DOCSLIB.ORG

Mémoire En Science Politique[BR]- Travail Écrit : "Les Représentations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mémoire En Science Politique[BR]- Travail Écrit : http://lib.uliege.be https://matheo.uliege.be Mémoire en science politique[BR]- Travail écrit : "Les représentations de l'Union Européenne véhiculées dans le discours des acteurs politiques nationaux influencent-elles la perception que les citoyens se font de l'Union et ce faisant, le processus d'intégration lui-même ?Application d'un cadre de linguistique cognitive aux campagnes référendaires irlandaises pour la ... Auteur : Gérard, Nelly Promoteur(s) : Michel, Quentin Faculté : Faculté de Droit, de Science Politique et de Criminologie Diplôme : Master en sciences politiques, orientation générale, à finalité spécialisée en relations internationales Année académique : 2018-2019 URI/URL : http://hdl.handle.net/2268.2/7959 Avertissement à l'attention des usagers : Tous les documents placés en accès ouvert sur le site le site MatheO sont protégés par le droit d'auteur. Conformément aux principes énoncés par la "Budapest Open Access Initiative"(BOAI, 2002), l'utilisateur du site peut lire, télécharger, copier, transmettre, imprimer, chercher ou faire un lien vers le texte intégral de ces documents, les disséquer pour les indexer, s'en servir de données pour un logiciel, ou s'en servir à toute autre fin légale (ou prévue par la réglementation relative au droit d'auteur). Toute utilisation du document à des fins commerciales est strictement interdite. Par ailleurs, l'utilisateur s'engage à respecter les droits moraux de l'auteur, principalement le droit à l'intégrité de l'oeuvre et le droit de paternité et ce dans toute utilisation que l'utilisateur entreprend. Ainsi, à titre d'exemple, lorsqu'il reproduira un document par extrait ou dans son intégralité, l'utilisateur citera de manière complète les sources telles que mentionnées ci-dessus. Toute utilisation non explicitement autorisée ci-avant (telle que par exemple, la modification du document ou son résumé) nécessite l'autorisation préalable et expresse des auteurs ou de leurs ayants droit. Annexe 2 I. Fianna Fáil - 2009 - 2e référendum ................................................................................................1 (a) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le Taoiseach (premier ministre) Brian Cowen (08/09/2009) ........................................................................................................1 (b) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le Ministre des Affaires Étrangères Micheál Martin (10/09/2009) .......................................................................................................13 (c) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le Bishop of down and Connor (16/09/2009) .................................................................................................................................19 (d) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président de Sinn Féin Caoimhgín Ó Caoláin (17/09/2009) ...................................................................................................................20 (e) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président du Labour Eamon Gilmore (22/09/2009) .................................................................................................................................23 (f) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président de Fine Gael Enda Kenny (24/09/2009) .................................................................................................................................24 (g) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président du Green Party John Gormley (29/09/2009) .................................................................................................................25 (h) Poster We’re stronger together ...........................................................................................27 (i) Poster Yes for the economy ................................................................................................28 (j) Poster Keep our commissioner ...........................................................................................29 (k) Poster Yes on 2nd October ..................................................................................................30 (l) Poster 5 ...............................................................................................................................31 (m) Poster Stronger together .....................................................................................................32 II. Fine Gael - 2009 - 2e référendum ................................................................................................34 (n) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le Taoiseach (premier ministre) Brian Cowen (08/09/2009) ....................................................................................................................34 (o) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président de Sinn Féin Caoimhgín Ó Caoláin (17/09/2009) ...................................................................................................................37 (p) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président de Fine Gael Enda Kenny (24/09/2009) .................................................................................................................................37 (q) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président du Green Party John Gormley (29/09/2009) .................................................................................................................44 III. Green Party - 2009 - 2e référendum ............................................................................................46 (a) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le Ministre des Affaires Étrangères Micheál Martin (10/09/2009) .......................................................................................................46 (b) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président de Fine Gael Enda Kenny (24/09/2009) .................................................................................................................................47 (c) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président du Green Party John Gormley (29/09/2009) .................................................................................................................47 (d) Poster Reasons to Vote Yes to Lisbon .................................................................................55 IV. Labour - 2009 - 2e référendum .....................................................................................................57 !1 Annexe 2 (a) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le Taoiseach (premier ministre) Brian Cowen (08/09/2009) ....................................................................................................................57 (b) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le Bishop of down and Connor (16/09/2009) .................................................................................................................................58 (c) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président du Labour Eamon Gilmore (22/09/2009) .................................................................................................................................58 (d) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président du Green Party John Gormley (29/09/2009) .................................................................................................................66 (e) Déclaration de Nessa Childers lors de l’Export Europe Day du Irish Exporters’ Association à Rosslare (04/09/2009) ...........................................................................................68 (f) Déclaration de Allan Kelly « Yes side must invest in time in conversations to win Lisbon » (09/09/2009) ..............................................................................................................................68 (g) Déclaration de Joe Costello lors du lancement de la campagne pour le oui du Labour, Est de l’Irlande (10/09/2009) .............................................................................................................69 (h) Déclaration de Michael Higgins lors du lancement de la campagne du Labour pour le oui à Galway (14/09/2009) ................................................................................................................70 (i) Déclaration de Allan Kelly lors d'une visite du Labour aux championnats de Ploughing (24/09/2009) .................................................................................................................................74 (j) Poster The Lisbon Treaty Good for Gays ...........................................................................78 V. Sinn Féin - 2009 - 2e référendum ..................................................................................................80 (a) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président de Sinn Féin Caoimhgín Ó Caoláin (17/09/2009) ...................................................................................................................80 (b) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président du Labour Eamon Gilmore (22/09/2009) .................................................................................................................................85 (c) Joint Committee on European Affairs - débat avec le président du Green Party John Gormley (29/09/2009) .................................................................................................................86
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GRAND CHAMBER CASE of MOCANU and OTHERS V. ROMANIA
    GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Applications nos. 10865/09, 45886/07 and 32431/08) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 17 September 2014 This judgment is final. MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Mocanu and Others v. Romania, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of: Dean Spielmann, President, Guido Raimondi, Mark Villiger, Isabelle Berro, Peer Lorenzen, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Ledi Bianku, Nona Tsotsoria, Ann Power-Forde, Işıl Karakaş, Nebojša Vučinić, Paulo Pinto de Albuquerque, Paul Lemmens, Aleš Pejchal, Johannes Silvis, Krzysztof Wojtyczek, judges, Florin Streteanu, ad hoc judge, and Johan Callewaert, Deputy Grand Chamber Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 2 October 2013 and 25 June 2014, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last- mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in three applications against Romania lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three Romanian nationals, Mrs Anca Mocanu (no. 10865/09), Mr Marin Stoica (no. 32431/08) and Mr Teodor Mărieş, and by the Association “21 December 1989”, a legal entity registered under Romanian law and based in Bucharest (no. 45886/07) (“the applicants”) on 28 January 2009, 25 June 2008 and 13 July 2007 respectively. 2. Before the Court, Mrs Mocanu, Mr Mărieş and the applicant association were represented by Mr A. Popescu, Ms I. Sfîrăială and Mr I. Matei, lawyers practising in Bucharest. Mrs Mocanu was granted legal aid. Mr Stoica, who was also granted legal aid, was represented until 8 December 2009 by Ms D.
    [Show full text]
  • Register of Insurance & Reinsurance Intermediaries European
    Register of Insurance & Reinsurance Intermediaries European Communities (Insurance Mediation) Regulations, 2005 Insurance Mediation Register: A list of Insurance & Reinsurance Intermediaries registered under the European Communities (Insurance Mediation) Regulations, 2005 (as amended). Registration of insurance/reinsurance intermediaries by the Central Bank of Ireland, does not of itself make the Central Bank of Ireland liable for any financial loss incurred by a person because the intermediary, any of its officers, employees or agents has contravened or failed to comply with a provision of these regulations, or any condition of the intermediary’s registration, or because the intermediary has become subject to an insolvency process. Ref No. Intermediary * Registered As Registered on Tied to** Persons Responsible*** Passporting Into C98 Gerry Owens Insurance Intermediary 31 July 2007 t/a Negotiators 1A Lislee Road Maryborough Douglas Co. Cork C100 Richard A Pratt Insurance Intermediary 29 June 2007 t/a Richard Pratt & Co Main Street Ballincollig Co Cork C136 Michael Creedon Insurance Intermediary 29 February 2008 t/a Cork Accounting Services Ballyvourney Co Cork C153 Norca Limited Insurance Intermediary 31 July 2007 Joe Cashin t/a EBS Drumcondra, EBS Swords, EBS Tallaght 8 Upper Drumcondra Road Drumcondra Dublin 9 C160 Barney Kiernan Insurance Intermediary 31 July 2007 Linenhall Street Castlebar Co Mayo C366 Melrose Finance Limited Insurance Intermediary 31 October 2007 John Murphy United Kingdom (FOS) Melrose House Dundrum Road Dundrum
    [Show full text]
  • THIRD SECTION CASE of BAZJAKS V. LATVIA
    THIRD SECTION CASE OF BAZJAKS v. LATVIA (Application no. 71572/01) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 19 October 2010 FINAL 19/01/2011 This judgment has become final under Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. BAZJAKS v. LATVIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Bazjaks v. Latvia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Josep Casadevall, President, Elisabet Fura, Boštjan M. Zupančič, Alvina Gyulumyan, Ineta Ziemele, Luis López Guerra, Ann Power, judges, and Santiago Quesada, Section Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 28 September 2010, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 71572/01) against the Republic of Latvia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by a “permanently resident non-citizen” of the Republic of Latvia, Mr Igors Bazjaks (“the applicant”), on 29 May 2001. 2. The Latvian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mrs I. Reine. 3. The applicant alleged, in particular, that the conditions of his detention in Daugavpils prison had amounted to inhuman and degrading treatment and that he lacked an effective remedy in that regard. 4. On 26 November 2004 the President of the Third Section decided to give notice of the application to the Government and to invite them to submit written observations concerning the complaints under Articles 3 and 13 of the Convention. It was also decided to examine the merits of the application at the same time as its admissibility.
    [Show full text]
  • GRAND CHAMBER CASE of VINTER and OTHERS V
    GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (Applications nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 9 July 2013 This judgment is final but may be subject to editorial revision. VINTER AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Vinter and Others v. the United Kingdom, The European Court of Human Rights, sitting as a Grand Chamber composed of: Dean Spielmann, President, Josep Casadevall, Guido Raimondi, Ineta Ziemele, Mark Villiger, Isabelle Berro-Lefèvre, Dragoljub Popović, Luis López Guerra, Mirjana Lazarova Trajkovska, Nona Tsotsoria, Ann Power-Forde, Işıl Karakaş, Nebojša Vučinić, Linos-Alexandre Sicilianos, Paul Lemmens, Paul Mahoney, Johannes Silvis, judges, and Michael O’Boyle, Deputy Registrar, Having deliberated in private on 28 November 2012 and on 29 May 2013, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on the last-mentioned date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in three applications (nos. 66069/09, 130/10 and 3896/10) against the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by three British nationals, Mr Douglas Gary Vinter (“the first applicant”), Mr Jeremy Neville Bamber (“the second applicant”) and Mr Peter Howard Moore (“the third applicant”), on 11 December 2009, 17 December 2009 and 6 January 2010 respectively. 2. The first applicant was born in 1969 and is currently detained at Her Majesty’s Prison Frankland. He is represented before the Court by Mr S. Creighton, a lawyer practising in London with Bhatt Murphy Solicitors, assisted by Mr P.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 1 TOGHCHÁIN ÁITIÚLA, 1999 LOCAL ELECTIONS, 1999
    TOGHCHÁIN ÁITIÚLA, 1999 LOCAL ELECTIONS, 1999 Volume 1 TOGHCHÁIN ÁITIÚLA, 1999 LOCAL ELECTIONS, 1999 Volume 1 DUBLIN PUBLISHED BY THE STATIONERY OFFICE To be purchased through any bookseller, or directly from the GOVERNMENT PUBLICATIONS SALE OFFICE, SUN ALLIANCE HOUSE, MOLESWORTH STREET, DUBLIN 2 £12.00 €15.24 © Copyright Government of Ireland 2000 ISBN 0-7076-6434-9 P. 33331/E Gr. 30-01 7/00 3,000 Brunswick Press Ltd. ii CLÁR CONTENTS Page Foreword........................................................................................................................................................................ v Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................... vii LOCAL AUTHORITIES County Councils Carlow...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Cavan....................................................................................................................................................................... 8 Clare ........................................................................................................................................................................ 12 Cork (Northern Division) .......................................................................................................................................... 19 Cork (Southern Division).........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THIRD SECTION CASE of BAYATYAN V. ARMENIA
    THIRD SECTION CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA (Application no. 23459/03) JUDGMENT STRASBOURG 27 October 2009 This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision. BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA JUDGMENT 1 In the case of Bayatyan v. Armenia, The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of: Josep Casadevall, President, Elisabet Fura, Corneliu Bîrsan, Boštjan M. Zupan čič, Alvina Gyulumyan, Egbert Myjer, Ann Power, judges, and Stanley Naismith, Deputy Section Registrar , Having deliberated in private on 6 October 2009, Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date: PROCEDURE 1. The case originated in an application (no. 23459/03) against the Republic of Armenia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by an Armenian national, Mr Vahan Bayatyan (“the applicant”), on 22 July 2003. 2. The applicant was represented by Mr J. M. Burns, Mr A. Carbonneau and Mr R. Khachatryan, lawyers practising in Georgetown (Canada), Patterson (USA) and Yerevan respectively. The Armenian Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent, Mr G. Kostanyan, Representative of the Republic of Armenia at the European Court of Human Rights. 3. The applicant alleged that his conviction for refusal to serve in the army had unlawfully interfered with his right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion. 4. By a decision of 12 December 2006, the Chamber declared the application admissible under Article 9 of the Convention and the remainder inadmissible.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the 30 Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups
    European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland Guide to the 30th Dáil for Anti-Poverty Groups ‘EAPN Ireland is a network of groups and individuals working against poverty and social exclusion. Our objective is to put the fight against poverty at the top of the European and Irish agendas’ Contents Page Acknowledgements 2 Introduction 2 The Parties 4 Dáil Session Guide 5 A Brief Guide to Legislation 7 Dáil Committees 9 The TD in the Dáil 9 Contacting a TD 12 APPENDICES 1: List of Committees and Spokespersons 2: Government Ministers and Party Spokespersons 1 Introduction This Guide has been produced by the European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN) Ireland. It is intended as a short briefing on the functioning of the Dáil and a simple explanation of specific areas that may be of interest to people operating in the community/NGO sector in attempting to make the best use of the Dáil. This briefing document is produced as a result of the EAPN Focus on Poverty in Ireland project, which started in December 2006. This project aimed to raise awareness of poverty and put poverty reduction at the top of the political agenda, while also promoting understanding and involvement in the social inclusion process among people experiencing poverty. This Guide is intended as an accompanying document to the EAPN Guide to Understanding and Engaging with the European Union. The overall aim in producing these two guides is to inform people working in the community and voluntary sector of how to engage with the Irish Parliament and the European Union in influencing policy and voicing their concerns about poverty and social inclusion issues.
    [Show full text]
  • Election of Judges
    Press Release Parliamentary Assembly Communication Unit Ref: 042b08 Tel: +33 3 88 41 31 93 Fax :+33 3 90 21 41 34 [email protected] internet: www.coe.int/press L’APCE élit cinq juges à la Cour européenne des droits de 47 members l’homme Albania Andorra Strasbourg, 22.01.2008 - L’Assemblée parlementaire du Conseil de l’Europe (APCE), qui Armenia se réunit cette semaine à Strasbourg en session plénière, a élu aujourd’hui cinq juges à la Austria Cour européenne des droits de l’homme. Il s’agit de : Azerbaijan Belgium - Zdravka Vladimirova Kalaydjieva, au titre de la Bulgarie ; Bosnia and - Ann Power, au titre de l’Irlande ; Herzegovina - Ineta Ziemele, au titre de la Lettonie ; Bulgaria Croatia - Mihail Poalelungi, au titre de la Moldova ; Cyprus - Ayşe Işıl Karakas, au titre de la Turquie. Czech Republic Denmark Les juges sont élus par l’APCE à partir d’une liste de trois candidats présentée par chacun Estonia des Etats ayant ratifié la Convention européenne des droits de l’homme. Finland France Résultats du vote et CVs des candidats Georgia Germany Contacts pour la presse : Greece Hungary - Unité de communication de l’APCE, Iceland tél ; +33 3 88 41 31 93, [email protected] ; http://assembly.coe.int Ireland - Unité de la presse de la Cour européenne des droits de l’homme, Italy tél. +33 3 88 41 21 54, [email protected] , http://www.echr.coe.int Latvia Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg PACE elects five judges to the European Court of Human Malta Rights Moldova Monaco Strasbourg, 22.01.2008 – The Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE), Montenegro Netherlands meeting this week in plenary session in Strasbourg, today elected five judges to the Norway European Court of Human Rights.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Curriculum Vitae Updated 27/11/2019 FEDERICO FABBRINI
    Curriculum Vitae Updated 27/11/2019 FEDERICO FABBRINI Current Academic Position Since 2016: Full Professor (tenured) of EU Law School of Law & Government Dublin City University (Ireland) Since 2017: Founding Director DCU Brexit Institute Since 2017: Director DCU Law Research Center Previous Academic Positions 2016-2014: Associate Professor (tenured) of European & International Law iCourts (Center of Excellence for International Courts), Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen (Denmark) 2014-2012: Assistant Professor (tenure-track) of European & Comparative Constitutional Law Department of Public Law, Jurisprudence & Legal History, Tilburg Law School (the Netherlands) Tenure awarded on 15 May 2014 Visiting Positions 2013: Visiting professor, Meiji University, Tokyo (Japan) (December) 2012: Visiting professor, University of New South Wales, Sydney (Australia) (December) Prizes and Fellowships 2018-9: Charlemagne Prize Fellow sponsored by the Karlspreis Europa Stiftung und Akademie in Aachen Judicial Clerkship and Institutional Traineeship 2010-2009: Clerk for Justice Sabino Cassese at the Constitutional Court of Italy 2013-2008: Personal Assistant to Martin Scheinin in his capacity as United Nations (UN) Special Rapporteur on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms while Countering Terrorism, and then as the President of the International Association of Constitutional Law Higher Education 2012: Doctorate in Law (PhD) at the Law Department of the European University Institute - Research thesis on: “Fundamental Rights in Europe: Challenges and Transformations of a Multilevel System in Comparative Perspective” under the supervision of prof. Miguel Poiares Maduro. Degree awarded (with a recommendation for publication of the thesis) on 7 June 2012 by a Jury composed of prof. Miguel Maduro (EUI), prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Thirteenth Annual Report
    BRITISH-IRISH PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY TIONÓL PARLAIMINTEACH NA BREATAINE AGUS NA HÉIREANN Doc No 142 March 2009 1 CONTENTS Introduction…………………………………………………………………………… Membership of the Body……………………………………………………………… Political developments……………………………………………………………… The work of the Body………………………………………………………………… Thirty-sixth Plenary ……………………………………………………………… Thirty-seventh Plenary……………………………………………………………… Steering Committee………………………………………………………………… Committees…………………………………………………………………………… Staffing………………………………………………………………………………… Prospects for 2009…………………………………………………………………… APPENDIX 1: Membership of the Body…………………………………… APPENDIX 2: Reports and other documents approved by the Body……… APPENDIX 3: Work of Committees……………………………………… Committee A…………………………………………………………… Committee B…………………………………………………………… Committee C…………………………………………………………… Committee D…………………………………………………………… 2 APPENDIX 4: Staff of the Body…………………………………………… 3 THIRTEENTH ANNUAL REPORT THE WORK OF THE BRITISH-IRISH INTER-PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY Introduction 1.This is the thirteenth annual report of the Body since it was decided at the Plenary Session in May 1996 that such a Report should be made. This Report summarises the work of the Body during 2008. Membership of the Body 2.There were a number of significant changes in membership during the year. In the early spring, the British Co-Chair, the Rt Hon Paul Murphy, returned to the Cabinet and was replaced by the Rt Hon Peter Hain. Sean O‟Fearghail was replaced as an Irish Vice-Chair and Chair of Committee C by Ms Margaret Conlon. Most importantly for the future of the Body, the October session was attended for the first time by delegates from the Democratic unionist Party and the Ulster Unionist party. Political Developments General Overview 3. 2008 was a year of consolidation for the peace process in Northern Ireland following the restoration of devolved government in May 2007. A Programme for Government and Investment Strategy for Northern Ireland, along with the Budget, were passed by the Assembly on 28 and 29 January 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Seanad Éireann
    SEANAD ÉIREANN AN BILLE UM PÁIRTNÉIREACHT SHIBHIALTA AGUS UM CHEARTA AGUS OIBLEAGÁIDÍ ÁIRITHE DE CHUID COMHCHÓNAITHEOIRÍ 2009 CIVIL PARTNERSHIP AND CERTAIN RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF COHABITANTS BILL 2009 athraithe ó changed from AN BILLE UM PÁIRTNÉIREACHT SHIBHIALTA 2009 CIVIL PARTNERSHIP BILL 2009 LEASUITHE COISTE COMMITTEE AMENDMENTS [It is proposed to take second and committee stages of this Bill today. Accordingly, this numbered list of amendments is circulated in advance of the conclusion of Second Stage. 07-07-10] [No. 44b of 2009] [07 July, 2010] SEANAD ÉIREANN AN BILLE UM PÁIRTNÉIREACHT SHIBHIALTA AGUS UM CHEARTA AGUS OIBLEAGÁIDÍ ÁIRITHE DE CHUID COMHCHÓNAITHEOIRÍ 2009 —AN COISTE CIVIL PARTNERSHIP AND CERTAIN RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF COHABITANTS BILL 2009 —COMMITTEE STAGE Leasuithe Amendments SECTION 1 1. In page 13, subsection (1), lines 16 and 17, to delete all words from and including “Civil” in line 16 down to and including “2010” in line 17 and substitute the following: “Partnership and Cohabitants (Non marital Relationships) Act 2010”. —Senators John Hanafin, Labhras Ó Murchú, Jim Walsh. SECTION 2 2. In page 13, between lines 30 and 31, to insert the following: “ “dependent child” means a person under the age of 18 years, or if the person has attained that age— (a) is a person who is or will be or, if an order were made under any Act providing for periodical payments for his or her support or for the provision of a lump sum for the child, would be receiving full-time education or instruction at any university, institute of technology, college, school or other educational establishment and is under the age of 23 years, or (b) is a person who has an intellectual or physical disability to such extent that it is not reasonably possible for the child to maintain himself or herself fully;”.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court Annual Report 2020
    2020Annual Report Report published by the Supreme Court of Ireland with the support of the Courts Service An tSeirbhís Chúirteanna Courts Service Editors: Sarahrose Murphy, Senior Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Patrick Conboy, Executive Legal Officer to the Chief Justice Case summaries prepared by the following Judicial Assistants: Aislinn McCann Seán Beatty Iseult Browne Senan Crawford Orlaith Cross Katie Cundelan Shane Finn Matthew Hanrahan Cormac Hickey Caoimhe Hunter-Blair Ciara McCarthy Rachael O’Byrne Mary O’Rourke Karl O’Reilly © Supreme Court of Ireland 2020 2020 Annual Report Table of Contents Foreword by the Chief Justice 6 Introduction by the Registrar of the Supreme Court 9 2020 at a glance 11 Part 1 About the Supreme Court of Ireland 15 Branches of Government in Ireland 16 Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court 17 Structure of the Courts of Ireland 19 Timeline of key events in the Supreme Court’s history 20 Seat of the Supreme Court 22 The Supreme Court Courtroom 24 Journey of a typical appeal 26 Members of the Supreme Court 30 The Role of the Chief Justice 35 Retirement and Appointments 39 The Constitution of Ireland 41 Depositary for Acts of the Oireachtas 45 Part 2 The Supreme Court in 2020 46 COVID-19 and the response of the Court 47 Remote hearings 47 Practice Direction SC21 48 Application for Leave panels 48 Statement of Case 48 Clarification request 48 Electronic delivery of judgments 49 Sitting in King’s Inns 49 Statistics 50 Applications for Leave to Appeal 50 Categorisation of Applications for Leave to Appeal
    [Show full text]