Targeting Giants the Pharmacology of Adhesion Gpcrs

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Targeting Giants the Pharmacology of Adhesion Gpcrs Targeting Giants The Pharmacology of Adhesion GPCRs Torsten Schöneberg Rudolf Schönheimer Institute of Biochemistry Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig Leipzig, Germany The class of adhesion GPCRs G lutamate (Family C) R hodopsin (Family A) A dhesion (Family B) F rizzled/Taste2 S ecretin (Family B) Groups of adhesion GPCRs Hamann J., et al. Pharm Rev. 2015;67(2):338-67. Adhesion GPCR are giants among receptors Giants - > 750 Mio. years old - N terminus - up to 5,800 aa - C terminus - up to 450 aa - numerous interaction partners - numerous splice variants Evolution of aGPCRs and phenotypes in humans Signatures of recent selection Selection in human populations - GPR133 - GPR133 - GPR110, GPR111, GPR123 - GPR110, GPR111, GPR113 - GPR56, GPR64, GPR126 - GPR115, GPR64, GPR126 - EMR1, BAI1, CELSR1 … - EMR1, EMR3, BAI3 … QTL/SNP association GPR133 - height, weight, lipid, glucose, heart rate, myocardial infarction GPR126 - weight, lipid, glucose, insulin, height, pulmonary function … Kovacs P, Schöneberg T. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2016;234:179-217. GPR133 promotes glioblastoma growth Bayin et al. Oncogenesis. 2016;5:e263. Adhesion GPCRs couple to G proteins SP HA tag P2Y12 N term. FLAG tag Human GPR133 Bohnekamp J, Schöneberg T. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:41912 Deletion of the N terminus initiates G-protein coupling GPR133 CTF P2Y12 CTF 800 SP n *** o HA tag i t 600 a l SP ] u t *** P2Y12 N term. w HA tag m f u o c 400 c a % [ P M 200 A c FLAG tag FLAG tag 0 t F F w T T C -C 2 Y 1 2 P Hypothetic scenarios of adhesion GPCR activation Ectodomain as tethered inverse agonist Ligand binding autoprot. cleavage Hypothetic scenarios of adhesion GPCR activation Ectodomain contains a tethered agonist Ligand binding autoprot. cleavage 800 n *** o i t 600 a l Deletion of the ectodomain activates GPR126 ] u t *** w m f u o c 400 c a % [ P M 200 A c 0 t F F F F w T T T T C -C -C -C 2 S S Y 1 P P 2 G G P Δ -Δ 2 Y 1 2 P Liebscher et al. Cell Rep. 2014;9:2018 -26. Peptide activation of GPR126 Peptide activation of GPR126 The ‚Stachel‘ Sequence EMR1 SSFAVLMAHYDVQ CD97 SSFAILMAHYDVE GPR56 TYFAVLMVSSVEV GPR114 TYFAVLMQLSGDP GPR115 TSFSILMSSKPVK GPR116 TSFSILMSPDSPD GPR126 THFGVLMDLPRSA GPR133 TNFAILMQVVPLE The ‚Stachel‘ Sequences of aGPCRs aGPCR Peptide length EC50 reference GPR126 16 AA > 400 µM Liebscher et al. (2014) Cell Rep GPR133 13 AA > 400 µM Liebscher et al. (2014) Cell Rep GPR56 7 AA 35 µM Stoveken et al. (2015) PNAS GPR110 10 AA 37 µM Stoveken et al. (2015) PNAS GPR64 15 AA 77 µM Demberg et al. (2015) BBRC GPR114 18 AA 100 µM Wilde et al. (2015) Faseb J Lat-1 12 AA Not determined Müller et al. (2015) PLoS Genet ‚Stachel‘ sequence in an aGPCR model GPR126 is a Gs protein-coupled receptor Mogha et al. J Neurosci. 2013; 33:17976-85. Rescue of myelination phenotype in GPR126-mutant zebrafish Stachel sequence Liebscher et al. Cell Rep. 2014;9:2018-26. Stachel peptide specificity Hamann J., et al. Pharm Rev. 2015;67(2):338-67. Stachel - derived peptide pcDps GPR64 GPR126specificity GPR110 30 *** , r 25 o t n c o e i *** t v a ) 20 l y *** e t u ** d Demberg Demberg p i t m m p u e 15 e c ** r c p * e a o v et al. et P n o 10 M d l A J o c f Biol - x ( 5 Chem. 2017 292:4383 2017 Chem. 0 pGPR64 - + - - - + - - - + - - - + - - pGPR126 - - + - - - + - - - + - - - + - pGPR110 - - - + - - - + - - - + - - - + - 94 Tethered agonism in GPCRs matrix proteins cell-cell contacts proteases mechanical force ? GPHs protease thyreostimulin relaxin LDLa TRAP p10 Stachel PARs GPHRs RXFP1 Adhesion GPCRs GPR126 is activated by shaking Petersen et al. Neuron 2015;85:755-69. Small Ligands of aGPCRs Gupte et al. FEBS Lett. 2012;586:1214-9. Antagonist at GPR56 and GPR114 Dihydromunduletone Stoveken et al. Mol Pharmacol. 2016;90:214-24. cis/trans signaling of adhesion GPCRs trans signaling (other partners) cis signaling (G proteins) (and others, e.g. ELMO/Dock) Acknowledgment University of Leipzig, Germany Ines Liebscher Julia Schön Lilian Demberg Caro Wilde Nina Auerbach Vera Lede Christin Schröck Simone Prömel Jana Winkler Antje Müller Charite Berlin, Germany Gunnar Kleinau Vollum Institute Portland, OR, USA Kelly Monk http://www.adhesiongpcr.org.
Recommended publications
  • Dissecting Signaling and Functions of Adhesion G Proteincoupled Receptors
    Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. ISSN 0077-8923 ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Issue: Annals Meeting Reports Dissecting signaling and functions of adhesion G protein–coupled receptors Demet Arac¸,1 Gabriela Aust,2 Davide Calebiro,3 Felix B. Engel,4 Caroline Formstone,5 Andre´ Goffinet,6 Jorg¨ Hamann,7 Robert J. Kittel,8 Ines Liebscher,9 Hsi-Hsien Lin,10 Kelly R. Monk,11 Alexander Petrenko,12 Xianhua Piao,13 Simone Promel,¨ 9 HelgiB.Schioth,¨ 14 Thue W. Schwartz,15 Martin Stacey,16 Yuri A. Ushkaryov,17 Manja Wobus,18 Uwe Wolfrum,19 Lei Xu,20 and Tobias Langenhan8 1Stanford University, Stanford, California. 2Department of Surgery, Research Laboratories, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 3Institute of Pharmacology and Rudolf Virchow Center, DFG-Research Center for Experimental Biomedicine, University of Wurzburg,¨ Wurzburg,¨ Germany. 4Department of Cardiac Development and Remodelling, Max-Planck-Institute for Heart and Lung Research, Bad Nauheim, Germany, and Laboratory of Experimental Renal and Cardiovascular Research, Department of Nephropathology, Institute of Pathology, University of Erlangen-Nurnberg,¨ Erlangen, Germany. 5MRC Centre for Developmental Neurobiology, King’s College London, New Hunts House, London, United Kingdom. 6Universite´ Catholique de Louvain, Institute of Neuroscience, Developmental Neurobiology, Brussels, Belgium. 7Department of Experimental Immunology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 8Institute of Physiology, Department of Neurophysiology, University of Wurzburg,¨ Wurzburg,¨ Germany. 9Institute of Biochemistry, Molecular Biochemistry, Medical Faculty, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany. 10Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan. 11Department of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. 12Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Moscow, Russia.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer
    Edinburgh Research Explorer International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list Citation for published version: Davenport, AP, Alexander, SPH, Sharman, JL, Pawson, AJ, Benson, HE, Monaghan, AE, Liew, WC, Mpamhanga, CP, Bonner, TI, Neubig, RR, Pin, JP, Spedding, M & Harmar, AJ 2013, 'International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXXVIII. G protein-coupled receptor list: recommendations for new pairings with cognate ligands', Pharmacological reviews, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 967-86. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 Digital Object Identifier (DOI): 10.1124/pr.112.007179 Link: Link to publication record in Edinburgh Research Explorer Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Published In: Pharmacological reviews Publisher Rights Statement: U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Edinburgh Research Explorer is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The University of Edinburgh has made every reasonable effort to ensure that Edinburgh Research Explorer content complies with UK legislation. If you believe that the public display of this file breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 02. Oct. 2021 1521-0081/65/3/967–986$25.00 http://dx.doi.org/10.1124/pr.112.007179 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Pharmacol Rev 65:967–986, July 2013 U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Material For
    Supplemental material for Epithelial to mesenchymal transition rewires the molecular path to PI3-Kinase-dependent proliferation Megan B. Salt1,2, Sourav Bandyopadhyay1,3 and Frank McCormick1 Authors Affiliations: 1-Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; 2-Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; 3-California Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, San Francisco, California. Supplemental Figure Legends Table S1. EMT associated changes in gene expression. Significantly (A) up- and (B) down- regulated genes in comparing H358-TwistER cells to control H358-GFP expressing cells treated with 100nM 4OHT for 12 days. The four columns on the right are associated with significantly upregulated genes, while the four columns furthest left described significantly downregulated genes. The first column for the up- and downregulated genes shows the Probe ID associated with each gene from the Affymetric Human Gene 1.0 ST microarrays. The gene name are shown in the next column, followed by the log2(fold change) in expression for each gene after 4OHT treatment in the H358-TwistER cells. The final column shows the p-value for each gene adjusted for the false discovery rate. Figure S1. Akt inhibition reduces serum-independent proliferation. (A) Proliferation of H358- TwistER cells with increasing concentrations (uM) of GSK-690693 (top) or MK-2206 (bottom). (B) Lysates from H358-TwistER cells treated for 48hrs in serum free media with indicated concentrations of GSK-690693 (top), or MK-2206 (bottom). Figure S2. The effects of TGFβ1 are specific to epithelial cells and lead to reduced serum- independent proliferation. (A) Proliferation of untreated (top) or TGFβ1 pre-treated (bottom) H358 and H441 cells in the presence (10%) or absence (SS) of serum.
    [Show full text]
  • The Expanded Endocannabinoid System/Endocannabinoidome As a Potential Target for Treating Diabetes Mellitus
    Current Diabetes Reports (2019) 19:117 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1248-9 OBESITY (KM GADDE, SECTION EDITOR) The Expanded Endocannabinoid System/Endocannabinoidome as a Potential Target for Treating Diabetes Mellitus Alain Veilleux1,2,3 & Vincenzo Di Marzo1,2,3,4,5 & Cristoforo Silvestri3,4,5 # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019 Abstract Purpose of Review The endocannabinoid (eCB) system, i.e. the receptors that respond to the psychoactive component of cannabis, their endogenous ligands and the ligand metabolic enzymes, is part of a larger family of lipid signals termed the endocannabinoidome (eCBome). We summarize recent discoveries of the roles that the eCBome plays within peripheral tissues in diabetes, and how it is being targeted, in an effort to develop novel therapeutics for the treatment of this increasingly prevalent disease. Recent Findings As with the eCB system, many eCBome members regulate several physiological processes, including energy intake and storage, glucose and lipid metabolism and pancreatic health, which contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Preclinical studies increasingly support the notion that targeting the eCBome may beneficially affect T2D. Summary The eCBome is implicated in T2D at several levels and in a variety of tissues, making this complex lipid signaling system a potential source of many potential therapeutics for the treatments for T2D. Keywords Endocannabinoidome . Bioactive lipids . Peripheral tissues . Glucose . Insulin Introduction: The Endocannabinoid System cannabis-derived natural product, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and its Subsequent Expansion (THC), responsible for most of the psychotropic, euphoric to the “Endocannabinoidome” and appetite-stimulating actions (via CB1 receptors) and immune-modulatory effects (via CB2 receptors) of marijuana, The discovery of two G protein-coupled receptors, the canna- opened the way to the identification of the endocannabinoids binoid receptor type-1 (CB1) and − 2 (CB2) [1, 2], for the (eCBs).
    [Show full text]
  • Globin Gene Expression in Correlation with G Protein-Related Genes During
    Čokić et al. BMC Genomics 2013, 14:116 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/14/116 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Globin gene expression in correlation with G protein-related genes during erythroid differentiation Vladan P Čokić1*, Reginald D Smith2, Angélique Biancotto3, Constance T Noguchi4, Raj K Puri5 and Alan N Schechter4 Abstract Background: The guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein)-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulate cell growth, proliferation and differentiation. G proteins are also implicated in erythroid differentiation, and some of them are expressed principally in hematopoietic cells. GPCRs-linked NO/cGMP and p38 MAPK signaling pathways already demonstrated potency for globin gene stimulation. By analyzing erythroid progenitors, derived from hematopoietic cells through in vitro ontogeny, our study intends to determine early markers and signaling pathways of globin gene regulation and their relation to GPCR expression. Results: Human hematopoietic CD34+ progenitors are isolated from fetal liver (FL), cord blood (CB), adult bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood (PB) and G-CSF stimulated mobilized PB (mPB), and then differentiated in vitro into erythroid progenitors. We find that growth capacity is most abundant in FL- and CB-derived erythroid cells. The erythroid progenitor cells are sorted as 100% CD71+, but we did not find statistical significance in the variations of CD34, CD36 and GlyA antigens and that confirms similarity in maturation of studied ontogenic periods. During ontogeny, beta-globin gene expression reaches maximum levels in cells of adult blood origin (176 fmol/μg), while gamma-globin gene expression is consistently up-regulated in CB-derived cells (60 fmol/μg). During gamma-globin induction by hydroxycarbamide, we identify stimulated GPCRs (PTGDR, PTGER1) and GPCRs-coupled genes known to be activated via the cAMP/PKA (ADIPOQ), MAPK pathway (JUN) and NO/cGMP (PRPF18) signaling pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Synaptamide Activates the Adhesion GPCR GPR110 (ADGRF1) Through GAIN Domain Binding
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-020-0831-6 OPEN Synaptamide activates the adhesion GPCR GPR110 (ADGRF1) through GAIN domain binding Bill X. Huang1, Xin Hu2, Heung-Sun Kwon1, Cheng Fu1, Ji-Won Lee1, Noel Southall2, Juan Marugan2 & ✉ Hee-Yong Kim1 1234567890():,; Adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCR) are characterized by a large extracellular region containing a conserved GPCR-autoproteolysis-inducing (GAIN) domain. Despite their relevance to several disease conditions, we do not understand the molecular mechanism by which aGPCRs are physiologically activated. GPR110 (ADGRF1) was recently deorphanized as the functional receptor of N-docosahexaenoylethanolamine (synaptamide), a potent synap- togenic metabolite of docosahexaenoic acid. Thus far, synaptamide is the first and only small- molecule endogenous ligand of an aGPCR. Here, we demonstrate the molecular basis of synaptamide-induced activation of GPR110 in living cells. Using in-cell chemical cross-linking/ mass spectrometry, computational modeling and mutagenesis-assisted functional assays, we discover that synaptamide specifically binds to the interface of GPR110 GAIN subdomains through interactions with residues Q511, N512 and Y513, causing an intracellular conforma- tional change near TM6 that triggers downstream signaling. This ligand-induced GAIN-tar- geted activation mechanism provides a framework for understanding the physiological function of aGPCRs and therapeutic targeting in the GAIN domain. 1 Laboratory of Molecular Signaling, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse
    [Show full text]
  • Gpcrs Show Widespread Differential Mrna Expression and Frequent Mutation and Copy Number Variation in Solid Tumors
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/546481; this version posted February 11, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. GPCRs show widespread differential mRNA expression and frequent mutation and copy number variation in solid tumors Krishna Sriram1, Kevin Moyung1, Ross Corriden1, Hannah Carter2, Paul A. Insel1, 2 * Departments of Pharmacology1 and Medicine2 University of California, San Diego *: Corresponding Author Contact Information: Email: [email protected] Phone: 858 534 2298 Mailing Address: 9500 Gilman Drive, BSB 3076, Mail Code 0636 La Jolla, CA, 92093 Abstract: G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the most widely targeted gene family for FDA-approved drugs. To assess possible roles for GPCRs in cancer, we analyzed Cancer Genome Atlas data for mRNA expression, mutations, and copy number variation (CNV) in 20 categories/45 sub-types of solid tumors and quantified differential expression of GPCRs by comparing tumors against normal tissue from the GTEx database. GPCRs are over-represented among coding genes with elevated expression in solid tumors; most tumor types differentially express >50 GPCRs, including many targets for approved drugs, hitherto largely unrecognized as targets of interest in cancer. GPCR mRNA signatures characterize specific tumor types, indicate survival and correlate with expression of cancer-related pathways. Tumor GPCR mRNA signatures have prognostic relevance for survival and correlate with expression of numerous cancer-related genes and pathways. GPCR expression in tumors is largely independent of staging/grading/metastasis/driver mutations and GPCRs expressed in cancer cell lines parallels that measured in tumors.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Basis for Adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptor Gpr126 Function
    Washington University School of Medicine Digital Commons@Becker Open Access Publications 2020 Structural basis for adhesion G protein-coupled receptor Gpr126 function Katherine Leon University of Chicago Rebecca L. Cunningham Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis Joshua A. Riback University of Chicago Ezra Feldman University of Chicago Jingxian Li University of Chicago See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs Recommended Citation Leon, Katherine; Cunningham, Rebecca L.; Riback, Joshua A.; Feldman, Ezra; Li, Jingxian; Sosnick, Tobin R.; Zhao, Minglei; Monk, Kelly R.; and Araç, Demet, ,"Structural basis for adhesion G protein-coupled receptor Gpr126 function." Nature Communications.,. (2020). https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/open_access_pubs/8691 This Open Access Publication is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons@Becker. It has been accepted for inclusion in Open Access Publications by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons@Becker. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Katherine Leon, Rebecca L. Cunningham, Joshua A. Riback, Ezra Feldman, Jingxian Li, Tobin R. Sosnick, Minglei Zhao, Kelly R. Monk, and Demet Araç This open access publication is available at Digital Commons@Becker: https://digitalcommons.wustl.edu/ open_access_pubs/8691 ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14040-1 OPEN Structural basis for adhesion G protein-coupled receptor Gpr126 function Katherine Leon1,2, Rebecca L. Cunningham3, Joshua A. Riback1,4, Ezra Feldman1, Jingxian Li1,2, Tobin R. Sosnick1,5, Minglei Zhao1, Kelly R. Monk3,6 & Demet Araç 1,2* Many drugs target the extracellular regions (ECRs) of cell-surface receptors. The large and alternatively-spliced ECRs of adhesion G protein-coupled receptors (aGPCRs) have key 1234567890():,; functions in diverse biological processes including neurodevelopment, embryogenesis, and tumorigenesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Dihydromunduletone | Medchemexpress
    Inhibitors Product Data Sheet Dihydromunduletone • Agonists Cat. No.: HY-101483 CAS No.: 674786-20-0 Molecular Formula: C₂₅H₂₈O₆ • Molecular Weight: 424.49 Screening Libraries Target: Others Pathway: Others Storage: Powder -20°C 3 years 4°C 2 years In solvent -80°C 6 months -20°C 1 month SOLVENT & SOLUBILITY In Vitro DMSO : 250 mg/mL (588.94 mM; Need ultrasonic) Mass Solvent 1 mg 5 mg 10 mg Concentration Preparing 1 mM 2.3558 mL 11.7788 mL 23.5577 mL Stock Solutions 5 mM 0.4712 mL 2.3558 mL 4.7115 mL 10 mM 0.2356 mL 1.1779 mL 2.3558 mL Please refer to the solubility information to select the appropriate solvent. In Vivo 1. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 40% PEG300 >> 5% Tween-80 >> 45% saline Solubility: ≥ 2.08 mg/mL (4.90 mM); Clear solution 2. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 90% (20% SBE-β-CD in saline) Solubility: ≥ 2.08 mg/mL (4.90 mM); Clear solution 3. Add each solvent one by one: 10% DMSO >> 90% corn oil Solubility: ≥ 2.08 mg/mL (4.90 mM); Clear solution BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITY Description Dihydromunduletone (DHM) is a rotenoid derivative and a selective, potent adhesion G protein-coupled receptor (aGPCR) ( [1] GPR56 and GPR114/ADGRG5) antagonist with an IC 50 of 20.9 μM for GPR56, but not inhibit GPR110 or class A GPCRs . IC₅₀ & Target IC50: 20.9 μM (GPR56)[1]; GPR114[1] In Vitro Assays are initiated by the addition of [35S]GTPγS, and the rates of aGPCR-stimulated G protein activation ([35S]GTPγS binding to Gα) are measured with or without the influence of added compounds.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1
    Supplementary Table 1. 492 genes are unique to 0 h post-heat timepoint. The name, p-value, fold change, location and family of each gene are indicated. Genes were filtered for an absolute value log2 ration 1.5 and a significance value of p ≤ 0.05. Symbol p-value Log Gene Name Location Family Ratio ABCA13 1.87E-02 3.292 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family unknown transporter A (ABC1), member 13 ABCB1 1.93E-02 −1.819 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family Plasma transporter B (MDR/TAP), member 1 Membrane ABCC3 2.83E-02 2.016 ATP-binding cassette, sub-family Plasma transporter C (CFTR/MRP), member 3 Membrane ABHD6 7.79E-03 −2.717 abhydrolase domain containing 6 Cytoplasm enzyme ACAT1 4.10E-02 3.009 acetyl-CoA acetyltransferase 1 Cytoplasm enzyme ACBD4 2.66E-03 1.722 acyl-CoA binding domain unknown other containing 4 ACSL5 1.86E-02 −2.876 acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain Cytoplasm enzyme family member 5 ADAM23 3.33E-02 −3.008 ADAM metallopeptidase domain Plasma peptidase 23 Membrane ADAM29 5.58E-03 3.463 ADAM metallopeptidase domain Plasma peptidase 29 Membrane ADAMTS17 2.67E-04 3.051 ADAM metallopeptidase with Extracellular other thrombospondin type 1 motif, 17 Space ADCYAP1R1 1.20E-02 1.848 adenylate cyclase activating Plasma G-protein polypeptide 1 (pituitary) receptor Membrane coupled type I receptor ADH6 (includes 4.02E-02 −1.845 alcohol dehydrogenase 6 (class Cytoplasm enzyme EG:130) V) AHSA2 1.54E-04 −1.6 AHA1, activator of heat shock unknown other 90kDa protein ATPase homolog 2 (yeast) AK5 3.32E-02 1.658 adenylate kinase 5 Cytoplasm kinase AK7
    [Show full text]
  • Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Amy Sue Bogard University of Tennessee Health Science Center
    University of Tennessee Health Science Center UTHSC Digital Commons Theses and Dissertations (ETD) College of Graduate Health Sciences 12-2013 Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Amy Sue Bogard University of Tennessee Health Science Center Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.uthsc.edu/dissertations Part of the Medical Cell Biology Commons, and the Medical Molecular Biology Commons Recommended Citation Bogard, Amy Sue , "Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells" (2013). Theses and Dissertations (ETD). Paper 330. http://dx.doi.org/10.21007/etd.cghs.2013.0029. This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Graduate Health Sciences at UTHSC Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations (ETD) by an authorized administrator of UTHSC Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells Document Type Dissertation Degree Name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Program Biomedical Sciences Track Molecular Therapeutics and Cell Signaling Research Advisor Rennolds Ostrom, Ph.D. Committee Elizabeth Fitzpatrick, Ph.D. Edwards Park, Ph.D. Steven Tavalin, Ph.D. Christopher Waters, Ph.D. DOI 10.21007/etd.cghs.2013.0029 Comments Six month embargo expired June 2014 This dissertation is available at UTHSC Digital Commons: https://dc.uthsc.edu/dissertations/330 Adenylyl Cyclase 2 Selectively Regulates IL-6 Expression in Human Bronchial Smooth Muscle Cells A Dissertation Presented for The Graduate Studies Council The University of Tennessee Health Science Center In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy From The University of Tennessee By Amy Sue Bogard December 2013 Copyright © 2013 by Amy Sue Bogard.
    [Show full text]