DOCSLIB.ORG

NI 43-101 Beartrack-Arnett Gold Project Technical Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

REVIVAL GOLD INC. TECHNICAL REPORT ON THE BEARTRACK – ARNETT GOLD PROJECT, LEMHI COUNTY, IDAHO, USA NI 43-101 Report Qualified Persons: Mark B. Mathisen, C.P.G. Ryan Rodney, C.P.G. Kathleen A. Altman, Ph.D., P.E. February 21, 2020 Effective Date: December 10, 2019 RPA55 University Ave. Suite 501 I Toronto, ON, Canada M5J 2H7 I T + 1 (416) 947 0907 www.rpacan.com Report Control Form Document Title Technical Report on the Beartrack-Arnett Gold Project, Lemhi County, Idaho, USA Client Name & Address Revival Gold Inc. 145 King Street W. Suite 2870 Toronto, ON, M5H 1J8 Document Reference Project #3111 Status & FINAL Issue No. Version Effective Date December 10, 2019 Lead Author Mark B. Mathisen (Signed) Ryan Rodney (Signed) Kathleen A. Altman (Signed) Peer Reviewer David Ross (Signed) Reno Pressacco (Signed) Wayne W. Valliant (Signed) Project Manager Approval Grant A. Malensek (Signed) Project Director Approval Richard J. Lambert (Signed) Report Distribution Name No. of Copies Client RPA Filing 1 (project box) Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. 55 University Avenue, Suite 501 Toronto, ON M5J 2H7 Canada Tel: +1 416 947 0907 Fax: +1 416 947 0395 [email protected] www.rpacan.com FORWARD LOOKING INFORMATION The information contained herein contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. "Forward-looking information" includes, but is not limited to, statements with respect to the activities, events or developments that Revival Gold Inc. expects or anticipates will or may occur in the future, including, without limitation, disclosure regarding the economics and project parameters presented in the preliminary economic assessment referred to herein as the PEA, including, without limitation, IRR, NPV and other costs and economic information (including the price of gold), possible events, conditions or financial performance that is based on assumptions about future economic conditions and courses of action; the timing and costs of future development and exploration activities on the Rook I Project; success of development and exploration activities; permitting timelines and requirements; timelines for technical reports and further studies, including a pre-feasibility study; planned exploration and development of properties and the results thereof; and planned expenditures and budgets and the execution thereof. Generally, but not always, forward-looking information and statements can be identified by the use of words such as "plans", "expects", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates", or "believes" or the negative connotation thereof or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved" or the negative connotation thereof. Forward-looking information and statements are based on the then current expectations, beliefs, assumptions, estimates and forecasts about Revival Gold Inc.'s business and the industry and markets in which it operates. Forward-looking information and statements are made based upon numerous assumptions, including among others, the results of planned exploration activities are as anticipated, the price of gold, the cost of planned exploration and development activities, that financing will be available if and when needed and on reasonable terms, that third party contractors, equipment, supplies and governmental and other approvals required to conduct Revival Gold Inc.’s planned exploration and development activities will be available on reasonable terms and in a timely manner and that general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner. Although the assumptions made by Revival Gold Inc. and the authors of this Technical Report in providing forward looking information or making forward looking statements are considered reasonable at this time, there can be no assurance that such assumptions will prove to be accurate. Forward-looking information and statements also involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties and other factors, which may cause actual results, performances and achievements of Revival Gold Inc. to differ materially from any projections of results, performances and achievements of Revival Gold Inc. expressed or implied by such forward-looking information or statements, including, among others, negative operating cash flow and dependence on third party financing, uncertainty of the availability of additional financing, the risk that pending assay results will not confirm previously announced preliminary results, imprecision of mineral resource estimates, the appeal of alternate sources of energy and sustained low gold prices, aboriginal title and consultation issues, exploration risks, reliance upon key management and other personnel, deficiencies in the Revival Gold Inc.'s title to its properties, uninsurable risks, failure to manage conflicts of interest, failure to obtain or maintain required permits and licenses, changes in laws, regulations and policy, competition for resources and financing and other factors discussed or referred to in Revival Gold Inc.'s Annual Information Form dated March 31, 2017 under "Risk Factors". Although the Revival Gold Inc. and the authors of this Technical Report have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking information or implied by forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Revival Gold Inc. – Beartrack-Arnett Gold Project, Project #3111 Technical Report NI 43-101 – February 21, 2020 Page i www.rpacan.com There can be no assurance that forward-looking information and statements will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated, estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements or information. Neither Revival Gold Inc. nor the authors of this Technical Report undertakes any obligation to update or reissue forward-looking information as a result of new information or events except as required by applicable securities laws. Revival Gold Inc. – Beartrack-Arnett Gold Project, Project #3111 Technical Report NI 43-101 – February 21, 2020 Page ii www.rpacan.com TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1 SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... 1-1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 1-1 Technical Summary ....................................................................................................... 1-6 2 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 2-1 Sources of Information ................................................................................................... 2-1 Effective Date ................................................................................................................ 2-2 List of Abbreviations ....................................................................................................... 2-3 3 RELIANCE ON OTHER EXPERTS.................................................................................. 3-1 4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION ................................................................ 4-1 Land Tenure .................................................................................................................. 4-1 Obligations to Maintain the Properties ............................................................................ 4-6 Agreements ................................................................................................................... 4-6 Environment and Permitting ......................................................................................... 4-10 5 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE, AND PHYSIOGRAPHY ............................................................................................................... 5-1 Accessibility ................................................................................................................... 5-1 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 5-1 Local Resources ............................................................................................................ 5-2 Infrastructure .................................................................................................................. 5-2 Physiography ................................................................................................................. 5-3 6 HISTORY......................................................................................................................... 6-1 District HIstory ............................................................................................................... 6-1 Beartrack ....................................................................................................................... 6-1 Arnett ............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Redfern-Keily Park Management Plan Draft for Public Review

    Redfern-Keily Park Management Plan Draft for Public Review

    Redfern-Keily Park Management Plan Draft for Public Review Disclaimer: This draft management plan contains preliminary proposals that are subject to change and therefore may not necessarily reflect the position of the Ministry of Environment and Climate Change Strategy. At the conclusion of the planning process, a revised management plan will be approved by the Ministry. January 2019 Cover Page Photo Credit: Al Hansen, BC Parks Area Supervisor Foreword by BC Treaty 8 First Nations WELCOME to our homeland. The Beaver (Dunne-za, Dane-zaa), Cree, Saulteau, Slavey (Dene), and TseK’ hene indigenous groups have occupied these lands since time immemorial. Treaty 8 was signed in the spirit of Peace and Friendship on June 21, 1899. British Columbia Treaty 8 Territory is hundreds of thousands of square kilometres in size and includes 8 groups: Blueberry River First Nations, Doig River First Nation, Fort Nelson First Nation, Halfway River First Nation, McLeod Lake Indian Band, Prophet River First Nation, Saulteau First Nations and West Moberly First Nations. Our relationship to the land has and continues to be the spiritual basis for our mode of life. The land has always, and will continue to, provide shelter, food, clothing, and the economic resources for our livelihood. As a First Nation, we have an obligation to implement our inherent rights that are affirmed by the Constitution Act, 1982. This includes sustainability of our resources in order for us to hunt, trap, fish, and continue our mode of life. Prior to the arrival of the Europeans we were actively involved in the management of our territories: the lands understood us and we understood the land.
  • Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies

    Glaciers of the Canadian Rockies

    Glaciers of North America— GLACIERS OF CANADA GLACIERS OF THE CANADIAN ROCKIES By C. SIMON L. OMMANNEY SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD Edited by RICHARD S. WILLIAMS, Jr., and JANE G. FERRIGNO U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1386–J–1 The Rocky Mountains of Canada include four distinct ranges from the U.S. border to northern British Columbia: Border, Continental, Hart, and Muskwa Ranges. They cover about 170,000 km2, are about 150 km wide, and have an estimated glacierized area of 38,613 km2. Mount Robson, at 3,954 m, is the highest peak. Glaciers range in size from ice fields, with major outlet glaciers, to glacierets. Small mountain-type glaciers in cirques, niches, and ice aprons are scattered throughout the ranges. Ice-cored moraines and rock glaciers are also common CONTENTS Page Abstract ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- J199 Introduction----------------------------------------------------------------------- 199 FIGURE 1. Mountain ranges of the southern Rocky Mountains------------ 201 2. Mountain ranges of the northern Rocky Mountains ------------ 202 3. Oblique aerial photograph of Mount Assiniboine, Banff National Park, Rocky Mountains----------------------------- 203 4. Sketch map showing glaciers of the Canadian Rocky Mountains -------------------------------------------- 204 5. Photograph of the Victoria Glacier, Rocky Mountains, Alberta, in August 1973 -------------------------------------- 209 TABLE 1. Named glaciers of the Rocky Mountains cited in the chapter
  • Download Index

    Download Index

    First Edition, Index revised Sept. 23, 2010 Populated Places~Sitios Poblados~Lieux Peuplés 1—24 Landmarks~Lugares de Interés~Points d’Intérêt 25—31 Native American Reservations~Reservas de Indios Americanos~Réserves d’Indiens d’Améreque 31—32 Universities~Universidades~Universités 32—33 Intercontinental Airports~Aeropuertos Intercontinentales~Aéroports Intercontinentaux 33 State High Points~Puntos Mas Altos de Estados~Les Plus Haut Points de l’État 33—34 Regions~Regiones~Régions 34 Land and Water~Tierra y Agua~Terre et Eau 34—40 POPULATED PLACES~SITIOS POBLADOS~LIEUX PEUPLÉS A Adrian, MI 23-G Albany, NY 29-F Alice, TX 16-N Afton, WY 10-F Albany, OR 4-E Aliquippa, PA 25-G Abbeville, LA 19-M Agua Prieta, Mex Albany, TX 16-K Allakaket, AK 9-N Abbeville, SC 24-J 11-L Albemarle, NC 25-J Allendale, SC 25-K Abbotsford, Can 4-C Ahoskie, NC 27-I Albert Lea, MN 19-F Allende, Mex 15-M Aberdeen, MD 27-H Aiken, SC 25-K Alberton, MT 8-D Allentown, PA 28-G Aberdeen, MS 21-K Ainsworth, NE 16-F Albertville, AL 22-J Alliance, NE 14-F Aberdeen, SD 16-E Airdrie, Can 8,9-B Albia, IA 19-G Alliance, OH 25-G Aberdeen, WA 4-D Aitkin, MN 19-D Albion, MI 23-F Alma, AR 18-J Abernathy, TX 15-K Ajo, AZ 9-K Albion, NE 16,17-G Alma, Can 30-C Abilene, KS 17-H Akhiok, AK 9-P ALBUQUERQUE, Alma, MI 23-F Abilene, TX 16-K Akiak, AK 8-O NM 12-J Alma, NE 16-G Abingdon, IL 20-G Akron, CO 14-G Aldama, Mex 13-M Alpena, MI 24-E Abingdon, VA Akron, OH 25-G Aledo, IL 20-G Alpharetta, GA 23-J 24,25-I Akutan, AK 7-P Aleknagik, AK 8-O Alpine Jct, WY 10-F Abiquiu, NM 12-I Alabaster,
  • Redfern-Keily Park Management Plan

    Redfern-Keily Park Management Plan

    Redfern-Keily Park Management Plan Draft Nov 2011 Management Plan Redfern-Keily Park Management Plan Approved by: ______________________________ __________________ First Nation Date ______________________________ __________________ Brian Bawtinheimer Date Director, Parks Planning and Management Branch BC Parks ______________________________ __________________ Larry Boudreau Date Regional Manager, Northern Region BC Parks Redfern‐Keily Park Management Plan Acknowledgements This plan was produced by BC Parks staff of the Northern Region ‐ Peace Section of the Ministry of Environment (MOE). A majority of the draft plan was written by Marilynn Hagedorn, Planning Assistant. General direction was provided by Don Roberts, MOE Project Manager. Jeff Burrows, MOE Senior Fish Biologist, Bryan Webster, MOE Senior Wildlife Biologist, and Rob Honeyman, North Peace Area Supervisor, provided valuable technical assistance. Mapping and GIS analysis was provided by Jason Kubian, MOE Data Technician. Thank you to the individuals who completed and returned the Community Involvement Workbooks. Your insights, comments and suggestions were greatly appreciated and helped us to achieve a better understanding of the management issues in Redfern‐Keily Park. We would especially like to express our appreciation to the Muskwa‐Kechika Advisory Board Trust Fund for providing support through all the phases of plan development. Thank you. Redfern‐Keily Park Management Plan i Vision Statement This vision statement describes the future state and management regime that is desired for Redfern‐Keily Park over the next 25 to 50 years. It provides long term direction for park managers, while aiding them in making decisions regarding current issues. It is based on prevailing environmental and socio‐economic attitudes concerning protected areas, and is also based, in part, on the conservation and recreation contributions of Redfern‐Keily Park to the provincial Protected Areas Strategy.
  • Ministerial Order 244/2021

    Ministerial Order 244/2021

    PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ORDER OF THE MINISTER OF ENVIRONMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGY Muskwa-Kechika Management Area Act Ministerial Order No. M244 I, George Heyman, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy, order that the attached Redfern – Keily Park, Northern Rocky Mountains Park and Northern Rocky Mountains Protected Area Management Plans are enacted, pursuant to section 5 (1.1) of the Muskwa- Kechika Management Area Act. June 14, 2021 Date Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy (This part is for administrative purposes only and is not part of the Order.) Authority under which Order is made: Act and section: Muskwa-Kechika Management Area Act, S.B.C. 1998, c. 38, s. 5 (1.1) Other: page 1 of 111 Northern Rocky Mountains Park and Northern Rocky Mountains Protected Area Management Plan February 2021 BC Parks Northern Rocky Mountains Park and Northern Rocky Mountains Protected Area Management Plan Approved by: ______________________________ June 14, 2021________ Honourable George Heyman Minister of Environment and Climate Change Strategy Foreword by BC Treaty 8 First Nations WELCOME to our homeland. The Beaver (Dunne-za, Dane-zaa), Cree, Saulteau, Slavey (Dene), and TseK’ hene indigenous groups have occupied these lands since time immemorial. Treaty 8 was signed in the spirit of Peace and Friendship on June 21, 1899. British Columbia Treaty 8 Territory is hundreds of thousands of square kilometres in size and includes 8 groups: Blueberry River First Nations, Doig River First Nation, Fort Nelson First Nation, Halfway River First Nation, McLeod Lake Indian Band, Prophet River First Nation, Saulteau First Nations and West Moberly First Nations.
  • Appendix B Freshwater Fish and Fish Habitat Aquatic Catalogue and Watercourse Crossing Data

    Appendix B Freshwater Fish and Fish Habitat Aquatic Catalogue and Watercourse Crossing Data

    Technical Data Report Freshwater Fish and Fish Habitat ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY PROJECT Jacques Whitford AXYS Ltd. Burnaby, British Columbia M. Whelen, R.P.Bio. AMEC Earth & Environmental A division of AMEC Americas Limited Burnaby, British Columbia K. Bradley, B.Sc., R.B.Tech. 2010 Preface This Technical Data Report (TDR) primarily relies on data collected up to October 2009. These data are used in the Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment (ESA) for the Enbridge Northern Gateway Project, Volume 6A, Part 2, Section 11. Freshwater Fish and Fish Habitat Technical Data Report Table of Contents Table of Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................ 1-1 1.3 Objectives ........................................................................................................ 1-3 2 Methods ......................................................................................................... 2-1 2.1 Study Area Boundaries .................................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Study Area for Existing Data Review ............................................................. 2-4 2.1.2 Study Area for Field Surveys ........................................................................