A History of Detection of Explosive Devices 1. (700-1950)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A History of Detection of Explosive Devices 1. (700-1950) Land Forces Academy Review Vol. XXV, No 3(99), 2020 A HISTORY OF DETECTION OF EXPLOSIVE DEVICES 1. (700-1950) Tibor HORVÁTH National University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary [email protected] József Zsolt SZATAI National University of Public Service, Budapest, Hungary [email protected] ABSTRACT This study presents the history of explosive devices and that of their detection. With the invention of explosive devices and their subsequent use, the methods of warfare changed significantly. New procedures emerged that were already unthinkable to implement without the use of such tools. In parallel with the emergence of explosive devices with increasing destructive power, the need to deactivate them also came to the fore. Opposing parties made increasing efforts to detect, deactivate, and destroy explosive devices. After the completion of military operations, the detection of explosive devices did not lose its importance, and developed into an essential mission, since the areas had to be cleared of devices left over from the military actions and posing a murderous danger. KEYWORDS: explosive device, mine, minefield, detection, deactivation 1. Introduction “compounds” have been used in countless The history of mankind is a history of cases for and against humanity. Accidental wars. This statement is especially true of the explosions during their discovery or th 20 century, where not a single year passed production have clearly demonstrated the without an armed conflict (Kiadó, 2001). “magical power” of these materials. Throughout human history, combat tools and Although they were only utilised as procedures have been continually developed. fireworks at religious ceremonies for a long The ancient legend of Prometheus, who stole time, it was also realized that such materials fire from the gods to pass it on to humans, is could be used for “something else” (Szabó very well known. In this myth, our distant Tóth, 2012). The pre-planned and ancestors could have foreseen that the key to human growth lies in the control of fire. After systemic use of the properties of explosive all, he who is able to dominate fire, gains materials resulted in the creation of advantage over others. The same was thought explosive devices. Explosive devices can be of explosives as well. used both in defensive and offensive It has been a very long time since the operations. Such type of their military invention of explosives, and these application changed the nature of warfare. DOI: 10.2478/raft-2020-0023 © 2017. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License. 189 Parallel with their application, the need for After its discovery, the gunpowder defence against explosive devices emerged, spread quite slowly in the world, because which could result in increased the Chinese, having recognised the survivability of friendly troops. The history importance of “black dust,” kept it as a of the detection of explosive devices dates secret weapon. Into Europe, the black back to about the same era as the history of powder was brought by English monk the military use of explosive devices. Robert Bacon, who presented its operation and strategic importance to the Pope in 2. From the Medieval Period to the 1240. In 1242, in his book “Liber de End of the Modern Period Nullitate Magiae”, Bacon provides an exact For centuries, humankind has been “smoke powder” recipe for fireworks. using explosive materials both for military According to this, black powder can be and industrial purposes. The use of produced by mixing 40% potassium nitrate, explosives for military purposes resulted in 30% carbon and 30% sulphur. the creation of explosive devices. Black powder appeared in the Middle According to current wording, an explosive East at about the same time when it device can be any object or device that appeared in Europe. It is not known contains an explosive or pyrotechnic whether it was “borrowed” from China or substance (Mű/41, 2014). The earliest man- developed independently, but according to made explosive material was black or certain records, Muslims used the mix as smoky gunpowder, which is commonly early as the 13th century. The incendiary referred to as gunpowder, as it was used for arrows coated with the flammable materials a very long time mainly to fire projectiles they had previously used had not been from firearms. The history of black powder effective enough because they went out begins in China around 700 A.D., when it easily during flight. It was established that was discovered that the mix of nitric, black powder mixed with salt compounds sulphur, and charcoal in the right was significantly more stable and did not go proportions might result in a material that out in flight, so that previous deficiencies can make spectacular fireworks (Lukács, could be easily eliminated. It was also 2012). However, it was not used for found that when a mixture of such a military purposes for another nearly 300 composition was filled into a tube with one years. Documents suggest that in China, of its end left open, the gases formed during during the Song Dynasty in 970, Feng ignition left the open part and the device Y-Sheng and Yue Y-Feng used incendiary itself did not have to be thrown because it arrows, the tips of which were dipped in activated itself, got launched and airborne. gunpowder, (Андреев, 1956) but black In flight, it was driven by the thrust powder was also used to operate other produced by the ejecting gases rearward. weapons. Subsequently, gunpowder was As a result of this process, the rocket was regularly used in China for military invented. Such rudimentary missiles were purposes too. In 1232, in Kai-Fung-Fu, the used in the wars against the Mongols and capital of the Jong Dynasty, the city’s the Crusaders (Ghazal Ismail, 2011). defenders used “Ho-Pao” devices in order Although the use of black powder in an to break the siege by the Mongols. From the explosive device proved to be beneficial to descriptions of the effects of the device, it the troops using it, its use in this field was can be concluded that it might have been not widespread. Presumably, this may be the first explosive device in the world. related to the conditions required for the 190 storage of gunpowder, which became wet thus preventing planting a mine. This type and unusable if it was not stored in of demining procedure was used for force sufficiently dry conditions. The dry protection right until World War I. Later, conditions, necessary for storage, could not simultaneously with the development of always be created by the belligerents on the mines, new and more sophisticated battlefield, since their camps were often detection and clearance procedures were relocated. Therefore, the creation of those developed. Attempts were made to flood conditions was limited for providing the tunnels with water, thereby neutralizing gunpowder necessary for the use of firearms. the explosive device containing mainly In the 15th century, in addition to its gunpowder, but the applied techniques also use in firearms, black powder was included destruction with explosive charge introduced for use in tunnels and shaft adjacent to the main charge. passages dug into the ground, with the aim Some records from the mid-16th of destroying enemy fortifications. To this century also mention the use of black end, tunnels were dug as close as possible powder for criminal purposes. One such to the walls of fortifications. They were case was the assassination at Kirk O. Field filled with black powder or other incendiary in 1567, which ended with the death of mixtures that were blown up in order to Lord Darnley. As these cases were unique destroy the walls of the fortifications and to and the acts specifically targeted one create a gap in it for access by the attacking particular person, the use of explosive infantry. Such a method was used by the devices for such purposes cannot be army of Russian Tsar Ivan IV, also known considered widespread. Nor did the as “Ivan the Terrible” during the siege of contemporary authorities identify this type Kazan in 1552. of crime as a common source of danger, Parallel with such type of use of therefore no attempt was made for explosive materials, the need to detect them investigation. The first use of black powder emerged for the defenders. There are many as an industrial explosive in the world took stories about how demining activities place in Selmecbánya, present day Banská actually began. In the Medieval Times, Štiavnica, in 1627, where it was used by given the contemporary procedures master miner Gáspár Weindl to crack the according to which mines were explosives mine wall. hidden in tunnels, tunnels were also dug as In the 16th century, new types of a possible way to defend against attackers’ combat firearms appeared on the battlefield, mines. With digging the probing tunnels, while the typical use of black powder in the intention was to find the tunnel made by explosive devices was limited to mines the enemy and the explosives hidden in it hidden below ground level. The first before it was put into action. This was an controlled-effect shrapnel mine on the extremely tedious task that failed to meet battlefield was used by Francois de Fleury, the expectations in many cases. An an engineer of George Washington, on the improved version of the method was to dig banks of the Delaware River in New Jersey “counter-tunnels” in which explosives and in October 1777. The mine consisted of incendiary materials were placed. Those, explosive material dug into the ground, and when initiated in good time, collapsed the stones placed onto or next to the charge, to tunnel excavated by the attacking enemy, act as shrapnel.
Recommended publications
  • La Guardia-Pyke Bomb Carriers James A
    Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Volume 34 | Issue 3 Article 8 1943 La Guardia-Pyke Bomb Carriers James A. Pyke Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc Part of the Criminal Law Commons, Criminology Commons, and the Criminology and Criminal Justice Commons Recommended Citation James A. Pyke, La Guardia-Pyke Bomb Carriers, 34 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 198 (1943-1944) This Criminology is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology by an authorized editor of Northwestern University School of Law Scholarly Commons. THE LA GUARDIA-PYKE BOMB CARRIERS* James A. Pyket Soon after the World's Fair bomb explosion of July 4, 1940, in which two members of the New York Police Department were killed and several injured, the Honorable Fiorello H. La Guardia, Mayor of the City of New York, summoned the author, as Com- manding Officer of the Bomb Squad, to the City Hall for the pur- pose of discussing the catastrophe and means of preventing a re- currence. As the result of this and several other conferences the "La Guardia-Pyke Bomb Carriers" were developed. The purpose of these carriers is to take a bomb from a congested area to a remote or suburban district and to do so in a manner which will protect the public and the police. With the construc- tion adopted should the bomb explode enroute the explosive forces are reduced to a minimum by means of a triple air-cushioning effect produced by the baffle screens of woven steel cable.
    [Show full text]
  • Conventional Explosions and Blast Injuries 7
    Chapter 7: CONVENTIONAL EXPLOSIONS AND BLAST INJURIES David J. Dries, MSE, MD, FCCM David Bracco, MD, EDIC, FCCM Tarek Razek, MD Norma Smalls-Mantey, MD, FACS, FCCM Dennis Amundson, DO, MS, FCCM Objectives ■ Describe the mechanisms of injury associated with conventional explosions. ■ Outline triage strategies and markers of severe injury in patients wounded in conventional explosions. ■ Explain the general principles of critical care and procedural support in mass casualty incidents caused by conventional explosions. ■ Discuss organ-specific support for victims of conventional explosions. Case Study Construction workers are using an acetylene/oxygen mixture to do some welding work in a crowded nearby shopping mall. Suddenly, an explosion occurs, shattering windows in the mall and on the road. The acetylene tank seems to be at the origin of the explosion. The first casualties arrive at the emergency department in private cars and cabs. They state that at the scene, blood and injured people are everywhere. - What types of patients do you expect? - How many patients do you expect? - When will the most severely injured patients arrive? - What is your triage strategy, and how will you triage these patients? - How do you initiate care in victims of conventional explosions? Fundamental Disaster Management I . I N T R O D U C T I O N Detonation of small-volume, high-intensity explosives is a growing threat to civilian as well as military populations. Understanding circumstances surrounding conventional explosions helps with rapid triage and recognition of factors that contribute to poor outcomes. Rapid evacuation of salvageable victims and swift identification of life-threatening injuries allows for optimal resource utilization and patient management.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosive Device Response Operations
    EXPLOSIVE DEVICE RESPONSE OPERATIONS Capability Definition Explosive Device Response Operations is the capability to coordinate, direct, and conduct improvised explosive device (IED) response after initial alert and notification. Coordinate intelligence fusion and RESPOND MISSION: EXPLOSIVE DE analysis, information collection, and threat recognition, assess the situation and conduct appropriate Render Safe Procedures (RSP). Conduct searches for additional devices and coordinate overall efforts to mitigate chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear, and explosive (CBRNE) threat to the incident site. Outcome Threat assessments are conducted, the explosive and/or hazardous devices are rendered safe, and the area is cleared of hazards. Measures are implemented in the following priority order: ensure public safety; safeguard the officers on the scene (including the bomb technician); collect and preserve evidence; protect and preserve public and private property; and restore public services. Relationship to National Response Plan Emergency Support Function (ESF)/Annex This capability supports the following Emergency Support Functions (ESFs): Terrorism Incident Law Enforcement and Investigation Annex ESF #10: Oil and Hazardous Materials Response ESF #13: Public Safety and Security VICE RESPONSE OPERATIONS Preparedness Tasks and Measures/Metrics Activity: Develop and Maintain Plans, Procedures, Programs, and Systems Critical Tasks Res.B2c 1.1 Develop, distribute, and maintain National Guidelines for Bomb Technicians Develop effective procedures
    [Show full text]
  • Explosive Weapon Effectsweapon Overview Effects
    CHARACTERISATION OF EXPLOSIVE WEAPONS EXPLOSIVEEXPLOSIVE WEAPON EFFECTSWEAPON OVERVIEW EFFECTS FINAL REPORT ABOUT THE GICHD AND THE PROJECT The Geneva International Centre for Humanitarian Demining (GICHD) is an expert organisation working to reduce the impact of mines, cluster munitions and other explosive hazards, in close partnership with states, the UN and other human security actors. Based at the Maison de la paix in Geneva, the GICHD employs around 55 staff from over 15 countries with unique expertise and knowledge. Our work is made possible by core contributions, project funding and in-kind support from more than 20 governments and organisations. Motivated by its strategic goal to improve human security and equipped with subject expertise in explosive hazards, the GICHD launched a research project to characterise explosive weapons. The GICHD perceives the debate on explosive weapons in populated areas (EWIPA) as an important humanitarian issue. The aim of this research into explosive weapons characteristics and their immediate, destructive effects on humans and structures, is to help inform the ongoing discussions on EWIPA, intended to reduce harm to civilians. The intention of the research is not to discuss the moral, political or legal implications of using explosive weapon systems in populated areas, but to examine their characteristics, effects and use from a technical perspective. The research project started in January 2015 and was guided and advised by a group of 18 international experts dealing with weapons-related research and practitioners who address the implications of explosive weapons in the humanitarian, policy, advocacy and legal fields. This report and its annexes integrate the research efforts of the characterisation of explosive weapons (CEW) project in 2015-2016 and make reference to key information sources in this domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification, Chemistry, and Behavior of Seal Bombs Used to Control
    f MARCH 1990 h IDENTIFICATION, CHEMISTRY, AND BEHAVIOR OF SEAL BOMBS USED TO CONTROL DOLPHINS IN THE YELLOWFIN TUNA PURSE-SEINE FISHERY IN THE EASTERN TROPICAL PACIFIC: POTENTIAL HAZARDS By Albert C. Myrick Jr. Martin Fink Cheryl B. Glick ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT LJ-90-08 f This administrative Report is issued as an informal document to ensure prompt dissemination of preliminary results, interim reports and special studies. We recommend that it not be abstracted or cited. 5H // Sic 2 ft,o. 90-0? C. ^ IDENTIFICATION, CHEMISTRY, AND BEHAVIOR OF SEAL BOMBS USED TO CONTROL DOLPHINS IN THE YELLOWFIN TUNA PURSE-SEINE FISHERY IN THE EASTERN TROPICAL PACIFIC: POTENTIAL HAZARDS By 12 1 Albert C. Myrick Jr., Martin Fink, and Cheryl B. Glick 1. Southwest Fisheries Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, P.O. Box 271, La Jolla, CA 92038 2. San Diego County Sheriff's Dept., Crime Laboratory, 3520 Kurtz Street, San Diego, CA 92110 LIBRARY March 1990 FEB 28 2008 National oceanic & Atmospheric Administration U.S. Dept, of Commerce ADMINISTRATIVE REPORT LJ-90-08 CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT...................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION.................................................. 1 METHODS AND MATERIALS........................................ 3 RESULTS Description.............................................. 4 Chemical Analysis and Apparent TNT Equivalents........ 5 Charge-Weights and Relative Strengths.................. 7 Behavior of Units Detonated............................. 7 Relative Strengths Based on Combined Characteristics..
    [Show full text]
  • Securing Transportation Assets & Operations
    Securing Transportation Assets & Operations Mitigation Strategies for Highway Modes INTRODUCTION The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) Highway and Motor Carrier (HMC) Section and the Bus Industry Safety Council (BISC) collaborated with multiple HMC stakeholders to create this security guidance, which serves to enhance security awareness among the industry. This guidance offers useful information, tips, and tools to strengthen the industry’s resistance to disruption of its critical services. It contains viable options for consideration, but these recommended measures are not required by TSA or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). TSA does not intend for the information in this document to conflict with or supersede existing regulatory requirements, statutory requirements, or laws. Furthermore, stakeholders using this guidance should ensure practices align with company/organizational policies and protocols prior to implementation. While many of the security practices published in this document apply to all elements of the HMC community (i.e., trucking, commercial and school passenger carriers, and infrastructure), some meet only the needs of a specific stakeholder element. Where those circumstances occur, this guide attempts to note the exceptions. If you have questions, comments, or suggestions about the content of this document, please contact TSA at [email protected]. PLEASE NOTE: Always call 911 in the event of an emergency or immediate danger. Always follow organizational procedures, and when in doubt, err
    [Show full text]
  • United States Bomb Data Center (Usbdc) Explosives Incident Report (Eir)
    UNCLASSIFIED UNITED STATES BOMB DATA CENTER (USBDC) EXPLOSIVES INCIDENT REPORT (EIR) 2018 The Annual Explosives Incident Report (EIR) reviews bombing and explosives related incidents from information reported to the United States Bomb Data Center (USBDC) through the Bomb Arson Tracking System (BATS). UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Table of Contents Executive Summary ______________________________________________________________ 1 Explosions – 2018 ________________________________________________________________ 2 Recoveries – 2018 ________________________________________________________________ 8 Suspicious Packages – 2018 ___________________________________________________ 12 Bomb Threats – 2018 __________________________________________________________ 13 Hoaxes – 2018 __________________________________________________________________ 14 Thefts/Losses – 2018 __________________________________________________________ 15 Contact Information ___________________________________________________________ 17 UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED 2018 Explosives Incident Report (EIR) EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OPERATING HIGHLIGHTS The 2018 Explosives Incident Report (EIR) is an informational product prepared by the United States Bomb Data Center (USBDC), using incident data reported in the Bomb Arson Tracking System (BATS) by its 2,764 interagency partners and 13,059 registered users. This report examines the total number of explosives related incidents reported in BATS for calendar year 2017 and includes explosions and bombings, recoveries, suspicious packages, bomb
    [Show full text]
  • Tank Sampling
    STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 2010 PAGE: 1 of 21 Rev: 0.0 DATE: 11/16/94 TANK SAMPLING CONTENTS 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY 3.0 SAMPLE PRESERVATION, CONTAINERS, HANDLING, AND STORAGE 4.0 INTERFERENCES AND POTENTIAL PROBLEMS 5.0 EQUIPMENT/APPARATUS 6.0 REAGENTS 7.0 PROCEDURES 7.1 Preparation 7.2 Preliminary Inspection 7.3 Sampling Procedure 7.4 Sampling Devices 7.4.1 Bacon Bomb 7.4.2 Sludge Judge 7.4.3 Subsurface Grab 7.4.4 Glass Thief 7.4.5 Bailer 7.4.6 COLIWASA 8.0 CALCULATIONS 9.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL 10.0 DATA VALIDATION 11.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY 12.0 REFERENCES 13.0 APPENDICES A - Calculations B - Figures SUPERCEDES: SOP #2010; Revision 1.0; 08/16/91; U.S. EPA Contract 68-03-3482. STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURES SOP: 2010 PAGE: 2 of 21 Rev: 0.0 DATE: 11/16/94 TANK SAMPLING 1.0 SCOPE AND APPLICATION The purpose of this standard operating procedure (SOP) is to provide technical guidance for the implementation of sampling protocols for tanks and other confined spaces from outside the vessel. These are standard (i.e., typically applicable) operating procedures which may be varied or changed as required, dependent on site conditions, equipment limitations or limitations imposed by the procedure or other procedure limitations. In all instances, the ultimate procedures employed should be documented and associated with the final report. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute U.S. EPA endorsement or recommendation for use. 2.0 METHOD SUMMARY The safe collection of a representative sample should be the criteria for selecting sample locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Early 18Th Century Hand Grenades on the North American Atlantic Coast an Experimental Archaeology Study By
    Early 18th Century Hand Grenades on the North American Atlantic Coast An Experimental Archaeology Study by Stephen Lacey April, 2019 Director of Thesis: Donald H. Parkerson, Ph.D. Major Department: History, Program of Maritime Studies ABSTRACT In the first half of the eighteenth century, standardization of weapons appears in cannon, shot, and small arms. No comparative study has been conducted to determine if grenades follow this pattern. In this study, three collections of cast iron grenades dating from 1700–1750 were compared to determine if any statistical significance exists. If so, this will form the basis to create a taxonomy to assist in dating sites. Furthermore, grenade blasts from this era are reported in the historical record but recorders barely understood ballistics. An experimental phase has been designed into the project to fully record a blast via controlled detonation. The concussive force and decibel levels were recorded to help assess potential damage. Upon completion, medical evaluations can be made to determine the full lethality of cast iron grenades. This allows an evaluation of historical records for unexplained deaths, altered behaviors post battle, and critical evaluation of historical documents on grenade lethality. Early 18th Century Hand Grenades on the North American Atlantic Coast An Experimental Archaeology Study A Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Department of History East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master’s of Arts By Stephen Lacey April, 2019 ©Stephen Lacey, 2019 Early 18th Century Hand Grenades on the North American Atlantic Coast An Experimental Archaeology Study By Stephen Lacey APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS: ___________________________________________ Donald H.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is the Difference Between a Hydrogen Bomb and an Atomic Bomb?
    Source 1 Source Information: Time Magazine Article, What Is the Difference Between a Hydrogen Bomb and an Atomic Bomb? What Is the Difference Between a Hydrogen Bomb and an Atomic Bomb? A mushroom cloud forms over Nagasaki, Japan after the dropping of the second atomic bomb. Time ​ ​ Life Pictures—The LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images BY MELISSA CHAN ​ SEPTEMBER 22, 2017 ​ North Korea warned this week that it might test a hydrogen bomb in the Pacific ​ ​ Ocean, after saying the country had already successfully detonated one. A hydrogen bomb has never been used in battle by any country, but experts say it has the power to wipe out entire cities and kill significantly more people than the already powerful atomic bomb, which the U.S. dropped in Japan during World War II, killing tens of thousands of people. As global tensions continue to rise over North Korea’s nuclear weapons program, here’s what to know about atomic and hydrogen bombs: Why is a hydrogen bomb stronger than an atomic bomb? More than 200,000 people died in Japan after the U.S. dropped the world’s first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and then another one three days later in Nagasaki during World War II in 1945, according to the Associated Press. The bombings in the two cities were so devastating, they forced Japan to surrender. But a hydrogen bomb has the potential to be 1,000 times more powerful than an atomic bomb, according to several nuclear experts. The U.S. witnessed the magnitude of a hydrogen bomb when it tested one within the country in 1954, the New York Times reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosives Recognition and Response for First Responders
    Explosives Recognition and Response for First Responders I. Training Briefing A. A brief history of the civilian Bomb Squads in the United States. 1. Hazardous Devices School: began official training of all civilian Bomb Technicians in 1971. a. Butte County has had an accredited Bomb Squad since the early 1990’s. (1) Information about the current members. 2. Training requirements for Bomb Technicians B. Overview of training. 1. Commercial explosives, military ordnance, Improvised Explosive Devices (IEDs), statutes and response to possible explosives related incident. II. Chemical Explosives A. Rapid conversion of a solid or liquid explosive compound into gases. 1. Explosion - a rapid form of combustion. 2. The speed of the burning reaction constitutes the difference between combustion, explosion, and detonation. a. Detonation is defined as instantaneous combustion. B. Effects of an explosion 1. Blast Pressure a. Detonation produces expanding gases in a period of 1/10,000 of a second and reaches velocities of up to 13,000 mile per hour, producing 700 tons of pressure per square inch. b. The blast front will vaporize flesh and bone and pulverize concrete. c. Mass of expanding gas rolls outward in a spherical pattern like a giant wave. 2. Fragmentation a. Pipe bomb will reach about the same velocity as a military rifle bullet - approximately 2,700 feet per second. 3. Incendiary Thermal Effect a. High explosives will reach temperatures of about 8,000 degrees F. C. Explosives 1. Classification a. Low Explosives (1) Deflagrate (burn) rather than detonate (a) Burning is transmitted from one grain to the next Training OuTline 1 (2) Initiated by a flame/safety fuse (3) Primarily used as propellants and have pushing or heaving effect (4) Black powder/smokeless powder (5) Must be confined to explode (6) Burning rate of under 3,280 fps b.
    [Show full text]
  • FMU-139C/B Bomb Fuze System
    FFMMUU--113399CC//BB BBoommbb FFuuzzee SSyysstteemm MAIN FEATURES P Compatible with most U.S. Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps and NATO aircraft. P Compatible with most in-service weapon guidance kits, tail units and high explosive bombs. P All arming and detonation event functions combined in a single fuze system. P Dual independent launch signals and environmental sensing. P Advanced electronics technology implemented with solid-state circuitry. P Automatic retard deceleration recognition. P Reliability greater than 95%. P Ten year shelf life. P One year service life. P Fully developed and in high volume production. P Annual production capacity greater than 60,000 units. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION The FMU-139C/B Bomb Fuze is an electro-mechanical impact/impact delay fuzing system developed for use by both the U.S. Navy and U.S. Air Force in the MK82, MK83, MK84, BLU-110, BLU-111, BLU-117, low drag and high drag, laser guided and JDAM (limited), high explosive bomb systems. In addition to impact/impact delay, the fuze is capable of accepting a signal from a separate Proximity Sensor (DSU-33D/B). The Fuzing System meets USAF, NAVAIR and other Air Force requirements, including the safety criteria of MIL-STD-1316E. FUNCTIONS P Proximity P Impact “0” delay P Post impact delay - Short FMU-139C/B Bomb Fuze System PERFORMANCE CHARACTERISTICS Parameter Settings Navy and USAF Applications with FZU-48/B NAVAIR Applications with FFC MK122 Safety Switch Arming Time - High Drag 2.0, 2.6, 4.0, 5.0 sec 2.6 sec Arm/Instant (+300 vdc) 2.6 sec Arm/Instant (-300
    [Show full text]