DOCSLIB.ORG

State of Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of Arizona Bureau of Geology and Mineral Technology STATE OF ARIZONA BUREAU OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL TECHNOLOGY GEOLOGIC EVALUATION OF URANIUM IN PLUTONIC ROCKS NORTHWESTERN ARIZONA Geological Survey Branch Geothermal Group Earth Science and Mineral Resources in Arizona 845 N. PARK AVENUE TUCSON, ARIZONA netadc784601 85719 .ll National Uranium Resource Evaluation GEOLOGIC EVALUATION OF URANIUM IN PLUTONIC ROCKS NORTHWESTERN ARIZONA GEOLOGY BUR1AUBUWpUrIOF 1 T-CHNOLOGY Status Report By: James D. Loghry & Walter E. Heinrichs, Jr. Loghry/Heinrichs Joint Venture P. 0. Box 5964 Tucson, Arizona 85703 (602) 623-0578 July 1980 GJBX-213 (80) Microfiche Open File PREPARED FOR U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Assistant Secretary for Resource Applications Grand Junction Office, Colorado Contract No. 79-348-S and Bendix Field Engineering Corporation Project No. 30-79-3307 This report is a result of work performed by Science Applications, Inc., through a Bendix Field Engineering Corporation Subcontract, as part of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation. NURE is a program of the U. S. Depart- ment of Energy's Grand Junction, Colorado, Office to acquire and compile geologic and other information with which to assess the magnitude and distribution of uranium resources and to determine areas favorable for the occurrence of uranium in the United States. This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favor- ing by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States. Govern- ment or any agency thereof. N.W. Arizona Plutonics Project No. 30-79-3307 Subcontract No. 79-348-S Loghry/Heinrichs Joint Venture CONTENTS Page Nos. Introduction------------------------------------------------------- 1-2 Project Summary and Conclusions------------------------------------ 2-3 Histogram---------------------------------------------------------- 4 Table of Surface Geologic Unit Codes, units, number of sites anomalous or weakly anomalous and index map location code number--------------------------------------------------- 5-10 Recommendations for work needed to complete Final Report----------- 11 Index Maps of Area U.S.G.S. Top. Quad.Index-------------------------------------- 12 N.W.A. Plutons, Dikes & Veins--------------------------------- 13 General Location and Geology--------------------------------- 14 Hualapai Mountains------------------------------------------------- 15 Hualapai Valley Pluton--------------------------------------------- 15 Peacock Mountains-------------------------------------------------- 15-16 Cerbat Mountains--------------------------------------------------- 16 Cerbat Mountains Veins--------------------------------------------- 16-17 Aquarius Mountains------------------------------------------------- 17-18 Water Samples & Table of Anomalous Water Samples------------------- 19-20 Master Sample Lists: 70 pages of 426 rocks, 2 rock-soils = 428 samples 9 pages of 90 water samples Project Follow Up Recommendations (Beyond Completion of Final Report) -------------------------- 21 References--------------------------------------------------------- 22-27 Signature page and/or letter of transmittal------------------------ 28 Appendix: BFEC-GJO Certificates of Assay--------------------- 3 pages Petrography: Letter dated July 19, 1980 from S.A.Williams-- 2 " Letter dated July 3, 1980 from J.D. Loghry---- 2 " Letter dated March 10, 1980 from S.A.Williams- 2 " CONTENTS (Cont'd) Petrography (continued) Data (Rock Analyses)---------------------------------39 pages Samples to S.A.Williams, Jan.29, 1980----------------10 " Letter Jan. 29, 1980 from J. D. Loghry--------------2 Geologic Unit Code Changes June 26, 1980 & July 7, 1980---10 Rock Chip Samples submitted to ORGDP---------------------- 1 Water Samples submitted to ORGDP-------------------------- 1 Rock & Water Samples submitted to ORGDP lacking data received-------------------------------- 1 ORGDP Analytical Data Critique-------------------------- 3 " BFEC-GJO Analytical data received------------------------- 1 Six digit master sample numbers assigned to replace numbers 154013 through 154133 originally used in the field----------------------------------------- 2 ORGDP Computer Analysis printouts (Water)-----------------3 ORGDP Computer Analysis printouts (Rocks)----------------18 Sample Site Location Maps at 1:125,000 scale; Rocks, Waters, & Base Topography--------------------------------(In Pocket) N.W.Arizona Plutonics Project No. 30-79-3307 Subcontract No. 79-348-S Loghry-Heinrichs Joint Venture INTRODUCTION This report is a status report to complete present contract obligations and is submitted in lieu of a Final Report. A Final Report is not feasible especially until complete analyses and statistical treatment of all of the 436 rock chip, 2 soil-rock and 90 water samples, a total of 528 samples submitted by the partners to Union Carbide, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, plus remaining analyses to be run by BFEC's Grand Junction Laboratory become available and other recommendations and necessities are done. See subsequent section of this report titled: "Recommend- ations For Work Needed to Complete Final Report". A Final Report may be prepared by the partners if supplemental funds for such work and for completion of the analyses and their statistical treatment ever become available. On June 21, 1980, an ORGDP printout with letter of May 16, 1980, was received with more or less complete data for 304 samples within the series 153603 and 153916 A copy and critique of the ORGDP report of May 16, 1980, is included in the Appen- dix of this report. Seven samples in the series are absent and about 240 of the 304 samples present are missing various data. The original BFEC proposal envision- ed 1000-1500 professional hours, 300-400 samples and a 'total expenditure of $60,000.00 was contracted for on a firm fixed price basis. As of July 26, 1980, the partners and their associates, Phillip Anderson and Mark Anders have spent 1571 hours in the field and 1109 office hours, a total of 2680 professional hours and a total cost of $69,330.65 to the partners. Total area actually mapped and sampled by the partners touches all or parts of the equivalent of 41 - 7 1/2 minute U.S.G.S. quadrangles or, roughly 2500 square miles. Of the quads, 17 contain extensive mapping, an equivalent of 20 contain minor mapping and 4 contain no mapping. The core of this report consists of master lists of rock chip (and two soil) samples (70 pages) and water samples (9 pages) with sample locations and field descriptions. Where available, petrologic descriptions and Mt. Sopris total cps readings are provided for the rock chip sample sites. Petrologic reports for 117 specimens and letter reports by Dr. S. A. Williams (through 19 July 1980) and J. D. Loghry are appended to this report. The rock chip (soil) sample locations and the water sample locations are computer plotted on 1:125,000 scale maps. In most cases. geologic mapping in pencil on non-reproducible 7 1/2' quadrangle field maps was far enough advanced to tentatively transfer the contacts of the sampled plutons and a few other geologic features to a rough preliminary base rock chip sample map. Due to scale limitations and limited detailed mapping the geology is partly diagram- atical. Ideally, this aspect would be somewhat further resolved if as and when it is decided to complete a Final Report. In keying these master sample lists to the Oak Ridge and BFEC analysis results. the six digit master sample number must be used. In turn, these sample numbers are keyed to each sample site number as indicated on the master list. Rock sample site numbers and lists are arranged in order from No. 1 through No. 497. Water sample numbers and lists follow the rock lists and are arranged in order from Water Sample No. 1 through No. 90 with each corresponding N.W.A. project site number and master project six digit sample number. Oak Ridge Geochemical Sampling Forms and KUT Supplemental Forms are keyed by project 6 digit sample numbers and site numbers. Computer plotted maps show rock sample locations by site numbers, 1 through 497, and water sample locations by water numbers 1 through 90. Corresponding water site numbers range from 44 through 528. -1 - INTRODUCTION (Continued) Following the section on "Recommendations For Work Needed To Complete Final Report" in this report are three index maps of the project area. First, at a scale of 1:1,000,000 are shown all of the U.S.G.S. Quadrangle Maps used as field base sheets and the extent of geologic mapping done on each sheet. Next is a sheet at a scale of 1:500,000 showing approximate relative location on a prelim- inary basis, of the various occurrences sampled. These are keyed by number and Surface Unit Geologic Code Symbol to a Surface Unit Geologic Code table, which also shows sampled occurrence name, the number of sample sites per occurrence and whether strongly or weakly radioactively
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona
    2.SOB nH in ntoiOGIGM. JAN 3 1 1989 Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701-C Chapter C Mineral Resources of the Harquahala Mountains Wilderness Study Area, La Paz and Maricopa Counties, Arizona By ED DE WITT, S.M. RICHARD, J.R. HASSEMER, and W.F. HANNA U.S. Geological Survey J.R. THOMPSON U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1701 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS- WEST-CENTRAL ARIZONA AND PART OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1988 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publlcatlon Data Mineral resources of the Harquahala Mountains wilderness study area, La Paz and Maricopa counties, Arizona. (Mineral resources of wilderness study areas west-central Arizona and part of San Bernardino County, California ; ch. C) (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701-C) Bibliography: p. Supt. of Docs, no.: I 19.3:1701-C 1. Mines and mineral resources Arizona Harquahala Mountains Wilderness. 2. Harquahala Mountains (Ariz.) I. DeWitt, Ed. II. Series. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1701. QE75.B9 no. 1701-C 557.3 s [553'.09791'72] 88-600012 [TN24.A6] STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Detrital Valley Basin: an ADEQ 2002 Baseline Study
    Ambient Groundwater Quality of the Detrital Valley Basin: An ADEQ 2002 Baseline Study normal pool elevation of Lake Mead. Dolan Springs is the largest community in the basin. In the DET, 27 percent of land is managed by the National Park Service as part of the Lake Mead National Recreational Area. The remainder is managed by the Bureau of Land Management (42 percent) and State Trust land (9 percent) or consists of private lands (22 percent). III. Hydrology Groundwater from the alluvial aquifer underneath Detrital Valley is the principle water source in the basin and has the ability to supply up to 150 gallons per minute (gpm).3 However, depths to groundwater, approaching 800 feet below land surface (bls) in the valley, make tapping this aquifer for 2 Figure 1. In a bit of hydrologic serendipity, during the course of ADEQ’s study of the Detrital domestic use an expensive proposition. Valley basin, Lake Mead receeded to levels low enough to expose Monkey Cove Spring for the first time since July 1969. The spring flowed at an amazing 1,200 gallons per minute in 1964. I. Introduction factsheet reports upon the results of groundwater quality investigations in The Detrital Valley Groundwater Basin the DET and is a summary of the more (DET), traversed by U.S. Highway 93, extensive report produced by the is roughly located between the city of Arizona Department of Environmental Kingman and Hoover Dam on the Quality (ADEQ).1 Colorado River in northwestern Arizona (Map 1). Although lightly populated II. Background with retirement and recreation-oriented communities, the recent decision to The DET is approximately 50 miles construct a Hoover Dam bypass route long (north to south) and 15 miles wide for U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunrock Dispatch
    DISPATCH Volume 17, Issue 1 4th Quarter 2013 SUNROCK WELCOMES TEREX WASHING SYSTEMS’ DEALERS AND CUSTOMERS Katherine Pfohl, Executive Vice President Sunrock’s willingness to try innovative products and processes, coupled with its relationship with Powerscreen Mid- Atlantic, our local Terex dealer, afforded Sunrock the opportunity to host over 150 attendees for the Terex Washing Systems’ Annual Product Forum, AggreSand Launch Event, and Customer Day from November 19-21. Attendees included dealers and customers who came from the US, Canada, Mexico, and South America. Attendees had a full schedule complete with accommodations at Durham’s Washington Duke Inn and Golf Club. The three day event was designed exclusively for Terex Washing Systems’ We Are The People. Who Make The Products. That Build Your World. dealers and customers. The first day consisted of a general update on Terex Washing Systems. Day two included a live demonstration of the AggreSand system for Terex Washing Systems’ dealers at Sunrock’s Kittrell Quarry and a tour of Butner’s Matec Water Management Attendees learning about the Terex AggreSand system Plant. Day three was a customer day where customers accompanied dealers in 2013. Terex Washing Systems works with Matec, a for tours of both systems. leading company worldwide that provides waste water purification and filtration plant solutions. The demonstration at Sunrock’s Kittrell Quarry served as the USA premier launch event of Terex’s AggreSand Sunrock would like to especially thank Powerscreen system. This system differentiates itself from its Mid-Atlantic and its owner, Andrew Coney, for the competition by combining aggregate washing and opportunity to host Terex Washing Systems’ attendees at screening with sand processing on a modular chassis.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of the ROANOKE and STEWARTSVILLE QUADRANGLES, VIRGINIA by Mervin J
    VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 34 GEOLOGY OF THE ROANOKE AND STEWARTSVI LLE OUADRANG LES, VI RG I N IA Mervin J. Bartholomew COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VIRGI NIA 1 981 VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 34 GEOLOGY OF THE ROANOKE AND STEWARTSVI LLE OUADRANG LES, VI RG I N IA Mervin J. Bartholomew COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRGINIA 1 981 FRONT COVER: Fold showing slightly fanned, axial plane, slaty cleav- age in a loose block of Liberty Hall mudstone at Reference Locality 20, Deer Creek, Roanoke quadrangle. REFERENCE: Portions of this publication may be quoted if credit is given to the Virginia Division of Mineral Resources. It is recommended that referenee to this report be made in the following form: Bartholomew, M. J., 1981, Geology of the Roanoke and Stewaitsville quadrangles, Vir- ginia, Vlrginia Division of Mineral Resources Publicatio4 34,23 p. VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES PUBLICATION 34 GEOLOGY OF THE ROANOKE AND STEWARTSVI LLE OUADRANG LES, VIRG I N IA Mervin J. Bartholomew COM MONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Robert C. Milici, Commissioner of Mineral Resources and State Geologist CHARLOTTESVILLE, VIRG INIA 1 981 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond, Virginia FRED W. WALKER, Director JERALD F. MOORE, Deputy Director BOARD ARTHUR P. FLIPPO, Doswell, Chairman HENRY T.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08
    Prepared in cooperation with the Arizona Department of Water Resources Groundwater Budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08 Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey COVER: View of August 2010, monsoon thunderstorm over Hualapai Mountains, looking east from Sacramento Valley. Photo by Bradley D. Garner. Prepared in cooperation with the Arizona Department of Water Resources Groundwater Budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08 By Bradley D. Garner and Margot Truini Scientific Investigations Report 2011–5159 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2011 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. Suggested citation: Garner, B.D., and Truini, Margot, 2011, Groundwater budgets for Detrital, Hualapai, and Sacramento Valleys, Mohave County, Arizona, 2007–08: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5159, 34 p.
    [Show full text]
  • Summits on the Air – ARM for the USA (W7A
    Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) Summits on the Air U.S.A. (W7A - Arizona) Association Reference Manual Document Reference S53.1 Issue number 5.0 Date of issue 31-October 2020 Participation start date 01-Aug 2010 Authorized Date: 31-October 2020 Association Manager Pete Scola, WA7JTM Summits-on-the-Air an original concept by G3WGV and developed with G3CWI Notice “Summits on the Air” SOTA and the SOTA logo are trademarks of the Programme. This document is copyright of the Programme. All other trademarks and copyrights referenced herein are acknowledged. Document S53.1 Page 1 of 15 Summits on the Air – ARM for the U.S.A (W7A - Arizona) TABLE OF CONTENTS CHANGE CONTROL....................................................................................................................................... 3 DISCLAIMER................................................................................................................................................. 4 1 ASSOCIATION REFERENCE DATA ........................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Program Derivation ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 General Information ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1.3 Final Ascent
    [Show full text]
  • Scorpiones: Vaejovidae)
    New Species of Vaejovis from the Whetstone Mountains, Southern Arizona (Scorpiones: Vaejovidae) Richard F. Ayrey & Michael E. Soleglad January 2015 — No. 194 Euscorpius Occasional Publications in Scorpiology EDITOR: Victor Fet, Marshall University, ‘[email protected]’ ASSOCIATE EDITOR: Michael E. Soleglad, ‘[email protected]’ Euscorpius is the first research publication completely devoted to scorpions (Arachnida: Scorpiones). Euscorpius takes advantage of the rapidly evolving medium of quick online publication, at the same time maintaining high research standards for the burgeoning field of scorpion science (scorpiology). Euscorpius is an expedient and viable medium for the publication of serious papers in scorpiology, including (but not limited to): systematics, evolution, ecology, biogeography, and general biology of scorpions. Review papers, descriptions of new taxa, faunistic surveys, lists of museum collections, and book reviews are welcome. Derivatio Nominis The name Euscorpius Thorell, 1876 refers to the most common genus of scorpions in the Mediterranean region and southern Europe (family Euscorpiidae). Euscorpius is located at: http://www.science.marshall.edu/fet/Euscorpius (Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755-2510, USA) ICZN COMPLIANCE OF ELECTRONIC PUBLICATIONS: Electronic (“e-only”) publications are fully compliant with ICZN (International Code of Zoological Nomenclature) (i.e. for the purposes of new names and new nomenclatural acts) when properly archived and registered. All Euscorpius issues starting from No. 156 (2013) are archived in two electronic archives: Biotaxa, http://biotaxa.org/Euscorpius (ICZN-approved and ZooBank-enabled) Marshall Digital Scholar, http://mds.marshall.edu/euscorpius/. (This website also archives all Euscorpius issues previously published on CD-ROMs.) Between 2000 and 2013, ICZN did not accept online texts as "published work" (Article 9.8).
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Geological Association Publication 30.Pub
    Utah Geological Association Publication 30 - Pacific Section American Association of Petroleum Geologists Publication GB78 239 CENOZOIC EVOLUTION OF THE NORTHERN COLORADO RIVER EXTEN- SIONAL CORRIDOR, SOUTHERN NEVADA AND NORTHWEST ARIZONA JAMES E. FAULDS1, DANIEL L. FEUERBACH2*, CALVIN F. MILLER3, 4 AND EUGENE I. SMITH 1Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Mail Stop 178, Reno, NV 89557 2Department of Geology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 *Now at Exxon Mobil Development Company, 16825 Northchase Drive, Houston, TX 77060 3Department of Geology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235 4Department of Geoscience, University of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV 89154 ABSTRACT The northern Colorado River extensional corridor is a 70- to 100-km-wide region of moderately to highly extended crust along the eastern margin of the Basin and Range province in southern Nevada and northwestern Arizona. It has occupied a criti- cal structural position in the western Cordillera since Mesozoic time. In the Cretaceous through early Tertiary, it stood just east and north of major fold and thrust belts and also marked the northern end of a broad, gently (~15o) north-plunging uplift (Kingman arch) that extended southeastward through much of central Arizona. Mesozoic and Paleozoic strata were stripped from the arch by northeast-flowing streams. Peraluminous 65 to 73 Ma granites were emplaced at depths of at least 10 km and exposed in the core of the arch by earliest Miocene time. Calc-alkaline magmatism swept northward through the northern Colorado River extensional corridor during early to middle Miocene time, beginning at ~22 Ma in the south and ~12 Ma in the north.
    [Show full text]
  • Stations Monitored
    Stations Monitored 10/01/2019 Format Call Letters Market Station Name Adult Contemporary WHBC-FM AKRON, OH MIX 94.1 Adult Contemporary WKDD-FM AKRON, OH 98.1 WKDD Adult Contemporary WRVE-FM ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY 99.5 THE RIVER Adult Contemporary WYJB-FM ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY B95.5 Adult Contemporary KDRF-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 103.3 eD FM Adult Contemporary KMGA-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 99.5 MAGIC FM Adult Contemporary KPEK-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 100.3 THE PEAK Adult Contemporary WLEV-FM ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM, PA 100.7 WLEV Adult Contemporary KMVN-FM ANCHORAGE, AK MOViN 105.7 Adult Contemporary KMXS-FM ANCHORAGE, AK MIX 103.1 Adult Contemporary WOXL-FS ASHEVILLE, NC MIX 96.5 Adult Contemporary WSB-FM ATLANTA, GA B98.5 Adult Contemporary WSTR-FM ATLANTA, GA STAR 94.1 Adult Contemporary WFPG-FM ATLANTIC CITY-CAPE MAY, NJ LITE ROCK 96.9 Adult Contemporary WSJO-FM ATLANTIC CITY-CAPE MAY, NJ SOJO 104.9 Adult Contemporary KAMX-FM AUSTIN, TX MIX 94.7 Adult Contemporary KBPA-FM AUSTIN, TX 103.5 BOB FM Adult Contemporary KKMJ-FM AUSTIN, TX MAJIC 95.5 Adult Contemporary WLIF-FM BALTIMORE, MD TODAY'S 101.9 Adult Contemporary WQSR-FM BALTIMORE, MD 102.7 JACK FM Adult Contemporary WWMX-FM BALTIMORE, MD MIX 106.5 Adult Contemporary KRVE-FM BATON ROUGE, LA 96.1 THE RIVER Adult Contemporary WMJY-FS BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS MAGIC 93.7 Adult Contemporary WMJJ-FM BIRMINGHAM, AL MAGIC 96 Adult Contemporary KCIX-FM BOISE, ID MIX 106 Adult Contemporary KXLT-FM BOISE, ID LITE 107.9 Adult Contemporary WMJX-FM BOSTON, MA MAGIC 106.7 Adult Contemporary WWBX-FM
    [Show full text]
  • Peak List Please Send Updates Or Corrections to Lat/Lon to Mike Heaton
    Operation On Target Arizona Peak List Please send updates or corrections to Lat/Lon to Mike Heaton Description Comment Latitude Longitude Elevation "A" Mountain (Tempe) ASU campus by Sun Devil Stadium 33.42801 -111.93565 1495 AAA Temp Temp Location 33.42234 -111.8227 1244 Agassiz Peak @ Snow Bowl Tram Stop (No access to peak) 35.32587 -111.67795 12353 Al Fulton Point 1 Near where SR260 tops the Rim 34.29558 -110.8956 7513 Al Fulton Point 2 Near where SR260 tops the rim 34.29558 -110.8956 7513 Alta Mesa Peak For Alta Mesa Sign-up 33.905 -111.40933 7128 Apache Maid Mountain South of Stoneman Lake - Hike/Drive? 34.72588 -111.55128 7305 Apache Peak, Whetstone Mountain Tallest Peak, Whetstone Mountain 31.824583 -110.429517 7711 Aspen Canyon Point Rim W. of Kehl Springs Point 34.422204 -111.337874 7600 Aztec Peak Sierra Ancha Mountains South of Young 33.8123 -110.90541 7692 Battleship Mountain High Point visible above the Flat Iron 33.43936 -111.44836 5024 Big Pine Flat South of Four Peaks on County Line 33.74931 -111.37304 6040 Black (Chocolate) Mountain, CA Drive up and park, near Yuma 33.055 -114.82833 2119 Black Butte, CA East of Palm Springs - Hike 33.56167 -115.345 4458 Black Mountain North of Oracle 32.77899 -110.96319 5586 Black Rock Mountain South of St. George 36.77305 -113.80802 7373 Blue Jay Ridge North end of Mount Graham 32.75872 -110.03344 8033 Blue Vista White Mtns. S. of Hannagan Medow 33.56667 -109.35 8000 Browns Peak (Four Peaks) North Peak of Four Peaks Range 33.68567 -111.32633 7650 Brunckow Hill NE of Sierra Vista, AZ 31.61736 -110.15788 4470 Bryce Mountain Northwest of Safford 33.02012 -109.67232 7298 Buckeye Mountain North of Globe 33.4262 -110.75763 4693 Burnt Point On the Rim East of Milk Ranch Point 34.40895 -111.20478 7758 Camelback Mountain North Phoenix Mountain - Hike 33.51463 -111.96164 2703 Carol Spring Mountain North of Globe East of Highway 77 33.66064 -110.56151 6629 Carr Peak S.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona's Wildlife Linkages Assessment
    ARIZONAARIZONA’’SS WILDLIFEWILDLIFE LINKAGESLINKAGES ASSESSMENTASSESSMENT Workgroup Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Arizona’s Wildlife Linkages Assessment Prepared by: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Siobhan E. Nordhaugen, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Evelyn Erlandsen, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Habitat Branch Paul Beier, Northern Arizona University, School of Forestry Bruce D. Eilerts, Arizona Department of Transportation, Natural Resources Management Group Ray Schweinsburg, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Terry Brennan, USDA Forest Service, Tonto National Forest Ted Cordery, Bureau of Land Management Norris Dodd, Arizona Game and Fish Department, Research Branch Melissa Maiefski, Arizona Department of Transportation, Environmental Planning Group Janice Przybyl, The Sky Island Alliance Steve Thomas, Federal Highway Administration Kim Vacariu, The Wildlands Project Stuart Wells, US Fish and Wildlife Service 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT First Printing Date: December, 2006 Copyright © 2006 The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written consent from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written consent of the copyright holder. Additional copies may be obtained by submitting a request to: The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup E-mail: [email protected] 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT The Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup Mission Statement “To identify and promote wildlife habitat connectivity using a collaborative, science based effort to provide safe passage for people and wildlife” 2006 ARIZONA’S WILDLIFE LINKAGES ASSESSMENT Primary Contacts: Bruce D.
    [Show full text]
  • Knigman General Plan Update 2030
    II .0. Jj1! IOn City of Knigman General Plan Update 2030 Mayor and Com.non Council Janet Vatson, Mayor Carole Young, Vice-Mayor Richard Aiaderson, Councilmenaber Lawrence Carver, Councilmenaber Erm Cochran, Councilmember Jennee Miles, Councilmember Mark Wunpee, Sr. Councilmember 1’laimmg and Zoning Commission Matthew Ladendecker, Chair Allen Mossberg, Vice-Chair Mike Blair, Commissioner Dana Harvey, Commissioner Eugene Kirkham, Com.nissioner Vicki Kress, Commissioner Dustm Lewis, CommissioHer March 2014 -4 t’ •,,4 ** 4 - ‘4 3444341 ! . 3- .-. _: $4 ‘,,•‘ - - - ;‘44a., 444 -- * 2’ 4 -ra..-,, 4 ‘--34 4:44 - -:4-’; 43• 444$; 3 4- $3. 4., ‘:• 43 . 4€; - 3 44 4- 3 .4 ‘-J. ‘$3 -a 3-. - 4-’. 4+,. -, .4 • . - ‘-‘-3 -. —4. •• •• • ..- 4• •‘ a. 4. 4 • ‘-44$ t- 4’.- • •: • 4. 444 4 j, 4-4 •; •• • -r 4- -4 ‘ :- - — — 4’,-- — •4H •.. ‘3’ 1 -:44 • • • . • 4 44 $ 44-4 .4, a, ‘.4’ • . • • • - TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: GOALS AND OBJECTIVES Land Use Element Page 1 Growth Area Element Page 1 Redevelopment and Public Facilities and Buildings Element Page 4 Circulation Element Page 6 Parks, Recreation, Trails and Open Space Element Page 7 Cost of Development Page 10 Environmental Planning Page 12 CHAPTER 2: DEMOGRAPHICS 2010 Census Page 17 Racial Composition Page 17 Education Page 17 Housing Page 17 Income Page 18 Vehicles Page 18 Poverty Page 18 Economy Page 18 Aviation Page 19 Energy Page 20 Healthcare Services Page 20 Manufacturing Page 20 Mining Page 21 Motorsports Page 21 Transportation and Logistics Page 21 2015 Demographic Projection Page 22 Conclusion
    [Show full text]