DOCSLIB.ORG

Table of Contents

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................... 7 Preface .............................................................................................. 9 A. Executive summary and recommendations .................................. 13 Executive summary ......................................................... 14 Recommendations ........................................................... 15 B. Overview .................................................................................... 19 Introduction .................................................................... 20 1. Background ............................................................... 23 1.1 Central Government bodies ............................... 23 1.2 Funding the Strategy .......................................... 24 1.3 Roma NGOs and the Strategy ........................... 26 1.4 The Strategy and new international initiatives .... 27 2. Findings from local-level monitoring ......................... 29 2.1 Administrative bodies ........................................ 29 2.2 Housing ............................................................. 34 2.3 Social protection ................................................ 36 2.4 Health ............................................................... 37 2.5 Economic initiatives ........................................... 39 2.6 Justice and public order ..................................... 40 2.7 Child protection ................................................ 41 2.8 Education .......................................................... 42 2.9 Culture and denominations ............................... 44 2.10 Public participation ........................................... 44 2.11 Communication and civic participation ............. 45 3. Conclusions ............................................................... 47 Brăila County ................................................................................. 49 Background ..................................................................... 50 1. Executive summary .................................................... 50 2. Local implementation ................................................ 50 2.1 Administrative bodies ......................................... 51 2.2 Housing ............................................................. 52 2.3 Social protection ................................................ 53 2.4 Health care ........................................................ 54 2.5 Economic initiatives ........................................... 55 2.6 Justice and public order ..................................... 55 3 MONITORING LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STRATEGY – ROMANIA 2.7 Child protection ................................................. 56 2.8 Education ........................................................... 56 2.9 Culture and denominations ................................ 58 2.10 Public participation ............................................ 59 2.11 Communication and civic participation............... 59 Cluj County .................................................................................... 61 Background ..................................................................... 62 1. Executive summary .................................................... 62 2. Local implementation ................................................. 63 2.1 Administrative bodies ......................................... 63 2.2 Housing ............................................................. 68 2.3 Social protection ................................................. 70 2.4 Health care ......................................................... 71 2.5 Economic initiatives ........................................... 72 2.6 Justice and public order ...................................... 74 2.7 Child protection ................................................. 75 2.8 Education ........................................................... 75 2.9 Culture and denominations ................................ 76 2.10 Public participation ............................................ 77 2.11 Communication and civic participation .............. 77 Dolj County .................................................................................... 79 Background ..................................................................... 80 1. Executive summary .................................................... 80 2. Local implementation ................................................. 81 2.1 Administrative bodies ......................................... 81 2.2 Housing ............................................................. 83 2.3 Social protection ................................................. 84 2.4 Health care ......................................................... 85 2.5 Economic initiatives ........................................... 86 2.6 Justice and public order ...................................... 88 2.7 Child protection ................................................. 89 2.8 Education ........................................................... 89 2.9 Culture and denominations ................................ 92 2.10 Public participation ............................................ 93 2.11 Communication and civic participation .............. 93 Jaşi County ...................................................................................... 95 Background ..................................................................... 96 1. Executive summary .................................................... 96 2. Local implementation ................................................. 97 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 Administrative bodies ........................................ 97 2.2 Housing ........................................................... 102 2.3 Social protection .............................................. 102 2.4 Health care ...................................................... 104 2.5 Economic initiatives ......................................... 105 2.6 Justice and public order ................................... 106 2.7 Child protection .............................................. 106 2.8 Education ........................................................ 107 2.9 Culture and denominations ............................. 108 2.10 Public participation ......................................... 109 2.11 Communication and civic participation ........... 109 Timiş County ............................................................................... 111 Background ................................................................... 112 1. Executive summary .................................................. 112 2. Local implementation .............................................. 113 2.1 Administrative bodies ...................................... 113 2.2 Housing ........................................................... 116 2.3 Social protection .............................................. 117 2.4 Health care ...................................................... 117 2.5 Economic initiatives ......................................... 117 2.6 Justice and public order ................................... 119 2.7 Child protection .............................................. 119 2.8 Education ........................................................ 119 2.9 Culture and denominations ............................. 120 2.10 Public participation ......................................... 120 2.11 Communication and civic participation ........... 121 Participating Organisations ............................................................ 123 5 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Acknowledgements The Open Society Institute would like to acknowledge the primary role of the following individuals in researching and drafting the local monitoring reports. Final responsibility for the content of the reports rests with the Open Society Institute. Brăila County Anton Gina and Parnica Anisoara Cluj County Maria Ursu and Adrian Moldovan Dolj County Costache Marcel and Silviu Bratu Iaşi County Laura Constantin and Daniela Rusu Timiş County Valentin Pepenel and Carmen Marcu A joint project of: THE RESOURCE CENTER FOR ROMA COMMUNITIES (RCRC), CLUJ NAPOCA, ROMANIA Florin Moisă Executive President THE EU MONITORING AND ADVOCACY PROGRAM (EUMAP), OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE, BUDAPEST Penelope Farrar Program Director Miriam Anati Deputy Program Director Alphia Abdikeeva Program Officer Katy Negrin Program Officer Andrea Gurubi Watterson Program Assistant THE ROMA PARTICIPATION PROGRAM (RPP), OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE, BUDAPEST Rumyan Russinov Program Director Bernard Rorke Deputy Program Director Iulius Rostas Program Manager Links: http://www.romacenter.ro http://www.eumap.org http://www.soros.org/initiatives/roma/focus_areas/rpp 7 8 PREFACE Preface With the expansion of the EU in May 2004, an estimated 1.5 million Roma in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) became EU citizens. When Bulgaria and Romania join, scheduled for 2007, that number will increase to some 4.4 million.1 What will this mean in practice for the majority of CEE Roma, who continue to experience discrimination in every aspect of their lives and on a daily basis?2 Roma constitute the largest and most marginalized ethnic minority group in Europe; and its biggest civil rights issue. Although most people agree that the enlargement process is likely to bring positive changes for Roma in the region, the impact of EU membership can only be assessed in the years ahead
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Romania Page 1 of 13
    Romania Page 1 of 13 Romania International Religious Freedom Report 2005 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor The Constitution provides for freedom of religion; while the Government generally respects this right in practice, some restrictions adversely affect religious freedom, and several minority religious groups continued to claim credibly that low-level government officials impeded their efforts at proselytizing and interfered with other religious activities. There was no overall change in the status of respect for religious freedom during the period covered by this report. The Government continues to differentiate between recognized and unrecognized religions, and registration and recognition requirements still posed obstacles to minority religions. The Government did not adopt a new law regulating religions; however, a draft law on religious freedom is under debate by the State Secretariat for Religious Denominations and the recognized religions. Unrecognized religions have not been given any role or say in the debate. The Government has not passed legislation to return to the Greek Catholic community the churches and church property transferred by the communists to the Orthodox Church in 1948, nor has it shown any inclination to do so. An international commission headed by Nobel Prize Laureate Elie Wiesel, set up in 2003 to study the Holocaust in Romania, presented its report, conclusions, and recommendations in November 2004, and state authorities acknowledged publicly the occurrence of the Holocaust in the country. In October 2004, the country commemorated its first annual Holocaust Remembrance Day with the Government organizing public events for the commemoration. The Government also took some steps towards introducing the issue of the Holocaust in the country in school curricula.
    [Show full text]
  • Wo Conservative Prefects: Nicolae P. Guran and Constantin Radu Geblescu1 T
    JOURNAL of Humanities, Culture and Social Sciences, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2018 ISSN 2393 – 5960; ISSN – L 2393-5960, pp. 10-25 wo conservative prefects: Nicolae P. Guran and Constantin Radu Geblescu1 T Mirela-Minodora Mincă-Mălăescu, Ph.D.c. Counsellor, Romanian National ArChives, Dolj County Department Romania [email protected] Abstract In the present study we approaCh the aCtivity of NiColae P. Guran and Constantin Radu GeblesCu, two of Dolj County prefeCts from the end of the 19th Century, and the beginning of the 20th Century. Two Conservatives, whose activity was foCused on the supporting of the rural education and Culture, they also Considered that the issue on addressing the modernisation of Romania Could be aCComplished only through the eduCation of the rural population and the improvement of the living Conditions (Coord. ACad. Gheorghe Platon: 2003: 191-207). The building of sChools and hospitals, the spreading of Culture through education and the learning of minimal hygiene norms were few of the objectives of the two Conservative prefeCts, who supported finanCially, from the budget of the County, the ConstruCtion of sChools and hospitals, along with the reorganisation of the Superior Trade SChool, where the Children from the rural areas were obtaining high qualificationforms. NiColae P. Guran and Constantin Radu GeblesCu filled the position of prefeCt in Dolj County, between the 12th of April 1899 and the 14th of February 1901, respeCtively the 24th of DeCember 1904 and the 12th of MarCh 1907. Keywords: activity, prefeCt, Dolj, Guran, GeblesCu. 1 The present study is part of the doCtor degree researCh project: The institution of the prefect in Dolj County, during the reign of Carol I, Carried outbetween 2015 and 2018, within the SoCial Sciences Faculty.
    [Show full text]
  • Generated an Epistemological Knowledge of the Nation—Quantifying And
    H-Nationalism The “Majority Question” in Interwar Romania: Making Majorities from Minorities in a Heterogeneous State Discussion published by Emmanuel Dalle Mulle on Wednesday, April 22, 2020 H-Nationalism is proud to publish here the sixth post of its “Minorities in Contemporary and Historical Perspectives” series, which looks at majority- minority relations from a multi-disciplinary and diachronic angle. Today’s contribution, by R. Chris Davis (Lone Star College–Kingwood), examines the efforts of Romanian nation-builders to make Romanians during the interwar period. Heterogeneity in Interwar Romania While the situation of ethnic minorities in Romania has been examined extensively within the scholarship on the interwar period, far too little consideration is given into the making of the Romanian ethnic majority itself. My reframing of the “minority question” into its corollary, the “majority question,” in this blogpost draws on my recently published book examining the contested identity of the Moldavian Csangos, an ethnically fluid community of Romanian- and Hungarian-speaking Roman Catholics in eastern Romania.[1] While investigating this case study of a putative ethnic, linguistic, and religious minority, I was constantly reminded that not only minorities but also majorities are socially constructed, crafted from regional, religious, and linguistic bodies and identities. Transylvanians, Bessarabians, and Bănățeni (people from the Banat region) and Regațeni (inhabitants of Romania’s Old Kingdom), for example, were rendered into something
    [Show full text]
  • December 2020 Contract Pipeline
    OFFICIAL USE No Country DTM Project title and Portfolio Contract title Type of contract Procurement method Year Number 1 2021 Albania 48466 Albanian Railways SupervisionRehabilitation Contract of Tirana-Durres for Rehabilitation line and ofconstruction the Durres of- Tirana a new Railwaylink to TIA Line and construction of a New Railway Line to Tirana International Works Open 2 Albania 48466 Albanian Railways Airport Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 3 Albania 48466 Albanian Railways Asset Management Plan and Track Access Charges Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 4 Albania 49351 Albania Infrastructure and tourism enabling Albania: Tourism-led Model For Local Economic Development Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 5 Albania 49351 Albania Infrastructure and tourism enabling Infrastructure and Tourism Enabling Programme: Gender and Economic Inclusion Programme Manager Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 6 Albania 50123 Regional and Local Roads Connectivity Rehabilitation of Vlore - Orikum Road (10.6 km) Works Open 2022 7 Albania 50123 Regional and Local Roads Connectivity Upgrade of Zgosth - Ura e Cerenecit road Section (47.1km) Works Open 2022 8 Albania 50123 Regional and Local Roads Connectivity Works supervision Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 9 Albania 50123 Regional and Local Roads Connectivity PIU support Consultancy Competitive Selection 2021 10 Albania 51908 Kesh Floating PV Project Design, build and operation of the floating photovoltaic plant located on Vau i Dejës HPP Lake Works Open 2021 11 Albania 51908
    [Show full text]
  • CULTURAL HERITAGE in MIGRATION Published Within the Project Cultural Heritage in Migration
    CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Published within the project Cultural Heritage in Migration. Models of Consolidation and Institutionalization of the Bulgarian Communities Abroad funded by the Bulgarian National Science Fund © Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova, Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova, editors, 2017 © Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Studies with Ethnographic Museum – BAS, 2017 © Paradigma Publishing House, 2017 ISBN 978-954-326-332-5 BULGARIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ETHNOLOGY AND FOLKLORE STUDIES WITH ETHNOGRAPHIC MUSEUM CULTURAL HERITAGE IN MIGRATION Edited by Nikolai Vukov, Lina Gergova Tanya Matanova, Yana Gergova Paradigma Sofia • 2017 CONTENTS EDITORIAL............................................................................................................................9 PART I: CULTURAL HERITAGE AS A PROCESS DISPLACEMENT – REPLACEMENT. REAL AND INTERNALIZED GEOGRAPHY IN THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MIGRATION............................................21 Slobodan Dan Paich THE RUSSIAN-LIPOVANS IN ITALY: PRESERVING CULTURAL AND RELIGIOUS HERITAGE IN MIGRATION.............................................................41 Nina Vlaskina CLASS AND RELIGION IN THE SHAPING OF TRADITION AMONG THE ISTANBUL-BASED ORTHODOX BULGARIANS...............................55 Magdalena Elchinova REPRESENTATIONS OF ‘COMPATRIOTISM’. THE SLOVAK DIASPORA POLITICS AS A TOOL FOR BUILDING AND CULTIVATING DIASPORA.............72 Natália Blahová FOLKLORE AS HERITAGE: THE EXPERIENCE OF BULGARIANS IN HUNGARY.......................................................................................................................88
    [Show full text]
  • Primaria Craiova
    CRAIOVA growth pole; cultural and economical pole on Jiu river; the heart of Oltenia region; city of Craiova, between culture and economy; Oltenian spirit and European prosperity! revival of an ancient destiny: “City of Governors”; the spirit and vision of Mihai Viteazu; The city’s vision for development is based on the following principles: Promoting the social and territorial cohesion both within the city and in the relations with the : local communities from the metropolitan area in order to achieve a balanced development; encouragement of the urban development towards the multicentric model by encouraging the provision of adequate facilities in all neighbourhood centres (possibly shaping these centres) and counteracting developments that maintain or increase the need for access towards the centre or for crossing the city systematically or frequently for current needs; optimizing the access to the peri-urban area by adopting policies to modernize transport and increase traffic intensity. These will be achieved through the effective integration and interconnection of local, regional, national and international transport networks; the primacy of environmental conservation at the expense of economic development (assuming balanced economic growth and imposing the use of protective production technologies); increasing the living standards of the population as a result of the revival of the economic growth and the improvement of the situation of the various social aspects; Establishing and encouraging desirable areas of local development
    [Show full text]
  • LOCALITATE Zo N a Nr. INREG. CUI FIRMA ADRESA OBIECT
    STARE OBIECT PRINCIPAL DE NR LOCALITATE Nr._INREG. CUI FIRMA ADRESA FIRMA (**) SAL. Zona (*) ACTIVITATE Beba Veche J35/1324/200 21489660 AGRISANTI.RO SRL Beba Veche, jud. A 1-0111-Cultivarea cerealelor, 0 2 7 Timis porumbului şi a altor plante n.c.a. Beba Veche J35/3108/201 31029040 ANDREEA & nr 648, Beba A 2-8121-Activităţi generale de 2 2 ALBERT SRL Veche, jud. Timis curăţenie a clădirilor Beba Veche J35/1660/201 27591014 ARDELEAN nr 355, Beba A 2-0145-Creşterea ovinelor şi 2 2 0 CARPINISAN Veche, jud. Timis caprinelor Beba Veche J35/3987/199 7033862 ARRIA SRL nr 562, Beba DL- 2-2893-Fabricarea utilajelor pentru 2 4 Veche, jud. Timis L31 prelucrarea produselor alimentare, băuturilor şi tutunului Beba Veche J35/1050/200 16328609 ASTEN SRL nr 562, Beba A 2-2825-Fabricarea echipamentelor 2 4 Veche, jud. Timis de ventilaţie şi frigorifice, exclusiv a echipamentelor de uz casnic Beba Veche J35/3450/200 22432247 CENTRO ARIETI SRL Beba Veche, jud. L,ITA 1-0122-Creşterea ovinelor, 2 7 Timis caprinelor, cabalinelor, măgarilor, catârilor şi asinilor Beba Veche J35/1335/200 25714536 CRACIUN & TRIF Beba Veche, jud. A 2-0111-Cultivarea cerealelor 6 9 AGROMEC SRL Timis (exclusiv orez), plantelor 2 leguminoase şi a plantelor producătoare de seminţe oleaginoase Beba Veche F35/379/2013 31368763 CRĂCIUN MEDA nr 697, Beba A 2-0113-Cultivarea legumelor şi a 2 ÎNTREPRINDERE Veche, jud. Timis pepenilor, a rădăcinoaselor şi INDIVIDUALĂ tuberculilor Beba Veche J35/608/2007 21053997 DENI ŞI SUZI SRL nr 241, Beba ITA 2-4711-Comerţ cu amănuntul în Veche, jud.
    [Show full text]
  • INCIDENTA CUMULATA 18.08.2021.Xlsx
    DATELE STATISTICE PRIVIND NR PERSOANELOR CU DOMICILIUL SAU RESEDINTA GRUPATE PE UAT IN JUDEȚUL BRĂILA JUD. UAT LOCALITATE NUMAR CAZURI INCIDENTA PERIOADA MONITORIZARE PERIOADA MONITORIZARE INCIDENTA POPULAT CONFIRM LA 1000 INCIDENTA > 3/1000 DE ≥1.5/1000 DE LOCUITORI-≤ 3/1000 DE IE ATE LOCUITORI LOCUITORI LOCUITORI BR 335566 28 0.08 BR Mun.Brăila Mun.Brăila 196601 21 0.11 BR Orş.Făurei Orş.Făurei 3814 BR Orş.Ianca Orş.Ianca 6480 BR Orş.Însurăţei Orş.Însurăţei 6402 BR Com.Frecăţei Sat.Agaua 400 BR Com.Tichileşti Sat.Albina 295 BR Com.Salcia Tudor Sat.Ariciu 160 BR Com.Vădeni Sat.Baldovineşti 1274 BR Com.Cireşu Sat.Batogu 610 BR Com.Măraşu Sat.Băndoiu 397 BR Com.Bărăganul Sat.Bărăganul 2934 1 0.34 BR Orş.Ianca Sat.Berleşti 301 BR Com.Berteştii de Jos Sat.Berteştii de Jos 866 BR Com.Berteştii de Jos Sat.Berteştii de Sus 312 BR Com.Râmnicelu Sat.Boarca 50 BR Com.Bordei Verde Sat.Bordei Verde 1256 BR Com.Surdila-Greci Sat.Brateşu Vechi 106 BR Com.Jirlău Sat.Brădeanca 4 BR Com.Dudeşti Sat.Bumbăcari 8 BR Com.Cazasu Sat.Cazasu 3798 BR Com.Traian Sat.Căldăruşa 176 BR Com.Vişani Sat.Câineni-Băi 362 BR Com.Ciocile Sat.Chichineţu 349 BR Com.Ciocile Sat.Chioibăşeşti 164 BR Com.Chiscani Sat.Chiscani 4679 BR Com.Ciocile Sat.Ciocile 1723 860 Com.Cireşu Sat.Cireşu 858 BR Com.Frecăţei Sat.Cistia 8 BR Com.Roşiori Sat.Colţea 481 BR Com.Tudor Vladimirescu Sat.Comăneasca 196 BR Com.Bordei Verde Sat.Constantin Gabrielescu 640 BR Com.Râmnicelu Sat.Constantineşti 321 BR Com.Racoviţa Sat.Corbeni 120 BR Com.Maxineni Sat.Corbu Nou 830 BR Com.Maxineni Sat.Corbu Vechi
    [Show full text]
  • The Economy of a Regional Metropolis. Case-Study: Iaşi, Romania*1
    THE ECONOMY OF A REGIONAL METROPOLIS. CASE-STUDY: IAŞI, ROMANIA*1 Claudia POPESCU Claudia POPESCU Professor, Faculty of International Economics and Business, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania Tel.: 0040-213-319.1900/378 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract The city of Iaşi with a population of over 300,000 people is the biggest European Union city at the border with the former-Soviet space. The article, part of an extended study on territorial development of Iaşi and its peri-urban area, focuses on the role of the city to trigger regional growth and to enhance cross border cooperation. Recent processes at work generating economic cohesion and integration are explored drawing on the catalytic factors of development and the specialization of local economies. The paper discusses also the externalities of urban growth such as the urban sprawl that causes land use conflicts at the rural-urban fringe. It argues that human capital and higher birth rates than the national average are the strengths, and low connectivity and accessibility are the weaknesses for regional growth. The regional polarization of the city is based on the supply of high level services over the entire North-East Region and opportunities to cross border cooperation through the expansion of an agro-alimentary supply-chain are highlighted. Building on the main capabilities and assets of the * The paper is part of the research conducted between 2009 agglomeration economies of Iaşi, the paper finally and 2010 in the view of drafting the Master Plan of the Iaşi identifies some of the mechanisms and structures Municipality, Romania.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Soil Erosion by Water on Agricultural Land in Cenei, Timiş County, Romania
    Advances in Environmental Development, Geomatics Engineering and Tourism Modeling soil erosion by water on agricultural land in Cenei, Timiş County, Romania GEORGE NARCIS PELEA, IOANA ALINA COSTESCU, ERIKA BEILICCI, TEODOR EUGEN MAN, ROBERT BEILICCI Faculty of Civil Engineering, Hydrotehnical Engineering Department University Politehnica of Timişoara G. Enescu Street No. 1A 300022 Timişoara, Timiş County ROMANIA [email protected] http://www.upt.ro Abstract: This paper aims to present soil erosion by water on agricultural land with low slope up to 5%. In the study were analyzedthe agricultural land of Cenei, in Timiş County, Romania, on part of drainage systems Răuţi – Sânmihaiu German and Checea – Jimbolia, and on the course section of river BegaVeche. The model analyzes soil erosion by water and sediment transport on the main drainage channels and the course section of river BegaVeche. Key-Words:soil erosion by water, sediment transport, drainage system, earth channels,hydrographic area, low slope erosion. 1 Introduction In order to evaluate the soil erosion by water on the Through the water cycle in nature appears the studied surface due to the small slope of phenomenon of soil erosionby water on agricultural surface,which is up to 5%., for the analysis was used land. This phenomenon affects the condition of the a modelling program -WEPP (Water Erosion drainage systems by clogging the channels section. Prediction Project) [5] Due to this problem it is brought to discussion the WEPP is software for the prediction of erosion possibility of analysis of soil erosionby water on processes in watersheds, developed by USDA agricultural land with small slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Helena Maria SABO 1 1 Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Psychology and Science of Education, Cluj-Napoca, ROMANIA E-Mail: [email protected]
    Centre for Research on Settlements and Urbanism Journal of Settlements and Spatial Planning J o u r n a l h o m e p a g e: http://jssp.reviste.ubbcluj.ro Rural Tourism Development in the Basin of Drăgan River Helena Maria SABO 1 1 Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Psychology and Science of Education, Cluj-Napoca, ROMANIA E-mail: [email protected] K e y w o r d s: attractive potential, tourism, Dr ăganului Valley, rural sustainable development A B S T R A C T This paper prese nts a description of the tourism potential in the region of Drăgan Valley Basin. The motivation in choosing this theme is given by the variety of tourism resources that is found in the picturesque Valley of Drăgan River and the attractiveness of this type of tourism that has recently developed in Romania, rural tourism, and particularly the prospects of development in the context of European context. Drăgan river basin is a major tourist attraction located in the mountainous area in the Northwestern region of Cluj County. The region stands out due to its various and attractive landscape: barren Picks, snowbound Alpine heights in dense forests, Mountain meadows with millions of flowers, the impressive vertical scale is enriched by the presence of unique natural phenomena: waterfalls, springs, caves. The natural tourism potential in the region is completed by the major cultural, historical and religious attractions. 1. INTRODUCTION Mountains into two branches: east branch and west branch [8]. Most of Drăgan river basin is located in Cluj Drăgan River crosses Vlădeasa Mountains County.
    [Show full text]
  • Jud. Uat Localitate Numar Populat Ie Cazuri Confirm
    DATELE STATISTICE PRIVIND NR PERSOANELOR CU DOMICILIUL SAU RESEDINTA GRUPATE PE UAT IN JUDEȚUL BRĂILA JUD. UAT LOCALITATE NUMAR CAZURI INCIDENTA PERIOADA MONITORIZARE PERIOADA MONITORIZARE INCIDENTA POPULAT CONFIRM LA 1000 INCIDENTA > 3/1000 DE ≥1.5/1000 DE LOCUITORI-≤ 3/1000 DE IE ATE LOCUITORI LOCUITORI LOCUITORI BR 335941 9 0.03 BR Mun.Brăila Mun.Brăila 196853 7 0.04 BR Orş.Făurei Orş.Făurei 3822 BR Orş.Ianca Orş.Ianca 6481 BR Orş.Însurăţei Orş.Însurăţei 6410 BR Com.Frecăţei Sat.Agaua 402 BR Com.Tichileşti Sat.Albina 294 BR Com.Salcia Tudor Sat.Ariciu 160 BR Com.Vădeni Sat.Baldovineşti 1271 BR Com.Cireşu Sat.Batogu 613 BR Com.Măraşu Sat.Băndoiu 397 BR Com.Bărăganul Sat.Bărăganul 2939 BR Orş.Ianca Sat.Berleşti 302 BR Com.Berteştii de Jos Sat.Berteştii de Jos 865 BR Com.Berteştii de Jos Sat.Berteştii de Sus 312 BR Com.Râmnicelu Sat.Boarca 50 BR Com.Bordei Verde Sat.Bordei Verde 1254 BR Com.Surdila-Greci Sat.Brateşu Vechi 107 BR Com.Jirlău Sat.Brădeanca 4 BR Com.Dudeşti Sat.Bumbăcari 8 BR Com.Cazasu Sat.Cazasu 3792 BR Com.Traian Sat.Căldăruşa 172 BR Com.Vişani Sat.Câineni-Băi 362 BR Com.Ciocile Sat.Chichineţu 350 BR Com.Ciocile Sat.Chioibăşeşti 165 BR Com.Chiscani Sat.Chiscani 4683 BR Com.Ciocile Sat.Ciocile 1733 860 Com.Cireşu Sat.Cireşu 855 BR Com.Frecăţei Sat.Cistia 8 BR Com.Roşiori Sat.Colţea 481 BR Com.Tudor Vladimirescu Sat.Comăneasca 197 BR Com.Bordei Verde Sat.Constantin Gabrielescu 637 BR Com.Râmnicelu Sat.Constantineşti 324 BR Com.Racoviţa Sat.Corbeni 121 BR Com.Maxineni Sat.Corbu Nou 829 BR Com.Maxineni Sat.Corbu Vechi 284
    [Show full text]