Charlotte Perkins Gilman Portrait of Charlotte Perkins Stetson [Gilman] by Charles Walter Stetson, 1891

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charlotte Perkins Gilman Portrait of Charlotte Perkins Stetson [Gilman] by Charles Walter Stetson, 1891 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by KnowledgeBank at OSU Charlotte Perkins Gilman Portrait of Charlotte Perkins Stetson [Gilman] by Charles Walter Stetson, 1891. Courtesy of Walter Stetson Chamberlin. Charlotte Perkins Gilman New Texts, New Contexts EDITED BY Jennifer S. Tuttle & Carol Farley Kessler THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY PRESS · COLUMBUS Copyright © 2011 by The Ohio State University. All rights reserved. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Charlotte Perkins Gilman : new texts, new contexts / edited and with an introduction by Jennifer S. Tuttle and Carol Farley Kessler. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8142-1144-1 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8142-1144-5 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-8142-9243-3 (cd) 1. Gilman, Charlotte Perkins, 1860–1935—Criticism and interpretation. 2. Feminism and literature—United States—History—19th century. 3. Feminism and literature— United States—History—20th century. 4. Women and literature—United States—His- tory—19th century. 5. Women and literature—United States—History—20th century. I. Tuttle, Jennifer S., 1967– II. Kessler, Carol Farley, 1936–. PS1744.G57Z617 2011 818'.409—dc22 2010024754 This book is available in the following editions: Cloth (ISBN 978-08142-1144-1) CD-ROM (ISBN 978-08142-9243-3) Cover design by Larry Nozik. Type set in Adobe Sabon. Printed by Thomson-Shore, Inc. The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials. ANSI Z39.48-1992. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction Jennifer S. Tuttle and Carol Farley Kessler 1 Part I. BIOGRAPHICAL AND CRITICAL OVERVIEWS Chapter 1 “that pure New England stock”: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and the Construction of Identity Denise D. Knight 27 Chapter 2 Looking Backward: Rereading Gilman in the Early Twenty-First Century Catherine J. Golden 44 Part II. NEW TEXTS Chapter 3 The Torn Voice in “The Giant Wistaria” and “The Unnatural Mother” Jill Rudd 69 Chapter 4 An “Absent Mother”: Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Mag—Marjorie, and the Politics of Maternal Responsibility Charlotte J. Rich 85 Chapter 5 Turning “The Balsam Fir” into Mag—Marjorie: Generic Transposition in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Imaginative Economy Frederick Wegener 103 Contents Chapter 6 “The Same Revulsion against Them All”: Ida Tarbell and Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Suffrage Dialogue Aleta Feinsod Cane 122 Chapter 7 Doing It “man-fashion”: Gender Performance in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s Unpunished Jill Bergman 140 Part III. NEW CONTEXTS Chapter 8 “There are things in that paper that nobody knows but me”: An Alternative Reading of Neurasthenia Jennifer Lunden 161 Chapter 9 The Yellow Newspaper: Charlotte Perkins Gilman and Sensational Journalism Sari Edelstein 180 Chapter 10 The Madwoman’s Other Sisters: Charlotte Perkins Gilman, Gloria Naylor, and the Re-Inscription of Loss Caroline Brown 200 Chapter 11 Feminist Humor and Charlotte Perkins Gilman Shelley Fisher Fishkin 222 Contributors 251 Index 255 - vi - Acknowledgments The editors would like to thank the Maine Women Writers Collection and the University of New England (UNE) for hosting the conference “Charlotte Perkins Gilman: Then & Now,” June 2006; their support, along with the co- sponsorship of the Charlotte Perkins Gilman Society and the rich intellectual contributions of the conference participants, provided the impetus for this volume. We are grateful for financial assistance provided by UNE’s Depart- ment of English and Language Studies. The Maine Women Writers Collec- tion also gave a much appreciated subvention grant. We are indebted to the librarians who graciously and cheerfully helped us with inquiries and interli- brary loans: Roberta Gray, Cally Gurley, Gay Marks, and Laurie Mathes at the Abplanalp Library on the Portland Campus of UNE; Brenda Austin at the Ketchum Library on the UNE Biddeford Campus; Jean Sphar and Susan Ware at the John D. Vairo Library of Penn State Brandywine; and Diana Carey at the Schlesinger Library. Denise D. Knight also answered several queries from her personal library with astonishing promptness, and Cynthia J. Davis generously helped us to secure the frontispiece image. Special thanks go to Lisa M. Thomas for her quick and thorough editing. On behalf of our- selves and the volume contributors, we would like to express our gratitude to Walter Stetson Chamberlin and Linda Chamberlin; the Schlesinger Library, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, Harvard University; and the Women’s History Museum and Educational Center in San Diego, CA for granting us permission to quote from or to print unpublished sources in their hold- ings. Finally, we are grateful to the staff at The Ohio State University Press for their guidance and expertise—particularly Sandy Crooms, who offered unfailing enthusiasm, patience, and support—and to the Press’s anonymous readers, whose suggestions have markedly strengthened the volume. - vii - Introduction JENNIFER S. TUTTLE AND CAROL FARLEY KESSLER A central concern for scholars of U.S. women’s writing has been the recov- ery of lost or unread texts, a process well exemplified by recent work on Charlotte Perkins Gilman. In the twenty-fifth anniversary issue of Legacy: A Journal of American Women Writers (26.2 [2009]), critics participat- ing in a roundtable discussion assess the successes and failures of recovery during the past the three decades or so. Recovering the writing of women, through scholarship and through modern editions, has been a central, even generative, component of many academic fields that have proliferated since the 1970s, not only literary criticism and women’s history but also women’s studies, cultural studies, and other cross-disciplinary areas of investigation. While a need for unearthing unknown authors and their texts remains, how- ever, in the Legacy roundtable Sharon M. Harris suggests that today scholars are “in need of new recovery that asks us to interrogate our long-held (or even newly embraced) ideas about women writers in continually expanding ways” (Tuttle, “Legacy Roundtable” 229). Or, in the words of Lisa A. Long, “while the project [of recovery] remains the same, the terms of the conversa- tion have changed dramatically in the past twenty-five years”: we need to “trouble,” rather than to “reify,” our categories and objects of study (Tuttle, “Legacy” 230). The field of Charlotte Perkins Gilman studies mirrors these larger trends. Indeed, more than ten years ago, at the Second International Charlotte Perkins Gilman Conference in 1997, Gary Scharnhorst issued a call for scholars to think differently about Gilman—to look beyond her most acces- - 1 - Introduction sible works and genres to recover her entire body of work, and to resist the temptation to idealize or sanitize it to fit their own agendas. “[A]s scholars,” he urged, “we should read all of her work we can find but read it critically, measuring her achievement on a historical template, situating her not only in our time but in her own” (“Historicizing” 72). This volume takes up that challenge, representing a new groundswell of work in Gilman studies. During her lifetime, Gilman (1860–1935) was a world-famous writer, lecturer, and reformer, whose work was influential and widely celebrated; she has been called the “leading intellectual in the women’s movement in the United States during the first two decades of the twentieth century” (Degler xiii). At her core a social philosopher, Gilman practiced her art and activism in an array of venues, and her interests were numerous, including women’s issues, labor, human rights, ethics, and social reform. As this volume’s second essay demonstrates, criticism on Gilman has undergone a number of transformations since Carl N. Degler and Elaine R. Hedges first began recovering Gilman’s work in 1966 and 1973, respectively. The initial celebration of the rich vein of writing and artwork left to us by this prolific woman was followed by more critical reconsiderations of her life and accomplishments, ultimately leaving scholars in the ambivalent position of documenting Gilman’s “mixed legacy” of ideas both abhorrent and vision- ary (Golden and Zangrando). And contending with this legacy has sparked a new phase of recovery work, which aims both to “read all of her work we can find” (as Scharnhorst put it) and to understand this work in new, more accurately historicized ways. Certainly, we still need to recover previously unknown documents and information about Gilman. Such work brings recently discovered, unfamil- iar, or otherwise obscure sources to the attention of Gilman scholars.1 But beyond filling such obvious gaps, we need to attend to neglected parts of her oeuvre, to other “new texts”—works that we know exist, and are even in print, but that have not yet received adequate critical scrutiny. While a pro- fusion of scholarship on Gilman has been published, until recently much of it has concerned a small number of her most popular prose works, such as “The Yellow Wall-Paper” (1892), Women and Economics (1898), and Her- land (1915). These were among the first of Gilman’s works to be recovered in the present era. This may be due in part simply to their effectiveness as texts: Gilman, writing always “with a purpose,” had mixed success as a rhetorician whose creative work was invariably didactic (Living 121). Yet such evalua- tive arguments having to do with aesthetic appeal are largely subjective, and they unfairly obscure the skill and subtlety with which much of her work was crafted: it may be neither accurate nor fair to say that these texts have been - 2 - Introduction studied most thoroughly because they are her best work. Another factor that obscured much of Gilman’s other work for so long was its lack of availability. For example, most of her fiction appeared in The Forerunner, which had a very limited circulation, and her unpublished work remained in private hands and institutional repositories.
Recommended publications
  • The Civil War
    HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY Harriet Tubman The Civil War Teacher Guide Union soldier Confederate soldier G2T-U9_The Civil War_FrontCover_TG.indd 1 22/11/19 12:47 AM G2T-U9_The Civil War_TG.indb 2 21/11/19 10:49 PM The Civil War Teacher Guide G2T-U9_The Civil War_TG.indb 1 21/11/19 10:49 PM Creative Commons Licensing This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. You are free: to Share—to copy, distribute, and transmit the work to Remix—to adapt the work Under the following conditions: Attribution—You must attribute the work in the following manner: This work is based on an original work of the Core Knowledge® Foundation (www.coreknowledge.org) made available through licensing under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. This does not in any way imply that the Core Knowledge Foundation endorses this work. Noncommercial—You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike—If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. With the understanding that: For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ Copyright © 2019 Core Knowledge Foundation www.coreknowledge.org 8 All Rights Reserved. - 5 Core Knowledge®, Core Knowledge Curriculum Series™, Core Knowledge History and Geography™, and CKHG™ are trademarks of the Core Knowledge Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • "There's a Way to Alter the Pain". Biblical Revision and African
    11 1. Introduction The angel of the LORD found Hagar near a spring in the desert […] "Hagar, servant of Sarai, where have you come from, and where are you going?" "I'm running away from my mistress Sarai," she answered. Then the angel of the LORD told her, "Go back to your mistress and submit to her." The angel added, "I will so increase your descendants that they will be too numerous to count." […] She gave this name to the LORD who spoke to her: "You are the God who sees me," for she said, "I have now seen the One who sees me.1 Ah wanted to preach a great sermon about colored women sittin’ on high, but they wasn’t no pulpit for me […] Freedom found me wid a baby daughter in mah arms, so Ah said Ah’s take a broom and a cook-pot and throw up a highway though de wilderness for her. She would expound what Ah felt. But somehow she got lost offa de highway and next thing Ah knowed here was you in de world. So whilst Ah was tendin’ you of nights Ah said Ah’d save de text for you.2 A few years short of the turn of the 19th century, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, an out- spoken leading figure in the early women’s rights movement, refused to attend a suffragists prayer meeting that was to begin with the singing of the hymn Guide Us, O Thou Great Jehovah. Her reasons for not attending, recounts Elisabeth Schüssler-Fiorenza in In Memory Of Her, was her conviction that the Biblical Jehovah had “never taken any active part in the suffrage movement”3 and that ecclesiastical teachings made Christian women falsely believe that any man had “ever [seen] or talked with God.”4 Her experience of the seeming indifference of a patriarchal Yahweh figure preached in church towards the rights of the op- pressed sparked her deep personal conviction that the Bible itself carried great political influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Catharine Beecher, Domestic Economy, and Social Reform
    Constructing the Past Volume 7 Issue 1 Article 5 2006 Architecture of the Millennium: Catharine Beecher, Domestic Economy, and Social Reform Erie M. Roberts Illinois Wesleyan University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing Recommended Citation Roberts, Erie M. (2006) "Architecture of the Millennium: Catharine Beecher, Domestic Economy, and Social Reform," Constructing the Past: Vol. 7 : Iss. 1 , Article 5. Available at: https://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/constructing/vol7/iss1/5 This Article is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Commons @ IWU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this material in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This material has been accepted for inclusion by editorial board of the Undergraduate Economic Review and the Economics Department at Illinois Wesleyan University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ©Copyright is owned by the author of this document. Architecture of the Millennium: Catharine Beecher, Domestic Economy, and Social Reform Abstract This article discusses Catherine Beecher's ideas about how women, as the Christian moral center and teachers, could reform American society. She put homemakers at a center of power, since she believed that they would be able to not only teach children to become true Christian citizens, but reform men as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Harriet Beecher Stowe Papers in the HBSC Collection
    Harriet Beecher Stowe Papers in the Harriet Beecher Stowe Center’s Collections Finding Aid To schedule a research appointment, please call the Collections Manager at 860.522.9258 ext. 313 or email [email protected] Harriet Beecher Stowe Papers in the Stowe Center's Collection Note: See end of document for manuscript type definitions. Manuscript type & Recipient Title Date Place length Collection Summary Other Information [Stowe's first known letter] Ten year-old Harriet Beecher writes to her older brother Edward attending Yale. She would like to see "my little sister Isabella". Foote family news. Talks of spending the Nutplains summer at Nutplains. Asks him to write back. Loose signatures of Beecher, Edward (1803-1895) 1822 March 14 [Guilford, CT] ALS, 1 pp. Acquisitions Lyman Beecher and HBS. Album which belonged to HBS; marbelized paper with red leather spine. First written page inscribed: Your Affectionate Father Lyman At end, 1 1/2-page mss of a 28 verse, seven Beecher Sufficient to the day is the evil thereof. Hartford Aug 24, stanza poem, composed by Mrs. Stowe, 1840". Pages 2 and 3 include a poem. There follow 65 mss entitled " Who shall not fear thee oh Lord". poems, original and quotes, and prose from relatives and friends, This poem seems never to have been Katharine S. including HBS's teacher at Miss Pierece's school in Litchfield, CT, published. [Pub. in The Hartford Courant Autograph Bound mss, 74 Day, Bound John Brace. Also two poems of Mrs. Hemans, copied in HBS's Sunday Magazine, Sept., 1960].Several album 1824-1844 Hartford, CT pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Harriet Beecher Stowe's Multifaceted Response to the Nineteenth
    Harriet Beecher Stowe’s Multifaceted Response to the Nineteenth-Century Woman Question amy easton-flake Downloaded from http://direct.mit.edu/tneq/article-pdf/86/1/29/1793865/tneq_a_00256.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 N the decade following the American Civil War, the I renowned children of Lyman Beecher each took his or her own position along the broad spectrum of debate con- cerning woman suffrage. Henry Ward Beecher served as the first president of the American Woman Suffrage Association (estab. 1869); Isabella Beecher Hooker worked closely with Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony in the National Woman Suffrage Association (estab. 1869); Catharine Beecher helped found the first female-led antisuffrage association, the Anti-Sixteenth Amendment Society (estab. 1870); and Harriet Beecher Stowe, despite pressure from her siblings and other movement leaders and an obvious interest in the issue, re- mained aloof from all organized groups. In the absence of any definitive statement from her, each faction claimed her as an advocate. Between 1870 and 1871, for example, each organi- zation’s journal either listed Stowe as a contributor or quoted from her writings.1 In recent years, literary critics Josephine Donovan and Bar- bara A. White have investigated Stowe’s relation to suffrage 1Stanton listed both Isabella Beecher Hooker and Harriet Beecher Stowe as “prin- cipal contributors” (p. 397)inthe23 December 1869 Revolution, organ of the National Woman Suffrage Association, although Stowe never contributed a single piece of writ- ing to it. Stowe did contribute numerous pieces to the Woman’s Journal. For instance, she praised the Woman’s Journal for its “conservative religious tone” and for not fol- lowing George Sand and the French Woman’s movement (3 September 1870,p.273).
    [Show full text]
  • American Heritage Day
    American Heritage Day DEAR PARENTS, Each year the elementary school students at Valley Christian Academy prepare a speech depicting the life of a great American man or woman. The speech is written in the first person and should include the character’s birth, death, and major accomplishments. Parents should feel free to help their children write these speeches. A good way to write the speech is to find a child’s biography and follow the story line as you construct the speech. This will make for a more interesting speech rather than a mere recitation of facts from the encyclopedia. Students will be awarded extra points for including spiritual application in their speeches. Please adhere to the following time limits. K-1 Speeches must be 1-3 minutes in length with a minimum of 175 words. 2-3 Speeches must be 2-5 minutes in length with a minimum of 350 words. 4-6 Speeches must be 3-10 minutes in length with a minimum of 525 words. Students will give their speeches in class. They should be sure to have their speeches memorized well enough so they do not need any prompts. Please be aware that students who need frequent prompting will receive a low grade. Also, any student with a speech that doesn’t meet the minimum requirement will receive a “D” or “F.” Students must portray a different character each year. One of the goals of this assignment is to help our children learn about different men and women who have made America great. Help your child choose characters from whom they can learn much.
    [Show full text]
  • Selected Highlights of Women's History
    Selected Highlights of Women’s History United States & Connecticut 1773 to 2015 The Permanent Commission on the Status of Women omen have made many contributions, large and Wsmall, to the history of our state and our nation. Although their accomplishments are too often left un- recorded, women deserve to take their rightful place in the annals of achievement in politics, science and inven- Our tion, medicine, the armed forces, the arts, athletics, and h philanthropy. 40t While this is by no means a complete history, this book attempts to remedy the obscurity to which too many Year women have been relegated. It presents highlights of Connecticut women’s achievements since 1773, and in- cludes entries from notable moments in women’s history nationally. With this edition, as the PCSW celebrates the 40th anniversary of its founding in 1973, we invite you to explore the many ways women have shaped, and continue to shape, our state. Edited and designed by Christine Palm, Communications Director This project was originally created under the direction of Barbara Potopowitz with assistance from Christa Allard. It was updated on the following dates by PCSW’s interns: January, 2003 by Melissa Griswold, Salem College February, 2004 by Nicole Graf, University of Connecticut February, 2005 by Sarah Hoyle, Trinity College November, 2005 by Elizabeth Silverio, St. Joseph’s College July, 2006 by Allison Bloom, Vassar College August, 2007 by Michelle Hodge, Smith College January, 2013 by Andrea Sanders, University of Connecticut Information contained in this book was culled from many sources, including (but not limited to): The Connecticut Women’s Hall of Fame, the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Context, Intention, and Purpose in "The Yellow Wall-Paper": a Tale In
    CONTEXT, INTENTION, AND PURPOSE IN “THE YELLOW WALL-PAPER”, A TALE IN THE POE AND THE ROMANTIC TRADITION GEORGE MONTEIRO Brown University/USA Over the last twenty-five years there has been a dramatic increase overall in the attention paid to Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wall- paper.” Critics, scholars, and feminists, in and out of the academy, have discovered in this story, first published in 1892, cultural, historical, and ideological conflicts and implications that were hardly perceived by Gilman’s readers during the first eight decades of her story’s existence. During this period of “rediscovery” there have been some formal analyses of style and structure, but these have been greatly outnumbered by pieces that are predominantly political in intention, designed and narrowed down to serve in the furtherance of causes and attitudes. The programmatically political, however, is not of major concern here. The vein to be worked here is somewhat different: an examination of Gilman’s Fragmentos, número 17, p. 041/054 Florianópolis/ jul - dez/ 1999 41 sense of her story’s purpose and its potential social uses, and an essay at placing “The Yellow Wall-paper” within the Poe tradition of the American short story—a connection discerned by two or three of Gilman’s reviewers but subsequently ignored (or denied in the omission) by her readers.1 Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s single most influential piece of fiction had, in its times, its own designs, and in certain important ways, continues to do so. If by the author’s own admission “The Yellow Wall-paper” was intended as a cautionary tale regarding the dire consequences of applying the so- called rest cure to treat “nervous” women, it cannot be over-emphasized that it is, after all, a tale, and therefore does not follow the “objective” rules or intentions of what one might call a case history.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Kind of People: Social Status and Class Awareness in Post -Reconstruction African American Fiction
    OUR KIND OF PEOPLE: SOCIAL STATUS AND CLASS AWARENESS IN POST -RECONSTRUCTION AFRICAN AMERICAN FICTION Andreá N. Williams A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of English Chapel Hill 2006 Approved by Advisor: William L. Andrews Reader: James W. Coleman Reader: Philip F. Gura Reader: Trudier Harris Reader: Jane F. Thrailkill © 2006 Andreá N. Williams ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ANDREÁ N. WILLIAMS: Our Kind of People: Social Status and Class Awareness in Post -Reconstruction African American Fiction (Under the dir ection of William L. Andrews) Postbellum African American fiction provides an index to the complex attitudes toward social status and class divisions that arose within post -Civil War black communities. As I argue, African American narratives in the last quarter of the nineteenth century encode the discourse of class in discussions of respectability, labor, and discrimination. Conceiving of class as a concept that does not necessarily denote economic conditions, both well -known and largely ignored narrativ es of the period emphasize moral and ideological parameters for judging social distinctions. Writers theorize whether intraracial class stratification thwarts black sociopolitical advancement, fracturing black communities from within, or conversely, foster s racial uplift led by the black “better class.” Though the fiction variably delineates social classes, each of the texts under study in Our Kind of People imagines classification as an inevitable and useful means of reforming the turn -of-the-century Ameri can social order. Subverting the class disparity spurred by Gilded Age materialism, Frances E.
    [Show full text]
  • Reframing National Women's History Month: Practicalities and Consequences
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 5-2021 Reframing National Women's History Month: Practicalities and Consequences Skylar Bre’z Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Women's History Commons, and the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Bre’z, Skylar, "Reframing National Women's History Month: Practicalities and Consequences" (2021). Dissertations. 3715. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/3715 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Reframing National Women's History Month: Practicalities and Consequences by Skylar Bre’z A dissertation submitted to the Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy History Western Michigan University May 2021 Doctoral Committee: Edwin A. Martini, Ph.D., Chair Mitch Kachun, Ph.D. Susan Freeman, Ph.D. Reframing Women's History Month: Practicalities and Consequences Skylar Bre’z, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2021 This study evaluates the practicalities and consequences of designating one month (March) out of the calendar year for the commemoration of women’s history. In the 1970s and 1980s, national women’s organizations such as the Women’s Action Alliance (WAA) collaborated with the Smithsonian Institute and the Women’s History Program at Sarah Lawrence College to build programs to increase awareness of women’s history.
    [Show full text]
  • "The Yellow Wallpaper" and Gilman's Problem with Language
    Approaching the Ineffable: "The Yellow Wallpaper" and Gilman's Problem with Language Jenny Weatherford Copenhagen University The sheer volume of Charlotte Perltins Gilman's oeuvre would seem to testify to Gilman's remarkable facility with language and her passionate belief that "We live, humanly, only through our power of com- m~nication."~As the author of five books of social criticism, eight novels, numerous short stories, an autobiography, dozens of lectures and articles, and her own magazine, Gilman devoted her life to conveying her ideas to others in hopes of fostering a better so~iety.~But for all her productivity and publishing success, Gilman did not feel that language was entirely at her command. Language was for Gilman a rational tool that could be used to explore and mold ideas, but one that was inadequate before the chaos of emotion and psychological pain that tortured her throughout her life. Frustrated by her inability to deal with her personal agony in words, Gilman felt that her pain was locked away in silence and, recognizing that her own experience was not unique, came, as a writer and analyst of woman's condition, to doubt whether language and conventional means of story-telling could ever present an authentic view of a woman's inner experience. Gilman's strong misgivings about 1. Charlotte Perkins Gilinan, The Maiz-Made World (New York: Charlton, 1911; Rpt. New York: Johnson, 1971) 89. 2. In The Liviizg of Charlotte Perkins Gilman: An Autobiography (New Yok: D. Appletoil-Century, 1935. Rpt. Yew York: Arno, 1971), Gilman said that she had "written enough to make a set of twenty-five [books], including volumes of stories, plays, verse, and miscellany" (100).
    [Show full text]
  • Disentangling Panoptic Structures in Charlotte Perkins Gilman's
    Language, Literature, and Interdisciplinary Studies (LLIDS) ISSN: 2547-0044 http://ellids.com/archives/2019/07/2.4-Fox.pdf CC Attribution-No Derivatives 4.0 International License www.ellids.com What Cannot Be (Re)written: Disentangling Panoptic Structures in Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wall-paper” and Herland Heather Fox With its centered tower encircled by inmates’ cells, Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon was an architectural response to an eighteenth- century social problem: how to best control a prison’s population. Its design—a circular structure with a centered tower that is “...pierced with wide windows that open onto the inner side of the ring…and di- vided into cells, each of which extends the whole width of the build- ing”—positions inmates’ bodies relative to the watchtower, in order to perpetuate a sense of constant surveillance.1 The incarcerated cannot see into the watchtower from their cells. They cannot discern whether or not they are actually being observed. Blending this sense of visibil- ity with invisibility, the Panopticon produces docile bodies, evaluated from a distance and controlled through the mind.2 Thus, as Michel Foucault warns in Discipline and Punish (1975), “visibility is a trap” (200). Psychological infrastructure, more than physical design, estab- lishes and re-enforces its power. The Panopticon’s design, however, is not dependent on a prison setting but can be evoked in any setting that constructs a pan- optic relationship between the observer and the observed. Literary representations, such as Charlotte Perkins Gilman’s “The Yellow Wall-paper” and Herland, further illuminate connections between set- ting and psychological control to reinforce oppressive ideology.
    [Show full text]