DOCSLIB.ORG

Second Target Station Workshop Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Second Target Station Workshop Report 3 Workshop Organization Co-Chair M. R. Eskildsen (University of Notre Dame) B. Khaykovich (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) Program Advisory Committee M. K. Crawford (DuPont) K. W. Herwig (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) S. W. Jorgensen (General Motors) Y.-J. Kim (University of Toronto) T. L. Kuhl (University of California, Davis) S. Krueger (NIST Center for Neutron Research) C. Leighton (University of Minnesota) R. J. McQueeney (Iowa State University) F. Meilleur (Oak Ridge National Laboratory/North Carolina State University) B. D. Olsen (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) E. H. Snell (SUNY-Buffalo) N. Wagner (University of Delaware) S. D. Wilson (University of California, Santa-Barbara) P. M. Woodward (Ohio State University) Workshop Support T. M. Holder T. K. Sawyer 4 Table of Contents Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Initialisms .................................................................................................... 8 1. Workshop Summary ........................................................................................................................... 12 2. Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................. 14 2.1 Future Science Needs for Neutrons and Their Role .................................................................. 14 2.1.1 Quantum Materials ....................................................................................................... 15 2.1.2 Soft Matter ................................................................................................................... 15 2.1.3 Biology ......................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.4 Materials Discovery, Characterization, and Application ............................................. 17 2.2 Addressing Future Science Challenges with the Second Target Station .................................. 18 3. Science Discussion Working Group Summaries ................................................................................ 18 3.1 Membranes and Thin Films ...................................................................................................... 19 3.2 Structure and dynamics of biomacromolecules, large Complexes, and intrinsically disordered systems .................................................................................................................. 22 3.3 Colloids, self-assembled surfactants, charged polymers in solution, polymer networks, hydrogels, nanocomposites and hierarchical systems ............................................................. 23 3.4 Dynamics in soft matter, glasses, gels, transport in soft matter, and active soft matter ............ 24 3.5 Hetero- and Nano-Structured Materials .................................................................................... 27 3.6 Bulk Functional Materials and Emergent States of Matter ....................................................... 29 3.7 In situ chemical reactions and catalysts .................................................................................... 31 3.8 Advanced Functional Materials ................................................................................................ 33 3.9 Advanced Energy Materials ...................................................................................................... 35 3.10 Engineering Materials ............................................................................................................... 37 4. Instrument and Technique Working Group Summaries ..................................................................... 39 4.1 Powder Diffraction .................................................................................................................... 39 4.2 Single-Crystal Diffraction ......................................................................................................... 40 4.3 SANS ........................................................................................................................................ 42 4.4 Reflectometry ............................................................................................................................ 44 4.5 Direct Geometry Spectrometers ................................................................................................ 48 4.6 High-Resolution Backscattering and Neutron Spin Echo ......................................................... 50 4.7 Inverse geometry spectrometers for chemical spectroscopy ..................................................... 52 4.8 Imaging and Engineering Diffraction ....................................................................................... 54 4.9 Fundamental Physics................................................................................................................. 56 Appendix 1. WORKSHOP Agenda .............................................................................................................. 3 Appendix 2. Workshop worksheets. ............................................................................................................. 5 Appendix 3. Current and Proposed Neutron Sources at ORNL .................................................................... 7 A3.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 7 A3.1 Source Characteristics and Strengths .......................................................................................... 8 A3.2 STS Instrument Strategies ............................................................................................................ 9 Appendix 4. Instrument Concepts ............................................................................................................... 11 A.4.1 EWALD – Enhanced Wide Angle Laue Diffractometer .......................................................... 12 A.4.2 HighResPD – High-Resolution Powder Diffractometer ........................................................... 14 A.4.3 NeSCry – Neutron Single Crystal Diffractometer .................................................................... 16 A.4.4 VERDI – Versatile Diffractometer for Complex Magnetic Structures ..................................... 18 A.4.5 MENUS - Materials Engineering by NeUtron Scattering ......................................................... 19 A.4.6 BWAVES – Broad-range Wide Angle Velocity Selector ......................................................... 21 A.4.7 CHESS – Chopper Spectrometer for Small Samples ................................................................ 23 A.4.8 HERTZ—High Energy Resolution Terahertz Spectrometer .................................................... 25 A.4.9 JANUS – INS Instrument for Catalysis .................................................................................... 27 A.4.0 MBARS – Mica Backscattering Spectrometer ......................................................................... 29 5 A.4.11 SPHIINXS – Spherical Indirect Inelastic Crystal Spectrometer ............................................. 31 A.4.12 XTREME-X – Extreme Environment Multi-Energy Spectrometer with Crystal Analyzers ................................................................................................................................ 33 A.4.13 CAMEA - Indirect time of flight spectrometer ....................................................................... 35 A.4.14 HiRes-SWANS – High Resolution Small/Wide Angle Neutron Scattering ........................... 37 A.4.15 ZEEMANS – High Magnetic Field Beam Line ...................................................................... 38 A.4.16 FLOODS – Flux-Optimized Order/Disorder SANS ............................................................... 40 A.4.17 M-STAR – Magnetism-Second Target Advanced Reflectometer .......................................... 42 A.4.18 WASABI –Wide and Small Angles with Big Intensity .......................................................... 44 A.4.19 QIKR – Quite Intense Kinetics Reflectometer ........................................................................ 46 A.4.20 VBPR – Variable Beam Profile Reflectometer ....................................................................... 48 A.4.21 POPCORN -- Polychromatic Phase-Contrast Neutron Imaging ............................................. 50 A.4.22 nEDM@STS – A neutron electric dipole moment (EDM) experiment at the second target station ............................................................................................................................ 51 Appendix 5. Workshop Participants ........................................................................................................... 53 6 7 ABBREVIATIONS, ACRONYMS, AND INITIALISMS 3D 3-dimensional AC alternating current DNP dynamic nuclear polarization DOE Department of Energy DYPol dynamically polarized crystallography ESS European Spallation Source FI ferromagnetic insulator FTS first target station FWHM full width at half maximum GID grazing incidence diffraction GI-SANS grazing incidence small angle scattering GINS grazing incidence neutron scattering HFIR High Flux Isotope Reactor Hz Hertz IDPs intrinsically disordered proteins IDRs intrinsically disordered protein regions ILL Institut Laue-Langevin INS inelastic neutron scattering IR infared J-PARC Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex LDRD Laboratory Directed Research and Development
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Development, Design & Technology of Neutron Scattering Instruments By
    Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft der Mitglied Development, design & technology of neutron scattering instruments by ZAT Dr. R. Hanslik - Central Institute of Technology (ZAT) Overview • FRM II Garching - Overview • ZAT-Projects at the research reactor FRM II in Garching − Some current developments and new options for the neutron scattering instruments in Garching • Neutron Spin Echo Spectrometer for SNS in Oak Ridge (USA) • Summary ZAT – Central Institute of Technology R. Hanslik FRM II in Garching Neutron Guide Hall Reactor building Neutron Guide Hall Reactor building East FRM II West FRM I ZAT – Central Institute of Technology R. Hanslik ZAT projects at the research reactor FRM II in Garching • Upgraded instruments moved from Dido reactor at FZJ to FRM II in Garching • New instruments development and manufacture by ZAT • New beam hole plug SR5 ZAT – Central Institute of Technology R. Hanslik Moved and upgraded instruments Neutron Guide Hall West KWS 2 KWS 1 J-NSE DNS KWS 3 ZAT – Central Institute of Technology R. Hanslik J-NSE Juelich - Neutron Spin Echo Spectrometer Tool to study slow dynamics in soft matter, glasses, magnetic materials, and biological systems at highest energy resolution ZAT – Central Institute of Technology R. Hanslik NSE ZAT Developments und Modifications Adaptation of the Shielding for polarizer support system to and drive polarizer the new neutron adjustment beam height (beam height at FRMII about 270mm lower than by DIDO) Development of Double correction correction coil coil adjustement for two independent XY systems. ZAT – Central Institute of Technology R. Hanslik DNS Diffuse Neutron Scattering Spectrometer Tool to study magnetic structure, superconductivity and diffuse scattering ZAT – Central Institute of Technology R.
    [Show full text]
  • The High-Flux Backscattering Spectrometer at the NIST Center For
    REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS VOLUME 74, NUMBER 5 MAY 2003 The high-flux backscattering spectrometer at the NIST Center for Neutron Research A. Meyera) National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Center for Neutron Research, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8562 and University of Maryland, Department of Materials and Nuclear Engineering, College Park, Maryland 20742 R. M. Dimeo, P. M. Gehring, and D. A. Neumannb) National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST Center for Neutron Research, Gaithersburg, Maryland 20899-8562 ͑Received 18 September 2002; accepted 23 January 2003͒ We describe the design and current performance of the high-flux backscattering spectrometer located at the NIST Center for Neutron Research. The design incorporates several state-of-the-art neutron optical devices to achieve the highest flux on sample possible while maintaining an energy resolution of less than 1 ␮eV. Foremost among these is a novel phase-space transformation chopper that significantly reduces the mismatch between the beam divergences of the primary and secondary parts of the instrument. This resolves a long-standing problem of backscattering spectrometers, and produces a relative gain in neutron flux of 4.2. A high-speed Doppler-driven monochromator system has been built that is capable of achieving energy transfers of up to Ϯ50 ␮eV, thereby extending the dynamic range of this type of spectrometer by more than a factor of 2 over that of other reactor-based backscattering instruments. © 2003 American Institute of Physics. ͓DOI: 10.1063/1.1568557͔ I. INTRODUCTION driven monochromator ͑Sec. III E͒, which operates with a cam machined to produce a triangular velocity profile, ex- Neutron scattering is an invaluable tool for studies of the tends the dynamic range of the spectrometer by more than a structural and dynamical properties of condensed matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Conceiving a Backscattering Spectrometer at the European Spallation
    ICANS XX, 20th meeting on Collaboration of Advanced Neutron Sources March 4 – 9, 2012 Bariloche, Argentina Conceiving a Backscattering Spectrometer at the European Spallation Source to Bridge Time and Length Scales H.N. Bordallo1,2, R.E. Lechner1, J. Eckert3, K. H. Andersen1 and O. Kirstein1. 1. ESS Design update Programme-Denmark; Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen. 2. European Spallation Source ESS AB, Stora Algatan 4, Lund, Sweden. 3. University South Florida, Florida, USA [email protected] Abstract Neutron backscattering spectroscopy has been proposed by Maier-Leibnitz nearly 50 years ago. This method improved the energy resolution of neutron spectrometers pushing it into the μeV range. The prototype BS spectrometer built at the FRM in the 1960s yielded an energy resolution of 0.6 μeV (FWHM). Two experiments were then carried out successfully in a completely new energy transfer window: quasi-elastic scattering in viscous Glycerol and nuclear spin excitations in V2O3.With this experimental breakthrough the term 'microeV' was coined in neutron scattering. The development of the neutron backscattering technique follows the basic idea to use Bragg angles near 90° with moderate collimation for both beam monochromatisation and analysis, in order to obtain very high-energy resolution. Since the early experiments backscattering spectroscopy has largely progressed. Nowadays the need to study systems involving longer length scales, which in turn require an increase of the corresponding time scale, i.e. higher energy resolution, is pressing. Moreover, the rapid rise in computer power, coupled with multi-processor computers and better simulation algorithms has led to significant improvements in the capability of molecular dynamics simulation for aiding the understanding of dynamic molecular order on various time scales.
    [Show full text]
  • Geant4 Simulation of the Neutron Backscattering Technique in Farm Soil for Landmine Detection
    Geant4 simulation of the neutron backscattering technique in farm soil for landmine detection Daniel Alejandro Andrade Rodr´ıguez Universidad Nacional de Colombia Facultad de Ciencias Departamento de F´ısica Grupo de f´ısicanuclear - GFNUN Advisor Prof. Fernando Cristancho December 5, 2014 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The interaction of neutrons with matter2 2.1 Moderation process: Slowing down the neutrons....................3 2.2 Neutron detection....................................6 2.3 The 3He proportional counter..............................6 2.4 The wall effect......................................7 3 The neutron backscattering technique8 3.1 The simulation setup and data analysis.........................8 3.2 Details of the implementation in Geant4........................ 10 3.2.1 Soil implementation............................... 11 3.2.2 252Cf source and landmine implementation................... 12 4 Geant4 simulation of the neutron backscattering technique 13 4.1 NBT in dry soil..................................... 13 4.2 NBT with moisture in the soil............................. 16 4.3 Amplitude relation.................................... 19 5 Conclusions 21 ii List of Figures 2.1 Elastic scattering in the laboratory system (left) and the center mass system (right). A neutron (mass m) with initial velocity v0 is scattered by a target nucleus M initially at rest...........................................3 2.2 Total cross section for three different targets commonly used in the neutron detection (3He, 6Li and 10He ) as a function of the incident neutron energy. The cross section for thermal neutrons (E = 0:025 eV) is about 4 order of magnitude larger than the cross section for fast neutrons (E = 1 MeV)......................6 2.3 Product reaction inside the detector, if the reactions happens near to the detector wall, part of the energy could not be registered (right).................7 3.1 Simulation setup of the NBT for the detection of a landmine buried in two different kind of soils (sand and farm soil).
    [Show full text]
  • Fuel Cell Electrode Characterization Using Neutron Scattering
    materials Article Fuel Cell Electrode Characterization Using Neutron Scattering Olaf Holderer 1,* , Marcelo Carmo 2, Meital Shviro 2 , Werner Lehnert 2,3 , Yohei Noda 4, Satoshi Koizumi 4, Marie-Sousai Appavou 1 , Marina Appel 1 and Henrich Frielinghaus 1 1 Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich Centre for Neutron Science (JCNS) at MLZ, 85747 Garching, Germany; [email protected] (M.-S.A.); [email protected] (M.A.); [email protected] (H.F.) 2 Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Energy and Climate Research, IEK-14: Electrochemical Process Engineering, 52425 Jülich, Germany; [email protected] (M.C.); [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (W.L.) 3 Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, RWTH Aachen University, 52062 Aachen, Germany 4 Ibaraki University, D302 IQBRC 162-1, Shirakata, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki 305-8577, Japan; [email protected] (Y.N.); [email protected] (S.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 13 February 2020; Accepted: 19 March 2020; Published: 24 March 2020 Abstract: Electrochemical energy conversion and storage is key for the use of regenerative energies at large scale. A thorough understanding of the individual components, such as the ion conducting membrane and the electrode layers, can be obtained with scattering techniques on atomic to molecular length scales. The largely heterogeneous electrode layers of High-Temperature Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cells are studied in this work with small- and wide-angle neutron scattering at the same time with the iMATERIA diffractometer at the spallation neutron source at J-PARC, opening a view on structural properties on atomic to mesoscopic length scales.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Probing Dynamics at Interfaces: Options for Neutron and X
    Probing Dynamics at Interfaces: Options for Neutron and X-ray Spectroscopy Maikel C. Rheinstädter1*, Tilo Seydel1, Bela Farago1 and Tim Salditt2 1Institut Laue-Langevin, 6 rue Jules Horowitz, BP 156, 38042 Grenoble Cedex, France 2Institut für Röntgenphysik, Georg-August Universität, Geistrasse 11, 37037 Göttingen, Germany Dated: Wednesday, November 24, 2004 Abstract Inelastic neutron and X-ray scattering experiments on surfaces and interfaces are a challenging topic in modern physics. Particular interest arises regarding surfaces and interfaces of soft matter and biological systems. We review both neutron and x-ray spectroscopic techniques with view at their applicability to these samples. We discuss the different methods, namely neutron triple-axis, backscattering and spin-echo spectroscopy as well as x-ray photon correlation spectroscopy, in the context of planar lipid membrane models as an example. By the combination of the different methods, a large range in momentum and energy transfer is accessible. Introduction An outstanding problem of modern condensed matter physics relates to the question how structure, thermodynamics, phase transitions and molecular motions change from the bulk values when the spatial dimensions are reduced. In recent years, a growing interest has arisen in studying dynamics at surfaces and interfaces in as large a range of time scales as possible. While most spectroscopic techniques, as e.g. nuclear magnetic resonance or dielectric spectroscopy, are limited to the center of the Brillouin zone at Q=0 and probe the macroscopic response, neutron and x-ray scattering experiments give the unique access to microscopic dynamics at length scales of e.g. intermolecular distances. To enlarge the Q-ω range to a maximum, several experimental techniques from neutron and x-ray scattering have to be combined.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Release from Sodium Alanate Observed by Time-Resolved
    Hydrogen Release from Sodium Alanate Observed by Time-resolved Neutron Backscattering Aline L´eon Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Institute of Nanotechnology, Hermann-von-Helmholtz-Platz 1, 76344 Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany∗ Joachim Wuttke J¨ulich Centre for Neutron Science JCNS, Forschungszentrum J¨ulich GmbH, Outstation at FRM II, Lichtenbergstr. 1, 85747 Garching, Germany† (Dated: December 6, 2018) Innermolecular motion in Na3AlH6 gives rise to a Lorentzian spectrum with a wavenumber- ◦ independent width of about 1 µeV at 180 C, which is probably due to rotation of AlH6 tetrahedra. There is no such quasielastic line in NaAlH4 or NaH. Based on this finding, time-resolved measure- ments on the neutron backscattering spectrometer SPHERES were used to monitor the decompo- sition kinetics of sodium alanate, NaAlH4 → Na3AlH6 → NaH. Both reaction steps were found to be accelerated by autocatalysis, most likely at the surfaces of Na3AlH6 and NaH crystallites. PACS numbers: 88.30.R-,82.30.Lp,63.50.-x,61.05.F- I. INTRODUCTION (1) and (2) depend only little on doping, but much on pressure [10]. At 1 bar, they are about 30◦C and 110◦C, Sodium alanate NaAlH4 is widely studied as a model respectively, with uncertainties of several degrees [11, system for hydrogen storage [1–3]. While hydrogen ex- Fig. 2]. A thermodynamic argument suggests that at change in pure bulk alanate is not reversible, hydrogen particle sizes below 50 nm, NaAlH4 may decompose in a desorption and absorption kinetics has been improved de- single step into NaH, Al, and H2 [12]. On the other hand, cisively by doping [4, 5] and nanostructuring [6–8].
    [Show full text]
  • A Time-Of-Flight Backscattering Spectrometer at the Spallation Neutron Source, BASIS E
    A time-of-flight backscattering spectrometer at the Spallation Neutron Source, BASIS E. Mamontov and K. W. Herwig Citation: Review of Scientific Instruments 82, 085109 (2011); doi: 10.1063/1.3626214 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3626214 View Table of Contents: http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/rsi/82/8?ver=pdfcov Published by the AIP Publishing Articles you may be interested in A radial collimator for a time-of-flight neutron spectrometer Rev. Sci. Instrum. 85, 085101 (2014); 10.1063/1.4891302 Spin exchange optical pumping based polarized 3He filling station for the Hybrid Spectrometer at the Spallation Neutron Source Rev. Sci. Instrum. 84, 065108 (2013); 10.1063/1.4809942 The new cold neutron chopper spectrometer at the Spallation Neutron Source: Design and performance Rev. Sci. Instrum. 82, 085108 (2011); 10.1063/1.3626935 Spallation neutron source (SNS) AIP Conf. Proc. 613, 15 (2002); 10.1063/1.1472000 Time-of-flight neutron spectrometer for JT-60U Rev. Sci. Instrum. 72, 828 (2001); 10.1063/1.1323240 This article is copyrighted as indicated in the article. Reuse of AIP content is subject to the terms at: http://scitationnew.aip.org/termsconditions. Downloaded to IP: 129.21.35.191 On: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 10:04:05 REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS 82, 085109 (2011) A time-of-flight backscattering spectrometer at the Spallation Neutron Source, BASIS E. Mamontova) and K. W. Herwig Neutron Scattering Science Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA (Received 1 June 2011; accepted 28 July 2011; published online 25 August 2011) We describe the design and current performance of the backscattering silicon spectrometer (BASIS), a time-of-flight backscattering spectrometer built at the spallation neutron source (SNS) of the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Neutron Scattering Instrumentation
    Chapter 3 Neutron Scattering Instrumentation Helmut Schober Abstract This chapter gives a short introduction into neutron scattering instrumentation to allow the non-specialist reader to acquire the basics of the method necessary to understand the technical aspects in the topical articles. The idea is not to go into details but to elaborate on the principles as general as possible. We start with a short discussion of neutron production at large-scale facilities. We then present the main characteristics of neutron beams and show how these can be tai- lored to the specific requirements of the experiment using neutron optical devices and time-of-flight discrimination. This will allow us in the final section to present a non-exhaustive selection of instrument classes. Emphasis will be given to the design aspects responsible for resolution and dynamic range, as these define the field of scientific application of the spectrometers. 3.1 Introduction Free neutrons are elementary particles discovered by James Chadwick [1, 2] in 1932. The quantum mechanical state of a free neutron is determined by the momen- tum |p > (p = k, k = h/λ) and spin state |s >, where, for all practical purposes, it will be sufficient to work with non-relativistic energies (E = 2k2/2m). The mass of the neutron1 is given as 1.008 amu, which leads us to the relation between energy and wavelength of a neutron: −2 2 E[meV] ≡ 2.0725k2 A˚ ≡ 81.8204λ−2 A˚ . (3.1) 1We use the constants as given by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Constants/): h = 6.62606896 × 10−34 Js and m = 1.674927211 × 10−27 kg.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Resolution Neutron Spectroscopy Using Backscattering and Neutron Spin-Echo Spectrometers in Soft and Hard Condensed Matter
    TECHNICAL REVIEWS High-resolution neutron spectroscopy using backscattering and neutron spin-echo spectrometers in soft and hard condensed matter Jason S. Gardner 1*, Georg Ehlers2, Antonio Faraone3 and Victoria García Sakai4 Abstract | The instruments best suited to performing high-energy-resolution neutron spectroscopy are spin-echo spectrometers and backscattering spectrometers. The development of these experimental techniques dates back almost half a century, and most major neutron scattering facilities operate mature spectrometers of one or both classes. Recent advances in instrumentation and neutron sources are enhancing their performance and expanding their capabilities, with the objective of enabling researchers to tackle new and more complex problems. In this Technical Review, we assess the current state of the art in high-energy-resolution neutron spectrometers, showcasing their role in the study of nanoscale dynamics in soft and biological materials, as well as disordered magnets. The dynamic processes that occur on the nanoscale in Key aspects of neutron scattering many materials, ranging from proteins and quantum As neutrons have no charge, they are insensitive to the magnets to catalysts, are crucial to their functional­ charge in the electron cloud of atoms and are scattered ity and are often essential to understanding their bulk directly by the nuclei. The interaction potential between properties. A wide range of characterization tools can a neutron and the nucleus, quantified as a scattering be used to probe the complex set of dynamic modes that cross section, is isotope dependent3 (Supplementary are found in materials, including dielectric spectros­ Table 1); for example, there is a notable difference copy, muon spin spectroscopy, NMR or Mössbauer in the scattering cross sections of hydrogen and its spectroscopy.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Backscattering Technique for the Detection of Buried Organic Objects
    UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE F´ISICA Neutron Backscattering Technique for the Detection of Buried Organic Objects Angel Humberto Cruz Silva Master‘s Thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Science in Physics. Supervisor PhD. Fernando Cristancho Bogot´a- Colombia Nov. 2009 ii Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 Basic aspects of the neutron-matter interaction 3 2.1 Introduction .................................... 3 2.1.1 Elasticscattering ............................. 4 2.2 Neutrondetection ................................ 6 2.2.1 The 3Heproportionalcounter. 7 2.2.2 Thewalleffect................................ 8 3 Neutron Physics with Geant4 9 3.1 Exponential attenuation in dry sand (SiO2) .................... 9 3.1.1 Exponential attenuation using Geant4. ....... 11 3.2 Thermalizationinahydrogentarget . ....... 13 3.3 Interactions in a 3Hedetector............................ 13 3.3.1 Fast neutron and gamma-ray interactions . ...... 15 4 The Neutron Backscattering Technique 19 4.1 NBTset-upanddataanalysis. 19 4.2 Geant4simulationofNBT . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 22 4.2.1 NBTincludingmoistureinthesoil . 24 4.3 ExperimentalResults ............................. 31 4.3.1 DepthDependence ............................. 34 4.3.2 Moisturedependence . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 34 5 Results with the prototype HYDAD-D 39 5.1 TheHYDAD-Dset-up................................ 39 5.2 TheHYDAD-Ddetectionparameter . 40 5.3 Laboratorytests ................................. 41 5.4
    [Show full text]
  • A Neutron Publication Survey 2005-2015
    Do neutrons publish? A neutron publication survey 2005-2015 T. Gutberlet1, D. Tunger2, P. Zeitler2, T. Br¨uckel 1 1J¨ulich Centre for Neutron Science, Forschungszentrum J¨ulich GmbH, J¨ulich, Germany 2Zentralbibliothek, Forschungszentrum J¨ulich GmbH, J¨ulich, Germany Corresponding author: [email protected] April 20, 2018 Abstract Publication in scientific journals is the main product of scientific research. The amount of papers published, their placement in high impact journals, and their citations are used as a measure of the productivity of individual scientists, institutes or fields of science. To give a profound basis on the publication record and the quality of the publication efforts in neutron scattering, a survey has been done following the approach to use bibliographic databases. Questions to be addressed by this survey are: Is the productivity of research with neutrons changing over the years? Which is the geographic distribution in this field of research? Which ones are leading facilities? Is the quality of publications changing? The main results found are presented. 1 Introduction Publication in scientific journals is the main product of scientific research. In peer reviewed journals the manuscript is refereed prior to publication by experts in the corresponding field of science. Published papers of interest are cited in other publications by the scientists, which distributes a publication within the scientific community. Journals which have a significant reputation in a scientific area are preferred by authors as they may help to reach out to as many of interested scientists in the particular field. This helps to level the impact of a paper and in response of the scientific journal.
    [Show full text]