Appendix a California Natural Diversity Database Records Search Results Appendix B California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix a California Natural Diversity Database Records Search Results Appendix B California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants Appendix A California Natural Diversity Database Records Search Results Appendix B California Native Plant Society Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants Appendix C U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Lists of Special-Status Species Appendix D Noise and Vibration Technical Memorandum Appendix E Title VI Compliance Analysis California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB_Alameda & Contra Costa Counties CDFG or Scientific Name/Common Name Element Code Federal Status State Status GRank SRank CNPS/R-E-D 1 Accipiter cooperii ABNKC12040 G5 S3 SC Cooper's hawk 2 Accipiter striatus ABNKC12020 G5 S3 SC sharp-shinned hawk 3 Agelaius tricolor ABPBXB0020 G2G3 S2 SC tricolored blackbird 4 Alkali Meadow CTT45310CA G3 S2.1 5 Alkali Seep CTT45320CA G3 S2.1 6 Allium sharsmithiae PMLIL02310 G2 S2.3 1B/2-1-3 Sharsmith's onion 7 Ambystoma californiense AAAAA01180 Threatened G2G3 S2S3 SC California tiger salamander 8 Amsinckia grandiflora PDBOR01050 Endangered Endangered G1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 large-flowered fiddleneck 9 Amsinckia lunaris PDBOR01070 G2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 bent-flowered fiddleneck 10 Andrena blennospermatis IIHYM35030 G2 S2 11 Anniella pulchra pulchra ARACC01012 G3G4T3T4 S3 SC silvery legless lizard Q 12 Apodemia mormo langei IILEPH7012 Endangered G5T1 S1 Lange's metalmark butterfly 13 Aquila chrysaetos ABNKC22010 G5 S3 SC golden eagle 14 Archoplites interruptus AFCQB07010 G3 S1 SC Sacramento perch 15 Arctostaphylos auriculata PDERI04040 G2 S2.2 1B/3-1-3 Mt. Diablo manzanita 16 Arctostaphylos manzanita ssp. laevigata PDERI04273 G5T2 S2 1B/3-2-3 Contra Costa manzanita 17 Arctostaphylos pallida PDERI04110 Threatened Endangered G1 S1.2 1B/3-3-3 pallid manzanita 18 Ardea herodias ABNGA04010 G5 S4 great blue heron 19 Asio flammeus ABNSB13040 G5 S3 SC short-eared owl 20 Aster lentus PDAST0T540 G2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 Suisun Marsh aster 21 Astragalus tener var. tener PDFAB0F8R1 G1T1 S1.1 1B/3-2-3 alkali milk-vetch 22 Athene cunicularia ABNSB10010 G4 S2 SC burrowing owl 23 Atriplex cordulata PDCHE040B0 G2? S2.2? 1B/2-2-3 heartscale 24 Atriplex depressa PDCHE042L0 G2Q S2.2 1B/2-2-3 brittlescale Commercial Version -- Dated April 29, 2005 -- Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch Page 1 Report Printed on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 Information Expires 10/29/2005 California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB_Alameda & Contra Costa Counties CDFG or Scientific Name/Common Name Element Code Federal Status State Status GRank SRank CNPS/R-E-D 25 Atriplex joaquiniana PDCHE041F3 G2 S2.1 1B/2-2-3 San Joaquin spearscale 26 Balsamorhiza macrolepis var. macrolepis PDAST11061 G3G4T2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 big-scale balsamroot 27 Blepharizonia plumosa PDAST1C011 G1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 big tarplant 28 Branchinecta longiantenna ICBRA03020 Endangered G1 S1 longhorn fairy shrimp 29 Branchinecta lynchi ICBRA03030 Threatened G3 S2S3 vernal pool fairy shrimp 30 Branchinecta mesovallensis ICBRA03150 G2 S2 midvalley fairy shrimp 31 Buteo swainsoni ABNKC19070 Threatened G5 S2 Swainson's hawk 32 Calochortus pulchellus PMLIL0D160 G2 S2.1 1B/2-2-3 Mt. Diablo fairy-lantern 33 Calystegia atriplicifolia ssp. buttensis PDCON04012 G5T3 S3.2 1B/2-2-3 Butte County morning-glory 34 Calystegia purpurata ssp. saxicola PDCON040D2 G4T2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 coastal bluff morning-glory 35 Campanula exigua PDCAM020A0 G2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 chaparral harebell 36 Carex comosa PMCYP032Y0 G5 S2? 2/3-3-1 bristly sedge 37 Caulanthus coulteri var. lemmonii PDBRA0M0E0 G4T2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 Lemmon's jewelflower 38 Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii PDAST4R0P1 G4?T3 S3.2 1B/2-2-3 Congdon's tarplant 39 Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus ABNNB03031 Threatened G4T3 S2 SC western snowy plover 40 Chorizanthe cuspidata var. cuspidata PDPGN04081 G2T2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 San Francisco Bay spineflower 41 Chorizanthe robusta var. robusta PDPGN040Q2 Endangered G2T1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 robust spineflower 42 Circus cyaneus ABNKC11010 G5 S3 SC northern harrier 43 Cirsium andrewsii PDAST2E050 G2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 Franciscan thistle 44 Cirsium fontinale var. campylon PDAST2E0F0 G2T2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 Mt. Hamilton thistle 45 Cismontane Alkali Marsh CTT52310CA G1 S1.1 46 Clarkia franciscana PDONA050H0 Endangered Endangered G1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 Presidio clarkia 47 Coastal Brackish Marsh CTT52200CA G2 S2.1 48 Coastal and Valley Freshwater Marsh CTT52410CA G3 S2.1 Commercial Version -- Dated April 29, 2005 -- Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch Page 2 Report Printed on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 Information Expires 10/29/2005 California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB_Alameda & Contra Costa Counties CDFG or Scientific Name/Common Name Element Code Federal Status State Status GRank SRank CNPS/R-E-D 49 Coelus gracilis IICOL4A020 G1 S1 San Joaquin dune beetle 50 Cordylanthus maritimus ssp. palustris PDSCR0J0C3 G4?T2 S2.2 1B/2-2-2 Point Reyes bird's-beak 51 Cordylanthus mollis ssp. hispidus PDSCR0J0D1 G2T2 S2.1 1B/2-3-3 hispid bird's-beak 52 Cordylanthus mollis ssp. mollis PDSCR0J0D2 Endangered Rare G2T1 S1.1 1B/3-2-3 soft bird's-beak 53 Cordylanthus nidularius PDSCR0J0F0 Rare G1 S1.2 1B/3-3-3 Mt. Diablo bird's-beak 54 Cordylanthus palmatus PDSCR0J0J0 Endangered Endangered G1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 palmate-bracted bird's-beak 55 Coreopsis hamiltonii PDAST2L0C0 G2 S2.2 1B/3-2-3 Mt. Hamilton coreopsis 56 Corynorhinus townsendii townsendii AMACC08015 G4T3T4 S2S3 SC Townsend's western big-eared bat 57 Cryptantha hooveri PDBOR0A190 G2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 Hoover's cryptantha 58 Danaus plexippus IILEPP2010 G5 S3 monarch butterfly 59 Deinandra bacigalupii PDAST4R0V0 G1 S1.2 1B/3-2-3 Livermore tarplant 60 Delphinium californicum ssp. interius PDRAN0B0A2 G3T2? S2? 1B/3-2-3 Hospital Canyon larkspur 61 Delphinium recurvatum PDRAN0B1J0 G2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 recurved larkspur 62 Dendroica petechia brewsteri ABPBX03018 G5T3? S2 SC yellow warbler 63 Dipodomys heermanni berkeleyensis AMAFD03061 G3G4TH S1 Berkeley kangaroo rat 64 Dirca occidentalis PDTHY03010 G2G3 S2S3 1B/2-2-3 western leatherwood 65 Efferia antiochi IIDIP07010 G1G3 S1S3 Antioch efferian robberfly 66 Egretta thula ABNGA06030 G5 S4 snowy egret 67 Elanus leucurus ABNKC06010 G5 S3 white-tailed kite 68 Emys (=Clemmys) marmorata ARAAD02030 G3G4 S3 SC western pond turtle 69 Emys (=Clemmys) marmorata pallida ARAAD02032 G3G4T2T3 S2 SC southwestern pond turtle Q 70 Eremophila alpestris actia ABPAT02011 G5T3 S3 SC California horned lark 71 Eriastrum brandegeeae PDPLM03020 G3 S3.2 1B/2-2-3 Brandegee's eriastrum Commercial Version -- Dated April 29, 2005 -- Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch Page 3 Report Printed on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 Information Expires 10/29/2005 California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB_Alameda & Contra Costa Counties CDFG or Scientific Name/Common Name Element Code Federal Status State Status GRank SRank CNPS/R-E-D 72 Eriogonum truncatum PDPGN085Z0 GH SH 1A/ * Mt. Diablo buckwheat 73 Erodium macrophyllum PDGER01070 G4 S2.1 2/2-3-1 round-leaved filaree 74 Eryngium aristulatum var. hooveri PDAPI0Z043 G5T2 S2.1 1B/3-3-3 Hoover's button-celery 75 Eryngium racemosum PDAPI0Z0S0 Endangered G2Q S2.1 1B/2-3-3 Delta button-celery 76 Erysimum capitatum ssp. angustatum PDBRA16052 Endangered Endangered G5T1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 Contra Costa wallflower 77 Eschscholzia rhombipetala PDPAP0A0D0 G1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 diamond-petaled California poppy 78 Eucerceris ruficeps IIHYM18010 G1G2 S1S2 redheaded sphecid wasp 79 Eucyclogobius newberryi AFCQN04010 Endangered G3 S2S3 SC tidewater goby 80 Euphydryas editha bayensis IILEPK4055 Threatened G5T1 S1 Bay checkerspot butterfly 81 Falco mexicanus ABNKD06090 G5 S3 SC prairie falcon 82 Falco peregrinus anatum ABNKD06071 Delisted Endangered G4T3 S2 American peregrine falcon 83 Fritillaria falcata PMLIL0V070 G2 S2.2 1B/3-2-3 talus fritillary 84 Fritillaria liliacea PMLIL0V0C0 G2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 fragrant fritillary 85 Geothlypis trichas sinuosa ABPBX1201A G5T2 S2 SC saltmarsh common yellowthroat 86 Haliaeetus leucocephalus ABNKC10010 Threatened Endangered G4 S2 bald eagle 87 Helianthella castanea PDAST4M020 G3 S3.2 1B/2-2-3 Diablo helianthella 88 Helminthoglypta nickliniana bridgesi IMGASC2362 G2T1 S1 Bridges' coast range shoulderband (snail) 89 Hesperolinon breweri PDLIN01030 G2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 Brewer's western flax 90 Hesperolinon sp. nov. "serpentinum" PDLIN010D0 G1 S1.2 1B/3-2-3 Napa western flax 91 Hibiscus lasiocarpus PDMAL0H0Q0 G4 S2.2 2/2-2-1 rose-mallow 92 Hoita strobilina PDFAB5Z030 G2 S2.1 1B/2-3-3 Loma Prieta hoita 93 Holocarpha macradenia PDAST4X020 Threatened Endangered G1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 Santa Cruz tarplant 94 Horkelia cuneata ssp. sericea PDROS0W043 G4T1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 Kellogg's horkelia Commercial Version -- Dated April 29, 2005 -- Wildlife and Habitat Data Analysis Branch Page 4 Report Printed on Tuesday, August 16, 2005 Information Expires 10/29/2005 California Department of Fish and Game Natural Diversity Database CNDDB_Alameda & Contra Costa Counties CDFG or Scientific Name/Common Name Element Code Federal Status State Status GRank SRank CNPS/R-E-D 95 Hygrotus curvipes IICOL38030 G1 S1 curved-foot hygrotus diving beetle 96 Idiostatus middlekauffi IIORT31010 G1G2 S1 Middlekauff's shieldback katydid 97 Juglans hindsii PDJUG02040 G1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 Northern California black walnut 98 Lanius ludovicianus ABPBR01030 G4 S4 SC loggerhead shrike 99 Lasthenia conjugens PDAST5L040 Endangered G1 S1.1 1B/3-3-3 Contra Costa goldfields 100 Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus ABNME03041 Threatened G4T1 S1 California black rail 101 Lathyrus jepsonii var. jepsonii PDFAB250D2 G5T2 S2.2 1B/2-2-3 Delta tule pea 102 Legenere
Recommended publications
  • Literature Cited
    Literature Cited Robert W. Kiger, Editor This is a consolidated list of all works cited in volumes 19, 20, and 21, whether as selected references, in text, or in nomenclatural contexts. In citations of articles, both here and in the taxonomic treatments, and also in nomenclatural citations, the titles of serials are rendered in the forms recommended in G. D. R. Bridson and E. R. Smith (1991). When those forms are abbre- viated, as most are, cross references to the corresponding full serial titles are interpolated here alphabetically by abbreviated form. In nomenclatural citations (only), book titles are rendered in the abbreviated forms recommended in F. A. Stafleu and R. S. Cowan (1976–1988) and F. A. Stafleu and E. A. Mennega (1992+). Here, those abbreviated forms are indicated parenthetically following the full citations of the corresponding works, and cross references to the full citations are interpolated in the list alphabetically by abbreviated form. Two or more works published in the same year by the same author or group of coauthors will be distinguished uniquely and consistently throughout all volumes of Flora of North America by lower-case letters (b, c, d, ...) suffixed to the date for the second and subsequent works in the set. The suffixes are assigned in order of editorial encounter and do not reflect chronological sequence of publication. The first work by any particular author or group from any given year carries the implicit date suffix “a”; thus, the sequence of explicit suffixes begins with “b”. Works missing from any suffixed sequence here are ones cited elsewhere in the Flora that are not pertinent in these volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts
    Appendix D Species Accounts Appendix D Species Accounts Table of Contents San Joaquin Spearscale (Atriplex joaquiniana) ...................................................... 1 Recurved Larkspur (Delphinium recurvatum) ........................................................ 4 Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) .................................................................... 6 Congdon’s Tarplant (Centromadia parryi ssp. congdonii) ..................................... 8 Palmate-bracted bird’s-beak (Cordylanthus palmatus) ....................................... 10 Livermore tarplant (Deinandra bacigalupii) ........................................................ 11 Longhorn Fairy Shrimp ......................................................................................... 12 Vernal Pool Fairy Shrimp ..................................................................................... 15 Callippe Silverspot Butterfly ................................................................................ 18 California Tiger Salamander ................................................................................. 21 California Red-Legged Frog .................................................................................. 25 Foothill yellow-legged frog .................................................................................. 28 Alameda Whipsnake ............................................................................................ 31 Central California Coast Steelhead .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia Plumosa)
    Plants Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) Status Federal: None State: None CNPS: List 1B Population Trend Global: Unknown State: Unknown Within Inventory Area: Unknown © 2002 John Game Data Characterization The location database for big tarplant includes 36 data records dated from 1916 to 2001 (California Natural Diversity Database 2005). Twenty-nine of the occurrences were documented within the last 10 years. Seven of the occurrences have not been observed for over 60 years, but all the other occurrences are believed to be extant (California Natural Diversity Database 2005). Most of the occurrences are of high precision and may be accurately located, including those within the inventory area. Very little ecological information is available for big tarplant. The published literature on the species pertains primarily to its taxonomy. The main sources of general information on this species are the Jepson Manual (Hickman 1993) and the California Native Plant Society (2005). Specific observations on habitat and plant associates, threats, and other factors are summarized in the California Natural Diversity Database (2005). Range Big tarplant is endemic to the Mount Diablo foothills and is found primarily in eastern Contra Costa, eastern Alameda, and western San Joaquin Counties (Hoover 1937). Occurrences within the ECCC HCP/NCCP Inventory Area In the inventory area, big tarplant is known from 4 occurrences on Cowell Ranch, west of Brentwood, 7 occurrences on Roddy Ranch, south of Antioch, and one occurrence in Mount Diablo State Park, southeast of Clayton (California Natural Diversity Database 2005, Lake 2004). The historic occurrences in Antioch are likely to have been extirpated, although at least 1 population is present at Black Diamond Mines Regional Park (Preston pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 392 Phylogenies and Secondary Chemistry in Arnica (Asteraceae) CATARINA EKENÄS ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7092-0 2008 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva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ist of Papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to in the text by their Roman numerals: I Ekenäs, C., B. G. Baldwin, and K. Andreasen. 2007. A molecular phylogenetic
    [Show full text]
  • Round Valley Regional Preserve Checklist of Wild Plants Sorted Alphabetically by Growth Form, Scientific Name
    Round Valley Regional Preserve Checklist of Wild Plants Sorted Alphabetically by Growth Form, Scientific Name This is a comprehensive list of the wild plants reported to be found in Round Valley Regional Preserve. The plants are sorted alphabetically by growth form, then by scientific name. This list includes the common name, family, status, invasiveness rating, origin, longevity, habitat, and bloom dates. EBRPD plant names that have changed since the 1993 Jepson Manual are listed alphabetically in an appendix. Column Heading Description Checklist column for marking off the plants you observe Scientific Name According to The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (JM2) and eFlora (ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html) (JM93 if different) If the scientific name used in the 1993 edition of The Jepson Manual (JM93) is different, the change is noted as (JM93: xxx) Common Name According to JM2 and other references (not standardized) Family Scientific family name according to JM2, abbreviated by replacing the “aceae” ending with “-” (ie. Asteraceae = Aster-) Status Special status rating (if any), listed in 3 categories, divided by vertical bars (‘|’): Federal/California (Fed./Calif.) | California Native Plant Society (CNPS) | East Bay chapter of the CNPS (EBCNPS) Fed./Calif.: FE = Fed. Endangered, FT = Fed. Threatened, CE = Calif. Endangered, CR = Calif. Rare CNPS (online as of 2012-01-23): 1B = Rare, threatened or endangered in Calif, 3 = Review List, 4 = Watch List; 0.1 = Seriously endangered in California, 0.2 = Fairly endangered in California EBCNPS (online as of 2012-01-23): *A = Statewide listed rare; A1 = 2 East Bay regions or less; A1x = extirpated; A2 = 3-5 regions; B = 6-9 regions; C = watch list Inv California Invasive Plant Council Inventory (Cal-IPCI) Invasiveness rating: H = High, L = Limited, M = Moderate, N = Native OL Origin and Longevity.
    [Show full text]
  • Table C-1. Special-Status Wildlife Species Known to Occur Or with Potential to Occur in East Contra Costa County Page 1 of 12
    Table C-1. Special-Status Wildlife Species Known to Occur or with Potential to Occur in East Contra Costa County Page 1 of 12 Statusa Likelihood for Occurrence Common and Scientific Name Federal/State California Distribution Habitats in Plan Areab Invertebrates Longhorn fairy shrimp E/– Eastern margin of central Coast Ranges from Small, clear pools in sandstone rock High. Covered species under Branchinecta longiantenna Contra Costa County to San Luis Obispo outcrops of clear to moderately turbid proposed Plan County; disjunct population in Madera clay- or grass-bottomed pools County Vernal pool fairy shrimp T/– Central Valley, central and south Coast Common in vernal pools; also found in High. Covered species under Branchinecta lynchi Ranges from Tehama County to Santa sandstone rock outcrop pools proposed Plan Barbara County; isolated populations also in Riverside County Midvalley fairy shrimp PE/– Central Valley, scattered populations in Small, short-lived vernal pools, seasonal High. Covered species under Branchinecta mesovallensis Sacramento, Solano, Contra Costa, San wetlands and depressions proposed Plan Joaquin, Madera, Merced, and Fresno Counties Vernal pool tadpole shrimp E/– Shasta County south to Merced County Vernal pools and ephemeral stock ponds High. Two CNDDB records from Lepidurus packardi inventory area Valley elderberry longhorn beetle T/– Stream side habitats below 3,000 feet Riparian and oak savanna habitats with High. Species may occur in suitable Desmocerus californicus throughout the Central Valley elderberry shrubs; elderberries are the habitat eastern fringe of inventory dimorphus host plant area; impacts would be limited Delta green ground beetle T/– Restricted to Olcott Lake and other vernal Sparsely vegetated edges of vernal lakes Low.
    [Show full text]
  • C6 Draft Delineation of Waters of the United States on the Newell Ranch Property
    C6 Draft Delineation of Waters of the United States on the Newell Ranch Property DRAFT DELINEATION OF WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES NEWELL RANCH PROPERTY NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA April 2015 This page intentionally left blank DELINEATION OF WATERS OF THE UNITED STATES NEWELL RANCH PROPERTY NAPA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: American Canyon 1, LLC 1001 42nd Street, Suite 200 Oakland, California 94608 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 157 Park Place Point Richmond, California 94801 510.236.6810 Project No. ACC1401 April 2015 This page intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 PROPERTY LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION ...................................................... 1-1 1.1.1 Location ......................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.2 Description .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1.3 Vegetation and Plant Communities ............................................................... 1-1 1.1.4 Soils ............................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.5 Hydrology ...................................................................................................... 1-2 1.2 REGULATORY BACKGROUND ............................................................................ 1-3 2.0 METHODS .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy, Cytology, and Evolutionary Relationships Sherwin Carlquist Claremont Graduate School
    Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 4 | Issue 2 Article 2 1959 Studies on Madinae: Anatomy, Cytology, and Evolutionary Relationships Sherwin Carlquist Claremont Graduate School Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Carlquist, Sherwin (1959) "Studies on Madinae: Anatomy, Cytology, and Evolutionary Relationships," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 4: Iss. 2, Article 2. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol4/iss2/2 ALISO VoL. 4, No.2, pp. 171-236 }UNE 26, 1959 STUDIES ON MADINAE: ANATOMY, CYTOLOGY, AND EVOLUTIONARY RELATIONSHIPS SHERWIN CARLQUIST Claremont Graduate School, Claremont, California INTRODUCTION The tarweeds (Compositae, tribe Heliantheae, subtribe Madinae) are one of the best-known groups of western plants from the aspects of gross morphology, cytology, and genetics. I have desired to complement this body of information with studies on the anatomy of the subtribe so that a more adequate picture of variation and evolution in this remarkable group could be obtained. The anatomical diversity of the Madinae is, in fact, no less interesting than the variation patterns in cytological, genetical, and morphological characters. The latter features lend themselves well to studies of speci­ ation, whereas the anatomical characters evidence trends in the development of genera or criteria for defining the group as a whole. In a number of instances, species dif­ ferences are also revealed by anatomical studies. The primary focus of this study is the definition of the subtribe and its genera, and the exposition of phyletic tendencies within the Madinae by combination of anatomical data with that of other disciplines.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine-Scale to Flora-Wide Phylogenetic Perspectives on Californian Plant Diversity, Endemism, and Conservation
    Fine-scale to flora-wide phylogenetic perspectives on Californian plant diversity, endemism, and conservation Bruce G. Baldwin1,2 1 I thank Peter H. Raven, Patricia J. D. Raven, and Peter C. Hoch for being such gracious hosts at the 65th Annual Symposium of the Missouri Botanical Garden on the “Biota of North America: What we know, what we don’t know and what we’re losing.” I also am grateful to Brent D. Mishler, David D. Ackerly, Matthew M. Kling, Andrew H. Thornhill, and other members of the California Plant Phylodiversity Project (CPPP) for their spatial phylogenetic and conservation prioritization efforts and collaboration, to Matthew M. Kling for providing Fig. 1G and 1H, to Toni Corelli, Neal Kramer, Michael Park, and Chris Winchell for permission to reproduce photographs in Fig. 1, to Susan Fawcett for assistance with Fig. 1, and to her and an anonymous reviewer for helpful comments on the manuscript. Research summarized here was supported in part by the National Science Foundation (DEB-1354552, to Brent D. Mishler, David D. Ackerly, and BGB; DEB-1601504, to Adam C. Schneider and BGB; and DEB-0324733 and DEB-9458237, to BGB), the Lawrence R. Heckard Endowment Fund of the Jepson Herbarium, and the late Roderic B. Park and other Friends of the Jepson Herbarium. 2 Jepson Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, 1001 Valley Life Sciences Building #2465, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720-2465, U.S.A. [email protected] Key words: biodiversity hotspots, California Floristic Province, cryptic diversity, deserts, extinction, floristics, Mediterranean climate, neo-endemism, paleo-endemism, phylodiversity, phyloendemism, spatial phylogenetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Status and Invasive Plant Management Pilot Project
    SPECIAL STATUS AND INVASIVE PLANT MANAGEMENT PILOT PROJECT EAST CONTRA COSTA COUNTY HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN / NATURAL COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN MARCH 2018 Prepared for Prepared By 822 MAIN STREET MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 94553 30 Muir Road (925) 228-1027 Martinez, CA 94553 & California Department of Fish and Wildlife Ecosystem Conservation Division 1416 Ninth Street, Suite 1208 Sacramento, CA 95814 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section 1. Introduction ................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Background .................................................................................................................... 1 1.2. Species Ecology and Difficulties .................................................................................... 3 1.3. Target Species ............................................................................................................... 4 1.4. Project Goals .................................................................................................................. 9 Section 2. Study Methods ............................................................................................. 11 2.1. Seed Germination Study .............................................................................................. 11 2.2. Invasive Plant study ..................................................................................................... 17 2.3. Data Analysis ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plants Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia Plumosa)
    Plants Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) Big Tarplant (Blepharizonia plumosa) Status Federal: None State: None CNPS: List 1B Population Trend Global: Unknown State: Unknown Within Inventory Area: Unknown © 2002 John Game Data Characterization The location database for big tarplant includes 36 data records dated from 1916 to 1998 (California Natural Diversity Database 2001). Twenty-nine of the occurrences were documented within the last 10 years. Seven of the occurrences have not been observed for over 60 years, but all the other occurrences are believed to be extant (California Natural Diversity Database 2001). Most of the occurrences are of high precision and may be accurately located, including those within the inventory area. Very little ecological information is available for big tarplant. The published literature on the species pertains primarily to its taxonomy. The main sources of general information on this species are the Jepson Manual (Hickman 1993) and the California Native Plant Society (2001). Specific observations on habitat and plant associates, threats, and other factors are summarized in the California Natural Diversity Database (2001). Range Big tarplant is endemic to the Mount Diablo foothills and is found primarily in eastern Contra Costa, eastern Alameda, and western San Joaquin Counties (Hoover 1937). Occurrences within the ECCC HCP/NCCP Inventory Area In the inventory area, big tarplant is known from 4 occurrences on Cowell Ranch, west of Brentwood, and 7 occurrences on Roddy Ranch, south of Antioch (California Natural Diversity Database 2001). The historic occurrences in Antioch are likely to have been extirpated, although at least 1 population is present at Black Diamond Mines Regional Park (Preston pers.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Plants of Contra Loma Regional Park Common Name Version
    Wild Plants of Contra Loma Regional Park Common Name Version A Photographic Guide Sorted by Form, Color and Family with Habitat Descriptions and Identification Notes Photographs and text by Wilde Legard District Botanist, East Bay Regional Park District New Revised and Expanded Edition - Includes the latest scientific names, habitat descriptions and identification notes Decimal Inches .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 .5 2 .5 3 .5 4 .5 5 .5 6 .5 7 .5 8 .5 9 1/8 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 1/2 2 1/2 3 1/2 4 1/2 5 1/2 6 1/2 7 1/2 8 1/2 9 English Inches Notes: A Photographic Guide to the Wild Plants of Contra Loma Regional Park More than 2,000 species of native and naturalized plants grow wild in the San Francisco Bay Area. Most are very difficult to identify without the help of good illustrations. This is designed to be a simple, color photo guide to help you identify some of these plants. This guide is published electronically in Adobe Acrobat® format so that it can easily be updated as additional photographs become available. You have permission to freely download, distribute and print this guide for individual use. Photographs are © 2014 Wilde Legard, all rights reserved. In this guide, the included plants are sorted first by form (Ferns & Fern-like, Grasses & Grass-like, Herbaceous, Woody), then by most common flower color, and finally by similar looking flowers (grouped by genus within each family). Each photograph has the following information, separated by '-': COMMON NAME According to The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (JM2) and other references (not standardized).
    [Show full text]