DOCSLIB.ORG

Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Status Report Hearing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ALASKA NATURAL GAS PIPELINE STATUS REPORT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND AIR QUALITY OF THE COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED EIGHTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 5, 2004 Serial No. 108–82 Printed for the use of the Committee on Energy and Commerce ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/house U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 93–978PDF WASHINGTON : 2004 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:33 Aug 06, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 93978.TXT HCOM1 PsN: HCOM1 COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE JOE BARTON, Texas, Chairman W.J. ‘‘BILLY’’ TAUZIN, Louisiana JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan RALPH M. HALL, Texas Ranking Member MICHAEL BILIRAKIS, Florida HENRY A. WAXMAN, California FRED UPTON, Michigan EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts CLIFF STEARNS, Florida RICK BOUCHER, Virginia PAUL E. GILLMOR, Ohio EDOLPHUS TOWNS, New York JAMES C. GREENWOOD, Pennsylvania FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey CHRISTOPHER COX, California SHERROD BROWN, Ohio NATHAN DEAL, Georgia BART GORDON, Tennessee RICHARD BURR, North Carolina PETER DEUTSCH, Florida ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky BOBBY L. RUSH, Illinois CHARLIE NORWOOD, Georgia ANNA G. ESHOO, California BARBARA CUBIN, Wyoming BART STUPAK, Michigan JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York HEATHER WILSON, New Mexico ALBERT R. WYNN, Maryland JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona GENE GREEN, Texas CHARLES W. ‘‘CHIP’’ PICKERING, KAREN MCCARTHY, Missouri Mississippi, Vice Chairman TED STRICKLAND, Ohio VITO FOSSELLA, New York DIANA DEGETTE, Colorado STEVE BUYER, Indiana LOIS CAPPS, California GEORGE RADANOVICH, California MICHAEL F. DOYLE, Pennsylvania CHARLES F. BASS, New Hampshire CHRISTOPHER JOHN, Louisiana JOSEPH R. PITTS, Pennsylvania TOM ALLEN, Maine MARY BONO, California JIM DAVIS, Florida GREG WALDEN, Oregon JANICE D. SCHAKOWSKY, Illinois LEE TERRY, Nebraska HILDA L. SOLIS, California MIKE FERGUSON, New Jersey CHARLES A. GONZALEZ, Texas MIKE ROGERS, Michigan DARRELL E. ISSA, California C.L. ‘‘BUTCH’’ OTTER, Idaho JOHN SULLIVAN, Oklahoma BUD ALBRIGHT, Staff Director JAMES D. BARNETTE, General Counsel REID P.F. STUNTZ, Minority Staff Director and Chief Counsel SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND AIR QUALITY RALPH M. HALL, Texas, Chairman CHRISTOPHER COX, California RICK BOUCHER, Virginia RICHARD BURR, North Carolina (Ranking Member) ED WHITFIELD, Kentucky TOM ALLEN, Maine CHARLIE NORWOOD, Georgia HENRY A. WAXMAN, California JOHN SHIMKUS, Illinois EDWARD J. MARKEY, Massachusetts Vice Chairman FRANK PALLONE, Jr., New Jersey HEATHER WILSON, New Mexico SHERROD BROWN, Ohio JOHN B. SHADEGG, Arizona ALBERT R. WYNN, Maryland CHARLES W. ‘‘CHIP’’ PICKERING, GENE GREEN, Texas Mississippi KAREN MCCARTHY, Missouri VITO FOSSELLA, New York TED STRICKLAND, Ohio GEORGE RADANOVICH, California LOIS CAPPS, California MARY BONO, California MIKE DOYLE, Pennsylvania GREG WALDEN, Oregon CHRIS JOHN, Louisiana MIKE ROGERS, Michigan JIM DAVIS, Florida DARRELL E. ISSA, California JOHN D. DINGELL, Michigan, C.L. ‘‘BUTCH’’ OTTER, Idaho (Ex Officio) JOHN SULLIVAN, Oklahoma JOE BARTON, Texas, (Ex Officio) (II) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:33 Aug 06, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 0486 93978.TXT HCOM1 PsN: HCOM1 C O N T E N T S Page Testimony of: Carruthers, John, Vice President, Upstream Development of Enbridge Pipelines, Inc ................................................................................................. 40 Konrad, Ken J., Senior Vice President, Alaska Gas BP Alaska ................... 45 McConaghy, Dennis, Executive Vice President, Gas Development Trans- canada Corporation ....................................................................................... 32 Murkowski, Hon. Lisa, a United States Senator from the State of Alaska . 6 Wood, Hon. Patrick, III, Chairman, Federal Energy Regulatory Commis- sion ................................................................................................................. 19 Additional material submitted for the record: American Chemistry Council, prepared statement of ................................... 60 Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, letter dated May 28, 2004 to Hon. Joe Barton and Hon. Ralph M. Hall ..................................... 62 (III) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:33 Aug 06, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 93978.TXT HCOM1 PsN: HCOM1 VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:33 Aug 06, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 0486 Sfmt 0486 93978.TXT HCOM1 PsN: HCOM1 ALASKA NATURAL GAS PIPELINE STATUS REPORT WEDNESDAY, MAY 5, 2004 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND COMMERCE, SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND AIR QUALITY, Washington, DC. The subcommittee met, pursuant to notice, at 10 a.m., in room 2322, Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Ralph M. Hall (chair- man) presiding. Members present: Representatives Hall, Whitfield, Shimkus, Walden, Rogers, Issa, Otter, Barton (ex officio), Boucher, Allen, Wynn, Green, McCarthy, Strickland, and Dingell (ex officio). Staff present: Mark Menezes, majority counsel; Bill Cooper, ma- jority counsel; Peter Kielty, legislative clerk; Sue Sheridan, minor- ity counsel; and Bruce Harris, minority counsel. Mr. HALL. All right. I thank everyone for coming to the hearing on the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline, and I especially want to thank the panelist for her time, her very valuable time, and being punc- tual and being right here. And I understand if you are in a bind, we will go ahead and hear you now. If not, we will get the opening statements behind us. I know you hate not to get to hear the opening statements. If you will bear with us. The subcommittee will come to order. And without objection, the subcommittee will proceed pursuant to Committee Rule 4E. So or- dered. The Chair recognizes himself for an opening statement. The people of the United States are demanding an ever increas- ing amount of natural gas. Americans use roughly 62 billion cubic feet of natural gas everyday. Natural gas is the fuel of choice be- cause it is clean burning and environmentally friendly. The prob- lem is we are not producing enough natural gas to be self-suffi- cient. So the question is how do we solve that problem? Many oil and gas experts will say that there are no more giant oil and natural gas fields left to be discovered. That may be true in the Lower 48, however Alaska’s North Slope has over 30 trillion cubic feet of proven gas reserves. If a pipeline is built, it could de- liver as much as 4 to 6 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. We have to figure out how to get it here. The development of the infrastructure would do several things. It will require major investments first and the shouldering of a lot of major risk by those that build the pipeline from Alaska to the Lower 48. Of course, for the past two Congresses we have worked (1) VerDate 11-MAY-2000 11:33 Aug 06, 2004 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 93978.TXT HCOM1 PsN: HCOM1 2 on that and we have tried to pass legislation that would encourage the construction of a pipeline from Alaska’s North Slope to the Lower 48 states. However, such legislation is yet to be signed into law. In spite of the outcry we have come to expect that without Federal action the pipeline will never be built. In spite of that, we hear rumblings that companies are coming forward to negotiate with the State of Alaska in order to clear some legal hurdles nec- essary to build it. The newspaper accounts have the thing built already. All of this activity has occurred despite the fact that Federal legislation is stalled in the Senate. Is the Alaskan natural gas pipeline going to be built without Federal legislation? What is happening in Alaska now that would give us some encouragement that it will be built? Finding the an- swers to these questions is what this hearing is all about, and I look forward to hearing from the testimony from the witness. Today, actually we have an update. Today’s Oil Daily reports that Enbridge has filed an application with the State of Alaska to negotiate a contract for the construction of the Alaska pipeline. We look forward to hearing from Enbridge about all of this and the late breaking news and to explain the article. This news comes on the heels of an earlier article this week discussing the competitive na- ture of the project between TransCanada and Enbridge. That arti- cle even discussed the possibility that these two entitles would eventually work together to complete project. This should be a very informative hearing today. One question the witnesses probably cannot answer: What hap- pened to MidAmerican? I have just received a letter rom David L. Sokol of MidAmerican essentially saying that while it pulled out of the negotiation with the State of Alaska, the project needs to go forward and needs to be built for the benefit of American con- sumers. Without objection, I would like to submit this letter as a part of the record. Without objection, it is so ordered. [The prepared statement of Hon. Ralph Hall and the letter fol- lows: PREPARED STATEMENT OF HON. RALPH HALL, CHAIRMAN, SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY AND AIR QUALITY Thank you for coming to this hearing on the Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline. I espe- cially want to thank the panelists for attending and for their written testimonies. I look forward to hearing from each of you. The Subcommittee will come to order. Without objection, the subcommittee will proceed pursuant to Committee Rule 4(e). So ordered. The Chair recognizes himself for an opening statement. The people of the United States are demanding an ever-increasing amount of nat- ural gas. Americans use roughly 62 billion cubic feet of natural gas every day. Nat- ural gas is the fuel of choice because it is clean burning and environmentally friend- ly. The problem is we are not producing enough natural gas to be self-sufficient.
Recommended publications
  • STATEMENT of VOTE, Summary Pages Xxii

    STATEMENT of VOTE, Summary Pages Xxii

    STATEMENT OF VOTE, Summary Pages President Votes Percent Congressional District 9 Votes Percent John F. Kerry, DEM 6,745,485 54.4% *Barbara Lee, DEM 215,630 84.60% *George W. Bush, REP 5,509,826 44.4% Claudia Bermudez, REP 31,278 12.30% Michael Anthony Peroutka, AI 26,645 0.2% Jim Eyer, LIB 8,131 3.10% David Cobb, GRN 40,771 0.3% Michael Badnarik, LIB 50,165 0.4% Congressional District 10 Votes Percent Leonard Peltier, PF 27,607 0.2% *Ellen O. Tauscher, DEM 182,750 65.80% Anthony Jabin (W/I) 1 0.0% Jeff Ketelson, REP 95,349 34.20% James Alexander-Pace (W/I) 8 0.0% John Joseph Kennedy (W/I) 82 0.0% Congressional District 11 Votes Percent John Parker (W/I) 49 0.0% Gerald (Jerry) M. McNerney, DEM 103,587 38.7% Ralph Nader (W/I) 20,714 0.1% *Richard Pombo, REP 163,582 61.3% Votes Not Cast 170,142 1.35% Congressional District 12 Votes Percent US Senate Votes Percent *Tom Lantos, DEM 171,852 68.1% *Barbara Boxer, DEM 6,955,728 57.8% Mike Garza, REP 52,593 20.8% Bill Jones, REP 4,555,922 37.8% Pat Gray, GRN 23,038 9.1% Don J. Grundmann, AI 81,224 0.6% Harland Harrison, LIB 5,116 2.0% James P. "Jim" Gray, LIB 216,522 1.7% Marsha Feinland, PF 243,846 2.1% Congressional District 13 Votes Percent Dennis Richter (W/I) 43 0.0% *Fortney Pete Stark, DEM 144,605 71.7% Howard Johnson (W/I) 6 0.0% George I.
  • Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System (ANGTS)

    Alaska Natural Gas Transportation System (ANGTS)

    Alaska Natural Gas Pipeline Proposals (North Slope to Market) Chronology of Events: 1984- by Betty Galbraith 7/15/09 March 7, 1984 The Joint Oil and Gas Committee met to receive briefings on the status of transporting and marketing North slope natural gas. Yukon Pacific Corporation's TAGS project for exporting gas to Pacific Rim countries was discussed as an alternative to ANGTS. March 10, 1984 Legislative digest: A Forecast and Review reported that testimony before the Alaska Joint House-Senate Oil and Gas Committees indicated that natural gas markets in the U.S. and elsewhere would have to improve substantially before financing of the gas pipeline could be financed. Dec 15, 1984 The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission issued an order conditionally approving an extension of the importation of natural gas from Canada for another 4 year period. April 3, 1986 HCR 8 encouraging the Governor to consider a gas pipeline from the North Slope to Fairbanks with spurs to other communities as an alternative to other energy proposals, passed to become Alaska Legislative Resolve 36 Nov 1, 1986 The Bureau of Land Management published a notice in the Federal Register, of their intent to prepare an environmental impact statement for the TAGS pipeline proposal. Dec 5, 1986 Yukon Pacific Corporation issued its Trans-Alaska Gas System Project Description. The project involved a pipeline to transport North Slope gas to tidewater, a facility in the Valdez area to liquefy the gas for ocean transport to Asia. The project would be phased in over a period of years. Dec 5, 1986 Yukon Pacific Corporation filed an application with the Bureau of Land Management and the Army Corps of Engineers to construct a large diameter pipeline between Prudhoe Bay and Anderson Bay (Valdez) to export LNG.
  • MICROCOMP Output File

    MICROCOMP Output File

    FINAL EDITION OFFICIAL LIST OF MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES of the UNITED STATES AND THEIR PLACES OF RESIDENCE ONE HUNDRED SIXTH CONGRESS . JANUARY 4, 2001 Compiled by JEFF TRANDAHL, Clerk of the House of Representatives http://clerk.house.gov Republicans in roman (222); Democrats in italic (208); Independents in SMALL CAPS (2); vacancies (3) 1st VA, 4th MN, 32d CA; total 435. The number preceding the name is the Member’s district. ALABAMA 1 Sonny Callahan ........................................... Mobile 2 Terry Everett ............................................... Enterprise 3 Bob Riley ..................................................... Ashland 4 Robert B. Aderholt ...................................... Haleyville 5 Robert E. (Bud) Cramer, Jr. ........................ Huntsville 6 Spencer Bachus ........................................... Vestavia Hills 7 Earl F. Hilliard ........................................... Birmingham ALASKA AT LARGE Don Young ................................................... Fort Yukon ARIZONA 1 Matt Salmon ................................................ Mesa 2 Ed Pastor ..................................................... Phoenix 3 Bob Stump ................................................... Tolleson 4 John B. Shadegg .......................................... Phoenix 5 Jim Kolbe ..................................................... Tucson 6 J. D. Hayworth ............................................ Scottsdale ARKANSAS 1 Marion Berry ............................................... Gillett
  • California Capitol Hill Bulletin

    California Capitol Hill Bulletin

    THE CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE FOR FEDERAL POLICY RESEARCH 419 New Jersey Avenue, SE, Washington, D.C. 20003 202-546-3700 fax: 202-546-2390 e-mail:[email protected] web:http://www.calinst.org California Capitol Hill Bulletin Volume 8, Bulletin 26 –September 6, 2001 To expand communications between Washington and California, the California Institute provides periodic faxed bulletins regarding current activity on Capitol Hill which directly impacts our state. Bulletins are published weekly during sessions of Congress, and occasionally during other periods. The e-mail edition is made possible in part by in-kind contributions from Sun Microsystems and IBM Corp. REP. HORN TO RETIRE AFTER 107TH CONGRESS On Tuesday, September 4, Rep. Steve Horn announced that CONTENTS: he will not seek re-election to a sixth term in the House at the end of Rep. Horn To Retire After 107th the current Congressional session. Rep. Horn, who will have Congress .................. 1 represented Long Beach and the surrounding area for 10 years, has Radanovich and Capps Circulating amassed a solidly bipartisan record in his work on behalf of Delegation Letter On Medicaid California issues and concerns. Upper Payment Limit ........ 1 Rep. Horn commented that “Locally, every major challenge Senate Passes Export Administration that we faced in 1993 has been finished or is on track to be Act ...................... 2 completed by the end of 2002. Specifically, the Air Force’s C-17 State Redistricting Plan Unveiled; project, which was threatened with cancellation in 1993, was saved Status Quo Would Be Largely and we have laid the groundwork for its expansion. The Los Maintained ...............
  • Congressional Committees Roster

    Congressional Committees Roster

    HOUSE AND SENATE COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP Provided below are House and Senate Committee membership rosters with jurisdiction over health programs as of Friday, November 17, 2006. At the time of this printing, only the Senate Democrats have released their Committee assignments. Assignments for the House Committees will not take place until December when Congress reconvenes in the lame-duck session. However, most Members of Congress who were on the Committees before the election will continue to serve. Members whose names are crossed out will not be returning in the 110th Congress. Members whose names are underlined, indicates that they have been added to the Committee. Senate Appropriations Committee Majority Minority Robert C. Byrd, WV - Chair Thad Cochran, MS - Rnk. Mbr. Daniel K. Inouye, HI Ted Stevens, AK Patrick J. Leahy, VT Arlen Specter, PA Tom Harkin, IA Pete V. Domenici, NM Barbara A. Mikulski, MD Christopher S. Bond, MO Harry Reid, NV Mitch McConnell, KY Herbert H. Kohl, WI Conrad Burns, MT Patty Murray, WA Richard C. Shelby, AL Byron L. Dorgan, ND Judd Gregg, NH Dianne Feinstein, CA Robert F. Bennett, UT Richard J. Durbin, IL Larry Craig, ID Tim P. Johnson, SD Kay Bailey Hutchison, TX Mary L. Landrieu, LA Mike DeWine, OH Jack Reed, RI Sam Brownback, KS Frank Lautenberg NJ Wayne A. Allard, CO Ben Nelson, NE Senate Budget Committee Majority Minority Kent Conrad, ND - Chair Judd Gregg, NH - Rnk. Mbr. Paul S. Sarbanes, MD Pete V. Domenici, NM Patty Murray, WA Charles E. Grassley, IA Ron Wyden, OR Wayne A. Allard, CO Russ Feingold, WI Michael B.
  • Near East University Docs

    Near East University Docs

    NEAR EAST UNIVERSITY THE FACULTY OF MARITIME STUDIES GRADUATION PROJECT LNG CARRIAGE ON THE WORLD Submitted to: OCEAN GOING MASTER AHMET BEYOGLU Submitted by: EMRE EVREN YURTSEVEN SHIP MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NICOSIA - 2003 • Introduction The purpose of the IMO model coursesis to assist maritime training institutes and their teaching staff in organising and introducing new training courses, or in enhancing, updating or supplementing existing training material where the quality and effectiveness of the training courses may thereby be improved. It is not the intention of the model course programme to present instructors with a rigid 'teaching package' which they are expected to 'follow blindly' .Nor, is the intention to substitute audio-visual or 'programmed' material for the instructor's presence .As in all training endeavours, the knowledge, skills and detication of the instructor are the key components in the transfer of knowledge and skills to those being trained through IMO model course material. Because educational systems and the cultural backgrounds of trainees in maritime subjects vary considerably from country, the model course material has been designed to identify the basic entry requirements and trainee target group for each course in universally applicable terms , and to specify clearly the technical content and levels of knowledge and skill necessary to meet the technical intent of IMO conventions and related recommendations . • CONTENTS: PARTl SECTION 1 1. Executive Summary 1 1.1 Main conclusions 1 1.2 Natural gas demand trends 3 1.3 Natural gas reserves 3 1.4 Historical developmentof natural gas carriage 4 SECTiON 2 2. The natural gas market 5 2.1 What is natural gas and energy 5 2.1.1 Natural gas 5 2.1.2 Liquefied natural gas LNG 5 2.1.3 Applications 5 2.1.4 The natural gas industry 6 2.1.5 Natural gas and environment 7 2.2 World primary energy consumption 8 2.3 Natural gas consumption trends 11 2.4 Natural gas production trends 12 2.5 The international natural gas reserves 13 2.6 The international natural gas trade 14 SECTiON 3 3.
  • ALABAMA Senators Jeff Sessions (R) Methodist Richard C. Shelby

    ALABAMA Senators Jeff Sessions (R) Methodist Richard C. Shelby

    ALABAMA Senators Jeff Sessions (R) Methodist Richard C. Shelby (R) Presbyterian Representatives Robert B. Aderholt (R) Congregationalist Baptist Spencer Bachus (R) Baptist Jo Bonner (R) Episcopalian Bobby N. Bright (D) Baptist Artur Davis (D) Lutheran Parker Griffith (D) Episcopalian Mike D. Rogers (R) Baptist ALASKA Senators Mark Begich (D) Roman Catholic Lisa Murkowski (R) Roman Catholic Representatives Don Young (R) Episcopalian ARIZONA Senators Jon Kyl (R) Presbyterian John McCain (R) Baptist Representatives Jeff Flake (R) Mormon Trent Franks (R) Baptist Gabrielle Giffords (D) Jewish Raul M. Grijalva (D) Roman Catholic Ann Kirkpatrick (D) Roman Catholic Harry E. Mitchell (D) Roman Catholic Ed Pastor (D) Roman Catholic John Shadegg (R) Episcopalian ARKANSAS Senators Blanche Lincoln (D) Episcopalian Mark Pryor (D) Christian Representatives Marion Berry (D) Methodist John Boozman (R) Baptist Mike Ross (D) Methodist Vic Snyder (D) Methodist CALIFORNIA Senators Barbara Boxer (D) Jewish Dianne Feinstein (D) Jewish Representatives Joe Baca (D) Roman Catholic Xavier Becerra (D) Roman Catholic Howard L. Berman (D) Jewish Brian P. Bilbray (R) Roman Catholic Ken Calvert (R) Protestant John Campbell (R) Presbyterian Lois Capps (D) Lutheran Dennis Cardoza (D) Roman Catholic Jim Costa (D) Roman Catholic Susan A. Davis (D) Jewish David Dreier (R) Christian Scientist Anna G. Eshoo (D) Roman Catholic Sam Farr (D) Episcopalian Bob Filner (D) Jewish Elton Gallegly (R) Protestant Jane Harman (D) Jewish Wally Herger (R) Mormon Michael M. Honda (D) Protestant Duncan Hunter (R) Protestant Darrell Issa (R) Antioch Orthodox Christian Church Barbara Lee (D) Baptist Jerry Lewis (R) Presbyterian Zoe Lofgren (D) Lutheran Dan Lungren (R) Roman Catholic Mary Bono Mack (R) Protestant Doris Matsui (D) Methodist Kevin McCarthy (R) Baptist Tom McClintock (R) Baptist Howard P.
  • CHAPTER 6 List of Agencies, Organizations, and Persons to Whom Copies of the FEIS Were Sent

    CHAPTER 6 List of Agencies, Organizations, and Persons to Whom Copies of the FEIS Were Sent

    Final Environmental Impact Statement CHAPTER 6 List of Agencies, Organizations, and Persons to Whom Copies of the FEIS Were Sent Copies of the the Final Environmental Impact Statement (approximately 850) were distributed to agencies, organizations, elected officials, tribes, and individuals. The elected officials, agencies, tribes, and organizations are listed below. The individuals are included on the mailing list, which is on file at the Inyo Forest Supervisor's Office, Bishop, California. Copies of the FEIS were sent to all who responded to the Forest Service’s inquiry to determine who wanted the document and in which format. Elected Officials - Federal Elected Officials - State Senator Barbara Boxer Senator Jim Costa Senator Dianne Feinstein Senator Tim Leslie Congressman John T. Doolittle Senator W.M. Knight Congressman Jerry Lewis Senator Richard Montieth Congressman George Radanovich Senator Chuck Poochigain Assemblyman George House Assemblyman Thomas Oller Assemblyman Keith Olberg Federal Agencies • Advisory Council On Historic Preservation; Western Office Of Review • Environmental Protection Agency: Office Of Environmental Review and Region 9 Office • Federal Aviation Administration, Northwest Region • Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Advisor On Environmental Quality • Federal Highway Administration, Western Resource Center • General Services Administration, Office Of Planning & Analysis • National Resource Conservation Environmental Coordinator of Ecological Sciences Division • Office Of Transportation & Regulatory Affairs;
  • 111Th Congress Gold Mouse Project Overview

    111Th Congress Gold Mouse Project Overview

    111th Congress g old Mouse Proje C t Overview The State of Congressional web Sites Since 1998, the Congressional Management Foundation has assessed the quality of congressional web sites to determine how Members of Congress can use the internet to more effectively communicate with and serve citizens. The Gold Mouse Project seeks to improve these sites by identifying best and innovative practices that can be more widely adopted by House & Senate offices. in the 111th Congress evaluations, we found that there is a digital divide in Congress: the most common letter grades earned were “A” and “F”. © Congressional Management Foundation • www.pmpu.org 1 of 17 111th Congress g old Mouse Proje C t Overview what Did we Do? in 2009, CMF, with the assistance of our research partners at Harvard Kennedy School, Northeastern University, University of California–riverside, and the Ohio State University, conducted an extensive evaluation of all congressional web sites in the 111th Congress. 439 House Member web sites1 99 Senate Member web sites2 68 House & Senate Committee web sites (majority and minority) +14 House & Senate Leadership web sites 620 1 includes 433 representatives (there were two vacancies at the time of our evaluations), 5 delegates, and 1 resident commissioner. 2 There was one vacancy in the Senate at the time of our evaluations. © Congressional Management Foundation • www.pmpu.org 2 of 17 111th Congress g old Mouse Proje C t Overview what were Our Criteria? Member web sites were judged on 93 criteria in the following broad categories. The 61 committee criteria and 49 leadership criteria fell into most of these categories as well, but were adjusted to reflect their unique roles.
  • 5Th Pipeline Technology Conference 2010

    5Th Pipeline Technology Conference 2010

    5th Pipeline Technology Conference 2010 The next generation of oil and gas pipelines - who, what, where and when.... Julian Lee Senior Energy Analyst Centre for Global Energy Studies UK Abstract This paper seeks to identify the next wave of major oil and gas pipeline construction projects around the world, assessing which countries are likely to be able to turn their plans for new pipelines into real, bankable projects. It is not a comprehensive, or exhaustive, list of new pipeline projects. There is no shortage of new oil and gas pipeline proposals that are keeping project sponsors, industry analysts and conference organisers busy. Many of them are grand in their ambition, many seek to meet the political ends of their sponsors, many cross several international borders, and all will compete for capital and resources. Many of tomorrow’s oil and gas supplies are being developed in areas that are remote from existing infrastructure, far from markets or export terminals. Tomorrow’s big, new hydrocarbons consumers live in countries that are only just beginning to develop their oil and gas import and transmission infrastructures, while traditional markets are stagnating. Politics, too, is playing its part, as old alliances are tested and both buyers and sellers seek security of supply and greater diversification. 1. The evolving geography of oil and gas The geography of oil and gas trade is changing. Big new oil and consumers are emerging. The centre of energy demand growth has shifted dramatically from West to East. At the same time, new centres of oil and gas production are also emerging.
  • Domestic Oil and Natural Gas: Alaskan Resources, Access and Infrastructure

    Domestic Oil and Natural Gas: Alaskan Resources, Access and Infrastructure

    W RITTEN STATEMENT OF C YNTHIA L. QUARTERMAN A DMINISTRATOR PIPEL INE AND H AZARDOUS M ATERIALS SAFETY A DMINISTRATION B EFORE THE C OMMITTEE ON NATURAL R ESOURCES SUBCOMMITTEE ON E NERGY AND M INERAL R ESOURCES UNITED STATES HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES Domestic Oil and Natural Gas: Alaskan Resources, Access and Infrastructure June 2, 2011 I. Introduction Chairman Lamborn, Ranking Member Holt, members of the Subcommittee, thank you for the opportunity to appear today to discuss the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration’s (PHMSA) oversight of America’s 2.5-million-mile energy pipeline system. Safety is the number one priority of Secretary Ray LaHood, myself, and the employees of PHMSA and we are all strongly committed to reducing transportation risks to the public and environment. Our Nation’s reliance on the safe and environmentally sound transportation of energy fuels and hazardous materials is increasing. PHMSA’s safety oversight of the pipeline network that delivers these products is providing critical protections for the American people. PHMSA is responsible for establishing and enforcing safety standards for the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the nation’s pipeline transportation system. PHMSA's authority to regulate pipelines includes oversight of the Trans Alaska Pipeline System (TAPS), North Slope pipelines, certain pipelines in the Cook Inlet area, Liquefied Natural Gas (or LNG) facilities, and the distribution systems that deliver natural gas to homes, businesses, and power plants. Alaska oil and gas resources are critical to the nation’s energy needs, and PHMSA recognizes its role in ensuring that this energy is transported safely and efficiently.
  • Growing Value $245 Billion of Revenues As of Dec

    Growing Value $245 Billion of Revenues As of Dec

    www.conocophillips.com ConocoPhillips is an international, integrated energy company with interests around the world. Headquartered in Houston, the company had operations in more than 35 countries, approximately 29,800 employees, $153 billion of assets and Growing Value $245 billion of revenues as of Dec. 31, 2011. 2011 SUMMARY ANNUAL REPORT 90414conD1R1.indd 1 2/28/12 11:05 PM Shareholder Information 1 Letter to Shareholders Certain disclosures in this Summary Annual Annual Meeting Information Requests Copies of Form 10-K, Proxy Statement 49 Report may be considered “forward-looking” and Summary Annual Report 5 Financial and Operating Highlights ConocoPhillips’ annual meeting of For information about dividends and statements. These are made pursuant to “safe stockholders will be held: certificates, or to request a change of Copies of the Annual Report on Form 10-K 6 Repositioning harbor” provisions of the Private Securities address form, shareholders may contact: and the Proxy Statement, as filed with the Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The “Cautionary Wednesday, May 9, 2012 U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, Statement” in Management’s Discussion and Omni Houston Hotel Westside Computershare are available free by making a request on Our Commitments Analysis in Appendix A of ConocoPhillips’ 2012 13210 Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas P.O. Box 358015 the company’s website, calling 918-661- Proxy Statement should be read in conjunction Pittsburgh, PA 15252-8015 8 Enhancing Financial Performance Notice of the meeting and proxy materials 3700 or writing: with such statements. Toll-free number: 800-356-0066 are being sent to all shareholders. 10 Empowering Our People Outside the U.S.: 201-680-6578 ConocoPhillips – 2011 Form 10-K TDD for hearing impaired: 800-231-5469 B-41 Adams Building 12 Operating Responsibly “ConocoPhillips,” “the company,” “we,” “us” Direct Stock Purchase and Dividend and “our” are used interchangeably in this report TDD outside the U.S.: 201-680-6610 411 South Keeler Ave.