Agrarian Class Struggle and the South African War, 1899-1902
UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND AFRICAN STUDIES INSTITUTE African Studies Seminar Paper to be presented in RW 4.00pm MARCH 1987 Title: Agrarian Class Struggle and the South African War, 1899-1902, by: Jeremy Krikler No. 204 My thanks to the following people for criticism, advice and help of various kinds: Russell Ally, Helen Bradford, Colin Bundy, Eliza Kentridge, Richard Mendelsohn, Julian Rollnick and Maureen Swan. None of these people, some of whose criticisms were delivered in the forum of a seminar, are responsible for the arguments presented in this study. M r~ s. r> s ;vr s and !D istr LJi-xci ±^1^. Rule ± in rlv — x e-t^l-^ t^XJl MAP OF THE TRANSVAAL COLONY Art/-- Co/OMtt/ A Ttmtorist Dittncf Bound* ntt In the immediate aftermath of the South African War, the Bri- tish divided the Transvaal into five regions for the purposes of "native administration". Each of these regions was commanded by a native commissioner (NC) . They were stationed in the following dis- trits: Zoutpansberg, Lydenburg, Pretoria, Rustenburg and Waterburg and were responsible for the northern, eastern, central and southern western, and north-western zones of the colony respectively. Thus, for example, the Lydenburg NC was responsible for the Eastern Trans- vaal generally (including such districts as Barberton, Carolina, Ermelo, Middelburg, Piet Retief and Wakkerstroom as well as Lyden- burg itself).This point needs to be laboured for when, in the text, the NC of a particular district is cited referring to affairs within it, he will often be referring to the entire region under his co- mmand and not merely to the district by which he is designated.
[Show full text]