WEAPONS (Marine Infantry Battalion)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

WEAPONS (Marine Infantry Battalion) — WEAPONS (Marine Infantry Battalion) T.O. Approved 1 July, 1942 H F- - ECKERT Published: For Instructional Purposes Only. MARINE CORPS SCHOOLS MARINE BARRACKS, QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 1943 WEAPONS (MARINE INFANTRY BATTALION) T.O. APPROVED 1 JULY, 1942 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraph Page Introduction vii SECTION 1 U.S. RIFLE, CAL. .30, M1903 General 1 1 Essential Characteristics 2 1 Organization of Personnel 3 1 Ammunition Supply 4 5 Employment 5 5 SECTION 2 U.S. RIFLE, CAL. .30, Ml Essential Characteristics 1 7 Organization of Personnel 2 11 Ammunition Supply 3 11 Employment 4 11 SECTION 3 BAYONET, M1905 Description and Employment 1 13 SECTION 4 AUTOMATIC PISTOL, CAL. .45, M1911 and 1911A1 Essential Characteristics 1 15 SECTION 5 U.S. CARBINE, CAL. .30, Ml General 1 19 Essential Characteristics 2 19 Employment 3 19 SECTION 6 BROWNING AUTOMATIC RIFLE, CAL. .30 Paragraph Page General 1 23 Essential Characteristics 2 23 Organization of Personnel 3 25 Ammunition Supply 4 28 Employment 5 28 SECTION 7 REISING SUBMACHINE GUN, CAL. .45 MODELS 50, 55, and 60 Essential Characteristics 1 29 Ammunition Supply 2 30 Employment 3 30 SECTION 8 THOMPSON SUBMACHINE GUN, CAL. .45 Essential Characteristics 1 35 Ammunition Supply 2 40 Employment 3 40 SECTION 9 BROWNING LIGHT MACHINE GUN. CAL. .30 Essential Characteristics 1 41 Organization of Personnel 2 41 Ammunition Supply 3 43 Employment 4 43 SECTION 10 60mm MORTAR, M2 Essential Characteristics 1 45 Organization of Personnel 2 49 Ammunition Supply . 3 51 Employment 4 51 SECTION 11 81mm MORTAR, Ml Essential Characteristics 1 53 Organization of Personnel and Equipment 2 56 Ammunition Supply 3 56 Employment 4 57 ii SECTION 12 BROWNING HEAVY MACHINE GUN, CAL. .30 Paragraph Page Essential Characteristics 1 59 Organization of Personnel 2 61 Ammunition Supply 3 61 Employment 4 61 SECTION 13 BROWNING MACHINE GUN, CAL. .50, M2 Essential Characteristics 1 69 Ammunition Supply 2 71 Employment 3 71 SECTION 14 37mm GUN, ANTITANK, M3 Essential Characteristics 1 73 Ammunition Supply 2 77 Employment 3 77 SECTION 15 ANTITANK MINES General 1 79 SECTION 16 GRENADES Part I.—Hand Grenades. Fragmentation Hand Grenades, Mk. II 1 81 Chemical Hand Grenades 2 81 Practice Hand Grenades 3 81 Other Types 4 83 Part II.—Rifle Grenades, VB and Chemical. Rifle Grenade, V.B., Mk. I 1 84 Rifle Grenade, Chemical 2 84 Part III.—Antitank Mines 87 ill . LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS Figure Page U.S. Rifle, Cal. .30, M1903 1 3 U.S. Rifle, Cal. .30, Ml 2 9 Automatic Pistol, Cal. .45, M1911A1 3 16 Automatic Pistol, Cal. .45, M1911 4 17 U.S. Carbine, Cal. .30, Ml 5 20 Comparative Sizes of Small Arms Ammunition (A) Cartridge, Ball, Cal. .30, M2 (B) Cartridge, Carbine, Cal. .30, Ml (C) Cartridge, Ball, Cal. .45, M1911 6 21 Standing Position, U.S. Carbine 7 22 Browning Automatic Rifle, Cal. .30, M1918A2 8 24 Browning Automatic Rifle, Prone Position 9 26 Browning Automatic Rifle, Antiaircraft Position . 10 27 Reising Submachine Gun, Cal. .45 11 31 Reising Submachine Gun, Cal. 45, Model 50 12 33 Thompson Submachine Gun, Cal. .45, M1928A1 13 37 Thompson Submachine Gun, Cal. .45, M1928 14 39 Light Machine Gun, Cal. .30, M1919A4 15 42 Light Machine Gun in Position 16 44 60mm Mortar and Shell 17 46 M4 Mortar Sight 18 47 Type EE Field Glass 19 47 Reticle on Field Glass of Older Manufacture Show- ing Mil Scales and Inverted Sight Leaf 20 48 Reticle on Field Glass of Recent Manufacture Show- ing Mil Scales 21 • 48 60mm Mortar in Position 22 50 81mm Mortar and Shell 23 54 81mm and 60mm Mortars, Comparative Sizes .... 24 55 81mm Mortar in Position 25 58 Browning Heavy Machine Gun, Cal. .30, M1917 .... 26 60 Heavy Machine Gun in Position 27 63 Illustration of Final Protective Lines 28 67 Browning Machine Gun, Cal. .50, M2 29 70 Browning Machine Gun, Cal. .50, in Position 30 72 37mm Antitank Gun, M3, Mounted on Carriage, M4 31 74 Penetration of Armor Plate by 37mm AP Shot, M51 32 75 Penetration of 1V2 " Armor Plate by 37mm AP Shot, M51 33 76 37mm Antitank Gun Going Into Position 34 78 Antitank Mine 35 79 Fragmentation Hand Grenade, Mk II 36 82 Fragmentation Hand Grenade, Cross Section 37 85 Irritant Gas Hand Grenade 38 85 Grenade, AT, M9, and Equipment 39 88 Grenade, AT, M9A1 40 90 Launcher, Grenade, U/Ml Attached to M1903 Rifle 41 91 IV Figure Pas Grenade, AT. M9, In Place on M1903 Rifle 42 91 Recoil Pad Attached to Rifle Butt 43 91 Rear Sight Leaf M1903 Rifle Set For Use With Grenade AT, M9 or Mil 44 92 Method of Aiming at Various Ranges 45 92 Standing Position 46 93 Grenadier in Foxhole Firing From Shoulder 47 93 Method of Resting Butt Against Wall of Foxhole. 48 94 Method of Resting Butt Against Stump for Prone Position 49 94 Steps to Firing AT Grenade 50 95 : WEAPONS (MARINE INFANTRY BATTALION) T.O. APPROVED 1 JULY, 1942 INTRODUCTION Strategy and tactics of warfare have been considerably affected by the rapid strides made in the development of modern weapons, especially the airplane, the tank, and other armored vehicles. The high mobility and tremendous striking power of these weapons have caused attention to be focused on them to such a degree that many laymen believe the impor- tance of the infantry arm in modern warfare is negligible. In spite of all new developments, the importance and task of the infantry remains essentially unchanged. Infantry may be transported to the theater of operations by vehicle or by air; they may even be landed by plane or parachute at points within the enemy lines—but their job is still the same they must close with the enemy in personal combat and take and hold the ground. The assistance of the supporting arms is aimed toward this phase in offensive combat. They can assist the infantry with the fires of their weapons up to a certain distance, whereupon the infantry must maintain such fire superiority that has been gained from the enemy by using the fire power of its own weapons, until such time as the ene- my can be closed upon. In defensive combat the supporting arms assist the infantry in stopping enemy attack troops from reaching the supported infantry. The infantry uses all the means at its disposal for its defense and in case of a penetration, assumes a limited offensive in the form of count- erattacks to drive out the hostile troops. To accomplish the above tasks, the infantry has been armed with the weapons described herein. Material in this text is intended only for the purpose of acquainting students of these Schools with the general characteristics of weapons of the rifle battalion and their battlefield employment in brief. No attempt has been made to cover technical details involved in the firing, functioning, care and cleaning, or training. Organizational data is taken from Tables of Organiza- tion, Infantry Regiment, Marine Division, Approved 1 July, 1942. Vll : — U.S. Rifle, Cal. .30, M1903 1—3 SECTION 1 U.S. RIFLE, CAL. .30, M1903* 1. General.—The rifle with its bayonet is the infantry- man's main reliance. In spite of the addition of numerous auxiliary weapons to infantry units, the rifle is by far the most versatile weapon of the infantry soldier; it is primarily the weapon for frontal fire and for distributed fire. The individual soldier, with his own fire weapon, including his bay- onet, remains the basic element of infantry combat. 2. Essential Characteristics.—a. Description.—The U.S. Rifle, cal. .30, M1903, is a manually operated clip loaded, maga- zine fed, air-cooled shoulder weapon of the bolt type. Provision has been made for attaching a bayonet. This rifle is com- monly referred to as the Springfield Rifle. (See Fig. 1.) b. General data. Weights Rifle (without bayonet) (pounds) 8.69 Bayonet (pounds) 1 Length (without bayonet) (inches) 43 Average effective rate of fire (aimed shots per minute) 10 Sights graduated to (yards) 2,850 Maximum range: Ml cartridge (yards) 5,500 M2 cartridge (yards) 3,450 c. Loading.—The magazine of the rifle holds five car- tridges and one additional cartridge may be inserted in the chamber, making the maximum capacity of the rifle six shots for one loading. In order to facilitate loading, cartridges are issued in clips holding five cartridges each. d. Functioning.—Extraction, ejection, and loading are accomplished by manual operation of the bolt. The rifle fires once for each squeeze of the trigger. e. Rear sight.—The rear sight leaf is graduated from 100 to 2,850 yards, the proper range being set by moving the drift slide up or down the sight leaf. Windage adjustments are made by means of a knob on the right side of the rear sight. 3. Organization of Personnel. — a. Assignment. — The M1903 Rifle is a basic, individual weapon, and the rifleman himself is a complete fire unit. *The U.S. Rifle, Cal. .30, M1903A1 is essentially the same as the M1903 Rifle except that it has a pistol grip stock. U.S. Rifle, Cal. .30, M1903 3—5 b. Equipment.—Each rifleman armed with the M1903 Rifle carries one cartridge belt containing 40 rounds, and a bayonet and scabbard. 4. Ammunition Supply.—a. Allowance.—The unit of fire* is 100 rounds per rifle in an infantry battalion, proportioned as follows: 80 per cent ball, 15 per cent armor piercing, and 5 per cent tracer. b. Distribution.—Ammunition is distributed as fol- lows : 40 rounds carried on the rifleman and extra ammunition issued prior to combat.
Recommended publications
  • Thompson Brochure 9Th Edition.Indd
    9th Edition Own A Piece Of American History Thompson Submachine Gun General John T. Thompson, a graduate of West Point, began his research in 1915 for an automatic weapon to supply the American military. World War I was dragging on and casualties were mounting. Having served in the U.S. Army’s ordnance supplies and logistics, General Thompson understood that greater fi repower was needed to end the war. Thompson was driven to create a lightweight, fully automatic fi rearm that would be effective against the contemporary machine gun. His idea was “a one-man, hand held machine gun. A trench broom!” The fi rst shipment of Thompson prototypes arrived on the dock in New York for shipment to Europe on November 11, 1918 the day that the War ended. In 1919, Thompson directed Auto-Ordnance to modify the gun for nonmilitary use. The gun, classifi ed a “submachine gun” to denote a small, hand-held, fully automatic fi rearm chambered for pistol ammunition, was offi cially named the “Thompson submachine gun” to honor the man most responsible for its creation. With military and police sales low, Auto-Ordnance sold its submachine guns through every legal outlet it could. A Thompson submachine gun could be purchased either by mail order, or from the local hardware or sporting goods store. Trusted Companion for Troops It was, also, in the mid ‘20s that the Thompson submachine gun was adopted for service by an Dillinger’s Choice offi cial military branch of the government. The U.S. Coast Guard issued Thompsons to patrol While Auto-Ordnance was selling the Thompson submachine gun in the open market in the ‘20s, boats along the eastern seaboard.
    [Show full text]
  • MK19 MOD 3 40MM ADVANCED GRENADE LAUNCHER Reliable, Portable, Lethal
    MK19 MOD 3 40MM ADVANCED GRENADE LAUNCHER Reliable, portable, lethal General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems including lightly armored vehicles and dismounted infantry. produces the MK19 MOD 3 40mm grenade machine It will penetrate 75mm rolled homogenous armor at a maxi- gun, an air-cooled, blow-back operated, belt-fed weapon. mum range of 2,050 meters. Dismounted personnel within Highly portable within small soldier units, the weapon’s a radius of 15 meters from impact will be immobilized by high lethality and broad versatility make it the prime blast and fragmentation. choice of U.S. warfighters as an essential weapon in both offensive and defensive operations. The MK19 is a reliable, portable 40mm grenade weapon system suited for light infantry vehicles and tripod applications. Firing M430A1 High Explosive Dual Purpose grenades, the MK19 provides lethal fire against a variety of targets, MK19 MOD 3 40MM ADVANCED GRENADE LAUNCHER SPECIFICATIONS s Key Features: Caliber 40mm - Sustained automatic firing MK19 Weight 77.6 pounds (35 kg) - Dual spade grips for stable control MK19 Length 43.1 inches (1,095 mm) - Removable barrel MK19 Width 13.4 inches (340 mm) - No headspace or timing adjustments required Rate of fire 325-375 rounds per minute All high velocity 40mm - Open-bolt firing eliminates cook off, enhances Ammunition NATO-qualified cooling between bursts and allows sustained 2,000 meters - area target firing at three-to-five round bursts Maximum effective range 1,500 meters - point target - Simple design for easy maintenance Maximum range 2,212 meters - Mean rounds between failure exceeds 241 meters (790 feet) Muzzle velocity 20,000 rounds per second Standard 40mm Machine Gun Product Improvements: As part of General Dynamics’ standard 40mm machine gun offering, product improvements include a set of four enhanced internal parts for increased durability and reliability.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States Atomic Army, 1956-1960 Dissertation
    INTIMIDATING THE WORLD: THE UNITED STATES ATOMIC ARMY, 1956-1960 DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Paul C. Jussel, B.A., M.M.A.S., M.S.S. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee Approved by Professor Allan R. Millett, Advisor Professor John R. Guilmartin __________________ Professor William R. Childs Advisor Department of History ABSTRACT The atomic bomb created a new military dynamic for the world in 1945. The bomb, if used properly, could replace the artillery fires and air-delivered bombs used to defeat the concentrated force of an enemy. The weapon provided the U.S. with an unparalleled advantage over the rest of the world, until the Soviet Union developed its own bomb by 1949 and symmetry in warfare returned. Soon, theories of warfare changed to reflect the belief that the best way to avoid the effects of the bomb was through dispersion of forces. Eventually, the American Army reorganized its divisions from the traditional three-unit organization to a new five-unit organization, dubbed pentomic by its Chief of Staff, General Maxwell D. Taylor. While atomic weapons certainly had an effect on Taylor’s reasoning to adopt the pentomic organization, the idea was not new in 1956; the Army hierarchy had been wrestling with restructuring since the end of World War II. Though the Korean War derailed the Army’s plans for the early fifties, it returned to the forefront under the Eisenhower Administration. The driving force behind reorganization in 1952 was not ii only the reoriented and reduced defense budget, but also the Army’s inroads to the atomic club, formerly the domain of only the Air Force and the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost and Performance Report: Grenade Range Management
    ESTCP Cost and Performance Report (ER-0216) Grenade Range Management Using Lime for Metals Immobilization and Explosives Transformation August 2008 ENVIRONMENTAL SECURITY TECHNOLOGY CERTIFICATION PROGRAM U.S. Department of Defense COST & PERFORMANCE REPORT Project: ER-0216 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................ 1 2.0 TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTION ...................................................................................... 5 2.1 TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION.................................. 5 2.1.1 Technology Background, Development, Function, and Intended Use .............................................................................................................. 5 2.1.2 Applicable Systems..................................................................................... 5 2.1.3 Target Contaminants................................................................................... 5 2.1.4 Theory of Operation.................................................................................... 6 2.2 PROCESS DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 7 2.2.1 Mobilization, Installation, and Operational Requirements......................... 7 2.2.2 Design Criteria............................................................................................ 7 2.2.3 Site Operation Schematics .......................................................................... 8 2.2.4
    [Show full text]
  • PANZER BRIGADES on the EASTERN FRONT by Phil Yates
    By Phil Yates UPDATED ON 11 SEPTEMBER 2014 1 PANZER BRIGADES ON THE EASTERN FRONT Y HIL ATES B P Y After the destruction of Army Group Centre in Byelorussia by the Soviet Operation Bagration, there was little left to stop them short of the German border, 600 kilometres to the west. Hitler ordered twelve new panzer brigades created to ‘surprise and destroy the attacking armoured spearheads’. The first four of these entered combat on the Eastern Front in late August 1944, launching immediate counterattacks against the Red Army’s deepest thrusts. When the Red Army launched its counteroffensive after the The first four were to be ready in just over one month. Bearing Battle of Kursk in August 1943, the German Army had little in mind that a panzer division was usually given six months to stop it. The much vaunted panzer divisions had worn to rebuild after being mauled at the front, the timetable for themselves out attacking the Soviet defences around Kursk, creating whole new units was incredibly short. The Army had leaving the new Panther and Tiger battalions being rushed to suggested rushing refitting panzer divisions back to the front, the front as the only significant armoured forces. A number but Hitler had insisted on forming new units instead. of Kampfgruppen, ad hoc battlegroups, were formed around The first of these was 101. Panzerbrigade under the command these battalions and the remains of various panzer divisions of the highly decorated Generalmajor Hyacinth Graf von under the command of experienced panzer leaders. Wherever Strachwitz und Camminetz (Major-general Hyacinth Count they were employed these powerful battlegroups halted and of Strachwitz and Camminetz), known as the Panzergraf or threw back the Red Army’s thrusts.
    [Show full text]
  • REFERENCE BOOK Table of Contents Designer’S Notes
    REFERENCE BOOK Table of Contents Designer’s Notes ............................................................ 2 31.0 Mapmaker’s Notes ................................................. 40 26.0 Footnoted Entries ........................................... 2 32.0 Order of Battle ....................................................... 41 27.0 Game Elements .............................................. 13 33.0 Selected Sources & Recommended Reading ......... 48 28.0 Units & Weapons ........................................... 21 29.0 OB Notes ....................................................... 33 30.0 Historical Notes ............................................. 39 GMT Games, LLC • P.O. Box 1308, Hanford, CA 93232-1308 www.GMTGames.com 2 Operation Dauntless Reference Book countryside characterized by small fields rimmed with thick and Designer’s Notes steeply embanked hedges and sunken roads, containing small stout I would like to acknowledge the contributions of lead researchers farms with neighbouring woods and orchards in a broken landscape. Vincent Lefavrais, A. Verspeeten, and David Hughes to the notes Studded with small villages, ideal for defensive strongpoints…” appearing in this booklet, portions of which have been lifted rather 6 Close Terrain. There are few gameplay differences between close liberally from their emails and edited by myself. These guys have terrain types. Apart from victory objectives, which are typically my gratitude for a job well done. I’m very pleased that they stuck village or woods hexes, the only differences are a +1 DRM to Re- with me to the end of this eight-year project. covery rolls in village hexes, a Modifier Chit which favors village and woods over heavy bocage, and a higher MP cost to enter woods. Furthermore, woods is the only terrain type that blocks LOS with 26.0 Footnoted Entries respect to spotting units at higher elevation. For all other purposes, close terrain is close terrain.
    [Show full text]
  • Part II (A) Non-Russian Motorcycles with Machine Guns and MG Mounts
    PartPart IIII (A)(A) NonNon--RussianRussian MotorcyclesMotorcycles withwith MachineMachine GunsGuns andand MGMG MountsMounts ErnieErnie FrankeFranke Rev.Rev. 1:1: 05/201105/2011 [email protected]@tampabay.rr.com NonNon--RussianRussian MotorcyclesMotorcycles byby CountryCountry • Universal Role of Adding Machine Guns to Motorcycles • American –Indian –Harley-Davidson –Kawasaki • British –Clyno –Royal Enfield –Norton • Danish –Harley-Davidson –Nimbus • Dutch –Swiss Motosacoche –FN Products (Belgium) –Norton –Harley-Davidson • German –BMW –Zundapp • Italy –Moto Guzzi • Chinese –Chang Jiang • Russian –Ural Man has been trying to add a machine gun to a sidecar for many years in many countries. American: Browning 1895 on a Harley-Davidson Sidecar (browningmgs.com) World War-One (WW-I) machine gun mounted on Indian motorcycle with sidecar. American:American: MotorcycleMotorcycle MachineMachine GunGun (1917)(1917) (www.usmilitariaforum.com) World War-One (WW-I) machine gun mounted on a Indian motorcycle with sidecar. American:American: BenetBenet--MercieMercie mountedmounted onon IndianIndian (forums.gunboards.com) It is hard to see how any accuracy could be achieved while on the move, so the motorcycle had to be stopped before firing. American:American: MilitaryMilitary IndianIndian SidecarsSidecars (browningmgs.com) One Indian has the machine gun, the other has the ammo. American: First Armored Motor Battery of NY and Fort Gordon, GA (www.motorcycle-memories.com and wikimedia.org) (1917) The gun carriage was attached as a trailer to a twin-cylinder motorcycle. American:American: BSABSA (info.detnews.com) World War-Two (WW-II) 50 cal machine gun mounted on a BSA motorcycle with sidecar. American:American: HarleyHarley--DavidsonDavidson WLAWLA ModelModel Ninja Warriors! American:American: "Motorcycle"Motorcycle ReconnaissanceReconnaissance TroopsTroops““ byby RolandRoland DaviesDavies Determined-looking motorcycle reconnaissance troops head towards the viewer, with the first rider's Thompson sub machine-gun in action.
    [Show full text]
  • M430A1 HEDP 40Mm Grenade Is the High Velocity Grenade of Choice for Our Warfighters Using the MK19 and MK47 Automatic Grenade Launchers
    M430A1 High Explosive Dual Purpose 40mm Grenade The M430A1 HEDP 40mm Grenade is the High Velocity Grenade of choice for our Warfighters using the MK19 and MK47 Automatic Grenade Launchers. The Grenade consists of the M169 Aluminum Cartridge Case, M549A1 AMTEC Point Detonating Fuze, Copper Liner, Warhead Body with Fragmentation and CompA5 Explosive. The M430A1 is capable of defeating light Armor and Incapacitating Personnel, out to a range of 2,000 Meters. M169 Cartridge Case Explosive Comp A5 Spitback Assembly Base Plug Copper Liner Closing Cup M549 Fuze Low Pressure Chamber Projectile Body M2 Propelling Percussion Primer Rotating Band FED-215 Charge Characteristics Details Assembly Facility Spectra Technologies – Camden , Arkansas AMTEC, the largest producer of 40mm Grenades Armor Penetration 76mm Steel in the world, is currently under contract with the US Cartridge Case - Manufacture M169 40x53mm - Amron, Antigo Wisconsin Army to produce the M430A1, along with Max Range / Effective Range 2,200 Meters / 2,000 Meters additional Muzzle Velocity 241 Meters/Second Grenades in both Explosive Fill Composition A5 the Low and High Velocity Fuze - Manufacture M549A1 - AMTEC, Janesville Wisconsin family of 40mm. Detonator - Manufacture M55 – Tech Ord, Clear Lake South Dakota These include: Specification / DODIC MIL-DTL-50863 / B542 Tactical, NSN 1310-01-567-5540 (Wood Pallet) Training, Smoke, 1310-01-564-2160 (Metal Pallet) Illumination, and Hazard Class / UN 1.1E / 0006 Non Lethal. Packaging 32 Linked Cartridges in PA-120 Steel Container 1,536 Cartridges per pallet AMTEC has delivered more than 15 Million M430A1 Grenades to the US Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps since 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Construction`Of a Single Impulse Activated Grenade
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library Advances in Applied Science Research, 2013, 4(1): 488-491 ISSN: 0976-8610 CODEN (USA): AASRFC Design and Construction of a S ingle Impulse Activated Grenade Don Okpala. V. Uche. Department of Industrial Physics, Anambra State University, Uli, Anambra State, Nigeria _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT A single impulse activated grenade which is powered by an impulse has been designed, constructed and tested. The components used in the construction an d the principles involved have been highlighted in this work. Its operation is electro-mechanically controlled. It was found that the grenade detonated in an impact, thus, it has the shortest detonating time. Keywords: Grenade, Explosives, Detonation and Shock wave. _____________________________________________________________________________________________ INTRODUCTION Modern man has built gigantic bridges to span the seas and gargantuan buildings to kiss the skies but the invention of grenade marked the dawn of a new era in the science and technology world. A grenade, according to standard learners’ English dictionary, is defined as a small bomb thrown by hand. Conventionally, grenades are small explosives or chemical missile used for attacking enemy troops, vehicles or fortified positions at close range. When designed to be thrown by hand they are called hand grenades. The term grenade was originally applied to any explosive shell fired from a gun. Also, grenades when adapted for lunching from riffle or carbine are called riffle grenades. “Grenades” is derived from French word for pomegranate because of resemblance to that fruit of early grenades shape. In later years, grenades were nicknamed “Pineapple” because of the bulbous and rough exterior of the type used in the World War 1, [1].
    [Show full text]
  • The U.S. Military's Force Structure: a Primer
    CHAPTER 2 Department of the Army Overview when the service launched a “modularity” initiative, the The Department of the Army includes the Army’s active Army was organized for nearly a century around divisions component; the two parts of its reserve component, the (which involved fewer but larger formations, with 12,000 Army Reserve and the Army National Guard; and all to 18,000 soldiers apiece). During that period, units in federal civilians employed by the service. By number of Army divisions could be separated into ad hoc BCTs military personnel, the Department of the Army is the (typically, three BCTs per division), but those units were biggest of the military departments. It also has the largest generally not organized to operate independently at any operation and support (O&S) budget. The Army does command level below the division. (For a description of not have the largest total budget, however, because it the Army’s command levels, see Box 2-1.) In the current receives significantly less funding to develop and acquire structure, BCTs are permanently organized for indepen- weapon systems than the other military departments do. dent operations, and division headquarters exist to pro- vide command and control for operations that involve The Army is responsible for providing the bulk of U.S. multiple BCTs. ground combat forces. To that end, the service is orga- nized primarily around brigade combat teams (BCTs)— The Army is distinct not only for the number of ground large combined-arms formations that are designed to combat forces it can provide but also for the large num- contain 4,400 to 4,700 soldiers apiece and include infan- ber of armored vehicles in its inventory and for the wide try, artillery, engineering, and other types of units.1 The array of support units it contains.
    [Show full text]
  • HB277 Original
    HLS 13RS-177 ORIGINAL Regular Session, 2013 HOUSE BILL NO. 277 BY REPRESENTATIVE LAMBERT Prefiled pursuant to Article III, Section 2(A)(4)(b)(i) of the Constitution of Louisiana. WEAPONS/FIREARMS: Repeals provisions of law regarding prior approval for the transfer of certain firearms 1 AN ACT 2 To repeal R.S. 40:1784, relative to the possession and transfer of certain firearms; to repeal 3 provisions requiring prior approval for the transfer of certain firearms. 4 Be it enacted by the Legislature of Louisiana: 5 Section 1. R.S. 40:1784 is hereby repealed in its entirety. DIGEST The digest printed below was prepared by House Legislative Services. It constitutes no part of the legislative instrument. The keyword, one-liner, abstract, and digest do not constitute part of the law or proof or indicia of legislative intent. [R.S. 1:13(B) and 24:177(E)] Lambert HB No. 277 Abstract: Repeals provisions requiring the prior approval of DPS&C for the possession and transfer of certain types of firearms. For purposes of certain provisions of law governing the transfer of weapons, present law defines "firearm" as a shotgun having a barrel of less than 18 inches in length; a rifle having a barrel of less than 16 inches in length; any weapon made from either a rifle or a shotgun if the weapon has been modified to have an overall length of less than 26 inches; any other firearm, pistol, revolver, or shotgun from which the serial number or mark of identification has been obliterated, from which a shot is discharged by an explosive, if that weapon is capable of being concealed on the person; or a machine gun, grenade launcher, flame thrower, bazooka, rocket launcher, excluding black powder weapons, or gas grenade; and includes a muffler or silencer for any firearm, whether or not the firearm is included within this definition.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Military Department News
    Texas Military Department News "Texans Serving Texas" MEDIA ADVISORY Media wishing to cover the re-enactments are invited to do so beginning at 11:00 a.m. or 2:00 p.m. and must arrive 30 minutes before the show to allow for parking and coordination. Members of the media are required to RSVP no later than Friday, May 27, 2016, by 5:00 p.m. with the TXMF Museum at 512-782-5659 or 512-934-4059. Camp Mabry is accessed at the Maintenance Drive gate from 35th Street and media will be required to show credentials at the gate. FOR IMMEDIATE PUBLIC RELEASE: World War II-Close Assault Re-enactments Kick off Saturday, Ends Sunday AUSTIN, Texas (May 25, 2016) – Close Assault 1944 will kick off on Saturday, May 28, 2016 and conclude Sunday, May 29, 2016 at Camp Mabry, in Austin, to honor the service and sacrifice of America’s veterans and focus on the history of the 36th Infantry Division of the Texas Army National Guard during World War II. Show times are at 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. both days. The free program, now in its tenth year, features members of the Texas Military Forces Living History Detachment exhibiting the uniform and equipment worn by the American GI in the European Theater of the Second World War, as well as those of his German opponent. Visitors will also be able to see everything from tents, radio equipment, GI baseball gloves and mess kits to operational vehicles, such as an M4 Sherman Tank, M3 Halftrack, German Hetzer tank destroyer and Jeeps.
    [Show full text]