Plant Associations of the Blue and Ochoco Mountains

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Plant Associations of the Blue and Ochoco Mountains Plant Assocato Is Aqicuirure Forest Sce PN Blue and Ochoco Mountains Chares Grer .Jonpso Jr R6-ERWTP O3C.2 Rodnck CtausnUze ant Ass ai ns Bue Co ont by harles Grier Johnson Jr Rodrick Clausni zer PHOTO CREDITS Cover Late view summer of southern Blue Mountains from Strawber Mountain CO Johnson Jr Title Page View from Monument Rock toward ironaide Mountain C.G Johnson Jr Photos by F.C Hall Pages 25 29 33 35 37 49 61 63 67 69 73 79 81 83 89 91 93 99 105 113 115 119 131 143 155 Photos by CG Johnson Pages 2731 4547515355 57596571858797101 103107 109 lii 117 121 125127 133 135 137 139 141 145 151 153 PREFACE The Blue and Ochoco Mountains were first sampled for ecological classification purposes by Fred Hall in the 1950s and 960s His energy and vision resulted in the first publication of plant community types for the Region The basic choices of where to and how characterize the the put plot to vegetation of Blue and Ochoco Mountains was determined by Fred We have inherited his data added few new plots and designed new classification Wed like to express our for the assistance Fred has in the fundamental data he has formed about appreciation given acquisition the hypotheses the typea and the pioneering pathway he forged in providing the first ecolo9ic document for land managers on the Malheur Ochoco Umatilla and Wallows-Whitman National Forests In the past years the classification effortfor the Blue and Ochoco Mountains has been team effort Wa have produced 1990 classification review 1991 and this the draft publication review dreft finally 1991 field guide In producing review drafts and this final publication we have had excellent fscilitiation from Dr Len Volland Regional Ecologist Chuck Ernst Bill Gast and our Area Forest Supervisors Bob Richmond Mark Boche Jim Lawrence and Jeff Blackwood Two formal field reviews were held with many ideas for improvement of the classification and format of the field guide resulting The two review drafts were reproduced for field training end use by the employees of the Area with excellent help from the word processing and document reproduction units of the four National Forest Supervisors Offices The placing of the numbers and words onto the printed page has evolved into an electronic computerized world where the skills of the word influence processing specialist directly the appearance snd utility of the final document We have been fortunate to have some very dedicated and extramely helpful word processing people in the production of our field guide Our heartfelt gratitude to Vicki Medlin for her supervision and to Kathy Hottle and Paula McBroom for thairwisdom and professional attitude as well as those nimble fingersl This classification and field guide is dedicated to our families and posthumously to Tern Cummings dedicated Forest Service lost before she could employee we help us complete this project Charlie and Rod Plant Associations of the Blue and Ochoco Mountains Table of Contents Page Climate -------------------------------------3 ThePlantAssoclatlonConcept --- --- ----------------------------------4 Indicator Species--- -------------------------- DatsAnalysis --- ------ ------ --- Wetland --- ---------------------------- Early Seral Vegetation Disclirnax Communities and Ecotones---------------- -- -- Use of the Field Guide __-__-__ -____ Considerations for Estimating Cover--- __-- to ---------- Keys Blue-Ochoco Mountain Vegetation --- -- 11 Kay to Subalpine Fir Series Vegetstion--------------- -------------------------------- ------- 12 Key to Grand Fir Series Vegatation------------ --------------------------------_ 14 Key to Lodgepole Pine Series Vegetation ----------------------------------- ----- 16 Kay to Douglas-fir Series Vegetation ---. _---------------_-_-__------ ----- 17 Kay to Ponderosa Pine Series Vegetation ------. -------------- --- ----- 16 Key to Western Juniper Series Vegetation ------- -------- ---- 20 KaytoShrublarrdVegetstion------------ --------------------------------------- ------- 21 KaytoGrasslandVegetstion --_ ------- -------------------- -- 23 SUBALPINE FIR SERIES ABLA2ITRCA3-- -------------------- --------- --25 ABLA2/CLUN ------------------------- 27 ABLA2/LIBO2 --------------------------- 29 ASLA2/MEFE ------ 31 ABLA2NAME ---- __ _- 33 ABLA2NASC ----------------------------_-- -36 ABLA2/CAGE 37 ABLA2/ARCOpct ------------------------- 39 ------- ---- ABLA2/STOC pet ------- ----40 SUBALPINE FIR SERIES coot PICOABLA2NASC pot --- 41 PICOABLA2NAME/CARU pot ------.__ ---------____ -- 42 PlCOAaNAME pot 42 ABLA2/RHAL comm --- 42 ABLA2-PIAUPQpH ABLA2-PIAL/JuDR comm--- ------------.-_ --------------- --43 ABLA2-PIAL/popu oomm--------- ---------------------.--__-_- --43 HCOABLA2/CAGE oomm---------___ --- ---------_-____ ---------------- 43 PICOABLA2/STOC comm -_-_--_-___ ---------------- -- -43 GRAND FIR SERIES ABGR/GYDR-_ ----- ------_--___--__ ABGAIPOMU-ASCA3 ------- -------------_-_ -- ------ -------- 47 ASGR/TRCA3 ---- ABGR -------------- -- -- 51 ABGR/TABR/L1902 --------- 53 ABGR/ACGL-__ -- ------------ ABOR/CLUN----- ------- ----- -- 57 ABGR/LIBO2--_ -- --- -- ABOR/VAME _-___-_ 61 ABGRIVASC-L1802 ------_ -------- --- 63 ABGRIVASC _----_ -------- 65 ABGR/BRVU ---- ------- --- --------- ---- 67 ABGRISPBE- ------ ------ 69 ABOR/CARU ----__ _------_ 71 ABGR/CAGE------ -- -------- ---- -- ABGR/ARCO pot ------ --- 75 PC0ABGRNAMELIBO2 pot ---- 76 PICOABGRNAME/CARU pot ----- -- 76 PICOABGRNAME pot ----- -------- ---- 76 PICOABGR/CARU pot---- ---- ---- 77 PICOABGRNASC/CARU pot ------ ----77 PICOABGRNAME/PTAQ 00mm ----- -----------_-_-_ ----- 77 PICOABGR/ARNE Comm ------------- 77 PICOABGR/AL$I Comm-------_ -- 78 ABGR-CHNONAME Comm ---- ---- -- ------ 78 LODGEPOLE PINE SERIES PICO/CARU- -- ___ _---_ __ 79 DOUGLAS-FIR SERIES PSMEIVAME--- --- PSME/PHMA 81 83 PSME/HODI ------__ PSME/SYAL 85 PSMEISYOR----_ 87 ---- 89 PSME/CARLJ----_ --- PSMEICAGE- ---------------------- 91 -- ---- PSME/CELE/CAGE pcI PONDEROSA PINE SERIES 97 PIPO/CELEIPONE----- --------- -------------------------------- 99 PIPO/CELE/FEID-AGSP PIPO/SYAL----------------- -------------------------- -------- 103 PPO/SYOR --------------------------- ------------------------------ --105 PPO/CARU ------------------------------------------------------ 107 PPO/CAGE --__-_-------------_------------------__ -- ------- ----109 PIPO/PUTR/CARO----- ---------------------------------------------------- --111 PPO/PUTR/CAGE---- ------------------------ ------------------ -----113 PIPO/PUTR/FEID-AGSP -- ----------- -------- 115 PIPO/ARTAV/FEID-AGSP--- --------- ---- ------------- 117 -- ---------------------- PIPO/AGSP------------------------- ---- ------ ------ -----121 PIPO/ARTRV/CAGE Comm ------------ ------- PIPOIPERA3 Comm ----------------- ------------------------------ -123 PPO/ARAR Comm---- ----------- ---- ------- PPO/RHGL Comm ---------------------------- --------- ---124 JUNIPER WOODLANDS JUOCIPUTR/FEID-AGSP-------- --------------- -125 JUOC/FEID-AGSP----- ___- ---- JUOC/CELE/CAGE Comm --_ ---- ---- ---- -129 JUOC/CELE/FEID-AGSP comm ----- --- 129 JUOC/ARTRV/FEI0-AGSP comm ------ 129 JUOC/ARAR comm ----------- ------130 JUOC/ARRI comm -- ------------------ -- 130 SHRUBLANDS __ ___ -------------- CELE/FEID-AGSP-------------------- -------- ----------------- PUTFEID-AGSP------ -- ------- 135 ARTRV/CAGE------ ------- --------- ----------- 137 ARTRV/FEID-AGSP- -------- 139 ARAR/FEID-AGSP ---- ---- -- 141 ARARIPOSA3- ------ -143 ARRVPOSA3 ----- -- -145 ARTRV/ERCA pct-- 147 ARTRV/STOC comm ------ ---147 CAGE comm ----- -- 147 ALSI comm--- 148 CEVEcomm-- -- ------ ____ 148 SYALcomm-- -- ------- ----- SYOR comm- ---------------------- 149 CELE/CAGE comm ____- GRASSLANDS FEID-AGSP AGSP-POSA3 ----1 AGSP-POSA3-DAUN pct---------------_ --- FE\/l subalpine comni -- 158 FEIDsubalpine Comm -- ---- --------- ---158 CAHOsubalpine comm-- -- ----------------_- 158 STOCsubalpine comm -- ---- -161 LiteratureCfted____ ------_____ ------___-__ Appendtces Appendix Table of Types and Relationship to Area Classifications Appendix Blue-Ochoco Species List Appendix Coverage/Constancy Table Appendix Forest Productivity Table Forest Appendix Productivity Classes Appendix Cross Reference List of Plant Associations Appendix Condition Range Standards/Plant Association Cross-References Appendix Ecoclass Codes Listing NTRODUCflON The Blue end Ochoco Mountains Plant Association Classification Field Guide is provided for use by resource managers on land administered by the Forest Service of the Meiheur Ochoco Umatilla end Wallows-Whitman National Forests This is the second classification of the of the vegetation Blue and Ochoco Mountains It is combined revision of the 1973 Plant Community Type classification authored by Dr Frederick Hall as wall as new classification for kinds of not includad earlier vegetation in the work see Appendix This classification was developed with concept similar to that used in the development of the Wallows-Snake Plant Associations completed in 1987 by Johnson and Simon The conceptual approach for these investigations is based on providing the field investigator with floristic indicator which is of environment That environment species diagnostic particular in turn has capability of providing defined plant community which has been described in the pages that follow The focus descriptions on mid to late seral vegetation of the uplands but also included are descriptions of early seral found in the Blue and Ochoco Mountains Earlier seral vegetation commonly upland vegetation is being studied as series of investigations by ecologists
Recommended publications
  • Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the Re-Opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside
    Volcanic Vistas Discover National Forests in Central Oregon Summer 2009 Celebrating the re-opening of Lava Lands Visitor Center Inside.... Be Safe! 2 LAWRENCE A. CHITWOOD Go To Special Places 3 EXHIBIT HALL Lava Lands Visitor Center 4-5 DEDICATED MAY 30, 2009 Experience Today 6 For a Better Tomorrow 7 The Exhibit Hall at Lava Lands Visitor Center is dedicated in memory of Explore Newberry Volcano 8-9 Larry Chitwood with deep gratitude for his significant contributions enlightening many students of the landscape now and in the future. Forest Restoration 10 Discover the Natural World 11-13 Lawrence A. Chitwood Discovery in the Kids Corner 14 (August 4, 1942 - January 4, 2008) Take the Road Less Traveled 15 Larry was a geologist for the Deschutes National Forest from 1972 until his Get High on Nature 16 retirement in June 2007. Larry was deeply involved in the creation of Newberry National Volcanic Monument and with the exhibits dedicated in 2009 at Lava Lands What's Your Interest? Visitor Center. He was well known throughout the The Deschutes and Ochoco National Forests are a recre- geologic and scientific communities for his enthusiastic support for those wishing ation haven. There are 2.5 million acres of forest including to learn more about Central Oregon. seven wilderness areas comprising 200,000 acres, six rivers, Larry was a gifted storyteller and an ever- 157 lakes and reservoirs, approximately 1,600 miles of trails, flowing source of knowledge. Lava Lands Visitor Center and the unique landscape of Newberry National Volcanic Monument. Explore snow- capped mountains or splash through whitewater rapids; there is something for everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Sutton Mountain Painted Hills Pat's Cabin
    visitors guide sutton mountain pat’s cabin painted hills proposed wilderness areas oregon natural desert association John Day River area (photo © Tyler Roemer) area facts Plant Communities Welcome to Sutton Mountain, Pat’s Cabin, Sutton Mountain, Pat’s Cabin, and Painted Hills are all dominated by big sagebrush, Painted Hills Proposed Wilderness Areas native bunchgrasses, and western juniper, Located near Mitchell, Oregon, and surrounding the Painted Hills National Monument, Sutton providing important habitat and forage for Mountain, Pat’s Cabin, and Painted Hills Proposed Wilderness Areas provide spectacular vistas of native wildlife. The sagebrush-juniper wood- the John Day River, Bridge Creek valley and surrounding landscape. These unique wild areas offer lands that characterize these unique areas recreational opportunities for hikers, horseback riders, hunters, botanists and other outdoor enthu- provide vital habitat for the sensitive species siasts. The proposed wilderness areas encompass Arrowleaf thelypody and Peck’s milkvetch. a diversity of habitat types including grasslands, riparian areas, sagebrush shrub steppe, wood- Wildlife lands, and forests. They also provide important This unique area provides essential habitat habitat for threatened summer steelhead and for a variety of wildlife, such as Western Chinook salmon. toads, lizards, snakes, Pygmy rabbits, bobcats, coyotes, cougar, mule deer, California bighorn Sutton Mountain The John Day River winds lazily around the sheep, and elk. A large number of birds base of Sutton Mountain, an iconic gem of also frequent the areas, including pileated the John Day Basin. This 29,000-acre potential woodpeckers, white-headed woodpeckers, wilderness area towers over steep ravines, native red-naped sapsuckers, ferruginous hawks, grasslands, and dramatic clay formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Beaver Dams Along Bridge Creek in Central Oregon
    Rick Demmer, Bureau of Land Management, Prineville, Oregon 97554 and Robert L. Beschta1, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97330 Recent History (1988-2004) of Beaver Dams along Bridge Creek in Central Oregon Abstract Bridge Creek is a low-gradient stream in the John Day River basin of eastern Oregon. After decades of grazing, riparian vegetation along a 31.7 km reach was sparse and low in diversity, vegetated floodplains were typically narrow, and the stream was relatively wide and shallow. Cattle grazing within this reach was reduced in 1988, irrigation diversion ditches were replaced with culverts in 1989, and beaver (Castor canadensis) trapping was discontinued after 1991. Between 1988 and 2004, we inventoried beaver dams and ponds twice a year and estimated their dimensions. Field notes and photographs were used to document habitat use and better understand the potential role of beaver with regard to channel morphology and riparian plant communities. The an- nual number of beaver dams present in the study reach ranged from 9 to 103. On average, dams were nearly 8 m in length with ponds extending upstream 26 m. We also found that beaver dams/ponds, over time, typically accumulated sediment, improved conditions for establishment and growth of riparian plants, and altered channels. Dams that breached during periods of high flow often contributed to long-term increases in channel complexity through the formation of new meanders, pools, and riffles. Exposed sediment deposits associated with breached dams provided fresh seedbeds for regeneration of willows (Salix spp.), black cottonwood (Populus balsamifera ssp. trichocarpa), and other riparian plants.
    [Show full text]
  • This File Was Created by Scanning the Printed Publication
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Text errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Editors SHARON E. CLARKE is a geographer and GIS analyst, Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331; and SANDRA A. BRYCE is a biogeographer, Dynamac Corporation, Environmental Protection Agency, National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory, Western Ecology Division, Corvallis, OR 97333. This document is a product of cooperative research between the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; the Forest Science De- partment, Oregon State University; and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Cover Artwork Cover artwork was designed and produced by John Ivie. Abstract Clarke, Sharon E.; Bryce, Sandra A., eds. 1997. Hierarchical subdivisions of the Columbia Plateau and Blue Mountains ecoregions, Oregon and Washington. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-395. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 114 p. This document presents two spatial scales of a hierarchical, ecoregional framework and provides a connection to both larger and smaller scale ecological classifications. The two spatial scales are subregions (1:250,000) and landscape-level ecoregions (1:100,000), or Level IV and Level V ecoregions. Level IV ecoregions were developed by the Environmental Protection Agency because the resolution of national-scale ecoregions provided insufficient detail to meet the needs of state agencies for estab- lishing biocriteria, reference sites, and attainability goals for water-quality regulation. For this project, two ecoregions—the Columbia Plateau and the Blue Mountains— were subdivided into more detailed Level IV ecoregions.
    [Show full text]
  • County Natural Resources Policy
    Crook County Oregon Natural Resources Policy Crook County Board of County Commissioners CROOK COUNTY NATURAL RESOURCES PLAN REVISION 013 1 | Page Table of Contents Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 4 Purpose & Need ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Revision .................................................................................................................................................... 5 Severability ............................................................................................................................................... 5 Crook County Overview ............................................................................................................................... 6 Land Use & Management ......................................................................................................................... 8 Agriculture & Timber ............................................................................................................................... 9 Recreation & Tourism ............................................................................................................................. 10 Wilderness and Areas of Critical Environmental Concern ..................................................................... 10 Principles for Local Government
    [Show full text]
  • North Ochoco Ranch Mitchell, Oregon | 8,780 Acres | $11,750,000
    North Ochoco Ranch Mitchell, Oregon | 8,780 Acres | $11,750,000 Located in the heart of the Ochoco Mountains, a little over an hour east of Prineville, Oregon, lies the North Ochoco Ranch. This extremely private ranch consists of 8,780+/- acres (8,200 acres deeded), in one large block. The ranch has a 150-year history as an operating cattle and hay with over 800 acres of irrigated or sub-irrigated farmed hay fields, as well as a large irrigation water permit with significant existing irrigation infrastructure, plus 2,000+/- acres timbered canyons. The North Ochoco Ranch is also known for exceptional wildlife opportunities especially Rocky Mountain elk, mule deer and wild bison. a brand you can trust www.RanchLand.com LOCATION & Acreage The ranch is located east of Prineville, Oregon approximately 60 miles, in the Norther slopes of the Ochoco Mountains, in the John Day River Basin. The ranch consists of deep rocky-walled canyons, glacially cut gorges, sagebrush steppe, juniper woodlands, mountain lakes, forests, meadows, mountain ranges, valleys and plateaus. The broad irrigated meadows support ranches with rich farmland. The Ochoco Mountains are located at the western end of the Blue Mountain ecosystem and has been regarded as one of Oregon’s premier big game hunting units. Redmond Municipal Airport (RDM) is the nearest commercial airport approximately 80 miles to the West. Condon State Airport (FAA LID: 3S9), is located approximate 50 miles to the North and can accommodate general aviation, including private business class jets. WILDLIFE The ranch is located in the South Fossil Hunting Unit and adjacent to the Ochoco Hunting Unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Plan
    Deschutes County Transportation System Plan 2010 - 2030 Adopted by Ordinance 2012-005 August 6, 2012 By The Deschutes County Board of Commissioners EXHIBIT C ORDINANCE 2012-005 Page 1 of 268 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 10 Chapter One Introduction ...................................................................................................................................30 1.1 Geographic Setting .......................................................................................................30 1.2 Transportation Planning ..............................................................................................31 Goal 12 .....................................................................................................................31 Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) ..................................................................31 TPR Requirements for Deschutes County ......................................................33 1.3 Major Changes Since the Adoption of the 1998 Plan ...........................................35 Regional Growth and Destination Resorts ......................................................35 Urban Growth and County Coordination .......................................................36 Public Transportation ...........................................................................................36 Financial Impacts ....................................................................................................37
    [Show full text]
  • Or Wilderness Protection in the Blue Mountain Ecoregion Have Been Identified by the Nature Conservancy As Vital to Protect Biodiversity in the Area
    172 OREGON WILD Neither Cascades nor Rockies, but With Attributes of Both Blue Mountains Ecoregion xtending from Oregon’s East Cascades Slopes and Foothills to the from 30 to 130 days depending on elevation. The forests are home to Rocky Mountain intersection of Oregon, Idaho and Washington, the 15.3 million acres elk, mule deer, black bear, cougar, bobcat, coyote, beaver, marten, raccoon, fisher, of the Blue Mountains Ecoregion in Oregon are a conglomeration of pileated woodpecker, golden eagle, chickadee and nuthatch, as well as various species Emountain ranges, broad plateaus, sparse valleys, spectacular river canyons of hawks, woodpeckers, owls and songbirds. Wolves, long absent from Oregon, are and deep gorges. The highest point is the Matterhorn that rises to 9,832 making their return to the state in this ecoregion. Individuals from packs reintroduced feet in the Wallowa Mountains. The ecoregion extends into southeastern Washington in nearby Idaho are dispersing into Oregon. Fish species include bull and rainbow and west central Idaho. trout, along with numerous stocks of Pacific salmon species. Most of the mountain ranges in the Blue Mountains Ecoregion are volcanic. The Depending on precipitation, aspect, soil type, elevation, fire history and other Crooked River separates the Maury Mountains from the Ochoco Mountains, which are factors, one generally finds various combinations of Douglas-fir, ponderosa pine, lodge- separated from the Aldrich Mountains by the South Fork John Day River. The Aldrich pole, western larch, juniper and Engelmann spruce throughout the Blue Mountains. Mountains are separated from the Strawberry Mountain Range by Canyon Creek. Beginning approximately at the Lower Deschutes River and rising eastward, the These ranges generally run east-west.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guides
    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on May 6, 2011 Field Guides Paleogene calderas of central and eastern Oregon: Eruptive sources of widespread tuffs in the John Day and Clarno Formations Jason D. McClaughry, Mark L. Ferns, Martin J. Streck, Karyn A. Patridge and Caroline L. Gordon Field Guides 2009;15;407-434 doi: 10.1130/2009.fld015(20) Email alerting services click www.gsapubs.org/cgi/alerts to receive free e-mail alerts when new articles cite this article Subscribe click www.gsapubs.org/subscriptions/ to subscribe to Field Guides Permission request click http://www.geosociety.org/pubs/copyrt.htm#gsa to contact GSA Copyright not claimed on content prepared wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are hereby granted permission, without fees or further requests to GSA, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works and to make unlimited copies of items in GSA's journals for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science. This file may not be posted to any Web site, but authors may post the abstracts only of their articles on their own or their organization's Web site providing the posting includes a reference to the article's full citation. GSA provides this and other forums for the presentation of diverse opinions and positions by scientists worldwide, regardless of their race, citizenship, gender, religion, or political viewpoint. Opinions presented in this publication do not reflect official positions of the Society. Notes © 2009 Geological Society of America Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on May 6, 2011 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 15 2009 Paleogene calderas of central and eastern Oregon: Eruptive sources of widespread tuffs in the John Day and Clarno Formations Jason D.
    [Show full text]
  • Crook County Community Wildfire Protection Plan August 2014
    Crook County Community Wildfire Protection Plan August 2014 1 As required by the Healthy Forest Restoration Act, the undersigned representatives of Crook County, Crook County Fire Chief, and Oregon Department of Forestry acknowledge that they have reviewed and approve the contents of this plan. Crook County Commission Chair ____________________________________________ ______________ Commissioner Fahlgren Date Crook County Fire and Rescue ___________________________________________ _____________ Matt Smith Date Oregon Department of Forestry ________________________________________ _____________ George Ponte Date 2 This Community Wildfire Protection Plan represents the efforts and cooperation of a number of organizations and agencies working together to improve preparedness for wildfire events while reducing risk factors. 2013-14 Steering Committee Guy Chamness Bureau of Land Management Pete Ridenour Central Oregon Fire Management Service/BLM Bryan Scholz Central Oregon Fire Management Service John Jackson Consultant Ken Fahlgren Crook County Commissioner Casey Kump Crook County Fire and Rescue Michael Ryan Crook County Sheriff Bob and Jerri Bronson Dry Creek Airpark Residents Gordon Foster Sr. Oregon Department of Forestry Gordon Foster Jr. Oregon Department of Forestry Kevin Benton Oregon Department of Forestry Map Production Steve Dougill Crook County GIS Department Levi Roberts Crook County GIS Department This plan is available online at: www.coic2.org/crook-county-cwpp Or contact the following agencies: Crook County Administration Colleen Ferguson 300 NE 3rd Street 541-447-6555 Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council Tami Geiger, Program Coordinator 334 NE Hawthorne Ave., Bend OR [email protected] | 541.548-9527 June 2014 (v.2) Author: Tami Geiger, Central Oregon Intergovernmental Council June 2005 (v.1) Author: John Jackson, Consultant, Singletree Enterprises, LLC 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Some Antelope & Area History
    SOME ANTELOPE FACTS & AREA HISTORY The TOWN OF ANTELOPE, OREGON Histories of this area abound… they have similar threads and stories but some emphasize one aspect over another. The Oregon Encyclopedia asserts that the little town of Antelope and the (Big) Muddy Ranch are “closely intertwined,” but such a statement leaves one with the impression that Antelope doesn’t have a real history of it’s own. Though many of the local ranches have had a close, generations-long relationship with the town, Antelope has always been it’s own community and is a Pronghorn Antelope functioning town which as of the 2000 census listed 59 residents – a figure which was somehow inflated as it has only around 39 permanent residents and a few vacation homeowners who visit from time to time. Interaction between local area ranchers and the town will undoubtedly remain close as it’s the only functioning community for many miles around. The city limits encompass about a square mile but the urban- growth boundary is much less. The current (2013) commercial focal point is the historic Antelope Café which is much busier during the summer months and fall hunting seasons than during the winter. When traveling Highway 97, which bisects Oregon in a north – south direction, visit Shaniko, a functioning “ghost town” & tourist-stop, then take the short 8-mile scenic detour south to Antelope. Stop at the Café and say “HI” to any locals you find there; we’d love to see you, too. Although many central Oregon communities have undergone rapid changes at times, none has been more profoundly affected by changing events than the tiny town of Antelope.
    [Show full text]
  • Humphrey Ranch
    HUMPHREY RANCH SALE PRICE: $8,500,000 9,430± Deeded Acres near Paulina, OR 97751 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY – 4 STRUCTURES – 6 CATTLE RANCH – 8 HUNTING CAMP – 10 RECREATION – 12 WATER & IRRIGATION – 14 HAY PRODUCTION – 16 TIMBERED LAND – 18 DISCLAIMER – 20 2 3 v Price $8,500,000 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Deeded Acres ±9,430 DETAILS Location 15 miles from Paulina, OR 44.21606, -119.74924 The historic Humphrey Ranch, dating back to 1875, is a 500 Lat/Long head cow/calf operation stretching across 9,430± deeded acres nestled in the foothills of the stunning Ochoco SURROUNDED BY THE Rangeland Acres ±7,828 Mountains. Located in the draw-only Ochoco Hunting OCHOCO MOUNTAINS Unit, the ranch is a hunter’s oasis with abundant elk and Timbered Acres ±441 mule deer populations. Turkey, chukar, grouse, duck Irrigated Hay Grounds ±707 and geese also call the area home. In addition to the Sub-Irrigated Hay Grounds ±454 deeded acres, a generous 27,906± acres of grazing Total Deeded Acres ±9,430 allotments (1,783+/- AUMs) supports the cattle 10,000+ ACRES OF LAND BREAKDOWN operation. The property currently has 707± acres of Grazing Allotments ±27,906 RECREATION LAND native grass hay fields and three stacking yards. Total Usable Acres ±37,976 Featuring magnificent views of lush green meadows, the private homestead includes a recently updated ranch home, a barn constructed from the finest Existing Structures: House, Barn, Bunkhouse, Shop materials, and a bunkhouse which will stand 100 Hunting Camp and Private Reservoir years with minimal maintenance.
    [Show full text]