Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus Apella) Show Understanding of Human Attentional States When Requesting Food Held by a Human

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus Apella) Show Understanding of Human Attentional States When Requesting Food Held by a Human Anim Cogn (2010) 13:87–92 DOI 10.1007/s10071-009-0248-6 ORIGINAL PAPER Tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) show understanding of human attentional states when requesting food held by a human Yuko Hattori · Hika Kuroshima · Kazuo Fujita Received: 16 January 2009 / Revised: 28 May 2009 / Accepted: 28 May 2009 / Published online: 11 June 2009 © Springer-Verlag 2009 Abstract Researchers have investigated to what extent others’ attentional states, although this ability appears lim- non-human primates understand others’ attentional states, ited compared to what is seen in humans. as this ability is considered an important prerequisite for theory of mind. However, previous studies using food Keywords Social cognition · Non-human primates · requesting tasks have failed to show that non-human prima- Attention · Eye gaze tes attribute perception to others as a function of their atten- tional states. One possible reason is that food requesting tasks may require subjects not only to take into account an Introduction experimenter’s attentional state but also to direct it toward the food. The present study tested tufted capuchin mon- Understanding others’ visual perception is an important keys’ (Cebus apella) understanding of others’ attentional prerequisite for development of theory of mind in human states in a food requesting task. In the Wrst situation, mon- children. Flavell et al. (1981) distinguished two stages of keys were required only to attract an experimenter’s atten- understanding others’ visual perception. In the Wrst stage, tion. In the second situation, the monkeys were required to referred to as Level 1 visual perspective-taking, children both attract the experimenter’s attention and direct it are able to determine what others can or cannot see based toward food on a table. The results revealed that capuchin upon the presence or absence of visual obstructions in their monkeys showed evidence of understanding the experi- line of sight. Later, in Level 2 visual perspective-taking, menter’s attentional variations only in the former condition. children are able to mentally recreate the visual representa- This suggests that previous tasks, requiring referential ges- tions possessed by other individuals and to determine how tures, lacking in most non-human primates, failed to reveal an object appears to individuals viewing the object from a sensitivity to human attentional states because the subjects diVerent position. However, there is controversy about the might not have understood the requesting situation. In con- extent to which nonhuman primates share humans’ ability clusion, capuchin monkeys can understand variations in to relate mental states, such as what others can and cannot see, to seeing. In Wfteen experiments, Povinelli and Eddy (1996) tested Present Address: whether juvenile chimpanzees understood the necessary Y. Hattori (&) conditions underlying others’ visual perception, in terms of Primate Research Institute, Kyoto University, bodily and facial orientation and states of the eyes. They Kanrin 41-2, Inuyama, Aichi 484-8506, Japan trained each ape to extend their hand through one of the two e-mail: [email protected] holes on a Plexiglas wall to request food from one of two Y. Hattori experimenters who each held food. In test trials, a human Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tsukuba, Japan experimenter stood behind each hole, with food available on the table between them. One experimenter could see the H. Kuroshima · K. Fujita Department of Psychology, Graduate School of Letters, ape but the other could not, due to facing the other way, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan occluding the face with a bucket, closing the eyes, etc. 123 88 Anim Cogn (2010) 13:87–92 When the subjects had to choose which of the two humans direct it to the target of interest (Gomez 2005). The latter to beg food from, they showed no diVerential responses may require the use of “referential gestures”, that is direct- except in the most basic condition in which one experi- ing others’ attention to a location of an object, which are menter faced the ape and the other had her back turned. The relatively rare in non-human primates (see Call and investigators concluded that these young chimpanzees did Tomasello 1994; Leavens et al. 2005; Liebal et al. 2007 for not seem to understand precisely how visual perception examples in captive apes). Although monkeys can learn to works, especially the role of the eyes. make an action when an experimenter looks at them, the Other studies, using object-choice procedures have situation is unnatural and apparently diYcult to recognize largely also failed to demonstrate nonhuman primates’ use as a requesting situation. Recently, however, chimpanzees of eyes as an eVective cue. Typically, subjects are presented were reported to attract others’ attention using vocal and with two opaque containers, only one of which contains manual gestures Xexibly, matched to variations in the food. An experimenter then gives a social cue such as look- experimenter’s attentional states (i.e. open or closed eyes) ing, orienting his/her head, pointing, and so on toward the (Hostetter et al. 2007). This suggests that non-human pri- container with food inside. Typically when non-human pri- mates may be in fact sensitive to variable attentional states, mates are tested with this paradigm, results are poorer for but the unnaturalness of many requesting tasks might limit use of eye-gaze cues than other cues (chimpanzees, Call the expression of their sensitivity. If so, then previous et al. 1998, 2000; rhesus monkeys, Anderson et al. 1996; “cooperative paradigms” have probably underestimated the capuchin monkeys, Anderson et al. 1995; Vick and extent of the ability to read attentional states. Anderson 2000). In this study, we hypothesized that a new “cooperative For successful performance in the tasks above, the sub- paradigm,” in which the subjects request food held directly ject has to respond to attentional states of a “cooperative” in an experimenter’s hand (Hand situation), would be more trainer, who will reward the subject with food if the likely to reveal monkeys’ true understanding of attentional response is correct. This is an unusual situation in the sub- states. In this situation, monkeys only have to attract the jects’ daily life. On the other hand, Vick and Anderson experimenter’s attention in order to request food. We com- (2003), Flombaum and Santos (2005) and Hare et al. (2000, pared performances in this situation with those on trials 2001, 2003) used a “competitive paradigm”, in which the using a more conventional paradigm in which the subjects subject must use a human’s or conspeciWc’s attentional have to ask the experimenter to hand over food on a table states to outcompete the opponent in a contest for food; this (Table situation). We predicted that in the new paradigm is probably a more familiar kind of situation for monkeys. (Hand situation), monkeys would produce their request Actually, Vick and Anderson (2003) reported that three action diVerentially according to the attentional state of the olive baboons successfully learned to exploit a human experimenter, whereas in the conventional paradigm (Table experimenter’s head orientation as a cue to obtain a food situation), they would not. We also predicted that they item. Flombaum and Santos (2005) also demonstrated that would respond diVerentially to variations in the experi- rhesus monkeys selectively stole grapes from an experi- menter’s attentional states in the new paradigm. SpeciW- menter who was not able to see the grape more often than cally, the monkeys would respond less to an experimenter from an experimenter who was even based on the experi- with eyes closed than to an experimenter looking at either menter’s eye gaze. Additionally, with competitive para- food or the monkeys. This is because Hattori et al. (2007) digm, Hare et al. (2000, 2001, 2003) found that subordinate found that capuchin monkeys are sensitive to eye gaze in chimpanzees but not capuchin monkeys took a dominant conventional food request paradigm. In Hattori et al. the individual’s perspective into account and went preferen- monkeys requested food using a trained pointing-like tially for food that only they and not the dominant could behavior, and frequency of pointing and looking duration to see. Thus results obtained from “competitive” paradigms an experimenter’s face were measured. Although the fre- suggest that not only apes but also Old World monkeys quency of pointing did not change, looking duration diVered may have sensitivity to social cues such as head orientation Xexibly depending upon the experimenter’s state of gaze. and eye gaze, and represent perception in others to some We tested a New World species, tufted capuchin mon- extent. keys. The new cooperative paradigm seems ecologically Why do “cooperative paradigms” generally fail to reveal valid for this species because begging and sharing food are non-human primates’ understanding others’ attentional common even among unrelated individuals (de Waal 1997, states? As well as the unnaturalness of receiving coopera- 2000) and they may respond to conspeciWcs’ direct gaze tive food-related signals, some cooperative tasks with aYnitive facial expressions leading to active contact (e.g., Povinelli and Eddy 1996; Kaminski et al. 2004) (Weigel 1979). In the conventional cooperative paradigm, required two things of the subject as a requesting situation; the requesting task required subjects to direct the experi- namely, capture the attention of the addressee, and then menter’s attention to food, which requires referential 123 Anim Cogn (2010) 13:87–92 89 gestures and is clearly not adapted for capuchin monkeys or for other non-human primates. Tufted capuchin monkeys are evolutionarily more dis- tant from humans than are chimpanzees, but they show a variety of social abilities including coalition formation, group hunting and triadic awareness both in the Weld and in captivity, as well as advanced physical cognitive abilities (e.g., Perry et al.
Recommended publications
  • Black Capped Capuchin (Cebus Apella)
    Husbandry Manual For Brown Capuchin/Black-capped Capuchin Cebus apella (Cebidae) Author: Joel Honeysett Date of Preparation: March 2006 Sydney Institute of TAFE, Ultimo Course Name and Number: Captive Animals. Lecturer: Graeme Phipps TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 4 2 Taxonomy ............................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Nomenclature ................................................................................................................. 5 2.2 Subspecies ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.3 Recent Synonyms ........................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Other Common Names ................................................................................................... 5 3 Natural History ....................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Morphometrics ............................................................................................................... 7 3.1.1 Mass And Basic Body Measurements ....................................................................... 7 3.1.2 Sexual Dimorphism ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Enrichment for Nonhuman Primates, 2005
    A six-booklet series on providing appropriate enrichment for baboons, capuchins, chimpanzees, macaques, marmosets and tamarins, and squirrel monkeys. Contents ...... Introduction Page 4 Baboons Page 6 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues References Common Names of the Baboon Capuchins Page 17 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues Resources Common Names of Capuchins Chimpanzees Page 28 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues Resources Common Names of Chimpanzees contents continued on next page ... Contents Contents continued… ...... Macaques Page 43 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues Resources Common Names of the Macaques Sample Pair Housing SOP -- Macaques Marmosets and Tamarins Page 58 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Safety Issues References Common Names of the Callitrichids Squirrel Monkeys Page 73 Background Social World Physical World Special Cases Problem Behaviors Safety Issues References Common Names of Squirrel Monkeys ..................................................................................................................... For more information, contact OLAW at NIH, tel (301) 496-7163, e-mail [email protected]. NIH Publication Numbers: 05-5745 Baboons 05-5746 Capuchins 05-5748 Chimpanzees 05-5744 Macaques 05-5747 Marmosets and Tamarins 05-5749 Squirrel Monkeys Contents Introduction ...... Nonhuman primates maintained in captivity have a valuable role in education and research. They are also occasionally used in entertainment. The scope of these activities can range from large, accredited zoos to small “roadside” exhib- its; from national primate research centers to small academic institutions with only a few monkeys; and from movie sets to street performers. Attached to these uses of primates comes an ethical responsibility to provide the animals with an environment that promotes their physical and behavioral health and well-be- ing.
    [Show full text]
  • Pest Risk Assessment
    PEST RISK ASSESSMENT Black-tufted capuchin monkey Cebus apella (Photo: courtesy of Charles J. Sharp. Image from Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons Attribution License, Version 3.) March 2011 Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Resource Management and Conservation Division Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment 2011 Information in this publication may be reproduced provided that any extracts are acknowledged. This publication should be cited as: DPIPWE (2011) Pest Risk Assessment: Black-tufted capuchin monkey (Cebus paella). Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment. Hobart, Tasmania. About this Pest Risk Assessment This pest risk assessment is developed in accordance with the Policy and Procedures for the Import, Movement and Keeping of Vertebrate Wildlife in Tasmania (DPIPWE 2011). The policy and procedures set out conditions and restrictions for the importation of controlled animals pursuant to s32 of the Nature Conservation Act 2002. This pest risk assessment is prepared by DPIPWE for the use within the Department. For more information about this Pest Risk Assessment, please contact: Wildlife Management Branch Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Address: GPO Box 44, Hobart, TAS. 7001, Australia. Phone: 1300 386 550 Email: [email protected] Visit: www.dpipwe.tas.gov.au Disclaimer The information provided in this Pest Risk Assessment is provided in good faith. The Crown, its officers, employees and agents do not accept liability however arising, including liability for negligence, for any loss resulting from the use of or reliance upon the information in this Pest Risk Assessment and/or reliance on its availability at any time.
    [Show full text]
  • A Meta-Analysis of Primate Hand Preferences, Particularly for Reaching
    A Meta-Analysis of Primate Hand Preferences, Particularly for Reaching By: Eros Papademetriou, Ching-Fan Sheu, and George F. Michel Papademetriou, E., Sheu, C-F, Michel, GF (2005). A meta-analysis of primate hand preference for reaching and other hand-use preferences. Journal of Comparative Psychology. 119(1), 33-48. Digital Object Identifier: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.1.33 Made available courtesy of American Psychological Association: http://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/com/index.aspx This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record. ***Note: Figures may be missing from this format of the document Humans, as do most vertebrate species studied, exhibit a limb preference for unimanual activities. However, two characteristics of the human limb preference are thought to distinguish it from that of other vertebrates: (a) The preference is the same across a variety of manual tasks that have few task demands or motor skills in common (handedness consistency); and (b) the handedness consistency is unevenly distributed in the population with a distinct right-handed skew. Thus, depending on the criteria used to define a preference, 70%–90% of humans exhibit a consistent right-hand preference for manual activities (Annett, 1985). This sharp population bias in the distribution of hand preference has been prevalent for much of the natural history of humans (Corballis, 1991) and is present in all cultures (Annett, 1985). Anthropological evidence suggests a population bias toward right-handedness in the hominid ancestors of humans that dates back at least 1.8 million years (McManus, 2002; Toth, 1985).
    [Show full text]
  • Hooded Capuchin • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Sapajus Apella Caythrough Human Understanding
    Hooded Capuchin • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Sapajus apella caythrough human understanding Classification What groups does this organism belong to based on characteristics shared with other organisms? Class: Mammalia (all mammals) Order: Primates (prosimians, monkeys, apes, humans) Family: Cebidae (new world monkey capuchin, squirrel monkey) Genus: Sapajus Species: apella Distribution Where in the world does this species live? They live in South America, specifically Southeastern Bolivia, Northern Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay. Habitat What kinds of areas does this species live in? Hooded capuchins live in sub-tropical humid and semi-deciduous forests. In Bolivia and Argentina they live in seasonal subtropical laurel and montane forests up to 5000 ft. In Paraguay, they live in dense humid semi-deciduous forest and gallery forests in areas of thorn scrub and savannah. Physical Description How would this animal’s body shape and size be described? • Hooded capuchins are 12-22 inches (30-56 cm) long with a 15-22 inch (38-56 cm) tail. • Adults weigh six to eight pounds (3-4 kg). • Hooded Capuchin are not sexually dimorphic but males may have darker appearing fur.. • They have a brownish crown with two tuft-like horns of fur. • They are overall quite pale, and differ from other tufted capuchin because the hair on the back of the neck and dorsal part of the tail is burnt brown, with a greyish brown dorsal body, shoulders, front upper arms, saddle, rump and thighs and black forearms and legs, black hands, wrists and feet. Diet What does this species eat? In their historic range: They are omnivores eating mostly fruit, young leaves including succulent leaf bases, insects, small animal prey and flower nectar.
    [Show full text]
  • Implications for the Evolution of Human Bipedalism
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 150:76–86 (2013) Ground Reaction Forces and Center of Mass Mechanics of Bipedal Capuchin Monkeys: Implications for the Evolution of Human Bipedalism Brigitte Demes and Matthew C. O’Neill Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794 KEY WORDS locomotion; center of mass; bipedalism; quadrupedalism; capuchin monkey ABSTRACT Tufted capuchin monkeys are known to GRFs as well as CoM work, power, and collisional losses use both quadrupedalism and bipedalism in their natural are higher in bipedalism than quadrupedalism. The posi- environments. Although previous studies have investi- tive CoM work is 2.04 6 0.40 Jkg21 m21 (bipedalism) and gated limb kinematics and metabolic costs, their ground 0.70 6 0.29 Jkg21 m21 (quadrupedalism), which is within reaction forces (GRFs) and center of mass (CoM) mechan- the range of published values for two and four-legged ics during two and four-legged locomotion are unknown. terrestrial animals. The results of this study confirm that Here, we determine the hind limb GRFs and CoM energy, facultative bipedalism in capuchins and other nonhuman work, and power during bipedalism and quadrupedalism primates need not be restricted to a pendulum-like walking over a range of speeds and gaits to investigate the effect of gait, but rather can include running, albeit without an aer- differential limb number on locomotor performance. Our ial phase. Based on these results and similar studies of results indicate that capuchin monkeys use a ‘‘grounded other facultative bipeds, we suggest that important transi- run’’ during bipedalism (0.83–1.43 ms21) and primarily tions in the evolution of hominin locomotor performance ambling and galloping gaits during quadrupedalism (0.91– were the emergences of an obligate, pendulum-like walk- 6.0 ms21).
    [Show full text]
  • Key Stage 2 Teacher Notes
    Tropical Rainforests and Us Wild About Monkeys! Conservation Crazy! Key Stage 2 Teacher Notes Contents Page 4 Aims of this pack How to use this teachers’ pack 5 Section One: Tropical Rainforests and Us 6 Learning Objectives What is a tropical rainforest? What does a Rainforest consist of? 7 The canopy The understory The forest floor 8 Climbers, epiphytes & stranglers How do people use the rainforest? 9 Who lives in the rainforest? 11 Suggested Lesson Plans Rainforest pen pals 12 How do I use the rainforest? 14 Design an Amazon animal 16 Make up a campfire story 17 Rainforest sounds 18 Additional Resources—Books and Websites 19 Section 2 - Wild About Monkeys 20 Learning Objectives 1 20 (contd.) Woolly Monkeys What is a woolly monkey and where do they come from? 21 What does a woolly monkey’s diet consist of? How do woolly monkeys play an important part in the ecosystem? 22 How are the woolly monkeys adapted for life in the treetops? What do we know about woolly monkey social structure? How do woolly monkeys communicate? 23 What threatens woolly monkeys in the wild? 25 Capuchin Monkeys What is a capuchin monkey and where do they come from? What do we know about capuchin monkey social structure? 26 What does a capuchin monkey’s diet consist of? How do capuchins communicate? What threatens capuchins in the wild? 27 Monkeys in Captivity - At the Sanctuary Why are they here? Where do they live? 28 What does their diet consist of? How large are their groups? 29 What are the problems and how are they overcome? 30 Monkey in Captivity - Primates
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.A Case of Infanticide in Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus Nigritus)
    Mastozoología Neotropical ISSN: 0327-9383 [email protected] Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Argentina Izar, Patrícia; Ramos-da-Silva, Eduardo D.; de-Resende, Briseida D.; Ottoni, Eduardo B. A case of infanticide in tufted capuchin monkeys (cebus nigritus) Mastozoología Neotropical, vol. 14, núm. 1, enero-junio, 2007, pp. 73-76 Sociedad Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos Tucumán, Argentina Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45714109 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Mastozoología Neotropical, 14(1):73-76, Mendoza, 2007 ISSN 0327-9383 ©SAREM, 2007 Versión on-line ISSN 1666-0536 www.cricyt.edu.ar/mn.htm A CASE OF INFANTICIDE IN TUFTED CAPUCHIN MONKEYS (Cebus nigritus) Patrícia Izar, Eduardo D. Ramos-da-Silva, Briseida D. de-Resende, and Eduardo B. Ottoni Department of Experimental Psychology, University of São Paulo, Av. Prof. Mello Moraes, 1721, CEP 05508-030, Brazil. Phone 55 011 30914448 - 30. <[email protected]> ABSTRACT: According to behavioural ecology, infanticide by males would be an adaptive reproductive strategy because it allows faster fertilization of the females and reduces investment in unrelated offspring. Critics of this view indicate the lack of evidence of the behaviour for several primate species, hence the relevance of reports of observed infan- ticide events. Here we report a case of infant killing in a free-ranging group of tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus nigritus).
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Observations of Complex Object Manipulation
    acta ethol DOI 10.1007/s10211-016-0244-1 SHORT COMMUNICATION Preliminary observations of complex object manipulation in a wild population of Sapajus cay Illiger 1815 (primates: Cebidae) in a fragment of upper Paraná Atlantic Forest, Rancho Laguna Blanca, eastern Paraguay Rebecca L. Smith1 Received: 16 May 2016 /Revised: 12 October 2016 /Accepted: 24 October 2016 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and ISPA 2016 Abstract Capuchin monkeys are known for their cognitive potatoes before consuming them (Kawai 1965). abilities, including object manipulation and use of a variety of Chimpanzees display a wide repertoire of tool use and object tools. The hooded capuchin (Sapajus cay) is the only repre- manipulation including termite fishing, nut cracking (Inoue- sentative of its genus found in Paraguay and is critically Nakamura and Matsuzawa 1997) and pounding using a pestle understudied in the country. This paper reports on preliminary (Yamakoshi and Sugiyama 1995). Olive baboons (Papio observations of a group of hooded capuchins, in Rancho cynocephalus anubis) in Nairobi National Park use twigs to Laguna Blanca, San Pedro, Paraguay, using two different extract stone fragments from a clay matrix (Oyen 1979). first-order object manipulation techniques to open the seeds Long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis) in Thailand and of the tree Cariniana estrellensis (Lecythidaceae). Some indi- sea islets in the Andaman Sea use stones to crack open oyster viduals held the seed in both hands and stood bipedally, using shells, bivalves and crabs (Carpenter 1887; Malaivijitnond their entire body weight to smash the seed against a branch. et al. 2007). Blonde and black-capped capuchins (Sapajus The more commonly observed technique involved the mon- flavius and S.
    [Show full text]
  • Neotropical Primates
    ISSN 1413-4703 NEOTROPICAL PRIMATES A Journal of the Neotropical Section of the IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group Volume 15 Number 1 January 2008 Editors Erwin Palacios Liliana Cortés-Ortiz Júlio César Bicca-Marques Eckhard Heymann Jessica Lynch Alfaro Liza Veiga News and Book Reviews Brenda Solórzano Ernesto Rodríguez-Luna PSG Chairman Russell A. Mittermeier PSG Deputy Chairman Anthony B. Rylands Neotropical Primates A Journal of the Neotropical Section of the IUCN/SSC Primate Specialist Group Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Conservation International 2011 Crystal Drive, Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202, USA ISSN 1413-4703 Abbreviation: Neotrop. Primates Editors Erwin Palacios, Conservación Internacional Colombia, Bogotá DC, Colombia Liliana Cortés Ortiz, Museum of Zoology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Júlio César Bicca-Marques, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brasil Eckhard Heymann, Deutsches Primatenzentrum, Göttingen, Germany Jessica Lynch Alfaro, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA Liza Veiga, Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, Belém, Brazil News and Books Reviews Brenda Solórzano, Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, México Ernesto Rodríguez-Luna, Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, México Founding Editors Anthony B. Rylands, Center for Applied Biodiversity Science Conservation International, Arlington VA, USA Ernesto Rodríguez-Luna, Instituto de Neuroetología, Universidad Veracruzana, Xalapa, México Editorial Board Hannah M. Buchanan-Smith, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK Adelmar F. Coimbra-Filho, Academia Brasileira de Ciências, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Carolyn M. Crockett, Regional Primate Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA Stephen F. Ferrari, Universidade Federal do Sergipe, Aracajú, Brazil Russell A. Mittermeier, Conservation International, Arlington, VA, USA Marta D.
    [Show full text]
  • Cebus Apella (Tufted Capuchin)
    UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Behaviour Cebus apella (Tufted Capuchin) Family: Cebidae (Capuchin and Squirrel Monkeys) Order: Primates (Lemurs, Monkeys and Apes) Class: Mammalia (Mammals) Fig. 1. Tufted capuchin, Cebus apella. [http://pin.primate.wisc.edu/factsheets/entry/tufted_capuchin, downloaded 8 November 2012] TRAITS. The tufted capuchin is distinguished from other primates due to the characteristic colour of its head; that is dark sideburns with a black to dark auburn cap. On top of the ears tufts of dark hair are present on either side of the cap. The back of the capuchin can show a colour from yellow up to red-brown but is darker at the middle of the back as compared to its shoulders which are brighter in colour. Its tail, limbs and hands are darker than the rest of their fur while the colour ranges from brown to pink (Groves 2001). Even though adult males are darker as compared to females, there is a considerable variation in face colour amongst group members (Emmons and Freer 1997). Locomotion is generally on four limbs (quadrupeds) and whilst roaming, its prehensile tail is curved downwards and is not used. Foraging activities and feeding are the key functions of the tail. It also serves as an anchor while descending (Youlatos 1999). The tail aids in assisting with directional changes, controlling risky movements and primarily stabilizing them in a seated position whilst feeding. Generally tufted capuchins have a UWI The Online Guide to the Animals of Trinidad and Tobago Behaviour head-body length of 13-22 inches, tail length of 15-22 inches and weighs between 4.2-11 lbs where the males are larger and heavier than the females.
    [Show full text]
  • Facial Displays in Young Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus Apella)
    FLORE Repository istituzionale dell'Università degli Studi di Firenze Facial displays in young tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): appearance, meaning, context and target Questa è la Versione finale referata (Post print/Accepted manuscript) della seguente pubblicazione: Original Citation: Facial displays in young tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): appearance, meaning, context and target / A. De Marco; E. Visalberghi. - In: FOLIA PRIMATOLOGICA. - ISSN 0015-5713. - STAMPA. - 78(2007), pp. 118-137. Availability: This version is available at: 2158/422260 since: Terms of use: Open Access La pubblicazione è resa disponibile sotto le norme e i termini della licenza di deposito, secondo quanto stabilito dalla Policy per l'accesso aperto dell'Università degli Studi di Firenze (https://www.sba.unifi.it/upload/policy-oa-2016-1.pdf) Publisher copyright claim: (Article begins on next page) 26 September 2021 Original Article Folia Primatol 2007;78:118–137 Received: January 16, 2006 DOI: 10.1159/000097061 Accepted after revision: June 14, 2006 Facial Displays in Young Tufted Capuchin Monkeys (Cebus apella): Appearance, Meaning, Context and Target a, b a Arianna De Marco Elisabetta Visalberghi a Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, b Roma , e Giardino faunistico di Piano dell’Abatino, Poggio San Lorenzo , Italia Key Words Facial displays Communication Ontogeny Infancy Capuchin monkey Cebus apella Abstract Facial displays are important for communication, and their ontogeny has been studied primarily in chimpanzees and macaques. We investigated the ontogeny, com- municative function and target of facial displays in Cebus apella . Our results show that facial displays are absent at birth and develop as infants grow older.
    [Show full text]