DOCSLIB.ORG

Materials Management Plan for the British Virgin Islands

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Materials Management Plan for the British Virgin Islands ATERIALS ANAGEMENT FINAL REPORT M M AUGUST 2019 PLAN FOR THE BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS Ref. 32-BV-2018 Waste Management Strategy for the British Virgin Islands Ministry of Health & Social Development CLIENT Organisation Name Department of Waste Management (DWM) Address Road Town, Tortola British Virgin Islands Contact person Greg Massicote [email protected] CONSULTANT Corporate Name Agency RED – Agency for Resilience, Empowerment and Development Address Rue du Vicaire Savoyard, 8 1203, Geneva Switzerland Contact Person Charlotte Boutboul [email protected] TEAM STRUCTURE AND CONTACT DETAILS Name of team Phone Area of expertise Email members number alkebulanmindsrecycling@g +1 (284) 442- Gavin Baird Local WM Expert mail.com 5326 Project charlotte.boutboul@agency- Charlotte Boutboul +94773859453 coordinator red.com Noni.georges@agency- Noni Georges Legal expert red.com [email protected] Hakan Mat Economist Expert N/A m Team Leader & Eva Röben [email protected] +32491735317 WM Expert REPORT STRUCTURE Title Materials Management Plan Number of pages 60 Number of annexes 0 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND DISCLAIMER This document has been produced by RED Agency under contract to the Ministry of Health & Social Development of the Virgin Islands. The views expressed in this document are entirely those of the authors 2019 and do not necessarily represent the MHSD own views or policies. ©Copyrigh t reserved Ref. 32-BV-2018 Waste Management Strategy for the British Virgin Islands Ministry of Health & Social Development CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION.........................................................6 2 EXISTING WASTE STREAMS........................................6 2.1 HOUSEHOLD AND ASSIMILATED WASTE...........................................6 2.2 SPECIAL WASTES............................................................................8 3 WASTE STREAM MANAGEMENT..................................9 3.1 MANAGEMENT OF HOUSEHOLD AND ASSIMILATED WASTE - PACKAGING................................................................................9 3.1.1 Paper and Cardboard..........................................................................9 3.1.2 PET...................................................................................................11 3.1.3 HDPE 3D and 2D...............................................................................13 3.1.4 LDPE and LLDPE................................................................................15 3.1.5 PP 3D and 2D....................................................................................17 3.1.6 PS.....................................................................................................19 3.1.7 Fe packaging....................................................................................21 3.1.8 Al Packaging 3D and 2D...................................................................22 3.1.9 Glass.................................................................................................25 3.1.10 Complex (Composite) Packaging Items..........................................26 3.2 MANAGEMENT OF HOUSEHOLD AND ASSIMILATED WASTE – ORGANIC WASTE.....................................................................................27 3.2.1 Food Waste: Wasted Food, Kitchen and Restaurant Waste...............27 3.2.2 Garden Waste...................................................................................29 3.3 MANAGEMENT OF HOUSEHOLD AND ASSIMILATED WASTE – OTHER WASTES...................................................................................31 3.3.1 Textile and Shoes.............................................................................31 3.3.2 Baby Diaper, Pads and Humid Wipes................................................32 3.3.3 Ceramic and Inert Waste..................................................................33 3.3.4 Other Wastes....................................................................................34 3.4 MANAGEMENT OF SPECIAL WASTE – ORGANIC WASTE.....................34 3.4.1 Sargasso Weeds...............................................................................34 3.4.2 Edible Oil..........................................................................................37 3.4.3 Septage (Black water)......................................................................38 3.4.4 Wastewater Treatment Sludge.........................................................39 3.5 MANAGEMENT OF SPECIAL WASTE – BULK WASTE..........................39 3.5.1 WEEE................................................................................................39 3.5.2 Pallets...............................................................................................40 3.5.3 Other (furniture)...............................................................................41 3.6 MANAGEMENT OF SPECIAL WASTE – HAZARDOUS WASTE................43 i Materials Management Plan – August 2019 Ref. 32-BV-2018 Waste Management Strategy for the British Virgin Islands Ministry of Health & Social Development 3.6.1 Chemicals.........................................................................................43 3.6.2 Small WEEE......................................................................................44 3.6.3 Medical Waste..................................................................................44 3.6.4 Batteries and Accumulators..............................................................45 3.6.5 Oil and Lubricants.............................................................................46 3.7 MANAGEMENT OF SPECIAL WASTE – OTHER WASTE STREAMS.........47 3.7.1 End of Life Vehicles Including Tyres..................................................47 3.7.2 End of Life Boats and Planes.............................................................48 3.7.3 Construction and Demolition Waste..................................................50 3.7.4 Incinerator residues..........................................................................51 4 WASTE FLOW SCENARIOS ACCORDING TO THE MATERIALS MANAGEMENT PLAN..........................52 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Household waste streams: Quantities and measures for prevention, separate collection and recovery......................................................................................................6 Table 2: Specific waste streams: Quantities and measures for prevention, separate collection and recovery......................................................................................................8 Table 3: Options for paper prevention, re-use and recycling............................................10 Table 4: Geographic and economic aspects of paper and cardboard recycling................11 Table 5: Options for PET prevention, re-use and recycling...............................................13 Table 6: Geographic and economic aspects of PET recycling...........................................13 Table 7: Options to prevent, re-use and recycle HDPE.....................................................14 Table 8: Geographic and economic aspects of HDPE recycling........................................15 Table 9: Options to prevent, re-use and recycle LDPE......................................................16 Table 10: Geographic and economic aspects of LDPE recycling.......................................17 Table 11: Options to prevent, re-use and recycle PP........................................................18 Table 12: Geographic and economic aspects of PP recycling...........................................19 Table 13: Options to prevent, re-use and recycle PS........................................................20 Table 14: Geographic and economic aspects of PS recycling...........................................21 Table 15: Options to prevent, re-use and recycle Fe packaging.......................................22 Table 16: Geographic and economic aspects of Fe recycling...........................................22 Table 17: Options to prevent, re-use and recycle Al packaging.......................................23 Table 18: Geographic and economic aspects of Al recycling............................................24 Table 19: Options to prevent, re-use and recycle glass packaging..................................25 Table 20: Geographic and economic aspects of glass recycling.......................................26 Table 21: Options to prevent, re-use and recycle complex packaging.............................27 Table 22: Geographic and economic aspects of PS recycling...........................................27 ii Materials Management Plan – August 2019 Ref. 32-BV-2018 Waste Management Strategy for the British Virgin Islands Ministry of Health & Social Development Table 23: Options to prevent, re-use and recover food waste..........................................28 Table 24: Geographic and economic aspects of food waste recovery..............................29 Table 25: Options to prevent, re-use and recover garden waste......................................30 Table 26: Geographic and economic aspects of garden waste recovery..........................30 Table 27: Options to prevent, re-use and recover garden waste......................................31 Table 28: Geographic and economic aspects of textile and shoe waste recovery............32 Table 29: Options to prevent, re-use and recover nappies, napkins and wipes................33 Table 30: Geographic and economic aspects of nappie and napkin recovery..................33 Table 31: Options to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PET Bottle Recycling - Wikipedia
    7/24/2018 PET bottle recycling - Wikipedia PET bottle recycling Bottles made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET, sometimes PETE) can be used to make lower grade products, such as carpets. To make a food grade plastic, the bottles need to be hydrolysed down to monomers, which are purified and then re- polymerised to make new PET. In many countries, PET plastics are coded with the resin identification code number "1" inside the universal recycling symbol, usually located on the bottom of the container. Contents Usage of PET Process Post-consumer waste Sorting Processing for sale Further treatment Melt filtration Drying polyester Global statistics Re-use of PET bottles See also References External links Usage of PET PET is used as a raw material for making packaging materials such as bottles and containers for packaging a wide range of food products and other consumer goods. Examples include soft drinks, alcoholic beverages, detergents, cosmetics, pharmaceutical products and edible oils. PET is one of the most common consumer plastics used.[1] Polyethylene terephthalate can also be used as the main material in making water-resistant paper.[2] Process Post-consumer waste The empty PET packaging is discarded by the consumer, after use and becomes PET waste. In the recycling industry, this is referred to as "post-consumer PET." Many local governments and waste collection agencies have started to collect post- consumer PET separately from other household waste. Besides that there is container deposit legislation in some countries which also applies to PET bottles. It is debatable whether exporting circulating resources that damages the domestic recycling industry is acceptable or not.[4] In Japan, overseas market pressure led to a significant cost reduction in the domestic market.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Waste Gypsum Wallboard As a Composting Additive
    Evaluation of Waste Gypsum Wallboard as a Composting Additive Prepared for the Resource Recovery Fund Board March 2013 Investigators: Dr. G. W. Price Innovative Waste Management Research Program Department of Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University Truro, NS Christopher Richards, M.Sc. candidate Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University Truro, NS Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the financial support for this project through the RRFB, as well as in-kind contributions and advice from Halifax C&D (Mr. D. Chaissie). We also acknowledge technical and editorial contributions from staff at Nova Scotia Environment (B. Kenney, D. MacQueen), Resource Recovery Fund Board (E. Christensen, B. Gillis) and the Colchester County Waste Management Division. Field and analytical support from technical staff at Facutly of Agriculture, Dalhousie University (M. Tate, C. Roberts) and numerous undergraduate research assistants are also gratefully acknowledged. We would like to thank Drs. P. Arnold (Acadia University) and R. Donald (NSAC/Dalhousie University) for technical support and advice throughout the project. Page | 2 Executive Summary A series of studies were conducted to evaluate the possibility of diverting Waste Gypsum Wallboard (WGW) from C&D and municipal landfills in Nova Scotia. Previous studies have shown the potential to use wallboard gypsum as an agricultural amendment but the materials used were primarily from clean sources. The feasibility of using WGW as a feedstock in compost systems was examined through three different studies over two years at the Faculty of Agriculture, Dalhousie University. An initial investigation to characterize and determine the potential compostability of WGW was conducted using a pilot scale in-vessel composting unit at the Bio-Environmental Engineering Centre, Bible Hill, NS.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    GtoG Project From production to recycling: a circular economy for the European gypsum Industry with the demolition and recycling Industry LIFE PROGRAMME LIFE11 ENV/BE/001039 DA1-Inventory of Current Practices EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SEPTEMBER 2013 DA1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY GtoG Project Introduction Gypsum – an exceptional construction The problem material In the 8 EU target countries (Belgium, France, Gypsum is a rock-like mineral used in Germany, Greece, Poland, Spain, the construction in different applications such as Netherlands and the UK), it is estimated that plasterboard, building plaster and gypsum blocks, around 1,150,000 tonnes of plasterboard waste among others. were generated in 2012. In most of the European countries where it is produced a low recycling rate The GtoG project focuses on lightweight of this gypsum waste is observed. gypsum components also known as plasterboard products that mainly consist of The aim of the GtoG project is to obtain up to gypsum whose surface and longitudinal edges 30% of reincorporation of the recycled gypsum, are covered with paper and used for partitions from both production and Construction and and the lining of walls, ceilings, roofs and floors. Demolition (C&D) waste, into the plasterboard Other generic terms used for this product are: manufacturing process. gypsum board, drywall and wallboard. Main types of gypsum In Europe the first plasterboard plant was built in Until mid-1980s most of the gypsum used in the Liverpool in 1917. European Union was natural gypsum extracted from quarries. Since then, FGD gypsum (a by- product from the Electricity Industry) became an important supply for the Gypsum Industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste Management
    WASTE MANGEMENT 1. Materials Management Overview How society uses materials fundamentally affects our economic and environmental future. Inefficient and wasteful use of materials now challenges the capacity of the Earth – air, water and land. We can fulfill our needs and prosper while using less material, reducing toxics, and recovering more of the material we consume. By acting less wastefully and considering system- wide impacts in the design, marketing, reuse, recycling, and disposal of products, life-cycle materials assessment represents an important change in how we think about waste and chemicals management. Actions are being taken by EPA to: (1) manage materials and products on a life-cycle basis; (2) build the nation’s capacity to manage materials, and (3) accelerate the public dialogue necessary to create a green, resilient, competitive, and sustainable economy in the future. The President’s Executive Order 13514 , Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic Performance, emphasizes the importance of sustainability and requires U.S. Federal agencies to meet a number of energy, water, and waste reduction targets, including 50% recycling and waste diversion by 2015. 1.a EPA Materials Management Responsibilities EPA’s Strategic Plan http://www.epa.gov/finance/plan/plan.htm identifies priority approaches to protect the land, including reducing waste at its source, recycling waste for materials or energy values, managing waste effectively by preventing spills and releases of toxic materials, and cleaning up contaminated properties. EPA’s waste management office, the Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery, http://www.epa.gov/epawaste/index.htm is primarily responsible for overseeing implementation of certain provisions of the nation’s Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
    [Show full text]
  • The Path to PET Bottle Recycling Made Easier with the Avery Dennison Cleanflake™ Portfolio. Label Material Advances Allow Brand Owners to Improve Recyclability
    The Path to PET Bottle Recycling Made Easier with the Avery Dennison CleanFlake™ Portfolio. Label material advances allow brand owners to improve recyclability Advances by Avery Dennison have leveled the playing field for PET recyclability and shelf-impact. Traditionally there has been a trade-off between the two; however, the Avery Dennison CleanFlake™ Portfolio is designed specifically for the PET (polyethylene terephthalate) recycling stream. PET is a popular plastic package for food and non-food products because of its strength, thermo-stability and transparency. Bottle-to-bottle recycling reduces landfills, enables up-cycling into food-grade rPET and capitalizes on the renewable energy in a PET bottle. Brand owners, packaging designers, raw material suppliers, converters, retailers, consumers and waste management companies collectively impact sustainability. While the overall goal is to make it easier to recover more materials, brand owners look beyond package design. They recognize sustainability can offer a significant point of differentiation as retailers’ demands and consumer awareness about the environment and natural resources carry increasing influence towards the brands that are put on store shelves and in shopping bags. “NAPCOR applauds Avery Dennison and its customers for addressing a critical impediment to the efficient recycling of PET containers,” said Mike Schedler, National Association for PET Container Resources (NAPCOR) Director of Technology. “The popularity of pressure-sensitive labels makes it imperative that they be successfully removed as part of the standard PET reclamation process to increase their recyclability. We hope other label manufacturers and brand owners follow Avery Dennison’s lead.” Promoting Sustainability, Creating Shelf Appeal and Capturing Share Whether it’s a private label or a national brand, consumers will only behind its latest pressure-sensitive label constructions, which are spend about 2.5 seconds at the shelf deciding what product to designed to improve recycling efficiencies and the overall quality of buy.
    [Show full text]
  • Moving Forwards
    Recycling Today Magazine ~> Moving Forward Page 1 of 3 recvdin MoVing Forward By: Timothy G. Townsend May 2003 URL: http:llwww.recyclingtoday,com/arficles/article.asp?lD=4759&CafiD=&SubCatlD= Gypsum drywall is a major component of modern buildings, yet it is often one of the least likely components of debris frem building construction, demolition or renovation to be recycled. Gypsum drywall typically makes up 5 percent to 25 percent of the weight of debris from building-related C&D activities, A typical rule of thumb for drywall generation from construction activities is one pound of drywall per cubic foot of construction. The amount of post-consumer drywall generated in Florida C&D debris in 2000 was estimated at nearly 500,000 tons. Most of this was disposed in unlined landfills. Recovery and recycling is always desired in place of lend- filling when feasible, but several environmentel factors (odor, groundwater contamination) create added incentive for recycling d~JwalL While several gypsum drywall recycling operations exist in North America at the current time, in many areas (Florida for example) drywa!l recycling is relatively nonexistent. This paper describe~ some of the issues facing the C&D debris industry and summarizes the current state of gypsum drywall recycling in North America. DRYWALL BASICS Gypsum drywall, often referred to as gypsum wallbeard or sheet rock, replaced gypsum piaster as the major interior wall surface because of its ease of installation and its fire resistant properties. Gypsum drywal! consists of approximately 90 percent gypsum and 10 percent paper facing and backing. Gypsum is a mineral composed of calcium sulfate (CaSOL and water (H20).
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Rate Report
    2015 PET Recycling Rate Report Register for Upcoming Webinars! Today’s Presenters Kate Eagles NAPCOR Program Director Kara Pochiro APR Communications Director SteveResa DiminoAlexander APRNAPCOR Executive Director of DirectorPublic Policy Steve Alexander APR Executive Director Rick Moore NAPCOR Executive Director Agenda & Acknowledgments • Deep dive into 2015 PET recycling rate and supporting data • Jointly released by NAPCOR and the APR • Thanks to the following data providers, funders, and contractors: – PET Reclaimers and Converters – Providers of additional market data and perspectives – Consulting support from Moore Recycling Associates and HDR Who is APR? International trade association The Voice of Plastics Recycling® Companies committed to the success of plastics recycling Technical Authority on Plastics Recycling Technical Programs APR Design®Guide for Plastics Recyclability Test Methods/Guidance Protocols Brand Owner Training APR Committees Communication/Education/Advocacy APR Primary Goals Increase Enhance Communicate Supply Quality Value Increase the Value Proposition of Recycled Plastics Introduction to NAPCOR • NAPCOR is the trade Container PET association for the PET Producers Reclaimers packaging industry in the United States, Canada and PET Suppliers to Resin the PET Mexico Producers Industry • 52 members encompass all facets of the PET value chain Sheet & Thermoform Producers NAPCOR Membership 2016 PET Industry Suppliers PET Container Manufacturers American Starlinger-Sahm, Inc. Nissei ASB Company Amcor Rigid Plastics AMUT North America, Inc. Penn Color Plastipak Packaging, Inc. BP Plastic Technologies, Inc. Yoshino America Corporation ColorMatrix Polymetrix Erema North America REPI Husky Injection Molding Systems Sidel Inc. PET Sheet / Thermoformers Krones Inc. Sorema Plastic Recycling Sys. Muehlstein Sukano Polymers Corporation Dart Container Corporation National Recovery Technologies TABB Packaging Solutions, LLC Direct Pack, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Opportunities for Promoting the Recycling of Gypsum Board from Construction, Renovation, and Demolition in Manitoba
    Opportunities for Promoting the Recycling of Gypsum Board from Construction, Renovation, and Demolition in Manitoba by Hyunjoo Oh A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Natural Resources Management Natural Resources Institute Clayton H. Riddell Faculty of Environment, Earth, and Resources University of Manitoba Winnipeg, Manitoba Copyright © 2019 by Hyunjoo Oh ABSTRACT This thesis is the result of a two-year (2016-2018) study through literature and document review and semi-structured interviews; many people in Manitoba from industry and government participated in the interviews, and many others in other Canadian provinces shared their knowledge and experience in the construction, gypsum manufacturing, and recycling industries. The research aimed to explore opportunities for promoting the recycling of gypsum board in Manitoba, given that gypsum is largely landfilled despite its high recyclability. Overall, this study concludes that the establishment of recycling infrastructure and minimized distance of transport are key factors in gypsum recycling. Considering these factors of importance and regional recycling conditions and circumstances, the study highlights the fact that government initiative and support through financial (dis)incentives and regulations are at the core of promoting the recycling of gypsum board in Manitoba. KEYWORDS: gypsum board, recycling policy, waste management, construction waste, CRD waste, gypsum to gypsum, drywall disposal. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Many people assisted and supported me in completing this thesis. First, I would like to thank my committee: Dr. Iain Davidson-Hunt, my academic advisor, for your inspiration, confidence in me, warm encouragement, and constant support and guidance; Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • PET Bottle Recycling for Sustainable Textiles PET Bottle Recycling for Sustainable Textiles
    DOI: 10.5772/intechopen.72589 Chapter 2 Provisional chapter PET Bottle Recycling for Sustainable Textiles PET Bottle Recycling for Sustainable Textiles Esin Sarioğlu and Hatice Kübra Kaynak Esin Sarioğlu and Hatice Kübra Kaynak Additional information is available at the end of the chapter Additional information is available at the end of the chapter http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.72589 Abstract Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), as the most favorable packaging material, is owing to its transparent color, lightweight, strength, food safe, inexpensive price, fully recyclabil- ity, etc. In addition to all these advantages, PET as a waste material takes up consider- able space in nature and needs to be recycled for the disposal of these wastes. In this regard, recycling enables conserving raw materials, reducing energy use in order to produce virgin PET, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Today, PET is the most widely recycled plastic in the world. Eco-friendly products obtained by recycling of PET are mainly used as textile fibers. In addition, both brands and consumers are seen to be enthusiastic in order to minimize the environmental effects of PET wastes. This study is concerned with the use of textile fiber from recycled PET (r-PET) bottles to produce a cotton blended ring and compact yarns. Undoubtedly, the study also includes compar- ison of cotton blended virgin polyester fiber (v-PET) with r-PET fiber to determine the advantages and disadvantages of r-PET fiber. The reason for choosing cotton fiber is the most preferred fiber blending with PET commercially. Keywords: r-PET, recycle, PET bottle, ring spinning system, compact spinning system, virgin PET 1.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Import of Waste PET Bottles Benefited Global Plastic Circularity
    pubs.acs.org/journal/ascecg Research Article China’s Import of Waste PET Bottles Benefited Global Plastic Circularity and Environmental Performance Zijie Ma, Morten W. Ryberg, Peng Wang, Linbin Tang, and Wei-Qiang Chen* Cite This: ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 2020, 8, 16861−16868 Read Online ACCESS Metrics & More Article Recommendations *sı Supporting Information ABSTRACT: Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) used to account for ≈50% of China’s waste plastics import. In 2018, the Chinese government banned the import of waste plastics due to the environmental and health burdens caused by the waste treatment processes. However, the recycling of waste PET also helps avoid the production of virgin PET and several corresponding environ- mental impacts such as fossil resources use and carbon emission, which remain unquantified. We combine material flow analysis and life cycle assessment to map the PET bottle cycles and evaluate the relevant environmental performances during 2000−2018 in China. The cumulative recycling of PET bottles amounted to 78 million tons (Mt) in China during the studied period. Among them, 29 Mt waste PET bottles (37% of total recycling) were imported from abroad and accounted for 40% of the world’s total export. Most waste PET bottles in China was recycled to produce PET fibers, which significantly improved global PET circularity, reduced the use of virgin PET material, and saved about 109 Mt oil-eq of fossil resources (e.g., coal and oil) use and avoided 233 Mt CO2-eq emissions. Despite these benefits, the environmental burdens with regional impacts during waste plastics treatment should be significantly reduced, and technologies for close-loop, namely bottle-to-bottle, recycling of PET should be further developed and widely applied.
    [Show full text]
  • BATTERY DISPOSAL Batteries Consist of Different Chemical Combinations Used to Produce Charges
    BATTERY DISPOSAL Batteries consist of different chemical combinations used to produce charges. Many of the materials used to manufacture batteries, cadmium, lead, lithium, nickel, magnesium and zinc, are hazardous. Hazardous Batteries Include: ! Lithium Ion batteries have potential to explode, do not dispose of in your trash/recycling bin. Lithium-Ion (Li-Ion), Lithium Polymer (Li Poly), Nickle Metal Hydride (Ni-MH), Nickle Cadmium (Ni-CAD), Nickle Zinc (NiZn), Lead Acid, Silver Oxide Button, When Recycling or Disposing Mercuric Oxide Button. of Batteries: Rechargeable batteries: • Cover the electrical contacts or battery ends with a non-conductive Include batteries in your phone, camera and power tape (electrical or vinyl tape), or tools. Rechargeable batteries can come as AA, AAA, lithium, NiMH and NiCD. Rechargeable batteries are • Seal individual batteries in separate less wasteful than single-use alkaline batteries, they plastic bags (like Ziploc® bags or can be recharged up to 1,000 times, last 2-5 years similar) so that they cannot conduct and are easy to recycle. However, they do contain electricity. toxic heavy metals and should be disposed of properly. This helps eliminate potential fire or explosion Button Cell Batteries: hazard when the batteries are collected together Are found in hearing aids and wrist watches. Because in a bulk container. of their size, these types of batteries can be easy to swallow. (Silver Oxide, Lithium, Alkaline): “L” Button Cell Batteries have numbers on the top Where to Recycle Batteries: of them. Batteries with numbers that start with • Northampton County Household Hazardous an “L” can be safely thrown away or recycled Waste Collection event as alkaline of lithium batteries.
    [Show full text]
  • Postconsumer PET Thermoform Containers, Recyclable Vs. Recycled
    A Dordan Manufacturing White Paper 2025 S. Castle Rd. Woodstock, IL, 60098 815.334.0087 WWW.DORDAN.COM Postconsumer PET Thermoform Containers, Recyclable vs. Recycled By Chandler Slavin Sustainability Coordinator Dordan Manufacturing Co. Inc. ©2015 Five years ago I was working Dordan’s booth at the Walmart Sustainable Packaging Expo in Bentonville, Arkansas, when a packaging engineer from Burts Bees walked by. “Thermoformed packaging!?” I exclaimed enthusiastically, only to be met with an ambivalent expression and the following remark; “We are getting out of thermoformed trays because thermoformed packaging isn’t recyclable.” Crickets. Fast-forward and NAPCOR1 reports that in 2013, PET thermoforms collected for recycling in the U.S. and Canada increased 25% over 2012, from 47.8 million pounds to 60 million.2 In five years, PET thermoformed containers went from being largely landfilled to collected for recycling in the majority of American communities.3 This tremendous development in post consumer thermoform recycling served as the foundation for my 2013 “Recycling Report,” published in Plastics in Packaging Magazine.4 Therein I describe the industry-initiated timeline of events that facilitated the inclusion of thermoformed packaging in the recycling infrastructure. My conclusion states, With the majority of American communities now accepting all non-bottle rigid containers for recycling and the technical barriers to PC PET thermoform recycling being resolved, the floodgates to PET thermoform are nearly ready to be opened.5 So, have the floodgates opened? Are communities finding a market for post consumer PET thermoformed packaging? It is one thing to accept material for recycling; it is quite another, however, to actually recycle it.
    [Show full text]