DOCSLIB.ORG

Recovery Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

) ~ .:. .,.. ::. ."\ .. ~:~.'.. ' \ ,.' . ~ \~~ ; ~ \ :K 36 J 92875 ~/~ This is the c~pleted IndiaRa Bat Recovery Plan. It has been approved by the. U. S Fish and Wildlife Service. It does not necessarily represent official positions or approvals of cooperating agencie8 (and it does not necessarily represent the views of aU recovery team aellbers/individuals, who played the key role in pre- paring this plan. ~is plan i8 8ubject to modification as dictated by new findings and changes in 8pecies status and completion of tasks deseribed in the plan. Goals and objectives vi 11 be attained and funds e~nded contingent upon appropriations, priorities, and other budgetary constraints. ACknowledgements should read as follows: The Indiana Bat Recovery Plan, dated October 14.1983, prepared by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service in cooperation with the Indiana Bat Recovery Team: John T. Brady, Leader (~980-Pre8ent) Indiana Bat Recovery Team U. S. Army Corps of Engineers 210 Tucker Boulevard North St, Louis, Missouri 63101 Richard K. LaVal, Leader (1979-1980) Apt. 10165 . San Jose, Costa Rica (Formerly vi th the Missouri Department of Conservation) ~O8as H. Kunz, Member Indiana Bat Recovery Team Deparblent of 8i oloqy Boston Uni~r.lty 2 CUIImington Street Boston, Massachusetts 02215 Merlin D. Tuttle, Member Indiana Sa t Recovery Team Vertebrate Division, CUrator of Mammals Hi lwaukee Public Museum 800 West Wells Street Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233 Donald E. Nilson, Member Indiana Ba t Recovery Team National Fish' Wildlife Laboratory National Museum of Natural History Washinqton, D.C. 20560 Richard L. Clawson, Member Indiana Bat Recovery Team Missouri Department of Conservation Fish and Wildlife Research Center 1110 College A".nue Columbia, ~ 65201 i - Additional cqpies may be obtained from: Fish and Wildlife Reference Service 1776 E. Jefferson Street 4th Floor Rockville, Maryl'and 20852 800-582-3421 . ~ Approved: J~ t>6put1 Director, U.f. Fish and Wildlife Service 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page No. PREFACE i PART I Description 1 Distribution 1 Life History 1 Habi ta t Requi rements 4 Causes of Decline 5 CUrrent Status of Population and Trends 7 Associations With Other Listed Species 8 Cri tical Habitat for the Indi ana Bat 8 PART II Step-down Outline 10 Recovery Plan Narrative 12 Literature Cited 17 PART III Implementation 21 APPENDICES I. Cave Priority Data 1-1 Acknowledgments 11-1 Cave Management 111-1 Hibernacula by State IV-l v. Fact Sheet on Bats V-l Guidelines for Banding and Census Taking VI-l iii LIST OF FIGURES Piqure No: .!!!!!. Page No. 1. Known and SUspected Range of the Indiana Bat 2 2. MYO~!S ,!odal,i8 cluster 3 3. Warning Sign used ~ the Missouri Department of Conservation 111-5 4. Photo of FeQc. Erected at Norris ~ Cave, Tennessee, by the ~nnessee Valley Authority 111-6 s. Pnoto of Fence Erected at Hambrick Cave, Alabama, by the Tennessee Valley Authority 111-7 6. Photo of Gate Erected at Great Scott Cave by the Hi ssour! Department of Conserva tiOn 111-8 '7 Photo of Gate Erected at Bear Cave by the Missouri Depart.nt of Conservation 111-9 iv LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title - . P!~ N2. 1. Indiana Bat Population 8 2. Priority l.Caves for indiana" Bats' 27 3. Priority 2 Caves for Indi'ana-'Bats 28 Priority 3 Caves for Indiana Bats 31 4.. , .' C S. Priority 4 Caves for Indlana Bats 35 Indiana Bat Caves in Alabama Appendix IV 6 Indiana Bat Caves in Ark~nsas " , 7. 8. Indiana Bat Caves in Georgia:" " 9. Indiana Bat Caves in Illinois " 10. Indiana Bat Caws in Indiana . 11. Indiana Bat Caves in Kentooky . 12. Indiana Bat -Caves in'i4a'ryland" . 13. Indiana Bat Caves in Mississippi " 14. Indiana Bat!Ca'ves in Missouri " Indiana Bat Caves in New' York ., " 15. , 16. Indiana Bat Caves in North carolina " 17. Indiana Bat Caves in Ohio . Indiana' Bat Caves It\' Oklahoma" . 18. .' 19. Indiana Bat Caves -in Penn,sylvariia . 20. Indiana Bat Caves in Tennessee' . 21. Indiana Bat Caves in Virginia . 22. Indiana Bat Caves in West Yirginia . 23. Caves with Both Indiana Bats and . Gray Bats present . v PART I De8cription ~e Indiana bat (MyoUs sodalis) is a medium-sized .-mber of the qenus with a for~arm lenqth of 3S to 41 mm. The head and body lenqth ranqes from 41 to 49 am. This species closely resembles the little brown bat (Myotis lucifuqus), but differs in havinq a keeled calcar. The hind feet of the Indiana bat tend to be smaller and more delicate and hairs on the hind feet tend to be shorter The skull has a small sagittal crest, and the braincase tends to be smaller, lower, and narrower than that of the little brown bat. Appendix V provides a comparison of characteristics useful in identifying Indiana bats from other potentially confusing Myotis. Distribution The Indiana bat is a monotypic species that occupies much of the eastern half of the United States (Fiqure 1). Large hibernating populations are found in Indiana, Missouri, and Kentucky; however, populations and individual records have been reported from Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Maryland, Massachusetts, MiChigan, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia, and Wisconsin. Some records from areas on the margins of the range may represent occasional wanderers rather than viable populations. Life History The Indiana bat is known primarily from the caves in which it hibernates. Approximately 8S' of the entire known population winters in only seven hibernacula, wi th almost half limi ted to two. Summer nursery colonies have been found beneath loose bark of trees, containing 100 bats or less per colony. Most Indiana bats migrate seasonally between winter and summer roosts. Movement has been recorded between hibernacula in central Kentucky and summer areas in Indiana, Kentucky, Ohio, and Michigan (Barbour and Davis, 1969), as well as between hibernacula in southern Missouri and summer areas in northern Missouri and southern Iowa (Myers, 1964; LaVal and LaVal, 1980; Bowles, 1980). On arrival at hibernating caves, swarming occurs. Swarming is described as a phenomenon in which large numbers of bats fly in and out of cave entrances from dusk to dawn, While relatively few roost in the caves during the day. (Cope and Humphrey, 1977). SWarming may continue-for several weeks. Fat supplies are replenished prior to hibernation. In Missouri, Indiana bats tended to hibernate in the same cave in which they swarmed, although elsewhere (i.e., Indiana) swarming has occurred in caves other than where they hibernated (LaVal et al., 1977b). Males tend to 1 "' 1/ ~ ~'""'~ , -~~~ J . ~ ,~.. \ . --, " ,. ~\'\ 0 PRIORITY#1HIBERNACULA '-' - - FIGURE 1 2 r_ain active over a ~onger period of tille .t cave ent~ances during the swarming' period than females (1.aVal and LaVal, 1980). Bats ate and females enter directly into hibernation, sorne as early as Octobe~. Nearly all male. are hibernating by late November. Presumably, adult females store sperm through the winter and bec~e pregnant 8oon after emergence from hibernation. Hall (1962) noted limited Mting activity thr~ghout the winter and in late April a8 the bats :were leaving hibernation. Females emerge in late March or early April, follCNed by males. Most IX>pulations leave by late April, but some males spend the summer in hibernacula. Migration is probably hazardous (Tuttle and Stevenson, 1977), especially in spring when fat reserves and food supplies are low. Consequently, adult mortality may be highest in late March and in April. Females give birth to a single young in June or early July. At that time, they join toget,her in nursery colonies beneath the loose bark of trees. Scattered records indicate that ma'les disperse throughout the range in summer, but little is known of their roosting habits. Known maternity colonies occupy home ranges containing roost sites in riparian habitat. Loyalty for a particular reach of stream has been documented (J.B. Cope, pers. comm.). Recent evidence suggests that colonies may also occur in upland habitat (Bowles, 1981). The young are capable of flight within a month of birth. Flying young have been taken as early as the first week in July in Iowa (Bowles, 1981), but an immature taken from beneath a concrete bridge in Indiana in late July appeared barely able to fly (Mumford and Cope, 1964). They spend the latter part of the summer accumulating fat reserves for fall migration and hibernation. Habi tat Requirements 1. Winter Habitat. Depending on local weather conditions, Indiana bats hibernate from October throuqh April (LaVal et al., 1977bJ Hall, 1962). They require 8pecific roost si tes in caves or aines that have stable temperatures below 10°C, preferably from 4° to 8°C. Only a small percentage of available caves provide for this specialized requirement. Stable low temperatures allow bats to maintain a low rate of metabolism and conserve fat reserves until spring (Humphrey, 1978). Indiana bats usually hibernate in larqe, dense clusters of about 300 bats per square foot (3200/meter2, Fiqure 2) (Engel et al., 1976; Clawson et al., 1980). Relative humidity at roost sites during hibernation is usually above 74\ (Humphrey, 1978; LaVal et al., 1977b; Hall, 1962), althouqh Myers (1964) observed relative humidity as low as 54\. Specific cave confiqura- tions determine temperature and humidity aicroclimates required by these bats (Tuttle and Stevenson, 1978J LaVal and LaVal, 1980). 2. SUmJler Habitat. Little is kn<*n about Indiana bat sum.r habitat. Recent studies indicate that maternity colonies are formed mostly in riparian and floodplain areas of ..all to .dium-sized streams (Humphrey et al., 1977; Cope et al., 1978; Sparling et al., 1979; Gardner and Gardner, 1980). Bats a180 have been found along tree-lined drainage ditches in Illinois (Brack, 1979).
Recommended publications
  • Eastern Small-Footed Myotis (Myotis Leibii)

    Eastern Small-Footed Myotis (Myotis Leibii)

    ========================================================================== Current Status and Conservation Strategy for the Eastern Small-footed Myotis (Myotis leibii) October 2001 Technical Report #00-19 =========================================================================== Current Status and Conservation Strategy for the Eastern Small-footed Myotis (Myotis leibii) Prepared by: Sandra Y. Erdle and Christopher S. Hobson for: The George Washington and Jefferson National Forests Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation Division of Natural Heritage 217 Governor Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 (804) 786-7951 Technical Report #00-19 This document may be cited as follows: Erdle, S. Y., and C. S. Hobson. 2001. Current status and conservation strategy for the eastern small-footed myotis (Myotis leibii). Natural Heritage Technical Report # 00-19. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage, Richmond, VA. 17 pp + appendices. Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation programs, activities, and employment opportunities are available to all people regardless of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, national origin, or political affiliation. An equal opportunity/affirmative action employer. Current status and conservation strategy: Myotis leibii (October 2001) 2 CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . ii INTRODUCTION. 1 LIFE HISTORY AND ECOLOGY . 2 Taxonomy . 2 General Characteristics . 2 Distribution and Abundance . 2 Conservation Status . 4 Summer Ecology and Behavior . 4 Winter Ecology and Behavior . 5 Ecologic and Economic Importance . 5 Ontogeny and Reproduction . 6 Predators . 7 DISCUSSION AND MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS . 7 CONSERVATION AND PROTECTION . 9 Recommendations . 9 Information Needs . 10 PERTINENT LITERATURE . 12 APPENDICES . 18 Appendix A - Survey Form - List of Personal Contacts and Plan Reviewers - Responses to Survey Form Appendix B - Explanation of the Natural Heritage Ranking System Appendix C - Poster Abstract (American Society of Mammalogists) FIGURES Figure 1.
  • INDIANA BAT Scientific Name: Myotis Sodalis Miller and Allen Other

    INDIANA BAT Scientific Name: Myotis Sodalis Miller and Allen Other

    Common Name: INDIANA BAT Scientific Name: Myotis sodalis Miller and Allen Other Commonly Used Names: Indiana myotis, social myotis Previously Used Names: none Family: Vespertilionidae Rarity Ranks: G2/S1 State Legal Status: Endangered Federal Legal Status: Endangered Description: The dorsal hair of the Indiana bat is dark chestnut gray to pinkish gray, darker at the base, and lacks luster. Individual hairs have three bands of color. The ears and wing membranes also have a flat coloration that does not contrast with the fur. The underfur is somewhat lighter colored with a pinkish cast. The hairs on the relatively small (9 mm, inch) feet are short and inconspicuous and the calcar (a spur of cartilage arising from inner side of ankle and running along part of outer wing ) is keeled. The total length is 41 - 49 mm (1 - 1 inches), the forearm length is 35 - 41 mm (1 -1 inches), the wingspread is 24 - 27 cm (9 - 10 inches), and the weight is about 5 - 8 grams (about ¼ ounce). Similar Species: In general, the Indiana bat closely resembles the little brown bat (Mysotis lucifugus). Characters of the latter that help distinguish it are a slightly larger (10mm) foot, toe hairs that extend beyond the knuckles, a keel-less calcar, and burnished bronze hair tips. Habitat: Indiana bats gather in large groups in suitable caves to hibernate, more than 85% of the population in just nine caves in Indiana, Missouri, and Kentucky. These bats need winter caves with a stable temperature of 4 - 8°C (39 - 46°F) that contain standing water which maintains relative humidity above 74%.
  • Indiana Bat Habitat Requirements

    Indiana Bat Habitat Requirements

    Section II-F Bat Habitat Conservation Priorities in Missouri Indiana Bat, Northern Long-Eared Bat, and Gray Bat NOTE: The Missouri Heritage Database, adapted for NRCS Field Office Technical Guide use, will be consulted for potential impacts to the Indiana Bat, Northern Long- Eared Bat, and Gray Bat. Please refer questions regarding these Bat Habitat Conservation Priorities to the Area Biologist. Area staff should direct questions to the State Wildlife Biologist. Indiana Bat The Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) is a federal and state listed endangered species. When the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) provides technical or financial assistance to landowners, habitat for this species must be considered and evaluated by NRCS staff that has completed the joint agency workshop, “U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service/NRCS Coordination for the Conservation of the Indiana Bat in Missouri.” Biology of the Indiana Bat From late fall through winter, Indiana bats in Missouri hibernate in caves in the Ozark Region. During the spring and summer, the bats utilize living, injured (e.g. split trunks and broken limbs from lightening strikes or wind), dead or dying trees for roosting throughout the state. Indiana bat roost trees tend to be greater than 9 inches (dbh) with loose or exfoliating bark. Large trees (greater than 20 inches dbh) are preferred. Most important are the structural characteristics that provide adequate space for bats to roost. Preferred roost sites are located in forest openings, at the forest edge, or where the overstory canopy allows some sunlight exposure to the roost tree which is usually within 0.6 miles of water.
  • Conservation Guidance for Indiana Bat (Myotis Sodalis)

    Conservation Guidance for Indiana Bat (Myotis Sodalis)

    Conservation Guidance for Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis). Henning, Bridget; Hinz Jr., Leon C; Kath, Joe INHS Technical Report 2017 (26) Prepared for Illinois Department of Natural Resources, State Wildlife Initiative Grants Program Issue Date: 8/30/2017 Unrestricted, for immediate release Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Mark R. Ryan, Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Leellen Solter, Interim Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Illinois Natural History Survey has undertaken a project producing documents that provide conservation guidance for listed species in Illinois for the Illinois Department of Natural Resources. The project is titled: Conservation Guidance for Species in Greatest Need of Conservation (SGNC) T- 96-R-001. The primary purpose of guidance documents is to provide various project developers/land managers with information on the species, how their actions may impact the species, and how they can minimize/mitigate/monitor those impacts. In addition, the documents may be useful for identifying research needs to direct various funds, as a first step towards recovery planning, or for informing the general public. We intend the documents to be comprehensive and inclusive of scientific and experiential knowledge of the species and its conservation. The documents incorporate information on current conservation efforts, conservation opportunities and research needs. Interviews with stakeholders were held to identify information that should be included in conservation guidance documents. We prioritized document production for species that were frequently the subject of Incidental Take Authorizations or were consulted on in the IDNR’s EcoCat program. Initial literature reviews was conducted to produce first draft documents.
  • Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats

    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats

    Index of Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Vol. 9. Bats A agnella, Kerivoula 901 Anchieta’s Bat 814 aquilus, Glischropus 763 Aba Leaf-nosed Bat 247 aladdin, Pipistrellus pipistrellus 771 Anchieta’s Broad-faced Fruit Bat 94 aquilus, Platyrrhinus 567 Aba Roundleaf Bat 247 alascensis, Myotis lucifugus 927 Anchieta’s Pipistrelle 814 Arabian Barbastelle 861 abae, Hipposideros 247 alaschanicus, Hypsugo 810 anchietae, Plerotes 94 Arabian Horseshoe Bat 296 abae, Rhinolophus fumigatus 290 Alashanian Pipistrelle 810 ancricola, Myotis 957 Arabian Mouse-tailed Bat 164, 170, 176 abbotti, Myotis hasseltii 970 alba, Ectophylla 466, 480, 569 Andaman Horseshoe Bat 314 Arabian Pipistrelle 810 abditum, Megaderma spasma 191 albatus, Myopterus daubentonii 663 Andaman Intermediate Horseshoe Arabian Trident Bat 229 Abo Bat 725, 832 Alberico’s Broad-nosed Bat 565 Bat 321 Arabian Trident Leaf-nosed Bat 229 Abo Butterfly Bat 725, 832 albericoi, Platyrrhinus 565 andamanensis, Rhinolophus 321 arabica, Asellia 229 abramus, Pipistrellus 777 albescens, Myotis 940 Andean Fruit Bat 547 arabicus, Hypsugo 810 abrasus, Cynomops 604, 640 albicollis, Megaerops 64 Andersen’s Bare-backed Fruit Bat 109 arabicus, Rousettus aegyptiacus 87 Abruzzi’s Wrinkle-lipped Bat 645 albipinnis, Taphozous longimanus 353 Andersen’s Flying Fox 158 arabium, Rhinopoma cystops 176 Abyssinian Horseshoe Bat 290 albiventer, Nyctimene 36, 118 Andersen’s Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arafura Large-footed Bat 969 Acerodon albiventris, Noctilio 405, 411 Andersen’s Leaf-nosed Bat 254 Arata Yellow-shouldered Bat 543 Sulawesi 134 albofuscus, Scotoecus 762 Andersen’s Little Fruit-eating Bat 578 Arata-Thomas Yellow-shouldered Talaud 134 alboguttata, Glauconycteris 833 Andersen’s Naked-backed Fruit Bat 109 Bat 543 Acerodon 134 albus, Diclidurus 339, 367 Andersen’s Roundleaf Bat 254 aratathomasi, Sturnira 543 Acerodon mackloti (see A.
  • Myotis Sodalis) in Illinois

    Myotis Sodalis) in Illinois

    Transactions of the Illinois State Academy of Science (1996), Volume 89, 3 and 4, pp. 187-196 Summer Distribution of the Federally Endangered Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) in Illinois James E. Gardner, Joyce E. Hofmann, and James D. Garner* Illinois Natural History Survey Champaign, IL 61820 and *Illinois Department of Natural Resources Springfield, IL 62701 Present address of JEG: Missouri Highway and Transportation Department Jefferson City, MO 65102 ABSTRACT During the summers of 1985 through 1994, mist netting was conducted at 191 sites in 71 Illinois counties to determine the summer distribution of the federally endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). A total of 115 Indiana bats was captured at 35 sites in 21 counties in the southern three-fourths of Illinois. Adult male Indiana bats were also found to be using two caves and one mine during the summer. Because one cave was located in an additional county, summer records were obtained for 22 counties. Captures of reproduc- tively active females or juveniles at 24 sites in 16 counties indicated that maternity colo- nies of this species occur throughout its range in Illinois. Recaptures of banded individu- als in the same area during different summers demonstrated that Indiana bats displayed loyalty to their summer ranges. INTRODUCTION The federally endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) is a migratory species that congre- gates in caves and abandoned mines during the winter, but is more widely dispersed during the summer (Barbour and Davis 1969). The majority of this species hibernates in a few caves and one mine in Missouri, southern Indiana, and Kentucky (Brady et al.
  • GRAY BAT Scientific Name: Myotis Grisescens Howell Other Commonly

    GRAY BAT Scientific Name: Myotis Grisescens Howell Other Commonly

    Common Name: GRAY BAT Scientific Name: Myotis grisescens Howell Other Commonly Used Names: gray myotis Previously Used Scientific Names: none Family: Vespertilionidae Rarity Ranks: G3/S1 State Legal Status: Endangered Federal Legal Status: Endangered Description: Color of the gray bat varies from dark gray immediately following molt in July or August, to russet, which is especially evident in females during the spring. Woolly-looking dorsal fur is uniformly gray from root to tip and the belly fur is grayish-white. The rear edge of the wing membrane attaches at the ankle. This is Georgia's largest Myotis bat, with a total length of 80 - 100 mm (3 - 4 inches), forearm length of 40 - 46 mm (1 -1 inches), wing spread of about 30 cm (12 inches) and weight of 7 - 16 grams (¼ - ½ ounces), typically 8 - 11 grams (about ¼ ounces). Similar Species: The gray bat is very similar to several other species in the same genus: southeastern bat (Myotis austroriparius), little brown bat (M. lucifugus), northern long-eared bat (M. septentrionalis), and Indiana bat (M. sodalis). However, these other myotis bats have banded dorsal fur (not uniformly colored from base to tip), and the wing membrane attaches to the base of the first toe rather than the ankle. Habitat: Perhaps the most cave-dependent mammal in this country, the gray bat roosts and hibernates exclusively in suitable caves in the southeastern U.S. However, some of the few specimens collected in Georgia were found in a drainage tunnel under the University of Georgia football stadium. Less than 5% of available caves in the southeastern U.S.
  • Appendix J Wildlife Reports

    Appendix J Wildlife Reports

    Appendix J Wildlife Reports To: Linda Cope, Wyoming Game and Fish Department From: Kim Chapman & Genesis Mickel, Applied Ecological Services Date: June 14, 2017 Re: Memo on new surveys requested by Wyoming Game & Fish Department _____________________________________________________________________________________ AES biologists have been collecting baseline biological data and recording incidental observations for the Boswell Springs Wind Project between 2011 and 2016 in consultation with Wyoming Game and Fish Department (WGFD) and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). During a Project meeting on May 26, 2017 and follow-up letter dated June 5, 2017, staff at the WGFD requested targeted surveys for four species of interest to better assess their presence or absence in the Project area. The four species are black-footed ferret, swift fox, mountain plover, and long-billed curlew. The purpose of this memo is to summarize the survey methodology presented and accepted by WGFD on a June 12, 2017 conference call. 1. White-tailed prairie dog activity areas. Incidental sightings or evidence for black-footed ferret, swift fox, and mountain plover, have been isolated to areas identified as high-density for prairie dog burrows. As a result, the first task is to refine the mapping of the prairie dog colonies and field verify the high- activity areas. The resulting high-activity areas will then be used to survey for presence or absence of these species. Prairie dog burrow densities were originally mapped in the Project area from aerial photos, which were then ground-truthed along transects. The resulting map indicated areas of burrows at high, moderate, and low densities, but did not pinpoint the areas where prairie dogs were most active.
  • GRAY and Indiana BAT POPULATION TRENDS in MISSOURI PE-44

    GRAY and Indiana BAT POPULATION TRENDS in MISSOURI PE-44

    PE-44 Gray and Indiana Bat population Trends in Missouri William R. Elliott Cave Biologist/Resource Scientist Missouri Department of Conservation Resource Science Division Jefferson City, Missouri 65102-0180 [email protected] 573-751-4115 ext 3194 Abstract Since 1975 the Missouri Department of Conservation (MDC) has system- atically censused the endangered bats, Myotis sodalis (Indiana bat) and M. grise- scens (Gray bat). A recent statewide reestimate of about 15,812 indicates that Indiana bats declined by 95% since 1979. Pilot Knob Mine, a National Wildlife Refuge, had 80,000-100,000 Indiana bats in 1958, but only 1,678 were found there in February 2008, a 98% decline. At other sites they declined or abandoned one cave for another, seeking protection and more optimal temperatures. Their decline probably was caused by multiple factors, including human disturbance, the partial collapse of Pilot Knob Mine in 1979, warming of hibernacula, and possibly by pesticides and loss of summer habitat in northern Missouri. White Nose Syndrome has not been found in Missouri. Missouri’s Gray bat population declined, but it is now stable or increasing in some protected caves. Many other caves remain abandoned for various reasons. At bottom, Gray bats lost at least 67% of their maximum past population, as measured in 56 important caves, and 53% of the caves were abandoned. The ma- ternity population of Gray bats is currently estimated at approximately 635,000, but it may have been >1,700,000 in the past. The three largest Gray bat hiber- nacula were censused in 2006 and totalled 773,850.
  • Little Brown Bat Indiana Bat Small-Footed Bat Northern Long

    Little Brown Bat Indiana Bat Small-Footed Bat Northern Long

    Little Brown Bat Small-footed Bat (Myotis lucifugus) (Myotis leibii) The Little Brown Bat is one This bat is the smallest bat of the most common bat species in New York State. species and is found Weighing in at less than a nickel, throughout North America this colonial bat is often found including Alaska. This is a roosting in rock crevices, under colonial bat that can be boulders, and in quarries in the found in human dwellings, summer. They hibernate in caves but they will also roost in or mines in the winter. The trees during the summer. Small-footed Bat is a Species of During the winter, the Little Brown Bat will Special concern in New York. hibernate in caves or mines. It appears at least some Little Brown Bats on Fort Drum fly to the Indiana Bat other side of the Adirondacks to hibernate in the (Myotis sodalis) Champlain Valley. Little Brown Bats have Despite being called the experienced extensive population declines due to Indiana Bat, in 2006 White-nose Syndrome. there was approximately 35,000 bats, or 9% of the How Can You Tell Them Apart? entire population in New Myotis or “mouse-eared” bats all look very similar York State. The number and are very difficult to tell apart. They all typically of Indiana bats has since have dark ears, faces, and wing membranes; glossy declined due to White- brown or gray fur; wingspans of 8-11 inches; and nose Syndrome. body lengths of 2-3 inches. Determining the species Fort Drum documented the first Indiana Bat on the can usually only be done by individuals trained to installation in August 2006.
  • Indiana Myotis, Myotis Sodalis

    Indiana Myotis, Myotis Sodalis

    Myotis sodalis (Miller and Allen, 1928) INMY W. Mark Ford and Brian R. Chapman CONTENT AND TAXONOMIC COMMENTS The Indiana (or social) myotis (Myotis sodalis)isa monotypic species (Hall 1981). Before the Indiana myotis was described, several authors identified specimens as the little brown myotis (M. lucifugus). Cases of misidentification were described by Miller and Allen (1928) and Mumford and Cope (1964). The literature on the life history, ecology, and management of the Indiana myotis is reviewed by Thomson (1982), Menzel et al. (2001), and Kurta and Kennedy (2002). DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTICS The Indiana myotis is a small-to-medium-sized bat. Measurements are: total length, 70.8–90.6 mm; tail, 27–43.8 mm; hind foot, 7.2–8.6 mm; forearm, 36–40.4 mm; weight, 5–11 g. The color of the dorsal pelage varies, but is often dull brownish-gray to dark pinkish-gray. Individual dorsal hairs are tricolor. The ventral pelage is lighter and appears pinkish-white. The bat is most easily confused with the little brown myotis and southeastern myotis (M. austroriparius) from which it can be distinguished by its short, almost inconspicuous toe hairs and a small but noticeable keel on the calcar (Menzel et al. 2002). The dental formula is: I 2/3, C 1/1, P 3/3, M 3/3 = 38 (Figure 1). CONSERVATION STATUS The Indiana myotis has a global rank of Imperiled (NatureServe 2007). It is also Imperiled in Alabama, and Arkansas, and is Critically Imperiled in Kentucky, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee and Virginia. In North Carolina, the status of the bat is Under Review.
  • SC Bat Conservation Plan Ii

    SC Bat Conservation Plan Ii

    SOUTH CAROLINA Bat Conservation Plan South Carolina Department of Natural Resources SOUTH CAROLINA BAT CONSERVATION PLAN Updated September 2020 Prepared by: Jennifer R. Kindel Wildlife Biologist South Carolina Department of Natural Resources 124 Wildlife Drive Union, SC 29379 This is the South Carolina Bat Conservation Plan. It has been revised and updated annually from the initial plan created in September 2015. This plan provides information on legal status, public health, conservation issues, natural history, habitat requirements, species-specific accounts, threats and conservation strategies for bat species known to occur in the state. The primary purpose of this plan is to summarize available information for these species and provide proactive strategies in order to help guide management and conservation efforts. Suggested citation: South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. 2020. South Carolina Bat Conservation Plan. Columbia, South Carolina. 206 pp. Cover photo by Mary Bunch Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... v Purpose ..............................................................................................................................................................................v Bat Species in South Carolina................................................................................................................................