DOCSLIB.ORG

Poussin's Women

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

25 VISUAL AND MATERIAL CULTURE, 1300-1700 Thomas Poussin’s Women Troy Thomas Poussin’s Women Sex and Gender in the Artist’s Works Poussin’s Women Visual and Material Culture, 1300-1700 A forum for innovative research on the role of images and objects in the late medieval and early modern periods, Visual and Material Culture, 1300-1700 publishes monographs and essay collections that combine rigorous investigation with critical inquiry to present new narratives on a wide range of topics, from traditional arts to seemingly ordinary things. Recognizing the fluidity of images, objects, and ideas, this series fosters cross-cultural as well as multi-disciplinary exploration. We consider proposals from across the spectrum of analytic approaches and methodologies. Series Editor Dr. Allison Levy, an art historian, has written and/or edited three scholarly books, and she has been the recipient of numerous grants and awards, from the National Endowment for the Humanities, the American Association of University Women, the Getty Research Institute, the Dumbarton Oaks Research Library of Harvard University, the Whiting Foundation and the Bogliasco Foundation, among others. www.allisonlevy.com. Poussin’s Women Sex and Gender in the Artist’s Works Troy Thomas Amsterdam University Press The publication of this book is made possible by grants from the Office of Research and Outreach and from the School of Humanities at The Pennsylvania State University, Harrisburg. Cover illustration: Nicolas Poussin, Diana and Endymion, detail, c.1630. Oil on canvas. Detroit Institute of Arts, Founders Society Purchase, General Membership Fund (Photo: Detroit Institute of Arts). Cover design: Coördesign, Leiden Lay-out: Crius Group, Hulshout isbn 978 94 6372 184 4 e-isbn 978 90 4855 238 2 doi 10.5117/9789463721844 nur 654 © T. Thomas / Amsterdam University Press B.V., Amsterdam 2020 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. Every effort has been made to obtain permission to use all copyrighted illustrations reproduced in this book. Nonetheless, whosoever believes to have rights to this material is advised to contact the publisher. Table of Contents List of Illustrations 11 Acknowledgments 21 Part I – Violence and Virtue in Poussin’s Representations of Women 23 Part II – Poussin’s Women—Cultural and Social Frames 53 Part III – Paintings and Drawings 93 1. Predators 95 Cephalus and Aurora, 1624-1625. Oil on canvas, 79 × 152 cm. Hovingham Hall, Yorkshire (Fig. 1.1). 97 Cephalus and Aurora, c. 1629-1630. Oil on canvas, 96.5 × 130.5 cm. National Gallery, London (Fig. 1.2) 99 Diana and Endymion, c. 1630. Oil on canvas, 121 × 168 cm. Detroit Institute of Arts (Fig. 1.4) 106 2. The Lustful—Triumphant, Impulsive, Spying, Conquered 123 Triumph of Pan, 1635-1636. Oil on canvas, 134 × 145 cm. National Gallery, London (Fig. 2.1) 125 Hymenaios Disguised as a Woman During an Offering to Priapus, 1634-1638. Oil on canvas, 167 × 376 cm. Museu de Arte, São Paulo (Fig. 2.16) 150 Rinaldo and Armida, c. 1627. Oil on canvas, 95 × 133 cm. Pushkin Museum of Fine Arts, Moscow (Fig. 2.18) 153 Rinaldo and Armida, c. 1628. Oil on canvas, 80 × 107 cm. Dulwich Picture Gallery, London (Fig. 2.19) 157 Venus Espied by Shepherds, c. 1625. Oil on canvas, 71 × 96 cm. Staatliche Gemäldegalerie, Dresden (Fig. 2.7) 159 Landscape with Polyphemus, 1649. Oil on canvas, 150 × 198 cm. State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg (Fig. 2.21) 161 Amor Vincit Pan, c. 1625-1627. Slight graphite underdrawing, pen and gray-brown ink, gray-brown wash on paper, 11.5 × 14.1 cm. Royal Library, Windsor Castle (Fig. 2.22) 163 Venus and Mercury, c. 1627-1629. Oil on canvas, cut down, right-hand part 78 × 85 cm. Dulwich Picture Gallery, London (Fig. 2.23) 165 3. Lovers—Genuine, Controlling, Unrequited, Jealous 171 Venus and Adonis, c. 1624-1625. Oil on canvas, 98.5 × 134.6 cm. Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, TX (Fig. 3.1) 174 Venus and Adonis, 1625. Oil on canvas, 75 × 99 cm. Rhode Island School of Design, Providence, RI (Fig. 3.3) 176 Acis and Galatea, 1627-1628. Oil on canvas, 98 × 137 cm. National Gallery of Ireland, Dublin (Fig. 3.5) 179 Triumph of Neptune and Amphitrite, 1635-1636. Oil on canvas, 114.5 × 146.5 cm. Philadelphia Museum of Art (Fig. 3.7) 181 Arcadian Shepherds, c. 1628-1629. Oil on canvas, 101 × 82 cm. The Chats- worth Settlement, Chatsworth (Fig. 3.9) 185 The Four Seasons: Spring (Earthly Paradise), 1660-1664. Oil on canvas, 118 × 160 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris (Fig. 3.11) 187 The Four Seasons: Summer (Ruth and Boaz), 1660-1664. Oil on canvas, 118 × 160 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris (Fig. 3.12) 189 Mars and Venus, c. 1627-1628. Oil on canvas, 155 × 213.5 cm. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (Fig. 3.13) 191 Tancred and Erminia, c. 1631. Oil on canvas, 98 × 147 cm. State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg (Fig. 3.14) 194 Tancred and Erminia, c. 1633-1634. Oil on canvas, 75.5 × 99.7 cm. Barber Institute of Fine Arts, University of Birmingham (Fig. 3.15) 196 Landscape with Juno and Argus, 1636-1637. Oil on canvas, 120 × 195 cm. Gemäldegalerie, Berlin (Fig. 3.17) 198 4. Killers, Transgressors 205 Medea Killing her Children, c. 1649-1650. Pen and brown ink on paper, 15.9 × 16.7 cm. Royal Library, Windsor Castle (Fig. 4.1) 207 Medea Killing her Children, c. 1649-1650. Slight black underdrawing, pen and brown ink, pale brown wash on paper, 25.5 × 19.9 cm. Royal Library, Windsor Castle (Fig. 4.2) 209 Diana Killing Acteon, c. 1625-1627. Slight graphite (?) underdrawing, pen and brown ink on pale blue paper, 15 × 23.6 cm. Royal Library, Windsor Castle (Fig. 4.3) 212 Landscape with Diana and Orion, 1658. Oil on canvas, 119 × 183 cm. Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York (Fig. 4.5) 214 Diana Slaying Chione, c. 1622-1623. Pen and brown ink, brown wash on paper, 18.5 × 31.5 cm. Royal Library, Windsor Castle (Fig. 4.6) 216 Birth of Adonis, c. 1622-1623. Pen and brown ink, gray wash on paper, 18.3 × 32.5 cm. Royal Library, Windsor Castle (Fig. 4.7) 218 Death of Sapphira, c. 1654. Oil on canvas, 122 × 199 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris (Fig. 4.10) 223 5. Victims I—Killed, Assaulted 227 Death of Virginia, c. 1634-1636. Pen and brown ink, brown wash on paper, 17.7 × 23.4 cm. Royal Library, Windsor Castle (Fig. 5.1) 232 Landscape with Orpheus and Eurydice, c. 1650. Oil on canvas, 124 × 200 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris (Fig. 5.2) 234 Landscape with Pyramus and Thisbe, 1651. Oil on canvas, 192 × 273 cm. Städelsches Kunstinstitut, Frankfurt (Fig. 5.4) 237 Realm of Flora, 1631. Oil on canvas, 131 × 181 cm. Staatliche Gemäldegalerie, Dresden (Fig. 5.6) 239 Massacre of the Innocents, c. 1627-1628. Oil on canvas, 147 × 171 cm. Musée Condé, Chantilly (Fig. 5.7) 244 Christ and the Woman Taken in Adultery, c. 1653. Oil on canvas, 121 × 195 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris (Fig. 5.10) 246 Queen Zenobia found on the Banks of the River Arax, c. 1657-1660. Oil on canvas, 156 × 194.5 cm. State Hermitage Museum, St. Petersburg (Fig. 5.11) 248 Apollo and Daphne, 1625. Oil on canvas, 97 × 131 cm. Alte Pinakothek, Munich (Fig. 5.12) 249 Apollo and Daphne, 1664. Oil on canvas, 155 × 200 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris (Fig 5.13) 251 Pan and Syrinx, 1637. Oil on canvas, 106.5 × 82 cm. Staatliche Gemälde- galerie, Dresden (Fig. 5.14) 255 Rape of the Sabine Women, 1634. Oil on canvas, 154.6 × 210 cm. Metropo- litan Museum of Art, New York (Fig. 5.15) 257 Rape of the Sabine Women, c. 1637. Oil on canvas, 157 × 203 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris (Fig. 5.16) 259 Battle between the Israelites and the Midianites, c. 1630. Graphite under- drawing, pen and brown ink, brown wash on paper, 16.3 × 28 cm. Royal Library, Windsor Castle (Fig. 5.18) 262 Rape of Europa, 1649. Pen with bister wash on paper, 26.3 × 57.2 cm. Nationalmuseum, Stockholm (Fig. 5.19) 264 6. Victims II—Voiceless, Deceived 271 Echo and Narcissus, c. 1629-1630. Oil on canvas, 74 × 100 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris (Fig. 6.1) 274 Continence of Scipio, 1640. Oil on canvas, 114.5 × 163.5 cm. Pushkin Mu- seum, Moscow (Fig. 6.3) 280 Testament of Eudamidas, 1644-1648. Oil on canvas, 110.5 × 138.5 cm. Statens Museum for Kunst, Copenhagen (Fig. 6.4) 283 Birth of Bacchus, 1657. Oil on canvas, 114.5 × 167.5 cm. Fogg Art Museum, Cambridge, MA (Fig. 6.5) 285 Achilles Among the Daughters of Lycomedes, c. 1651-1653. Oil on canvas, 97 × 129.5 cm. Museum of Fine Arts, Boston (Fig. 6.6) 291 Achilles Among the Daughters of Lycomedes, c. 1656. Oil on canvas, 98 × 131 cm. Virginia Museum of Fine Arts, Richmond (Fig. 6.7) 293 Judgment of Solomon, 1649. Oil on canvas, 101 × 150 cm. Musée du Louvre, Paris (Fig. 6.8) 296 7. Heroines, Great Ladies 301 Landscape with the Ashes of Phocion Collected by His Widow, 1648. Oil on canvas, 116.5 × 178.5 cm. Walker Art Gallery, Liverpool (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Eighteenth-Century English and French Landscape Painting

    Eighteenth-Century English and French Landscape Painting

    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-2018 Common ground, diverging paths: eighteenth-century English and French landscape painting. Jessica Robins Schumacher University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/etd Part of the Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Schumacher, Jessica Robins, "Common ground, diverging paths: eighteenth-century English and French landscape painting." (2018). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 3111. https://doi.org/10.18297/etd/3111 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMON GROUND, DIVERGING PATHS: EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLISH AND FRENCH LANDSCAPE PAINTING By Jessica Robins Schumacher B.A. cum laude, Vanderbilt University, 1977 J.D magna cum laude, Brandeis School of Law, University of Louisville, 1986 A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of the University of Louisville in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in Art (C) and Art History Hite Art Department University of Louisville Louisville, Kentucky December 2018 Copyright 2018 by Jessica Robins Schumacher All rights reserved COMMON GROUND, DIVERGENT PATHS: EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY ENGLISH AND FRENCH LANDSCAPE PAINTING By Jessica Robins Schumacher B.A.
  • Evolution and Ambition in the Career of Jan Lievens (1607-1674)

    Evolution and Ambition in the Career of Jan Lievens (1607-1674)

    ABSTRACT Title: EVOLUTION AND AMBITION IN THE CAREER OF JAN LIEVENS (1607-1674) Lloyd DeWitt, Ph.D., 2006 Directed By: Prof. Arthur K. Wheelock, Jr. Department of Art History and Archaeology The Dutch artist Jan Lievens (1607-1674) was viewed by his contemporaries as one of the most important artists of his age. Ambitious and self-confident, Lievens assimilated leading trends from Haarlem, Utrecht and Antwerp into a bold and monumental style that he refined during the late 1620s through close artistic interaction with Rembrandt van Rijn in Leiden, climaxing in a competition for a court commission. Lievens’s early Job on the Dung Heap and Raising of Lazarus demonstrate his careful adaptation of style and iconography to both theological and political conditions of his time. This much-discussed phase of Lievens’s life came to an end in 1631when Rembrandt left Leiden. Around 1631-1632 Lievens was transformed by his encounter with Anthony van Dyck, and his ambition to be a court artist led him to follow Van Dyck to London in the spring of 1632. His output of independent works in London was modest and entirely connected to Van Dyck and the English court, thus Lievens almost certainly worked in Van Dyck’s studio. In 1635, Lievens moved to Antwerp and returned to history painting, executing commissions for the Jesuits, and he also broadened his artistic vocabulary by mastering woodcut prints and landscape paintings. After a short and successful stay in Leiden in 1639, Lievens moved to Amsterdam permanently in 1644, and from 1648 until the end of his career was engaged in a string of important and prestigious civic and princely commissions in which he continued to demonstrate his aptitude for adapting to and assimilating the most current style of his day to his own somber monumentality.

  • Key to the People and Art in Samuel F. B. Morse's Gallery of the Louvre

    15 21 26 2 13 4 8 32 35 22 5 16 27 14 33 1 9 6 23 17 28 34 3 36 7 10 24 18 29 39 C 19 31 11 12 G 20 25 30 38 37 40 D A F E H B Key to the People and Art in Samuel F. B. Morse’s Gallery of the Louvre In an effort to educate his American audience, Samuel Morse published Descriptive Catalogue of the Pictures. Thirty-seven in Number, from the Most Celebrated Masters, Copied into the “Gallery of the Louvre” (New York, 1833). The updated version of Morse’s key to the pictures presented here reflects current scholarship. Although Morse never identified the people represented in his painting, this key includes the possible identities of some of them. Exiting the gallery are a woman and little girl dressed in provincial costumes, suggesting the broad appeal of the Louvre and the educational benefits it afforded. PEOPLE 19. Paolo Caliari, known as Veronese (1528–1588, Italian), Christ Carrying A. Samuel F. B. Morse the Cross B. Susan Walker Morse, daughter of Morse 20. Leonardo da Vinci (1452–1519, Italian), Mona Lisa C. James Fenimore Cooper, author and friend of Morse 21. Antonio Allegri, known as Correggio (c. 1489?–1534, Italian), Mystic D. Susan DeLancy Fenimore Cooper Marriage of St. Catherine of Alexandria E. Susan Fenimore Cooper, daughter of James and Susan DeLancy 22. Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640, Flemish), Lot and His Family Fleeing Fenimore Cooper Sodom F. Richard W. Habersham, artist and Morse’s roommate in Paris 23.
  • Descriptive Catalogue of the Paintings, Sculpture and Drawings and of the Walker Collection

    Descriptive Catalogue of the Paintings, Sculpture and Drawings and of the Walker Collection

    Bowdoin College Bowdoin Digital Commons Museum of Art Collection Catalogues Museum of Art 1930 Descriptive Catalogue of the Paintings, Sculpture and Drawings and of the Walker Collection Bowdoin College. Museum of Art Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/art-museum-collection- catalogs Recommended Citation Bowdoin College. Museum of Art, "Descriptive Catalogue of the Paintings, Sculpture and Drawings and of the Walker Collection" (1930). Museum of Art Collection Catalogues. 4. https://digitalcommons.bowdoin.edu/art-museum-collection-catalogs/4 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Museum of Art at Bowdoin Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Museum of Art Collection Catalogues by an authorized administrator of Bowdoin Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2015 https://archive.org/details/descriptivecatal00bowd_2 BOWDOIN MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS WALKER ART BUILDING DESCRIPTIVE CATALOGUE OF THE PAINTINGS, SCULPTURE and DRAWINGS and of the WALKER COLLECTION FOURTH EDITION Price Fifty Cents BRUNSWICK, MAINE 1930 THE RECORD PRES5 BRUNSWICK, MAINE TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE List of Illustrations 3 Prefatory Note 4 Historical Introduction 8 The Walker Art Building 13 Sculpture Hall 17 The Sophia Walker Gallery 27 The Bowdoin Gallery 53 The Boyd Gallery 96 Base:.:ent 107 The Assyrian Room 107 Corridor 108 Class Room 109 King Chapel iio List of Photographic Reproductions 113 Index ...115 Finding List of Numbers 117 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS FACING PAGE Walker Art Building — Frontispiece Athens, by John La Farge 17 Venice, by Kenyon Cox 18 Rome, by Elihu Vcdder 19 Florence, hy Abbott Thayer 20 Alexandrian Relief Sculpture, SH-S 5 ..
  • Jacques-Louis David

    Jacques-Louis David

    Jacques-Louis David THE FAREWELL OF TELEMACHUS AND EUCHARIS Jacques-Louis David THE FAREWELL OF TELEMACHUS AND EUCHARIS Dorothy Johnson GETTY MUSEUM STUDIES ON ART Los ANGELES For my parents, Alice and John Winter, and for Johnny Christopher Hudson, Publisher Cover: Mark Greenberg, Managing Editor Jacques-Louis David (French, 1748 — 1825). The Farewell of Telemachus and Eucharis, 1818 Benedicte Gilman, Editor (detail). Oil on canvas, 87.2 x 103 cm (34% x 40/2 in.). Elizabeth Burke Kahn, Production Coordinator Los Angeles, The J. Paul Getty Museum (87.PA.27). Jeffrey Cohen, Designer Lou Meluso, Photographer Frontispiece: (Getty objects, 87.PA.27, 86.PA.740) Jacques-Louis David. Self-Portrait, 1794. Oil on canvas, 81 x 64 cm (31/8 x 25/4 in.). Paris, © 1997 The J. Paul Getty Museum Musee du Louvre (3705). © Photo R.M.N. 17985 Pacific Coast Highway Malibu, California 90265-5799 All works of art are reproduced (and photographs Mailing address: provided) courtesy of the owners, unless otherwise P.O. Box 2112 indicated. Santa Monica, California 90407-2112 Typography by G&S Typesetters, Inc., Library of Congress Austin, Texas Cataloging-in-Publication Data Printed by C & C Offset Printing Co., Ltd., Hong Kong Johnson, Dorothy. Jacques-Louis David, the Farewell of Telemachus and Eucharis / Dorothy Johnson, p. cm.—(Getty Museum studies on art) Includes bibliographical references (p. — ). ISBN 0-89236-236-7 i. David, Jacques Louis, 1748 — 1825. Farewell of Telemachus and Eucharis. 2. David, Jacques Louis, 1748-1825 Criticism and interpretation. 3. Telemachus (Greek mythology)—Art. 4. Eucharis (Greek mythology)—Art. I. Title.
  • 29 Diana and Endymion

    29 Diana and Endymion

    29 Seligmann inventory); sold 1914 to (M. Knoedler & Co., London, New York, and Paris); sold March 1922 to John McCormack 1960.6.2 [1884 – 1945], New York; (M. Knoedler & Co., London, New York, and Paris); sold 1924 to William R. Timken [1866 – 1949], Diana and Endymion New York;1 by inheritance to his widow, Lillian Guyer Timken c. 1753 / 1756 [1881 – 1959], New York. Exhibited: L’Art du XVIIIe siècle, Galerie Georges Petit, Paris, 1883 – oil on canvas, 94.9 × 136.8 (37 3/8× 53 7/8) 1884, no. 7, as by Boucher. Loan Exhibition of Paintings by Old Timken Collection Masters, Palace of Fine Arts, San Francisco, 1920, no. 90, as by Boucher. Loan for display with permanent collection, Museum Distinguishing Marks and Labels of Fine Arts, St. Petersburg, Florida, 1966 – 1981, as by Boucher. The Loves of the Gods: Mythological Painting from Watteau to David, On stretcher: in blue crayon, “(5855)”; in blue crayon, “15444”; Galeries nationales du Grand Palais, Paris; Philadelphia Museum paper label, printed “15444”; Nga label of Art; Kimbell Art Museum, Fort Worth, 1991 – 1992, no. 60. Technical Notes: The support is a fine-weight, plain-weave fabric. The tacking margins have been removed, and the painting has been double-lined. There is a vertical seam in the original fabric approxi- mately 24 cm from the left edge. The painting’s original shape was changed radically during an early conservation treatment. The X- radiographs indicate that four fabric inserts were added to the paint- ing to change it from a curvilinear, scalloped shape to a rectangular format.
  • 110 Culture 110 Cu Ltu Re

    110 Culture 110 Cu Ltu Re

    images of orphans in fine art By Rita ANOKHIN, Yuriy KUDINOV “ONE PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS,” a popular saying rphaned characters are extremely common as literary protagonists, and abandonment by par- ents is a persistent theme in myth, fairy tales, fantasy, ancient poetry, and children’s literature. We À nd orphaned heroes in sacred texts: Moses, the great prophet was abandoned in infancy; and in legends, such as that of the founding of Rome by Romulus and Remus who were reared by a she-wolf. OThe classic orphan is one of the most widespread characters in literature. For example: in the 19th century one can À nd Dickens’ Oliver Twist and David CopperÀ eld; Mark Twain’s Huckleberry Finn; and Charlotte Bronte’s Jane Eyre. In the 20th century we meet James Henry Trotter from Roald Dahl’s James and the Giant Peach; Dorothy from the Wizard of Oz; and the Harry Potter series, À rst published in 1997. So far, young Mr. Potter has been arguably the most famous character – orphaned or otherwise – of the 21st century. Authors orphan their characters in order to free them from family obligations and supervision, to force them to pursue a more interesting or adventurous life, or simply to deprive them of a more prosaic exist- ence. The removal of parents and loving guardians creates self-contained, introspective characters who strive for affection. Although orphans can be a useful literary technique, these invented lives do not reÁ ect reality. Orphaned characters in À ction are often remarkably – even unbelievably – successful, sentimental, or wise beyond their years.
  • Reproduction and Authenticity in Bernard Picart's Impostures

    Reproduction and Authenticity in Bernard Picart's Impostures

    75 ANN JENSEN ADAMS REPRODUCTION AND AUTHENTICITY IN BERNARD PICART’S IMPOSTURES INNOCENTES In 1768, nearly thirty-five years after the death of Bernard Picart, English critic William Gilpin opined: Picart was one of the most ingenious of the French engravers. His imitations are among the most entertaining of his works. The cry, in his day, ran wholly in favour of antiquity: “No modern masters were worth looking at.” Picart, piqued at such prejudice, etched several pieces in imitation of ancient masters; and so happily, that he almost out-did, in their own excellencies, the artists whom he copied. These prints were much admired, as the works of guido, rembrandt, and others. Having had his joke, he published them under the title of Impostures innocentes.1 In the final years of his life, Bernard Picart — the leading illustrator to the French Huguenot–dominated book trade in the Netherlands — had written a defense of the reproductive prints that he intended to publish with a collection of some seventy- eight exemplary etchings by him after paintings, and particularly drawings, by sixteenth- and seventeenth-century masters as well as a handful after his own designs. A year after Picart’s death in 1733, his wife published his defense — titled “Discours sur les préjugés de certains curieux touchant la gravure” (A discourse on the prejudices of certain critics in regard to engraving) — and reproductive etch- ings along with a preface, a biography, and a catalog of his works under the title Impostures innocentes; ou, Recueil d’estampes d’après divers peintres illustres (1734; Innocent impostures; or, A collection of prints after various celebrated painters).2 Twenty-two years later, the essay and an abbreviated biography were published in English along with the original — and by that time deeply worn — plates.3 This culminated a life as one of Europe’s leading printmakers, first in Paris and after 1710 in the northern Netherlands.
  • The Nude Figure in Renaissance Art Thomas Martin

    The Nude Figure in Renaissance Art Thomas Martin

    19 The Nude Figure in Renaissance Art Thomas Martin The establishment of the nude as an independent and vital subject in post-antique western art occurred during the Renaissance and is, along with the use of perspective, one of the most important markers differentiating Renaissance art from medieval art. One factor driving these innovations was the desire to portray a world that conforms to visual reality, where objects decrease in size as they move away from the picture plane, and where human anatomy is rigorously understood. Just as Renaissance artists employed perspective to portray naturalistic spaces, so they also populated those spaces with proportional, anatomically accurate figures and, during the course of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries, the occasions when those figures were depicted nude occurred more and more frequently. Naturalism, however, was but one motive for the increased use of the nude, and by the first half of the 1500s, the naked body had achieved a wider and more varied presence in art than had been the case in the Middle Ages or even in antiquity where, with few exceptions, its use was confined to male athletes, heroes, and divinities. This essay will focus on two issues: where is the nude used – i.e., what are its locations – and what are the meanings of its uses? As it is today, the body in the Renaissance was multivalent. European Christian society believed that as a cause of lust and sin, the body was fearful and needed to be covered up. Yet at the same time it was the form the Savior, Jesus Christ, took during his lifetime, and the Catholic Church taught that it is in our very own earthly bodies that, after the last trumpet, we will spend eternity either in bliss in Heaven or in despair in Hell.
  • Art Guide 2015 Columban Art Calendar Front Cover

    Art Guide 2015 Columban Art Calendar Front Cover

    2015 Columban Art Calendar Art Guide 2015 Columban Art Calendar Front Cover Virgin and Child (detail) by Domenico Ghirlandaio (c.1470-1475) Amongst the subjects favoured by Renaissance masters and their patrons, that of the Virgin and Child must rank as the most beloved. The archetypal image of a serene young woman embracing her child has never failed to appeal to viewers searching for reassurance or mercy. With consummate skill Ghirlandaio evokes the physical presence of the young mother, whose heavy folds of blue fabric create a protective space to enclose her son. The gold background reminiscent of heaven reminds us of the Virgin’s ancient title as “God- Bearer,” the one who made possible the Incarnation. The rock crystal mounted at the centre of the fabulous jewel had traditionally symbolized purity. Thus the magnificent object, known as a morse, which served to fasten the priest’s robe at the neck, here decorates the Virgin’s neckline. As a symbol of purity, the rock crystal alludes to a quality that both poets and theologians had long ascribed to Christ’s mother. Ghirlandaio’s artistry elevates this rather familiar image into a symbol of Mary’s archetypal role as protector and mediator. January 2015 St Paul and the Viper (detail) Mural, Canterbury Cathedral by English School (c. 1180) St Paul is remembered as a great missionary, who after his conversion preached throughout Asia Minor and as far west as Rome and Malta. This wall painting, which once decorated Canterbury Cathedral, recalls an incident recounted in Acts 28:1-6. Paul had been arrested and was on his way to Rome, where he was to be tried.
  • Evidence That Leonardo Da Vinci Had Strabismus

    Evidence That Leonardo Da Vinci Had Strabismus

    Confidential: Embargoed Until 11:00 am ET, October 18, 2018. Do Not Distribute Research JAMA Ophthalmology | Brief Report Evidence That Leonardo da Vinci Had Strabismus Christopher W. Tyler, PhD, DSc Supplemental content IMPORTANCE Strabismus is a binocular vision disorder characterized by the partial or complete inability to maintain eye alignment on the object that is the target of fixation, usually accompanied by suppression of the deviating eye and consequent 2-dimensional monocular vision. This cue has been used to infer the presence of strabismus in a substantial number of famous artists. OBJECTIVE To provide evidence that Leonardo da Vinci had strabismus. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In exotropia, the divergent eye alignment is typically manifested as an outward shift in the locations of the pupils within the eyelid aperture. The condition was assessed by fitting circles and ellipses to the pupils, irises, and eyelid apertures images identified as portraits of Leonardo da Vinci and measuring their relative positions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Geometric angle of alignment of depicted eyes. RESULTS This study assesses 6 candidate images, including 2 sculptures, 2 oil paintings, and 2 drawings. The mean relative alignments of the pupils in the eyelid apertures (where divergence is indicated by negative numbers) showed estimates of −13.2° in David,−8.6° in Salvator Mundi,−9.1° in Young John the Baptist,−12.5° in Young Warrior, 5.9° in Vitruvian Man, and −8.3° in an elderly self-portrait. These findings are consistent with exotropia (t5 = 2.69; P = .04, 2-tailed). Author Affiliation: Division of Optometry and Vision Sciences, School of Health Sciences, City CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The weight of converging evidence leads to the suggestion University of London, London, that da Vinci had intermittent exotropia with the resulting ability to switch to monocular United Kingdom.
  • From Batoni's Brush to Canova's Chisel: Painted and Sculpted Portraiture at Rome, 1740-1830 Volume One of Two: Text Maeve O'dwy

    From Batoni's Brush to Canova's Chisel: Painted and Sculpted Portraiture at Rome, 1740-1830 Volume One of Two: Text Maeve O'dwy

    From Batoni's Brush to Canova's Chisel: Painted and sculpted portraiture at Rome, 1740-1830 Volume One of Two: Text Maeve O'Dwyer PhD Thesis University of Edinburgh 2016 I, Maeve O'Dwyer, ________________________________, hereby declare that the work contained within has been composed by me and is entirely my own work. No part of this thesis has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. 2 Abstract This thesis examines the city of Rome as a primary context of British sociability and portrait identity during the period from 1740 to 1830. Part I considers the work of the portrait painter Pompeo Batoni. It examines the pictorial record of grand tourist sociability at Rome in the 1750s, questioning the complex articulation of nationality among British visitors, and the introduction of overt references to antiquity in the portraiture of Pompeo Batoni. It subsequently interrogates Batoni's use of the partially nude Vatican Ariadne sculpture in five portraits of male grand tourists, dating from Charles John Crowle in 1762, to Thomas William Coke in 1774. Part II of this thesis considers the realities of viewing the sculpted body at Rome, recreating the studios of sculptors Christopher Hewetson and Antonio Canova. It posits the studio space as a locus of sociability for British visitors to Rome, drawing on the feminine gaze in the form of the early nineteenth-century writings of Charlotte Eaton and Lady Murray. The final chapter moves from the focus on British sitters to examine sculpture by Antonio Canova, framing it within a wider discourse of masculinity and propriety.