DOCSLIB.ORG

IILP Review 2012: the State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession © 2012 Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession All Rights Reserved

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IILP Review 2012: the State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession © 2012 Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession All Rights Reserved IILP Review 2012: The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession © 2012 Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession All rights reserved. IILP Review 2012: The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession IILP Review 2012 •••• 1 Editorial Board Editor-in-Chief Elizabeth Chambliss Editorial Board Brian W. Duwe Sharon E. Jones Sandra S. Yamate Articles Editors Kienan Christianson Joshua Druckerman Jessamyn Farkas Editorial Assistant Jaimie Hendle The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the author of each article or essay and not necessarily those of the Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profes- sion or the employer of any author. Any individuals who may be quoted in specific articles and who are identified in connection with their employer are not representing the views, opinions, or positions of their employer unless that representation is specifically noted. 2 •••• IILP Review 2012 Table of Contents 8 Letter from the Chair 9 Letter from the Editor-in-Chief 10 Letter from The Claro Group 11 About IILP 11 About the IILP Review: The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession 13 The Demographics of the Profession by Elizabeth Chambliss Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession in General 37 “What would you say?” Giving Teeth to Diversity Programming By Audrey Lee 40 Fisher and the Future of Affirmative Action By William C. Kidder 46 The Door to Law School By John Nussbaumer and E. Christopher Johnson 56 Who’s on Law Review? A Study of Diversity on Law Reviews By Marcey L. Grigsby IILP Review 2012 •••• 3 Table of Contents 60 Protecting Workers, Promoting Diversity and Enforcing the Law By Patricia A. Shiu 70 Resisting Challenges to the Diversity Value Proposition By E. Macey Russell 76 Rhetoric or Rule? Race-Blindness in French and American Antidiscrimination Law By Julie C. Suk Gender Diversity and Inclusion Issues in the Legal Profession 87 Gender and the Billable Hour By Nicole Nehama Auerbach 90 Diversity in the Legal Profession: Comparing Professional Work and Personal Lives of Female Lawyers in U.S. and German Cities By Gabriele Plickert Racial and Ethnic Diversity and Inclusion Issues in the Legal Profession 97 Are Ideal Litigators White? Measuring the Myth of Colorblindness By Jerry Kang 102 Race, Law and Latino Communities: The Diversity Pipeline By Juan Cartagena 106 Diversity in Florida By Yara Lorenzo 4 •••• IILP Review 2012 110 Apples, Bananas, Coconuts and Oreos – the Fruit Salad and Dessert of Race: American Indians in the Diversity Discourse By Lawrence R. Baca 118 Discrimination Faced By Gypsies and Travelers in the United Kingdom By Marc Willers 124 Memo to Law Firms: How to Better Recruit and Retain South Asian American Lawyers By Mona Mehta Stone 144 Japanese Americans at a Crossroads: Toward a Dynamic Model of Community By Steven Yoda 148 Redefining the Black Face of Affirmative Action: The Impact on Ascendant Black Women By Kevin D. Brown and Renee Turner Disability Diversity and Inclusion Issues in the Legal Profession 161 Diversity in the Legal Profession Cuts Both Ways: The Lawyer’s Dual Role as Employer and Public Accommodation By Michael A. Schwartz 166 Consciously Overcoming Unconscious Biases Against Lawyers with Disabilities By Paula Pearlman IILP Review 2012 •••• 5 Table of Contents LGBT Diversity and Inclusion Issues in the Legal Profession 171 Major LGBT Legal Developments of 2011 By Arthur S. Leonard 196 Transgender in Law By Mia Yamamoto 210 The Other: How Bias Against Gender Nonconformers Impedes Inclusion of LGBT Legal Professionals By Takeia R. Johnson Issues of Class and Socioeconomic Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession 219 Lawyers and the Class System in Britain By Carol Madison Graham 224 About the Authors 246 2012 Practice Round-Up 260 IILP Board of Directors 261 IILP Advisory Board 262 Partners, Allies and Friends 264 Acknowledgements 6 •••• IILP Review 2012 Diverse teams arrive at better and more creative solutions. Whether it is developing the next generation of lawyers, providing leadership in organizations that promote diversity, or working on legal matters with far-reaching impact, we strive to build diversity and inclusion in the legal profession, the community and our firm. We salute the Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession for its real-world, common-sense approach to addressing diversity in today’s legal profession. CHICAGO | LOS ANGELES | NEW YORK | WASHINGTON, DC JENNER & BLOCK LLP | 353 NORTH CLARK STREET, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60654-3456 | 312 222-9350 JENNER.COM IILP Review 2012 •••• 7 December, 2012 Dear Colleagues, Last year, the Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession (IILP) published its inaugural review of the state of diversity in the legal profession. The 2011 IILP Review brought together essays on key aspects of diversity, from many different perspectives. The response was quite encouraging, with many people saying that they found the IILP Review to contain many useful insights in pursuing our shared goal of a more diverse and inclusive profession. On behalf of the IILP, I am delighted that we are able to present the second edition of the IILP Review. The 2012 IILP Review combines insightful personal reflections with hard data; in my view, it is the type of report that is valuable in pursuing our shared goals. My sincerest thanks and compliments go to the authors and editors whose hard work made this year’s IILP Review possible. Indeed, IILP’s determination to contribute through thought, word and deed to real change in the state of diversity depends on the collaboration and dedication that the IILP Review reflects. I hope that you find the 2012 IILP Review interesting, informative and, perhaps, provocative. Finally, as IILP enters its fourth year, I want to thank all of those individuals and organizations who are supporting the Institute’s efforts. We are indeed making progress and, with your help, we will help ensure that the legal profession becomes a model for diversity and inclusion. With best wishes. Marc S. Firestone Chair Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession 8 •••• IILP Review 2012 December, 2012 Dear Readers, The Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession (IILP) is proud to present the 2012 edition of the IILP Review: The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession. The IILP Review brings together a statistical summary of recent demographic data, thought pieces exploring diversity issues in a wide range of professional contexts, and a round- up of initiatives by law firms, corporations, law schools, bar associations, and govern- ment—all in an accessible, readable format. Our goal is make it easier for busy lawyers, judges, law professors, students, employers and diversity professionals to keep abreast of thinking and research related to diversity and inclusion in the profession and to provide momentum—and a regular venue—for addressing the continuing challenges that we face. Thanks to your efforts, this year’s IILP Review is expanded significantly from our inau- gural issue in 2011, and includes contributions from 26 people at the forefront of think- ing and practice in the field. We are delighted to present such a comprehensive sampling of this important work and welcome the continued development of both the content and format of the review. In particular, we hope to stimulate both large-scale and small-scale data collection and reporting by employers, diversity professionals, bar associations, and research institutions, so that we might better assess our progress toward greater integration and inclusion within the profession. We hope that you find the 2012 IILP Review useful and informative; and that you will consider contributing to a future issue of the IILP Review. Elizabeth Chambliss Editor-in-Chief IILP Review 2012 •••• 9 10 •••• IILP Review 2012 About IILP The Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession (IILP) is a 501 (c) (3) organization that believes that the legal profession must be diverse and inclusive. Through its pro- grams, projects, research, and collaborations, it seeks real change, now, and offers a new model of inclusion to achieve it. IILP asks the hard questions, gets the data, talks about what is really on people’s minds, no matter how sensitive, and invents and tests methodologies that will lead to change. For more information about IILP, visit www. theIILP.com. About the IILP Review: The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession The IILP Review features the most current data about the state of diversity in the legal profession, compelling essays that explore subtle issues of diversity and inclusion for lawyers, and current research from academic experts. As such, the IILP Review brings together general insights on programs and strategies to improve diversity and inclu- sion, as well as targeted articles about the different challenges faced by those seeking to survive and thrive as law students, lawyers, judges, and leaders. The depth and breadth of diversity and inclusion efforts makes it hard to keep abreast of the most current information about our progress or lack thereof. Furthermore, as notions of diversity and inclusion have expanded and evolved, it’s even more difficult to stay current with the latest thinking. The IILP Review addresses that challenge by making information about diversity and inclusion more readily and easily accessible. If you are interested in submitting an article for a future edition of the IILP Review please visit www.TheIILP.com for more information and to download the Call for Papers. IILP Review 2012 •••• 11 IILP Review 2012: The State of Diversity and Inclusion in the Legal Profession 12 •••• IILP Review 2012 Demographic Summary Elizabeth Chambliss Professor of Law, New York Law School In this executive summary, Professor Elizabeth Chambliss, author of the ABA report, Miles to Go: Progress of Minorities In the Profession, explains the most current demographic data on the legal profession he Institute for Inclusion in the Legal Profession (IILP) was created in 2009 to promote demographic and cultural diversity and inclusion in the U.S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
    Case 2:19-cv-00687-JP Document 32 Filed 01/15/20 Page 1 of 4 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HENRY J. LACHER, DAVID MASONOFF, WILLIAM WERONKO, LEVI GASTON, KATHLEEN CUSHING, DAVE KEEN, BRENT SCOTT, CHARLES MAYER, CASE NO. 2:19-cv-00687-JP JANELL PETERSON, SCOTT HERBST, EDUARDO PAULINO, PAUL DOHERTY, and JOYCE YIN, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, Defendant. MICHAEL MERCER and LEO FORD, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, CASE NO. 2:19-cv-02762-JP Plaintiffs, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION, Defendant. PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF THE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND OTHER RELATED RELIEF As reflected in the accompanying “Joint Stipulation of Settlement,” see Doc. 32-1, Plaintiffs Henry J. Lacher, David Masonoff, William Weronko, Levi Gaston, Kathleen Cushing, Dave Keen, Brent Scott, Charles Mayer, Janell Peterson, Scott Herbst, Eduardo Paulino, Paul Doherty, Joyce Yin, Michael Mercer, and Leo Ford (collectively “Plaintiffs”) have agreed to Case 2:19-cv-00687-JP Document 32 Filed 01/15/20 Page 2 of 4 settle this consolidated class action lawsuit for a total of $21,000,000.00 on behalf of 4,501 putative settlement class members who worked as Band 4-8 managers for Defendant Aramark Corporation (“Aramark”).1 Under the December 1, 2018 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Civil Rule”) 23, the Court “should direct notice in a reasonable manner” to all class members covered by a proposed settlement if the parties demonstrate that, at the post-notice final approval stage, the Court “will likely be able to” (i) give final approval of the settlement under the criteria described in Civil Rule 23(e)(2) and (ii) certify the settlement class.
    [Show full text]
  • Living the Law Bridget Daley, L’13, and Other Alumni Serve As Force for Change Message from the Dean
    THE SUMMER 2018 The Duquesne University School of Law Magazine for Alumni and Friends LIVING THE LAW BRIDGET DALEY, L’13, AND OTHER ALUMNI SERVE AS FORCE FOR CHANGE MESSAGE FROM THE DEAN Dean’s Message Congratulations to our newest alumni! Duquesne Law read about a new faculty/student mentorship program, which celebrated the 104th commencement on May 25 with the Class was made possible with alumni donations. You will also read of 2018 and their families, friends and colleagues. These J.D. and about alumni who are serving their communities in new ways, LL.M. graduates join approximately 7,800 Duquesne Law alumni often behind the scenes and with little fanfare, taking on pro residing throughout the world. bono cases, volunteering at nonprofit organizations, coordinating We all can be proud of what our graduates have community services and starting projects to help individuals in accomplished and the opportunities they have. Many of these need. You will discover how Duquesne Law is expanding diversity accomplishments and opportunities have been made possible and inclusion initiatives and read about new faculty roles in the because of you, our alumni. Indeed, our alumni go above and community as well as new scholarly works. Finally, you will read beyond to help ensure student success here. Colleagues in the about student achievements and the amazing work of student law often share with me that the commitment of Duquesne Law organizations here. alumni is something special! I invite you to be in touch and to join us for one of our Thank you most sincerely for all that you do! Whether you alumni events.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Report of the Third Circuit Task Force on Eyewitness Identifications 2019 REPORT of the THIRD CIRCUIT TASK FORCE on EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS
    2019 Report of the Third Circuit Task Force on Eyewitness Identifications 2019 REPORT OF THE THIRD CIRCUIT TASK FORCE ON EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS THIRD CIRCUIT TASK FORCE ON EYEWITNESS IDENTIFICATIONS Hon. Theodore A. McKee, Co-Chair Hon. Mitchell S. Goldberg, Co-Chair U.S. Court of Appeals U.S. District Court for the Third Circuit for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Dr. Amanda Bergold Robert F. Kravetz Assistant Professor of Criminal Justice at Assistant Professor of Law Marist College at the Duquesne University School of Law; Hon. Cathy Bissoon Special Assistant United States Attorney for U.S. District Court the District of Delaware for the Western District of Pennsylvania Hon. Wilma A. Lewis, Chief Judge William G. Brooks, III U.S. District Court Chief of Police for the District of the Virgin Islands at the Norwood Police Department Hon. L. Felipe Restrepo Robert Czepiel, Jr. U.S. Court of Appeals Supervising Deputy Attorney General for for the Third Circuit the State of New Jersey Hon. Timothy R. Rice Jules Epstein U.S. District Court Professor of Law for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania at the Temple University Beasley School of Law Hon. Jerome B. Simandle U.S. District Court John Hollway for the District of New Jersey Executive Director of the Quattrone Center for the Fair Administration of Justice at the Hon. Patty Shwartz University of Pennsylvania Carey Law U.S. Court of Appeals School for the Third Circuit Abigail Horn James V. Wade Assistant Federal Public Defender Former Federal Public Defender for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Hon.
    [Show full text]
  • Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Nominations Submitted to The
    Administration of Barack Obama, 2011 Nominations Submitted to the Senate December 16, 2011 The following list does not include promotions of members of the Uniformed Services, nominations to the Service Academies, or nominations of Foreign Service Officers. Submitted January 5 Arenda L. Wright Allen, of Virginia, to be U.S. District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, vice Jerome B. Friedman, retired. Anthony J. Battaglia, of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of California, vice M. James Lorenz, retired. Cathy Bissoon, of Pennsylvania, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, vice Thomas M. Hardiman, elevated. James Emanuel Boasberg, of the District of Columbia, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of Columbia, vice Thomas F. Hogan, retired. Vincent L. Briccetti, of New York, to be U.S. District Judge for the Southern District of New York, vice Kimba M. Wood, retired. Louis B. Butler, Jr., of Wisconsin, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of Wisconsin, vice John C. Shabaz, retired. Susan L. Carney, of Connecticut, to be U.S. Circuit Judge for the Second Circuit, vice Barrington D. Parker, retired. Claire C. Cecchi, of New Jersey, to be U.S. District Judge for the District of New Jersey, vice Joseph A. Greenaway, elevated. Edward Milton Chen, of California, to be U.S. District Judge for the Northern District of California, vice Martin J. Jenkins, resigned. Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., of North Carolina, to be U.S. District Judge for the Western District of North Carolina, vice Lacy H.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Demographic Compositions of U.S. Circuit and District Courts
    GETTY STEELE IMAGES/KIM Examining the Demographic Compositions of U.S. Circuit and District Courts By Democracy and Government Reform Team February 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Examining the Demographic Compositions of U.S. Circuit and District Courts By Democracy and Government Reform Team February 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 7 The demographic compositions of the U.S. Courts of Appeals 10 1st Circuit 23 8th Circuit 12 2nd Circuit 25 9th Circuit 14 3rd Circuit 27 10th Circuit 16 4th Circuit 29 11th Circuit 18 5th Circuit 31 D.C. Circuit 20 6th Circuit 32 Federal Circuit 22 7th Circuit 33 The demographic compositions of the U.S. District Courts 36 District courts housed 66 District courts housed within the 1st Circuit within the 7th Circuit 39 District courts housed 71 District courts housed within the 2nd Circuit within the 8th Circuit 44 District courts housed 76 District courts housed within the 3rd Circuit within the 9th Circuit 48 District courts housed 86 District courts housed within the 4th Circuit within the 10th Circuit 54 District courts housed 91 District courts housed within the 5th Circuit within the 11th Circuit 60 District courts housed 97 District court housed within the 6th Circuit within the D.C. Circuit 110 Conclusion 111 Endnotes Introduction and summary Authors’ note: This report reflects data as of November 18, 2019. Its main goal is to provide advocates and policymakers with an accessible resource demonstrating general trends pertaining to the lack of demographic diversity across all of the lower federal courts. Some individual data points may have altered slightly between November and publication and are not reflected within this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressional Record United States Th of America PROCEEDINGS and DEBATES of the 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 112 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 157 WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 5, 2011 No. 1 Senate The fifth day of January being the ginning January 3, 2011. All certifi- STATE OF CONNECTICUT day prescribed by Public Law 111–289 cates, the Chair is advised, are in the Executive Department for the meeting of the 1st Session of form suggested by the Senate or con- To the President of the Senate of the United the 112th Congress, the Senate assem- tain all essential requirements of the States: bled in its Chamber at the Capitol and form suggested by the Senate. If there This is to Certify that on the second day of at 12:04 p.m. was called to order by the is no objection, the reading of the cer- November, two thousand and ten Richard Vice President (Mr. BIDEN). tificates will be waived and they will Blumenthal was duly chosen by the qualified be printed in the RECORD. electors of the State of Connecticut Senator PRAYER There being no objection, the mate- from said State to represent said State in The Chaplain, Dr. Barry C. Black, of- the Senate of the United States for the term rial was ordered to be printed in the of six years, beginning on the third day of fered the following prayer: Record, as follows: January two thousand and eleven. Let us pray. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Witness: Her Excellency our Governor; M. Almighty God, who has placed us Executive Department Jodi Rell and our seal hereto affixed at Hart- here and gives us work to do at the ford, this twenty-fourth day of November, in opening of the 112th Congress, we pause To the President of the Senate of the United States: the year of our Lord two thousand ten.
    [Show full text]
  • Members by Circuit (As of January 3, 2017)
    Federal Judges Association - Members by Circuit (as of January 3, 2017) 1st Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Bruce M. Selya Jeffrey R. Howard Kermit Victor Lipez Ojetta Rogeriee Thompson Sandra L. Lynch United States District Court District of Maine D. Brock Hornby George Z. Singal John A. Woodcock, Jr. Jon David LeVy Nancy Torresen United States District Court District of Massachusetts Allison Dale Burroughs Denise Jefferson Casper Douglas P. Woodlock F. Dennis Saylor George A. O'Toole, Jr. Indira Talwani Leo T. Sorokin Mark G. Mastroianni Mark L. Wolf Michael A. Ponsor Patti B. Saris Richard G. Stearns Timothy S. Hillman William G. Young United States District Court District of New Hampshire Joseph A. DiClerico, Jr. Joseph N. LaPlante Landya B. McCafferty Paul J. Barbadoro SteVen J. McAuliffe United States District Court District of Puerto Rico Daniel R. Dominguez Francisco Augusto Besosa Gustavo A. Gelpi, Jr. Jay A. Garcia-Gregory Juan M. Perez-Gimenez Pedro A. Delgado Hernandez United States District Court District of Rhode Island Ernest C. Torres John J. McConnell, Jr. Mary M. Lisi William E. Smith 2nd Circuit United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Barrington D. Parker, Jr. Christopher F. Droney Dennis Jacobs Denny Chin Gerard E. Lynch Guido Calabresi John Walker, Jr. Jon O. Newman Jose A. Cabranes Peter W. Hall Pierre N. LeVal Raymond J. Lohier, Jr. Reena Raggi Robert A. Katzmann Robert D. Sack United States District Court District of Connecticut Alan H. NeVas, Sr. Alfred V. Covello Alvin W. Thompson Dominic J. Squatrito Ellen B.
    [Show full text]
  • Frederick Banks V. United States Court of Appeals
    Opinions of the United 2020 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-8-2020 Frederick Banks v. United States Court of Appeals Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2020 Recommended Citation "Frederick Banks v. United States Court of Appeals" (2020). 2020 Decisions. 566. https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2020/566 This June is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2020 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. ALD-166 NOT PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ___________ No. 19-3586 ___________ FREDERICK H. BANKS, Appellant v. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT; NIKOLAS VASELOPULOS; LAURA SCHLEICH IRWIN; UNITED STATES MARSHAL; ORLANDO L. HARPER; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY; THIRD CIRCUIT PANEL ATTORNEY ________________ On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (D.C. Civ. No. 2-19-cv-01354) District Judge: Cathy Bissoon _____________________________ Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6 or Issuance of a Certificate of Appealability Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) April 16, 2020 Before: MCKEE, SHWARTZ and PHIPPS, Circuit Judges (Opinion filed: June 8, 2020) _________ OPINION* _________ * This disposition is not an opinion of the full Court and pursuant to I.O.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Biographies
    Speaker Biographies Ope Adebanjo ’20, Student, Harvard Law School Ope Adebanjo is a second year JD Candidate at Harvard Law School. She graduated from Harvard College in 2015 and majored in Comparative Literature and African Studies, with a minor in Sociology and a citation in Yoruba. Ope worked as an operations supervisor at McMaster-Carr Supply Company in Atlanta GA, managing teams of e-commerce and sales representatives and managing warehouse projects and operations during her time before law school. She also has her Masters in International Business from J. Mack Robinson College of Business at Georgia State University. As a HLS student, Ope is interested in intellectual property law and international business law with a focus on the intersection of policy and technology. Kendra Albert ’16, Clinical Instructional Fellow, Cyberlaw Clinic, Harvard Law School Kendra is a clinical instructional fellow at the Cyberlaw Clinic at Harvard Law School, where they teach students how to practice law by working with pro bono clients. Previously, they were an associate at Zeitgeist Law PC, a boutique technology law firm in San Francisco, and a research associate at the Berkman Klein Center for Internet and Society. Kendra’s scholarship and academic work touches on diverse issues, from online harassment to linkrot to video game preservation. They hold a JD cum laude from Harvard Law School and a bachelor’s degree in lighting design and history from Carnegie Mellon University. Julie Anna Alvarez ’88, Director of Alumni and International Career Services, Columbia Law School Julie Anna Alvarez is the Director of Alumni and International Career Services at Columbia Law School’s Office of Career Services and Professional Development.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
    Case 2:16-cv-00638-CB-MPK Document 9 Filed 06/17/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HECTOR VARGAS TORRES ) ) Petitioner, ) Civil Action No. 16-638 ) Judge Cathy Bissoon/ vs. ) Chief Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly ) JAY LANE, Superintendent of SCI- ) Fayette; PA ATTORNEY GENERAL, ) ) Respondents. ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION I. RECOMMENDATION It is respectfully recommended that “Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus” (the “Petition”), be dismissed pre-service for failing to state a claim that is cognizable in habeas. A certificate of appealability should be denied. II. REPORT A. Relevant Procedural History Hector Vargas Torres (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner, who at the time of filing the Petition was incarcerated in the State Correctional Institution at Fayette (“SCI-Fayette”). In the Petition, Petitioner does not complain about his conviction or sentence but only about the conditions of his confinement. Specifically, Petitioner complains of the poor ventilation system which never lets in any fresh air and circulates ash-like dust, ECF No. 1 ¶¶ 9 - 10, as well as the poor quality of water at SCI-Fayette which, according to Petitioner, causes him illness. Id. ¶ 11. Petitioner seeks “immediate relief in the form of a permanent transfer” to another SCI prison, “which does not have the same type of ventilation and air tight building[.]” Id. ¶ 6. Case 2:16-cv-00638-CB-MPK Document 9 Filed 06/17/16 Page 2 of 5 This Petition was originally filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth V. Mora
    Supreme Judicial Court for the Commonwealth Full Court: SJC-12890 Filed: 3/27/2020 4:33 PM COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS Supreme Judicial Court SUFFOLK, SS. NO. SJC-12890 COMMONWEALTH, Appellee, v. NELSON MORA, ET AL., Appellants. ON RESERVATION AND REPORT FROM THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT FOR SUFFOLK COUNTY BRIEF FOR THE COMMONWEALTH MAURA HEALEY Attorney General Anna Lumelsky (BBO#677708) Gina Masotta (BBO #669602) Assistant Attorneys General Criminal Bureau One Ashburton Place Boston, Massachusetts 02108 (617) 963-2334 email: [email protected] TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................................................ 4 QUESTION PRESENTED ............................................................................... 10 STATEMENT OF THE CASE ......................................................................... 10 STATEMENT OF THE FACTS ...................................................................... 12 I. Using various investigative methods, law-enforcement officers uncover extensive evidence of drug trafficking by appellants ..... 12 II. Investigators install pole cameras that video-record public areas and capture relevant evidence. ..................................................... 14 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ............................................................... 16 ARGUMENT .................................................................................................... 19 I. STANDARD OF REVIEW ......................................................... 19 II. THE
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania
    Case 4:16-cv-00469-MWB Document 51 Filed 06/22/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : RANDY WALTZ, et al. : : 4:16-cv-00469-MWB v. : : AVEDA TRANSPORTATION AND : ENERGY SERVICES INC., et al. : : PLAINTIFFS’ UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF THE FLSA SETTLEMENT Having settled this FLSA collective action lawsuit, Originating Plaintiff Randy Waltz and Opt-In Plaintiffs David Canada, Toby Hayes, Mark Ortiz, Gary Solinger, John Tinkle, and Michael Tinkle (collectively “Plaintiffs”) now move for judicial approval of the settlements. See Schwartz v. The Pennsylvania State University, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58874 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 18, 2017) (Brann, J.) (discussing legal standards applicable to approval of FLSA settlements). Defendants do not oppose this motion. The settlement agreements are attached as Exhibit A, and a declaration addressing the undersigned’s fee lodestar (which is greater than the fee recovered under the settlement) and out-of-pocket expenses is attached as Exhibit B. In the next few days, the undersigned counsel will file a brief in support of this motion pursuant to Local Civil Rule 7.5. 1 Case 4:16-cv-00469-MWB Document 51 Filed 06/22/17 Page 2 of 2 WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs respectfully request that the Court grant this motion and approve the settlement of this FLSA action. A proposed order is attached. Date: June 22, 2017 Respectfully, /s/ Peter Winebrake Peter Winebrake R. Andrew Santillo Mark J. Gottesfeld WINEBRAKE & SANTILLO, LLC 715 Twining Road, Suite 211 Dresher, PA 19025
    [Show full text]