International Journal of Engineering Research (IJFER) Year 2 Num 2 - 2016 (1-17)

EVALUATION OF TURKISH QUALITY: SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND TURKISH FOOD CODEX

G. TÜRK1, Z. Tacer-CABA1, Burcu ÇAKMAK2, H. ÖZPINAR1

Abstract Olive oil is a significant food product that is directly consumed and highly recommended for health. Therefore it must be produced at right and hygienic conditions. This study aimed to evaluate some quality and purity criteria of olive oil samples from different regions and different olive types around Turkey according to regulations of Turkish Food Codex. Free acidity, peroxide number and oil acid compositions of samples were studied for evaluation of quality and purity. According to the results, although free acidity results of all Riviera olive oil samples were in conformity to those in standards; 46% of extra virgin olive oil samples were out of the acceptable limits. Peroxide values of both types (22% of virgin olive oil and 15% of Riviera oil samples) were above the limits given in standards. compositions of linolenic, heptadecanoic and heptadecenoic acid values were not within the legal limits. According to overall results; 46%, 20% and 9% of all samples were out of the standard limits, for free acidity, peroxide value and distribution of fatty acids, respectively. These data provide evidence of the variation in olive oil quality around Turkish olive oil samples.

Keyword: olive oil, quality, food codex

Introduction Olive oil is extracted from olive tree Olea (phenolic compounds, tocopherol, other europaea L. fruits and consumed directly. It is aromatic components), high amount of mono- nutritionally beneficial for health, comprising unsaturated fatty acid (oleic acid), high nutritional compounds of oil acids, vitamins, oxidative stability and it is processed only sterols and phenolic compounds. Since it has physically (press, centrifugation, percolation), some unique antioxidant compounds it is considered as a natural fruit oil or oily

1Food Engineering Department of Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul/Turkey 2Nutrition and Dietetic Department of Istanbul Esenyurt University, Istanbul /Turkey

1 EVALUATION OF TURKISH OLIVE OIL QUALITY: SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND TURKISH FOOD CODEX fruit juice and has numerous different millions of trees. Production of olives is quite quality olive oil is hard to produce and Southeast region, in two consecutive harvest properties in comparison to other edible common for manty different regions of expensive and the high costs related to olive years of seasons 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. vegetable oils [1,2]. It is one of the most Turkey such as; Aydn, İzmir, Muğla, trees growing, olive harvest and oil extraction Different regions and provinces were depicted significant crops in Mediteranean countries Balkesir, Bursa, Manisa, Çanakkale, are among the main reasons behind this fact. in Table 1. The predominant olive varieties of and a very important contributor of the Gaziantep and İçel; in the Aegean, the Therefore adulteration of this valuable Gemlik, Ayvalk and Memecik which are Mediterranean diet [3]. Marmara, the Mediterranean and the product in such approach as blending grown in a number of regions were chosen as Southeast regions [12]. In Spain, world leader changing quality olive oil types and marketing monovarietal types whereas Karma (mixed) Positive effects of extra virgin olive oil on olive oil producer, total amount of oli oil them as extra virgin olive oil, quite commonly types were made by blanching different health comprise cardiovascular health, and produced was around 825.7 thousand ton in exists [14]. For prevention of adulteration, it varieties. List of all olive oil samples used in cancer [4]. Previous studies clearly revealed season 2014-2015, while in Turkey it was is significant to determine the quality and the study was given in Table 2. the antioxidant, inflammatory, and around 190 thousand ton. USA and European purity properties of olive oil samples. chemotherapic effects as well [5]. Unioun member countries are significant Table 1. Provinces at different growing Epidemiological and nutritional studies world olive oil traders [12]. Olive oil quality is related to many different regions mainly focused on PUFAs [6], phenolic factors such as olive variety, geographic Growing Provinces compounds and tocopherols [6, 7]. Other Olive oil that is unable to be consumed region, climate conditions, tree properties, Region clinical studies presented the positive effets of directly is processed into as refined olive oil. olive fruit maturity and harvest time, way of The Marmara Çanakkale (Küçükkuyu), contiunuos olive oil consumption and its Refining may comprise processes such as olive collecting, storage conditions, oil region Balkesir (Burhaniye, effects on coronary heart diseases, [8], removal of aroma and resin, blanching, in processing methods, and mechanical Edremit, Ayvalk) ve oxidative damage on DNA and RNA [9] and addition to decreasing the free acidity level to properties of press machines [15]. This study Bursa (Orhangazi, risk of Alzheimer disease [10, 11]. below 0.3%. This type of olive oil is so called aimed to investigate the quality and purity Mudanya, Gemlik) as refined olive oil. Although undesired criteria of some common olive oil samples of The Aegean İzmir (Ödemiş, Bornova), Global olive production has been made properties are eliminated, the specific aroma extra virgin olive oil and Riviera type olive oil region Aydn (Nazilli, Karacasu, mainly around Mediterranean region (90% of and flavor of oil is also lost during refining according to Turkish Food legistations. Köşk), Manisa (Akhisar) all global production). Annual olive process. Riviera type oil is a mixture of The Muğla (Fethiye), Hatay production is around 17 million tons and refined olive oil having changing ratios (5- Materials Mediterranean (Samandağ), Kilis countries of Spain, Italy, Greece, Tunisia, 20%) and virgin olive oil [13]. 50 different extra virgin olive oil and 20 region Portugal, and Turkey are among the olive different rafined type samples from producers The Southeast Gaziantep produces. Annual amount of olive production Legal status of olive oil in Turkey is at 4 different growing regions of Turkey region in Turkey was around 1 676 000 tons for the determined according to the rules specified by comprising the Marmara region, the Aegean season 2013-2014, with more than 167 the Turkish Food Codex standard [14]. High region, the Mediterranean region and the

2 G. TÜRK, Z. Tacer-CABA, Burcu ÇAKMAK, H. ÖZPINAR fruit juice and has numerous different millions of trees. Production of olives is quite quality olive oil is hard to produce and Southeast region, in two consecutive harvest properties in comparison to other edible common for manty different regions of expensive and the high costs related to olive years of seasons 2012-2013 and 2013-2014. vegetable oils [1,2]. It is one of the most Turkey such as; Aydn, İzmir, Muğla, trees growing, olive harvest and oil extraction Different regions and provinces were depicted significant crops in Mediteranean countries Balkesir, Bursa, Manisa, Çanakkale, are among the main reasons behind this fact. in Table 1. The predominant olive varieties of and a very important contributor of the Gaziantep and İçel; in the Aegean, the Therefore adulteration of this valuable Gemlik, Ayvalk and Memecik which are Mediterranean diet [3]. Marmara, the Mediterranean and the product in such approach as blending grown in a number of regions were chosen as Southeast regions [12]. In Spain, world leader changing quality olive oil types and marketing monovarietal types whereas Karma (mixed) Positive effects of extra virgin olive oil on olive oil producer, total amount of oli oil them as extra virgin olive oil, quite commonly types were made by blanching different health comprise cardiovascular health, and produced was around 825.7 thousand ton in exists [14]. For prevention of adulteration, it varieties. List of all olive oil samples used in cancer [4]. Previous studies clearly revealed season 2014-2015, while in Turkey it was is significant to determine the quality and the study was given in Table 2. the antioxidant, inflammatory, and around 190 thousand ton. USA and European purity properties of olive oil samples. chemotherapic effects as well [5]. Unioun member countries are significant Table 1. Provinces at different growing Epidemiological and nutritional studies world olive oil traders [12]. Olive oil quality is related to many different regions mainly focused on PUFAs [6], phenolic factors such as olive variety, geographic Growing Provinces compounds and tocopherols [6, 7]. Other Olive oil that is unable to be consumed region, climate conditions, tree properties, Region clinical studies presented the positive effets of directly is processed into as refined olive oil. olive fruit maturity and harvest time, way of The Marmara Çanakkale (Küçükkuyu), contiunuos olive oil consumption and its Refining may comprise processes such as olive collecting, storage conditions, oil region Balkesir (Burhaniye, effects on coronary heart diseases, [8], removal of aroma and resin, blanching, in processing methods, and mechanical Edremit, Ayvalk) ve oxidative damage on DNA and RNA [9] and addition to decreasing the free acidity level to properties of press machines [15]. This study Bursa (Orhangazi, risk of Alzheimer disease [10, 11]. below 0.3%. This type of olive oil is so called aimed to investigate the quality and purity Mudanya, Gemlik) as refined olive oil. Although undesired criteria of some common olive oil samples of The Aegean İzmir (Ödemiş, Bornova), Global olive production has been made properties are eliminated, the specific aroma extra virgin olive oil and Riviera type olive oil region Aydn (Nazilli, Karacasu, mainly around Mediterranean region (90% of and flavor of oil is also lost during refining according to Turkish Food legistations. Köşk), Manisa (Akhisar) all global production). Annual olive process. Riviera type oil is a mixture of The Muğla (Fethiye), Hatay production is around 17 million tons and refined olive oil having changing ratios (5- Materials Mediterranean (Samandağ), Kilis countries of Spain, Italy, Greece, Tunisia, 20%) and virgin olive oil [13]. 50 different extra virgin olive oil and 20 region Portugal, and Turkey are among the olive different rafined type samples from producers The Southeast Gaziantep produces. Annual amount of olive production Legal status of olive oil in Turkey is at 4 different growing regions of Turkey region in Turkey was around 1 676 000 tons for the determined according to the rules specified by comprising the Marmara region, the Aegean season 2013-2014, with more than 167 the Turkish Food Codex standard [14]. High region, the Mediterranean region and the

International Journal of Food Engineering Research (IJFER) Year 2 Num 2 - 2016 (1-17) 3 EVALUATION OF TURKISH OLIVE OIL QUALITY: SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND TURKISH FOOD CODEX

N32 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 Table 2. Olive oil samples used in the study N33 Mudanya/Bursa Extra Virgin Gemlik 2012-2013 Olive Oil Provinces Type Variety Season N34 Mudanya/Bursa Extra Virgin Gemlik 2013-2014 Sample N35 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2012-2013 N1 Kilis Extra Mixed 2012-2013 N36 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 N2 Kilis Extra Mixed 2013-2014 N37 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2012-2013 N3 Samandağ/Hatay Extra Gemlik 2012-2013 N38 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 N4 Samandağ/Hatay Extra Gemlik 2013-2014 N39 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2012-2013 N5 Samandağ/Hatay Extra Mixed 2012-2013 N40 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 N6 Samandağ/Hatay Extra Mixed 2013-2014 N41 Aydn Extra Virgin Memecik 2012-2013 N7 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Ayvalık 2012-2013 N42 Aydn Extra Virgin Memecik 2013-2014 N8 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Ayvalık 2013-2014 N43 Fethiye/Muğla Extra Virgin Memecik 2012-2013 N9 Altnoluk/Edremit/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2012-2013 N44 Fethiye/Muğla Extra Virgin Memecik 2013-2014 N10 Altnoluk/Edremit/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2013-2014 N45 Karacasu/Aydn Extra Virgin Memecik 2012-2013 N11 Nazilli/Aydn Extra Memecik 2012-2013 N46 Karacasu/Aydn Extra Virgin Memecik 2013-2014 N12 Nazilli/Aydn Extra Memecik 2013-2014 N47 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2012-2013 N13 Nazilli/Aydn Extra Mixed 2012-2013 N48 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 N14 Nazilli/Aydn Extra Mixed 2013-2014 N49 Orhangazi/Bursa Extra Virgin Gemlik 2012-2013 N15 Burhaniye/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2012-2013 N50 Orhangazi/Bursa Extra Virgin Gemlik 2013-2014 N16 Burhaniye/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2013-2014 R1 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N17 Tarsus/Mersin Extra Mixed 2012-2013 R2 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N18 Tarsus/Mersin Extra Mixed 2013-2014 R3 Gemlik/Bursa Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N19 Ödemiş/İzmir Extra Memecik 2012-2013 R4 Gemlik/Bursa Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N20 Ödemiş/İzmir Extra Memecik 2013-2014 R5 Akhisar/Manisa Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N21 Köşk/Aydn Extra Memecik 2012-2013 R6 Akhisar/Manisa Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N22 Köşk/Aydn Extra Memecik 2013-2014 R7 Akhisar/Manisa Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N23 Aydn Extra Memecik 2012-2013 R8 Akhisar/Manisa Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N24 Aydn Extra Memecik 2013-2014 R9 Gaziantep Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N25 Aydn Extra Memecik 2012-2013 R10 Gaziantep Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N26 Aydn Extra Memecik 2013-2014 R11 Nizip/Gaziantep Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N27 Gemlik/Bursa Extra Gemlik 2012-2013 R12 Nizip/Gaziantep Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N28 Gemlik/Bursa Extra Gemlik 2013-2014 R13 Bursa Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N29 Bornova/İzmir Extra Mixed 2012-2013 R14 Bursa Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N30 Bornova/İzmir Extra Mixed 2013-2014 R15 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N31 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2012-2013 R16 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 R17 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2012-2013

4 G. TÜRK, Z. Tacer-CABA, Burcu ÇAKMAK, H. ÖZPINAR

N32 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 Table 2. Olive oil samples used in the study N33 Mudanya/Bursa Extra Virgin Gemlik 2012-2013 Olive Oil Provinces Type Variety Season N34 Mudanya/Bursa Extra Virgin Gemlik 2013-2014 Sample N35 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2012-2013 N1 Kilis Extra Mixed 2012-2013 N36 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 N2 Kilis Extra Mixed 2013-2014 N37 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2012-2013 N3 Samandağ/Hatay Extra Gemlik 2012-2013 N38 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 N4 Samandağ/Hatay Extra Gemlik 2013-2014 N39 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2012-2013 N5 Samandağ/Hatay Extra Mixed 2012-2013 N40 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 N6 Samandağ/Hatay Extra Mixed 2013-2014 N41 Aydn Extra Virgin Memecik 2012-2013 N7 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Ayvalık 2012-2013 N42 Aydn Extra Virgin Memecik 2013-2014 N8 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Ayvalık 2013-2014 N43 Fethiye/Muğla Extra Virgin Memecik 2012-2013 N9 Altnoluk/Edremit/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2012-2013 N44 Fethiye/Muğla Extra Virgin Memecik 2013-2014 N10 Altnoluk/Edremit/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2013-2014 N45 Karacasu/Aydn Extra Virgin Memecik 2012-2013 N11 Nazilli/Aydn Extra Memecik 2012-2013 N46 Karacasu/Aydn Extra Virgin Memecik 2013-2014 N12 Nazilli/Aydn Extra Memecik 2013-2014 N47 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2012-2013 N13 Nazilli/Aydn Extra Mixed 2012-2013 N48 Küçükkuyu/Çanakkale Extra Virgin Ayvalık 2013-2014 N14 Nazilli/Aydn Extra Mixed 2013-2014 N49 Orhangazi/Bursa Extra Virgin Gemlik 2012-2013 N15 Burhaniye/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2012-2013 N50 Orhangazi/Bursa Extra Virgin Gemlik 2013-2014 N16 Burhaniye/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2013-2014 R1 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N17 Tarsus/Mersin Extra Mixed 2012-2013 R2 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N18 Tarsus/Mersin Extra Mixed 2013-2014 R3 Gemlik/Bursa Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N19 Ödemiş/İzmir Extra Memecik 2012-2013 R4 Gemlik/Bursa Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N20 Ödemiş/İzmir Extra Memecik 2013-2014 R5 Akhisar/Manisa Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N21 Köşk/Aydn Extra Memecik 2012-2013 R6 Akhisar/Manisa Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N22 Köşk/Aydn Extra Memecik 2013-2014 R7 Akhisar/Manisa Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N23 Aydn Extra Memecik 2012-2013 R8 Akhisar/Manisa Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N24 Aydn Extra Memecik 2013-2014 R9 Gaziantep Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N25 Aydn Extra Memecik 2012-2013 R10 Gaziantep Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N26 Aydn Extra Memecik 2013-2014 R11 Nizip/Gaziantep Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N27 Gemlik/Bursa Extra Gemlik 2012-2013 R12 Nizip/Gaziantep Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N28 Gemlik/Bursa Extra Gemlik 2013-2014 R13 Bursa Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N29 Bornova/İzmir Extra Mixed 2012-2013 R14 Bursa Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 N30 Bornova/İzmir Extra Mixed 2013-2014 R15 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 N31 Ayvalk/Balkesir Extra Ayvalık 2012-2013 R16 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 R17 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2012-2013

International Journal of Food Engineering Research (IJFER) Year 2 Num 2 - 2016 (1-17) 5 EVALUATION OF TURKISH OLIVE OIL QUALITY: SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND TURKISH FOOD CODEX

R18 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 3.2.2 Olive oil purity analyses 4. RESULTS and DISCUSSION R19 Ayvalk/Balkesir Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 3.2.2.1 Analysis of fatty acids and isomers 4.1 Olive Oil Quality Tests R20 Ayvalk/Balkesir Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 Measurements were made using gas 4.1.1 Free acidity and peroxide value chromatography (GC) according to the Overall results showed that 23 of all extra Methods 3.2.1.2 Peroxide value conditions given standard [18]. GC details virgin olive oil samples were above the legal 3.2.1 Olive Oil Quality Tests Determination of Peroxide Number was made were depicted in Table 3. Results were given limit for free acidity given in Turkish Food 3.2.1.1 Free acidity (oleic acid, %) according to TS EN ISO 3960 [16] and result as methy ester %. Codex (0.8%, oleic acid). On the other hand, Method of Turkish Standards Institute given as mili equivalent weight of active Riviera type olive oil samples were within the

(Number: TS EN ISO 660) [16] was used to O2/kg oil [16]. The equation used is given in Table 3. GC conditions legal limits. Free acidity values of extra virgin determine the free acidity of the olive oil Eq. 2.This value is accepted as a real indicator Instrument: Agilent 6890 GC olive oil and Riviera olive oil samples samples. Free acidity is defined as percent free for oil oxidation [17]. Sample dissolved in Detector: FID (Flame Ionization Dedector) according to their growing regions were given fatty acid (FFA) content and given as a acetic acid- isooctane solution is mixed with Coloumn: 100 m x 0.25 mm ID, 0.2 µm HP- in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. he free acidity percentage of oleic acid in Eq. 1. potassium iodine solution to form iodine 88 values among extra virgin olive oil samples which is titrated with sodium thiosulfate [16]. Split Ratio: 1:50 changed between 0.28 and 12.69 % oleic acid, M 100  McV  V )(1000  cV Injector Temperature: 250 °C while for Riviera type samples the results wFFA=  cV   PV  0  1000 m 10 m m ranged between 0.11 and 0.96 %. Present Oven Temperature: 120 °C 230 °C (Eq. 2) findigns were slightly higher than the findings Detector Tempearture: 280 °C (1) Where; Detector Gases: Hydrogen (40 ml/min.), of a previous study [19], in which 10 samples Where; Air (450 ml/min.), Helium (30 ml/min.) of extra virgin olive oil and 8 samples of V = Amount of potassium hydroxide with V = Sodium thiosulfate solution volume Riviera type olive oil had the free acidity ethanol consumed (mL) consumed, (mL) 3.2.3 Statistical Analyses levels of changing between 0.41 and 0.93%;

V0 = Sodium thiosulfate solution volume The differences among extra virgn olive oil and 0.14 and 0.69%, respectively. c = Normality of potassium hydroxide consumed for blank, (mL) and among Riviera type samples were solution with ethanol (N), c = Exact molarity of sodium thiosulfate investigated by one-way analysis of variance Differences among the growing regions were

solution consumed; (ANOVA) (p<0.05). Detailed examinations only significant for extra virgin olive oil M = Molecular weight of oleic acid (= m = Sample weight, (g) for significant differences were made using samples from The Mediterranean region 282g/mol); Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test. SPSS (p<0.05). The Mediterranean region was m = Sample weight (g) 16.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, previously determined as having the highest

IL, USA) was used in all statistical analyses. free acidity levels in a study comprising

different growing regions of the North and

6 G. TÜRK, Z. Tacer-CABA, Burcu ÇAKMAK, H. ÖZPINAR

R18 Bornova/İzmir Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 3.2.2 Olive oil purity analyses 4. RESULTS and DISCUSSION R19 Ayvalk/Balkesir Riviera Mixed 2012-2013 3.2.2.1 Analysis of fatty acids and isomers 4.1 Olive Oil Quality Tests R20 Ayvalk/Balkesir Riviera Mixed 2013-2014 Measurements were made using gas 4.1.1 Free acidity and peroxide value chromatography (GC) according to the Overall results showed that 23 of all extra Methods 3.2.1.2 Peroxide value conditions given standard [18]. GC details virgin olive oil samples were above the legal 3.2.1 Olive Oil Quality Tests Determination of Peroxide Number was made were depicted in Table 3. Results were given limit for free acidity given in Turkish Food 3.2.1.1 Free acidity (oleic acid, %) according to TS EN ISO 3960 [16] and result as methy ester %. Codex (0.8%, oleic acid). On the other hand, Method of Turkish Standards Institute given as mili equivalent weight of active Riviera type olive oil samples were within the

(Number: TS EN ISO 660) [16] was used to O2/kg oil [16]. The equation used is given in Table 3. GC conditions legal limits. Free acidity values of extra virgin determine the free acidity of the olive oil Eq. 2.This value is accepted as a real indicator Instrument: Agilent 6890 GC olive oil and Riviera olive oil samples samples. Free acidity is defined as percent free for oil oxidation [17]. Sample dissolved in Detector: FID (Flame Ionization Dedector) according to their growing regions were given fatty acid (FFA) content and given as a acetic acid- isooctane solution is mixed with Coloumn: 100 m x 0.25 mm ID, 0.2 µm HP- in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. he free acidity percentage of oleic acid in Eq. 1. potassium iodine solution to form iodine 88 values among extra virgin olive oil samples which is titrated with sodium thiosulfate [16]. Split Ratio: 1:50 changed between 0.28 and 12.69 % oleic acid, M 100  McV  V )(1000  cV Injector Temperature: 250 °C while for Riviera type samples the results wFFA=  cV   PV  0  1000 m 10 m m ranged between 0.11 and 0.96 %. Present Oven Temperature: 120 °C 230 °C (Eq. 2) findigns were slightly higher than the findings Detector Tempearture: 280 °C (1) Where; Detector Gases: Hydrogen (40 ml/min.), of a previous study [19], in which 10 samples Where; Air (450 ml/min.), Helium (30 ml/min.) of extra virgin olive oil and 8 samples of V = Amount of potassium hydroxide with V = Sodium thiosulfate solution volume Riviera type olive oil had the free acidity ethanol consumed (mL) consumed, (mL) 3.2.3 Statistical Analyses levels of changing between 0.41 and 0.93%;

V0 = Sodium thiosulfate solution volume The differences among extra virgn olive oil and 0.14 and 0.69%, respectively. c = Normality of potassium hydroxide consumed for blank, (mL) and among Riviera type samples were solution with ethanol (N), c = Exact molarity of sodium thiosulfate investigated by one-way analysis of variance Differences among the growing regions were solution consumed; (ANOVA) (p<0.05). Detailed examinations only significant for extra virgin olive oil M = Molecular weight of oleic acid (= m = Sample weight, (g) for significant differences were made using samples from The Mediterranean region 282g/mol); Duncan’s New Multiple Range Test. SPSS (p<0.05). The Mediterranean region was m = Sample weight (g) 16.0 statistical software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, previously determined as having the highest

IL, USA) was used in all statistical analyses. free acidity levels in a study comprising

different growing regions of the North and

International Journal of Food Engineering Research (IJFER) Year 2 Num 2 - 2016 (1-17) 7 EVALUATION OF TURKISH OLIVE OIL QUALITY: SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND TURKISH FOOD CODEX

South Aegean, Mediterranean and Southeast Table 5. Free Acidity (oleic acid, %) values free acidity results in plastic bottle types were Anatolia [20]. Early maturation and late of Riviera olive oil samples according to similar to previous literature findings [23, 24] 2012- 25 1.28 19.32 harvesting of olives was proposed to be their growing regions Overall results for peroxide number values 2013 related with the higher acidity values [20, 21]. Olive oil n Free Acidity revealed that 11 of extra virgin olive oil Extra 2013- 25 1.89 15.36 Higher acidity was also related with the growing (Oleic acid, samples were above the limit value (20 meq virgin 2014 increased enzyme activity as a result of higher regions %) active O2/kg) defined in Turkish Food Codex; 2012- 10 0.39 11.50 than desired content in olives, X whereas among the Riviera type olive oil Riviera 2013 pathologic organisms and mechanical The Aegean 12 0.40 samples; 3 samples were higher than the legal 2013- 10 0.50 12.50 problems, and these factors were given as region limit (15 meq active O2/kg). The lowest 2014 reasons for the hydrolysis of triglycerides, as The Southeast 4 0.46 peroxide values among extra virgin olive oil well [22]. region samples were in samples N8 of 2013-2014 The lowest and highest values for Riviera type The Marmara 4 0.64 and N15 of 2012-2013 seasons (7 meq active olive oil results were for sample R14 Table 4. Free Acidity (oleic acid, %) values region O2/kg). The highest value was detected in belonging to 2013-2014 season (5 meq active

of extra virgin olive oil samples according to sample N23 (51 meq active O2/kg) of 2012- O2/kg) and sample R2 (2013-2014 season), 26

their growing regions Changes in free acidity and peroxide number 2013 season. Average peroxide value results meq active O2/kg). On the other hand, the Olive oil growing n Free Acidity values of extra virgin and Riviera olive oil were 19.32 ve 15.36 meq active O2/kg for average peroxide values in Riviera type olive regions (Oleic acid, samples according to their harvest times were 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 seasons, oil samples were 11.50 ve 12.50 meq active

%) X given in Table 6. Average free acidity values respectively (Table 6). O2/kg for 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 seasons, The 10 3.96a of 2012-2013 season extra virgin and Riviera respectively. Differences in peroxide values Mediterranean type oil samples were found as 1.28 and 0.39, Table 6: Average free acidity and peroxide among extra virgin olive oil samples and region respectively. On the other hand, same number values according to seasons of Riviera type olive oil samples were The Aegean 28 1.06b measurements for seasons 2013-2014 were harvest of extra virgin and Riviera olive oil insignificant (p<0.05) when different growing region 1.89 and 0.50. Differences between different samples regions were considered (Tables 7 and 8). The Marmara 12 0.84b harvesting seasons were statistically Type Seasons n Free Peroxide Extra virgin olive oil samples from The region insignificant (p>0.05). of Acidity Number Mediterrenean region and Riviera type olive Olive (oleic (meq oil samples from the Aegean regions had *Different letters in the same coloumn (a,b) Differences in free acidities of extra virgin and Oil acid, active slightly higher average peroxide values than represent statistically significant differences Riviera type olive oil samples due to %) O2/kg the other regions studied. Peroxide values in results (p<0.05) packaging were statistically insignificant X oil) determined in this current study, were (p>0.05). However generally higher results X generally higher than the results some

8 G. TÜRK, Z. Tacer-CABA, Burcu ÇAKMAK, H. ÖZPINAR

South Aegean, Mediterranean and Southeast Table 5. Free Acidity (oleic acid, %) values free acidity results in plastic bottle types were Anatolia [20]. Early maturation and late of Riviera olive oil samples according to similar to previous literature findings [23, 24] 2012- 25 1.28 19.32 harvesting of olives was proposed to be their growing regions Overall results for peroxide number values 2013 related with the higher acidity values [20, 21]. Olive oil n Free Acidity revealed that 11 of extra virgin olive oil Extra 2013- 25 1.89 15.36 Higher acidity was also related with the growing (Oleic acid, samples were above the limit value (20 meq virgin 2014 increased enzyme activity as a result of higher regions %) active O2/kg) defined in Turkish Food Codex; 2012- 10 0.39 11.50 than desired water content in olives, X whereas among the Riviera type olive oil Riviera 2013 pathologic organisms and mechanical The Aegean 12 0.40 samples; 3 samples were higher than the legal 2013- 10 0.50 12.50 problems, and these factors were given as region limit (15 meq active O2/kg). The lowest 2014 reasons for the hydrolysis of triglycerides, as The Southeast 4 0.46 peroxide values among extra virgin olive oil well [22]. region samples were in samples N8 of 2013-2014 The lowest and highest values for Riviera type The Marmara 4 0.64 and N15 of 2012-2013 seasons (7 meq active olive oil results were for sample R14 Table 4. Free Acidity (oleic acid, %) values region O2/kg). The highest value was detected in belonging to 2013-2014 season (5 meq active of extra virgin olive oil samples according to sample N23 (51 meq active O2/kg) of 2012- O2/kg) and sample R2 (2013-2014 season), 26 their growing regions Changes in free acidity and peroxide number 2013 season. Average peroxide value results meq active O2/kg). On the other hand, the Olive oil growing n Free Acidity values of extra virgin and Riviera olive oil were 19.32 ve 15.36 meq active O2/kg for average peroxide values in Riviera type olive regions (Oleic acid, samples according to their harvest times were 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 seasons, oil samples were 11.50 ve 12.50 meq active

%) X given in Table 6. Average free acidity values respectively (Table 6). O2/kg for 2012-2013 and 2013-2014 seasons, The 10 3.96a of 2012-2013 season extra virgin and Riviera respectively. Differences in peroxide values Mediterranean type oil samples were found as 1.28 and 0.39, Table 6: Average free acidity and peroxide among extra virgin olive oil samples and region respectively. On the other hand, same number values according to seasons of Riviera type olive oil samples were The Aegean 28 1.06b measurements for seasons 2013-2014 were harvest of extra virgin and Riviera olive oil insignificant (p<0.05) when different growing region 1.89 and 0.50. Differences between different samples regions were considered (Tables 7 and 8). The Marmara 12 0.84b harvesting seasons were statistically Type Seasons n Free Peroxide Extra virgin olive oil samples from The region insignificant (p>0.05). of Acidity Number Mediterrenean region and Riviera type olive Olive (oleic (meq oil samples from the Aegean regions had *Different letters in the same coloumn (a,b) Differences in free acidities of extra virgin and Oil acid, active slightly higher average peroxide values than represent statistically significant differences Riviera type olive oil samples due to %) O2/kg the other regions studied. Peroxide values in results (p<0.05) packaging were statistically insignificant X oil) determined in this current study, were (p>0.05). However generally higher results X generally higher than the results some

International Journal of Food Engineering Research (IJFER) Year 2 Num 2 - 2016 (1-17) 9 EVALUATION OF TURKISH OLIVE OIL QUALITY: SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND TURKISH FOOD CODEX previous literature concerning the similar Table 8. Average peroxide number values of (65.34 %, p<0.05). This might be attributed to Heptade 0.07b 0.16 0.06b 0.19a regions of growth and/or olive varieties [20, Riviera type olive oil samples according to the argument that the cooler regions having cenoic ab 25-27]; although some similar results were their growing regions higher amounts of oleic acid % [31]. Increase acid also found [28]. The main reason might be the in unsaturated fatty acid content with the Arachidi 0.11a 0.14 0.24a 0.10a enlonged storage periods between production Olive oil n Peroxide decrease in temperature was also reported by c acid a and analyses in addition to negative storage sample Number previous studies [32, 33]. Eicosen 0.29a 0.22 0.06a 0.16a conditions such as light [23, 29]. Average (meq active oic acid a peroxide number values were higher in glass O2/kg oil) Table 9. Average fatty acid % results of Palmitol 1.16a 0.91 0.99ab 0.90b bottle types (19.38 meq active O2/kg) in extra X extra virgin olive oil samples according to eic acid b virgin olive oil samples, whereas plastic bottle The Aegean 12 12.58 different growing regions Myristic 0b 0b 0.01a 0b types had higher average peroxide values region Fatty Growing region acid (12.57 meq active O2/kg) in Riviera type olive The Southeast 4 10.50 Acid The The The The oil samples. region Composi Mediterr Aeg South Mar *Different letters in the same line (a,b) The Marmara 4 11.75 tion, % enean ean east mara represent statistically significant differences Table 7. Average peroxide number values of region region regi regio regio in results (p<0.05) extra virgin olive oil samples according to on n n their growing regions Olive Oil Purity Analyses Oleic 65.34b 69.9 69.59 71.34 Results gathered around provinces in the 4.2.1. Fatty Acid Composition Results of acid 9a a a growing regions, displayed that the lowest Olive oil sample n Peroxide Olive Oil Samples Linoleic 9.95a 9.43 9.47a 8.69a oleic acid content was in the extra virgin olive Number (meq The most common fatty acid found in olive oil acid a acid from Hatay-Samandağ (62.31%, product active O2/kg is the oleic acid and according to the overall Linoleni 0.65a 0.64 0.59a 0.60a of season 2013-2014). The highest oleic acid oil) results, all samples provided the required legal c acid a content was also measured in the extra virgin X minimum limits for oleic acid. Moreover, all Palmitic 15.88a 14.9 15.68 14.42 olive oil belonging to 2013-2014 season, in The Mediterranean 10 18.10 samples are within the limits for linoleic, acid 1a a a Aydn-Nazilli (78. 02 %). Statistically region palmitic, stearic, arachidic and myristic acids. Stearic 2.93a 2.51 2.94a 2.85a significant and lower (p<0.05) steraic acid % The Aegean region 28 17.32 Average fatty acid % results according to acid b was detected the samples from the Aegean The Marmara 12 16.75 different growing regions were given in Table Heptade 0.11a 0.11 0.11a 0.11a region. Differences among different provinces region 9. The highest average oleic acid was 71.34% canoic a and regions of growing were also common to

in the Marmara region, while the lowest result acid previous findings [34]. was detected in the Mediterreanaen region

10 G. TÜRK, Z. Tacer-CABA, Burcu ÇAKMAK, H. ÖZPINAR previous literature concerning the similar Table 8. Average peroxide number values of (65.34 %, p<0.05). This might be attributed to Heptade 0.07b 0.16 0.06b 0.19a regions of growth and/or olive varieties [20, Riviera type olive oil samples according to the argument that the cooler regions having cenoic ab 25-27]; although some similar results were their growing regions higher amounts of oleic acid % [31]. Increase acid also found [28]. The main reason might be the in unsaturated fatty acid content with the Arachidi 0.11a 0.14 0.24a 0.10a enlonged storage periods between production Olive oil n Peroxide decrease in temperature was also reported by c acid a and analyses in addition to negative storage sample Number previous studies [32, 33]. Eicosen 0.29a 0.22 0.06a 0.16a conditions such as light [23, 29]. Average (meq active oic acid a peroxide number values were higher in glass O2/kg oil) Table 9. Average fatty acid % results of Palmitol 1.16a 0.91 0.99ab 0.90b bottle types (19.38 meq active O2/kg) in extra X extra virgin olive oil samples according to eic acid b virgin olive oil samples, whereas plastic bottle The Aegean 12 12.58 different growing regions Myristic 0b 0b 0.01a 0b types had higher average peroxide values region Fatty Growing region acid (12.57 meq active O2/kg) in Riviera type olive The Southeast 4 10.50 Acid The The The The oil samples. region Composi Mediterr Aeg South Mar *Different letters in the same line (a,b) The Marmara 4 11.75 tion, % enean ean east mara represent statistically significant differences Table 7. Average peroxide number values of region region regi regio regio in results (p<0.05) extra virgin olive oil samples according to on n n their growing regions Olive Oil Purity Analyses Oleic 65.34b 69.9 69.59 71.34 Results gathered around provinces in the 4.2.1. Fatty Acid Composition Results of acid 9a a a growing regions, displayed that the lowest Olive oil sample n Peroxide Olive Oil Samples Linoleic 9.95a 9.43 9.47a 8.69a oleic acid content was in the extra virgin olive Number (meq The most common fatty acid found in olive oil acid a acid from Hatay-Samandağ (62.31%, product active O2/kg is the oleic acid and according to the overall Linoleni 0.65a 0.64 0.59a 0.60a of season 2013-2014). The highest oleic acid oil) results, all samples provided the required legal c acid a content was also measured in the extra virgin X minimum limits for oleic acid. Moreover, all Palmitic 15.88a 14.9 15.68 14.42 olive oil belonging to 2013-2014 season, in The Mediterranean 10 18.10 samples are within the limits for linoleic, acid 1a a a Aydn-Nazilli (78. 02 %). Statistically region palmitic, stearic, arachidic and myristic acids. Stearic 2.93a 2.51 2.94a 2.85a significant and lower (p<0.05) steraic acid % The Aegean region 28 17.32 Average fatty acid % results according to acid b was detected the samples from the Aegean The Marmara 12 16.75 different growing regions were given in Table Heptade 0.11a 0.11 0.11a 0.11a region. Differences among different provinces region 9. The highest average oleic acid was 71.34% canoic a and regions of growing were also common to in the Marmara region, while the lowest result acid previous findings [34]. was detected in the Mediterreanaen region

International Journal of Food Engineering Research (IJFER) Year 2 Num 2 - 2016 (1-17) 11 EVALUATION OF TURKISH OLIVE OIL QUALITY: SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND TURKISH FOOD CODEX

Ten samples of extra virgin olive oil and 8 results of their study [19]. However, *Different letters in the same line (a,b) These findings were parallel to previous samples of Riviera type olive oil werestudied generally, the literature findings related to represent statistically significant differences findings [36]. [19] and according to the results, oleic acid% oleic acid were higher than the present in results (p<0.05) of extra virgin olive oil samples changed findings; whereas the palmitic acid contents Generally type of packaging had almost no between 71.09 and 74.82 %, while in Riviera were generally lower [34, 35]. In samples with Table 11: Average fatty acid % results effect on the fatty acid compositions of olive type samples it was 70.72-73.23%. In the lower oleic acid content, the other fatty acids according to the seasons of harvest oil samples (p>0.05) as given in Table 12. current study, except for the highest sample such as palmitic acid and linoleic acid were Fatty Acid Season of harvest (78.02 %); oleic acid content in extra virgin more dominant with higher values. Average Composition, % 2012- 2013- Table 12: Average fatty acid % results olive oil samples anged between 62.31-74.94 fatty acid % results of extra virgin olive oil 2013 2014 according to the type of packaging % and for Riviera samples 67.44-72.41 %. samples according to olive varieties in Table Oleic acid 69.56 69.67 Therefore the findings were close to the 10. Linoleic acid 8.95 9.73 Fatty Acid Type of Packaging Linolenic acid 0.63 0.62 Composition, % Glass Plastic Can Table 10: Average fatty acid % results of extra virgin olive oil Palmitic acid 15.12 14.85 Oleic acid 69.68 69.57 69.84 samples according to olive varieties Stearic acid 2.67 2.67 Linoleic acid 9.36 9.31 9.57 Fatty Acid Ayval Gemlik Memecik Mixed Heptadecanoic 0.12 0.11 Linolenic acid 0.60 0.64 0.60 Composition, % k acid Palmitic acid 14.99 14.99 14.82 a a a Oleic acid 68.87 71.08 69.72 69.56 Heptadecenoic 0.16 0.14 Stearic acid 2.68 2.64 3.02 a b a a Linoleic acid 9.76 7.23 10.03 9.30 acid Heptadecanoic 0.13 0.10 0.14 b b a a Linolenic acid 0.57 0.58 0.72 0.63 Arachidic acid 0.12 0.15 acid a a a a Palmiticacid 15.63 14.72 14.27 15.10 Eikosenoic acid 0.36 0.06 Heptadecenoic 0.16 0.14 0.21 bc a c ab Stearic acid 2.55 3.03 2.46 2.75 Palmitoleic acid 0.99 0.91 acid a a a a Heptadeccdanoic acid 0.15 0.11 0.06 0.12 Myristic acid 0 0 Arachidic acid 0.16 0.12 0.21 a ab b b Heptadecenoic acid 0.22 0.17 0.11 0.13 Eicosenoic acid 0.39 0.13 0.22 a a Arachidic acid 0.12 0.07 0.15 0.15 As depicted in Table 11, seasons of harvest Palmitoleic acid 0.91 0.97 0.84 Eicosenoic acid 0.38a 0.12a 0.22a 0.14a made only slight differences on the average Myristic acid 0 0 0 Palmitoleic acid 0.88a 1.09a 0.94a 0.96a fatty acid % results of the samples (p>0.05). Myristic acid 0 0 0 0 The comparison of oleic acid % contents of CONCLUSION two harvest seasons revealed that, Gemlik had Results presented in this study, indicated that the highest, while Ayvalk had the lowest some of the olive oil samples were not within content of oleic acid %, for both seasons. the required limits given in Turkish Food

12 G. TÜRK, Z. Tacer-CABA, Burcu ÇAKMAK, H. ÖZPINAR

Ten samples of extra virgin olive oil and 8 results of their study [19]. However, *Different letters in the same line (a,b) These findings were parallel to previous samples of Riviera type olive oil werestudied generally, the literature findings related to represent statistically significant differences findings [36]. [19] and according to the results, oleic acid% oleic acid were higher than the present in results (p<0.05) of extra virgin olive oil samples changed findings; whereas the palmitic acid contents Generally type of packaging had almost no between 71.09 and 74.82 %, while in Riviera were generally lower [34, 35]. In samples with Table 11: Average fatty acid % results effect on the fatty acid compositions of olive type samples it was 70.72-73.23%. In the lower oleic acid content, the other fatty acids according to the seasons of harvest oil samples (p>0.05) as given in Table 12. current study, except for the highest sample such as palmitic acid and linoleic acid were Fatty Acid Season of harvest (78.02 %); oleic acid content in extra virgin more dominant with higher values. Average Composition, % 2012- 2013- Table 12: Average fatty acid % results olive oil samples anged between 62.31-74.94 fatty acid % results of extra virgin olive oil 2013 2014 according to the type of packaging % and for Riviera samples 67.44-72.41 %. samples according to olive varieties in Table Oleic acid 69.56 69.67 Therefore the findings were close to the 10. Linoleic acid 8.95 9.73 Fatty Acid Type of Packaging Linolenic acid 0.63 0.62 Composition, % Glass Plastic Can Table 10: Average fatty acid % results of extra virgin olive oil Palmitic acid 15.12 14.85 Oleic acid 69.68 69.57 69.84 samples according to olive varieties Stearic acid 2.67 2.67 Linoleic acid 9.36 9.31 9.57 Fatty Acid Ayval Gemlik Memecik Mixed Heptadecanoic 0.12 0.11 Linolenic acid 0.60 0.64 0.60 Composition, % k acid Palmitic acid 14.99 14.99 14.82 a a a Oleic acid 68.87 71.08 69.72 69.56 Heptadecenoic 0.16 0.14 Stearic acid 2.68 2.64 3.02 a b a a Linoleic acid 9.76 7.23 10.03 9.30 acid Heptadecanoic 0.13 0.10 0.14 b b a a Linolenic acid 0.57 0.58 0.72 0.63 Arachidic acid 0.12 0.15 acid a a a a Palmiticacid 15.63 14.72 14.27 15.10 Eikosenoic acid 0.36 0.06 Heptadecenoic 0.16 0.14 0.21 bc a c ab Stearic acid 2.55 3.03 2.46 2.75 Palmitoleic acid 0.99 0.91 acid a a a a Heptadeccdanoic acid 0.15 0.11 0.06 0.12 Myristic acid 0 0 Arachidic acid 0.16 0.12 0.21 a ab b b Heptadecenoic acid 0.22 0.17 0.11 0.13 Eicosenoic acid 0.39 0.13 0.22 a a Arachidic acid 0.12 0.07 0.15 0.15 As depicted in Table 11, seasons of harvest Palmitoleic acid 0.91 0.97 0.84 Eicosenoic acid 0.38a 0.12a 0.22a 0.14a made only slight differences on the average Myristic acid 0 0 0 Palmitoleic acid 0.88a 1.09a 0.94a 0.96a fatty acid % results of the samples (p>0.05). Myristic acid 0 0 0 0 The comparison of oleic acid % contents of CONCLUSION two harvest seasons revealed that, Gemlik had Results presented in this study, indicated that the highest, while Ayvalk had the lowest some of the olive oil samples were not within content of oleic acid %, for both seasons. the required limits given in Turkish Food

International Journal of Food Engineering Research (IJFER) Year 2 Num 2 - 2016 (1-17) 13 EVALUATION OF TURKISH OLIVE OIL QUALITY: SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND TURKISH FOOD CODEX

Codex standard. Unsatisfactory results are virgin olive oils: a survey of their by membrane treatment,” Food [11] Monti, M. C., Margarucci, L., Tosco, thought to be related with the problems in sensory properties, health effects, Chemistry, 124, pp. 1308–1315, 2011. A., Riccio, R., Casapullo, A., “New storage conditions, olive quality, effect of antioxidant activity and analytical [8] Keys, A., Mienotti, A., Karvonen, M. J., insights on the interaction mechanism geographical differences and process methods. An overview of the last Aravanis, C., Blackburn, H., Buzina, R., between tau protein and oleocanthal, an conditions. On the other hand, fatty acid decade,” Molecules, 12, pp. 1679–1719, Djordjevic, B. S., Dontas, A. S., extra-virgin olive-oil bioactive compositions were within the limits of 2007 Fidanza, F., Keys, M. H., Kromhout, D., component,” Food Function, 2 (7), pp. Turkish standards and these results were [4] Simopoluos, A. P., “The Mediterranean Nedeljkovic, S., Punsar, S., Seccareccia, 423–428, 2011. diets: What is so special about the diet F., Toshima, H., “The diet and 15-year [12] Anonim, T.C. Gümrük ve Ticaret indicators of purity but not adulteration. This of Greece? The scientific evidence,” death rate in the seven countries study,” Bakanlğ Kooperatifçilik Genel study was significant as giving idea about the The Journal of Nutrition, 131, pp. American Journal of Epidemiology, 124 Müdürlüğü, “2014 Yl Zeytin ve quality problems present in the olive oil 3065S–3073S, 2001. (6), pp. 903–915. 1986. Zeytinyağ Raporu,” Şubat 2015, products found in the Turkish market and [5] Calvo, P., Castaño, Á́ . L, Lozano, M., [9] Machowetz, A., Poulsen, H. E., http://koop.gtb.gov.tr/data/53319ec14 frequent occurance of unsuitabilities of these González-Gómez, “Influence of the Gruendel, S., Weimann, A., Fito, M., 87c8eb1e43d72a1/2014%20Zeytinya% products in the legal limit values. microencapsulation on the quality Marrugat, J., De La Torre, R., Salonen, C4%9F%C4%B1%20Raporu.pdf,

parameters and shelf-life of extra-virgin J. T., Nyyssonen, K., Mursu, J., 2015. REFERENCES olive oil encapsulated in the presence of Nascetti, S., Gaddi, A., Kiesewetter, H., [13] Altan, A., Kola, O., Yağ İşleme [1] Visioli F., Galli C., “Olive oil phenols BHT and different capsule wall Baumler, H., Selmi, H., Kaikkonen, J., Teknolojisi, Bizim Büro Yaynevi, and their potential effects on human components,” Food Research Zunft, H. J. F., Convas, M. I., Koebnick, Sakarya, 230, 2009. health,” Journal of Agricultural and International, 45, pp. 256-261, 2012. C., “Effect of olive oils on biomarkers of [14] Lerma-García M. J., Herrero-Martínez Food Chemistry, 46, 10, pp. 4292-4296, [6] Riediger, N. D., Othhnman, R. A., Suh, oxidative DNA stress in Northern and J. M., Ramis-Ramos G., Simó-Alfonso 1998 M., Moghadasian, M. H., “A systemic Southern Europeans,” FASEB Journal, E. F., “Evaluation of the quality of olive [2] Öztürk F., Yalçn M., Draman H., review of the roles of n-3 fatty acids in 21 (1), pp. 45–52, 2007. oil using fatty acid profiles by direct “Türkiye zeytinyağ ekonomisine health and disease,” Journal of the [10] Abuznait, A. H., Qosa, H., Busnena, B. infusion electrospray ionization mass genel bir bakş,” Gda Teknolojileri American Dietetic Association, 109(4), A., El Sayed, K. A., Kaddoumi, A., spectrometry,” Food Chemistry, 107, Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt 4, No: 2, pp. 668–679, 2009. “Olive-oil derived oleocanthal enhances pp. 1307-1313, 2008. 35-51, 2009 [7] Servilli, M., Esposto, S., Veneziani, G., b-amyloid clearance as a potential [15] Güler Z., Gürsoy-Balc A. C., Üstünel http://teknolojikarastirmalar. Urbani, S., Taticchi, A., Di Maio, I., neuroprotective mechanism against M. A, Taş, E., “Hatay bölgesinde com/pdf/tr/02_2009_4_2_58_411.pdf “Improvement of bioactive phenol Alzheimer’s disease: in vitro and in vivo üretilen natürel zeytinyağlarnn kalite [3] Bendini, A., Cerretani, L., Carrasco- content in virgin olive oil with an olive- studies,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience, kriterleri,” Akademik Gda, Say 24, ss. Pancorbo, A., Gómez-Caravaca, A. M., vegetation water concentrate produced 4(6), pp. 973–982, 2013. 18–21, 2006. Segura-Carretero, A., Fernández- Gutiérrez, A., “Phenolic molecules in

14 G. TÜRK, Z. Tacer-CABA, Burcu ÇAKMAK, H. ÖZPINAR

Codex standard. Unsatisfactory results are virgin olive oils: a survey of their by membrane treatment,” Food [11] Monti, M. C., Margarucci, L., Tosco, thought to be related with the problems in sensory properties, health effects, Chemistry, 124, pp. 1308–1315, 2011. A., Riccio, R., Casapullo, A., “New storage conditions, olive quality, effect of antioxidant activity and analytical [8] Keys, A., Mienotti, A., Karvonen, M. J., insights on the interaction mechanism geographical differences and process methods. An overview of the last Aravanis, C., Blackburn, H., Buzina, R., between tau protein and oleocanthal, an conditions. On the other hand, fatty acid decade,” Molecules, 12, pp. 1679–1719, Djordjevic, B. S., Dontas, A. S., extra-virgin olive-oil bioactive compositions were within the limits of 2007 Fidanza, F., Keys, M. H., Kromhout, D., component,” Food Function, 2 (7), pp. Turkish standards and these results were [4] Simopoluos, A. P., “The Mediterranean Nedeljkovic, S., Punsar, S., Seccareccia, 423–428, 2011. diets: What is so special about the diet F., Toshima, H., “The diet and 15-year [12] Anonim, T.C. Gümrük ve Ticaret indicators of purity but not adulteration. This of Greece? The scientific evidence,” death rate in the seven countries study,” Bakanlğ Kooperatifçilik Genel study was significant as giving idea about the The Journal of Nutrition, 131, pp. American Journal of Epidemiology, 124 Müdürlüğü, “2014 Yl Zeytin ve quality problems present in the olive oil 3065S–3073S, 2001. (6), pp. 903–915. 1986. Zeytinyağ Raporu,” Şubat 2015, products found in the Turkish market and [5] Calvo, P., Castaño, Á́ . L, Lozano, M., [9] Machowetz, A., Poulsen, H. E., http://koop.gtb.gov.tr/data/53319ec14 frequent occurance of unsuitabilities of these González-Gómez, “Influence of the Gruendel, S., Weimann, A., Fito, M., 87c8eb1e43d72a1/2014%20Zeytinya% products in the legal limit values. microencapsulation on the quality Marrugat, J., De La Torre, R., Salonen, C4%9F%C4%B1%20Raporu.pdf, parameters and shelf-life of extra-virgin J. T., Nyyssonen, K., Mursu, J., 2015. REFERENCES olive oil encapsulated in the presence of Nascetti, S., Gaddi, A., Kiesewetter, H., [13] Altan, A., Kola, O., Yağ İşleme [1] Visioli F., Galli C., “Olive oil phenols BHT and different capsule wall Baumler, H., Selmi, H., Kaikkonen, J., Teknolojisi, Bizim Büro Yaynevi, and their potential effects on human components,” Food Research Zunft, H. J. F., Convas, M. I., Koebnick, Sakarya, 230, 2009. health,” Journal of Agricultural and International, 45, pp. 256-261, 2012. C., “Effect of olive oils on biomarkers of [14] Lerma-García M. J., Herrero-Martínez Food Chemistry, 46, 10, pp. 4292-4296, [6] Riediger, N. D., Othhnman, R. A., Suh, oxidative DNA stress in Northern and J. M., Ramis-Ramos G., Simó-Alfonso 1998 M., Moghadasian, M. H., “A systemic Southern Europeans,” FASEB Journal, E. F., “Evaluation of the quality of olive [2] Öztürk F., Yalçn M., Draman H., review of the roles of n-3 fatty acids in 21 (1), pp. 45–52, 2007. oil using fatty acid profiles by direct “Türkiye zeytinyağ ekonomisine health and disease,” Journal of the [10] Abuznait, A. H., Qosa, H., Busnena, B. infusion electrospray ionization mass genel bir bakş,” Gda Teknolojileri American Dietetic Association, 109(4), A., El Sayed, K. A., Kaddoumi, A., spectrometry,” Food Chemistry, 107, Elektronik Dergisi, Cilt 4, No: 2, pp. 668–679, 2009. “Olive-oil derived oleocanthal enhances pp. 1307-1313, 2008. 35-51, 2009 [7] Servilli, M., Esposto, S., Veneziani, G., b-amyloid clearance as a potential [15] Güler Z., Gürsoy-Balc A. C., Üstünel http://teknolojikarastirmalar. Urbani, S., Taticchi, A., Di Maio, I., neuroprotective mechanism against M. A, Taş, E., “Hatay bölgesinde com/pdf/tr/02_2009_4_2_58_411.pdf “Improvement of bioactive phenol Alzheimer’s disease: in vitro and in vivo üretilen natürel zeytinyağlarnn kalite [3] Bendini, A., Cerretani, L., Carrasco- content in virgin olive oil with an olive- studies,” ACS Chemical Neuroscience, kriterleri,” Akademik Gda, Say 24, ss. Pancorbo, A., Gómez-Caravaca, A. M., vegetation water concentrate produced 4(6), pp. 973–982, 2013. 18–21, 2006. Segura-Carretero, A., Fernández- Gutiérrez, A., “Phenolic molecules in

International Journal of Food Engineering Research (IJFER) Year 2 Num 2 - 2016 (1-17) 15 EVALUATION OF TURKISH OLIVE OIL QUALITY: SOME QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS AND TURKISH FOOD CODEX

[16] Anonim, TS EN ISO 3960:2010, virgin olive oil: a study of five crop kalite kriterleri arasndaki ilişkiler,” [34] Tanlgan, K., Özcan, M. M., Ünver, A., “Hayvansal ve Bitkisel Kat ve Sv seasons. Composition, quality and Ulusal Zeytin ve Zeytinyağ “Physical and chemical characteristics Yağlar-Peroksit değeri tayini- oxidative stability,” Food Chemistry, Sempozyumu ve Sergisi, 15-17 Eylül of five Turkish olive (Olea europea L.) İyodometrik (görsel) son nokta tayini,” 74, pp. 267-274, 2001. 2006/İzmir, 347-357. 2006. varieties and their oils,” Grasas Y 2010. [23] Gutiérrez, F. R., Herrera, C. G., [28] Kaftan A., “Farkl yöre zeytinlerinden Aceites, 58 (2), pp. 142-147, 2007. [17] Grossi, M., Di Lecce, G., Gallina, T., Guttierez, G.-Q, “Estudio de la cine´tica elde edilen naturel zeytinyağnn [35] Arslan D., “Physico-chemical Riccò B., “A novel electrochemical de evolutio´n de los ´ndices de calidad duyusal kalitesini oluşturan lezzet characteristics of olive fruits of Turkish method for olive oil acidity del aceite de oliva virgen durante su maddelerinin SPME/GC/MS ve lezzet varieties from the province of Hatay,” determination,” Microelectronics conservatio´n en envases comerciales,” profili analizi teknikleri kullanlarak Grasas Y Aceites, 63(2), pp. 158-166, Journal, 2014. Grasas y Aceites, 39, pp. 245–253, belirlenmesi,” Ege Üniversitesi Doktora 2012. [18] Anonim, TS 4664 EN ISO 5508:1996, 1988. Tezi, p. 158, 2007. [36] Gürdeniz, G., Ozen, B., Tokatli, F., “Hayvansal ve Bitkisel Kat ve Sv [24] Mastrobaistta, G., “Effect of light on [29] Bubola, K. B., Koprivnjak, O., Sladonja, “Classification of Turkish olive oils Yağlar-Yağ Asitleri Metil Esterlerinin extra virgin olive oils in different types B., Belobrajic, I., “Influence of storage with respect to cultivar, geographic Gaz Kromatografisiyle Analizi,” 1996. of glass bottles,” Italian Journal of Food temperature on quality parameters, origin and harvest year, using fatty acid [19] Bykl, K., “Türk Zeytinyağlarnn Science, 3, pp. 191–195, 1990. phenols and volatile compounds of profile and mid-IR ,” Saflk Derecelerinin Belirlenmesi,” [25] Gökalp Y. H., Nas S., Ünsal M., Croatian virgin olive oils,” Grasas y European Food Research and Ankara Üniversitesi Yüksek Lisans “Yusufeli-Çoruh vadisinde yetiştirilen aceites, 65(3), pp. 034, 2014. Technology, 227, pp. 1275-1281, 2008. Tezi, 2009 farkl zeytin çeşitlerinin ve yağlarnn [31] Lotti, G., Izzo, R., Riu, P., “Effects of [20] Yavuz, H., “Türk Zeytinyağlarnn Baz baz fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikleri,” climate on acid and sterol composition Kalite ve Saflk Kriterlerinin Standart Dergisi, Ağustos 1993. of olive oil,” Riviera Soc. Ital. Scien., Belirlenmesi,” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, [26] Taşan, M., “Tekirdağ İli Şarköy 11, pp. 115, 1982. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Yöresinin Natürel Zeytin Yağlarnn [32] Osman, M., Metzidakis, I., Enstitüsü, 2008. Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Özelliklerinin Gerasopoulos, D., Kiritsakis, A., [21] Uğurlu, A, H., “Zeytin Olgunlaşma Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştrma,” “Qualitative changes in olive oil fruits Derecesinin Zeytinyağnn Fiziksel, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trakya collected from trees grown at two Kimyasal ve Antioksidan Özellikleri Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, s. altitudes,” Riv. Ita. Sost. Grasse, 71, pp. Üzerine Etkisi,” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 45, 1995. 187-190, 1994. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Gda [27] Köseoğlu O., Ünal K., Irmak Ş., [33] Kiritsakis, A. K., Olive Oil, 2nd Ed, Mühendisliği Anabilim Dal, 2011. Ayvalk, “Memecik ve Gemlik zeytin Food and Nutrition Press, Trumbull, CT, [22] Salvador M. D., Aranda F., Gómez- çeşitlerinden farkl hasat dönemlerinde 1998. Alonso S., Fregapane G., "Cornicobra elde edilen yağlarn aclklar ile baz

16 G. TÜRK, Z. Tacer-CABA, Burcu ÇAKMAK, H. ÖZPINAR

[16] Anonim, TS EN ISO 3960:2010, virgin olive oil: a study of five crop kalite kriterleri arasndaki ilişkiler,” [34] Tanlgan, K., Özcan, M. M., Ünver, A., “Hayvansal ve Bitkisel Kat ve Sv seasons. Composition, quality and Ulusal Zeytin ve Zeytinyağ “Physical and chemical characteristics Yağlar-Peroksit değeri tayini- oxidative stability,” Food Chemistry, Sempozyumu ve Sergisi, 15-17 Eylül of five Turkish olive (Olea europea L.) İyodometrik (görsel) son nokta tayini,” 74, pp. 267-274, 2001. 2006/İzmir, 347-357. 2006. varieties and their oils,” Grasas Y 2010. [23] Gutiérrez, F. R., Herrera, C. G., [28] Kaftan A., “Farkl yöre zeytinlerinden Aceites, 58 (2), pp. 142-147, 2007. [17] Grossi, M., Di Lecce, G., Gallina, T., Guttierez, G.-Q, “Estudio de la cine´tica elde edilen naturel zeytinyağnn [35] Arslan D., “Physico-chemical Riccò B., “A novel electrochemical de evolutio´n de los ´ndices de calidad duyusal kalitesini oluşturan lezzet characteristics of olive fruits of Turkish method for olive oil acidity del aceite de oliva virgen durante su maddelerinin SPME/GC/MS ve lezzet varieties from the province of Hatay,” determination,” Microelectronics conservatio´n en envases comerciales,” profili analizi teknikleri kullanlarak Grasas Y Aceites, 63(2), pp. 158-166, Journal, 2014. Grasas y Aceites, 39, pp. 245–253, belirlenmesi,” Ege Üniversitesi Doktora 2012. [18] Anonim, TS 4664 EN ISO 5508:1996, 1988. Tezi, p. 158, 2007. [36] Gürdeniz, G., Ozen, B., Tokatli, F., “Hayvansal ve Bitkisel Kat ve Sv [24] Mastrobaistta, G., “Effect of light on [29] Bubola, K. B., Koprivnjak, O., Sladonja, “Classification of Turkish olive oils Yağlar-Yağ Asitleri Metil Esterlerinin extra virgin olive oils in different types B., Belobrajic, I., “Influence of storage with respect to cultivar, geographic Gaz Kromatografisiyle Analizi,” 1996. of glass bottles,” Italian Journal of Food temperature on quality parameters, origin and harvest year, using fatty acid [19] Bykl, K., “Türk Zeytinyağlarnn Science, 3, pp. 191–195, 1990. phenols and volatile compounds of profile and mid-IR spectroscopy,” Saflk Derecelerinin Belirlenmesi,” [25] Gökalp Y. H., Nas S., Ünsal M., Croatian virgin olive oils,” Grasas y European Food Research and Ankara Üniversitesi Yüksek Lisans “Yusufeli-Çoruh vadisinde yetiştirilen aceites, 65(3), pp. 034, 2014. Technology, 227, pp. 1275-1281, 2008. Tezi, 2009 farkl zeytin çeşitlerinin ve yağlarnn [31] Lotti, G., Izzo, R., Riu, P., “Effects of [20] Yavuz, H., “Türk Zeytinyağlarnn Baz baz fiziksel ve kimyasal özellikleri,” climate on acid and sterol composition Kalite ve Saflk Kriterlerinin Standart Dergisi, Ağustos 1993. of olive oil,” Riviera Soc. Ital. Scien., Belirlenmesi,” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, [26] Taşan, M., “Tekirdağ İli Şarköy 11, pp. 115, 1982. Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Yöresinin Natürel Zeytin Yağlarnn [32] Osman, M., Metzidakis, I., Enstitüsü, 2008. Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Özelliklerinin Gerasopoulos, D., Kiritsakis, A., [21] Uğurlu, A, H., “Zeytin Olgunlaşma Belirlenmesi Üzerine Bir Araştrma,” “Qualitative changes in olive oil fruits Derecesinin Zeytinyağnn Fiziksel, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Trakya collected from trees grown at two Kimyasal ve Antioksidan Özellikleri Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, s. altitudes,” Riv. Ita. Sost. Grasse, 71, pp. Üzerine Etkisi,” Yüksek Lisans Tezi, 45, 1995. 187-190, 1994. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Gda [27] Köseoğlu O., Ünal K., Irmak Ş., [33] Kiritsakis, A. K., Olive Oil, 2nd Ed, Mühendisliği Anabilim Dal, 2011. Ayvalk, “Memecik ve Gemlik zeytin Food and Nutrition Press, Trumbull, CT, [22] Salvador M. D., Aranda F., Gómez- çeşitlerinden farkl hasat dönemlerinde 1998. Alonso S., Fregapane G., "Cornicobra elde edilen yağlarn aclklar ile baz

International Journal of Food Engineering Research (IJFER) Year 2 Num 2 - 2016 (1-17) 17