DOCSLIB.ORG

Kentucky Nonpoint Source Management Plan: a Strategy for 2019-2023

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kentucky Nonpoint Source Management Plan: a Strategy for 2019-2023 Kentucky Division of Water 2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Kentucky Nonpoint Source Management Plan: A Strategy for 2019-2023 Kentucky Division of Water June 30, 2019 The Kentucky Energy and Environment Cabinet does not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability and provides, on request, reasonable accommodations including auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all services, programs and activities. i | P a g e Kentucky Division of Water 2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan This page intentionally left blank. ii | P a g e Kentucky Division of Water 2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Table of Contents List of Figures ....................................................................................................................... vi List of Tables ....................................................................................................................... vii 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 8 1.1 Nonpoint Source Pollution vs. Point Source Pollution ............................................................. 8 1.2 Guiding Principles ..................................................................................................................... 9 1.3 Kentucky Nonpoint Source Management Plan ......................................................................... 9 1.3.1 EPA Key Components Requirements ................................................................................. 10 1.3.2 319(h) Nonpoint Source Grants ........................................................................................... 11 1.3.3 Program Goals, Objectives, and Strategies .......................................................................... 12 2. Water Quality Monitoring ................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Monitoring Programs .............................................................................................................. 13 2.1.1 Groundwater Monitoring .................................................................................................... 13 2.1.2 Surface Water Monitoring ................................................................................................... 13 2.1.3 Biological Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 13 2.1.4 Success Monitoring .............................................................................................................. 14 2.1.5 Lake Monitoring ................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.6 National Water Quality Initiative (NWQI) ............................................................................ 14 2.1.7 Mississippi River Basin Healthy Watersheds Initiative (MRBI) ............................................ 15 2.2 Quality Assurance (QA) ........................................................................................................... 15 2.2.1 Quality Assurance Project Plans (QAPPs) ............................................................................ 15 3. Watershed Management ................................................................................................. 16 3.1 Framework .............................................................................................................................. 17 3.2 Priority Watersheds ................................................................................................................ 18 3.3 Watershed Planning ................................................................................................................ 20 3.4 TMDL Implementation ............................................................................................................ 22 3.5 Watershed Planning Guidebook and the Kentucky Watershed Academy ............................. 22 3.6 Centers of Excellence .............................................................................................................. 22 3.8 Objectives and Action Items ................................................................................................... 23 Program Evaluation ....................................................................................................................... 24 4. Kentucky Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program Implementation ............................ 25 4.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 25 4.2 Program Partner Strategy ....................................................................................................... 25 4.3 Program Functional Areas ....................................................................................................... 26 5. Agriculture ...................................................................................................................... 27 5.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 27 5.2 DOW Strategy ......................................................................................................................... 28 iii | P a g e Kentucky Division of Water 2019 Nonpoint Source Management Plan 5.2.1 Partner Strategy ................................................................................................................... 28 5.2.2 Land Grant Institutions ........................................................................................................ 31 5.2.3 Education and Outreach ...................................................................................................... 31 5.2.4 Funding ................................................................................................................................ 33 5.3 Objectives and Action Items ................................................................................................... 34 6. Developed Lands ............................................................................................................. 37 6.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 37 6.2 DOW Strategy ......................................................................................................................... 37 6.2.1 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4s) .............................................................. 38 6.2.2 Combined Sewer Overflows (CSOs) ..................................................................................... 38 6.2.3 Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSOs) ......................................................................................... 38 6.2.4 Brownfields .......................................................................................................................... 39 6.2.5 Construction ......................................................................................................................... 39 6.2.6 Partner Strategy ................................................................................................................... 40 6.2.7 Education and Outreach ...................................................................................................... 42 Urban/Developed Lands ............................................................................................................... 42 Stormwater/MS4 .......................................................................................................................... 43 Construction .................................................................................................................................. 44 SSO/CSO ........................................................................................................................................ 44 6.2.8 Green Infrastructure ............................................................................................................ 45 6.2.9 Funding ................................................................................................................................ 45 6.3 Objectives and Action Items ................................................................................................... 46 7. Forestry ........................................................................................................................... 47 7.1 Summary ................................................................................................................................. 47 7.2 DOW Strategy ......................................................................................................................... 47 7.2.1 Partner Strategy ................................................................................................................... 48 7.2.2 Education and Outreach ...................................................................................................... 52 7.2.3 Funding ................................................................................................................................ 53 7.3 Objectives and Action Items ..................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kenton County, Kentucky Historic Resources Survey
    KENTON COUNTY, KENTUCKY HISTORIC RESOURCES SURVEY RESEARCH DESIGN REPORT (KYSHPO Grant Agreement FY01-00-HP-203) Prepared for Northern Kentucky Area Planning Commission 2332 Royal Drive Fort Mitchell, Kentucky 41017-2088 and Kentucky Heritage Council 400 Washington Street Frankfort, Kentucky 40601-1967 Prepared by TAYLOR & TAYLOR ASSOCIATES, INC. Historic Preservation and Community Development Specialists 9 Walnut Street Brookville, Pennsylvania 15825 2000 Research Design, Survey Methodology and Criteria & Guidelines for the Selection of Resources The present Historic Resources Survey is the first undertaken by the Northern Kentucky Area Planning Commission. As such, it marks the beginning of the development of a comprehensive data base, which, if properly used, will enable both the public and the private sector to arrive at informed decisions regarding future development within the County. Historic preservation and cultural resource management should always be important components in the short- and long-range municipal and area-wide planning process. This survey, and those which will follow, will provide decision-makers with professionally-compiled information regarding those properties in Kenton County whose preservation should be advocated. The survey project was instituted by the Commission using funds from the Kentucky State Historic Preservation Office-sponsored survey and planning grant program. The project began the assembly of a professionally- prepared survey of significant historic architecture within the geographically-large
    [Show full text]
  • Bulletin Kenton County Historical Society
    Bulletin of the Kenton County Historical Society Website: www.kentoncountyhistoricalsociety.org Email: [email protected] P.O. Box 641, Covington, Kentucky 41012-0641 (859) 491-4003 November / December 2015 Tidbits of History Surrounding the Piner/Fiskburg/Morning View Region of Southern Kenton County The Morning View Heritage Area: Where Rural History and Natural History Meet Tidbits of History Surrounding the Piner/Fiskburg/Morning View Region of Southern Kenton County Robert D. Webster While our staff continues to strive to include Four sisters accompanied the boys and they married articles on the entire county in the “Bulletin,” it seems, into well-known Kyle, Taylor, and Youtsey families. for whatever reason, Southern Kenton County is often overlooked. Numerous pieces have been written about the DeCoursey Pike is named for Revolutionary War people, places and things found within the Covington city veteran, William DeCoursey (1756-1841). In 1794, limits, and articles on the earliest settlers of Bromley, Lud- DeCoursey ascended the Licking River by canoe and low, Erlanger and the like, have been printed time and time settled on its western shore, about two miles south of again. This short piece, in no way a concise history, will the mouth of Banklick Creek. He was instrumental focus on the people and places within the southernmost in the establishment of the Mouth of the Licking Bap- region of this fine county. Most readers are aware that we tist Church in 1794 (this congregation is now Cold encourage anyone to write articles and, maybe this short Spring Baptist Church). Several famous surnames story will spark the interest of someone to author a more exist within the DeCoursey descendants.
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Comp Plan
    ENVIRONMENT INTRODUCTION Environment is defined by Webster’s Dictionary as “the circumstances, objects, or conditions by which one is surrounded” and ”the complex of physical, chemical, and biotic factors (as climate, soil, and living things) that act upon an organism or an ecological community and ultimately determine its form and survival.” These amenities also provide additional, less visible qualities, such as cleaner air, recreational areas, and wildlife habitat that are important to a community. Development has an effect on the physical and social environment of a community, and this can affect many of the characteristics which make the community unique or those qualities that its residents feel are important. Therefore, development should preserve and promote an overall high quality of life while allowing a reasonable economic return. While it’s true that Boone County is located less than 15 miles from downtown Cincinnati, has three interstate highways, an international airport, and a regional shopping mall, a significant part of the county can still be considered rural. This rural character is a desirable environmental quality which attracts people to become residents of Boone County. Prime agricultural land, woodland areas, scenic valleys, streams, and hillsides are the most significant environmental resources that exist in Boone County. This quality, which attracts many new residents, is often replaced by the development built to accommodate them. This element is prepared from an environmental perspective and is to be used as one factor in determining the future land use of this plan. This element establishes the fact that environmental impacts should be addressed up front rather than allowed to accumulate and therefore require much more expenditure in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Banklick Creek Watershed Characterization Report
    SD1 Source: Banklick Creek Watershed Characterization Report Prepared for: Sanitation District No. 1 of Northern Kentucky January 2009 Ann Arbor, Michigan www.limno.com This page is blank to facilitate double sided printing. Banklick Creek Watershed Characterization Report January 2009 Table of Contents 1. Watershed Summary....................................................................................................... 1 2. Watershed Features......................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Physical and Natural Features................................................................................... 5 2.2 Land Cover Characteristics..................................................................................... 12 2.3 Infrastructure Features ............................................................................................ 16 2.4 Sensitive Areas ....................................................................................................... 25 2.5 Public Interest/Watershed Group Activities ........................................................... 30 3. Waterbody Uses............................................................................................................ 33 3.1 Designated Uses...................................................................................................... 33 3.2 Current Uses ........................................................................................................... 33 4. Waterbody Conditions
    [Show full text]
  • Gunpowder Creek Watershed Plan
    Final Report Gunpowder Creek Watershed Plan Prepared by the Gunpowder Creek Watershed Initiative October 2016 Grant Name, Number: FFY 2009 Section 319(h) Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program; #C9994861-09 Application Title, Number: The Gunpowder Creek Watershed Initiative, #09-10 Grant Agreement Number: PO2 1000003483 Project Period: November 1, 2009 to May 31, 2016. Submitted by: Boone County Conservation District Final Report October 2016 The Energy and Environment Cabinet (EEC) and the Boone County Conservation District (BCCD) do not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, or disability. The EEC and BCCD will provide, on request, reasonable accommodations including auxiliary aids and services necessary to afford an individual with a disability an equal opportunity to participate in all services, programs and activities. To request materials in an alternative format, contact the Kentucky Division of Water, 300 Sower Blvd, Frankfort, KY 40601 or call (502) 564- 3410, or contact the BCCD, 6028 Camp Ernst Rd, Burlington, KY 41005 or call (859) 586-7903. Funding for this project was provided in part by a grant from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) through the Kentucky Division of Water, Nonpoint Source Section, to the BCCD as authorized by the Clean Water Act Amendments of 1987, §319(h) Nonpoint Source Implementation Grant #C9994861-09. Mention of trade names or commercial products, if any, does not constitute endorsement. This document was printed on recycled paper. Gunpowder Creek Watershed Initiative page 1 Final Report October 2016 Acknowledgements The Gunpowder Creek Watershed Initiative (GCWI) has been a collaborative effort guided by a Steering Committee of local agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Geology of the Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Region” Is the Result
    Exploring the Geology of the Cincinnati/ Northern Kentucky Region Paul Edwin Potter Second revised edition KENTUCKY GEOLOGICAL SURVEY James C. Cobb, State Geologist and Director UNIVERSITY of KENTUCKY, Lexington SPECIAL PUBLICATION 8 Series XII, 2007 Kentucky Geological Survey James C. Cobb, State Geologist and Director University of Kentucky, Lexington Exploring the Geology of the Cincinnati/ Northern Kentucky Region Paul Edwin Potter Second revised edition Front cover: Downtown Cincinnati, the northern Kentucky city of Ludlow, and the Ohio River, looking east and upstream from the overlook at Mount Echo Park in Price Hill. The topographic basin occupied by Cincinnati’s business district and Covington was formerly a course of the north-flowing Licking River, and the steep hill below the overlook is the result of erosion by the Ohio River as it flows west toward Anderson Ferry. Special Publication 8 Series XII, 2007 Our Mission Our mission is to increase knowledge and understanding of the mineral, energy, and water resources, geologic hazards, and geology of Kentucky for the benefit of the Commonwealth and Nation. © 2006 University of Kentucky Earth Resources—OurFor further information Common contact: Wealth Technology Transfer Officer Kentucky Geological Survey 228 Mining and Mineral Resources Building University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0107 www.uky.edu/kgs ISSN 0075-5591 Technical Level Technical Level General Intermediate Technical General Intermediate Technical ISSN 0075-5613 Contents Preface ......................................................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • Kenton County Homeland Security Emergency Management
    KENTON COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATION PLAN Kenton County Homeland Security Emergency Management Authority: Kenton County Fiscal Court Judge Executive Kris Knochelmann Kenton County Homeland Security Emergency Management Director Steve Hensley In Coordination With The Kentucky Division Of Emergency Management KCEOP Basic Plan Page 1 of 47 Version: KCEOP 059 ♦ 04 ♦ 2021 KENTON COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATION PLAN THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK KCEOP Basic Plan Page 2 of 47 Version: KCEOP 059 ♦ 04 ♦ 2021 KENTON COUNTY EMERGENCY OPERATION PLAN FOREWORD This is the Kenton County Emergency Operations Plan (KCEOP or EOP), created in conjunction with the Commonwealth of Kentucky Division of Emergency Management. The EOP is developed using Emergency Support Functions (ESF’s), which are disciplines or capabilities critical to our ability to manage an incident. ESF’s identify an ESF Coordinator and define the responsibilities of the ESF Coordinator, agencies of government and others who serve within that support function. This EOP is also supplemented by Support Plans, Incident Specific Plans, Tactical Worksheets (field use checklists developed to help first responders act in accordance with the provisions of the EOP), and Standard Operating Procedures or Guidelines (detailed operating procedures maintained by the ESF Coordinator and/or individual departments, agencies or organizations). These additional documents required for implementation of the EOP are not included because of their voluminous nature. The term “Incident”, when used in this Basic Plan, Annexes, Appendices, ESF’s, SOP’s, SOG’s, Support Plans or “Stand Alone” Plans, will mean: “An occurrence or event, natural, technological or human-caused, which requires an emergency response to protect life, the environment or property.
    [Show full text]