Cranial Performance in Solid and Fenestrated Caecilian Skulls

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cranial Performance in Solid and Fenestrated Caecilian Skulls 833 The Journal of Experimental Biology 215, 833-844 © 2012. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd doi:10.1242/jeb.065979 RESEARCH ARTICLE Is solid always best? Cranial performance in solid and fenestrated caecilian skulls Thomas Kleinteich1,2,*, Hillary C. Maddin3, Julia Herzen4, Felix Beckmann4 and Adam P. Summers2 1Christian-Albrechts-Universität Kiel, Department of Zoology – Functional Morphology and Biomechanics, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24098 Kiel, Germany, 2University of Washington, Friday Harbor Laboratories, 620 University Road, Friday Harbor, WA 98250, USA, 3University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 1N4, Canada and 4Helmholtz Zentrum Geesthacht, Institute of Materials Research, Max-Planck-Straße 1, 21502 Geesthacht, Germany *Author for correspondence ([email protected]) Accepted 23 November 2011 SUMMARY Caecilians (Lissamphibia: Gymnophiona) are characterized by a fossorial lifestyle that appears to play a role in the many anatomical specializations in the group. The skull, in particular, has been the focus of previous studies because it is driven into the substrate for burrowing. There are two different types of skulls in caecilians: (1) stegokrotaphic, where the squamosal completely covers the temporal region and the jaw closing muscles, and (2) zygokrotaphic, with incomplete coverage of the temporal region by the squamosal. We used 3-D imaging and modeling techniques to explore the functional consequences of these skull types in an evolutionary context. We digitally converted stegokrotaphic skulls into zygokrotaphic skulls and vice versa. We also generated a third, akinetic skull type that was presumably present in extinct caecilian ancestors. We explored the benefits and costs of the different skull types under frontal loading at different head angles with finite element analysis (FEA). Surprisingly, the differences in stress distributions and bending between the three tested skull types were minimal and not significant. This suggests that the open temporal region in zygokrotaphic skulls does not lead to poorer performance during burrowing. However, the results of the FEA suggest a strong relationship between the head angle and skull performance, implying there is an optimal head angle during burrowing. Supplementary material available online at http://jeb.biologists.org/cgi/content/full/215/5/833/DC1 Key words: caecilian, burrowing, skull evolution, 3-D surface manipulation, amphibian origin. INTRODUCTION Caecilians are a monophyletic group of amphibians with skulls that Marcus et al., 1933; Carroll and Currie, 1975). This view is are thought to be highly specialized for their burrowing lifestyle; supported by the absence of a real suture between the squamosal they are wedge shaped, compact and robust (Wake, 1993). Many and the parietal in the stegokrotaphic skull. However, the discovery bones of the skull have been fused into larger compound elements, of a stem group caecilian with a stegokrotaphic skull, Eocaecilia e.g. the os basale of caecilians comprises all of the bones of the micropodia, has challenged this view and suggests that the skull base [i.e. the parasphenoid, the exoccipitals, and the caudal zygokrotaphic skull in the Rhinatrematidae is a derived condition parts of the neurocranium, including the otic capsules (Wake, 2003) and that stegokrotaphy is ancestral for all caecilians (Jenkins and (Fig.1)]. There are two distinct skull types in caecilians: (1) Walsh, 1993; Carroll, 2000; Jenkins et al., 2007). zygokrotaphic, in which the skull is fenestrated between the Despite coverage of the temporal region by the squamosal in squamosal and the parietal, and (2) stegokrotaphic, in which the the stegokrotaphic caecilian skull type, there is always a narrow skull is completely roofed. gap between the squamosal and the parietal instead of a tight Based on recently published caecilian phylogenies (Roelants et suture (Wiedersheim, 1879; Sarasin and Sarasin, 1887–1890; al., 2007; Zhang and Wake, 2009; Pyron and Wiens, 2011; Peter, 1898; Versluys, 1912; Abel, 1919; Marcus et al., 1933; Wilkinson et al., 2011) (Fig.2), the zygokrotaphic skull has evolved Goodrich, 1958; Lawson, 1963; Taylor, 1969; Nussbaum, 1977; independently several times in caecilians, in the Scolecomorphidae, Nussbaum, 1983; Wake and Hanken, 1982). This gap is supposed Typhlonectidae and Dermophiidae (Brand, 1956; Taylor, 1969; to allow movement of the squamosal and the attached quadrate Nussbaum, 1977; Nussbaum, 1985; Wilkinson and Nussbaum, 1997; and thus plays a role in a complex cranial kinesis (Versluys, 1912; Müller et al., 2009). Zygokrotaphy in the Rhinatrematidae, however, Marcus et al., 1933; Iordansky, 1990; Iordansky, 2000). has usually been considered to be the ancestral condition for the Movement of the squamosal is related to the unique caecilian dual Gymnophiona (Nussbaum, 1977; Nussbaum, 1983; Wake, 2003; jaw closing mechanism that involves an accessory ventral jaw Müller, 2007), and the reduction of bone coverage in the temporal closing muscle (m. interhyoideus posterior) acting simultaneously skull region was considered to be homologous among caecilians, with the primary jaw closing muscles (mm. levatores mandibulae) frogs and salamanders. Thus, the completely roofed stegokrotaphic (Bemis et al., 1983; Nussbaum, 1983). The movement of the skulls of some caecilians were considered to be secondarily derived squamosal during feeding, as revealed by three-dimensional (3- in association with their burrowing lifestyle (Peter, 1898; Goodrich, D) modeling, is a small mediolateral rocking that does not expose 1958; Parsons and Williams, 1963; Nussbaum, 1983; but see a substantial gap in the skull (Kleinteich et al., 2008; Kleinteich, THE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY 834 T. Kleinteich and others Fig.1. Caecilian cranial anatomy and regions that were Premaxillary constrained in the finite element model applied herein. Nasal Surface renderings in dorsal (left), ventral (right) and Prefrontal lateral (bottom) view based on the HRCT data for Ichthyophis cf. kohtaoensis. Caecilian skulls are compact Frontal Vomer and wedge shaped. The maxillopalatine and the os basale are compound bones that can be ontogenetically Maxillopalatine derived from separate ossification centers. For finite element analysis, we applied point loads to the area Squamosal around the nasal capsules (highlighted in pink) and Pterygoid prevented the joint areas of the occipital condyles Parietal (highlighted in green) from translation or rotation in either direction. The terms for cranial bones follow Wake (Wake, Os basale 2003). Occipital condyle Parietal 2 mm Point loads Squamosal Os basale Fixed displacements Prefrontal Nasal Premaxillary Occipital condyle Maxillopalatine 2010). The stem group caecilian E. micropodia, however, differs zygokrotaphic dermophiid caecilian Geotrypetes seraphini shows from extant caecilians by having additional bones in the temporal similar burrowing performance to other stegokrotaphic caecilians region (e.g. a presumed tabular) and a different jaw joint that is (Herrel and Measey, 2010). flat instead of a deep groove (Jenkins et al., 2007), which suggests Here, we present an experimental study where we modified the the presence of a different jaw closing mechanism, possibly 3-D geometry of zygokrotaphic and stegokrotaphic caecilian skulls without movements of the squamosal. to artificially render zygokrotaphic skulls stegokrotaphic and vice Understanding the costs and benefits of one skull type over the versa. We further modified the stegokrotaphic skull models to test other is crucial for evaluating amphibian skull evolution because it a third, akinetic skull type. The original and modified skull gives insight into how strongly the biology of a caecilian is affected geometries were tested using finite element analysis (FEA) for their by its skull. The stegokrotaphic skull would, on casual inspection, performance under the frontal loading regime that caecilians appear better suited to burrowing than the zygokrotaphic skull with encounter during burrowing. The skulls were oriented at different the large unroofed region and, for two caecilian groups with angles relative to their anterior–posterior axis to simulate varying zygokrotaphic skulls, there might actually be an ecological link to directions of the frontal loads that caecilians are likely to encounter poorer burrowing performance; rhinatrematids are considered to be by dorso-ventral movements of the head to manipulate the substrate poor burrowers that can be readily trapped during surface activity (Wake, 1993). The aims of this study were: (1) to evaluate the (Nussbaum, 1983; Gower et al., 2010); typhlonectids are mainly sensitivity of the strain distribution in caecilian skulls as the head aquatic species and may therefore be relieved of the constraints of moves through different angles during burrowing; (2) to quantify burrowing (Wilkinson and Nussbaum, 1997). However, the the difference in deformation of zygokrotaphic and stegokrotaphic zygokrotaphic scolecomorphids are considered to be specialized caecilian skulls under frontal loading; (3) to determine whether burrowers (Nussbaum, 1977; Nussbaum, 1983); furthermore, the deflection during burrowing is affected by the state of the skull Table 1. Specimens used in this study, and parameters for HRμCT imaging Total length Preparation for Energy for HRμCT Resolution of HRμCT I.D. Species (mm) Original skull type HRμCT imaging imaging (keV) dataset (μm) MNHN 1999.8360
Recommended publications
  • Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L
    Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bioseries12-Amphibians-Taita-English
    0c m 12 Symbol key 3456 habitat pond puddle river stream 78 underground day / night day 9101112131415161718 night altitude high low vegetation types shamba forest plantation prelim pages ENGLISH.indd ii 2009/10/22 02:03:47 PM SANBI Biodiversity Series Amphibians of the Taita Hills by G.J. Measey, P.K. Malonza and V. Muchai 2009 prelim pages ENGLISH.indd Sec1:i 2009/10/27 07:51:49 AM SANBI Biodiversity Series The South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI) was established on 1 September 2004 through the signing into force of the National Environmental Management: Biodiversity Act (NEMBA) No. 10 of 2004 by President Thabo Mbeki. The Act expands the mandate of the former National Botanical Institute to include responsibilities relating to the full diversity of South Africa’s fauna and ora, and builds on the internationally respected programmes in conservation, research, education and visitor services developed by the National Botanical Institute and its predecessors over the past century. The vision of SANBI: Biodiversity richness for all South Africans. SANBI’s mission is to champion the exploration, conservation, sustainable use, appreciation and enjoyment of South Africa’s exceptionally rich biodiversity for all people. SANBI Biodiversity Series publishes occasional reports on projects, technologies, workshops, symposia and other activities initiated by or executed in partnership with SANBI. Technical editor: Gerrit Germishuizen Design & layout: Elizma Fouché Cover design: Elizma Fouché How to cite this publication MEASEY, G.J., MALONZA, P.K. & MUCHAI, V. 2009. Amphibians of the Taita Hills / Am bia wa milima ya Taita. SANBI Biodiversity Series 12. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Siphonops Paulensis Boettger, 1892 (Gymnophiona: Siphonopidae) in the State of Sergipe, Northeastern Brazil
    10TH ANNIVERSARY ISSUE Check List the journal of biodiversity data NOTES ON GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION Check List 11(1): 1531, January 2015 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.15560/11.1.1531 ISSN 1809-127X © 2015 Check List and Authors First record of Siphonops paulensis Boettger, 1892 (Gymnophiona: Siphonopidae) in the state of Sergipe, northeastern Brazil Daniel Oliveira Santana1*, Crizanto Brito De-Carvalho2, Evellyn Borges de Freitas2, Geziana Silva Siqueira Nunes2 and Renato Gomes Faria2 1 Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Programa de Pós Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia). Cidade Universitária, Avenida Contorno da Cidade Universitária, s/nº, Castelo Branco. CEP 58059-900. João Pessoa, PB, Brazil 2 Universidade Federal de Sergipe, Programa de Pós-graduação em Ecologia e Conservação. Cidade Universitária Prof. José Aloísio de Campos, Avenida Marechal Rondon, s/nº, Jardim Rosa Elze. CEP 49100-000. São Cristóvão, SE, Brazil * Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Siphonopidae is represented by 25 caecilians spe- even been found in urban gardens. It is oviparous with terrestrial cies in South America. In Brazil, Siphonops paulensis is found eggs and direct development, and not dependent on water for in the states of Maranhão, Rio Grande do Norte, Bahia, Tocan- breeding (Aquino et al. 2004). We present a distribution map tins, Goiás, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul, Minas Gerais, (Figure 1) and data in Table 1 of the current known distribution São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Rio Grande do Sul, and in the Dis- of this species based on literature. trito Federal. Herein, we report the first record of Siphonops Herein, we report the first record ofSiphonops paulensis paulensis in the state of Sergipe, Brazil, Simão Dias municipal- (Figure 2) for the state of Sergipe, Brazil.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeographic Analysis Reveals Ancient Continental Vicariance and Recent Oceanic Dispersal in Amphibians ∗ R
    Syst. Biol. 63(5):779–797, 2014 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: [email protected] DOI:10.1093/sysbio/syu042 Advance Access publication June 19, 2014 Biogeographic Analysis Reveals Ancient Continental Vicariance and Recent Oceanic Dispersal in Amphibians ∗ R. ALEXANDER PYRON Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA; ∗ Correspondence to be sent to: Department of Biological Sciences, The George Washington University, 2023 G Street NW, Washington, DC 20052, USA; E-mail: [email protected]. Received 13 February 2014; reviews returned 17 April 2014; accepted 13 June 2014 Downloaded from Associate Editor: Adrian Paterson Abstract.—Amphibia comprises over 7000 extant species distributed in almost every ecosystem on every continent except Antarctica. Most species also show high specificity for particular habitats, biomes, or climatic niches, seemingly rendering long-distance dispersal unlikely. Indeed, many lineages still seem to show the signature of their Pangaean origin, approximately 300 Ma later. To date, no study has attempted a large-scale historical-biogeographic analysis of the group to understand the distribution of extant lineages. Here, I use an updated chronogram containing 3309 species (~45% of http://sysbio.oxfordjournals.org/ extant diversity) to reconstruct their movement between 12 global ecoregions. I find that Pangaean origin and subsequent Laurasian and Gondwanan fragmentation explain a large proportion of patterns in the distribution of extant species. However, dispersal during the Cenozoic, likely across land bridges or short distances across oceans, has also exerted a strong influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomia Dos Anfíbios Da Ordem Gymnophiona Da Amazônia Brasileira
    TAXONOMIA DOS ANFÍBIOS DA ORDEM GYMNOPHIONA DA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA ADRIANO OLIVEIRA MACIEL Belém, Pará 2009 MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARÁ PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ZOOLOGIA MESTRADO EM ZOOLOGIA Taxonomia Dos Anfíbios Da Ordem Gymnophiona Da Amazônia Brasileira Adriano Oliveira Maciel Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Zoologia, Curso de Mestrado, do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi e Universidade Federal do Pará como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de mestre em Zoologia. Orientador: Marinus Steven Hoogmoed BELÉM-PA 2009 MUSEU PARAENSE EMÍLIO GOELDI UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO PARÁ PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM ZOOLOGIA MESTRADO EM ZOOLOGIA TAXONOMIA DOS ANFÍBIOS DA ORDEM GYMNOPHIONA DA AMAZÔNIA BRASILEIRA Adriano Oliveira Maciel Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Zoologia, Curso de Mestrado, do Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi e Universidade Federal do Pará como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de mestre em Zoologia. Orientador: Marinus Steven Hoogmoed BELÉM-PA 2009 Com os seres vivos, parece que a natureza se exercita no artificialismo. A vida destila e filtra. Gaston Bachelard “De que o mel é doce é coisa que me nego a afirmar, mas que parece doce eu afirmo plenamente.” Raul Seixas iii À MINHA FAMÍLIA iv AGRADECIMENTOS Primeiramente agradeço aos meus pais, a Teté e outros familiares que sempre apoiaram e de alguma forma contribuíram para minha vinda a Belém para cursar o mestrado. À Marina Ramos, com a qual acreditei e segui os passos da formação acadêmica desde a graduação até quase a conclusão destes tempos de mestrado, pelo amor que foi importante. A todos os amigos da turma de mestrado pelos bons momentos vividos durante o curso.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Evidence-Based Husbandry for Caecilian Amphibians: Substrate Preference in Geotrypetes Seraphini (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Dermophiidae)
    RESEARCH ARTICLE The Herpetological Bulletin 129, 2014: 15-18 Towards evidence-based husbandry for caecilian amphibians: Substrate preference in Geotrypetes seraphini (Amphibia: Gymnophiona: Dermophiidae) BENJAMIN TAPLEY1*, ZOE BRYANT1, SEBASTIAN GRANT1, GRANT KOTHER1, YEDRA FEL- TRER1, NIC MASTERS1, TAINA STRIKE1, IRI GILL1, MARK WILKINSON2 & DAVID J GOWER2 1Zoological Society of London, Regents Park, London NW1 4RY 2Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD *Corresponding author email: [email protected] ABSTRACT - Maintaining caecilians in captivity provides opportunities to study life-history, behaviour and reproductive biology and to investigate and to develop treatment protocols for amphibian chytridiomycosis. Few species of caecilians are maintained in captivity and little has been published on their husbandry. We present data on substrate preference in a group of eight Central African Geotrypetes seraphini (Duméril, 1859). Two substrates were trialled; coir and Megazorb (a waste product from the paper making industry). G. seraphini showed a strong preference for the Megazorb. We anticipate this finding will improve the captive management of this and perhaps also other species of fossorial caecilians, and stimulate evidence-based husbandry practices. INTRODUCTION (Gower & Wilkinson, 2005) and little has been published on the captive husbandry of terrestrial caecilians (Wake, 1994; O’ Reilly, 1996). A basic parameter in terrestrial The paucity of information on caecilian ecology and caecilian husbandry is substrate, but data on tolerances and general neglect of their conservation needs should be of preferences in the wild or in captivity are mostly lacking. concern in light of global amphibian declines (Alford & Terrestrial caecilians are reported from a wide range of Richards 1999; Stuart et al., 2004; Gower & Wilkinson, soil pH (Gundappa et al., 1981; Wake, 1994; Kupfer et 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Lissamphibia)
    The evolution of intrauterine feeding in the Gymnophiona (Lissamphibia) A comparative study on the morphology, function, and development of cranial muscles in oviparous and viviparous species Thomas Kleinteich Zusammenfassung 7 Summary 9 Introduction 11 Chapter 1: The hyal and ventral branchial muscles in caecilian and salamander larvae: homologies and evolution 23 Chapter 2: Cranial muscle development in direct developing oviparous and in viviparous caecilians 59 Chapter 3: Allometric growth and heterochrony in the cranial development of oviparous and viviparous caecilians – a geometric morphometric study 97 Chapter 4: Feeding biomechanics during caecilian development: functional consequences for suction feeding, scraping, and biting 129 Synopsis: The evolution of intrauterine feeding in caecilians 163 Acknowledgments 175 Die rezenten Amphibien (Lissamphibia) sind durch einen komplexen biphasischen Lebenszyklus gekennzeichnet. Sie durchlaufen eine Metamorphose, bei der sich eine aquatische Larve zum terrestrischen Adultus entwickelt. Im Zusammenhang mit dem biphasischen Lebenszyklus gilt Oviparie als ursprünglicher Fortpflanzungsmodus für die Lissamphibia. In allen drei Gruppen der Amphibien, d.h. innerhalb der Froschlurche (Anura), Schwanzlurche (Caudata) und Blindwühlen (Gymnophiona), sind abgeleitete Fortpflanzungsmodi (Oviparie mit direkter Entwicklung, Viviparie) evolviert. Innerhalb der Blindwühlen ist die Evolution von abgeleiteten Fortpflanzungsmodi mit neuen Beutefangmechanismen während der Ontogenese verbunden: Im ursprünglichen
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK
    Technical Assistance Report Protected Area Management Plan Development - SAPO NATIONAL PARK - Sapo National Park -Vision Statement By the year 2010, a fully restored biodiversity, and well-maintained, properly managed Sapo National Park, with increased public understanding and acceptance, and improved quality of life in communities surrounding the Park. A Cooperative Accomplishment of USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon- USDA Forest Service May 29, 2005 to June 17, 2005 - 1 - USDA Forest Service, Forestry Development Authority and Conservation International Protected Area Development Management Plan Development Technical Assistance Report Steve Anderson and Dennis Gordon 17 June 2005 Goal Provide support to the FDA, CI and FFI to review and update the Sapo NP management plan, establish a management plan template, develop a program of activities for implementing the plan, and train FDA staff in developing future management plans. Summary Week 1 – Arrived in Monrovia on 29 May and met with Forestry Development Authority (FDA) staff and our two counterpart hosts, Theo Freeman and Morris Kamara, heads of the Wildlife Conservation and Protected Area Management and Protected Area Management respectively. We decided to concentrate on the immediate implementation needs for Sapo NP rather than a revision of existing management plan. The four of us, along with Tyler Christie of Conservation International (CI), worked in the CI office on the following topics: FDA Immediate
    [Show full text]
  • 06 Silva Et Al Nota Et Al Sin Cursiva
    Boletín de la Sociedad Zoológica del Uruguay, 2021 Vol. 30 (1): 61-64 ISSN 2393-6940 https://journal.szu.org.uy DOI: https://doi.org/10.26462/30.1.6 NOTA FACING TOXICITY: FIRST REPORT ON THE PREDATION OF Siphonops paulensis (CAECILIDAE) BY Athene cunicularia (STRIGIDAE) Emanuel M. L. Silva1,2 , Luís G. S. Castro3 , Ingrid R. Miguel4 , Nathalie Citeli3 , & Mariana de-Carvalho1,5 . 1 Laboratório de Relações Solo-Vegetação, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Ecologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal 70910-900, Brazil. 2 Faculdade Anhanguera de Brasília, Universidade Kroton, Brasília, Distrito Federal, Distrito Federal 71950- 550, Brazil. 3 Laboratório de Fauna e Unidades de Conservação, Faculdade de Tecnologia, Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal 70910-900, Brazil. 4 Museu Nacional, Departamento de Vertebrados, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro 21941-901, Brazil. 5 Laboratório de Comportamento Animal, Instituto de Biologia, Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, Distrito Federal 70910-900, Brazil. Corresponding author: [email protected] Fecha de recepción: 20 de febrero de 2021 Fecha de aceptación: 20 de mayo de 2021 ABSTRACT The Burrowing Owl (Athene cunicularia) is a common bird of prey distributed throughout the We report the first record of Siphonops paulensis American continent, occurring from southern Canada predation by Burrowing Owl occurred in a Cerrado to southern Chile (Sick, 1997). In Brazil, it is quite fragment. In addition to describing the predation event, we common to find its in dry and open places with few discuss the owl's ability to hunt for fossorial species and trees, such as restingas and pastures, being frequently the presence of poison glands on the amphibian's skin, seen in urban areas (Sick, 1997).
    [Show full text]
  • The Butterflies of Taita Hills
    FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS A FIELD GUIDE Esther N. Kioko, Alex M. Musyoki, Augustine E. Luanga, Oliver C. Genga & Duncan K. Mwinzi FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS A FIELD GUIDE TO THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS Esther N. Kioko, Alex M. Musyoki, Augustine E. Luanga, Oliver C. Genga & Duncan K. Mwinzi Supported by the National Museums of Kenya and the JRS Biodiversity Foundation ii FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS Dedication In fond memory of Prof. Thomas R. Odhiambo and Torben B. Larsen Prof. T. R. Odhiambo’s contribution to insect studies in Africa laid a concrete footing for many of today’s and future entomologists. Torben Larsen’s contribution to the study of butterflies in Kenya and their natural history laid a firm foundation for the current and future butterfly researchers, enthusiasts and rearers. National Museums of Kenya’s mission is to collect, preserve, study, document and present Kenya’s past and present cultural and natural heritage. This is for the purposes of enhancing knowledge, appreciation, respect and sustainable utilization of these resources for the benefit of Kenya and the world, for now and posterity. Copyright © 2021 National Museums of Kenya. Citation Kioko, E. N., Musyoki, A. M., Luanga, A. E., Genga, O. C. & Mwinzi, D. K. (2021). Fluttering beauty with benefits: The butterflies of Taita Hills. A field guide. National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya. ISBN 9966-955-38-0 iii FLUTTERING BEAUTY WITH BENEFITS: THE BUTTERFLIES OF TAITA HILLS FOREWORD The Taita Hills are particularly diverse but equally endangered.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Systematics and Diversity of Extant Amphibians
    Systematics and Diversity of 3 Extant Amphibians he three extant lissamphibian lineages (hereafter amples of classic systematics papers. We present widely referred to by the more common term amphibians) used common names of groups in addition to scientifi c Tare descendants of a common ancestor that lived names, noting also that herpetologists colloquially refer during (or soon after) the Late Carboniferous. Since the to most clades by their scientifi c name (e.g., ranids, am- three lineages diverged, each has evolved unique fea- bystomatids, typhlonectids). tures that defi ne the group; however, salamanders, frogs, A total of 7,303 species of amphibians are recognized and caecelians also share many traits that are evidence and new species—primarily tropical frogs and salaman- of their common ancestry. Two of the most defi nitive of ders—continue to be described. Frogs are far more di- these traits are: verse than salamanders and caecelians combined; more than 6,400 (~88%) of extant amphibian species are frogs, 1. Nearly all amphibians have complex life histories. almost 25% of which have been described in the past Most species undergo metamorphosis from an 15 years. Salamanders comprise more than 660 species, aquatic larva to a terrestrial adult, and even spe- and there are 200 species of caecilians. Amphibian diver- cies that lay terrestrial eggs require moist nest sity is not evenly distributed within families. For example, sites to prevent desiccation. Thus, regardless of more than 65% of extant salamanders are in the family the habitat of the adult, all species of amphibians Plethodontidae, and more than 50% of all frogs are in just are fundamentally tied to water.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text in Pdf Format
    Vol. 45: 331–335, 2021 ENDANGERED SPECIES RESEARCH Published May 27 https://doi.org/10.3354/esr01138 Endang Species Res OPEN ACCESS NOTE First case of male alloparental care in amphibians: tadpole stealing in Darwin’s frogs Osvaldo Cabeza-Alfaro1, Andrés Valenzuela-Sánchez2,3,4, Mario Alvarado-Rybak2,5, José M. Serrano3,6, Claudio Azat2,* 1Zoológico Nacional, Pio Nono 450, Recoleta, Santiago 8420541, Chile 2Sustainability Research Centre & PhD Programme in Conservation Medicine, Faculty of Life Sciences, Universidad Andres Bello, Republica 440, Santiago 8370251, Chile 3ONG Ranita de Darwin, Ruta T-340 s/n, Valdivia 5090000, Chile 4Instituto de Conservación, Biodiversidad y Territorio, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y Recursos Naturales, Universidad Austral de Chile, Casilla 567, Valdivia 5110027, Chile 5Núcleo de Ciencias Aplicadas en Ciencias Veterinarias y Agronómicas, Universidad de las Américas, Echaurren 140, Santiago 8370065, Chile 6Museo de Zoología ‘Alfonso L. Herrera’, Departamento Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Circuito Exterior s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, Coyoacán, Mexico City 04510, Mexico ABSTRACT: Alloparental care, i.e. care directed at non-descendant offspring, has rarely been described in amphibians. Rhinoderma darwinii is an Endangered and endemic frog of the tem - perate forests of Chile and Argentina. This species has evolved a unique reproductive strategy whereby males brood their tadpoles within their vocal sacs (known as neomelia). Since 2009, the National Zoo of Chile has developed an ex situ conservation programme for R. darwinii, in which during reproduction, adults are kept in terraria in groups of 2 females with 2 males. In September 2018, one pair engaged in amplexus, with one of the males fertilizing the eggs.
    [Show full text]