DOCSLIB.ORG

Charles Lyell and the Geological Society

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Charles Lyell and the Geological Society Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 24, 2014 Geological Society, London, Special Publications Charles Lyell and the Geological Society John C. Thackray Geological Society, London, Special Publications 1998, v.143; p17-20. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1998.143.01.03 Email alerting click here to receive free e-mail alerts when service new articles cite this article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or request part of this article Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes © The Geological Society of London 2014 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 24, 2014 Charles Lyell and the Geological Society JOHN C. THACKRAY Department of Library and Information Services, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK Abstract: Charles Lyell was a loyal and committed Fellow of the Geological Society from 1819 until 1875, serving as Secretary, Foreign Secretary and President. He was principally a theorist, his uniformitarian outlook strongly influenced by the work of James Hutton. The Society on the other hand was devoted to the collection and dissemination of facts; on the whole, theorizing was unwelcome. In line with this tradition the papers Lyell read to the Society are largely factual, and do not add a great deal to the ideas put forward in the Principles of Geology. However, his theories were not ignored by the Society, being noticed in the annual presidential address and, more importantly, in the unscripted and largely spontaneous discussions that took place after many of the papers read at the Society's evening meetings. Charles Lyell was elected a Member of the Charles Darwin on 26 December 1836: Geological Society on 19 March 1819. His admis- Don't accept any official scientific place, if you sion certificate, which is number 498 in a series can avoid it, and tell no one I gave you this which had reached 18 000 by 1990, is signed by the advice, as they would all cry out against me as Revd William Buckland, the Revd William D the preacher of anti-patriotic principles. I fought Conybeare and the Revd William Hony. Lyell was against the calamity of being President as long as then 22 years old and a student at Exeter College, I could ... (Burkhardt & Smith 1985, p.532) Oxford. He remained a Member (converting to Fellow in 1826 after the granting of the Royal We have a pen picture by John Ruskin of Lyell at Charter) until his death 56 years later. Lyell served a Society meeting during his first presidency as Secretary, Foreign Secretary, Vice President and which, although distinctly unflattering, is well President. He attended Council Meetings in one worth reproducing: capacity or another for an astonishing 52 years. One finely made, gentlemanly-looking man was The Geological Society was not, of course, very busy among the fossils which lay on the Lyell's only society, for he belonged to the Royal, table, and shook hands with most of the members Linnean, Zoological and Geographical societies as they came in. His forehead was low and not and probably others (Morrell 1976). But there is very wide, and his eyes were small, sharp, and little doubt that Lyell loved the Geological Society rather ill-natured. He took the chair, however, above all others. This was partly of course because and Mr. Charlesworth, coming in after the geology was his favourite science, but also because business of the meeting had commenced, he subscribed to its ethos and way of doing things. stealing quietly into the room, and seating him- One sees his pride when he reports to his friends: 'a self beside me, informed me that it was Mr. splendid meeting', 'an excellent meeting' and 'all Lyell. I expected a finer countenance in the great the best men present'. Certainly in the 1820s and geologist. (Cook & Wedderburn 1909, vol. 1, p. 1830s most observers agreed that the Geological 9) was easily the brightest and liveliest of London's scientific societies, and even so critical a writer as Charles Lyell was a great theorist. His Principles Charles Babbage sang its praises (Babbage 1830, of Geology (12 edns, 1830-1875) offers his readers pp. 45-46). a world in equilibrium, where organic and Lyell was not however prepared to devote his inorganic processes interact and balance; where whole life to the Society, and occasionally resented things move slowly and steadily and naturally the amount of time that his offices took up. He within a long timescale. He had a deep and long managed to avoid being President for 1833-1835, term commitment to what became known as unifor- though he succumbed for 1835-1837. He wrote to mitarianism, and the presentation of observations THACKRAY, J. C. 1998. Charles Lyell and the Geological Society. In: BLUNDELL, D. J. & SCOTT, A. C. (eds) 17 Lyell: the Past is the Key to the Present. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 143, 17-20. Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ by guest on June 24, 2014 18 j.C. THACKRAY and field examples are part of Lyell's strategy for similarities between the world of today and the promoting this theory (Rudwick 1970). This world of the geological past. outlook owed a lot to James Hutton, or at least to The second paper was read in April 1839 and Playfair's interpretation of Hutton, and Hutton was concerned some fossil and recent shells collected in one of those geological system builders that the Canada by Captain Bayfield. Lyell used these to Geological Society deeply disapproved of. The deduce that the climate was colder in the recent past Geological Society had been founded in 1807 to and slightly less cold at a more distant period. Once facilitate the collection and communication of new again, the paper was published in the Proceedings facts, and not for the discussion of systems and (Lyell 1839). The shells are cited in the second theories (Rudwick 1963). G. B. Greenough (1778- edition of the Elements of Geology (Lyell 1841, vol. 1855), the first President, was still active through 1, p. 236), where they join the mass of evidence that the 1820s and 1830s and was fiercely sceptical of Lyell gathers to show that the climate of particular all attempts at theorizing. The typical paper locations has changed during the Earth's history, presented during the first 50 years of the Society's but that the overall temperature of the Earth has life was a piece of regional geology in which strata remained constant. were described and mapped, and their age deduced The third paper was read on Lyell's behalf in from a study of their fossil remains. The deduction January 1842 and deals with Niagara Falls, which of theories from facts was certainly acceptable, but he had visited the previous autumn. Lyell's anything that smacked of the all-inclusive theories enthusiasm for this great marvel of nature is clear of the previous century was deeply suspect. as he describes the strata of the district and then the Were the theoretical tenets to which Lyell was so phenomena of the falls themselves (Lyell 1842). committed simply ignored by the Society to which Niagara had featured in the Principles of Geology he gave his allegiance? from the very first edition to demonstrate the role of Lyell read 45 papers to the Geological Society running water in erosion, with a description based between 1824 and 1854. Twenty derive from his on the work of Robert Bakewell (Bakewell 1830) visits to North America, 15 relate to the Tertiary and Captain Basil Hall (Hall 1829). In the seventh and Quaternary strata of Britain and the Continent edition the account is rewritten on the basis of of Europe, five to other aspects of British geology, Lyell's own fieldwork and this paper, but in essence and five to overseas affairs. None relates explicitly it is unchanged (Lyell 1847). The importance of to Lyell's uniformitarian programme. They are all Lyell's visits to America in the context of his total papers based on geological fieldwork which lie field experience has recently been demonstrated quite easily alongside those of his less philo- (Dott 1997). sophical colleagues such as R. I. Murchison In sum then, Lyell's Geological Society papers (1792-1871), H. T. De la Beche (1796-1855) and add some depth and supporting detail to the the rest. On closer inspection, however, many of the argument set out in the Principles of Geology, but papers do relate to subsidiary themes covered in the their overall effect is quite small. Principles of Geology, and many contained obser- There was, however, another forum where vations that were added to the ever-developing text Lyell's ideas featured more prominently: the annual of the Principles and Elements of Geology (six presidential address. By tradition the President was edns, 1838-1865). Three papers will serve as given more latitude in dealing with speculative or examples of the ways in which this happened. theoretical issues than were speakers at the In April 1834 Lyell read a paper on the loamy Ordinary General Meetings. So, in his address of deposit called 'loess' in the valley of the Rhine, February 1831, the Revd Professor Adam which was based on fieldwork carried out the Sedgwick, having reviewed the papers read to the previous year. Among the distinctively Lyellian Society through the year, turned his attention to features of the paper are the use made of the Lyell's Principles (Sedgwick 1831, pp. 298-306). modern sediments of the Rhine to deduce the He first gave an account of his own views of the environment of deposition of the loess, and the origin of the Earth as a molten globe and the effects emphasis laid on the considerable geographic of its steadily decreasing temperature through changes that must have taken place since the geological time, before showing how Lyell had deposition of this geologically recent deposit, and misunderstood and 'sometimes violated' these yet with no sign of violence or catastrophe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} on Art and Life by John Ruskin History of the Victorian Art Critic and Writer John Ruskin
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} On Art and Life by John Ruskin History of the Victorian Art Critic and Writer John Ruskin. Ruskin200.com is no longer available here. Please visit ruskinprize.co.uk/manchester instead. Who Was John Ruskin? John Ruskin was undoubtedly a fascinating character, one of the most famous art critics of the Victorian era. His many talents included philosophy, philanthropy, and writing. His books spanned many genres, including geology, myths, and literature. Ruskin's Personal Life. Ruskin had a complex personality and today would be described as bipolar, as he often suffered bouts of depression. For long periods, the state of his mental health rendered him powerless to do anything. His first relationship was a failure. He was said to be disgusted by his wife's body, leading to a divorce on the grounds of consummation not having happened. A second love affair was marred by tragedy as the object of his affections died of anorexia at the age of 27. Ruskin's Books. A prolific writer, Ruskin, published several important works on a great many subjects. His first volume of Modern Painters was a very influential piece, written when he was only 24. His alternative views on popular artists brought him to the attention of the art establishment. The Stones of Venice was published in 1851 and discussed Ruskin's love of Venice and its architecture. His beliefs that the classical style represented a need to control civilisation are still studied today. There is much to learn about John Ruskin, and there is a museum dedicated to him, located in the Lake District.
    [Show full text]
  • Bertrand Russell on Aesthetics 51
    Bertrand Russell on Aesthetics CARL SPADONI Introduction "What is your attitude toward art today?" "I have no view about art today." 1 That is Bertrand Russell's reply when he was asked in 1929 to comment on modern art. Itis a confession ofignorance and not false modesty. In contrast to his profound contributions to other areas of philosophy, he made no major attempt to answer the fundamental questions of aesthetics­ questions such as: What is a work ofart? Whatis the nature ofbeauty? What constitutes an aesthetic experience? What are the nature, function and justification ofartistic criticism? When we examine Russell's correspondence of the 1950S and 1960s on this subject, we encounter statements such as the following: I doubt whether I shall have an opinion of any value as regards your essay on beauty, for beauty is a subject about which I have never had any views whatever. 2 I am not sufficiently competent to make judgments on painting.... I feel I cannot sponsor or publicly promote paintings because I do not have a professional knowledge ofthe field. 3 I have no views whatsoever in connection with the graphic arts.... The philosophy ofart is a subject which I have not studied, so that any views expressed by me would be oflittle value. 4 49 50 Carl Spadoni Bertrand Russell on Aesthetics 51 You ask why I have not written on the subject of painting. The chief "good" is to be interpreted subjectively as an attempt to universalize our reason is that I suffer from an inadequate appreciation of pictures. I get desires.
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Pastorals
    Urban Pastorals By Clive Wilmer Worple Press When I heard Clive Wilmer read his Urban Pastorals last Monday evening in the Cambridge University Library I was moved. There was a quiet solemnity about the delivery but it was tinged with wistfulness and a gentle wry humour that had echoes of Alan Bennett talking of his Yorkshire childhood. Peter Carpenter’s Worple Press has published these short pieces of nostalgic insight into a childhood spent in the South London of Tooting Bec and I recommend everyone to get a copy. The Press is based at Achill Sound, 2b Dry Hill Road, Tonbridge, Kent TN9 1LX and is well-known for excellent productions (including volumes by Iain Sinclair). When D.W. Harding wrote his seminal essay on nostalgia for the first issue of F.R. Leavis’s Quarterly Review, Scrutiny, in 1932 he referred to ‘simple homesickness’ being ‘an aspect of social life’ where the home that one yearns for ‘comprises the whole familiar framework—objects and institutions as well as people—within which one lives and in dealing with which one possesses established habits and sentiments.’ It is an established truth that no man is the author of himself and in moments of clarity, and humility, we can recognise how much we are the result of everything that has happened to us. This awareness is, of course, a far cry from some regressive tendencies that can be bound up within the world of nostalgia: ‘regressive because the ideal period seems to have been free from difficulties that have to be met in the present, and nostalgic because the difficulties of the present are seldom unrelated to the difficulty of living with an uncongenial group.’ (Harding) Clive Wilmer’s beautifully poised writing never runs the danger of forfeiting its tone of recognition: the past’s importance is registered precisely because it is the past.
    [Show full text]
  • The Labour Party and the Idea of Citizenship, C. 193 1-1951
    The Labour Party and the Idea of Citizenship, c. 193 1-1951 ABIGAIL LOUISA BEACH University College London Thesis presented for the degree of PhD University of London June 1996 I. ABSTRACT This thesis examines the development and articulation of ideas of citizenship by the Labour Party and its sympathizers in academia and the professions. Setting this analysis within the context of key policy debates the study explores how ideas of citizenship shaped critiques of the relationships between central government and local government, voluntary groups and the individual. Present historiographical orthodoxy has skewed our understanding of Labour's attitude to society and the state, overemphasising the collectivist nature and centralising intentions of the Labour party, while underplaying other important ideological trends within the party. In particular, historical analyses which stress the party's commitment from the 1930s to achieving the transition to socialism through a strategy of planning, (of industrial development, production, investment, and so on), have generally concluded that the party based its programme on a centralised, expert-driven state, with control removed from the grasp of the ordinary people. The re-evaluation developed here questions this analysis and, fundamentally, seeks to loosen the almost overwhelming concentration on the mechanisms chosen by the Labour for the implementation of policy. It focuses instead on the discussion of ideas that lay behind these policies and points to the variety of opinions on the meaning and implications of social and economic planning that surfaced in the mid-twentieth century Labour party. In particular, it reveals considerable interest in the development of an active and participatory citizenship among socialist thinkers and politicians, themes which have hitherto largely been seen as missing elements in the ideas of the interwar and immediate postwar Labour party.
    [Show full text]
  • Article BRTLT
    A SPECTRAL TURN AROUND VENICE By Luke Jones I spent several days, during a recent trip to Venice, in conversation with a ghost. The writer and critic John Ruskin became my spectral guide, and his commentary on the buildings that we visited transformed my experience of those spaces. What follows is an account of my time with him. This ‘conversation’, if it were a conceit on my part, had the aim of finding a productive way of addressing his difficult, extraordinary, vast Stones of Venice in light of the deeply, but incompletely, felt affection which many have for it. The book is a history of Venice as a sort of epic tragedy narrated by its buildings, and it is simultaneously a polemic against the previous three hundred years of European architecture, directed particularly against London, and proposing a revolution in architectural style. It is commonly viewed as a heroic, rousing failure. Kenneth Clark said of it that ‘even now […], when the cause it advocates is dead, we cannot read it without a thrill, without a sudden resolution to reform the world’ (Clark 1964, 181), and Colin Amery reveals a typical ambivalence when he writes that ‘the trouble is that Ruskin was wrong […] [yet] we need a voice like his again’ (Amery 2001, viii-ix). The effect of invoking Ruskin in the manner of a haunting is not simply to convey a measure of sympathy for him, as a figure, or his work. Rather, I am trying to approach, however obliquely, the subtle and intriguing way in which Ruskin’s rhetoric, which is concerned with portraying contemporary Venice as a ruin, also starts to reveal within itself the ruin of Ruskin’s ideals.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roots of Ruskin, Florida
    Tampa Bay History Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 3 6-1-1982 Socialism in the Sunshine: The Roots of Ruskin, Florida Lori Robinson Bill De Young Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tampabayhistory Recommended Citation Robinson, Lori and De Young, Bill (1982) "Socialism in the Sunshine: The Roots of Ruskin, Florida," Tampa Bay History: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/tampabayhistory/vol4/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Access Journals at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Tampa Bay History by an authorized editor of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Robinson and De Young: Socialism in the Sunshine: The Roots of Ruskin, Florida John Ruskin, 1876. Photograph from The Works of John Ruskin. SOCIALISM IN THE SUNSHINE: THE ROOTS OF RUSKIN, FLORIDA by Lori Robinson and Bill De Young Today, Ruskin is a quiet Florida town, known primarily for the sweet, red tomatoes and other farm produce grown in its clay soil. Only a few street names and the name of the town itself remain as vestiges of a dream that brought a small band of settlers to the Florida pinewoods on the sparsely settled eastern shore of Tampa Bay. They were utopians from the North, intellectuals and farmers in search of a new life and a new community. As they cut down the pines from the surrounding turpentine groves and set about building their community, they named its shady but rocky streets after some of the men whose principles they held dear – Carlyle, Bellamy, and Morris.
    [Show full text]
  • Vernacular Revival and Ideology – What’S Left? by Peter Guillery
    Vernacular Revival and Ideology – What’s Left? by Peter Guillery This essay derives from a lecture first given at a Vernacular Architecture Group conference on vernacular revivals in 2015, reprised to generally younger audiences at the Bartlett School of Architecture and the University of Westminster. Its retrospection about vernacular architecture, anonymity, revival and left-wing ideologies was prompted primarily by a bemused awareness of recent advances in self-building. It seemed timely to try to get at how and why certain ideas retain traction. Then, coincidentally, young and old were recombining behind Jeremy Corbyn to reinvigorate Labour, and the self-styled design ‘collective’ Assemble won the Turner Prize. John Ruskin, William Morris, the Arts and Crafts Movement and Romanticism will arise (how could they not?), but only in passing, for a revisionist view of what has come since. It is taken as read that a strong commitment to architectural design as being rooted in labour and everyday or subaltern agency tallied with the emergence of socialism and was an important part of architectural thinking and history in late-19th-century England. This is an attempt to relate that history to the present in a new overview for a new framework. It adopts an unconventional or purist definition of what vernacular means that will clash with many preconceptions. Peter Guillery is an architectural historian and editor for the Survey of London, in the Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London. He is the author of The Small House in Eighteenth-Century London (2004), and the editor of Built from Below: British Architecture and the Vernacular (2011), and (with David Kroll) Mobilising Housing Histories: Learning from London’s Past (2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Ruskin Unleashed: Towards a Revised Political Economy of Art Or Joy for Ever: How to Use Art to Change the World (And Its Price Beyond the Market)
    Ruskin unleashed: towards a revised political economy of art or Joy for ever: How to use art to change the world (and its price beyond the market) Alistair Hudson Figure 1 The Whitworth, University of Manchester, with advertisements for its exhibition ‘Joy for ever: How to use art to change the world (and its price in the market)’ held from 29 March to 9 June 2019. Photo: author Joy for ever: How to use art to change the world (and its price in the market) was an exhibition held at the Whitworth, University of Manchester, from 29 March to 9 June 2019 (fig. 1). It was held to coincide with the 200th anniversary of the birth of John Ruskin, the British artist, writer, commentator and educationalist, who was the principal voice campaigning throughout the nineteenth century against the ills of an increasingly industrial and dehumanising world. The exhibition also marked the beginning of a new chapter in the history of the Whitworth in a post-Postindustrial era of ecological, political, financial and social crisis. The institution is now seeking to evolve as a museum that is relevant Journal of Art Historiography Number 22 June 2020 Alistair Hudson Ruskin unleashed … or … How to use art to change the world and useful in our context and one that takes an active role in society, promoting art as a tool for social change. With this goal in mind, our aim is to reconnect with our founders’ intentions, to create an institute, art gallery and park that can help realise the full potential of the city and its residents.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Sancity of Womanhood': John Ruskin and the Medieval Madonna
    Columbus State University CSU ePress Theses and Dissertations Student Publications 2015 'The Sancity Of Womanhood': John Ruskin And The Medieval Madonna Katherine M. Hinzman Follow this and additional works at: https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Hinzman, Katherine M., "'The Sancity Of Womanhood': John Ruskin And The Medieval Madonna" (2015). Theses and Dissertations. 181. https://csuepress.columbusstate.edu/theses_dissertations/181 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Publications at CSU ePress. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CSU ePress. COLUMBUS STATE UNIVERSITY 'THE SANCTITY OF WOMANHOOD': JOHN RUSKIN AND THE MEDIEVAL MADONNA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF REQUIREMENTS OF THE CSU HONORS PROGRAM FOR HONORS IN THE DEGREE OF BACHELOR OF ARTS DEPARTMENT OF ART DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY BY KATHERINE M. HINZMAN COLUMBUS, GEORGIA 2015 nas Copyright © 2015 Katherine M. Hinzman All Rights Reserved. lumwuHWuimujuiiuimiuinnjiwuiuniiiiini Hanaro BBS 'The Sanctity of Womanhood': John Ruskin and the Medieval Madonna by {Catherine Margaret Hinzman A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of Requirements of the CSU Honors Program for Honors in the degree of Bachelor of Arts in Art History and History College of Arts College of Letters and Sciences Columbus State University Thesis Advisor: Date: Y/ao/fr>/J* Dr. ClaireMcCoy Xdt&gSL-/^ p&MyQJ^\ _ Date: y/~2~o/-g>( f Dr. Barlfefa Johnston Committee Member: r 1,-J/hs^ Date: ^ - Zo~( 5~~ Professor Michele McCrillis s Honors Committee Member Date 3-d&rij24>ir Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruskin and Political Economy
    Donald Winch Ruskin and Political Economy Since I was educated originally as an economist, and have spent a number of years writing the history of what Ruskin came to regard as ‘the most cretinous, speechless, paralysing plague that has yet touched the brains of mankind’, you will sense my discomfort in speaking about his relationship with political economy on this celebratory occasion, surrounded by a distinguished gathering of Ruskinians.1 What I have to say, however, depends as much on my longer second occupation as a practitioner of intellectual history as it does on my fading knowledge of economists’ ways of thinking. Intellectual history requires a measure of generosity towards past thinkers, even an enjoyment of their quiddities. But approaching Ruskin’s views on political economy without prejudice requires an effort. For example, I cannot recognise the author of the Wealth of Nations, still less the author of the Theory of Moral Sentiments, in Ruskin’s description of Adam Smith as that ‘half-bred and half-witted Scotchman’ who had taught the ‘deliberate blasphemy’ that ‘thou shalt hate the Lord thy God, damn His laws, and covet thy neighbour’s goods’.2 Nor can I recognise John Stuart Mill in the hypercritical remarks that pepper Ruskin’s writings and correspondence. Supposing it to be true that Mill genuinely was ‘a poor cretinous wretch’ whose opinions on political economy were as false as Ruskin believed them to be, I still cannot believe that Mill was literally ‘the root of nearly all immediate evil among us in England’? 3 No doubt some of these pronouncements can be excused as rhetoric – in a post-modern world most things can.
    [Show full text]
  • Carlyle, Ruskin, and Morris: Work Across the ‘River of Fire’
    Carlyle, Ruskin, and Morris: Work Across the ‘River of Fire’ Rob Knowles* for between us and that which is to be, if art is not to perish utterly, there is something alive and devouring; something as it were a river of fire that will put all that tries to swim across to a hard proof indeed... (cited in Thompson 1977, 244). This imagery is from William Morris (1834-1896) writer, poet, artist, artisan, and socialist calling for courage in confronting the daunting work of transforming industrial capitalist society to a better socialist future; a transformation from ‘old art’ to ‘new art’. The reference to ‘art’ here is a reflection of Morris’s developed view of art as a holistic manifestation of the condition of human society and of its deep connection with ‘work’ or labour (Morris [1884] 1969, 94-5). The intransigent and deeply embedded barrier which Morris saw before him in his mission to contribute to transforming society was the Political Economy of his time.1 It was a similarly daunting ‘river of fire’ which had earlier confronted the prophetic ‘man of letters’, historian and social critic Thomas Carlyle (1795-1881) and the equally prophetic and incisive social critic and art critic John Ruskin (1819-1900). Although the view of a politics of transformation or reform and the politics of a future society was distinctly different between these men, it was not nearly as different as many superficial readings of their work has suggested (Williams [1958] 1983, 146-9; Rosenberg 1974, chapter IX). And while their comparative politics is a subject which begs for a new history, it cannot be explored here.
    [Show full text]
  • Hobson on Democracy and the Humanized Economy." Democratic Moments: Reading Democratic Texts
    Tyler, Colin. "Hobson on Democracy and the Humanized Economy." Democratic Moments: Reading Democratic Texts. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2018. 169–176. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 23 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350006195.ch-022>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 23 September 2021, 12:00 UTC. Copyright © Xavier Márquez and Contributors 2018. You may share this work for non- commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE Hobson on Democracy and the Humanized Economy Colin Tyler Pacific internationalism, not merely in the sense of disarmament and political co-operation, but expressed in a growing solidarity of economic institutions, is not merely in the long run but even in the short run essential to the survival and revival of democracy within each State. This judgment does not, however, signify that we must wait for an international solidarity, which now seems remoter than in 1918, before attempting seriously such national planning as is needed to replace the fumbling wastes and failures of a capitalism which can no longer be operated so as to secure its prime object, profit. A revival of democracy upon a reformed basis will need a simultaneous activity upon the national and international fronts. The planning of economic life must be taken out of the hands of dictators and placed in the hands of the freely elected representatives of the people. This conscious struggle for economic democracy, with its equality of opportunity and standard of living, must be fought out within each nation.
    [Show full text]