DOCSLIB.ORG

Copyright and Use of This Thesis This Thesis Must Be Used in Accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

COPYRIGHT AND USE OF THIS THESIS This thesis must be used in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Reproduction of material protected by copyright may be an infringement of copyright and copyright owners may be entitled to take legal action against persons who infringe their copyright. Section 51 (2) of the Copyright Act permits an authorized officer of a university library or archives to provide a copy (by communication or otherwise) of an unpublished thesis kept in the library or archives, to a person who satisfies the authorized officer that he or she requires the reproduction for the purposes of research or study. The Copyright Act grants the creator of a work a number of moral rights, specifically the right of attribution, the right against false attribution and the right of integrity. You may infringe the author’s moral rights if you: - fail to acknowledge the author of this thesis if you quote sections from the work - attribute this thesis to another author - subject this thesis to derogatory treatment which may prejudice the author’s reputation For further information contact the University’s Copyright Service. sydney.edu.au/copyright A study of scaling physics in a Polywell device Scott Cornish (SID: 306130319) School of Physics University of Sydney Australia A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Research) 2016 Declaration of originality I certify that the work presented in this thesis was undertaken solely during my PhD candidature, and has not been presented for any other degree. I certify also that this thesis was written by myself, and that all external contributions and sources have been duly acknowledged. Signature of candidate: ............................................ Scott Cornish i Acknowledgements A PhD thesis is awarded to only one person however as John Donne reminds us “no man is a island”. Without the help of countless others the writing of this thesis would have not been possible. I would like to take this opportunity to extend my utmost gratitude to all of those involved in this great effort. My primary supervisor A/Proff Joe Khachan was and is a seriously smashing supervisor from whom I have learned innumerable technical skills and plasma physics knowledge. From Joe I also learned the most important lesson of my own limitations as an individual physicist and the value of collaboration with others. I will always consider you as a friend and fellow colleague in the pursuit of truth and fusion energy. I have always enjoyed our conversations and I hope that I will be able to carry the torch for the Polywell and produce research that you would be proud of. I would also like to thank my associate supervisor Dr Alex Samarian. I would also like to give a big shout out to the rest of the Polywell crew, Matt Carr, Dave Gum- mersall and Johnson Ren with whom I have enjoyed extensive collaboration and thoroughly enjoyable discussions about all things Polywell. A special thanks to Dave for his collaboration in my first Polywell experiment, whose contributions were the icing on the cake. To my original office mates Colin Tuft and Adam Israel I truly had a blast with you guys. I wish you all the best for the future. The technical staff at the School of Physics have helped me in many ways. Particularly the workshop staff, Mr. Michael Paterson and Mr. Terry Pfeiffer who helped me in designing and machining the Polywells used in this thesis. A particular thanks to Mr Phil Dennis who consulted me on power supply design and checked that my work would not result in death. I would also like to thank the School of Physics administration staff, particularly Ms Eve Teran, Miss Alexis George and Ms Cynthia Kiu who were endlessly supportive in all my administrative needs. Finally to the School of Physics itself which provided me with the Denison Postgraduate Award and allowed me to undertake this PhD program. To my parents, thank you for the support you provided during the early years of my thesis. Finally the biggest thankyou of all to my beautiful and brilliant wife Louise. You have been a constant source of inspiration and support. Without you I would have thrown in the towel and never finished this thesis. Of this, I am sure. As I now come to the close of my PhD work on the Polywell, I am reminded of the introduction to one of my favourite Led Zeppelin songs. Indeed, is this the end or just beginning? Only time will tell. ii Should I fall out of love, my fire in the light To chase a feather in the wind Within the glow that weaves a cloak of delight There moves a thread that has no end. For many hours and days that pass ever soon the tides have caused the flame to dim At last the arm is straight, the hand to the loom Is this to end or just beginning? All of my Love - Led Zeppelin iii Abstract The Polywell is an Inertial Electrostatic Confinement (IEC) device that aims to confine ions at fusion energies. The Polywell uses a virtual cathode in place of a metal grid cathode used in regular IEC devices, in which a high voltage is applied to the grid to accelerate ions to fusion energies and confine them in a spherical geometry. The virtual cathode is produced by confining high energy electrons in a magnetic well by mirror reflections, which produces a potential well. Three orthogonal pairs of coils with antiparallel currents are placed equidistant from the centre of the device, such that the six coils make up the faces of a cube. In this way a magnetic well is produced with a magnetic null at the centre of the device and strong magnetic fields near the coils. Spherically symmetric potential wells are also required in order to maximise the degree of ion focusing attained in the core of the device. The formation of deep, symmetrical potential wells is critical to the functioning of the Polywell and is the major focus of this thesis. This thesis aims to explore how the depth and symmetry of potential wells vary with a number of device parameters. These include injected electron current and electron energy and magnetic field strength. The spacing of magnetic field coils is also investigated. Varying the spacing of the magnetic field coils changes the relative magnetic field strength in the different cusps of the device and hence the electron trapping in these cusps. Electron losses through the cusps represent a major energy loss mechanism and are a major impediment to the potential of the device to eventually reach net fusion energy. The electron trapping is maximised by determining the ideal intercoil spacing. Different sizes of magnetic field coil were used to investigate how increasing the device size improves the electron trapping and potential well formation. It is hypothesized that larger devices are able to trap higher energy electrons and produce deeper potential wells capable of accelerating ions to fusion energies. The scaling experiments with smaller devices are used to estimate the size of device needed to reach fusion energies. In order to investigate the potential formation multiple secondary electron emission capacitive probes (SECP) were constructed. The use of these probes in the Polywell plasma could give a direct measure of the plasma potential and hence the potential well. However, this type of probe has not be shown to be effective in the highly magnetised non-Maxwellian, non-neutral electron plasma found in the Polywell. A planar vacuum diode within a Helmholtz pair is used to test the applicability of a SECP in such a plasma, with magnetic fields up to 0.35 T, and for electron energies of 100 eV-4000 eV. The plasma potential is accurately measured by the probe when the electron Larmor radius is greater than the probe diameter. When the electron Larmor radius is less than the probe diameter, the measured plasma potential iv is underestimated. However, this effect ceases at a finite Larmor radius and the SECP can be used to measure the plasma potential in high magnetic fields using a correction factor. A small Polywell with a 48 mm average coil diameter is tested with central face magnetic fields up to ∼ 0:5 T. The effect of magnetic field coil current and electron injection current and electron energy on the development of potential wells is observed. The electron emission current is varied from 150- 1680 mA and electron energies range between 150-800 V. These device parameters are tested over a much larger range than previously examined. A linear relationship is observed between potential well depth and injection current. A non-linear relationship is observed between potential well depth and magnetic field strength, with further increases to the magnetic field strength having less effect on the well depth. Investigations are made into the effect of the applied magnetic field current on the amount of emitted electrons that are injected into the device. An analytical model is created to estimate the electron confinement time from the measured potential well depth. From these results, an experimentally derived equation for electron confinement time is constructed, based on the experimental parameters of electron energy and coil current. These results are compared to a similar equation derived from a particle orbit simulation. A similar setup is used to again test the effect of magnetic field strength and emission current on the potential well depth. However, in the second experiment the two variables are completely decoupled. A nonlinear relationship is now observed between emission current and potential well depth, with the increases to both variables having diminishing returns on the well depth achieved.
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 3 Dynamics of the Electromagnetic Fields

    Chapter 3 Dynamics of the Electromagnetic Fields

    Chapter 3 Dynamics of the Electromagnetic Fields 3.1 Maxwell Displacement Current In the early 1860s (during the American civil war!) electricity including induction was well established experimentally. A big row was going on about theory. The warring camps were divided into the • Action-at-a-distance advocates and the • Field-theory advocates. James Clerk Maxwell was firmly in the field-theory camp. He invented mechanical analogies for the behavior of the fields locally in space and how the electric and magnetic influences were carried through space by invisible circulating cogs. Being a consumate mathematician he also formulated differential equations to describe the fields. In modern notation, they would (in 1860) have read: ρ �.E = Coulomb’s Law �0 ∂B � ∧ E = − Faraday’s Law (3.1) ∂t �.B = 0 � ∧ B = µ0j Ampere’s Law. (Quasi-static) Maxwell’s stroke of genius was to realize that this set of equations is inconsistent with charge conservation. In particular it is the quasi-static form of Ampere’s law that has a problem. Taking its divergence µ0�.j = �. (� ∧ B) = 0 (3.2) (because divergence of a curl is zero). This is fine for a static situation, but can’t work for a time-varying one. Conservation of charge in time-dependent case is ∂ρ �.j = − not zero. (3.3) ∂t 55 The problem can be fixed by adding an extra term to Ampere’s law because � � ∂ρ ∂ ∂E �.j + = �.j + �0�.E = �. j + �0 (3.4) ∂t ∂t ∂t Therefore Ampere’s law is consistent with charge conservation only if it is really to be written with the quantity (j + �0∂E/∂t) replacing j.
  • Microfluidics

    Microfluidics

    MICROFLUIDICS Sandip Ghosal Department of Mechanical Engineering, Northwestern University 2145 Sheridan Road, Evanston, IL 60208 1 Article Outline Glossary 1. Definition of the Subject and its Importance. 2. Introduction 3. Physics of Microfluidics 4. Future Directions 5. Bibliography GLOSSARY 1. Reynolds number: A characteristic dimensionless number that determines the nature of fluid flow in a given set up. 2. Stokes approximation: A simplifying approximation often made in fluid mechanics where the terms arising due to the inertia of fluid elements is neglected. This is justified if the Reynolds number is small, a situation that arises for example in the slow flow of viscous liquids; an example is pouring honey from a jar. 3. Ion mobility: Velocity acquired by an ion per unit applied force. 4. Electrophoretic mobility: Velocity acquired by an ion per unit applied electric field. 5. Zeta-potential: The electric potential at the interface of an electrolyte and substrate due to the presence of interfacial charge. Usually indicated by the Greek letter zeta (ζ). 1 6. Debye layer: A thin layer of ions next to charged interfaces (predominantly of the opposite sign to the interfacial charge) due to a balance between electrostatic attraction and random thermal fluctuations. 7. Debye Length: A measure of the thickness of the Debye layer. 8. Debye-H¨uckel approximation: The process of linearizing the equation for the electric potential; valid if the potential energy of ions is small compared to their average kinetic energy due to thermal motion. 9. Electric Double Layer (EDL): The Debye layer together with the set of fixed charges on the substrate constitute an EDL.
  • Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Fusor Cody Boyd Virginia Commonwealth University

    Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Fusor Cody Boyd Virginia Commonwealth University

    Virginia Commonwealth University VCU Scholars Compass Capstone Design Expo Posters College of Engineering 2015 Inertial Electrostatic Confinement Fusor Cody Boyd Virginia Commonwealth University Brian Hortelano Virginia Commonwealth University Yonathan Kassaye Virginia Commonwealth University See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/capstone Part of the Engineering Commons © The Author(s) Downloaded from https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/capstone/40 This Poster is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Engineering at VCU Scholars Compass. It has been accepted for inclusion in Capstone Design Expo Posters by an authorized administrator of VCU Scholars Compass. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Authors Cody Boyd, Brian Hortelano, Yonathan Kassaye, Dimitris Killinger, Adam Stanfield, Jordan Stark, Thomas Veilleux, and Nick Reuter This poster is available at VCU Scholars Compass: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/capstone/40 Team Members: Cody Boyd, Brian Hortelano, Yonathan Kassaye, Dimitris Killinger, Adam Stanfield, Jordan Stark, Thomas Veilleux Inertial Electrostatic Faculty Advisor: Dr. Sama Bilbao Y Leon, Mr. James G. Miller Sponsor: Confinement Fusor Dominion Virginia Power What is Fusion? Shielding Computational Modeling Because the D-D fusion reaction One of the potential uses of the fusor will be to results in the production of neutrons irradiate materials and see how they behave after and X-rays, shielding is necessary to certain levels of both fast and thermal neutron protect users from the radiation exposure. To reduce the amount of time and produced by the fusor. A Monte Carlo resources spent testing, a computational model n-Particle (MCNP) model was using XOOPIC, a particle interaction software, developed to calculate the necessary was developed to model the fusor.
  • Screened Electrostatic Interaction of Charged Colloidal Particles in Nonpolar Liquids Carlos Esteban Espinosa

    Screened Electrostatic Interaction of Charged Colloidal Particles in Nonpolar Liquids Carlos Esteban Espinosa

    Screened Electrostatic Interaction of Charged Colloidal Particles in Nonpolar Liquids A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Carlos Esteban Espinosa In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Chemical Engineering School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology August 2010 Screened Electrostatic Interaction of Charged Colloidal Particles in Nonpolar Liquids Approved by: Dr. Sven H. Behrens, Adviser School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Victor Breedveld School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Carson Meredith School of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: 12 May 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank my adviser, Dr. Sven Behrens. His support and orienta- tion was essential throughout the course of this work. I would like to thank all members of the Behrens group that have made all the difference. Dr. Virendra, a great friend and a fantastic office mate who gave me im- portant feedback and guidance. To Qiong and Adriana who helped me throughout. To Hongzhi Wang, a great office mate. I would also like to thank Dr. Victor Breedveld and Dr. Carson Meredith for being part of my committee. Finally I would like to thank those fellow graduate students in the Chemical Engineering Department at Georgia Tech whose friendship I am grateful for. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................... iii LIST OF TABLES ............................... vi LIST OF FIGURES .............................. vii SUMMARY .................................... x I INTRODUCTION ............................. 1 II BACKGROUND .............................. 4 2.1 Electrostatics in nonpolar fluids . .4 2.1.1 Charge formation in nonpolar fluids . .4 2.1.2 Charge formation in nonpolar oils with ionic surfactants .
  • This Chapter Deals with Conservation of Energy, Momentum and Angular Momentum in Electromagnetic Systems

    This Chapter Deals with Conservation of Energy, Momentum and Angular Momentum in Electromagnetic Systems

    This chapter deals with conservation of energy, momentum and angular momentum in electromagnetic systems. The basic idea is to use Maxwell’s Eqn. to write the charge and currents entirely in terms of the E and B-fields. For example, the current density can be written in terms of the curl of B and the Maxwell Displacement current or the rate of change of the E-field. We could then write the power density which is E dot J entirely in terms of fields and their time derivatives. We begin with a discussion of Poynting’s Theorem which describes the flow of power out of an electromagnetic system using this approach. We turn next to a discussion of the Maxwell stress tensor which is an elegant way of computing electromagnetic forces. For example, we write the charge density which is part of the electrostatic force density (rho times E) in terms of the divergence of the E-field. The magnetic forces involve current densities which can be written as the fields as just described to complete the electromagnetic force description. Since the force is the rate of change of momentum, the Maxwell stress tensor naturally leads to a discussion of electromagnetic momentum density which is similar in spirit to our previous discussion of electromagnetic energy density. In particular, we find that electromagnetic fields contain an angular momentum which accounts for the angular momentum achieved by charge distributions due to the EMF from collapsing magnetic fields according to Faraday’s law. This clears up a mystery from Physics 435. We will frequently re-visit this chapter since it develops many of our crucial tools we need in electrodynamics.
  • Magnetohydrodynamics 1 19.1Overview

    Magnetohydrodynamics 1 19.1Overview

    Contents 19 Magnetohydrodynamics 1 19.1Overview...................................... 1 19.2 BasicEquationsofMHD . 2 19.2.1 Maxwell’s Equations in the MHD Approximation . ..... 4 19.2.2 Momentum and Energy Conservation . .. 8 19.2.3 BoundaryConditions. 10 19.2.4 Magneticfieldandvorticity . .. 12 19.3 MagnetostaticEquilibria . ..... 13 19.3.1 Controlled thermonuclear fusion . ..... 13 19.3.2 Z-Pinch .................................. 15 19.3.3 Θ-Pinch .................................. 17 19.3.4 Tokamak.................................. 17 19.4 HydromagneticFlows. .. 18 19.5 Stability of Hydromagnetic Equilibria . ......... 22 19.5.1 LinearPerturbationTheory . .. 22 19.5.2 Z-Pinch: Sausage and Kink Instabilities . ...... 25 19.5.3 EnergyPrinciple ............................. 28 19.6 Dynamos and Reconnection of Magnetic Field Lines . ......... 29 19.6.1 Cowling’stheorem ............................ 30 19.6.2 Kinematicdynamos............................ 30 19.6.3 MagneticReconnection. 31 19.7 Magnetosonic Waves and the Scattering of Cosmic Rays . ......... 33 19.7.1 CosmicRays ............................... 33 19.7.2 Magnetosonic Dispersion Relation . ..... 34 19.7.3 ScatteringofCosmicRays . 36 0 Chapter 19 Magnetohydrodynamics Version 1219.1.K.pdf, 7 September 2012 Please send comments, suggestions, and errata via email to [email protected] or on paper to Kip Thorne, 350-17 Caltech, Pasadena CA 91125 Box 19.1 Reader’s Guide This chapter relies heavily on Chap. 13 and somewhat on the treatment of vorticity • transport in Sec. 14.2 Part VI, Plasma Physics (Chaps. 20-23) relies heavily on this chapter. • 19.1 Overview In preceding chapters, we have described the consequences of incorporating viscosity and thermal conductivity into the description of a fluid. We now turn to our final embellishment of fluid mechanics, in which the fluid is electrically conducting and moves in a magnetic field.
  • The Electrostatic Screening Length in Concentrated Electrolytes Increases with Concentration

    The Electrostatic Screening Length in Concentrated Electrolytes Increases with Concentration

    The Electrostatic Screening Length in Concentrated Electrolytes Increases with Concentration Alexander M. Smith*,a, Alpha A. Lee*,b and Susan Perkin*,a aDepartment of Chemistry, Physical & Theoretical Chemistry Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QZ, U.K. bSchool of EnGineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Corresponding author emails: [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1 ABSTRACT According to classical electrolyte theories interactions in dilute (low ion density) electrolytes decay exponentially with distance, with the Debye screeninG lenGth the characteristic length-scale. This decay length decreases monotonically with increasing ion concentration, due to effective screening of charges over short distances. Thus within the Debye model no long-range forces are expected in concentrated electrolytes. Here we reveal, using experimental detection of the interaction between two planar charged surfaces across a wide range of electrolytes, that beyond the dilute (Debye- Hückel) regime the screening length increases with increasing concentration. The screening lengths for all electrolytes studied – including aqueous NaCl solutions, ionic liquids diluted with propylene carbonate, and pure ionic liquids – collapse onto a single curve when scaled by the dielectric constant. This non-monotonic variation of the screening length with concentration, and its generality across ionic liquids and aqueous salt solutions, demonstrates an important characteristic of concentrated electrolytes of substantial relevance from biology to energy storage. TOC Image: 2 Electrolytes are ubiquitous in nature and in technology: from the interior of cells to the oceans, from supercapacitors to nanoparticle dispersions, electrolytes act as both solvent and ion conduction medium.
  • Electrophoresis of Charged Macromolecules

    Electrophoresis of Charged Macromolecules

    Electrophoresis of Charged Macromolecules Christian Holm Institut für Computerphysik, Universität Stuttgart Stuttgart, Germany 1! Charge stabilized Colloids! The analytical description of charged colloidal suspensions is problematic:! n " Long ranged interactions: electrostatics/ hydrodynamics! n " Inhomogeneous/asymmetrical systems! n " Many-body interactions! Alternative! : the relevant microscopic degrees of freedom are simulated! via Molecular Dynamics! ●Explicit" particles (ions) with charges ε ●Implicit" solvent approach, but hydrodynamic interactions of the solvent are included via a Lattice-Boltzmann algorithm Test of LB implementation for Poiseuille! Simulation box of size 80x40x10. Velocity profile for a Poiseuille flow in a channel, which is tilted by 45◦ relative to the Lattice-Boltzmann node mesh. Computed using ESPResSo. Profile of the absolute fluid velocity of the Poiseuille flow in the 45◦ tilted channel. Red crosses represent simulation data, the blue line is the theoretical result and the dashed blue line represents the theoretical result, using the channel width as a fit parameter 3! EOF in a Slit Pore! Simulation results for a water system. Solid lines denote simulation results, the dotted lines show the analytical results for comparison. Red stands for ion density in particles per nm3, blue stands for the fluid velocity in x-direction, green denotes the particle velocity. All quantities in simulation units. 4! Colloidal Electrophoresis! local force balance FE = FDrag leads to stationary state ν FE F = Z E − Zeff
  • Mutual Inductance

    Mutual Inductance

    Chapter 11 Inductance and Magnetic Energy 11.1 Mutual Inductance ............................................................................................ 11-3 Example 11.1 Mutual Inductance of Two Concentric Coplanar Loops ............... 11-5 11.2 Self-Inductance ................................................................................................. 11-5 Example 11.2 Self-Inductance of a Solenoid........................................................ 11-6 Example 11.3 Self-Inductance of a Toroid........................................................... 11-7 Example 11.4 Mutual Inductance of a Coil Wrapped Around a Solenoid ........... 11-8 11.3 Energy Stored in Magnetic Fields .................................................................. 11-10 Example 11.5 Energy Stored in a Solenoid ........................................................ 11-11 Animation 11.1: Creating and Destroying Magnetic Energy............................ 11-12 Animation 11.2: Magnets and Conducting Rings ............................................. 11-13 11.4 RL Circuits ...................................................................................................... 11-15 11.4.1 Self-Inductance and the Modified Kirchhoff's Loop Rule....................... 11-15 11.4.2 Rising Current.......................................................................................... 11-18 11.4.3 Decaying Current..................................................................................... 11-20 11.5 LC Oscillations ..............................................................................................
  • Lecture 4: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), MHD Equilibrium, MHD Waves

    Lecture 4: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), MHD Equilibrium, MHD Waves

    HSE | Valery Nakariakov | Solar Physics 1 Lecture 4: Magnetohydrodynamics (MHD), MHD Equilibrium, MHD Waves MHD describes large scale, slow dynamics of plasmas. More specifically, we can apply MHD when 1. Characteristic time ion gyroperiod and mean free path time, 2. Characteristic scale ion gyroradius and mean free path length, 3. Plasma velocities are not relativistic. In MHD, the plasma is considered as an electrically conducting fluid. Gov- erning equations are equations of fluid dynamics and Maxwell's equations. A self-consistent set of MHD equations connects the plasma mass density ρ, the plasma velocity V, the thermodynamic (also called gas or kinetic) pressure P and the magnetic field B. In strict derivation of MHD, one should neglect the motion of electrons and consider only heavy ions. The 1-st equation is mass continuity @ρ + r(ρV) = 0; (1) @t and it states that matter is neither created or destroyed. The 2-nd is the equation of motion of an element of the fluid, "@V # ρ + (Vr)V = −∇P + j × B; (2) @t also called the Euler equation. The vector j is the electric current density which can be expressed through the magnetic field B. Mind that on the lefthand side it is the total derivative, d=dt. The 3-rd equation is the energy equation, which in the simplest adiabatic case has the form d P ! = 0; (3) dt ργ where γ is the ratio of specific heats Cp=CV , and is normally taken as 5/3. The temperature T of the plasma can be determined from the density ρ and the thermodynamic pressure P , using the state equation (e.g.
  • Electrical Double Layer Interactions with Surface Charge Heterogeneities

    Electrical Double Layer Interactions with Surface Charge Heterogeneities

    Electrical double layer interactions with surface charge heterogeneities by Christian Pick A dissertation submitted to Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Baltimore, Maryland October 2015 © 2015 Christian Pick All rights reserved Abstract Particle deposition at solid-liquid interfaces is a critical process in a diverse number of technological systems. The surface forces governing particle deposition are typically treated within the framework of the well-known DLVO (Derjaguin-Landau- Verwey-Overbeek) theory. DLVO theory assumes of a uniform surface charge density but real surfaces often contain chemical heterogeneities that can introduce variations in surface charge density. While numerous studies have revealed a great deal on the role of charge heterogeneities in particle deposition, direct force measurement of heterogeneously charged surfaces has remained a largely unexplored area of research. Force measurements would allow for systematic investigation into the effects of charge heterogeneities on surface forces. A significant challenge with employing force measurements of heterogeneously charged surfaces is the size of the interaction area, referred to in literature as the electrostatic zone of influence. For microparticles, the size of the zone of influence is, at most, a few hundred nanometers across. Creating a surface with well-defined patterned heterogeneities within this area is out of reach of most conventional photolithographic techniques. Here, we present a means of simultaneously scaling up the electrostatic zone of influence and performing direct force measurements with micropatterned heterogeneously charged surfaces by employing the surface forces apparatus (SFA). A technique is developed here based on the vapor deposition of an aminosilane (3- aminopropyltriethoxysilane, APTES) through elastomeric membranes to create surfaces for force measurement experiments.
  • General Fusion

    General Fusion

    General Fusion Fusion Power Associates, 2011 Annual Meeting 1 General Fusion Making commercially viable fusion power a reality. • Founded in 2002, based in Vancouver, Canada • Plan to demonstrate a fusion system capable of “net gain” within 3 years • Industrial and institutional partners including Los Alamos National Lab and the Canadian Government • $32.5M in venture capital, $4.5M in government support Fusion Power Associates, 2011 Annual Meeting 2 General Fusion’s Acoustically Driven MTF Fusion Power Associates, 2011 Annual Meeting 3 Commercialization Advantages Fusion Challenge General Fusion Solution 1.5 m of liquid lead lithium greatly lowers the neutron energy spectrum Neutron activation and embrittlement of structure Low neutron load at the metal wall Low activation Low radiation damage n,2n reaction in lead 4π coverage Tritium breeding Thick blanket High tritium breeding ratio of 1.6 Heat extraction Heat extraction by the working fluid Pb -Li Solubility of tritium in Pb -Li is low Tritium safety 100 M W plant size Low tritium inventory (2g) Pneumatic energy storage >100X lower System cost cost than capacitors Cost of targets in pulsed Liquid metal compression systems - “kopeck” problem No consumables Fusion Power Associates, 2011 Annual Meeting 4 Development Plan 4 years PHASE I Proof of principle Completed 2009 PHASE IIa Construct key components at full scale 2.5 years Prove system can be built $30M Progress to Date Plasma compression tests PHASE II 2012 PHASE IIb 2 years Demonstration of Net Gain Build net gain prototype $35M