Annual Report 2018

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Annual Report 2018 National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Annual Report 2018 (Revised version pursuant to subsection 21(5) of the NSICOP Act ) Submitted to the Prime Minister on December 21, 2018 pursuant to subsection 21(2) of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Act © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada (2019) All rights reserved. Ottawa, ON National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Annual Report 2018 (Revised version pursuant to subsection 21(5) of the NSICOP Act) CP100 (Print) CP100E-PDF (Online) ISSN 2562-5101 (Print) ISSN 2562-511X (Online) ANNUAL REPORT 2018 The National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians The Honourable David McGuinty, P.C., M.P. Chair April 2019 Revis ions Consistent with sub-section 21(1) of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Act (NSICOP Act), the Committee must submit an annual report to the Prime Minister. Consistent with subsection 21(5) of the Act, the Prime Minister may, after consulting the Chair of the Committee, direct the Committee to submit to him or her a revised version of the annual report that does not conta in information the Prime Minister believes the disclosure of which would be injurious to national security, national defence or international relations or is information that is protected by solicitor-client privilege. This document is a revised version of the report provided to the Prime Minister on 21 December 2018. Revisions were made to remove information the disclosure of which the Prime Minister believes would be injurious to national defence, national security or international relations , or which constitutes solicitor-client privilege. Where information could simply be removed without affecting the readability of the document, the Committee noted the removal with three asterisks (***) in the text of this document. Where information cou Id not simply be removed without affecting the readability of the document, the Committee revised the document to summarize the information that was removed. Those sections are marked with three asterisks at the beginning and the end of the summary, and the summary is enclosed by square brackets (see example below). EXAMPLE: (*** Revised sections are marked with three asterisks at the beginning and the end of the sentence, and the summary is enclosed by square brackets. ***] Image credit: ©Ho use of Commons Collection, Ottawa Dedication The National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians dedicates its first Annual Report to the memory of Gordon Brown, Member of Parliament for Leeds-Grenville-Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes. He was a good colleague and a dear friend. His commitment to public service continues to inspire us. Chair's Message Ottawa, ON - December 21, 2018 lt is my honour to submit the first An nuai Report of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians. The Annual Report marks the first time that Canada has had a committee of Parliamentarians cleared to examine issues of national security and intelligence. This Committee takes that responsibility very seriously. ln our first year, we have conducted 54 meetings totaling 220 hours as part of our commitment to understanding the roles and responsibilities of Canada's security and intelligence organizations and the issues that affect them. 1 am proud of the dedication and engagement of the members -from all parties and from both the House of Commons and Senate -who have shown great commitment and collegiality. Our work has demonstrated that there are issues which are beyond partisanship -accountability, the security of Canada, and the protection of our democratic rights and freedoms. ln the coming year, the Committee intends to maintain an ambitious pace. We will continue to meet with departments and agencies, with our allied counterparts, with academics and experts, and with civil rights groups to ensure that our work continues to be relevant and well-informed. As we review national security and intelligence activities and organizations, we hope that our findings and recommendations strengthen the accountability and effectiveness of Canada's security and intelligence community. Finally, 1 encourage Canadians to read our report and the many excellent documents produced by the departments and agencies responsible for the security of Canada. While Parliamentarians, review bodies and government officiais work on behalf of all Canadians, there is no substitute for a citizenry that is well-informed of the risks facing Canada and the measures in place to address the m. 1 hope that the work of this Committee contributes to better informing debate on issues that are of fundamental importance to Canadians. The Honourable David McGuinty, P.C., M.P. Chair National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians THE NATIONAL SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE OF PARLIAMENTARIANS The Hon. David McGuinty, P.C., M.P. (Chair) Mr. Gordon Brown, M.P. Ms. Gudie Hutchings, M.P. nd (Deceased May 2 , 2018) The Hon. Frances Lankin, P.C., C.M., The Hon. Tony Clement, P.C., M.P. Senator (Resigned November 7th, 2018) Mr. Murray Rankin, M.P. The Hon. Percy Downe, Senator Ms. Brenda Shanahan, M.P. Mr. Emmanuel Dubourg, M.P. The Hon. Vernon White, Senator The Hon. Hedy Fry, P.C. M.P. National Security and Intelligence Comité des parlementaires sur la Committee of Parliamentarians sécurité nationale et le renseignement Chair Président April 8, 2019 The Right Honourable Justin Trudeau, P.C., M.P. Prime Minister of Canada Office of the Prime Minister and Privy Council Ottawa, ON KlA 0A2 Dear Prime Minister, On behalf of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians, it is my pleasure to present you with its An nuai Report for 2018. The report includes the two substantive reviews completed by the Committee in its first year of activity, notably on the Government of Canada's process to establish its intelligence priorities, and the intelligence activities of the Department of National Defence and the Canadian Armed Forces. The Committee makes eleven findings and seven recommendations. Consistent with subsection 21(5) of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians Act, the report was revised to remove content deemed injurious to national security, international relations, national defence, and information subject to solicitor-client privilege. Yours sincerely, The Honourable David McGuinty, P.C., M.P. Chair National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians P.O. Box 8015, Station "T" / C.P. 8015, Succursale« T .. Ottawa, Canada K1G 5A6 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction........................ ........................................................................................................................... l Chapter 1: Review in Canada and NSICOP's Mandate .................................................................................. 3 What is review and who conducts it in Canada? ...................................................................................... 3 What was missing? ....................................................................................................................................6 What is NSICOP's mandate and does it address some of the review gaps? ............................................. 7 What is NSICOP's role and how does it operate? ................................................................................... 11 How does NSICOP decide what to review? ............................................................................................. 13 Beyond the annual reviews, what else has NSICOP done in its inaugural year? .................................... 15 Chapter 2: A Functional Overview of the Security and Intelligence Community ........................................ 17 What is national security and intelligence? ............................................................................................17 Who belongs to the security and intelligence community? ...................................................................19 Keeping Canadians safe ........................................................................................................................... 24 Terrorism .............................................................................................................................................24 Espionage and foreign influence ......................................................................................................... 26 Cyber threats ....................................................................................................................................... 27 Major organized crime ........................................................................................................................ 28 Weapons of mass destruction ............................................................................................................. 29 Promoting Canadian interests .................................................................................................................30 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................................31 Chapter 3: Review of the Process for Setting Intelligence Priorities .......................................................... 33 lntroduction..............................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Canada Gazette, Part I
    EXTRA Vol. 153, No. 12 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 153, no 12 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 OTTAWA, LE JEUDI 14 NOVEMBRE 2019 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER BUREAU DU DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members elected at the 43rd general Rapport de député(e)s élu(e)s à la 43e élection election générale Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 317 of the Can- Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’ar- ada Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, ticle 317 de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports, have been received of the election of Members to serve in dans l’ordre ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élec- the House of Commons of Canada for the following elec- tion de député(e)s à la Chambre des communes du Canada toral districts: pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral District Member Circonscription Député(e) Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Matapédia Kristina Michaud Matapédia Kristina Michaud La Prairie Alain Therrien La Prairie Alain Therrien LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Burnaby South Jagmeet Singh Burnaby-Sud Jagmeet Singh Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke Randall Garrison Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Associations' Activities and Expenditures
    PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATIONS’ ACTIVITIES AND EXPENDITURES FROM APRIL 1, 2018 TO MARCH 31, 2019 JOINT INTERPARLIAMENTARY COUNCIL REPORT Co-Chairs Hon. Donald Neil Plett, Senator 42nd Parliament, First Session Bruce Stanton, M.P. June 2019 June 2019 JOINT INTERPARLIAMENTARY COUNCIL CO-CHAIRS Hon. Donald Neil Plett, Senator Bruce Stanton, M.P. MEMBERS Hon. Dennis Dawson, Senator Hon. Wayne Easter, P.C., M.P. Hon. Marc Gold, Senator Hon. Mark Holland P.C., M.P. Jenny Kwan, M.P. Scott Simms, M.P. John Brassard, M.P. Linda Lapointe, M.P. CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Colette Labrecque-Riel June 2019 Table of Contents Section I: Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Parliamentary Associations and Interparliamentary Groups ................................................................................ 2 Joint Interparliamentary Council ........................................................................................................................... 4 Supporting Parliamentary Associations ................................................................................................................. 4 Section II: 2018-2019 Activities and Expenditures – Overview ......................................................................... 5 Section III: Activities and Expenditures by Parliamentary Association ............................................................ 12 Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association (CAAF)...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ENGINEERING HISTORY PAPER #92 “150 Years of Canadian Engineering: Timelines for Events and Achievements”
    THE ENGINEERING INSTITUTE OF CANADA and its member societies L'Institut canadien des ingénieurs et ses sociétés membres EIC’s Historical Notes and Papers Collection (Compilation of historical articles, notes and papers previously published as Articles, Cedargrove Series, Working Papers or Journals) ENGINEERING HISTORY PAPER #92 “150 Years of Canadian Engineering: Timelines for Events and Achievements” by Andrew H. Wilson (previously produced as Cedargrove Series #52/2019 – May 2019) *********************** EIC HISTORY AND ARCHIVES *********************** © EIC 2019 PO Box 40140, Ottawa ON K1V 0W8 +1 (613) 400-1786 / [email protected] / http://www.eic-ici.ca THE CEDARGROVE SERIES OF DISCOURSES, MEMOIRS AND ESSAYS #52/2019 150 YEARS OF CANADIAN ENGINEERING: TIMELINES FOR EVENTS AND ACHIEVEMENTS by Andrew H. Wilson May 2019 Abstract The research for this paper was done as part of a sesquicentennial project on 150 Years of Canadian Engineering. Some of its material has also been presented orally. This paper covers briefly and selectively Canadian engineering events and achievements in four time periods: one up to the time of Confederation in 1867, and three others between then and 2017. Associated with the three later periods are corresponding economic/political/social timelines to help put the engineering in context. There are no comments in it on the quality of the design, construction/manufacture, origins and uses of the items listed. This paper took a whole lot longer than expected to research and write, so that it carries a date in 2019 rather than late in 2017, when the chronological material in it ends. There are no maps or photographs.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter To
    Open Letter To: Justin Trudeau, Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and Youth Carolyn Bennett, Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs James Carr, Minister of Natural Resources Catherine McKenna, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Dear Justin Trudeau, Carolyn Bennett, James Carr and Catherine McKenna, We learned recently that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is proposing massive changes to the license for the Chalk River Laboratories, site of a proposed radioactive megadump, including removal of 28 conditions of the license itself and removal of several hundred “compliance verification criteria”. We are appalled at this radical move toward deregulation to benefit the multinational consortium, Canadian National Energy Alliance, whose Canadian partner, SNC Lavalin, is currently debarred from the World Bank for ten years and facing criminal charges in Canada for fraud, bribery and corruption. Our two groups along with First Nations, scientists, municipalities, individuals, and the Quebec Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development are very concerned about the consortium’s plan to emplace and eventually abandon one million cubic meters of radioactive wastes in a giant mound on the side of a hill, next to a swamp, less than one kilometer from the Ottawa River at Chalk River, Ontario in unceded traditional Algonquin territory. As we and many others have stated, in comments on the environmental assessment for this misleadingly named “Near Surface” Disposal Facility, the proposed giant mound flouts international guidance, would exceed public dose limits for radiation for 100,000+ years and would contaminate the Ottawa River, Canada’s most recently designated Heritage River, which provides drinking water for millions of Canadians downstream all the way to Montreal.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Readiness of Canada's Naval Forces Report of the Standing
    The Readiness of Canada's Naval Forces Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence Stephen Fuhr Chair June 2017 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (UIPU)
    Report of the Canadian Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (UIPU) 206th Session of the Governing Council Extraordinary Virtual Session November 1-3, 2020 Overview A delegation from the Canadian Group of the Inter- Parliamentary Union (IPU) participated in the 206th Session of the Governing Council, which took place as an Extraordinary Virtual Session from 1–3 November 2020. The Canadian delegation comprised: - the Honourable David McGuinty, P.C., M.P., President of the Canadian Group of the IPU and Vice-President of the IPU Executive Committee for the Twelve Plus Group (official delegate); - the Honourable Salma Ataullahjan, Senator, Vice-President of the Canadian Group of the IPU, Chair of the IPU Committee on Middle East Questions, and Bureau member of the IPU’s Forum of Women Parliamentarians (observer); - the Honourable Senator Mohamed-Iqbal Ravalia, Senator, Member of the Executive of the Canadian Group of the IPU (official delegate); - Ms. Marilène Gill, M.P., Member of the Executive of the Canadian Group of the IPU (observer); and - Ms. Stephanie Kusie, M.P. (official delegate). The delegation was assisted by Ms. Céline Ethier, the Executive Secretary of the Canadian Group of the IPU, as well as Mr. Scott McTaggart and Ms. Natalie Mychajlyszyn, Advisors to the Canadian Group of the IPU, Library of Parliament. Background Established in 1889, the IPU is the world organization of parliaments of sovereign states. Headquartered in Geneva, its membership includes 179 national parliaments, as well as 13 regional parliamentary assemblies as associate members.1 The Canadian Group of the IPU formally joined the IPU in 1912, with the modern-day Canadian Group being established in 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Rae Makes Positive Impression on Liberal Supporters, but May Have Difficulty Wooing Other Voters Just One in Three
    Bob Rae Makes Positive Impression on Liberal Supporters, But May Have Difficulty Wooing Other Voters Just One in Three (34%) Canadians Agrees Bob Rae Would Make a Good Prime Minister of Canada, But Majority (59%) of Liberal Supporters Agree Public Release Date: Saturday, June 9, 2012, 6:00 AM EDT Ipsos Reid is Canada's market intelligence leader and the country’s leading provider of public opinion research. With operations in eight cities, Ipsos Reid employs more than 300 research professionals and support staff in Canada. The company has the biggest network of telephone call centres in Canada, as well as the largest pre-recruited household and on-line panels. Ipsos Reid’s Canadian marketing research and public affairs practices are staffed with seasoned research consultants with extensive industry-specific backgrounds, offering the premier suite of research vehicles in Canada—including the Ipsos Trend Report, the leading source of public opinion in the country—all of which provide clients with actionable and relevant information. Ipsos Reid is an Ipsos company, a leading global survey-based market research group. To learn more, visit www.ipsos.ca For copies of other news releases, please visit http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/ © Ipsos Reid Washington z New York z Chicago z Minneapolis z Seattle z San Francisco Vancouver z Edmonton z Calgary z Winnipeg z Toronto z Ottawa z Montreal Bob Rae Makes Positive Impression on Liberal Supporters, But May Have Difficulty Wooing Other Voters Just One in Three (34%) Canadians Agrees Bob Rae Would Make a Good Prime Minister of Canada, But Majority (59%) of Liberal Supporters Agree Toronto, ON – Bob Rae appears to have made a positive overall impression on Liberal supporters, but he may have a hard time wooing supporters of other parties back into the Liberal fold, according to a new Ipsos Reid poll conducted on behalf of Postmedia News and Global Television.
    [Show full text]
  • Question of Privilege Relating to the Failure of the Government to Fully Provide the Documents As Ordered by the House
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA QUESTION OF PRIVILEGE RELATING TO THE FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT TO FULLY PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS AS ORDERED BY THE HOUSE Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Joe Preston, M.P. Chair MARCH 2011 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Hack Moscow Secret Code Russian Spies Used Kaspersky AV to Hack NSA Staffer, Swipe Exploit Code – New Claim
    hack moscow secret code Russian spies used Kaspersky AV to hack NSA staffer, swipe exploit code – new claim. Russian government spies used Kaspersky Lab software to extract top-secret software exploits from an NSA staffer's home PC, anonymous sources have claimed. The clumsy snoop broke regulations by taking the classified code, documentation, and other materials home to work on using his personal computer, which was running Kaspersky's antivirus, sources told the Wall Street Journal. It is alleged Kremlin hackers exploited the security package in one way or another to identify those sensitive files and exfiltrate them. In effect, it means the Russian government has copies of the NSA's tools used to exploit vulnerabilities in computer systems and equipment to spy on other nations and targets. It also means Russia can turn the cyber-weapons on American corporations, government agencies and other networks, and steal secrets, cause merry havoc, and so on. The theft, reported today, is said to have occurred in 2015, but apparently wasn't discovered until earlier this year. The allegedly stolen NSA code and dossiers sound an awful lot like the Shadow Brokers archive of stolen agency spyware. The brokers' pilfered exploits dates back to 2013, though. And this case is not thought to be related to the former Booz Allen Hamilton contractor Harold Thomas Martin III who stashed classified NSA materials at his home to study. Martin was indicted in February and faces prison time for removing top-secret files from his employer's workplace, if convicted. He denies any wrongdoing. "Whether the information is credible or not, NSA's policy is never to comment on affiliate or personnel matters," an NSA spokesperson said.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Débats De La Chambre Des Communes
    43e LÉGISLATURE, 2e SESSION Débats de la Chambre des communes Compte rendu officiel (Hansard) Volume 150 No 011 Le mercredi 7 octobre 2020 Présidence de l'honorable Anthony Rota TABLE DES MATIÈRES (La table des matières quotidienne des délibérations se trouve à la fin du présent numéro.) 669 CHAMBRE DES COMMUNES Le mercredi 7 octobre 2020 La séance est ouverte à 14 heures. ne contient pas un mot sur la hausse de la criminalité en milieu ru‐ ral ni sur la crise des opioïdes. Il ne prévoit absolument rien pour remédier à la crise d'unité nationale qui prend de l'ampleur dans l'Ouest canadien. Prière ● (1405) Les petites entreprises sont l'épine dorsale du Canada, et le gou‐ [Traduction] vernement les a presque totalement oubliées. Les collectivités de ma circonscription dépendent des retombées économiques de Le Président: Puisque nous sommes mercredi, nous allons grands événements, comme le stampede de Williams Lake, le festi‐ maintenant chanter l'hymne national, qui sera entonné par le député val Billy Barker Days, la fête aérienne Vanderhoof International d'Okanagan-Sud—Kootenay-Ouest. Airshow et la British Columbia Northern Exhibition. Tous ces évé‐ [Les députés chantent l'hymne national.] nements ont été annulés en 2020 à cause de la COVID‑19. Pour cette raison, des entreprises et membres importants de la DÉCLARATIONS DE DÉPUTÉS collectivité comme C+ Rodeos, Central Display, Judy Russell's En‐ chainement Dance Centre, Blake Productions et des milliers [Français] d'autres ont subi d'énormes pertes cette année. Malheureusement, le ALFRED‑PELLAN gouvernement les a tous laissés tomber. Ils méritent mieux.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Associations' Activities and Expenditures
    PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATIONS’ ACTIVITIES AND EXPENDITURES FROM APRIL 1, 2015 TO MARCH 31, 2016 JOINT INTERPARLIAMENTARY COUNCIL REPORT CO-CHAIRS: HON. FABIAN MANNING, SENATOR BRUCE STANTON, M.P. 41st PARLIAMENT, SECOND SESSION AND 42nd PARLIAMENT, FIRST SESSION October 2016 October 2016 JOINT INTERPARLIAMENTARY COUNCIL CO-CHAIRS Hon. Fabian Manning, Senator Bruce Stanton, M.P. MEMBERS Hon. Percy Downe, Senator Irene Mathyssen, M.P. Hon. Wayne Easter, M.P. Hon. Ginette Petitpas Taylor, M.P. Hon. Andrew Leslie, M.P. Hon. Donald Plett, Senator Dave MacKenzie, M.P. Scott Simms, M.P. CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Colette Labrecque-Riel LIBRARY OF PARLIAMENT Parliamentary Information and Research Service Marcus Pistor, Senior Director October 2016 Table of contents Section I: Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Parliamentary Associations and Interparliamentary Groups ................................................................................ 2 Joint Interparliamentary Council ........................................................................................................................... 3 Supporting Parliamentary Associations ................................................................................................................. 4 Section II: 2015-2016 Activities and Expenditures – Overview......................................................................... 5 Section III: Activities and Expenditures by Parliamentary
    [Show full text]