DOCSLIB.ORG

Hemsworth Ward

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Hemsworth Ward InstantAtlas™ Server 6 Wakefield Ward Profile Selection: Hemsworth Ward Introduction The Wakefield district is divided into 21 wards, with each ward being represented by three councillors. Councillors are elected by residents of the district and are responsible for making decisions about local services and budgets, such as Council Tax, on behalf of the local community. Each councillor serves for a period of four years. The ward boundaries are reviewed periodically, and the current boundaries were last altered in 2004. Hemsworth Ward is situated in the south east of the District and incorporates Fitzwilliam, Kinsley, Hemsworth and South Hiendley. The East Coast Mainline rail route runs through the middle of the ward. Selected landmarks: Fitzwilliam Country Park Hemsworth Water Park Holgate hospital Profile created: 9/1/2017 Population Profile Population Size The most accurate population estimates are produced every ten years from the Census. These are updated annually using administrative data to produce mid- year population estimates. The mid-2014 estimates show that the size of the resident population in Hemsworth Ward is 15,536 people. The tables below shows the percentage breakdown by age groups and gender. The actual number of people in each age group is shown in brackets. Population Size Hemsworth Ward Total population (2014) 15,536 people Total male population (2014) 7,638 people Total female population (2014) 7,898 people Source: Office for National Statistics Population Groups (% of total population) Hemsworth Ward Wakefield England People aged 0-15 (2014) 18.8% (2927 people) 18.5% 19.0% People aged 16-29 (2014) 17.9% (2782 people) 16.9% 18.3% People aged 30-44 (2014) 17.2% (2667 people) 18.9% 19.9% People aged 45-64 (2014) 27.0% (4190 people) 27.3% 25.3% People aged 65 and over (2014) 19.1% (2963 people) 18.4% 17.6% Source: Office for National Statistics Ethnicity and Language Wakefield district has become more ethnically diverse over the past 10 years. In 2001, the district's ethnic population represented just 3.3% of the total population, but the 2011 Census shows this has risen to 7.2%. This proportion, though, is much lower than the England average of 20.2%. A large part of the district increase in the ethnic minority population has been due to immigration from Eastern Europe, particularly from Poland. There has also been continued immigration from South Asia, and a small but growing number of people immigrating from Africa. The ethnic mix for this area is shown in the table below. Population by Ethnicity (% of total population) Hemsworth Ward Wakefield England White: English/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish/British 97.0% (14888 people) 92.8% 79.8% White: Irish 0.2% (27 people) 0.3% 1.0% White: Gypsy or Irish Traveller 0.0% (2 people) 0.1% 0.1% White: Other White 1.0% (156 people) 2.3% 4.6% Mixed/multiple ethnic group: White and Black Caribbean 0.4% (61 people) 0.3% 0.8% Mixed/multiple ethnic group: White and Black African 0.1% (19 people) 0.1% 0.3% Mixed/multiple ethnic group: White and Asian 0.1% (21 people) 0.3% 0.6% Mixed/multiple ethnic group: Other Mixed 0.1% (17 people) 0.2% 0.5% Asian/Asian British: Indian 0.2% (29 people) 0.5% 2.6% Asian/Asian British: Pakistani 0.2% (30 people) 1.5% 2.1% Asian/Asian British: Bangladeshi 0.0% ( people) 0.0% 0.8% Asian/Asian British: Chinese 0.2% (24 people) 0.3% 0.7% Asian/Asian British: Other Asian 0.1% (18 people) 0.4% 1.6% Black/African/Caribbean/Black British: African 0.2% (35 people) 0.6% 1.8% Black/African/Caribbean/Black British: Caribbean (% of total population) 0.1% (10 people) 0.1% 1.1% Black/African/Caribbean/Black British: Other Black (% of total population) 0.1% (7 people) 0.1% 0.5% Other ethnic group: Arab (% of total population) 0.0% (3 people) 0.1% 0.4% Other ethnic group: Any other ethnic group 0.0% (3 people) 0.2% 0.6% Source: 2011 Census, Office for National Statistics The 2011 Census also provides information about people's country of birth. This presents us with a better understanding of the size of newly arrived immigrant communities within the district. District-wide, the 2011 Census showed that people from the ten European Union Accession States (A10) made up the largest group of people born outside Britain. The numbers of people in Hemsworth Ward born outside Britain are shown below, although only a selected group of countries/continents are included. Country of Birth (% of total population) Hemsworth Ward Wakefield England A10: Lithuania (2011) 0.0% (3 people) 0.1% 0.2% A10: Poland (2011) 0.5% (80 people) 1.3% 1.1% A10: Romania (2011) 0.0% (1 people) 0.0% 0.2% A10: Other EU accession countries (2011) 0.2% (27 people) 0.4% 0.7% Africa (2011) 0.3% (46 people) 0.8% 2.4% India (2011) 0.1% (15 people) 0.3% 1.3% Pakistan (2011) 0.1% (10 people) 0.6% 0.9% Source: 2011 Census, Office for National Statistics In Hemsworth Ward, 1.3% of the population have a main language that is not English, and of this group, 7.7% cannot speak English at all. Proficiency in English Hemsworth Ward Wakefield England % of people for whom English is not their main language 1.3% (196 people) 3.5% 8.0% % English not main language: can speak English very well 44.9% (88 people) 29.0% 41.5% % English not main language: can speak English well 29.1% (57 people) 41.4% 37.7% % English not main language: cannot speak English well 18.4% (36 people) 24.5% 17.4% % English not main language: cannot speak English 7.7% (15 people) 5.1% 3.3% Source: 2011 Census, Office for National Statistics Religion The 2011 Census questions on religion were not compulsory to answer, and in Hemsworth Ward 6.5% of people didn't answer the question and 24.3% of people stated that they didn't follow a religion. The religions that people do follow are shown in the table below. Religion (% of total population) Hemsworth Ward Wakefield England Christian (2011) 68.4% (10492 people) 66.4% 59.4% Muslim (2011) 0.3% (44 people) 2.0% 5.0% Hindu (2011) 0.2% (23 people) 0.3% 1.5% Sikh (2011) 0.0% (3 people) 0.1% 0.8% Jewish (2011) 0.0% ( people) 0.0% 0.5% Buddhist (2011) 0.1% (21 people) 0.2% 0.5% Other religion (2011) 0.3% (45 people) 0.3% 0.4% No religion (2011) 24.3% (3729 people) 24.4% 24.7% Religion not stated (2011) 6.5% (993 people) 6.4% 7.2% Source: 2011 Census, Office for National Statistics Household Structure The 2011 Census shows that there are a total of 6,566 households in Hemsworth Ward. Household composition classifies households according to the relationships between the household members. A cohabiting couple family consists of two people of any sex who are living together as a couple, with or without their child(ren), but who are not married or in a same­sex civil partnership. A dependent child is a person aged 0 – 15 in a household (whether or not in a family) or aged 16 – 18 in full­time education and living in a family with his or her parent(s). Household Composition (% of all households) Hemsworth Ward Wakefield England One person household: Aged 65 and over (2011) 13.9% (910 households) 13.0% 12.4% One person household: Other (2011) 15.6% (1026 households) 16.7% 17.9% One family only: All aged 65 and over (2011) 8.6% (564 households) 8.5% 8.1% One family only: Married or same-sex civil partnership couple: No children (2011) 13.5% (883 households) 14.1% 12.3% One family only: Married or same-sex civil partnership couple: Dependent children (2011) 12.3% (809 households) 14.1% 15.3% One family only: Married or same-sex civil partnership couple: All children non-dependent 7.1% (463 households) 6.4% 5.6% (% of all households) (2011) One family only: Cohabiting couple: No children (2011) 4.4% (288 households) 5.7% 5.3% One family only: Cohabiting couple: Dependent children (2011) 6.3% (415 households) 5.2% 4.0% One family only: Cohabiting couple: All children non-dependent (2011) 0.7% (47 households) 0.6% 0.5% One family only: Lone parent: Dependent children (2011) 8.7% (569 households) 7.6% 7.1% One family only: Lone parent: All children non-dependent (2011) 4.4% (286 households) 3.4% 3.5% Other household types: With dependent children (2011) 2.3% (149 households) 2.0% 2.7% Other household types: All full-time students (2011) 0.0% ( households) 0.0% 0.6% Other household types: All aged 65 and over (2011) 0.3% (18 households) 0.2% 0.3% Other household types: Other (2011) 2.1% (139 households) 2.6% 4.5% Source: 2011 Census, Office for National Statistics Levels of Deprivation As is the case across the country, there are parts of the Wakefield district where more people tend to be poorer, or less healthy, or more likely to be out of work. The English Indices of Deprivation are the most detailed and frequently used measure of deprivation. The Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) is calculated for every neighbourhood in England every three years, and it combines many variables, grouped into seven themes: Income Employment Health deprivation and disability Education, skills and training Barriers to housing and services Crime Living environment The IMD 2015 shows that conditions have worsened for some of the district’s most deprived areas relative to deprivation elsewhere in England.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • LEVEL 5 NORTH PREMIER Otley Preston Macclesfield Sandal
    LEVEL 5 NORTH PREMIER Otley Preston Macclesfield Sandal Billingham Blackburn Lymm Kirkby Lonsdale Rossendale Wirral Alnwick Burnage Northwich York LEVEL 6 North 1 West North 1 East Carlisle Morpeth Altrincham Kersal Ilkley Firwood Waterloo Cleckheaton Wilmslow Moortown Birkenhead Pk Driffield Stockport Heath Douglas(IOM) Morley Vale Of Lune Pocklington Penrith Scarborough Broughton Pk Malton and Norton Bowdon Bradford and Bingley Manchester Durham City Glossop Consett Kendal Old Brodleians Level 7 NORTH 2 WEST DUR/NORTH ONE YORKS ONE Warrington St Benedicts Beverley Keswick Percy Park O Crossleyans Rochdale W Hartlepool West Leeds Leigh Bradford Salem Anselmians Northern Selby Aspatria S Shields Westoe Goole Southport Stockton Dinnington Aspull Novocastrians Leodiensians Tarleton Medicals Bridlington De La Salle Whitley Bay Rockliff Pontefract Winnington Pk Acklam Huddersfield YMCA Bolton Hartlepool Rovers Roundhegians Orrell Horden and Peterlee Old Rishworthians Cockermouth Ponteland Middlesboro Sunderland One club to Level transfer to Yorks One LEVEL 8 LANCS/CHESHIRE ONE CUMBRIA Hoylake Wigton Congleton Whitehaven Ellesmere Pt Upper Eden New Brighton Hawcoat Pk Sefton Egremont Eccles Workington Millom Vagabonds Furness Pt Sunlight Silloth Windermere Creighton Carlisle Crusaders ???? D/N 2 YORKSHIRE TWO Gateshead Keighley North Shields Hullensians Barnard Castle Wensleydale Guisborough Wath upon Dearne Hartlepool Ripon Winlaton Vulcans Wheatley Hills Ryton North Ribblesdale Ashington Northallerton Whitby Old Grovians Bishop Auckland Thornensians Darlington Yarnbury Sedgefield Wetherby Redcar Leeds Corinthians Seaham Baildon LEVEL 9 LANCS/CHESHIRE TWO D/N THREE YORKSHIRE THREE Ramsey Gosforth Barnsley Birchfield Seaton Carew West Park Leeds Blyth Knottingley Wallsend Harrogate Pythons Liverpool University Houghton Old Otlensians Old Parkonians Newton Aycliffe Wibsey Newton Le Willows Seghill Ossett Mossley Hill Yarm Castleford Prudhoe and Stocksfield Halifax Vandals W.
    [Show full text]
  • 36 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    36 bus time schedule & line map 36 Barnsley Town Centre <-> South Elmsall View In Website Mode The 36 bus line (Barnsley Town Centre <-> South Elmsall) has 7 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Barnsley Town Centre <-> South Elmsall: 8:30 AM - 3:47 PM (2) Barnsley Town Centre <-> South Kirkby: 1:47 PM (3) Brierley <-> Barnsley Town Centre: 8:01 AM (4) Hemsworth <-> Barnsley Town Centre: 3:05 PM (5) Hemsworth <-> South Kirkby: 3:27 PM (6) South Elmsall <-> Barnsley Town Centre: 8:24 AM - 2:47 PM (7) South Elmsall <-> Hemsworth: 1:45 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 36 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 36 bus arriving.
    [Show full text]
  • Station Officer Michael Clive Mee, GM Ice Rescue Turns Into Tragedy
    MICHAEL CLIVE MEE 12-28-1995 PSDIVER MAGAZINE 12-28-1995 – South Yorkshire UK – Michael C Mee – FF – Off duty Ice Rescue Attempt Memorial Tribute by: Firefighters Memorial Trust Date added: 21 Mar 2016 https://www.theonlinebookcompany.com/OnlineBooks/FirefighterMemorialTrust/Celebrations/Firefight erMemorial/2920 Station Officer Michael Clive Mee, GM Brigade: South Yorkshire Brigade: South Yorkshire Date Inured: 28 December 1995 Location Injured: Hemsworth Water Park Died: 28 December 1995 Age: 48 Location Died: Pontefract Hospital Cause of Death: Due to cardiac arrest whilst attempting live rescue at drowning incident Current Fire Authority: South Yorkshire Posthumous award of George Medal for attempting to save drowning small girl Ice rescue turns into tragedy http://www.independent.co.uk/news/ice-rescue-turns-into-tragedy-1527587.html 28 December 1995 LOUISE JURY and WILL BENNETT Three die after five-hour fight to revive them fails An astonishing attempt by doctors to save the lives of a girl who fell into an icy lake and two men who plunged in to try to save her ended in failure last night when all three were declared dead. Medical teams fought for more than five hours to save Tracy Patterson, 11, who had run on to the one-inch-thick ice after a dog, and her two would-be rescuers Michael Mee, 48, an off-duty firefighter, and Jack Crawshaw, 51. All three were recovered from a lake at Kinsley, West Yorkshire, by police frogmen yesterday, but despite intensive hospital treatment they never regained consciousness. Medical teams attempted to warm the bodies of the victims, whose temperatures were so low as to be unrecordable when they arrived at Pontefract General Infirmary after nearly two hours in the freezing water.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Recommendations on the Future Electoral Arrangements for Wakefield
    Final recommendations on the future electoral arrangements for Wakefield Report to The Electoral Commission July 2003 © Crown Copyright 2003 Applications for reproduction should be made to: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office Copyright Unit. The mapping in this report is reproduced from OS mapping by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD 03114G. This report is printed on recycled paper. Report no. 342 2 Contents Page What is The Boundary Committee For England? 5 Summary 7 1 Introduction 13 2 Current electoral arrangements 15 3 Draft recommendations 19 4 Responses to consultation 21 5 Analysis and final recommendations 23 6 What happens next? 67 Appendices A Final recommendations for Wakefield: Detailed mapping 69 B First draft of electoral change Order for Wakefield 71 C Guide to interpreting the first draft of the electoral Order 76 3 4 What is The Boundary Committee for England? The Boundary Committee for England is a committee of The Electoral Commission, an independent body set up by Parliament under the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000. The functions of the Local Government Commission for England were transferred to The Electoral Commission and its Boundary Committee on 1 April 2002 by the Local Government Commission for England (Transfer of Functions) Order 2001 (SI 2001 no. 3692). The Order also transferred to The Electoral Commission the functions of the Secretary of State in relation to taking decisions on recommendations for changes to local authority electoral arrangements and implementing them.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 Joseph Friend Private Member Male U10 14 16 Oscar Hall Otley
    15 Joseph Friend Private Member Male U10 14 16 Oscar Hall Otley CC Male U10 7 56 Jacob Rook East Bradford CC Male U10 7 29 Mark Ketteringham Private Member Male U10 6 49 Joshua Turton East Bradford CC Male U10 5 38 Jody Mills Huddersfield Star Wheelers Male U10 5 26 Bryon Jaques Leeds Mercury Cycling Club Male U10 4 2 Ruaridh Aylward Otley CC Male U10 3 62 Lennart Rost Leeds Mercury Cycling Club Male U10 3 31 Nicky Langdon Private Member Male U10 1 10 Ben Crowther Leeds Mercury Cycling Club Male U10 0 24 Theo Hutter Leeds Mercury Cycling Club Male U10 0 36 Daniel Middlebrooke Otley CC Male U10 0 46 Freddie Portman WRTL Male U10 0 64 Joe Hemsworth East Bradford CC Male U10 0 69 Ryden Hindle East Bradford CC Male U10 0 77 Jaelan Johnson WRTL Male U10 0 47 Geniveve Schubert Otley CC Female U10G 11 1 Isla Aylward WRTL Female U10G 7 72 Rosa McAnilia Leeds Mercury Cycling Club Female U10G 6 59 Chloe Coldwell Vertex Female U10G 5 57 Lily Davies W Female U10G 2 17 Camilla Henry Private Member Female U10G 0 20 Amy Hodgkins Otley CC Female U10G 0 40 Darcey Mollitt WRTL Female U10G 0 43 Amber Peacock Otley CC Female U10G 0 60 Molly Horsman WRTL Female U10G 0 76 Ella Sanders Female U10G 0 63 Carmeron Carrington-Hodgson Leeds Mercury Cycling Club Male U12 12 34 James Luxton Otley CC Male U12 11 52 Jack Wilks Otley CC Male U12 9 11 Magnus Denwood Private Member Male U12 0 21 Alex Hodgkins Otley CC Male U12 0 33 Griff Lippiatt WRTL Male U12 0 53 Issac Wytchard Albarosa Cycling Club Male U12 0 54 Rhys Wytchard Albarosa Cycling Club Male U12 0 70 Issac
    [Show full text]
  • Neighbourhood Deprivation in Wakefield
    Centre for Regional Economic and Social Research Neighbourhood Deprivation in Wakefield David Robinson, Sarah Coward and Andrew Larkin 2003 A Report to the Wakefield Local Strategic Partnership Acknowledgements This report could not have been produced without the help of many people. We are particularly indebted to Graham Brown of the Wakefield HAZ and Tony Todd of Wakefield MDC, who provided invaluable guidance, help and support. We are also grateful to Lee Adams, formerly of the HAZ, and to Peter Lee of the Centre for Urban Studies at the University of Birmingham, for their assistance during the early stages of the research. The research would not have been possible without the active involvement and assistance of numerous agencies and service providers working in the case study neighbourhoods and across the district. Thanks in particular to the agencies and individual officers who agreed to be interviewed by the research team and provided frank and honest insights and to the SRB officers - Mark Cranmer, Penny Hudson, Stephan Nicholls and Kath Starks - who put us in touch with local groups and agencies in the case study neighbourhoods. We are also grateful to the various statutory agencies and individual officers who willingly provided documentary evidence and administrative data. The guarantee of anonymity for all contributors and respondents prevents us from naming organisations and individuals who were involved in the focus group sessions, but we would like to extend our thanks to all who co-operated with and contributed to the group discussions. Thanks must also be extended to the hundreds of residents who responded with willing to the household survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Wakefield Metropolitan District Council Home to School Transport
    WAKEFIELD METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COUNCIL HOME TO SCHOOL TRANSPORT POST 16 TRANSPORT POLICY 2018/2019 eport on: Transport policy statement for learners aged 16-18 in further education and training and continuing learners with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities aged 19 and over ACADEMIC YEAR: 2018/2019 1 1. SUMMARY OF POLICY STATEMENT AND MAIN OBJECTIVES 1.1 There is no automatic entitlement to free home to school or college transport once a student is over 16 years. Responsibility for making appropriate transport arrangements rests with a student and/or parents/carers. 1.2 Providing assisted transport (e.g. taxis, specially adapted vehicles) will only be provided in exceptional circumstances. 1.3 Wakefield Council is committed to ensuring that every child and young person can fulfil their potential. The aim of this policy is that all children and young people with an Education Health and Care Plan (EHCP) should lead lives that are as independent and as free from restriction as possible and that each child and young person is supported to achieve independent travel wherever practicable. 1.4 This policy explains the entitlement to travel assistance for children and young people post 16. Wakefield Council’s policies on travel to and from school and other establishments for statutory aged pupils and statutory aged pupils with special educational needs are available separately. 1.5 The main objective of the Wakefield Transport Partnership is to provide accessibility to education or training as a means of promoting learning, training, social inclusion, choice and diversity of learning provision. The central principal is that no learner should be prevented from taking part in full-time education (not less than 12 guided learning hours per week) or training because of the lack of support travelling to an education or training or learning provision or where appropriate, an independent specialist institution.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report on UK Supplementary Assessment Under the Air Quality
    Technical report on UK supplementary assessment under The Air Quality Directive (2008/50/EC), The Air Quality Framework Directive (96/62/EC) and Fourth Daughter Directive (2004/107/EC) for 2019 ___________________________________________________ Report for The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, The Welsh Government, The Scottish Government and The Department of the Environment for Northern Ireland Ricardo Energy & Environment/R/3472 ED 12633 | Issue Number 1 | Date 12/02/2021 Ricardo Energy & Environment Technical report on UK supplementary assessment | i under The Air Quality Directive (2008/50/EC), The Air Quality Framework Directive (96/62/EC) and Fourth Daughter Directive (2004/107/EC) for 2019 Customer: Contact: The Department for Environment, Food and Sally Whiting Rural Affairs, The Welsh Government, The Ricardo Energy & Environment Scottish Government and The Department of Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, the Environment for Northern Ireland United Kingdom Customer reference: t: +44 (0) 1235 75 3186 ecm_55496 e: [email protected] Confidentiality, copyright & reproduction: Ricardo is certificated to ISO9001, ISO14001 © Copyright Defra and OHSAS18001 This report is the Copyright of Defra and has been prepared by Ricardo Energy & Author: Environment, a trading name of Ricardo-AEA Daniel M Brookes, John R Stedman, Andrew J Ltd under contract ecm_55496 dated Kent, Sally L Whiting, Rebecca A Rose, Chris J 01/06/2019. The contents of this report may not Williams, Katherine L Pugsley, Jasmine V be reproduced, in whole or in part, nor passed to Wareham, Abigail Pepler any organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of Defra. Ricardo Approved By: Energy & Environment accepts no liability whatsoever to any third party for any loss or John Stedman damage arising from any interpretation or use of the information contained in this report, or Date: reliance on any views expressed therein, other 12 February 2021 than the liability that is agreed in the said contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Applications and Decisions for the North East of England
    OFFICE OF THE TRAFFIC COMMISSIONER (NORTH EAST OF ENGLAND) APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS PUBLICATION NUMBER: 6345 PUBLICATION DATE: 29/05/2019 OBJECTION DEADLINE DATE: 19/06/2019 Correspondence should be addressed to: Office of the Traffic Commissioner (North East of England) Hillcrest House 386 Harehills Lane Leeds LS9 6NF Telephone: 0300 123 9000 Fax: 0113 248 8521 Website: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners The public counter at the above office is open from 9.30am to 4pm Monday to Friday The next edition of Applications and Decisions will be published on: 05/06/2019 Publication Price 60 pence (post free) This publication can be viewed by visiting our website at the above address. It is also available, free of charge, via e-mail. To use this service please send an e-mail with your details to: [email protected] APPLICATIONS AND DECISIONS General Notes Layout and presentation – Entries in each section (other than in section 5) are listed in alphabetical order. Each entry is prefaced by a reference number, which should be quoted in all correspondence or enquiries. Further notes precede each section, where appropriate. Accuracy of publication – Details published of applications reflect information provided by applicants. The Traffic Commissioner cannot be held responsible for applications that contain incorrect information. Our website includes details of all applications listed in this booklet. The website address is: www.gov.uk/traffic-commissioners Copies of Applications and Decisions can be inspected
    [Show full text]
  • Local Government Boundary Commission for England Report No.349 O LOCAL GOVERNMENT' BOUND.'-RY COMMISSION for £.:Glaild
    Local Government Boundary Commission For England Report No.349 o LOCAL GOVERNMENT' BOUND.'-RY COMMISSION FOR £.:GLAilD CHAIRMAN Sir Nicholas Morrison KCB DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J M Rankin QC MEMBERS Lady Bowden Mr J T Brockbank Mr R R Thornton CB DL Mr D P Harrison Professor G E Cherry To the Rt. Hon. William Vftiitelaw,CH,MC,liIP Secretary of Stale for the Homo Department PROPOSALS FOP THp; FUTURE. ELECTORAL ARrtAKGlvIENTS FOR THE METROPOLITAN DISTRICT OF WAKivF'JKLD 1. We, the Local Government Boundary Commission for England, having carried out our initial review of the electoral arrangements for the metropolitan district of Wakefield in accordance with the requirements of section 63 of, and Schedule 9 to, the Local Government Act 1972, present our proposals for the future electoral arrangements for that district. 2. In accordance with the procedure laid down in section 60(1) and (2) of the 1972 Act, notice was given on 27 August 1975 that v:c were to undertake this review. This was incorporated in a consultation letter addressed to the District Council, copies of which were circulated to West Yorkshire County Council, the Members of Parliament for the constituencies concerned and tho headquarters of the main political parties. Copies were also sent to the editors of local newspapers circulating in the area and of the local government press. Notices inserted in the local press announced the start of the review and invited comments from members of the public a:id .frosi interested bodies. 3- Vakefield. Metropolitan District Council were invited to prepare a draft •scheme of representation for our consideration.
    [Show full text]
  • Ossett, Overton, Horbury, Middlestown Netherton and Lupset
    Local Support and Social Groups to aid independence and healthy living Wakefield North West - Ossett, Overton, Horbury, Middlestown Netherton and Lupset This information has been compiled by the Live Well Wakefield Service South West Yorkshire Partnership NHS Foundation Trust. We aim to provide accurate and useful information and every effort has been made to ensure this information is correct. This directory was updated on the date shown below. If that date is not within the last 6 months there will be a more up to date version available. Please note: This directory is not exhaustive and inclusion is not an endorsement. No responsibility can be taken for advice or services provided by any support service or social group listed. If you notice any errors or would like more information, please telephone our office on 01924 255363. Live Well Wakefield, the Agbrigg and Belle Vue Community Centre, Montague Street, Agbrigg, Wakefield WF1 5BB Updated October 2019 Areas covered in this Directory Page Ossett and Overton 2 - 11 Horbury, Middlestown and Netherton 12 - 21 Lupset 22 - 25 Other Useful Contacts area wide 26 - 27 Each area contains the following headings: Hobbies and Social Groups Lunch Clubs Physical Activity Support Groups Other Directories cover the following areas: PONTEFRACT, Carleton, Darrington, East Hardwick, Knottingley and Ferrybridge CASTLEFORD and Airedale SOUTH EAST – Ackworth, South Elmsall, South Kirkby, Upton, Hemsworth, Ryhill, and Havercroft NORMANTON, Altofts, Featherstone, Sharlston, Crofton, Walton and Nostell
    [Show full text]
  • Green Belt: Cudworth (Including the Village of Brierley)
    Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Barnsley Green Belt Review Green Belt: Cudworth (including the village of Brierley) 01 Issue | August 2014 This report takes into account the particular instructions and requirements of our client. It is not intended for and should not be relied upon by any third party and no responsibility is undertaken to any third party. Job number 233367-00 Ove Arup & Partners Ltd 13 Fitzroy Street London W1T 4BQ United Kingdom www.arup.com Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council 13TBarnsley Green Belt Review Green Belt: Cudworth (including the village of Brierley) Contents Page 1 Introduction 3 2 Assessment of Green Belt ‘General Areas’ 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 Approach 5 3 General Area - CUD1 7 3.1 Stage 1: CUD1 Green Belt Assessment Proforma 7 3.2 Functional Relationship to Existing Built Form 12 3.3 Stage 2: Technical Site Assessment 12 3.4 Stage 3: Evaluating the Potential Newly Defined Green Belt Boundaries 15 3.5 Conclusion for CUD1 16 4 ‘General Area’ – CUD2 17 4.1 Stage 1: CUD2 Site Assessment Proforma 17 4.2 Stage 2: Technical Site Assessment 22 4.3 Stage 3: Evaluating the Potential Newly Defined Green Belt Boundary 25 4.4 Conclusion for CUD2 27 5 ‘General Area’ CUD3 29 5.1 Stage 1: CUD3 Green Belt Assessment Proforma 29 5.2 Conclusion for CUD3 35 6 ‘General Area’ – CUD4 36 6.1 Stage 1: CUD4 Green Belt Assessment Proforma 36 6.2 Conclusions 42 7 ‘General Area’ – CUD5 43 7.1 Stage 1: CUD5 Green Belt Assessment Proforma 43 7.2 Conclusion for CUD5 49 8 ‘General Areas’ CUD6 50 8.1 Stage 1: CUD6 Green Belt
    [Show full text]