Chemung Subbasin-Cohocton River Survey

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chemung Subbasin-Cohocton River Survey Publication 259 September 2008 Chemung Subbasin Small Watershed Study: Cohocton River A Water Quality and Biological Assessment, April 2007 - February 2008 The Susquehanna River Basin Commission (SRBC) completed a water quality survey in the Cohocton River Watershed from April 2007- February 2008 as part of the Year-2 small watershed study in the Chemung Subbasin (Figure 1). Year-1 and Year-2 surveys are part Introduction . .1 of SRBC’s Subbasin Survey Program, which is funded in part by the United States Description . .2 Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). This program Methods . .3 consists of two-year assessments in each of the six major subbasins in the Susquehanna River Figure 1. Location of Cohocton River Watershed in the Data Analysis . .4 Chemung River Subbasin Basin on a rotating schedule. The Year-1 studies are broad-brush, one-time samples of about 100 stream sites to Results/Discussion . .6 - 11 assess water quality, macroinvertebrates, and physical habitat. The Year-2 studies focus on a particular region or small watershed within the major subbasin, and typically Conclusion . .11 consist of quarterly sampling over a one-year period at a set number of sampling locations. SRBC conducted the Chemung Subbasin Year-1 study from June-August References . .12 2006 (Buda, 2007). The Year-2 sampling plan is tailored for the individual needs or concerns of a chosen watershed, and, through sampling seasonally at various flow regimes, a more detailed evaluation of the watershed can be made. Appendix . .12 For more information on SRBC’s Subbasin Survey Program, see reports by Buda (2006 and 2007) and Steffy (2007). These reports are posted on SRBC’s web site at www.srbc.net/pubinfo/techdocs/Publications/techreports.htm. This technical report was produced by: Luanne Y. Steffy Aquatic Ecologist (717) 238-0426 ext. 112 [email protected] For more information on the methods or results of this survey, contact Luanne Y. Steffy. For raw data, visit the web site at www.srbc.net/pubinfo/publications/techreports.htm For additional copies of this Subbasin survey contact the Commission by e-mail at [email protected]. Headwaters of the Cohocton River west of Atlanta, N.Y. The Cohocton River Watershed Cohocton River Watershed that will Planning and Development Board was chosen for the detailed Year-2 study benefit from the additional data (STCRPB), the Soil and Water for several reasons. During initial provided from this project. Since Conservation Districts of Steuben and coordination meetings with state and October 2005, staff has been conducting Schuyler Counties, local citizens, and local agencies in the area, many groups water quality sampling on the Cohocton other interested parties. expressed interest in having additional River at Campbell, N.Y., as part of the data for the Cohocton River, as there Chesapeake Bay Program’s Non-tidal DESCRIPTION has not been any recent ongoing Water Quality Monitoring Network. of the Cohocton River monitoring in the watershed. Based on Monthly nutrient and sediment data are Watershed these coordination meetings, SRBC collected, as well as seasonal storm samples, The Cohocton River Watershed created a sampling plan, which included weather permitting. More information drains 604 square miles and flows establishing 25 sampling locations to on this program can be found at southeast through the southern tier of address numerous potential issues in www.srbc.net/programs/CBP/nutrient- New York State (Figure 1). More than the Cohocton River Watershed. program.htm. 80 percent of the watershed is located The Cohocton River Watershed is Additionally, in 2007, SRBC in Steuben County, with smaller sections one of the major drainages in the expanded its Early Warning System located in Schuyler (ten percent), Chemung Subbasin, and much of the (EWS) program into the New York Livingston (three percent), Yates (two land remains forested and undeveloped. State portion of the Susquehanna River percent), and Ontario (less than one However, agriculture does represent Basin to protect public drinking water percent) counties. The Cohocton River almost 20 percent of the land use in the supplies. This program helps protect and the Tioga River converge in the watershed, and there are local concerns public water supplies that serve the Village of Painted Post, N.Y., to form the about the resulting impacts of nutrients almost 700,000 customers in the Elmira mainstem of the Chemung River. Most and sediment. Nineteen sites were sampled and Binghamton, N.Y., areas. The EWS of the streams in the Cohocton River throughout the watershed to assess program involves a monitoring network Watershed, including all the sampling ambient water quality and document that helps minimize the impact from locations, are designated as either Class nutrient levels likely resulting from contaminant spills, and provides data B or Class C waters, which are typically agricultural practices. for improving day-to-day treatment intended for primary and secondary The water quality of tributaries operations, further ensuring a continuous recreation and fishing. Two sampling entering Lamoka and Waneta Lakes was and safe supply of drinking water. sites, the Cohocton River south of Avoca another concern that was addressed The City of Elmira’s water treatment (about river mile 25.0) and the mouth of in the sampling plan. To evaluate where facilities, included in the EWS network, Meads Creek (MEAD 0.1), are in reaches excess nutrients in the lakes may be are located downstream of the outlet of designated as trout waters. In addition, originating, SRBC sampled six sites the Cohocton River. The treatment Twelvemile Creek (TWVE 0.5) is listed around, between, and downstream of facility benefits from the real-time by NYSDEC as trout spawning waters. the lakes. Quarterly sampling at these monitors that record temperature, turbidity, The Cohocton River Watershed is a 25 sites was conducted throughout the dissolved oxygen, and conductance. primarily rural area with forested lands watershed to provide information for There is also an ultraviolet absorbance covering more than 75 percent of the determining any temporal or spatial monitoring system, which can be used basin. Agriculture makes up almost changes in water quality and to provide to detect organic contaminants. By 20 percent of the watershed, and just evidence of anthropogenic influence, monitoring these few major parameters over one percent is developed land. Two particularly with regard to agricultural continuously, any changes can be large lakes and numerous sizeable sources of nutrients or the possibility of detected early, before they threaten wetland areas make up most of the other sources, such as septic systems. the safe supply of drinking water. For remaining area. The largest population In addition, due to the numerous more information on the EWS program center is Bath, located in the central large automobile salvage yards in the at SRBC, go to http://www.srbc.net/ region of Steuben County (Figure 2). watershed, quarterly volatile organics programs/docs/ EWSGeneral(2_07).pdf. Land use information is based on the sampling (specifically looking for BTEX - This Year-2 watershed study will 2000 land use coverage from the benzene, toluene, ethyl benzene, provide valuable biological, chemical, Chesapeake Bay Program. xylenes mix) also was incorporated and habitat information to SRBC The entire Cohocton River upstream and downstream of two and other agencies, including the Watershed falls within Ecoregion 60, salvage yards to assess any surface water Upper Susquehanna Coalition (USC), which is the Northern Appalachian impacts from these facilities. New York State Department of Plateau. This ecoregion is a combination SRBC also has numerous other Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), of agriculture and forested land and is involvements in and around the Southern Tier Central Regional considered a transition ecoregion between 2 the more agricultural and urban ecoregions The Cohocton River also provides METHODS to the north and west and the more opportunities for canoeing and kayaking, DATA COLLECTION mountainous and forested ecoregions to especially on the lower reaches and onto Between April 2007 and February the south and east. The geology of these the Chemung River. There are three 2008, SRBC staff collected quarterly areas consists mainly of sandstone and specific launches for canoes and kayaks: water chemistry samples and measured shale (www.newyork.geology-forum.com). along Route 11 in the Town of Bath stream discharge at 25 stream sites Recreational opportunities are (sampling site COHO 16.5), at Wood Road in the Cohocton River Watershed. abundant in the Cohocton River in the Town of Campbell (sampling site Macroinvertebrate samples were collected, Watershed, with Lamoka and Waneta COHO 9.7), and at Kinsella Park in the and habitat assessments were completed Lakes and the Cohocton River Town of Erwin (sampling site COHO at each site in June 2007. Appendix A providing for many outdoor activities. 0.5). The Chemung Basin River Trail contains a list of station names, sampling NYSDEC maintains numerous public Partnership is an active organization in location descriptions, drainage areas, fishing areas along the entire extent the area and was formed in 1999 to and latitude and longitude coordinates of the river. Information on the promote protection of the Chemung for each of these sites. In addition, location of these access areas, as basin, including the Cohocton River volatile organic samples were collected well as fishing regulations for these Watershed. For more information on this at one of the original 25 sites as well areas, can be found under Region 8, group or to sign up for its newsletter, as three additional locations. These Steuben County at http://www.dec.ny.gov/ please see the partnership’s web site at additional sites were located upstream outdoor/9924.html. http://www.chemungrivertrail.com. and downstream of large automobile salvage yards and are listed in red in Appendix A. The site listed in blue was sampled for both volatile organics and nutrient parameters.
Recommended publications
  • Sold Is Gold!
    %+)ì ìeì ,632-'0)ì (O -7)6ìeì92(%=Aì%=ìAì AREA REAL ESTATE (315) 531-9251 GARY IRVINE (585) 554-6444 LIC ASSOC RE BROKER 100 State Route 245; Rushville 384 N. MAIN STREET CANANDAIGUA, NY 14424 AmandaGroverRealEstate.com O: 585-396-5268 *Sales stats derived from GRAR MLS, 1/1/13 - 12/31/13 [email protected] #1 BROKERAGE FOR LISTED & SOLD ACREAGE IN YATES COUNTY!* /0%.(/53%s35.$!9 -!9s 0- "* Ê"1- Ê-1 °]Ê9Ê£ÇÊUÊ£ÎÊ* NEW MIDDLESEX KEUKA LAKE: 3501 W. Bluff NEW 2257 EASTMAN PRICE Beautiful 2 Story Dr. Beautiful year round, 1722 LISTING AVE., PENN YAN on 9 Wooded Just Outside SF, 3 Br/3Ba, w/o bsmt, built in Village! Nicely Acres! ‘98. Plus 429 SF seasonal guest done 3 BR, Remodeled! cottage at water’s edge. 100’ kitch w/SS appl, pantry eat-in/formal DR. 1st flr Hardwood lakefront. $550,000 office & laundry. Walk to Keuka Lake-deeded floors, vaulted ceilings in bedrooms, paver pa- access or Indian Pines park. Low utilities! Call tio. Home office with separate entrance. Must Call our 4-Sale line at 585-292-5000 or 1-800-295-2797, Press in 5 digit code for info Sue Polizzi 585.794.2895 $139,900 see! Call Sue Polizzi 585.794.2895 $124,900 RUSHVILLE "* Ê"1- Ê-/°]Ê9ÊÓÎÊUÊ£ÎÊ* Spacious 1944 ST. Village RTE. 28, NEW OLD FORGE, PRICE Home ADIRONDACKS 2 car - Snowmobil- garage/shop. 2 BA, 3 BR. Layout er’s Getaway or Mountain Home! Lake access-Okara Lake allows for 1 or 2 family.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: 2005-2014
    Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: 2005-2014 NY 6 NTN Stations 9 7 10 8 Susquehanna 11 82 Eastern Shore 83 Western Shore 12 15 14 Potomac 16 13 17 Rappahannock York 19 21 20 23 James 18 22 24 25 26 27 41 43 84 37 86 5 55 29 85 40 42 45 30 28 36 39 44 53 31 38 46 MD 32 54 33 WV 52 56 87 34 4 3 50 2 58 57 35 51 1 59 DC 47 60 62 DE 49 61 63 71 VA 67 70 48 74 68 72 75 65 64 69 76 66 73 77 81 78 79 80 Prepared on 10/20/15 Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network: All Stations NTN Stations 91 NY 6 NTN New Stations 9 10 8 7 Susquehanna 11 82 Eastern Shore 83 12 Western Shore 92 15 16 Potomac 14 PA 13 Rappahannock 17 93 19 95 96 York 94 23 20 97 James 18 98 100 21 27 22 26 101 107 24 25 102 108 84 86 42 43 45 55 99 85 30 103 28 5 37 109 57 31 39 40 111 29 90 36 53 38 41 105 32 44 54 104 MD 106 WV 110 52 112 56 33 87 3 50 46 115 89 34 DC 4 51 2 59 58 114 47 60 35 1 DE 49 61 62 63 88 71 74 48 67 68 70 72 117 75 VA 64 69 116 76 65 66 73 77 81 78 79 80 Prepared on 10/20/15 Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • New York Freshwater Fishing Regulations Guide: 2015-16
    NEW YORK Freshwater FISHING2015–16 OFFICIAL REGULATIONS GUIDE VOLUME 7, ISSUE NO. 1, APRIL 2015 Fishing for Muskie www.dec.ny.gov Most regulations are in effect April 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR New York: A State of Angling Opportunity When it comes to freshwater fishing, no state in the nation can compare to New York. Our Great Lakes consistently deliver outstanding fishing for salmon and steelhead and it doesn’t stop there. In fact, New York is home to four of the Bassmaster’s top 50 bass lakes, drawing anglers from around the globe to come and experience great smallmouth and largemouth bass fishing. The crystal clear lakes and streams of the Adirondack and Catskill parks make New York home to the very best fly fishing east of the Rockies. Add abundant walleye, panfish, trout and trophy muskellunge and northern pike to the mix, and New York is clearly a state of angling opportunity. Fishing is a wonderful way to reconnect with the outdoors. Here in New York, we are working hard to make the sport more accessible and affordable to all. Over the past five years, we have invested more than $6 million, renovating existing boat launches and developing new ones across the state. This is in addition to the 50 new projects begun in 2014 that will make it easier for all outdoors enthusiasts to access the woods and waters of New York. Our 12 DEC fish hatcheries produce 900,000 pounds of fish each year to increase fish populations and expand and improve angling opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • LWLA Spring 2016 Newsletter
    Spring Newsletter – April 2016 A Message from the President – Terry Allison Like most of you, I was totally amazed by the mild winter weather we had this year. I can only wonder what the weather will be like as we begin the 2016 lake season! The new lake season brings for you and your LWLA continued vigilance overseeing the good health of our beautiful lakes. It is a united effort. That’s why it’s so important that you support us with your membership. If you haven’t paid your 2016 dues, please do. We cannot accomplish anything without you and your financial support. We continue to face several issues that are never ending. The fight to keep Eurasian Milfoil under control has become common place on our “to-do” list. Along with that, we now face a financial deficit because of the rising cost of chemical treatment. Thanks to the Lakes District Commission, we’ve done well for many years. But now, we face shortfalls unless we change our taxation formula. The Lamoka-Waneta Lakes' Protection District tax was started in 2003. There has never been an increase. To make ends meet, we will be proposing an increase. The increase will be 50% over the current rates so that 80' of frontage or less pays $135/year (was $90), greater than 80' of frontage pays $180/year (was $120), access to the lake pays $90/year (was $60), and non-developable properties such as wetlands pay $27 (was $18). It’s our hope that this will keep pace with our expenses.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Event of 3/4/1964 - 3/7/1964
    Flood Event of 3/4/1964 - 3/7/1964 Chemung Site Flood Stage Date Crest Flow Category Basin Stream County of Gage County of Forecast Point Campbell 8.00 3/5/1964 8.45 13,200 Minor Chemung Cohocton River Steuben Steuben Chemung 16.00 3/6/1964 20.44 93,800 Moderate Chemung Chemung River Chemung Chemung Corning 29.00 3/5/1964 30.34 -9,999 Moderate Chemung Chemung River Steuben Steuben Elmira 12.00 3/6/1964 15.60 -9,999 Moderate Chemung Chemung River Chemung Chemung Lindley 17.00 3/5/1964 18.48 37,400 Minor Chemung Tioga River Steuben Steuben Delaware Site Flood Stage Date Crest Flow Category Basin Stream County of Gage County of Forecast Point Walton 9.50 3/5/1964 13.66 15,800 Minor Delaware West Branch Delaware Delaware Delaware River James Site Flood Stage Date Crest Flow Category Basin Stream County of Gage County of Forecast Point Lick Run 16.00 3/6/1964 16.07 25,900 Minor James James River Botetourt Botetourt Juniata Site Flood Stage Date Crest Flow Category Basin Stream County of Gage County of Forecast Point Spruce Creek 8.00 3/5/1964 8.43 4,540 Minor Juniata Little Juniata River Huntingdon Huntingdon Created On: 8/16/2016 Page 1 of 4 Main Stem Susquehanna Site Flood Stage Date Crest Flow Category Basin Stream County of Gage County of Forecast Point Towanda 16.00 3/6/1964 23.63 174,000 Moderate Upper Main Stem Susquehanna River Bradford Bradford Susquehanna Wilkes-Barre 22.00 3/7/1964 28.87 180,000 Moderate Upper Main Stem Susquehanna River Luzerne Luzerne Susquehanna North Branch Susquehanna Site Flood Stage Date Crest Flow Category
    [Show full text]
  • Susquehanna Riyer Drainage Basin
    'M, General Hydrographic Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 109 Series -j Investigations, 13 .N, Water Power, 9 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR HYDROGRAPHY OF THE SUSQUEHANNA RIYER DRAINAGE BASIN BY JOHN C. HOYT AND ROBERT H. ANDERSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1 9 0 5 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittaL_.__.______.____.__..__.___._______.._.__..__..__... 7 Introduction......---..-.-..-.--.-.-----............_-........--._.----.- 9 Acknowledgments -..___.______.._.___.________________.____.___--_----.. 9 Description of drainage area......--..--..--.....-_....-....-....-....--.- 10 General features- -----_.____._.__..__._.___._..__-____.__-__---------- 10 Susquehanna River below West Branch ___...______-_--__.------_.--. 19 Susquehanna River above West Branch .............................. 21 West Branch ....................................................... 23 Navigation .--..........._-..........-....................-...---..-....- 24 Measurements of flow..................-.....-..-.---......-.-..---...... 25 Susquehanna River at Binghamton, N. Y_-..---...-.-...----.....-..- 25 Ghenango River at Binghamton, N. Y................................ 34 Susquehanna River at Wilkesbarre, Pa......_............-...----_--. 43 Susquehanna River at Danville, Pa..........._..................._... 56 West Branch at Williamsport, Pa .._.................--...--....- _ - - 67 West Branch at Allenwood, Pa.....-........-...-.._.---.---.-..-.-.. 84 Juniata River at Newport, Pa...-----......--....-...-....--..-..---.-
    [Show full text]
  • Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy
    Brook Trout Outcome Management Strategy Introduction Brook Trout symbolize healthy waters because they rely on clean, cold stream habitat and are sensitive to rising stream temperatures, thereby serving as an aquatic version of a “canary in a coal mine”. Brook Trout are also highly prized by recreational anglers and have been designated as the state fish in many eastern states. They are an essential part of the headwater stream ecosystem, an important part of the upper watershed’s natural heritage and a valuable recreational resource. Land trusts in West Virginia, New York and Virginia have found that the possibility of restoring Brook Trout to local streams can act as a motivator for private landowners to take conservation actions, whether it is installing a fence that will exclude livestock from a waterway or putting their land under a conservation easement. The decline of Brook Trout serves as a warning about the health of local waterways and the lands draining to them. More than a century of declining Brook Trout populations has led to lost economic revenue and recreational fishing opportunities in the Bay’s headwaters. Chesapeake Bay Management Strategy: Brook Trout March 16, 2015 - DRAFT I. Goal, Outcome and Baseline This management strategy identifies approaches for achieving the following goal and outcome: Vital Habitats Goal: Restore, enhance and protect a network of land and water habitats to support fish and wildlife, and to afford other public benefits, including water quality, recreational uses and scenic value across the watershed. Brook Trout Outcome: Restore and sustain naturally reproducing Brook Trout populations in Chesapeake Bay headwater streams, with an eight percent increase in occupied habitat by 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Pennsylvania Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws PERMITS, MULTI-YEAR LICENSES, BUTTONS
    2018PENNSYLVANIA FISHING SUMMARY Summary of Fishing Regulations and Laws 2018 Fishing License BUTTON WHAT’s NeW FOR 2018 l Addition to Panfish Enhancement Waters–page 15 l Changes to Misc. Regulations–page 16 l Changes to Stocked Trout Waters–pages 22-29 www.PaBestFishing.com Multi-Year Fishing Licenses–page 5 18 Southeastern Regular Opening Day 2 TROUT OPENERS Counties March 31 AND April 14 for Trout Statewide www.GoneFishingPa.com Use the following contacts for answers to your questions or better yet, go onlinePFBC to the LOCATION PFBC S/TABLE OF CONTENTS website (www.fishandboat.com) for a wealth of information about fishing and boating. THANK YOU FOR MORE INFORMATION: for the purchase STATE HEADQUARTERS CENTRE REGION OFFICE FISHING LICENSES: 1601 Elmerton Avenue 595 East Rolling Ridge Drive Phone: (877) 707-4085 of your fishing P.O. Box 67000 Bellefonte, PA 16823 Harrisburg, PA 17106-7000 Phone: (814) 359-5110 BOAT REGISTRATION/TITLING: license! Phone: (866) 262-8734 Phone: (717) 705-7800 Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. The mission of the Pennsylvania Hours: 8:00 a.m. – 4:00 p.m. Monday through Friday PUBLICATIONS: Fish and Boat Commission is to Monday through Friday BOATING SAFETY Phone: (717) 705-7835 protect, conserve, and enhance the PFBC WEBSITE: Commonwealth’s aquatic resources EDUCATION COURSES FOLLOW US: www.fishandboat.com Phone: (888) 723-4741 and provide fishing and boating www.fishandboat.com/socialmedia opportunities. REGION OFFICES: LAW ENFORCEMENT/EDUCATION Contents Contact Law Enforcement for information about regulations and fishing and boating opportunities. Contact Education for information about fishing and boating programs and boating safety education.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018
    Summary of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Suspended-Sediment Loads and Trends Measured at the Chesapeake Bay Nontidal Network Stations for Water Years 2009–2018 Prepared by Douglas L. Moyer and Joel D. Blomquist, U.S. Geological Survey, March 2, 2020 The Chesapeake Bay nontidal network (NTN) currently consists of 123 stations throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Stations are located near U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) stream-flow gages to permit estimates of nutrient and sediment loadings and trends in the amount of loadings delivered downstream. Routine samples are collected monthly, and 8 additional storm-event samples are also collected to obtain a total of 20 samples per year, representing a range of discharge and loading conditions (Chesapeake Bay Program, 2020). The Chesapeake Bay partnership uses results from this monitoring network to focus restoration strategies and track progress in restoring the Chesapeake Bay. Methods Changes in nitrogen, phosphorus, and suspended-sediment loads in rivers across the Chesapeake Bay watershed have been calculated using monitoring data from 123 NTN stations (Moyer and Langland, 2020). Constituent loads are calculated with at least 5 years of monitoring data, and trends are reported after at least 10 years of data collection. Additional information for each monitoring station is available through the USGS website “Water-Quality Loads and Trends at Nontidal Monitoring Stations in the Chesapeake Bay Watershed” (https://cbrim.er.usgs.gov/). This website provides State, Federal, and local partners as well as the general public ready access to a wide range of data for nutrient and sediment conditions across the Chesapeake Bay watershed. In this summary, results are reported for the 10-year period from 2009 through 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • REED, FJ and MB STURGIS. 1937. a Study of the Fertilization of Rice
    BIOCHEMICAL CHANGES IN MARSHES—Cook, Powers 65 REED, F. J. and M. B. STURGIS. 1937. A study of the fertilization of rice. Louisiana State Univ. Bull. 292. ROBINSON, W. 0. 1931. Some chemical phases of submerged soil conditions. Soil Sci. 30:197-217. RUTTNER, FRANZ. 1953. Fundamentals of linmology. (Trans. by D. G. Frey and F. E. J. Fry) Univ. Toronto Press, Toronto. SCHAEPERCLAUS, WILHELM. 1933. Text book of pond culture. (Trans. by Frederick Hund) Fish. Leaflet 311, U. S. Dept. Int. SHIOIRI, M. and M. YOSHIDA. 1951. Studies on the manganese in the paddy soil. Jour. Sci. Soil Manuring 22:53-60. SVERDRUP, H. U., MARTIN W. JOHN SON and RICHARD H. FLEMING. 1942. The oceans. Prentice-Hall, Inc., New York. TARAS, M. 1948. New total alkalinity indicators. Jour. Am. Water Works Assn. 40:468-472. TISDALE, S. L. and W. L. NELSON. 1956. Soil fertility and fertilizers. Macmillan Co., New York. VAN RAALTE, M. H. 1941. On the oxidation environment by roots. Ann. Bot. Gard., Buitenzorg. Vol. Hors. Serie. 15-34. VLAMIS, J. and A. R. DAVIS. 1944. Effects of oxygen tension on certain physiological responses of rice, barley and tomato. Plant Physiol. 19:33-51. WILDE, S. A., C. T. YOUNGBERG and J. H. HOVIN D. 1950. Changes in com- position of ground water, soil fertility, and forest growth produced by the construction and removal of beaver dams. Jour. Wildl. Mgt. 14(2) : 123-128. • • COMPARISON OF ESTIMATES OF FISH POPULATIONS IN LAKES' Howard A. Loeb Aquatic Biologist New York State Conservation Department ABSTRACT Population studies involving a number of fish species, but carp primarily, were carried out in three lakes ranging from 30 to 800 acres in size.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemung River Friends 2019 Annual Report Notes River Development/Access
    1 CHEMUNG RIVER FRIENDS 2019 ANNUAL REPORT NOTES RIVER DEVELOPMENT/ACCESS: River Friends led a project to make badly needed improvements at the Fitch’s Bridge Boat Launch in Big Flats. Improvements included: installing a concrete boat ramp, grading and paving the badly rutted and pot-holed access road and parking lot and installing a drainage pipe to reduce erosion and storm water damage. “The scores of potholes, ruts and pooled water made it one of the worst launch sites on the river,” said River Friends Executive Director Jim Pfiffer. “It was impossible to drive a vehicle on the access road and parking lot without hitting potholes. It was so bad motorists were driving off the road and onto the grass causing more ruts and drainage problems in the turf.” The project was a community partnership that involved River Friends, the Sportsmen’s Federation of Chemung County, an Elmira Heights contractor, an Elmira fabricating business and a municipality. The launch is owned by the nonprofit Sportsmen’s Federation of Chemung County. The town of Big Flats paved for free and Edger Contractors in Elmira installed the concrete ramp for free. River Friends financed the $16,627 cost of materials. The 30-foot concrete ramp was installed in July and features a plaque honoring the late Tom Beecher, a former River Friends board president who died in 2017 and who enjoyed fishing and paddling on the river. The plaque was created and donated to River Friends by Southern Tier Custom Fabricators in Elmira. CORNING RIVER DEVELOPMENT: We worked with City of Corning officials on their 10-year river/parks development plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Fish Consumption Advisories - 2018
    Revised: February 13, 2018 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA FISH CONSUMPTION ADVISORIES - 2018 DELAWARE RIVER BASIN Water Body Area Under Advisory Species Meal Frequency Contaminant Belmont Lake (Wayne Co.) Entire Lake Rock Bass 1 meal/month Mercury Beltzville Lake (Beltzville State Park) Entire Lake Walleye 2 meals/month Mercury (Carbon Co.) Brady’s Lake (Monroe Co.) Entire Lake Chain pickerel 6 meals/year Mercury Yellow Perch 1 meal/month Broadhead Creek (Monroe Co.) Entire Basin Rock Bass 2 meals/month Mercury Bushkill Creek (Monroe and Pike Co.) Entire Basin American eel 2 meals/month Mercury All suckers Chester Creek (Delaware Co.) Confluence of W. Br. Chester Channel catfish 2 meals/month Mercury Ck. To Mouth Darby Creek (Delaware and Philadelphia Entire Basin Channel catfish 1 meal/month PCB Co.) Delaware River Source to Trenton, NJ- Rock bass 2 meals/month Mercury Morrisville, PA bridge Walleye > 17” Smallmouth bass 1 meal/month Delaware Estuary, including the tidal Trenton, NJ-Morrisville, PA White perch 1 meal/month PCB portion of all PA tributaries and the Bridge to PA/DE border Channel catfish Schuylkill River to the Fairmount Dam Flathead catfish (Bucks, Philadelphia, & Delaware Co.) Striped bass > 28” Carp 6 meals/year PCB American eel Do Not Eat PCB Hickory Lake (Wayne Co.) Entire Lake Largemouth bass 2 meals/month Mercury Smallmouth bass Lake Maskenozha (Pike Co.) Entire Lake Yellow perch 2 meals/month Mercury Lake Wallenpaupack (Pike & Wayne Co.) Entire Lake Walleye 1 meal/month Mercury Lake Towhee (Bucks Co.) Entire Lake
    [Show full text]