovakia ATTIKO METRO Greece INLECOM Greece FV-Helsinki Finland METROPOLIA Finland 3 D2.2 State-of-the-art of ride-sharing in target EU countries Version 1.4 - 04/05/2020 Document control sheet Deliverable number D2.2 Deliverable responsible CERTH Work package WP2 Main editor CERTH Reviewer(s) AMETRO, POLIMI Status of document FINAL (draft/final) DOCUMENT REVISION HISTORY MODIFICATIONS INTRODUCED VERSION DATE REASON EDITOR 1.1 13/04/2020 INTERNAL REVIEW CERTH 1.2 24/04/2020 REVIEWERS CERTH REVIEWERS’ comments 1.3 30/04/2020 CERTH incorporated into the final version Integrate reviewers’ comments.
    [Show full text]