DOCSLIB.ORG

To Download the ERC Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
To Download the ERC Journal ERC Journal An update on news, views and developments in India’s EIA Process Issue 1, Volume V I I I , March, 2015 WHY JAYANTHI NATARAJAN IS WRONG Ritwick Dutta The recent disclosure by former Environment Minister, Jayanthi Natarajan about the ‘request’ she received from the Congress Vice President Rahul Gandhi, with respect to certain projects related to mining, construction and hydro power, needs a critical analysis. The BJP has been Contents quick to respond to the allegation and the Union Environment Minister Prakash Javadekar has been quick to state that his Ministry will review the projects rejected Editorial …… 1 by Jayanthi based on Rahul Gandhi’s NGT Update …… 5 request. In the letter written by Jayanthi Natarajan, she has stated that specific Analysis …… 11 ‘requests’ were made with reference to the following projects which led her to take action including rejection of these projects: 1. The Vedanta Bauxite Mining decide on how mining will affect the Project in Orissa cultural rights of tribals, if mining is 2. The Adani Port Project in Gujarat allowed on the Niyamgiri Hills. The 3. The GVK Hydro Power Project in Supreme Court also directed that the Uttarakhand Ministry of Environment and Forests 4. The Lavasa Township Project in should take a decision based on the Maharashtra outcome of the Gram Sabha proceedings. 5. The Nirma Cement Plant in Gujarat All the Gram Sabhas unanimously decided to reject the proposal for mining. The Let us examine the reality with respect to Ministry of Environment and Forests had each of these projects. It needs to be no option but to accept the verdict of the highlighted that Jayanthi Natarajan was Gram Sabhas and reject the Forest the Environment Minister from July 2011 Clearance. Thus, it is the resolution of the to December 2013. Gram Sabhas which was accepted by the Ministry Vedanta Mining Project: of Environment and In her letter, Natarajan In her letter she has Forests when Jayanthi has specifically referred to the ‘Stalled GVK Natarajan was the mentioned that she has Minister. rejected the project in Himachal Environmental Pradesh’. Let’s get the facts Adani Port Project: No Clearance (EC) of right: The GVK Hydro Adani Project was ever Vedanta. This is wrong. Power Project is neither rejected. Despite The Forest Clearance violation of (FC) was rejected by the ‘stalled’ nor is it in environmental laws, the Ministry of Himachal Pradesh. Committee appointed Environment and by Jayanthi Natarajan, Forests on 24.08.2010. which was headed by Sunita Narain, At the time of rejection of the Forest recommended imposing a fine of Rs. 200 Clearance, it was Jairam Ramesh who was crores (which accounts for 1% of the total the Minister for Environment and Forests investments) for the Adani Waterfront and not Jayanthi Natarajan. The decision and Power Plant project. In her letter, of Jairam Ramesh to reject the Forest Jayanthi Natarajan has not referred to any Clearance was challenged before the specific Adani project. Supreme Court by Vedanta and Orissa Mining Corporation. The Supreme Court GVK Hydro Power Project: In her letter, directed that the Gram Sabhas should Jayanthi Natarajan has referred to the ERC JOURNAL, MARCH 2015 Page 2 ‘Stalled GVK project in Himachal Pradesh’. Let’s get the facts right: The GVK Hydro Power Project is neither ‘stalled’ nor is it The Lavasa Township in Himachal Pradesh. The project is project was never stopped located in Uttarakhand and the project by Jayanthi Natarajan. The construction work is in full swing. The Project was indeed stopped for some time Environmental Clearance based on orders passed under Section 5 of for the project was in fact the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. granted on 09.11.2011 by This order was issued during her tenure. However, this stop work order was issued the Ministry of in view of a letter written by BJP leader Environment and Forests Uma Bharti (presently Water Resources and Ganga Rejuvenation Minister) who Environment and Forests has defended had expressed concern over the the grant of approval before both the submergence of the Dhari Devi temple. Courts. The decision of the MoEF to direct stoppage of work was challenged before Nirma Cement Plant: This leaves us with the Supreme Court and the Supreme only the Nirma Cement Plant in Gujarat. Court allowed the work on the GVK The Environmental Clearance of Nirma project to continue. was indeed revoked by the Ministry of Environment and Forests on 1-12-2011 Lavasa Township Project: The Lavasa during the tenure of Jayanthi Natarajan. Township project was never stopped by The clearance was revoked on the ground Jayanthi Natarajan. The Environmental that the expert committee constituted by Clearance for the project was in fact the Ministry of Environment and Forests granted on 09.11.2011 by the Ministry of had come to a categorical conclusion Environment and Forests during her based on a field visit, that the project tenure despite the finding of the Ministry proponent has deliberately given wrong of Environment and Forests that Lavasa information. This decision of the Ministry Corporation has violated the provisions of of Environment and Forests was the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 challenged by Nirma before the National and the Environment Impact Assessment Green Tribunal and the NGT in its latest (EIA) Notification, 2006. The project was decision has quashed the order of challenged before the National Green revocation issued by the MoEF. Therefore, Tribunal (NGT) and is presently before the order revoking the Environmental the Supreme Court. The Ministry of Clearance has been set aside by the NGT. ERC JOURNAL, MARCH 2015 Page 3 The Ministry of Environment and Forests despite serious environmental and social has defended the grant of approval before concerns. She also does not deny it. In her both the Courts. letter to Sonia Gandhi she has clearly stated ‘I was never a bottleneck, nor was I Review? ever responsible for unwarranted delays in major projects, and I can prove this at This does not mean that one should not any time”. The National Green Tribunal review the decisions taken during the era has repeatedly stated that what ails the of Jayanthi Natarajan. It is strange that the MoEF is the hasty decision making letter of Jayanthi Natarajan only refers to process wherein it’s various committees, requests for rejection, but not a word in a mechanical manner approve a large about projects which were approved number of projects. It is unlikely that this based on specific requests. Conservative will be done, but if the Government is estimates suggest that she would have serious about good governance and wants approved not less than 1,500 projects to end crony capitalism, then a during her tenure and rejected only about transparent review of the approvals (both 1 or 2 projects. Jayanthi Natarajan during Forest and Environmental Clearances) her tenure was called a Green Minister: granted during Jayanthi Natarajan’s She gave a green signal to every project tenure is called for. ERC Journal is an Initiative of the EIA Resource and Response Centre (ERC), The Access Initiative India coalition Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment and aims to disseminate information on Forest and Environmental Clearance issues. We invite articles which involve critical analysis of Court judgments, EIA reports and other related issues. Address: N-71 LGF, Greater Kailash 1, New Delhi, 110048. www.ercindia.org. For articles please email: [email protected] No copyright is claimed and the contents can be freely used. ERC JOURNAL, MARCH 2015 Page 4 NGT Update NGT quashes approval of industries and associated development of infrastructure. Further, the area has a IL & FS for improper high Comprehensive Environmental Cumulative Impact Pollution Index (CEPI) index, and was, until recently, classified as a “critically Assessment polluted area”. It is also located close to the Pichavaram mangroves – an 1 Preeta Dhar ecologically fragile ecosystem. The project would have a wide range of impacts on In a significant decision, the National the stressed and fragile ecosystem, as well Green Tribunal (NGT) quashed the as the health and livelihood of local Environment Clearance (EC) for the 3,600 communities. MW Thermal Power Plant of IL & FS in Cuddalore, Tamil Nadu, on the ground The project was granted Environmental that the project had not conducted a Clearance on 31 May, 2010. The NGT, on proper Cumulative Impact Assessment 23 May, 2012, had stayed the EC and (CIA). The Tribunal held that the directed a Cumulative Impact Assessment Cumulative Impact Assessment of the for the project to be conducted by the project, was conducted by the project project proponent. proponent on the basis of incomplete information and “non-existent” standards, In the judgment delivered on 10 and the EC granted by the MoEF was November, 2014, the NGT reiterated that without application of mind. a Cumulative Impact Assessment of the project was a mandatory requirement, The project had been proposed to be flowing from the declaration in column developed as a part of a Petroleum, 9.4 of Form-1 of the Environment Impact Chemicals and Petrochemicals Investment Assessment Notification, 2006. It was Region (PCPIR) with a port, several observed that the “cumulative impact due to proximity of other existing or proposed projects” forms a material parameter of 1 Legal Initiative for Forest and Environment (LIFE), the appraisal required to be done by the New Delhi Expert Appraisal Committee (EAC). ERC JOURNAL, MARCH 2015 Page 5 On the quality of the Cumulative Impact Assessment done by the project proponent, the NGT observed that the Most shockingly, the entire exercise of Cumulative Impact standards used for the Assessment (CIA) was completed by the entire study were the project proponent within a period of 2 weeks without collecting any baseline “non-existent” National data.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • [28 DEC. 1989] on the President's 202 Address
    201 Motion of thanks [28 DEC. 1989] on the President's 202 Address SHRI DINESH GOSWAMI: Madam, I THE MINISTER OF STATE (INDE- also beg to lay on the Table a copy each (in PENDENT CHARGE) OF THE MINISTRY English and Hindi, ) of the following papers; OF WATER RESOURCES (SHRI MANOBHAI KOTADIA); Madam, I beg to I. (i) Thirty-first Annual Report and lay on the Table, under sub-section (1) Accounts of the Indian Law Institute, section 619A of tie Companies Act, 1956, a New Delhi, for the year 1987-88, to- copy each (in English and Hindi) of the gether with the Audit Report on the followng papers; — Accounts, (i) Twentieth Annual Report and Accounts (ii) Statement by Government accepting of the Water and Power. Consultancy the above Report. Services (India). Limited, New Delhi, for the year. 1988—89, together with the (iii) Statement giving reasons for the delay Auditor's Report on the Accounts and in laying the paper mentioned at (i) above. the comments of the Comptroller and [Placed in Library. See No. LT— 244/89 Auditor General of India thereon, for (i) to (iii)]. (ii) Review by Government on the II. A copy (in English and Hindi) of working of the Company. the Ministry of Law and Justice (Legisla [Placed in Library. See No. LT— tive Department) Notification S. O. No. 61/89]. 958(E), dated the 17th November, 1989, publishing the Conduct of Election; (Third Amendment) Rules, 1989, under section 169 of the Representation of the REPORT OF THE COMMITTEE ON People Act, 1951.
    [Show full text]
  • OM/RG/6.00/4B SHRI A.K. ANTONY (Contd.): This Is the Report of The
    -OM/RG/6.00/4B SHRI A.K. ANTONY (contd.): This is the Report of the Press Information Bureau, Government of India, dated 11 th March, 2013. It says, "The Government has blacklisted following six firms for a period of ten years by the Ministry of Defence I.D. No.310, April, 2012: Singapore Technologies, Israeli Military Industries Limited, Rheinmetall Air Defence (RAD), Zurich, M/s Corporation Defence, Russia, etc." These are all powerful multinational companies, and these include two Indian companies as well. We didn't show mercy. When corruption was proved and the CBI recommended that we should take action and blacklist them, we blacklisted six companies. This happened for the first time that six companies, at a stretch, were blacklisted. Otherwise, some years back, one company was blacklisted. So, not sitting on procedures, we also took action and sent a message to the world, sent a message to the arms dealers, that India would not tolerate corruption. We proved that merciless strong action would be taken. That was our message at that time. Sir, this is as far as the background is concerned. Coming to this particular thing, so many friends quoted so many things including CAG Reports and newspaper reports. In the last few weeks, many people were trying to make clouds. I would like to present a few facts after which I will also table them in the House. This is also the official release of the Press Information Bureau relating to the Ministry of Defence, titled, 'Acquisition of AW-101 Choppers for IAF: The Facts'.
    [Show full text]
  • India-Brazil Bilateral Relations Are in a State of Clearly Discernible Upswing
    India-Brazil Relations Political: India-Brazil bilateral relations are in a state of clearly discernible upswing. Although the two countries are divided by geography and distance, they share common democratic values and developmental aspirations. Both are large developing countries, each an important player in its region, both stable, secular, multi-cultural, multi-ethnic, large democracies as well as trillion-dollar economies. There has been frequent exchange of VVIP, Ministerial and official-level visits in recent years resulting in strengthening of bilateral relationship in various fields. Jawaharlal Nehru Award for International Understanding for 2006 and Indira Gandhi Prize for Peace, Disarmament and Development for 2010 was conferred on President Lula. Our shared vision of the evolving global order has enabled forging of close cooperation and coordination in the multilateral arena, be in IBSA, BRICS, G-4, BASIC, G-20 or other organizations. VVIP visits from India: Vice President S. Radhakrishnan (1954), Prime Minister Indira Gandhi (1968), Prime Minister Narasimha Rao (1992 - for Earth Summit), President K.R. Narayanan (1998), Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh (2006 and April 2010) ,President Pratibha Patil (2008) and Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh (June 2012-for Rio+20 summit). Other important visits from India in recent years: Kumari Selja, Minister of State of Urban Development and Poverty Alleviation, Mr. Anand Sharma, Minister of State for External Affairs, Mr. Rao Inderjit Singh, Minister of State for Defence Production, Mr. Subodh Kant Sahai, Minister of State for Food Processing Industries, Shri Pranab Mukherjee, Minister of External Affairs (Feb 2008), Shri P. Chidambaram, Finance Minister from India (Nov 2008) and Shri S.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Rajya Sabha —— List of Business
    RAJYA SABHA —— LIST OF BUSINESS Monday, August 3, 2009 11A.M. ——— OBITUARY REFERENCE OBITUARY REFERENCE to the passing away of Shri Syed Rahmat Ali (ex-Member). ———— QUESTIONS QUESTIONS entered in separate lists to be asked and answers given. ———— PAPERS TO BE LAID ON THE TABLE Following Ministers to lay papers on the Table entered in the separate list: — 1. SHRI M. VEERAPPA MOILY for Ministry of Law and Justice; 2. SHRI B.K. HANDIQUE for Ministry of Mines; 3. SHRI SUBODH KANT SAHAY for Ministry of Food Processing Industries; 4. SHRI SHRIPRAKASH JAISWAL for Ministry of Coal; 5. SHRI SALMAN KHURSHEED for Ministry of Corporate Affairs; 6. SHRI JAIRAM RAMESH for Ministry of Environment and Forests; 7. SHRI JITIN PRASADA for Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas; and 8. SHRI BHARATSINH SOLANKI for Ministry of Power. ———— STATEMENTS BY MINISTERS 1. SHRI SALMAN KHURSHEED to make a statement regarding status of implementation of recommendations contained in the Seventy- seventh Report of the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance. 2. SHRI MULLAPPALLY RAMACHANDRAN to make a statement regarding status of implementation of recommendations contained in the Hundred and Fortieth Report of the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Home Affairs. ———— 185 LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS Bill for introduction The Judges 1. SHRI M. VEERAPPA MOILY to move for leave to introduce a (Declaration of Bill to provide for the declaration of assets and liabilities by the Judges. Assets and Liabilities) ALSO to introduce the Bill. Bill, 2009 Bill for consideration and passing The 2. SHRI M. VEERAPPA MOILY to move that the Bill further to Constitution amend the Constitution of India, be taken into consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Swinging from Inaction to Capitulation on Climate Policy
    COMMENTARY Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC); Swinging from Inaction to (iii) India, in the interest of securing some kind of agreement at the UN summit on Capitulation on Climate Policy climate change in Copenhagen in Decem- ber will agree to the watering down of emission reduction commitments by the T Jayaraman developed countries to well below the tar- gets recommended by the Intergovern- Manmohan Singh’s government fter a decade and a half of inaction mental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC); appears to be contemplating a and bringing up the rear in global (iv) India will not seek any quid pro quo 180-degree turn to India’s two- A climate change negotiations, India’s from the developed world in terms of adap- climate policy seems all set to swing to the tation financing and technology transfer for decade old position on global and opposite extreme of capitulation to the the developing countries and will be pre- country-wise commitments to demands of the industrialised nations. pared for a considerably lowered financial combat climate change. The R ecent media reports, notably in the Times commitment; and (v) India will no longer leaked contents of an of India (19 October 2009) and the Reuters tie its position to that of the G-77 (namely, News Agency (16 October 2009), suggest all developing countries) but will focus on extraordinary communication that important sections of the government the G-20 as its arena of intervention. from Minister of State for of India, led by Minister of State for Envi- To cap it all (the pun is certainly intended), Environment and Forests Jairam ronment and Forests Jairam Ramesh, are the minister’s letter suggests that India’s Ramesh to Prime Minister pushing a radical rewriting of India’s climate change positions must be “prag- c limate policy.
    [Show full text]
  • UNDP Chief Helen Clark Visit India from 13To17 March
    UNDP Chief Helen Clark to visit India from 13 to 17 March New Delhi, 12 March 2012: Helen Clark, United Nations Development Programme Administrator arrives in New Delhi on Thursday 13 March 2012 on a five‐day official visit. During her visit, Helen Clark will witness the signing of the Government of India‐UNDP Partnership Framework Agreement that seeks to take cooperation and partnership between the two entities to the next level by enhancing South‐South cooperation in support of other developing countries. Helen Clark, the former Prime Minister of New Zealand was appointed UNDP Administrator in 2009. This is her second visit to India in her current capacity. While in India she will meet senior leaders including the Minister of External Affairs, Mr. S. M. Krishna, the Minister of Rural Development, Mr. Jairam Ramesh, Minister of Environment and Forests, Ms. Jayanthi Natarajan, and Minister of Tribal Affairs and Panchayati Raj, Mr. V.Chandra Singh Deo,. During her visit Helen Clark will interact with women leaders who are influencing policy and action at local and national levels. She will also have an opportunity to see first‐hand some of their work. To commemorate India’s leadership in embracing the human development approach Helen Clark will present the inaugural India Human Development Awards instituted by UNDP and the Planning Commission. Titled Manav Vikas, the awards are in recognition of India’s rich body of work in national, state and district Human Development Reports (HDR) and its emergence as the world’s largest producer of sub‐national HDRs. At the culmination of her visit Helen Clark will deliver the 12th D.T Lakdawala Memorial Lecture on, ‘Why Equity and Sustainability Matter for Human Development‘, organized by the Institute of Social Sciences and sponsored by the Planning Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • LIST of FUNCTIONAL GROUPS of MINISTERS (Goms) As on 18.12.2013
    LIST OF FUNCTIONAL GROUPS OF MINISTERS (GoMs) as on 18.12.2013. Sl.No. Subject 1 Group of Ministers for evolving an integrated strategy for Water Management. Composition Shri Sharad Pawar, Minister of Agriculture and Minister of Food Processing Industries. Shri S. Jaipal Reddy, Minister of Science and Technology, and Minister of Earth Sciences. Shri Kamal Nath, Minister of Urban Development, and Minister of Parliamentary Affairs. Kumari Selja, Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment. Dr. Girija Vyas, Minister of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation. Shri Jairam Ramesh, Minister of Rural Development. Shri Harish Rawat, Minister of Water Resources. Shri Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission. Smt. Jayanthi Natarajan, Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Environment and Forests. Shri Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia, Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Power. Shri Bharatsinh Solanki, Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Drinking Water and Sanitation. Shri Namo Narain Meena, Minister of State in the Ministry of Finance. Terms of Reference (i) To evolve an integrated strategy for water management in the context of rising population, rapid urbanization, industrialization, the need for increasing agricultural productivity and ensuring environmental sustainability; and (ii) To bring about convergence in the policy and programmes aimed at water augmentation, conservation, preservation and optimal use. Sl.No. Subjec t 2 GoM to consider the Reports of the Administrative Reforms Commission. Composition Shri A.K.Antony, Minister of Defence. Shri Sharad Pawar, Minister of Agriculture and Minister of Food Processing Industries. Shri P. Chidambaram, Minister of Finance. Shri Sushilkumar Shinde, Minister of Home Affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • TRAFFIC Post, India Office Newsletter (PDF)
    • South Asia unites to curb illegal • India ranks highest in Tiger parts Pg 8 trade in endangered wildlife seizure over last decade • Officers from Uttar Pradesh, Pg 3 Maharashtra, Andhra Pradesh and West Bengal sharpen skills on wildlife law enforcement • Raja and Jackie: The new ATE champions fighting wildlife Pg 3 crime • World leaders echo support to IN FOCUS ensure doubling of world's wild Pg 4 India TRAFFIC © Tiger population • Efforts augmented to ensure sustainable harvesting and trade Pg 4 TRAFFIC Alert (Latest news on of MAPs illegal wildlife trade in India): Pg 5 • TRAFFIC India's film “Don't Buy T Trouble” now available in Hindi • Guard held with zebra skin Pg 5 TRAFFIC INDIA UPD • Customs officials seize Pg 6 ornamental fish at Coimbatore Airport • Five tonnes of Red Sanders logs Pg 7 • Experts link up to combat illegal Pg 5 seized at Gujarat port wildlife trade in Sri Lanka TRAFFIC ALER • Four tonnes of Sea cucumber Pg 7 seized in Tamil Nadu • Email alerts on CITES related Pg 6 SIGNPOST: Other significant Pg 12 OUTPOST issues now available by subscription news stories to read SIGNPOST Pg 10 NEW SECTION WILD CRY : Illegal wildlife trade threatens the future of many species in the © Ola Jennersten Ola © wild. This section highlights the plight of CITES one such species in trade. UPDATE • Tiger killers will be brought to Pg 6 book, says CITES Secretary General Pangolins in peril TRAFFIC POST march 2011 South Asia unites to curb illegal trade in endangered wildlife he eight countries of South Asia—India, Nepal, Pakistan, TAfghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives and Sri Lanka— joined forces and established the South Asia Wildlife Enforcement Network (SAWEN) to collaborate and co-operate on strengthening wildlife law enforcement in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Rajya Sabha —— Revised List of Business
    RAJYA SABHA —— REVISED LIST OF BUSINESS Thursday, December 12, 2013 11 A.M. ——— QUESTIONS QUESTIONS entered in separate lists to be asked and answers given. ———— PAPERS TO BE LAID ON THE TABLE Following Ministers to lay papers on the Table entered in the separate list: — 1. SHRI G.K. VASAN for Ministry of Shipping; 2. SHRI SALMAN KHURSHID for Ministry of External Affairs; 3. SHRI V. KISHORE CHANDRA DEO for Ministry of Tribal Affairs; 4. SHRI BENI PRASAD VERMA for Ministry of Steel; 5. SHRIMATI JAYANTHI NATARAJAN for Ministry of Environment and Forests; 6. SHRI PABAN SINGH GHATOWAR for Ministry of Development of North Eastern Region; 7. SHRI E. AHAMED for Ministry of External Affairs; 8. SHRI V. NARAYANASAMY for Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions and for Department of Space; 9. SHRI MILIND DEORA for Ministry of Communications and Information Technology; 10. SHRI RAJEEV SHUKLA for Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs; 11. SHRI SARVEY SATHYANARAYANA for Ministry of Road Transport and Highways; and 12. SHRIMATI DEEPA DASMUNSI for Ministry of Urban Development. ———— 60 REPORT OF THE DEPARTMENT RELATED PARLIAMENTARY STANDING COMMITTEE ON FOOD, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION DR. BHARATKUMAR RAUT DR. T.N. SEEMA to lay on the Table, a copy (in English and Hindi) of the Thirty-second Report of the Department-related Parliamentary Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution (2013-14) on Action taken by the Government on the observations/ recommendations contained in the Twenty-eighth Report of the Committee (2012-13) on ‘Demands for Grants (2013-14)’ pertaining to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution (Department of Food and Public Distribution).
    [Show full text]
  • MANTRIMANDAL SACHIVALAYA) ***** New Delhi, the 161H August, 2013
    No. 1/11/6/2013-Cab. GOVERNMENT OF INDIA (SHARA T SARKAR) CABINET SECRETARIAT (MANTRIMANDAL SACHIVALAYA) ***** New Delhi, the 161h August, 2013 Subject : Composition of the Cabinet Committee for providing broad guidance to re• construction and rehabilitatior"i'.efforts in Uttarakhand. Reference Cabinet Secretariat's memo of even number dated 10.07.2013. 2. It has been decided, with the approval of the Prime Minister, to include Smt. Jayanthi Natarajan, Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Environment and Forests in the Cabinet Committee for providing broad guidance to re-construction and rehabilitation efforts in Uttarakhand. 3. Accordingly the composition of the Cabinet Committee will now be as under: Prime Minister; Shri A.K. Antony, Minister of Defence; Shri Sharad Pawar, Minister of Agriculture, and Minister of Food Processing Industries; Shri P. Chidambaram, Minister of Finance; Shri Ghulam Nabi Azad, Minister of Health and Family Welfare; Shri Sushilkumar Shinde, Minister of Home Affairs; Shri Oscar Fernandes, Minister of Road Transport and Highways; Shri Kapil Sibal, Minister of Communications and Information Technology, and Minister of Law and Justice; Dr. Girija Vyas, Minister of Housing and Urban Poverty Alleviation; Shri Jairam Ramesh, Minister of Rural Development; and Shri Harish Rawat, Minister of Water Resources. Permanent Invitees: Shri Montek Singh Ahluwalia, Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission; Shri Vijay Bahuguna, Chief Minister, Uttarakhand; and Shri Shashidhar Reddy, Vice-Chairman, National Disaster Manag.ementAuthority. Special Invitee: Smt. Jayanthi Natarajan, Minister of State (Independent Charge) of the Ministry of Environment and Forests; {S~ay) for Cabinet Secretary Tele: 2379 2204 To All Members and Permanent Invitees of the Cabinet Committee.
    [Show full text]
  • Rajya Sabha —— List of Business
    RAJYA SABHA —— LIST OF BUSINESS Monday, September 14, 2020 _______ 3 P.M. ——— OATH OR AFFIRMATION MEMBERS, to make the prescribed oath or affirmation of allegiance to the Constitution. ———— OBITUARY REFERENCES OBITUARY REFERENCES to the passing away of — 1. Shri Pranab Mukherjee, former President of India and ex-Member; 2. Shri Beni Prasad Verma, sitting Member; 3. Shri M. P. Veerendra Kumar, sitting Member; 4. Shri Amar Singh, sitting Member; 5. Shri Hiphei (ex-Member); 6. Shri M V Rajasekharan (ex-Member); 7. Shri Sanatan Bisi (ex-Member); 8. Shri Basant Kumar Das (ex-Member); 9. Shri R. T. Gopalan (ex-Member) ; 10. Shri Bhabani Charan Pattanayak (ex-Member); 11. Shri Ajit P.K. Jogi (ex-Member); 12. Shrimati Saroj Dubey (ex-Member); 13. Shri Vishwa Bandhu Gupta (ex-Member); 14. Shri Bishnu Charan Das (ex-Member); 15. Shri Ram Awadesh Singh (ex-Member); 16. Shri Shyamal Chakraborty (ex-Member); 17. Shri Nandi Yellaiah (ex-Member); 18. Shri Narendra Kumar Swain (ex-Member); and 19. Pandit Jasraj, renowned Indian classical vocalist. ———— PAPERS TO BE LAID ON THE TABLE I. SECRETARY-GENERAL to lay on the Table, a statement (in English and Hindi) showing the Bills passed by the Houses of Parliament during the Two Hundred and Fifty-first Session of the Rajya Sabha and assented to by the President. II. SHRI V. MURALEEDHARAN to lay papers on the Table, entered in the separate list, for Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs. ———— 1 STATEMENTS REGARDING ORDINANCES 1. DR. HARSH VARDHAN to lay on the Table, a statement (in English and Hindi) explaining the circumstances which had necessitated immediate legislation by the Epidemic Diseases (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Shifting Discourses of Climate Change in India
    Climatic Change DOI 10.1007/s10584-014-1059-6 Shifting discourses of climate change in India Jagadish Thaker & Anthony Leiserowitz Received: 15 May 2013 /Accepted: 5 January 2014 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014 Abstract Developing countries like India are under international pressure to sign a legally binding emissions treaty to avert catastrophic climatic change. Developing countries, however, have argued that any international agreement must be based on historic and per capita carbon emissions, with developed countries responsible for reducing their emissions first and funding mitigation and adaptation in other countries. Recently, however, several scholars have argued that Indian government climate change discourses are shifting, primarily by recognizing the “co-benefits” of an alignment between its development and climate change objectives, and by displaying increasing “flexibility” on mitigation targets. This study investigates the factors driving shifting Indian discourses of climate change by conducting and analyzing 25 inter- views of Indian climate policy elites, including scientists, energy policy experts, leading government officials, journalists, business leaders, and advocates, in addition to analysis of articles published in Economic and Political Weekly (a prominent Indian policy journal), and reports published by the government and other agencies. Our analysis suggests that India’s concerns about increasing energy access and security, along with newer concerns about vulnerability to climate change and the international leadership aspirations of the Indian government, along with emergence of new actors and institutions, has led to plurality of discourses, with potential implications for India’s climate change policies. 1 Introduction India is one of the world’s most vulnerable countries to climate change (Cruz et al.
    [Show full text]