DOCSLIB.ORG

COMMUNIQUÉ Volume 28, Issue 20 May 18, 2021 Is Our Federal Cabinet Trying to Impose a CCP-Style ‘Dictatorship’ in Canada?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
COMMUNIQUÉ Volume 28, Issue 20 May 18, 2021 Is Our Federal Cabinet Trying to Impose a CCP-Style ‘Dictatorship’ in Canada? COMMUNIQUÉ Volume 28, Issue 20 May 18, 2021 Is Our Federal Cabinet Trying to Impose a CCP-Style ‘Dictatorship’ in Canada? Ron Gray Former Leader, CHP Canada Are Prime Minister Trudeau, Canadian Heritage Minster Steven Guilbeault, and Deputy Prime Minister Chrystia Freeland trying to import aspects of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) dictatorship into Canada? Recall Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s 2012 statement that: “There’s a level admiration I actually have for China because their basic dictatorship is allowing them to actually turn their economy around on a dime . .”1 Should we all admire a tyranny because it can implement more changes, more quickly, by force, than a democracy? Why is the so-called ‘opposition’ in the House of Commons (with the exception of MPs Michael Barrett, Rachael Harder and Pierre Poilievre) so mute? Why did the Prime Minister say at a meeting that went largely unreported in Canada that the Covid-19 pandemic “provides an opportunity for a Reset?”2 The idea of the Great Reset is that “You will own nothing and be happy,” says the World Economic Forum in its promotional video3 . and the government will have total control through schemes like Universal Basic Income, digital currencies, and the health passport . because if you don’t do as you are told by the government, you will not get your benefits/money/rights . Canada needs a reset, all right: a restoration of the Judaeo-Christian moral foundation of our laws and lawmakers, and a renewal of the understanding that our Constitution’s primary function is to protect our God-given rights and freedoms from unwarranted incursions by government—NOT TO DECIDE WHAT PRIVILEGES THE GOVERNMENT WILL ‘PERMIT’ US TO HAVE. Consider what hasn’t been in the news lately . The CCP’s ‘Social Credit’ system, which targets control of opinion, thought, and individual action, operates with impunity in China, but the Liberal administration is doing some eerily similar things in Canada: the CBC continues to shape public opinion with its never-ending tax-funded budget; political correctness continues to make citizens think twice about what they should, and can say, and internet censorship could be on it’s way4 (more on that later). In Section 189 of Canada’s National Security and Intelligence Committee’s 2019 Annual Report, Liberal MP David McGuinty, reports: March 12, 2020—“The committee believes there is ample evidence *** that Canada is the target of significant and sustained foreign interference activities. *** The PRC [People’s Republic of China], the Russian Federation, *** other states ***. “The Committee believes these states target Canada for a variety of reasons; but all seek to exploit the openness of our society and penetrate our fundamental institutions to meet their objectives. Page 1 of 2 “They target ethno-cultural communities, seek to corrupt the political process, manipulate the media and attempt to curate debate on post-secondary campuses. “Each of these activities poses significant risk to the rights and freedoms of Canadians and to the country’s sovereignty. They are a clear threat to the security of Canada.”5 (PDF) That is a significant acknowledgement from an MP who is part of the government. On the other hand, the government is also working on Bill C-10; Maclean’s Magazine interprets it this way: Liberal Heritage Minister Stephen Guilbeault “. has promised that his legislation will target content and Internet sites and services anywhere in the world, provided [they are] accessible to Canadians. The obvious implication is that the government plans to introduce mandated content-blocking to keep such content out of Canada as a so-called last resort. “This suggests requiring Internet providers to install blocking capabilities, creating content adjudicators to issue blocking orders, dispensing with net neutrality, and building a Canadian Internet wall.”6 Similar, perhaps to Communist China’s “Great Firewall?”7 Action4Canada, a coalition of disquieted citizens across the nation, added this comment on Bill C-10 (and also a list of disturbing actions8 of the CCP): “The Liberals also tried to sneak in an extra section that would silence individuals’ private posts and videos. Thankfully, this quickly received massive push back and so they withdrew it, but the fact they tried to do this after shutting down the review committee speaks volumes.” Our country ought not to be run like a dictatorship. MPs of all stripes should be speaking up against the increasing power and control of the Prime Minister and his cabinet. We, as citizens, should do likewise; the insistent voices of voters can give courage to cowardly MPs. Pray for Canada . and pray for the few politicians—and CHP, the only political party—that are working to defend Canadians’ God-given rights. Join CHP Canada today and defend our democracy.9 Footnotes 1 www.youtube.com/watch?v=eqnmfNiaM-Y 2 www.youtube.com/watch?v=n2fp0Jeyjvw&t=183s 3 www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hx3DhoLFO4s 4 carm.org/social-justice/what-is-the-social-credit-system/ 5 www.nsicop-cpsnr.ca/reports/rp-2020-03-12-ar/annual_report_2019_public_en.pdf 6 www.macleans.ca/opinion/the-real-consequences-of-steven-guilbeaults-battle-with-the-web-giants/ 7 www.washingtonpost.com/world/asia_pacific/chinas-scary-lesson-to-the-world-censoring-the-internet- works/2016/05/23/413afe78-fff3-11e5-8bb1-f124a43f84dc_story.html 8 action4canada.com/chinese-communist-party-and-trudeau-plan-to-control-the-internet-and-us/ 9 www.chp.ca/get-involved/ The Christian Heritage Party of Canada www.chp.ca • NationalOffi[email protected] • 1-888-VOTE-CHP (868-3247) PO Box 4958, Station E, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5J1 This Communiqué may be copied Page 2 of 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Canada Gazette, Part I
    EXTRA Vol. 153, No. 12 ÉDITION SPÉCIALE Vol. 153, no 12 Canada Gazette Gazette du Canada Part I Partie I OTTAWA, THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2019 OTTAWA, LE JEUDI 14 NOVEMBRE 2019 OFFICE OF THE CHIEF ELECTORAL OFFICER BUREAU DU DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES ÉLECTIONS CANADA ELECTIONS ACT LOI ÉLECTORALE DU CANADA Return of Members elected at the 43rd general Rapport de député(e)s élu(e)s à la 43e élection election générale Notice is hereby given, pursuant to section 317 of the Can- Avis est par les présentes donné, conformément à l’ar- ada Elections Act, that returns, in the following order, ticle 317 de la Loi électorale du Canada, que les rapports, have been received of the election of Members to serve in dans l’ordre ci-dessous, ont été reçus relativement à l’élec- the House of Commons of Canada for the following elec- tion de député(e)s à la Chambre des communes du Canada toral districts: pour les circonscriptions ci-après mentionnées : Electoral District Member Circonscription Député(e) Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Avignon–La Mitis–Matane– Matapédia Kristina Michaud Matapédia Kristina Michaud La Prairie Alain Therrien La Prairie Alain Therrien LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti LaSalle–Émard–Verdun David Lametti Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Longueuil–Charles-LeMoyne Sherry Romanado Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Richmond–Arthabaska Alain Rayes Burnaby South Jagmeet Singh Burnaby-Sud Jagmeet Singh Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Pitt Meadows–Maple Ridge Marc Dalton Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke Randall Garrison Esquimalt–Saanich–Sooke
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Associations' Activities and Expenditures
    PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATIONS’ ACTIVITIES AND EXPENDITURES FROM APRIL 1, 2018 TO MARCH 31, 2019 JOINT INTERPARLIAMENTARY COUNCIL REPORT Co-Chairs Hon. Donald Neil Plett, Senator 42nd Parliament, First Session Bruce Stanton, M.P. June 2019 June 2019 JOINT INTERPARLIAMENTARY COUNCIL CO-CHAIRS Hon. Donald Neil Plett, Senator Bruce Stanton, M.P. MEMBERS Hon. Dennis Dawson, Senator Hon. Wayne Easter, P.C., M.P. Hon. Marc Gold, Senator Hon. Mark Holland P.C., M.P. Jenny Kwan, M.P. Scott Simms, M.P. John Brassard, M.P. Linda Lapointe, M.P. CLERK OF THE COUNCIL Colette Labrecque-Riel June 2019 Table of Contents Section I: Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 Parliamentary Associations and Interparliamentary Groups ................................................................................ 2 Joint Interparliamentary Council ........................................................................................................................... 4 Supporting Parliamentary Associations ................................................................................................................. 4 Section II: 2018-2019 Activities and Expenditures – Overview ......................................................................... 5 Section III: Activities and Expenditures by Parliamentary Association ............................................................ 12 Canada-Africa Parliamentary Association (CAAF)...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • George Committees Party Appointments P.20 Young P.28 Primer Pp
    EXCLUSIVE POLITICAL COVERAGE: NEWS, FEATURES, AND ANALYSIS INSIDE HARPER’S TOOTOO HIRES HOUSE LATE-TERM GEORGE COMMITTEES PARTY APPOINTMENTS P.20 YOUNG P.28 PRIMER PP. 30-31 CENTRAL P.35 TWENTY-SEVENTH YEAR, NO. 1322 CANADA’S POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT NEWSWEEKLY MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2016 $5.00 NEWS SENATE REFORM NEWS FINANCE Monsef, LeBlanc LeBlanc backs away from Morneau to reveal this expected to shed week Trudeau’s whipped vote on assisted light on deficit, vision for non- CIBC economist partisan Senate dying bill, but Grit MPs predicts $30-billion BY AbbaS RANA are ‘comfortable,’ call it a BY DEREK ABMA Senators are eagerly waiting to hear this week specific details The federal government is of the Trudeau government’s plan expected to shed more light on for a non-partisan Red Cham- Charter of Rights issue the size of its deficit on Monday, ber from Government House and one prominent economist Leader Dominic LeBlanc and Members of the has predicted it will be at least Democratic Institutions Minister Joint Committee $30-billion—about three times Maryam Monsef. on Physician- what the Liberals promised dur- The appearance of the two Assisted ing the election campaign—due to ministers at the Senate stand- Suicide, lower-than-expected tax revenue ing committee will be the first pictured at from a slow economy and the time the government has pre- a committee need for more fiscal stimulus. sented detailed plans to reform meeting on the “The $10-billion [deficit] was the Senate. Also, this is the first Hill. The Hill the figure that was out there official communication between Times photograph based on the projection that the the House of Commons and the by Jake Wright economy was growing faster Senate on Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Letter To
    Open Letter To: Justin Trudeau, Minister of Intergovernmental Affairs and Youth Carolyn Bennett, Minister of Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs James Carr, Minister of Natural Resources Catherine McKenna, Minister of Environment and Climate Change Dear Justin Trudeau, Carolyn Bennett, James Carr and Catherine McKenna, We learned recently that the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission is proposing massive changes to the license for the Chalk River Laboratories, site of a proposed radioactive megadump, including removal of 28 conditions of the license itself and removal of several hundred “compliance verification criteria”. We are appalled at this radical move toward deregulation to benefit the multinational consortium, Canadian National Energy Alliance, whose Canadian partner, SNC Lavalin, is currently debarred from the World Bank for ten years and facing criminal charges in Canada for fraud, bribery and corruption. Our two groups along with First Nations, scientists, municipalities, individuals, and the Quebec Ministry of Environment and Sustainable Development are very concerned about the consortium’s plan to emplace and eventually abandon one million cubic meters of radioactive wastes in a giant mound on the side of a hill, next to a swamp, less than one kilometer from the Ottawa River at Chalk River, Ontario in unceded traditional Algonquin territory. As we and many others have stated, in comments on the environmental assessment for this misleadingly named “Near Surface” Disposal Facility, the proposed giant mound flouts international guidance, would exceed public dose limits for radiation for 100,000+ years and would contaminate the Ottawa River, Canada’s most recently designated Heritage River, which provides drinking water for millions of Canadians downstream all the way to Montreal.
    [Show full text]
  • Core 1..146 Hansard (PRISM::Advent3b2 8.00)
    CANADA House of Commons Debates VOLUME 140 Ï NUMBER 098 Ï 1st SESSION Ï 38th PARLIAMENT OFFICIAL REPORT (HANSARD) Friday, May 13, 2005 Speaker: The Honourable Peter Milliken CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) All parliamentary publications are available on the ``Parliamentary Internet Parlementaire´´ at the following address: http://www.parl.gc.ca 5957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, May 13, 2005 The House met at 10 a.m. Parliament on February 23, 2005, and Bill C-48, an act to authorize the Minister of Finance to make certain payments, shall be disposed of as follows: 1. Any division thereon requested before the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, shall be deferred to that time; Prayers 2. At the expiry of the time for consideration of Government Orders on Thursday, May 19, 2005, all questions necessary for the disposal of the second reading stage of (1) Bill C-43 and (2) Bill C-48 shall be put and decided forthwith and successively, Ï (1000) without further debate, amendment or deferral. [English] Ï (1010) MESSAGE FROM THE SENATE The Speaker: Does the hon. government House leader have the The Speaker: I have the honour to inform the House that a unanimous consent of the House for this motion? message has been received from the Senate informing this House Some hon. members: Agreed. that the Senate has passed certain bills, to which the concurrence of this House is desired. Some hon. members: No. Mr. Jay Hill (Prince George—Peace River, CPC): Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Readiness of Canada's Naval Forces Report of the Standing
    The Readiness of Canada's Naval Forces Report of the Standing Committee on National Defence Stephen Fuhr Chair June 2017 42nd PARLIAMENT, 1st SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise. The House of Commons retains the right and privilege to find users in contempt of Parliament if a reproduction or use is not in accordance with this permission.
    [Show full text]
  • Angry Birds: Twitter Harassment of Canadian Female Politicians By
    Angry Birds: Twitter Harassment of Canadian Female Politicians By Jess Ann Gordon Submitted to the Faculty of Extension University of Alberta In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Communications and Technology August 5, 2019 2 Acknowledgments Written with gratitude on the unceded traditional territories of the Skwxw�7mesh (Squamish), Səl̓ �lwətaʔ/Selilwitulh (Tsleil-Waututh), and xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam) Nations, and on Treaty 6 territory, the traditional lands of diverse Indigenous peoples including the Cree, Blackfoot, Métis, Nakota Sioux, Iroquois, Dene, Ojibway, Saulteaux, Anishinaabe, Inuit, and many others. I would like to take this opportunity to thank my friends, family, cohort colleagues, and professors who contributed to this project. Thank you to my project supervisor, Dr. Gordon Gow, for his steadying support throughout the project and the many valuable suggestions. Thank you as well to Dr. Stanley Varnhagen, who provided invaluable advice on the design and content of the survey. I am grateful to both Dr. Gow and Dr. Varnhagen for sharing their expertise and guidance to help bring this project to life. Thank you to my guinea pigs, who helped me to identify opportunities and errors in the draft version of the survey: Natalie Crawford Cox, Lana Cuthbertson, Kenzie Gordon, Ross Gordon, Amanda Henry, Lucie Martineau, Kory Mathewson, and Ian Moore. Thank you to my MACT 2017 cohort colleagues and professors their support and encouragement. Particularly, I’d like to thank Ryan O’Byrne for helping me to clarify the project concept in its infant stages, and for being a steadfast cheerleader and friend throughout this project and the entire MACT program.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (UIPU)
    Report of the Canadian Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union (UIPU) 206th Session of the Governing Council Extraordinary Virtual Session November 1-3, 2020 Overview A delegation from the Canadian Group of the Inter- Parliamentary Union (IPU) participated in the 206th Session of the Governing Council, which took place as an Extraordinary Virtual Session from 1–3 November 2020. The Canadian delegation comprised: - the Honourable David McGuinty, P.C., M.P., President of the Canadian Group of the IPU and Vice-President of the IPU Executive Committee for the Twelve Plus Group (official delegate); - the Honourable Salma Ataullahjan, Senator, Vice-President of the Canadian Group of the IPU, Chair of the IPU Committee on Middle East Questions, and Bureau member of the IPU’s Forum of Women Parliamentarians (observer); - the Honourable Senator Mohamed-Iqbal Ravalia, Senator, Member of the Executive of the Canadian Group of the IPU (official delegate); - Ms. Marilène Gill, M.P., Member of the Executive of the Canadian Group of the IPU (observer); and - Ms. Stephanie Kusie, M.P. (official delegate). The delegation was assisted by Ms. Céline Ethier, the Executive Secretary of the Canadian Group of the IPU, as well as Mr. Scott McTaggart and Ms. Natalie Mychajlyszyn, Advisors to the Canadian Group of the IPU, Library of Parliament. Background Established in 1889, the IPU is the world organization of parliaments of sovereign states. Headquartered in Geneva, its membership includes 179 national parliaments, as well as 13 regional parliamentary assemblies as associate members.1 The Canadian Group of the IPU formally joined the IPU in 1912, with the modern-day Canadian Group being established in 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • Bob Rae Makes Positive Impression on Liberal Supporters, but May Have Difficulty Wooing Other Voters Just One in Three
    Bob Rae Makes Positive Impression on Liberal Supporters, But May Have Difficulty Wooing Other Voters Just One in Three (34%) Canadians Agrees Bob Rae Would Make a Good Prime Minister of Canada, But Majority (59%) of Liberal Supporters Agree Public Release Date: Saturday, June 9, 2012, 6:00 AM EDT Ipsos Reid is Canada's market intelligence leader and the country’s leading provider of public opinion research. With operations in eight cities, Ipsos Reid employs more than 300 research professionals and support staff in Canada. The company has the biggest network of telephone call centres in Canada, as well as the largest pre-recruited household and on-line panels. Ipsos Reid’s Canadian marketing research and public affairs practices are staffed with seasoned research consultants with extensive industry-specific backgrounds, offering the premier suite of research vehicles in Canada—including the Ipsos Trend Report, the leading source of public opinion in the country—all of which provide clients with actionable and relevant information. Ipsos Reid is an Ipsos company, a leading global survey-based market research group. To learn more, visit www.ipsos.ca For copies of other news releases, please visit http://www.ipsos-na.com/news/ © Ipsos Reid Washington z New York z Chicago z Minneapolis z Seattle z San Francisco Vancouver z Edmonton z Calgary z Winnipeg z Toronto z Ottawa z Montreal Bob Rae Makes Positive Impression on Liberal Supporters, But May Have Difficulty Wooing Other Voters Just One in Three (34%) Canadians Agrees Bob Rae Would Make a Good Prime Minister of Canada, But Majority (59%) of Liberal Supporters Agree Toronto, ON – Bob Rae appears to have made a positive overall impression on Liberal supporters, but he may have a hard time wooing supporters of other parties back into the Liberal fold, according to a new Ipsos Reid poll conducted on behalf of Postmedia News and Global Television.
    [Show full text]
  • Proclamation/Greeting Letter Request for 29Th Falun Dafa Day Anniversary April 8, 2021
    Proclamation/Greeting Letter Request for 29th Falun Dafa Day Anniversary April 8, 2021 Dear Mayor Jim Diodati We hope you and your loved one have been safe and well. We respectfully request a greeting/proclamation letter in recognition of Falun Dafa Day for this year (May 13, 2021). This is our annual celebration of 29 years spreading of Falun Dafa to the public, the contributions of the Falun Dafa community in Canada and to honor the values of Truthfulness, Compassion, and Forbearance. We truly appreciate for your previous proclamations to us during the past years! Falun Dafa (also known as Falun Gong) is a spiritual practice for mind and body, rooted in the ancient schools of cultivation in China. It consists of meditative exercises, and a moral philosophy aimed at the promotion of virtue. At the core of Falun Dafa’s teachings are the tenets of “Truthfulness, Compassion, and Forbearance.” Tens of millions of people from diverse cultural backgrounds in over 100 countries, including Canada, benefit from practicing Falun Gong, where the free teachings help people improve their mental, moral, and physical wellbeing and contribute to a more healthy and harmonious society. Falun Dafa practitioners have also helped Canadians during these difficult times, by offering free meditation exercise instruction in communities and online classes. As traditional Chinese culture believes, and scientific studies, as well as survey results, are now proving, the connection between mind and body is key for a healthy immune system and to combat illness and stress. As you may be aware, for the past 22 years, major human rights organizations have documented the nation-wide campaign of hatred, torture, forced thoughts conversion, mass imprisonment, and killing of people who practice Falun Gong in China, including evidence of practitioners being murdered for their vital organs that are being sold by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
    [Show full text]
  • Question of Privilege Relating to the Failure of the Government to Fully Provide the Documents As Ordered by the House
    HOUSE OF COMMONS CANADA QUESTION OF PRIVILEGE RELATING TO THE FAILURE OF THE GOVERNMENT TO FULLY PROVIDE THE DOCUMENTS AS ORDERED BY THE HOUSE Report of the Standing Committee on Procedure and House Affairs Joe Preston, M.P. Chair MARCH 2011 40th PARLIAMENT, 3rd SESSION Published under the authority of the Speaker of the House of Commons SPEAKER’S PERMISSION Reproduction of the proceedings of the House of Commons and its Committees, in whole or in part and in any medium, is hereby permitted provided that the reproduction is accurate and is not presented as official. This permission does not extend to reproduction, distribution or use for commercial purpose of financial gain. Reproduction or use outside this permission or without authorization may be treated as copyright infringement in accordance with the Copyright Act. Authorization may be obtained on written application to the Office of the Speaker of the House of Commons. Reproduction in accordance with this permission does not constitute publication under the authority of the House of Commons. The absolute privilege that applies to the proceedings of the House of Commons does not extend to these permitted reproductions. Where a reproduction includes briefs to a Standing Committee of the House of Commons, authorization for reproduction may be required from the authors in accordance with the Copyright Act. Nothing in this permission abrogates or derogates from the privileges, powers, immunities and rights of the House of Commons and its Committees. For greater certainty, this permission does not affect the prohibition against impeaching or questioning the proceedings of the House of Commons in courts or otherwise.
    [Show full text]
  • Debates of the House of Commons
    43rd PARLIAMENT, 2nd SESSION House of Commons Debates Official Report (Hansard) Volume 150 No. 111 Friday, June 4, 2021 Speaker: The Honourable Anthony Rota CONTENTS (Table of Contents appears at back of this issue.) 7957 HOUSE OF COMMONS Friday, June 4, 2021 The House met at 10 a.m. The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès): One at a time, please. I was just told we cannot challenge a ruling that has been made Prayer already. The instruction for committee is perfectly legitimate. An hon. member: Point of order. GOVERNMENT ORDERS The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès): ● (1000) Since I have not read the motion yet and it has not been brought forth to the chamber, I am going to read the motion first and then [Translation] we will listen to the points of order. BROADCASTING ACT [Chair read text of the motion to the House] BILL C-10—TIME ALLOCATION MOTION Hon. Mona Fortier (Minister of Middle Class Prosperity and Ms. Rachael Harder: Madam Speaker, I am rising on a point of Associate Minister of Finance, Lib.) moved: order in order to challenge the admissibility of that time allocation motion because it does not satisfy the requirements of Standing Or‐ That, in relation to Bill C-10, An Act to amend the Broadcasting Act and to make related and consequential amendments to other Acts, not more than five fur‐ der 78(3) and the usual practices of this House. Please allow me to ther hours shall be allotted to the consideration of the committee stage of the bill; explain further.
    [Show full text]