Understanding the Marine Environment – Seabed Habitat Investigations of Submarine Structures in the Mid Irish Sea and Solan Bank Area of Search (Aos)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Understanding the Marine Environment – Seabed Habitat Investigations of Submarine Structures in the Mid Irish Sea and Solan Bank Area of Search (Aos) JNCC Report No. 430 Understanding the marine environment – seabed habitat investigations of submarine structures in the mid Irish Sea and Solan Bank Area of Search (AoS) Paul Whomersley, Christian Wilson, Annika Clements, Craig Brown, David Long, Alick Leslie and David Limpenny March 2010 © JNCC, Peterborough 2010 ISSN 0963-8091 For further information please contact: Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1JY Email: [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)1733 866840 Fax: +44 (0)1733 555948 Website: www.jncc.gov.uk This report should be cited as: Whomersley, P., Wilson, C., Clements, A., Brown, C., Long, D., Leslie, A. & Limpenny. D. 2010. Understanding the marine environment – seabed habitat investigations of submarine structures in the mid Irish Sea and Solan Bank Area of Search (AoS). JNCC Report No. 430. Understanding the marine environment – seabed habitat investigations of submarine structures in the mid Irish Sea and Solan Bank Area of Search (AoS)` Contents 1 Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Submarine structures in the mid-Irish Sea ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Solan Bank ............................................................................................................................. 2 2 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Location of Areas of Search .................................................................................................. 3 2.1.1 Submarine structures in the mid-Irish Sea ........................................................................ 3 2.1.2 Solan Bank ........................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 Main Aims of Project ............................................................................................................ 4 2.3 Submarine structures in the mid-Irish Sea AoS ..................................................................... 6 2.4 Regional geology of the Submarine structures in the mid-Irish Sea AoS ............................. 7 2.4.1 Bedrock Geology .............................................................................................................. 8 2.4.2 Quaternary Geology ........................................................................................................ 10 2.4.3 Seabed sediments and morphology ................................................................................. 12 2.4.4 Shallow gas ..................................................................................................................... 13 2.5 Biological context ................................................................................................................ 15 2.6 Solan Bank AoS .................................................................................................................. 17 2.6.1 Regional geology of the Solan Bank AoS ....................................................................... 18 2.6.2 Major structural features ................................................................................................. 21 2.6.3 Post-Jurassic history ........................................................................................................ 23 2.7 Biological context ................................................................................................................ 23 3 Survey design and methods .......................................................................................................... 25 3.1 Equipment used ................................................................................................................... 25 3.1.1 Hull mounted multibeam echo-sounder system .............................................................. 25 3.1.2 Towed sidescan sonar ..................................................................................................... 25 3.1.3 Camera sledge, camera and video equipment ................................................................. 25 3.1.4 Benthic ground-truthing equipment (Hamon grab and Rock dredge) ............................. 26 3.2 Submarine structures in the mid-Irish Sea AoS ................................................................... 26 3.2.1 Acoustic survey design and methodology ....................................................................... 26 3.2.2 QTC Multiview and CLAMS processing of mid-Irish Sea EM3000D data ................... 29 3.2.3 Video footage and still image acquisition ....................................................................... 31 3.2.4 Video footage and still image processing ....................................................................... 31 3.2.5 Biotope Analysis ............................................................................................................. 32 3.2.6 Stills Analysis .................................................................................................................. 33 3.2.7 Benthic grab sampling ..................................................................................................... 33 3.2.8 Particle size analysis ....................................................................................................... 34 3.3 Solan Bank AoS .................................................................................................................. 34 3.3.1 Acoustic survey design and methodology ....................................................................... 34 3.3.2 QTC Multiview and CLAMS processing of Solan Bank EM3000D data ...................... 34 Understanding the marine environment – seabed habitat investigations of submarine structures in the mid Irish Sea and Solan Bank Area of Search (AoS)` 3.3.3 Video footage and still image acquisition ....................................................................... 36 3.3.4 Biotope Analysis ............................................................................................................. 36 3.3.5 Stills Analysis .................................................................................................................. 36 3.3.6 Benthic grab sampling ..................................................................................................... 38 3.3.7 Particle size analysis ....................................................................................................... 38 3.4 Quality Assurance (QA) procedures .................................................................................... 38 3.4.1 Acoustic data collection and processing ......................................................................... 38 3.4.2 Video and stills analysis .................................................................................................. 38 3.4.3 Infauna sample identification .......................................................................................... 39 3.4.4 Epi-faunal sample identification ..................................................................................... 39 3.4.5 Particle size analysis ....................................................................................................... 39 4 Results .......................................................................................................................................... 40 4.1 Submarine structures in the mid-Irish Sea AoS ................................................................... 40 4.1.1 Geology ........................................................................................................................... 40 4.1.2 Background seabed topography ...................................................................................... 40 4.1.3 MDAC ............................................................................................................................. 41 4.1.4 Formation of the MDAC ................................................................................................. 45 4.1.5 Distribution of MDAC .................................................................................................... 46 4.1.6 Weathering of the MDAC ............................................................................................... 46 4.1.7 MBES and SS (Bathymetry and Backscatter) ................................................................. 48 4.1.8 Surface sediments (From PSA, MBES backscatter/sidescan data) ................................. 54 4.1.9 Epi-fauna (Video, stills and rock dredge samples) .......................................................... 55 4.1.10 Infauna (Hamon grab samples) ................................................................................... 62 4.2 Solan Bank AoS .................................................................................................................. 63 4.2.1 Geology ........................................................................................................................... 63 4.2.2 Seabed morphology ......................................................................................................... 64 4.2.3 MBES and SS (Bathymetry and Backscatter) ................................................................. 66 4.2.4 Surface sediments (From PSA,
Recommended publications
  • High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project
    High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00 For: The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme Report issued 30 August 2002 (Version with minor corrections 16 September 2002) Keith Hiscock, Harvey Tyler-Walters and Hugh Jones Reference: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H. & Jones, H. 2002. High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Report from the Marine Biological Association to The Department of Trade and Industry New & Renewable Energy Programme. (AEA Technology, Environment Contract: W/35/00632/00/00.) Correspondence: Dr. K. Hiscock, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB. [email protected] High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species ii High level environmental screening study for offshore wind farm developments – marine habitats and species Title: High Level Environmental Screening Study for Offshore Wind Farm Developments – Marine Habitats and Species Project. Contract Report: W/35/00632/00/00. Client: Department of Trade and Industry (New & Renewable Energy Programme) Contract management: AEA Technology, Environment. Date of contract issue: 22/07/2002 Level of report issue: Final Confidentiality: Distribution at discretion of DTI before Consultation report published then no restriction. Distribution: Two copies and electronic file to DTI (Mr S. Payne, Offshore Renewables Planning). One copy to MBA library. Prepared by: Dr. K. Hiscock, Dr. H. Tyler-Walters & Hugh Jones Authorization: Project Director: Dr. Keith Hiscock Date: Signature: MBA Director: Prof. S. Hawkins Date: Signature: This report can be referred to as follows: Hiscock, K., Tyler-Walters, H.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Norwegian Sea Slugs (Nudibranchia): New Species to Norwegian Coastal Waters and New Data on Distribution of Rare Species
    Fauna norvegica 2013 Vol. 32: 45-52. ISSN: 1502-4873 Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species Jussi Evertsen1 and Torkild Bakken1 Evertsen J, Bakken T. 2013. Diversity of Norwegian sea slugs (Nudibranchia): new species to Norwegian coastal waters and new data on distribution of rare species. Fauna norvegica 32: 45-52. A total of 5 nudibranch species are reported from the Norwegian coast for the first time (Doridoxa ingolfiana, Goniodoris castanea, Onchidoris sparsa, Eubranchus rupium and Proctonotus mucro- niferus). In addition 10 species that can be considered rare in Norwegian waters are presented with new information (Lophodoris danielsseni, Onchidoris depressa, Palio nothus, Tritonia griegi, Tritonia lineata, Hero formosa, Janolus cristatus, Cumanotus beaumonti, Berghia norvegica and Calma glau- coides), in some cases with considerable changes to their distribution. These new results present an update to our previous extensive investigation of the nudibranch fauna of the Norwegian coast from 2005, which now totals 87 species. An increase in several new species to the Norwegian fauna and new records of rare species, some with considerable updates, in relatively few years results mainly from sampling effort and contributions by specialists on samples from poorly sampled areas. doi: 10.5324/fn.v31i0.1576. Received: 2012-12-02. Accepted: 2012-12-20. Published on paper and online: 2013-02-13. Keywords: Nudibranchia, Gastropoda, taxonomy, biogeography 1. Museum of Natural History and Archaeology, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NO-7491 Trondheim, Norway Corresponding author: Jussi Evertsen E-mail: [email protected] IntRODUCTION the main aims.
    [Show full text]
  • E Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary
    !e Urban Sanctuary Algae and Marine Invertebrates of Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary Jessica Reeves & John Buckeridge Published by: Greypath Productions Marine Care Ricketts Point PO Box 7356, Beaumaris 3193 Copyright © 2012 Marine Care Ricketts Point !is work is copyright. Apart from any use permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission of the publisher. Photographs remain copyright of the individual photographers listed. ISBN 978-0-9804483-5-1 Designed and typeset by Anthony Bright Edited by Alison Vaughan Printed by Hawker Brownlow Education Cheltenham, Victoria Cover photo: Rocky reef habitat at Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary, David Reinhard Contents Introduction v Visiting the Sanctuary vii How to use this book viii Warning viii Habitat ix Depth x Distribution x Abundance xi Reference xi A note on nomenclature xii Acknowledgements xii Species descriptions 1 Algal key 116 Marine invertebrate key 116 Glossary 118 Further reading 120 Index 122 iii Figure 1: Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary. !e intertidal zone rocky shore platform dominated by the brown alga Hormosira banksii. Photograph: John Buckeridge. iv Introduction Most Australians live near the sea – it is part of our national psyche. We exercise in it, explore it, relax by it, "sh in it – some even paint it – but most of us simply enjoy its changing modes and its fascinating beauty. Ricketts Point Marine Sanctuary comprises 115 hectares of protected marine environment, located o# Beaumaris in Melbourne’s southeast ("gs 1–2). !e sanctuary includes the coastal waters from Table Rock Point to Quiet Corner, from the high tide mark to approximately 400 metres o#shore.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bioturbation Classification of European Marine Infaunal
    A bioturbation classification of European marine infaunal invertebrates Ana M. Queiros 1, Silvana N. R. Birchenough2, Julie Bremner2, Jasmin A. Godbold3, Ruth E. Parker2, Alicia Romero-Ramirez4, Henning Reiss5,6, Martin Solan3, Paul J. Somerfield1, Carl Van Colen7, Gert Van Hoey8 & Stephen Widdicombe1 1Plymouth Marine Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth, PL1 3DH, U.K. 2The Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science, Pakefield Road, Lowestoft, NR33 OHT, U.K. 3Department of Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, European Way, Southampton SO14 3ZH, U.K. 4EPOC – UMR5805, Universite Bordeaux 1- CNRS, Station Marine d’Arcachon, 2 Rue du Professeur Jolyet, Arcachon 33120, France 5Faculty of Biosciences and Aquaculture, University of Nordland, Postboks 1490, Bodø 8049, Norway 6Department for Marine Research, Senckenberg Gesellschaft fu¨ r Naturforschung, Su¨ dstrand 40, Wilhelmshaven 26382, Germany 7Marine Biology Research Group, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281/S8, Ghent 9000, Belgium 8Bio-Environmental Research Group, Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research (ILVO-Fisheries), Ankerstraat 1, Ostend 8400, Belgium Keywords Abstract Biodiversity, biogeochemical, ecosystem function, functional group, good Bioturbation, the biogenic modification of sediments through particle rework- environmental status, Marine Strategy ing and burrow ventilation, is a key mediator of many important geochemical Framework Directive, process, trait. processes in marine systems. In situ quantification of bioturbation can be achieved in a myriad of ways, requiring expert knowledge, technology, and Correspondence resources not always available, and not feasible in some settings. Where dedi- Ana M. Queiros, Plymouth Marine cated research programmes do not exist, a practical alternative is the adoption Laboratory, Prospect Place, The Hoe, Plymouth PL1 3DH, U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an Updated Checklist
    Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Taxonomic Paper Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist Chryssanthi Antoniadou‡, Vasilis Gerovasileiou§§, Nicolas Bailly ‡ Department of Zoology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece § Institute of Marine Biology, Biotechnology and Aquaculture, Hellenic Centre for Marine Research, Heraklion, Greece Corresponding author: Chryssanthi Antoniadou ([email protected]) Academic editor: Christos Arvanitidis Received: 18 May 2016 | Accepted: 17 Jul 2016 | Published: 01 Nov 2016 Citation: Antoniadou C, Gerovasileiou V, Bailly N (2016) Ascidiacea (Chordata: Tunicata) of Greece: an updated checklist. Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e9273. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e9273 Abstract Background The checklist of the ascidian fauna (Tunicata: Ascidiacea) of Greece was compiled within the framework of the Greek Taxon Information System (GTIS), an application of the LifeWatchGreece Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) aiming to produce a complete checklist of species recorded from Greece. This checklist was constructed by updating an existing one with the inclusion of recently published records. All the reported species from Greek waters were taxonomically revised and cross-checked with the Ascidiacea World Database. New information The updated checklist of the class Ascidiacea of Greece comprises 75 species, classified in 33 genera, 12 families, and 3 orders. In total, 8 species have been added to the previous species list (4 Aplousobranchia, 2 Phlebobranchia, and 2 Stolidobranchia). Aplousobranchia was the most speciose order, followed by Stolidobranchia. Most species belonged to the families Didemnidae, Polyclinidae, Pyuridae, Ascidiidae, and Styelidae; these 4 families comprise 76% of the Greek ascidian species richness. The present effort revealed the limited taxonomic research effort devoted to the ascidian fauna of Greece, © Antoniadou C et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Leafy Bryozoans and Other Bryozoan Species in General Play an Important Role in Marine Ecosystems
    These wash up on the shoreline looking like Flustra foliacea clumps of seaweed. Class: Gymnolaemata Order: Cheilostomata Family: Flustridae Genus: Flustra Distribution Flustra foliacea has a wide It is common to the coastal areas of northern Europe especially distribution in the North in the North Sea. Countries include Britain, Ireland, Belgium, Atlantic Ocean, on both the Netherlands, and France. It does not continue any further south European and American than northern Spain. In Canada it is in Nova Scotian waters, sides. including the Bay of Fundy and the Minas Basin. Habitat It most frequently occurs between 10-20 m water depths. It is This is a cold water species. typically found on the upper faces of moderately wave-exposed It prefers high salinity bedrock or boulders subjected to moderately strong tidal waters, but can also found streams. These rocky patches may be interspersed with gravelly in areas with lower salinity. sand patches, causing a scouring effect. Most Bryozoans live in It occupies sublittoral salt water, and of the 20 or so freshwater species found in North (below low tide) areas. America, most are found in warm-water regions attached to plants, logs, rocks and other firm substrates. Food This species is an active This is a colonial animal composed of various types of zooids. A suspension feeder. They zooid is a single animal that is part of the colony. The basic consume phytoplankton, zooids are the feeding ones, called the autozooid. Each of these detritus, and dissolved has a mouth and a feeding structure, the lophophore, which is organic matter.
    [Show full text]
  • FROM ROCAS ATOLL, BRAZIL, with the DESCRIPTION of a NEW SPECIES 1 (With 4 Figures)
    Arquivos do Museu Nacional, Rio de Janeiro, v.65, n.3, p.363-368, jul./set.2007 ISSN 0365-4508 SABELLIDAE LATREILLE, 1825 (ANNELIDA, POLYCHAETA) FROM ROCAS ATOLL, BRAZIL, WITH THE DESCRIPTION OF A NEW SPECIES 1 (With 4 figures) ELISA MARIA COSTA-PAIVA 2, 3 PAULO CESAR PAIVA 2 ABSTRACT: Three species of sabellids belonging to the genera Bispira and Notaulax were found in Rocas Atoll, Rio Grande do Norte State (RN), Brazil (3 o51’30”S and 33 o49’29”W). Among them, Bispira klautae is a new species. The description of this new species and a redescription of B. melanostigma and N. occidentalis are provided. Key words: Polychaeta. Sabellidae. Rocas Atoll. Brazil. New species. RESUMO: Sabellidae Latreille, 1825 (Annelida, Polychaeta) do Atol das Rocas, Brasil, com a descrição de uma nova espécie. Três espécies de sabelídeos pertencentes aos gêneros Bispira e Notaulax foram encontrados no Atol das Rocas, Rio Grande do Norte (RN), Brasil (3 o51’30”S e 33 o49’29”W). Dentre estas, uma nova espécie: Bispira klautae . Além da descrição desta nova espécie, é fornecida a redescrição de B. melanostigma e N. occidentalis. Palavras-chave: Polychaeta. Sabellidae. Atol das Rocas. Brasil. Espécie nova. INTRODUCTION associated with hard surfaces and soft sediments for all latitudes from intertidal areas to shelf depths After the original description, the first significant (F AUCHALD , 1977; R OUSE & P LEIJEL , 2001; G IANGRANDE subdivision of the Sabellidae was carried by R IOJA & L ICCIANO , 2004). (1923) who divided the family in three subfamilies: The major characteristics used in sabellids taxonomy Myxicolinae, Fabriciinae, and Sabellinae, based include: (a) the presence or absence of companion largely on setal characters.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Monitoring of Subtidal Sponge Assemblages
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 311: 79–91, 2006 Published April 13 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Morphological monitoring of subtidal sponge assemblages James J. Bell1,*, Mark Burton2, Blaise Bullimore2, Philip B. Newman2, Kate Lock2 1Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Wales, Aberystwyth, Edward Llwyd Building, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 3DA, UK 2Skomer Marine Nature Reserve, Countryside Council for Wales, Fishermans Cottage, Martins Haven, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire SA62 3BJ, UK ABSTRACT: The management of the marine environment requires effective temporal monitoring of communities and assemblages to detect any change above the level of natural variability. Even though sponges are usually abundant in subtidal hard substratum environments and have the ability to significantly influence other community members, they have often been excluded from monitoring programmes because they are taxonomically difficult and often hard to quantify compared to other marine groups. We consider the use of a morphological method to examine photoquadrat data collected at 3 hard substratum sites over a 10 yr period at Skomer Marine Nature Reserve, south-west Wales. Differences in the morphological assemblages and abundance were apparent between years, but the sponge assemblages showed rapid recovery (within 1 yr) to their original assemblage composition and abundance following declines. The changes were attributed to natural biological variation or a short-term impact, rather than any response to prolonged environmental change and there was no correlation between any of the changes in assemblages observed and the environmen- tal variables measured. A comparison of morphological and species data enabled the same sponge assemblages to be identified at different sites, validating the method. This morphological approach to monitoring represents a cost-effective and realistic way of monitoring certain sponge assemblages.
    [Show full text]
  • THE LISTING of PHILIPPINE MARINE MOLLUSKS Guido T
    August 2017 Guido T. Poppe A LISTING OF PHILIPPINE MARINE MOLLUSKS - V1.00 THE LISTING OF PHILIPPINE MARINE MOLLUSKS Guido T. Poppe INTRODUCTION The publication of Philippine Marine Mollusks, Volumes 1 to 4 has been a revelation to the conchological community. Apart from being the delight of collectors, the PMM started a new way of layout and publishing - followed today by many authors. Internet technology has allowed more than 50 experts worldwide to work on the collection that forms the base of the 4 PMM books. This expertise, together with modern means of identification has allowed a quality in determinations which is unique in books covering a geographical area. Our Volume 1 was published only 9 years ago: in 2008. Since that time “a lot” has changed. Finally, after almost two decades, the digital world has been embraced by the scientific community, and a new generation of young scientists appeared, well acquainted with text processors, internet communication and digital photographic skills. Museums all over the planet start putting the holotypes online – a still ongoing process – which saves taxonomists from huge confusion and “guessing” about how animals look like. Initiatives as Biodiversity Heritage Library made accessible huge libraries to many thousands of biologists who, without that, were not able to publish properly. The process of all these technological revolutions is ongoing and improves taxonomy and nomenclature in a way which is unprecedented. All this caused an acceleration in the nomenclatural field: both in quantity and in quality of expertise and fieldwork. The above changes are not without huge problematics. Many studies are carried out on the wide diversity of these problems and even books are written on the subject.
    [Show full text]
  • A Biotope Sensitivity Database to Underpin Delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the Seas Around England and Scotland
    English Nature Research Reports Number 499 A biotope sensitivity database to underpin delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the seas around England and Scotland Harvey Tyler-Walters Keith Hiscock This report has been prepared by the Marine Biological Association of the UK (MBA) as part of the work being undertaken in the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). The report is part of a contract placed by English Nature, additionally supported by Scottish Natural Heritage, to assist in the provision of sensitivity information to underpin the implementation of the Habitats Directive and the UK Biodiversity Action Plan. The views expressed in the report are not necessarily those of the funding bodies. Any errors or omissions contained in this report are the responsibility of the MBA. February 2003 You may reproduce as many copies of this report as you like, provided such copies stipulate that copyright remains, jointly, with English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Marine Biological Association of the UK. ISSN 0967-876X © Joint copyright 2003 English Nature, Scottish Natural Heritage and the Marine Biological Association of the UK. Biotope sensitivity database Final report This report should be cited as: TYLER-WALTERS, H. & HISCOCK, K., 2003. A biotope sensitivity database to underpin delivery of the Habitats Directive and Biodiversity Action Plan in the seas around England and Scotland. Report to English Nature and Scottish Natural Heritage from the Marine Life Information Network (MarLIN). Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the UK. [Final Report] 2 Biotope sensitivity database Final report Contents Foreword and acknowledgements.............................................................................................. 5 Executive summary .................................................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction to the project ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Habitats Et Communautés Benthiques Du Bassin Oriental De La Manche
    UNIVERSITE LILLE NORD DE FRANCE ECOLE DOCTORALE Sciences de la Matière, du Rayonnement et de l’Environnement Thèse pour obtenir le grade de DOCTEUR DE L’UNIVERSITE LILLE 1 Discipline : Géosciences, Ecologie, Paléontologie, Océanographie Par Aurélie FOVEAU HABITATS ET COMMUNAUTES BENTHIQUES DU BASSIN ORIENTAL DE LA MANCHE : ETAT DES LIEUX AU DEBUT DU XXIème SIECLE Soutenue le 14 décembre 2009 devant un jury composé de : Roger COGGAN, CEFAS Examinateur Jean‐Claude DAUVIN, professeur, Université Lille 1 Co‐directeur de thèse Steven DEGRAER, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences Rapporteur Nicolas DESROY, cadre de recherche, IFREMER Co‐directeur de thèse Jean‐Marie DEWARUMEZ, ingénieur de recherche, CNRS Co‐directeur de thèse Christian HILY, chargé de recherche, CNRS Rapporteur François SCHMITT, directeur de recherche, CNRS Examinateur Alain TRENTESAUX, professeur, Université Lille 1 Président du Jury 1 RESUME Cette étude est consacrée à la réactualisation de la distribution spatiale des communautés macrobenthiques du bassin oriental de la Manche au début des années 2000, avec une comparaison avec celles identifiées par L. Cabioch et ses collaborateurs pour la période 1971-1976. La distribution des communautés macrobenthiques étant régie pro parte par la couverture sédimentaire, la nature des fonds du bassin oriental de la Manche a été caractérisée et cartographiée à partir de la classification de Folk pour les deux périodes étudiées. Une relative stabilité de la couverture sédimentaire a été mise en évidence : 69 % de la zone étudiée présentant peu ou pas de changements. Ces observations ont été mises en relation avec l’hydrodynamisme, facteur structurant dominant de la couverture sédimentaire en Manche. Les zones où un changement est observable se situent dans les baies, à la sortie des estuaires et à proximité des zones connues de bancs de sable.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Environmental Conditions Update Report
    ISLANDMAGEE GAS STORAGE FACILITY Marine Environmental Conditions Update Report IBE1600/Rpt/01 Marine Environmental Conditions Update F02 9 December 2019 rpsgroup.com ISLANDMAGEE GAS STORAGE FACILITY Document status Version Purpose of document Authored by Reviewed by Approved by Review date D01 Marine Licencing DH MB AGB 29/10/2019 F01 Marine Licencing DH MB AGB 31/10/2019 F02 Marine Licencing DH MB AGB 09/12/2019 Approval for issue AGB 9 December 2019 © Copyright RPS Group Plc. All rights reserved. The report has been prepared for the exclusive use of our client and unless otherwise agreed in writing by RPS Group Plc, any of its subsidiaries, or a related entity (collectively 'RPS'), no other party may use, make use of, or rely on the contents of this report. The report has been compiled using the resources agreed with the client and in accordance with the scope of work agreed with the client. No liability is accepted by RPS for any use of this report, other than the purpose for which it was prepared. The report does not account for any changes relating to the subject matter of the report, or any legislative or regulatory changes that have occurred since the report was produced and that may affect the report. RPS does not accept any responsibility or liability for loss whatsoever to any third party caused by, related to or arising out of any use or reliance on the report. RPS accepts no responsibility for any documents or information supplied to RPS by others and no legal liability arising from the use by others of opinions or data contained in this report.
    [Show full text]